Final Report Long Term Alborz Hgdtydjgjdgncn

Alborz Distribution Network Planning
E D SE PTI Long term planning

E D SE PTI NC-sk0289/Hab page 1 of 103 21.07.2008
J:\SE\ERLS\PT-Consulting\PT5\01_Projects_0200-0299\sk0289_Tavanir\03 Ergebnis, Bericht\4_3_LongTermPlanning\Reports\Long_term_Alborz_02.doc
Template: VO-NC003_20.07.2005


Long term planning

Energy Sector Power Distribution
Service Power Technology International
Network Consulting
No. of order: E D SE PTI NC-sk0289/Hab
Date: 21.07.2008
Editor: Dr.-Ing. Matthias Hable
Address: Freyeslebenstr. 1
reviewed and released 91058 Erlangen
Tel. +49 (9131) 7 - 33467
Fax +49 (9131) 7 - 34881
Responsibility e-mail matthias.hable@siemens.com
Table of Contents
Page
1 Executive Summary 4
1.1 Option 1 4
1.2 Option 2 7
1.3 Recommendation 11
2 Introduction 12
3 Basic procedure of strategic planning 12
4 Separation of MV and LV network planning 14
5 Long term network 15
5.1 Modelling of existing network 18
5.2 Forecast of long-term load distribution 19
5.3 Definition of firm substation capacity 20
5.4 Calculation of number of substations 24
5.5 Determination of optimal location of substations 24
5.6 Definition of standard substation structure 29
5.6.1 Typical substation structures 30
5.6.2 Selection of substation structures 33
5.7 Definition of standard network structure 37
5.7.1 General considerations 37
5.7.2 Discussion of influence of reliability 38
5.7.3 Discussion of influence of operability 40
5.7.4 Discussion of influence of flexibility 41
5.7.5 Typical network structures 41
5.7.6 Decision on network structure 51
5.8 Determination of standard line capability 53
5.9 Determination of standard line type 54
5.10 Determination of supply areas 61
5.11 Determination of future substation load 70
5.12 Modelling of additional load as new RMU 70
5.13 Determination of feeders 70
5.14 Allocation of RMUs to feeder 77
5.15 Determination of optimal route of feeder 82
5.16 PSSSincal network model for long term option 82
5.17 Technical and economical evaluation 83
5.17.1 Load flow calculations 83
5.17.2 Short circuit calculations 86
5.17.3 Calculation of costs 87
5.18 Fine tuning of the network 87
5.19 Documentation 88
6 Calculation of the Objective: Economical Evaluation 89
6.1 Type of costs 89
6.1.1 Investment costs 89
6.1.2 Replacement costs 91
6.1.3 Operational and maintenance costs 91
6.1.4 Cost of losses 92
6.1.5 Total costs 93
6.2 Cost basis 99
6.3 Comparison of options 100
7 Annex 102
7.1 Diagrams 102
7.2 Tables 103

1 Executive Summary
For the city of Alborz the medium voltage network is to be planned. In the first step
two long term options are designed, which are presented in this report. The proce-
dure to perform the strategic planning for the long term networks is demonstrated.
After the decision, which long term option should be elaborated further, a planning of
the short term and medium term network will then be performed in the next step.
The base of the planning is the predicted development of the loads from 2008 to
2018. For the Alborz area the total load to supply increases from app. 128 MVA in
the year 2008 to app. 204 MVA in the year 2018.
To supply this load two options were investigated:
1.1 Option 1
Each primary substation is equipped with 2 transformers 40 MVA each. As network
structure open rings between primary substations are chosen. The principle structure
is illustrated in Figure 1.1.
40MVAfirmcapacity,
40MVAreservefor
adjacentsubstation
185mmAl
Ith =222A
Sth =7,5MVA
sizeofRMUdepending
oncustomersload,
numberlimitedbycable
capability
n.o.
openpointat
boundaryof
supplyarea
numberof
feeders
dependingon
loaddistribution
andreserve
requirements
Ik=20 kA
distributionon
busbars
accordingtoload
63kV-network
63/20kV
30/40MVA
uk =14%
Yd11
n.o.
63kV-network
63/20kV
30/40MVA
u
k
=14%
Yd11
n.o.

Figure 1.1 Option 1, principle structure
For this option 2 additional primary substations are needed. The already existing
primary substations in the north and in the west of the Alborz area are used fully for
the supply of the Alborz area. The principle structure of the proposed medium volt-
age network is illustrated in Figure 1.2.
feederbetween
substations
(S
max
=7.5MVA)
Primarysubstation,
2transformers
40MVA
approximateshapeof
supplyarea
switchingstation
withouttransformer
feedingcablefor
reserve
Alborz
Switching
station1
Alborz
Existing1
Gomrok
Existing2
Alvand
Switching
station1

Figure 1.2 Option 1, principle network
The primary substations are inherently safe. The firm power is equivalent to the
rating of one transformer. For higher flexibility for the load distribution the double
busbar structure is used for the primary substations. The rings can be supplied from
both sides. They are operated open with the open points at the borders of the supply
areas. One switching station is introduced between Alvand and Gomrok. Except for
the connections to the switching station, load shifting between primaries is possible.
All technical requirements are met as load flow and short circuit calculations show.
The (n-1)-criterion is observed in the network.
The total cash value of Option 1 is app. 18 mio. , taking the investment costs and
the costs for maintenance and operation as well as the cost of losses into considera-
tion.

1.2 Option 2
Each primary substation is equipped with 2 transformers 30 MVA each. As network
structure open rings between primary substations are chosen. The principle structure
is illustrated in Figure 1.3.
30MVAfirmcapacity,
30MVAreservefor
adjacentsubstation
185mmAl
I
th
=222A
S
th
=7,5MVA
sizeofRMUdepending
oncustomersload,
capability
n.o.
openpointat
boundaryof
supplyarea
numberof
feeders
dependingon
loaddistribution
andreserve
requirements
I
k
=20 kA
distributionon
busbars
accordingtoload
63kV-network
63/20kV
22,5/30MVA
u
k
=14%
Yd11
n.o.
63kV-network
63/20kV
22,5/30MVA
u
k
=14%
Yd11
n.o.

Figure 1.3 Option 2, principle structure
For this option 4 additional primary substations are needed. The already existing
primary substations in the north and in the west of the Alborz area are used fully for
the supply of the Alborz area. Additionally 2 new primary substations are proposed in
the south and the east of the Alborz area. The principle structure of the proposed
medium voltage network is illustrated in Figure 1.4.
Alborz
Existing 1
Gomrok
Existing 2
Alvand
feeder between
substations
(S
max
= 7.5 MVA)
Primary substation,
2 transformers
30 MVA
approximate shape of
supply area
Alborz
New 2
New 1

Figure 1.4 Option 2, principle network
The primary substations are inherently safe. The firm power is equivalent to the
rating of one transformer. The existing transformers can be used. If a higher firm
capacity is needed, the primary substations could be upgraded with 40 MVA trans-
formers later. For higher flexibility for the load distribution the double busbar struc-
ture is used for the primary substations. The rings can be supplied from both sides.
They are operated open with the open points at the borders of the supply areas.
Load shifting between primaries is possible. Close to the load centres new primaries
are installed.
All technical requirements are met as load flow and short circuit calculations show.
The (n-1)-criterion is observed in the network.
The total cash value of Option 1 is app. 14 mio. , taking the investment costs and
the costs for maintenance and operation as well as the cost of losses into considera-
tion.

1.3 Recommendation
Both proposed options fulfil the technical requirements and the (n-1)-criterion.
The advantages of option 1 are that no additional primary substations are needed
and that the total length of the cables can be reduced by the installation of one
switching station between Alvand and Gomrok.
The advantages of option 2 are that there are primary substations close to the load
centres and the transformers in the existing primary substations can further be used.
The total cash value is lower. The total amount of firm transformer power is a bit
higher, giving some reserve for additional load growth beyond the predicted values.
If required, the transformers could be exchanged by 40 MVA transformers later,
increasing the firm capacity of the substations.
Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both options it is recommended to
select option 2 (2x30 MVA transformers) for short term and medium term planning.

2 Introduction
The city of Alborz in Iran operates a medium voltage network.
For the medium voltage network in the first step two long term variants are to be
planned.
Within this document the procedure to perform the strategic planning for the long
term networks for the medium voltage level in Alborz is explained.
The main focus is on the explanation which steps have to be performed in which
order and which tasks have to be solved during each step. The results are docu-
mented and commented. This methodology document is based on the document
Planning Standards and Criteria Report which gives a general overview of the task
of distribution network planning and on the document Qazvin and Alborz Distribution
Network Planning Methodology. All documents, the Planning Standards, the
Methodology and this document have to be read together as they refer to and are
based on each other.
The goal of the detailed description of the planning procedure within this document is
to give the planners in Iran a guideline so that they are able to perform similar plan-
ning tasks on their own. On the other hand it is always necessary to stick to the
national and international standards. There might be many special cases which
require a deviation from this guideline.
There are two different kinds of planning:
operational planning and
strategic planning.
Operational planning describes the planning of the day to day work in each utility.
There are questions to answer about installing a certain joint or repairing a faulted
substation. This kind of planning is not in the focus of this methodology document.
The task of the strategic planning is the definition of a target network which acts as
guideline for the expansion and improvement planning tasks. This target network will
always describe a state far in the future. But the strategic planning also will show
ways to develop the actual existing network in a way to converge to this target net-
work although it will never reach it perfectly because of the uncertainty of important
input data as load distribution for example.

3 Basic procedure of strategic planning
The planning process is an open loop. Based on the existing network and technical
and economical constraints, which have to be fulfilled, an optimal network is
planned which meets the predicted supply task in the future. To show a way to move
from the existing network structure to the future target network intermediate solutions
are planned for short term and medium term (see Figure 3.1). The planning of the
short term and medium term networks is described in a separate report as it is per-
formed after the decision on the option for the long term planning has been done.
The short term network will be based on the existing network, removing weak points
in a way that tries to avoid stranded investments. The medium term network should
already fulfil at least the technical constraints. The long-term solution acts as a
guideline, if major investments have to be decided and to reduce costs of civil works
by early determining possibilities for co-laying options of cables. Due to the high
costs of civil work, which are the dominating part of the cost of a route, large savings
can be achieved.

Figure 3.1 Planning loop
The time horizon of the planning steps is given in Figure 3.1. The long term goal
network (basic concept) describes a network which will be able to meet the predicted
requirements in about 10 years. Predictions which reach further in the future become
too imprecise to be used for a serious network planning. The short term network
describes a network which should realistically be reached within the next 2 years. As
all building work needs preparation time, it does not make sense to plan a network
closer to today. The medium term network is located with 5 years approximately in
the middle between short term and long term network.
In societies with a saturated load development (like Germany with load growth rates
of less than 1 %/year) the time horizons reach farther into the future (e.g. 20 years).
In societies with a dynamical load development (like the Arabian Peninsula with load
growth rates of more than 30 %/year in selected regions) the time horizons have to
be kept closer to the presence as farther predictions cannot be reliable.
The time steps of 2 years in the future for the short term planning, 5 years in the
future for the medium term planning and 10 years in the future for the long term
planning are used in this report, if not otherwise stated.
As the development of the low voltage network heavily depends on the load devel-
opment of a comparably small number of customers it is usually not possible to pre-
dict the load development far into the future with the necessary accuracy. Therefore
for low voltage networks there will be only a short term planning looking two years
into the future.

4 Separation of MV and LV network planning
As explained later in this document, the sector wise load growth factors contain not
only the load growth of existing clients with their internal load growth rate, but also
new loads with even unknown location and implementation time. These load growth
factors are normally derived also from the historical load development, which in-
cludes both internal and external load growth.
The uncertainty concerning the spatial distribution and implementation time of the
new loads grows in the same way as the size of the investigated sector reduces. The
impact of a new load on the network structure of the sector rises with the ratio of the
size of the new load to capacity of the infeeding unit (for example substation trans-
former). This ratio is higher for LV distribution networks in comparison to public MV
distribution networks. Therefore a long-term planning for the distribution area of one
distribution substation makes no sense because of the high uncertainty of the load
development. Instead of this, LV structure planning concentrates on determination of
locations for new substations in case of weak points and implementation of standard
structures and equipment. This enables the operator to reduce operation costs and
to gain more flexibility with respect to uncertainty of load.
The influence of uncertainty on the quality of the MV network structure reduces sig-
nificantly, because of the lower individual impact of a distribution substation on the
MV feeders and primary substation. The variances of the location and loads of distri-
bution substations are equalizing each other in a high degree.
Therefore it is sufficient and common practise to carry out MV and LV structure plan-
ning activities separately.


5 Long term network
Planning standards
If the load development is identified, the planner has to define planning standards.
The tasks of these standards are amongst others:
to make the planning comprehensible,
to reach a simple network structure by using standard network structures,
to find a cost efficient solution,
to define a comprehensive and clear operational philosophy,
to act as a standard for intermediate planning works to adapt the network to
unexpected changes in the boundary conditions.
Therefore it is very important to carefully set these standards.
The planning standards define the rules for
network and substation structures
equipment selection
maximum loading of the equipment
power quality performance
reliability.
The planning standards represent the rules and principles which should be followed
in each planning process to keep or improve the networks performance as well as to
meet the future demands.

Voltage level
The first decision is to define the voltage levels of the target network as this will have
the most important influence on the choice of the equipment and the network struc-
ture.
For the Ablorz area the low voltage level (0.4 kV) and the transmission level (63 kV)
are defined by boundary conditions which cannot be changed. Therefore the only
degree of freedom is the choice of the medium voltage level. As the goal is to oper-
ate the network with low losses, the highest possible voltage level has to be chosen,
for which transformers to the low voltage level can be bought economically. This is
the 20 kV level.
This voltage level already exists, so it will be kept for the future.

Basic planning procedure
According to Figure 3.1 the planning of the medium voltage networks is started with
the planning of the long term network. The basic procedure to reach this long term
network is illustrated in Figure 5.1. The individual steps are explained and illustrated
using the planning of option 1 of the long term network of Alborz in the following
sections.
There are many loops in the planning procedure. Although in the following sections
the explanations are given in a mainly linear way, for the real work the planner al-
ways has to loop back as most of the features cannot be set independently of each
other. Therefore the later determination of one feature might require the revision and
possible change of another feature determined earlier. Therefore it is necessary for
the planner always to think about the total system if he determines an additional
feature.
Especially this interrelation of all features and the fact that it is necessary to take a
lot of non-technical and soft boundary conditions into consideration make it very
difficult to find optimisation algorithms which can perform the full planning task (es-
pecially the long term planning) automatically.
Although it is tried to illustrate the planning process as a linear task one has to un-
derstand that in reality it is a holistic process.

Figure 5.1 Basic planning procedure

5.1 Modelling of existing network
To form the base for the planning, the existing network has to be modelled in a net-
work calculation program like PSSSincal for steady state and short circuit calcula-
tions. There are two representations possible:
schematical representation
semi-geographical representation.

In the schematical representation the substations are arranged according to their
electrical connections. Lines are drawn usually only in vertical and horizontal direc-
tion. The length of the drawn line is independently of its actual length.
In the semi-geographical representation a detailed map of the area under considera-
tion is put into the background. In this map the primary substations and the RMUs
are inserted according to their actual location in the area. The lines also are inserted
following their actual routes. If available the geographical information can be im-
ported from a geographical information system (GIS).
Both representations are compared in Table 5.1

Table 5.1 Comparison of schematical and semi-geographical representation
Schematical representation Semi-geographical representation
+ useful for operational purposes + useful for planning purposes
+ network structure easy to identify
+ load and infeed distribution easy to
identify
+ needed for planning decisions
- distribution of problematic areas difficult
to identify
+ problematic areas and solutions easy
to identify
- difficult to decide on network extensions
- operational network structure difficult to
identify

- results of calculations sometimes diffi-
cult to represent

- difficult to represent networks with high
and low density in different areas in one
plan

As for the further planning work the location of the loads is important the network has
to be modelled in a semi-geographical way.
For the loads the total load of each RMU under peak load conditions is modelled.
The subtransmission network (63 kV) is simplified modelled using an infeed with the
given short circuit power and a voltage of 100 % of nominal voltage at the high volt-
age side of the transformers.
The model of the existing medium voltage network for Alborz is shown in the dia-
grams in the appendix. In one diagram the network together with the map is drawn.
For the evaluation of the network structure and the readability of the load values the
diagrams the background map are suited better. In these diagrams the locational
relations of the loads still can be identified.
With the existing network a load flow analysis has to be conducted to perform a
weak point analysis. This analysis is needed to design the short term network.
Therefore this topic will be discussed in more detail in the report regarding the short
term planning.

5.2 Forecast of long-term load distribution
The basis of the long term planning is the future load distribution. The basics of the
prediction of the load development are described in the Methodology report in
section 4.1.
For the Alborz area the existing loads have all the same load growth factor of
1 %/year up to 2012 and 2.8 %/year between 2012 and 2018. As this is an industrial
area many new loads will be connected with new factories. These loads are given as
single loads in a diagram. During the meeting with Tavanir on May 27
th
2008 the time
schedule of their installation was agreed upon. This time schedule is modelled in the
load increase tables in PSSSincal.
The load data for Alborz delivered by Tavanir describes the load measured at the
secondary side of the 20/0.4 kV transformer. For the medium voltage network plan-
ning the load at the primary side of the transformer is needed. This load contains
additionally the transformer losses. These losses consist of the no-load losses of the
transformers and of the load dependent losses. There are no data sheets for the
transformers available. Therefore the loads of the primary side are determined by
adding 6 kW to the loads measured at the secondary side. These are the average
losses of a 1000 kVA transformer which is loaded approximately 50 %. For the pur-
pose of the network planning this simplification is sufficiently good. Any detailed
modelling of the transformers with their actual losses will not change the results of
the medium voltage network planning.
All loads in Alborz are modelled with their measured power factor. If no power factor
is available, a power factor of cos()=0.90 is used.

5.3 Definition of firm substation capacity
In the previous sections the existing network was analysed to get a basis for the
network planning. In this and the following sections the planning standards for the
long term network are set.
The reasons for setting up planning standards are explained in detail in the Method-
ology in section 4.2. The main reasons are to make the planning comprehensible
and to standardized network structures which simplify the operation and the mainte-
nance of the network.
All the steps between no. 3 and no. 11 have to be executed in the form of a loop.
The different decisions depend on each other. For example the structure of a pri-
mary substation influences the number of transformers to be installed there. The
structures of the substations and of the network also define the number of trans-
formers which set the firm capacity of a primary substation. As the size of the trans-
formers is limited by possibilities of manufacturing, the structure of the primary sub-
stations influences the firm substation capacity.
For example in a ring structure of the network no reserve can be given by adjacent
primary substations. Therefore the firm capacity of a primary substation will be the
sum of the installed power of the transformers minus the size of the largest trans-
former.

One limit of the substation capacity is given by the short circuit withstand capability
of the switchgear at the secondary side of the transformers. The lower the short
circuit withstand capability the lower the maximum size of the transformers or the
lower the maximum number of transformers with a given size which can be operated
in parallel on one busbar, if the short circuit impedance of the transformers is kept
fix.
The maximum transformer power which can be operated in parallel on one busbar
can be estimated using the following formulas. It is important to understand that the
given calculation procedure is only a rough estimation. After the decision on the
substation design it has to be verified using the real network data.
The short circuit power S
k
is calculated with the following formula (all calculations
refer to the maximum 3phase short circuit current, as this is usually the limiting pa-
rameter in the medium voltage networks):

" "
3
k n k
I U S =
with S
k
short circuit power
U
n
nominal voltage of the network level (e.g. 20 kV)
I
k
short circuit withstand capability of the equipment (e.g. 20 kA)

The impedance which limits the short circuit can be calculated the following:

network Tr SC
Z Z Z + =
with Z
SC
impedance limiting the short circuit current (positive sequence)
Z
Tr
transformer impedance
Z
network
impedance of the feeding network

For the worst case the impedance of the feeding network can be assumed to be
zero. Therefore the short circuit is limited only by the transformer impedance, which
can be calculated as follows (the c-factor has to be considered):

"
2 2
k
n
SC
S
c U
Z

=

k
n
n
Tr
u
S
U
Z =
2

with c c-factor (1.1 for maximum short circuit current in medium voltage
networks)
S
n
rated power of transformer
u
k
transformer impedance [%]

Now the formulas can be put together as follows:

k
n
n
k
n
u
S
U
S
c U
=
2
"
2 2

This formula now can be rearranged to calculate the maximum total rated power of
all transformers which feed parallel on one substation:

2
"
max _
3
c
u I U
S
k k n
n

=

Using the data of the Alborz network the use of this formula is illustrated. The follow-
ing assumptions are used:
maximum short circuit withstand capability of 20 kV equipment: I
k
=20 kA
(which is a typical value of the equipment used in distribution networks)
transformer impedance u
k
=14 % (which is a typical value of primary substa-
tion transformers, the existing transformers in Alborz are in the range of 13
15 %)

MVA
A V
c
u I U
S
k k n
n
80
1 , 1
14 , 0 10 20 10 20 3
3
2
3 3
2
"
max _

=

=

This means for the given equipment in total in maximum 80 MVA transformer power
can be operated on one busbar. This can for example mean that in maximum 2
transformers each 40 MVA or 3 transformers each 25 MVA rated power can be
operated in parallel.
Depending on the network structure (see section 5.7) this means that for a ring
structure for instance 2 transformers each 40 MVA can be operated on one busbar.
If a structure with adjacent primary substations is used than in one substation only 1
transformer can be operated on one busbar, as in case of load transfer there might
be a coupling between the 2 adjacent substations. If a fault occurs during this time
then from each substation one transformer will feed the short circuit current.
Of course the substation size can be smaller. But for high load density areas a high
substation capacity should be chosen, as the lines are very short and therefore the
number of primary substations will mainly determine the total investment cost.

For areas with a low load density the maximum size of the supply area can be limit-
ing for the firm primary substation capacity. As a rough guideline the following rule of
thumb for the maximum size of a supply area can be used:
maximum diameter of supply area [km] = voltage level [kV]
This means for a 20 kV level the maximum diameter of a supply area should be in
the range of 20 km. If the supply area is assumed to have a shape of a circle, then
the area is approximately
( )
2
2
2
314
20
4
4
km
km
d A
=
=
=

With an average load density for the Alborz area of about 17 MVA/km
2
the required
firm capacity for the primary substation would be about
MVA
km
MVA
km S
n
5300 17 314
2
2
max _
=
It has to be noted, that the maximum area calculated above is larger than the area of
Alborz, which is in the range of about 10 km
2
. Therefore the resulting power is larger
than the maximum demand of Alborz. These results are given only, to illustrate the
ways to determine the firm capacity of primary substations.

From both limits, the maximum short circuit withstand capability and the maximum
size of the supply area, the lower value has to be chosen as upper limit of the firm
capacity of the substation.
This clearly shows that for areas with a high load density the maximum short circuit
current withstand capability and the maximum manufacturable size of the transform-
ers limit the firm capacity of the primary substation but not the maximum size of the
supply area. In the medium voltage level the maximum size of the supply area usu-
ally is only in very rural areas a limiting factor for the firm capacity of a substation.
But in low voltage networks it very often is the limiting factor.

Based on these thoughts and the existing transformers the following firm primary
substation capabilities were selected to be investigated:
Option 1: 40 MVA
Option 2: 30 MVA

5.4 Calculation of number of substations
If the firm capacity of the primary substations is defined, then the number of substa-
tions can be calculated easily:

max _ n
total
S
S
n
with n number of substations
S
total
total demand in the area under consideration
S
n_max
maximum firm capacity of substations

For the option 1 of the Alborz network the number of primary substations can be
calculated as follows:
5
40
204
= =
MVA
MVA
n

For the other options the following number of primary substations can be calculated:
Alborz:
o Option 1: 5
40
204
= =
MVA
MVA
n , using five primary substations means they
will be loaded a little bit above their determined firm power of 40 MVA.
But according to Tavanir it is not possible to place a new primary sub-
station within the industrial area of Alborz because there is no space
available. Therefore a network is proposed which uses the 5 already
available primary substations. In case of a fault of a transformer the re-
serve transformer has to be operated under overloading. Such an op-
eration is possible but normally should be avoided during planning. As
the overloading is quite low and it would be difficult to insert an addi-
tional primary substation, option 1 is realized with only five primary
substations. Depending on the actual load development later it might
be necessary to install one additional primary substation.
o Option 2: 7
30
204
= =
MVA
MVA
n

5.5 Determination of optimal location of substations
The determination of the optimal location of the primary substations is a difficult
optimization task. The goal is to place the primary substations in the centres with the
highest load densities so that the ways to the loads are minimised. To reach this
goal it is necessary to identify the load centres. PSSSincal allows to colour areas
according to their load density and to calculate the position of the centre of gravity of
the loads. For the Alborz areas this load density plot is shown in Figure 5.2.

Figure 5.2 Load density distribution for Alborz 2018
The decision process of the placement of the substations is influenced by the exist-
ing substations and by the availability of space. If a substation already exists, then
usually it does not make sense to move this substation to be closer to the load cen-
tre. The cost of moving the substation usually is much higher than the saving re-
ceived from reduced losses in the network. As substations need a certain amount of
space it is usually difficult to place them directly in the load centres, as in areas with
a high load density normally there is also a high density in buildings.
In many cases the placement of the substations is also influenced by the shape of
the area under consideration and by natural boundaries (like rivers, large streets,
railway lines). It does not make sense to place substations in a way that the lines
have to cross natural boundaries even if the location then is close to the load centre.

The existing primary substations are marked in the load density distribution plot in
Figure 5.3.

Figure 5.3 Load density distribution for Alborz 2018 with existing substations
With a total load of about 200 MVA and a firm capacity of the primary substations of
40 MVA each in total 5 primary substations are needed. If the external primary sub-
stations Existing 1 and Existing 2 in the north and the west of the Alborz area can
fully be used, then the load can be covered with the existing primary substations.
Therefore no new primary substations are needed. The load density distribution
together with the placing of the existing primary substations can be found in Figure
5.3. In this figure it can be seen, that the primary substations should be better placed
in the southeast of the Alborz area instead of the north and the west. In the investi-
gated option 2 there are two new primary substations placed in the south and the
east as it can be seen in Figure 5.5. The primary substation Existing 2 is still
needed because of the river forming a natural boundary in the city.

Figure 5.4 Availability of space for substations in Alborz (by Tavanir)


Figure 5.5 Load density distribution 2018 with new substations (option 2)

5.6 Definition of standard substation structure
The structure of the primary substations and their rating as well as the number and
rating of the transformers are discussed in detail in the Planning Standards, e.g. in
section 4.1 and 5.5.2.2.2. The selection of the substation structure has to be taken in
coordination with the selection of the network structure, see section 5.7.

5.6.1 Typical substation structures
In this section typical substation structures for distribution networks together with
their main properties are given. In section 5.6.2 they are compared according to their
suitability for the networks of Alborz. In this section the busbar structures for the
different options are selected.

5.6.1.1 Single busbar
The basic structure of a single busbar substation is described in Figure 5.6. The
operation is very simple. There is no flexibility. A fault at the busbar will interrupt the
supply until it is repaired, if the loads cannot be supplied from the other end of the
feeder (e.g. in a ring structure). For maintenance the complete station has to be
switched off.

Figure 5.6 Structure single busbar
5.6.1.2 Single busbar with sectionaliser
The basic structure of a single busbar substation with sectionaliser is described in
Figure 5.7. The operation is quite simple. Compared to the single busbar there is a
good flexibility. If there are two separate infeeds it is possible to distribute the supply
for normal operation. This means for instance bad customers (e. g. arc furnaces,
long lines with a high number of faults, industrial areas with large motors that start
often) can be separated from important and good customers (e. g. offices, lights)
during normal operation. In case of the fault of an infeed still both busbar sections
can be supplied now operating both from one connected busbar.
If the sectionaliser is operated open then also the short circuit current can be re-
duced on the busbars. This is especially important, if this substation structure is used
in a network structure with connections between adjacent substations and trans-
formers from the adjacent substation do also feed on the short circuit.
A fault at the busbar will interrupt the supply of all loads connected to this busbar
section until it is repaired, if the loads cannot be supplied from the other end of the
feeder (e.g. in a ring structure). For maintenance only the loads connected to one
busbar section have to be switched off.

Figure 5.7 Structure single busbar with sectionaliser

5.6.1.3 Double busbar
The basic structure of a double busbar substation is described in Figure 5.8. The
operation is more complicated but still quite clear. There is a high flexibility. Loads
can be connected to the different busbars to divide bad from good loads (see
section 5.6.1.2) or to balance load on separate infeeds, which is especially important
for networks with a high expected load growth which cannot be predicted exactly.
The bus coupler can be operated open to reduce the short circuit current on the
busbars, especially if transformers on adjacent substations can additionally feed on
a short circuit.
A fault at one busbar will interrupt the supply of all loads connected to this busbar
only until they are switched to the other busbar. For maintenance all loads can be
shifted to one busbar. Then no loads are interrupted during the maintenance opera-
tion.


Figure 5.8 Structure double busbar

5.6.1.4 Double busbar with sectionalisers
The basic structure of a double busbar substation with sectionalisers is described in
Figure 5.9. The operation is quite complex. The probability of wrong switching opera-
tions is quite high. The construction of an interlock strategy that avoids all wrong
switching operations but still allows the complete flexibility is not a simple task.
There is a very high flexibility. Nearly all demands can be met by that station struc-
ture. Such a structure can be used to connect different supply areas.
A fault at one busbar section will interrupt the supply only of the loads connected to
this busbar section until they are switched to the other busbar. The loss of an infeed
can be handled by few switching operations.
Maintenance can be carried out without interrupting any loads. For some loads even
in the case of maintenance there can be still switching reserve against a fault at the
busbar.


Figure 5.9 Structure double busbar with sectionalisers

5.6.1.5 Special structures
More complicated special structures are used for special applications or for special
cases in the transmission network. As the have to be tailor-made to the specific
requirements they can not be discussed generally in this report.

5.6.2 Selection of substation structures
A comparison between different substation structures is given in table 4.2. The
statements in this qualitative comparison must relate to the requirements of the net-
work operation regarding reliability and others to avoid over-dimensioned substa-
tions.

Table 5.2 Comparison of selected substation structures
Switching
station struc-
ture
Complexity of
operation
Flexibility
Effects and
handling of
faults
Handling of
maintenance
Single busbar ++ -- -- --
Single busbar
with sectional-
iser
++ - - -
Double busbar + + + +
Double busbar
with sectional-
iser
- ++ ++ ++

Especially in those cases, where load transfer between primary substations should
be possible to handle even the outage of a transformer or the whole substation, the
firm capacities of the primary substations should be equal. Consequently the trans-
former sizes should also be equal.
The transformer size has to be chosen in relation to the size of the supply area. If the
transformer size is too large, then the supply area becomes too large and the power
has to be transported too far at the medium voltage level. If the transformer size is
too small, then the number of the supply areas becomes too large and too many
primary substations are needed, which are more expensive than cables.
The best practice in Germany shows that primary substations in urban areas should
have a firm capacity in the range of 30 40 MVA. A primary substation should be
designed to have at least two transformers. These values also relate to the calcu-
lated firm capacity of a primary substation in section 5.3.

Also the type of equipment has to be defined. The different types are discussed in
detail in the Planning Standards, e.g. in section 4.1 and 5.4.2.3.6.
The equipment has to be rated sufficiently to withstand the expected loading. The
question of loading is discussed in detail in the Planning Standards in section 3.1.
Although most equipment can be overloaded to a certain amount, for planning pur-
poses it is assumed that the equipment is under no circumstances loaded higher
than 100 % of its rating. This leaves some reserves to react on a load development
different than expected and it gives some additional freedom for the actual network
operation.

The decision of the standard substation structure has to be taken in relation with the
decision of the standard network structure and under consideration of the transform-
ers which are available. Taking the firm capacities of the primary substations be-
tween 30 and 60 MVA under consideration then there will be 2 or three transformers
in each primary substation. Because for the network structure feeder to adjacent
primary substations is chosen, not all transformers can be operated in parallel. In
case of a connection between 2 primary substations the transformers of both primary
substations will feed on a short circuit exceeding the short circuit withstand capability
of the equipment. Therefore the choice will be limited to 2 typical substation struc-
tures:
a) Single busbar with sectionaliser (see Figure 5.10)
b) Double busbar with bus coupler (see Figure 5.11).

Figure 5.10 Principle of single busbar structure


Figure 5.11 Principle of double busbar structure
The single busbar solution is cheaper and the complexity of operation is lower.
The double busbar solution is more expensive. The significant advantage of the
double busbar solution is that there is no fix connection between a feeder and a
transformer. Each feeder can be connected to each transformer. This allows an easy
load balancing on the transformers with the continuing network development or in
the case of load changes due to load transfer operations between primary substa-
tions. With the single busbar solution such a load balancing is not possible, leading
to an uneven loading of the transformers.
For the short circuit rating a short circuit current withstand capability of I
k
=20 kA is
recommended following to the assumed actual rating.
For the operational current it is assumed, that the busbar should be able to transport
the full firm capacity of the primary substation. This allows a safe operation even
under the worst case, if there is full load and the second transformer has to supply
its full power as reserve to the adjacent stations and the feeder layout is such that
there is the worst load distribution.
Therefore the following structures are proposed:
Option 1: Double busbar structure, 2 transformers each 40 MVA,
I
k
=20 kA, I
r
=1500 A
Option 2: Double busbar structure, 2 transformers each 30 MVA,
I
k
=20 kA, I
r
=1500 A

One of the options relates to the existing primary substation structure.
5.7 Definition of standard network structure
5.7.1 General considerations
The decision of the network structure is related to the decision of the structure and
the rating of the switchgear and the infeeding transformers. The main factors which
influence the decision of the network structure are:
reliability of supply
operability of the network
flexibility
economics.

A network that is of an extreme simple structure is usually cheap and simple to op-
erate. But reliability and flexibility are low. If a network becomes more and more
complex then flexibility and reliability increase. But the network becomes more ex-
pensive and more difficult to operate. Beyond a certain point the reliability even de-
creases as the network operation becomes so difficult that the probability of wrong
operations (especially under stress conditions) increases (for a qualitative example
see Figure 5.12)
Reliability
Network
complexity

Figure 5.12 Reliability vs. network complexity (qualitative example)
Also it is important to get a certain balance between the different parameters that
influence the quality of the network. Usually the weakest element defines the net-
work quality. Therefore it is not an economical solution to improve already good
components if there are worse components in the network. The complete picture has
to be considered. Money spend on the worst part will have the greatest gain (see
Figure 5.13).
quality
actual quality level
parameters of
influence
network
structure
protection
concept
communication
system
load forecast
maintenance
asset
management
...

Figure 5.13 Discussion on influence on quality level
5.7.2 Discussion of influence of reliability
It is the nature of technical systems that failures can not be avoided completely.
Therefore it is possible to get the non-availability (interrupted time per customer and
year) down to small values but it is not possible to avoid power interruptions for cus-
tomers completely.
For most of the customers short power interruptions are acceptable if they are rare
(e.g. for household customers). For some customers they will cause the lost of a
certain amount of money (e. g. factories). This amount of money can become con-
siderably high depending of the nature of the production (e. g. several thousand
Euro per second for chip factories). Customers with extreme high requirements re-
garding reliability of supply are of a low number. Therefore special solutions can be
applied to such costumers.
A benchmark of the non-availability observed in some European countries in the
year 2002 is shown in Figure 5.14.
Non-Availability in European countries
15
25
42,6
57
63
152
180
191
0
50
100
150
200
250
G
e
r
m
a
n
y
N
e
t
h
e
r
l
a
n
d
s
A
u
s
t
r
i
a
F
r
a
n
c
e
U
n
i
t
e
d

K
i
n
g
d
o
m
S
w
e
d
e
n
N
o
r
w
a
y
I
t
a
l
y
m
i
n

/

a

Figure 5.14 Non-availability in different European countries in the year 2002
Generally for higher loads a higher reliability of supply is asked for than for smaller
loads. That relation is expressed in the so called Zollenkopf-criterion which is com-
monly accepted by German utilities. As a consequence of that rule the higher the
voltage level of a network (and therefore usually the transported power) the higher
the reliability for what is asked for is (and the higher the accepted price of the net-
work is).
This is the reason why usually in high voltage networks for instantaneous reserve is
asked, in medium voltage networks for switching reserve is asked and low voltage
networks have to be repaired after a failure.
In theory it would be possible to construct networks to reach a certain level of reli-
ability (e. g. average frequency of power interruption of customers is smaller than 1
interruption per customer and year). But such planning requires the reliability data of
all elements in the network. As such data usually is not available in the required
quality, normally simpler criteria like the (n-1)-criterion are applied for planning pur-
poses.
In general the (n-1)-criterion means that the failure of any single element in the net-
work will not lead to a permanent power interruption to a customer. Depending on
the voltage level and on the philosophy of the network operator the interpretation of
the (n-1)-criterion can be different. It can be asked for instantaneous reserve or for
switching reserve. Also the definition of the quantity of the elements which are sub-
ject to failure can be varied. For simple networks only the failure of a line (cable or
overhead line) or a transformer is considered for the (n-1)-criterion. For higher reli-
ability requirements the failure of a complete route (several systems of an overhead
line), busbar failure, or even station failures are considered for the (n-1)-criterion. So
there exists a large range for interpretation of this criterion. It is important to define
together with the network operator the common understanding of the (n-1)-criterion
for the network planning.
Usually for medium voltage networks the failure of a line or of one transformer has to
be handled ((n-1)-criterion). Switching reserve for these faults is considered suffi-
ciently. The fault of a busbar or of a complete primary substation usually is not re-
quired to be handled by the network structure as these faults occur with a sufficiently
low probability.
The proposed network structure (see section 5.7.6) allows for the general case even
the handling of fault of a complete primary substation. If for option 1 in Alborz the
proposed switching station is introduced (see section 5.13) then the fault of the com-
plete primary substation Alvand cannot be handled. But as explained above, usually
it is not required to handle this kind of faults.
The mean time of interruption of disconnected loads can be reduced in the 20 kV
level by automation. In each line a short circuit indicator should be installed which
remotely signals its excitation. This allows a fast location of the fault. The main
breakers should be remotely controllable. The questions of automation are dis-
cussed in detail in the Planning Standards and Criteria Report in section 7.

5.7.3 Discussion of influence of operability
Although the amount of automation is increasing network operation is still done by
people. People have to be trained and they can only process a certain amount of
information in a given time interval. For network operation especially under stress
conditions (faults in the networks) operators have to make a high number of deci-
sions within a short time interval. If decisions are wrong than the network state can
even worsen compared to the case if not decision is taken at all.
For the sake of safe and reliable operation networks should be as simple as possi-
ble. That allows the operator to take standard decisions in case of standard failures.
This reduces the amount of training needed for the network operator. But even more
important, it greatly reduces the probability of wrong decisions.
Networks also should be constructed in a way that the consequences of faults and
also of wrong decisions of the operators will be limited to a certain (small) area of the
network and most of the network will be undisturbed.
Especially meshed networks are difficult to operate and sensitive to mistakes of the
operator as the consequences of decisions often can not be foreseen easily.
As there are no measures for operability to be expressed in numbers and the oper-
ability is influenced by many factors which often can not controlled the development
of a network which is easy to operate highly depends on the experience of the net-
work planner. That step is difficult to automatise and standardise. But the general
rule is to keep the network structure as simple as possible.

5.7.4 Discussion of influence of flexibility
Flexibility describes the number of different possibilities to supply a certain load and
to react on a certain failure.
In general a high flexibility is considered to be a good feature. But for networks flexi-
bility very often correlates to network complexity. A network which gives a high flexi-
bility in operation usually is of a high complexity. Networks of a high complexity usu-
ally are difficult to operate (see section 5.7.1) leading to a low reliability.
Therefore usually certain contingency and fault scenarios are defined which the
network should be flexible enough to handle (e. g. (n-1)-criterion). The network then
is not required to be able to handle more difficult scenarios.
The general rule is to keep the network structure as simple as possible to handle the
defined scenarios.

5.7.5 Typical network structures
In this section typical network structures are shown and their properties shortly ex-
plained. They are qualitatively compared in Table 5.3.
5.7.5.1 Radial structure
The most simple network structure is the radial structure (see Figure 5.15). As the
failure of a line always causes a power interruption of the loads behind the fault until
the line is repaired, the reliability of supply is very low. The operation is very simple.
Protection is simple and cheap. Losses are comparable high and there is no flexibil-
ity in operation. The network is cheap.
Such a network structure is typically used if a network has to be cheap, if the load
supplied is of low importance. It might also be used if the distances are very small
and the estimated outage frequency is very low.
Such a network structure might be used in medium voltage networks if the underly-
ing low voltage network is strongly meshed, so that the failure of one medium volt-
age infeed into the low voltage network can be handled by the low voltage network
for long time without overloading lines or interrupting power.

Figure 5.15 Principle of radial network

5.7.5.2 Ring structure
A very common network structure is the ring structure (see Figure 5.16). The opera-
tion is quite simple and the structure is very clear. Each ring starts and ends on the
same station. The ring can be operated as a closed loop or with an open point. The
protection is simple. The losses can be low. After a fault all not affected loads can be
resupplied after a few switching operations.
These networks are very often used in the medium voltage. Typically they are oper-
ated with an open point which is tried to be located in such a way that the loading of
both parts of the ring is balanced to keep losses as low as possible. Each RMU is
often equipped with a short circuit indicator to avoid installation of expensive protec-
tive devices but still have the possibility to locate faults fast. Typically protection and
circuit breakers are only in the infeeding substation. Simple overcurrent protection
can be used.
As in case of a fault all loads in the ring will be switched off, the number of stations
should be limited. Typically in the range of 10 stations are supplied by a ring. If the
number of stations per ring is much higher then the reliability decreases, as all sta-
tion on one half of the ring are disconnected in case of a fault.
If the ring is operated with open point the load distribution on both feeders might not
be equal but in case of a fault only the loads in one half of the ring are interrupted.
Even if the structure open rings between primary substations (see section 5.7.5.4)
is used as standard structure for a network then sometimes ring structures are used
for areas at the boundary of the area under consideration.

Substation
RMU
normally
open
point

Figure 5.16 Principle of ring structure

5.7.5.3 Switching substation
The structure with switching substation (see Figure 5.17 and Figure 5.18) should be
used if there are loads located in one direction from the infeeding point and there is
no adjacent infeed available or needed (because of power demand).
It can be used in two different forms:
with express feeder: The maximum loading of each feeder is 100 % but it has
to be made sure that there are no loads connected to the express feeder.
without express feeder: The maximum loading of each feeder is lower than
100 %. The highest loaded feeder has to be able to supply the lowest loaded
feeder additionally. The lowest loaded feeder has to be able to supply the
highest loaded feeder additionally.
The structure is more difficult. The operation is quite difficult for the structure without
express feeder as the loading has to be checked continuously to avoid overloading
in case of emergency supply. For that structure there are no clear defined decisions
in case of a fault which line to use as emergency supply. For the structure with ex-
press feeder one has to make sure that no loads are placed on the express feeder
during the development of the network over time.
The protection can be simple overcurrent protection. As the open points always have
to be in the switching station no load balancing is possible. Therefore the losses are
higher compared to ring structure.

Substation
RMU
normallyopenpoint
Switchingstation
Expressfeeder

Figure 5.17 Principle of switching station with express feeder

Substation
RMU
normallyopenpoint
Switchingstation

Figure 5.18 Principle of switching station without express feeder

5.7.5.4 Open rings between primary substations
With the structure open rings between primary substations two primary substations
are connected by lines with RMUs (see Figure 5.19). To avoid parallel operation of
the medium voltage line to the high voltage line connecting the two primary substa-
tions and to avoid power transfer between the two primary substations the lines
between the primary substations have to be operated with open point. The location
of that open point can be chosen to minimise line losses or to shift load between
primary substations.
The reliability of supply for the loads is comparably high with that structure. The
failure of a line can be handled by switching to the other primary substation. With this
structure also the outage of a primary substation can be handled by transferring load
from one primary substation to another, which is not possible with all the other struc-
tures explained above. By applying a consequent load shifting the losses can be
reduced quite much in such a structure. The protection can be simple overcurrent
protection.
The operation is relatively simple. For all faults there are clear guidelines which deci-
sions have to be taken. The operator only has always to make sure that there is no
permanent connection between the two primary substations.

Primarysubstation
RMU
normallyopenpoint
Primarysubstation

Figure 5.19 Principle of open rings between primary substations

5.7.5.5 Meshed network
Meshed networks are typically used in low and extra high voltage networks. Such a
structure allows the supply of a load on different ways (see Figure 5.20).
Protection of such a network is difficult. Each branch has to be equipped with a pro-
tection device. This is realised in extra high voltage networks (there other reasons
justify the use of such an effort) and in low voltage networks (here cheap fuses are
used). For medium voltage networks such an effort is normally not justified. There-
fore in medium voltage level networks with a meshed structure always have to be
operated in a radial structure by placing open points at the necessary locations.
The operation of a meshed network is very difficult. The network structure is very
complex. It is very difficult to predict changes in the load flow caused by a certain
switching operation. Faults might influence large areas of the network in extreme
cases causing a network to completely go black-out after certain fault combinations.
There are no simple guidelines how to restore power after a fault as there are many
possibilities how to do that. The probability of wrong switching operations is quite
high.
The losses can be reduced to a minimum value if the network is operated meshed.
As there are many ways to supply a certain load the flexibility in operation is high.

Substation
RMU
normallyopenpoint
Substation
Substation

Figure 5.20 Principle of meshed network (example)

5.7.5.6 Other structures
There are many other structures which are used for special applications. Also there
are many combinations between the structures described above. For planning of a
new network it is recommended to decide on one standard structure and then apply
it to the total network to simplify operation.

5.7.6 Decision on network structure
The standard network structure for public distribution networks is the open ring struc-
ture. Following rules have to be taken into account for selecting the right open ring
structure:
If a ring structure is chosen, then the primary substations have to be inher-
ently safe and sufficiently rated to supply all the loads in the supply area.
If a structure with open rings between primary substations is chosen, then the
primary substations can be rated lower as they do not have to be inherently
safe. They do have to have reserve transformer power, if the fault of a com-
plete primary substation should be handled and load has to be transferred to
another primary substation.
The different network structures are discussed in detail in the Planning Standards in
section 5.5.1.2. Table 4.1 summarizes the results.

Table 5.3 Comparison of selected network structures
Network
structure
Operability
Simplicity
of protec-
tion
reliability of
supply of the
loads
Flexibility Losses
Radial
structure
++ ++ -- -- --
Ring
structure
++ ++ + + +
Switching
substation
(express
feeder)
+ + + ++ +
Switching
substation
(no express
feeder)
-- + + - +
Rings be-
tween sub-
stations
+ + ++ ++ ++
Meshed
network
-- -- ++ ++ ++

For the networks of Alborz the structure Rings between substations is chosen be-
cause of the following reasons:
because of the high expected load growth a high flexibility of the network is
required
to react on deviations of the load growth from the expected one, it should be
possible to shift loads between primary substations
the structure should fulfil the (n-1)-criterion
the losses should be minimised
because there is no space available, the new primary substations cannot be
placed directly in the load centres. It is possible to place substations on both
sides of the load centres, therefore a solution in which lines can be spanned
between two substations will lead to a favourable power flow.

The schematic principle of the network structure is illustrated together with the cho-
sen lines and the structure of the primary substations in Figure 5.22 to Figure 5.23 at
the end of section 5.9.

5.8 Determination of standard line capability
The determination of the standard line capability is strongly related to the decision on
the standard line type.
For cables the main costs are the cost of installation which is determined by civil
works. Especially in cities these costs can be very high, if important streets have to
be opened or if natural borders have to be crossed. For normal cable laying in cities
the costs of civil works are about 5 to 10 times the costs of the material of the ca-
bles. In countries with lower wages, these costs might be lower. Therefore the high-
est possible cross section should be chosen for an economical power transport. On
the other hand are cables with large cross sections difficult to handle. The typical
compromise between power transport capability and possibility to handle the cable
are cables with a cross section in the range between 150 mm
2
and 240 mm
2
. In the
20 kV level these cross sections can transport a power in the range of 7 to 12 MVA.
The maximum allowable current depends on the laying conditions and on the load
profile. Therefore the same cable has a lower current rating if several cables are laid
in parallel and if they are loaded continuously compared to the typical utility load
pattern.
For overhead lines the costs of installation are similar to the cost of the material.
With the same cross section they can be loaded usually higher than cables because
of the better heat dissipation. Because it has to be mounted on poles the largest
cross section which can be handled with overhead lines is smaller compared to
cables. In the 20 kV level overhead lines can transport a power in the range 7 to
12 MVA.
Because of the critical laying conditions (there are many lines in parallel) and the
industrial load profile with a high portion of constant load for Alborz the standard line
capability was chosen to 7.5 MVA. This allows about 9 RMUs with a transformer of
800 kVA to be connected to each feeder. This is a quite theoretical value as in Al-
borz most of the loads are industrial loads where the customers have their own
transformers which usually have a higher rating than 800 kVA. With a firm capacity
of a primary substation of 40 MVA about 5 feeders for the normal power supply and
about 5 feeders for reserve supply have to be connected to each primary substation.
As depending on the location of the loads not all feeders can be fully loaded, the
total number of feeder in each station will be higher.
For the selection of the line type refer to the following section.

5.9 Determination of standard line type
For the planning task first the question has to be answered, if cables or overhead
lines are to be used in the network. A comparison between cable and overhead line
(OHL) is given in table 4.3. Although the costs are higher, in German urban areas
usually only cables are used for low voltage and medium voltage lines. Overhead
lines are used in the medium voltage level only in rural areas and their share on LV
networks reduces drastically.
Main reason for this development is the higher reliability of cables and isolated over-
head lines and the reduced need of space in comparison to overhead lines. Espe-
cially the last aspect gains importance for areas with high load density. For typical
urban load density values of 3 to 5 MVA/km and higher, cables are used exclu-
sively.
So the load density, the amount of new MV feeders with the required space for
feeder trenches determines the selection of the line type in urban networks.

Table 5.4 General comparison between cable and overhead line
Criterion overhead line cable
price of material similar for cable and overhead line
price of installation app. 5 to 10 times of OHL
aesthetics visually distractive not seen
frequency
of interruption
higher,
more than 2 times

duration
of interruption
shorter, easier to locate,
sometimes only short
interruptions with self-
healing
higher, (app. 2 times),
any faults need repair,
exchange of cable parts
reliability during
lifetime
constantly relatively low
low at begin (installation)
and at end of lifetime
(after >20 years),
high in middle
maintenance easy virtually not needed
power theft simple difficult
safety of people low high

For an urban network only one standard type of cables should be used. The cost of
the civil work to lay a cable is normally higher than the cable itself. Therefore it is
usually more expensive to exchange a cable with a rating that does not fit the re-
quirements any more than to install a larger cable right from the beginning. The use
of only one cross section also allows a better adaptation of the network structure to
the actual load development.
Therefore for new installations in Alborz as well as in Qazvin the use of cables is
recommended.
For the selection of a cable the following decisions have to be taken:
conductor material (aluminium / copper)
cross section
cable type (e.g. XLPE).

A comparison between the materials copper and aluminium is given in table 4.4.
Usually for aluminium cable one cross section step higher has to be chosen than for
copper cable (e.g. 185 mm
2
Al instead of 150 mm
2
Cu). Although even then the
losses at rated load are slightly higher in aluminium cable than in copper usually
aluminium cable is used for the distribution task. It is cheaper, easier to handle and
the cable usually is only partially loaded with accordingly lower losses.

Table 5.5 Comparison between aluminium and copper cable
Criterion Aluminium Copper
Allowed current den-
sity
app. 80 % of Cu
-> 1 cross section size
larger needed

specific Resistance
at 20C
app. 160 % of Cu
current dependent
losses
app. 130 % of Cu
weight app. 150 % of Al
handling easier
price for same cross
section
app. 50% cheaper
(app. 30 % cheaper for
same current capability)
expensive because of
current high copper price
price for same cross
section including civil
works
app. 15% cheaper
recommendation re-
garding economics of
losses
Use for typical distribu-
tion task
use for constantly high
load

The optimum for the selection of the cross section is relatively flat for typical cable
types (see figure 4.2). The given prices are examples for the cable without laying.
The actual prices will be very different depending on the price of the material and the
situation of supply. A typical cable size used in Germany for medium voltage net-
works is 185 mm
2
aluminium XLPE cable. It has a rated current of about 360 A
which gives a transport capability of about 12.5 MVA at 20 kV. This value does not
take any reduction factors into consideration. For industrial networks like in Alborz a
reduction factor of 0.6 can be used. This reduces the transport capability to about
222 A which are 7.5 MVA at 20 kV.
The given reduction factors are only guideline. The exact reduction factor has to be
determined during the detailed implementation planning based on local conditions.

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
50 70 95 120 150 185 240 300 400 500
cross section [mm
2
]
P
r
i
c
e

p
e
r

M
V
A

t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

p
o
w
e
r

w
i
t
h
o
u
t
l
a
y
i
n
g
[
1
0
0
0

E
u
r
o
/
(
M
V
A
*
k
m
)
]

3 x N2XSY 1x, 10 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 20 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 30 kV
3 x NA2XSY 1x, 10 kV
increasing
voltage level
relatively independent of cross section
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
50 70 95 120 150 185 240 300 400 500
cross section [mm
2
]
P
r
i
c
e

p
e
r

M
V
A

t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

p
o
w
e
r

w
i
t
h
o
u
t
l
a
y
i
n
g
[
1
0
0
0

E
u
r
o
/
(
M
V
A
*
k
m
)
]

3 x N2XSY 1x, 10 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 20 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 30 kV
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
50 70 95 120 150 185 240 300 400 500
cross section [mm
2
]
P
r
i
c
e

p
e
r

M
V
A

t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

p
o
w
e
r

w
i
t
h
o
u
t
l
a
y
i
n
g
[
1
0
0
0

E
u
r
o
/
(
M
V
A
*
k
m
)
]

3 x N2XSY 1x, 10 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 20 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 30 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 10 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 20 kV
3 x N2XSY 1x, 30 kV
increasing
voltage level
relatively independent of cross section

Figure 5.21 Examples of cost of power transport for selected cables
The current capacity of the cable gives one limit to the maximum number of the
RMUs per feeder. The question of reliability also sets a limit as in case of a fault all
RMUs at this feeder will have a supply interruption until the fault is isolated and the
resupply is realised. Therefore the reliability will decrease for each RMU with a grow-
ing number of RMUs per feeder.
The maximum length of the cable is defined by three criteria:
maximum loading
maximum voltage drop
minimum fault current.
The maximum loading is given by the number and the assigned load of the RMUs.
The limit for the maximum voltage drop is set by the standards of the power quality.
This is explained in detail in the Planning Standards in section 3.2. According to best
practice in medium voltage networks the voltage drop should not exceed about 5 %
for normal operation conditions and 10 % for emergency conditions, although this is
stricter than the requirements of the standard. The minimum fault current is needed
to make sure the protection device will safely detect any worst case fault. This crite-
rion usually does limit the cable length only in low voltage networks. In typical me-
dium voltage networks the limiting criteria is the maximum loading.

Principle network structure
After the decisions in the previous section have been taken, now the principle net-
work structures are determined. For a better overview the results should be summa-
rized in a drawing.
For Alborz the principle structures are displayed in Figure 5.22 for option 1 and
Figure 5.23 for option 2.
40MVAfirmcapacity,
40MVAreservefor
adjacentsubstation
185mmAl
Ith =222A
Sth =7,5MVA
sizeofRMUdepending
oncustomersload,
capability
n.o.
openpointat
boundaryof
supplyarea
numberof
feeders
dependingon
loaddistribution
andreserve
requirements
Ik=20 kA
distributionon
busbars
accordingtoload
63kV-network
63/20kV
30/40MVA
uk =14%
Yd11
n.o.
63kV-network
63/20kV
30/40MVA
u
k
=14%
Yd11
n.o.

Figure 5.22 Alborz, principle structure option 1

30MVAfirmcapacity,
30MVAreservefor
adjacentsubstation
185mmAl
I
th
=222A
S
th
=7,5MVA
sizeofRMUdepending
oncustomersload,
capability
n.o.
openpointat
boundaryof
supplyarea
numberof
feeders
dependingon
loaddistribution
andreserve
requirements
I
k
=20 kA
distributionon
busbars
accordingtoload
63kV-network
63/20kV
22,5/30MVA
u
k
=14%
Yd11
n.o.
63kV-network
63/20kV
22,5/30MVA
u
k
=14%
Yd11
n.o.

Figure 5.23 Alborz, principle structure option 2


5.10 Determination of supply areas
As a supply area an area is called which is supplied by one substation under normal
operating conditions. Such areas cannot be defined in meshed networks as there is
no fix border of the supply area.
The size and the shape of a supply area are determined by the:
firm power of the substation
standard network structure
maximum feeder length
location of the neighbouring substations, shape of the neighbouring supply
areas
load density distribution
natural boundaries (rivers, large streets etc.).

For the determination of the supply areas the following procedure, which is illustrated
in Figure 5.26 to Figure 5.31 for Alborz option 1, can be used as good practice:
1) Start in one area which has defined natural boundaries. They limit the
shape of the supply area.
2) In the other directions the loads are summarized until the firm power of
the substation is reached.
3) Then the boundary of this supply area is drawn. It is tried to follow
natural boundaries like streets in this case.
4) Starting from this border the next supply area is drawn.
5) This procedure is followed until all supply areas are determined.

These supply areas are a initial step for the further planning work. The final supply
areas are determined at the end of the planning during the fine tuning of the network
by changing the positions of the open points of the rings between substations. If the
network structure would be rings without connections between adjacent substations
then the determination of the supply areas requires much more care as later
changes of the shape are difficult to realise.
Besides the natural borders the chosen standard network structure also determines
the shape of the supply areas. Always the goal is to have lines which are as short as
possible to minimise losses and voltage drop. Therefore the optimal shape of a sup-
ply area will be different for the ring structure without connections between adjacent
substations and the chosen structure with rings between adjacent substations. This
principle is illustrated in Figure 5.24 and Figure 5.25. For the ring structure without
connection between adjacent substations the substation should be placed in the
centre of the supply area which should have the shape of a circle. For the ring struc-
ture between adjacent substations the substations should be placed at the end of the
supply areas which should have the shape of an ellipse.

Figure 5.24 optimal shape of supply area for ring structure


Figure 5.25 optimal shape of supply area for rings between adjacent substa-
tion structure


Figure 5.26 Alborz area with substations and natural boundaries

supplyareadefinedby
naturalboundaries

Figure 5.27 Alborz area with natural supply area

1.addingloads,starting
atnaturalboundaries,
untilfirmcapabilityof
substationisreached
2.settingborderofsupply
areafollowingnatural
boundaries

Figure 5.28 Alborz area, development of supply area

addingloadsstartingat
naturalboundariesandat
alreadydefined
boundariesofsupplyareas
substationisreached
addingloadsstartingat
naturalboundariesandat
alreadydefined
boundariesofsupplyareas
substationisreached

Figure 5.29 Alborz area, development of next supply areas


Figure 5.30 Alborz area with borders of supply areas


Figure 5.31 Alborz area with supply areas (option 1)

5.11 Determination of future substation load
This step is related to the division of the network into supply areas which is de-
scribed in section 5.10. The firm capacity of the substation is one of the limits of the
size of the supply area.
It has to be checked, if the supply areas can be built in a way that no substation is
overloaded. Such cases can happen, if the natural boundaries require unfavourable
shapes of the supply areas.
At this planning stage it is not yet necessary to determine the exact future load of the
substation. This task will be done after a load flow calculation can be performed and
the positions of the open points in the feeders between adjacent substations have
been fine tuned.

5.12 Modelling of additional load as new RMU
The base of the network planning are the loads which have been measured at a
certain moment in time in all ring main units. To these loads the load growth factors
are applied. The resulting loads describe the load which has to be supplied in this
area at the end of the long term planning horizon. For many cases this load will be
larger than the installed transformer size. This means that the existing RMU is not
able to supply this expected load without reconstruction.
In Alborz there are many loads which are much higher than 800 kVA. Therefore for
this city it is assumed that all loads are industrial loads. Therefore the necessity to
install additional RMUs has to be determined for each RMU independently taking
their customers into consideration. Therefore in the Alborz network no additional
RMUs are installed, independently of the expected load which might reach up to
approximately 9000 kVA for a single given load.

5.13 Determination of feeders
The determination of the number of feeders which connect each two adjacent sub-
stations is strongly related to the allocation to the RMUs to the feeders and the de-
termination of the optimal route of each feeder.
For a first estimate the following procedure can be used to get an idea of the number
of feeders which are connected to each substation:
Each substation has to supply their firm power using the standard line type.
Therefore the number of fully loaded outgoing feeders can be calculated as
follows

op n
firm
ff
I U
S
n

3

with n
ff
number of fully loaded feeders
S
firm
firm capacity of substation [MVA]
U
n
voltage level (20 kV)
I
op
operational current per line [A], contains any reduction factors

This number has to be rounded to the next higher number.
Each substation also has to provide reserve. On average each outgoing fully
loaded feeder needs reserve. Therefore the number of the fully loaded feed-
ers can be doubled to get the number of outgoing feeders.
This calculation is a very rough first estimate. It does not consider the following facts:
substations in the centre have to give reserve to a higher number of adjacent
substations than substations at the border of the area under consideration
(see Figure 5.25). The number of feeders which are not loaded but connected
only for reserve reasons can be much higher for a centrally located substation
compared to the number of loaded feeders.
because of the distribution of the loads it might not be possible to load all
feeders to their limit. Their might be feeders which are only partially loaded
because they pass only a small number of loads.
it might be possible to install switching stations to reduce the number of feed-
ers which are required for reserve reasons.
Because of these reasons the number of feeders should be determined only after a
sketch of the future network has been developed. This sketch should contain already
all lines with all the RMUs allocated to their supplying line. After having a load flow
calculated this network should not have to be changed considerably. There should
be only a fine tuning of the open points of the feeders be necessary.

To illustrate the principle of the proposed network it makes sense to draw sketches
containing the substations and the feeders between them. By neglecting the detailed
routing of the feeders the future network structure can easily be identified. From
these sketches the number of bays needed in each substation can be derived.
In Figure 5.32 to Figure 5.34 the principle network structure for the proposed options
for Alborz are displayed.

feederbetween
substations
(S
max
=7.5MVA)
Primarysubstation,
2transformers
40MVA
approximateshapeof
supplyarea
switchingstation
withouttransformer
feedingcablefor
reserve
Alborz
Switching
station1
Alborz
Existing1
Gomrok
Existing2
Alvand
Switching
station1

Figure 5.32 Principle network structure Alborz, option 1
In Figure 5.32 between the primary substations Alvand and Gomrok a switching
station can be found. This does not follow the principle network structure given in
Figure 5.22. Because of the shape of the supply area and the load density distribu-
tion of the supply area of Alvand there are two possibilities to build the network:
a) Follow the determined principle network structure. In this case all feeders
from Alvand to Gomrok are built as lines from Alvand to Gomrok. In this case
the lower 5 lines supply loads which are close to the Alvand substation. But
for reserve reasons long cables in the Gomrok supply area are needed which
normally do not carry load current (the lines between the Alvand and the
switching station in Figure 5.32 would have to be extended to Gomrok).
b) Build a switching station at the border between the supply areas of Alvand
and Gomrok. In this switching station all lines are collected which do only
supply loads in the supply area of Alvand and which would need the connec-
tion to the Gomrok substation only for reserve reasons. The switching station
is built with single busbar and with sectionaliser. It is supplied by two lines
from Gomrok which normally do not carry any load current (see Figure 5.33).
These express feeders are only for reserve reasons. Now in case of a fault in
a line between Alvand and the switching station, the according breaker in the
switching station is closed and the faulted line is supplied from Gomrok. If two
reserve lines are laid between Gomrok and the switching station for each sec-
tion of the busbar individual reserve is possible.

For option b) the advantage is that a lot of cable can be saved. The disadvantage is
that there is not sufficient reserve in the cable network to handle the failure of the
complete primary substation Alvand. With option a) this scenario could be handled.
Usually such a fault is not required to be handled. Therefore the installation of a
switching station is proposed. Taking the high loading of the transformers in this
scenario into consideration, the switching station gives the possibility to be extended
to a primary substation if later more power than expected is needed. This is another
advantage of the option b).
On an economical estimation the options are compared in Table 5.6. The used cost
parameters can be found in section 6.2. In this table only the investment costs are
compared. No cash values are necessary and therefore are not used. This compari-
son shows a clear advantage of the solution with the switching station. There is no
calculation of losses necessary as all cables under consideration are used only for
reserve and therefore under normal operation conditions are not loaded.

Table 5.6 Evaluation of switching station in Alborz, option 1
Investment
Amount
per unit Unit
Option a)
without
switching
station
Option b)
with
switching
station Remarks
Reserve cables 1,3 km/cable 5 2
Switching bays
complete 5 10
(2 at Gomrok,
1 sectional-
iser,
2 for reserve
cables,
5 feeder)
Switching bays
with circuit brea-
ker 5 3
(2 at Gomrok,
1 sectional-
iser, others
need only load
breaker)
Cost for cable
including installa-
tion 150000 Euro/km 975000 390000 Euro
Cost of switching
station 20000 Euro/bay 100000 200000 Euro

Total cost of
option 1 075 000 590 000 Euro


Figure 5.33 Principle of use of switching station in network structure for Al-
borz, option 1

Alborz
Existing 1
Gomrok
Existing 2
Alvand
feeder between
substations
(S
max
= 7.5 MVA)
Primary substation,
2 transformers
30 MVA
approximate shape of
supply area
Alborz
New 2
New 1

Figure 5.34 Principle network structure Alborz, option 2

5.14 Allocation of RMUs to feeder
If the primary substations are placed and the supply areas are defined, then the
RMUs are connected by the standard lines following the standard network structure.
During this allocation the planner tries to achieve the following goals:
load all feeders up to their capability. In reality because of the location of the
loads this will not be possible. In this case the feeder will be only partially
loaded.
keep the feeders as short as possible. All detours should be avoided. This is
related with the optimal routing of the feeders with what is dealt with in section
5.15.
create lines which allow a supply of the loads from the primary substation of
their supply area. This seems trivial but often it is difficult, especially in the Al-
borz region, where often the loads are quite far away from their feeding pri-
mary substation but they have to be allocated to this primary substation be-
cause no other supply area shape is possible.

To connect all loads to feeders which fulfil the goals stated above it is in some occa-
sions necessary to deviate from the standard structure. Although in general each
RMU has one incoming and one outgoing line (see Figure 5.36) it might be neces-
sary to connect RMUs with low load of less importance by a radial feeder (see
Figure 5.37). It also might be necessary to form loops in the network by dividing one
route during a certain section into two routes and connect them together at the end
(see Figure 5.38 and Figure 5.39). It is necessary to operate such constructions in a
radial structure to avoid unexpected current flows. The RMUs at the beginning and
at the end of such a construction as well as the RMUs which feed an additional radial
feeder need to have more than 3 bays (incoming line, outgoing line, transformer, see
Figure 5.35). As these stations still should have the character of a RMU but not of a
switching station normally they should not have more than 1 or 2 additional bays. To
change the switching state quickly in case of a fault all RMUs with more than the 3
necessary bays should be remotely controllable.

3x185mm
2
Al,XLPEcable
switch
3x185mm
2
Al,XLPEcable
switch
20/0,4kV,
800kVA
Load:
800kVA
HH-Fuse
switch

Figure 5.35 Standard structure of RMU with switches


Figure 5.36 example of looped in RMU

Figure 5.37 example of RMU connected by radial feeder

incoming line
outgoing line
parallel lines
normal open connection!
RMU

Figure 5.38 principle structure of RMUs connected by parallel lines

incoming line
outgoing line
radial feeder for low loads
with less importance
parallel lines
normal open connection!

Figure 5.39 example of RMUs connected by parallel lines

5.15 Determination of optimal route of feeder
While in the work described in sections 5.13 and 5.14 the main focus was to connect
all the loads to the feeders of their supplying substation in this section the optimal
routing is explained.
This is done after all connections are made. During this routing the lines are adjusted
to follow the streets. If possible, co-laying options are realized in the way that as
many as possible lines are run in the same street. In this case civil works, which are
the most expensive part of cable laying, can be reduced drastically.
If during this point routes are required which are not available for cable laying then
the planner has to go back to the previous point. He might change the allocation of
the RMUs to the feeders until all RMUs are connected to feeders which follow only
available routes. For this task local knowledge is required to assess which routes are
available or not. For the development of the long term options it is assumed that all
streets describe available routes for cable laying. Especially for cable laying this
assumption usually is possible as cables normally do much less interfere with other
buildings and construction as overhead lines do.
The results are documented in the diagrams in the appendix which contain the input
data and the detailed cable routing.

5.16 PSSSincal network model for long term option
The result of the planning work is a network model in a network calculation program
like PSSSincal for each of the investigated long term options.
As many of the planning work in the previous sections can be done without the help
of a computer, it is possible to develop the complete long term option with pencil and
paper supported by a calculator. A printout of the existing network with a map in the
background and the upscaled loads is needed. An example for a portion of the Qaz-
vin area is given in Figure 5.40.


Figure 5.40 Example of planning procedure
At the end of the planning the network should be modelled in a network calculation
program to perform the calculations which are described in the next section to prove
the functionality of the planned network.

5.17 Technical and economical evaluation
5.17.1 Load flow calculations
With the network model load flow calculations have to be performed. With these
calculations the functionality of the planned option can be shown. Load flow calcula-
tion for the normal operation state has to be evaluated according to the following
criteria:
all loads supplied? This is mainly a check, if the network model is right and all
open points are placed at the right lines.
no line overloaded? As for planning purposes the limit of the loading is always
100 % of the operational rating, no line may be loaded higher than its opera-
tional loading although during the real operation such a loading might be al-
lowed for emergency situations.
no transformer overloaded? No primary substation should supply more than
their firm power. The load should be distributed nearly equally on both trans-
formers.
all voltages in the range? No voltage at any busbar in the network should be
below 95 % for the normal operation state. No voltage should be higher than
105 % for the normal operation state.

The same calculations have to be performed for all critical outage scenarios to prove
the fulfilment of the (n-1)-criterion. For the structure open rings between primary
substations this usually means, that there is a fault in the first or last section of the
connection so that all loads on one feeder have to be supplied from one side. In this
case no cable should be overloaded and the voltage should not drop below 88 %.
The maximum loading of the highest loaded feeder for the worst (n-1)-fault is given
in Table 5.7 for each network option.
Although the goal of the planning is that no feeder will be loaded higher than 100 %
even under fault conditions, there might be situations where a slight overloading is
accepted to avoid the installation of an additional feeder. According to the Planning
Standards and Criteria Report in section 3.1.1.2, an overloading of cables up to
120 % under emergency conditions can be accepted. This limit is not exceeded
under the worst fault conditions.
In Table 5.8 the loading of the primary substations under normal conditions is given.
The installed transformer capacity is not exceeded in any primary substation. The
firm transformer capacity is slightly exceeded in a few primary substations. Accord-
ing to the Planning Standards and Criteria Report in section 3.1.2 an overloading of
transformer of up to 130 % can be accepted under emergency conditions. This limit
is not exceeded for any substation.
The chosen network structure additionally allows to shift load to adjacent primary
substations in case of the fault of one transformer, reducing the load on the faulted
primary substation.
The evaluations of the load flow show that the (n-1)-criterion is observed in all net-
work options under the worst fault conditions.
The load flow calculations are the main base for the fine tuning of the network. In this
task mainly normal open points are moved or RMU are connected to other feeders to
improve the load flow.
Table 5.7 Maximum feeder loading for worst emergency case

Total load
connected
S [MVA] Remarks
Option 1
Primary substation cable rating: 7,5 MVA
From To Via
Alborz Gomrok 34319LB00025 7,6

Option 2
Primary substation
From To Via
Alvand 34319LB00134a - 8,8
(single large load, connec-
tion with a higher cross
section if necessary)
Alvand Alborz 34319LB00089 7,8
(slight overloading can be
accepted for emergency
operation)

Table 5.8 Loading of primary substations for normal operation
Option 1 Firm capacity: 40 MVA
Primary substation P [MW] Q [MVAr] S [MVA]
Alborz 35,7 19,6 40,7
Alvand 38,7 11,1 40,2
Existing_1 37,1 20,3 42,3
Existing_2 34,9 18,9 39,7
Gomrok 38,0 16,8 41,6

Option 2 Firm capacity: 30 MVA
Primary Substation P [MW] Q [MVAr] S [MVA]
Alborz 25,2 14,0 28,8
ALVAND 29,6 5,2 30,1
Existing_1 26,7 14,6 30,4
Existing_2 25,0 13,5 28,4
GOMROK 28,3 12,1 30,7
New_1 25,5 13,2 28,7
New_2 24,1 13,6 27,7


5.17.2 Short circuit calculations
The short circuit calculations are needed to show that the equipment can withstand
the highest short circuit current and the protection devices will pick up the lowest
short circuit current. The calculations are performed according to IEC 60909. For the
highest short circuit the scenario in which 2 primary substations operate in parallel
might be investigated, although it is not required by the standard, if this scenario only
happens during switching operations.
The loads usually are assumed to be passive loads for the short circuit calculation.
Only if it is known that the loads have a mainly motorical characteristic (e.g. if there
is a high portion of air conditioning in the network) the loads are modelled as motors,
feeding a current on the short circuit. For such a modelling usually it is assumed that
a certain portion of the load (e.g. 50 %) is of motorical characteristic and the other
portion is of passive characteristic. For typical European medium voltage distribution
networks the modelling of the motorical characteristic of the loads can be neglected.
The main results of the short circuit calculation:
maximum fault currents for 3phase short circuit
minimum fault currents for 2phase short circuit
are given in Table 5.9. For each calculation the worst values which appear in the
network are listed. The single phase to ground fault currents depend on the neutral
treatment of the transformers.
For the primary substations a short circuit withstand capability of I
k
=20 kA is rec-
ommended. This allows the temporary parallel operation of two primary substations
(e.g. for load shifting operations) without exceeding the short circuit withstand capa-
bility.
The minimum short circuit current should be sufficiently high to safely start the pro-
tection devices. As the maximum feeder current is less than 300 A and the minimum
fault current is higher than 3500 A, this can be ensured. Therefore the feeders can
be protected with over-current protection.

Table 5.9 Results of short circuit calculation
Remarks
Option 1
maximum fault currents for 3phase
short circuit I
k
" [kA] 9,8
(at secondary side of two 30/40 MVA trans-
formers, higher values while connection to
adjacent primary is closed)
minimum fault currents for 2phase
short circuit I
k
" [kA] 3,7

Option 2
maximum fault currents for 3phase
short circuit I
k
" [kA] 7,9
(at secondary side of two 22,5/30 MVA
transformers, higher values while connection
to adjacent primary is closed)
minimum fault currents for 2phase
short circuit I
k
" [kA] 4,1

5.17.3 Calculation of costs
If the network is finally modelled, the investment and the operational costs for each
option will be determined to compare the different options.
The calculation of the costs is explained in detail in section 6.

5.18 Fine tuning of the network
After the first planning the calculations (see section 5.17) will probably show that
there is some room for improvement in the network. Therefore a fine tuning loop has
to be gone through until the network has reached a sufficiently good quality.

5.19 Documentation
The investigated network options have to be documented. Amongst others the fol-
lowing means of documentation are necessary for each network option:
diagrams with modelling data for existing network
diagrams with modelling data for each long term option. This should contain
the upscaled and new loads as well as the used line types and cross sections.
diagrams with load flow results for the normal operation state. The lines
should be coloured according to their loading (e.g.
green, if I < 50 % of I
op

blue, if 50 % of I
op
< I < 100 % of I
op

red, if 100 % of I
op
< I)
with I
op
operational limit of loading [A]
The busbars should be coloured according to their voltage (e.g.
green, if 95 % U/U
n
< U < 105 % U/U
n

red otherwise).
Such a colouring allows an easy identification of problematic areas.
tables containing the evaluation of the costs for each option and a table con-
taining the comparison of the costs of the options.

6 Calculation of the Objective: Economical Evaluation
6.1 Type of costs
The different options are compared regarding cost. Therefore the costs can be seen
as the objective function for the optimisation of the networks.
For the construction and operation of a network the following main types of costs can
be identified:
investment cost (if new equipment is installed)
replacement costs (if existing equipment is exchanged by the same type)
operational and maintenance costs
cost of losses (lost electrical energy).

6.1.1 Investment costs
If new equipment is introduced into the network or if existing equipment is ex-
changed by equipment of a different type or rating, then investment costs have to be
spent. For an economical analysis it is important to know at which moment in time
this money is spent. Depending on the relation between the rate of price increase
and the interest rate for credits for the investment, the optimal point in time for the
investment can be different. If, as it usually is the case, the rate of price increase is
substantially lower than the interest rate for credits, any investments should be post-
poned as far into the future as possible. If the rate of price increase is higher than
the interest rate for credits, then all investments should be realised as soon as pos-
sible. To compare investments or other costs which are executed at different points
of time the method of cash value evaluation is used.
The basic principle of the cash value calculation is that all money spent or earned
are discounted (if in the future) or compounded (if in the history) to the value which
represents the value, if the money is spent or earned at a defined date. For singular
money transfers the following formulas are used:
If the money transfer occurs in the future:

( )
n
n
q
V
V
+
=
1
0

with V
0
present value
V
n
value n periods in the future
n number of periods (usually years) to the point in the future
q interest rate (e.g. for interest rate of 5 % -> q = 0.05)

If the money transfer occurred in the past:
( )
n
n
q V V + = 1
0

This means, money spent or earned in history has today a higher monetary value,
money spent or earned in the future has today a lower monetary value. This formula
does not take price changes into consideration. Therefore the real value of money
spent or earned in history or future can be very different from the monetary value. If
the real value is needed, than for simplification reasons it can be calculated, if the
interest rate is adjusted by the rate of price change. To give some examples:
If the interest rate is 5 % and the rate of price change is p = 2 % increase per year
then the real value of an investment (VR
0
) 3 years in the future can be calculated
using the following formula:

( )
n
n
p q
V
VR
+
=
1
0

For the example:

( ) ( )
093 . 1
03 . 1 02 . 0 05 . 0 1
3 3
0
n n n
V V V
VR = =
+
=

If the interest rate is equal to the rate of price change and both are 5 %, the future
value does not change compared to the real value:

( ) ( )
n
n n
V
V V
VR = =
+
=
3 3
0
1 05 . 0 05 . 0 1

If the interest rate is lower (e.g. 2 %/year) than the rate of price change (e.g.
5 %/year) then the real value of an investment in the future will be lower than of an
investment today.

( ) ( )
913 . 0
97 . 0 05 . 0 02 . 0 1
3 3
0
n n n
V V V
VR = =
+
=

Based on this principle of cash value all investments have to be evaluated. The
procedure is explained in section 6.1.5.

6.1.2 Replacement costs
All equipment has a certain economical and technical lifetime. After the economical
lifetime it is depreciated and at the end of the technical lifetime it fails. In a static
network environment it has to be replaced by a new piece of equipment with the
same technical data. In this case replacement costs occur. The optimisation of the
replacement costs belongs to the field of the asset management. It is not part of the
network planning. The lifetime of a typical piece of equipment in the utility is in the
range of 40 years. Therefore for the task of the network planning with a 10 year
planning horizon the replacement of the equipment can be neglected, especially if
the technical conditions of all the pieces of equipment are not known exactly. Con-
sequently the replacement costs will not be considered for the network planning.

6.1.3 Operational and maintenance costs
The operational and maintenance costs are calculated very often as a certain per-
centage of the investment costs of the equipment. For the task of strategic network
planning this assumption is reasonable.
From this percentage of investment costs yearly costs are derived by applying the
following formula:

ec
invest om
OM
T
K k
K

=
with K
OM
yearly operational and maintenance cost
k
om
percentage value of operational and maintenance costs in relation
to investment cost (e.g. 5 %)
K
invest
investment cost
T
ec
economical lifetime of equipment (depreciation period, e.g. 20
years)
The cost of losses are added to these calculated operational and maintenance costs.

6.1.4 Cost of losses
Losses are the difference between energy sold to the customers and energy fed into
the network. There are several types of losses:
current dependent losses
voltage dependent losses
losses caused by inaccuracies of measurement devices
losses caused by accounting problems
losses caused by power theft or other

As only the first two types of losses can be influenced by the network planning, only
these two types are considered. Losses by power theft can be reduced, if more ca-
bles are used instead of overhead lines.
The calculation of losses is explained in detail in the Weak Point Analysis Report
Part III: Network Analysis Report Qazvin 20kV.

The total cost of losses for a certain time period consist of two parts:
cost of lost energy
cost of power losses

The cost of lost energy describes the energy which has to be fed into the network
but cannot be sold to the customers. It is calculated using the following formula:

energy lost energy lost
K W K =
_

with K
lost_energy
cost of lost energy
K
energy
cost of one kWh for the utility

For the calculation of the lost energy the following formula will be used:

B load loss B load no loss lost
T P T P W + =
, ,

with W
lost
lost energy per year
P
loss,no-load
no-load losses, calculated by a load flow calculation with all
loads switched off
T
B
time of period, one year, 8760 h
loss factor, = 0.21 (see section 3.4.2, page 21 of Network Analysis
Report Qazvin 20 kV)

load loss
P
,
- load dependent losses at peak load, calculated by a load flow

calculation under peak load condition

The cost of power losses describes the fact that the lost power has to be transported
through the network. Therefore there is a certain investment into the network neces-
sary to transport this power. This will be covered by the power cost. Also the power
has to be bought at the peak conditions from the generation companies at a higher
price compared to the average of the period under consideration.
The cost of power losses are calculated according to the following formula:
( )
power peak load no loss load loss losses power
K P P K

+ =
, , _

with K
power_losses
cost of power losses
K
peak-power
power cost under peak load conditions

The total cost of losses for each time period are calculated following:

losses power energy lost losses
K K K
_ _
+ =

6.1.5 Total costs
For the total cost of a network option the cash values of all investments and the cash
values of all losses have to be calculated. Such a calculation requires a very detailed
network analysis. All investments have to be dated accurately. But for the future it is
not possible to predict an exact date for the realisation of an investment. The cables
have to be laid, when the streets can be opened for any reason, not only when they
are needed by the network development. For an exact calculation of the losses, the
loss factors for each year in the future are needed. Also the exact state of the net-
work and the switching is needed. This information is also not available in the details
required. Therefore simplifications are needed to be able to perform a reasonable
planning work. The main simplification is, to evaluate the losses and the investments
only at certain characteristic network stages (see Figure 6.1).

today
+0 years
short term
+2 years
medium term
+5 years
long term
+10 years
network
evaluation
base for
determination
of cash value:
year +1
network
evaluation
(investment,
losses)
network
evaluation
(investment,
losses)
network
evaluation
(investment,
losses)
base for
determination
of cash value:
year +3.5
base for
determination
of cash value:
year +7.5

Figure 6.1 Principle of cost evaluation
Each network option will be planned for the long term situation. This network will be
modelled in the network calculation program PSSSincal. The losses will be calcu-
lated for the situation 10 years in the future after the long term date.
Based on this long term network network options for the short term and for the me-
dium term have to be modelled in PSSSincal to calculate the costs for the different
networks stages. According to the Scope of work document for two options a long
term planning has to be performed. From both options one will be selected and for
this option short term and medium stages are planned. This means that at the time
of the decision between the two long term options no short and medium term net-
works exist. To perform a cash value calculation simplifications have to be intro-
duced to derive values for investment costs for the short term and medium term
networks.
The following simplifications are used:
for short term option:
In the existing network the loads are scaled to the value of 2010. With these
loads a load flow calculation for the normal operation state is performed. It
is assumed that all lines which are overloaded in this calculation have to be
exchanged. This is a simplification as the explicit goal of the long term plan-
ning is to avoid a one-to-one replacement of overloaded lines. But the error
is assumed to be quite small. This network is used for the calculation of the
losses in the short term option.
If for the total loads in 2010 an additional primary substation is needed, then
the costs of this substation is considered for the investment costs.

for medium term option:
The medium term option should mainly already show the basic structure of
the long term option. Therefore the network with the long term structure is
used. If for this network existing lines are used, then these lines are only re-
placed by the standard lines, if they are overloaded in the load state 2013
under normal operation. It is not required for this state that all loads can be
supplied in case of a line fault. For the long term option all lines are re-
placed by the standard cable type. This will lead to a network which cannot
only handle the normal operation state but also the emergency state. For
the calculation of the losses the long term network with the load state of
2013 is used.
It is assumed that for the medium term option already all primary substa-
tions with all necessary transformers are in operation.

In Alborz many new loads are connected to the network between the short term and
the medium term stage. These loads are placed between already existing loads.
Also many cables are already of the standard type with 185 mm
2
. To reduce the
investment cost, one goal of the planning was to use as many existing cables as
possible for the new network. Because of the new loads and the changed network
structure many existing cables can be used in principle but they have to be modified
to connect to the newly allocated loads. In the network model such modified cables
are modelled as new lines. The principle is illustrated in Figure 6.2. By using such
modified cables it is not possible to produce tables between which busbars (nodes)
new cables are installed and between which busbars cables are upgraded. There-
fore for the evaluation of the medium term network for Alborz not the differences in
the individual cables are evaluated but the total differences in the line lengths are
evaluated. This gives a sufficiently accuracy of the needed investment costs. If it is
necessary to see which lines are modified in which ways, then the according
PSSSincal files have to be compared.

existing cables
modified cables

Figure 6.2 Modification of existing cables in Alborz

It has to be understood that the results of this cost calculation are not the actual
investments needed. The calculated cost can only be used to compare two options
to each other. For the calculation of the real investment cost many other factors of
influence like availability of manpower, development of copper costs, possible politi-
cal restrictions in the supply of material, competitive situation of the chosen supplier,
available time frame for the construction work and many others influence the actual
price that the network operator has to pay for a given building project. If information
about the actual investment sum is needed then a detailed tendering process has to
be initiated.

As the investments are not executed at the moment of the network evaluation (e.g.
+5 years) but in the interval between the two network stages (e.g. continuously be-
tween +2 years and +5 years) the investments are discounted as if they were exe-
cuted all in the middle of the interval (e.g. +3.5 years). The value of the investments
is calculated following the formula below:

( ) ( ) ( )
5 . 7
5 _ 10 _
5 . 3
2 _ 5 _
1
0 _ 2 _
0 _
1 1 1 q
V V
q
V V
q
V V
V
network network network network network network
investment
+
+
+
+
+
=
+ + + + +

with V
investment_0
cash value of the investments of this network option
V
network_+x
value of the network at the moment +x; calculated by multiply-
ing the bill of quantity with the prices of the equipment.
q interest rate

Similarly the losses are calculated at the moment of the network evaluation (e.g.
+5 years) but it is assumed that they are constant between the earlier network
evaluation and the actual evaluation (e.g. between +2 years and +5 years). There-
fore they are multiplied with the duration of the interval (e.g. 5-2 = 3 years). The full
losses are discounted as if they appear in the middle of the interval (e.g. +3.5 years).
The value of the losses can be calculated following the formula below:

( )
( )
( )
5 . 7
_ 5 _ _
5 . 3
_ 2 _ _
1
_ 0 _ _
0 _
1
5
1
3
1
2
q
K W K
q
K W K
q
K W K
V
losses power lost energy lost
losses
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
=
+
+
+

with V
losses_0
cash value of the losses of this network option
W
lost_+x
lost energy per year in the network at the moment +x; calculated
by estimation formula explained above
q interest rate

This simplified approach reduces the calculation effort significantly. Nevertheless it
allows to compare the developed long term options.
To make the cost of losses comparable to the investment cost both have to be re-
lated to the same base. To realise this the following approach is used:
It is assumed that the all equipment is used at least for a certain economical lifetime
(depreciation period, e.g. 20 years).
To calculate the losses for the period of 20 years, although only a time horizon of 10
years is used for the planning, it is assumed that the load conditions stay constant
after the year 2018. This is a reasonable assumption as the network is to be planned
to satisfy the requirements of the year 2018. There is no information about the fur-
ther development neither of the load nor of the network structure available. So for a
comparison it makes sense to keep the conditions fix at the point of 2018.
It is also assumed that there is no change of equipment after the year 2018. The
already existing equipment is assumed to be able to be operated after its economical
lifetime, which is reasonable as usually the technical lifetime is much higher than the
economical lifetime.
These assumptions lead to the following formula which is used for the calculation of
the value of the losses:

( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
15
_ 10 _ _
5 . 7
_ 5 _ _
5 . 3
_ 2 _ _
1
_ 0 _ _
0 _
1
10
1
5
1
3
1
2
q
K W K
q
K W K
q
K W K
q
K W K
V
losses
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
=
+
+
+
+

6.2 Cost basis
The input parameters for the economical evaluation have been selected based on
typical European values and are given in Table 6.1. This approach has been ap-
proved by Tavanir. Consequently the real prices will be different!
Table 6.1 Parameters used for cost calculation
For losses:
Price of energy [/MWh] 60
Price of power [/MW] 5,8

For investment:
Price of substation without transformer but with all bays
except 20kV feeder bays [] 700.000
Price of transformer 63/20 kV 30 MVA [] 600.000
Price of 20 kV feeder bay [] 20.000

Price of OHL including installation [/km] 25.000
Price of NA2XS2Y 3x1x185 mm2 incl. installation
[/km] 150.000

Portion of operation cost [%of investment] 5
Depreciation time [years] 20

For cash value calculation
Interest rate [%/year] 7
Price growing rate [%/year] 2

6.3 Comparison of options
The two options will be compared regarding their cash values for investment and
losses. The net cash value is referred to the year 2008. The investments up to the
year 2018 are considered with an economical lifetime of 20 years and a technical
lifetime of at least up to 2028 (2008 + 20). The cost of losses and the operation and
maintenance costs are calculated up to the year 2028 (2008 + 20).
The option with the lower cash value can be selected for the short term and medium
term planning.
The summary of the cost evaluation for Alborz is given below. The details can be
found in the appendix.
It can be seen that the option 2 (2 x 30 MVA transformers per substation) has a
lower total cash value although 2 additional substations are needed, but the existing
30 MVA transformers in the other substations can be used for the future network.
The two substations Existing 1 and Existing 2 are calculated as if they have to be
built new for both options as they are needed now exclusively only for the Alborz
area and they cannot deliver power to other areas.

Cost of option 1 (2 x 40 MVA)

Network state 2008 2010 2013 2018
Investment costs compared to
previous state [] 0 - 16.859.525 219.164
Cash value of investment costs
in 2008 [] 0 - 14.212.903 152.002
Operation and maintenance
costs per year [] 0 - 42.149 548
Cost of losses for the network
state per year [] 188.738 191.167 266.955 301.725

Total cash value of investments
in 2008 [] 14.364.905
Total cash value of operation and
maintenance [] 148.798
(calculated
until 2028!)
Total cash value of losses in
2008 [] 3.220.059
(losses
calculated
until 2028!)

Total cash value of network
option in 2008 [] 17.733.761


Network state 2008 2010 2013 2018
Investment costs compared to
previous state [] 0 - 12.476.587 163.113
Cash value of investment costs
in 2008 [] 0 - 10.518.002 113.128
Operation and maintenance
costs per year [] 0 - 31.191 408
Cost of losses for the network
state per year [] 188.738 191.167 317.633 345.449

Total cash value of investments
in 2008 [] 10.631.130
Total cash value of operation and
maintenance [] 160.035
(calculated
until 2028!)
Total cash value of losses in
2008 [] 3.606.122
(losses
calculated
until 2028!)

Total cash value of network
option in 2008 [] 14.397.287

7 Annex
7.1 Diagrams
Number Page Format Network state Content
1 A E.01 A0 Existing (2008) Input Data
2 A E.02 A0 Existing (2008) Supply areas feeder
3 A E.03 A0 Existing (2008)
Supply areas feeder substa-
tions
4 A E.04 A0 Existing (2008) Supply areas with map
5 A E.05 A0 Existing (2008) Loadflow Normal Operation

6 A 1.01 A0
Long term, option 1
(2018) Input Data
7 A 1.02 A0
Long term, option 1
(2018) Supply areas feeder
8 A 1.03 A0
Long term, option 1
(2018)
tions
9 A 1.04 A0
Long term, option 1
(2018) Supply areas with map
10 A 1.05 A0
Long term, option 1
(2018) Loadflow Normal Operation

11 A 2.01 A0
Long term, option 2
(2018) Input Data
12 A 2.02 A0
Long term, option 2
(2018) Supply areas feeder
13 A 2.03 A0
Long term, option 2
(2018)
tions
14 A 2.04 A0
Long term, option 2
(2018) Supply areas with map
15 A 2.05 A0
Long term, option 2
(2018) Loadflow Normal Operation

7.2 Tables
Cost evaluation
Page Content
1 Cost parameters
2 Summary of cost calculation
3 Loss evaluation
4 Investments for short term network

Option 1
5
Investments for medium term net-
work
6 Investments for long term network

Option 2
7
Investments for medium term net-
work
8 Investments for long term network

Load flow results
Page Content
Option 1
1-8 Line utilization
9-16 Node voltages

Option 2
17-24 Line utilization
25-32 Node voltages

Cost evaluation Cost Parameters
Alborz
Medium voltage network
Cost Parameters
For losses:
Price of energy [/MWh] 60
Price of power [/MW] 5,8
For investment:
Price of substation without transformer but with all bays ex 700.000
Price of 20 kV feeder bay [] 20.000
Price of OHL including installation [/km] 25.000
Price of NA2XS2Y 3x1x185 mm2 incl. installation [/km] 150.000
Portion of operation cost [%of investment] 5
Depreciation time [years] 20
For cash value calculation
Interest rate [%/year] 7
Price growing rate [%/year] 2
J:\SE\ERLS\PT-Consulting\PT5\01_Projects_0200-0299\sk0289_Tavanir\03 Ergebnis,
Bericht\4_3_LongTermPlanning\Reports\Cost_evaluation_Alborz_02.xls
page 1 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation Summary
Alborz
Network state 2008 2010 2013 2018
Investment costs compared to previous state [] 0 - 16.859.525 219.164
Cash value of investment costs in 2008 [] 0 - 14.212.903 152.002
Operation and mainenance costs per year [] 0 - 42.149 548
Cost of losses for the network state per year [] 188.738 191.167 266.955 301.725
Total cash value of investments in 2008 [] 14.364.905
Total cash value of operation and maintenance [] 148.798 (calculated until 2028!)
Total cash value of losses in 2008 [] 3.220.059 (losses calculated until 2028!)
Total cash value of network option in 2008 [] 17.733.761
Network state 2008 2010 2013 2018
Investment costs compared to previous state [] 0 - 12.476.587 163.113
Cash value of investment costs in 2008 [] 0 - 10.518.002 113.128
Operation and mainenance costs per year [] 0 - 31.191 408
Cost of losses for the network state per year [] 188.738 191.167 317.633 345.449
Total cash value of investments in 2008 [] 10.631.130
Total cash value of operation and maintenance [] 160.035 (calculated until 2028!)
Total cash value of losses in 2008 [] 3.606.122 (losses calculated until 2028!)
Total cash value of network option in 2008 [] 14.397.287
Bericht\4_3_LongTermPlanning\Reports\Cost_evaluation_Alborz_02.xls
page 2 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation Loss evaluation
Alborz
As-is Option 1 Option 2
Year 2008 2010 2013 2018 2013 2018
Total power supplied [MVA] 127,8 130,6 176,0 203,8 175,9 203,5
Total active power supplied [MW] 117,7 120,1 160,5 184,4 160,5 184,4
Total reactive power supplied [MVAr] 49,8 51,4 72,2 86,7 71,9 86,1
total losses (no-load losses + load losses) P [MW] 1,029 1,051 1,305 1,620 1,324 1,576
no-load losses P [MW] 0,181 0,181 0,296 0,296 0,413 0,413
load losses P [MW] 0,848 0,870 1,009 1,324 0,911 1,163
Lost energy per year [MWh] 3146 3186 4449 5029 5294 5757
Price of energy [/MWh] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Price of power [/MW] 5,8 5,8 5,8 5,8 5,8 5,8
Cost of energy losses [] 188.732 191.161 266.947 301.715 317.625 345.440
Cost of power losses [] 6 6 8 9 8 9
Total cost of losses per year [] 188.738 191.167 266.955 301.725 317.633 345.449
J:\SE\ERLS\PT-Consulting\PT5\01_Projects_0200-0299\sk0289_Tavanir\03 Ergebnis, Bericht\4_3_LongTermPlanning\Reports\Cost_evaluation_Alborz_02.xls
page 3 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation Investment
Short term network
Alborz
New Substations
no new substations needed
New lines
no new lines needed
Total line length to newly install [km]: 0,000
Upgraded lines
no upgrade of lines needed
1 line (Alvand - 34319LB00129) overloaded with 101%,
this is supposed to be accepted for the intermediate stage.
Total line length to upgrade [km]: 0,000
Total cost for short term network development [] 0
page 4 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation
Option 1 (2x40 MVA)
Investment
Medium term network
Alborz
New Substations
Total cost per
substation []
Substation Existing 1 700.000
with 2 transformers 63/20 kV, 30/40 MVA 1.300.000
no. of 20 kV feeder bays: 7 140.000
with 2 transformers 63/20 kV, 30/40 MVA 1.300.000
New Switching station
Cost of building is supposed to be included in cost of bays.
Upgraded Substations
Substation Alborz
Number of upgraded transformers 63/20 kV, 30/40 MVA 2 1.300.000
no. of additional 20 kV feeder bays: 0 -
Substation Alvand
no. of additional 20 kV feeder bays: 0 -
Substation Gomrok
no. of additional 20 kV feeder bays: 10 200.000
New Lines
There are many new loads in the Alborz network which are located between the existing ones.
During the planning the existing cables were used as much as possible to connect existing and new loads.
This leads to a situation where in Sincal new cables had to be drawn although mainly the existing ones are used.
An example of such a situation is illustrated in the report in figure 5.2
Therefore no lists can be generated containing new and changed lines as they would contain a large portion
of the already existing lines.
For the cost evaluation only the total length of lines to install or to exchange is needed.
The values for theses lengths are given in the following table in comparison to the existing line lengths.
Type q [mm] Ith [kA] l 2008 [km] l 2013 [km] Difference [km] Cost per km [] Total cost per line type []
59 cable 185 0,222 70,8 126,4 55,6 150.000 8.339.525
32 cable 120 0,32 2,7 0,0 removal
7 cable 95 0,37 1,5 0,9 removal
5 cable 120 0,415 0,2 0,2 0
OHL 126 126 0,285 16,2 0,9 removal
OHL 63 63 0,192 9,5 0,2 removal
OHL 36 36 0,15 4,9 0,6 removal
Total 105,8 129,3
Total line length to install [km]: 55,6
Total cost for medium term development []: 16.859.525
page 5 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation
Option 1 (2x40 MVA)
Investment
Long term network
Alborz
New Substations
no, in 2013 already all installed.
New Lines
no, in 2013 already all installed
between 2013 and 2018 only upgrade of existing lines
Upgraded Lines
Existing lines given. They are upgraded to the standard cable NA2XS2Y 3 x 1 x 185 mm2.
Node 1 Node 2 Type q [mm] l [km] Ith [kA] Cost per km [] Total cost per line []
34319NH00078 34319LB00131 OHL 126 0,6 0,285 25.000 15.000
34318NH20027 34318NH50022 OHL 126 0,3 0,285 25.000 7.500
34319NH10010 34319NH10011 OHL 63 0,04 0,192 25.000 1.000
POLE 34319NH10010 OHL 63 0,03 0,192 25.000 750
POLE 34319SP00012 OHL 63 0,035 0,192 25.000 875
POLE POLE OHL 63 0,135 0,192 25.000 3.375
34319NH50015 34319NH00273 OHL 36 0,12 0,15 25.000 3.000
POLE 34319NH10008 OHL 36 0,09 0,15 25.000 2.250
34319NH10008 34319NH10009 OHL 36 0,095 0,15 25.000 2.375
34319NH50010 34319SP00013 OHL 36 0,3 0,15 25.000 7.500
34319LB00108 34319LB00355 Cable 120 0,0416779 0,415 150.000 6.252
34319LB00124 34319LB00125 Cable 120 0,147 0,415 150.000 22.050
34319LB00125 34319LB00354 Cable 120 0,035 0,415 150.000 5.250
34318LB00202 34318LB00352 Cable 120 0,025 0,32 150.000 3.750
34318LB00205 34318LB00206 Cable 95 0,177 0,37 150.000 26.550
34318LB00186 34318GOMK Cable 95 0,70958391 0,37 150.000 106.438
34319NH00273 34319LB00273 Cable 95 0,035 0,37 150.000 5.250
Total cost for long term network development [] 219.164
page 6 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation
Option 2 (2x30 MVA)
Investment
Medium term network
Alborz
New Substations
Total cost
per
substation
[]
with 2 transformers 63/20 kV, 22,5/30 MVA 1.200.000
Substation New 1 700.000
Substation New 2 700.000
Upgraded Substations
no upgrading of transformers, as substations are already equipped with 30 MVA transformers
Substation Alvand
no. of additional 20 kV feeder bays: 3 18 15 60.000
Substation Gomrok
no. of additional 20 kV feeder bays: 2 10 8 40.000
New Lines
There are many new loads in the Alborz network which are located between the existing ones.
During the planning the existing cables were used as much as possible to connect existing and new loads.
This leads to a situation where in Sincal new cables had to be drawn although mainly the existing ones are used.
An example of such a situation is illustrated in the report in figure 5.2
Therefore no lists can be generated containing new and changed lines as they would contain a large portion
of the already existing lines.
For the cost evaluation only the total length of lines to install or to exchange is needed.
The values for theses lengths are given in the following table in comparison to the existing line lengths.
Type q [mm] Ith [kA] l 2008 [km] l 2013 [km] Difference [kmCost per km [ Total cost per line type []
59 cable 185 0,222 70,8 99,4 28,6 150.000 4.296.587
32 cable 120 0,32 2,7 0,1 removal
7 cable 95 0,37 1,5 0,2 removal
5 cable 120 0,415 0,2 0,2 0,0
OHL 126 126 0,285 16,2 1,8 removal
OHL 63 63 0,192 9,5 0,6 removal
OHL 36 36 0,15 4,9 2,5 removal
Total 105,8 104,9
Total line length to install [km]: 28,6
Total cost for medium term development []: 12.476.587
page 7 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Cost evaluation
Option 2 (2x30 MVA)
Investment
Long term network
Alborz
New Substations
no, in 2013 already all installed.
New Lines
no, in 2013 already all installed
between 2013 and 2018 only upgrade of existing lines
Upgraded Lines
Existing lines given. They are upgraded to the standard cable NA2XS2Y 3 x 1 x 185 mm2.
Node 1 Node 2 Type q [mm] l [km] Ith [kA] Cost per km [ Total cost per line []
34318NH100 34318NH500 OHL 63 0,400 0,192 25.000 10.000
34319NH100 34319NH100 OHL 63 0,045 0,192 25.000 1.132
POLE 34319NH100 OHL 63 0,030 0,192 25.000 750
POLE 34319SP000 OHL 63 0,030 0,192 25.000 750
POLE POLE OHL 63 0,135 0,192 25.000 3.375
34319NH500 34319SP0002OHL 36 0,450 0,15 25.000 11.241
34319NH001 34319NH500 OHL 36 0,550 0,15 25.000 13.750
34319NH500 34319NH002 OHL 36 0,120 0,15 25.000 3.000
34318NH002 34318NH500 OHL 36 0,300 0,15 25.000 7.500
34319NH100 POLE OHL 36 0,400 0,15 25.000 10.000
POLE 34319NH100 OHL 36 0,090 0,15 25.000 2.250
34319NH100 34319NH100 OHL 36 0,095 0,15 25.000 2.375
34319NH500 34319SP000 OHL 36 0,300 0,15 25.000 7.500
34319NH500 34319NH100 OHL 36 0,200 0,15 25.000 5.000
34319LB001034319LB0035Cable 120 0,040 0,415 150.000 6.000
34319LB001234319LB0012Cable 120 0,147 0,415 150.000 22.050
34319LB001234319LB0035Cable 120 0,035 0,415 150.000 5.250
34318LB002034318LB0035Cable 120 0,025 0,32 150.000 3.750
34319NH000 34319LB0007Cable 120 0,074 0,32 150.000 11.140
34318LB002034318LB0020Cable 95 0,177 0,37 150.000 26.550
34319NH002 34319LB0027Cable 95 0,035 0,37 150.000 5.250
34318NH100 34318LB0009Cable 50 0,030 0,26 150.000 4.500
Total cost for long term network development [] 163.113
page 8 of 8
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
From Node To Node Length [km] P [MW] S [MVA] I [A] I/Ir [%]
New049 34318GOMK 0,391 6,826 7,522 207 93
34319ALVD 34319ALVD 0,084 6,662 7,429 206 93
34319NH50015 34319ALVD 0,762 6,638 7,325 203 92
34319LB00097a 34318GOMK 1,555 6,795 7,328 202 91
34319LB00079 34318ALBRb 1,022 6,617 7,251 201 91
Existing_1a 34318NH20027 0,403 6,567 7,208 199 90
34318NH50022 34318LB00051 0,365 6,554 7,192 199 90
34318NH20027 34318NH50022 0,300 6,561 7,199 199 90
34319ALVD 34319LB00130 1,223 6,388 7,069 196 88
34319ALVD 34319LB00142a 1,061 6,357 7,037 195 88
34318LB00051 34318LB00045 0,284 6,346 6,958 193 87
34319NH50015 34319LB00266 0,083 6,302 6,939 193 87
34319LB00138 34319ALVD 0,667 6,216 6,918 192 86
34319LB00266 34319LB00139 0,247 6,186 6,822 190 85
Existing_1b New053 2,119 6,178 6,789 189 85
34319LB00168 New049 0,039 6,229 6,850 189 85
Existing_1b 34318LB00199 1,387 6,190 6,732 188 85
34319ALVD 34319LB00136 0,149 6,198 6,745 187 84
Existing_2b 34318LB00357 1,555 6,073 6,682 184 83
34319LB00168 34319LB00169 0,420 5,964 6,562 181 82
34319LB00136 34319LB00137 0,116 5,913 6,432 178 80
34319LB00169 34319LB00170 0,104 5,863 6,445 178 80
New053 34318LB00211 0,033 5,817 6,346 178 80
Existing_2a 34318LB00011 0,951 5,825 6,381 178 80
34318LB00357 34318SB00358 0,350 5,810 6,367 176 79
34319LB00141 34319LB00138 0,179 5,690 6,324 176 79
Existing_2b 34319LB00105 1,808 5,698 6,342 175 79
34319LB00140 34319LB00141 0,043 5,642 6,270 174 79
Existing_1b 34318LB00052 1,104 5,655 6,241 174 78
34318LB00210 34318LB00211 0,037 5,670 6,191 174 78
34318LB00026 34318SP00003 0,052 5,528 6,182 172 77
New029 Existing_2a 1,757 5,633 6,159 171 77
34318LB00045 34318LB00046 0,120 5,592 6,126 170 77
34319LB00110 New029 0,090 5,590 6,083 170 77
34318LB00209 34318LB00210 0,093 5,520 6,037 170 76
34318SP00003 34318LB00001 0,038 5,528 6,075 169 76
34318LB00104 34318LB00011 0,356 5,521 6,032 168 76
34318LB00208 34318LB00209 0,157 5,380 5,893 166 75
34319LB00111 34319LB00110 0,148 5,420 5,894 165 74
34319LB00137 New014 0,033 5,459 5,931 165 74
34319LB00111 34319LB00112 0,280 5,390 5,863 164 74
34319LB00079 34319LB00085 0,472 5,312 5,849 163 73
34318LB00104 34319SP00016 0,341 5,134 5,638 157 71
34318ALBRa New040 1,193 5,189 5,663 157 71
New040 34319LB00066 0,193 5,144 5,600 156 70
34319LB00170 New048 0,046 5,034 5,542 153 69
Existing_1a New058 0,140 4,999 5,495 152 68
34319SP00016 34319SP00015 0,315 4,928 5,408 151 68
34318GOMK 34318GOMK 0,162 4,605 5,475 151 68
Bericht\4_3_LongTermPlanning\Reports\Blug_2008_07_21_Berichte\Evaluation_line_loading_node_voltages_01.xls
page 1 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
34319LB00112 34319SB00165 0,353 4,947 5,371 150 68
34319LB00066 34319LB00067 0,037 4,951 5,382 150 67
34318SB00358 34319LB00113 1,041 4,932 5,398 150 67
Existing_1a New057 0,871 4,893 5,378 149 67
34318LB00046 34318LB00062 0,232 4,838 5,298 147 66
34319LB00105 34319LB00106 0,052 4,628 5,142 143 64
34318LB00188 34318LB00208 0,220 4,626 5,064 142 64
34319LB00085 34319LB00089 0,351 4,638 5,098 142 64
34319SP00015 New020 0,118 4,616 5,055 141 64
34318LB00197 34318LB00198 0,092 4,655 5,005 140 63
34319LB00158 New020 0,088 4,574 5,008 140 63
34319SB00388 34319SB00165 0,038 4,573 4,980 140 63
34319LB00162 34319SB00388 0,175 4,564 4,972 139 63
34319LB00067 New039 0,269 4,536 4,925 137 62
34319LB00139 New006 0,361 4,456 4,900 136 61
34318LB00062 34318LB00063 0,060 4,472 4,907 136 61
34319LB00113 New024 0,373 4,492 4,900 136 61
34319LB00098 34318GOMK 1,676 4,625 4,937 136 61
34318LB00196 34318LB00197 0,096 4,523 4,860 136 61
New039 34319LB00037 0,317 4,492 4,876 136 61
New014 34319LB00070 0,487 4,504 4,876 135 61
New024 34319LB00163 0,174 4,449 4,850 135 61
New058 34318NH50028 0,054 4,402 4,831 134 60
34318LB00195 34318LB00196 0,092 4,415 4,743 133 60
34319LB00276 34318GOMK 1,443 4,450 4,803 132 60
34318LB00001 34318LB00032 0,144 4,292 4,703 131 59
34319LB00164 34319LB00163 0,063 4,295 4,677 130 59
34319LB00037 34319LB00144 0,050 4,225 4,593 128 58
34319LB00171 New048 0,272 4,199 4,617 128 58
New006 34319LB00149 0,430 4,151 4,561 127 57
New057 34318LB00044 0,402 4,175 4,573 127 57
34318NH50028 34318LB00099 0,340 4,171 4,577 127 57
34318LB00054 34318LB00052 0,133 4,108 4,522 127 57
34318LB00032 34318LB00041 0,238 4,145 4,552 126 57
34319LB00180 34318GOMK 0,346 4,296 4,551 125 57
34318LB00195 34318LB00194 0,200 4,164 4,465 125 56
34319LB00134a Existing_2a 2,943 4,097 4,479 125 56
Existing_2a 34319LB00134a 2,981 4,045 4,422 123 55
34319LB00158 34319SP00014 0,171 3,987 4,357 122 55
34319LB00172 34319LB00171 0,270 4,002 4,402 122 55
34318LB00188 34318SB00187 0,235 3,847 4,238 119 54
34318LB00099 34318SB00387 0,366 3,911 4,294 119 54
34319LB00164 34319LB00166 0,113 3,771 4,097 114 51
34318SB00187 34318LB00350 0,115 3,658 4,024 113 51
New019 34319SP00014 0,314 3,665 4,007 112 51
34318ALBRa 34318LB00352 0,103 3,588 4,007 111 50
34318LB00041 New068 0,053 3,636 3,997 111 50
New018 New019 0,146 3,622 3,958 111 50
34319LB00274 34319LB00070 0,090 3,632 3,969 110 50
page 2 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
34319LB00159 New018 0,107 3,580 3,911 110 49
34319LB00024 34319LB00180 0,607 3,758 3,963 109 49
34318LB00194 34318LB00193 0,035 3,601 3,888 109 49
34318LB00199 New055 0,020 3,555 3,868 108 49
New010 34319LB00274 0,021 3,558 3,891 108 49
34319LB00280 34319LB00279 0,037 3,468 3,853 107 48
34319LB00279 34319ALVD 0,179 3,468 3,855 107 48
34318LB00350 34318LB00091 0,055 3,455 3,798 107 48
New046 34318GOMK 1,239 3,499 3,830 106 48
34318LB00193 New054 0,096 3,474 3,759 105 47
34318ALBRb 34318LB00115 0,290 3,415 3,740 104 47
34319LB00172 New045 0,269 3,404 3,738 103 47
34318LB00047 34318SB00387 0,162 3,376 3,711 103 46
34319LB00166 34319LB00161 0,458 3,367 3,650 102 46
34319LB00106 New028 0,051 3,295 3,660 101 46
34319LB00275 New010 0,112 3,315 3,621 101 45
New028 34318LB00107 0,248 3,252 3,613 100 45
34319LB00161 New022 0,050 3,268 3,538 99 44
34318LB00026 34318ALBRa 0,233 3,154 3,525 98 44
34319ALVD 34319LB00283 0,803 3,142 3,495 97 44
34319LB00175 New045 0,056 3,185 3,493 97 44
New011 34319LB00275 0,033 3,156 3,450 96 43
34318LB00048 34318LB00047 0,037 3,135 3,458 96 43
34318LB00055 34318LB00054 0,072 3,107 3,422 96 43
34319LB00135 34319LB00089 0,460 3,098 3,422 95 43
34148LB00049 34318LB00048 0,190 3,107 3,429 95 43
34319LB00157 34319LB00159 0,042 3,081 3,386 95 43
34318LB00056 34318LB00055 0,108 3,075 3,387 95 43
34319LB00143 34319LB00140 0,220 3,055 3,396 94 43
New068 34318LB00033 0,129 3,039 3,334 93 42
34319LB00179 34318GOMK 0,103 2,988 3,325 92 41
New022 34319LB00160 0,110 3,025 3,268 91 41
New054 34318LB00192 0,036 2,995 3,228 91 41
34318LB00107 New030 0,283 2,906 3,228 90 40
34319LB00179 34319SP00021 1,952 2,890 3,225 89 40
34318GOMK New041 1,834 2,901 3,196 88 40
34318LB00203 34318ALBRa 0,231 2,819 3,094 86 39
New013 34319LB00280 0,080 2,773 3,082 86 39
34319LB00080 34318ALBRa 1,159 2,820 3,044 84 38
34319LB00283 34319LB00131 0,497 2,704 3,006 83 38
34319LB00160 34319LB00156 0,484 2,764 2,980 83 37
34318LB00352 34318LB00026 0,137 2,677 2,994 83 37
34319SP00021 New009 0,203 2,688 2,988 83 37
34319LB00096b 34319LB00097b 0,773 2,637 2,933 81 37
34318LB00203 New080 0,107 2,654 2,924 81 37
34319LB00173 34319LB00174 0,248 2,673 2,927 81 37
34318LB00033 34318LB00019 0,042 2,638 2,914 81 36
34319LB00080 34319LB00083 0,359 2,677 2,889 80 36
34318LB00115 34318LB00116 0,042 2,587 2,861 79 36
page 3 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
34319LB00157 New017 0,032 2,582 2,832 79 36
34318LB00198 34318LB00199 0,150 2,606 2,805 79 35
New030 New027 0,064 2,545 2,827 78 35
34318LB00019 34318LB00020 0,045 2,535 2,800 78 35
New027 34319LB00108 0,060 2,503 2,780 77 35
New007 34319LB00143 0,266 2,483 2,760 77 35
34319LB00176 New046 0,035 2,548 2,767 76 34
34319LB00040 34319LB00276 0,178 2,458 2,731 76 34
New080 34318SP00005 0,057 2,470 2,720 75 34
New044 34319LB00176 0,390 2,490 2,704 75 34
34318LB00116 34318LB00117 0,083 2,429 2,690 75 34
34148LB00049 New066 0,202 2,408 2,669 74 33
34318LB00057 34318LB00056 0,355 2,405 2,642 74 33
34318LB00063 34318LB00064 0,087 2,438 2,649 74 33
34318LB00064 34318LB00065 0,193 2,438 2,649 74 33
New043 34319LB00040 0,115 2,339 2,599 72 32
New017 POLE 0,036 2,340 2,562 72 32
Existing_1b New065 0,989 2,312 2,572 72 32
34318LB00192 34318LB00191 0,038 2,340 2,549 72 32
34319LB00108 34319LB00355 0,042 2,304 2,559 71 32
New065 New064 0,142 2,270 2,522 70 32
New021 34319LB00162 0,136 2,346 2,511 70 32
Existing_2b 34318LB00010 0,973 2,295 2,546 70 32
New064 New063 0,132 2,228 2,475 69 31
New021 34319LB00153 0,452 2,304 2,465 69 31
34318ALBRa 34318SP0004 0,690 2,216 2,462 68 31
New063 New062 0,150 2,185 2,429 68 31
34318LB00204 34318SP00005 0,047 2,204 2,441 68 31
New044 34319LB00039 0,075 2,248 2,434 67 30
34319LB00069 New011 0,030 2,205 2,394 67 30
New062 New061 0,191 2,143 2,382 67 30
34318LB00057 New056 0,078 2,151 2,373 66 30
New061 34318SP00017 0,040 2,101 2,335 65 29
34318LB00191 34318LB00190 0,406 2,120 2,306 65 29
New055 34318LB00198 0,150 2,132 2,290 64 29
POLE 34319NH10010 0,030 2,087 2,282 64 29
POLE POLE 0,135 2,087 2,282 64 29
New013 34319LB00071 0,427 2,058 2,287 63 29
34319LB00155 34319LB00156 0,144 2,083 2,255 63 28
34318ALBRb 34318LB00265 0,489 2,082 2,258 63 28
34318SP0004 New075 0,068 2,020 2,242 62 28
34318LB00034 34318LB00020 0,087 1,976 2,179 61 27
34318LB00185 34318LB00065 0,535 2,001 2,174 60 27
34318LB00117 34318LB00118 0,179 1,931 2,136 59 27
34319LB00149 34319SP00001 0,111 1,907 2,120 59 27
34319LB00153 34319LB00129 0,115 1,943 2,089 59 26
New032 34318ALBRb 0,888 1,928 2,112 59 26
34318SP00017 New060 0,175 1,876 2,084 58 26
34319LB00083 34319LB00084 0,036 1,934 2,064 57 26
page 4 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
34319SP00011 34319NH10011 0,030 1,872 2,042 57 26
34319NH10010 34319NH10011 0,040 1,872 2,043 57 26
New060 New059 0,226 1,833 2,038 57 26
34318LB00021 34318LB00034 0,060 1,839 2,036 57 25
New059 34318SP00018 0,025 1,792 1,991 56 25
34318LB00002 34318LB00010 0,339 1,816 2,012 56 25
34319LB00173 New047 0,018 1,824 2,003 56 25
34319SP00001 New005 0,159 1,784 1,982 55 25
34319LB00281 34319LB00069 0,177 1,805 1,981 55 25
34319LB00355 34319LB00122 0,206 1,769 1,965 55 25
34318LB00044 34318LB00043 0,130 1,784 1,942 54 24
34319SP00011 New016 0,026 1,741 1,899 53 24
34319LB00154 34319LB00155 0,270 1,717 1,866 52 23
New016 34319SP00007 0,238 1,699 1,852 52 23
34319LB00076 New041 0,225 1,714 1,870 52 23
New056 34318LB00058 0,145 1,673 1,841 52 23
34318LB00002 New077 0,403 1,677 1,859 51 23
New038 34318ALBRa 1,345 1,664 1,842 51 23
34318LB00035 34318LB00021 0,066 1,660 1,837 51 23
34319LB00122 34319LB00123 0,165 1,654 1,837 51 23
34318SP00018 34318SP00019 0,115 1,620 1,800 50 23
34319LB00090 New038 0,128 1,622 1,793 50 22
34318LB00265 New073 0,030 1,634 1,759 49 22
34318LB00204 New076 0,217 1,583 1,751 49 22
34319LB00039 34319LB00353 0,036 1,579 1,754 49 22
34319LB00076 34319LB00077 0,075 1,577 1,718 48 21
34319SP00007 New015 0,352 1,542 1,681 47 21
34318LB00035 34318LB00036 0,081 1,531 1,693 47 21
New001 New009 0,611 1,501 1,668 46 21
New015 POLE 0,064 1,501 1,634 46 21
POLE 34319NH10008 0,090 1,501 1,634 46 21
34318LB00189 34318LB00190 0,037 1,499 1,616 45 20
34318LB00118 New072 0,088 1,470 1,624 45 20
New066 34318LB00050 0,135 1,458 1,613 45 20
34318LB00058 34318LB00059 0,354 1,445 1,588 44 20
New075 New074 0,053 1,424 1,580 44 20
34318SP00019 New050 0,057 1,403 1,559 44 20
34319LB00077 34319LB00078 0,063 1,438 1,563 43 19
34319LB00084 New031 0,034 1,473 1,555 43 19
34319LB00038 New043 0,301 1,388 1,543 43 19
34318LB00022 34319LB00024 0,623 1,367 1,513 42 19
34319LB00282 34319LB00130 0,059 1,395 1,498 42 19
34319LB00123 34319LB00124 0,210 1,324 1,470 41 18
34318LB00050 34318LB00200 0,461 1,322 1,469 41 18
34319LB00135 34319LB00132 0,257 1,303 1,448 40 18
34319LB00072 New007 0,110 1,296 1,440 40 18
New072 New071 0,060 1,228 1,354 38 17
34319LB00124 34319LB00125 0,147 1,206 1,340 37 17
34319NH10022 New001 0,078 1,199 1,333 37 17
page 5 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
New005 New004 1,091 1,187 1,319 37 17
New032 34319LB00081 0,244 1,213 1,317 37 16
New042 34318GOMK 1,574 1,187 1,320 36 16
34319LB00090 New035 0,041 1,174 1,301 36 16
34319LB00133 34319LB00132 0,218 1,112 1,236 34 16
34318SB00385 34318LB00022 0,151 1,125 1,243 34 15
34319NH10008 34319NH10009 0,095 1,101 1,190 33 15
New008 34319LB00071 0,163 1,069 1,187 33 15
34319LB00125 34319LB00354 0,035 1,068 1,186 33 15
New031 34319SP00002 0,040 1,112 1,158 32 15
New002 34319NH10022 0,104 1,000 1,111 31 14
34318LB00059 34318LB00351 0,206 0,981 1,090 31 14
New067 34318LB00200 0,078 0,972 1,080 30 13
34319LB00177 New047 0,075 0,992 1,078 30 13
34319SP00023 34319SP00023 0,030 0,958 1,064 29 13
34319SP00023 New002 0,102 0,958 1,064 29 13
New078 New077 0,078 0,963 1,065 29 13
34319LB00354 New023 0,040 0,951 1,056 29 13
34319LB00178 34319LB00177 0,081 0,940 1,022 28 13
34319LB00025 34319LB00178 0,137 0,913 0,993 28 12
New003 34319SP00023 0,120 0,892 0,991 27 12
Existing_2b 34318LB00103 1,665 0,892 0,992 27 12
34319NH10009 34319LB00145 0,190 0,905 0,973 27 12
New074 34318SB00386 0,083 0,827 0,917 25 11
New069 34318LB00043 0,404 0,834 0,910 25 11
New071 34318LB00119 0,063 0,808 0,888 25 11
34319LB00074 34319LB00281 0,187 0,794 0,882 25 11
34319SP00002 34319LB00086 0,074 0,854 0,881 24 11
34319LB00105 34319LB00121 0,390 0,781 0,868 24 11
New073 34318LB00092 0,058 0,801 0,839 23 10
34318LB00351 34318LB00060 0,331 0,728 0,809 23 10
34318LB00189 New051 0,079 0,714 0,794 22 10
New079 POLE 0,181 0,720 0,795 22 10
POLE New078 0,121 0,720 0,795 22 10
34318LB00042 New069 0,049 0,710 0,772 21 10
34319LB00074 New012 0,057 0,667 0,741 21 9
34318LB00101 34318LB00103 0,183 0,647 0,719 20 9
34318LB00184 34318LB00185 0,104 0,637 0,708 20 9
34318LB00206 New076 0,130 0,633 0,695 19 9
34319LB00081 34319LB00082 0,202 0,624 0,692 19 9
34318SB00386 New081 0,035 0,622 0,691 19 9
34318LB00060 New052 0,128 0,596 0,663 19 8
34318LB00036 34319LB00023 0,687 0,603 0,663 18 8
New070 34318SB00385 0,050 0,596 0,663 18 8
New081 34318LB00207 0,079 0,580 0,645 18 8
New037 New035 0,038 0,578 0,639 18 8
34319LB00146 34319LB00145 0,285 0,553 0,595 17 8
New034 New037 0,032 0,536 0,592 16 7
34319LB00154 34319LB00152 0,268 0,531 0,553 15 7
page 6 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
34318LB00092 34318LB00093 0,142 0,511 0,537 15 7
34318LB00101 New082 0,259 0,443 0,492 14 6
New079 34318LB00205 0,334 0,419 0,460 13 6
New033 New034 0,080 0,411 0,454 13 6
34319NH10008 34319SP00008 0,030 0,400 0,444 12 6
34318LB00102 New082 0,149 0,401 0,445 12 6
34318LB00093 34318LB00094 0,240 0,404 0,423 12 5
34318LB00201 New067 0,096 0,375 0,417 12 5
34319NH50015 34319NH00273 0,120 0,335 0,368 10 5
34319NH00273 34319LB00273 0,035 0,335 0,368 10 5
34319LB00282 34319LB00073 0,032 0,319 0,354 10 4
34318SP00006 34319LB00121 0,112 0,283 0,315 9 4
34318LB00095 34318LB00094 0,080 0,290 0,302 8 4
34318LB00202 34318LB00352 0,025 0,267 0,297 8 4
34319LB00147 34319LB00146 0,196 0,261 0,280 8 4
34319LB00151 34319LB00129 0,037 0,261 0,280 8 4
POLE 34319SP00012 0,035 0,252 0,280 8 4
New050 34318SP00020 0,100 0,217 0,241 7 3
34319SP00010 34319NH10010 0,030 0,215 0,239 7 3
34318SP00006 New026 0,088 0,207 0,230 6 3
34318LB00181 34318GOMK 0,633 0,202 0,225 6 3
34319NH10022 34319SP00022 0,030 0,200 0,222 6 3
34319SP0009 34319NH10009 0,030 0,196 0,217 6 3
New033 New036 0,037 0,169 0,185 5 2
New026 New025 0,106 0,165 0,183 5 2
34318LB00183 34318LB00184 0,214 0,139 0,155 4 2
New012 34319LB00075 0,064 0,129 0,144 4 2
New036 34319LB00068 0,160 0,127 0,138 4 2
34319LB00150 New025 0,795 0,123 0,137 4 2
34318LB00119 34318LB00120 0,035 0,106 0,117 3 1
34318LB00091 34318LB00186 0,066 0,095 0,106 3 1
34318LB00102 New083 0,019 0,084 0,093 3 1
34319LB00082 34319LB00088 0,331 0,057 0,062 2 1
New084 New083 0,099 0,042 0,046 1 1
34319NH50010 34319SP00013 0,300 0,037 0,041 1 1
34319LB00159 34319NH50010 0,021 0,037 0,041 1 1
34319SP00013 34319SP00013 0,030 0,037 0,041 1 1
34318LB00181 34318LB00182 0,035 0,027 0,029 1 0
34319LB00138 34319NH00138 0,030 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318NH50019 34318GOMK 0,142 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00151 34319ALVD 0,365 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318SP00020 34318GOMK 0,154 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00201 34318LB00202 0,252 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00095 New070 0,151 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318ALBRb 34318LB00042 0,650 0,000 0,000 0 0
New023 34319LB00150 0,285 0,000 0,000 0 0
New003 New008 0,320 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00207 34318LB00101 0,570 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00179 34318GOMK15 0,195 0,000 0,000 0 0
page 7 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 1
34319LB00147 34319ALVD 0,261 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00150 34319ALVD 0,408 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00088 34319LB00038 0,429 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00182 34319LB00023 0,521 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00075 Schaltstation 1,015 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00186 34318GOMK 0,710 0,000 0,000 0 0
New051 34318GOMK 0,887 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00152 34319ALVD 0,391 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00086 34319LB00353 0,885 0,000 0,000 0 0
New1758 Schaltstation 1,227 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00183 34318GOMK 0,633 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00144 New042 0,847 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318ALBRb 34319LB00096a 2,369 0,000 0,000 0 0
Schaltstation 34319LB00072 2,512 0,000 0,000 0 0
Schaltstation New004 2,642 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00078 34319NH00078 0,025 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319SP00021 34319SB00390 0,030 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00205 34318LB00206 0,177 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00134a 34319ALVD 0,485 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00134a 34319ALVD 0,496 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00120 34318LB00101 0,551 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319NH00078 34319LB00131 0,600 0,000 0,000 0 0
New052 34318NH50019 0,613 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00098 34319LB00068 1,054 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318GOMK Schaltstation 1,234 0,000 0,000 0 0
Schaltstation 34319LB00073 1,361 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318ALBRb 34319LB00025 2,055 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00142 Schaltstation 2,562 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00133 34318GOMK 2,580 0,000 0,000 0 0
page 8 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
34148LB00049 104,1
34318ALBRa 104,1
34318ALBRb 104,1
34318GOMK 104,7
34318GOMK 104,6
34318GOMK15 104,7
34318LB00001 104,0
34318LB00002 104,5
34318LB00010 104,6
34318LB00011 103,5
34318LB00019 103,9
34318LB00020 103,9
34318LB00021 103,9
34318LB00022 104,5
34318LB00026 104,0
34318LB00032 104,0
34318LB00033 103,9
34318LB00034 103,9
34318LB00035 103,9
34318LB00036 103,9
34318LB00041 103,9
34318LB00042 104,1
34318LB00043 104,1
34318LB00044 104,1
34318LB00045 104,0
34318LB00046 103,9
34318LB00047 104,2
34318LB00048 104,2
34318LB00050 104,1
34318LB00051 104,0
34318LB00052 103,2
34318LB00054 103,1
34318LB00055 103,1
34318LB00056 103,1
34318LB00057 103,1
34318LB00058 103,1
34318LB00059 103,0
34318LB00060 103,0
34318LB00062 103,9
34318LB00063 103,9
34318LB00064 103,8
34318LB00065 103,8
34318LB00091 102,6
34318LB00092 104,0
34318LB00093 104,0
34318LB00094 104,0
34318LB00095 104,0
34318LB00099 104,3
34318LB00101 104,6
page 9 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
34318LB00102 104,6
34318LB00103 104,6
34318LB00104 103,4
34318LB00107 104,1
34318LB00115 104,0
34318LB00116 104,0
34318LB00117 104,0
34318LB00118 104,0
34318LB00119 104,0
34318LB00120 104,0
34318LB00181 104,7
34318LB00182 104,7
34318LB00183 103,8
34318LB00184 103,8
34318LB00185 103,8
34318LB00186 102,6
34318LB00188 102,7
34318LB00189 102,9
34318LB00190 102,9
34318LB00191 102,9
34318LB00192 102,9
34318LB00193 102,9
34318LB00194 102,9
34318LB00195 103,0
34318LB00196 103,0
34318LB00197 103,0
34318LB00198 103,0
34318LB00199 103,1
34318LB00200 104,1
34318LB00201 104,1
34318LB00202 104,1
34318LB00203 104,1
34318LB00204 104,0
34318LB00205 104,5
34318LB00206 104,0
34318LB00207 104,0
34318LB00208 102,7
34318LB00209 102,8
34318LB00210 102,8
34318LB00211 102,8
34318LB00265 104,0
34318LB00350 102,6
34318LB00351 103,0
34318LB00352 104,1
34318LB00357 104,2
34318NH20027 104,3
34318NH50019 104,7
34318NH50022 104,2
34318NH50028 104,4
page 10 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
34318SB00187 102,6
34318SB00358 104,1
34318SB00385 104,5
34318SB00386 104,0
34318SB00387 104,2
34318SP00003 104,0
34318SP00005 104,0
34318SP00006 104,1
34318SP00017 103,3
34318SP00018 103,3
34318SP00019 103,2
34318SP00020 103,2
34318SP0004 104,0
34319ALVD 104,1
34319ALVD 104,1
34319ALVD 104,1
34319LB00023 103,9
34319LB00024 104,5
34319LB00025 104,2
34319LB00037 103,6
34319LB00038 104,3
34319LB00039 104,4
34319LB00040 104,3
34319LB00066 103,7
34319LB00067 103,7
34319LB00068 104,0
34319LB00069 103,9
34319LB00070 103,9
34319LB00071 104,0
34319LB00072 103,7
34319LB00073 103,7
34319LB00074 103,8
34319LB00075 103,8
34319LB00076 104,4
34319LB00077 104,4
34319LB00078 104,4
34319LB00079 103,7
34319LB00080 103,9
34319LB00081 104,0
34319LB00082 104,0
34319LB00083 103,9
34319LB00084 103,9
34319LB00085 103,6
34319LB00086 103,9
34319LB00088 104,0
34319LB00089 103,5
34319LB00090 104,0
34319LB00096a 104,0
34319LB00096b 104,0
page 11 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
34319LB00097a 104,1
34319LB00097b 104,1
34319LB00098 104,3
34319LB00105 104,1
34319LB00106 104,1
34319LB00108 104,0
34319LB00110 103,3
34319LB00111 103,2
34319LB00112 103,1
34319LB00113 103,8
34319LB00121 104,1
34319LB00122 104,0
34319LB00123 104,0
34319LB00124 104,0
34319LB00125 104,0
34319LB00129 102,9
34319LB00130 103,7
34319LB00131 103,9
34319LB00132 103,4
34319LB00133 103,4
34319LB00134a 103,2
34319LB00135 103,5
34319LB00136 104,0
34319LB00137 104,0
34319LB00138 103,9
34319LB00139 103,7
34319LB00140 103,8
34319LB00141 103,8
34319LB00142 103,8
34319LB00142a 103,8
34319LB00143 103,8
34319LB00144 103,6
34319LB00145 102,9
34319LB00146 102,9
34319LB00147 102,9
34319LB00149 103,5
34319LB00150 104,1
34319LB00151 102,9
34319LB00152 103,5
34319LB00153 102,9
34319LB00154 103,5
34319LB00155 103,5
34319LB00156 103,5
34319LB00157 103,0
34319LB00158 103,2
34319LB00159 103,0
34319LB00160 103,6
34319LB00161 103,6
34319LB00162 103,0
page 12 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
34319LB00163 103,7
34319LB00164 103,7
34319LB00166 103,7
34319LB00168 104,5
34319LB00169 104,4
34319LB00170 104,4
34319LB00171 104,3
34319LB00172 104,3
34319LB00173 104,2
34319LB00174 104,2
34319LB00175 104,2
34319LB00176 104,4
34319LB00177 104,2
34319LB00178 104,2
34319LB00179 104,7
34319LB00180 104,6
34319LB00266 103,8
34319LB00273 103,8
34319LB00274 103,9
34319LB00275 103,9
34319LB00276 104,3
34319LB00279 104,0
34319LB00280 104,0
34319LB00281 103,8
34319LB00282 103,7
34319LB00283 103,9
34319LB00353 104,4
34319LB00354 104,0
34319LB00355 104,0
34319NH00078 104,4
34319NH00138 103,9
34319NH00273 103,8
34319NH10008 102,9
34319NH10009 102,9
34319NH10010 103,0
34319NH10011 103,0
34319NH10022 104,3
34319NH50010 103,0
34319NH50015 103,8
34319SB00165 103,0
34319SB00388 103,0
34319SB00390 104,4
34319SP00001 103,5
34319SP00002 103,9
34319SP00007 103,0
34319SP00008 102,9
34319SP00010 103,0
34319SP00011 103,0
34319SP00012 103,0
page 13 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
34319SP00013 103,0
34319SP00013 103,0
34319SP00014 103,1
34319SP00015 103,2
34319SP00016 103,3
34319SP00021 104,4
34319SP00022 104,3
34319SP00023 104,3
34319SP00023 104,3
34319SP0009 102,9
63 Alborz 100,0
ALVAND 100,0
EXISITING_2 100,0
EXISTING_1 100,0
Existing_1a 104,4
Existing_1b 103,5
Existing_2a 103,8
Existing_2b 104,7
GOMROK 100,0
N1525 104,1
N1527 104,1
N1528 104,1
N1529 104,1
N1531 104,6
N1536 104,7
New001 104,3
New002 104,3
New003 104,3
New004 103,4
New005 103,5
New006 103,6
New007 103,7
New008 104,0
New009 104,4
New010 103,9
New011 103,9
New012 103,8
New013 104,0
New014 104,0
New015 103,0
New016 103,0
New017 103,0
New018 103,1
New019 103,1
New020 103,2
New021 103,0
New022 103,6
New023 104,0
New024 103,7
page 14 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
New025 104,1
New026 104,1
New027 104,0
New028 104,1
New029 103,3
New030 104,0
New031 103,9
New032 104,0
New033 104,0
New034 104,0
New035 104,0
New036 104,0
New037 104,0
New038 104,0
New039 103,7
New040 103,8
New041 104,4
New042 104,6
New043 104,3
New044 104,4
New045 104,2
New046 104,4
New047 104,2
New048 104,4
New049 104,6
New050 103,2
New051 102,9
New052 103,0
New053 102,8
New054 102,9
New055 103,1
New056 103,1
New057 104,2
New058 104,4
New059 103,3
New060 103,3
New061 103,3
New062 103,3
New063 103,3
New064 103,4
New065 103,4
New066 104,1
New067 104,1
New068 103,9
New069 104,1
New070 104,5
New071 104,0
New072 104,0
New073 104,0
page 15 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 1
Name U/Un [%]
New074 104,0
New075 104,0
New076 104,0
New077 104,5
New078 104,5
New079 104,5
New080 104,0
New081 104,0
New082 104,6
New083 104,6
New084 104,6
New1758 104,6
POLE 102,9
POLE 103,0
POLE 103,0
POLE 104,5
Schaltstation 104,6
page 16 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
New_2b New004 0,277 -6,371 7,079 196 88
New_1b New041 0,979 -6,474 7,083 196 88
34319LB00142 New_2a 0,653 6,357 7,028 194 88
34319LB00276 New_1a 1,215 6,618 7,017 194 87
34319LB00130 New_1b 1,736 6,340 7,001 193 87
34319ALVD New043 1,394 -6,318 6,765 189 85
Existing_2a New029 1,853 -5,924 6,453 179 80
34319LB00179 34318GOMK 0,195 5,943 6,475 178 80
34318LB00026 34318ALBR 0,233 5,750 6,428 178 80
34319LB00110 New029 0,090 5,851 6,372 177 80
Existing_2a 34318LB00357 1,696 5,809 6,390 177 80
Existing_2a 34318LB00011 1,015 5,826 6,383 177 80
Exisiting_1a 34318NH20027 0,398 5,774 6,353 176 79
34318NH20027 34318NH50022 0,283 5,770 6,346 176 79
34318NH50022 New057 0,172 -5,770 6,341 176 79
34319LB00179 34319LB00180 0,260 5,849 6,371 176 79
34319LB00105 Existing_2b 1,764 5,697 6,340 175 79
Existing_1b 34318LB00052 1,069 5,655 6,240 173 78
34319LB00111 34319LB00110 0,148 5,681 6,184 172 77
34319LB00111 34319LB00112 0,280 5,650 6,153 171 77
34318LB00357 34318SB00358 0,367 5,547 6,074 169 76
34318LB00026 34318SP00003 0,080 5,448 6,089 169 76
34318LB00104 34318LB00011 0,368 5,522 6,033 167 75
34319LB00025 34318GOMK 0,868 5,487 6,027 166 75
34318SP00003 34318LB00001 0,083 5,447 5,982 166 75
34319LB00149 New_2a 0,319 5,360 5,904 163 74
34319LB00097a New043 0,112 5,342 5,684 160 72
34319LB00180 34318LB00181 0,334 5,310 5,779 159 72
34319LB00072 New004 0,378 5,174 5,749 159 72
34319LB00076 New041 0,218 5,267 5,741 159 72
34319LB00112 34319SB00165 0,359 5,207 5,661 158 71
34318LB00104 34319SP00016 0,344 5,135 5,639 157 71
Existing_2a Existing_2b 0,226 5,175 5,585 154 70
34318LB00051 New057 0,201 5,051 5,541 154 69
34318LB00181 34318LB00182 0,035 5,134 5,579 154 69
34319LB00023 34318LB00182 0,513 5,101 5,549 153 69
34319LB00089 34319ALVD1 0,584 4,973 5,466 153 69
Exisiting_1a New058 0,133 -5,001 5,497 152 69
34319NH10016 34319SP00016 0,030 4,932 5,408 150 68
34319NH10015 34319NH10016 0,300 4,928 5,408 150 68
34319NH10015 34319SP00015 0,030 4,928 5,404 150 68
34318LB00051 34318LB00045 0,286 4,844 5,315 148 67
34319SB00388 34319SB00165 0,038 4,833 5,269 147 66
34319SB00388 34319LB00162 0,177 4,824 5,261 147 66
34318GOMK New049 0,416 -4,834 5,317 146 66
34318LB00183 34318GOMK 0,699 4,842 5,308 146 66
34319LB00135 34319ALVD2 0,200 4,625 5,119 143 64
34318SB00358 34319LB00113 1,031 4,670 5,106 142 64
34318LB00183 34318LB00184 0,234 4,700 5,145 142 64
page 17 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
New_1a New_1b 0,242 4,523 5,102 141 63
34319SP00015 New020 0,112 -4,618 5,056 141 63
34319LB00158 New020 0,078 4,574 5,007 139 63
34319LB00025 34319LB00178 0,137 4,573 5,021 139 62
34319LB00178 34319LB00177 0,081 4,546 4,990 138 62
34318GOMK New050 0,284 -4,577 4,997 138 62
34318NH10027 34318LB00027 0,030 4,496 4,956 138 62
Existing_1b 34318LB00027 0,434 4,497 4,961 138 62
34318NH10027 34318NH50021 0,400 4,493 4,956 138 62
34318NH50021 New065 0,154 -4,493 4,951 138 62
34318LB00203 34318ALBR1 0,409 4,499 4,959 137 62
34319LB00276 34319LB00098 0,122 4,625 4,921 136 61
34319LB00023 34319LB00037 0,780 4,492 4,880 135 61
34318NH50028 New058 0,054 4,403 4,832 134 60
34318LB00203 New080 0,122 -4,335 4,786 133 60
34318SP00017 New061 0,030 4,277 4,711 131 59
34319LB00113 New024 0,415 -4,234 4,610 129 58
34319LB00168 New049 0,062 4,233 4,649 128 58
34318LB00001 34318LB00033 0,437 4,209 4,609 128 58
34319LB00163 New024 0,173 4,187 4,558 127 57
34319LB00037 34319LB00144 0,055 4,225 4,593 127 57
34318NH10099 34318NH50029 0,200 4,171 4,576 127 57
34318NH50029 34318NH50028 0,300 4,173 4,579 127 57
34318NH10099 34318LB00099 0,030 4,171 4,574 127 57
34318SP00005 New080 0,064 4,150 4,580 127 57
34318LB00184 34318LB00185 0,104 4,201 4,589 127 57
34319LB00078 New_1b 1,307 4,144 4,580 127 57
34318LB00054 34318LB00052 0,133 4,108 4,522 126 57
34319LB00134a 34319ALVD1 0,246 4,104 4,463 125 56
34318SP00017 New060 0,167 -4,051 4,460 124 56
34318LB00091 New060 0,272 4,006 4,410 123 55
34319LB00134a 34319ALVD1 0,250 4,038 4,392 123 55
34319LB00164 34319LB00163 0,063 4,033 4,387 122 55
Exisiting_1a New055 1,325 -4,074 4,405 122 55
34318ALBR 34318LB00265 0,488 3,992 4,402 122 55
34319LB00158 34319SP00014 0,145 3,988 4,357 121 55
34319LB00168 34319LB00169 0,420 3,972 4,362 120 54
34319LB00072 New007 0,110 -3,878 4,309 119 54
34318LB00204 34318SP00005 0,025 3,883 4,302 119 54
34318LB00099 34318SB00387 0,356 3,911 4,294 119 54
34319LB00169 34319LB00170 0,104 3,872 4,249 117 53
New_2a New005 0,525 -3,815 4,224 117 53
34318LB00033 34318LB00019 0,037 3,807 4,185 116 52
34319LB00105 34319LB00106 0,052 3,726 4,139 115 52
34318LB00019 34318LB00020 0,045 3,704 4,071 113 51
34319NH50005 New019 0,164 -3,666 4,006 112 50
34319NH50005 34319NH10014 0,200 3,666 4,007 112 50
34319NH10014 34319SP00014 0,030 3,667 4,008 112 50
34319LB00159 New018 0,106 3,580 3,910 109 49
page 18 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
34318LB00265 New073 0,060 -3,544 3,900 108 49
New_2a New_2b 0,239 3,554 3,878 107 48
34319LB00164 34319LB00166 0,126 3,510 3,806 106 48
34319LB00085 34319LB00089 0,382 3,433 3,786 106 48
34318ALBR2 34318LB00115 0,290 3,415 3,740 104 47
34318LB00047 34318SB00387 0,162 3,376 3,710 103 46
34318LB00186 New050 0,366 3,386 3,675 101 46
34318LB00204 New076 0,219 -3,262 3,612 100 45
34319LB00076 34319LB00077 0,075 3,324 3,608 100 45
34319LB00143 New005 0,421 3,213 3,555 99 44
34318LB00186 34318LB00350 0,092 3,290 3,569 98 44
34318LB00048 34318LB00047 0,037 3,135 3,458 96 43
34319LB00277 34319LB00136 0,065 3,096 3,431 96 43
N1573 34319LB00277 0,071 3,096 3,432 96 43
34319ALVD1 N1573 0,252 3,097 3,433 96 43
34319LB00149 34319SP00001 0,111 3,115 3,461 96 43
34319LB00077 34319LB00073 0,344 3,183 3,453 96 43
34318LB00020 34318LB00034 0,086 3,145 3,450 96 43
34148LB00049 34318LB00048 0,152 3,107 3,429 95 43
34318LB00055 34318LB00054 0,072 3,107 3,422 95 43
34319LB00157 34319LB00159 0,042 3,082 3,387 94 43
34318LB00056 34318LB00055 0,108 3,075 3,387 94 42
34319LB00161 34319LB00166 0,488 3,106 3,360 94 42
Exisiting_1a Existing_1b 0,240 3,111 3,352 93 42
34319LB00170 New048 0,044 -3,043 3,347 92 42
34318SB00187 34318LB00350 0,115 3,086 3,343 92 42
34319LB00142a 34319LB00142 0,044 2,958 3,324 92 41
34319SP00001 New006 0,364 -2,992 3,324 92 41
34318LB00034 34318LB00021 0,046 3,008 3,306 92 41
34319LB00161 New022 0,050 -3,007 3,248 91 41
34319LB00135 34319LB00132 0,242 2,829 3,145 88 40
34319LB00136 34319LB00137 0,113 2,813 3,121 87 39
34318LB00044 34318LB00045 0,049 2,860 3,137 87 39
34318LB00188 34318SB00187 0,235 2,897 3,131 86 39
34318LB00021 34318LB00035 0,053 2,829 3,108 86 39
34318LB00185 34318LB00065 0,535 2,836 3,124 86 39
34319LB00282 34319LB00073 0,036 2,864 3,098 86 39
34319LB00085 New031 0,049 -2,763 3,040 85 38
34319LB00078 34319NH00078 0,025 2,706 3,006 83 38
34319NH00078 34319LB00131 0,600 2,704 3,006 83 38
34319LB00156 New022 0,142 2,764 2,978 83 38
N1574 New006 0,176 2,688 2,987 83 37
N1574 34319LB00140 0,165 2,688 2,987 83 37
34318LB00092 New073 0,063 2,711 2,974 82 37
34318LB00035 34318LB00036 0,066 2,700 2,964 82 37
34319LB00132 34319LB00096a 0,403 2,637 2,932 82 37
34319LB00139 34319LB00143 0,255 2,641 2,920 81 36
34318LB00115 34318LB00116 0,042 2,587 2,861 79 36
34319LB00157 New017 0,043 -2,582 2,832 79 36
page 19 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
34318LB00199 New055 0,023 2,642 2,818 78 35
34319LB00162 34319LB00160 0,140 2,606 2,799 78 35
34318LB00198 34318LB00199 0,143 2,612 2,786 77 35
34319LB00177 New047 0,076 -2,521 2,769 76 34
34318LB00197 34318LB00198 0,092 2,531 2,696 75 34
34319LB00173 New044 0,507 -2,492 2,704 75 34
34318LB00116 34318LB00117 0,083 2,429 2,690 75 34
34148LB00049 New066 0,205 -2,409 2,670 74 33
34318LB00092 34318LB00093 0,142 2,420 2,675 74 33
34319LB00084 New031 0,044 2,402 2,639 74 33
34319LB00106 New028 0,051 -2,393 2,658 74 33
34318LB00057 34318LB00056 0,355 2,405 2,642 74 33
34319LB00137 New014 0,051 -2,360 2,622 73 33
34318LB00064 34318LB00065 0,193 2,399 2,648 73 33
34318LB00063 34318LB00064 0,087 2,399 2,647 73 33
34318LB00107 New028 0,248 2,350 2,611 73 33
34319SP00012 New017 0,043 2,340 2,562 71 32
34318LB00093 New040 0,539 -2,313 2,562 71 32
34318LB00196 34318LB00197 0,096 2,400 2,553 71 32
34318LB00206 New076 0,128 2,311 2,554 71 32
34319LB00160 New021 0,112 -2,347 2,511 70 32
34319LB00066 New040 0,190 2,270 2,513 70 31
34319LB00153 New021 0,439 2,304 2,464 69 31
34319LB00133 34319ALVD1 0,467 2,281 2,449 68 31
34318SP0004 34318ALBR1 0,910 2,216 2,462 68 31
34319LB00024 34318GOMK 0,833 2,390 2,466 68 31
34318LB00195 34318LB00196 0,092 2,292 2,436 68 31
34319LB00039 New044 0,090 2,248 2,433 67 30
34319LB00171 New048 0,280 2,210 2,422 67 30
34318LB00057 New056 0,077 -2,151 2,373 66 30
34318ALBR2 New032 0,891 -2,157 2,325 64 29
34319LB00066 34319LB00067 0,037 2,076 2,298 64 29
POLE POLE 0,135 2,087 2,282 64 29
POLE 34319SP00012 0,030 2,088 2,282 64 29
POLE 34319NH10010 0,030 2,087 2,282 64 29
34318LB00188 New051 0,119 -2,120 2,305 64 29
New_2b New008 0,834 -2,059 2,288 63 29
34319LB00155 34319LB00156 0,118 2,083 2,255 63 28
34318ALBR2 34318LB00032 0,332 2,085 2,276 63 28
34318SP0004 34318NH10004 0,030 2,020 2,242 62 28
34318NH10004 New075 0,047 -2,020 2,242 62 28
34318LB00107 New030 0,283 -2,005 2,227 62 28
34319LB00172 34319LB00171 0,270 2,014 2,210 61 27
34318LB00195 34318LB00194 0,200 2,042 2,160 60 27
34319LB00177 34319LB00173 0,113 1,972 2,164 60 27
34319LB00083 34319LB00084 0,036 1,941 2,127 60 27
34318LB00117 34318LB00118 0,179 1,931 2,136 59 27
34318LB00032 34318LB00041 0,235 1,940 2,126 59 27
34319LB00153 34319LB00129 0,118 1,943 2,089 58 26
page 20 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
34319SP00011 34319NH10011 0,030 1,872 2,043 57 26
34319NH10010 34319NH10011 0,045 1,872 2,043 57 26
34319SP00023 New003 0,109 1,797 1,996 55 25
34319LB00076 34319LB00075 0,219 1,805 1,981 55 25
34319LB00282 34319LB00283 0,139 1,788 1,954 54 24
34318LB00095 34318LB00036 0,213 1,772 1,933 54 24
34319SP00023 New002 0,117 -1,730 1,923 53 24
34319SP00011 New016 0,026 -1,741 1,899 53 24
34319LB00154 34319LB00155 0,307 1,717 1,866 52 23
34319SP00022 New002 0,151 1,688 1,876 52 23
34319LB00121 34319LB00105 0,377 1,681 1,868 52 23
34319SP00007 New016 0,233 1,699 1,852 52 23
34318LB00205 34318LB00206 0,177 1,678 1,859 52 23
34318LB00058 New056 0,143 1,673 1,841 51 23
34319LB00067 New039 0,283 -1,664 1,841 51 23
34319LB00075 New012 0,070 -1,676 1,837 51 23
34319LB00173 New047 0,018 1,688 1,844 51 23
34319LB00068 New039 0,230 1,622 1,793 50 22
34319LB00108 New027 0,048 1,603 1,780 49 22
34319LB00039 34319LB00353 0,035 1,579 1,754 48 22
34319NH10007 34319SP00007 0,030 1,543 1,681 47 21
POLE 34319NH10008 0,090 1,542 1,680 47 21
34319NH10007 POLE 0,400 1,542 1,681 47 21
Exisiting_1a New053 1,806 -1,548 1,679 47 21
34319LB00040 New_1a 1,296 1,507 1,676 46 21
34319LB00068 New036 0,140 -1,495 1,655 46 21
34319SP00022 New001 0,075 -1,488 1,654 46 21
34318LB00095 34318LB00094 0,080 1,481 1,634 45 20
34318LB00118 New072 0,088 -1,470 1,624 45 20
34318LB00050 New066 0,137 1,458 1,613 45 20
34319LB00175 34319LB00174 0,036 1,442 1,602 44 20
34318LB00058 34318LB00059 0,354 1,445 1,588 44 20
34318LB00194 34318LB00193 0,035 1,479 1,582 44 20
34319LB00280 New014 0,027 1,409 1,565 44 20
34318LB00041 New068 0,040 -1,431 1,572 44 20
34319LB00108 34319LB00355 0,040 1,404 1,559 43 20
34319LB00172 New045 0,261 -1,418 1,547 43 19
34319LB00038 34319LB00040 0,406 1,388 1,543 43 19
34319LB00079 New032 0,054 1,440 1,532 42 19
34318LB00094 New070 0,214 -1,367 1,513 42 19
34318LB00189 New051 0,073 1,406 1,512 42 19
34318LB00050 34318LB00200 0,475 1,322 1,469 41 18
34319LB00283 New011 0,513 -1,351 1,469 41 18
34318LB00193 New054 0,096 -1,353 1,453 40 18
34319LB00070 34319LB00130 0,355 1,347 1,424 40 18
34318LB00205 New079 0,341 -1,259 1,399 39 17
34318LB00045 34318LB00046 0,118 1,232 1,349 38 17
34319LB00097a New042 0,095 -1,187 1,318 37 17
34318SP00006 34319LB00121 0,122 1,184 1,315 37 16
page 21 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
34319LB00082 34319LB00083 0,083 1,198 1,301 36 16
34319LB00175 New045 0,051 1,199 1,304 36 16
34318LB00211 New053 0,033 1,185 1,277 35 16
34319NH10008 34319NH10009 0,095 1,143 1,237 34 16
34319LB00074 New012 0,056 1,138 1,240 34 15
34318SP00006 New026 0,085 -1,107 1,230 34 15
34319LB00088 34319LB00133 0,336 1,169 1,220 34 15
34319LB00086 34319LB00088 0,195 1,112 1,158 32 15
34318NH50006 New025 0,078 1,024 1,137 32 14
34319LB00150 34318NH50006 0,727 1,023 1,137 32 14
34318LB00210 34318LB00211 0,037 1,038 1,123 31 14
34319LB00174 New046 0,219 -1,008 1,120 31 14
34319LB00141 34319LB00140 0,147 1,017 1,115 31 14
34319LB00281 34319LB00074 0,165 1,011 1,099 30 14
34319NH00071 New008 0,158 0,989 1,099 30 14
34319NH00071 34319LB00071 0,074 0,989 1,099 30 14
34318LB00059 34318LB00351 0,226 0,981 1,090 30 14
34318LB00200 New067 0,070 -0,972 1,080 30 14
POLE New078 0,121 -0,957 1,063 30 13
POLE New079 0,176 0,957 1,063 30 13
34319LB00141 34319LB00266 0,272 0,969 1,064 29 13
34319NH10009 34319LB00145 0,140 0,947 1,020 28 13
34318LB00352 34318ALBR 0,104 0,911 1,012 28 13
34319LB00150 New023 0,292 -0,900 0,999 28 13
34319LB00140 34319LB00139 0,037 0,915 1,002 28 13
34318LB00103 Existing_2b 1,670 0,892 0,992 27 12
34318LB00209 34318LB00210 0,093 0,890 0,969 27 12
34318NH50007 34319LB00122 0,040 0,869 0,964 27 12
34319LB00355 34318NH50007 0,170 0,869 0,965 27 12
34319LB00273 34319LB00266 0,187 0,857 0,948 26 12
34318LB00192 New054 0,038 0,874 0,924 26 12
34318SB00386 New074 0,072 0,827 0,917 25 11
34318LB00042 New068 0,088 0,834 0,910 25 11
34318LB00119 New071 0,063 0,808 0,888 25 11
34318SB00385 New070 0,035 0,771 0,850 24 11
34319LB00122 34319LB00123 0,037 0,754 0,837 23 10
34318LB00208 34318LB00209 0,157 0,752 0,826 23 10
34318LB00351 34318LB00060 0,355 0,728 0,809 23 10
34319LB00280 New013 0,093 -0,715 0,794 22 10
34318LB00091 New059 0,273 -0,647 0,719 20 9
34318LB00101 34318LB00103 0,183 0,647 0,719 20 9
34318SB00386 New081 0,035 -0,622 0,691 19 9
34318LB00189 34318LB00190 0,037 0,621 0,690 19 9
34318LB00010 Existing_2b 1,047 0,617 0,684 19 9
34319LB00082 New038 0,098 -0,631 0,673 19 8
34318SP00018 New059 0,058 0,605 0,672 19 8
34318LB00060 New052 0,130 -0,596 0,663 18 8
34319LB00145 New015 0,103 -0,595 0,641 18 8
34318LB00207 New081 0,051 0,580 0,645 18 8
page 22 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
34319LB00081 New038 0,100 0,589 0,627 18 8
34319LB00146 New015 0,613 0,553 0,595 17 7
34319NH00273 34319LB00273 0,035 0,523 0,581 16 7
34319NH50015 34319NH00273 0,120 0,523 0,581 16 7
34319NH00138 34319NH50015 0,550 0,522 0,581 16 7
34319LB00138 34319NH00138 0,060 0,522 0,581 16 7
34319LB00154 34319LB00152 0,260 0,531 0,553 15 7
34318LB00043 34318LB00046 0,116 0,480 0,523 15 7
34319LB00274 34319LB00070 0,090 0,475 0,518 14 6
34318LB00044 34318LB00043 0,130 0,469 0,509 14 6
34319LB00090 New035 0,041 0,448 0,492 14 6
34318LB00101 New082 0,295 -0,443 0,492 14 6
34318SP00018 34318SP00019 0,121 0,433 0,481 13 6
34319LB00123 34319LB00124 0,210 0,424 0,471 13 6
34319NH10008 34319SP00008 0,030 0,400 0,444 12 6
34318LB00102 New082 0,146 0,401 0,445 12 6
34319LB00274 New010 0,021 -0,402 0,440 12 6
34318LB00201 New067 0,094 0,375 0,417 12 5
34319LB00069 New011 0,051 0,400 0,417 12 5
34318LB00062 34318LB00063 0,060 0,366 0,389 11 5
34319LB00173 34319LB00175 0,265 0,320 0,387 11 5
34319LB00124 34319LB00125 0,147 0,306 0,341 9 4
34318LB00202 34318LB00352 0,025 0,267 0,297 8 4
34319SP00002 34319LB00086 0,074 0,258 0,280 8 4
34319LB00151 34319LB00129 0,037 0,261 0,280 8 4
34319LB00147 34319LB00146 0,196 0,261 0,280 8 4
34318SB00385 34318LB00022 0,151 0,242 0,269 7 3
34318LB00192 34318LB00191 0,038 0,219 0,243 7 3
34318SP00019 34318SP00020 0,180 0,217 0,241 7 3
34319SP00010 34319NH10010 0,030 0,215 0,239 7 3
34319NH50018 34319SP00021 0,450 0,201 0,228 6 3
34319NH50018 New_1b 0,847 0,201 0,228 6 3
34319SP0009 34319NH10009 0,030 0,196 0,217 6 3
34319LB00125 34319LB00354 0,035 0,168 0,187 5 2
34319LB00275 New010 0,120 0,159 0,171 5 2
34318LB00010 34318LB00002 0,344 0,138 0,152 4 2
34319LB00079 34319LB00080 0,065 0,142 0,151 4 2
34318LB00042 New069 0,038 -0,124 0,138 4 2
34318LB00119 34318LB00120 0,035 0,106 0,117 3 1
34318LB00102 New083 0,019 -0,084 0,093 3 1
34319LB00176 New046 0,035 0,057 0,063 2 1
34319LB00354 New023 0,040 -0,051 0,057 2 1
34319NH50010 34319LB00159 0,021 0,037 0,041 1 1
34319NH50010 34319SP00013 0,300 0,037 0,041 1 1
34319SP00013 34319SP00013 0,030 0,037 0,041 1 1
34318LB00207 34318NH00207 0,038 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318SP00020 34318NH50019 0,093 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00179 34318GOMK15 0,195 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318NH00207 34318NH50004 0,300 0,000 0,000 0 0
page 23 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Line utilization
Alborz
Option 2
34319LB00069 34319LB00281 0,175 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00090 34319SP00002 0,276 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00208 34318LB00190 0,373 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00279 34319ALVD2 0,135 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318NH50019 34318GOMK 0,150 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00101 34318NH50004 0,246 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00151 34319ALVD 0,346 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00152 34319ALVD 0,393 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00101 34318LB00120 0,608 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00002 New077 0,400 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319SP00021 New009 0,194 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00080 34319LB00081 0,252 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00062 New069 0,281 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00275 34319ALVD2 0,679 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00353 34319ALVD 1,389 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00281 34319ALVD2 0,543 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00191 34318GOMK 1,177 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00071 34319LB00131 0,859 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00176 34319ALVD2 1,938 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00044 34318ALBR 0,918 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318GOMK New052 0,684 0,000 0,000 0 0
New_1a New042 1,250 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00098 34318GOMK 1,458 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319SP00021 34319SB00390 0,030 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00201 34318LB00202 0,252 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00147 34319ALVD2 0,274 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00150 34319ALVD1 0,299 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00096b 34319LB00038 0,417 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00279 34319LB00138 0,552 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00139 New013 0,562 0,000 0,000 0 0
34318LB00022 34319LB00024 0,621 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00142a New1792 0,947 0,000 0,000 0 0
34319LB00144 34319ALVD2 1,142 0,000 0,000 0 0
page 24 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
34148LB00049 103,8
34318ALBR 104,3
34318ALBR1 104,3
34318ALBR2 104,3
34318GOMK 104,8
34318GOMK 104,8
34318GOMK15 104,8
34318LB00001 104,1
34318LB00002 104,4
34318LB00010 104,4
34318LB00011 104,1
34318LB00019 104,0
34318LB00020 104,0
34318LB00021 104,0
34318LB00022 104,0
34318LB00026 104,2
34318LB00027 104,0
34318LB00032 104,2
34318LB00033 104,1
34318LB00034 104,0
34318LB00035 104,0
34318LB00036 104,0
34318LB00041 104,2
34318LB00042 104,2
34318LB00043 103,7
34318LB00044 103,7
34318LB00045 103,7
34318LB00046 103,7
34318LB00047 103,8
34318LB00048 103,8
34318LB00050 103,8
34318LB00051 103,8
34318LB00052 103,8
34318LB00054 103,8
34318LB00055 103,8
34318LB00056 103,8
34318LB00057 103,7
34318LB00058 103,7
34318LB00059 103,7
34318LB00060 103,7
34318LB00062 104,5
34318LB00063 104,5
34318LB00064 104,5
34318LB00065 104,5
34318LB00091 103,7
34318LB00092 104,1
34318LB00093 104,1
34318LB00094 104,0
34318LB00095 104,0
page 25 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
34318LB00099 103,9
34318LB00101 104,3
34318LB00102 104,3
34318LB00103 104,3
34318LB00104 104,0
34318LB00107 103,9
34318LB00115 104,2
34318LB00116 104,2
34318LB00117 104,2
34318LB00118 104,2
34318LB00119 104,2
34318LB00120 104,2
34318LB00181 104,6
34318LB00182 104,6
34318LB00183 104,6
34318LB00184 104,6
34318LB00185 104,6
34318LB00186 104,7
34318LB00188 104,6
34318LB00189 104,6
34318LB00190 104,6
34318LB00191 103,7
34318LB00192 103,7
34318LB00193 103,8
34318LB00194 103,8
34318LB00195 103,8
34318LB00196 103,8
34318LB00197 103,8
34318LB00198 103,8
34318LB00199 103,8
34318LB00200 103,7
34318LB00201 103,7
34318LB00202 104,3
34318LB00203 104,2
34318LB00204 104,1
34318LB00205 104,1
34318LB00206 104,1
34318LB00207 104,1
34318LB00208 103,9
34318LB00209 104,0
34318LB00210 104,0
34318LB00211 104,0
34318LB00265 104,2
34318LB00350 104,7
34318LB00351 103,7
34318LB00352 104,3
34318LB00357 103,9
34318NH00207 104,1
34318NH10004 104,2
page 26 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
34318NH10027 104,0
34318NH10099 103,9
34318NH20027 104,0
34318NH50004 104,1
34318NH50006 103,8
34318NH50007 103,8
34318NH50019 103,7
34318NH50021 103,9
34318NH50022 103,9
34318NH50028 104,1
34318NH50029 104,0
34318SB00187 104,7
34318SB00358 103,8
34318SB00385 104,0
34318SB00386 104,1
34318SB00387 103,9
34318SP00003 104,2
34318SP00005 104,1
34318SP00006 103,9
34318SP00017 103,8
34318SP00018 103,7
34318SP00019 103,7
34318SP00020 103,7
34318SP0004 104,2
34319ALVD 103,3
34319ALVD1 103,3
34319ALVD2 103,3
34319LB00023 104,5
34319LB00024 104,7
34319LB00025 104,6
34319LB00037 104,3
34319LB00038 104,4
34319LB00039 104,4
34319LB00040 104,4
34319LB00066 104,0
34319LB00067 104,0
34319LB00068 104,0
34319LB00069 104,0
34319LB00070 103,9
34319LB00071 104,3
34319LB00072 104,2
34319LB00073 104,0
34319LB00074 104,1
34319LB00075 104,1
34319LB00076 104,1
34319LB00077 104,1
34319LB00078 104,2
34319LB00079 104,2
34319LB00080 104,2
page 27 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
34319LB00081 103,0
34319LB00082 103,0
34319LB00083 103,0
34319LB00084 103,0
34319LB00085 103,0
34319LB00086 103,2
34319LB00088 103,2
34319LB00089 103,1
34319LB00090 104,0
34319LB00096a 103,1
34319LB00096b 104,4
34319LB00097a 102,8
34319LB00098 104,1
34319LB00105 103,9
34319LB00106 103,9
34319LB00108 103,8
34319LB00110 103,8
34319LB00111 103,7
34319LB00112 103,7
34319LB00113 103,5
34319LB00121 103,9
34319LB00122 103,8
34319LB00123 103,8
34319LB00124 103,8
34319LB00125 103,8
34319LB00129 103,4
34319LB00130 103,9
34319LB00131 104,1
34319LB00132 103,2
34319LB00133 103,2
34319LB00134a 103,2
34319LB00135 103,2
34319LB00136 103,2
34319LB00137 103,2
34319LB00138 104,1
34319LB00139 104,1
34319LB00140 104,1
34319LB00141 104,1
34319LB00142 104,1
34319LB00142a 104,1
34319LB00143 104,2
34319LB00144 104,3
34319LB00145 103,5
34319LB00146 103,5
34319LB00147 103,5
34319LB00149 104,3
34319LB00150 103,8
34319LB00151 103,4
34319LB00152 103,2
page 28 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
34319LB00153 103,4
34319LB00154 103,2
34319LB00155 103,2
34319LB00156 103,3
34319LB00157 103,6
34319LB00158 103,7
34319LB00159 103,6
34319LB00160 103,5
34319LB00161 103,3
34319LB00162 103,5
34319LB00163 103,4
34319LB00164 103,4
34319LB00166 103,4
34319LB00168 104,7
34319LB00169 104,6
34319LB00170 104,6
34319LB00171 104,6
34319LB00172 104,5
34319LB00173 104,5
34319LB00174 104,5
34319LB00175 104,5
34319LB00176 104,5
34319LB00177 104,5
34319LB00178 104,5
34319LB00179 104,8
34319LB00180 104,7
34319LB00266 104,1
34319LB00273 104,1
34319LB00274 103,9
34319LB00275 103,9
34319LB00276 104,1
34319LB00277 103,2
34319LB00279 104,1
34319LB00280 103,2
34319LB00281 104,0
34319LB00282 104,0
34319LB00283 104,0
34319LB00353 104,4
34319LB00354 103,8
34319LB00355 103,8
34319NH00071 104,3
34319NH00078 104,2
34319NH00138 104,1
34319NH00273 104,1
34319NH10007 103,5
34319NH10008 103,5
34319NH10009 103,5
34319NH10010 103,6
34319NH10011 103,6
page 29 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
34319NH10014 103,7
34319NH10015 103,8
34319NH10016 103,9
34319NH50005 103,7
34319NH50010 103,6
34319NH50015 104,1
34319NH50018 104,4
34319SB00165 103,6
34319SB00388 103,6
34319SB00390 104,4
34319SP00001 104,2
34319SP00002 103,2
34319SP00007 103,5
34319SP00008 103,5
34319SP00010 103,6
34319SP00011 103,5
34319SP00012 103,6
34319SP00013 103,6
34319SP00013 103,6
34319SP00014 103,7
34319SP00015 103,8
34319SP00016 103,9
34319SP00021 104,4
34319SP00022 104,1
34319SP00023 104,1
34319SP0009 103,5
63 Alborz 100,0
ALVAND 100,0
Exisiting_1 100,0
Exisiting_1a 104,1
Existing_1b 104,1
Existing_2 100,0
Existing_2a 104,4
Existing_2b 104,4
GOMROK 100,0
N1525 104,3
N1527 104,3
N1528 103,3
N1529 103,3
N1531 104,8
N1536 104,8
N1573 103,2
N1574 104,2
New_1 100,0
New_1a 104,5
New_1b 104,5
New_2 100,0
New_2a 104,4
New_2b 104,4
page 30 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
New001 104,0
New002 104,1
New003 104,1
New004 104,3
New005 104,2
New006 104,2
New007 104,2
New008 104,3
New009 104,0
New010 103,9
New011 104,0
New012 104,1
New013 103,2
New014 103,2
New015 103,5
New016 103,5
New017 103,6
New018 103,6
New019 103,6
New020 103,8
New021 103,5
New022 103,3
New023 103,8
New024 103,4
New025 103,9
New026 103,9
New027 103,8
New028 103,9
New029 103,8
New030 103,8
New031 103,0
New032 104,2
New033 104,0
New034 104,0
New035 104,0
New036 104,0
New037 104,0
New038 103,0
New039 104,0
New040 104,1
New041 104,1
New042 102,8
New043 102,8
New044 104,5
New045 104,5
New046 104,5
New047 104,5
New048 104,6
New049 104,7
page 31 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Long term network
Load flow results
Node voltages
Alborz
Option 2
Name U/Un [%]
New050 104,8
New051 104,6
New052 103,7
New053 104,0
New054 103,7
New055 103,8
New056 103,7
New057 103,8
New058 104,1
New059 103,7
New060 103,7
New061 103,8
New062 103,8
New063 103,8
New064 103,9
New065 103,9
New066 103,8
New067 103,7
New068 104,2
New069 104,2
New070 104,0
New071 104,2
New072 104,2
New073 104,2
New074 104,1
New075 104,1
New076 104,1
New077 104,0
New078 104,0
New079 104,0
New080 104,1
New081 104,1
New082 104,3
New083 104,3
New084 104,3
POLE 103,5
POLE 103,6
POLE 103,6
POLE 104,0
page 32 of 32
.
.
sk0289 / Ha
21.07.2008
Alborz Primary Sub-Station
Gomrok Primary Sub-Station
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
228 kVA
673 kVA
895 kVA
562 kVA
562 kVA
784 kVA
228 kVA
395 kVA
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
895 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
562 kVA
673 kVA 4
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
3
9
k
V
A
450 kVA
3
3
9
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
1117 kVA
562 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
784 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
206 kVA
228 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
673 kVA
339 kVA
339 kVA
3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
673 kVA
5
0
6
k
V
A
895 kVA
228 kVA
1117 kVA
1006 kVA
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1117 kVA
8
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
27
0
6
kV
A
0
k
W
2
5
9
8
k
V
A
0 kW
2592 kVA
0 kW
2592 kVA
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
673 kVA
-1
1
8
k
W
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
-42 kW
46 kVA
273 kVA
-755 kW
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
-105 kW
117 kVA
-327 kW
344 kVA
-111 kW
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
2
0
4
kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kV
A
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
5
2
9 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
k
V
A
2
8
7
k
V
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
1
3
9
kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
k
V
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
ALVAND S/S
1000,0 MVA
41042 kW
42731 kVA
GOMROK
1000,0 MVA
27845 kW
30084 kVA
ALBORZ
1000,0 MVA
48818 kW
55556 kVA
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Power Transmission and Distribution
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
A E.01 Alborz_2008_05_As_is.sin
PTD SE PTI NC
20 kV existing network Power Technologies International
checked:
changed.:
Order No.: PTD SE PTI NC / sk0289 / Bl
Load stage 2008
Node Element
P [kW]
S [kVA]
Input Data
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
228 kVA
673 kVA
895 kVA
562 kVA
562 kVA
784 kVA
228 kVA
395 kVA
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
895 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
562 kVA
673 kVA 4
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
3
9
k
V
A
450 kVA
3
3
9
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
1117 kVA
562 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
784 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
206 kVA
228 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
673 kVA
339 kVA
339 kVA
3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
673 kVA
5
0
6
k
V
A
895 kVA
228 kVA
1117 kVA
1006 kVA
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1117 kVA
8
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
27
0
6
kV
A
0
k
W
2
5
9
8
k
V
A
0 kW
2592 kVA
0 kW
2592 kVA
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
673 kVA
-1
1
8
k
W
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
-42 kW
46 kVA
273 kVA
-755 kW
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
-105 kW
117 kVA
-327 kW
344 kVA
-111 kW
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
2
0
4
kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kV
A
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
5
2
9 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
k
V
A
2
8
7
k
V
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
1
3
9
kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
k
V
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
ALVAND S/S
1000,0 MVA
41042 kW
42731 kVA
GOMROK
1000,0 MVA
27845 kW
30084 kVA
ALBORZ
1000,0 MVA
48818 kW
55556 kVA
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
supply areas feeder
Load stage 2008
Node Element
P [kW]
S [kVA]
Input Data
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
228 kVA
673 kVA
895 kVA
562 kVA
562 kVA
784 kVA
228 kVA
395 kVA
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
895 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
562 kVA
673 kVA 4
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
3
9
k
V
A
450 kVA
3
3
9
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
1117 kVA
562 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
784 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
206 kVA
228 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
673 kVA
339 kVA
339 kVA
3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
673 kVA
5
0
6
k
V
A
895 kVA
228 kVA
1117 kVA
1006 kVA
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1117 kVA
8
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
27
0
6
kV
A
0
k
W
2
5
9
8
k
V
A
0 kW
2592 kVA
0 kW
2592 kVA
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
673 kVA
-1
1
8
k
W
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
-42 kW
46 kVA
273 kVA
-755 kW
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
-105 kW
117 kVA
-327 kW
344 kVA
-111 kW
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
2
0
4
kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kV
A
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
5
2
9 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
k
V
A
2
8
7
k
V
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
1
3
9
kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
k
V
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
ALVAND S/S
1000,0 MVA
41042 kW
42731 kVA
GOMROK
1000,0 MVA
27845 kW
30084 kVA
ALBORZ
1000,0 MVA
48818 kW
55556 kVA
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Supply areas feeder substations
Load stage 2008
Node Element
P [kW]
S [kVA]
Input Data
f
h
g
of Hchn
of {dx
hdh ch hdh p
l k-
', fha t,c
'
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_

h
g
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
c
28
7 2
k- hgc
fhv tvhf
fhv hf s { f
5 1 4 1
of f
of oh{ k xs
fhv l wvh
hdh
nv hg
fhvhl;yf
gg hjg hgc ` h,v j
2
;vj `v
f f `v
hdh à `v h` fgs hdh gf hdh
f ft
w d 'chdh
ld
;
2 0
;
}k
gg
1 hjg
6 2
hdh
;vfhjv
lfh
ll
hgck
`v ,ha
k jh
jh v w
kvhgd
'hk r,d
of a- fm
8
fhv lnhln yf
fhv l wvh
fhv rm l thik
8 1
;f hgc
6
o
f
{
f hf p
7
; vhc
shj
1 2
of f
l
2
2
rv
fhv rm l thik
tht
nd
19
}f ;}
w d
f cd
jl hgc
Hvnla
9
1
6
5
3
3
8 2 2
2
6
0 2
1
4 3
8
5
3
1
1
1
9
7
2
2 1
10
6
4
1
3
2
sc
lchm
lv
`v
k{
w d
hgc
hfw
,a;
kvf r n
of oh{ k xs
am jh|
a ;
11
ak
hgc }
g
`v
j hgc
ah
ak
hdh ;
3 3
9
1
2 1 3 3
7 2
5 2
3 2
8
0 3
6
4
7 1
2
1
gg
;
hjg
}k
hgc k
r
hdh ;l
hgc
hvd onv,
`v '
hlh j
lj
;vfhjv
a t
ak
;vfhjvhdh
t sc k,l ;
fha hgc
ldh hgc
hdh
gs
hgc d
w hdh
fhv lnhln yf
am `d
1 3
k
fd
nk lsv hdh
t
,pt h
;
vhc
1
lvs
r s
c hdh
4
fhv s,vn
8
of {fhf p
2 1
fhv tvhf
`s la
;g ,a;
kcvk
o
f
hfvd
f,k
fhv tvhf
f
;
g
f
;
g
td
hgc
hs
s a
s hgd 1
`s
hdh
j
`v g
;vcd
Hj k
hdh ;vfhjv l hgd
ia
vk cv
3-
`k
l k-
`k
i t
`
t fvs
l l
7
j
hthft
r `s
` ;
` sch
nd;
x 'c
'n
nhk,
fhv hf s { f
à ft hdh
n,}o ,ljv s sc hdh
hgc
Hgl
of p dcni
;}h
`j
vd
hdh
2
nhv,
a
2
o
f
h f v d
f , k
j f
; hgc
H,k`s
of p ni
|, l ,h hdh rx
uhg
l- ` hdh
`
3 2
l
vt
fk
;sv sc hdh
4 2
of p i
fgh `
nk hgc
of p ni
of ul r,d
i i
gl
t `v
k,
sk l ;
ft
hdh
j
w d
fvhgc
`s `
Hbvr
fvhgc
w d l
'ld
ph
hgc
la
flgd
w
`v
vk
,p
onsch
l
g
y
'
jv
k-
p
hd
s
l
i ft
sdv
'hn
jhk
w d
5 2
hgc nhv,
x
`,d
f
of p i
of p a
f f jghv,
;vh,y
k hdh
1 5
fhv lnhln yf
thj
vi x
6 1
gl hdh
fhv lnhln ar
hdh `,hk
av
n,nl
of l
j
j
8
j
ljv;v
kvn,
of p `
`s vh
j
fhv hf s ag
j
9
s``s
s h
w d
j,h
hdh
nv,
jg `
of {{k
hv
Hg
1
hdh i
H,k ;v
H,k ;v
7
'
Hf
fhv lnhln ar
jd
jf jf
; ,l u ;y hdh
r `v
jd
01
Hf
of p a
Hf
Hf
Hf )h`(
o
f
b;d
vhc
,v ft
hdh
; hgc
w d hs
la nhv,
of p s
n; vp
od
fvs
l;t
,pt hd
ohih
ov }
fhv s,vn
htha g o,vh
` }
ss a
,vca ;v;h
aw hgc
hdh |khjv hs `jh
;l
h,vhk
xrh
h; hgc
lm
wd
` f
'c ;
of p }v
} sc hgc
v,; }f
`d
a ;v ; k
4
';ch
sl Htd
5
shl hgc
1 2
hdh a g
r hgc } j fj
`v `l
hdh`
of {{k
vhl
s hgc
hgc `s
;h hdh
nhnv
hdh
xv ft
r,d
ft '
vhl
hdh v,
vk `l
6
nhk h; hdh r
ad
`v `l
ad
s r,d
f
;
H
f
n
hnhv 'cvsk aw hgc
a w hgc
j ok
;l hdh
ghc ok `v
fhvp `kni
l
gv| `nv hdh
lgv| `nv hdh
3
w d
s
shl hr
9
vhnh ;
`v s
of a- fm
s`
hdh
lsv
k r,d
js }
b, k s
`v g
35
;f `v
3
;vj hgc
fhv t
vhf
l- sc y
0
`v
fhv hl; yf
2
hgc
;y
9
nhv,sch
fd nk
hdh
s
hkvlj
ol
a
;a hgk 1 ;a `v
of p }vni
a ;,vc
0 4
6
`v hgd
3
7 3
fhv hf s { f
l a a chn
w d
l a l
w d on;m
`v p
3
r `v
8
on;m
k
hgc
3 3
jg hl
sni
of a- fm
p of
3 2
a; xhp ,so w
1 3
oah
hd lv
hv;
jg
s
v,h
jc
ljv
jc
ljv
l pd
vq
ft
w
k{
fhv hl; ar
hdh
;
}
hdh
`ch
`ch
'c;
lni `
3
'c;
'c;
Hbvvcd
`v }
jv, 4
jv,
fhv hl; ar
j,k
hgc
w d
8 4
'
hdh }
Hchnh
o
jh cvk-
of p d
` `,` hdh ;
; v sc hdh hdh }
hdh sk
lh
fhv s,vn
f hv hf s
a
g
of b;d vhc
` f d
'k
Hj k
hlv }i ,l f H
f k Hfn
k, l ; ; sc
n s p d
`n chd
`k
fhv
s hgd 2
hdh vd
;a hgk 2
jd
w d s h
hdhk 3
of ;v'
Hvk
hthk-
lk
;
g x
ak d k-
|gj p
`;
htv
s
hdh
2
;a hgk 3
of ohvcl
`;
`;
jh
vhc
;
vhc
Hbv vcd
k- a
; '
{
v,%%177 h...
w d s h
hdhk 4
}f
j k-
vk
sh Hvh
Hvl `,
s hgc
k- j
hgc
sda
d lu
vqv{
sda
fhvp `kni
s hgc
01 l
lh r
`s g;
dst
,cd fv
, a;
hdh Hd
`v p
dkvhdh
lh ol
' r ln
p k
lh ;v'
ghc hjl hdh
rgd kd
'
hdhk
gfhjhv
of ul r,d
of {{k
o
f
a - f
m
tH,v
nhv,d
s nhk
r hjl
k,l ;
jg `v
v,; gs
r,d
of b;d vhc
Hvhd
gfhjhv
o
f
b;d
vhc
`s s v
2
Hd l
l
jl h{u
hnhv f
lfh
; hlhn
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
228 kVA
673 kVA
895 kVA
562 kVA
562 kVA
784 kVA
228 kVA
395 kVA
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
895 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
562 kVA
673 kVA 4
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
3
9
k
V
A
450 kVA
3
3
9
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
1117 kVA
562 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
784 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
206 kVA
228 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
673 kVA
339 kVA
339 kVA
3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
673 kVA
5
0
6
k
V
A
895 kVA
228 kVA
1117 kVA
1006 kVA
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1117 kVA
8
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
27
0
6
kV
A
0
k
W
2
5
9
8
k
V
A
0 kW
2592 kVA
0 kW
2592 kVA
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
673 kVA
-1
1
8
k
W
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
-42 kW
46 kVA
273 kVA
-755 kW
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
-105 kW
117 kVA
-327 kW
344 kVA
-111 kW
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
2
0
4
kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kV
A
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
5
2
9 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
k
V
A
2
8
7
k
V
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
1
3
9
kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
k
V
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
ALVAND S/S
1000,0 MVA
41042 kW
42731 kVA
GOMROK
1000,0 MVA
27845 kW
30084 kVA
ALBORZ
1000,0 MVA
48818 kW
55556 kVA
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load stage 2008
Node Element
P [kW]
S [kVA]
Input Data
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
228 kVA
673 kVA
895 kVA
562 kVA
562 kVA
784 kVA
228 kVA
395 kVA
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
895 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
562 kVA
673 kVA 4
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
3
9
k
V
A
450 kVA
3
3
9
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
1117 kVA
562 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
784 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
206 kVA
228 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
673 kVA
339 kVA
339 kVA
3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
895 kVA
673 kVA
5
0
6
k
V
A
895 kVA
228 kVA
1117 kVA
1006 kVA
1
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
5
6
2
k
V
A
1117 kVA
8
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
27
0
6
kV
A
0
k
W
2
5
9
8
k
V
A
0 kW
2592 kVA
0 kW
2592 kVA
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
0
kW 2
5
9
2
kV
A
673 kVA
-1
1
8
k
W
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
-42 kW
46 kVA
273 kVA
-755 kW
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
-105 kW
117 kVA
-327 kW
344 kVA
-111 kW
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
2
0
4
kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kV
A
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
5
2
9 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
k
V
A
2
8
7
k
V
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
1
3
9
kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
k
V
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA
8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
ALVAND S/S
1000,0 MVA
41042 kW
42731 kVA
GOMROK
1000,0 MVA
27845 kW
30084 kVA
ALBORZ
1000,0 MVA
48818 kW
55556 kVA
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load stage 2008
Node Element
P [kW]
S [kVA] Load Flow Results
Node

Filter V/Vn [%]:
V/Vn<95[%]
95[%]<=V/Vn<105[%]
V/Vn>=105[%]
Branch Element

Filter I/Ib [%]:
I/Ib<50[%]
50[%]<=I/Ib<100[%]
I/Ib>=100[%]
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
3
9
6
8
0
k
V
A
4
2
2
8
7
k
V
A
370 kV
A
4
00
kV
A
715 kVA
253 kVA
297 kVA
243 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
204 kVA
3
3
5
kV
A
269 kVA
794 kVA
1056 kVA
663 kVA 663 kVA
925 kVA
269 kVA
466 kVA
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1056 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
663 kVA
794 kVA
5
3
2
k
V
A
1
5
8
1
k
V
A
532 kVA
4
0
0
k
V
A
663 kVA
794 kVA
1318 kVA
663 kVA
9
2
5
k
V
A
925 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
243 kVA
269 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
794 kVA
400 kVA
400 kVA
4
6
kV
A
46 kVA
46 kVA 46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
1056 kVA
269 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
1056 kVA
794 kVA
5
9
7
k
V
A
1056 kVA
269 kVA
1318 kVA 1187 kVA
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1318 kVA
9
9
1
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
7 kVA
2
1
2
k
V
A
5
8
0
k
V
A
226 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
3323 kV
A
2
6
3
0
k
V
A
2601 kVA
2601 kVA
2599 kV
A
2599 kV
A
826 kVA
1
5
1
k
V
A
3
6
8
k
V
A
3004 kVA
4592 kVA
56 kVA
335 kVA
1031 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
144 kVA
422 kVA
144 kVA
7
4
k
V
A
2
2
2
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
241 kVA
241 kVA
191 kVA
251 kV
A
280 kVA
246 kVA
137 kVA
280 kVA
217 kVA
85 kVA
171 kVA
444 kVA
217 kVA
1
4
4
k
V
A
2
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
4
1
k
V
A
3
4
9
kV
A
349 kVA
226 kVA
9
6
3
k
V
A
152 kVA
1372 kVA
3
2
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
499 kVA
2
69
kV
A
1
0
9
9
k
V
A
3
5
k
V
A
7
4
4
k
V
A
1
6
9
9
k
V
A
226 kVA
144 kVA
7
5
9
k
V
A
2
9
k
V
A
2
5
3
k
V
A
117 kVA
772 kVA
5
3
1
k
V
A
3
3
2
k
V
A
394 kV
A
650 kV
A
303 kVA
594 kVA
221 kVA
383 kVA
1481 kVA
187 kVA
29 kVA 4
8
8
k
V
A
485 kVA
389 kVA
2464 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
4
4
7
k
V
A
1
7
1
k
V
A
110 kVA
288 kVA
5
5
5
k
V
A
485 kV
A
724 kVA
3
8
9
k
V
A
1
3
1
7
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
3
7
6
k
V
A
1
8
0
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
8
8
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
7
k
V
A
280 kVA
314 kVA
3
7
9
k
V
A
130 kVA
1
5
3
k
V
A
130 kVA
366 kVA
1
2
7
k
V
A
553 kVA
286 kVA
27
2 kV
A
2
2
7
kV
A
3
5
3
kV
A
512 kVA
553 kVA
171 kVA
881 kVA
645 kVA
695 kVA
460 kVA
690 kVA
171 kV
A
3
0
2
k
V
A
1
2
1
k
V
A
114 kVA
302 kVA
499 kVA
114 kVA
621 kVA
198 kVA
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
9
2
k
V
A
138 kVA
4
5
8
k
V
A
2
1
5
k
V
A
1382 kVA
151 kVA
627 kVA
630 kVA
512 kVA
744 kVA 881 kVA
62 kVA
1
6
7
2
k
V
A
1235 kVA
212 kVA 1972 kVA
310 kVA
499 kVA
772 kVA
580 kVA
1
1
7
kV
A
1918 kVA
51 kVA
2873 kVA
6
3
5
k
V
A
3694 kVA
2439 kVA
1
4
4
0
k
V
A
1099 kVA
5
5
4
8
k
V
A
417 kVA
171 kVA
78 kVA
908 kVA
4
8
5
k
V
A
1
1
4
5
k
V
A
3
5
4
k
V
A
1563 kVA
155 kVA
152 kVA 1
0
9
9
k
V
A
1
4
1
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
2930 kVA
280 kVA
1
5
4
3
k
V
A
4374 kVA
4
9
2
0
k
V
A
1
7
1
0
k
V
A
1
3
2
k
V
A
1754 kVA
690 kVA
6
3
k
V
A
84 kVA
4
8
2
k
V
A
2
1
2
k
V
A
9
0
1
k
V
A
2259 kVA
389 kVA
474 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
4
6
6
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
2
4
6
4
k
V
A
1
0
0
k
V
A
1
8
7
k
V
A
993 kVA
29 kVA
923 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
0
k
V
A
287 kVA
1
9
5
kV
A
2
9
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
2
2
6
k
V
A
4
1
7
k
V
A
3
8
9
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
7
7
2
k
V
A
1032 kVA
2627 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
8
2
6
k
V
A
690 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
3
6
9
2
k
V
A
1
0
6
k
V
A
147 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
683 kVA
580 kVA
130 kVA
2
7
8
k
V
A
40227 kVA
4
1
5
9
4
k
V
A
4
0
7
3
0
k
V
A
Schaltstation
104,6 %
Existing_1 Sub-Station
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
A 1.01 Alborz_LT_Var1_03_Long_Term.sin
PTD SE PTI NC
20 kV network Power Technologies International
checked:
changed.:
Load stage 2018
Option 1
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Input Data
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
3
9
6
8
0
k
V
A
4
2
2
8
7
k
V
A
370 kV
A
4
00
kV
A
715 kVA
253 kVA
297 kVA
243 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
204 kVA
3
3
5
kV
A
269 kVA
794 kVA
1056 kVA
663 kVA 663 kVA
925 kVA
269 kVA
466 kVA
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1056 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
663 kVA
794 kVA
5
3
2
k
V
A
1
5
8
1
k
V
A
532 kVA
4
0
0
k
V
A
663 kVA
794 kVA
1318 kVA
663 kVA
9
2
5
k
V
A
925 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
243 kVA
269 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
794 kVA
400 kVA
400 kVA
4
6
kV
A
46 kVA
46 kVA 46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
1056 kVA
269 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
1056 kVA
794 kVA
5
9
7
k
V
A
1056 kVA
269 kVA
1318 kVA 1187 kVA
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1318 kVA
9
9
1
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
7 kVA
2
1
2
k
V
A
5
8
0
k
V
A
226 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
3323 kV
A
2
6
3
0
k
V
A
2601 kVA
2601 kVA
2599 kV
A
2599 kV
A
826 kVA
1
5
1
k
V
A
3
6
8
k
V
A
3004 kVA
4592 kVA
56 kVA
335 kVA
1031 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
144 kVA
422 kVA
144 kVA
7
4
k
V
A
2
2
2
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
241 kVA
241 kVA
191 kVA
251 kV
A
280 kVA
246 kVA
137 kVA
280 kVA
217 kVA
85 kVA
171 kVA
444 kVA
217 kVA
1
4
4
k
V
A
2
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
4
1
k
V
A
3
4
9
kV
A
349 kVA
226 kVA
9
6
3
k
V
A
152 kVA
1372 kVA
3
2
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
499 kVA
2
69
kV
A
1
0
9
9
k
V
A
3
5
k
V
A
7
4
4
k
V
A
1
6
9
9
k
V
A
226 kVA
144 kVA
7
5
9
k
V
A
2
9
k
V
A
2
5
3
k
V
A
117 kVA
772 kVA
5
3
1
k
V
A
3
3
2
k
V
A
394 kV
A
650 kV
A
303 kVA
594 kVA
221 kVA
383 kVA
1481 kVA
187 kVA
29 kVA 4
8
8
k
V
A
485 kVA
389 kVA
2464 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
4
4
7
k
V
A
1
7
1
k
V
A
110 kVA
288 kVA
5
5
5
k
V
A
485 kV
A
724 kVA
3
8
9
k
V
A
1
3
1
7
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
3
7
6
k
V
A
1
8
0
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
8
8
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
7
k
V
A
280 kVA
314 kVA
3
7
9
k
V
A
130 kVA
1
5
3
k
V
A
130 kVA
366 kVA
1
2
7
k
V
A
553 kVA
286 kVA
27
2 kV
A
2
2
7
kV
A
3
5
3
kV
A
512 kVA
553 kVA
171 kVA
881 kVA
645 kVA
695 kVA
460 kVA
690 kVA
171 kV
A
3
0
2
k
V
A
1
2
1
k
V
A
114 kVA
302 kVA
499 kVA
114 kVA
621 kVA
198 kVA
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
9
2
k
V
A
138 kVA
4
5
8
k
V
A
2
1
5
k
V
A
1382 kVA
151 kVA
627 kVA
630 kVA
512 kVA
744 kVA 881 kVA
62 kVA
1
6
7
2
k
V
A
1235 kVA
212 kVA 1972 kVA
310 kVA
499 kVA
772 kVA
580 kVA
1
1
7
kV
A
1918 kVA
51 kVA
2873 kVA
6
3
5
k
V
A
3694 kVA
2439 kVA
1
4
4
0
k
V
A
1099 kVA
5
5
4
8
k
V
A
417 kVA
171 kVA
78 kVA
908 kVA
4
8
5
k
V
A
1
1
4
5
k
V
A
3
5
4
k
V
A
1563 kVA
155 kVA
152 kVA 1
0
9
9
k
V
A
1
4
1
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
2930 kVA
280 kVA
1
5
4
3
k
V
A
4374 kVA
4
9
2
0
k
V
A
1
7
1
0
k
V
A
1
3
2
k
V
A
1754 kVA
690 kVA
6
3
k
V
A
84 kVA
4
8
2
k
V
A
2
1
2
k
V
A
9
0
1
k
V
A
2259 kVA
389 kVA
474 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
4
6
6
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
2
4
6
4
k
V
A
1
0
0
k
V
A
1
8
7
k
V
A
993 kVA
29 kVA
923 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
0
k
V
A
287 kVA
1
9
5
kV
A
2
9
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
2
2
6
k
V
A
4
1
7
k
V
A
3
8
9
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
7
7
2
k
V
A
1032 kVA
2627 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
8
2
6
k
V
A
690 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
3
6
9
2
k
V
A
1
0
6
k
V
A
147 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
683 kVA
580 kVA
130 kVA
2
7
8
k
V
A
40227 kVA
4
1
5
9
4
k
V
A
4
0
7
3
0
k
V
A
Schaltstation
104,6 %
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load stage 2018
Option 1
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Input Data
Supply areas feeder
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
3
9
6
8
0
k
V
A
4
2
2
8
7
k
V
A
370 kV
A
4
00
kV
A
715 kVA
253 kVA
297 kVA
243 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
204 kVA
3
3
5
kV
A
269 kVA
794 kVA
1056 kVA
663 kVA 663 kVA
925 kVA
269 kVA
466 kVA
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1056 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
663 kVA
794 kVA
5
3
2
k
V
A
1
5
8
1
k
V
A
532 kVA
4
0
0
k
V
A
663 kVA
794 kVA
1318 kVA
663 kVA
9
2
5
k
V
A
925 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
243 kVA
269 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
794 kVA
400 kVA
400 kVA
4
6
kV
A
46 kVA
46 kVA 46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
1056 kVA
269 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
1056 kVA
794 kVA
5
9
7
k
V
A
1056 kVA
269 kVA
1318 kVA 1187 kVA
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1318 kVA
9
9
1
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
7 kVA
2
1
2
k
V
A
5
8
0
k
V
A
226 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
3323 kV
A
2
6
3
0
k
V
A
2601 kVA
2601 kVA
2599 kV
A
2599 kV
A
826 kVA
1
5
1
k
V
A
3
6
8
k
V
A
3004 kVA
4592 kVA
56 kVA
335 kVA
1031 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
144 kVA
422 kVA
144 kVA
7
4
k
V
A
2
2
2
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
241 kVA
241 kVA
191 kVA
251 kV
A
280 kVA
246 kVA
137 kVA
280 kVA
217 kVA
85 kVA
171 kVA
444 kVA
217 kVA
1
4
4
k
V
A
2
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
4
1
k
V
A
3
4
9
kV
A
349 kVA
226 kVA
9
6
3
k
V
A
152 kVA
1372 kVA
3
2
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
499 kVA
2
69
kV
A
1
0
9
9
k
V
A
3
5
k
V
A
7
4
4
k
V
A
1
6
9
9
k
V
A
226 kVA
144 kVA
7
5
9
k
V
A
2
9
k
V
A
2
5
3
k
V
A
117 kVA
772 kVA
5
3
1
k
V
A
3
3
2
k
V
A
394 kV
A
650 kV
A
303 kVA
594 kVA
221 kVA
383 kVA
1481 kVA
187 kVA
29 kVA 4
8
8
k
V
A
485 kVA
389 kVA
2464 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
4
4
7
k
V
A
1
7
1
k
V
A
110 kVA
288 kVA
5
5
5
k
V
A
485 kV
A
724 kVA
3
8
9
k
V
A
1
3
1
7
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
3
7
6
k
V
A
1
8
0
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
8
8
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
7
k
V
A
280 kVA
314 kVA
3
7
9
k
V
A
130 kVA
1
5
3
k
V
A
130 kVA
366 kVA
1
2
7
k
V
A
553 kVA
286 kVA
27
2 kV
A
2
2
7
kV
A
3
5
3
kV
A
512 kVA
553 kVA
171 kVA
881 kVA
645 kVA
695 kVA
460 kVA
690 kVA
171 kV
A
3
0
2
k
V
A
1
2
1
k
V
A
114 kVA
302 kVA
499 kVA
114 kVA
621 kVA
198 kVA
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
9
2
k
V
A
138 kVA
4
5
8
k
V
A
2
1
5
k
V
A
1382 kVA
151 kVA
627 kVA
630 kVA
512 kVA
744 kVA 881 kVA
62 kVA
1
6
7
2
k
V
A
1235 kVA
212 kVA 1972 kVA
310 kVA
499 kVA
772 kVA
580 kVA
1
1
7
kV
A
1918 kVA
51 kVA
2873 kVA
6
3
5
k
V
A
3694 kVA
2439 kVA
1
4
4
0
k
V
A
1099 kVA
5
5
4
8
k
V
A
417 kVA
171 kVA
78 kVA
908 kVA
4
8
5
k
V
A
1
1
4
5
k
V
A
3
5
4
k
V
A
1563 kVA
155 kVA
152 kVA 1
0
9
9
k
V
A
1
4
1
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
2930 kVA
280 kVA
1
5
4
3
k
V
A
4374 kVA
4
9
2
0
k
V
A
1
7
1
0
k
V
A
1
3
2
k
V
A
1754 kVA
690 kVA
6
3
k
V
A
84 kVA
4
8
2
k
V
A
2
1
2
k
V
A
9
0
1
k
V
A
2259 kVA
389 kVA
474 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
4
6
6
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
2
4
6
4
k
V
A
1
0
0
k
V
A
1
8
7
k
V
A
993 kVA
29 kVA
923 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
0
k
V
A
287 kVA
1
9
5
kV
A
2
9
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
2
2
6
k
V
A
4
1
7
k
V
A
3
8
9
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
7
7
2
k
V
A
1032 kVA
2627 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
8
2
6
k
V
A
690 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
3
6
9
2
k
V
A
1
0
6
k
V
A
147 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
683 kVA
580 kVA
130 kVA
2
7
8
k
V
A
40227 kVA
4
1
5
9
4
k
V
A
4
0
7
3
0
k
V
A
Schaltstation
104,6 %
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load stage 2018
Option 1
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Input Data
f
h
g
k
of Hchn
o f {dx
hdh ch hdh p
l k-
', fha t,c
'
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_

h
g
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
c
28 7 2 k- hgc
fhv tvhf
fhv hf s { f
5 1 4 1
of f
of oh{ k xs
fhv l wvh
hdh
nv hg
fhvhl;yf
gg hjg hgc ` h,v j
2
;vj `v
f f `v
f ft
w d 'chdh
ld
;
2 0
;
}k
gg
1 hjg
6 2
hdh
;vfhjv
lfh
ll
hgck
`v ,ha
k jh
jh v w
kvhgd
'hk r,d
of a- fm
8
fhv lnhln yf
fhv l wvh
fhv rm l thik
8 1
;f hgc
6
of {f hf p
7
; vhc
shj
1 2
of f
l
2
2
rv
fhv rm l thik
tht
nd
19
}f ;}
w d
f cd
jl hgc
Hvnla
9
1
6
5
3
3
8 2 2
2
6
0 2
1
4 3
8
5
3
1
1
1
9
7
2
2 1
10
6
4
1
3
2
sc
lchm
lv
`v
k{
w d
hgc
hfw
,a;
kvf r n
of oh{ k xs
am jh|
a ;
11
ak
hgc }
g
`v
j hgc
ah
ak
hdh ;
3 3
9
1
2 1 3 3
7 2
5 2
3 2
8
0 3
6
4
7 1
2
1
gg
;
hjg
}k
hgc k
r
hdh ;l
hgc
hvd onv,
`v '
hlh j
lj
;vfhjv
a t
ak
;vfhjvhdh
t sc k,l ;
fha hgc
ldh hgc
hdh
gs
hgc d
w hdh
fhv lnhln yf
am `d
1 3
kfd
nk lsv hdh
t ,pt h
; vhc
1
lvs
r sc hdh
4
fhv s,vn
8
of {fhf p
2 1
fhv tvhf
`s la
;g ,a;
kcvk
of hf vd f,k
fhv tvhf
f ;
g
f ;g
td
hgc
hs
s a
s hgd 1
`s
hdh
j
`v g
;vcd
Hj k
hdh ;vfhjv l hgd
ia
vk cv
3-
`k
l k-
`k
i t
`
t fvs
l l
7
j
hthft
r `s
` ;
` sch
nd;
x 'c
'n
nhk,
fhv hf s { f
à ft hdh
n,}o ,ljv s sc hdh
hgc
Hgl
of p dcni
;}h
`j
vd
hdh
2
nhv,
a
2
o f h f v d f , k
j f
; hgc
H,k`s
of p ni
|, l ,h hdh rx
uhg
l- ` hdh
`
3 2
l
vt
fk
;sv sc hdh
4 2
of p i
fgh `
nk hgc
of p ni
of ul r,d
i i
gl
t `v
k,
sk l ;
ft
hdh
j
w d
fvhgc
`s `
Hbvr
fvhgc
w d l
'ld
ph
hgc
la
flgd
w
`v
vk
,p
onsch
l
g
y
'
jv
k-
p
hd
s
l
i ft
sdv
'hn
jhk
w d
5 2
hgc nhv,
x
`,d
f
of p i
of p a
f f jghv,
;vh,y
k hdh
1 5
fhv lnhln yf
thj
vi x
6 1
gl hdh
fhv lnhln ar
hdh `,hk
av
n,nl
of l
j
j
8
j
ljv;v
kvn,
of p `
`s vh
j
fhv hf s ag
j
9
s``s
s h
w d
j,h
hdh
nv,
jg `
of {{k
hv
Hg
1
hdh i
H,k ;v
H,k ;v
7
'
Hf
fhv lnhln ar
jd
jf jf
; ,l u ;y hdh
r `v
jd
01
Hf
of p a
Hf
Hf
Hf )h`(
o
f b;d vhc
,v ft
hdh
; hgc
w d hs
la nhv,
of p s
n; vp
od
fvs
l;t
,pt hd
ohih
ov }
fhv s,vn
htha g o,vh
` }
ss a
,vca ;v;h
aw hgc
hdh |khjv hs `jh
;l
h,vhk
xrh
h; hgc
lm
wd
` f
'c ;
of p }v
} sc hgc
v,; }f
`d
a ;v ; k
4
';ch
sl Htd
5
shl hgc
1 2
hdh a g
r hgc } j fj
`v `l
hdh`
of {{k
vhl
s hgc
hgc `s
;h hdh
nhnv
hdh
xv ft
r,d
ft '
vhl
hdh v,
vk `l
6
nhk
h;
hdh r
ad
`v `l
ad
s r,d
f
;
Hf
n
hnhv 'cvsk aw hgc
a w hgc
j ok
;l hdh
ghc ok `v
fhvp `kni
l
gv| `nv hdh
lgv| `nv hdh
3
w d
s
shl hr
9
vhnh ;
`v s
of a- fm
s`
hdh
lsv
k r,d
js }
b, k s
`v g
35
;f `v
3
;vj hgc
fhv t
vhf
l- sc y
0
`v
fhv hl; yf
2
hgc
;y
9
nhv,sch
fd nk
hdh
s
hkvlj
ol
a
;a hgk 1 ;a `v
of p }vni
a ;,vc
0 4
6
`v hgd
3
7 3
fhv hf s { f
l a a chn
w d
l a l
w d on;m
`v p
3
r `v
8
on;m
k
hgc
3 3
jg hl
sni
of a- fm
p of
3 2
a; xhp ,so w
1 3
oah
hd lv
hv;
jg
s
v,h
jc
ljv
jc
ljv
l pd
vq
ft
w
k{
fhv hl; ar
hdh
;
}
hdh
`ch
`ch
'c;
lni `
3
'c;
'c;
Hbvvcd
`v }
jv, 4
jv,
fhv hl; ar
j,k
hgc
w d
8 4
'
hdh }
Hchnh
o
jh cvk-
of p d
` `,` hdh ; ; v sc hdh hdh }
hdh sk
lh
fhv s,vn
f h v h f s a g
of b;d vhc
` f d
'k
Hj k
hlv }i ,l f H
f k Hfn
k, l ; ; sc
n s p d
`n chd
`k
fhv
s hgd 2
hdh vd
;a hgk 2
jd
w d s h
hdhk 3
of ;v'
Hvk
hthk-
lk
;
g x
ak d k-
|gj p
`;
htv
s
hdh
2
;a hgk 3
of ohvcl
`;
`;
jh
vhc
;
vhc
Hbv vcd
k- a
; '
{
v,%%177 h...
w d s h
hdhk 4
}f
j k-
vk
sh Hvh
Hvl `,
s hgc
k- j
hgc
sda
d lu
vqv{
sda
fhvp `kni
s hgc
01 l
lh r
`s g;
dst
,cd fv
, a;
hdh Hd
`v p
dkvhdh
lh ol
' r ln
p k
lh ;v'
ghc hjl hdh
rgd kd
'
hdhk
gfhjhv
of ul r,d
of {{k
o f
a - f m
tH,v
nhv,d
s nhk
r hjl
k,l ;
jg `v
v,; gs
r,d
of b;d vhc
Hvhd
gfhjhv
of b;d vhc
`s s v
2
Hd l
l
jl h{u
hnhv f
lfh
; hlhn
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
3
9
6
8
0
k
V
A
4
2
2
8
7
k
V
A
370 kV
A
4
00
kV
A
715 kVA
253 kVA
297 kVA
243 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
204 kVA
3
3
5
kV
A
269 kVA
794 kVA
1056 kVA
663 kVA 663 kVA
925 kVA
269 kVA
466 kVA
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1056 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
663 kVA
794 kVA
5
3
2
k
V
A
1
5
8
1
k
V
A
532 kVA
4
0
0
k
V
A
663 kVA
794 kVA
1318 kVA
663 kVA
9
2
5
k
V
A
925 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
243 kVA
269 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
794 kVA
400 kVA
400 kVA
4
6
kV
A
46 kVA
46 kVA 46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
1056 kVA
269 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
1056 kVA
794 kVA
5
9
7
k
V
A
1056 kVA
269 kVA
1318 kVA 1187 kVA
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1318 kVA
9
9
1
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
7 kVA
2
1
2
k
V
A
5
8
0
k
V
A
226 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
3323 kV
A
2
6
3
0
k
V
A
2601 kVA
2601 kVA
2599 kV
A
2599 kV
A
826 kVA
1
5
1
k
V
A
3
6
8
k
V
A
3004 kVA
4592 kVA
56 kVA
335 kVA
1031 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
144 kVA
422 kVA
144 kVA
7
4
k
V
A
2
2
2
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
241 kVA
241 kVA
191 kVA
251 kV
A
280 kVA
246 kVA
137 kVA
280 kVA
217 kVA
85 kVA
171 kVA
444 kVA
217 kVA
1
4
4
k
V
A
2
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
4
1
k
V
A
3
4
9
kV
A
349 kVA
226 kVA
9
6
3
k
V
A
152 kVA
1372 kVA
3
2
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
499 kVA
2
69
kV
A
1
0
9
9
k
V
A
3
5
k
V
A
7
4
4
k
V
A
1
6
9
9
k
V
A
226 kVA
144 kVA
7
5
9
k
V
A
2
9
k
V
A
2
5
3
k
V
A
117 kVA
772 kVA
5
3
1
k
V
A
3
3
2
k
V
A
394 kV
A
650 kV
A
303 kVA
594 kVA
221 kVA
383 kVA
1481 kVA
187 kVA
29 kVA 4
8
8
k
V
A
485 kVA
389 kVA
2464 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
4
4
7
k
V
A
1
7
1
k
V
A
110 kVA
288 kVA
5
5
5
k
V
A
485 kV
A
724 kVA
3
8
9
k
V
A
1
3
1
7
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
3
7
6
k
V
A
1
8
0
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
8
8
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
7
k
V
A
280 kVA
314 kVA
3
7
9
k
V
A
130 kVA
1
5
3
k
V
A
130 kVA
366 kVA
1
2
7
k
V
A
553 kVA
286 kVA
27
2 kV
A
2
2
7
kV
A
3
5
3
kV
A
512 kVA
553 kVA
171 kVA
881 kVA
645 kVA
695 kVA
460 kVA
690 kVA
171 kV
A
3
0
2
k
V
A
1
2
1
k
V
A
114 kVA
302 kVA
499 kVA
114 kVA
621 kVA
198 kVA
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
9
2
k
V
A
138 kVA
4
5
8
k
V
A
2
1
5
k
V
A
1382 kVA
151 kVA
627 kVA
630 kVA
512 kVA
744 kVA 881 kVA
62 kVA
1
6
7
2
k
V
A
1235 kVA
212 kVA 1972 kVA
310 kVA
499 kVA
772 kVA
580 kVA
1
1
7
kV
A
1918 kVA
51 kVA
2873 kVA
6
3
5
k
V
A
3694 kVA
2439 kVA
1
4
4
0
k
V
A
1099 kVA
5
5
4
8
k
V
A
417 kVA
171 kVA
78 kVA
908 kVA
4
8
5
k
V
A
1
1
4
5
k
V
A
3
5
4
k
V
A
1563 kVA
155 kVA
152 kVA 1
0
9
9
k
V
A
1
4
1
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
2930 kVA
280 kVA
1
5
4
3
k
V
A
4374 kVA
4
9
2
0
k
V
A
1
7
1
0
k
V
A
1
3
2
k
V
A
1754 kVA
690 kVA
6
3
k
V
A
84 kVA
4
8
2
k
V
A
2
1
2
k
V
A
9
0
1
k
V
A
2259 kVA
389 kVA
474 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
4
6
6
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
2
4
6
4
k
V
A
1
0
0
k
V
A
1
8
7
k
V
A
993 kVA
29 kVA
923 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
0
k
V
A
287 kVA
1
9
5
kV
A
2
9
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
2
2
6
k
V
A
4
1
7
k
V
A
3
8
9
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
7
7
2
k
V
A
1032 kVA
2627 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
8
2
6
k
V
A
690 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
3
6
9
2
k
V
A
1
0
6
k
V
A
147 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
683 kVA
580 kVA
130 kVA
2
7
8
k
V
A
40227 kVA
4
1
5
9
4
k
V
A
4
0
7
3
0
k
V
A
Schaltstation
104,6 %
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load stage 2018
Option 1
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Input Data
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
3
9
6
8
0
k
V
A
4
2
2
8
7
k
V
A
370 kV
A
40
0 kV
A
715 kVA
253 kVA
297 kVA
243 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
204 kVA
3
3
5
kV
A
269 kVA
794 kVA
1056 kVA
663 kVA 663 kVA
925 kVA
269 kVA
466 kVA
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1056 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
663 kVA
794 kVA
5
3
2
k
V
A
1
5
8
1
k
V
A
532 kVA
4
0
0
k
V
A
663 kVA
794 kVA
1318 kVA
663 kVA
9
2
5
k
V
A
925 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
243 kVA
269 kVA
1
0
5
6
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1
3
8
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
794 kVA
400 kVA
400 kVA
46
kV
A
46 kVA
46 kVA 46 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
1056 kVA
269 kVA
46 kVA
46 kVA
4
6
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
46 kVA
1056 kVA
794 kVA
5
9
7
k
V
A
1056 kVA
269 kVA
1318 kVA 1187 kVA
1
3
1
8
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
6
6
3
k
V
A
1318 kVA
9
9
1
k
V
A
4
6
k
V
A
3
3
5
k
V
A
7 kVA
2
1
2
k
V
A
5
8
0
k
V
A
226 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
3323 kV
A
2
6
3
0
k
V
A
2601 kVA
2601 kVA
2599 kV
A
2599 kV
A
826 kVA
1
5
1
k
V
A
3
6
8
k
V
A
3004 kVA
4592 kVA
56 kVA
335 kVA
1031 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
144 kVA
422 kVA
144 kVA
7
4
k
V
A
2
2
2
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
241 kVA
241 kVA
191 kVA
251 kV
A
280 kVA
246 kVA
137 kVA
280 kVA
217 kVA
85 kVA
171 kVA
444 kVA
217 kVA
1
4
4
k
V
A
2
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
4
1
k
V
A
3
4
9
kV
A
349 kVA
226 kVA
9
6
3
k
V
A
152 kVA
1372 kVA
3
2
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
499 kVA
26
9 kV
A
1
0
9
9
k
V
A
3
5
k
V
A
7
4
4
k
V
A
1
6
9
9
k
V
A
226 kVA
144 kVA
7
5
9
k
V
A
2
9
k
V
A
2
5
3
k
V
A
117 kVA
772 kVA
5
3
1
k
V
A
3
3
2
k
V
A
39
4 kV
A
650 kV
A
303 kVA
594 kVA
221 kVA
383 kVA
1481 kVA
187 kVA
29 kVA 4
8
8
k
V
A
485 kVA
389 kVA
2464 kVA
5
8
0
k
V
A
4
4
7
k
V
A
1
7
1
k
V
A
110 kVA
288 kVA
5
5
5
k
V
A
485 kV
A
724 kVA
3
8
9
k
V
A
1
3
1
7
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
3
7
6
k
V
A
1
8
0
9
k
V
A
2
8
0
k
V
A
8
8
5
0
k
V
A
1
3
7
k
V
A
280 kVA
314 kVA
3
7
9
k
V
A
130 kVA
1
5
3
k
V
A
130 kVA
366 kVA
1
2
7
k
V
A
553 kVA
286 kVA
272
kV
A
2
2
7
kV
A
3
5
3
kV
A
512 kVA
553 kVA
171 kVA
881 kVA
645 kVA
695 kVA
460 kVA
690 kVA
171 kV
A
3
0
2
k
V
A
1
2
1
k
V
A
114 kVA
302 kVA
499 kVA
114 kVA
621 kVA
198 kVA
2
6
9
k
V
A
4
9
2
k
V
A
138 kVA
4
5
8
k
V
A
2
1
5
k
V
A
1382 kVA
151 kVA
627 kVA
630 kVA
512 kVA
744 kVA 881 kVA
62 kVA
1
6
7
2
k
V
A
1235 kVA
212 kVA 1972 kVA
310 kVA
499 kVA
772 kVA
580 kVA
1
1
7
kV
A
1918 kVA
51 kVA
2873 kVA
6
3
5
k
V
A
3694 kVA
2439 kVA
1
4
4
0
k
V
A
1099 kVA
5
5
4
8
k
V
A
417 kVA
171 kVA
78 kVA
908 kVA
4
8
5
k
V
A
1
1
4
5
k
V
A
3
5
4
k
V
A
1563 kVA
155 kVA
152 kVA 1
0
9
9
k
V
A
1
4
1
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
2930 kVA
280 kVA
1
5
4
3
k
V
A
4374 kVA
4
9
2
0
k
V
A
1
7
1
0
k
V
A
1
3
2
k
V
A
1754 kVA
690 kVA
6
3
k
V
A
84 kVA
4
8
2
k
V
A
2
1
2
k
V
A
9
0
1
k
V
A
2259 kVA
389 kVA
474 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
4
6
6
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
2
4
6
4
k
V
A
1
0
0
k
V
A
1
8
7
k
V
A
993 kVA
29 kVA
923 kVA
6
6
2
k
V
A
1
1
0
k
V
A
287 kVA
1
9
5
kV
A
2
9
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
2
2
6
k
V
A
4
1
7
k
V
A
3
8
9
k
V
A
5
5
3
k
V
A
7
7
2
k
V
A
1032 kVA
2627 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
5
5
k
V
A
1
4
4
k
V
A
8
2
6
k
V
A
690 kVA
826 kVA
826 kVA
3
6
9
2
k
V
A
1
0
6
k
V
A
147 kVA
2
8
0
k
V
A
683 kVA
580 kVA
130 kVA
2
7
8
k
V
A
40227 kVA
4
1
5
9
4
k
V
A
4
0
7
3
0
k
V
A
Schaltstation
104,6 %
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load Flow Results
Load stage 2018
Option 1
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Node

Filter V/Vn [%]:
V/Vn<95[%]
95[%]<=V/Vn<105[%]
V/Vn>=105[%]
Branch Element

Filter I/Ib [%]:
I/Ib<50[%]
50[%]<=I/Ib<100[%]
I/Ib>=100[%]
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
Existing 1
Existing 2
New_1
New_2 1
6
6
0
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
8
5
k
V
A
2
1
7
6
8
k
V
A
1
8
6
9
6
k
V
A
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
kV
A
228 kVA
228 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
206 kVA
228 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A 3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA 39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
228 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
2706 kV
A
2
6
2
2
k
V
A
2550 kVA
2550 kVA
2550 kV
A
2550 kV
A
673 kVA
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
46 kVA
273 kVA
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
117 kVA
344 kVA
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
20
4 kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kVA
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
kV
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
4
3
3
k
V
A
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
529 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
kV
A
2
8
7
kV
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
139 kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1
3
6
2
k
V
A
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
kV
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA 8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
kV
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
20681 kVA
1
9
8
8
9
k
V
A
1
7
0
7
7
k
V
A
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Input Data
Load stage 2018
Option 2
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
Existing 1
Existing 2
New_1
New_2 1
6
6
0
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
8
5
k
V
A
2
1
7
6
8
k
V
A
1
8
6
9
6
k
V
A
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
kV
A
228 kVA
228 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
206 kVA
228 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A 3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA 39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
228 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
2706 kV
A
2
6
2
2
k
V
A
2550 kVA
2550 kVA
2550 kV
A
2550 kV
A
673 kVA
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
46 kVA
273 kVA
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
117 kVA
344 kVA
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
20
4 kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kVA
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
kV
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
4
3
3
k
V
A
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
529 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
kV
A
2
8
7
kV
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
139 kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1
3
6
2
k
V
A
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
kV
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA 8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
kV
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
20681 kVA
1
9
8
8
9
k
V
A
1
7
0
7
7
k
V
A
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Input Data
Load stage 2018
Option 2
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Supply areas feeder
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
Existing 1
Existing 2
New_1
New_2 1
6
6
0
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
8
5
k
V
A
2
1
7
6
8
k
V
A
1
8
6
9
6
k
V
A
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
kV
A
228 kVA
228 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
206 kVA
228 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A 3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA 39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
228 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
2706 kV
A
2
6
2
2
k
V
A
2550 kVA
2550 kVA
2550 kV
A
2550 kV
A
673 kVA
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
46 kVA
273 kVA
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
117 kVA
344 kVA
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
20
4 kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kVA
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
kV
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
4
3
3
k
V
A
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
529 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
kV
A
2
8
7
kV
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
139 kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1
3
6
2
k
V
A
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
kV
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA 8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
kV
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
20681 kVA
1
9
8
8
9
k
V
A
1
7
0
7
7
k
V
A
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Input Data
Load stage 2018
Option 2
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
f
h
g
k
of Hchn
of {dx
hdh ch hdh p
l k-
', fha t,c
'
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_

h
g
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
c
28
7 2
k- hgc
fhv tvhf
fhv hf s { f
5 1 4 1
of f
of oh{ k xs
fhv lwvh
hdh
nv hg
fhvhl;yf
gg hjg hgc ` h,v j
2
;vj `v
f f `v
f ft
w d 'chdh
ld
;
2 0
;
}k
gg
1 hjg
6 2
hdh
;vfhjv
lfh
ll
hgck
`v ,ha
k jh
jh v w
kvhgd
'hk r,d
of a- fm
8
fhv lnhln yf
fhv lwvh
fhv rm l thik
8 1
;f hgc
6
o
f {
f hf p
7
; vhc
shj
1 2
of f
l
2
2
rv
fhv rm l thik
tht
nd
19
}f ;}
w d
f cd
jl hgc
Hvnla
9
1
6
5
3
3
8 2 2
2
6
0 2
1
4 3
8
5
3
1
1
1
9
7
2
2 1
10
6
4
1
3
2
sc
lchm
lv
`v
k{
w d
hgc
hfw
,a;
kvf r n
of oh{ k xs
am jh|
a;
11
ak
hgc }
g
`v
j hgc
ah
ak
hdh ;
3 3
9
1
2 1 3 3
7 2
5 2
3 2
8
0 3
6
4
7 1
2
1
gg
;
hjg
}k
hgc k
r
hdh ;l
hgc
hvd onv,
`v '
hlh j
lj
;vfhjv
a t
ak
;vfhjvhdh
t sc k,l ;
fha hgc
ldh hgc
hdh
gs
hgc d
w hdh
fhv lnhln yf
am `d
1 3
k
fd
nk lsv hdh
t ,pt h
; vhc
1
lvs
r s
c hdh
4
fhv s,vn
8
of {fhf p
2 1
fhv tvhf
`s la
;g ,a;
kcvk
o
f
hfvd
f,k
fhv tvhf
f
;
g
f
;
g
td
hgc
hs
s a
s hgd 1
`s
hdh
j
`v g
;vcd
Hj k
hdh ;vfhjv l hgd
ia
vk cv
3-
`k
l k-
`k
i t
`
t fvs
l l
7
j
hthft
r `s
` ;
` sch
nd;
x 'c
'n
nhk,
fhv hf s { f
à ft hdh
n,}o ,ljv s sc hdh
hgc
Hgl
of p dcni
;}h
`j
vd
hdh
2
nhv,
a
2
o f h f v d f , k
j f
; hgc
H,k`s
of p ni
|, l ,h hdh rx
uhg
l- ` hdh
`
3 2
l
vt
fk
;sv sc hdh
4 2
of p i
fgh `
nk hgc
of p ni
of ul r,d
i i
gl
t `v
k,
sk l ;
ft
hdh
j
w d
fvhgc
`s `
Hbvr
fvhgc
w d l
'ld
ph
hgc
la
flgd
w
`v
vk
,p
onsch
l
g
y
'
jv
k-
p
hd
s
l
i ft
sdv
'hn
jhk
w d
5 2
hgc nhv,
x
`,d
f
of p i
of p a
f f jghv,
;vh,y
k hdh
1 5
fhv lnhln yf
thj
vi x
6 1
gl hdh
fhv lnhln ar
hdh `,hk
av
n,nl
of l
j
j
8
j
ljv;v
kvn,
of p `
`s vh
j
fhv hf s ag
j
9
s``s
s h
w d
j,h
hdh
nv,
jg `
of {{k
hv
Hg
1
hdh i
H,k ;v
H,k ;v
7
'
Hf
fhv lnhln ar
jd
jf jf
; ,l u ;y hdh
r `v
jd
01
Hf
of p a
Hf
Hf
Hf )h`(
o
f
b;d
vhc
,v ft
hdh
; hgc
w d hs
la nhv,
of p s
n; vp
od
fvs
l;t
,pt hd
ohih
ov }
fhv s,vn
htha g o,vh
` }
ss a
,vca ;v;h
aw hgc
hdh |khjv hs `jh
;l
h,vhk
xrh
h; hgc
lm
wd
` f
'c ;
of p }v
} sc hgc
v,; }f
`d
a ;v ; k
4
';ch
sl Htd
5
shl hgc
1 2
hdh a g
r hgc } j fj
`v `l
hdh`
of {{k
vhl
s hgc
hgc `s
;h hdh
nhnv
hdh
xv ft
r,d
ft '
vhl
hdh v,
vk `l
6
nhk
h;
hdh r
ad
`v `l
ad
s r,d
f
;
Hf
n
hnhv 'cvsk aw hgc
a w hgc
j ok
;l hdh
ghc ok `v
fhvp `kni
l
gv| `nv hdh
lgv| `nv hdh
3
wd
s
shl hr
9
vhnh ;
`v s
of a- fm
s`
hdh
lsv
k r,d
js }
b, k s
`v g
35
;f `v
3
;vj hgc
fhv t
vhf
l- sc y
0
`v
fhv hl; yf
2
hgc
;y
9
nhv,sch
fd nk
hdh
s
hkvlj
ol
a
;a hgk 1 ;a `v
of p }vni
a ;,vc
0 4
6
`v hgd
3
7 3
fhv hf s { f
l a a chn
w d
l a l
w d on;m
`v p
3
r `v
8
on;m
k
hgc
3 3
jg hl
sni
of a- fm
p of
3 2
a; xhp ,so w
1 3
oah
hd lv
hv;
jg
s
v,h
jc
ljv
jc
ljv
l pd
vq
ft
w
k{
fhv hl; ar
hdh
;
}
hdh
`ch
`ch
'c;
lni `
3
'c;
'c;
Hbvvcd
`v }
jv, 4
jv,
fhv hl; ar
j,k
hgc
wd
8 4
'
hdh }
Hchnh
o
jh cvk-
of p d
` `,` hdh ;
; v sc hdh hdh }
hdh sk
lh
fhv s,vn
f hv h f s
a
g
of b;d vhc
` f d
'k
Hj k
hlv }i ,l f H
f k Hfn
k, l ; ; sc
n s p d
`n chd
`k
fhv
s hgd 2
hdh vd
;a hgk 2
jd
w d s h
hdhk 3
of ;v'
Hvk
hthk-
lk
;
g x
ak d k-
|gj p
`;
htv
s
hdh
2
;a hgk 3
of ohvcl
`;
`;
jh
vhc
;
vhc
Hbv vcd
k- a
; '
{
v,%%177 h...
w d s h
hdhk 4
}f
j k-
vk
sh Hvh
Hvl `,
s hgc
k- j
hgc
sda
d lu
vqv{
sda
fhvp `kni
s hgc
01 l
lh r
`s g;
dst
,cd fv
, a;
hdh Hd
`v p
dkvhdh
lh ol
' r ln
p k
lh ;v'
ghc hjl hdh
rgd kd
'
hdhk
gfhjhv
of ul r,d
of {{k
o
f
a - f
m
tH,v
nhv,d
s nhk
r hjl
k,l ;
jg `v
v,; gs
r,d
of b;d vhc
Hvhd
gfhjhv
of
b;d vhc
`s s v
2
Hd l
l
jl h{u
hnhvf
lfh
; hlhn
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
Existing 1
Existing 2
New_1
New_2 1
6
6
0
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
8
5
k
V
A
2
1
7
6
8
k
V
A
1
8
6
9
6
k
V
A
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
kV
A
228 kVA
228 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
206 kVA
228 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A 3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA 39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
228 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
2706 kV
A
2
6
2
2
k
V
A
2550 kVA
2550 kVA
2550 kV
A
2550 kV
A
673 kVA
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
46 kVA
273 kVA
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
117 kVA
344 kVA
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
20
4 kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kVA
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
kV
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
4
3
3
k
V
A
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
529 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
kV
A
2
8
7
kV
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
139 kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1
3
6
2
k
V
A
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
kV
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA 8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
kV
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
20681 kVA
1
9
8
8
9
k
V
A
1
7
0
7
7
k
V
A
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Input Data
Load stage 2018
Option 2
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Alvand Primary
Sub-Station
Existing 1
Existing 2
New_1
New_2 1
6
6
0
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
8
5
k
V
A
2
1
7
6
8
k
V
A
1
8
6
9
6
k
V
A
301 kV
A
3
2
6
kV
A
582 kVA
206 kVA
242 kVA
198 kVA
39 kVA
39 kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
173 kVA
2
8
4
kV
A
228 kVA
228 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
206 kVA
228 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A 3
9
kV
A
39 kVA
39 kVA 39 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
228 kVA
39 kVA
39 kVA
3
9
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
39 kVA
228 kVA
2
8
4
k
V
A
3
9
k
V
A
2
8
4
k
V
A
6 kVA
1
7
3
k
V
A
4
7
3
k
V
A
184 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
2706 kV
A
2
6
2
2
k
V
A
2550 kVA
2550 kVA
2550 kV
A
2550 kV
A
673 kVA
1
2
3
k
V
A
2
9
9
k
V
A
2446 kVA
3739 kVA
46 kVA
273 kVA
839 kVA
2
2
8
k
V
A
117 kVA
344 kVA
117 kVA
6
0
k
V
A
1
8
1
k
V
A
1
8
6
k
V
A
196 kVA
196 kVA
155 kVA
20
4 kV
A
228 kVA
200 kVA
112 kVA
228 kVA
177 kVA
69 kVA
139 kVA
362 kVA
177 kVA
1
1
7
k
V
A
1
9
5
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
3
4
k
V
A
2
8
4
kV
A
284 kVA
184 kVA
7
8
4
k
V
A
124 kV
A
1117 kVA
2
6
k
V
A
7
3
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
9
5
k
V
A
406 kVA
2
1
9
kV
A
8
9
5
k
V
A
2
8
k
V
A
6
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
8
4
k
V
A
184 kVA
117 kVA
6
1
8
k
V
A
2
4
k
V
A
2
0
6
k
V
A
95 kVA
628 kVA
4
3
3
k
V
A
2
7
0
k
V
A
3
2
1
kV
A
529 kV
A
247 kVA
484 kVA
180 kVA
312 kVA
1206 kVA
153 kVA
24 kVA 3
9
7
k
V
A
395 kVA
317 kVA
2006 kVA
4
7
3
k
V
A
3
6
4
k
V
A
1
3
9
k
V
A
89 kVA
235 kVA
4
5
2
k
V
A
3
9
5
kV
A
589 kVA
3
1
7
k
V
A
1
0
7
3
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
3
0
6
k
V
A
1
4
7
3
k
V
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
7
2
0
6
k
V
A
1
1
2
k
V
A
228 kVA
256 kVA
3
0
8
k
V
A
106 kVA
1
2
5
k
V
A
106 kVA
298 kVA
1
0
4
k
V
A
450 kVA
233 kVA
2
2
2
kV
A
1
8
5
kV
A
2
8
7
kV
A
417 kVA
450 kVA
139 kVA
717 kVA
525 kVA
566 kVA
375 kVA
562 kVA
139 kV
A
2
4
6
k
V
A
9
9
k
V
A
93 kVA
246 kVA
406 kVA
93 kVA
506 kVA
162 kVA
2
1
9
k
V
A
4
0
0
k
V
A
113 kVA
3
7
3
k
V
A
1
7
5
k
V
A
1125 kVA
123 kVA
510 kVA
513 kVA
417 kVA
606 kVA 717 kVA
50 kVA
1
3
6
2
k
V
A
1006 kVA
173 kVA 1606 kVA
253 kVA
406 kVA
628 kVA
473 kVA
9
5
kV
A
1562 kVA
42 kVA
2339 kVA
5
1
7
k
V
A
3008 kVA
1986 kVA
1
1
7
3
k
V
A
895 kVA
4
5
1
7
k
V
A
339 kVA
139 kVA
64 kVA
739 kVA
3
9
5
k
V
A
9
3
3
k
V
A
2
8
8
k
V
A
1273 kVA
126 kVA
124 kVA 8
9
5
k
V
A
1
1
5
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
2386 kVA
228 kVA
1
2
5
6
k
V
A
3562 kVA
4
0
0
6
k
V
A
1
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
0
7
k
V
A
1428 kVA
562 kVA
5
2
k
V
A
68 kVA
3
9
3
k
V
A
1
7
3
k
V
A
7
3
4
k
V
A
1839 kVA
317 kVA
386 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
1
1
9
4
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
2
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
2
k
V
A
1
5
3
k
V
A
808 kVA
24 kVA
752 kVA
5
3
9
k
V
A
8
9
k
V
A
234 kVA
1
5
9
kV
A
2
4
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
8
4
k
V
A
3
3
9
k
V
A
3
1
7
k
V
A
4
5
0
k
V
A
6
2
8
k
V
A
840 kVA
2139 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
2
6
k
V
A
1
1
7
k
V
A
6
7
3
k
V
A
562 kVA
673 kVA
673 kVA
3
0
0
6
k
V
A
8
6
k
V
A
119 kV
A
2
2
8
k
V
A
556 kVA
473 kVA
106 kVA
2
2
6
k
V
A
20681 kVA
1
9
8
8
9
k
V
A
1
7
0
7
7
k
V
A
Page:
Alborz
Resp.:
11.07.2008 Date:
SIEMENS AG
Service
Dr. Blug
Dept.:
PTD SE PTI NC
checked:
changed.:
Load Flow Results
Load stage 2018
Option 2
Long term
Node Element
S [kVA]
Branch Element

Filter I/Ib [%]:
I/Ib<50[%]
50[%]<=I/Ib<100[%]
I/Ib>=100[%]
Node

Filter V/Vn [%]:
V/Vn<95[%]
95[%]<=V/Vn<105[%]
V/Vn>=105[%]

Final Report Long Term Alborz Hgdtydjgjdgncn

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Final Report Long Term Alborz Hgdtydjgjdgncn

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Alborz Distribution Network Planning

E D SE PTI Long term planning

- load dependent losses at peak load, calculated by a load flow

Você também pode gostar