Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
c]]
MS1R
Since
n(n) = 1
n>0
n(u) =
1
1 +_
N!
(N -n)! n!
N
s
mox(ig , N
s
)
n
=1
N
n=1
2&3
The average number of active users can now be written as>
= nn(n)
N
n=1
293
Average /umbers of departures per unit of time is given by 4A5>
= p(n)n(n)
N
n=1
2"3
=rom littleOs law, average duration t
on
of an 1/ period+
t
on
=
2F3
And average throughput X
=
x
on
t
on
2%#3
The average instantaneous resource utili.ation 2of TDD frame3 is given as 4A5>
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
(' ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
u
=
ng
max(ng , N
s
)
n(n)
N
n=1
2%%3
V! /?@2I&CR=FI@1 2RAFFIC A#A@B2ICA@ /=>1@
=or analytical modelling (ulti profile 6! traffic is considered. (ulti profile traffic contain different class
of users and each class is characterised by a specific traffic profile. /ow some assumptions have been
made for the multi profile modelling 4A5.
The users are divided into @ classes of traffic, each one having a specific profile
2(ST@r, x
on
, t
o]]
3, rL%,$P@ =or a given class r , the average si.e of 1/ data volumes 2in bits3 , re*uired
(ST@ and the average duration of 1== periods are denoted by x
on
,(ST@r and t
o]]
respectively. -ence,
a traffic profile of a generic class r will be denoted by>
p
=
x
on
t
o]]
HSIR
=irstly, the profile of each class 2x
on
, (ST@r , t
o]]
3 is transformed into an e*uivalent profile such that
4A5>
x
on
t
o]]
HSIR
=
x
on
t'
o]]
HSIR
After this transformation, the mobile of the e*uivalent system have the same average 1/ si.e x
on
but
different 1== period t'
o]]
= t'
o]]
.
The active (S are modelled by station $ called <rocessor Sharing 2<S3 .This station has class
independent service rate or departure rate K 2n3 with n as the number of active (S. ?nlike for
conventional schemes, the e8pression of mono+profile traffic to calculate K 2n3 2!*. D3 cannot be
directly used here. The e*uation to find K 2n3 for station <S is written below 4A5
p(n) =
N
s
mox(g (n), N
s
)
n
HSIR
x
on
2%$3
where (ST@ and x
on
are related to e*uivalent multi+class after profiles and g (n) is average number of
slots per frame needed by n active mobiles to obtain their (ST@ re*uirement. To estimate g (n) , firstly
g
= p
k
BR
I
P
m
k
K
k=1
2%A3
'here p
k
is the stationary probability for (S of class r using (BSk and
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
(7 ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
BR
=
HSIR
1 -p
0
2%D3
Second, the probability o
(n) that an active (S belongs to class r, when there are n active (S, has to be
estimated. o
then o
(n) = N
N
And for n L %, the probabilityo
(1) =
N
_ N
R
=1
After calculating the above two limiting values, let o
(n) = on +b
'here o =
u
r
(N)-u
r
(1)
N-1
and b =
Nu
r
(1)-u
r
(N)
N-1
The e*uation for g (n), can now be e8pressed as>
g (n) = _ no
(n)
R
=1
g
After transformation of parameters, the closed *ueuing network shown in =igure. $ can now be handled
using e8tension of the 6B(< theorem for stations with state+dependent rates 4%A5.
0et population vector denoted by N
= (N
1
, N
2
N
R
), here /@ represents the number of (S of
class @.The steady state probabilities are written as>
n(n) = n(n
1
, n
2
) =
1
0
1
(n
1
)
2
(
2
)
-ere n
= (n
1
. n
R
) , ni@ represents the number of class+@ (S presents in station i .
1
(n
1
) =
1
n
11
! . . n
1R
!
1
1
n
11
. .
R
n
1R
2
(n
2
) =
(n
21
++n
2R
)!
n
21
! . . n
2R
!
1
p(k)
n
2
k=1
and , is a normali.ation constant presented as>
0 =
1
(n
1
)
2
(n
2
)
n
1
+n
2
=N
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
(E ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
Fi+ure 2 Closed&9ueuin+ #et,or5
Performance parameter:
/ow, the e8pressions for performance parameters are derived using steady+state probabilities. The
average number of active (S of class r active mobiles is given by>
= n
2
n(n
1
, n
2
)
n
1
+n
2
=N
2%73
The average number of class r mobiles completing their download per unit time, can be written as>
= p
n
1
+n
2
=N
(n
2
)n(n
1
, n
2
)
2%&3
where p(n
2
) is the departure rate 4A5of class r (S when there are n
2
active (S and is given as>
p
(n
2
) =
N
s
mox(g (n
2
), N
s
)
n
2
HSIR
x
on
2%93
g (n
2
) is given by g (n
2
) = _ n
2
g
R
=1
The average instantaneous throughput 4A5 for class+r (S is written as>
X
=
x
on
on
2%"3
where t
on
on
r
At the end, parameter u
=
g (n
2
)
mox(g (n
2
), N
s
)
n(n
1
, n
2
)
n
1
+n
2
=N
2%F3
VI! #?/1RICA@ R1"?@2
This section e8amines the proposed analytical model. The results of average active number of users,
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
(% ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
average throughput and average utili.ation of TDD frame are evaluated under different number of
mobile stations. All the system related parameters are listed in table%.A single 'i(A) cell. The number
of slots depends on the system bandwidth, the frame duration, the downlinkHuplink ratio, the subcarrier
permutation 2<?SB, =?SB, A(B3, and the protocol overhead 2preamble, =B-, maps3.The subcarrier
permutation <?SB is considered and it is assumed that protocol overhead is of fi8ed length 2$ symbols3
although in reality it is a function of the number of scheduled users.
2a6le 1! ".stem Carameters
Carameter Value
/umber of cell is system %
System 6andwidth %#(-.
DownlinkHuplink ratio in a TDD frame $HA
Duration of a TDD frame I
P
7ms
/umber of data slots per TDD frame D7#
n table $ traffic parameters for mono and multi profile traffic are listed. n this analytical model, it is
assumed that 1/ data volume and 1== duration are e8ponentially distributed. =or mono+profile traffic,
the behaviour of the model is observed for high data volume and low data volume 2&(bits and %
(bits3.=or multi+profile traffic, the total number of users / is divided e*ually among two classes.
2a6le 2! 2raffic parameters
Carameter /ono&traffic /ulti traffic
Class1 Class 2
(ST@ 7%$,%#$D,$#D" %#$D $#D"
12x
on
|Hbits] : A A
t
o]]
|Scc] A A &
'ireless channel parameters are summari.ed in table A.The table lists different (BS with their
respective number of bits transmitted per slot and stationary probabilities 4D5.
2a6le $! Channel Carameters
Channel state
F,1GAH
/C" and =uta+e 0its per slot
"tationar.
pro6a6ilit.
# 1utage m
0
L # #.#D
% :<SE+%H$ m
1
L D" #.$&
$ :<SE+AHD m
2
L 9$ #.%"
A %&:A(+%H$ m
3
L F& #.$D
D %&:A(+AHD m
4
L%DD #.%D
7 &D:A(+$HA m
5
L %F$ #.#$
& &D:A(+AHD m
6
L $%& #.%&7
=igure.A+F respectively show the plot for average number of active users, average instantaneous
throughput and the average channel utili.ation for mono profile traffic and multi traffic profile .
/ono&2raffic anal.sis> =igure A shows the variation of active number in accordance with the number of
users present in the cell. t can be seen that the number of active users in the cell increase linearly as with
the number of (S present in the cell i.e. the rate of increment of the number of active users is linear.
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
(( ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
=igure. D Show the graph between average instantaneous user throughputs for mono+traffic different
values of (ST@. The graph shows that as the number of (S in the cell is less, throughput is higher for (S
which has high (ST@ re*uirement but as the number of (S increases in the cell, throughput degraded for
all (S irrespective of their (ST@. =igure. 7 shows the variation of average resource utili.ation for mono
traffic with the number of users. ?tili.ation of resources increases with increase in number of users.
=orm =igure.& one more important thing can be observed that the analytical model performs well under
low 2%(63, medium 2A(b3 and high 2&(b3 load traffic condition. t can be also observed that throughput
is high for low load.
Fi+ure $ Avera+e num6er of active users, mono Fi+ure 4 Avera+e instantaneous user throu+hput &
traffic(/"2RI'1256ps, x
un
= 3Mb, t
uJJ
= 3se) mono&traffic different values of /"2R( x
un
=
$/6, t
uJJ
= 3 se)
Fi+ure ' Avera+e resource utili:ation, mono Fi+ure 7 Avera+e instantaneous user throu+hput
traffic, (/"2RI'12 56ps, x
un
= 3Mb,) mono&traffic different loads ( x
un
= 1Mb, $/6
t
uII
= 3se ) and 7 /6, /"2RI24% A6ps, t
uII
= 3se)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 10 20 30 40 50
A
v
e
r
a
+
e
n
u
m
6
e
r
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
e
m
o
6
i
l
e
s
#um6er of ?sers
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 10 20 30 40 50
A
v
e
r
a
+
e
i
n
s
t
a
n
t
e
o
u
s
t
h
r
o
u
+
h
t
p
u
t
F
/
6
p
s
H
#um6er of ?sers
MSTR=1024Kbps
MSTR=512Kbps
MSTR=2048Kbps
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 10 20 30 40 50
A
v
e
r
a
+
e
n
u
m
6
e
r
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
e
m
o
6
i
l
e
s
#um6er of ?sers
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 10 20 30 40 50
A
v
e
r
a
+
e
i
n
s
t
a
n
t
e
o
u
s
t
h
r
o
u
+
h
t
p
u
t
F
/
6
p
s
H
#um6er of ?sers
Xon=3Mb
Xon=1Mb
Xon=6Mb
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
1 ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
Fi+ure E Avera+e num6er of active users, multi& Fi+ure % Avera+e instantaneous user throu+hput,
profile, (x
un
1
= x
un
2
= 3Mb, t
II
1
= 3se, multi&Crofile ( x
un
1
= x
un
2
= 3Mb, t
II
1
= 3se,
t
uII
2
= se, MSTR
1
= 512 Kbps, t
uJJ
2
= se , MSTR
1
= 512Kbps and
MSTR
2
I124 A6ps) MSTR
2
I124 A6ps)
Fi+ure ( Avera+e resource utili:ation, multi&profile, (x
un
1
= x
un
2
= 3Mb, t
JJ
1
= 3se, t
uJJ
2
= se,
MSTR
1
= 512Kbps , MSTR
2
I124 A6ps)
/ulti&traffic Anal.sis+ =igure 9 Shows the variation of active users with the total number of users
present in cell. 'ith the same number of (S present in the cell, class % has more active number of (S
than class $.The reason is that the (ST@ re*uirement of the class % (S is less than the class $ and also,
hence departure rate of class % (S will be higher than the class $ and therefore the steady state
probability for $ different class of (S. Therefore the active number of (S is different for different class of
(S. =rom =igure.", it can be observed that X
1
and X
2
are not e*ual. =rom e*uation 2%F3 it is clear that
when a mobile belonging to class % enters the <S *ueue ,its probability to find a given number of mobiles
already present in the *ueue 2 n$%3 is different from the one of a mobile of class $2n$$3. As such, the
mobiles of each class donOt get the e8act same amount of resource and hence result into different
throughputs.
=igure.F shows the variation of average resource utili.ation with the number of users. t can be observed
that as number of user increases frame utili.ation increases and when the users are more than $7,
utili.ation is nearly %##R.
VII! C=#C@?"I=# A#> F?2?R1 3=RA"
n this paper, an analytical model using Bontinuous Time (arkov Bhain 2BT(B3 has been developed to
0
5
10
15
20
0 10 20 30 40
A
v
e
r
a
+
e
i
n
s
t
a
n
t
e
o
u
s
t
h
r
o
u
+
h
t
p
u
t
F
/
6
p
s
H
#um6er of ?sers
Class1
Class 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 10 20 30 40
A
v
e
r
a
+
e
i
n
s
t
a
n
t
e
o
u
s
t
h
r
o
u
+
h
t
p
u
t
F
/
6
p
s
H
#um6er of ?sers
Class1
Class 2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30 40
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
u
t
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Number of usersN= N
1
+N
2
(N
1
= N
1
)
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
11 ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
evaluate the performance parameter for 6! traffic in 'i(A) networks. This model takes into account the
:oS parameter (ST@ and multi profile web traffic and provide closed+form e8pressions giving all the
re*uired parameters such as average throughput, average resource utili.ation and average number of
active users. t can be concluded from the papers that as number of users increases, utili.ation of
resources increases but throughput decreases. =rom the paper, minimum number of users in the cell can
be found that gives more than 7#R average resource utili.ation. 'i(A) developer or manufacturer
decides certain minimum throughput threshold in the cell. The ma8imum number of users in the cell can
also be found that guarantee the minimum throughput threshold.
There are several aspects possible for future study. 1ne e8tension would be validate the model through
simulation. n this model (ST@ is taken into consideration, another e8tension would be considering
other :oS parameter to obtain the performance parameter. Analytical model has been developed only for
6! service class, another area of future wok will be integrating other service classes into the model.
VIII! R1F1R1#C1"
4%5 !!!, !!! standard for local and metropolitan area networks <art %&> Air interface for fi8ed and
mobile broadband wireless access systems 2amendment and corrigendum to !!! Std "#$.%&+
$##D3, $##7, ?@0 reference Shttp>HHstandards.ieee.orgHgetieee"#$HdownloadH"#$.%&e+
$##7.pdfT.
4$5 Ueffrey ,. Andrews, 2$##93 V%undamentals of &i#'( )nderstanding *road+and &ireless
,etwor"ingW, S6/ #+%A+$$$77$+$,D9" pages, <rentice -all Bommunications !ngineering and
!merging Technologies Series, te8t printed in the ?nited States in 'estford, (assachusetts. =irst
printing, =ebruary $##9.
4A5 6. 6aynat, S. Doirieu8, ,. /ogueira, (. (a*bool, and (. Boupechou8, VAn Analytical (odel for
'i(A) /etworks with (ultiple Traffic <rofiles and Throttling <olicy,W in <roc. of 'i1pt, Uune
$##F. 41nline5. Available> http>HHperso.telecom+paristech.frH~coupechoHpublisH'i1pt#F.pdf.
4D5 (. (a*bool, (. Boupechou8 and <. ,odlewski, VBomparison of ;arious =re*uency @euse <atterns
for 'i(A) /etworks with Adaptive 6eamforming,W in <roc. of !!! ;TB Spring, (ay $##".
41nline5. Available> http>HHperso.telecom+paristech.frHcoupechoHpublisHvtc#"spring%.pdf
475 6. 6aynat, S. Doirieu8, ,. /ogueira, (. (a*bool and (. Boupechou8,VAn !fficient Analytical (odel
for 'i(A) /etworks with (ultiple Traffic <rofiles,W in <roc. of AB(H!THBST '<A'/, 1ctober
$##". 41nline5. Available> http>HHperso.telecom+paristech.frHcoupechoHpublisHiwpawn#".pdf
4&5 6. 6aynat, ,. /ogueira, (. (a*bool, and (. Boupechou8, VAn !fficient Analytical (odel for the
Dimensioning of 'i(A) /etworks,W in <roc. of "th =<+TB& /etworking Bonference, (ay $##F.
41nline5. Available>http>HHperso.telecom+paristech.frHcoupechoHpublisHnetworking#F.pdf.
495 E. @amadas and @. Uain, V'i(A) System !valuation (ethodology,W'i(A) =orum, Tech. @ep.,
Uanuary $##9.
4"5 S. Eim and . Yeom, V<erformance Analysis of 6est !ffort Traffic in !!! "#$.%& /etworks,W !!!
Transactions on (obile Bomputing, $##".
International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC)
Volume 1, Issue 4, April 214! I""# 2$4% & 4%'$
12 ) * 214, IJAFRC All Ri+hts Reserved ,,,!i-afrc!or+
4F5 ,. 0eonardi, A. 6a..i, ,. <asolini, and 1. Andrisano, V!!!"#$.%&e 6est !ffort <erformance
nvestigation,W in <roc. of !!! BB, Uune $##9.
4%#5 =. -ou, U. She, <.+-. -o, and ). Shen, V<erformance Analysis of 'eighted <roportional =airness
Scheduling in !!! "#$.%& /etworks,W in <roc. 1f !!! BB, (ay $##".
4%%5 D. Sivchenko, /. 6ayer, 6. )u, ;. @akocevic, and U. -abermann, Vnternet Traffic <erformance in
!!! "#$.%& /etworks,W in <roc. of %$th !uropean 'ireless Bonference, April $##&
4%$5 E.S.Trivedi,W<robability and Statistics with @eliability, :ueuing, and Bomputer science
ApplicationsWS6/"%+$#A+#7#"+& <rentice+-all of ndia private limited,Delhi <ublication+$##&
4%A5 =. 6askett, E. Bhandy, @. (unt., and =. <alacios, V1pen Blosed and (i8ed /etworks of :ueues with
Different Blasses of Bustomers,W Uournal of the Association of Bomputing (achinery, April %F97.
4%D5 !!! Standard for 0ocal and (etropolitan Area /etworks <art %&> Air nterface for =i8ed
6roadband 'ireless Access Systems, 2$##D3. S
http>HHpubs.cs.uct.ac..aHarchiveH#####7%%H#%H"#$+%&Airnterface.pdfT
4%75 http>HHpastel.archives+ouvertes.frHdocsH##H7#H%DH#7H<D=HThesisX(a*boolX$##F.pdf