Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Day 8
Day 9
Days 8 and 9 of treatment with oral isoniazid and rifampin; days 4 and 5 of treatment with oral pyrazinamide. C
max
Maximum con-
centration; MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration
10716_long.qxd 01/08/2008 12:23 PM Page 242
to be increased and pleural fluid C
max
to be 4%, 34% and 48%
of serum C
max
for rifampin, streptomycin and ofloxacin,
respectively. In that case, pleural fluid as well as serum T
max
and C
max
for ethambutol were virtually identical.
Acquired drug resistance has been reported in eight cases of
TB empyema (1-4). All cases were resistant to INH, presum-
ably because it was the only drug that achieved therapeutic
concentrations in the pleural space. Using the C
max
/minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio an approximate meas-
ure of the potency of INH and rifampin in the pleural space,
with a value of greater than four indicating probable effective-
ness (6) INH was effective at 19.2 (0.96/0.05) and rifampin
was ineffective at 2.4 (0.48/0.20). The relationship between
C
max
and MIC is less clear for pyrazinamide. MICs of pyrazi-
namide for susceptible strains of M tuberculosis, which were
detemined using radiometric techniques, ranged between
6.2 g/mL or less and 50 g/mL when tested at a pH of 5.5 (7).
The recommended break point for susceptibility testing is less
than 100 g/mL, while the therapeutic range in vivo is
20 g/mL to 50 g/mL. It is probable that the achievable pleu-
ral fluid concentrations of pyrazinamide in our patient were
therapeutic, especially given that pyrazinamide is only effec-
tive in an acidic environment and acidity is a classic feature of
TB empyema. However, as a companion drug in the treatment
of pulmonary TB, pyrazinamide cannot be relied on to protect
against INH resistance (8).
All cases of acquired drug resistance in TB empyema also
had a BPF, a complication we speculate contributed to the
acquisition of resistance by improving oxygenation, mycobac-
terial growth and the number of resistant mutants. In the
absence of a BPF, Neihart et al (9) cured a patient with TB
empyema using a 24-month course of INH and ethambutol
(rifampin was also administered but is unlikely to have
achieved therapeutic concentrations in the empyema) in com-
bination with intermittent thoracentesis.
Taken together, our own experience and that of Neihart
et al (9) and Elliott et al (3) suggest the following:
it is possible to cure TB empyema, at least one that is
uncomplicated by BPF, without resorting to surgical
drainage;
12 to 18 months of high-end doses of oral INH,
pyrazinamide and ethambutol, together with tube
thoracostomy or intermittent thoracentesis, are curative
without threatening to induce drug resistance; and
combined oral plus intrapleural anti-TB drugs, along
with tube thoracostomy, while offering theoretical
advantages (reduced time to cure, reduced likelihood of
drug resistance), may not be required in all cases.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors are very grateful to
Carolyn Comin and the staff of the TB inpatient unit at the
University of Alberta Hospital, Pieter De Wet and the staff of the
Associate Medical Centre (McLennan, Alberta), and Dennis
Kunimoto, Greg Tyrrell and the staff of the Provincial Laboratory
for Public Health (Alberta) for their assistance in the manage-
ment of the patient. No outside financial support was sought or
received for this case study. There are no conflicts of interest for
any of the above authors.
Treatment of tuberculous empyema
Can Respir J Vol 15 No 5 July/August 2008 243
REFERENCES
1. Sahn SA, Iseman MD. Tuberculous empyema. Semin Respir Infect
1999;14:82-7.
2. Reeve PA, Seaton D. Tuberculous empyema a case history
extending over 30 years. Tubercle 1986;67:147-50.
3. Elliott AM, Berning SE, Iseman MD, Peloquin CA. Failure of drug
penetration and acquisition of drug resistance in chronic
tuberculous empyema. Tuber Lung Dis 1995;76:463-7.
4. Iseman MD, Madsen LA. Chronic tuberculous empyema with
bronchopleural fistula resulting in treatment failure and progressive
drug resistance. Chest 1991;100:124-7.
5. Minami M, Kawauchi N, Yoshikawa K, et al. Malignancy associated
with chronic empyema: Radiologic assessment. Radiology
1991;178;417-23.
6. Heifets LB. Antituberculous drugs: Antimicrobial activity in vitro.
In: Heifets LB, ed. Drug susceptibility in the chemotherapy of
mycobacterial infections. Florida: CRC Press 1991:13-57.
7. Salfinger M, Heifets LB. Determination of pyrazinamide MICs for
Mycobacterium tuberculosis at different pHs by the radiometric
method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988;32:1002-4.
8. Mitchison DA. The action of antituberculosis drugs in short-course
chemotherapy. Tubercle 1985;66:219-25.
9. Neihart RE, Hof DG. Successful nonsurgical treatment of
tuberculous empyema in an irreducible pleural space. Chest
1985;88:792-4.
10. Peloquin CA. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of
tuberculosis. Drugs 2002;62:2169-83.
10716_long.qxd 01/08/2008 12:23 PM Page 243