A. The study is undertaken with the following tenants:
1. African cinema has never been as homogeneous as scholars have tended us believe; 2. in a new context of transnational circulation, nation building has become a less prominent, if not absent, motivation in filmmaking; 3. cultural nationalism has thus far failed to give voice to laughter, joy, sexuality and formal experimentation presently being expounded in postcolonial narratives; 4. new analytical categories are needed to theorize a changing corpus that is no longer limited to social contestation, binary oppositions and essentialist cultural considerations.
B. Although the genre of committed filmmaking is close to exhausting itself, this has not always been the case because social contestation was almost a sacred norm. As a result, alternative and emerging film praxis was either ignored or dismissed because of the nationalist which equally dominated cultural criticism.
C. Films were largely concerned with providing a context (i.e. what is shown), and far less with questions of form (i.e. how it is shown); as such, it is possible to see in what way a diverse corpus generated an impression of uniformity;
D. ...the African reappropriation of the camera necessarily involved a radical reconsideration of the aesthetic as the ideological functions of the image being depicted. Cinema was not meant for pleasure, but for (political) instruction. In keeping with these propositions, African cinema, like African literature, could only be a cinema of contestation.
E. Nationalism thus becomes elitist in spite of its claims to represent subaltern classes;
F. The works of these filmmakers are predicated on an understandable desire to define Africa against a unified 'West', a search for an ontological 'African self ', a genuine anxiety over a lost history and a threatened identity. A paradoxical as it may be, from its pioneering phase and for decades thereafter, in a continent desperate for literation and democracy, African filmmaking and scholarship were reduced to a monolithic trilogy. This trilogy, demonstrated clearly in the above- cited case of Algeria, is comprised of the following tenets: one 'African 2 cinema', on e film association (FEPAC I) and one dominant (political) discourse.
G. ...the 'Africa' being does not correspond to a shared view. By incorporating new visions, genres, representations and aesthetic expressions, today's filmmakers are not only interrogating sub-Saharan African identities, but are furthermore staking out a place for African cultur es in global flows where identity oscillates between 'global and local , nati on and non nation' Pett , 2008, 1 . In a context o transnational , hybrid , shifting and multiple identities . it is difficult to imagin e that African produ ctions have remain ed immune to Outside influence . ;
H. The current status of African film production , with its multipli ciof issues , discourses and languages, strongly suggests that it is necess'.!!"y to de8ign a more innovab e and mclus1ve theoretical framework_. to accommodate a ra idl r mu tatin cor us whose analytical paradigms stretch beyon social chalJ en es, dualiti es and cultur al essen tia i s s
I. As Neil Lazaru s ( 1999, 78) asserts, national liberation movements were not what they were expected or claimed to be, namely organizations that aimed at empowering, safeguarding and helping the powerless. Instead , in the words of Franz Farron ( 1968, 152), the main project of the local bourgeoi s nationali sts was 'quite simply .. . [toJ transfer into native hands those unfair advan tages which are the l egacy of the colonial period' .
J. The decadence of the cinema of endless contestation...
K. uch stands by Ouedraogo, Maldoror, Bekolo and Ram aka clearly indicate the extent to which Sembene Ousmane's concepbon of cmein::r=as 'eventng school ' for consciousness-raising an d social transf ormation has become, in a way, som ehow outdated for several directors. This book aims to re- conceptualize contemporary sub- Saharan African cinema by foregroundin g the narrative and aesthetic structur es of recent films. The failure of liberationist discour ses to secure perman ent gains has r esulted in fifmmak er s selecti n g n ew a esth etic a pproa ch es th a t m pye b eyond anti - imperialist, historical contestations and cultural claim s; accord ing to chille Mbembe (2002a , 272), 'the very proj ect of an esse r:-er ic1a recovery o e [A ri canJ self is . . . oom ed ' .Thu s, the movementaway from liberationist aesthetics may have less to do with the Westernization of sub -Saharan Afr ican cinema or a facile 'fashion ct e em er en ce of a h brid cin em ati c st le intend ed to interrogate constructs n ow becoming unsettled in the context.of gk;balization.Ihe third and perhaps m ost decisive factor in und erstanding contem orar African films is the near dissolution of the African nation- tate and the resultant need to rethink nationalism. L. ...contemporary productions have significantly modified their formal and discursive architecture for a public which only wants to see good films, be they 'African' or not. 3
M. What is indisputable, though, is that liberationist aesthetics and paradigms seem to have played themselves out. N. }frican identity politics are concerned .with re udiatin Western imposition , developing instead a language infused with African 'auth enti city ' (244). The result of sue attltu e is e mvention of a narrativ e of li berab.on bUilt ar und a dual temporality: on the one hand, the i;tfucaI, glorious , vanished past tradition or history, and on the other e hope of a better funire fa be secnred tEliGHgf:! eemmit:ment to tionalist ideaE.....G--49-250). Typi cal of this tendency is Manthi a Di awara's return to the source' films which he uses in his typology ( 1992, 159-164). The second thrust, which Mbembe refers to as 'nativism,' foregrounds 'the i dea of a 1micp 1e African identity founded on 1+1e1+1b@rship ef the black re' (2002a, 240 241) . In this view transnational solidarity is buil t on a collective narrative that emph asizes a past gf dauer)'i cglgnizsatiem and apartheid .
N. One of the main arguments of this book is precisely that fixed identities and social realism are no more a fatality, the must feature of african film
O. ...it is obvious that the nation becomes less important, in not only absent, signifier. Although it has not been entirely abandoned, the idea of nation building has been somewhat overshadowed by a shift in focus to more quotidian priorities.
P. Because 'the natur e of African cinema has too often been traped 'rithin reductive opposition between Western and African cultur e' Mur hy, O , 241 ), in e context o g o a iza Postnationali sttifr;can Cwmas stigates how the emergen ce of n ew genres, discourses ard re resentations, some of which are totally unr elated to the nationalist dictates ou ence th e formJ] elisiees FRaEle 1-i, tire I1ew directors . It ex lores sub -Saharan cinema in terms of 'the emer ence of new thou ht forms' Me er 1 999, 108), orm s t at ave itt e, if an thing, LO do with moribund fifty-year-old imperatives. e o j ectives of this book are as follows:{I)describe the limits of current taxonomi es and critical:mestigations in light of new produ ctions; etermin e e new enres i:ti!Pe movies, epics, comedies) that have arisen; @.explore how n nnovations issu es and concerns are addressed in these genres and et apart from the foundational oeuvres; xamine how films ro ose ew mod es of representation , sexuality, end er and / or African identiti es; vestigate w at role is played by global cultur al forces and forms. Q. Shelbi e instead inscribes Black cultur al forces in transnationa l formations that cannot be limited to an 'ethnic' milieu .The shaping of new, hybri d cultur es d oes not in any way suggest that Bla cks cannot 4 build communit y spirit, or that brut e racial discrimination no longer exists.
L. In thi s book, I show that the fra mentation of experience and the appearance of tran snation al associations have brought a out nationa c_;isis; the reprodu cti on of alternative cultur al forms has become accelerated and accentuated in places where n ation building and social outcry are no lon ger. priorities . [ call narratives created in this context po stnationali st becau se tpey are th ematically beyond the mode of resistan ce. Far from advocating a strict social d eterminism , my argument here is that new contes have generated new forms and representati ons.
M. Althou h we all know that Western scholarship was born within a specific hi storical and discu sive setting that conso i ate its e emon the encounter with the African 'other' as een, or better or wors e, mutuall y (gan s)format1ve ID that director s, writers md artjsts now ex per i ence h brid identities. African filmmaker s have borrowed and substantially s bverte categories or codes indebted to foreign spaces and cultur es. N. ...theories of national cinema ought to interrogate the conceptual limits of nation, positioning it within transnational and international settings.
(France Overseas - Studies in Empire and D) Michael F. O'Riley - Cinema in An Age of Terror - North Africa, Victimization, and Colonial History-University of Nebraska Press (2010) PDF