Você está na página 1de 86

On Friendster networks, pyramid schemes and the spreading of virus

A review on diverse networks which surprisingly contain common attributes

Christopher Monterola,PhD

Complex Systems Group - IPL


National Institute of Physics
UP Diliman

1
Organization of Presentation
The Known Physics
Basic ideas on the science of Complexity

I. Different types of networks


II. Onset of Interest in small world networks
III. Multilevel marketing scheme

IV. Friendster Network

V. Olfactory network

2
The Known Physics

A. Why is the Sun the Center of our Solar System?

B. The Newtonian Era: F = m a

C. The Einstein Era: E = mc2

Monterola! !
A. Why is the Sun the center of our Solar System ?

1. Pythagoras (569 - 465 B.C.) → 2. Plato (427 - 327 B.C.) →

3. Eudoxus (409 – 356 B.C.) → 4. Aristotle (384 - 322 B.C.) →

5. Aristarchus* (310 - 230 B.C.) → 6. Hipparchus (190 - 120 B.C.) →

7. Claudius Ptolemy (A.D. 85 - 165 ) → GOOD FOR 1400 years!!!

Geocentric theory : “Earth- centered universe”


* Heliocentric theory:
! “Sun-centered
! universe”

Monterola! !
B. Newtonian Era
xCM = m1 x1 + m2 x2
Center of Mass m1 +m2

Motion in the CM is the motion of the entire bodies

Resolve: Sun as the center of the solar system


C. Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955)

´I have no special talents. I am


only passionately curious.´

Oh what oh what is the


speed of light?
C. Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955)

"Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour.
Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. THAT'S
relativity."

"Gravitation can not be held responsible for people falling in love"

"Only two things are infinite, the


universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former."

http://www.some-guy.com/quotes/einstein.html#relativity
Brandenburg Gate Geometrical Objects

Asin Saturn
But what if ...

Objects are countless - Avogadro’s limit

Entities can learn and adapt - Self-Organization

Entities form networks - Social Systems

9
Definition: Complex Systems
Best defined by what they are not:
• Complex systems are not simple ones
• Fundamental characteristic: Emergent properties

Defn: Emergent properties


are ones that arise due to
the interactions in a
system, and are not inherent The total is more than the sum of its parts…
in the individual components
http://necsi.org/guide/concepts/

Complex Systems Science


modeling systems of interacting components

Operates at different temporal and


spatial scales

Similar emergent properties are


found in many domains, such as
branching structures
Tree roots and branches
Neurons
Blood vessels
Road systems
Drainage basins

Why similar properties emerge across


different domains?

12
Complex Systems Science
extremely multidisciplinary

Metabolic pathways
Extremely multidisciplinary
Plants
Animals – shell patterns, ontogeny
Behaviour – swarms
Evolution
Financial markets
Traffic
Social Networks

Insights gained in physics or chemistry may be applicable to economics or biology

13
The study of complex networks tackles the emergence, dynamics, and
evolution of the “skeletons” of complex systems.

I. Different types of networks


II. Small world networks
III. Multilevel marketing scheme

IV. Friendster Network

V. Olfactory network
I. Types of Networks

15
I. Types of Networks

15
I. Types of Networks

Concept of neighborhood...
percolation models, theories
on regular lattices

15
I. Types of Networks

Concept of neighborhood...
percolation models, theories
on regular lattices

15
I. Types of Networks

Concept of neighborhood...
percolation models, theories
on regular lattices

Take few steps to reach


any vertex...
Erdos and co-workers
spread of epidemics,
random walks, random
graphs, quantum chaos

15
I. Types of Networks

Concept of neighborhood...
percolation models, theories
on regular lattices

Take few steps to reach


any vertex...
Erdos and co-workers
spread of epidemics,
random walks, random
graphs, quantum chaos

15
I. Types of Networks

Concept of neighborhood...
percolation models, theories
on regular lattices

Small world
“Six Degrees of
Separation”, Guare J., A
play, Vintage books 1990.

Take few steps to reach


any vertex...
Erdos and co-workers
spread of epidemics,
random walks, random
graphs, quantum chaos

15
Milgram Experiment

Short chains of acquaintances


linking pairs who didn’t know each other;
Source: Nebraska, Target: Massachusetts
Forward message to people they knew
personally (who should be closer to target)

Average length: 5 and 6 steps

“Six degrees of separation” principle


“Small-World” phenomenon

16
Small-World Network
Watts and Strogatz
a massive email experiment to test the theory
of "six degrees of separation"

More than 60,000 people


166 different countries
18 targets.

17
Small-World Network
Watts and Strogatz
a massive email experiment to test the theory
of "six degrees of separation"

More than 60,000 people


166 different countries
18 targets.

Social Networks exhibit:


Short characteristic path length
High degree of clustering

17
Onset of Interest
its a small world ...

Social networks have:


small average path lengths
LARGE degree of clustering
Painting by Idahlia Stanley.

Collective Dynamics of `small world` networks, Watts, D. J. & Strogatz, D. H. (1998) Nature 393, 440–442 (1998).

18
II. Small World Networks

Social Networks

(i) human sexual contacts (4781Swedes 18-74 yrs old)


vertices: males or females
links: sexual relation

SMALL WORLD implications:

Targeted control
`rich getting richer` phenomena

Classes of small-world networks, Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M. & Stanley,
H. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149–11152 (Oct 2000). 19
II. Small World Networks

Technological and Economic Networks

(ii) the electric power grid of Southern California:


vertices : generators, transformers, and substations
links : high-voltage transmission lines

Classes of small-world networks, Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M. & Stanley,
H. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149–11152 (Oct 2000). 20
II. Small World Networks

Iba pang Small World …

(iii) the network of world airports


vertices: airports
links: nonstop connections (cargo and
passengers).

21
(iv) the movie-actor network
vertices: actors
links: two actors were cast at least once in
the same movie

http://blog.clickz.com/img/socntwk.jpg
II. Small World Networks

Small World pa rin …

(v) the acquaintance network of Mormons


vertices: 43 Utah Mormons
links: the number of other Mormons they know

(vi) the friendship network of 417 Madison Jr HS Students


vertices:students
links: chosen as the two (or three) best friend

23
II. Small World Networks

Malaking Mundo ng Small World …

(vii) the neuronal network of the worm C. elegans


vertices: neurons
links:connections between neurons

(viii) the conformation space of a lattice polymer chain


vertices: polymer chain
links: connecting two conformations via local movements

http://cdg.columbia.edu/cdg/experiments

24
II. Small World Networks

IX. Protein-protein
interaction network
(Saccharomyces
cerevisiae)
Online Experiments
http://cdg.columbia.edu/cdg/experiments

MusicLab
Researchers: Duncan Watts, Matt Salganik, Peter Dodds, Peter Hausel, Jason Booher-Jennings

This project attempts to understand how musical tastes are formed. Visit the site for a chance to discover and
download new music by up-and-coming bands. It's all legal and totally free.

This experiment started in 2004.


Check out the website at: http://www.musiclab.columbia.edu/

Small World Experiment 2


Researchers: Duncan Watts, Peter Dodds, Roby Muhamad, Peter Hausel, and Mahesh Somashekhar

The Small World project is an online experiment to test the idea that any two people in the world can be
connected via "six degrees of separation".

This experiment started in 2003.


Check out the website at: http://smallworld.columbia.edu/

Small World Experiment 1


Researchers: Duncan Watts, Peter Dodds, and Roby Muhamad

This experiment ended in 2003. The results are available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/
301/5634/827?ijkey=Evqpw33f\
III. The Friendster Network

Recall: The Small-World Phenomenon

High Clustering Coefficient: It’s a network of friends

Short Path Length: everyone in the world can be reached


through a short chain of social acquaintances-
“six-degrees of separation”

27
III. The Friendster Network

The Small-World Experiment

Verified small-world hypothesis globally


Utilized the power and convenience of electronic
mail or email

Their Result
5 – 7 degrees of separation
6-degrees of separation is verified!

28
III. The Friendster Network

My Student`s Small World

29
III. The Friendster Network

My Student’s Friendster

30
III. The Friendster Network

31
III. The Friendster Network

http://www.washedashore.com/people/friendster/neato1.png
http://www.washedashore.com/people/friendster/DSC01474_v4.jpg
32
III. The Friendster Network

• Power Law
• Average Connection: 5 -7 links

33
Visualization of other small world networks

34
Pag isipan ...

Preferential attachment gives rise to a power law

Pareto rule or “80-20” rule, a power law disribution of property is universal


Less than 80 families control the economy of the Philippines
15 % of US population holds 91 % of total wealth
15 % of RP population holds 87 % of total wealth

Classes of small-world networks, Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M. & Stanley,
H. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149–11152 (Oct 2000).
35
Pag isipan ... 15% of population
5%
10 %
91% of incomes!

40 %

35 %

48%

43% 10 %

7%
1.5% 0.5%

www.gritty.org/Pages/GrittyBook/ pages/06WealthPoverty
Pag isipan ...

-0.4 Singapore

UK
-0.8 Bangladesh
USA
Japan U- actual [4]
-1.2
 predicted
France
-1.6

-2.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

[4] www. econ.worldbank.org/programs/poverty/library/


[5] www.grb.net/wealth/
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)

 Multilevel Marketing (MLM)


 Less EXPENSIVE Advertising
 Word-of-Mouth Marketing
 Credible [1]

 Cheaper [2]

 Consumers-Distributors-Recruiters
 incentive-driven
 a Billion $ industry
 controversial (Pyramid Schemes)

38
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)

Significance

 Existence of MLM in the Philippines


 Quantify MLM
 Econophysics problem:
Why different MLM network structures co-exist?

To appear in Physica A 2008

39
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Marketing Plan Structures

l=0

l=1

l=2

l=3

l=4

Unilevel Structure Binary Structure


unlimited downlines only 2 direct downlines only
Recruited agents are attached Recruited agents may or may not be
directly below their recruiters attached directly below their
recruiters

40
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Network Growth

 Cross-Section of the Network, f(l), the number of agents


at level l

f (0) = 1

f (1) = 3

f (2) = 6

f (3) = 3

f (4) = 3

41
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Unilevel Network Growth

The probability that an agent is added to level l is

42
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Unilevel Network Growth

The probability that an agent is added to level l is

Branching Rate

42
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Unilevel Network Growth

The probability that an agent is added to level l is

Branching Rate

Initially, f(0)=1 and f(l>0)=0. Thus, the normalized solution becomes

42
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Agent-Based Model: Unilevel

 Construct underlying social network (WS model)


 Allow agent recruitment
 Unilevel: WS model, recruit friends

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to
open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer,
and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the
image and then insert it again.

43
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Results

Unilevel Growth
Distribution
Number of Agents

Level
44
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Binary Network Growth

Agents are limited to two direct downlines.

Recruitment is by preferential attachment.

The number of possible downlines that can be placed at level l

The probability that a node is added at level l is therefore

45
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Binary Network Growth

Hence
,

46
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Binary Network Growth

Hence
,
Effective fraction of recruiting
members that situates a recruit
at l.

46
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Binary Network Growth

Hence
,
Effective fraction of recruiting
members that situates a recruit
at l.

46
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Binary Network Growth

Hence
,
Effective fraction of recruiting
members that situates a recruit
at l.

Initially, f(0)=1 and f(l>0)=0. Thus, the normalized solution becomes

46
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Agent-Based Model: Binary

 adopt BA preferential attachment model


 individuals connect to more established

N
!
Π(km ) = (km + 1)/ (kn + 1)
n=1

Imposed symmetry The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory
to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your

pairing bonus
computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have
to delete the image and then insert it again.

47
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Results

Binary Growth Distribution of


Legacy Philippines
Number of Agents

Level
48
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Results

Binary Growth Distribution of Unilevel Growth Distribution


Legacy Philippines
Number of Agents

Level

49
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Results

Binary Growth Distribution of Unilevel Growth Distribution


Legacy Philippines
Number of Agents

Contrary to claims of unbridled growth.

Level

49
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

ROBUSTNESS - the capacity to retain its overall structure


after a number of agents quit at a certain time.

Longer stay  less likely to quit


Agents at higher levels  more likely to quit

50
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

ROBUSTNESS - the capacity to retain its overall structure


after a number of agents quit at a certain time.

Longer stay  less likely to quit


Agents at higher levels  more likely to quit

50
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

ROBUSTNESS - the capacity to retain its overall structure


after a number of agents quit at a certain time.

Longer stay  less likely to quit


Agents at higher levels  more likely to quit

50
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

ROBUSTNESS - the capacity to retain its overall structure


after a number of agents quit at a certain time.

Longer stay  less likely to quit


Agents at higher levels  more likely to quit

50
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Results
Binary
f(l)

l Unilevel
51
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Linfoot’s Criterion

MLM Network F C Q
Fidelity Structural Correlation
Content Quality
Unilevel (N=2122) 0.8788 0.5702 0.7240
Unilevel (N=5000) 0.7804 0.6756 0.7280
Binary (N=2122) 0.9590 0.8523 0.9057
Binary (N=5000) 0.9865 0.9531 0.9698

Perfect Similarity F = C =Q = 1

52
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Linfoot’s Criterion

MLM Network F C Q
Fidelity Structural Correlation
Content Quality
Unilevel (N=2122) 0.8788 0.5702 0.7240
Binary
Unilevel (N=5000) structure
0.7804 -> More Robust
0.6756 0.7280
Binary (N=2122) 0.9590 0.8523 0.9057
Binary (N=5000) 0.9865 0.9531 0.9698

Perfect Similarity F = C =Q = 1

52
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

Unilevel Binary

53
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

Unilevel Binary

53
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

Unilevel Binary

53
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

Unilevel Binary

53
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Robustness

Unilevel Binary

“Healing Process”

53
IV. Multi-level Marketing (MLM)
Summary

Network Growth Robustness


Binary
Binary

Unilevel

Unilevel

Contrary to claims of unbridled growth.


Binary structure -> More Robust

54
V. Olfactory Network
The Physics of Smelling

Walkthrough

1. Psychophysical studies
2. Signal detection & representation
3. Olfactory network
4. Active research area
V. The Physics of Smelling

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2004

"for their discoveries of odorant receptors and the organization of the


olfactory system"

Richard Axel Linda B. Buck


1/2 of the prize   1/2 of the prize
USA USA

Columbia University Fred Hutchinson Cancer


New York, NY, USA; Howard Hughes Research Center
Medical Institute Seattle, WA, USA

b. 1946 b. 1947
V. The Physics of Smelling

1. Psychophysical studies related to smell

Everyone has a unique smell (Wudson, JPR 1989)

We can smell happiness (Ackerl et al, PNAS 2002)

www.happypeople.com

Sperm may smell their way to the egg (Spehr et al., Science 2003)

www.linealba.01.com

We can smell gender (Rendler et al, Nature 2005)

Males sweat relaxes women (Preti et al, Bio. of Reproduction 2003)


57
V. The Physics of Smelling

1. Psychophysical studies related to smell

Taste is mostly (~75%) smell (Moncrief, Neuron 1967)

Odour memory falls off less rapidly (Miles & Jenkins, 2000)

Sniff test suggests when, and with whom, women are


most likely to cheat (Havlicek J., J. Biol. Lett. 2005)

Schizophrenia is associated with a decreased capacity to experience


pleasure within the olfactory domain (Crespo-Facorro et al., JAMA 2001).

anosmic – people who cannot smell

58
V. The Physics of Smelling
2. Signal detection & representation
Hearing, Seeing, Tasting, Smelling the world ….

Auditory signal (frequency) Visual signal (wavelength)

Hair bundles 3 receptors

www.eyesokimage/rodscones.htm
www.frost.hair.com

Olfactory signal (odor molecules)


Gustation signal (taste molecules)

~1000 receptors 59
Figure from Mori & Sasaki, NCNS 1998
V. The Physics of Smelling
2. Signal detection & representation

Rose emits a specific combination of tens of different odour molecules

Molecular mass is between 26 - 300

Odor is invariant over three orders of magnitude

Odor fatigue

“The mammalian nose is the best chemical detector in the world, yet we still don’t understand how it codes”
–Firestein Columbian University
60
V. The Physics of Smelling

3. Olfactory network

Leynze & Macdonald, Nature 2004


61
V. The Physics of Smelling

3. Olfactory network

Current hypothesis
one sensory neuron–one receptor
one glomerulus – one receptor
(Buck & Axel, 1991)

Figure from Mori & Sasaki, NCNS 1998


62
V. The Physics of Smelling

3. Olfactory network
Four zones/compartments

Figure from Friedrich et al, Science 2002

Open problems: 1. Why converge to glomerulus?


! ! 2. Why four compartments?!
! ! 3. Role of feedback (sniffing)?
! ! 63
V. The Physics of Smelling

3. Olfactory network
Response time

Olfactory: 2 - 3 hz (~300 - 500 ms)

Visual: 12 hz (~100ms)

Taste: 100 hz (10 ms)

Auditory: 1000 hz (1 ms)

64
V. The Physics of Smelling

4. Models

Active area of research

Experiments looking for theories

Olfactory neurons synchronizes at 20-30 hz during categorization

Odor is invariant over three orders of magnitude

Odor fatigue

Theory for odor representation, combination?

"What's in a name? that which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet"
........................................Romeo and Juliet act 2, sc.2, l.66............................

65

Você também pode gostar