By the 17 th century, the appearance of the bourgeois classes made emerge a bigger control on discourse about sex. The rising of these sexual discourses eventually spread to other ambits like the public one. During the Roman Empire sex between people of the same gender (normally men) was a common practice that nobody give much thought about.
By the 17 th century, the appearance of the bourgeois classes made emerge a bigger control on discourse about sex. The rising of these sexual discourses eventually spread to other ambits like the public one. During the Roman Empire sex between people of the same gender (normally men) was a common practice that nobody give much thought about.
By the 17 th century, the appearance of the bourgeois classes made emerge a bigger control on discourse about sex. The rising of these sexual discourses eventually spread to other ambits like the public one. During the Roman Empire sex between people of the same gender (normally men) was a common practice that nobody give much thought about.
Reader Response 1 - Week 9, Michel Foucault: Discourse and History.
Foucault tries to convey in this essay how powerful language can be. By the 17 th century, the appearance of the bourgeois classes made emerge a bigger control on discourse about sex. The attempt to control sex through speech actually meant a rising about sex discourse. The Christian pastoral of the time obliged to confess not only sexual acts but also thoughts and desires. This led to a constant awareness of sexuality and a transformation of sex into discourse. The rising of these sexual discourses eventually spread to other ambits like the public one. Sex became a matter of study in any of its aspects: regulation of population, demographic studies, fertility rates and other public matters became of major importance through sexual discourse. Another matter that generated a discourse on sex was childrens sexuality. Dividing the schools by gender and making teenagers talk about sex in a proper manner was supposed to be a way to avoid perversion or desire. The youth spoke then with technical language to avoid jovial and frank discussion on the matter in order to elude possible immoralities. In conclusion, there is no such thing as a repression of sexuality but rather a controlled power that has brought sex into discourse to make of it a rational thing instead of the passionate element that it was before. All the arguments used by Foucault in this essay are facts rather than chimeras. During the Roman Empire sex between people of the same gender (normally men) was a common practice that nobody give much thought about and this shows how these different concerns in relation to sex are pretty recent and the result of the discourses which raised specially in the 19 th century. Foucault seems pretty interested in connoting that power; discourse and knowledge are directly connected. For him, all the studies and discourses had strongly influenced they way in which sexuality is understood and therefore, as I quote:
The nineteenth century and our own have been rather the age of multiplication: a dispersion of sexualities, a strengthening of their disparate forms, a multiple implantation of perversions. Our epoch has initiated sexual heterogeneities.