PAPADIAMANTI VASSO ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS EXECUTIVE MBA MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP PROF: DIMITRIOS BOURANTAS OCTOBER, 2013
2 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 3 1. WHO IS GE? ....................................................................... 3 2. THE BUILT TO LAST MODEL .................................................. 4 3. HOW IS GE EVOLVING SUCCESSFULLY? ...................................... 5 4. THE LESSON LEARNT .............................................................. 7 SOURCES AND REFERENCES ......................................................... 9
3 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 INTRODUCTION The General Electric Company (GE) is widely regarded as one of the worlds most successful corporations of the 20th century. The purpose of this paper is to briefly examine how the GE fits the built to last model as described by professor Bourantas. The presentation of the case study is organized in four (4) sections: 1. Who is GE? 2. What is the Built to last model? 3. How is GE evolving to success? 4. What is the lesson learnt?
1. WHO IS GE? GE, founded in 1892, is a diversified technology and financial services company. The products and services of the Company range from aircraft engines, power generation, water processing, and household appliances to medical imaging, business and consumer financing and industrial products. It serves customers in more than 100 countries. Its segments include Energy Infrastructure, Aviation, Healthcare, Transportation, Home & Business Solutions and GE Capital. According to Forbes Lists 1 it ranges #4 Global 2000 #21 in Sales #24 in Profit #44 in Assets #6 in Market value #8 World's Most Powerful Brands #90 Innovative Companies
Since its foundation GE has been a leading business partner of the American government 2 having an important political and economical influence. According to the New York Times Its extraordinary success is based on an aggressive strategy that mixes fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting that enables it to concentrate its profits offshore 3 . GE is one of the principal partners of president Obama supporting his current policies for jobs creation in the United States and the development of a 7 billion dollars energy infrastructure project in Africa as well.
1 http://www.forbes.com/companies/general-electric/ 2 GEs Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welchs Leadership, HBS 9-399-150 3 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 4 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 2. THE BUILT TO LAST MODEL Built to Last was a best seller book that studied the factors associated with companies that made great progress over competitors for a sustained period of time. In summary, it was the visionary nature of these companies that helped built their brand and distinguish them from their competitors. Built to Last is about enduringly, great organizations, known as visionary companies that have prospered over long periods of time through multiple product life cycles and several generations of leadership. Based on seven timeless principles of visionary companies: Be clock-builders, not time-tellers; Embrace the and, reject the or; More than profits; Walk the talk; Preserve the core ideology while stimulating progress; Never-ending process; and Build the vision; Collins and Porras presented the results of a six-year research project at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business using a comparative research model that traces the performance of eighteen visionary companies and their comparison companies (Collins and Porras 2002). General Electric was one of the visionary companies. The lasting success of a company depends on 7+1 independent parameters (Bourantas, 2005) presented in the following figure:
The built to last companies: Understand their environment and emerging opportunities Change to fit the environment and make new rules for the others Know what to change and what to keep Manage the contradiction Develop the critical success factors Do the right things right (Peter Drucker) Focus to results 5 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 3. HOW IS GE EVOLVING SUCCESSFULLY? Long regarded as a bellwether of American management practices, GE was constantly undergoing change. In the 1930s, it was a model of the eras highly centralized, tightly controlled corporate form. By the 1950s, GE had delegated responsibility to hundreds of department managers, leading a trend towards greater decentralization. But a subsequent period of profitless growth in the 1960s caused the company to strengthen its corporate staffs and develop sophisticated strategic planning systems. Again, GE found itself at the leading edge of management 4
The organizational challenges involved in World War II were a vital stimulus to strategic thinking. The problem of allocating scarce resources across the entire economy in wartime led to many innovations in management science. 5 America's first corporate development centre for managers is born in the fifties at Crotonville making of GE a vanguard in management and leadership. The last three decades GE has moved out of many major product markets in consumer, industrial, and natural resource sectors, while entering and prospering in new markets such as media, financial services, and information sectors (figure 2). At the same time, the company has become a global firm, as its businesses carry out research, sourcing, production, and sales activities throughout the world. How has the company changed so drastically, while violating so many truths about business change? 6
GE had to face in each period different political, economical and social context, threads, opportunities and risks but preserve its core ideology in contrast to its execution that may change over time and can include policies, procedures and practices (Collins & Porras, 2002). Confident of this core ideology, Jack Welch defends companys leadership You want to be No1. There is nothing wrong with that. You dont want to be a loser. Nos 3, 4, and 5 dont have the same flexibility. You cant do R&D at the same level. What you do with the resources that come from being a leader thats what determines your future 7 . Jack Welch became CEO of the GE in 1981 and inherited from his predecessor Reg Jones, a company focusing on strategic planning with sophisticated processes, complicated organizational multi layer structure and a technical manufacture portfolio of businesses. In the following table it is presented an overview of the evolution of the company since 1981 under the two CEOs Jack Welch (1981 2001) and Jeff Immelt (2001 present) including the major strategies, management innovations and practices. The overview scheme is organized according to the parameters of Bourantas model and allows comparing the different periods, observing the continuity and consistence of companys strategy and understanding the concept of Jack Welch Never let the present dictate your future that boosts GE to look forward with confidence. That is because we can shape some of the big growth drivers in any era 8 .
4 HBS-GEs Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welchs Leadership, Bartlett & Wozny, 2000 5 Working Knowledge- Harvard Business School, How Business Strategy Tamed the Invisible Hand http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3019.html 6 Will Mitchell, Duke University, March 2008 7 The new rules, Fortune August 7, 2006 8 GE Works 2012 Jeff Immelt Letter to Shareowners 6 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 Parameters Jack Welch era (1981 2001) Jeff Immelt era (2001 present) Historical context US economy in recession High interest rates Strong dollar Highest unemployment since the depression Japanese competition 9/11, Corporate scandals (Enron, WorldCom) Uncertainty, crisis of confidence among investors Financial crisis 2008 Globalization Core ideology: Become the #1 or #2 in every market we serve and revolutionalize this company to have the speed and agility of a small enterprise. Maximize profit for shareholders GE share price more than doubled despite the dotcom crash of 2000 Focus on long term profit growth for shareowners Strategy Performance and efficiency 3 circle vision: diversified portfolio Reduce dependence of traditional industrial products Downsizing and restructuring Orientation to services (financial, medical sectors) On the road to globalization (exploit Mexico crisis 1990s, European regression 80s, Asian crisis 1997) Organic growth emerging global trends 3 strategic imperatives 1) Sustaining its strong business model 2) Strengthening the business portfolio 3) Driving growth initiatives Creating differentiation advantage through innovative product services Acquisitions and alliances to change Structure Attack on bureaucratic processes Reduce hierarchical levels Fix, sell or close - Integrate new acquisitions Revitalization of marketing function commercial council Systems/ technology Six sigma Quality initiative Cutting edge acquisitions Industrial internet software and analytics The power of 1% Performance indicators Culture Break with the old culture Speed, Simplicity, Self-Confidence Openness, confidence, leadership and creative thinking at every level of the organization. Simplification Accountability of outcomes, Speed and compliance Long term thinking Striving to be better People New varsity team Neutron Jack - shape up or ship out, - A Players 4Es Globalizing the intellect of the company Stretch: achieving the impossible Motivation by encouraging moderating stretch inherited by Jack Welch era) Imagination at work Social responsibility
Initiatives - Programs Work out Best practices Developing leaders: improvement of Crotonville facilities Boundaryless behavior Digitization Technical leadership Services Customer focus Growth platform Globalization Ecomagination
7 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 4. THE LESSON LEARNT In spite of all criticism that rose on GEs strategies, behavior, initiatives and practices during the last three decades the fact is that GE sustain itself for more than 130 years and ranges among the top global company leaders. General Electric is both profitable and dynamic 9 . According to Mitchell GE success is due to its: External Strategy Acquisition strategy, including both careful pre-acquisition assessment and detailed post- acquisition integration. Active alliance identification programs within individual divisions and at the corporate level. Internal Strategy Active strategic planning A few high-powered programs Boundary-spanning knowledge management A small-company organization. Outcome Differentiation Cost Innovation Power In Good to Great Collins (2001) analogizes the success of great companies and classifies GE among them, to that of a flywheel, where a sustained momentum accelerates the energy output. The companies able to create this flywheel effect had the following characteristics in common 10 : Level 5 Leadership Level 5 Leaders are not charismatic, media types. Chances are youve never heard of them. They are humble, self-effacing and more concerned about the prosperity of the company than their individual success. First WhoThen What Using a bus analogy, Collins claims that great companies first get great people on the bus, then decide where to drive it. According to Collins, the right people are your most important asset. Confront the Brutal Facts (Yet Never Lose Faith) Good-to-Great companies maintain unwavering faith that they can and will prevail in the end, regardless of the difficulties, and at the same time have the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of their current reality whatever that might be. The Hedgehog Concept (Simplicity within the Three Circles) Good-to-Great companies do what they can do best (as opposed to what they want to do best), what they are deeply passionate about, and they focus on what drives their economic engine.
9 Will Mitchell, Duke University, March 2008 10 Good to Great book summary www.employeradvisorsnetwork.com 8 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 A Culture of Discipline Having a disciplined culture is the opposite of having a controlled one. There is no need for hierarchy, bureaucracy, or excessive control. According to Bourantas model GEs success is due to the following components: 1. GE has a purpose, a core ideology that stimulates progress and strives to improvement. 2. GE understands the external opportunities and threats, and internal strengths and weaknesses, keeps creating value by mobilizing wisely resources and applying smart strategies. 3. GE develops its human capital that is the main competitive advantage probably the only one that competitors cannot copy. 4. GE has a strong corporate culture. 5. GE has flexible structures and processes. 6. GE has a great competence of lifelong learning, improvement, adaptation and change. According to Jack Welch the difference between winning and losing will be how the men and women of one company view change as it comes at them. If they see it as a threat, as an ill wind to be resisted by keeping your hand down and digging your feet in, we lose. But if they are provided the educational tools and are encouraged to use them-to the point where they see change as synonymous with opportunity, where they become receptive to it, even demand of it-then every door we must pass through to win big all around the world will swing open to us, new markets, exotic technologies, novel ventures, dramatic productivity growth 11 . 7. GE has integrated the philosophy of meritocracy and mechanisms to permanently develop Leadership at all levels.
11 Effectiveness and Importance of Leadership in the Changing Period "A secret key to revitalize Japanese firms" by Yasushi Ueno May, 2001 9 Case Study: General Electric: a Build to last company
Vasso Papadiamanti - Executive MBA: Management and Leadership, 14/10/2013 SOURCES AND REFERENCES (2005). : , . . GE 2012 GE web site http://www.ge.com/ GEs Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welchs Leadership, HBS 9-399-150 HBS-GEs Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welchs Leadership, Bartlett & Wozny, 2000 Working Knowledge- Harvard Business School, How Business Strategy Tamed the Invisible Hand http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3019.html Corporate Strategy Analysis: General Electric Co. (1981present) Will Mitchell, Duke University, March 2008 The new rules, Fortune August 7, 2006 Good to Great book summary www.employeradvisorsnetwork.com Effectiveness and Importance of Leadership in the Changing Period "A secret key to revitalize Japanese firms" by Yasushi Ueno May, 2001 http://www.forbes.com/companies/general-electric/ http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 The Industrial Internet@Work, Marco Annunziata & Peter C. Evans, White Paper, 2013 How GE Teaches Teams to Lead Change, by Steven Prokesch, HBR, January 2009 Is GE a Good Model for Other Companies to Follow? Robert M. Tomasko, 2002