SATISFACTION AFFECTING ON HOTEL EMPLOYEE RETENTION: A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES
Puangpen Churintr Suratthani Rajabhat University
ABSTRACT A significant problem in the tourism industry is the lack of skilled employees. This study aims to investigate the influence of perceived organizational culture, stress, and job satisfaction on hotel employee retention. This study surveys 355 hotel employees in the Upper South of Thailand including 261 operational and 94 management hotel employees, respectively. Using structural equation, the results indicate that the low retention is an important problem. Data from in-depth interviews was used as supplement to the survey data. For employees at the operational level, perceived organizational culture is a more important factor than job satisfaction. On the other hand, for employees at management level, job satisfaction is more important than perceived organizational culture. Stress has no effect on the employee retention of both levels. The results of this study shed light on using tools to support the retention of skilled hotel employees.
INTRODUCTION Low retention is a serious problem in the hotel industry. There are different schools of thought on factors affecting the hotel employee retention. For example, some scholars found that organisational culture led to commitment and that commitment, in turn, can be used as a better predictor of the turnover rate of hotel employees than job satisfaction since those that are fully committed tended to continue their work even with no job satisfaction (Steers, 1977; Griffeth, Hom & Gaertner, 2000). On the other hand, Zohar (1994) found that stress affected the service quality. In addition, stress resulted in less job satisfaction (Singh, Goolsby & Rhoads, 1994; Jones, Chonko, Rangarajan & Roberts, 2007), increased the intent to leave (Jones et al., 2007) and affected behaviour on leaving the job (Sagar & Wilson, 1995). In contrast, Griffeth et al., 2000, found that job satisfaction is the most important factor to the retention.
The problem caused by turnover of operational employees in the hotel business is very important because it affects the employee performance and Perceived Organisational Culture, Stress and Job Satisfaction Affecting on Hotel Employee Retention: A comparison study between management and operational employees 2010 Employment Relations Record, Vol. 10, No. 2 Page 65
decision making to resign (Borchgravink & Boster, 1997). This problem affects hotel service quality and expenses which in turn affects performance and growth of the business. The expenses in training new employees are inversely related with customer satisfaction and business performance (Hinkin & Tracey, 2000; Davidson, Guilding, & Timo, 2006). In addition, without change in employees, training expenses can be saved because less training is required for skilled employees (Furunes & Mykletun, 2005) and also reduces cost of job advertisement, interview, selection and training processes (Pizam & Thornburg, 2000).
The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between perceived organisational culture, stress, and job satisfaction on the retention of employees at operational and management levels in hotel businesses from the Upper South region of Thailand. The contribution of this study is to provide empirical evidence of competing theories, guiding suitable support tools to human resource management in hotel business.
METHODOLOGY Sample The sample was hotel employees from 142 hotels, members of Thai hotel association, in the Upper South region totalling seven provinces, namely: Phuket, Chumporn, Krabi, Nakorn Srithammarat, Suratthani, Pang-nga and Ranong. A questionnaire was designed to collect quantitative data. It was tested for internal consistency of content and reliability of the tool before being distributed to random samples which consisted of 261 employees at operational level and 94 employees at management level.
Method A Structural Equation model was employed in elucidating the factors affecting retention of hotel employees at both operational and management levels. In addition, in-depth interviews were used to further explore the results that could not be explained by the survey.
RESULTS Descriptive statistics Table 1 illustrates that the age of employees in the sample are between 19-59 years with an average of 32.22 years. Duration of working at the present hotel is between 0.8-33 years with an average of 5.58 years. Duration of working in the present position is between 0.08-22.50 years with an average of 3.47 years and an average of working at management level of 1.23 years. The longest duration of working at management level is 23 years. Duration of working since graduation has an average of 9.64 years with the longest at 40 years and duration of working at present hotel is more than 3 years. Qualitative analysis Puangpen Churintr
from the in-depth interviews shows that hotels did not have a policy of firing even during low season but chose other means to solve the problem such as leave without pay, energy conservation measures, reducing service-charge payment, and arranging free-time activities such as cleaning, and exercise for employees.
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics Years (n=355) Min Max x S.D. Age 19.00 59.00 32.22
7.32 Duration of working at the present hotel 0.08 33.00 5.58
5.62 Duration of working in present position 0.08 22.50 3.47
3.31 Duration of working at management level 0.00 23.00 1.27
3.00 Duration of working since graduation 0.08 40.00 9.64
7.61
Relationship between perceived organisational culture, stress and job satisfaction on the employee retention of hotels from the Upper South region
1. Employees at operational level Table 2 shows that perceived organisational culture consists of turnover culture, politics and organisational support, which have average values at 3.41, 2.81 and 3.37 respectively. Stress, which consists of role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overload, show averages of being at different levels. Role ambiguity has an average value at high level of 4.05 while role conflict has an average value at moderate level and role overload has an average at low level of 3.05 and 2.57 respectively. Job satisfaction consists of general, intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction. These have average values at high level of 3.81, 3.83 and 3.49 respectively. The retention of employees from operational level consists of intention to leave, commitment, and job alternatives. Commitment and job alternatives have average values at high level of 3.78 and 3.56 respectively while intention to leave has an average value at low level of 2.55.
Table 2: Descriptive statistics of perceived organisational culture, stress, job satisfaction, and retention of hotel employees from operational level Perceived Organisational Culture, Stress and Job Satisfaction Affecting on Hotel Employee Retention: A comparison study between management and operational employees 2010 Employment Relations Record, Vol. 10, No. 2 Page 67
(n=261) Min Max x S.D. Turnover culture 5.00 1.00 3.41 0.89 Politics 5.00 1.00 2.81 0.73 Organizational support 5.00 1.33 3.37 0.65 Role conflict 5.00 1.00 3.05 0.76 Role ambiguity 5.00 1.00 4.05 0.59 Role overload 5.00 1.00 2.57 0.68 General satisfaction 5.00 1.00 3.81 0.81 Intrinsic satisfaction 5.00 1.67 3.83 0.53 Extrinsic satisfaction 5.00 1.29 3.49 0.61 Intention to leave 5.00 1.00 2.55 0.87 Commitment 5.00 1.00 3.78 0.74 Job Alternatives 5.00 1.00 3.56 0.69
2. Employees at management level
Table 3: Descriptive statistics of organisational culture, stress, job satisfaction, and the retention of hotel employees from management level Years (n = 94)
Max Min x S.D. Turnover culture 5.00 1.00 3.31 0.90 Politics 4.13 1.25 2.80 0.62 Organizational support 5.00 1.67 3.64 0.66 Role conflict 5.00 1.00 3.14 0.78 Role ambiguity 5.00 2.67 4.08 0.54 Role overload 3.67 1.00 2.65 0.56 General satisfaction 5.00 1.00 4.03 0.67 Intrinsic satisfaction 5.00 2.56 3.99 0.48 Extrinsic satisfaction 5.00 2.00 3.76 0.56 Intention to leave 5.00 1.00 2.54 0.75 Commitment 1.00 5.00 3.98 0.73 Job alternatives 1.50 5.00 3.68 0.65
Table 3 demonstrates that organisational support has an average value at high level of 3.64, while politics and turnover culture have average values at medium level of 3.31 and 2.80 respectively. Stress, which consists of role conflict, role uncertainty, and role overload, show averages of being at different levels. Role ambiguity has an average at high level of 4.08 while role Puangpen Churintr
conflict and role overload have average values at moderate level of 3.14 and 2.65 respectively. Job satisfaction which consists of general, intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction all have average values at high levels of 4.03, 3.99 and 3.76 respectively. The retention of employee from management level consists of intention to leave, commitment, and job alternatives. Commitment and job alternatives have average values at high level of 3.94 and 3.68 respectively while intention to leave has an average value at low level of 2.54.
CORRELATION It was found that correlation coefficients between every variable used in the analysis did not have multicollinearity (r< 0.70). Independent variables which are the components of organisational culture, stress, and job satisfaction do affect the retention of employees from both levels from hotels in the upper south region having a correlation between -0.49 to 0.68.
The relationship between perceived organisational culture, stress and job satisfaction on the retention of employees at management level Figure 1 shows that organisational culture significantly imposes negative influence on the stress in employees at management level with coefficient of 0.43. This means stress of the employees at management level will decrease as the organisational culture improves, such as all possible organisational support and less politics, while the stress will increase when these employees have role ambiguity and role overload. However, employees at management level better perceived organisational culture from organisational support (0.95) than from politics (0.33).
Figure 1 shows that organisational culture had a significantly positive influence on job satisfaction of employees at management level with coefficient of 0.37. This means that job satisfaction should increase as aspects of organisational culture such as high organisational support and less politics increases, where employees at management level have the highest value of intrinsic satisfaction at 0.83 with the 2 nd rank of general satisfaction at 0.78 respectively. Extrinsic satisfaction shows less influence than other types of satisfaction. Perceived Organisational Culture, Stress and Job Satisfaction Affecting on Hotel Employee Retention: A comparison study between management and operational employees 2010 Employment Relations Record, Vol. 10, No. 2 Page 69
Figure 1: Relationship between perceived organisational culture, stress and job satisfaction on the retention of employees at management level -0.45 AMBI
Figure 1 shows that stress had a significantly negative influence on job satisfaction with a coefficient of 0.45. The stress at management level was caused more by role ambiguity (0.94) than role overload (0.46). Organisational culture had a significantly positive influence on the retention with coefficient of 0.35. Stress is inversely related with retention of employees at management level but not significantly. Job satisfaction has a positive influence on the retention of employees at management level with a coefficient of 0.39 which indicates staying with the organisation providing that they have job satisfaction. Organisational culture, job satisfaction and stress accounts for 50 percent retention of employees at management level since the employees at management level gave highest priority to job satisfaction at 0.39 and at a lower priority to organisational culture at 0.35 without giving and consideration to stress (0.08) respectively.
Figure 2 shows that organisational culture has a significantly positive effect on stress of employees at operational level with a coefficient at 0.49. Organisational culture and stress impose a significantly positive influence on job satisfaction of employees at operational level with a coefficient at 0.36 and 0.41 respectively. Organisational culture has significantly positive influences on the retention of employees at operational level with a coefficient of 0.41 while stress has a positive influence on the retention of employees at operational level with a coefficient of 0.33.
SUMMARY The quantitative analytical result by descriptive statistics shows that an average value of duration for working at present hotels of 5.51 years, showing a moderate retention by being higher than 3 years and the duration of working after graduation of 9.64 years. The qualitative analytical results from in-depth interviews shows that hotels did not have a policy of firing even during low season but chose to solve the problem by other means such as leave without pay, energy conservation measures, reducing service charge payment and arranging extra activities such as cleaning, and exercise during free times for their employees.
In examining the effect of perceived organisational culture on stress and job satisfaction on the retention of employees at operational and management level, and the stress of employees at management level organisational culture explains up to 43% of stress influences. Stress from perceived organisational culture also results in less job satisfaction for employees at this level. Stress can be used in explaining 49% of job satisfaction. Employees at management level will stay with the organisation provided that they can accept the organisational culture, and they have high job satisfaction. Fifty percent of the Perceived Organisational Culture, Stress and Job Satisfaction Affecting on Hotel Employee Retention: A comparison study between management and operational employees 2010 Employment Relations Record, Vol. 10, No. 2 Page 71
Figure 2: The relationship between perceived organisational culture, stress and job satisfaction on the retention of employees at operational level CONFLI AMBI LOAD INTENT COMMIT CHOICE
CUL STRESS
JOBSAT R 2
= .44
RET R 2 = .52
TURNCUL POLITIC SUPPORT GENSAT INTSAT EXTSAT .39 .75 -.81 . .49 .36 .41 -.84 -.87 -.87 .41
.33 .10 -.54 -.77 .75
.82 -.80 .22 Puangpen Churintr
retention of employees at this level can be explained by perceived organisational culture, stress and job satisfaction. Once the results of in- depth interviews were brought into consideration, it was found that employees at management level would stay with the organisation provided that they had job satisfaction and accepted organisational culture, because they felt that they are an important member, and have self-sufficiency, loyalty, pride, and trust in their hotels owners. In addition, the hotels growth, which is being reflected through additional investment and continuous development, is also an important factor for employees to stay with their hotels. Stress is not a factor for employees at this level because they like challenging work.
Stress for employees at the operational level depends on organisational culture in which the culture can be used to explain 24% of stress. Stress from organisational culture becomes a challenge for employees who seek satisfaction in their job and stress can be used in explaining 44% of job satisfaction. Employees at the operational level will stay with the organisation if they accept the organisational culture and have high job satisfaction through organisational culture. Stress and job satisfaction can be used in explaining 52% of the retention of employees at operational level. From the in-depth interviews, it was found that employees at the operational level gave importance to systematic working, good working environment, pride, acceptance of working conditions, salary, good welfare, fair leadership, a good management team, and kind owners.
DISCUSSION Recommendations from this research are that strategic planning for the retention of employees at operational and management levels should be different from each other. At the operational level, emphasis should be given to organisational culture, the most important factor influencing their retention, while at management level emphasis should be given to job satisfaction. Stress is not important to the retention of employees at both levels even if it does show a higher relationship to job satisfaction than organisational culture at both levels. Organisational culture and stress have positive influences on job satisfaction of employees at the operational level. It is possible that employees at the operational level, having given importance to their leader, would try to please their leader to reap rewards such as promotion or organisational support and end up with job satisfaction. Similarly, Karatepe and Kilic (2007) found organisational support makes employees satisfied in their work. Stress has no influence on the retention of employees at operational and management level. It is possible that hotel employees accept stress as a norm in the business and have abilities to manage the stress.
Perceived Organisational Culture, Stress and Job Satisfaction Affecting on Hotel Employee Retention: A comparison study between management and operational employees 2010 Employment Relations Record, Vol. 10, No. 2 Page 73
The findings from this study suggest that people managers should treat the importance of organisational culture, stress and job satisfaction differently. Therefore, for employees at the operational level, less attention needs to be given to stress since this study has already shown that stress is not the important factor on the retention of employees at operational level. On the other hand, greater emphasis should be given to organisational culture which has more influence on the retention of employees at operational level. For employees at management level job satisfaction has a positive and the highest influence on the retention of employees. Therefore, to keep the employees working with the organisation, different strategies should be employed at operational and management levels.
However, the empirical variables used in this study do not include factors such as the influence of individual character on the retention of hotel employees. Only three empirical variables, namely turnover culture, politics, and organisational support, representing the manifest variables of organisational culture, were included. Future study may involve other empirical variables that represent the manifest variables of the organisational culture. It may also involve investigating the reason why turnover culture does not appear as one of the empirical factors representing the manifest variables of organisational culture in hotel business in this study, even though the work of Iverson and Deery (1997) shows that turnover culture in tourism industry is an important variable.
REFERENCES Borchgravink, C. P. & Boster, F. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange development: hospitality Antecedent investigation. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 16 (3), 241-259. Davidson, M., Guilding, C. and Timo, N. (2006). Employment, flexibility and labour market practices of domestic and MNC chain luxury hotels and Australia: Where has accountability gone? Hospitality Management. 25. 193-210. Deloitte-Travel Tourism & Leisure. (2004, Sept. 9). Focus on Thailand/Hotel industry continues to attract interest/Deloitte Report. Retrived December 17, 2006 from http://www.Hospitality Net-Industry New Focus on Thailand Hotel Industry Continues to Attract Interest Deloitte Report.htm Furunes, T., & Mykletun, R. J. (2005). Managers perceptions of older workers in the hotel and restaurant industry. International Congress Series. 1280, 275-280. Puangpen Churintr
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlated of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management. 26, 463-488. Hinkin, T.R., & Tracey, J.B., (2000). The cost of turnover. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. 41(3), 14-21. Iverson, R. D., & Deery, M. (1997). Turnover culture in the hospitality industry. Human Resource Management Journal, 7(4), 7182. Jones, E., Chonko, L., Rangarajan, D., & Roberts, J. (2007). The role of overload on job attitudes, turnover intentions, and salesperson performance. Journal of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.00.014. Karatepe, O. M., & Kilic, H. (2007). Relationships of supervisor support and conflicts in the work-family. Tourism Management, 28, 238-252. Pizam, A., & Thornburg, S.W. (2000). Research note absenteeism and voluntary turnover in Central Florida Hotels: A pilot study. Hospitality Management. 19, 211-217. Sagar, J. K., Wilson, P. H. (1995), Clarification of the meaning of job stress in the context of sales force research. Journal of Personality Sell Sales Management. 15(3), 51-63. Singh, J., Goolsby, J. R., & Rhoads, G. K. (1994). Behavioral and psychological Consequences of boundary spanning burnout for customer service representatives. Journal of Marketing Research. 31, 558-69. Steers, R.M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 22, 45-56. Zohar, D. (1994). Analysis of job stress profile in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 13(3). 219-231.
Copyright of Employment Relations Record is the property of Pacific Employment Relations Association (PERA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.