Ford and Toyota motors remain two of the largest companies in the world today. The companies,however, are on divergent paths. One, Toyota, is gaining market share and increasing the size of its company. The other, Ford, is rapidly losing market share and downsizing. Toyota will continue to carry a large market share and in the future will compete with General Motors for the tops spot. This success is due to a highly organized communications system that reflects the company’s goals throughout. Toyota need to maintain its aggressive “learning” approach to the industry and make minor improvements to its potential employee section of its website.
Ford, however, is losing market share and alienating customers. To maintain competitiveness, they need to improve customer relations, relations with families, and aggressively publicize its “Way Forward”
Ford and Toyota motors remain two of the largest companies in the world today. The companies,however, are on divergent paths. One, Toyota, is gaining market share and increasing the size of its company. The other, Ford, is rapidly losing market share and downsizing. Toyota will continue to carry a large market share and in the future will compete with General Motors for the tops spot. This success is due to a highly organized communications system that reflects the company’s goals throughout. Toyota need to maintain its aggressive “learning” approach to the industry and make minor improvements to its potential employee section of its website.
Ford, however, is losing market share and alienating customers. To maintain competitiveness, they need to improve customer relations, relations with families, and aggressively publicize its “Way Forward”
Ford and Toyota motors remain two of the largest companies in the world today. The companies,however, are on divergent paths. One, Toyota, is gaining market share and increasing the size of its company. The other, Ford, is rapidly losing market share and downsizing. Toyota will continue to carry a large market share and in the future will compete with General Motors for the tops spot. This success is due to a highly organized communications system that reflects the company’s goals throughout. Toyota need to maintain its aggressive “learning” approach to the industry and make minor improvements to its potential employee section of its website.
Ford, however, is losing market share and alienating customers. To maintain competitiveness, they need to improve customer relations, relations with families, and aggressively publicize its “Way Forward”
Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
1 Executive Summary
Ford and Toyota motors remain two of the largest companies in the world today. The companies, however, are on divergent paths. One, Toyota, is gaining market share and increasing the size of its company. The other, Ford, is rapidly losing market share and downsizing. Toyota will continue to carry a large market share and in the future will compete with General Motors for the tops spot. This success is due to a highly organized communications system that reflects the companys goals throughout. Toyota need to maintain its aggressive learning approach to the industry and make minor improvements to its potential employee section of its website. Ford, however, is losing market share and alienating customers. To maintain competitiveness, they need to improve customer relations, relations with families, and aggressively publicize its Way Forward campaign. While these two companies come from different backgrounds, an analysis conducted of their communications practices brings to light both successes and failures. These lessons are applicable to not only the company leadership, but students of business and communications alike.
Background and History of Toyota and Ford
Toyota Motors Originally established in the 1860s as a textile company, Toyota Motor Corporation was the creation of Kiichiro Toyoda. Completing his first prototype car in 1935, Toyoda was an innovator and researcher. In the 20s, he traveled to Europe and the United States to research manufacturing techniques and the automobile industry. On one such trip to Fords River Rouge plant he was impressed with the scale of the plant but critical of its inefficiencies. By 1933, he had converted one of his textile mills into a dedicated auto manufacture and research facility. In 1937, the company had produced enough prototypes to warrant Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
2 the establishment of Toyota Motor Co. Throughout these formative years, Toyoda pioneered the concepts of just-in-time inventory, kaizen or continuous improvement, and kanban parts labeling. Toyota Motor Corporation is growing. As of 31 March 2006, Toyota employed 285,966 people in over 28 countries. Additionally, revenues and market share for the company are growing. Revenues for 2006 totaled $179 billion with total company assets valued at $244 billion. With only $15 billion in operating expenses per year, there are not many companies in the world who can claim a value 16 times their yearly expenses. The company could not sell a single car for 15 years and still operate in the black. As of last quarter, Toyota overtook Ford as the second largest automaker world-wide. Ford Motors Ford Motor Company is closely identified with the history and development of the automotive industry. In 1913, the first moving assembly line was implemented at Fords Highland Park plant in Michigan. The new system allowed individual workers to stay in one place and perform the same take repeatedly on multiple vehicles. The assembly line greatly increased production and efficiency allowing the company to surpass competitors while making the vehicle more affordable. Henry Ford believed the companys future was based on the manufacturing of affordable cars for the public. The company began using the first 19 letters of the alphabet to name each car and in 1908 produced the well known Model T. In 1925, Ford Motor Company acquired the Lincoln Motor Company and in the 1930s created the Mercury division focusing on mid-priced cars. In the 1950s the Ford Motor Company went public and in 1967 Ford of Europe was established. In 1971 the company created its North American Automotive Operations which consolidated U.S., Canadian, and Mexican operations. As of today, Ford Motor Company manufactures and distributes automobiles in 200 markets across six continents and employees about 325,000 people worldwide. Ford Motor Company has 11 wholly owned, equity-owned joint venture plants around the world. Ford, currently in its second century of business, has Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
3 eight different brands including: Ford, Volvo, Lincoln, Jaguar, Mercury, Land Rover, Mazda and Aston Martin.
Assumptions/observations about the industry and environment
The automobile industry produces automobiles and other gasoline-powered vehicles, such as buses, trucks, and motorcycles. It provides jobs for millions of people, generates billions of dollars in worldwide revenues, and provides the basis for a multitude of related service and support industries. The automobile has enabled people to travel and transport goods farther and faster, and has opened wider market areas for business and commerce. Between 1886 and 1898, about 300 automobiles were built, but there was no real established industry. In 2005, with automakers and auto buyers expanding globally, the industry manufactured 53 million cars and employed over 1.76 million people in the US alone. Automobile manufacturers can be among some of the largest companies in the world. Some companies, such as Toyota, are multinational (operations in 28 countries). Some companies, such as General Motors, share parts with other manufacturers, use parts made in foreign factories, and assemble entire cars in foreign countries. The three major automobile manufacturers in the United States are General Motors, Ford, and Daimler Chrysler. These automakers provide much of the industry's employment in the United States, but lately, foreign automakers, such as Toyota and Nissan are building automobile assembly plants in the United States. The automotive industry is currently growing as a global industry. Over the past year, however, the industry has seen vast changes in both product and market shares.
Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
4 Guiding Principles:
1. Honor the language and spirit of the law of every nation and undertake open and fair corporate activities to be a good corporate citizen of the world.
2. Respect the culture and customs of every nation and contribute to economic and social development through corporate activities in the communities.
3. Dedicate ourselves to providing clean and safe products and to enhancing the quality of life everywhere through all our activities.
4. Create and develop advanced technologies and provide outstanding products and services that fulfill the needs of customers worldwide.]
5. Foster a corporate culture that enhances individual creativity and teamwork value, while honoring mutual trust and respect between labor and management.
6. Pursue growth in harmony with the global community through innovative management.
7. Work with business partners in research and creation to achieve stable, long-term growth and mutual benefits, while keeping ourselves open to new partnerships.
The Toyota Precepts
1. Be contributive to the development and welfare of the country by working together, regardless of position, in faithfully fulfilling your duties.
2. Be at the vanguard of the times through endless creativity, inquisitiveness and pursuit of improvement.
3. Be practical and avoid frivolity.
4. Be kind and generous; strive to create a warm, homelike atmosphere.
5. Be reverent, and show gratitude for things great and small in thought and deed.
How the principles of Toyota and Ford compare. Toyotas Philosophy The Toyota Way The philosophy of Toyota is entitled the Toyota Way. While the Toyota Way has many facets, its two main pillars are continuous improvement (kaizen) and respect for people. A deeper analysis of the Toyota Way reveals the companys basic principles and precepts. These two sets of rules essentially form the companys vision. But which of these rules guides the companys communications practices both to internal and external audiences? While none of these rules specifically dictate how the company communicates, they all reflect an open organization. By examining Toyotas corporate philosophy we see they appear open to inputs from both internal and external audiences. While Toyota does not have specific communications goals and principles stated in the Toyota Way, they have dedicated time and effort to spelling out specifically how they intend to live up to the Toyota Way in their communications efforts. Analysis of their annual Environmental and Social Report reveals a well-organized communications effort with all stakeholders. Their Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
5 Guiding Principles:
1. Products and Customers: We will offer excellent products and services.
2. Environment: We will respect the natural environment and help preserve it for future generations.
3. Community: We will respect and contribute to the communities around the world in which we work.
4. Quality of Relationships: We will strive to earn the trust and respect of our investors, customers, dealers, employees, unions, business partners and society.
5. Financial Health: We will make our decisions with proper regard to the long-term financial security of the Company. communications goals are aligned with these stakeholder groups. Fords Philosophy Keep It Simple Ford has very basic principles that the company defines in its Sustainability Report. For each principle, Ford performs a survey from year to year questioning how they compare to the year prior. The survey includes questions about employee satisfaction, safety recalls, sales satisfaction and owner loyalty. Similar to Toyota, Ford does not have specific communications goals and principles stated but it does make an attempt through reports and its website to keep an open line of communication with employees, stakeholders, investors, customers as well as the public. The website is direct and to the point. On first glance it offers information for investors, families, as well as current and future employees. Through analysis of the companys website and reports its communication style seems for the most part to be straightforward and honest. However, the company does not properly communicate its new Way Forward Plan. Through the use of reports and press releases Ford communicates its Way Forward plan. It is a blueprint for restructuring products, manufacturing capacity, cost, as well as brand positioning. The idea behind the Way Ford plan is to restore North American automotive operations to profitability by 2008. Ford claims the Way Forward plan includes, tough, sometimes painful, actions intended to respond to the realities of todays increasingly competitive global automotive industry. The plan is in response to Ford decreasing revenue and possibly its recent buy-out offers and lays offs. Ford does not successful Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
6 Toyotas Employee Goals
-Creating a workplace environment where employees can work with their trust in the company
-Stable employment where layoffs and dismissals are not readily made
-Steadily maintain and improve working conditions from a medium- to long-term perspective
-Ensure fairness and consistency
-Share the management mindset and sense of critical urgency through thorough communication
-Reflect business results in working conditions
-Promote personal growth through work
-Communication of the Toyota Way/role
-Promoting teamwork aimed at pursuit of individual roles and optimization of the entire team
-Thorough consensus building and achievement in single thrust
-Team results and creating a sense of unity
communicate or emphasize the Way Forward plan. It can only be found on the website in reports and press releases. This plan is important for all audience members. It will directly affect employees and investors, so it should be on the front line. It should be talked about and discussed or at least included on the website; not only in press releases. This plan seems like something the company would want to communicate and advertise. However, it seems Ford is falling short of its responsibility to its audience members on this particular aspect.
Internal Communications Snapshot Communications with employees. Toyota Toyota has several stated goals that relate to communication to employees. To analyze whether these goals are actually practiced, an interview was conducted of a dealership manager. Mr Vic Fiore, store manager of Geis Toyota provided feedback on whether Toyota walks the walk when it comes to interaction with employees. While Mr Fiore could not provide feedback on hiring and firing policies, he highlighted several of Toyotas goals. First, he stated that the corporation encourages training and off-site educational opportunities for employees. Trips to factories and test facilities are available to help educate employees on products. Additionally, implementation of Toyotas new Dealer Daily program has increased the Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
7 Ford Employee Goals:
-A learning community
-Values diversity: we recognize that diversity is not only a reality of our global nature; its a distinct advantage, and one that we value and embrace.
-Equal Opportunity Opportunities for employment and advancement will be available on a non-discriminatory basis--without regard to race, color, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, handicap, or veteran status.
-We take affirmative action in accordance with law to have minorities and women represented appropriately throughout the workforce and to provide qualified handicapped persons, disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnam era opportunity for employment and advancement.
-Employee Resource Groups: We welcome and value the ideas and contributions of all employees.
-Worklife Integration: Helping you find balance is a corporate commitment.
-Matching people with our hiring needs is personal, thorough, and efficient
amount of time salesmen and managers can spend with customers. This new program will be discussed later. In speaking with Mr Fiore, it appears Toyotas stated communication goals with employees match what the employees proved as feedback. Toyotas overall goals with respect to employees appear to promote open communication and reflect that employee satisfaction and input is key to corporate success. Ford Fords goals as that relate to communication to employees was more difficult to ascertain. Because of Fords unwillingness to cooperate, a majority of the information listed below is from the companys website for future employees. While we had hoped to discuss with several employees how the company pursues these goals, calls to employees were not returned. Perhaps these problems were due to the companys recent buy- outs. Over 32000 employees were offered buy-outs to leave the company in an effort to cut costs. Undoubtedly, these cutbacks have affected company morale and would explain a lack of goals that reflect as Toyota states, Stable employment where layoffs and dismissals are not readily made.
Internal Communications Snapshot II Messages conveyed to future employees. Another way to gauge continuity in messaging is to analyze messages to future employees. These messages tell prospective employees what qualities the company is looking for. Additionally, these messages can paint a picture of how the company sees itself in the future. For this analysis, we looked Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
8 Ford
-Integrity: behaves with honor and dignity
-Flawless Execution: passion for excellence
-Relationship: cares, develops, safeguards
-Foster teamwork and apply the knowledge, skills and values required to support the business.
-Anticipate tomorrows challenges and opportunities.
-Push the limits with innovative business solutions. Challenge norms and search out emerging HR issues and trends.
-Lead the change effort.
-Take action, deliver results and resolve problems.
-Embrace diversity and use it to deliver a competitive advantage.
-Measure results to support accountability.
Toyota -None provided at general qualities the company looks for and also compared job descriptions of two very similar jobs at each company. It should be noted that while both companies have portions of their websites dedicated to future employees, Toyotas site was sparse and almost appeared to not want any one to apply. Ford, however, had much information readily available even in the midst of 32000 buyouts. Toyota vs Ford What theyre looking for General Qualities:
Ford spends a lot of time on its website stating in general what qualities it looks for in potential employees. They even go as far as to post sample bios and pictures of its current employees. These images and bios also do a good job of promoting an image of diversity and inclusion. Toyota on the other hand offers no additional information. Their jobs site takes you right to searching for jobs.
Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
9 Toyota Description:
Toyota Technical Center, the R&D Division of Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, is currently seeking an Engineer to join our Drivetrain Engineering department at our Ann Arbor, Michigan location.
Responsibilities Develop prototype transmission components on localization projects. Increase design responsibility through value engineering. Manage an increased number of projects, responsible for implementation from prototype to production. Maintain quality of an increased amount of drivetrain components manufactured in North America. Research North American drivetrain trends and new technology, and recommend to Toyota Japan. Design Role: Develop local prototype transmission components. Create Automatic Transmission drawings in CAD. Countermeasure dynomometer evaluation results. Design Liaison Role: Travel to North American suppliers and Toyota Manufacturing Centers to gather engineering data. Compile and evaluate North American data and make an engineering recommendation to Toyota Design in Japan. Design Research Role:
Research North American Drivetrain trends and new technology. Report and recommend future Toyota design direction. Ford Description:
Ford Motor Company is a Fortune Five company and a recognized leader in the automotive industry offering competitive salaries and benefit plans. From employee discounts on our vehicles to educational opportunities, Ford works with its employees to strive for a quality of life that is second to none. By choice, Ford Motor Company is an Equal Opportunity Employer, committed to a culturally diverse workforce.
Transmission and Driveline Engineers work to design, develop, test & implement transmission systems. This spans the time from the vehicle's initial concept to supporting the daily production of transmissions. The development of a vehicle lasts 3-5 years, during which time an engineer's duties can be broken down into four distinct phases:
-Early Program Development - translate vehicle & customer requirements into component & system design specifications
-Design Development - design components to meet the customer's requirements
-Design Testing - oversee tests that ensure the transmission will withstand customer usage
-Program Launch - support powertrain plants in the manufacturing of quality transmissions
Whatever the development phase, an automatic transmission engineer is responsible for delivering a product that meets all program targets, including quality, cost, weight, manufacturability, ergonomics, and customer satisfaction.
Sample Job Description:
Comparing these two job descriptions it becomes apparent that Toyota is much more concerned with providing specifics than Ford. It appears Toyota is very concerned with weeding out potentially under qualified applicants with its detailed requirements. Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
10 Toyota Qualifications
-Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering.
-Strong problem solving and communication skills to lead and report projects.
-Experience/interest with automotive design and development.
-Experience and willingness to work with CAD, CAE.
-Knowledge of Toyota Production System and quality systems.
-Possibility of long term assignment in Toyota Japan.
-TTC Transfer or New Hire with Intern/Co-op Experience.
-Experience in Drivetrain Engineering preferred.
-Positive thinking and highly motivated for any problem
Ford Qualifications
-B.S. or M.S. in mechanical or electrical engineering
-The ability to adapt to a dynamic working environment and work within a diverse team
-Interest in the automotive industry and Transmission Engineering as a career path
- 0-2 years of automotive-related experience
-Candidates for positions with Ford Motor Company must be legally authorized to work in the United States. Verification of employment eligibility will be required at the time of hire. Visa sponsorship is not available for this position.
Comparing Qualifications *Reflects company goal or precept
These two descriptions paint the greatest contrast between the two companies. Toyota definitely wants person who knows about Toyota and is willing to enlist into their corporate culture. This is evidenced by four of nine qualifications reflecting the companys goals or precepts. Ford, however, has a rather diluted qualifications listing that only once reflects a company goals or mission. Clearly, Toyota is very up-front and clear that they want someone who will reflect the companys goals.
Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
11 Toyota Corporate Communications Employee Communications Flagship Publications Executive Communications Intranet Websites Toyota USA Archives Vintage Vehicle Museum Toyota Product News Division Lexus Product News Division National Corporate Media Relations Midwest (Detroit) Northeast (New York) Southeast (Miami) Washington D.C. Gulf States (Dallas) Gulf States (Houston) West Coast (San Francisco) Business Development Strategic Planning Division administration Corporate philanthropy Video production center Community Relations Strategic Planning and Administration Field Communications Internal Communications External Communications Organization and staffing of communications infrastructure Toyota Communications within Toyota is organized under the Corporate Communications Division in Torrance, CA. The mission of corporate communications is to develop and execute a broad base of communications strategies for multiple audiences, both inside and outside the company. The division is aligned into four primary functional areas. External Communications is responsible for all product news activities for the Toyota and Lexus sales divisions as well as corporate media relations. Additionally, this group covers general TMS business issues with added responsibility for diversity communications. Field Communications oversees Toyotas group of regionally based communications offices and public relations agencies in key markets, including the Northeast, Southeast, Washington, D.C., the Midwest, Gulf States, the Southwest, southern California, northern California and the Pacific Northwest. This network provides local service to news media and will work closely with Toyota and Lexus regional sales offices and dealers. Internal Communications is responsible for internal audience communications, including employee communications, flagship publications, executive communications, intranet Web sites and the Toyota USA Archives and Vintage Vehicle Museum. Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
12 Strategic Planning & Administration is a new department with responsibilities for business development, strategic and long-range planning, division administration, corporate philanthropy and the Toyota Video Production Center. Ford Organization of Fords communications infrastructure was not available due to a lack of response to queries.
A comparison of existing communication programs- Toyota Internal Communications Communication within the company is accomplished through a variety of methods. The company retains an intranet as well as standard electronic mail systems. The company relies heavily on internal training to ensure all employees understand the Toyota Way. This training consists of orientation training for newly promoted personnel, induction training for newly joined staff, advanced training for company specialist, career consultant and mentor training. The company also conducts cultural training and encourages managers to seek intra-company transfers to overseas assignments. The company maintains 600 on-site trainers at all its locations. Toyota sees good communication as the basis for all activities. In addition to communication in the workplace, Toyota has created numerous other opportunities for discussions between labor and management including Labor-Management Councils, Joint Labor-Management Round Table Conferences, and various subcommittees. Toyota has established a number of hotlines for swift resolution of issues related to compliance, gender harassment, mental health and working conditions. Further, Toyota implements employee morale surveys, and monitors employee job satisfaction, etc. In a survey conducted in FY2004, responses were received from 83% of the approximately 19,000 employees that Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
13 were surveyed. Positive responses such as Im proud to work at Toyota and Im satisfied with my working conditions continue to be at high levels. Dealer Daily - Web-based dealer communications system designed to improve communications between the automaker and its 1,100 Toyota and Lexus dealers. The Internet portal has increased dealer productivity by nearly 70%, according to Toyota. Because of the new system, dealers spend less time at their computers and more time selling vehicles, Cooper says. Toyota's Dealer Daily is a large, Windows- based virtual private network (VPN) that links the dealers' management systems to Toyota headquarters or to other business units around the clock. Communications with Employees Families. Since FY2002, greeting cards from the president have been sent to employees and their families at the end of the year, and since FY2003, various work sites have held workplace visits for families to facilitate communication between the workplace and home. Toyota also created the Toyota Fami-net, a family oriented website, and is taking other measures to enhance relations with employees families. External Communication Toyota conducts external communications in a number of varieties. The most popular are its websites and electronic communications programs. Toyota has websites for corporate communication, dealer communication, Fami-net for families, and websites for each of the different countries in which it operates. Additionally, they utilize print communications for annual reports, direct mail, and family newsletters. Ford Internal Communications. Because of Fords resistance to the attempts made at contacting the company directly, a dealer was contacted and was more than willing to answer any questions. The store manager at Leo Kaytes Ford in Warwick, New York said that Ford headquarters has three ways of communicating with the dealers. The first being email, the second is direct broadcast and the third is called Ford Star. Leslie Kaytes, the store manager, said the preferred way of communication is Ford Star. Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
14 Ford Star is a real time live chat session. Kaytes likes Ford Star because her questions are answered right away. There is no waiting for an email to come back or being placed on hold. She can talk with people at Ford headquarters at any time during business hours. Kaytes said that to become a certified dealer or employee an individual is required to take online classes. Once the classes are passed dealers take periodic classes to ensure they have retained and are utilizing lessons learns. The classes also offer incentives to sales people during the course of the year. Ford has an entire website dedicated to future employees. The first page of the career website says, Discover Bold Careers. The company offers student programs, co-op programs as well as full-time programs on its website than can be read about and if interested applied for. The website goes through topics such as diversity, worklife integration, recreation and fellowships, helping our community, company benefits, and Meet Ford People. Ford has employee resource groups that are made up of employees with common interest or backgrounds that provide insight as well as different perspectives to the company. The groups are company-sponsored and provide support, identify barriers and offer organized activities for members. These groups are: Ford-Employee African-Ancestry Network, Ford Asian Indian Association, Ford Chinese Association, Ford Finance Network, Ford Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual Employees, Ford Hispanic Network Group, Professional Womens Network, Women in Finance, Ford Parenting Network, Ford Interfaith Network, Middle Eastern Community @ Ford Motor Company, Ford Employees Dealing with DisAbilities. The Meet Ford People link mentioned above is very interesting. The website says, The best way to learn about working at Ford Motor Company is to let our people tell you. It lists hundreds of employees who have written a small blurb about why they like working at Ford. Some are actually videos of the employees talking about their jobs and how Ford is not only a great company to work for but it also considers ones family as well. Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
15 The Meet Ford People is an interesting approach to enticing new employees. Maybe after reading about a few employees and seeing their picture a person will feel more inclined to apply; especially if they read about someone or watch a video that they can relate to. Communication with Employees Families. Ford does an excellent job of communicating with the families of employees. However, the website does not directly take a visitor to the family website. A little searching must be done first. There are five tabs at the top of the screen. The fourth one is titled, Good Works. Within that page is a link to the environment, community, awards, and funding and grants pages. Within the community page is where the family website is located. The companys family page is centered on enriching the lives of its employees, retirees, and their families. The program strives to put families and communities first. Ford has created the Family Learning and Service Centers (FLSC). The FLSC slogan is, Strong families build better communities. FLSC provide high quality child care, family education and services, community service and outreach, and a volunteer support network. Some programs offered by the family education and services are family wellness, retiree program, summer and holiday camps, as well as job and career assistance programs. The retiree program has walking clubs, travel programs, food and friendship programs; the idea behind the program is to enrich retired life, from financial planning to gardening. FLSC has its own website which is more than likely offered to employees and their families. They more than likely do not have to search through the website to find it like non-employees. External Communication When the Ford Motor Company website is first opened there is a link on the bottom left entitled investor information. The company wants to ensure that investors have a direct line to the information they are looking for. The communication is open and direct. The company knows that people looking to invest do not have the time to search the site for the necessary information. Other Communication Methods: Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
16 Annual Reports Financial Results Stock Information Sustainability Reports Separate websites for any brand of Ford Motor Sales and Corporate Information FLSC Website Ford Star Direct Broadcasting Direct Mail Advertising Leslie Kaytes also discussed the advertising of Ford. There are three tiers: corporate, regional and dealer. The commercials and advertisements by Leo Kaytes Ford are not controlled by Fords corporate headquarters only monitored. Kaytes said that unless the dealer is doing something offensive the corporate headquarter has no control over how they choose to advertise. This is interesting and beneficial to the dealer but also to Ford as a whole. Warwick, New York is a small community and the Kaytes family is a well known establishment in this town. The family is often seen in commercial on television and it works as a communication method. It gives the viewer a sense of reality and builds a relationship with the community.
Recommendations
Toyota The old saying goes, What do you get a man that has everything? What can you recommend to a company that dominates the market and is poised for even greater market share? The best recommendation for Toyota is that it needs to ensure it continues to aggressively look forward and seek improvement on its current systems. The Toyota Way is based on a learning environment. One lesson Comparing Organizational Communications Ford Versus Toyota Authors: Elizabeth Zurlnick and Paul Hayes January 8, 2007
17 from the past is that people do not like monopolies. Toyota must strive to paint itself as a learning company that is not out to destroy all other automakers. Efforts at this have been seen in their recent talks with Ford executives. The second recommendation would be to improve their jobs portion of their website. They could include more information on what type of people they are looking for and put a face on the company much as Ford does with their site. Ford There are three recommendations for Ford. The first and most important is to add information to the website regarding the Way Forward program. This program will be a benefit to all audience members. Investors, employees, customers will be interested; basically anyone who has an interest in Ford will be interested in this program. It is a program that is attempting to turn Ford around within the next year. The goal of Way Forward is to return profitability by 2008. This program could make or break the company and Ford should be willing to advertise it. Show the public what the company is trying to do to turn profitability around and make Ford an investors dream again. The second recommendation is talk more with people. Be willing to communicate with the public. As a researcher it seemed that Ford was unwilling to talk and discuss the companys profile. The dealer was more than happy to answer any questions, which is definitely a plus. Dealers are on the front lines and often the only contact a person has with a company. So, their friendly disposition and character is definitely a plus for Ford Motor Company. The third and final recommendation would be to make the family and community page a more integral and obvious part of the website. As stated earlier an investor has an immediate entrance to the website. There is a special link for investor information. A person looking to find out the benefits of being a family member of a Ford employees or simply looking to see what benefits Ford has for the community should not have to search so hard. It should be made more available.