Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
P
yy
2
i
n
s
s
2
Ef yy
2
i
g; g
3
Ef yy
3
i
g
s
3
; g
4
Ef yy
4
i
g
s
4
; g
6
Ef yy
6
i
g
s
6
where E represents the expected value of the function.
Figure 1 shows the plots of features extracted from the vibration signals of ve channels,
where each row represents the features for one signal. Of these 25 plots, all are normalised
in the range of 0.01.0, except the third column (skewness) normalised in the range of 1
1. For normalisation, each feature was divided by the corresponding maximum value. The
plot of variance (second column) shows better separation between the normal and the
defective cases than the plot of rms (rst column), especially when the corresponding
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
1
0 10 20 0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20
0.5
1
0 10 20
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20 0 10 20
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20 0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20 0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
Feature 1
0 10 20
Feature 2
0 10 20
1
0
1
Feature 3
0 10 20
Feature 4
0 10 20
Feature 5
0
0.5
1
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
0.5
1
0
S
i
g
n
a
l
2
S
i
g
n
a
l
3
S
i
g
n
a
l
4
S
i
g
n
a
l
5
0
Figure 1. Time-domain features of acquired vibration signals: }, normal; . .. . ., defective.
ANN-BASED BEARING FAULT DIAGNOSTICS 319
signal rms values are not very close, since for a zero-mean signal the variance is the square
of its rms value. This justies the use of both rms and variance in the diagnosis process.
The features show some dierence between the cases with normal or faulty bearing,
especially for signals 24, thus making features extracted from these signals suitable for
fault diagnosis. The variations of features of dierent signals with or without the bearing
fault were used for training the ANN and diagnosing the bearing condition. The
contribution of the features and the signals in the diagnosis of machine condition is
discussed in the following sections.
4. TRAINING OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
The neural network consists of the input layer, two hidden layers and the output layer,
Fig 2. The input layer has nodes representing the normalised features extracted from the
measured vibration signals. The number of neurons in the rst hidden layer was varied
from 10 to 30 and the second one, from 5 to 10. The number of output nodes was varied
between 1 and 2. The target values of two output nodes can have only binary levels
representing normal and failed bearing. The inputs were normalised in the range of 0.0 and
1.0 except for skewness for which the range was 1.01.0. The ANN was trained and
implemented using the MATLAB neural network toolbox using backpropagation with
LevenbergMarquardt algorithm [16]. For training, a target mean square error (MSE) of
10
10
, a minimum gradient of 10
10
and maximum iteration number (epoch) of 5000 were
used. The training process would stop if any of these conditions were met. The initial
weights and biases of the network were generated automatically by the program.
5. DIAGNOSIS OF BEARING CONDITION
The vibration data representing 15 signals each with 20 480 samples were preprocessed
to obtain 20100 sets of ve normalised input features each for normal and failed bearing.
Of these total 40200 sets rst 24120 sets consisting of 1260 each for normal and failed
bearing were used to train the network. The remaining 1680 sets of input features were
used for testing. The structure of the ANN giving best results was 5:16:10:2 where the
gures represent the numbers of nodes in the input, the rst hidden, the second hidden and
the output layers, respectively. In the training stage, the target value of the rst output
node for the normal bearing condition was set 1 and that for the failed bearing was set 0,
similar to Fig. 3(a). Similarly, the target value for the second output node for the normal
bearing was set 0 and that for the failed bearing was 1, similar to Fig. 3(b).
Figure 2. Articial neural network.
B. SAMANTA AND K. R. AL-BALUSHI 320
5.1. EFFECTS OF INPUT SIGNALS
Table 1 shows the results of training and testing the diagnostic capability of the ANN
for dierent input signals 15, both individually and groups. All ve features were used for
studying the roles of the input signals. Though each of the individual input signals gave
rise to 100% training success, the test success varied from 93.75% (signals 2, 4) to 62.50%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Sequence no: 1
_
72 training data 73
_
120 test
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
/
n
e
t
o
u
t
p
u
t
s
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Sequence no: 1
_
72 training data 73
_
120 test data
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
/
n
e
t
o
u
t
p
u
t
s
Figure 3. Targets and actual values of output nodes: (a) node 1, (b) node 2: . . .. . .. . ., targets; }, outputs.
ANN-BASED BEARING FAULT DIAGNOSTICS 321
(signal 1). The signals with most signicant contributions in identication of the bearing
condition were found to be 2, 4 and 3 with test success of 15/16 (93.75%), 15/16 (93.75%)
and 13/16 (81.25%), respectively. These signals correspond to the radial vibration near the
failed bearing (signal 2), radial vibration at the double bearing (signal 4) and the transverse
vibration at the double bearing (signal 3) which were inuenced by the bearing fault. The
relatively low test success of signals 1 and 5 are due to the fact that the outer race damage
of the ball bearing would not have signicant eect on the axial vibration of the pump at
these locations. The groups of signals, 2, 3 (case 6), and 24 (case 7) lead to 100% success
in both training and test making these suitable for diagnostics. This also shows the
importance of using more than one signal in the diagnostic process. However, when
signals 1 and 5 were used along with signals 24 (cases 8 and 9), the training was
terminated after some iterations (epochs), due to the minimum gradient criterion of the
algorithm [16]. Both training and test success were low conrming the earlier observations.
5.2. EFFECTS OF SIGNAL FEATURES
Table 2 shows the relative importance of signal features in the identication of machine
condition. For all the cases, three input signals (2,3,4) were used with training success of
100%. The use of four signal features, namely, variance (s
2
), skewness (g
3
), kurtosis (g
4
)
and normalised sixth central moment (g
6
) gave 100% success in both training (72/72) and
test (48/48), case 1. In cases 24, only three features were used and test success was 47/48
(97.92%). In these, sixth moment, g
6
, was common. However, when g
6
was omitted from
the input list (case 5), the test success dropped from 100 to 85.42% and the training was
completed after 177 epoch. The use of rms did not aect the results for the signals (24)
without ltration. However, for all subsequent analysis rms was included in the list of
features because of its positive eect on the ANN-based diagnostic process. The use of
central moments of order more than six did not have any signicant eect on the diagnosis
results.
Figures 3(a) and (b) show the actual values of the output nodes 1 and 2, respectively, for
both training and test sets with three input signals (24) and ve input features. The actual
outputs of the nodes match quite closely with the corresponding target values.
The procedure was repeated halving the bin size from 1024 to 512 data points and using
three input signals (24) with ve input features. The training success was 100% but the
test success dropped to 93/96 (96.88%).
Table 1
Eects of input signals on identication of machine condition with ve features (rms, s
2
, g
3
,
g
4
, g
6
)
Case no. Input signals Training success Test success Epochs
1 1 24/24 (100%) 10/16 (62.5%) 26
2 2 24/24 (100%) 15/16 (93.75%) 20
3 3 24/24 (100%) 13/16 (81.25%) 16
4 4 24/24 (100%) 15/16 (93.75%) 19
5 5 24/24 (100%) 12/16 (75.00%) 17
6 2,3 48/48 (100%) 32/32 (100%) 18
7 2,3,4 72/72 (100%) 48/48(100%) 17
8 1,2,3,4 95/96 (98.96%) 55/64 (85.94%) 51
y
9 1,2,3,4,5 119/120 (99.17%) 61/80 (76.25%) 63
y
y
The training process was terminated due to the minimum gradient (10
10
) criterion [16].
B. SAMANTA AND K. R. AL-BALUSHI 322
5.3. EFFECTS OF HIGH-FREQUENCYSIGNAL FEATURES
The eectiveness of the proposed features, in presence of interference signals, is
discussed in this section. The acquired vibration signals were preprocessed to obtain the
high-frequency components dominated by the bearing fault, prior to extraction of the
characteristic features. Three schemes were studied for comparison: simple preprocessing
techniques like (i) high-pass or band-pass ltration, (ii) envelope detection or
demodulation of the band-pass ltered signal and (iii) a more elaborate signal processing
technique like wavelet transform.
5.3.1. High- and band-pass ltration
The examination of acquired vibration signals indicated the presence of low-frequency
interference. The signals were subjected to either high-pass or band-pass ltration to
remove the low-frequency interference components. Three band-pass (BP1BP3) and one
high-pass (HP) lters were studied. The band-pass frequencies (in kHz) of the BP1BP3
were chosen as: BP1 (4.620.0), BP2 (4.610.0), and BP3 (2.010.0). The cut-o frequency
of the HP lter was chosen as 4.6 kHz. These frequencies were selected to cover the signal
components containing the majority of the rolling element bearing energy [17]. One of the
signals (4), with normal bearings, before and after ltration (using BP1) is shown in
Fig. 4(a) and (b) and the corresponding signal, with defective bearing, is shown in Fig. 4(d)
and (e). The eects of ltration on the remaining signals were similar.
Time-domain features (rms, s
2
, g
3
, g
4
and g
6
) were obtained from each of these ltered
high-frequency signals and used in the ANN-based diagnostic procedure. Figure 5 shows
the features extracted from the band-pass (BP1) ltered signals. Table 3 shows the results
for dierent input signals and lters. The training success was 100% in all cases. The test
success varied from 100% (case 2) to 93.75% (case 1). The results of individual signals
were similar to that of Table 1. The use of high-pass or band-pass ltration improved
the training and test success, especially for signals 14 and 15 in comparison with that
of signals without any preprocessing, Table 1. The features extracted from ltered signals
24, 14, 15 gave very good results (95.83100%) indicating the inuence of the bearing
defect on the signal components in the selected frequency range. The results show
applicability of the proposed features for the signal components in the selected frequency
band, eliminating the eects of interfering signals outside this range.
5.3.2. Wavelet transform
The acquired vibration signals were processed through discrete wavelet transform
(DWT) using Daubechies wavelet of order 4 (Db4) at level 6 to obtain the coecients
corresponding to approximate (A6) and details (D1D6) [16]. The low-frequency
approximate (A6) and high-frequency detail signals (D1D6) were reconstructed from
Table 2
Eects of signal features on identication of machine condition with three input signals
(2,3,4)
Case no. Input features Test success Epochs
1 s
2
, g
3
, g
4
, g
6
48/48 (100%) 28
2 g
3
, g
4
, g
6
47/48 (97.92%) 18
3 s
2
, g
4
, g
6
47/48 (97.92%) 16
4 s
2
, g
3
, g
6
47/48 (97.92%) 14
5 s
2
, g
3
, g
4
41/48 (85.42%) 177
ANN-BASED BEARING FAULT DIAGNOSTICS 323
Figure 4. Time-domain vibration signal 4: (a) acquired (normal), (b) band-pass ltered (normal), (c) wavelet
transformed D2 (normal), (d) acquired (defective), (e) band-pass ltered (defective), (f) wavelet transformed D2
(normal).
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
1
0
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
Feature 1
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
2
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
3
0 10 20
0
0.5
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
4
0
0.5
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
5
0 10 20
Feature 2
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
Feature 3
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
Feature 4
0
0.5
1
0 10 20
Feature 5
0
0.5
1
Figure 5. Time-domain features of band-pass (BP1) ltered vibration signal 4: }, normal; . .. . ., defective.
B. SAMANTA AND K. R. AL-BALUSHI 324
these coecients. Frequency ranges for the details were in the descending order, i.e. D1
had highest frequency content (1225.6 kHz), and D6 had lowest frequency content
(0.31.2 kHz). Figure 4(c) and (f) shows the time-domain signal of the re-synthesised detail
D2 (in the frequency range of 4.610.0 kHz) for signal 4 with normal and defective
bearing, respectively. Time-domain features, similar to that of Fig. 1, were obtained from
each of these reconstructed high-frequency signals and used in the ANN-based diagnostic
procedure. Table 4 shows the results for dierent input signals and high-frequency
components. The training success was 100% in all cases. The test success varied from
100% (case 2) to 83.33% (case 8). The features extracted from high frequency signals D2
and D3 gave very good results (97.92100%) indicating the inuence of the bearing defect
on the signal components in this frequency band (2.010.0 kHz). The performance of
components (D1, D5 and D6) outside this frequency range was not satisfactory which may
be attributed to the lack of inuence of bearing defect on these signal components. The
results show applicability of the proposed features for the signal components in the
selected frequency band obtained using DWT. However, the application of DWT did not
oer any substantial advantage over that of simple high-pass or band-pass ltration in
bearing condition diagnostics.
5.3.3. Demodulation
The eects of interfering signals within the selected frequency band can be minimised
by enveloping or demodulation [8, 9, 17, 18], if necessary. Demodulation or envelope
Table 3
Eects of ltered signals on identication of machine condition with ve input features (rms,
s
2
, g
3
, g
4
, g
6
)
Case no. Input signals Filter
y
Training success Test success Epochs
1 2, 3 BP1 48/48 (100%) 30/32 (93.75%) 19
2 2, 3, 4 BP1 72/72 (100%) 48/48 (100%) 19
3 1, 2, 3, 4 BP1 96/96 (100%) 63/64 (98.44%) 17
4 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 BP1 120/120 (100%) 77/80 (96.25%) 26
5 2, 3, 4 BP2 72/72 (100%) 46/48 (95.83%) 20
6 2 , 3, 4 BP3 72/72 (100%) 47/48 (97.92%) 34
7 2 , 3, 4 HP 72/72 (100%) 46/48 (95.83%) 12
8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 HP 120/120 (100%) 78/80 (97.50%) 21
y
Frequencies (kHz): BP1 (4.620.0); BP2 (4.610.0); BP3 (2.010.0); HP (4.6).
Table 4
Eects of wavelet transformed signals on identication of machine condition with ve input
features (rms, s
2
, g
3
, g
4
, g
6
)
Case no. Input signals Details Training success Test success Epochs
1 2, 3, 4 D1 72/72 (100%) 42/48 (87.50%) 20
2 2, 3, 4 D2 72/72 (100%) 48/48 (100%) 26
3 2, 3 D2 48/48 (100%) 31/32 (96.88%) 18
4 1, 2, 3, 4 D2 96/96 (100%) 63/64 (98.44%) 22
5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 D2 120/120 (100%) 77/80 (96.25%) 15
6 2 , 3, 4 D3 72/72 (100%) 47/48 (97.92%) 14
7 2 , 3, 4 D4 72/72 (100%) 45/48 (93.75%) 18
8 2, 3, 4 D5 72/72 (100%) 40/48 (83.33%) 27
9 2, 3, 4 D6 72/72 (100%) 41/48 (85.42%) 34
ANN-BASED BEARING FAULT DIAGNOSTICS 325
detection makes the diagnostic process a little more independent of a particular machine
since it focuses on the low-amplitude high-frequency broadband signals characterising the
bearing condition. Another property of a demodulated signal is that it signies local fault
as it gets easily attenuated and does not travel well through the machine structure because
of its high frequency. It is important to locate the accelerometers as close as feasible to
the bearing under test to keep the measurement path as short as possible. However,
the dependence of diagnostic results on measurement point is not signicant due to the
normalisation process used for feature extraction in the present study, as long as the
measured vibration signals are inuenced by the bearing condition. In the present study,
the envelope of each band-pass (BP1) ltered signal was obtained as the amplitude of a
complex signal consisting of the real signal and the corresponding Hilbert transform as the
imaginary part [16, 18]. An analog rectication and smoothing before sampling could be
considered as an alternative option. However, the demodulation using digital processing is
preferred because of its greater exibility compared to its analog form. The features
extracted from the envelopes, similar to that of Fig. 1, were used as inputs to the ANN and
the results obtained are shown in Table 5. The training success for each was 100%.
The results are almost similar to that of original signals (Table 1), especially for cases 24,
6 and 7 with some improvements in cases 1 and 5. The major improvement in cases 8 and 9
may be attributed to the better separation of the signal envelope features with and without
fault, especially for the combination of signals, compared to that of the original (Table 1)
and ltered signals (Table 3). However, the results for signals 24 are the same (training
and test success of 100%) with or without any preprocessing. This may be attributed to the
simple processing of signal segments for extraction of features that work well even in the
presence of interfering signals.
6. CONCLUSIONS
An ANN-based procedure is presented for fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings
using features extracted directly from time-domain vibration signal segments through
simple processing. The ANN consists of 45 input nodes, two hidden layers with 16 and 10
neurons and two output neurons. The eects of dierent input signals and features on the
success rate of training and test were studied. The most signicant group of vibration
signals and the characteristic features were identied. The accelerometers should be so
placed that the bearing defects have eective contribution to the accelerometer outputs.
Table 5
Eects of signal envelopes on identication of machine condition with ve features (rms, s
2
,
g
3
, g
4
, g
6
)
Case no. Input signals Training success Test success Epochs
1 1 24/24 (100%) 13/16 (81.25%) 28
2 2 24/24 (100%) 14/16 (87.50%) 17
3 3 24/24 (100%) 12/16 (75.00%) 33
4 4 24/24 (100%) 15/16 (93.75%) 24
5 5 24/24 (100%) 15/16 (93.75%) 19
6 2,3 48/48 (100%) 32/32 (100%) 12
7 2,3,4 72/72 (100%) 48/48(100%) 22
8 1,2,3,4 96/96 (100%) 63/64 (98.44%) 23
9 1,2,3,4,5 120/120 (100%) 79/80 (98.75%) 32
B. SAMANTA AND K. R. AL-BALUSHI 326
The eects of simple preprocessing prior to feature extraction, like high-pass or band-pass
ltration of the vibration signals, with and without demodulation, were studied. The use of
more elaborate signal processing technique like wavelet transform did not improve the
results signicantly. The success rate for training was almost 100% and that of test was
quite high 98100%. The training was quite fast requiring signicantly small number of
epochs (less than 50). This substantial reduction in training epochs is due to preprocessing
of the vibration data and using the substantially small number of extracted features
as inputs to the ANN. The features are eective in ANN-based diagnosis of bearing
failures using both original signals and the high-frequency components of the signals. The
present approach also shows the importance of using multiple signals in the diagnostic
process.
However, the present procedure is used to classify the status of the machine in the form
of normal or faulty bearings. There is a scope for its extension to identify fault types, fault
combinations, and severity levels. The ANN-based approach has its inherent short-
comings that the ANN needs to be trained for each machine condition: normal and
defective with dierent fault types and severity levels. The data acquisition and ANN
training may be done at both installation stage and regular operation of the machine.
Another limitation of the ANN-based approach is that the numerical values and the ANN
structure would not probably be optimal for another machine. This may necessitate
further ANN training and may be included in the machine test and condition monitoring
program [13]. Since the ANN training is quite fast requiring substantially small number of
iterations, at least for the cases considered, training and test may be done on-line. These
issues are subjects of further study.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The dataset was acquired in the Delft Machine diagnostics by neural network project
with help from Landustrie B.V., The Netherlands and can be downloaded freely at the
following web-address: http://www.ph.tn.tudelft.nl/ypma/mechanical.html. The authors
thank Dr. Alexander Ypma of TU Delft for making the dataset available and providing
useful clarications. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their
comments and suggestions that helped in revising the paper to its present form.
REFERENCES
1. A. C. McCormick and A. K. Nandi 1997 Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers,
Part C 211, 439450. Classication of the rotating machine condition using articial neural
networks.
2. A. C. McCormick and A. K. Nandi 1997 IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8, 748756.
Real-time classication of the rotating shaft loading conditions using articial neural networks.
3. A. C. McCormick, A. K. Nandi and L. B. Jack 1998 Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part C 212, 417428. Application of periodic time-varying autoregressive models to
the detection of bearing faults.
4. I. E. Alguindigue, A. Loskiewicz-Buczak and R. E. Uhrig 1993 IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, 40, 209216. Monitoring and diagnosis of rolling element bearings using
articial neural networks.
5. B. A. Paya, I. L. Esat and M. N. M. Badi 1997 Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 11,
751765. Articial neural network based fault diagnostics of rotating machinery using wavelet
transforms as a preprocessor.
6. M. Chow, P. M. Mangum and S. O. Yee 1991 IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 38,
448453. A neural network approach to real-time condition monitoring of induction motors.
ANN-BASED BEARING FAULT DIAGNOSTICS 327
7. J. Shiroishi, Y. Li, S. Liang, T. Kurfess and S. Danyluk 1997 Mechanical Systems and
Signal Processing 11, 693705. Bearing condition diagnostics via vibration and acoustics
emission measurements.
8. A. Barkov, N. Barkova and J. Mitchell 1995 Sound and Vibration 28, 1017 and 2731.
Condition assessment and life prediction of rolling element bearings.
9. A. Azovtsev, A. Barkov and D. Carter 1996 Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the
Vibration Institute, 2730. Improving accuracy of rolling element bearing condition assessment.
10. T. I. Liu and K. S. Anantharaman 1994 Transactions ASME, Journal of Engineering for
Industry, 116, 392397. Intelligent classication and measurement of drill wear.
11. T. I. Liu, W. Y. Chen and K. S. Anantharaman 1998 Mechanical Systems and Signal
Processing 12, 863873. Intelligent detection of drill wear.
12. Y. Maki and K. A. A. Loparo 1997 IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 5,
529541. A neural network approach to fault detection and diagnosis in industrial processes.
13. K. F. Martin and M. H. Marzi 1999 Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I
213, 229241. Diagnostics of a coolant system via neural networks.
14. D. C. Baillie and J. Mathew 1994 Proceedings of International Conference on Condition
Monitoring, University of Wales, Swansea, March 2125, 241252. Nonlinear model-based fault
diagnosis of bearings.
15. R. Ligteringen, R. P. W. Duin, E. E. E. Frietman and A. Ypma 1997 Asci97Setup/
paper 970120 2. Machine diagnostics by neural networks, experimental setup.
16. Mathworks Inc. 1995 MATLAB Reference Guide. MA, U.S.A.
17. D. L. Carter 1995 United States Patent No. 5477730. Rolling element bearing condition testing
method and apparatus.
18. D. Ho and R. B. Randall 2000 Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 14, 763788.
Optimisation of bearing diagnostic techniques using simulated and actual bearing fault signals.
B. SAMANTA AND K. R. AL-BALUSHI 328