Morphology, microstructure, and composition of carbonaceous particles were investigated. Carbonaceous components of coal, residual oil, and diesel fuel samples contain ultrafine soot aggregates. Large spherical or irregular-shaped porous char particles dominate the micrometer-sized fraction of coal and residual oil PM samples.
Morphology, microstructure, and composition of carbonaceous particles were investigated. Carbonaceous components of coal, residual oil, and diesel fuel samples contain ultrafine soot aggregates. Large spherical or irregular-shaped porous char particles dominate the micrometer-sized fraction of coal and residual oil PM samples.
Morphology, microstructure, and composition of carbonaceous particles were investigated. Carbonaceous components of coal, residual oil, and diesel fuel samples contain ultrafine soot aggregates. Large spherical or irregular-shaped porous char particles dominate the micrometer-sized fraction of coal and residual oil PM samples.
Particulate Matter Generated by Combustion of Fossil
Fuels Yuanzhi Chen, Naresh Shah,* Artur Braun, Frank E. Huggins, and Gerald P. Huffman Consortium for Fossil Fuel Science, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, 533 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4005 Received October 19, 2004. Revised Manuscript Received April 19, 2005 The morphology, microstructure, and composition of individual carbonaceous particles generated during combustion of coal, residual oil, and diesel fuel were investigated by various electron microscopy (EM) techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED)/dark-field imaging, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Carbonaceous components of all of these fossil-fuel-derived particulate matter (PM) samples contain ultrafine soot aggregates with fractal chain morphologies and spherical primary particles (sizes 30-50 nm) that exhibit a concentric arrangement of stacked graphitic layers around the particle center. Some submi- crometer soot aggregates with larger primary particles (100-400 nm) were also found in coal- derived carbonaceous PM. Larger spherical or irregular-shaped porous char particles dominate the micrometer-sized fraction of coal and residual oil PM samples. The relative fractions of sp 2 hybridized carbon atoms in carbonaceous particles were estimated from EELS measurements of the carbon K-edge taken at the magic angle. Although the carbonaceous particles generated by combustion of various fossil fuels may have quite different morphologies and microtextures, they possess similar internal structural parameters, such as the dimensions of basic structural units (BSUs) and the average hybridization state of the carbon atoms. Compositional differences between soot aggregates and char particles were observed, and such information could be used as fingerprints to identify the source of different types of carbonaceous particles. Introduction The correlation between the concentration of airborne particulate matter (PM) <2.5 m in mean diameter (PM 2.5 ) and human morbidity and mortality due to respiratory and cardiovascular disease has been well- established. 1,2 Available ambient measurements of PM 2.5 suggest that anthropogenic combustion sources, fires, and other emitters of condensable and secondary origins contribute a large percentage of the overall ambient PM 2.5 mass in most areas. 3 Not only is the carbonaceous mass a major contributor to total PM 2.5 mass in most areas of the United States, but a majority of the excess amount of PM 2.5 in urban areas with high population densities compared to nearby rural areas is due to carbonaceous matter. 4 Generally, carbonaceous PM in ambient aerosols is subdivided into two fractions: organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). Glo- bally, 45% of all EC emitted and 55% of all primary OC emitted are estimated to originate from fossil fuel burning. 5 Carbonaceous PM is also believed to have significant impact on global climate. For example, EC may be the second most important direct forcing com- ponent of global warming, after CO 2 . 6 Carbonaceous particles have been found to comprise about half of the submicrometer mass in many natural aerosols and may act as carriers of toxic chemicals. 7 In addition, unburnt residual carbon can also affect many aspects of fossil- fuel-fired power plant performance and economy, in- cluding boiler efficiency, electrostatic precipitator op- eration, and the value of the fly ash as a commercial product. 8 The composition and microstructure of com- bustion-generated carbonaceous PM could have signifi- cant effects on their roles and fates in the environment. The results obtained from conventional bulk analyses * Corresponding author. Phone: 859-257-4027. Fax: 859-257-7215. E-mail: naresh@uky.edu. (1) Dockery, D. W.; Pope, C. A., III.; Xu, X.; Spengler, J. D.; Ware, J. H.; Fay, M. E.; Ferris, B. G., Jr.; Speizer, F. E. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1753-1759. (2) Avakian, M. D.; Dellinger, B.; Heidelore, F.; Gullet, B.; Koshland, C.; Marklund, S.; Oberdorster, G.; Safe, S.; Sarofim, A. F.; Smith, K. R.; Schwartz, DE.; Suk, W. A. Environ. Health Persp. 2002, 110, 1155- 1162. (3) EPA Clearing House for Inventories and Emission Factors (CHIEF) website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/pm25inventory/ index.html. (4) National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Reports2003 special studies edition, US EPA report No. 454/R-03-005. Also available at http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/. (5) Seinfeld, J. H.; Pankow, J. F. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2003, 54, 121-40. (6) Jacobson, M. Z. Nature 2001, 409, 695-697. (7) Katrinak, K. A.; Rez, P.; Buseck, P. R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1967-1976. (8) Hurt, R. H.; Davis, K. A.; Yang, N. Y. C.; Headley, T. J.; Mitchell, G. D. Fuel 1995, 74, 1297-1306. 1644 Energy & Fuels 2005, 19, 1644-1651 10.1021/ef049736y CCC: $30.25 2005 American Chemical Society Published on Web 05/26/2005 are the average contributions of different particle types that have different physical and chemical properties. Studies based on analyses of individual particles provide additional information that complements conventional bulk analyses. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been rou- tinely used to characterize morphologies of carbon black particles. 9,10 High-resolution transmission electron mi- croscopy (HRTEM), which is capable of providing struc- tural information at an atomic level resolution, has been used to investigate the microstructures of diesel soot 11,12 and coal char. 13,14 Dark-field imaging has been used to characterize the structures and microtextures of various types of carbonaceous materials, especially those of poorly organized materials. 15-17 Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for obtaining information about bonding types and hybridization states of carbon atoms. 7,18 One limitation of electron microscopy (EM) techniques is that information about highly volatile components cannot be obtained, since those volatile species cannot withstand the vacuum and electron beam. If significant, such factors may complicate the analysis of the OC compo- nents but should not affect the analysis of EC compo- nents. Nevertheless, we still can use EM techniques to obtain abundant information that cannot be achieved from conventional bulk analyses. In this study, we use a series of EM techniques including SEM, HRTEM, selected area electron diffraction (SAED)/dark-field imaging, EELS, scanning transmission electron micros- copy (STEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to characterize the morphology, microstructure, and composition of individual carbonaceous particles generated from combustion of coal, residual oil, and diesel fuel. Such information along with that obtained from other techniques 19 should be useful for evaluating the environmental and health impacts of carbonaceous particles produced by combustion of fossil fuels. Experimental Section Samples. The coal and residual oil PM samples were prepared in combustion experiments conducted at the US EPAs National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRM- RL) using a down-fired, refractory-lined laboratory pulverized coal combustor and a North American three-pass fire-tube package boiler, respectively. Detailed descriptions of the combustor and boiler are given elsewhere. 20,21 The PM samples were separated aerodynamically by a cyclone into a fine PM2.5 and a coarse PM2.5+ fraction. Only the fine fraction samples, PM2.5, were used in this study. The coal and residual oil used in the combustion experiments were a high-volatile bituminous coal from Ohio and a high-sulfur No.6 residual oil. The diesel PM sample was produced at the diesel test engine facility at the University of Utah using a two-stroke diesel test engine (Kubota Z482B, 482 cm 3 displacement, 2200 rpm, 6 ft- lb load). The fuel/air ratio was 0.013. The diesel fuel tested was a 50:50 mixture of the Chevron/Phillips reference fuels T-22 and U-15, with an average cetane number of 46.7 and sulfur content of 79 ppm. Particles were collected on quartz filters and then separated from the filter for further analyses. Samples for SEM characterization were deposited on poly- carbonate filters and coated with a thin layer of an Au/Pd alloy. Samples for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis were prepared by ultrasonicating small amounts of the PM powder in acetone and transferring several drops of the suspensions onto holey carbon TEM grids. The holey carbon TEM grids were precoated with a layer of Au/Pd alloy to differentiate carbonaceous contaminations present on the lacey carbon film from the real sample particles. Analytical Procedure. The morphologies of coarse par- ticles were characterized by using an Hitachi S-3200 scanning electron microscope. A 200 kV field emission analytical transmission electron microscope (JEOL JEM-2010F) equipped with an Oxford energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer, a scan- ning (STEM) unit with high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector, and a Gatan imaging filter (GIF)/PEELS system was used for the in-depth analysis of individual particles. Bright- field imaging was used to visualize particle morphologies and sizes, while SAED/dark-field imaging was used to characterize the orientation and distribution of microcrystallites. HRTEM images were recorded under optimal focus condition at a typical magnification of 400K-500K. The profiles of the basic structural units (BSUs) were obtained by using 002 lattice fringe images. EELS spectra were recorded in diffraction mode (image-coupled mode) with an energy resolution of 1 eV (full width at half-maximum of zero-loss peak) and a dispersion rate of 0.2 eV/channel. The background at the carbon K-edge was subtracted from the EELS spectra by using a power law approximation, and a Fourier deconvolution was also con- ducted to remove the contribution of plural inelastic scattering. To avoid possible interference from the lacey carbon film, only unsupported particles hanging over the gaps in the lacey carbon support were analyzed. EDS analyses were conducted in STEM mode using an analytic probe with a size of 1.0 nm. Digital Micrograph software was used for image and EELS data recording and processing, while ES Vision Emispec software was used for EDS analysis and dark-field imaging. Results and Discussion Morphologies. Micrographs of different types of carbonaceous particles are shown in Figure 1. Soot aggregates dominate the ultrafine (<0.1 m) and sub- micrometer (0.1-1 m) fractions. Typically they have spherical primary particles with sizes of 30-50 nm and fractal-like chain structures that can extend to a micrometer or more (Figure 1a). This type of soot (referred to as ultrafine soot in the text) was observed in combustion products of diesel, residual oil, and coal. The second type of soot (Figure 1b) also has spherical primary particles, but with significantly larger sizes (0.1-0.4 m). This type of soot (referred to as submi- crometer soot in the text) was observed in samples (9) Stoffyn-Egli, P.; Potter, T. M.; Leonard, J. D.; Pocklington, R. Sci. Total Environ. 1997, 198, 211-223. (10) Fernandes, M. B.; Skjemstad, J. O.; Johnson, B. B.; Wells, J. D.; Brooks, P. Chemosphere 2003, 51, 785-795. (11) Saito, K.; Gordon, A. S.; Williams, F. A.; Stickle, W. F. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1991, 80, 103-119. (12) Ishiguro, T.; Takatori, Y.; Akihama, K. Combust. Flame 1997, 108, 231-234. (13) Sharma, A.; Kadooka, H.; Kyotani, T.; Tomita, A. Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 54-61. (14) Shim, H.-S.; Hurt, R. H.; Yang, N. Y. C. Prepr. Symp.sAm. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem. 1998, 43, 965-969. (15) Vanderwal, R. L. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1998, 132, 315-323. (16) Chen, H. X.; Dobbins, R. A. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2000, 159, 109-129. (17) Rouzaud, J. N. Fuel Process. Technol. 1990, 24, 55-69. (18) Ja ger, C.; Henning, Th.; Schlogl, R.; Spillecke, O. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1999, 258, 161-179. (19) Braun, A.; Shah, N.; Huggins, F. E.; Huffman, G. P.; Wirick, S.; Jacobsen, C.; Kelly, K.; Sarofim, A. F. Fuel 2004, 83, 997-1000. (20) Linak W. P.; Miller C. A.; Wendt J. O. L. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1532-1544. (21) Miller, C. A.; Linak, W. P.; King, C.; Wendt, J. O. L. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1998, 134, 477-502. EM of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 1645 derived from bituminous coal combustion, but not in samples derived from diesel or residual oil combustion. Char particles that are dominant in the micrometer- size fraction have quite different morphologies compared to those of the soot aggregates. Most char particles have porous structures with spherical or irregular shapes (Figure 1c, 1e), while some char particles have a solid structure and less porosity (Figure 1d). Such char particles are present in both coal and residual oil samples, but char particles from residual oil combustion typically have more perfect spherical shapes, which no doubt reflects the nature of liquid fuel droplets and the lack of any significant solid mineral matter in them. Cenospheres with porous surfaces or solid surfaces are very typical for residual oil samples. PM from diesel combustion rarely contains such char particles, although occasionally large carbonaceous residual particles with undefined random shapes can be found. The morphological differences between soot aggre- gates and char particles are mainly related to differ- ences in their formation. Primary soot particles are formed by generation of nuclei by condensation in cooling postcombustion gaseous streams. Often these primary particles mature to larger sizes by condensation of volatile organic compounds. Further collisions of these nuclei mode primary particles lead to accumulation mode aggregates. 22 Relatively larger char particles, on the other hand, are derived from pyrolysis and oxidation of fuel particles. The nature of the fuel, the fuel/air ratio, and the temperature and duration of combustion all play a role in determining the morphologies of these carbonaceous particles. Microstructural Observations. Two typical high- resolution images of primary particles of ultrafine soot aggregates are shown in Figure 2. In the first one, concentrically arranged stacked graphitic layers, roughly parallel and equidistant, form a microtexture similar to the structure of an onion. This type of microstructure has been previously reported in studies of carbon blacks 23,24 and diesel soots. 11,12 The second image dem- onstrates a similar outer arrangement to that of the first one, but multiple spherical nuclei surrounded by several graphitic layers are present in the inner core, indicating that original small nuclei mode primary particles may have coalesced together, perhaps followed also by gas- phase surface growth, to form a larger particle. These multiple nuclei or growth centers were also observed in an early study of carbon black 23 and in a more recent study of diesel soots. 12 A typical high-resolution image of a submicrometer primary soot particle derived from the coal combustion is shown in Figure 3. The primary particles also exhibit a concentric arrangement of graphitic layers. Some of the particles show a more ordered structure in which the graphitic layers are longer and consist of more stacked planes. Since the center of the particle is too thick for normal HRTEM observation conditions, it cannot be established whether this type of particle contains multiple growth centers. The larger char particles do not exhibit concentric microtextures such as those observed in primary soot particles. They typically demonstrate an anisotropic arrangement of graphitic layers with varying length and thickness. Figure 4 shows the HRTEM image of the tip of a char particle. Short and discontinuous graphitic layers are observed roughly extending along the tip direction. Quantitative characterization of the microstructures of different types of carbonaceous particles was at- tempted by measuring their basic structural unit (BSU) (22) Kittleson, D. B. J. Aerosol Sci. 1998, 29, 575-588. (23) Ban, L. L.; Hess, W. M. Petroleum Derived Hydrocarbons; ACS Symposium Series 21; Deviney, M. L., OGrady, T. M., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976; pp 358-376. (24) Donnet, J. B. Carbon 1982, 20, 267-282. Figure 1. Morphologies of carbonaceous particles derived from combustion of different fossil fuels: (a) ultrafine soot (diesel), (b) submicrometer soot (coal), (c) an irregular-shaped porous char (coal), (d) an irregular-shaped solid char (coal), (e) a spherical char with a highly porous surface (residual oil), and (f) a char cenosphere with a smooth surface (residual oil). 1646 Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 Chen et al. parameters, including the average distance of interlayer spacings (d 002 ), the stacked layer length (L a ), and the layer thickness (L c ) from the 002 lattice fringe images. About 10 particles in different fields, each with 5-8 measuring points, were measured for each parameter. As shown in Figure 5, the average d 002 values are in the range of 3.65-3.75 , whereas L a and L c are in the range of 10-14 for all carbonaceous particles, al- though some individual values were far from the aver- age value. Typical stacked layer numbers are 3-5. The differences among each category are not significant, although the primary particles of diesel soot aggregates exhibit somewhat larger L a and L c and smaller d 002 values compared with soot aggregates derived from other fuels. Typical SAED patterns of soot aggregates and char particles are shown in Figure 6. The rings or arcs are indexed to the crystalline structure of graphite. 25 The SAED pattern (Figure 6a) obtained from soot aggregates shows broad and diffuse 002 and hk rings, which indicates a microstructure consisting of randomly dis- tributed crystallites that have a fine size and do not possess long range order. The SAED pattern in Figure 6b was obtained from a char particle that has some of the crystalline domains in the Bragg condition for the 002 reflection, but not randomly distributed over all azimuthal angles, and therefore, it exhibits the 002 reflection as arcs. The SAED pattern in Figure 6c (25) Beyssac, O.; Rouzaud, J.; Goffe, B.; Brunet, F.; Chopin, C. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 143, 19-31. Figure 2. HRTEM images of an ultrafine soot primary particle showing a concentric arrangement of stacked graphitic layers (a) and a particle with multiple nuclei (indicated by arrows in part b). Figure 3. HRTEM image of a submicrometer primary soot particle. Figure 4. HRTEM image of a char particle. EM of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 1647 represents the case in which char particles have stacked layer planes normal to the incident beam direction. However, since the 002 planes are not in the Bragg condition, only the 10 and 11 diffraction rings are observed. Dark-field imaging was used to visualize individual microcrystallites or BSUs and mutual orientations among them. Figure 7 shows typical bright-field and 002 dark-field images of soot aggregate. The bright spots in the dark-field image are produced by diffraction from the 002 planes of microcrystallites that fulfill the Bragg condition. An objective aperture was placed at the 9 oclock position of the 002 diffraction ring, so that only microcrystallites corresponding to this position would be imaged. By moving the objective aperture around the 002 diffraction ring, microcrystallites at different azi- muthal angles can be imaged. All these dark-field images show patterns in which bright spots are distrib- uted on the particles edge but are absent in the center. Such patterns are observed because there is a larger density of circumferential 002 lattice planes parallel to the electron beam (with normal azimuthal orientation) on the edge than in the center. Since it is thermody- namically unfavorable to form circumferential arrange- ments of microcrystallites with small radii of curvature in the core region, the core region possesses a less ordered arrangement. Higher solubility of the inner core in nitric acid than the rigid outer shell of diesel soot aggregate has been attributed to less ordering of the core region. 12 Figure 8 shows the bright-field and 002 dark-field image of a char particle. Instead of showing the con- centric microtextures that were observed in soot ag- gregates, the char particle exhibits microtextures with different orientations, which can be discerned from the nonuniform distribution of bright spots and dark regions in the dark-field image. The sizes of the individual bright spots in the dark-field image, which approxi- mately represent the dimensions of BSUs, are in agree- ment with the HRTEM observations. These heteroge- neous microtextures are commonly seen in larger coal and residual oil char particles, and the formation mechanism depends on the chemical nature of parent fuel, pyrolysis temperature, and residence time. De- tailed microtextural models developed for coal carbon- ization are available. 17,26 Bonding Information. A transmission electron mi- croscope equipped with EELS becomes a powerful spectroscopic technique that can be used to probe the chemical information and electronic structure in a material with high-spatial resolution. This technique has been employed to characterize various carbon materials, such as diamond films, 27 carbon black, 18 and urban carbonaceous PM. 7 A detailed introduction to EELS may be found in ref 28. In carbonaceous materi- als, a carbon atom may adopt different hybrid electronic configurations, such as sp 1 , sp 2 , or sp 3 . In a sp 2 -bonded carbon material, the carbon atoms have three strong bonds formed in the basal plane and (p z ) orbitals out of the plane. Electronic transition from the 1s core level to an unoccupied 2p(*) state is manifested as a sharp peak at 285 eV in EELS and NEXAFS spectra. 29 In sp 3 - bonded carbon materials, such transitions are absent. By quantitatively analyzing the carbon K-edge features and comparing them to standards such as graphite (100% sp 2 in the basal plane) and polyethylene (0% sp 2 bonding), quantitative information regarding the rela- tive abundance of the two hybridization states of the carbonaceous component of PM can be obtained. In a specimen that is crystallographically anisotropic (e.g. graphite), the exact direction of momentumtransfer and hence energy states available to the excited electron depend on the specimen orientation with respect to the incident electron beam. 30 Therefore, the intensity of the near-edge features is related to the orientation of the basal plane with respect to the incident electron beam. To alleviate this experimental anomaly, EELS spectra must be obtained under the so-called magic angle condition, where spectral details are independent of orientation. 31-34 In this study, the magic angle condi- tions were empirically determined by collecting a series of carbon K-edge spectra of graphite particles under different collection angles and then integrating the * and * + * peaks. Typical EELS spectra of a char particle are shown in Figure 9a. Microtextures with preferred orientations are present in the char particle, which are revealed from the SAED patterns recorded from two different regions (marked by circles in Figure 9c). The EELS spectra collected under normal large collection angle condition from these two regions show quite different 1s-* peak intensities. Spectra collected at the magic angle (Figure 9b) at the identical regions overlap each other because the magic angle condition reduces the orientation dependence of near-edge features and thereby provides truer bonding information. Typical carbon K-edge EELS spectra of ultrafine soot aggregates from combustion of various fossil fuels are (26) Rouzaud, J. N.; Vogt, D.; Oberlin, A. Fuel Process. Technol. 1988, 20, 143-154. (27) Bruley, J.; Williams, D. B.; Cuomo, J. J.; Pappas, D. P. J. Microsc. 1995, 180, 22-32. (28) Egerton, R. F. Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope; Plenum Press: New York, 1996. (29) Stohr, J. NEXAFS Spectroscopy; Springer Series in Surface Science 25; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1992. (30) Leapman, R. D.; Fejes, P. L.; Silcox, J. Phys. Rev. B 1983, 28, 2361-2370. (31) Menon, N. K.; Yuan, J. Ultramicroscopy 1998, 74, 83-94. (32) Yuan, J.; Brown, L. M. Micron 2000, 31, 515-525. (33) Daniels, H. R.; Brydson, R.; Rand, B.; Brown, A. P. E. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2001, 168, 291-294. (34) Daniels, H.; Brown, A.; Scott, A.; Nichells, T.; Rand, B.; Brydson, R. Ultramicroscopy 2003, 96, 523-534. Figure 5. BSU parameters of different types of carbonaceous particles measured from 002 lattice images: (A) coal ultrafine soot, (B) coal submicrometer soot, (C) coal char, (D) residual oil ultrafine soot, (E) residual oil char, (F) diesel ultrafine soot. (The error bars represent standard deviations of the mean values.) 1648 Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 Chen et al. shown in Figure 10. These spectra show somewhat broadened 1s-* peaks at 285.4 eV and 1s-* peaks at 292.4 eV compared to that of graphite. Although some spectra show minor deviations, significant differences between these spectra were not observed. Carbon K- edge spectra of submicrometer soot aggregates from coal samples show very similar features to those of ultrafine soot aggregates, although some primary particles show- ing more amorphous characteristics can also be found. Soluble organic species that may be associated with carbonaceous particles are assumed to be dissolved in the acetone during the dispersion process and therefore they do not interfere with the analysis. Compared to the obvious morphological and microtextural differences among the different carbonaceous types, the variation in the sp 2 fraction is not large, with values around 80%. This implies that there is an intrinsic similarity in the basic constitution of all carbonaceous particles derived from fossil-fuel combustion, which may serve to dif- ferentiate them from those formed by other processes, such as diamond-like carbonaceous materials (very low contents of sp 2 fraction) produced by laser ablation or ion beam sputtering. Elemental Compositions. Elemental compositions of these carbonaceous particles, at high spatial resolu- tion, were obtained using STEM/EDS. The ultrathin- window detector provides compositional information for all elements heavier than beryllium. Figure 11a shows the typical EDS spectrum and STEM/HAADF image of a coal ultrafine primary soot particle. Besides the dominant carbon, much weaker but discernible O and S can also be detected (estimated to be less than 1%). The EDS spectra of coal submicrome- ter soot and residual-oil ultrafine soot aggregates are basically similar to those of coal ultrafine soot ag- gregates, although some coal submicrometer soot par- ticles may have somewhat higher O contents. Diesel ultrafine soot aggregates typically exhibit much lower Figure 6. Typical SAED patterns of soot aggregates (a), chars with preferential orientation of basal planes of BSUs approximately parallel to incident beam (b), and chars with basal planes of BSUs approximately normal to incident beam (c). Figure 7. Bright-field image (left) and corresponding 002 dark-field image (right) of an ultrafine soot aggregate. Figure 8. Bright-field image (left) and corresponding 002 dark-field image (right) of a char particle. EM of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 1649 S contents compared to coal and residual oil soot aggregates, which is related to the lower S content of diesel fuels. One of the compositional differences be- tween soot and char particles is that some char particles contain more discernible sulfur and metallic elements (e.g., Al and Ti in coal chars and V in residual oil chars) than soot particles. Typical EDS spectrum and STEM/ HAADF image of a coal char particle are shown in Figure 11b. The S content of the coal char particle is higher than that of the coal ultrafine soot aggregate shown in Figure 11a. Furthermore, the EDS spectrum of the coal char particle also exhibits a weak Al peak, which is absent in all EDS spectra of the coal soot aggregates examined in this study. Similarly, residual- oil char particles typically exhibit higher sulfur contents than residual oil soot aggregates. V and P, which are basically indiscernible in the residual oil soot ag- gregates, are frequently observed in the residual-oil char particles. 35 The metallic elements may originate from organically bound species in the parent fuel. S K-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy indicates that thiophene is the major organic sulfur form in coal fly ash and residual oil fly ash (ROFA). 36 The compositional differences between soot aggre- gates and char particles can be explained by their formation mechanisms. Since the char particles do not undergo a vaporization-condensation process, inorganic elements that originate from the parent fuels could be more easily preserved in the char particles, whereas for the soot particles, the heterogeneous elements (e.g., S, Al, and V) are not conducive to forming graphitic layers during the formation of the primary particles. In addition to the intrinsic elements, coal-derived carbonaceous particles (either soot or char particles) may be coated/mixed with external inorganic species that contain alkali and alkaline earth elements, such as Na, Mg, Ca, and Ba, whereas residual-oil-derived carbonaceous particles are coated/mixed with species containing transition metals, such as V, Ni, Fe, and Zn. Diesel-derived carbonaceous particles have many less inorganic inclusions than those derived from coal and residual oil. These external inorganic species, along with the intrinsic elements in the carbonaceous particles, may constitute an important fingerprint that could be used to identify their possible combustion and fuel sources. Conclusions Ultrafine soot aggregates, which are believed to form via a vaporization-condensation mechanism, are one of two major forms of carbonaceous particles derived from combustion of fossil fuels. In this paper, they have been identified in the combustion products of coal, residual oil, and diesel, but they are more abundant in diesel-derived samples. These ultrafine soot aggregates typically have a fractal-like chain structure with spheri- cal primary particles having sizes between 30 and 50 nm and microtextures consisting of concentrically stacked graphitic layers. In addition to ultrafine soot aggregates, submicrometer soot aggregates have been observed in the bituminous-coal-derived sample. These also have a (35) Chen, Y.; Shah, N.; Huggins, F. E.; Huffman, G. P. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38 (24), 6553-6560. (36) Huggins, F. E.; Huffman, G. P. Int. J. Soc. Mater. Eng. Resour. 2002, 10, 1-13. Figure 9. (a) Carbon K-edge EELS spectra obtained from region 1 (dashed line) and region 2 (solid line) of the char particle shown in part c at normal large collection angle. (b) Under magic angle conditions, carbon K-edge EELS spectra from the same regions overlap, overcoming the angular dependency of the graphitic crystalline anisotropy. (c) TEM bright-field image of the char particle. Insets are SAED patterns recorded from regions 1 and 2. Figure 10. Typical EELS carbon K-edge spectra (collected under magic angle conditions) of ultrafine soot derived from (a) coal, (b) residual oil, and (c) diesel, respectively. 1650 Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 Chen et al. similar concentric layered microtexture but a signifi- cantly larger primary particle size, between 100 and 400 nm. The other major carbonaceous type is porous or solid char particles with shapes varying from nearly spherical to highly irregular. These particles dominate the micron-size fraction in the coal and residual oil derived samples. Compared to the relatively homoge- neous arrangement of BSUs in soot particles, the char particles typically exhibit microtextures with preferred orientations. The HRTEM observation shows that the BSUs in these carbonaceous particles consist of several roughly parallel stacked graphitic layers with interlayer spacing larger than that of graphite and dimensions typically ranging between 10 and 14 . The carbon atom hybridization state was examined by EELS using the magic angle approach. EELS experi- ments at such angles greatly reduce the orientation dependence of carbon 1s near-edge features and make the analysis of carbon particles with heterogeneous microtextures possible. All types of carbonaceous par- ticles investigated in this study exhibit approximately 80% sp 2 fraction with no significant variation among different carbonaceous types. EDS spectra recorded from individual particles indicate that diesel soot aggregates contain much less sulfur than coal and residual oil soot aggregates. Coal char and residual oil char particles typically exhibit much more sulfur and metallic ele- ments than coal soot and residual oil soot aggregates. Acknowledgment. The authors are grateful to Dr. William P. Linak and Dr. C. Andrew Miller of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for generating the coal and residual oil samples, Ms. Kerry Kelly of University of Utah for generating diesel soot samples, and Dr. Alan Dozier for his assistance in the use of the TEM. Financial support by the National Science Foundation under CRAEMS grant CHE-0089133 is also acknowledged. EF049736Y Figure 11. EDS spectra and STEM/HAADF images of (a) coal ultrafine soot aggregates and (b) a coal char particle. The spectra are normalized to the height of the carbon peak for comparison. The beam positions are indicated by the circles, and Cu peaks are from TEM grids. EM of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter Energy & Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005 1651