Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements Vol. I FINAL

vii
CONTENTS
Foreword
Preface
How to Use this Volume.......................................................................I-VI
Section I: Authority
1. Announcements of the Council regarding Status of Various Documents
Issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.......................... I.1
2. Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review,
Other Assurance and Related Services................................................... I.22
Section II: Standards on Quality Control (SQCs)
1. Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of
Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance
and Related Services Engagements.........................................................II-1
Section III: Framework
1. Framework for Assurance Engagements.................................................III-1
Section IV: Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial
Information
100-999 Standards on Auditing (SAs)
100-199 Introductory Matters
200-299 General Principles and Responsibilities
200 Basic Principles Governing an Audit........................................................IV-1
200A Objective and Scope of the Audit of Financial Statements....................IV-7
210 Terms of Audit Engagements................................................................IV-11
(General Clarification (GC)-AASB/2/2004 on SA 210)...........................IV-19
220 Quality Control for Audit Work...............................................................IV-21

viii
230 Documentation.......................................................................................IV-26
240 (Revised) the Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud
in an Audit of Financial Statements.......................................................IV-31
240 The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud and Error
in an Audit of Financial Statements ......................................................IV-79
250 Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of
Financial Statements ..........................................................................IV-115
260 Communications of Audit Matters with Those Charged
with Governance .................................................................................IV-125
299 Responsibility of Joint Auditors............................................................IV-131
300-499 Risk Assessment and Response to Assessed Risks
300 (Revised) Planning an Audit of Financial Statements..........................IV-136
300 Audit Planning......................................................................................IV-150
310 Knowledge of the Business..................................................................IV-156
315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment.....................................IV-164
320 Audit Materiality....................................................................................IV-220
330 The Auditors Responses to Assessed Risks ......................................IV-225
400 Risk Assessments and Internal Control ...............................................IV-251
401 Auditing in a Computer Information Systems Environment..................IV-269
402 Audit Considerations Relating to Entities Using
Service Organizations .........................................................................IV-278
500-599 Audit Evidence
500 Audit Evidence ....................................................................................IV-284
501 Audit EvidenceAdditional Considerations for
Specific Items ......................................................................................IV-290
505 External Confirmations ........................................................................IV-302
510 Initial EngagementsOpening Balances ............................................IV-315
520 Analytical Procedures .........................................................................IV-319
530 Audit Sampling.....................................................................................IV-325
540 Audit of Accounting Estimates ............................................................IV-335

ix
550 Related Parties ...................................................................................IV-342
560 Subsequent Events .............................................................................IV-349
570 Going Concern ....................................................................................IV-353
(General Clarification (GC)-AASB/3/2004 on SA 570).........................IV-360
580 Representations by Management .......................................................IV-362
600-699 Using Work of Others
600 Using the Work of Another Auditor .....................................................IV-372
610 Relying Upon the Work of an Internal Auditor .....................................IV-379
620 Using the Work of an Expert................................................................IV-385
(General Clarification (GC)-AASB/1/2002 on SA 620).........................IV-391
700-799 Audit Conclusions and Reporting
700 The Auditors Report on Financial Statements.....................................IV-392
710 Comparatives ......................................................................................IV-413
800-899 Specialized Areas
2000-2699 Standards on ReviewEngagements (SREs)
2400 Engagements to Review Financial Statements...................................IV-425

Section V: Assurance Engagements Other Than Audits or
Reviews of Historical Financial Information
3000-3699 Standards on Assurance Engagements (SAEs)
3000-3399 Applicable to All Assurance Engagements
3400-3699 Subject Specific Standards
3400 The Examination of Prospective Financial Information ..........................V-1
Section VI: Related Services
4000-4699 Standards on Related Services (SRSs)
4400 Engagements to perform Agreed-Upon Procedures Regarding Financial
Information.............................................................................................VI-1
4410 Engagements to Compile Financial Information..................................VI-12

x
Section VII: Statements on Auditing
1. Statement on Reporting under Section 227(1A) of the Companies Act,
1956 ......................................................................................VII-1
2. Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 [Issued under Section 227 (4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956]........................................................................VII-11
3. Statement on Payments to Auditors for Other Services...................VII-270
Reconciliation of the International Standards on Quality Control, Auditing,
Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, issued by the International
Federation of Accountants with the Standards, issued by ICAI (as on May 29,
2008)

Back

How to Use This Volume

This Volume I of the Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements contains the text of
the auditing standards as well as the Statements on Auditing issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The readers would find this edition of
Volume I quite different from the previous (2007) edition. To help the readers to
find the information that they need, we wish to highlight the following points:
I. Renaming, Re-numbering and Categorisation of
Auditing and Assurance Standards
1

The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, in 2007, adopted the Revised
Preface to Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and
Related Services. In terms of the Revised Preface, the Auditing and Assurance
Standards are now renamed based on the type of assurance provided by the
engagement undertaken by a member, viz.,
(i) Standards on Auditing (SAs) - to be applied in the audit of historical
financial information
(ii) Standards on Review Engagements (SREs) - to be applied in the review of
historical financial information
(iii) Standards on Assurance Engagements (SAEs) - to be applied in assurance
engagements, engagements dealing with subject matters other than
historical financial information
(iv) Standards on Related Services (SRSs) - to be applied to engagements to
apply agreed upon procedures to information and other related services
engagements such as compilation engagements
Further, there is also a mother standard on quality control.
In addition, each of the above group of Standards has been allotted a numerical
series as follows and the Standards pertaining to a particular group is allotted a
number from that numerical series:

1
This is based on the pattern followed by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board.
Back

II
Type of Standard Numerical Series
Standards on Quality Control 01 - 99
Standards on Auditing 100 999
Standards on Review Engagements 2000 2699
Standards on Assurance Engagements 3000 3699
Related Services 4000 4699
The Standards on Auditing have also been further divided into seven categorize
based on the aspect of audit engagement addressed by them and each of these
categories has a unique numerical series allotted. Therefore, a Standard
pertaining to a particular aspect of audit would be allotted a number from that
relevant numerical series. These categories and series are as follows:
Aspect of Auditing Covered Numerical Series
Introductory Matters 100 - 199
General Principles and Responsibilities 200 299
Risk Assessment and Response to Assessed
Risk
300 - 499
Audit Evidence 500 599
Using Work of Others 600 - 699
Audit Conclusions and Reporting 700 - 799
Specialised Areas 800 - 899
Accordingly, the erstwhile Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 30, External
Confirmations can be found under the category Audit Evidence as Standard on
Auditing (SA) 505. Similarly, AAS 3, Documentation can be found under the
category General Principles and Responsibilities as SA 230. The readers
would therefore, find the Standards appearing in the order of the new number
allotted to them and not the number which they carried as AAS. A complete
table of old AAS numbers vis a vis corresponding SA number is given as
APPENDIX A to this note. Also a diagrammatic representation of the structure of
Standards under the new Preface is given as APPENDIX B to this note.

III
II. Use of Bold Lettering vis a vis Plain Type Face The
new format of writing Standards
In 2007, the AASB also adopted the format and conventions (popularly known as
the Clarity Convention/ Project) in which the International Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board is now writing its International Standards on
Auditing. Accordingly, the Standards on Auditing issued in 2007 by AASB under
the Clarity Project, i.e., SA 240, SA 300, SA 315 and SA 330 have been written
following that format and conventions. As per this new format/ convention, a
Standard on Auditing is divided into the following distinct parts:
Introduction
Objective
Definitions
Requirements
Application and Other Explanatory Material
The Requirements part of the Standard outlines the fundamental principles
enunciated in the Standard whereas the Application and Other Explanatory
Material part provides guidance on the application of the aforesaid principles.
Readers may also note that in the AASs 14 to 35 (except the revised AAS 4,
AAS 6 and AAS 10) the principles vis a vis application guidance was
distinguished by use of the expression shouldcoupled with bold type face for
the principles and normal type face for the application guidance. This new
format for writing Standards also no longer uses the word should in stead it
uses the word shall nor does it reflect the principles contained in the
Requirement part in bold. All the text in the Standard, whether principles or
application guidance is given in normal type face.
Readers may also note that even in erstwhile AAS 1 to 13, no bold type face was
used to distinguish between principles and application guidance, the entire
Standard appeared in normal type face.
In any case, in the above context, it is essential to note that whatever be the
format/ convention used in writing a Standard, the entire Standard is mandatory
for the members.

IV
APPENDIX A
Renumbering of the Auditing and Assurance Standards-
At a Glance
Existing
AAS
Number
Title of the Standard NewNumber of the
Standard
1 Basic Principles Governing an Audit SA 200
2 Objectives and Scope of the Audit of
Financial Statements
SA 200A
3 Documentation SA 230
4 The Auditors Responsibility to
Consider Fraud and Error in an Audit
of Financial Statements
SA 240
5 Audit Evidence SA 500
6 Risk Assessments and Internal
Control
SA 400
7 Relying Upon the Work of an Internal
Auditor
SA 610
8 Audit Planning SA 300
9 Using the Work of an Expert SA 620
10 Using the Work of Another Auditor SA 600
11 Representations by Management SA 580
12 Responsibility of Joint Auditors SA 299
13 Audit Materiality SA 320
14 Analytical Procedures SA 520
15 Audit Sampling SA 530
16 Going Concern SA 570
17 Quality Control for Audit Work SA 220
18 Auditing of Accounting Estimates SA 540

V
19 Subsequent Events SA 560
20 Knowledge of the Business SA 310
21 Consideration of Laws and
Regulations in an Audit of Financial
Statements
SA 250
22 Initial Engagements Opening
Balances
SA 510
23 Related Parties SA 550
24 Audit Considerations Relating to
Entities Using Service Organisations
SA 402
25 Comparatives SA 710
26 Terms of Audit Engagement SA 210
27 Communication of Audit Matters with
Those Charged with Governance
SA 260
28 The Auditors Report on Financial
Statements
SA 700
29 Audit in a Computer Information
Systems Environment
SA 401
30 External Confirmations SA 505
31 Engagements to Compile Financial
Information
SRS 4410
32 Engagements to Perform Agreed-
upon Procedures Regarding
Financial Information
SRS 4400
33 Engagements to Review Financial
Statements
SRE 2400
34 Audit Evidence Additional
Considerations for Specific Items
SA 501
35 The Examination of Prospective
SAE 3400

VI
APPENDIX B
Diagrammatic Representation of the Structure
of Standards Under the NewPreface

Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
Code of Ethics and other relevant
pronouncements of the ICAI
Standards on Quality Control (SQCs)
Services covered by the pronouncements of the Auditing
and Assurance Standards Board under the authority of the
Council of ICAI
Assurance Services
Related Services
Framework for Assurance
Engagements
Audits and reviews
of historical
financial
information
Assurance Engagements
other than audits or
reviews of historical
Standards on
Auditing
(SAs)

100 - 999

Standards on
Review
Engagements
(SREs)

2000 - 2699
Standards on
Assurance
Engagements
(SAEs)

3000 - 3699
Standards on
Related Services
(SRSs)

4000 - 4699
Back

ANNOUNCEMENTS OF THE COUNCIL
REGARDING STATUS OF
VARIOUS DOCUMENTS
ISSUED BY THE INSTITUTE OF
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
Contents
Page
A. Clarification regarding Authority Attached to Documents
Issued by the Institute .................................................................I-2
B. Use of Bold Type Face/ Normal Type Face in
Auditing and Assurance Standards................................................. I-5
C. Clarification on the Auditors Rights Where Clients and
Other Auditors Seek Access to their Audit Working Papers ........... I-6
D. Format of Review Report under Clause 41 of
the Listing Agreement..................................................................... I-7
E. Audit in Situations of Missing or Incomplete Records..................... I-8
F. List of Mandatory Statements and Standards on Auditing.............I-15
(I) List of Statements on Auditing as on 01.04.2008.....................I-15
(II) List of Quality Control and Engagement Standards
as on 01.04.2008......................................................................I-15

Back
Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements-I
Announcements I-2
A. Clarification regarding Authority Attached to
Documents Issued by the Institute
1

1. The Institute has, from time to time, issued Guidance Notes and
Statements on a number of matters. With the formation of the
Accounting Standards Board and the Auditing Practices Committee
2
,
Accounting Standards and Statements on Standard Auditing Practices
3

are also being issued.
2. Members have sought guidance regarding the level of authority
attached to the various documents issued by the Institute and the degree
of compliance required in respect thereof. This note is being issued to
provide this guidance.
3. The Statements have been issued with a view to securing
compliance by members on matters which, in the opinion of the Council,
are critical for the proper discharge of their functions. Statements
therefore are mandatory. Accordingly, while discharging their attest
function, it will be the duty of the members of the Institute:
(a) to examine whether Statements relating to accounting matters are
complied with in the presentation of financial statements covered by
their audit. In the event of any deviation from the Statements, it will be
their duty to make adequate disclosures in their audit reports so that
the users of financial statements may be aware of such deviations; and
(b) to ensure that the Statements relating to auditing matters are
followed in the audit of financial information covered by their audit
reports. If, for any reason, a member has not been able to perform
an audit in accordance with such Statements, his report should
draw attention to the material departures therefrom.

1
Published in the December, 1985 issue of the The Chartered Accountant.
2
The Auditing Practices Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India was
established in 1982 with, inter alia, the objectives of preparing the Statements on Standard
Auditing Practices (SAPs), Guidance Notes on matters related to auditing, etc. At its 226
th

meeting held on July 2, 2002 at New Delhi, the Council of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India approved the recommendations of the Auditing Practices Committee to
strengthen the role being played by it in the growth and development of the profession of
chartered accountancy in India. The Council also approved renaming of the Committee as,
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB) with immediate effect to better reflect the
activities being undertaken by the Committee. Apart from changes designed to strengthen the
process for establishing auditing and assurance standards, such a move would bring about
greater transparency in the working of the Auditing Practices Committee now known as the
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB).
The Council also approved the renaming of the Statements on Standard Auditing Practices
(SAPs) as, Auditing and Assurance Standards (AASs).
3
ibid.
Announcements of the Council
Announcements

I-3
4. A list of Statements issued by the Institute and currently in force is
given at the end of this note.
4

5. Guidance Notes are primarily designed to provide guidance to
members on matters which may arise in the course of their professional
work and on which they may desire assistance in resolving issues which
may pose difficulty. Guidance Notes are recommendatory in nature. A
member should ordinarily follow recommendations in a guidance note
relating to an auditing matter except where he is satisfied that in the
circumstances of the case, it may not be necessary to do so. Similarly,
while discharging his attest function, a member should examine whether
the recommendations in a guidance note relating to an accounting matter
have been followed or not. If the same have not been followed, the
member should consider whether keeping in view the circumstances of
the case, a disclosure in his report is necessary.
6. There are however a few guidance notes in case of which the
Council has specifically stated that they should be considered as
mandatory on members while discharging their attest function. A list of
these guidance notes is given below:
(i) Guidance Note on Treatment of Interest on Deferred Payments read
along with the pronouncement of the Council, published in The
Chartered Accountant, March 1984.
5

(ii) Provision for Depreciation in respect of Extra or Multiple Shift
Allowance, published in The Chartered Accountant, May 1984.
6

4
An updated list of mandatory statements on accounting and auditing is included in the List
of Mandatory Statements and Standards given after this clarification. It may also be noted
that besides statements on accounting and auditing, the Institute has issued statements on
other aspects also, namely, Statement on Peer Review and Statement on Continuing
Professional Education.
5
The nomenclature of this document was changed by the Council of the Institute at its 133
rd

meeting held in April, 1988. The new nomenclature was Statement on Treatment of Interest
on Deferred Payments. In view of para 8 of this Clarification, with Accounting Standard (AS)
10 on Accounting for Fixed Assets, becoming mandatory (see Announcement II) in respect of
accounts for periods commencing on or after 1.4.1991, the Statement on Treatment of
Interest on Deferred Payments stands automatically withdrawn except in the case of certain
specified non-corporate entities where it stands withdrawn in respect of accounts for periods
commencing on or after 1.4.1993 (see Announcements III, V and VI in this regard). It may be
noted that pursuant to the issuance of Accounting Standard (AS) 16 on Borrowing Costs,
which came into effect in respect of accounting periods commencing on or after 1-4-2000,
paragraph 9.2 and paragraph 20 (except the first sentence) of AS 10, relating to treatment of
finance costs including interest, stand withdrawn from that date.
6
The nomenclature of this document was changed by the Council of the Institute at its 133
rd

meeting held in April, 1988. The new nomenclature was Statement on Provision for
Depreciation in respect of Extra or Multiple Shift Allowance. This statement has been
Announcements I-4
7. The Accounting Standards and Statements on Standard Auditing
Practices
7
issued by the Accounting Standards Board and the Auditing
Practices Committee
8
, respectively, establish standards which have to be
complied with to ensure that financial statements are prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting standards and that
auditors carry out their audits in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices. They become mandatory on the dates specified either
in the respective document or by notification issued by the Council.
9

8. There can be situations in which certain matters are covered both
by a Statement and by an Accounting Standard/Statement on
Standard Auditing Practices
10
. In such a situation, the Statement shall
prevail till the time the relevant Accounting Standard/Statement on
Standard Auditing Practices
11
becomes mandatory. It is clarified that
once an Accounting Standard/Statement on Standard Auditing
Practices
12
becomes mandatory, the concerned Statement or the
relevant part thereof shall automatically stand withdrawn.
9. List of statements issued by the Institute and which are mandatory
in nature.
1. Statement on Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (Revised
2005)
2. Statement on Reporting under Section 227(1A) of the Companies
Act, 1956. List of Mandatory Statements and Standards
On the basis of the above announcements made by the Council, the
Secretariat of the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
13
has
prepared the following list of statements and standards which are
mandatory as on 01.04.2008 or would become mandatory at specified
date(s) in future.

withdrawn in respect of accounting periods commencing on or after 1.4.1989, as per the
Guidance Note on Accounting for Depreciation in Companies, issued in pursuance of
amendments in the Companies Act, 1956, through Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988.
7
Refer footnote 2. Statements on Standard Auditing Practices have been renamed as
Auditing and Assurance Standards.
8
Refer footnote 2. The Auditing Practices Committee has been renamed as Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board.
9
Subsequent to the publication of this Clarification, the Council has made various Accounting
Standards mandatory. The Announcements made by the Council in this regard are
reproduced hereafter.
10
Refer footnote 2. Statements on Standard Auditing Practices have been renamed as
Auditing and Assurance Standards.
11
ibid.
12
ibid.
13
Refer footnote 2.
Announcements

I-5
B. Use of Bold Type Face/ Normal Type Face in Auditing and
Assurance Standards
I. As the members are aware, the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India has till date issued 35 (thirty five) Auditing
and Assurance Standards (AASs). It may be reiterated that all
the Standards are mandatory in nature. This means that while
carrying out an attest function, it will be the duty of the
members of the Institute to ensure that these AASs are
followed in the audit of financial information covered by their
audit reports. If for any reason a member has not been able to
perform an audit in accordance with the AASs, his report
should draw attention to the material departures therefrom.
II. Further, it might have been noted by the members that in case
of AAS 1 to AAS 15, the entire text of the Standards appears
in normal type face, except for the headings and sub headings
therein. On the other hand, in case of AAS 16 to AAS 35,
certain text in the Standards is appearing in bold typeface
and certain portion of the text appearing in normal type face.
Normally, in these Standards, the bold type face has been
used to used to facilitate distinction between the principles vis-
a-vis the application/ procedural aspects, which have been
written in normal type face. In any case, however, the entire
text of the Standard is mandatory, irrespective of the fact
whether such distinction is made in the Standard or not.
The NewFormat (applicable from1
st
April, 2008)
14[*]

III. Members may also note that recently, the Council of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has approved the
Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing,
Review, Other Assurance and Related Services. The said
Preface introduces a totally new format of writing Standards, in
line with that adopted by the International Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board pursuant to its Clarity Project.
According to the new format the Standards on Auditing (SAs)
would now contain two distinct sections, one, the
Requirements section and, two, the Application Guidance
section.

14[*]
The Preface to Standards on Quality control, auditing, Review, Other Assurance and
Related Services and the document containing the Reclassification and renumbering of the
Auditing and Assurance Standards issued by the Institute have been published in the July
2007 issue of the Journal.
Announcements I-6
IV. The fundamental principles of the Standard are contained in the
Requirements section and represented by use of shall.
Hitherto, the word, should was used in the Standards, for this
purpose. Further, this format also does away with the need to
present the principles laid down by the Standard in bold text. The
application and other explanatory material contained in a
Standard on Auditing (SA) is an integral part of the SA as it
provides further explanation of, and guidance for carrying out, the
requirements of an SA, along with the background information on
the matters addressed in the SA. It may include examples of
procedures, some of which the auditor may judge to be
appropriate in the circumstances. Such guidance is, however, not
intended to impose a requirement. In view of this format of
writing, the standard portion or principles enunciated in a
Standard would no longer be given in bold face.
V. The new presentation format has, however, not as yet being
followed in drafting the Standards on Quality Control and other
Standards.
VI. There is no change in the authority attached to the
Standards, i.e., they are mandatory in nature,
notwithstanding the newformat of writing the Standards.
C. Clarification on the Auditors Rights Where Clients and
Other Auditors Seek Access to their Audit Working Papers
*

I. Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 1
15
, Basic Principles
Governing An Audit, states in para 6, The auditor should
respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course
of his work and should not disclose any such information to a
third party without specific authority or unless there is a legal
or professional duty to disclose. Auditing and Assurance
Standard (AAS) 3
16
, Documentation (Paragraph 13), states,
Working papers are the property of the auditor. The auditor
may, at his discretion, make portions of or extracts from his
working papers available to his client. AAS 3 further requires
(paragraph 14), inter alia, that the auditor should adopt
reasonable procedures for custody and confidentially of his
working papers.

*
Published in May, 2000 issue of The Chartered Accountant.
15
Now known as Standard on Auditing (SA) 200.
16
Announcements

I-7
II. Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949 provides that A Chartered Accountant in practice
shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he
Discloses information acquired in the course of his
professional engagement to any person other than his client,
without the consent of his client or otherwise than as required
by any law for the time being in force.
III. Requests are sometimes received by the members of the Institute,
who have/had been performing the duties as the auditors of an
enterprise, to provide access to their audit working papers. The
requests may be made by the clients or other auditors of the
enterprise or its related enterprise such as a parent enterprise.
IV. It is hereby clarified that except to the extent stated in para 5
below, an auditor is not required to provide the client or the
other auditors of the same enterprise or its related enterprise
such as a parent or a subsidiary, access to his audit working
papers. The main auditors of an enterprise do not have right
of access to the audit working papers of the branch auditors. In
the case of a company, the statutory auditor has to consider
the report of the branch auditor and has a right to seek
clarifications and/or to visit the branch if he deems it necessary
to do so for the performance of the duties as auditor. An
auditor can rely on the work of another auditor, without having
any right of access to the audit working papers of the other
auditor
17
. For this purpose, the term auditor includes internal
auditor.
V. As stated in para 4, the client does not have a right to access
the working papers of the auditor. However, the auditor may,
at his discretion, in cases considered appropriate by him,
make portions of or extracts from his working papers available
to the client.
D. Format of ReviewReport
**
under Clause 41 of the Listing
Agreement
I. As the members are aware, the Institute had in March 2005,
issued Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 33
18
,

17
Reference in this regard may be made to the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 10,
Using the Work of Another Auditor and the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 7,
Relying on the Work of Internal Auditor.
**
Issued in July, 2005.
18
Now known as Standard on Review Engagements (SRE) 2400.
Announcements I-8
Engagements to Review Financial Statements, applicable to all
review engagements relating to accounting periods beginning
on or after April 1, 2005. Appendix 3 to the said AAS contains
an illustrative format of review report in respect of balance
sheet. The illustrative format given in the AAS is different from
the format of the review report required to be given under
clause 41 of the Listing Agreement in that it is in respect of
review of financial results and not a balance sheet.
II. In view of the above, the members are requested to note that
in so far as review carried out in terms of clause 41 of the
Listing Agreement is concerned, the members are expected to
submit their review report in accordance with the format
prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in
clause 41 of the Listing Agreement.
E. Audit in Situations of Missing or Incomplete Records
***

I. Members of the Institute while carrying out audit assignments
might come across a situation where the records of the client
are incomplete or destroyed (partially or completely) on
account of a natural calamity or otherwise. While guidance on
reporting responsibilities of the members in such cases has
been provided to the members by way of publications such as
Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 28
19
, The Auditors
Report on Financial Statements, the Statement on
Qualifications in Auditors Report, opinions of the Expert
Advisory Committee, and a publication titled, Study on Audit
and Certification in Case of Missing Records, issued by the
Institute, the Council, for the benefit of the members, wishes to
reiterate the guidance in the following paragraphs.
II. The auditor should, first, obtain a representation from the
management that the original accounts are not available for
audit. The letter should also include the fact whether the
accounts of the entity have been reconstructed by the
management. If yes, the extent thereof (partial or complete)
and the details of the items of financial statements that have
been reconstructed should also be specified in the said letter.
In case the accounts have been reconstructed, the members
must consider the limitation of scope in audit imposed by the
circumstances. Limitation on scope of audit can be of two
types, firstly, inability of the management to reconstruct some

***
Issued in October, 2006.
19
Announcements

I-9
or all of the items of the financial statements either for the
whole financial year or for a certain period during the financial
year and secondly, lack of corroborative evidence to support
certain or all the entries in the reconstructed accounts. In case
of completely reconstructed accounts, the lack of supporting
evidence will pose a greater risk of limitation on scope,
whereas, for partially reconstructed accounts, both types of
limitations, i.e., inability of the management to reconstruct
accounts and lack of supporting evidence, can be material.
While auditing the reconstructed accounts (partial as well as
complete), the auditor should analyse the limitation imposed
on application of audit procedures required to be applied in the
given situation and use his professional judgment to determine
whether to issue an unqualified opinion, qualified opinion or
disclaimer of opinion. Further, the fact of scope limitation must
clearly be mentioned in the scope paragraph of the audit
report. The AAS 28, The Auditors Report on Financial
Statements, in its paragraphs 43 and 44 reproduced below,
provides the guidance for the auditor in case of a scope
limitation:
43. A scope limitation may be imposed by circumstances, for
example, when the timing of the auditor's appointment is
such that the auditor is unable to observe the counting of
physical inventories. It may also arise when, in the
opinion of the auditor, the entity's accounting records
are inadequate or when the auditor is unable to carry
out an audit procedure believed to be desirable. In
these circumstances, the auditor would attempt to
carry out reasonable alternative procedures to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support an
unqualified opinion. (emphasis added)
44. When there is a limitation on the scope of the auditor's
work that requires expression of a qualified opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion, the auditor's report should describe
the limitation and indicate the possible adjustments to the
financial statements that might have been determined to
be necessary had the limitation not existed.
III. Guidance in respect of the matter discussed in the two
paragraphs above has been explained in paragraph 45 of the
AAS 28 by way of illustrative examples of the scope
paragraphs in the audit reports in the cases of qualified
opinion and disclaimer of opinion:
Announcements I-10
In situations of Qualified Opinion
We have audited ...
Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted
our audit in accordance with .
We did not observe the counting of the physical inventories as
at 31st March 2XXX since that date was prior to the time we
were appointed as auditors of .(Name of the entity).
Owing to the nature of the entitys records, we were unable to
satisfy ourselves as to inventory quantities by other audit
procedures.

In situations of Disclaimer of Opinion
The paragraph discussing the scope of the audit would
either be omitted or amended according to the
circumstances. (emphasis added)
(Add a paragraph discussing the scope limitation as follows:)
We were not able to observe all physical inventories and
confirmaccounts receivable due to limitations placed on the
scope of our work by the entity.
IV. Paragraph 10 of AAS 13
20
, Audit Materiality, reproduced
below, states that the auditor while auditing the reconstructed
accounts must consider the concept of materiality and the
audit risk involved with specific account balances and classes
of transactions:
10. There is an inverse relationship between materiality and
the degree of audit risk, that is, the higher the materiality
level, the lower the audit risk and vice versa. For
example, the risk that a particular account balance or
class of transactions could be misstated by an extremely
large amount might be very low, but the risk that it could
be misstated by an extremely small amount might be very
high. The auditor takes the inverse relationship between
materiality and audit risk into account when determining
the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures. For
example, if, after planning for specific audit procedures,
the auditor determines that the acceptable materiality
level is lower, audit risk is increased. The auditor would

20
Announcements

I-11
compensate for this by either:
(a) reducing the assessed degree of control risk, where
this is possible, and supporting the reduced degree
by carrying out extended or additional tests of
control; or
(b) reducing detection risk by modifying the nature,
timing and extent of planned substantive
procedures.
V. While auditing the reconstructed accounts, since the auditor
would normally find it difficult to obtain internally generated
corroborative evidences supporting the reconstructed
accounts, the auditor should apply alternative audit procedures
such as inquiry and external confirmation as outlined in
paragraphs 14 and 15 of the AAS 5
21
, Audit Evidence,
reproduced below:
Inquiry and Confirmation
14. Inquiry consists of seeking appropriate information from
knowledgeable persons inside or outside the entity. Inquiries
may range fromformal written inquiries addressed to third
parties to informal oral inquiries addressed to persons inside
the entity. Responses to inquiries may provide the auditor with
information which he did not previously possess or may
provide himwith corroborative evidence.
15. Confirmation consists of the response to an inquiry to
corroborate information contained in the accounting records.
For example, the auditor requests confirmation of receivables
by direct communication with debtors.
For assessing the reliability of the evidence obtained by the
auditor fromvarious sources, the auditor is guided by the
principles enunciated in paragraph 7 of AAS 5.
VI. The auditor, if he himself was not the auditor in the
immediately preceding financial year, must apply the principles
laid down in AAS 22
22
, Initial Engagements - Opening
Balances while verifying the figures of opening balances.
VII. Paragraph 4 of the AAS 28, The Auditors Report on Financial
Statements, provides that the auditors report should contain a

21
22
Announcements I-12
clear written expression of opinion on the financial statements
taken as a whole. An unqualified opinion can be expressed
only if the auditor is able to satisfy himself, by way of
application of sufficient appropriate compliance and
substantive procedures, that the financial statements give a
true and fair view. The scope limitation imposed by lack of
supporting evidence implies a particular emphasis on obtaining
alternative corroborative evidence. However, if the auditor
concludes that an unqualified opinion can not be expressed
but the limitation on scope is not so material and pervasive as
to require a disclaimer of opinion, a qualified opinion should be
expressed. Further, a disclaimer of opinion should be
expressed when the possible effect of a limitation on scope is
so material and pervasive that the auditor has not been able to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence and is,
accordingly, unable to express an opinion on the financial
statements. Paragraph 45 of AAS 28 illustrates the principles
enunciated here above. Having regard to the above, two
illustrative formats of reporting by the auditor are given in the
paragraphs 8 and 10 below for guidance of the members.
VIII. Illustrative audit report where the auditor decides to express a
qualified opinion about the true and fair view of the financial
statements:
I. (Where accounts have been reconstructed for some or all
of the items for the whole financial year)
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of .
(name of the client), as at 31st March 2XXX, and also the
Profit and Loss Account and the cash flow statement for the
year ended on that date annexed thereto. We have been
informed by the management that because of _____(give
reason)__________ the original accounts are not available for
audit and hence these financial statements have been
prepared from the reconstructed accounts prepared by the
management. The accounts as well as the financial statements
are the responsibility of the management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit of the accounts.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing
standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
Announcements

I-13
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to obtain corroborative audit evidence
supporting following items of the financial statements while
auditing the accounts of the entity:
(State the areas for which the corroborative evidences were
not available along with their quantification, to the extent
possible and also their resultant effect on the financial
statements.)
Subject to the above, the financial statements give a true and
fair view:
(i) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of the
___________ (name of the client) affairs as at the end of
its financial year;
(ii) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit or
loss for its financial year; and
(iii) In the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows
for the year ended on that date.
(iv) (where accounts have been reconstructed only for certain
period during the year)
(name of the client), as at 31st March 2XXX, and also the
Profit and Loss Account and the cash flow statement for the
year ended on that date annexed thereto. We have been
informed by the management that because of _____(give
reason)__________ the original accounts are not available for
audit and hence these financial statements have been
prepared from the reconstructed accounts prepared by the
management for the period from _____ to _____ during the
financial year. The accounts as well as the financial
statements are the responsibility of the management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit of the accounts.
(Other paragraphs shall be same as in the format given in Part
Announcements I-14
I above.)
IX. If the auditor is satisfied after obtaining a representation letter
from the management and considering the results of sufficient
appropriate audit procedures that the reconstruction of the
accounts of the entity is not possible, he has no other option
but to issue a disclaimer of opinion. The auditor should issue a
report to the shareholders mentioning therein that it is not
possible for him to express any opinion. The format of audit
report to express disclaimer of opinion has been suggested in
the following paragraph for guidance of the members.
X. Illustrative audit report in situations where the reconstruction of
the accounts is not possible:
We were engaged to audit the Balance Sheet of
. (name of the client), as at 31st March 2XXX,
and also the Profit and Loss Account and the cash flow
statement for the year ended on that date. The financial
statements are the responsibility of the companys
management. The management of
____________________________(name of the client) has
informed us that owing to ___________ (state the reason for
unavailability of records), the books of account and/ or other
related records and documents of the ____________________
(name of the client) have been completely destroyed. The
management has also informed us that the reconstruction of
the accounts is also not possible.
Since we have not been able to examine the books of account
as well as the financial statements of
___________________(name of the client), we are unable to
form any opinion on the financial statements.
XI. Members attention is also invited to the opinion given by the
Expert Advisory Committee in September 1988 in situation of
an audit where the records etc., had been seized by the
income tax authorities and released after four years and
records were reconstructed for the interregnum. The
Committee, apart from the opinion on the type of the opinion to
be expressed by the auditor in such cases, has also opined
that the auditor should not normally rely on the managements
certificate as to the opening balances unless the information
therein can be corroborated by other supporting document.
Announcements

I-15
F. List of Mandatory Statements and Standards on Auditing
I. List of Statements on Auditing as on 01.04.2008
1. Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 (Revised 2005).
23

2. Statement on Reporting under section 227 (1A) of the
Companies Act, 1956
24
.
II. List of Quality Control and Engagement Standards as on
01.04.2008
Quality Control
New
Standard
Number
(SQC)
(1-99)
Standards on
Quality Control
(SQCs)

Corresponding
Auditing and
Assurance
Standard
(AAS)
Number
Date fromwhich
effective

1

Quality Control for
Firms that Perform
Audit and Reviews
of Historical
Financial
Information, and
other Assurance
and Related
Services
Engagements
25

-
Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information
New
Standard
Number
(SA)
(100-
999)
Standards on
Auditing (SAs)
Corresponding
AAS Number
Date fromwhich
effective

100-199 Introductory Matters

23
Issued in April, 2004, pursuant to the issuance of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order,
2003. The revised edition issued in April 2005 pursuant to the issuance of the Companies
(Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004.
24
The Council, at its 269
th
meeting held from July 18, 2007 to July 20, 2007 at New Delhi,
decided to withdraw the Statement on Qualifications in Auditors Report except paragraphs
2.1 to 2.30 dealing with reporting under section 227 (1A) of the Companies Act, 1956 and to
rename the Statement as Statement on Reporting under section 227 (1A) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
25
Published in October, 2007 issue of the Journal.
Announcements I-16
200-299 General Principles and Responsibilities
200

Basic Principles
Governing an
Audit
26

1 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
beginning on or after
April 1, 1985
200A

Objective and
Scope of the Audit
of Financial
Statements
27

2 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1985
210 Terms of Audit
Engagement
26 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
220 Quality Control for
Audit Work
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1999
230 Documentation 3

Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
July 1, 1985
240 The Auditors
Responsibility to
Consider Fraud and
Error in an Audit of
Financial
Statements
28

4 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
240
(Revised)
The Auditors
Responsibilities
Relating to Fraud in
an Audit of
SA 240 This SA is effective
for audits of financial
statements for
periods beginning on

26
The Board has undertaken a project to issue a single Standard on Auditing (SA)
corresponding to ISA 200, Objective and General Principles Governing an Audit of Financial
Statements and withdraw the SA 200 and SA 200A
27
ibid
28
SA 240, The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud and Error in an Audit of Financial
Statements becomes operative for all audits related to accounting periods beginning on or
after 1st April, 2003. The original AAS 4, Fraud and Error, issued in June, 1987, remains
operative for all audits relating to accounting periods beginning on or before 31st March,
2003.
Announcements

I-17
Financial
Statements
29

or after 1st April,
2009.
250 Consideration of
Laws and
Regulations in an
Audit of Financial
Statements
audits commencing
on or after July 1,
2001
260 Communications of
Audit Matters with
Those Charged with
Governance
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
299 Responsibility of
Joint Auditors
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1996
300-499 Risk Assessment and Response to Assessed Risks
300 Audit Planning 8 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1989
300
(Revised)
Planning an Audit of
Financial
Statements
30

SA 300 This SA is effective
statements for
or after 1st April,
2008.
310 Knowledge of the
Business
@

audits commencing
on or after April 1,
2000
315 Identifying and
Assessing the Risks
of Material
Misstatement
through
Understanding the
This SA is effective
statements for
or after April 1, 2008.

29
Published in December, 2007 issue of the Journal.
30
Published in December, 2007 issue of the Journal.
@
SA 310 shall stand withdrawn once SA 315 and SA 330 become effective.
Announcements I-18
Entity and Its
Environment
31

320 Audit Materiality 13 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1996
330 The Auditors
Responses to
Assessed Risks
32

This SA is effective
statements for
or after April 1, 2008.
400 Risk Assessments
and Internal
Control
33

6 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2002
401 Audit in a Computer
Information
Systems
Environment
@@

29

Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
402 Audit
Considerations
Relating to Entities
Using Service
Organisations
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
500599 Audit Evidence
500 Audit Evidence 5 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
January 1, 1989
501 Audit Evidence
Additional
Considerations for
34 Applicable to all
audits related to
accounting period

31
Published in February, 2008 issue of the Journal.
32
Published in February, 2008 issue of the Journal.
33
SA 400, Risk Assessments and Internal Control is operative for all audits related to
accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April 2002. The original AAS 6, Study and
Evaluation of the Accounting System and Related Internal Controls in Connection with an
Audit issued in May, 1988 was operative for all audits relating to accounting periods
beginning on or before 31st March, 2002. The SA 400 shall stand withdrawn once the SA 315
and SA 330 come into effect.
@@
SA 401 shall stand withdrawn once the SA 315 and SA 330 come into force.
Announcements

I-19
Specific Items beginning on or after
April 1, 2005
505 External
Confirmations
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
510 Initial
Engagements
Opening Balances
audits commencing
on or after July 1,
2001
520 Analytical
Procedures
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1997
530 Audit Sampling 15 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1998
540 Auditing of
Accounting
Estimates
audits commencing
2000
550 Related Parties 23 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2001
560 Subsequent
Events
audits commencing
2000
570 Going Concern 16 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1999
580 Representations by
Management
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1995
Announcements I-20
600-699 Using Work of Others
600 Using the Work of
Another Auditor
34

audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2002
610 Relying Upon the
Work of an Internal
Auditor
7 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1989
620 Using the Work of
an Expert
9 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 1991
700-799 Audit Conclusions and Reporting
700 The Auditors
Report on
Financial
Statements
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
710 Comparatives 25 Effective for all
audits related to
accounting periods
April 1, 2003
800-899 Specialized Areas
New
Standard
Number
(SRE)
(2000-
2699)
Standards on
Review
Engagements
(SREs)
Corresponding
Existing AAS
Number
Date fromwhich
effective

2400 Engagements to
Review Financial
Statements
35

review engagements
relating to
accounting periods

34
SA 600, Using the Work of Another Auditor becomes operative for all audits related to
accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April 2002. The original AAS 10, Using the Work
of Another Auditor issued in April 1995 remains operative for all audits relating to accounting
periods beginning on or before 31st March, 2002.
35
With the issuance of SRE 2400, the Guidance Note on Engagement to Review Financial
Statements issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India in May 2000 stands
withdrawn.
Announcements

I-21
April 1, 2005
Assurance Engagements Other Than Audits or Reviews
of Historical Financial Information
New
Standard
Number
(SAE)
(3000-
3699)
Standards on
Assurance
Engagements
(SAEs)
Corresponding
Existing AAS
Number
Date fromwhich
effective

3000-
3399
Applicable to all Assurance Engagements
3400-
3699
Subject Specific Standards
3400 The Examination of
Prospective
Financial
Information
35 Effective in relation
to reports on
projections/forecasts,
issued on or after
April 1, 2007
Related Services
New
Standard
Number
(SRS)
(4000-
4699)
Standards on
Related Services
(SRSs)
Corresponding
Existing AAS
Number
Date fromwhich
effective

4400 Engagements to
Perform Agreed-
upon Procedures
Regarding
Financial
Information
36

agreed upon
procedures
engagements
April 1, 2004
4410 Engagements to
Compile Financial
Information
37

compilation
engagements
April 1, 2004

36
With the issuance of this SRS, the Guidance Note on Engagements to Perform Agreed-
upon Procedures regarding Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India in July 2001, shall stand withdrawn.
37
With the issuance of this SRS, the Guidance Note on Members Duties regarding
Engagements to Compile Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India in February 2002, shall stand withdrawn.
Back

PREFACE TO
STANDARDS ON QUALITY CONTROL,
AUDITING, REVIEW, OTHER
ASSURANCE AND RELATED SERVICES
1

(Effective from April 1, 2008)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction............................................................................................. 1-2
Standards Issued by AASB Under the Authority of the Council .............. 3-4
Standards on Auditing............................................................................. 5-9
Objectives ...................................................................................... 10
Requirements............................................................................. 11-14
Application and Other Explanatory Material................................ 15-16
Introductory Material and Definitions.......................................... 17-18
Standards on Quality Control ................................................................... 19
Other Standards....................................................................................... 20
Statements on Auditing............................................................................ 21
General Clarifications............................................................................... 22
Professional Judgment............................................................................. 23
Authority Attached to Other Standards,
Statements on Auditing and General Clarifications.............................. 24-25
Guidance Notes....................................................................................... 26
Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies
and Other Papers Published by the
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board................................................ 27
Material Modifications to the Preface to International Standards on Quality
Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services
Annexure - Structure of Standards issued by Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board under the Authority of the Council of ICAI
Appendix Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and its Due Process

1
Back
Preface to SQC, Auditing, Review and Other Services
Preface I-23
Introduction
1. This Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review,
Other Assurance and Related Services has been issued to facilitate
understanding of the scope and authority of the pronouncements of the
AASB issued under the authority of the Council of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India (the ICAI).
2. The ICAI is committed to the goal of enabling the accountancy profession in
India to provide services of high quality in the public interest and which are
accepted worldwide. To further this goal, the ICAI develops and promulgates
technical Standards and other professional literature. The ICAI being one of the
founder members of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), the
Standards developed and promulgated by the AASB under the authority of the
Council of the ICAI are in conformity with the corresponding International
Standards issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
(IAASB), established by the IFAC. The Due Process of the AASB for
formulation of Standards, Statements, Guidance Notes and its other
pronouncements is given in the Appendixto this Preface.
Standards Issued by AASB Under the Authority of the Council of ICAI
3. The following Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board under the authority of the Council are collectively known as the
Engagement Standards:
(a) Standards on Auditing (SAs), to be applied in the audit of historical financial
information.
(b) Standards on Review Engagements (SREs), to be applied in the review of
historical financial information.
(c) Standards on Assurance Engagements (SAEs), to be applied in assurance
engagements, dealing with subject matters other than historical financial
information.
(d) Standards on Related Services (SRSs), to be applied to engagements
involving application of agreed-upon procedures to information, compilation
engagements, and other related services engagements, as may be
specified by the ICAI.
4. Standards on Quality Control (SQCs), issued by the AASB under the
authority of the Council, are to be applied for all services covered by the
Preface I-24
Engagement Standards as described in paragraph 3 above.
A diagram containing the structure of the Standards issued by the Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board under the authority of the Council is given as
Annexureto this Preface.
Standards on Auditing
5. The Standards on Auditing (SAs) referred to in Paragraph 3(a) above are
formulated in the context of an audit of financial statements by an independent
auditor. They are to be adapted as necessary in the circumstances when applied
to audits of other historical financial information.
6. The objective of an audit of financial statements is to enable the auditor to
express an opinion whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material
respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework. It is
undertaken to enhance the degree of confidence of intended users in the
financial statements. The Standards on Auditing, taken together, provide the
standards for the auditors work in fulfilling this objective.
7. In conducting an audit, the overall objective of the auditor is to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to report on
the financial statements in accordance with the auditors findings. However,
owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that
some material misstatements of the financial statements will not be detected,
even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the
SAs. In all cases, when this overall objective has not been or cannot be
achieved, the SAs require the auditor to modify the auditors opinion accordingly
or withdraw from the engagement as may be appropriate, depending upon the
facts and circumstances of each case.
8. The auditor applies each Standard on Auditing (SA) relevant to the audit.
An SA is relevant when the SA is in effect and the circumstances addressed by
the SA exist.
9. The SAs deal with the general responsibilities of the auditor, as well as the
auditors further considerations relevant to the application of those
responsibilities to specific areas. An SA contains objectives and requirements
together with related guidance in the form of application and other explanatory
material. It may also contain introductory material that provides context to a
Preface I-25
proper understanding of the SAs, and definitions. It is, therefore, necessary to
consider the entire text of an SA to understand and apply its requirements.
Objectives
10. Each SA contains an objective or objectives, which provide the context in
which the requirements of the Standards on Auditing are set. Any limitation of the
applicability of a specific Standard is made clear in the Standard itself. An
individual Standard should be read in the context of the objective stated in the
Standard as well as this Preface. The auditor aims to achieve these objectives,
having regard to the interrelationships amongst the SAs. For this purpose, the
auditor uses the objectives to judge whether, having complied with the
requirements of the SAs, sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained
in the context of the overall objective of the auditor. Where an individual objective
has not been or cannot be achieved, the auditor considers whether this prevents
the auditor from achieving his overall objective.
Requirements
2

11. The requirements of each SA are contained in a separate section and
expressed using the word shall. The auditor applies the requirements in the
context of the other material included in the Standard.
12. The auditor complies with the requirements of an SA in all cases where
they are relevant in the circumstances of the audit. In exceptional circumstances,
however, the auditor may judge it necessary to depart from a relevant
requirement by performing alternate audit procedures to achieve the aim of that

2
The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, pursuant to its Clarity Project, has
adopted a new format for presentation of the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by
it. As per the new format, an ISA is divided into two sections, one, the requirements section and
second, the application and other explanatory material section. Accordingly, the practice of
presenting the standard portion (i.e., the principles enunciated) in bold lettering and the
application/ explanatory guidance in plain lettering has been done away with. The entire text of the
Standard, whether the requirements section or the application and other explanatory material
section are presented in plain lettering.
In so far as the Auditing and Assurance Standards (AASs) issued by the Institute are concerned, in
the AASs issued prior to December 1997, the entire text of the Standard is presented in the plain
lettering, whereas in case of the AASs issued subsequent to that date, the standard portion/
principles enunciated are given in boldlettering whereas the explanatory/ application guidance is
given in plain lettering. The presentation of the Standards on Auditing, issued subsequent to the
date this Preface comes into effect, would be in line with that adopted by the IAASB for its ISAs
pursuant to the Clarity Project. In the due course, the existing Standards would also be brought in
line with the abovementioned convention.
Preface I-26
requirement. The need for the auditor to depart from a relevant requirement is
expected to arise only where the requirement is for a specific procedure to be
performed and, in the specific circumstances of the audit, that procedure would
be ineffective.
13. When a situation envisaged in paragraph 12 above arises, the auditor is
required to document how alternative procedures performed achieve the aim of
the requirement, and, the reasons for the departure. Further, his report also
should draw attention to such departures. However, a mere disclosure in his
report does not absolve an auditor from complying with the applicable
Standard(s).
14. A requirement is not relevant only in the cases where the SA is not
relevant, or the circumstances envisioned do not apply because the requirement
is conditional and the condition does not exist. The auditor is not required to
comply with a requirement that is not relevant in the circumstances of the audit
and this does not constitute a departure from the requirement. However, the
auditor should document the steps undertaken by him to satisfy himself that the
process adopted in the circumstances of the audit assisted him in achieving his
overall objective.
15. The application and other explanatory material contained in an SA is an
integral part of the SA as it provides further explanation of, and guidance for
carrying out, the requirements of an SA, along with the background information
on the matters addressed in the SA. It may include examples of procedures,
some of which the auditor may judge to be appropriate in the circumstances.
Such guidance is, however, not intended to impose a requirement.
16. Appendices, which form part of the application and other explanatory
material, are an integral part of an SA. The purpose and intended use of an
appendix are explained in the body of the related Standard or within the title and
introduction of the appendix itself.
Introductory Material and Definitions
17. Introductory material may include, as needed, such matters as explanation
of the purpose and scope of the Standard, including how the SA relates to other
SAs, the subject matter of the SA, specific expectations from the auditor and
others, and the context in which the SA is set.
Preface I-27
18. A Standard on Auditing may include, in a separate section under the
heading Definitions, a description of the meanings attributed to certain terms for
purposes of the SAs. These are provided to assist in the consistent application
and interpretation of the SAs, and are not intended to override definitions that
may be established for other purposes, whether in law, regulation or otherwise.
Unless otherwise indicated, those terms will carry the same meanings throughout
the SAs.
Standards on Quality Control
19 SQCs are written to apply to firms
3
in respect of all their services falling
under the Engagement Standards issued by the AASB of ICAI. The authority of
SQCs is set out in the introduction to the SQCs.
Other Standards
20. The other Engagement Standards identified in paragraph 3 (b) to (d) as well
as Standards on Quality Control referred to in paragraph 4 contain basic principles
and essential procedures (identified in bold type lettering and by the word
should) together with related guidance in the form of explanatory and other
material, including appendices. The basic principles and essential procedures are
to be understood and applied in the context of the explanatory and other material
that provides guidance for their application. It is therefore necessary to consider the
entire text of a Standard to understand and apply the basic principles and essential
procedures. Appendices, which form part of the application material, are an integral
part of a Standard. The purpose and intended use of an appendix are explained in
the body of the related Standard or within the title and introduction of the appendix
itself. An individual Standard should be read in the context of the objective stated in
the Standard as well as this Preface. Any limitation of the applicability of a specific
Standard is made clear in the Standard itself.
Statements on Auditing
21. Statements on Auditing are issued with a view to securing compliance by
professional accountants on matters which, in the opinion of the Council, are
critical for the proper discharge of their functions. Statements are, therefore,
mandatory.

3
The term firm refers to a sole practitioner/proprietor, partnership, or any such entity of
professional accountants, as may be permitted by law.
Preface I-28
General Clarifications
22. General Clarifications are issued by the Board under the authority of the
Council of the Institute with a view to clarify any issues arising from the
Standards. General Clarifications are mandatory in nature.
Professional Judgment
23. The nature of the Standards/Statements/General Clarifications requires the
professional accountant
4
to exercise professional judgment in applying them.
Authority Attached to Other Standards, Statements on
Auditing and General Clarifications
24. It is the duty of the professional accountants to ensure that the
Standards/Statements/General Clarifications are followed in the engagements
undertaken by them
5
. The need for the professional accountants to depart from
a relevant requirement is expected to arise only where the requirement is for a
specific procedure to be performed and, in the specific circumstances of the
engagement, that procedure would be ineffective. If because of that reason, a
professional accountant has not been able to perform an engagement procedure
in accordance with any Standard/Statement/General Clarification, he is required
to document how alternative procedures performed achieve the purpose of the
procedure, and, unless otherwise clear, the reasons for the departure. Further,
his report should draw attention to such departures. However, a mere disclosure
in his report does not absolve a professional accountant from complying with the
applicable Standards/Statements/General Clarifications
6
.

4
The term professional accountant refers to a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India.
5
Members attention is invited to Clause 5 of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, according to which a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to
be guilty of professional misconduct, if he fails to disclose a material fact known to him which is not
disclosed in a financial statement, but disclosure of which is necessary in making such financial
statement where he is concerned with that financial statement in a professional capacity. Further
Clause 7 of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a
chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he
does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.
6
Attention of the members is also drawn to Clause 9 of Part I of the Second Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, whereby, a member is deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he fails to invite attention to any material departure from the generally accepted
procedures of audit applicable to the circumstances.
Preface I-29
25. There may be a situation where a matter is covered both by a Standard as
also by a Statement on Auditing. In such a situation, the Statement shall prevail
till the time the Standard becomes mandatory. Once a Standard becomes
mandatory, the concerned Statement or the relevant portion(s) thereof will
automatically be withdrawn.
Guidance Notes
26. Guidance Notes are issued to assist professional accountants in
implementing the Engagement Standards and the Standards on Quality Control
issued by the AASB under the authority of the Council. Guidance Notes are also
issued to provide guidance on other generic or industry specific audit issues, not
necessarily arising out of a Standard. Professional accountants should be aware
of and consider Guidance Notes applicable to the engagement. A professional
accountant who does not consider and apply the guidance included in a relevant
Guidance Note should be prepared to justify the appropriateness and
completeness of the alternate procedures adopted by him to deal with the
objectives and basic principles set out in the Guidance Note.
Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies and Other
Papers Published by the Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board
27. The Board may also publish Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies
and other papers. Technical Guides are ordinarily aimed at imparting broad
knowledge about a particular aspect or of an industry to the professional
accountants. Practice Manuals are aimed at providing additional guidance to
professional accountants in performing audit and other related assignments.
Studies and other papers are aimed at promoting discussion or debate or
creating awareness on issues relating to quality control, auditing, assurance and
related service, affecting the profession. Such publications of the Board do not
establish any basic principles or essential procedures to be followed in audit,
review, other assurance or related services engagements, and accordingly, have
no authority of the Council attached to them.
Material Modifications to the Preface to International
Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other
Assurance and Related Services
Additions
1. This Preface, by virtue of the requirement of the Clause 9 of Part I of the
Preface I-30
Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, requires a member to
draw attention to any material departures from the requirements of the applicable
Standards, Statements and General clarifications in his report. However, there is
no such requirement in the Preface issued by the IAASB.
2. This Preface deals, apart from the Standards, with the Statements on
Auditing and the General Clarifications as the mandatory documents for use by
the professional accountants in performing engagements by them, whereas, the
Preface issued by the IAASB does not deal with such aspects. Further, the
nomenclature of International Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs) referred in
the Preface issued by the IAASB has been changed to Guidance Notes in this
Preface.
3. The Preface issued by the IAASB requires documentation of the reasons
for the departure from the requirements of the other International Standards only,
i.e., International Standards other than International Standards on Auditing and
International Standard on Quality control, whereas this Preface requires such
documentation in the cases of departure from the requirements of any
Engagement Standard, Statement and/or General Clarification.
4. The Preface issued by the AASB refers to inherent limitations of an audit in
paragraph 7 for better understanding of audit function.
Deletion
1. The Preface issued by the IAASB provides to include, in appropriate cases,
additional considerations specific to public sector entities within the body of the
Standard. However, since the Standards, Statements, General Clarifications and
Guidance Notes issued by the ICAI are equally applicable in case of all
engagements, irrespective of the form, nature and size of the entity, this Preface
does not deal separately with the public sector perspective.
Preface I-31
Annexure
Structure of Standards issued by the Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board under the Authority of the
Council of ICAI

The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
Code of Ethics and other relevant
pronouncements of the ICAI
Standards on Quality Control (SQCs)
Framework for Assurance
Engagements
Audits and reviews
of historical
financial
information
other than audits or
reviews of historical
Standards on
Auditing
(SAs)

100 - 999
Standards on
Review
Engagements
(SREs)

2000 - 2699
Standards on
Assurance
Engagements (SAEs)

3000 - 3699
Standards on
Related Services
(SRSs)

4000 - 4699
Services covered by the pronouncements of the Auditing
and Assurance Standards Board under the authority of the
Council of ICAI
Assurance Services
Related Services
Preface I-32
Appendix
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
and its Due Process
Brief History
1. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) constituted the
Auditing Practices Committee (APC) on 17
th
September 1982, to review the
existing auditing practices in India and to develop Statements on Standard
Auditing Practices so that these may be issued under the authority of the
Council of the Institute. Subsequently, at its 226
th
meeting held in July 2002,
the Council of the Institute approved certain recommendations of the APC to
strengthen its role in the growth and development of the accountancy
profession in India. The Council, at the said meeting, also approved the
renaming of the Auditing Practices Committee as the Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board (AASB) as well as renaming of the Statements on Standard
Auditing Practices as Auditing and Assurance Standards (AASs).
2. The ICAI is one of the founder members of the International Federation
of Accountants (IFAC). It is one of the membership obligations of the Institute
to actively propagate the pronouncements of the International Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) of the IFAC to contribute towards global
harmonisation and acceptance of the Standards issued by the IAASB.
Accordingly, while formulating Engagement and Quality Control Standards,
the AASB takes into consideration the corresponding Standards, if any,
issued by the IAASB. In addition, the AASB also takes into consideration the
applicable laws, customs, usages and business environment prevailing in
India within the parameters of the July 2006 Policy Paper, A Guide for
National Standard Setters that Adopt IAASBs International Standards but
Find it Necessary to Make Limited Modifications, issued by the IAASB.
Objectives and Functions of the Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board
3. The following are the objectives and functions of the Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board:
(i) To review the existing and emerging auditing practices worldwide and
identify areas in which Standards on Quality Control, Engagement
Standards and Statements on Auditing need to be developed.
Preface I-33
(ii) To formulate Engagement Standards, Standards on Quality Control and
Statements on Auditing so that these may be issued under the authority
of the Council of the Institute.
(iii) To review the existing Standards and Statements on Auditing to assess
their relevance in the changed conditions and to undertake their
revision, if necessary.
(iv) To develop Guidance Notes on issues arising out of any Standard,
auditing issues pertaining to any specific industry or on generic issues,
so that those may be issued under the authority of the Council of the
Institute.
(v) To review the existing Guidance Notes to assess their relevance in the
changed circumstances and to undertake their revision, if necessary.
(vi) To formulate General Clarifications, where necessary, on issues arising
from Standards.
(vii) To formulate and issue Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies
and other papers under its own authority for guidance of professional
accountants in the cases felt appropriate by the Board.
Composition
4. The composition of the AASB is fairly broad-based and attempts to
ensure participation of all interest groups in the standard-setting process.
Apart from amongst the elected members of the Council of the ICAI the
following are also represented on AASB:
(i) Eminent members of the profession, whether in industry or in practice,
as co-opted members on the Board.
(ii) One special invitee from each three regulatory bodies, viz., the
Securities and Exchange Board of India, the Reserve Bank of India and
the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority.
(iii) One special invitee from the Indian Institute(s) of Management, or from
any other prominent academic and/or research organisation, as
considered appropriate.
(iv) One special invitee from a prominent Industry association.
(v) One special invitee representing public interest, e.g., not for profit
organization, etc.
Preface I-34
The special invitees mentioned at (ii) through (v) above are decided in
consultation with the President of the Institute. Further, special invitees do
not constitute the members of the Board, as referred to in this document.
Termof the Members
5. The term of the Chairman of the Board is three years. Where such
period of three years exceeds the term of the Council of ICAI during which
the Chairman has been appointed, the term of the Chairman is restricted to
the abovementioned term of the Council. The Council of the ICAI may fill any
vacancy in the Office of the Chairman and the Chairman so appointed holds
office for the unexpired term of the Council. The term of other members of
the Board and the special invitees is one year. However, in case the period
of one year exceeds the term of the Council during which the members have
been appointed, the term of the members is restricted to the abovementioned
term of the Council.
Attendance at the Meetings
6. Each AASB meeting requires the presence, in person, of at least one
third of the members of the Board. However, the AASB meetings whereat a
Standard or Statement, at whatever stage (as envisaged in the following
paragraphs), is proposed to be considered, requires attendance of at least
two thirds of the AASB members, in person or by simultaneous
telecommunication link.
7. In case any member of the AASB absents himself from three
consecutive meetings of the Board, the AASB would bring such fact to the
attention of the Council.
AASB Working Procedure
Standards, Statements on Auditing and General Clarifications
Project Identification, Prioritization and Approval
8. Project proposals to develop new, or revise existing Standards,
Statements or General Clarifications are identified based on international and
national developments, input from members of the Council of the ICAI, AASB
members, members of other committees of the ICAI and/or recommendations
received from other interested parties, such as regulators or professional
accountants.
9. The AASB determines the priorities of various projects on hand for
Preface I-35
commencement.
10. In the preparation of Standards, Statements and General Clarifications,
AASB is assisted by Study Groups/Task Forces constituted to consider
specific projects. The AASB appoints one of the professional accountants as
a convenor of the Study Group/Task Force. The convenor, in consultation
with the Chairman, AASB, nominates other members of the Study
Group/Task Force, ordinarily five to seven in number. For operating
convenience and economy, a study group is usually based in the area where
the convenor is located. In situations considered necessary, the Board may
also consider having an outside expert on such Study Groups/Task Forces
and such an expert need not necessarily be a professional accountant. The
Study Group/Task Force is responsible for preparing the basic draft of the
Standard/ Statement/ General Clarification. In addition, a separate group of
experts may be formed to advice the Study Group /Task Force.
11. The AASB may also conduct projects jointly with regulators and/or
others. In such cases, the joint Study Group/Task Force is ordinarily chaired
by the convenor appointed with mutual consent.
Consultation and Debate
12. The Study Group/Task Force develops the preliminary draft of the
Standard/ Statement/ General Clarification based on appropriate research
and consultation, which may include, depending on the circumstances,
consultation with the other professionals, regulators and other interested
parties, as well as reviewing professional pronouncements issued by IFAC
member bodies and other professional bodies. The draft submitted by the
study group, along with issue papers/background papers, is sent to the
Chairman, AASB for approval.
13. The draft Standard/Statement/General clarification, along with other
agenda papers, as approved by the Chairman, is hosted on the website of
the AASB at least twenty one days in advance of the AASB meeting at which
such draft Standard/ Statement is planned to be considered. A notification to
that effect is also sent to the AASB members. The printed version of the
agenda papers, including background papers and draft Standard/
Statement/General Clarification prepared by the Study Group/Task Force for
review and debate are made available to the members of and special invitees
to the AASB at the concerned meeting.
14. The AASB considers the preliminary draft of the Standard/
Preface I-36
Statement/General Clarification prepared by the Study Group/Task Force.
The AASB may refer the draft to the Study Group/Task Force to examine the
issues arising out of the deliberations of the AASB and accordingly modify
the draft Standard/ Statement/General Clarification.
15. In case the revision to the Standard/ Statement/General Clarification is
made by the Study Group/ Task Force in terms of the requirements of
paragraph 14 above, the procedure laid down in paragraphs 12 to 14 above
is followed for the revised draft of the Standard/ Statement/General
Clarification.
16. The draft of the proposed Standard/ Statement/General Clarification, as
modified in the light of the deliberations of the Board and approved by the
Chairman, AASB, is circulated to the Council members of the ICAI for their
comments before being issued as an Exposure Draft. Normally, a period of
ten days is given for receiving comments on the Draft Exposure Draft. AASB
finalises the Exposure Draft of the proposed Standard/ Statement on the
basis of the comments so received, if any. Ordinarily, an Exposure Draft of a
General Clarification is not issued.
Public Exposure
17. The Exposure Draft of the proposed Standard / Statement is issued, by
way of publication in the monthly Journal of the Institute, for comments by
the professional accountants and the public. The Board, however, may
decide not to issue an Exposure Draft of a Statement, in which case, the
reasons for such a decision is recorded in the minutes of the relevant AASB
meeting. Each Exposure Draft is, ordinarily, accompanied by an explanatory
memorandum that highlights the objectives and significant proposals
contained in the draft. The explanatory memorandum may also direct the
respondents to those aspects of the Exposure Draft on which specific
feedback is sought.
18. The Exposure Draft is sent to the members of the Council of the ICAI,
the Institutes past Presidents, Regional Councils and their branches. Copies
of the Exposure Draft are also sent to the following bodies:
i. The Ministry of Company Affairs, Government of India
ii. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India
iii. The Reserve Bank of India
iv. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
Preface I-37
v. The Central Board of Direct Taxes
vi. The Central Board of Excise and Customs
vii. The Securities and Exchange Board of India
viii. The Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies
ix. The Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India
x. The Institute of Company Secretaries of India
xi. The Indian Banks Association
xii. Industry organizations such as Federation of Indian Chambers of
Commerce and Industry, Associated Chambers of Commerce,
Confederation of Indian Industry
xiii. Indian Institute(s) of Management
xiv. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
xv. The Standing Conference on Public Enterprises
xvi. Recognised stock exchanges in India
xvii. Any other body considered relevant by the AASB keeping in view the
nature and requirement of AAS/Statement.
19. Exposure Draft is also hosted on the website of the ICAI as well as the
AASB, and is downloadable free of charge. To allow adequate time for due
consideration and comment from all interested parties, exposure period is
ordinarily 60 (sixty) days or such other period, but not less than 60 days in
any case, as may be decided by the AASB.
Responses to Exposure Drafts and Consideration of Respondents
Comments
20. An acknowledgement is sent to every respondent to an Exposure Draft.
Except where the respondent has specifically indicated otherwise, the
respondents comments are considered a matter of public records.
Comments which are received upto ten days prior to the date of the AASB
meeting at which such comments are proposed to be considered, are hosted
on the website of the AASB and kept there till the date of the AASB meeting
at which the Exposure Draft and comments thereon are considered. The
members of the AASB as well as the Council of the Institute are notified
when the comments are hosted on the website of the AASB. Copies of the
Exposure Draft and comment letters are also made available to the AASB
members at the AASB meeting at which the Exposure Draft is scheduled for
Preface I-38
discussion.
21. The comments and suggestions received within the exposure period are
read and considered by the AASB. The AASBs deliberations on the
significant issues raised in the comments letters received together with the
AASBs decision thereon are recorded in the minutes of the relevant AASB
meeting and also hosted on the website of the AASB. The AASB may decide
to discuss with the respondents their comment letters or explain to them the
reasons for not having accepted their proposals. The nature and outcome of
such discussions are reported and recorded in the minutes of the relevant
AASB meeting.
22. Such part of the AASB meetings whereat the Exposure Draft of proposed
Standard/ Statement and the comments thereon are to be discussed is open for
public. The members of the public, at their own expenditure, can attend the said
part of the meeting(s) as observers. Such observers, however, do not have the
right to participate in the discussions at the meeting. The notification as to the
date of the said AASB meeting is hosted on the website of the Institute at least
30 days in advance and the members of the public desirous of attending the said
meeting(s) are required to send their request for the same to the Board at least
15 days prior to the date of the concerned AASB meeting. The seats for the
members of the public at such meetings are limited to such numbers as may be
decided by the AASB and allotted on a first come first serve basis. The AASB
may also hold a meeting with the representatives of the specified bodies, as may
be identified by the Board on a case to case basis, to ascertain their views on the
draft of the proposed Standard/ Statement.
23. After taking into consideration the comments received, the draft of the
proposed Standard/ Statement is finalized by the AASB and submitted to the
Council of the ICAI for its consideration and approval. The draft of the
General Clarification, as finalised by the AASB, is submitted to the Council of
ICAI for its consideration and approval.
24. The Council of the ICAI considers the final draft of the proposed
Standard/ Statement/General Clarification, and if found necessary, modifies
the same in consultation with AASB. The concerned Standard/ Statement/
General Clarification is then issued under the authority of the Council of the
ICAI.
Re-exposure
25. The AASB on a direction from the Council of the ICAI or on its own, in
Preface I-39
cases considered appropriate, may re-expose a proposed Standard/
Statement. The need for re-exposure may arise on account of factors such
as significant issues coming to the notice of the Board subsequently,
including, significant changes in the laws or regulations having an impact on
the requirements of the Standard/ Statement or revision of the corresponding
International Standard by IAASB. In cases where a re-exposure of a
Standard or a Statement is required, the procedures as listed in paragraphs
12 to 24 are followed.
Procedure for Issuing the Guidance Notes
26. The AASB identifies the issues on which Guidance Notes need to be
formulated and the priority in regard to selection thereof.
27. In the preparation of the Guidance Note, the AASB is assisted by Study
Groups/Task Forces constituted to consider specific projects. The AASB
appoints one of the professional accountants as a convenor of the Study
Group / Task Force. The Convenor nominates other members of the Study
Group/Task Force and in the formation of Study Groups / Task Forces,
provision is made for participation of a cross-section of members of the ICAI.
In situations considered necessary, the Board may also consider having an
outside expert on such Study Groups/Task Forces and such expert need
not necessarily be a professional accountant. The Study Group/Task Force
will be responsible for preparing the basic draft of the Guidance Note.
28. The Study Group/Task Force develops the preliminary draft of the
Guidance Note based on appropriate research and consultation, which may
include, depending on the circumstances, consulting with the other
professionals, regulators and other interested parties, as well as reviewing
professional pronouncements issued by IFAC member bodies and other
parties and submits the preliminary draft Guidance Note to the AASB. The
draft Guidance Note, along with the background papers, if any, is sent to the
Chairman, AASB for approval.
29. The AASB considers the preliminary draft prepared by the Study
Group/Task Force and may refer the same to the Study Group/Task Force to
examine the issues arising out of the deliberations of the AASB and
accordingly modify the draft Guidance Note. The modified Draft Guidance Note
is once again considered by the Board. The draft Guidance Note as finalised
by the Board is submitted for the consideration of the Council of the ICAI.
30. Unlike Standards/Statements, ordinarily, no proposed Guidance Note is
Preface I-40
exposed for comments of the professional accountants and others.
However, in situations considered necessary by the Board, an Exposure
Draft of a Guidance Note may well be issued for public comments. In case
an Exposure Draft of a Guidance Note is to be issued, the same procedures
as required for an Exposure Draft of the Standard/ Statement (as mentioned
in paragraphs 17 to 22 above) is required to be followed. The reasons for
issuing an Exposure Draft of the Guidance Note are recorded in the minutes
of the relevant AASB meeting. However, the part of the AASB meeting at
such Exposure Draft is considered is not open for public.
31. The Council of the Institute considers the final draft of the proposed
Guidance Note and, if necessary, suggests modifications thereto in
consultation with the AASB. The Guidance Note is then issued under the
authority of the Council of the ICAI.
Limited or Substantive Revision to the Standard, Statement or
Guidance Note
32. Subsequent to issuance of a Standard, Statement or Guidance Note, the
introduction of any new legal or professional requirement or any other national or
international development in the field of auditing, may require a substantive
revision to that Standard, Statement or Guidance Note. In that case, the Council
of the ICAI makes substantive revision to such Standard/ Statement /Guidance
Note. The procedure followed for substantive revision is the same as that
followed for formulation of a new Standard, Statement or the Guidance Note, as
the case may be, as detailed above.
33. Similarly, subsequent to issuance of a Standard, Statement or Guidance
Note, some aspect(s) may require revision which are not substantive in nature. For
this purpose, the Council of the ICAI may make limited revision to a Standard/
Statement /Guidance Note. In case of the Standards on Auditing (SAs), any
revision to a Standard is treated as limited only if that revision is restricted to the
application guidance of that Standard. The procedure followed for the limited
revision is, in principle, the same as that followed for formulation of a Standard,
Statement or Guidance Note, as the case may be. However, the AASB may decide
to cut short some time limits, e.g. period of public exposure in case of a limited
revision to a Standard/Statement, as detailed above, for the process.
Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies and Other Papers
Published by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
34. For issuance of a Technical Guides/Studies, etc., the procedure
Preface I-41
adopted by the AASB is ordinarily the same as in case of a Guidance Note
except that the draft Technical Guide/ Practice Manual/ Study is never
exposed for public comments nor such part of the AASB meeting at which
the proposed Technical Guide, Practice Manual, etc., is considered, open for
public. Also, since the Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies, etc., do
not have any authority attached to them, those are not required to be placed
for consideration and final approval of the Council, rather they are issued by
the AASB under its own authority.
Voting
35. The affirmative votes of at least two thirds of the members of the Board,
in person or by simultaneous telecommunication link, are required to approve
the final draft of a Standard or Statement for submission to the Council.
36. Each member of the AASB has the right to one vote.

Back

STANDARD ON QUALITY CONTROL (SQC) 1
QUALITY CONTROL FOR FIRMS
THAT PERFORMAUDITS
AND REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL
INFORMATION, AND OTHER ASSURANCE
AND RELATED SERVICES ENGAGEMENTS
(Effective for all engagements relating to
accounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 2009)

Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction .......................................................................................1 5
Definitions .............................................................................................. 6
Elements of a Systemof Quality Control..........................................7 8
Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the Firm...............9 13
Ethical Requirements......................................................................14 27
Independence..........................................................................18 27
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships
and Specific Engagements.............................................................28 35
Human Resources...........................................................................36 45
Assignment of Engagement Teams...........................................42 45
Engagement Performance..............................................................46 85
Consultation..............................................................................51 56
Differences of Opinion..............................................................57 59
Engagement Quality Control Review.........................................60 73
Engagement Documentation..................................................... 74 - 85
Back
SQC 1 II-2
Monitoring.....................................................................................86 105
Complaints and Allegations.................................................. 101 - 105
Documentation............................................................................106 109
Effective date.......................................................................................110
Material Modifications to the International Standard on Quality Control (ISQC) 1

The following is the text of the Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 1, Quality
Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial
Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements. The
Standard should be read in conjunction with the Preface to Standards on Quality
Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
1
.

1
Published in the July 2007 issue of the Journal.
Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 1
SQC 1 II-3
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Quality Control (SQC) is to establish
standards and provide guidance regarding a firms responsibilities for its
system of quality control for audits and reviews of historical financial
information, and for other assurance and related services engagements. This
SQC is to be read in conjunction with the requirements of the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, the Code of Ethics and other relevant pronouncements
of the Institute
2
(hereinafter referred to as the Code).
2. Additional standards and guidance on the responsibilities of firm
personnel regarding quality control procedures for specific types of
engagements are set out in other pronouncements of the Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board (AASB) issued under the authority of the Council.
For example, Standard on Auditing (SA) 220, Quality Control for Audit Work
3
,
establishes standards and provides guidance on quality control procedures for
audits of historical financial information.
3. The firmshould establish a systemof quality control designed to
provide it with reasonable assurance that the firmand its personnel
comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements, and that reports issued by the firm
4
or engagement
partner(s) are appropriate in the circumstances.
4. A system of quality control consists of policies designed to achieve the
objectives set out in paragraph 3 and the procedures necessary to implement
and monitor compliance with those policies.
5. This SQC applies to all firms. The nature of the policies and procedures
developed by individual firms to comply with this SQC will depend on various
factors such as the size and operating characteristics of the firm, and whether
it is part of a network.
Definitions
6. In this SQC, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:

2
Attention of the members is invited, for instance, to the Guidance Note on Independence of
Auditors, issued by the Committee on Ethical Standards.
3
Earlier known as Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 17, Quality Control for Audit Work.
4
It is clarified that in India the reports are not issued/signed in the firm name, rather they are
issued/signed on behalf of the firm by the sole practitioner, proprietor or a partner of the firm, as the
case may be, in his individual name. The definition of a firm has been given in paragraph 6(f) of
this Standard.
SQC 1 II-4
(a) Engagement documentation the record of work performed, results
obtained, and conclusions the practitioner reached (terms such as
working papers or workpapers are also sometimes used). The
documentation for a specific engagement is assembled in an
engagement file;
(b) Engagement partner the partner or other person in the firm who is
a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and is in
full time practice and is responsible for the engagement and its
performance, and for the report that is issued on behalf of the firm,
and who, where required, has the appropriate authority from a
professional, legal or regulatory body.
(c) Engagement quality control review a process designed to provide
an objective evaluation, before the report is issued, of the significant
judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions they
reached in formulating the report.
(d) Engagement quality control reviewer a partner, other person
5
in
the firm, suitably qualified external person, or a team made up of
such individuals, with sufficient and appropriate experience and
authority to objectively evaluate, before the report is issued, the
significant judgments the engagement team made and the
conclusions they reached in formulating the report. However, in case
the review is done by a team of individuals, such team should be
headed by a member of the Institute.
(e) Engagement team all personnel performing an engagement,
including any experts contracted by the firm in connection with that
engagement.
(f) Firm a sole practitioner/proprietor, partnership, or any such entity
of professional accountants, as may be permitted by law.
(g) Inspection in relation to completed engagements, procedures
designed to provide evidence of compliance by engagement teams
with the firms quality control policies and procedures.
(h) Listed entity an entity whose shares, stock or debt are quoted or
listed on a recognized stock exchange, or are traded under the
regulations of a recognized stock exchange or other equivalent

5
Such other person should be a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
SQC 1 II-5
body.
(i) Monitoring a process comprising an ongoing consideration and
evaluation of the firms system of quality control, including a periodic
inspection of a selection of completed engagements, designed to
enable the firm to obtain reasonable assurance that its system of
quality control is operating effectively.
(j) Network firm an entity under common control, ownership or
management with the firm or any entity that a reasonable and
informed third party having knowledge of all relevant information
would reasonably conclude as being part of the firm nationally or
internationally.
(k) Partner any individual with authority to bind the firm with respect to
the performance of a professional services engagement.
(l) Personnel partners and staff.
(m) Professional standards engagement standards, as defined in the
AASBs Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing,
Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, and relevant
ethical requirements as contained in the Code. TY CTROL
(n) Reasonable assurance in the context of this SQC, a high, but not
absolute, level of assurance.
(o) Staff professionals, other than partners, including any experts
which the firm employs.
(p) Suitably qualified external person an individual outside the firm
with the capabilities and competence to act as an engagement
partner, for example a partner or an employee
6
(with appropriate
experience) of another firm.
Elements of a Systemof Quality Control
7. The firms systemof quality control should include policies and
procedures addressing each of the following elements:
(a) Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm.
(b) Ethical requirements.
(c) Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and

6
Such employee should be a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
SQC 1 II-6
specific engagements.
(d) Human resources.
(e) Engagement performance.
(f) Monitoring.
8. The quality control policies and procedures should be documented
and communicated to the firms personnel. Such communication describes
the quality control policies and procedures and the objectives they are
designed to achieve, and includes the message that each individual has a
personal responsibility for quality and is expected to comply with these policies
and procedures. In addition, the firm recognizes the importance of obtaining
feedback on its quality control system from its personnel. Therefore, the firm
encourages its personnel to communicate their views or concerns on quality
control matters.
Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the Firm
9. The firmshould establish policies and procedures designed to
promote an internal culture based on the recognition that quality is
essential in performing engagements. Such policies and procedures
should require the firms chief executive officer (or equivalent) or, if
appropriate, the firms managing partners (or equivalent), to assume
ultimate responsibility for the firms systemof quality control.
10. The firms leadership and the examples it sets significantly influence the
internal culture of the firm. The promotion of a quality-oriented internal culture
depends on clear, consistent and frequent actions and messages from all
levels of the firms management emphasizing the firms quality control policies
and procedures, and the requirement to:
(a) Perform work that complies with professional standards and regulatory
and legal requirements; and
(b) Issue reports that are appropriate in the circumstances.
Such actions and messages encourage a culture that recognizes and rewards
high quality work. They may be communicated by training seminars, meetings,
formal or informal dialogue, mission statements, newsletters, or briefing
memoranda. They are incorporated in the firms internal documentation and
training materials, and in partner and staff appraisal procedures such that they
will support and reinforce the firms view on the importance of quality and how,
SQC 1 II-7
practically, it is to be achieved.
11. Of particular importance is the need for the firms leadership to recognize
that the firms business strategy is subject to the overriding requirement for the
firm to achieve quality in all the engagements that the firm performs.
Accordingly:
(a) The firm assigns its management responsibilities so that commercial
considerations do not override the quality of work performed;
(b) The firms policies and procedures addressing performance evaluation,
compensation, and promotion (including incentive systems) with regard to
its personnel, are designed to demonstrate the firms overriding
commitment to quality; and
(c) The firm devotes sufficient resources for the development, documentation
and support of its quality control policies and procedures.
12. Any person or persons assigned operational responsibility for the
firms quality control systemby the firms chief executive officer or
managing board of partners should have sufficient and appropriate
experience and ability, and the necessary authority, to assume that
responsibility.
13. Sufficient and appropriate experience and ability enables the responsible
person or persons to identify and understand quality control issues and to
develop appropriate policies and procedures. Necessary authority enables the
person or persons to implement those policies and procedures.
Ethical Requirements
provide it with reasonable assurance that the firmand its personnel
comply with relevant ethical requirements.
15. Ethical requirements relating to audits and reviews of historical financial
information, and other assurance and related services engagements are
contained in the Code. The Code establishes the fundamental principles of
professional ethics, which include:
(a) Integrity;
(b) Objectivity;
SQC 1 II-8
(c) Professional competence and due care;
(d) Confidentiality; and
(e) Professional behavior.
16. The Code includes a conceptual approach to independence for assurance
engagements, including aspects such as threats to independence, accepted
safeguards and the public interest.
17. The firms policies and procedures should emphasize the
fundamental principles, which are reinforced in particular by (a) the
leadership of the firm, (b) education and training, (c) monitoring, and (d) a
process for dealing with non-compliance. Independence for assurance
engagements is so significant that it is addressed separately in paragraphs 18-
27 below. These paragraphs need to be read in conjunction with the Code.
Independence
provide it with reasonable assurance that the firm, its personnel and,
where applicable, others subject to independence requirements
(including experts contracted by the firmand network firmpersonnel),
maintain independence where required by the Code. Such policies and
procedures should enable the firmto:
(a) Communicate its independence requirements to its personnel and,
where applicable, to others subject to them; and
(b) Identify and evaluate circumstances and relationships that create
threats to independence, and to take appropriate action to eliminate
those threats or reduce themto an acceptable level by applying
safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdrawfromthe
engagement.
19. Such policies and procedures should require:
(a) Engagement partners to provide the firm with relevant
information about client engagements, including the scope of
services, to enable the firmto evaluate the overall impact, if
any, on independence requirements;
(b) Personnel to promptly notify the firmof circumstances and
relationships that create a threat to independence so that
SQC 1 II-9
appropriate action can be taken; and
(c) The accumulation and communication of relevant information
to appropriate personnel so that:
(i) The firmand its personnel can readily determine whether
they satisfy independence requirements;
(ii) The firmcan maintain and update its records relating to
independence; and
(iii) The firmcan take appropriate action regarding identified
threats to independence.
provide it with reasonable assurance that it is notified of breaches of
independence requirements, and to enable it to take appropriate actions
to resolve such situations. The policies and procedures should include
requirements for:
(a) All who are subject to independence requirements to promptly notify
the firmof independence breaches of which they become aware;
(b) The firmto promptly communicate identified breaches of these
policies and procedures to:
(i) The engagement partner who, with the firm, needs to address
the breach; and
(ii) Other relevant personnel in the firmand those subject to the
independence requirements who need to take appropriate
action; and
(c) Prompt communication to the firm, if necessary, by the engagement
partner and the other individuals referred to in subparagraph (b)(ii)
of the actions taken to resolve the matter, so that the firmcan
determine whether it should take further action.
21. Comprehensive guidance on threats to independence and safeguards,
including application to specific situations are contained in the Code.
22. A firm receiving notice of a breach of independence policies and
procedures promptly communicates relevant information to engagement
partners, others in the firm, as appropriate and, where applicable, experts
contracted by the firm and network firm personnel, for appropriate action.
SQC 1 II-10
Appropriate action by the firm and the relevant engagement partner includes
applying appropriate safeguards to eliminate the threats to independence or to
reduce them to an acceptable level, or withdrawing from the engagement. In
addition, the firm provides independence education to personnel who are
required to be independent.
23. At least annually, the firmshould obtain written confirmation of
compliance with its policies and procedures on independence fromall
firmpersonnel required to be independent in terms of the requirements
of the Code.
24. Written confirmation may be in paper or electronic form. By obtaining
confirmation and taking appropriate action on information indicating non-
compliance, the firm demonstrates the importance that it attaches to
independence and makes the issue current for, and visible to, its personnel.
25. The Code discusses the familiarity threat that may be created by using
the same senior personnel on an assurance engagement over a long period of
time and the safeguards that might be appropriate to address such a threat.
Accordingly, the firmshould establish policies and procedures:
(a) Setting out criteria for determining the need for safeguards to
reduce the familiarity threat to an acceptable level when using the
same senior personnel on an assurance engagement over a long
period of time; and
(b) For all audits of financial statements of listed entities, requiring the
rotation of the engagement partner after a specified period in
compliance with the Code.
26. Using the same senior personnel on assurance engagements over a
prolonged period may create a familiarity threat or otherwise impair the quality
of performance of the engagement. Therefore, the firm should establish criteria
for determining the need for safeguards to address this threat. In determining
appropriate criteria, the firm considers such matters as (a) the nature of the
engagement, including the extent to which it involves a matter of public
interest, and (b) the length of service of the senior personnel on the
engagement. Examples of safeguards include rotating the senior personnel or
requiring an engagement quality control review.
27. The familiarity threat is particularly relevant in the context of financial
statement audits of listed entities. For these audits, the engagement
SQC 1 II-11
partner should be rotated after a pre-defined period, normally not more
than seven years
7
.
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and
Specific Engagements
28. The firm should establish policies and procedures for the
acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific
engagements, designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that it
will undertake or continue relationships and engagements only where it:
(a) Has considered the integrity of the client and does not have
information that would lead it to conclude that the client lacks
integrity;
(b) Is competent to performthe engagement and has the capabilities,
time and resources to do so; and
(c) Can comply with the ethical requirements.
The firmshould obtain such information as it considers necessary in the
circumstances before accepting an engagement with a newclient, when
deciding whether to continue an existing engagement, and when
considering acceptance of a newengagement with an existing client.
Where issues have been identified, and the firmdecides to accept or
continue the client relationship or a specific engagement, it should
document howthe issues were resolved.
29. With regard to the integrity of a client, matters that the firm considers
include, for example:
The identity and business reputation of the clients principal owners, key
management, related parties and those charged with its governance.
The nature of the clients operations, including its business practices.
Information concerning the attitude of the clients principal owners, key
management and those charged with its governance towards such
matters as aggressive interpretation of accounting standards and the

7
The provision of rotation of partners shall not be applicable in case the audit of listed entities is
being done by a sole practitioner/proprietor. However, in order to ensure that appropriate system of
quality control exists in the firm and that appropriate reports are issued in the circumstances by
sole practitioners/proprietors, such practice unit(s) shall be compulsorily reviewed under the
process of peer review.
SQC 1 II-12
internal control environment.
Whether the client is aggressively concerned with maintaining the firms
fees as low as possible.
Indications of an inappropriate limitation in the scope of work.
Indications that the client might be involved in money laundering or other
criminal activities.
The reasons for the proposed appointment of the firm and non-
reappointment of the previous firm.
The extent of knowledge a firm will have regarding the integrity of a client will
generally grow within the context of an ongoing relationship with that client.
30. Information on such matters that the firm obtains may come from, for
example:
Communications with existing or previous providers of professional
accountancy services to the client in accordance with the Code, and
discussions with other third parties.
Inquiry of other firm personnel or third parties such as bankers, legal
counsel and industry peers.
Background searches of relevant databases.
31. In considering whether the firm has the capabilities, competence, time
and resources to undertake a new engagement from a new or an existing
client, the firm reviews the specific requirements of the engagement and
existing partner and staff profiles at all relevant levels. Matters the firm
considers include whether:
Firm personnel have knowledge of relevant industries or subject matters;
Firm personnel have experience with relevant regulatory or reporting
requirements, or the ability to gain the necessary skills and knowledge
effectively;
The firm has sufficient personnel with the necessary capabilities and
competence;
Experts are available, if needed;
Individuals meeting the criteria and eligibility requirements to perform
engagement quality control review are available, where applicable; and
The firm would be able to complete the engagement within the reporting
deadline.
SQC 1 II-13
32. The firm also considers whether accepting an engagement from a new or
an existing client may give rise to an actual or perceived conflict of interest
8
.
Where a potential conflict is identified, the firm considers whether it is
appropriate to accept the engagement.
33. Deciding whether to continue a client relationship includes consideration
of significant matters that have arisen during the current or previous
engagements, and their implications for continuing the relationship. For
example, a client may have started to expand its business operations into an
area where the firm does not possess the necessary knowledge or expertise.
34. Where the firmobtains information that would have caused it to
decline an engagement if that information had been available earlier,
policies and procedures on the continuance of the engagement and the
client relationship should include consideration of:
(a) The professional and legal responsibilities that apply to the
circumstances, including whether there is a requirement for the firm
to report to the person or persons who made the appointment or, in
some cases, to regulatory authorities; and
(b) The possibility of withdrawing fromthe engagement or fromboth
the engagement and the client relationship.
35. Policies and procedures on withdrawal from an engagement or from both
the engagement and the client relationship address issues that include the
following:
Discussing with the appropriate level of the clients management and
those charged with its governance regarding the appropriate action that
the firm might take based on the relevant facts and circumstances.
If the firm determines that it is appropriate to withdraw, discussing with
the appropriate level of the clients management and those charged with
its governance withdrawal from the engagement or from both the

8
Paragraph 1.4 of the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI provides that When in practice, an
accountant should both be, and appear to be, free of any interest which might be regarded,
whatever its actual effect, as being incompatible with integrity and objectivity. The Guidance Note
on Independence of Auditors issued by the ICAI provides that In addition to ensuring
independence during the assignment, it is also essential to avoid any situation in near future which
may be interpreted as a threat to independence, as for example, he or any other partner of his firm
should not accept any other assignment such as internal audit, system audit and management
consultancy services within one year from the completion of audit assignment.
SQC 1 II-14
engagement and the client relationship, and the reasons for the
withdrawal.
Considering whether there is a professional, regulatory or legal
requirement for the firm to remain in place, or for the firm to report the
withdrawal from the engagement, or from both the engagement and the
client relationship, together with the reasons for the withdrawal, to
regulatory authorities.
Documenting significant issues, consultations, conclusions and the basis
for the conclusions.
Human Resources
provide it with reasonable assurance that it has sufficient personnel with
the capabilities, competence, and commitment to ethical principles
necessary to performits engagements in accordance with professional
standards and regulatory and legal requirements, and to enable the firm
or engagement partners to issue reports that are appropriate in the
circumstances.
37. Such policies and procedures address the following personnel issues:
(a) Recruitment;
(b) Performance evaluation;
(c) Capabilities;
(d) Competence;
(e) Career development;
(f) Promotion;
(g) Compensation; and
(h) Estimation of personnel needs.
Addressing these issues enables the firm to ascertain the number and
characteristics of the individuals required for the firms engagements. The
firms recruitment processes include procedures that help the firm select
individuals of integrity as well as the capacity to develop the capabilities
and competence necessary to perform the firms work.
SQC 1 II-15
38. Capabilities and competence are developed through a variety of methods,
including the following:
Professional education.
Continuing professional development, including training.
Work experience.
Coaching by more experienced staff, for example, other members of the
engagement team.
39. The continuing competence of the firms personnel depends to a
significant extent on an appropriate level of continuing professional
development so that personnel maintain and also enhance their knowledge
and capabilities. The firm therefore emphasizes in its policies and procedures,
the need for continuing training for all levels of firm personnel, and provides the
necessary training resources and assistance to enable personnel to develop
and maintain the required capabilities and competence. Where internal
technical and training resources are unavailable, or for any other reason, the
firm may use a suitably qualified external person for that purpose.
40. The firms performance evaluation, compensation and promotion
procedures give due recognition and reward to the development and
maintenance of competence and commitment to ethical principles. In
particular, the firm:
(a) Makes personnel aware of the firms expectations regarding performance
and ethical principles;
(b) Provides personnel with evaluation of, and counseling on, performance,
progress and career development; and
(c) Helps personnel understand that advancement to positions of greater
responsibility depends, among other things, upon performance quality
and adherence to ethical principles, and that failure to comply with the
firms policies and procedures may result in disciplinary action.
41. The size and circumstances of the firm will influence the structure of the
firms performance evaluation process. Smaller firms, in particular, may employ
less formal methods of evaluating the performance of their personnel.
Assignment of Engagement Teams
42. The firmshould assign responsibility for each engagement to an
SQC 1 II-16
engagement partner. The firmshould establish policies and procedures
requiring that:
(a) The identity and role of the engagement partner are communicated
to key members of the clients management and those charged with
governance;
(b) The engagement partner has the appropriate capabilities,
competence, authority and time to performthe role; and
(c) The responsibilities of the engagement partner are clearly defined
and communicated to that partner.
43. Policies and procedures include systems to monitor the workload and
availability of engagement partners so as to enable these individuals to have
sufficient time to adequately discharge their responsibilities.
44. The firmshould also assign appropriate staff with the necessary
capabilities, competence and time to perform engagements in
accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements, and to enable the firmor engagement partners to issue
reports that are appropriate in the circumstances.
45. The firm establishes procedures to assess its staffs capabilities and
competence. The capabilities and competence considered when assigning
engagement teams, and in determining the level of supervision required,
include the following:
An understanding of, and practical experience with, engagements of a
similar nature and complexity through appropriate training and
participation.
An understanding of professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements.
Appropriate technical knowledge, including knowledge of relevant
information technology.
Knowledge of the relevant industries in which the clients operate.
Ability to apply professional judgment.
An understanding of the firms quality control policies and procedures.
Engagement Performance
SQC 1 II-17
provide it with reasonable assurance that engagements are performed in
accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements, and that the firmor the engagement partner issues reports
that are appropriate in the circumstances.
47. Through its policies and procedures, the firm seeks to establish
consistency in the quality of engagement performance. This is often
accomplished through written or electronic manuals, software tools or other
forms of standardized documentation, and industry or subject matter-specific
guidance materials. Matters addressed include the following:
How engagement teams are briefed on the engagement to obtain an
understanding of the objectives of their work.
Processes for complying with applicable engagement standards.
Processes of engagement supervision, staff training and coaching.
Methods of reviewing the work performed, the significant judgments made
and the form of report being issued.
Appropriate documentation of the work performed and of the timing and
extent of the review.
Processes to keep all policies and procedures current.
48. It is important that all members of the engagement team understand the
objectives of the work they are to perform. Appropriate team-working and
training are necessary to assist less experienced members of the engagement
team to clearly understand the objectives of the assigned work.
49. Supervision includes the following:
Tracking the progress of the engagement.
Considering the capabilities and competence of individual members of the
engagement team, whether they have sufficient time to carry out their
work, whether they understand their instructions and whether the work is
being carried out in accordance with the planned approach to the
engagement.
Addressing significant issues arising during the engagement, considering
their significance and appropriately modifying the planned approach
appropriately.
Identifying matters for consultation or consideration by more experienced
engagement team members during the engagement.
SQC 1 II-18
50. Review responsibilities are determined on the basis that more
experienced engagement team members, including the engagement partner,
review work performed by less experienced team members. Reviewers
consider whether:
(a) The work has been performed in accordance with professional standards
and regulatory and legal requirements;
(b) Significant matters have been raised for further consideration;
(c) Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions
have been documented and implemented;
(d) There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed;
(e) The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is
appropriately documented;
(f) The evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the report;
and
(g) The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
Consultation
provide it with reasonable assurance that:
(a) Appropriate consultation takes place on difficult or contentious
matters;
(b) Sufficient resources are available to enable appropriate consultation
to take place;
(c) The nature and scope of such consultations are documented; and
(d) Conclusions resulting from consultations are documented and
implemented.
52. Consultation includes discussion, at the appropriate professional level,
with individuals within or outside the firm who have specialized expertise, to
resolve a difficult or contentious matter.
53. Consultation uses appropriate research resources as well as the
collective experience and technical expertise of the firm. Consultation helps to
promote quality and improves the application of professional judgment. The
SQC 1 II-19
firm seeks to establish a culture in which consultation is recognized as a
strength and encourages personnel to consult on difficult or contentious
matters.
54. Effective consultation with other professionals requires that those
consulted be given all the relevant facts that will enable them to provide
informed advice on technical, ethical or other matters. Consultation procedures
require consultation with those having appropriate knowledge, seniority and
experience within the firm (or, where applicable, outside the firm) on significant
technical, ethical and other matters, and appropriate documentation and
implementation of conclusions resulting from consultations.
55. A firm needing to consult externally, for example, a firm without
appropriate internal resources, may take advantage of advisory services
provided by (a) other firms, or (b) professional and regulatory bodies. Before
contracting for such services, the firm considers whether the external provider
is suitably qualified for that purpose.
56. The documentation of consultations with other professionals that involve
difficult or contentious matters is agreed by both the individual seeking
consultation and the individual consulted. The documentation is sufficiently
complete and detailed to enable an understanding of:
(a) The issue on which consultation was sought; and
(b) The results of the consultation, including any decisions taken, the basis
for those decisions and how they were implemented.
Differences of Opinion
57. The firmshould establish policies and procedures for dealing with
and resolving differences of opinion within the engagement team, with
those consulted and, where applicable, between the engagement partner
and the engagement quality control reviewer. Conclusions reached
should be documented and implemented.
58. Such procedures encourage identification of differences of opinion at an
early stage, provide clear guidelines as to the successive steps to be taken
thereafter, and require documentation regarding the resolution of the
differences and the implementation of the conclusions reached. The report
should not be issued until the matter is resolved.
59. A firm using a suitably qualified external person(s) to conduct an
SQC 1 II-20
engagement quality control review recognizes that differences of opinion can
occur and establishes procedures to resolve such differences, for example, by
consulting with another practitioner or firm, or a professional or regulatory
body.
Engagement Quality Control Review
60. The firmshould establish policies and procedures requiring, for
appropriate engagements, an engagement quality control reviewthat
provides an objective evaluation of the significant judgments made by
the engagement teamand the conclusions reached in formulating the
report. Such policies and procedures should:
(a) Require an engagement quality control reviewfor all audits of
financial statements of listed entities;
(b) Set out criteria against which all other audits and reviews of
historical financial information, and other assurance and related
services engagements should be evaluated to determine whether an
engagement quality control reviewshould be performed; and
(c) Require an engagement quality control reviewfor all engagements
meeting the criteria established in compliance with subparagraph
(b).
61. The firms policies and procedures should require the completion of
the engagement quality control reviewbefore the report is issued.
62. Criteria that a firm considers when determining which engagements other
than audits of financial statements of listed entities are to be subject to an
engagement quality control review include the following:
The nature of the engagement, including the extent to which it involves a
matter of public interest.
The identification of unusual circumstances or risks in an engagement or
class of engagements.
Whether laws or regulations require an engagement quality control
review.
63. The firmshould establish policies and procedures setting out:
(a) The nature, timing and extent of an engagement quality control
review;
SQC 1 II-21
(b) Criteria for the eligibility of engagement quality control reviewers;
and
(c) Documentation requirements for an engagement quality control
review.
Nature, Timing and Extent of the Engagement Quality Control Review
64. An engagement quality control review ordinarily involves discussion with
the engagement partner, a review of the financial statements or other subject
matter information and the report, and, in particular, consideration of whether
the report is appropriate. It also involves a review of selected working papers
relating to the significant judgments that the engagement team made and the
conclusions they reached. The extent of the review depends on the complexity
of the engagement and the risk that the report might not be appropriate in the
circumstances. The review does not reduce the responsibilities of the
engagement partner.
65. An engagement quality control review for audits of financial statements of
listed entities includes considering the following:
The engagement teams evaluation of the firms independence in relation
to the specific engagement.
Significant risks identified during the engagement and the responses to
those risks.
Judgments made, particularly with respect to materiality and significant
risks.
Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on matters involving
differences of opinion or other difficult or contentious matters, and the
conclusions arising from those consultations.
The significance and disposition of corrected and uncorrected
misstatements identified during the engagement.
The matters to be communicated to management and those charged with
governance and, where applicable, other parties such as regulatory
bodies.
Whether working papers selected for review reflect the work performed in
relation to the significant judgments and support the conclusions reached.
The appropriateness of the report to be issued.
Engagement quality control reviews for engagements other than audits of
SQC 1 II-22
financial statements of listed entities may, depending on the circumstances,
include some or all of these considerations.
66. The engagement quality control reviewer conducts the review in a timely
manner at appropriate stages during the engagement so that significant
matters may be promptly resolved to the reviewers satisfaction before the
report is issued.
67. Where the engagement quality control reviewer makes recommendations
that the engagement partner does not accept and the matter is not resolved to
the reviewers satisfaction, the report is not issued until the matter is resolved
by following the firms procedures for dealing with differences of opinion.
Criteria for the Eligibility of Engagement Quality Control Reviewers
68. The firms policies and procedures should address the appointment
of engagement quality control reviewers and establish their eligibility
through:
(a) The technical qualifications required to performthe role, including
the necessary experience and authority; and
(b) The degree to which an engagement quality control reviewer can be
consulted on the engagement without compromising the reviewers
objectivity.
69. The firms policies and procedures on the technical qualifications of
engagement quality control reviewers address the technical expertise,
experience and authority necessary to perform the role. What constitutes
sufficient and appropriate technical expertise, experience and authority
depends on the circumstances of the engagement. In addition, the
engagement quality control reviewer for an audit of the financial statements of
a listed entity is an individual with sufficient and appropriate experience and
authority to act as an audit engagement partner on audits of financial
statements of listed entities.
70. The firms policies and procedures are designed to maintain the
objectivity of the engagement quality control reviewer. For example, the
engagement quality control reviewer:
(a) Is not selected by the engagement partner;
(b) Does not otherwise participate in the engagement during the period of
SQC 1 II-23
review;
(c) Does not make decisions for the engagement team; and
(d) Is not subject to other considerations that would threaten the reviewers
objectivity.
71. The engagement partner may consult the engagement quality control
reviewer during the engagement. Such consultation need not compromise the
engagement quality control reviewers eligibility to perform the role. Where the
nature and extent of the consultations become significant, however, care is
taken by both the engagement team and the reviewer to maintain the
reviewers objectivity. Where this is not possible, another individual within the
firm or a suitably qualified external person is appointed to take on the role of
either the engagement quality control reviewer or the person to be consulted
on the engagement. The firms policies provide for the replacement of the
engagement quality control reviewer where the ability to perform an objective
review may be impaired.
72. Suitably qualified external persons may be contracted where sole
practitioners or small firms identify engagements requiring engagement quality
control reviews. Alternatively, some sole practitioners or small firms may wish
to use other firms to facilitate engagement quality control reviews. Where the
firm contracts suitably qualified external persons, the firm follows the
requirements and guidance in paragraphs 69-72.
Documentation of the Engagement Quality Control Review
73. Policies and procedures on documentation of the engagement
quality control reviewshould require documentation that:
(a) The procedures required by the firms policies on engagement
quality control reviewhave been performed;
(b) The engagement quality control reviewhas been completed before
the report is issued; and
(c) The reviewer is not aware of any unresolved matters that would
cause the reviewer to believe that the significant judgments the
engagement teammade and the conclusions they reached were not
appropriate.

SQC 1 II-24
Engagement Documentation
Completion of the Assembly of Final Engagement Files
74. The firmshould establish policies and procedures for engagement
teams to complete the assembly of final engagement files on a timely
basis after the engagement reports have been finalized.
75. Law or regulation may prescribe the time limits by which the assembly of
final engagement files for specific types of engagement should be completed.
Where no such time limits are prescribed in law or regulation, the firm
establishes time limits appropriate to the nature of the engagements that
reflect the need to complete the assembly of final engagement files on a timely
basis. In the case of an audit, for example, such a time limit is ordinarily not
more than 60 days after the date of the auditors report.
76. Where two or more different reports are issued in respect of the same
subject matter information of an entity, the firms policies and procedures
relating to time limits for the assembly of final engagement files address each
report as if it were for a separate engagement. This may, for example, be the
case when the firm issues an auditors report on a components financial
information for group consolidation purposes and, at a subsequent date, an
auditors report on the same financial information for statutory purposes.
Confidentiality, Safe Custody, Integrity, Accessibility and Retrievability of
Engagement Documentation
maintain the confidentiality, safe custody, integrity, accessibility and
retrievability of engagement documentation.
78. Relevant ethical requirements establish an obligation for the firms
personnel to observe at all times the confidentiality of information contained in
engagement documentation, unless specific client authority has been given to
disclose information, or there is a legal or professional duty to do so. Specific
laws or regulations may impose additional obligations on the firms personnel
to maintain client confidentiality, particularly where data of a personal nature
are concerned.
79. Whether engagement documentation is in paper, electronic or other
media, the integrity, accessibility or retrievability of the underlying data may be
compromised if the documentation could be altered, added to or deleted
SQC 1 II-25
without the firms knowledge, or if it could be permanently lost or damaged.
Accordingly, the firm designs and implements appropriate controls for
engagement documentation to:
(a) Enable the determination of when and by whom engagement
documentation was created, changed or reviewed;
(b) Protect the integrity of the information at all stages of the engagement,
especially when the information is shared within the engagement team or
transmitted to other parties via the Internet;
(c) Prevent unauthorized changes to the engagement documentation; and
(d) Allow access to the engagement documentation by the engagement team
and other authorized parties as necessary to properly discharge their
responsibilities.
80. Controls that the firm may design and implement to maintain the
confidentiality, safe custody, integrity, accessibility and retrievability of
engagement documentation include, for example:
The use of a password among engagement team members to restrict
access to electronic engagement documentation to authorized users.
Appropriate back-up routines for electronic engagement documentation at
appropriate stages during the engagement.
Procedures for properly distributing engagement documentation to the
team members at the start of engagement, processing it during
engagement, and collating it at the end of engagement.
Procedures for restricting access to, and enabling proper distribution and
confidential storage of, hardcopy engagement documentation.
81. For practical reasons, original paper documentation may be electronically
scanned for inclusion in engagement files. In that case, the firm implements
appropriate procedures requiring engagement teams to:
(a) Generate scanned copies that reflect the entire content of the original
paper documentation, including manual signatures, cross-references and
annotations;
(b) Integrate the scanned copies into the engagement files, including
indexing and signing off on the scanned copies as necessary; and
(c) Enable the scanned copies to be retrieved and printed as necessary.
SQC 1 II-26
The firm considers whether to retain original paper documentation that has
been scanned for legal, regulatory or other reasons.
Retention of Engagement Documentation
82. The firmshould establish policies and procedures for the retention
of engagement documentation for a period sufficient to meet the needs of
the firmor as required by lawor regulation.
83. The needs of the firm for retention of engagement documentation, and
the period of such retention, will vary with the nature of the engagement and
the firms circumstances, for example, whether the engagement documentation
is needed to provide a record of matters of continuing significance to future
engagements. The retention period may also depend on other factors, such as
whether local law or regulation prescribes specific retention periods for certain
types of engagements, or whether there are generally accepted retention
periods in the jurisdiction in the absence of specific legal or regulatory
requirements. In the specific case of audit engagements, the retention period
ordinarily is no shorter than ten years from the date of the auditors report, or, if
later, the date of the group auditors report.
84. Procedures that the firm adopts for retention of engagement
documentation include those that:
Enable the retrieval of, and access to, the engagement documentation
during the retention period, particularly in the case of electronic
documentation since the underlying technology may be upgraded or
changed over time.
Provide, where necessary, a record of changes made to engagement
documentation after the engagement files have been completed.
Enable authorized external parties to access and review specific
engagement documentation for quality control or other purposes.
Ownership of Engagement Documentation
85. Unless otherwise specified by law or regulation, engagement
documentation is the property of the firm. The firm may, at its discretion, make
portions of, or extracts from, engagement documentation available to clients,
provided such disclosure does not undermine the validity of the work
performed, or, in the case of assurance engagements, the independence of the
firm or its personnel.
SQC 1 II-27
Monitoring
provide it with reasonable assurance that the policies and procedures
relating to the systemof quality control are relevant, adequate, operating
effectively and complied with in practice. Such policies and procedures
should include an ongoing consideration and evaluation of the firms
systemof quality control, including a periodic inspection of a selection of
completed engagements.
87. The purpose of monitoring compliance with quality control policies and
procedures is to provide an evaluation of:
(a) Adherence to professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements;
(b) Whether the quality control system has been appropriately designed and
effectively implemented; and
(c) Whether the firms quality control policies and procedures have been
appropriately applied, so that reports that are issued by the firm or
engagement partners are appropriate in the circumstances.
88. The firm entrusts responsibility for the monitoring process to a partner or
partners or other persons with sufficient and appropriate experience and
authority in the firm to assume that responsibility. Monitoring of the firms
system of quality control is performed by competent individuals and covers
both the appropriateness of the design and the effectiveness of the operation
of the system of quality control.
89. Ongoing consideration and evaluation of the system of quality control
includes matters such as the following:
Analysis of:
o New developments in professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements, and how they are reflected in the firms policies and
procedures where appropriate;
o Written confirmation of compliance with policies and procedures on
independence;
o Continuing professional development, including training; and
o Decisions related to acceptance and continuance of client
relationships and specific engagements.
SQC 1 II-28
Determination of corrective actions to be taken and improvements to be
made in the system, including the provision of feedback into the firms
policies and procedures relating to education and training.
Communication to appropriate firm personnel of weaknesses identified in
the system, in the level of understanding of the system, or compliance
with it.
Follow-up by appropriate firm personnel so that necessary modifications
are promptly made to the quality control policies and procedures.
90. The inspection of a selection of completed engagements is ordinarily
performed on a cyclical basis. Engagements selected for inspection include at
least one engagement for each engagement partner over an inspection cycle,
which ordinarily spans no more than three years. The manner in which the
inspection cycle is organized, including the timing of selection of individual
engagements, depends on many factors, including the following:
The size of the firm.
The number and geographical location of offices.
The results of previous monitoring procedures.
The degree of authority both personnel and offices have (for example,
whether individual offices are authorized to conduct their own inspections
or whether only the head office may conduct them).
The nature and complexity of the firms practice and organization.
The risks associated with the firms clients and specific engagements.
91. The inspection process includes the selection of individual engagements,
some of which may be selected without prior notification to the engagement
team. Those inspecting the engagements are not involved in performing the
engagement or the engagement quality control review. In determining the
scope of the inspections, the firm may take into account the scope or
conclusions of an independent external inspection program. However, an
independent external inspection program does not act as a substitute for the
firms own internal monitoring program.
92. Small firms and sole practitioners may wish to use a suitably qualified
external person or another firm to carry out engagement inspections and other
monitoring procedures. Alternatively, they may wish to establish arrangements
to share resources with other appropriate organizations to facilitate monitoring
activities.
SQC 1 II-29
93. The firmshould evaluate the effect of deficiencies noted as a result
of the monitoring process and should determine whether they are either:
(a) Instances that do not necessarily indicate that the firms systemof
quality control is insufficient to provide it with reasonable assurance
that it complies with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements, and that the reports issued by the firmor engagement
partners are appropriate in the circumstances; or
(b) Systemic, repetitive or other significant deficiencies that require
prompt corrective action.
94. The firmshould communicate to relevant engagement partners and
other appropriate personnel deficiencies noted as a result of the
monitoring process and recommendations for appropriate remedial
action.
95. The firms evaluation of each type of deficiency should result in
recommendations for one or more of the following:
(a) Taking appropriate remedial action in relation to an individual
engagement or member of personnel;
(b) The communication of the findings to those responsible for training
and professional development;
(c) Changes to the quality control policies and procedures; and
(d) Disciplinary action against those who fail to comply with the policies
and procedures of the firm, especially those who do so repeatedly.
96. Where the results of the monitoring procedures indicate that a
report may be inappropriate or that procedures were omitted during the
performance of the engagement, the firmshould determine what further
action is appropriate to comply with relevant professional standards and
regulatory and legal requirements. It should also consider obtaining legal
advice.
97. At least annually, the firmshould communicate the results of the
monitoring of its quality control systemto engagement partners and
other appropriate individuals within the firm, including the firms chief
executive officer or, if appropriate, its managing partner(s). Such
communication should enable the firmand these individuals to take
prompt and appropriate action where necessary in accordance with their
SQC 1 II-30
defined roles and responsibilities. Information communicated should
(a) A description of the monitoring procedures performed.
(b) The conclusions drawn fromthe monitoring procedures.
(c) Where relevant, a description of systemic, repetitive or other
significant deficiencies and of the actions taken to resolve or amend
those deficiencies.
98. The reporting of identified deficiencies to individuals other than the
relevant engagement partners ordinarily does not include an identification of
the specific engagements concerned, unless such identification is necessary
for the proper discharge of the responsibilities of the individuals other than the
engagement partners.
99. Some firms operate as part of a network and, for consistency, may
implement some or all of their monitoring procedures on a network basis.
Where firms within a network operate under common monitoring policies and
procedures designed to comply with this SQC, and these firms place reliance
on such a monitoring system:
(a) At least annually, the network communicates the overall scope, extent
and results of the monitoring process to appropriate individuals within the
network firms;
(b) The network communicates promptly any identified deficiencies in the
quality control system to appropriate individuals within the relevant
network firm or firms so that the necessary action can be taken; and
(c) Engagement partners in the network firms are entitled to rely on the
results of the monitoring process implemented within the network, unless
the firms or the network advises otherwise.
100. Appropriate documentation relating to monitoring:
(a) Sets out monitoring procedures, including the procedure for
selecting completed engagements to be inspected;
(b) Records the evaluation of:
(i) Adherence to professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements;
(ii) Whether the quality control system has been appropriately
designed and effectively implemented; and
(iii) Whether the firms quality control policies and procedures have
SQC 1 II-31
been appropriately applied, so that reports that are issued by
the firm or engagement partners are appropriate in the
circumstances; and
(c) Identifies the deficiencies noted, evaluates their effect, and sets out
the basis for determining whether and what further action is
necessary.
Complaints and Allegations
provide it with reasonable assurance that it deals appropriately with:
(a) Complaints and allegations that the work performed by the firmfails
to comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements; and
(b) Allegations of non-compliance with the firms systemof quality
control.
102. Complaints and allegations (which do not include those that are clearly
frivolous) may originate from within or outside the firm. They may be made by
firm personnel, clients or other third parties. They may be received by
engagement team members or other firm personnel.
103. As part of this process, the firm establishes clearly defined channels for
firm personnel to raise any concerns in a manner that enables them to come
forward without fear of reprisals.
104. The firm investigates such complaints and allegations in accordance with
established policies and procedures. The investigation is supervised by a
partner with sufficient and appropriate experience and authority within the firm
but who is not otherwise involved in the engagement, and includes involving
legal counsel as necessary. Small firms and sole practitioners may use the
services of a suitably qualified external person or another firm to carry out the
investigation. Complaints, allegations and the responses to them are
documented.
105. Where the results of the investigations indicate deficiencies in the design
or operation of the firms quality control policies and procedures, or non-
compliance with the firms system of quality control by an individual or
individuals, the firm takes appropriate action as discussed in paragraph 95.
Documentation
106. The firm should establish policies and procedures requiring
SQC 1 II-32
appropriate documentation to provide evidence of the operation of each
element of its systemof quality control.
107. How such matters are documented is the firms decision. For example,
large firms may use electronic databases to document matters such as
independence confirmations, performance evaluations and the results of
monitoring inspections. Smaller firms may use more simpler and informal
methods such as manual notes, checklists and forms.
108. Factors to consider when determining the form and content of
documentation evidencing the operation of each of the elements of the system
of quality control include the following:
The size of the firm and the number of offices.
The degree of authority both personnel and offices have.
The nature and complexity of the firms practice and organization.
109. The firm retains this documentation for a period of time sufficient to permit
those performing monitoring procedures to evaluate the firms compliance with
its system of quality control, or for a longer period if required by law or
regulation.
Effective Date
110. This Standard on Quality Control is recommendatory for all engagements
relating to accounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 2008 and is
mandatory for all engagements relating to accounting periods beginning on or
after April 1, 2009.
Material Modifications to the International Standard on
Quality Control (ISQC) 1, Quality Control for Firms that
Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial
Information, and Other Assurance Related Services
Engagements
Additions
1. Paragraph 6(d) of the ISQC 1, dealing with the definition of engagement
quality control reviewer mentions that other person in the firm with sufficient
SQC 1 II-33
and appropriate experience and authority can also act as quality control
reviewer. The SQC 1 has retained this concept subject to the condition that
such other person in the firm should also be a member of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India.
2. Paragraph 6(d) of the ISQC 1, while defining the engagement quality
control reviewer provides that the review can be done by a team of individuals
comprising the partner, other person in the firm and/or the suitably qualified
external person. The SQC 1 has retained this concept subject to the condition
that in case of review by a team of individuals, such team should be headed by
a member of the Institute.
3. Paragraph 6(f) of the ISQC 1 defines firm as a sole practitioner,
partnership, corporation or other entity of professional accountants. Since in
India an individual can practice in his individual name and also in the name of
the firm as proprietor of that firm, accordingly, the term Proprietor has been
added to the definition of the firm.
4. Paragraph 83 of the ISQC 1 prescribes the minimum period of engagement
documentation as five years. The SQC 1 prescribes the minimum period of
retention of engagement documentation as ten years since, as per the provisions
of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, including regulations therein, prescribes
the minimum period of retention of working papers as ten years.
Deletions
1. Paragraph 6(f) of the ISQC 1 defines firm as a sole practitioner,
partnership, corporation or other entity of professional accountants. Since in
India, the practitioners establish any corporate entity for practice, the word
Corporation has been deleted from the definition.
2. In terms of paragraph 6(p) of the ISQC 1, defining a suitably qualified
external person as a partner of another firm, or an employee (with appropriate
experience) of either a professional accountancy body whose members may
perform audits and reviews of historical financial information, or other
assurance or related services engagements, or of an organisation that
provides relevant quality control services. Since, in India only the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India is the professional body whose members can
carry out an audit or a review of historical financial information or other
assurance engagement, a specific reference to this fact appearing in the
context of partner of another firm or an employee has been deleted from the
definition of suitably qualified external person.
SQC 1 II-34
3. Paragraph 6(p) lays down that an organisation that provides relevant
quality control services can also act as a suitably qualified person. The SQC
does not include any such requirement since it is felt that a review of a firm of
accountants should be done by a similar firm of accountants only.
4. Paragraph 27 of the ISQC 1 requires that in all engagements of audit of
listed companies, the engagement partner of the firm should be rotated within
a period of seven years in order to avoid the familiarity threat. The SQC 1 does
not mandate such a provision in the audit engagements of the listed entities
that are audited by the sole practitioners/proprietors as it is not possible to
apply the provision in such cases. However, the SQC 1 provides for peer
review of those firms in order to mitigate familiarity threat.
5. The ISQC 1 also deals with the public sector perspective. However, since
the Standards, Statements, General Clarifications and Guidance Notes issued
by the ICAI are equally applicable in case of all engagements, irrespective of
the form, nature and size of the entity, this Standard does not specifically
mention that aspect.
Back

FRAMEWORK FOR
ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS
(Effective From April 1, 2008)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-5
Ethical Principles and Quality Control Standards............................ 4-5
Definition and Objective of an Assurance Engagement ..................6-10
Scope of the Framework...................................................................11-14
Reports on Non-Assurance Engagements.................................. 14-15
Engagement Acceptance .................................................................16-18
Elements of an Assurance Engagement .........................................19-59
Three Party Relationship............................................................ 20-29
Subject Matter............................................................................ 30-32
Criteria....................................................................................... 33-37
Evidence ................................................................................... 38-54
Assurance Report ...................................................................... 55-59
Inappropriate Use of the Practitioners Name......................................60
Material Modifications to International Framework for Assurance
Engagements
Appendix: Differences Between Reasonable Assurance Engagements and
Limited Assurance Engagements
Back
Framework III-2
Introduction
1. This Framework defines and describes the elements and objectives of an
assurance engagement, and identifies engagements to which Standards on
Auditing (SAs), Standards on Review Engagements (SREs) and Standards on
Assurance Engagements (SAEs) apply. It provides a frame of reference for:
(a) Professional accountants in public practice
1
(practitioners) when
performing assurance engagements. Professional accountants who are
neither in public practice nor in the public sector are encouraged to
consider the Framework when performing assurance engagements
2

(b) Others involved with assurance engagements, including the intended
users of an assurance report and the responsible party; and
(c) The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB) in its development
of SAs, SREs and SAEs.
This Framework does not cover engagements covered by Standards on
Related Services (SRSs), such as engagements to perform agreed-upon
procedures and engagements to compile financial or other information since
the members do not express any assurance on the financial information or any
other subject matter of their report.
2. This Framework does not itself establish standards or provide procedural
requirements for the performance of assurance engagements. SAs, SREs and
SAEs contain basic principles, essential procedures and related guidance,
consistent with the concepts in this Framework, for the performance of
assurance engagements.

1
As defined in the Preface, the term professional accountant refers to the member of the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India. Further, the term professional accountant in public practice
(practitioner) refers to the member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India who is in
practice in terms of section 2 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The term is also used to
refer to a firm of chartered accountants in public practice.
2
If a professional accountant not in public practice applies this Framework, and (a) this
Framework, the SAs, SREs or the SAEs are referred to in the professional accountants report; and
(b) the professional accountant or other members of the assurance team and, when applicable, the
professional accountants employer, are not independent of the entity in respect of which the
assurance engagement is being performed, the lack of independence and the nature of the
relationship(s) with the entity are prominently disclosed in the professional accountants report.
Also, that report does not include the word independent in its title, and the purpose and users of
the report are restricted.
Framework for Assurance Engagements
Framework III-3
3. The following is an overview of this Framework:
Introduction: This Framework deals with assurance engagements
performed by practitioners. It provides a frame of reference for
practitioners and others involved with assurance engagements,
such as those engaging a practitioner (the engaging party).
Definition and objective of an assurance engagement: This
section defines assurance engagements and identifies the
objectives of the two types of assurance engagements a
practitioner is permitted to perform. This Framework calls these
two types reasonable assurance engagements and limited
3

Scope of the Framework: This section distinguishes assurance
engagements from other engagements, such as consulting
engagements.
Engagement acceptance: This section sets out characteristics
that must be exhibited before a practitioner can accept an
assurance engagement.
Elements of an assurance engagement: This section identifies
and discusses five elements that assurance engagements
performed by practitioners exhibit: a three party relationship, a
subject matter, criteria, evidence and an assurance report. It
explains important distinctions between reasonable assurance
engagements and limited assurance engagements (also outlined
in Appendix to the Framework). This section also discusses, for
example, the significant variation in the subject matters of
assurance engagements, the required characteristics of suitable
criteria, the role of risk and materiality in assurance engagements,
and how conclusions are expressed in each of the two types of
Inappropriate use of the practitioners name: This section
discusses implications of a practitioners association with a
subject matter.

3
For assurance engagements relating to historical financial information in particular, such
engagements which provide reasonable assurance are called audits, and those engagements
which provide limited assurance are called reviews.
Framework III-4
Ethical Principles and Quality Control Standards
4. In addition to this Framework and SAs, SREs and SAEs, practitioners
who perform assurance engagements are governed by:
(a) The requirements of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949;
(b) The Code of Ethics (the Code), issued by the Institute, which establishes
fundamental ethical principles for professional accountants;
(c) Other relevant pronouncements of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India
4
; and
(d) Standards on Quality Control (SQCs), which establish standards and
provide guidance on a firms system of quality control
5
.
5. The Code of Ethics sets out the fundamental ethical principles that all
professional accountants are required to observe, including:
(a) Integrity;
(b) Objectivity;
(d) Confidentiality; and
(e) Professional behaviour.
Definition and Objective of an Assurance Engagement
6. Assurance engagement means an engagement in which a practitioner
expresses a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the
intended users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the
evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.
7. The outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter is the
information that results from applying the criteria to the subject matter. For
example:

4
Attention of the members is invited, for instance, to the Guidance Note on Independence of
Auditors, issued by the Committee on Ethical Standards of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India.
5
Additional Standards and guidance on quality control procedures for specific types of assurance
engagements are set out in SAs, SREs and SAEs.
Framework III-5
The recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure
represented in the financial statements (outcome) result from
applying a financial reporting framework for recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure, such as the
Accounting Standards, (criteria) to an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows (subject matter).
An assertion about the effectiveness of internal control (outcome)
results from applying a framework for evaluating the effectiveness
of internal control, (criteria) to internal control, a process (subject
matter).
In the remainder of this Framework, the term subject matter information will
be used to mean the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject
matter. It is the subject matter information about which the practitioner gathers
sufficient appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for expressing a
conclusion in an assurance report.
8. Subject matter information can fail to be properly expressed in the context
of the subject matter and the criteria, and can therefore be misstated,
potentially to a material extent. This occurs when the subject matter
information does not properly reflect the application of the criteria to the subject
matter, for example, when an entitys financial statements do not give a true
and fair view of (or present fairly, in all material respects) its financial position,
financial performance and cash flows in accordance with the generally
accepted accounting principles, or when an entitys assertion that its internal
control is effective is not fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the
established internal control framework.
9. In some assurance engagements, the evaluation or measurement of the
subject matter is performed by the responsible party, and the subject matter
information is in the form of an assertion by the responsible party that is made
available to the intended users. These engagements are called assertion-
based engagements. In other assurance engagements, the practitioner either
directly performs the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter, or
obtains a representation from the responsible party that has performed the
evaluation or measurement that is not available to the intended users. The
subject matter information is provided to the intended users in the assurance
report. These engagements are called direct reporting engagements.

Framework III-6
10. Under this Framework, there are two types of assurance engagements a
practitioner is permitted to perform: a reasonable assurance engagement and
a limited assurance engagement. The objective of a reasonable assurance
engagement is a reduction in assurance engagement risk to an acceptably low
level in the circumstances of the engagement
6
as the basis for a positive form
of expression of the practitioners conclusion. The objective of a limited
assurance engagement is a reduction in assurance engagement risk to a level
that is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, but where that risk
is greater than for a reasonable assurance engagement, as the basis for a
negative form of expression of the practitioners conclusion.
Scope of the Framework
11. Not all engagements performed by practitioners are assurance
engagements. Other frequently performed engagements that do not meet the
above definition (and therefore are not covered by this Framework) include:
Engagements covered by Standards for Related Services, such as
agreed-upon procedures engagements and compilations of financial
or other information.
The preparation of tax returns where no conclusion conveying
assurance is expressed.
Consulting (or advisory) engagements
7
, such as management and
tax consulting.

6
Engagement circumstances include the terms of the engagement, including whether it is a
reasonable assurance engagement or a limited assurance engagement, the characteristics of the
subject matter, the criteria to be used, the needs of the intended users, relevant characteristics of
the responsible party and its environment, and other matters, for example events, transactions,
conditions and practices, that may have a significant effect on the engagement.
7
Consulting engagements employ a professional accountants technical skills, education,
observations, experiences and knowledge of the consulting process. The consulting process is an
analytical process that typically involves some combination of activities relating to: objective-
setting, fact-finding, definition of problems or opportunities, evaluation of alternatives, development
of recommendations including actions, communication of results and sometimes implementation
and follow-up. Reports (if issued) are generally written in a narrative (or long form) style.
Generally the work performed is only for the use and benefit of the client. The nature and scope of
work is determined by agreement between the professional accountant and the client. Any service
that meets the definition of an assurance engagement is not a consulting engagement but an
assurance engagement.
Framework III-7
12. An assurance engagement may be part of a larger engagement, for
example, when a business acquisition consulting engagement includes a
requirement to convey assurance regarding historical or prospective financial
information. In such circumstances, this Framework is relevant only to the
assurance portion of the engagement.
13. The following engagements, which may meet the definition in paragraph
6, need not be performed in accordance with this Framework:
(a) Engagements to testify in legal proceedings regarding accounting,
auditing, taxation or other matters; and
(b) Engagements that include professional opinions, views or wording
from which a user may derive some assurance, if all of the following
apply:
(i) Those opinions, views or wording are merely incidental to the
overall engagement;
(ii) Any written report issued is expressly restricted for use by only
the intended users specified in the report;
(iii) Under a written understanding with the specified intended
users, the engagement is not intended to be an assurance
engagement; and
(iv) The engagement is not represented as an assurance
engagement in the professional accountants report.
Reports on Non-Assurance Engagements
14. A practitioner reporting on an engagement that is not an assurance
engagement within the scope of this Framework, clearly distinguishes that
report from an assurance report. So as not to confuse users, a report that is
not an assurance report avoids, for example:
Implying compliance with this Framework, SAs, SREs or SAEs.
Inappropriately using the words assurance, audit or review.
Including a statement that could reasonably be mistaken for a
conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of
intended users about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement
of a subject matter against criteria.
Framework III-8
15. The practitioner and the responsible party may agree to apply the
principles of this Framework to an engagement when there are no intended
users other than the responsible party but where all other requirements of the
SAs, SREs or SAEs are met. In such cases, the practitioners report includes
a statement restricting the use of the report to the responsible party.
Engagement Acceptance
16. A practitioner accepts an assurance engagement only where the
practitioners preliminary knowledge of the engagement circumstances
indicates that:
(a) Relevant ethical requirements, such as independence and
professional competence will be satisfied, and
(b) The engagement exhibits all of the following characteristics:
(i) The subject matter is appropriate;
(ii) The criteria to be used are suitable and are available to the
intended users;
(iii) The practitioner has access to sufficient appropriate evidence
to support the practitioners conclusion;
(iv) The practitioners conclusion, in the form appropriate to either a
reasonable assurance engagement or a limited assurance
engagement, is to be contained in a written report; and
(v) The practitioner is satisfied that there is a rational purpose for
the engagement. If there is a significant limitation on the scope
of the practitioners work (see paragraph 54), it may be unlikely
that the engagement has a rational purpose. Also, a
practitioner may believe the engaging party intends to
associate the practitioners name with the subject matter in an
inappropriate manner (see paragraph 60).
Specific SAs, SREs or SAEs may include additional requirements that need
to be satisfied prior to accepting an engagement.
17. When a potential engagement cannot be accepted as an assurance
engagement because it does not exhibit all the characteristics in the previous
paragraph, the engaging party may be able to identify a different
engagement that will meet the needs of intended users. For example:
Framework III-9
(a) If the original criteria were not suitable, an assurance engagement
may still be performed if:
(i) the engaging party can identify an aspect of the original subject
matter for which those criteria are suitable, and the practitioner
could perform an assurance engagement with respect to that
aspect as a subject matter in its own right. In such cases, the
assurance report makes it clear that it does not relate to the
original subject matter in its entirety; or
(ii) alternative criteria suitable for the original subject matter can
be selected or developed.
(b) The engaging party may request an engagement that is not an
assurance engagement, such as a consulting or an agreed-upon
procedures engagement.
18. Having accepted an assurance engagement, a practitioner may not
change that engagement to a non-assurance engagement, or from a
reasonable assurance engagement to a limited assurance engagement
without reasonable justification. A change in circumstances that affects the
intended users requirements, or a misunderstanding concerning the nature
of the engagement, ordinarily will justify a request for a change in the
engagement. If such a change is made, the practitioner does not disregard
evidence that was obtained prior to the change.
Elements of an Assurance Engagement
19. The following elements of an assurance engagement are discussed in
this section:
(a) A three party relationship involving a practitioner, a responsible party,
and intended users;
(b) An appropriate subject matter;
(c) Suitable criteria;
(d) Sufficient appropriate evidence; and
(e) A written assurance report in the form appropriate to a reasonable
assurance engagement or a limited assurance engagement.
Framework III-10
Three Party Relationship
20. Assurance engagements involve three separate parties: a practitioner, a
responsible party and intended users.
21. The responsible party and the intended users may be from different
entities or the same entity. As an example of the latter case, in a two-tier
board structure, the supervisory board may seek assurance about
information provided by the management board of that entity. The
relationship between the responsible party and the intended users needs to
be viewed within the context of a specific engagement and may differ from
more traditionally defined lines of responsibility. For example, an entitys
senior management (an intended user) may engage a practitioner to perform
an assurance engagement on a particular aspect of the entitys activities that
is the immediate responsibility of a lower level of management (the
responsible party), but for which senior management is ultimately
responsible.
Practitioner
22. The term practitioner as used in this Framework is broader than the
term auditor as used in SAs and SREs, which relates only to practitioners
performing audit or review engagements with respect to historical financial
information.
23. A practitioner may be requested to perform assurance engagements on
a wide range of subject matters. Some subject matters may require
specialized skills and knowledge beyond those ordinarily possessed by an
individual practitioner. As noted in paragraph 17 (a), a practitioner does not
accept an engagement if preliminary knowledge of the engagement
circumstances indicates that ethical requirements regarding professional
competence will not be satisfied. In some cases this requirement can be
satisfied by the practitioner using the work of persons from other professional
disciplines, referred to as experts. In such cases, the practitioner is satisfied
that those persons carrying out the engagement collectively possess the
requisite skills and knowledge, and that the practitioner has an adequate
level of involvement in the engagement and understanding of the work for
which any expert is used.

Framework III-11
Responsible Party
24. The responsible party is the person (or persons) who:
(a) in a direct reporting engagement, is responsible for the subject matter;
or
(b) in an assertion-based engagement, is responsible for the subject
matter information (the assertion), and may be responsible for the
subject matter. An example of when the responsible party is
responsible for both the subject matter information and the subject
matter, is when an entity engages a practitioner to perform an
assurance engagement regarding a report it has prepared about its
own sustainability practices. An example of when the responsible
party is responsible for the subject matter information but not the
subject matter, is when a government organization engages a
practitioner to perform an assurance engagement regarding a report
about a private companys sustainability practices that the
organization has prepared and is to distribute to intended users.
The responsible party may or may not be the party who engages the
practitioner (the engaging party).
25. The responsible party ordinarily provides the practitioner with a written
representation that evaluates or measures the subject matter against the
identified criteria, whether or not it is to be made available as an assertion to
the intended users. In a direct reporting engagement, the practitioner may
not be able to obtain such a representation when the engaging party is
different from the responsible party.
Intended Users
26. The intended users are the person, persons or class of persons for
whom the practitioner prepares the assurance report. The responsible party
can be one of the intended users, but not the only one.
27. Whenever practical, the assurance report is addressed to all the
intended users, but in some cases there may be other intended users. The
practitioner may not be able to identify all those who will read the assurance
report, particularly where there is a large number of people who have access
to it. In such cases, particularly where possible readers are likely to have a
broad range of interests in the subject matter, intended users may be limited
Framework III-12
to major stakeholders with significant and common interests. Intended users
may be identified in different ways, for example, by agreement between the
practitioner and the responsible party or engaging party, or by law.
28. Whenever practical, intended users or their representatives are involved
with the practitioner and the responsible party (and the engaging party, if
different) in determining the requirements of the engagement. Regardless of
the involvement of others however, and unlike an agreed-upon procedures
engagement (which involves reporting findings based upon the procedures,
rather than a conclusion):
(a) The practitioner is responsible for determining the nature, timing and
extent of procedures; and
(b) The practitioner is required to pursue any matter the practitioner
becomes aware of that leads the practitioner to question whether a
material modification should be made to the subject matter
information.
29. In some cases, intended users (for example, bankers and regulators)
impose a requirement on, or request the responsible party (or the engaging
party, if different) to arrange for, an assurance engagement to be performed
for a specific purpose. When engagements are designed for specified
intended users or a specific purpose, the practitioner considers including a
restriction in the assurance report that limits its use to those users or that
purpose.
Subject Matter
30. The subject matter, and subject matter information, of an assurance
engagement can take many forms, such as:
Financial performance or conditions (for example, historical or
prospective financial position, financial performance and cash flows)
for which the subject matter information may be the recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure represented in financial
statements.
Non-financial performance or conditions (for example, performance
of an entity) for which the subject matter information may be key
indicators of efficiency and effectiveness.
Framework III-13
Physical characteristics (for example, capacity of a facility) for which
the subject matter information may be a specifications document.
Systems and processes (for example, an entitys internal control or
IT system) for which the subject matter information may be an
assertion about effectiveness.
Behaviour (for example, corporate governance, compliance with
regulation, human resource practices) for which the subject matter
information may be a statement of compliance or a statement of
effectiveness.
31. Subject matters have different characteristics, including the degree to
which information about them is qualitative versus quantitative, objective
versus subjective, historical versus prospective, and relates to a point in time
or covers a period. Such characteristics affect the:
(a) precision with which the subject matter can be evaluated or measured
against criteria; and
(b) the persuasiveness of available evidence.
The assurance report notes characteristics of particular relevance to the
intended users.
32. An appropriate subject matter is:
(a) identifiable, and capable of consistent evaluation or measurement
against the identified criteria; and
(b) such that the information about it can be subjected to procedures for
gathering sufficient appropriate evidence to support a reasonable
assurance or limited assurance conclusion, as appropriate.
Criteria
33. Criteria are the benchmarks used to evaluate or measure the subject
matter including, where relevant, benchmarks for presentation and
disclosure. Criteria can be formal, for example in the preparation of financial
statements, the criteria may be Accounting Standards issued by the Institute;
when reporting on internal control, the criteria may be an established internal
control framework or individual control objectives specifically designed for the
engagement; and when reporting on compliance, the criteria may be the
applicable law, regulation or contract. Examples of less formal criteria are an
Framework III-14
internally developed code of conduct or an agreed level of performance
(such as the number of times a particular committee is expected to meet in a
year).
34. Suitable criteria are required for reasonably consistent evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter within the context of professional judgment.
Without the frame of reference provided by suitable criteria, any conclusion is
open to individual interpretation and misunderstanding. Suitable criteria are
context-sensitive, that is, relevant to the engagement circumstances. Even
for the same subject matter there can be different criteria. For example, one
responsible party might select the number of customer complaints resolved
to the acknowledged satisfaction of the customer for the subject matter of
customer satisfaction; another responsible party might select the number of
repeat purchases in the three months following the initial purchase.
35. Suitable criteria exhibit the following characteristics:
(a) Relevance: relevant criteria contribute to conclusions that assist
decision-making by the intended users.
(b) Completeness: criteria are sufficiently complete when relevant factors
that could affect the conclusions in the context of the engagement
circumstances are not omitted. Complete criteria include, where
relevant, benchmarks for presentation and disclosure.
(c) Reliability: reliable criteria allow reasonably consistent evaluation or
measurement of the subject matter including, where relevant,
presentation and disclosure, when used in similar circumstances by
similarly qualified practitioners.
(d) Neutrality: neutral criteria contribute to conclusions that are free from
bias.
(e) Understandability: understandable criteria contribute to conclusions
that are clear, comprehensive, and not subject to significantly different
interpretations.
The evaluation or measurement of a subject matter on the basis of the
practitioners own expectations, judgments and individual experience would
not constitute suitable criteria.
36. The practitioner assesses the suitability of criteria for a particular
engagement by considering whether they reflect the above characteristics.
Framework III-15
The relative importance of each characteristic to a particular engagement is a
matter of judgment. Criteria can either be established or specifically
developed. Established criteria are those embodied in laws or regulations, or
issued by authorized or recognized bodies of experts that follow a
transparent due process. Specifically developed criteria are those designed
for the purpose of the engagement. Whether criteria are established or
specifically developed affects the work that the practitioner carries out to
assess their suitability for a particular engagement.
37. Criteria need to be available to the intended users to allow them to
understand how the subject matter has been evaluated or measured. Criteria
are made available to the intended users in one or more of the following
ways:
(a) Publicly.
(b) Through inclusion in a clear manner in the presentation of the subject
matter information.
(c) Through inclusion in a clear manner in the assurance report.
(d) By general understanding, for example the criterion for measuring
time in hours and minutes.
Criteria may also be available only to specific intended users, for example,
the terms of a contract, or criteria issued by an industry association that are
available only to those in the industry. When identified criteria are available
only to specific intended users, or are relevant only to a specific purpose, use
of the assurance report is restricted to those users or for that purpose.
8

Evidence
38. The practitioner plans and performs an assurance engagement with an
attitude of professional skepticism to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence
about whether the subject matter information is free of material
misstatement. The practitioner considers materiality, assurance engagement
risk, and the quantity and quality of available evidence when planning and

8
While an assurance report may be restricted whenever it is intended only for specified intended
users or for a specific purpose, the absence of a restriction regarding a particular reader or
purpose, does not itself indicate that a legal responsibility is owed by the practitioner in relation to
that reader or for that purpose. Whether a legal responsibility is owed will depend on the
circumstances of each case and the relevant jurisdiction.
Framework III-16
performing the engagement, in particular when determining the nature, timing
and extent of evidence-gathering procedures.
Professional Skepticism
39. The practitioner plans and performs an assurance engagement with an
attitude of professional skepticism recognizing that circumstances may exist
that cause the subject matter information to be materially misstated. An
attitude of professional skepticism means the practitioner makes a critical
assessment, with a questioning mind, of the validity of evidence obtained and
is alert to evidence that contradicts or brings into question the reliability of
documents or representations by the responsible party. For example, an
attitude of professional skepticism is necessary throughout the engagement
process for the practitioner to reduce the risk of overlooking suspicious
circumstances, of over generalizing when drawing conclusions from
observations, and of using faulty assumptions in determining the nature,
timing and extent of evidence-gathering procedures and evaluating the
results thereof.
40. An assurance engagement rarely involves the authentication of
documentation, nor is the practitioner trained as or expected to be an expert
in such authentication. However, the practitioner considers the reliability of
the information to be used as evidence, for example, photocopies, facsimiles,
filmed, digitized or other electronic documents, including consideration of
controls over their preparation and maintenance where relevant.
Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Evidence
41. Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of evidence. Appropriateness
is the measure of the quality of evidence; that is, its relevance and its
reliability. The quantity of evidence needed is affected by the risk of the
subject matter information being materially misstated (the greater the risk,
the more evidence is likely to be required) and also by the quality of such
evidence (the higher the quality, the less may be required). Accordingly, the
sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence are interrelated. However,
merely obtaining more evidence may not compensate for its poor quality.
42. The reliability of evidence is influenced by its source and by its nature,
and is dependent on the individual circumstances under which it is obtained.
Generalizations about the reliability of various kinds of evidence can be
made; however, such generalizations are subject to important exceptions.
Framework III-17
Even when evidence is obtained from sources external to the entity,
circumstances may exist that could affect the reliability of the information
obtained. For example, evidence obtained from an independent external
source may not be reliable if the source is not knowledgeable. While
recognizing that exceptions may exist, the following generalizations about
the reliability of evidence may be useful:
Evidence is more reliable when it is obtained from independent
sources outside the entity.
Evidence that is generated internally is more reliable when the
related controls are effective.
Evidence obtained directly by the practitioner (for example,
observation of the application of a control) is more reliable than
evidence obtained indirectly or by inference (for example, inquiry
about the application of a control).
Evidence is more reliable when it exists in documentary form,
whether paper, electronic, or other media (for example, a
contemporaneously written record of a meeting is more reliable than
a subsequent oral representation of what was discussed).
Evidence provided by original documents is more reliable than
evidence provided by photocopies or facsimiles.
43. The practitioner ordinarily obtains more assurance from consistent
evidence obtained from different sources or of a different nature than from
items of evidence considered individually. In addition, obtaining evidence
from different sources or of a different nature may indicate that an individual
item of evidence is not reliable. For example, corroborating information
obtained from a source independent of the entity may increase the assurance
the practitioner obtains from a representation from the responsible party.
Conversely, when evidence obtained from one source is inconsistent with
that obtained from another, the practitioner determines what additional
evidence-gathering procedures are necessary to resolve the inconsistency.
44. In terms of obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence, it is generally more
difficult to obtain assurance about subject matter information covering a period
than about subject matter information at a point in time. In addition,
conclusions provided on processes ordinarily are limited to the period covered
by the engagement; the practitioner provides no conclusion about whether the
Framework III-18
process will continue to function in the specified manner in the future.
45. The practitioner considers the relationship between the cost of obtaining
evidence and the usefulness of the information obtained. However, the
matter of difficulty or expense involved is not in itself a valid basis for
omitting an evidence-gathering procedure for which there is no alternative.
The practitioner uses professional judgment and exercises professional
skepticism in evaluating the quantity and quality of evidence, and thus its
sufficiency and appropriateness, to support the assurance report.
Materiality
46. Materiality is relevant when the practitioner determines the nature,
timing and extent of evidence-gathering procedures, and when assessing
whether the subject matter information is free of misstatement. When
considering materiality, the practitioner understands and assesses what
factors might influence the decisions of the intended users. For example,
when the identified criteria allow for variations in the presentation of the
subject matter information, the practitioner considers how the adopted
presentation might influence the decisions of the intended users. Materiality
is considered in the context of quantitative and qualitative factors, such as
relative magnitude, the nature and extent of the effect of these factors on the
evaluation or measurement of the subject matter, and the interests of the
intended users. The assessment of materiality and the relative importance of
quantitative and qualitative factors in a particular engagement are matters for
the practitioners judgment.
Assurance Engagement Risk
47. Assurance engagement risk is the risk that the practitioner expresses
an inappropriate conclusion when the subject matter information is materially
misstated
9
. In a reasonable assurance engagement, the practitioner reduces

9 (a)
This includes the risk, in those direct reporting engagements where the subject matter
information is presented only in the practitioners conclusion, that the practitioner inappropriately
concludes that the subject matter does, in all material respects, conform with the criteria, for
example: In our opinion, internal control is effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ
criteria.
(b)
In addition to assurance engagement risk, the practitioner is exposed to the risk of expressing an
inappropriate conclusion when the subject matter information is not materially misstated, and risks
through loss from litigation, adverse publicity, or other events arising in connection with a subject
matter reported on. These risks are not part of assurance engagement risk.
Framework III-19
assurance engagement risk to an acceptably low level in the circumstances
of the engagement to obtain reasonable assurance as the basis for a positive
form of expression of the practitioners conclusion. The level of assurance
engagement risk is higher in a limited assurance engagement than in a
reasonable assurance engagement because of the different nature, timing or
extent of evidence-gathering procedures. However, in a limited assurance
engagement, the combination of the nature, timing and extent of evidence-
gathering procedures is at least sufficient for the practitioner to obtain a
meaningful level of assurance as the basis for a negative form of expression.
To be meaningful, the level of assurance obtained by the practitioner is likely
to enhance the intended users confidence about the subject matter
information to a degree that is clearly more than inconsequential.
48. In general, assurance engagement risk can be represented by the
following components, although not all of these components will necessarily
be present or significant for all assurance engagements:
(a) The risk that the subject matter information is materially misstated,
which in turn consists of:
(i) Inherent risk: the susceptibility of the subject matter information
to a material misstatement, assuming that there are no related
controls; and
(ii) Control risk: the risk that a material misstatement that could
occur will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a
timely basis by related internal controls. When control risk is
relevant to the subject matter, some control risk will always
exist because of the inherent limitations of the design and
operation of internal control; and
(b) Detection risk: the risk that the practitioner will not detect a material
misstatement that exists.
The degree to which the practitioner considers each of these components is
affected by the engagement circumstances, in particular by the nature of the
subject matter and whether a reasonable assurance or a limited assurance
engagement is being performed.
Nature, Timing and Extent of Evidence-gathering Procedures
49. The exact nature, timing and extent of evidence-gathering
Framework III-20
procedures will vary from one engagement to the next. In theory, infinite
variations in evidence-gathering procedures are possible. In practice,
however, these are difficult to communicate clearly and unambiguously.
The practitioner attempts to communicate them clearly and
unambiguously and uses the form appropriate to a reasonable assurance
engagement or a limited assurance engagement.
10

50. Reasonable assurance is a concept relating to accumulating evidence
necessary for the practitioner to conclude in relation to the subject matter
information taken as a whole. To be in a position to express a conclusion in
the positive form required in a reasonable assurance engagement, it is
necessary for the practitioner to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence as
part of an iterative, systematic engagement process involving:
(a) Obtaining an understanding of the subject matter and other
engagement circumstances which, depending on the subject matter,
includes obtaining an understanding of internal control;
(b) Based on that understanding, assessing the risks that the subject
matter information may be materially misstated;
(c) Responding to assessed risks, including developing overall
responses, and determining the nature, timing and extent of further
procedures;
(d) Performing further procedures clearly linked to the identified risks,
using a combination of inspection, observation, confirmation,
recalculation, re-performance, analytical procedures and inquiry. Such
further procedures involve substantive procedures including, where
applicable, obtaining corroborating information from sources
independent of the responsible party, and depending on the nature of
the subject matter, tests of the operating effectiveness of controls; and
(e) Evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence.
51. Reasonable assurance is less than absolute assurance. Reducing
assurance engagement risk to zero is very rarely attainable or cost beneficial
as a result of factors such as the following:

10
Where the subject matter information is made up of a number of aspects, separate conclusions
may be provided on each aspect. While not all such conclusions need to relate to the same level of
evidence-gathering procedures, each conclusion is expressed in the form that is appropriate to
either a reasonable assurance or a limited assurance engagement.
Framework III-21
The use of selective testing.
The inherent limitations of internal control.
The fact that much of the evidence available to the practitioner is
persuasive rather than conclusive.
The use of judgment in gathering and evaluating evidence and
forming conclusions based on that evidence.
In some cases, the characteristics of the subject matter when
evaluated or measured against the identified criteria.
52. Both reasonable assurance and limited assurance engagements require
the application of assurance skills and techniques and the gathering of
sufficient appropriate evidence as part of an iterative, systematic
engagement process that includes obtaining an understanding of the subject
matter and other engagement circumstances. The nature, timing and extent
of procedures for gathering sufficient appropriate evidence in a limited
assurance engagement are, however, deliberately limited relative to a
reasonable assurance engagement. For some subject matters, there may be
specific pronouncements to provide guidance on procedures for gathering
sufficient appropriate evidence for a limited assurance engagement. For
example, SRE 2400
11
, Engagements to Review Financial Statements
establishes that sufficient appropriate evidence for reviews of financial
statements is obtained primarily through analytical procedures and inquiries.
In the absence of a relevant pronouncement, the procedures for gathering
sufficient appropriate evidence will vary with the circumstances of the
engagement, in particular, the subject matter, and the needs of the intended
users and the engaging party, including relevant time and cost constraints.
For both reasonable assurance and limited assurance engagements, if the
practitioner becomes aware of a matter that leads the practitioner to question
whether a material modification should be made to the subject matter
information, the practitioner pursues the matter by performing other
procedures sufficient to enable the practitioner to report.
Quantity and Quality of Available Evidence
53. The quantity or quality of available evidence is affected by:

11
Hitherto known as AAS 33, Engagements to Review Financial Statements.
Framework III-22
(a) The characteristics of the subject matter and subject matter
information. For example, less objective evidence might be expected
when information about the subject matter is future-oriented rather
than historical (see paragraph 31); and
(b) Circumstances of the engagement other than the characteristics of the
subject matter, when evidence that could reasonably be expected to
exist is not available because of, for example, the timing of the
practitioners appointment, an entitys document retention policy, or a
restriction imposed by the responsible party.
Ordinarily, available evidence will be persuasive rather than conclusive.
54. An unqualified conclusion is not appropriate for either type of assurance
engagement in the case of a material limitation on the scope of the
practitioners work, that is, when:
(a) Circumstances prevent the practitioner from obtaining evidence
required to reduce assurance engagement risk to the appropriate
level; or
(b) The responsible party or the engaging party imposes a restriction that
prevents the practitioner from obtaining evidence required to reduce
assurance engagement risk to the appropriate level.
Assurance Report
55. The practitioner provides a written report containing a conclusion that
conveys the assurance obtained about the subject matter information. SAs,
SREs and SAEs establish basic elements for assurance reports. In addition,
the practitioner considers other reporting responsibilities, including
communicating with those charged with governance when it is appropriate to
do so.
56. In an assertion-based engagement, the practitioners conclusion can be
worded either:
(a) In terms of the responsible partys assertion (for example: In our
opinion the responsible partys assertion that internal control is
effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ criteria, is fairly
stated); or
(b) Directly in terms of the subject matter and the criteria (for example: In
Framework III-23
our opinion internal control is effective, in all material respects, based
on XYZ criteria).
In a direct reporting engagement, the practitioners conclusion is worded
directly in terms of the subject matter and the criteria.
57. In a reasonable assurance engagement, the practitioner expresses the
conclusion in the positive form, for example: In our opinion internal control is
effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ criteria. This form of
expression conveys reasonable assurance. Having performed evidence-
gathering procedures of a nature, timing and extent that were reasonable
given the characteristics of the subject matter and other relevant
engagement circumstances described in the assurance report, the
practitioner has obtained sufficient appropriate evidence to reduce assurance
engagement risk to an acceptably low level.
58. In a limited assurance engagement, the practitioner expresses the
conclusion in the negative form, for example, based on our work described
in this report, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that
internal control is not effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ
criteria. This form of expression conveys a level of limited assurance that
is proportional to the level of the practitioners evidence-gathering
procedures given the characteristics of the subject matter and other
engagement circumstances described in the assurance report.
59. A practitioner does not express an unqualified conclusion for either type
of assurance engagement when the following circumstances exist and, in the
practitioners judgment, the effect of the matter is or may be material:
(a) There is a limitation on the scope of the practitioners work (see
paragraph 54). The practitioner expresses a qualified conclusion or a
disclaimer of conclusion depending on how material or pervasive the
limitation is. In some cases the practitioner considers withdrawing
from the engagement.
(b) In those cases where:
(i) The practitioners conclusion is worded in terms of the
responsible partys assertion, and that assertion is not fairly
stated, in all material respects; or
(ii) The practitioners conclusion is worded directly in terms of the
subject matter and the criteria, and the subject matter
Framework III-24
information is materially misstated,
12

The practitioner expresses a qualified or adverse conclusion depending on
how material or pervasive the matter is.
(c) When it is discovered after the engagement has been accepted, that
the criteria are unsuitable or the subject matter is not appropriate for
an assurance engagement. The practitioner expresses:
(i) A qualified conclusion or adverse conclusion depending on how
material or pervasive the matter is, when the unsuitable criteria
or inappropriate subject matter is likely to mislead the intended
users; or
(ii) A qualified conclusion or a disclaimer of conclusion depending
on how material or pervasive the matter is, in other cases.
In some cases, the practitioner considers withdrawing from the engagement.
Inappropriate Use of the Practitioners Name
60. A practitioner is associated with a subject matter when the practitioner
reports on information about that subject matter or consents to the use of the
practitioners name in a professional connection with that subject matter. If
the practitioner is not associated in this manner, third parties can assume no
responsibility of the practitioner. If the practitioner learns that a party is
inappropriately using the practitioners name in association with a subject
matter, the practitioner requires the party to cease doing so. The practitioner
also considers what other steps may be needed, such as informing any
known third party users of the inappropriate use of the practitioners name or
seeking legal advice.

12
In those direct reporting engagements where the subject matter information is presented only in
the practitioners conclusion, and the practitioner concludes that the subject matter does not, in all
material respects, conform with the criteria, for example: In our opinion, except for [], internal
control is effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ criteria, such a conclusion would also
be considered to be qualified (or adverse as appropriate).
Framework III-25
Material Modifications to International Framework for
Deletions
1. The International Framework issued by the IAASB specifically makes
it clear that such Framework is also relevant to professional
accountants in public sector. However, since the Standards,
Statements, General Clarifications and Guidance Notes issued by the
ICAI are equally applicable in case of all engagements, irrespective of
the form, nature and size of the entity, this Framework does not
specifically mention that aspect.
2. Paragraph 6 of the International Framework issued by the IAASB
refers to Part B of the International Code of Ethics regarding threats to
independence, accepted safeguards and the public interest, which is
applicable to professional accountants in public practice, has been
deleted since the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI is woven around
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules annexed thereto.
Framework III-26
Appendix
Differences Between
Reasonable Assurance Engagements
and Limited Assurance Engagements
This Appendix outlines the differences between a reasonable assurance
engagement and a limited assurance engagement discussed in the Framework
(see in particular the referenced paragraphs).

Type of
Engage-
ment
Objective Evidence-gathering procedures
13
The
Assurance
Report
Reasonable
Assurance
Engagement
A reduction in
assurance
engagement
risk to an
acceptably
low level in
the
circumstance
s of the
engagement
as the basis
for a positive
form of
expression of
the
practitioners
conclusion
(Paragraph
10)
Sufficient appropriate evidence
is obtained as part of a
systematic engagement
process that includes:
Obtaining an understanding of
the engagement
circumstances;
Assessing risks;
Responding to assessed risks;
Performing further procedures
using a combination of
inspection, observation,
confirmation, recalculation, re-
performance, analytical
procedures and inquiry. Such
further procedures involve
substantive procedures,
including, where applicable,
obtaining corroborating
information, and depending on
the nature of the subject
matter, tests of the operating
effectiveness of controls; and
Description
of the
engage-
ment
circum-
stances and
a positive
form of
expression
of the
conclusion
(Paragraph
57)

13
A detailed discussion of evidence-gathering requirement is only possible within SAEs for specific
subject matters.
Framework III-27
Evaluating the evidence
obtained (Paragraphs 50 and
51)
Limited
Assurance
Engagement
A reduction in
assurance
engagement
risk to a level
that is
acceptable in
the
circumstance
s of the
engagement
but where that
risk is greater
than for a
reasonable
assurance
engagement,
as the basis
for a negative
form of
expression of
the
practitioners
conclusion
(Paragraph
10)
Sufficient appropriate evidence is
obtained as part of a systematic
engagement process that includes
obtaining an understanding of the
subject matter and other
engagement circumstances, but in
which procedures are deliberately
limited relative to reasonable
assurance engagement (Paragraph
52)
Description
of the
engage-
ment
circum-
stances,
and a
negative
form of
expression
of the
conclusion
(Paragraph
58)

Back

SA 200 (AAS 1)
BASIC PRINCIPLES GOVERNING AN AUDIT
(Effective for all audits relating to
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Integrity, Objectivity and Independence............................................... 5
Confidentiality ......................................................................................... 6
Skills and Competence........................................................................7-8
Work Performed by Others ...............................................................9-10
Documentation ...................................................................................... 11
Planning ............................................................................................12-14
Audit Evidence .................................................................................15-17
Accounting System and Internal Control ......................................18-20
Audit Conclusions and Reporting..................................................21-23
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 24

Standard on Auditing (SA) 200
*
, Basic Principles Governing an Auditshould
be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control,
Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services
1
, which sets out
the authority of SAs.

*
Issued in April, 1985.
1
Back
SA 200 IV-2
Introduction
1. This Standard describes the basic principles which govern the auditors
professional responsibilities and which should be complied with whenever an
audit is carried out.
2. An audit is the independent examination of financial information of any
entity, whether profit oriented or not, and irrespective of its size or legal form,
when such an examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion
thereon
2
. In this Standard, the term financial information encompasses
financial statements.
3. Other Standards on Auditing to be issued by the Institute will elaborate
on the principles set out herein to give guidance on auditing procedures and
reporting practices.
4. Compliance with the basic principles requires the application of auditing
procedures and reporting practices appropriate to the particular
circumstances.
Integrity, Objectivity and Independence
5. The auditor should be straightforward, honest and sincere in his approach
to his professional work. He must be fair and must not allow prejudice or bias
to override his objectivity. He should maintain an impartial attitude and both be
and appear to be free of any interest which might be regarded, whatever its
actual effect, as being incompatible with integrity and objectivity.

2
.Para 3.1 of the Preface to the Statement on Standard Auditing Practices issued by the Council
of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India in 1982 states as follows:
3.1 The SAPs will apply whenever an independent audit is carried out; that is, in the
independent examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit oriented or not,
and irrespective of its size, or legal form (unless specified otherwise) when such an
examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion thereon. The SAPs may also
have application as appropriate, to other related functions of auditors.
The said Preface has been withdrawn pursuant to issuance of the Revised Preface to Standards
on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Service, by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India. The Revised Preface is effective from April 1, 2008. The text of
the revised Preface is reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.
Basic Principles Governing an Audit
SA 200 IV-3
Confidentiality
6. The auditor should respect the confidentiality of information acquired in
the course of his work and should not disclose any such information to a third
party without specific authority or unless there is a legal or professional duty
to disclose.
Skills and Competence
7. The audit should be performed and the report should be prepared with
due professional care by persons who have adequate training, experience
and competence in auditing.
8. The auditor requires specialised skills and competence which are
acquired through a combination of general education, technical knowledge
obtained through study and formal courses concluded by a qualifying
examination recognised for this purpose and practical experience under
proper supervision. In addition, the auditor requires a continuing awareness
of developments including pronouncements of ICAI on accounting and
auditing matters, and relevant regulations and statutory requirements.
Work Performed by Others
9. When the auditor delegates work to assistants or uses work performed by
other auditors and experts, he will continue to be responsible for forming and
expressing his opinion on the financial information. However, he will be entitled
to rely on work performed by others, provided he exercises adequate skill and
care and is not aware of any reason to believe that he should not have so
relied. In the case of any independent statutory appointment to perform the
work on which the auditor has to rely in forming his opinion, such as in the
case of the work of branch auditors appointed under the Companies Act, 1956,
the auditors report should expressly state the fact of such reliance.
10. The auditor should carefully direct, supervise and review work
delegated to assistants. The auditor should obtain reasonable assurance that
work performed by other auditors or experts is adequate for his purpose.
SA 200 IV-4
Documentation
11. The auditor should document matters which are important in providing
evidence that the audit was carried out in accordance with the basic
principles.
Planning
12. The auditor should plan his work to enable him to conduct an effective
audit in an efficient and timely manner. Plans should be based on a
knowledge of the clients business.
13. Plans should be made to cover, among other things:
(a) acquiring knowledge of the clients accounting system, policies and
internal control procedures;
(b) establishing the expected degree of reliance to be placed on
internal control;
(c) determining and programming the nature, timing, and extent of the
audit procedures to be performed; and
(d) coordinating the work to be performed.
14. Plans should be further developed and revised as necessary during the
course of the audit.
Audit Evidence
15. The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence through
the performance of compliance and substantive procedures to enable him to
draw reasonable conclusions therefrom on which to base his opinion on the
financial information.
16. Compliance procedures are tests designed to obtain reasonable
assurance that those internal controls on which audit reliance is to be placed
are in effect.
17. Substantive procedures are designed to obtain evidence as to the
completeness, accuracy and validity of the data produced by the accounting
system.

Basic Principles Governing an Audit
SA 200 IV-5
They are of two types:
(i) tests of details of transactions and balances;
(ii) analysis of significant ratios and trends including the resulting enquiry of
unusual fluctuations and items.
Accounting Systemand Internal Control
18. Management is responsible for maintaining an adequate accounting
system incorporating various internal controls to the extent appropriate to the
size and nature of the business. The auditor should reasonably assure
himself that the accounting system is adequate and that all the accounting
information which should be recorded has in fact been recorded. Internal
controls normally contribute to such assurance.
19. The auditor should gain an understanding of the accounting system and
related internal controls and should study and evaluate the operation of
those internal controls upon which he wishes to rely in determining the
nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures.
20. Where the auditor concludes that he can rely on certain internal
controls, his substantive procedures would normally be less extensive than
would otherwise be required and may also differ as to their nature and timing.
Audit Conclusions and Reporting
21. The auditor should review and assess the conclusions drawn from the
audit evidence obtained and from his knowledge of business of the entity as
the basis for the expression of his opinion on the financial information. This
review and assessment involves forming an overall conclusion as to whether:
(a) the financial information has been prepared using acceptable
accounting policies, which have been consistently applied;
(b) the financial information complies with relevant regulations and
statutory requirements;
(c) there is adequate disclosure of all material matters relevant to the
proper presentation of the financial information, subject to statutory
requirements, where applicable.
22. The audit report should contain a clear written expression of opinion on
the financial information and if the form or content of the report is laid down
SA 200 IV-6
in or prescribed under any agreement or statute or regulation, the audit
report should comply with such requirements. An unqualified opinion
indicates the auditors satisfaction in all material respects with the matters
dealt with in paragraph 21 or as may be laid down or prescribed under the
relevant agreement or statute or regulation, as the case may be.
23. When a qualified opinion, adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion is
to be given or reservation of opinion on any matter is to be made, the audit
report should state the reasons therefor.
Effective Date
24. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all audits relating to
accounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 1985.
Back

SA 200A (AAS 2)
OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF
THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Objective of an Audit ...........................................................................2-3
Responsibility for the Financial Statements ........................................ 4
Scope of an Audit...............................................................................5-13
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 14

Standard on Auditing (SA) 200A
*
, Objective and Scope of the Audit of
Financial Statementsshould be read in the context of the Preface to the
Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and
Related Services
1
, which sets out the authority of SAs.

*
1
Back
SA 200A IV-8
Introduction
1. This Standard describes the overall objective and scope of the audit of
general purpose financial statements of an enterprise by an independent
auditor. According to para 3.3 of the Preface to the Statements of Accounting
Standards
2
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the term
General Purpose Financial Statements includes balance sheet, statement of
profit and loss and other statements and explanatory notes which form part
thereof, issued for the use of shareholders/members, creditors, employees and
public at large. References to financial statements in this Standard should be
construed to refer to general purpose financial statements.
Objective of an Audit
2. The objective of an audit of financial statements, prepared within a
framework of recognised accounting policies and practices and relevant
statutory requirements, if any, is to enable an auditor to express an opinion
on such financial statements.
3. The auditors opinion helps determination of the true and fair view of the
financial position and operating results of an enterprise. The user, however,
should not assume that the auditors opinion is an assurance as to the future
viability of the enterprise or the efficiency or effectiveness with which
management has conducted the affairs of the enterprise.
Responsibility for the Financial Statements
4. While the auditor is responsible for forming and expressing his opinion
on the financial statements, the responsibility for their preparation is that of
the management of the enterprise. Managements responsibilities include the
maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls, the
selection and application of accounting policies and the safeguarding of the
assets of the enterprise. The audit of the financial statements does not
relieve management of its responsibilities.
Scope of an Audit
5. The scope of an audit of financial statements will be determined by the

2
The Preface to Statements of Accounting Standards issued in 1979 has been withdrawn
pursuant to issuance of Revised Preface issued in 2004. The aspects relating to para 3.3. of
original Preface are dealt by para 3.4 of the said Revised Preface, according to which General
Purpose Financial Statements also includes Cash Flow Statements.
Objective and Scope of the Audit of Financial Statements
SA 200A IV-9
auditor having regard to the terms of the engagement, the requirements of
relevant legislation and the pronouncements of the Institute. The terms of
engagement cannot, however, restrict the scope of an audit in relation to matters
which are prescribed by legislation or by the pronouncements of the Institute.
6. The audit should be organised to cover adequately all aspects of the
enterprise as far as they are relevant to the financial statements being
audited. To form an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor should
be reasonably satisfied as to whether the information contained in the
underlying accounting records and other source data is reliable and sufficient
as the basis for the preparation of the financial statements. In forming his
opinion, the auditor should also decide whether the relevant information is
properly disclosed in the financial statements subject to statutory
7. The auditor assesses the reliability and sufficiency of the information
contained in the underlying accounting records and other source data by:
(a) making a study and evaluation of accounting systems and internal
controls on which he wishes to rely and testing those internal controls to
determine the nature, extent and timing of other auditing procedures; and
(b) carrying out such other tests, enquiries and other verification
procedures of accounting transactions and account balances as he
considers appropriate in the particular circumstances.
8. The auditor determines whether the relevant information is properly
disclosed in the financial statements by:
(a) comparing the financial statements with the underlying accounting
records and other source data to see whether they properly summarise
the transactions and events recorded therein; and
(b) considering the judgements that management has made in preparing
the financial statements; accordingly, the auditor assesses the selection
and consistent application of accounting policies, the manner in which
the information has been classified, and the adequacy of disclosure.
9. The auditors work involves exercise of judgement, for example, in
deciding the extent of audit procedures and in assessing the reasonableness
of the judgements and estimates made by management in preparing the
financial statements. Furthermore, much of the evidence available to the
auditor can enable him to draw only reasonable conclusions therefrom.
Because of these factors, absolute certainty in auditing is rarely attainable.

SA 200A IV-10
10. In forming his opinion on the financial statements, the auditor follows
procedures designed to satisfy himself that the financial statements reflect a
true and fair view of the financial position and operating results of the
enterprise. The auditor recognises that because of the test nature and other
inherent limitations of an audit, together with the inherent limitations of any
system of internal control, there is an unavoidable risk that some material
misstatement may remain undiscovered. While in many situations the
discovery of a material misstatement by management may often arise during
the conduct of the audit, such discovery is not the main objective of audit nor
is the auditors programme of work specifically designed for such discovery.
The audit cannot, therefore, be relied upon to ensure the discovery of all
frauds or errors but where the auditor has any indication that some fraud or
error may have occurred which could result in material misstatement, the
auditor should extend his procedures to confirm or dispel his suspicions.
11. The auditor is primarily concerned with items which either individually or
as a group are material in relation to the affairs of an enterprise. However, it
is difficult to lay down any definite standard by which materiality can be
judged. Material items are those which might influence the decisions of the
user of the financial statements
3
. It is a matter in which a decision is arrived
at on the basis of the auditors professional experience and judgement.
12. The auditor is not expected to perform duties which fall outside the
scope of his competence. For example, the professional skill required of an
auditor does not include that of a technical expert for determining physical
condition of certain assets.
13. Constraints on the scope of the audit of financial statements that impair
the auditors ability to express an unqualified opinion on such financial
statements should be set out in his report, and a qualified opinion or
disclaimer of opinion should be expressed, as appropriate.
Effective Date

3
Accounting Standard (AS) 1, Disclosure of Accounting Policies issued by the Council of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Back

SA 210 (AAS 26)
TERMS OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENT
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Audit Engagement Letters ..................................................................5-9
Recurring Audits ..............................................................................10-11
Acceptance of a Change in Engagement ......................................12-19
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 20
Appendix

, Terms of Audit Engagement should be

read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control,
1
, which sets out
the authority of SAs. Fromthe date this Standard on Auditing becomes
effective, the Guidance Note on Audit Engagement Letters issued by the
Institute shall stand withdrawn.

Issued in January, 2003.

1
Back
SA 210 IV-12
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Auditing (SA) is to establish standards on:
(a) agreeing the terms of the engagement with the client; and
(b) the auditor's response to a request by a client to change the terms
of an engagement to one that provides a lower level of assurance
2
.
2. The auditor and the client should agree on the terms of the
engagement. The agreed terms would need to be recorded in an audit
engagement letter or other suitable form of contract.
3. This SA is intended to assist the auditor in the preparation of
engagement letters relating to audits of financial statements. The Standard
is also applicable to related services. When other services such as tax,
accounting, or management consultancy and other services
3
are to be
provided, separate letters may be appropriate.
4. Though the objective and scope of an audit and the auditor's obligations
are, normally, laid down in the applicable statute or regulations and the
pronouncements of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the audit
engagement letters would be informative for the clients.
Audit Engagement Letters
5. In the interest of both client and auditor, the auditor should send
an engagement letter, preferably before the commencement of the
engagement, to help avoid any misunderstandings with respect to the
engagement. The engagement letter documents and confirms the auditor's
acceptance of the appointment, the objective and scope of the audit and the
extent of the auditor's responsibilities to the client.
Principal Contents
6. The form and content of audit engagement letter may vary for each

2
Refer to Framework of Statements on Standard Auditing Practices and Guidance Notes on
Related Services issued in July, 2001 for the meaning of the term assurance and the type of
engagements that provide a lower level of assurance than an audit.
(The readers may note that the Framework issued in 2001 has been withdrawn pursuant to the
issuance of the Framework for Assurance Engagements, by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, in J uly, 2007. The Revised Framework is applicable fromApril 1, 2008. The
text of the Revised Framework is reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.)
3
Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India defines the term
"management consultancy and other services".
Terms of Audit Engagement
SA 210 IV-13
client, but it would generally include reference to:
The objective of the audit of financial statements.
Managements responsibility for the financial statements.
Management's responsibility for selection and consistent application of
appropriate accounting policies, including implementation of the
applicable accounting standards alongwith proper explanation relating to
material departures from those accounting standards.
Managements responsibility for preparation of the financial statements
on a going concern basis.
Managements responsibility for making judgements and estimates that
are reasonable and prudent so as to give a true and fair view of the state
of affairs of the entity at the end of the financial year and of the profit or
loss of the entity for that period.
Management's responsibility for the maintenance of adequate
accounting records and internal controls for safeguarding the assets of
the company and for preventing and detecting fraud or other
irregularities.
The scope of the audit, including reference to the applicable legislation,
regulations, and the pronouncements of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India.
The fact that having regard to the test nature of an audit, persuasive rather
than conclusive nature of audit evidence together with inherent limitations
of any accounting and internal control system, there is an unavoidable risk
that even some material misstatements, resulting from fraud, and to a
lesser extent error, if either exists, may remain undetected.
Unrestricted access to whatever records, documentation and other
information requested in connection with the audit.
The fact that the audit process may be subjected to a peer review under
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
7. The auditor may also include the following matters in the engagement
letter:
Arrangements regarding the planning of the audit.
Expectation of receiving from management written confirmation
concerning representations made in connection with the audit.
Request for the client to confirm the terms of the engagement by
acknowledging receipt of the engagement letter.
SA 210 IV-14
Description of any other letters or reports the auditor expects to issue to
the client.
Basis on which fees are computed and any billing arrangements.
8. When relevant, the following points could also be included in the
engagement letter:
Arrangements concerning the involvement of other auditors and experts
in some aspects of the audit.
Arrangements concerning the involvement of internal auditors and other
staff of the client.
Arrangements to be made with the predecessor auditor, if any, in the
case of an initial audit, i.e., when the financial statements for the
preceding period were audited by another auditor.
Any restriction of the auditor's liability when such possibility exists.
A reference to any further agreements between the auditor and the client.
An example of an engagement letter for audit under a statute is set out in the
Appendix
4
.
Audit of Components
9. When the auditor of a parent entity is also the auditor of its subsidiary,
branch or division (component), the factors that influence the decision
whether to send a separate engagement letter to the component include:
Who appoints the auditor of the component?
Whether a separate audit report is to be issued on the component.
Legal requirements.
The extent of any work performed by other auditors.
Degree of ownership by parent.
Degree of independence of the management of the component.
Recurring Audits
10. On recurring audits, the auditor should consider whether

4
The formats of the engagement letters to be issued in case of compilation, agreed upon
procedures or review are given in the Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4410, Engagements to
Compile Financial Information; SRS 4400, Engagements to Perform Agreed Upon Procedures
Regarding Financial Information, and Standard on Review Engagements (SRE) 2400,
Engagements to Review Financial Statements, respectively.
SA 210 IV-15
circumstances require the terms of the engagement to be revised and
whether there is a need to remind the client of the existing terms of the
engagement.
11. The auditor may decide not to send a new engagement letter each
period. However, the following factors may make it appropriate to send a new
letter:
Any indication that the client misunderstands the objective and scope of
the audit.
Any revised or special terms of the engagement.
A recent change of senior management, board of directors or ownership.
A significant change in nature or size of the client's business.
Legal requirements or pronouncements of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, or changes in the existing ones.
Acceptance of a Change in Engagement
12. An auditor who, before the completion of the engagement, is
requested to change the engagement to one which provides a lower
level of assurance, should consider the appropriateness of doing so.
13. A request from the client for the auditor to change the engagement may
result from a change in circumstances affecting the need for the service, a
misunderstanding as to the nature of an audit or related service originally
requested or a restriction on the scope of the engagement, whether imposed
by management or caused by circumstances. The auditor would consider
carefully the reason given for the request, particularly the implications of a
restriction on the scope of the engagement.
14. A change in circumstances that affects the entity's requirements or a
misunderstanding concerning the nature of service originally requested
would ordinarily be considered a reasonable basis for requesting a change in
the engagement. In contrast, a change would not be considered reasonable if
it appears that the change relates to information that is incorrect, incomplete
or otherwise unsatisfactory.
15. Before agreeing to change an audit engagement to a related service, an
auditor who was engaged to perform an audit in accordance with SAs would
consider, in addition to the above matters, any legal or contractual
implications of the change.
SA 210 IV-16
16. If the auditor concludes that there is reasonable justification to change
the engagement and if the audit work performed complies with the SAs
applicable to the changed engagement, the report issued would be that
appropriate for the revised terms of engagement. In order to avoid confusion,
the report would not include reference to:
(a) the original engagement; or
(b) any procedures that may have been performed in the original
engagement, except where the engagement is changed to an
engagement to undertake agreed-upon procedures and thus reference
to the procedures performed is a normal part of the report.
17. Where the terms of the engagement are changed, the auditor and
the client should agree on the newterms.
18. The auditor should not agree to a change of engagement where
there is no reasonable justification for doing so. An example might be an
audit engagement where the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence regarding receivables and the client asks for the engagement
to be changed to a review engagement to avoid a qualified, adverse or a
disclaimer of opinion.
19. If the auditor is unable to agree to a change of the engagement and
is not permitted to continue the original engagement, the auditor should
withdraw and consider whether there is any obligation, either
contractual or otherwise, to report the circumstances necessitating the
withdrawal to other parties, such as the board of directors or
shareholders.
Effective Date
accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2003.
Compatibility with International Standard on Auditing (ISA)
210
The auditing standards established in this SA are generally consistent in all
material respects with those set out in ISA 210 Terms of Audit
Engagements".
SA 210 IV-17
Appendix
Example of an Engagement Letter for an Audit under a
Statute
5

{The following letter is for use as a guide in conjunction with the
considerations outlined in this SA and will need to be varied according to
individual requirements and circumstances relevant to the engagement. This
Appendix does not formpart of the Standard.}
To the Board of Directors (or the appropriate representative of senior
management).
You have requested that we audit the balance sheet of (Name of the
Company) as at 31
st
March, 2XXX and the related profit and loss account
and the (cash flow statement)
6
for the year ended on that date. We are
pleased to confirm our acceptance and our understanding of this
engagement by means of this letter. Our audit will be conducted with the
objective of our expressing an opinion on the financial statements.
We will conduct our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally
accepted in India and with the requirements of the Companies Act, 1956.
Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation.
However, having regard to the test nature of an audit, persuasive rather than
conclusive nature of audit evidence together with inherent limitations of any
accounting and internal control system, there is an unavoidable risk that
even some material misstatements of financial statements, resulting from
fraud, and to a lesser extent error, if either exists, may remain undetected.
In addition to our report on the financial statements, we expect to provide you
with a separate letter concerning any material weaknesses in accounting and
internal control systems which might come to our notice.
The responsibility for the preparation of financial statements on a going
concern basis is that of the management. The management is also
responsible for selection and consistent application of appropriate accounting
policies, including implementation of applicable accounting standards along

5
In this illustration, the Companies Act, 1956.
6
Only in cases where relevant.
SA 210 IV-18
with proper explanation relating to any material departures from those
accounting standards. The management is also responsible for making
judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent so as to give a
true and fair view of the state of affairs of the entity at the end of the financial
year and of the profit or loss of the entity for that period.
The responsibility of the management also includes the maintenance of
adequate accounting records and internal controls for safeguarding of the
assets of the company and for the preventing and detecting fraud or other
irregularities. As part of our audit process, we will request from management
written confirmation concerning representations made to us in connection
with the audit.
We also wish to invite your attention to the fact that our audit process is
subject to 'peer review' under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The
reviewer may examine our working papers during the course of the peer
review.
We look forward to full cooperation with your staff and we trust that they will
make available to us whatever records; documentation and other information
are requested in connection with our audit.
Our fees will be billed as the work progresses.
This letter will be effective for future years unless it is terminated, amended
or superseded.
Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to indicate that it is in
accordance with your understanding of the arrangements for our audit of the
XYZ & Co.
Chartered Accountants

(Signature)
Date : (Name of the Member)
Place : (Designation
7
)
Acknowledged on behalf of
ABC Company by
..

(Signature)
Name and Designation
Date

7
Partner or proprietor, as the case may be.
Back
SA 210 IV-19
GENERAL CLARIFICATION
(GC)AASB/2/2004 ON SA 210
Standard on Auditing (SA) 210, Terms of Audit
Engagement
{The following is the General Clarification (GC)AASB/2/2004 issued by the
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India on Standard on Auditing (SA) 210, Terms of Audit
Engagement.}
1. The Standard on Auditing (SA) 210, Terms of Audit Engagement was
issued with a view to establish standards on:
(a) agreeing the terms of the engagement with the client; and
(b) the auditor's response to a request by a client to change the terms of an
engagement to one that provides a lower level of assurance.
2. A question that arises is whether it is necessary that the engagement
letter issued by the auditor should be acknowledged by addressee and
returned to the auditor to indicate that the clients understanding of the terms
of the engagement is in accordance with the engagement letter issued by the
auditor and to establish that the auditor has complied with the requirements
of the Standard in so far as they are related to sending the audit engagement
letter.
3. Paragraphs 2 through 4 of SA 210 provide as follows:
2. The auditor and the client should agree on the terms of
the engagement. The agreed terms would need to be recorded in
an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of contract.
3. This SA is intended to assist the auditor in the preparation of
engagement letters relating to audits of financial statements. The
Standard is also applicable to related services. When other
services such as tax, accounting, or management consultancy and
other services are to be provided, separate letters may be
appropriate.
4. Though the objective and scope of an audit and the auditor's
obligations are, normally, laid down in the applicable statute or
regulations and the pronouncements of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, the audit engagement letters would be
informative for the clients.

Back
SA 210 IV-20
4. From the above it is clear that the basic purpose of issuing an
engagement letter is that the auditor and the client should agree on the terms
of the engagement. The auditor and the client are normally considered to be
agreeing on the terms of the engagement if the objective and scope of an
audit and the auditor's obligations are laid down in the statute or regulations
governing the engagement. Examples of such engagements include audit
under section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, audit of public sector banks,
etc. In such cases, it is not necessary that the engagement letter sent by the
auditor in accordance with paragraph 5 of SA 210 is acknowledged by the
addressee and returned to the auditor to establish that the clients
understanding of the terms of the engagement is in accordance with the
engagement letter issued by the auditor. It shall be sufficient compliance with
the requirements related to sending the audit engagement letter, if an
engagement letter is appropriately delivered to the client and the auditor
retains the evidence for such delivery. In such cases, the audit engagement
letters would be informative for the clients.
5. If, however, the client seeks any further explanations or clarification in
regard to any terms, conditions or other contents of the engagement letter
issued, it might indicate that there exists a difference in understanding of the
terms of audit engagement either on the part of the client or on the part of the
auditor. The auditor, in such cases, should take necessary steps to resolve
the issues, for example by appropriately replying to the issues raised by the
client. It is also desirable that the auditor documents the evidence indicating
that the issues are settled and the client and auditor agree on the terms of
the engagement.
6. There may be certain engagements where the objective and scope of
the engagement and the auditor's obligations are not laid down in the
applicable statute or regulations. In such situations, the auditor should
request the client that a copy of the engagement letter be acknowledged by
the addressee and returned to the auditor to establish:
(a) that the clients understanding of the arrangements for the engagement
is in accordance with the engagement letter issued by the auditor; and
(b) that the auditor has complied with the requirements of the standard in
so far as they are related to sending the audit engagement letter.
Back

SA 220 (AAS 17)
QUALITY CONTROL FOR AUDIT WORK
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
Audit Firm .............................................................................................4-7
Individual Audits ................................................................................8-17
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 18

*
, Quality Control for Audit Work should be
1
, which sets out
the authority of SAs. From the date this Standard on Auditing becomes
effective, the Guidance Note on Control of the Quality of Audit Work issued
by the Institute shall stand withdrawn.

*
1
Back
SA 220 IV-22
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Auditing (SA) is to establish standards
on the quality control:
(a) policies and procedures of an audit firm regarding audit work generally; and
(b) procedures regarding the work delegated to assistants on an individual
audit.
2. Quality control policies and procedures should be implemented at
both the level of the audit firmand on individual audits.
3. In this SA, the following terms have the meaning attributed below:
(a) "the auditor" means the person with final responsibility for the audit;
(b) "audit firm" means either the partners of a firm providing audit services
or a sole practitioner providing audit services, as appropriate;
(c) "personnel" means all partners and professional staff engaged in the
audit practice of the firm; and
(d) "assistants" means personnel involved in an individual audit other than
the auditor.
Audit Firm
4. The audit firm should implement quality control policies and
procedures designed to ensure that all audits are conducted in
accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs).
5. Compliance with Standards on Auditing (SAs) is essential whenever an
audit is carried out and requires the application of auditing procedures and
reporting practices appropriate to the particular circumstances. An audit firm
needs to implement appropriate quality control policies and procedures to
ensure that all audits are carried out in accordance with Standards on
Auditing (SAs).
6. The objectives of the quality control policies to be adopted by an audit
firm will ordinarily incorporate the following:
(a) Professional Requirements: Personnel in the firm are to adhere to
the principles of Independence, Integrity, Objectivity, Confidentiality and
Professional Behavior.
Quality Control for Audit Work
SA 220 IV-23
(b) Skills and Competence
2
: The firm is to be staffed by personnel who
have attained and maintain the Technical Standards and Professional
Competence required to enable them to fulfil their responsibilities with
Due Care.
(c) Assignment: Audit work is to be assigned to personnel who have the
degree of technical training and proficiency required in the
circumstances.
(d) Delegation: There is to be sufficient direction, supervision and review
of work at all levels to provide reasonable assurance that the work
performed meets appropriate standards of quality.
(e) Consultation: Whenever necessary, consultation within or outside the
firm is to occur with those who have appropriate expertise.
(f) Acceptance and Retention of Clients: An evaluation of prospective
clients and a review, on an ongoing basis, of existing clients is to be
conducted. In making a decision to accept or retain a client, the firm's
independence and ability to serve the client properly are to be
considered.
(g) Monitoring: The continued adequacy and operational effectiveness of
quality control policies and procedures is to be monitored.
7. The firm's general quality control policies and procedures should
be communicated to its personnel in a manner that provides reasonable
assurance that the policies and procedures are understood and
implemented.
Individual Audits
8. The auditor should implement those quality control procedures
which are, in the context of the policies and procedures of the firm,
appropriate to the individual audit.
9. The auditor, and assistants with supervisory responsibilities, will
consider the professional competence of assistants performing work
delegated to them when deciding the extent of direction, supervision and
review appropriate for each assistant.

2
Refer to SA 200, Basic Principles Governing an Audit.
SA 220 IV-24
10. Any delegation of work to assistants would be in a manner that provides
reasonable assurance that such work will be performed with due care by
persons having the degree of professional competence required in the
circumstances.
Direction
11. Assistants to whom work is delegated need appropriate direction.
Direction involves informing assistants of their responsibilities and the
objectives of the procedures they are to perform. It also involves informing
them of matters, such as the nature of the entity's business and possible
accounting or auditing problems that may affect the nature, timing and extent
of audit procedures with which they are involved.
12. The audit programme is an important tool for the communication of
audit directions. Time budgets and the overall audit plan are also helpful in
communicating audit directions.
Supervision
13. Supervision is closely related to both direction and review and may
involve elements of both.
14. Personnel carrying out supervisory responsibilities perform the following
functions during the audit:
(a) monitor the progress of the audit to consider whether:
(i) assistants have the necessary skills and competence to carry out
their assigned tasks;
(ii) assistants understand the audit directions; and
(iii) the work is being carried out in accordance with the overall audit
plan and the audit programme;
(b) become informed of and address significant accounting and auditing
questions raised during the audit, by assessing their significance and
modifying the overall audit plan and the audit programme as
appropriate; and
(c) resolve any differences of professional judgement between personnel
and consider the level of consultation that is appropriate.
Quality Control for Audit Work
SA 220 IV-25
Review
15. The work performed by each assistant needs to be reviewed by
personnel of at least equal competence to consider whether:
(a) the work has been performed in accordance with the audit programme;
(b) the work performed and the results obtained have been adequately
documented;
(c) all significant audit matters have been resolved or are reflected in audit
conclusions;
(d) the objectives of the audit procedures have been achieved; and
(e) the conclusions expressed are consistent with the results of the work
performed and support the audit opinion.
16. The following need to be reviewed on a timely basis:
(a) overall audit plan and the audit programme;
(b) assessments of inherent and control risks, including the results of tests
of control and the modifications, if any, made to the overall audit plan
and the audit programme as a result of tests of control;
(c) documentation of the audit evidence obtained from substantive
procedures and the conclusions drawn therefrom, including the results
of consultations; and
(d) financial statements, proposed adjustments in financial statements
arising out of the auditor's examination, and the auditor's proposed
observations/report.
17. The process of reviewing an audit may include, particularly in the case
of large complex audits, requesting personnel not otherwise involved in the
audit to perform certain additional procedures before issuing the auditor's
report.
Effective Date
Back

SA 230 (AAS 3)
DOCUMENTATION
accounting periods beginning on or after July 1, 1985)

Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
Form and Content ..............................................................................4-12
Ownership and Custody of Working Papers.................................13-14
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 15

*
, Documentation should be read in the
context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing,
Review, Other Assurance and Related Services
1
, which sets out the
authority of SAs.

*
1
Back
Documentation
SA 230 IV-27
Introduction
1. Standard on Auditing (SA) 200, Basic Principles Governing an Audit
(Paragraph 11), states, The auditor should document matters which are
important in providing evidence that the audit was carried out in accordance
with the basic principles. The purpose of this Standard is to amplify the
basic principle outlined above.
2. Documentation, for purposes of this Standard, refers to the working
papers prepared or obtained by the auditor and retained by him, in
connection with the performance of his audit.
3. Working papers:
aid in the planning and performance of the audit;
aid in the supervision and review of the audit work; and
provide evidence of the audit work performed to support the
auditors opinion.
Formand Content
4. Working papers should record the audit plan, the nature, timing and
extent of auditing procedures performed, and the conclusions drawn from the
evidence obtained.
5. The form and content of working papers are affected by matters such
as:
The nature of the engagement.
The form of the auditors report.
The nature and complexity of the clients business.
The nature and condition of the clients records and degree of
reliance on internal controls.
The needs in particular circumstances for direction, supervision and
review of work performed by assistants.
6. Working papers should be designed and properly organised to meet the
circumstances of each audit and the auditors needs in respect thereof. The
standardisation of working papers (for example, checklists, specimen letters,
SA 230 IV-28
standard organisation of working papers) improves the efficiency with which
they are prepared and reviewed. It also facilitates the delegation of work
while providing a means to control its quality.
7. Working papers should be sufficiently complete and detailed for an
auditor to obtain an overall understanding of the audit. The extent of
documentation is a matter of professional judgement since it is neither
necessary nor practical that every observation, consideration or conclusion is
documented by the auditor in his working papers.
8. All significant matters which require the exercise of judgement, together
with the auditors conclusion thereon, should be included in the working
papers.
9. To improve audit efficiency, the auditor normally obtains and utilises
schedules, analyses and other working papers prepared by the client. In
such circumstances, the auditor should satisfy himself that these working
papers have been properly prepared. Examples of such working papers are
detailed analyses of important revenue accounts, receivables, etc.
10. In the case of recurring audits, some working paper files may be
classified as permanent audit files, which are updated currently with
information of continuing importance to succeeding audits, as distinct from
current audit files, which contain information relating primarily to the audit of
a single period.
11. A permanent audit file normally includes:
Information concerning the legal and organisational structure of the
entity. In the case of a company, this includes the Memorandum and
Articles of Association. In the case of a statutory corporation, this
includes the Act and Regulations under which the corporation
functions.
Extracts or copies of important legal documents, agreements and
minutes relevant to the audit.
A record of the study and evaluation of the internal controls related
to the accounting system. This might be in the form of narrative
descriptions, questionnaires or flow charts, or some combination
thereof.
Copies of audited financial statements for previous years.
Documentation
SA 230 IV-29
Analysis of significant ratios and trends.
Copies of management letters issued by the auditor, if any.
Record of communication with the retiring auditor, if any, before
acceptance of the appointment as auditor.
Notes regarding significant accounting policies.
Significant audit observations of earlier years.
12. The current file normally includes:
Correspondence relating to acceptance of annual reappointment.
Extracts of important matters in the minutes of Board Meetings and
General Meetings, as are relevant to the audit.
Evidence of the planning process of the audit and audit programme.
Analysis of transactions and balances.
A record of the nature, timing and extent of auditing procedures
performed, and the results of such procedures.
Evidence that the work performed by assistants was supervised and
reviewed.
Copies of communications with other auditors, experts and other
third parties.
Copies of letters or notes concerning audit matters communicated to
or discussed with the client, including the terms of the engagement
and material weaknesses in relevant internal controls.
Letters of representation or confirmation received from the client.
Conclusions reached by the auditor concerning significant aspects of
the audit, including the manner in which exceptions and unusual
matters, if any, disclosed by the auditors procedures were resolved
or treated.
Copies of the financial information being reported on and the related
audit reports.
SA 230 IV-30
Ownership and Custody of Working Papers
13. Working papers are the property of the auditor. The auditor may, at his
discretion, make portions of or extracts from his working papers available to
his client.
14. The auditor should adopt reasonable procedures for custody and
confidentiality of his working papers and should retain them for a period of
time sufficient to meet the needs of his practice and satisfy any pertinent
legal or professional requirements of record retention.
Effective Date
accounting periods beginning on or after July 1, 1985.
Back Back
SA 240 (REVISED)
1

THE AUDITORS RESPONSIBILITIES
RELATING TO FRAUD
IN AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Effective for audits of financial statements
for periods beginning on or after 1st April 2009)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction
Scope of this SA .......................................................................................1-8
Effective Date ..............................................................................................9
Objectives.................................................................................................10
Definitions ................................................................................................11
Requirements
Professional Skepticism .......................................................................12-14
Discussion Among the Engagement Team ...............................................15
Risk Assessment Procedures and Related Activities ...........................16-24
Identification and Assessment of the Risks of
Material Misstatement Due to Fraud ....................................................25-27
Responses to the Assessed Risks of
Material Misstatement Due to Fraud ....................................................28-33
Evaluation of Audit Evidence ................................................................34-37
Auditor Unable to Continue the Engagement ............................................38
Management Representations...................................................................39
Communications to Management and with
Those Charged with Governance .........................................................40-42

1
Issued in December, 2007. Earlier known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS)
4 The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud and Error in an Audit of Financial
Statements.
Back Back
SA 240(Revised) IV-32
Communications to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities ...................43
Documentation .....................................................................................44-47
Characteristics of Fraud ......................................................................A1-A6
Professional Skepticism ......................................................................A7-A9
Discussion Among the Engagement Team ................................. A10-A11
Risk Assessment Procedures and Related Activities ......................A12-A27
Identification and Assessment of the Risks of
Material Misstatement Due to Fraud ...............................................A28-A32
Responses to the Assessed Risks of
Material Misstatement Due to Fraud ...............................................A33-A47
Evaluation of Audit Evidence ...........................................................A48-A52
Auditor Unable to Continue the Engagement ..................................A53-A56
Management Representations ........................................................A57-A58
Communications to Management and
with Those Charged with Governance ............................................A59-A63
Communications to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities .........A64-A66
Material Modifications to ISA 240, The Auditors Responsibility relating to
Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements
Appendices:
1. Examples of Fraud Risk Factors
2. Examples of Possible Audit Procedures to Address the Assessed Risks
of Material Misstatement Due to Fraud
3. Examples of Circumstances that Indicate the Possibility of Fraud

Standard on Auditing (SA) 240 (Revised), The Auditors Responsibilities
Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements should be read in the
2
authority of SAs.

2
Published in the July, 2007 issue of the Journal.
The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud
Introduction
Scope of this SA
1. This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditors
responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements.
Specifically, it expands on how SA 315, Identifying and Assessing the Risks
of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and Its
Environment, and SA 330, The Auditors Responses to Assessed Risks,
are to be applied in relation to risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
Characteristics of Fraud
2. Misstatements in the financial statements can arise from either fraud
or error. The distinguishing factor between fraud and error is whether the
underlying action that results in the misstatement of the financial statements
is intentional or unintentional.
3. Although fraud is a broad legal concept, for the purposes of the SAs,
the auditor is concerned with fraud that causes a material misstatement in
the financial statements. Two types of intentional misstatements are
relevant to the auditor misstatements resulting from fraudulent financial
reporting and misstatements resulting from misappropriation of assets.
Although the auditor may suspect or, in rare cases, identify the occurrence
of fraud, the auditor does not make legal determinations of whether fraud
has actually occurred. (Ref: Para. A1-A6)
Responsibility for the Prevention and Detection of Fraud
4. The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud
rests with both those charged with governance of the entity and
management. It is important that management, with the oversight of those
charged with governance, place a strong emphasis on fraud prevention,
which may reduce opportunities for fraud to take place, and fraud
deterrence, which could persuade individuals not to commit fraud because
of the likelihood of detection and punishment. This involves a commitment
to creating a culture of honesty and ethical behavior which can be reinforced
by an active oversight by those charged with governance. In exercising
oversight responsibility, those charged with governance consider the
potential for override of controls or other inappropriate influence over the
financial reporting process, such as efforts by management to manage
earnings in order to influence the perceptions of analysts as to the entitys
performance and profitability.

Responsibilities of the Auditor
5. An auditor conducting an audit in accordance with SAs is responsible
for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements taken as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or
error. As described in SA 200, Objective and General Principles Governing
an Audit of Financial Statements
3
, owing to the inherent limitations of an
audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the
financial statements will not be detected, even though the audit is properly
planned and performed in accordance with the SAs.
6. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud
is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error. This is
because fraud may involve sophisticated and carefully organized schemes
designed to conceal it, such as forgery, deliberate failure to record
transactions, or intentional misrepresentations being made to the auditor.
Such attempts at concealment may be even more difficult to detect when
accompanied by collusion. Collusion may cause the auditor to believe that
audit evidence is persuasive when it is, in fact, false. The auditors ability to
detect a fraud depends on factors such as the skillfulness of the perpetrator,
the frequency and extent of manipulation, the degree of collusion involved,
the relative size of individual amounts manipulated, and the seniority of
those individuals involved. While the auditor may be able to identify
potential opportunities for fraud to be perpetrated, it is difficult for the auditor
to determine whether misstatements in judgment areas such as accounting
estimates are caused by fraud or error.
7. Furthermore, the risk of the auditor not detecting a material
misstatement resulting from management fraud is greater than for employee
fraud, because management is frequently in a position to directly or
indirectly manipulate accounting records, present fraudulent financial
information or override control procedures designed to prevent similar frauds
by other employees.
8. When obtaining reasonable assurance, the auditor is responsible for
maintaining an attitude of professional skepticism throughout the audit,
considering the potential for management override of controls and
recognizing the fact that audit procedures that are effective for detecting

3
Presently, AAS 1 (Renumbered as SA 200), Basic Principles Governing an Internal Audit
and AAS 2 (Renumbered as SA 200A) Objective and Scope of an Audit of Financial
Statements correspond to International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 200. Both the AASs are
currently being revised in the light of the ISA200. Post this revision, the principles covered by
AAS 1 and AAS 2 will be merged into one Standard i.e., SA200.
error may not be effective in detecting fraud. The requirements in this SA
are designed to assist the auditor in identifying and assessing the risks of
material misstatement due to fraud and in designing procedures to detect
such misstatement.
Effective Date
9. This SA is effective for audits of financial statements for periods
beginning on or after 1st April, 2009.
Objectives
10. The objectives of the auditor are:
(a) To identify and assess the risks of material misstatement in the
financial statements due to fraud;
(b) To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the assessed
risks of material misstatement due to fraud, through designing and
implementing appropriate responses; and
(c) To respond appropriately to identified or suspected fraud.
Definitions
11. For purposes of the SAs, the following terms have the meanings
attributed below:
(a) Fraud - An intentional act by one or more individuals among
management, those charged with governance, employees, or third
parties, involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or illegal
advantage.
(b) Fraud risk factors - Events or conditions that indicate an incentive or
pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity to commit fraud.
Requirements
12. In accordance with SA 200, the auditor shall maintain an attitude of
professional skepticism throughout the audit, recognizing the possibility that
a material misstatement due to fraud could exist, notwithstanding the
auditors past experience of the honesty and integrity of the entitys
management and those charged with governance. (Ref: Para. A7- A8)
13. Unless the auditor has reason to believe the contrary, the auditor
may accept records and documents as genuine. If conditions identified
during the audit cause the auditor to believe that a document may not be
authentic or that terms in a document have been modified but not disclosed
to the auditor, the auditor shall investigate further. (Ref: Para. A9)
14. Where responses to inquiries of management or those charged with
governance are inconsistent, the auditor shall investigate the
inconsistencies.
Discussion Among the Engagement Team
15. SA 315 requires a discussion among the engagement team
members and a determination by the engagement partner of matters which
are to be communicated to those team members not involved in the
discussion
4
. This discussion shall place particular emphasis on how and
where the entitys financial statements may be susceptible to material
misstatement due to fraud, including how fraud might occur. The discussion
shall occur notwithstanding the engagement team members beliefs that
management and those charged with governance are honest and have
integrity. (Ref: Para. A10-A11)
Risk Assessment Procedures and Related Activities
16. When performing risk assessment procedures and related activities
to obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the
entitys internal control, required by SA 315
5
, the auditor shall perform the
procedures in paragraphs 17-24 to obtain information for use in identifying
the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
Management and Others within the Entity
17. The auditor shall make inquiries of management regarding:
(a) Managements assessment of the risk that the financial statements
may be materially misstated due to fraud, including the nature, extent
and frequency of such assessments; (Ref: Para. A12-A13)
(b) Managements process for identifying and responding to the risks of
fraud in the entity, including any specific risks of fraud that
management has identified or that have been brought to its attention,
or classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures for which
a risk of fraud is likely to exist; (Ref: Para. A14)
(c) Managements communication, if any, to those charged with
governance regarding its processes for identifying and responding to
the risks of fraud in the entity; and

4
SA315, paragraph 10.
5
SA315, paragraphs 5-23.
(d) Managements communication, if any, to employees regarding its
views on business practices and ethical behavior.
18. The auditor shall make inquiries of management, and others within
the entity as appropriate, to determine whether they have knowledge of any
actual, suspected or alleged fraud affecting the entity. (Ref: Para. A15-A17)
19. For those entities that have an internal audit function, the auditor
shall make inquiries of internal audit to determine whether it has knowledge
of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud affecting the entity, and to obtain
its views about the risks of fraud. (Ref: Para. A18)
Those Charged with Governance
20. Unless all of those charged with governance are involved in
managing the entity, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of how those
charged with governance exercise oversight of managements processes for
identifying and responding to the risks of fraud in the entity and the internal
control that management has established to mitigate these risks. (Ref: Para.
A19-A21)
21. The auditor shall make inquiries of those charged with governance to
determine whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged
fraud affecting the entity. These inquiries are made in part to corroborate
the responses to the inquiries of management.
Unusual or Unexpected Relationships Identified
22. The auditor shall evaluate whether unusual or unexpected
relationships that have been identified in performing analytical procedures,
including those related to revenue accounts, may indicate risks of material
misstatement due to fraud.
Other Information
23. The auditor shall consider whether other information obtained by the
auditor indicates risks of material misstatement due to fraud. (Ref: Para.
A22)
Evaluation of Fraud Risk Factors
24. The auditor shall evaluate whether the information obtained from the
other risk assessment procedures and related activities performed indicates
that one or more fraud risk factors are present. While fraud risk factors may
not necessarily indicate the existence of fraud, they have often been present
in circumstances where frauds have occurred and therefore may indicate
risks of material misstatement due to fraud. (Ref: Para. A23-A27)
Identification and Assessment of the Risks of Material
Misstatement Due to Fraud
25. In accordance with SA 315, the auditor shall identify and assess the
risks of material misstatement due to fraud at the financial statement level,
and at the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances and
disclosures
6
.
26. When identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement
due to fraud, the auditor shall, based on a presumption that there are risks of
fraud in revenue recognition, evaluate which types of revenue, revenue
transactions or assertions give rise to such risks. Paragraph 47 specifies
the documentation required when the auditor concludes that the
presumption is not applicable in the circumstances of the engagement and,
accordingly, has not identified revenue recognition as a risk of material
misstatement due to fraud. (Ref: Para. A28-A30)
27. The auditor shall treat those assessed risks of material misstatement
due to fraud as significant risks and accordingly, to the extent not already
done so, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the entitys related
controls, including control activities, relevant to such risks. (Ref: Para. A31-
A32)
Responses to the Assessed Risks of Material Misstatement Due
to Fraud
Overall Responses
28. In accordance with SA 330, the auditor shall determine overall
responses to address the assessed risks of material misstatement due to
fraud at the financial statement level. (Ref: Para. A33)
29. In determining overall responses to address the assessed risks of
material misstatement due to fraud at the financial statement level, the
auditor shall:
(a) Assign and supervise personnel taking account of the knowledge,
skill and ability of the individuals to be given significant engagement
responsibilities and the auditors assessment of the risks of material
misstatement due to fraud for the engagement; (Ref: Para. A34-A35)
(b) Evaluate whether the selection and application of accounting policies
by the entity, particularly those related to subjective measurements
and complex transactions, may be indicative of fraudulent financial

6
SA315, Paragraph 24.
reporting resulting from managements effort to manage earnings;
and
(c) Incorporate an element of unpredictability in the selection of the
nature, timing and extent of audit procedures. (Ref: Para. A36)
Audit Procedures Responsive to Assessed Risks of Material
Misstatement Due to Fraud at the Assertion Level
30. In accordance with SA 330, the auditor shall design and perform
further audit procedures whose nature, timing and extent are responsive to
the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud at the assertion
level. (Ref: Para. A37-A40)
Audit Procedures Responsive to Risks Related to Management
Override of Controls
31. Management is in a unique position to perpetrate fraud because of
managements ability to manipulate accounting records and prepare
fraudulent financial statements by overriding controls that otherwise appear
to be operating effectively. Although the level of risk of management
override of controls will vary from entity to entity, the risk is nevertheless
present in all entities. Due to the unpredictable way in which such override
could occur, it is a risk of material misstatement due to fraud and thus a
significant risk.
32. Irrespective of the auditors assessment of the risks of management
override of controls, the auditor shall design and perform audit procedures
to:
(a) Test the appropriateness of journal entries recorded in the general
ledger and other adjustments made in the preparation of the financial
statements. In designing and performing audit procedures for such
tests, the auditor shall:
(i) Make inquiries of individuals involved in the financial reporting
process about inappropriate or unusual activity relating to the
processing of journal entries and other adjustments;
(ii) Select journal entries and other adjustments made at the end
of a reporting period; and
(iii) Consider the need to test journal entries and other
adjustments throughout the period. (Ref: Para. A41-A44)
(b) Review accounting estimates
7
for biases and evaluate whether the
circumstances producing the bias, if any, represent a risk of material
misstatement due to fraud. In performing this review, the auditor
shall:
(i) Evaluate whether the judgments and decisions made by
management in making the accounting estimates included in
the financial statements, even if they are individually
reasonable, indicate a possible bias on the part of the entitys
management that may represent a risk of material
misstatement due to fraud. If so, the auditor shall re-evaluate
the accounting estimates taken as a whole; and
(ii) Perform a retrospective review of management judgments
and assumptions related to significant accounting estimates
reflected in the financial statements of the prior year
8
. (Ref:
Para. A45-A46)
(c) For significant transactions that are outside the normal course of
business for the entity, or that otherwise appear to be unusual given
the auditors understanding of the entity and its environment and
other information obtained during the audit, the auditor shall evaluate
whether the business rationale (or the lack thereof) of the
transactions suggests that they may have been entered into to
engage in fraudulent financial reporting or to conceal
misappropriation of assets. (Ref: Para. A47)
33. The auditor shall determine whether, in order to respond to the
identified risks of management override of controls, the auditor needs to
perform other audit procedures in addition to those specifically referred to
above (i.e., when there are specific additional risks of management override
that are not covered as part of the procedures performed to address the
requirements in paragraph 32).
Evaluation of Audit Evidence (Ref: Para. A48)
34. The auditor shall evaluate whether analytical procedures
9
that are
performed when forming an overall conclusion as to whether the financial

7
Reference may be made to SA540, Auditing of Accounting Estimates.
8
Accounting Standard (AS) 5, Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and
Changes in Accounting Policies requires the adjustment of the prior period estimates, which
may affect both the period of change in the Accounting Estimates and subsequent periods, in
the subsequent years.
9
Reference may be made to SA520, Analytical Procedures.
statements as a whole are consistent with the auditors understanding of the
entity and its environment indicate a previously unrecognized risk of material
misstatement due to fraud. (Ref: Para. A49)
35. When the auditor identifies a misstatement, the auditor shall evaluate
whether such a misstatement is indicative of fraud. If there is such an
indication, the auditor shall evaluate the implications of the misstatement in
relation to other aspects of the audit, particularly the reliability of
management representations, recognizing that an instance of fraud is
unlikely to be an isolated occurrence. (Ref: Para. A50)
36. If the auditor identifies a misstatement, whether material or not, and
the auditor has reason to believe that it is or may be the result of fraud and
that management (in particular, senior management) is involved, the auditor
shall re-evaluate the assessment of the risks of material misstatement due
to fraud and its resulting impact on the nature, timing and extent of audit
procedures to respond to the assessed risks. The auditor shall also
consider whether circumstances or conditions indicate possible collusion
involving employees, management or third parties when reconsidering the
reliability of evidence previously obtained. (Ref: Para. A51)
37. When the auditor confirms that, or is unable to conclude whether, the
financial statements are materially misstated as a result of fraud the auditor
shall evaluate the implications for the audit. (Ref: Para. A52)
Auditor Unable to Continue the Engagement
38. If, as a result of a misstatement resulting from fraud or suspected
fraud, the auditor encounters exceptional circumstances that bring into
question the auditors ability to continue performing the audit, the auditor shall:
(a) Determine the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in the
circumstances, including whether there is a requirement for the
auditor to report to the person or persons who made the audit
appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities;
(b) Consider whether it is appropriate to withdraw from the engagement,
where withdrawal from the engagement is legally permitted; and
(c) If the auditor withdraws:
(i) Discuss with the appropriate level of management and those
charged with governance, the auditors withdrawal from the
engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal; and
(ii) Determine whether there is a professional or legal
requirement to report to the person or persons who made the
audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities,
the auditors withdrawal from the engagement and the
reasons for the withdrawal. (Ref: Para. A53-A56)
Management Representations
39. The auditor shall obtain written representations from management
that:
(a) It acknowledges its responsibility for the design, implementation and
maintenance of internal control to prevent and detect fraud;
(b) It has disclosed to the auditor the results of its assessment of the risk
that the financial statements may be materially misstated as a result
of fraud;
(c) It has disclosed to the auditor its knowledge of fraud or suspected
fraud affecting the entity involving:
(i) Management;
(ii) Employees who have significant roles in internal control; or
(iii) Others where the fraud could have a material effect on the
financial statements; and
(d) It has disclosed to the auditor its knowledge of any allegations of
fraud, or suspected fraud, affecting the entitys financial statements
communicated by employees, former employees, analysts,
regulators or others. (Ref: Para. A57-A58)
Communications to Management and with Those Charged with
Governance
40. If the auditor has identified a fraud or has obtained information that
indicates that a fraud may exist, the auditor shall communicate these
matters on a timely basis to the appropriate level of management in order to
inform those with primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of
fraud of matters relevant to their responsibilities. (Ref: Para. A59)
41. Unless all of those charged with governance are involved in
managing the entity, if the auditor has identified or suspects fraud involving:
(a) Management;
(b) Employees who have significant roles in internal control; or
(c) Others where the fraud results in a material misstatement in the
The auditor shall communicate these matters to those charged with
governance on a timely basis. If the auditor suspects fraud involving
management, the auditor shall communicate these suspicions to those
charged with governance and discuss with them the nature, timing and
extent of audit procedures necessary to complete the audit. (Ref: Para.
A60-A62)
42. In accordance with SA 260 (Revised), Communication with Those
Charged with Governance
10
, the auditor shall communicate with those
charged with governance any other matters related to fraud that are, in the
auditors judgment, relevant to their responsibilities. (Ref: Para. A63)
Communications to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities
43. If the auditor has identified or suspects a fraud, the auditor shall
determine whether there is a responsibility to report the occurrence or
suspicion to a party outside the entity. Although the auditors professional
duty to maintain the confidentiality of client information may preclude such
reporting, the auditors legal responsibilities may override the duty of
confidentiality in some circumstances. (Ref: Para. A64-A66)
Documentation
44. The auditors documentation of the understanding of the entity and its
environment and the assessment of the risks of material misstatement
required by SA 315 shall include:
(a) The significant decisions reached during the discussion among the
engagement team regarding the susceptibility of the entitys financial
statements to material misstatement due to fraud; and
(b) The identified and assessed risks of material misstatement due to
fraud at the financial statement level and at the assertion level.
45. The auditors documentation of the responses to the assessed risks
of material misstatement required by SA 330 shall include:
(a) The overall responses to the assessed risks of material misstatement
due to fraud at the financial statement level and the nature, timing
and extent of audit procedures, and the linkage of those procedures
with the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud at the
assertion level; and
(b) The results of the audit procedures, including those designed to

10
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 27, Communication of
Audit Matters with Those Charged with Governance.
address the risk of management override of controls.
46. The auditor shall document communications about fraud made to
management, those charged with governance, regulators and others.
47. When the auditor has concluded that the presumption that there is a
risk of material misstatement due to fraud related to revenue recognition is
not applicable in the circumstances of the engagement, the auditor shall
document the reasons for that conclusion.
Characteristics of Fraud (Ref: Para. 3)
A1. Fraud, whether fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of
assets, involves incentive or pressure to commit fraud, a perceived
opportunity to do so and some rationalization of the act. For example:
Incentive or pressure to commit fraudulent financial reporting may exist
when management is under pressure, from sources outside or inside
the entity, to achieve an expected (and perhaps unrealistic) earnings
target or financial outcome particularly since the consequences to
management for failing to meet financial goals can be significant.
Similarly, individuals may have an incentive to misappropriate assets,
for example, because the individuals are living beyond their means.
A perceived opportunity to commit fraud may exist when an individual
believes internal control can be overridden, for example, because the
individual is in a position of trust or has knowledge of specific
weaknesses in internal control.
Individuals may be able to rationalize committing a fraudulent act.
Some individuals possess an attitude, character or set of ethical values
that allow them knowingly and intentionally to commit a dishonest act.
However, even otherwise honest individuals can commit fraud in an
environment that imposes sufficient pressure on them.
A2. Fraudulent financial reporting involves intentional misstatements
including omissions of amounts or disclosures in financial statements to
deceive financial statement users. It can be caused by the efforts of
management to manage earnings in order to deceive financial statement
users by influencing their perceptions as to the entitys performance and
profitability. Such earnings management may start out with small actions or
inappropriate adjustment of assumptions and changes in judgments by
management. Pressures and incentives may lead these actions to increase
to the extent that they result in fraudulent financial reporting. Such a
situation could occur when, due to pressures to meet market expectations or
a desire to maximize compensation based on performance, management
intentionally takes positions that lead to fraudulent financial reporting by
materially misstating the financial statements. In some entities,
management may be motivated to reduce earnings by a material amount to
minimize tax or to inflate earnings to secure bank financing.
A3. Fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished by the following:
Manipulation, falsification (including forgery), or alteration of accounting
records or supporting documentation from which the financial
statements are prepared.
Misrepresentation in or intentional omission from, the financial
statements of events, transactions or other significant information.
Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to amounts,
classification, manner of presentation, or disclosure.
A4. Fraudulent financial reporting often involves management override of
controls that otherwise may appear to be operating effectively. Fraud can
be committed by management overriding controls using such techniques as:
Recording fictitious journal entries, particularly close to the end of an
accounting period, to manipulate operating results or achieve other
objectives.
Inappropriately adjusting assumptions and changing judgments used to
estimate account balances.
Omitting, advancing or delaying recognition in the financial statements
of events and transactions that have occurred during the reporting
period.
Concealing, or not disclosing, facts that could affect the amounts
recorded in the financial statements.
Engaging in complex transactions that are structured to misrepresent
the financial position or financial performance of the entity.
Altering records and terms related to significant and unusual
transactions.
A5. Misappropriation of assets involves the theft of an entitys assets
and is often perpetrated by employees in relatively small and immaterial
amounts. However, it can also involve management who are usually
more able to disguise or conceal misappropriations in ways that are
difficult to detect. Misappropriation of assets can be accomplished in a
variety of ways including:
Embezzling receipts (for example, misappropriating collections on
accounts receivable or diverting receipts in respect of written-off
accounts to personal bank accounts).
Stealing physical assets or intellectual property (for example, stealing
inventory for personal use or for sale, stealing scrap for resale, colluding
with a competitor by disclosing technological data in return for
payment).
Causing an entity to pay for goods and services not received (for
example, payments to fictitious vendors, kickbacks paid by vendors to
the entitys purchasing agents in return for inflating prices, payments to
fictitious employees).
Using an entitys assets for personal use (for example, using the entitys
assets as collateral for a personal loan or a loan to a related party).
Misappropriation of assets is often accompanied by false or misleading
records or documents in order to conceal the fact that the assets are missing
or have been pledged without proper authorization.
A6. The auditor may, at times, be required to by a legislation or a
regulation to make a specific assertion in respect of frauds on/by the entity in
his report. For example, Clause (xxi) of Paragraph 4 of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 2003 requires the auditor to specifically report
whether any fraud on or by the entity has been noticed or reported during
the year; if yes, the nature and amount involved is to be indicated. Similarly,
in case of audit of banks, the auditors, in terms of the circular no.
DBS.FGV.(F).No. BC/23.08.001/2001-02, is required to report to the
Reserve Bank of India anything susceptible to fraud or fraudulent activity or
act of excess power or any foul play in any transaction. Consequently, in
such cases, the auditors responsibilities may not be limited to consideration
of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, but may also
include a broader responsibility to consider risks of fraud.
Professional Skepticism(Ref: Para. 12-14)
A7. Professional skepticism is an attitude that includes a questioning
mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence. Maintaining an attitude of
professional skepticism requires an ongoing questioning of whether the
information and audit evidence obtained suggests that a material
misstatement due to fraud may exist. It includes considering the reliability of
the information to be used as audit evidence and the controls over its
preparation and maintenance where relevant. Due to the characteristics of
fraud, the auditors attitude of professional skepticism is particularly
important when considering the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
A8. Although the auditor cannot be expected to disregard past
experience of the honesty and integrity of the entitys management and
those charged with governance, the auditors attitude of professional
skepticism is particularly important in considering the risks of material
misstatement due to fraud because there may have been changes in
circumstances.
A9. As explained in SA 200, an audit performed in accordance with SAs
rarely involves the authentication of documents, nor is the auditor trained as
or expected to be an expert in such authentication. However, when the
auditor identifies conditions that cause the auditor to believe that a
document may not be authentic or that terms in a document have been
modified but not disclosed to the auditor, possible procedures to investigate
further may include:
Confirming directly with the third party.
Using the work of an expert to assess the documents authenticity.
Discussion Among the Engagement Team(Ref: Para. 15)
A10. Discussing the susceptibility of the entitys financial statements to
material misstatement due to fraud with the engagement team:
Provides an opportunity for more experienced engagement team
members to share their insights about how and where the financial
statements may be susceptible to material misstatement due to fraud.
Enables the auditor to consider an appropriate response to such
susceptibility and to determine which members of the engagement team
will conduct certain audit procedures.
Permits the auditor to determine how the results of audit procedures will
be shared among the engagement team and how to deal with any
allegations of fraud that may come to the auditors attention.
A11. The discussion may include such matters as:
An exchange of ideas among engagement team members about how
and where they believe the entitys financial statements may be
susceptible to material misstatement due to fraud, how management
could perpetrate and conceal fraudulent financial reporting, and how
assets of the entity could be misappropriated.
A consideration of circumstances that might be indicative of earnings
management and the practices that might be followed by management
to manage earnings that could lead to fraudulent financial reporting.
A consideration of the known external and internal factors affecting the
entity that may create an incentive or pressure for management or
others to commit fraud, provide the opportunity for fraud to be
perpetrated, and indicate a culture or environment that enables
management or others to rationalize committing fraud.
A consideration of managements involvement in overseeing employees
with access to cash or other assets susceptible to misappropriation.
A consideration of any unusual or unexplained changes in behavior or
lifestyle of management or employees which have come to the attention
of the engagement team.
An emphasis on the importance of maintaining a proper state of mind
throughout the audit regarding the potential for material misstatement
due to fraud.
A consideration of the types of circumstances that, if encountered, might
indicate the possibility of fraud.
A consideration of how an element of unpredictability will be
incorporated into the nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures
to be performed.
A consideration of the audit procedures that might be selected to
respond to the susceptibility of the entitys financial statement to
material misstatement due to fraud and whether certain types of audit
procedures are more effective than others.
A consideration of any allegations of fraud that have come to the
auditors attention.
A consideration of the risk of management override of controls.
Inquiries of Management
Managements Assessment of the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to
Fraud [Ref: Para. 17(a)]
A12. Management is responsible for the entitys internal control and for the
preparation of the financial statements. Accordingly, it is appropriate for the
auditor to make inquiries of management regarding managements own
assessment of the risk of fraud and the controls in place to prevent and
detect it. The nature, extent and frequency of managements assessment of
such risk and controls may vary from entity to entity. In some entities,
management may make detailed assessments on an annual basis or as part
of continuous monitoring. In other entities, managements assessment may
be less structured and less frequent. The nature, extent and frequency of
managements assessment are relevant to the auditors understanding of
the entitys control environment. For example, the fact that management
has not made an assessment of the risk of fraud may in some
circumstances be indicative of the lack of importance that management
places on internal control.
Considerations specific to smaller entities
A13. In some entities, particularly smaller entities, the focus of
managements assessment may be on the risks of employee fraud or
misappropriation of assets.
Managements Process for Identifying and Responding to the Risks of Fraud
(Ref: Para. 17(b))
A14. In the case of entities with multiple locations managements
processes may include different levels of monitoring of operating locations,
or business segments. Management may also have identified particular
operating locations or business segments for which a risk of fraud may be
more likely to exist.
Inquiry of Management and Others within the Entity (Ref: Para. 18)
A15. The auditors inquiries of management may provide useful
information concerning the risks of material misstatements in the financial
statements resulting from employee fraud. However, such inquiries are
unlikely to provide useful information regarding the risks of material
misstatement in the financial statements resulting from management fraud.
Making inquiries of others within the entity may provide individuals with an
opportunity to convey information to the auditor that may not otherwise be
communicated.
A16. Examples of others within the entity to whom the auditor may direct
inquiries about the existence or suspicion of fraud include:
Operating personnel not directly involved in the financial reporting
process.
Employees with different levels of authority.
Employees involved in initiating, processing or recording complex or
unusual transactions and those who supervise or monitor such
employees.
In-house legal counsel.
Chief ethics officer or equivalent person.
The person or persons charged with dealing with allegations of fraud.
A17. Management is often in the best position to perpetrate fraud.
Accordingly, when evaluating managements responses to inquiries with an
attitude of professional skepticism, the auditor may judge it necessary to
corroborate responses to inquiries with other information.
Inquiry of Internal Audit (Ref: Para. 19)
A18. SA 610, Considering the Work of Internal Audit
11
, establishes
requirements and provides guidance in audits of those entities that have an
internal audit function. In carrying out the requirement of SA 610 in the
context of fraud, the auditor may inquire about specific internal audit
activities including, for example:
The procedures performed, if any, by the internal auditors during the
year to detect fraud.
Whether management has satisfactorily responded to any findings
resulting from those procedures.
Obtaining an Understanding of Oversight Exercised by Those Charged
With Governance (Ref: Para. 20)
A19. Those charged with governance of an entity have oversight
responsibility for systems for monitoring risk, financial control and
compliance with the law. In many entities, corporate governance practices
are well developed and those charged with governance play an active role in
oversight of the entitys assessment of the risks of fraud and of the relevant
internal control. Since the responsibilities of those charged with governance
and management may vary by entity, it is important that the auditor
understands their respective responsibilities to enable the auditor to obtain
an understanding of the oversight exercised by the appropriate individuals.
12

A20. An understanding of the oversight exercised by those charged with
governance may provide insights regarding the susceptibility of the entity to
management fraud, the adequacy of internal control over risks of fraud, and
the competency and integrity of management. The auditor may obtain this
understanding in a number of ways, such as by attending meetings where

11
Hitherto known as Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 7, Relying Upon the Work of
an Internal Auditor.
12
SA260 (Revised), Communication with Those Charged with Governance, discusses with
whom the auditor communicates when the entitys governance structure is not well defined.
such discussions take place, reading the minutes from such meetings or
making inquiries of those charged with governance.
Considerations Specific to Smaller Entities
A21. In some cases, all of those charged with governance are involved in
managing the entity. This may be the case in a small entity where a single
owner manages the entity and no one else has a governance role. In these
cases, there is ordinarily no action on the part of the auditor because there is
no oversight separate from management.
Consideration of Other Information (Ref: Para. 23)
A22. In addition to information obtained from applying analytical
procedures, other information obtained about the entity and its environment
may be helpful in identifying the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
The discussion among team members may provide information that is
helpful in identifying such risks. In addition, information obtained from the
auditors client acceptance and retention processes, and experience gained
on other engagements performed for the entity, for example engagements to
review interim financial information, may be relevant in the identification of
the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
Evaluation of Fraud Risk Factors (Ref: Para. 24)
A23. The fact that fraud is usually concealed can make it very difficult to
detect. Nevertheless, the auditor may identify events or conditions that
indicate an incentive or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity
to commit fraud (fraud risk factors). For example:
The need to meet expectations of third parties to obtain additional
equity financing may create pressure to commit fraud;
The granting of significant bonuses if unrealistic profit targets are met
may create an incentive to commit fraud; and
A control environment that is not effective may create an opportunity to
commit fraud.
A24. Fraud risk factors cannot easily be ranked in order of importance.
The significance of fraud risk factors varies widely. Some of these factors
will be present in entities where the specific conditions do not present risks
of material misstatement. Accordingly, the determination of whether a fraud
risk factor is present and whether it is to be considered in assessing the
risks of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud
requires the exercise of professional judgment.
A25. Examples of fraud risk factors related to fraudulent financial reporting
and misappropriation of assets are presented in Appendix 1. These
illustrative risk factors are classified based on the three conditions that are
generally present when fraud exists:
An incentive or pressure to commit fraud;
A perceived opportunity to commit fraud; and
An ability to rationalize the fraudulent action.
Risk factors reflective of an attitude that permits rationalization of the
fraudulent action may not be susceptible to observation by the
auditor. Nevertheless, the auditor may become aware of the
existence of such information. Although the fraud risk factors
described in Appendix 1 cover a broad range of situations that may
be faced by auditors, they are only examples and other risk factors
may exist.
A26. The size, complexity, and ownership characteristics of the entity have
a significant influence on the consideration of relevant fraud risk factors. For
example, in the case of a large entity, there may be factors that generally
constrain improper conduct by management, such as:
Effective oversight by those charged with governance.
An effective internal audit function.
The existence and enforcement of a written code of conduct.
Furthermore, fraud risk factors considered at a business segment operating
level may provide different insights when compared with those obtained
when considered at an entity-wide level.
A27. In the case of a small entity, some or all of these considerations
may be inapplicable or less relevant. For example, a smaller entity may
not have a written code of conduct but, instead, may have developed a
culture that emphasizes the importance of integrity and ethical behavior
through oral communication and by management example. Domination
of management by a single individual in a small entity does not
generally, in and of itself, indicate a failure by management to display
and communicate an appropriate attitude regarding internal control and
the financial reporting process. In some entities, the need for
management authorization can compensate for otherwise weak controls
and reduce the risk of employee fraud. However, domination of
management by a single individual can be a potential weakness since
there is an opportunity for management override of controls.
Identification and Assessment of the Risks of Material
Misstatement Due to Fraud
Risks of Fraud in Revenue Recognition (Ref: Para. 26)
A28. Material misstatement due to fraudulent financial reporting relating to
revenue recognition often results from an overstatement of revenues
through, for example, premature revenue recognition or recording fictitious
revenues. It may result also from an understatement of revenues through,
for example, improperly shifting revenues to a later period.
A29. The risks of fraud in revenue recognition may be greater in some
entities than others. For example, there may be pressures or incentives on
management to commit fraudulent financial reporting through inappropriate
revenue recognition in the case of listed entities when, for example,
performance is measured in terms of year-over-year revenue growth or
profit. Similarly, for example, there may be greater risks of fraud in revenue
recognition in the case of entities that generate a substantial portion of
revenues through cash sales.
A30. The presumption that there are risks of fraud in revenue recognition
may be rebutted. For example, the auditor may conclude that there is no
risk of material misstatement due to fraud relating to revenue recognition in
the case where there is a single type of simple revenue transaction, for
example, leasehold revenue from a single unit rental property.
Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Due to
Fraud and Understanding the Entitys Related Controls (Ref: Para. 27)
A31. As explained in SA 315 management may make judgments on the
nature and extent of the controls it chooses to implement, and the nature
and extent of the risks it chooses to assume. In determining which controls
to implement to prevent and detect fraud, management considers the risks
that the financial statements may be materially misstated as a result of
fraud. As part of this consideration, management may conclude that it is not
cost effective to implement and maintain a particular control in relation to the
reduction in the risks of material misstatement due to fraud to be achieved.
A32. It is therefore important for the auditor to obtain an understanding of
the controls that management has designed, implemented and maintained
to prevent and detect fraud. In doing so, the auditor may learn, for example,
that management has consciously chosen to accept the risks associated
with a lack of segregation of duties. Information from obtaining this
understanding may also be useful in identifying fraud risks factors that may
affect the auditors assessment of the risks that the financial statements may
contain material misstatement due to fraud.
Responses to the Assessed Risks of Material Misstatement Due
to Fraud
Overall Responses (Ref: Para. 28)
A33. Determining overall responses to address the assessed risks of
material misstatement due to fraud generally includes the consideration of
how the overall conduct of the audit can reflect increased professional
skepticism, for example, through:
Increased sensitivity in the selection of the nature and extent of
documentation to be examined in support of material transactions.
Increased recognition of the need to corroborate management
explanations or representations concerning material matters.
It also involves more general considerations apart from the specific
procedures otherwise planned; these considerations include the
matters listed in paragraph 29, which are discussed below.
Assignment and Supervision of Personnel (Ref: Para. 29(a))
A34. The auditor may respond to identified risks of material misstatement
due to fraud by, for example, assigning additional individuals with
specialized skill and knowledge, such as forensic and IT experts, or by
assigning more experienced individuals to the engagement.
A35. The extent of supervision reflects the auditors assessment of risks of
material misstatement due to fraud and the competencies of the
engagement team members performing the work.
Unpredictability in the Selection of Audit Procedures (Ref: Para.
29(c))
A36. Incorporating an element of unpredictability in the selection of the
nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed is important
as individuals within the entity who are familiar with the audit procedures
normally performed on engagements may be more able to conceal
fraudulent financial reporting. This can be achieved by, for example:
Performing substantive procedures on selected account balances and
assertions not otherwise tested due to their materiality or risk.
Adjusting the timing of audit procedures from that otherwise expected.
Using different sampling methods.
Performing audit procedures at different locations or at locations on an
unannounced basis.
Audit Procedures Responsive to Assessed Risks of Material
Misstatement Due to Fraud at the Assertion Level (Ref: Para. 30)
A37. The auditors responses to address the assessed risks of material
misstatement due to fraud at the assertion level may include changing the
nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures in the following ways:
The nature of audit procedures to be performed may need to be
changed to obtain audit evidence that is more reliable and relevant or to
obtain additional corroborative information. This may affect both the
type of audit procedures to be performed and their combination. For
example:
o Physical observation or inspection of certain assets may
become more important or the auditor may choose to use
computer-assisted audit techniques to gather more evidence
about data contained in significant accounts or electronic
transaction files.
o The auditor may design procedures to obtain additional
corroborative information. For example, if the auditor identifies
that management is under pressure to meet earnings
expectations, there may be a related risk that management is
inflating sales by entering into sales agreements that include
terms that preclude revenue recognition or by invoicing sales
before delivery. In these circumstances, the auditor may, for
example, design external confirmations not only to confirm
outstanding amounts, but also to confirm the details of the
sales agreements, including date, any rights of return and
delivery terms. In addition, the auditor might find it effective to
supplement such external confirmations with inquiries of non-
financial personnel in the entity regarding any changes in sales
agreements and delivery terms.
The timing of substantive procedures may need to be modified. The
auditor may conclude that performing substantive testing at or near the
period end better addresses an assessed risk of material misstatement
due to fraud. The auditor may conclude that, given the assessed risks
of intentional misstatement or manipulation, audit procedures to extend
audit conclusions from an interim date to the period end would not be
effective. In contrast, because an intentional misstatementfor
example, a misstatement involving improper revenue recognitionmay
have been initiated in an interim period, the auditor may elect to apply
substantive procedures to transactions occurring earlier in or throughout
the reporting period.
The extent of the procedures applied reflects the assessment of the
risks of material misstatement due to fraud. For example, increasing
sample sizes or performing analytical procedures at a more detailed
level may be appropriate. Also, computer-assisted audit techniques
may enable more extensive testing of electronic transactions and
account files. Such techniques can be used to select sample
transactions from key electronic files, to sort transactions with specific
characteristics, or to test an entire population instead of a sample.
A38. If the auditor identifies a risk of material misstatement due to fraud
that affects inventory quantities, examining the entitys inventory records
may help to identify locations or items that require specific attention during
or after the physical inventory count. Such a review may lead to a decision
to observe inventory counts at certain locations on an unannounced basis or
to conduct inventory counts at all locations on the same date.
A39. The auditor may identify a risk of material misstatement due to fraud
affecting a number of accounts and assertions. These may include asset
valuation, estimates relating to specific transactions (such as acquisitions,
restructurings, or disposals of a segment of the business), and other
significant accrued liabilities (such as pension and other post-employment
benefit obligations, or environmental remediation liabilities). The risk may
also relate to significant changes in assumptions relating to recurring
estimates. Information gathered through obtaining an understanding of the
entity and its environment may assist the auditor in evaluating the
reasonableness of such management estimates and underlying judgments
and assumptions. A retrospective review of similar management judgments
and assumptions applied in prior periods may also provide insight about the
reasonableness of judgments and assumptions supporting management
estimates.
A40. Examples of possible audit procedures to address the assessed risks
of material misstatement due to fraud, including those that illustrate the
incorporation of an element of unpredictability, are presented in Appendix 2.
The appendix includes examples of responses to the auditors assessment
of the risks of material misstatement resulting from both fraudulent financial
reporting, including fraudulent financial reporting resulting from revenue
recognition, and misappropriation of assets.

Audit Procedures Responsive to Risks Related to Management
Override of Controls
J ournal Entries and Other Adjustments (Ref: Para. 32(a))
A41. Material misstatement of financial statements due to fraud often
involve the manipulation of the financial reporting process by recording
inappropriate or unauthorized journal entries. This may occur throughout
the year or at period end, or by management making adjustments to
amounts reported in the financial statements that are not reflected in journal
entries, such as through consolidating adjustments and reclassifications.
A42. Further, the auditors consideration of the risks of material
misstatement associated with inappropriate override of controls over journal
entries is important since automated processes and controls may reduce the
risk of inadvertent error but do not overcome the risk that individuals may
inappropriately override such automated processes, for example, by
changing the amounts being automatically passed to the general ledger or to
the financial reporting system. Furthermore, when IT is used to transfer
information automatically, there may be little or no visible evidence of such
intervention in the information systems.
A43. When identifying and selecting journal entries and other adjustments
for testing and determining the appropriate method of examining the
underlying support for the items selected, the following matters are of
relevance:
The assessment of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud the
presence of fraud risk factors and other information obtained during the
auditors assessment of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud
may assist the auditor to identify specific classes of journal entries and
other adjustments for testing.
Controls that have been implemented over journal entries and other
adjustments effective controls over the preparation and posting of
journal entries and other adjustments may reduce the extent of
substantive testing necessary, provided that the auditor has tested the
operating effectiveness of the controls.
The entitys financial reporting process and the nature of evidence that
can be obtained for many entities routine processing of transactions
involves a combination of manual and automated steps and procedures.
Similarly, the processing of journal entries and other adjustments may
involve both manual and automated procedures and controls. When
information technology is used in the financial reporting process, journal
entries and other adjustments may exist only in electronic form.
The characteristics of fraudulent journal entries or other adjustments
inappropriate journal entries or other adjustments often have unique
identifying characteristics. Such characteristics may include entries (a)
made to unrelated, unusual, or seldom-used accounts, (b) made by
individuals who typically do not make journal entries, (c) recorded at the
end of the period or as post-closing entries that have little or no
explanation or description, (d) made either before or during the
preparation of the financial statements that do not have account
numbers, or (e) containing round numbers or consistent ending
numbers.
The nature and complexity of the accounts inappropriate journal
entries or adjustments may be applied to accounts that (a) contain
transactions that are complex or unusual in nature, (b) contain
significant estimates and period-end adjustments, (c) have been prone
to misstatements in the past, (d) have not been reconciled on a timely
basis or contain unreconciled differences, (e) contain inter-company
transactions, or (f) are otherwise associated with an identified risk of
material misstatement due to fraud. In audits of entities that have
several locations or components, consideration is given to the need to
select journal entries from multiple locations.
Journal entries or other adjustments processed outside the normal
course of business non standard journal entries may not be subject to
the same level of internal control as those journal entries used on a
recurring basis to record transactions such as monthly sales, purchases
and cash disbursements.
A44. The auditor uses professional judgment in determining the nature,
timing and extent of testing of journal entries and other adjustments.
However, because fraudulent journal entries and other adjustments are
often made at the end of a reporting period, paragraph 32(a)(ii) requires the
auditor to select the journal entries and other adjustments made at that time.
Further, because material misstatements in financial statements due to fraud
can occur throughout the period and may involve extensive efforts to
conceal how the fraud is accomplished, paragraph 32(a)(iii) requires the
auditor to consider whether there is also a need to test journal entries and
other adjustments throughout the period.
Accounting Estimates (Ref: Para. 32(b))
A45. In preparing financial statements, management is responsible for
making a number of judgments or assumptions that affect significant
accounting estimates and for monitoring the reasonableness of such
estimates on an ongoing basis. Fraudulent financial reporting is often
accomplished through intentional misstatement of accounting estimates.
This may be achieved by, for example, understating or overstating all
provisions or reserves in the same fashion so as to be designed either to
smooth earnings over two or more accounting periods, or to achieve a
designated earnings level in order to deceive financial statement users by
influencing their perceptions as to the entitys performance and profitability.
A46. The purpose of performing a retrospective review of management
judgments and assumptions related to significant accounting estimates
reflected in the financial statements of the prior year is to determine whether
there is an indication of a possible bias on the part of management. It is not
intended to call into question the auditors professional judgments made in
the prior year that were based on information available at the time.
Business Rationale for Significant Transactions (Ref: Para. 32(c))
A47. Indicators that may suggest that significant transactions that are
outside the normal course of business for the entity, or that otherwise
appear to be unusual, may have been entered into to engage in fraudulent
financial reporting or to conceal misappropriation of assets include:
The form of such transactions appears overly complex (for example, the
transaction involves multiple entities within a consolidated group or
multiple unrelated third parties).
Management has not discussed the nature of and accounting for such
transactions with those charged with governance of the entity, and there
is inadequate documentation.
Management is placing more emphasis on the need for a particular
accounting treatment than on the underlying economics of the
transaction.
Transactions that involve non-consolidated related parties, including
special purpose entities, have not been properly reviewed or approved
by those charged with governance of the entity.
The transactions involve previously unidentified related parties or
parties that do not have the substance or the financial strength to
support the transaction without assistance from the entity under audit.
Evaluation of Audit Evidence (Ref: Para. 34-37)
A48. SA 330 requires the auditor, based on the audit procedures
performed and the audit evidence obtained, to evaluate whether the
assessments of the risks of material misstatement at the assertion level
remain appropriate. This evaluation is primarily a qualitative matter based
on the auditors judgment. Such an evaluation may provide further insight
about the risks of material misstatement due to fraud and whether there is a
need to perform additional or different audit procedures. Appendix 3
contains examples of circumstances that may indicate the possibility of
fraud.
Analytical Procedures Performed in the Overall Review of the Financial
Statements (Ref: Para. 34)
A49. Determining which particular trends and relationships may indicate a
risk of material misstatement due to fraud requires professional judgment.
Unusual relationships involving year-end revenue and income are
particularly relevant. These might include, for example: uncharacteristically
large amounts of income being reported in the last few weeks of the
reporting period or unusual transactions; or income that is inconsistent with
trends in cash flow from operations.
Consideration of Identified Misstatements (Ref: Para. 35-37)
A50. Since fraud involves incentive or pressure to commit fraud, a
perceived opportunity to do so or some rationalization of the act, an instance
of fraud is unlikely to be an isolated occurrence. Accordingly,
misstatements, such as numerous misstatements at a specific location even
though the cumulative effect is not material, may be indicative of a risk of
material misstatement due to fraud.
A51. The implications of identified fraud depend on the circumstances.
For example, an otherwise insignificant fraud may be significant if it involves
senior management. In such circumstances, the reliability of evidence
previously obtained may be called into question, since there may be doubts
about the completeness and truthfulness of representations made and about
the genuineness of accounting records and documentation. There may also
be a possibility of collusion involving employees, management or third
parties.
A52. SA 450, Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit
13
,
and SA 700, The Independent Auditors Report on General Purpose

13
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board will issue an Exposure Draft of the proposed
new Standard based on the corresponding International Standard on Auditing in the near
future.
14
, establish requirements and provide guidance on the
evaluation and disposition of misstatements and the effect on the auditors
opinion in the auditors report.
Auditor Unable to Continue the Engagement (Ref: Para. 38)
A53. Examples of exceptional circumstances that may arise and that may
bring into question the auditors ability to continue performing the audit
include:
(a) The entity does not take the appropriate action regarding fraud that
the auditor considers necessary in the circumstances, even when the
fraud is not material to the financial statements;
(b) The auditors consideration of the risks of material misstatement due
to fraud and the results of audit tests indicate a significant risk of
material and pervasive fraud; or
(c) The auditor has significant concern about the competence or integrity
of management or those charged with governance.
A54. Because of the variety of the circumstances that may arise, it is not
possible to describe definitively when withdrawal from an engagement is
appropriate. Factors that affect the auditors conclusion include the
implications of the involvement of a member of management or of those
charged with governance (which may affect the reliability of management
representations) and the effects on the auditor of a continuing association
with the entity.
A55. The auditor has professional and legal responsibilities in such
circumstances and these responsibilities may vary under different
legislations and regulations and, accordingly, the clients. Under some
legislations/ regulations, for example, the auditor may be entitled to, or
required to, make a statement or report to the person or persons who made
the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities. Given the
exceptional nature of the circumstances and the need to consider the legal
requirements, the auditor may consider it appropriate to seek legal advice
when deciding whether to withdraw from an engagement and in determining
an appropriate course of action, including the possibility of reporting to
shareholders, regulators or others
15.

14
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 28, The Auditors Report
on Financial Statements.
15
The Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India contains
guidance on communication between the outgoing and incoming auditor.
A56. In some cases, the option of withdrawing from the engagement may
not be available to the auditor due to the nature of the terms of appointment
or public interest considerations.
Management Representations (Ref: Para. 39)
A57. SA 580, Management Representations
16
, establishes requirements
and provides guidance on obtaining appropriate representations from
management in the audit. In addition to acknowledging its responsibility for
the financial statements, it is important that, irrespective of the size of the
entity, management acknowledge its responsibility for internal control
designed, implemented and maintained to prevent and detect fraud.
A58. Because of the nature of fraud and the difficulties encountered by
auditors in detecting material misstatements in the financial statements
resulting from fraud, it is important that the auditor obtain a written
representation from management confirming that it has disclosed to the
auditor:
(a) The results of managements assessment of the risk that the financial
statements may be materially misstated as a result of fraud; and
(b) Its knowledge of actual, suspected or alleged fraud affecting the
entity.
Communications to Management and with Those Charged with
Governance
Communication to Management (Ref: Para. 40)
A59. When the auditor has obtained evidence that fraud exists or may
exist, it is important that the matter be brought to the attention of the
appropriate level of management as soon as practicable. This is so even if
the matter might be considered inconsequential (for example, a minor
defalcation by an employee at a low level in the entitys organization). The
determination of which level of management is the appropriate one is a
matter of professional judgment and is affected by such factors as the
likelihood of collusion and the nature and magnitude of the suspected fraud.
Ordinarily, the appropriate level of management is at least one level above
the persons who appear to be involved with the suspected fraud.
Communication with Those Charged with Governance (Ref: Para. 41)
A60. The auditors communication with those charged with governance

16
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 11, Management
Representations.
may be made orally or in writing. SA 260 (Revised) identifies factors the
auditor considers in determining whether to communicate orally or in writing.
Due to the nature and sensitivity of fraud involving senior management, or
fraud that results in a material misstatement in the financial statements, the
auditor reports such matters on a timely basis and may consider it
necessary to also report such matters in writing.
A61. In some cases, the auditor may consider it appropriate to
communicate with those charged with governance when the auditor
becomes aware of fraud involving employees other than management that
does not result in a material misstatement. Similarly, those charged with
governance may wish to be informed of such circumstances. The
communication process is assisted if the auditor and those charged with
governance agree at an early stage in the audit about the nature and extent
of the auditors communications in this regard.
A62. In the exceptional circumstances where the auditor has doubts about
the integrity or honesty of management or those charged with governance,
the auditor may consider it appropriate to obtain legal advice to assist in
determining the appropriate course of action.
Other Matters Related to Fraud (Ref: Para. 42)
A63. Other matters related to fraud to be discussed with those charged
with governance of the entity may include, for example:
Concerns about the nature, extent and frequency of managements
assessments of the controls in place to prevent and detect fraud and of
the risk that the financial statements may be misstated.
A failure by management to appropriately address identified material
weaknesses in internal control, or to appropriately respond to an
identified fraud.
The auditors evaluation of the entitys control environment, including
questions regarding the competence and integrity of management.
Actions by management that may be indicative of fraudulent financial
reporting, such as managements selection and application of
accounting policies that may be indicative of managements effort to
manage earnings in order to deceive financial statement users by
influencing their perceptions as to the entitys performance and
profitability.
Concerns about the adequacy and completeness of the authorization of
transactions that appear to be outside the normal course of business.
Communications to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities
(Ref: Para. 43)
A64. The auditors professional duty to maintain the confidentiality of client
information may preclude reporting fraud to a party outside the client entity.
However, the auditors legal responsibilities vary by law & statute and, in
certain circumstances, the duty of confidentiality may be overridden by
statute, the law or courts of law. In some entities, for example, in case of
audit of banks, the auditor has a statutory duty to report the occurrence of
fraud to the supervisory authorities, i.e., the Reserve Bank of India, in terms
of the latters circular no. DBS.FGV.(F).No. BC/23.08.001/2001-02. Also, in
some entities the auditor may have a duty to report misstatements to
authorities in those cases where management and those charged with
governance fail to take corrective action.
A65. The auditor may consider it appropriate to obtain legal advice to
determine the appropriate course of action in the circumstances, the
purpose of which is to ascertain the steps necessary in considering the
public interest aspects of identified fraud.
A66. In some clients, requirements for reporting fraud, whether or not
discovered through the audit process, may be subject to specific provisions
of the audit mandate or related legislation or regulation.
Material Modifications to ISA 240, The Auditors
Responsibility relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial
Statements
Additions
1. In paragraph A64, the guidance has been made more entity specific,
in the context of Indian legal requirement, by way of an example.
Deletions
1. Paragraph A6 of the Application Section of ISA 240 dealt with the
application of the requirements of ISA 240 to the audits of public sector
entities. Since as mentioned in the Preface to the Standards on Quality
Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, the
Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, apply
equally to all entities, irrespective of their form, nature and size, a specific
reference to applicability of the Standard to public sector entities has been
deleted.
Further, it is also possible that such a specific reporting requirement may
also exist in case of non public sector entities pursuant to a requirement
under the statute or regulation under which they operate. Accordingly, the
spirit of erstwhile A6, highlighting the fact that in some cases, the auditors
may be required by the legislature or the regulator to specifically report on
the instances of actual/suspected fraud in the client entity, has been retained
and examples of such situations have also been added.
considerations specific to public sector entities. Since as mentioned in the
Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other
Assurance and Related Services, the Standards issued by the Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board, apply equally to all entities, irrespective of their
form, nature and size, a specific reference to applicability of the Standard to
public sector entities has been deleted.
Further, it is also possible that option of withdrawal may not be available in
case of non public sector entities pursuant to a requirement under the
statute or terms of appointment of the auditor. Accordingly, the spirit of
erstwhile A56, highlighting that in some cases, the auditors may not be
having an option to withdraw from the engagement has been retained.
entities. Since as mentioned in the Preface to the Standards on Quality
deleted.
Further, it is also possible that such a specific reporting requirement may
also exist in case of non public sector entities pursuant to a requirement
under the statute or regulation under which they operate. Accordingly, the
spirit of A66 as given ISA 240, highlighting the fact that in some cases,
requirements for reporting fraud, whether or not discovered through the audit
process, may be subject to specific provisions of the audit mandate or
related legislation or regulation, has been retained.
Appendix 1
(Ref: Para. A25)
Examples of Fraud Risk Factors
The fraud risk factors identified in this Appendix are examples of such
factors that may be faced by auditors in a broad range of situations.
Separately presented are examples relating to the two types of fraud
relevant to the auditors consideration, i.e., fraudulent financial reporting and
misappropriation of assets. For each of these types of fraud, the risk factors
are further classified based on the three conditions generally present when
material misstatements due to fraud occur: (a) incentives/pressures, (b)
opportunities, and (c) attitudes/rationalizations. Although the risk factors
cover a broad range of situations, they are only examples and, accordingly,
the auditor may identify additional or different risk factors. Not all of these
examples are relevant in all circumstances, and some may be of greater or
lesser significance in entities of different size or with different ownership
characteristics or circumstances. Also, the order of the examples of risk
factors provided is not intended to reflect their relative importance or
frequency of occurrence.
Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Arising fromFraudulent
Financial Reporting
The following are examples of risk factors relating to misstatements arising
from fraudulent financial reporting.
Incentives/Pressures
Financial stability or profitability is threatened by economic, industry, or entity
operating conditions, such as (or as indicated by):
High degree of competition or market saturation, accompanied by
declining margins.
High vulnerability to rapid changes, such as changes in technology,
product obsolescence, or interest rates.
Significant declines in customer demand and increasing business
failures in either the industry or overall economy.
Operating losses making the threat of bankruptcy, foreclosure, or hostile
takeover imminent.
Recurring negative cash flows from operations or an inability to
generate cash flows from operations while reporting earnings and
earnings growth.
Rapid growth or unusual profitability especially compared to that of
other companies in the same industry.
New accounting, statutory, or regulatory requirements.
Excessive pressure exists for management to meet the requirements or
expectations of third parties due to the following:
Profitability or trend level expectations of investment analysts,
institutional investors, significant creditors, or other external parties
(particularly expectations that are unduly aggressive or unrealistic),
including expectations created by management in, for example, overly
optimistic press releases or annual report messages.
Need to obtain additional debt or equity financing to stay competitive
including financing of major research and development or capital
expenditures.
Marginal ability to meet exchange listing requirements or debt
repayment or other debt covenant requirements.
Perceived or real adverse effects of reporting poor financial results on
significant pending transactions, such as business combinations or
contract awards.
Information available indicates that the personal financial situation of
management or those charged with governance is threatened by the entitys
financial performance arising from the following:
Significant financial interests in the entity.
Significant portions of their compensation (for example, bonuses, stock
options, and earn-out arrangements) being contingent upon achieving
aggressive targets for stock price, operating results, financial position,
or cash flow.
17

Personal guarantees of debts of the entity.
There is excessive pressure on management or operating personnel to
meet financial targets established by those charged with governance,
including sales or profitability incentive goals.
Opportunities
The nature of the industry or the entitys operations provides opportunities to
engage in fraudulent financial reporting that can arise from the following:
Significant related-party transactions not in the ordinary course of
business or with related entities not audited or audited by another firm.
A strong financial presence or ability to dominate a certain industry

17
Management incentive plans may be contingent upon achieving targets relating only to
certain accounts or selected activities of the entity, even though the related accounts or
activities may not be material to the entity as a whole.
sector that allows the entity to dictate terms or conditions to suppliers or
customers that may result in inappropriate or non-arms-length
transactions.
Assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses based on significant estimates
that involve subjective judgments or uncertainties that are difficult to
corroborate.
Significant, unusual, or highly complex transactions, especially those
close to period end that pose difficult substance over form questions.
Significant operations located or conducted across international borders
in jurisdictions where differing business environments and cultures
exist.
Use of business intermediaries for which there appears to be no clear
business justification.
Significant bank accounts or subsidiary or branch operations in tax-
haven jurisdictions for which there appears to be no clear business
justification.
The monitoring of management is not effective as a result of the following:
Domination of management by a single person or small group (in a non
owner-managed business) without compensating controls.
Oversight by those charged with governance over the financial reporting
process and internal control is not effective.
There is a complex or unstable organizational structure, as evidenced by the
following:
Difficulty in determining the organization or individuals that have
controlling interest in the entity.
Overly complex organizational structure involving unusual legal entities
or managerial lines of authority.
High turnover of senior management, legal counsel, or those charged
with governance.
Internal control components are deficient as a result of the following:
Inadequate monitoring of controls, including automated controls and
controls over interim financial reporting (where external reporting is
required).
High turnover rates or employment of accounting, internal audit, or
information technology staff that are not effective.
Accounting and information systems that are not effective, including
situations involving material weaknesses in internal control.

Attitudes/Rationalizations
Communication, implementation, support, or enforcement of the entitys
values or ethical standards by management, or the communication of
inappropriate values or ethical standards, that are not effective.
Non-financial managements excessive participation in or preoccupation
with the selection of accounting policies or the determination of
significant estimates.
Known history of violations of securities laws or other laws and
regulations, or claims against the entity, its senior management, or
those charged with governance alleging fraud or violations of laws and
regulations.
Excessive interest by management in maintaining or increasing the
entitys stock price or earnings trend.
The practice by management of committing to analysts, creditors, and
other third parties to achieve aggressive or unrealistic forecasts.
Management failing to correct known material weaknesses in internal
control on a timely basis.
An interest by management in employing inappropriate means to
minimize reported earnings for tax-motivated reasons.
Low morale among senior management.
The owner-manager makes no distinction between personal and
business transactions.
Dispute between shareholders in a closely held entity.
Recurring attempts by management to justify marginal or inappropriate
accounting on the basis of materiality.
The relationship between management and the current or predecessor
auditor is strained, as exhibited by the following:
Frequent disputes with the current or predecessor auditor on
accounting, auditing, or reporting matters.
Unreasonable demands on the auditor, such as unrealistic time
constraints regarding the completion of the audit or the issuance of
the auditors report.
Restrictions on the auditor that inappropriately limit access to
people or information or the ability to communicate effectively with
those charged with governance.
Domineering management behavior in dealing with the auditor,
especially involving attempts to influence the scope of the
auditors work or the selection or continuance of personnel
assigned to or consulted on the audit engagement.
Risk Factors Arising from Misstatements Arising from
Misappropriation of Assets
Risk factors that relate to misstatements arising from misappropriation of
assets are also classified according to the three conditions generally present
when fraud exists: incentives/pressures, opportunities, and
attitudes/rationalization. Some of the risk factors related to misstatements
arising from fraudulent financial reporting also may be present when
misstatements arising from misappropriation of assets occur. For example,
monitoring of management and weaknesses in internal control that is not
effective may be present when misstatements due to either fraudulent
financial reporting or misappropriation of assets exist. The following are
examples of risk factors related to misstatements arising from
misappropriation of assets.
Incentives/Pressures
Personal financial obligations may create pressure on management or
employees with access to cash or other assets susceptible to theft to
misappropriate those assets.
Adverse relationships between the entity and employees with access to
cash or other assets susceptible to theft may motivate those employees to
misappropriate those assets. For example, adverse relationships may be
created by the following:
Known or anticipated future employee layoffs.
Recent or anticipated changes to employee compensation or benefit
plans.
Promotions, compensation, or other rewards inconsistent with
expectations.
Opportunities
Certain characteristics or circumstances may increase the susceptibility of
assets to misappropriation. For example, opportunities to misappropriate
assets increase when there are the following:
Large amounts of cash on hand or processed.
Inventory items that are small in size, of high value, or in high demand.
Easily convertible assets, such as bearer bonds, diamonds, or computer
chips.
Fixed assets which are small in size, marketable, or lacking observable
identification of ownership.

Inadequate internal control over assets may increase the susceptibility of
misappropriation of those assets. For example, misappropriation of assets
may occur because there is the following:
Inadequate segregation of duties or independent checks.
Inadequate oversight of senior management expenditures, such as
travel and other reimbursements.
Inadequate management oversight of employees responsible for
assets, for example, inadequate supervision or monitoring of remote
locations.
Inadequate job applicant screening of employees with access to assets.
Inadequate record keeping with respect to assets.
Inadequate system of authorization and approval of transactions (for
example, in purchasing).
Inadequate physical safeguards over cash, investments, inventory, or
fixed assets.
Lack of complete and timely reconciliations of assets.
Lack of timely and appropriate documentation of transactions, for
example, credits for merchandise returns.
Lack of mandatory vacations for employees performing key control
functions.
Inadequate management understanding of information technology,
which enables information technology employees to perpetrate a
misappropriation.
Inadequate access controls over automated records, including controls
over and review of computer systems event logs.
Attitudes/Rationalizations
Disregard for the need for monitoring or reducing risks related to
misappropriations of assets.
Disregard for internal control over misappropriation of assets by
overriding existing controls or by failing to correct known internal control
deficiencies.
Behavior indicating displeasure or dissatisfaction with the entity or its
treatment of the employee.
Changes in behavior or lifestyle that may indicate assets have been
misappropriated.
Tolerance of petty theft.
Appendix 2
(Ref: Para. A40)
Examples of Possible Audit Procedures to Address the
Assessed Risks of Material Misstatement Due to Fraud
The following are examples of possible audit procedures to address the
assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud resulting from both
fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets. Although
these procedures cover a broad range of situations, they are only examples
and, accordingly they may not be the most appropriate nor necessary in
each circumstance. Also the order of the procedures provided is not
intended to reflect their relative importance.
Consideration at the Assertion Level
Specific responses to the auditors assessment of the risks of material
misstatement due to fraud will vary depending upon the types or
combinations of fraud risk factors or conditions identified, and the classes of
transactions, account balances, disclosures and assertions they may affect.
The following are specific examples of responses:
Visiting locations or performing certain tests on a surprise or
unannounced basis. For example, observing inventory at locations
where auditor attendance has not been previously announced or
counting cash at a particular date on a surprise basis.
Requesting that inventories be counted at the end of the reporting
period or on a date closer to period end to minimize the risk of
manipulation of balances in the period between the date of completion
of the count and the end of the reporting period.
Altering the audit approach in the current year. For example, contacting
major customers and suppliers orally in addition to sending written
confirmation, sending confirmation requests to a specific party within an
organization, or seeking more or different information.
Performing a detailed review of the entitys quarter-end or year-end
adjusting entries and investigating any that appear unusual as to nature
or amount.
For significant and unusual transactions, particularly those occurring at
or near year-end, investigating the possibility of related parties and the
sources of financial resources supporting the transactions.
Performing substantive analytical procedures using disaggregated data.
For example, comparing sales and cost of sales by location, line of
business or month to expectations developed by the auditor.
Conducting interviews of personnel involved in areas where a risk of
material misstatement due to fraud has been identified, to obtain their
insights about the risk and whether, or how, controls address the risk.
When other independent auditors are auditing the financial statements
of one or more subsidiaries, divisions or branches, discussing with them
the extent of work necessary to be performed to address the assessed
risk of material misstatement due to fraud resulting from transactions
and activities among these components.
If the work of an expert becomes particularly significant with respect to a
financial statement item for which the assessed risk of misstatement
due to fraud is high, performing additional procedures relating to some
or all of the experts assumptions, methods or findings to determine that
the findings are not unreasonable, or engaging another expert for that
purpose.
Performing audit procedures to analyze selected opening balance sheet
accounts of previously audited financial statements to assess how
certain issues involving accounting estimates and judgments, for
example, an allowance for sales returns, were resolved with the benefit
of hindsight.
Performing procedures on account or other reconciliations prepared by
the entity, including considering reconciliations performed at interim
periods.
Performing computer-assisted techniques, such as data mining to test
for anomalies in a population.
Testing the integrity of computer-produced records and transactions.
Seeking additional audit evidence from sources outside of the entity
being audited.
Specific ResponsesMisstatement Resulting fromFraudulent
Financial Reporting
Examples of responses to the auditors assessment of the risks of material
misstatement due to fraudulent financial reporting are as follows:
Revenue Recognition
Performing substantive analytical procedures relating to revenue using
disaggregated data, for example, comparing revenue reported by month
and by product line or business segment during the current reporting
period with comparable prior periods. Computer-assisted audit
techniques may be useful in identifying unusual or unexpected revenue
relationships or transactions.
Confirming with customers certain relevant contract terms and the
absence of side agreements, because the appropriate accounting often
is influenced by such terms or agreements and basis for rebates or the
period to which they relate are often poorly documented. For example,
acceptance criteria, delivery and payment terms, the absence of future
or continuing vendor obligations, the right to return the product,
guaranteed resale amounts, and cancellation or refund provisions often
are relevant in such circumstances.
Inquiring of the entitys sales and marketing personnel or in-house legal
counsel regarding sales or shipments near the end of the period and
their knowledge of any unusual terms or conditions associated with
these transactions.
Being physically present at one or more locations at period end to
observe goods being shipped or being readied for shipment (or returns
awaiting processing) and performing other appropriate sales and
inventory cut-off procedures.
For those situations for which revenue transactions are electronically
initiated, processed, and recorded, testing controls to determine
whether they provide assurance that recorded revenue transactions
occurred and are properly recorded.
Inventory Quantities
Examining the entity's inventory records to identify locations or items
that require specific attention during or after the physical inventory
count.
Observing inventory counts at certain locations on an unannounced
basis or conducting inventory counts at all locations on the same date.
Conducting inventory counts at or near the end of the reporting period
to minimize the risk of inappropriate manipulation during the period
between the count and the end of the reporting period.
Performing additional procedures during the observation of the count,
for example, more rigorously examining the contents of boxed items,
the manner in which the goods are stacked (for example, hollow
squares) or labeled, and the quality (that is, purity, grade, or
concentration) of liquid substances such as perfumes or specialty
chemicals. Using the work of an expert may be helpful in this regard.
Comparing the quantities for the current period with prior periods by
class or category of inventory, location or other criteria, or comparison
of quantities counted with perpetual records.
Using computer-assisted audit techniques to further test the compilation
of the physical inventory countsfor example, sorting by tag number to
test tag controls or by item serial number to test the possibility of item
omission or duplication.
Management Estimates
Using an expert to develop an independent estimate for comparison to
managements estimate.
Extending inquiries to individuals outside of management and the
accounting department to corroborate managements ability and intent
to carry out plans that are relevant to developing the estimate.
Specific ResponsesMisstatements Due to Misappropriation of
Assets
Differing circumstances would necessarily dictate different responses.
Ordinarily, the audit response to an assessed risk of material misstatement
due to fraud relating to misappropriation of assets will be directed toward
certain account balances and classes of transactions. Although some of the
audit responses noted in the two categories above may apply in such
circumstances, the scope of the work is to be linked to the specific
information about the misappropriation risk that has been identified.
Examples of responses to the auditors assessment of the risk of material
misstatements due to misappropriation of assets are as follows:
Counting cash or securities at or near year-end.
Confirming directly with customers the account activity (including credit
memo and sales return activity as well as dates payments were made)
for the period under audit.
Analyzing recoveries of written-off accounts.
Analyzing inventory shortages by location or product type.
Comparing key inventory ratios to industry norm.
Reviewing supporting documentation for reductions to the perpetual
inventory records.
Performing a computerized match of the vendor list with a list of
employees to identify matches of addresses or phone numbers.
Performing a computerized search of payroll records to identify
duplicate addresses, employee identification or taxing authority
numbers or bank accounts.
Reviewing personnel files for those that contain little or no evidence of
activity, for example, lack of performance evaluations.
Analyzing sales discounts and returns for unusual patterns or trends.
Confirming specific terms of contracts with third parties.
Obtaining evidence that contracts are being carried out in accordance
with their terms.
Reviewing the propriety of large and unusual expenses.
Reviewing the authorization and carrying value of senior management
and related party loans.
Reviewing the level and propriety of expense reports submitted by
senior management.
Appendix 3
(Ref: Para. A48)
Examples of Circumstances that Indicate the Possibility
of Fraud
The following are examples of circumstances that may indicate the
possibility that the financial statements may contain a material misstatement
resulting from fraud.
Discrepancies in the accounting records, including:
Transactions that are not recorded in a complete or timely manner or
are improperly recorded as to amount, accounting period, classification,
or entity policy.
Unsupported or unauthorized balances or transactions.
Last-minute adjustments that significantly affect financial results.
Evidence of employees access to systems and records inconsistent
with that necessary to perform their authorized duties.
Tips or complaints to the auditor about alleged fraud.
Conflicting or missing evidence, including:
Missing documents.
Documents that appear to have been altered.
Unavailability of other than photocopied or electronically transmitted
documents when documents in original form are expected to exist.
Significant unexplained items on reconciliations.
Unusual balance sheet changes, or changes in trends or important
financial statement ratios or relationships, for example, receivables
growing faster than revenues.
Inconsistent, vague, or implausible responses from management or
employees arising from inquiries or analytical procedures.
Unusual discrepancies between the entity's records and confirmation
replies.
Large numbers of credit entries and other adjustments made to
accounts receivable records.
Unexplained or inadequately explained differences between the
accounts receivable sub-ledger and the control account, or between the
customer statements and the accounts receivable sub-ledger.
Missing or non-existent cancelled checks in circumstances where
cancelled checks are ordinarily returned to the entity with the bank
statement.
Missing inventory or physical assets of significant magnitude.
Unavailable or missing electronic evidence, inconsistent with the entitys
record retention practices or policies.
Fewer responses to confirmations than anticipated or a greater number
of responses than anticipated.
Inability to produce evidence of key systems development and program
change testing and implementation activities for current-year system
changes and deployments.
Problematic or unusual relationships between the auditor and
management, including:
Denial of access to records, facilities, certain employees, customers,
vendors, or others from whom audit evidence might be sought.
Undue time pressures imposed by management to resolve complex or
contentious issues.
Complaints by management about the conduct of the audit or
management intimidation of engagement team members, particularly in
connection with the auditors critical assessment of audit evidence or in
the resolution of potential disagreements with management.
Unusual delays by the entity in providing requested information.
Unwillingness to facilitate auditor access to key electronic files for
testing through the use of computer-assisted audit techniques.
Denial of access to key IT operations staff and facilities, including
security, operations, and systems development personnel.
An unwillingness to add or revise disclosures in the financial statements
to make them more complete and understandable.
An unwillingness to address identified weaknesses in internal control on
a timely basis.
Other
Unwillingness by management to permit the auditor to meet privately
with those charged with governance.
Accounting policies that appear to be at variance with industry norms.
Frequent changes in accounting estimates that do not appear to result
from changed circumstances.
Tolerance of violations of the entitys Code of Conduct.
Back
SA 240 (AAS 4)
THE AUDITORS RESPONSIBILITY TO
CONSIDER FRAUD AND ERROR
accounting periods commencing on or after 1st April 2003)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction................................................................................................1-2
Fraud and Error and Their Characteristics .................................................3-9
Responsibility of Those Charged With
Governance and of Management..........................10-12
Responsibilities of the Auditor................................................................13-41
Procedures when Circumstances Indicate a
Possible Misstatement ...........................................................................42-45
Considering Whether an Identified Misstatement
may be Indicative of Fraud..................................................................46-47
Evaluation and Disposition of Misstatements
and the Effect on the Auditor's Report...................................................... 48
Documentation.......................................................................................49-50
Management Representations................................................................51-55
Communication......................................................................................56-68
Auditor Unable to Complete the Engagement.........................................69-75
Effective Date............................................................................................. 76
Appendices
*
, The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud
and Error in an Audit of Financial Statements should be read in the context of
the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other
1

*
Issued in January, 2003. This Standard was originally issued in June, 1987 and was titled,
Fraud and Error. The date Standard on Auditing (SA) 240 (Revised) comes into effect, this
Standard on Auditing shall stand withdrawn. SA 240 (Revised) is effective for audits of Financial
Statements for periods beginning on or after April 1, 2009.
1
Published in the July, 2007issue of the Journal.
Back
SA 240 IV-80
Introduction
on the auditor's responsibility to consider fraud and error in an audit of
financial statements. While this SA focuses on the auditor's responsibilities
with respect to fraud and error, the primary responsibility for the prevention
and detection of fraud and error rests with both those charged with
governance and the management of an entity. In this Standard, the term
'financial information' encompasses 'financial statements'. In some
circumstances, specific legislations and regulations may require the auditor
to undertake procedures additional to those set out in this SA.
2. When planning and performing audit procedures and evaluating
and reporting the results thereof, the auditor should consider the risk of
material misstatements in the financial statements resulting fromfraud
or error.
Fraud and Error and Their Characteristics
3. Misstatements in the financial statements can arise from fraud or error.
The term "error" refers to an unintentional misstatement in the financial
statements, including the omission of an amount or a disclosure, such as:
A mistake in gathering or processing data from which financial
statements are prepared.
An incorrect accounting estimate arising from oversight or
misinterpretation of facts.
A mistake in the application of accounting principles relating to
measurement, recognition, classification, presentation, or disclosure.
4. The term "fraud" refers to an intentional act by one or more individuals
among management, those charged with governance, employees, or third
parties, involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or illegal
advantage. Although fraud is a broad legal concept, the auditor is concerned
with fraudulent acts that cause a material misstatement in the financial
statements. Misstatement of the financial statements may not be the
objective of some frauds. Auditors do not make legal determinations of
whether fraud has actually occurred. Fraud involving one or more members
of management or those charged with governance is referred to as
"management fraud"; fraud involving only employees of the entity is referred
The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud and Error
SA 240 IV-81
to as "employee fraud". In either case, there may be collusion with third
parties outside the entity.
5. Two types of intentional misstatements are relevant to the auditor's
consideration of fraud-misstatements resulting from fraudulent financial
reporting and misstatements resulting from misappropriation of assets.
6. Fraudulent financial reporting involves intentional misstatements or
omissions of amounts or disclosures in financial statements to deceive
financial statement users. Fraudulent financial reporting may involve:
Deception such as manipulation, falsification, or alteration of accounting
records or supporting documents from which the financial statements
are prepared.
Misrepresentation in, or intentional omission from, the financial
statements of events, transactions or other significant information.
Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to
measurement, recognition, classification, presentation, or disclosure.
7. Misappropriation of assets involves the theft of an entity's assets.
Misappropriation of assets can be accomplished in a variety of ways
(including embezzling receipts, stealing physical or intangible assets, or
causing an entity to pay for goods and services not received); it is often
accompanied by false or misleading records or documents in order to
conceal the fact that the assets are missing.
8. Fraud involves motivation to commit fraud and a perceived opportunity
to do so. Individuals might be motivated to misappropriate assets, for
example, because the individuals are living beyond their means. Fraudulent
financial reporting may be committed because management is under
pressure, from sources outside or inside the entity, to achieve an expected
(and perhaps unrealistic) earnings target particularly when the consequences
to management of failing to meet financial goals can be significant. A
perceived opportunity for fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of
assets may exist when an individual believes internal control could be
circumvented, for example, because the individual is in a position of trust or
has knowledge of specific weaknesses in the internal control system.
9. The distinguishing factor between fraud and error is whether the
underlying action that results in the misstatement in the financial statements
is intentional or unintentional. Unlike error, fraud is intentional and usually
SA 240 IV-82
involves deliberate concealment of the facts. While the auditor may be able
to identify potential opportunities for fraud to be perpetrated, it is difficult, if
not impossible, for the auditor to determine intent, particularly in matters
involving management judgment, such as accounting estimates and the
appropriate application of accounting principles.
Responsibility of Those Charged With Governance and
of Management
10. The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud and
error rests with both those charged with the governance and the
management of an entity. The respective responsibilities of those charged
with governance and management may vary from entity to entity.
Management, with the oversight of those charged with governance, needs to
set the proper tone, create and maintain a culture of honesty and high ethics,
and establish appropriate controls to prevent and detect fraud and error
within the entity.
11. It is the responsibility of those charged with governance of an entity to
ensure, through oversight of management, the integrity of an entity's
accounting and financial reporting systems and that appropriate controls are
in place, including those for monitoring risk, financial control and compliance
with the laws and regulations.
12. It is the responsibility of the management of an entity to establish a
control environment and maintain policies and procedures to assist in
achieving the objective of ensuring, as far as possible, the orderly and
efficient conduct of the entity's business. This responsibility includes
implementing and ensuring the continued operation of accounting and
internal control systems, which are designed to prevent and detect fraud and
error. Such systems reduce but do not eliminate the risk of misstatements,
whether caused by fraud or error. Accordingly, management assumes
responsibility for any remaining risk.
Responsibilities of the Auditor
13. As described in SA 200A, "Objective and Scope of the Audit of Financial
Statements", the objective of an audit of financial statements, prepared within
a framework of recognised accounting policies and practices and relevant
statutory requirements, if any, is to enable an auditor to express an opinion
SA 240 IV-83
on such financial statements. An audit conducted in accordance with the
auditing standards generally accepted in India
2
is designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the financial statements taken as a whole are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. The fact that
an audit is carried out may act as a deterrent, but the auditor is not and
cannot be held responsible for the prevention of fraud and error.
Inherent Limitations of an Audit
14. An auditor cannot obtain absolute assurance that material
misstatements in the financial statements will be detected. Owing to the
inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some
material misstatements of the financial statements will not be detected, even
though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the
auditing standards generally accepted in India. An audit does not guarantee
that all material misstatements will be detected because of such factors as
the use of judgment, the use of testing, the inherent limitations of internal
control and the fact that much of the evidence available to the auditor is
persuasive rather than conclusive in nature. For these reasons, the auditor
is able to obtain only a reasonable assurance that material misstatements in
the financial statements will be detected.
15. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is
higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from
error because fraud, generally, involves sophisticated and carefully
organized schemes designed to conceal it, such as forgery, deliberate failure
to record transactions, or intentional misrepresentations being made to the
auditor. Such attempts at concealment may be even more difficult to detect
when accompanied by collusion. Collusion may cause the auditor to believe
that evidence is persuasive when it is, in fact, false. The auditor's ability to
detect a fraud depends on factors such as the skillfulness of the perpetrator,
the frequency and extent of manipulation, the degree of collusion involved,
the relative size of individual amounts manipulated, and the seniority of those
involved. Audit procedures that are effective for detecting an error may be
ineffective for detecting fraud.

2
Paragraph 15 of SA 700, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements describes the standards
generally accepted in India.
SA 240 IV-84
16. Furthermore, the risk of the auditor not detecting a material
misstatement resulting from management fraud is greater than for employee
fraud, because those charged with governance and management are often in
a position that assumes their integrity and enables them to override the
formally established control procedures. Certain levels of management may
be in a position to override control procedures designed to prevent similar
frauds by other employees, for example, by directing subordinates to record
transactions incorrectly or to conceal them. Given its position of authority
within an entity, management has the ability to either direct employees to do
something or solicit their help to assist management in carrying out a fraud,
with or without the employees' knowledge.
17. The auditor's opinion on the financial statements is based on the
concept of obtaining reasonable assurance; hence, in an audit, the auditor
does not guarantee that material misstatements, whether from fraud or error,
will be detected. Therefore, the subsequent discovery of a material
misstatement of the financial statements resulting from fraud or error does
not, in and of itself, indicate:
(a) failure to obtain reasonable assurance,
(b) inadequate planning, performance or judgment,
(c) absence of professional competence and due care, or,
(d) failure to comply with auditing standards generally accepted in India.
This is particularly the case for certain kinds of intentional misstatements,
since auditing procedures may be ineffective for detecting an intentional
misstatement that is concealed through collusion between or among one or
more individuals among management, those charged with governance,
employees, or third parties, or involves falsified documentation. Whether
the auditor has performed an audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India is determined by the adequacy of the audit
procedures performed in the circumstances and the suitability of the auditor's
report based on the result of these procedures.
18. The auditor plans and performs an audit with an attitude of professional
skepticism. Such an attitude is necessary for the auditor to identify and
properly evaluate, for example:
SA 240 IV-85
Matters that increase the risk of a material misstatement in the financial
statements resulting from fraud or error (for instance, management's
characteristics and influence over the control environment, industry
conditions, and operating characteristics and financial stability).
Circumstances that make the auditor suspect that the financial
statements are materially misstated.
Evidence obtained (including the auditor's knowledge from previous
audits) that brings into question the reliability of management
representations.
19. However, unless the audit reveals evidence to the contrary, the auditor
is entitled to accept records and documents as genuine. Accordingly, an
audit performed in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
India rarely contemplate authentication of documentation, nor are auditors
trained as, or expected to be, experts in such authentication.
Planning Discussions
20. In planning the audit, the auditor should discuss with other
members of the audit team, the susceptibility of the entity to material
misstatements in the financial statements resulting fromfraud or error.
21. Such discussions would involve considering, for example, in the context
of the particular entity, where errors may be more likely to occur or how fraud
might be perpetrated. Based on these discussions, members of the audit
team may gain a better understanding of the potential for material
misstatements in the financial statements resulting from fraud or error in the
specific areas of the audit assigned to them, and how the results of the audit
procedures that they perform may affect other aspects of the audit.
Decisions may also be made as to which members of the audit team will
conduct certain inquiries or audit procedures, and how the results of those
inquiries and procedures will be shared.
Inquiries of Management
22. When planning the audit, the auditor should make inquiries of
management:
(a) to obtain an understanding of:
(i) management's assessment of the risk that the financial
statements may be materially misstated as a result of fraud;
and
SA 240 IV-86
(ii) the accounting and internal control systems management has
put in place to address such risk;
(b) to obtain knowledge of management's understanding regarding the
accounting and internal control systems in place to prevent and
detect error;
(c) to determine whether management is aware of any known fraud
that has affected the entity or suspected fraud that the entity is
investigating; and
(d) to determine whether management has discovered any material
errors.
23. The auditor supplements his own knowledge of the entity's business by
making inquiries of management regarding management's own assessment
of the risk of fraud and the systems in place to prevent and detect it. In
addition, the auditor makes inquiries of management regarding the
accounting and internal control systems in place to prevent and detect error.
Since management is responsible for the entity's accounting and internal
control systems and for the preparation of the financial statements, it is
appropriate for the auditor to inquire of management how it is discharging
these responsibilities. Matters that might be discussed as part of these
inquiries include:
(a) whether there are particular subsidiary locations, business segments,
types of transactions, account balances or financial statement
categories where the possibility of error may be high, or where fraud
risk factors may exist, and how they are being addressed by
management;
(b) the work of the entity's internal audit function and whether internal audit
has identified fraud or any serious weaknesses in the system of internal
control; and
(c) how management communicates to employees its view on responsible
business practices and ethical behaviour, such as through ethics
policies or codes of conduct.
24. The nature, extent and frequency of management's assessment of such
systems and risk vary from entity to entity. In some entities, management
may make detailed assessments on an annual basis or as part of continuous
monitoring. In other entities, management's assessment may be less formal
SA 240 IV-87
and less frequent. The nature, extent and frequency of management's
assessment are relevant to the auditor's understanding of the entity's control
environment. For example, the fact that management has not made an
assessment of the risk of fraud may be indicative of the lack of importance
that management places on internal control.
25. It is also important that the auditor obtains an understanding of the
design of the accounting and internal control systems within the entity. In
designing such systems, management makes informed judgments on the
nature and extent of the control procedures it chooses to implement and the
nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume. As a result of making
these inquiries of management, the auditor may learn, for example, that
management has consciously chosen to accept the risk associated with a
lack of segregation of duties. Information from these inquiries may also be
useful in identifying fraud risk factors that may affect the auditor's
assessment of the risk that the financial statements may contain material
misstatements caused by fraud.
26. It is also important for the auditor to inquire about management's
knowledge of frauds that have affected the entity, suspected frauds that are
being investigated, and material errors that have been discovered. Such
inquiries might indicate possible weaknesses in control procedures if, for
example, a number of errors have been found in certain areas. Alternatively,
such inquiries might indicate that control procedures are operating effectively
because anomalies are being identified and investigated promptly.
27. Although the auditor's inquiries of management may provide useful
information concerning the risk of material misstatements in the financial
statements resulting from employee fraud, such inquiries are unlikely to
provide useful information regarding the risk of material misstatements in the
financial statements resulting from management fraud. Accordingly, the
auditor's follow-up of fraud risk factors, as discussed in paragraph 39, is of
particular relevance in relation to management fraud.
Discussions with Those Charged with Governance
28. Those charged with governance of an entity have oversight
responsibility for systems for monitoring risk, financial control and
compliance with the law. In case of clients whose corporate governance
practices are well developed and those charged with governance play an
active role in oversight of how management has discharged its
SA 240 IV-88
responsibilities, auditors are encouraged to seek the views of those charged
with governance on the adequacy of accounting and internal control systems
in place to prevent and detect fraud and error, the risk of fraud and error, and
the competence and integrity of management. Such inquiries may, for
example, provide insights regarding the susceptibility of the entity to
management fraud. The auditor may have an opportunity to seek the views
of those charged with governance during, for example, a meeting with the
audit committee to discuss the general approach and overall scope of the
audit and eliciting views of independent directors. This discussion may also
provide those charged with governance with the opportunity to bring matters
of concern to the auditor's attention.
29. Since the responsibilities of those charged with governance and
management may vary by entity, it is important that the auditor understands
the nature of these responsibilities within an entity to ensure that the
inquiries and communications described above are directed to the
appropriate individuals
3
.
30. In addition, following the inquiries of management described in
paragraphs 22-27, the auditor considers whether there are any matters of
governance interest to be discussed with those charged with governance of
the entity
4
. Such matters may include for example:
Concerns about the nature, extent and frequency of management's
assessments of the accounting and control systems in place to prevent
and detect fraud and error, and of the risk that the financial statements
may be misstated.
A failure by management to address appropriately material weaknesses
in internal control identified during the prior period's audit.
The auditor's evaluation of the entity's control environment, including
questions regarding managements competence and integrity.
The effect of any matters, such as those above, on the general
approach and overall scope of the audit, including additional procedures
that the auditor may need to perform.

3
SA 260, Communications of Audit Matters with Those Charged with Governance, paragraph 8,
discusses with whom the auditor communicates when the entitys governance structure is not well
defined.
4
For a discussion of these matters, see SA 260, Communications of Audit Matters with Those
Charged with Governance, paragraphs 11-14.
SA 240 IV-89
Audit Risk
31. SA 400 (Revised), "Risk Assessments and Internal Control," paragraph
3, states that "audit risk" is the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate
audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated. Such
misstatements can result from either fraud or error. SA 400 (Revised)
identifies the three components of audit risk i.e., inherent risk, control risk
and detection risk, and also provides guidance on how to assess these risks.
Inherent Risk and Control Risk
32. When assessing inherent risk and control risk in accordance with
SA 400 (Revised), Risk Assessments and Internal Control, the auditor
should consider how the financial statements might be materially
misstated as a result of fraud or error. In considering the risk of
material misstatement resulting fromfraud, the auditor should consider
whether fraud risk factors are present that indicate the possibility of
either fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of assets.
33. SA 400 (Revised), Risk Assessments and Internal Control, describes
the auditor's assessment of inherent risk and control risk, and how those
assessments affect the nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures. In
making those assessments, the auditor considers how the financial
statements might be materially misstated as a result of fraud or error.
34. The fact that fraud is usually concealed can make it very difficult to
detect. Nevertheless, using the auditor's knowledge of the business, the
auditor may identify events or conditions that provide an opportunity, a
motive or a means to commit fraud, or indicate that fraud may already have
occurred. Such events or conditions are referred to as "fraud risk factors".
For example, a document may be missing, a general ledger may be out of
balance, or an analytical procedure may not make sense. However, these
conditions may be the result of circumstances other than fraud. Therefore,
fraud risk factors do not necessarily indicate the existence of fraud, however,
they often have been present in circumstances where frauds have occurred.
The presence of fraud risk factors may affect the auditor's assessment of
inherent risk or control risk. Examples of fraud risk factors are set out in
Appendix 1to this SA.
35. Fraud risk factors cannot easily be ranked in order of importance or
combined into effective predictive models. The significance of fraud risk
SA 240 IV-90
factors varies widely. Some of these factors will be present in entities where
the specific conditions do not present a risk of material misstatement.
Accordingly, the auditor exercises professional judgment when considering
fraud risk factors individually or in combination and whether there are specific
controls that mitigate the risk.
36. Although the fraud risk factors described in Appendix 1cover a broad
range of situations typically faced by auditors, they are only examples.
Moreover, not all of these examples are relevant in all circumstances, and
some may be of greater or lesser significance in entities of different size, with
different ownership characteristics, in different industries, or because of other
differing characteristics or circumstances. Accordingly, the auditor uses
professional judgment when assessing the significance and relevance of
fraud risk factors and determining the appropriate audit response.
37. The size, complexity, and ownership characteristics of the entity have a
significant influence on the consideration of relevant fraud risk factors. For
example, in the case of a large entity, the auditor ordinarily considers factors
that generally constrain improper conduct by management, such as the
effectiveness of those charged with governance, and the internal audit
function. The auditor also considers what steps have been taken to enforce
a formal code of conduct, and the effectiveness of the budgeting system. In
the case of a small entity, some or all of these considerations may be
inapplicable or less important. For example, a smaller entity might not have
a written code of conduct but, instead, may have developed a culture that
emphasises the importance of integrity and ethical behaviour through oral
communication and by management example. Domination of management
by a single individual in a small entity does not generally, in and of itself,
indicate a failure by management to display and communicate an appropriate
attitude regarding internal control and the financial reporting process.
Furthermore, fraud risk factors considered at a business segment operating
level may provide different insights than the consideration thereof at an
entity-wide level.
38. The presence of fraud risk factors may indicate that the auditor will be
unable to assess control risk at less than high for certain financial statement
assertions. On the other hand, the auditor may be able to identify internal
controls designed to mitigate those fraud risk factors that the auditor can test
to support a control risk assessment below high.
SA 240 IV-91
Detection Risk
39. Based on the auditor's assessment of inherent and control risks
(including the results of any tests of controls), the auditor should
design substantive procedures to reduce to an acceptably lowlevel the
risk that misstatements resulting fromfraud and error that are material
to the financial statements taken as a whole will not be detected. In
designing the substantive procedures, the auditor should address the
fraud risk factors that the auditor has identified as being present.
40. SA 400 (Revised) Risk Assessments and Internal Control, explains
that the auditor's control risk assessment, together with the inherent risk
assessment, influences the nature, timing and extent of substantive
procedures to be performed to reduce detection risk to an acceptably low
level. In designing substantive procedures, the auditor addresses fraud risk
factors that the auditor has identified as being present. The auditor's
response to those factors is influenced by their nature and significance. In
some cases, even though fraud risk factors have been identified as being
present, the auditor's judgment may be that the audit procedures, including
both tests of control, and substantive procedures, already planned, are
sufficient to respond to the fraud risk factors.
41. In other circumstances, the auditor may conclude that there is a need to
modify the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures to address
fraud risk factors present. In these circumstances, the auditor considers
whether the assessment of the risk of material misstatement calls for an
overall response, a response that is specific to a particular account balance,
class of transactions or assertion, or both types of response. The auditor
considers whether changing the nature of audit procedures, rather than the
extent of them, may be more effective in responding to identified fraud risk
factors. Examples of response procedures are set out in Appendix 2to this
SA, including examples of responses to the auditor's assessment of the risk
of material misstatement resulting from both fraudulent financial reporting
and misappropriation of assets.
Procedures when Circumstances Indicate a Possible
Misstatement
42. When the auditor encounters circumstances that may indicate that
there is a material misstatement in the financial statements resulting
SA 240 IV-92
fromfraud or error, the auditor should performprocedures to determine
whether the financial statements are materially misstated.
43. During the course of the audit, the auditor may encounter
circumstances that indicate that the financial statements may contain a
material misstatement resulting from fraud or error. Examples of such
circumstances that, individually or in combination, may make the auditor
suspect that such a misstatement exists are set out in Appendix 3to this
SA.
44. When the auditor encounters such circumstances, the nature, timing
and extent of the procedures to be performed depends on the auditor's
judgment as to the type of fraud or error indicated, the likelihood of its
occurrence, and the likelihood that a particular type of fraud or error could
have a material effect on the financial statements. Ordinarily, the auditor is
able to perform sufficient procedures to confirm or dispel a suspicion that the
financial statements are materially misstated resulting from fraud or error. If
not, the auditor considers the effect on the auditor's report, as discussed in
paragraph 48.
45. The auditor cannot assume that an instance of fraud or error is an
isolated occurrence and therefore, before the conclusion of the audit, the
auditor considers whether the assessment of the components of audit risk
made during the planning of the audit may need to be revised and whether
the nature, timing and extent of the auditor's other procedures may need to
be reconsidered. {See SA 400 (Revised), "Risk Assessments and Internal
Control," paragraphs 40 and 47} For example, the auditor would consider:
The nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures.
The assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls if control risk
was assessed below high.
The assignment of audit team members that may be appropriate in the
circumstances.
Considering Whether an Identified Misstatement may be
Indicative of Fraud
46. When the auditor identifies a misstatement, the auditor should
consider whether such a misstatement may be indicative of fraud and if
there is such an indication, the auditor should consider the implications
SA 240 IV-93
of the misstatement in relation to other aspects of the audit, particularly
the reliability of management representations.
47. If the auditor has determined that a misstatement is, or may be, the
result of fraud, the auditor evaluates the implications, especially those
dealing with the organizational position of the person or persons involved.
For example, fraud involving misappropriations of cash from a small petty
cash fund is ordinarily of little significance to the auditor in assessing the risk
of material misstatement due to fraud. This is because both the manner of
operating the fund and its size tend to establish a limit on the amount of
potential loss, and the custodianship of such funds is ordinarily entrusted to
an employee with a low level of authority. Conversely, when the matter
involves management with a higher level of authority, even though the
amount itself is not material to the financial statement, it may be indicative of
a more pervasive problem. In such circumstances, the auditor reconsiders
the reliability of evidence previously obtained since there may be doubts
about the completeness and truthfulness of representations made and about
the genuineness of accounting records and documentation. The auditor also
considers the possibility of collusion involving employees, management or
third parties when reconsidering the reliability of evidence. If management,
particularly at the highest level, is involved in fraud, the auditor may not be
able to obtain the evidence necessary to complete the audit and report on
the financial statements.
Evaluation and Disposition of Misstatements, and the
Effect on the Auditor's Report
48. When the auditor confirms that, or is unable to conclude whether,
the financial statements are materially misstated as a result of fraud or
error, the auditor should consider the implications for the audit. SA
320, "Audit Materiality," paragraphs 12-16, and SA 700, The Auditors
Report on Financial Statements, paragraphs 37-47, provide guidance on the
evaluation and disposition of misstatements and the effect on the auditor's
report. Where a significant fraud has occurred or the fraud is committed by
those charged with governance, the auditor should consider the necessity for
a disclosure of the fraud in the financial statements. If adequate disclosure
is not made the auditor should consider the necessity for a suitable
disclosure in his report.
SA 240 IV-94
Documentation
49. The auditor should document fraud risk factors identified as being
present during the auditor's assessment process (see paragraph 32)
and document the auditor's response to any such factors (see
paragraph 39). If during the performance of the audit, fraud risk factors
are identified that cause the auditor to believe that additional audit
procedures are necessary, the auditor should document the presence
of such risk factors and the auditor's response to them.
50. The auditor must document matters which are important in providing
evidence to support the audit opinion, and the working papers must include
the auditor's reasoning on all significant matters which require the auditor's
judgment, together with the auditor's conclusion thereon. Because of the
importance of fraud risk factors in the assessment of the inherent or control
risk of material misstatement, the auditor documents fraud risk factors
identified and the response considered appropriate by the auditor.
(Reference may also be had to SA 230, Documentation).
51. The auditor should obtain written representations from management
that:
(a) it acknowledges its responsibility for the implementation and operation
of accounting and internal control systems that are designed to prevent
and detect fraud and error;
(b) it believes the effects of those uncorrected financial statement
misstatements aggregated by the auditor during the audit are
immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial
statements taken as a whole. A summary of such items should be
included in or attached to the written representation;
(c) it has disclosed to the auditor all significant facts relating to any frauds
or suspected frauds known to management that may have affected the
entity; and
(d) it has disclosed to the auditor the results of its assessment of the risk
that the financial statements may be materially misstated as a result of
fraud.
SA 240 IV-95
52. SA 580, Representations by Management provides guidance on
obtaining appropriate representations from management in the audit. In
addition to acknowledging its responsibility for the financial statements, it is
important that management acknowledges its responsibility for the
accounting and internal control systems designed to prevent and detect fraud
and error.
53. Because management is responsible for adjusting the financial
statements to correct material misstatements, it is important that the auditor
obtains written representation from management that any uncorrected
misstatements resulting from either fraud or error are, in management's
opinion, immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate. Such
representations are not a substitute for obtaining sufficient appropriate audit
evidence. In some circumstances, management may not believe that certain
of the uncorrected financial statement misstatements aggregated by the
auditor during the audit are misstatements. For that reason, management
may want to add to their written representation words such as, "We do not
agree that items and . constitute misstatements because
[description of reasons]."
54. The auditor may designate an amount below which misstatements need
not be accumulated because the auditor expects that the accumulation of
such amounts clearly would not have a material effect on the financial
statements. In so doing, the auditor considers the fact that the determination
of materiality involves qualitative as well as quantitative considerations and
that misstatements of a relatively small amount could nevertheless have a
material effect on the financial statements. The summary of uncorrected
misstatements included in or attached to the written representation need not
include such misstatements.
55. Because of the nature of fraud and the difficulties encountered by
auditors in detecting material misstatements in the financial statements
resulting from fraud, it is important that the auditor obtains a written
representation from management confirming that it has disclosed to the
auditor all facts relating to any frauds or suspected frauds that it is aware of
that may have affected the entity, and that management has disclosed to the
auditor the results of management's assessment of the risk that the financial
statements may be materially misstated as a result of fraud.
SA 240 IV-96
Communication
56. When the auditor identifies a misstatement resulting fromfraud, or
a suspected fraud, or error, the auditor should consider the auditor's
responsibility to communicate that information to management, those
charged with governance and, in some circumstances, when so
required by the laws and regulations, to regulatory and enforcement
authorities also.
57. Communication of a misstatement resulting from fraud, or a suspected
fraud, or error to the appropriate level of management on a timely basis is
important because it enables management to take necessary action. The
determination of which level of management is the appropriate one is a
matter of professional judgment and is affected by such factors as the
nature, magnitude and frequency of the misstatement or suspected fraud.
Ordinarily, the appropriate level of management is at least one level above
the persons who appear to be involved with the misstatement or suspected
fraud.
58. The determination of which matters are to be communicated by the
auditor to those charged with governance is a matter of professional
judgment and is also affected by any understanding between the parties as
to which matters are to be communicated. Ordinarily, such matters include:
Questions regarding management competence and integrity.
Fraud involving management.
Other frauds which result in a material misstatement of the financial
statements.
Material misstatements resulting from error.
Misstatements that indicate material weaknesses in internal control,
including the design or operation of the entity's financial reporting
process.
Misstatements that may cause future financial statements to be
materially misstated.
SA 240 IV-97
Communi cati on of Mi sstatements Resul ti ng From Error to
Management and to Those Charged Wi th Governance
59. If the auditor has identified a material misstatement resulting from
error, the auditor should communicate the misstatement to the
appropriate level of management on a timely basis, and consider the
need to report it to those charged with governance.
60. The auditor should informthose charged with governance of those
uncorrected misstatements aggregated by the auditor during the audit
that were determined by management to be immaterial, both
individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a
whole.
61. As noted in paragraph 54, the uncorrected misstatements
communicated to those charged with governance need not include the
misstatements below a designated amount.
Communi cati on of Mi sstatements Resul ti ng From Fraud to
Management and to Those Charged wi th Governance
62. If the auditor has:
(a) identified a fraud, whether or not it results in a material
misstatement in the financial statements; or
(b) obtained evidence that indicates that fraud may exist (even if the
potential effect on the financial statements would not be material);
the auditor should communicate these matters to the appropriate level
of management on a timely basis, and consider the need to report such
matters to those charged with governance.
63. When the auditor has obtained evidence that fraud exists or may exist,
it is important that the matter is brought to the attention of an appropriate
level of management. This is so even if the matter might be considered
inconsequential (for example, a minor defalcation by an employee at a low
level in the entity's organization). The determination of which level of
management is the appropriate one is also affected in these circumstances
by the likelihood of collusion or the involvement of a member of
management.
SA 240 IV-98
64. If the auditor has determined that the misstatement is, or may be, the
result of fraud, and either has determined that the effect could be material to
the financial statements or has been unable to evaluate whether the effect is
material, the auditor:
(a) discusses the matter and the approach to further investigation with an
appropriate level of management that is at least one level above those
involved, and with management at the highest level; and
(b) if appropriate, suggests that management consult legal counsel.
Communication of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control
65. The auditor should communicate to management any material
weaknesses in internal control related to the prevention or detection of fraud
and error, which have come to the auditor's attention as a result of the
performance of the audit. The auditor should also be satisfied that those
charged with governance have been informed of any material weaknesses in
internal control related to the prevention and detection of fraud that either
have been brought to the auditor's attention by management or have been
identified by the auditor during the audit.
66. When the auditor has identified any material weaknesses in internal
control related to the prevention or detection of fraud or error, the auditor
communicates these material weaknesses in internal control to management.
Because of the serious implications of material weaknesses in internal
control related to the prevention and detection of fraud, it is also important
that such deficiencies be brought to the attention of those charged with
governance.
67. If the integrity or honesty of management or those charged with
governance are doubted, the auditor ordinarily considers seeking legal
advice to assist in the determination of the appropriate course of action.
Communication to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities
68. The auditor's professional duty to maintain the confidentiality of client
information ordinarily precludes reporting fraud and error to a party outside
the client entity. However, the auditor's legal responsibilities may vary and in
certain circumstances, statute, the law or courts of law may override the duty
of confidentiality. For example, under the regulatory framework for Non-
Banking Financial Companies, an obligation is cast upon the auditor to report
SA 240 IV-99
to the Reserve Bank of India any adverse or unfavourable remarks in his
report. In such circumstances, the auditor may consider seeking legal
advice.
Auditor Unable to Complete the Engagement
69. If the auditor concludes that it is not possible to continue
performing the audit as a result of a misstatement resulting fromfraud
or suspected fraud, the auditor should:
(a) consider the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in
the circumstances, including whether there is a requirement for the
auditor to report to the person or persons who made the audit
appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities;
(b) consider the possibility of withdrawing fromthe engagement; and
(c) if the auditor withdraws:
(i) discuss with the appropriate level of management and those
charged with governance, the auditor's withdrawal fromthe
engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal; and
(ii) consider whether there is a professional or legal requirement
to report to the person or persons who made the audit
appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities, the
auditor's withdrawal fromthe engagement and the reasons for
the withdrawal.
70. The auditor may encounter exceptional circumstances that bring into
question the auditor's ability to continue performing the audit, for example, in
circumstances where:
(a) the entity does not take the remedial action regarding fraud that the
auditor considers necessary in the circumstances, even when the fraud
is not material to the financial statements;
(b) the auditor's consideration of the risk of material misstatement resulting
from fraud and the results of audit tests indicate a significant risk of
material and pervasive fraud; or
(c) the auditor has significant concern about the competence or integrity of
management or those charged with governance.
SA 240 IV-100
71. Because of the variety of the circumstances that may arise, it is not
possible to describe definitively when withdrawal from an engagement is
appropriate. Factors that affect the auditor's conclusion include the
implications of the involvement of a member of management or of those
charged with governance (which may affect the reliability of management
representations) and the effects on the auditor of continuing association with
the entity.
72. The auditor has professional and legal responsibilities in such
circumstances and these responsibilities may vary in different circumstances.
For example, the auditor may be entitled to, or required to, make a statement
or report to the person or persons who made the audit appointment or, in
some cases, to regulatory authorities. Given the exceptional nature of the
circumstances and the need to consider the legal requirements, the auditor
considers seeking legal advice when deciding whether to withdraw from an
engagement and in determining an appropriate course of action.
Communication with an Incoming Auditor
73. Clause 8 of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 lays down that a Chartered Accountant in
practice would be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts a
position as an auditor, previously held by another chartered accountant
without first communicating to himin writing. On receipt of an inquiry
froma incoming auditor, the existing auditor should advise whether
there are any professional reasons why the incoming auditor should not
accept the appointment. If the client denies the existing auditor
permission to discuss its affairs with the incoming auditor or limits
what the existing auditor may say, that fact should be disclosed to the
incoming auditor.
74. The auditor may be contacted by an incoming auditor inquiring whether
there are any professional reasons why the incoming auditor should not
accept the appointment. The responsibilities of existing and incoming auditor
are set out in the Code of Ethics, issued by the Institute of Chartered
75. The extent to which an existing auditor can discuss the affairs of a client
with an incoming auditor will depend on whether the existing auditor has
obtained the client's permission to do so, and on the professional and legal
responsibilities relating to such disclosure. Subject to any constraints arising
SA 240 IV-101
from these responsibilities, the existing auditor advises the incoming auditor
whether there are any professional reasons not to accept the appointment,
providing details of the information and discussing freely with the incoming
auditor all matters relevant to the appointment. If fraud or suspected fraud
was a factor in the existing auditor's withdrawal from the engagement, it is
important that the existing auditor take care to state only the facts (not his or
her conclusions) relating to these matters.
Effective Date
accounting periods commencing on or after 1
st
April 2003.
Compatibility with International Standard on Auditing
(ISA) 240
The auditing standards established in this Standard on Auditing are generally
consistent in all material respects with those set out in International Standard
on Auditing (ISA) 240, The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud and
Error in an Audit of Financial Statements.
SA 240 IV-102
Appendix 1
Examples of Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements
Resulting fromFraud
The fraud risk factors identified in this Appendix are examples of such factors
typically faced by auditors in a broad range of situations. However, the fraud
risk factors listed below are only examples; not all of these factors are likely
to be present in all audits, nor is the list necessarily complete. Furthermore,
the auditor exercises professional judgment when considering fraud risk
factors individually or in combination and whether there are specific controls
that mitigate the risk. Fraud risk factors are discussed in paragraphs 34-38.
Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Resulting from
Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Fraud risk factors that relate to misstatements resulting from fraudulent
financial reporting may be grouped in the following three categories:
1. Management's Characteristics and Influence over the Control
Environment.
2. Industry Conditions.
3. Operating Characteristics and Financial Stability.
For each of these three categories, examples of fraud risk factors relating to
misstatements arising from fraudulent financial reporting are set out below:
1. Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Management's Characteristics and
Influence over the Control Environment
A. These fraud risk factors pertain to management's abilities, pressures,
style, and attitude relating to internal control and the financial reporting
process.
There is motivation for management to engage in fraudulent
financial reporting. Specific indicators might include the following:
A significant portion of management's compensation is
represented by bonuses, stock options or other incentives,
the value of which is contingent upon the entity achieving
unduly aggressive targets for operating results, financial
position or cash flow.
SA 240 IV-103
There is excessive interest by management in maintaining or
increasing the entity's stock price or earnings trend through
the use of unusually aggressive accounting practices.
Management commits to analysts, creditors and other third
parties to achieving what appear to be unduly aggressive or
clearly unrealistic forecasts.
Management has an interest in pursuing inappropriate means
to minimize reported earnings for tax-motivated reasons.
B. There is a failure by management to display and communicate an
appropriate attitude regarding internal control and the financial reporting
process. Specific indicators might include the following:
Management does not effectively communicate and support the
entity's values or ethics, or management communicates
inappropriate values or ethics.
Management is dominated by a single person or a small group
without compensating controls such as effective oversight by those
charged with governance.
Management does not monitor significant controls adequately.
Management fails to correct known material weaknesses in
internal control on a timely basis.
Management sets unduly aggressive financial targets and
expectations for operating personnel.
Management displays a significant disregard for regulatory
authorities.
Management continues to employ ineffective accounting,
information technology or internal auditing staff.
Non-financial management participates excessively in, or is
preoccupied with, the selection of accounting principles or the
determination of significant estimates.
There is a high turnover of management, counsel or board
members.
SA 240 IV-104
There is a strained relationship between management and the
current or predecessor auditor. Specific indicators might include
the following:
Frequent disputes with the current or a predecessor auditor
on accounting, auditing or reporting matters.
Unreasonable demands on the auditor, including
unreasonable time constraints regarding the completion of
the audit or the issuance of the auditor's report.
Formal or informal restrictions on the auditor that
inappropriately limit the auditor's access to people or
information, or limit the auditor's ability to communicate
effectively with those charged with governance.
Domineering management behaviour in dealing with the
auditor, especially involving attempts to influence the scope
of the auditor's work.
There is a history of securities law violations, or claims against the
entity or its management alleging fraud or violations of securities
laws.
The corporate governance structure is weak or ineffective, which
may be evidenced by, for example:
A lack of members who are independent of management.
Little attention being paid to financial reporting matters and to
the accounting and internal control systems by those charged
with governance.
2. Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Industry Conditions
These fraud risk factors involve the economic and regulatory environment in
which the entity operates.
New accounting, statutory or regulatory requirements that could impair
the financial stability or profitability of the entity.
A high degree of competition or market saturation, accompanied by
declining margins.
A declining industry with increasing business failures and significant
declines in customer demand.
SA 240 IV-105
Rapid changes in the industry, such as high vulnerability to rapidly
changing technology or rapid product obsolescence.
3. Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Operating Characteristics and
Financial Stability
These fraud risk factors pertain to the nature and complexity of the entity and
its transactions, the entity's financial condition, and its profitability.
Inability to generate cash flows from operations while reporting earnings
and earnings growth.
Significant pressure to obtain additional capital necessary to stay
competitive, considering the financial position of the entity (including a
need for funds to finance major research and development or capital
expenditures).
Assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses based on significant estimates
that involve unusually subjective judgments or uncertainties, or that are
subject to potential significant change in the near term in a manner that
may have a financially disruptive effect on the entity (for example, the
ultimate collectibility of receivables, the timing of revenue recognition,
the realisability of financial instruments based on highly-subjective
valuation of collateral or difficult-to-assess repayment sources, or a
significant deferral of costs).
Significant related party transactions which are not in the ordinary
course of business.
Significant related party transactions which are not audited or are
audited by another firm.
Significant, unusual or highly complex transactions (especially those
close to year-end) that pose difficult questions concerning substance
over form.
Significant bank accounts or subsidiary or branch operations in tax-
haven jurisdictions for which there appears to be no clear business
justification.
An overly complex organizational structure involving numerous or
unusual legal entities, managerial lines of authority or contractual
arrangements without apparent business purpose.
SA 240 IV-106
Difficulty in determining the organization or person (or persons)
controlling the entity.
Unusually rapid growth or profitability, especially compared with that of
other companies in the same industry.
Especially high vulnerability to changes in interest rates.
Unusually high dependence on debt, a marginal ability to meet debt
repayment requirements, or debt covenants that are difficult to maintain.
Unrealistically aggressive sales or profitability incentive programs.
A threat of imminent bankruptcy, foreclosure or hostile takeover.
Adverse consequences on significant pending transactions (such as a
business combination or contract award) if poor financial results are
reported.
A poor or deteriorating financial position when management has
personally guaranteed significant debts of the entity.
Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Resulting from
Misappropriation of Assets
Fraud risk factors that relate to misstatements resulting from
misappropriation of assets may be grouped in the following two categories:
1. Susceptibility of Assets to Misappropriation.
2. Controls.
For each of these two categories, examples of fraud risk factors relating to
misstatements resulting from misappropriation of assets are set out below.
The extent of the auditor's consideration of the fraud risk factors in category
2 is influenced by the degree to which fraud risk factors in category 1 are
present.
1. Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Susceptibility of Assets to
Misappropriation
These fraud risk factors pertain to the nature of an entity's assets and the
degree to which they are subject to theft.
Large amounts of cash on hand or processed.
SA 240 IV-107
Inventory characteristics, such as small size combined with high value
and high demand.
Easily convertible assets, such as bearer bonds, diamonds or computer
chips.
Fixed asset characteristics, such as small size combined with
marketability and lack of ownership identification.
2. Fraud Risk Factors Relating to Controls
These fraud risk factors involve the lack of controls designed to prevent or
detect misappropriation of assets.
Lack of appropriate management oversight (for example, inadequate
supervision or inadequate monitoring of remote locations).
Lack of procedures to screen job applicants for positions where
employees have access to assets susceptible to misappropriation.
Inadequate record keeping for assets susceptible to misappropriation.
Lack of an appropriate segregation of duties or independent checks.
Lack of an appropriate system of authorization and approval of
transactions (for example, in purchasing).
Poor physical safeguards over cash, investments, inventory or fixed
assets.
Lack of timely and appropriate documentation for transactions (for
example, credits for merchandise returns).
Lack of mandatory vacations for employees performing key control
functions.
SA 240 IV-108
Appendix 2
Examples of Modifications of Procedures in Response
to the Assessment of Fraud Risk Factors in
Accordance with Paragraphs 39-41
The following are examples of possible responses to the auditor's
assessment of the risk of material misstatement resulting from both
fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets. The auditor
exercises judgment to select the most appropriate procedures in the
circumstances. The procedures identified may neither be the most
appropriate nor necessary in each circumstance. The auditor's response to
fraud risk factors is discussed in paragraphs 40-41.
Overall Considerations
Judgments about the risk of material misstatements resulting from fraud may
affect the audit in the following ways:
i. Professional skepticism: The application of professional skepticism may
include: (i) increased sensitivity in the selection of the nature and extent
of documentation to be examined in support of material transactions,
and (ii) increased recognition of the need to corroborate management
explanations or representations concerning material matters.
ii. Assignment of members of the audit team: The knowledge, skill and
ability of members of the audit team assigned significant audit
responsibilities need to be commensurate with the auditor's assessment
of the level of risk for the engagement. In addition, the extent of
supervision needs to recognize the risk of material misstatement
resulting from fraud and the qualifications of members of the audit team
performing the work.
iii. Accounting principles and policies: The auditor may decide to consider
further management's selection and application of significant accounting
policies, particularly those related to revenue recognition, asset
valuation or capitalizing versus expensing.
iv. Controls: The auditor's ability to assess control risk below high may be
reduced. However, this does not eliminate the need for the auditor to
obtain an understanding of the components of the entity's internal
control sufficient to plan the audit. In fact, such an understanding may
SA 240 IV-109
be of particular importance in further understanding and considering any
controls (or lack thereof) the entity has in place to address the fraud risk
factors identified. However, this consideration also needs to include an
added sensitivity to management's ability to override such controls.
The nature, timing and extent of procedures may need to be modified in the
following ways:
The nature of audit procedures performed may need to be changed to
obtain evidence that is more reliable or to obtain additional
corroborative information. For example, more audit evidence may be
needed from independent sources outside the entity.
The timing of substantive procedures may need to be altered to be
closer to, or at, year-end. For example, if there are unusual incentives
for management to engage in fraudulent financial reporting, the auditor
might conclude that substantive procedures should be performed near
or at year-end because it would not be possible to control the
incremental audit risk associated with that fraud risk factor.
The extent of the procedures applied will need to reflect the assessment
of the risk of material misstatement resulting from fraud. For example,
increased sample sizes or more extensive analytical procedures may be
appropriate.
The auditor considers whether changing the nature of the audit procedures,
rather than the extent of them, may be more effective in responding to
identified fraud risk factors.
Considerations at the Account Balance, Class of Transactions and
Assertion Level
Specific responses to the auditor's assessment of the risk of material
misstatement resulting from fraud will vary depending upon the types or
combinations of fraud risk factors or conditions identified, and the account
balances, classes of transactions and assertions they may affect. If these
factors or conditions indicate a particular risk applicable to specific account
balances or types of transactions, audit procedures addressing these specific
areas will need to be considered that will, in the auditor's judgment, limit
audit risk to an appropriate level in light of the fraud risk factors or conditions
identified.

SA 240 IV-110
The following are specific examples of responses:
Visit locations or perform certain tests on a surprise or unannounced
basis. For example, observe inventory at locations where auditor
attendance has not been previously announced or count cash at a
particular date on a surprise basis.
Request that inventories be counted at a date closer to the year-end.
Alter the audit approach in the current year. For example, contact
major customers and suppliers orally in addition to sending written
confirmation, send confirmation requests to a specific party within an
organization, or seek more and different information.
Perform a detailed review of the entity's quarter-end or year-end
adjusting entries and investigate any entries that appear unusual as to
nature or amount.
For significant and unusual transactions, particularly those occurring at
or near year-end, investigate the possibility of related parties and the
sources of financial resources supporting the transactions.
Perform substantive analytical procedures at a detailed level. For
example, compare sales and cost of sales by location and line of
business to expectations developed by the auditor.
Conduct interviews of personnel involved in areas for which there is a
concern about the risk of material misstatement resulting from fraud, to
obtain their insights about the risk and whether, or how, controls
address the risk.
When other auditors are auditing the financial statements of one or
more subsidiaries, divisions or branches, consider discussing with them
the extent of work necessary to be performed to ensure that the risk of
material misstatement resulting from fraud resulting from transactions
and activities among these components is adequately addressed.
If the work of an expert becomes particularly significant with respect a
financial statement item for which the risk of misstatement due to fraud
is high, perform additional procedures relating to some or all of the
expert's assumptions, methods or findings to determine that the findings
are not unreasonable, or engage another expert for that purpose.
SA 240 IV-111
Perform audit procedures to analyze selected opening balance sheet
accounts of previously audited financial statements to assess how
certain issues involving accounting estimates and judgments, for
example, an allowance for sales returns, were resolved with the benefit
of hindsight.
Perform procedures on account or other reconciliation(s) prepared by
the entity, including consideration of reconciliation(s) performed at
interim periods.
Perform computer-assisted techniques, such as data mining to test for
anomalies in a population.
Test the integrity of computer-produced records and transactions.
Seeking additional audit evidence from sources outside of the entity
being audited.
Specific Responses-Misstatements Resulting fromFraudulent Financial
Reporting
Examples of responses to the auditor's assessment of the risk of material
misstatements resulting from fraudulent financial reporting are as follows:
Revenue recognition: If there is a risk of material misstatement
resulting from fraud that may involve or result in improper revenue
recognition, it may be appropriate to confirm with customers certain
relevant contract terms and the absence of side agreements, inasmuch
as the appropriate accounting is often influenced by such terms or
agreements.
Inventory quantities: If there is a risk of material misstatement resulting
from fraud relating to inventory quantities, reviewing the entity's
inventory records may help to identify locations, areas or items for
specific attention during or after the physical inventory count. Such a
review may lead, for example, to a decision to observe inventory counts
at certain locations on an unannounced basis, or to ask management to
ensure that counts at all locations subject to count are performed on the
same date.
Non-standard journal entries: If there is a risk of material misstatements
resulting from fraudulent financial reporting, performing tests of non-
standard journal entries to confirm that they are adequately supported
SA 240 IV-112
and reflect underlying events and transactions may help in identifying
fictitious entries of aggressive recognition practices. While there is not
generally accepted definition of non-standard journal entries, in general,
they are financial statement changes or entries made in the books and
records (including computer records) of an entity that usually are
initiated by management-level personnel and are not routine or
associated with the normal processing of transactions.
Specific Responses - Misstatements Resulting from Misappropriations
of Assets
Differing circumstances would necessarily dictate different responses.
Ordinarily, the audit response to a risk of material misstatement resulting
from fraud relating to misappropriation of assets will be directed toward
certain account balances and classes of transactions.
Although some of the audit responses noted in the two categories above may
apply in such circumstances, the scope of the work is to be linked to the
specific information about the misappropriation risk that has been identified.
For example, where a particular asset is highly susceptible to
misappropriation that is potentially material to the financial statements, it may
be useful for the auditor to obtain an understanding of the control procedures
related to the prevention and detection of such misappropriation and to test
the operating effectiveness of such controls.
SA 240 IV-113
Appendix 3
Examples of Circumstances that Indicate the
Possibility of Fraud or Error
The auditor may encounter circumstances that, individually or in combination,
indicate the possibility that the financial statements may contain a material
misstatement resulting from fraud or error. The circumstances listed below
are only examples; neither all of these circumstances are likely to be present
in all audits nor is the list necessarily complete. Circumstances that indicate
a possible misstatement are discussed in paragraphs 43-44.
Unrealistic time deadlines for audit completion imposed by
management.
Reluctance by management to engage in frank communication with
appropriate third parties, such as regulators and bankers.
Limitation in audit scope imposed by management.
Identification of important matters not previously disclosed by
management.
Significant difficult-to-audit figures in the accounts.
Aggressive application of accounting principles.
Conflicting or unsatisfactory evidence provided by management or
employees.
Unusual documentary evidence such as handwritten alterations to
documentation, or handwritten documentation which is ordinarily
electronically printed.
Information provided unwillingly or after unreasonable delay.
Seriously incomplete or inadequate accounting records.
Unsupported transactions.
Unusual transactions, by virtue of their nature, volume or complexity,
particularly if such transactions occurred close to the year-end.
Transactions not recorded in accordance with management's general or
specific authorization.
SA 240 IV-114
Significant unreconciled differences between control accounts and
subsidiary records or between physical count and the related account
balance which were not appropriately investigated and corrected on a
timely basis.
Inadequate control over computer processing (for example, too many
processing errors; delays in processing results and reports).
Significant differences from expectations disclosed by analytical
procedures.
Fewer confirmation responses than expected or significant differences
revealed by confirmation responses.
Evidence of an unduly lavish lifestyle by officers or employees.
Unreconciled suspense accounts.
Long outstanding account receivable balances.
Back

SA 250 (AAS 21)
CONSIDERATION OF
LAWS AND REGULATIONS
(Effective for all audits commencing on or after July 1, 2001)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-7
Responsibility of Management for the Compliance with
Laws and Regulations ....................................................................8-9
The Auditors Consideration of Compliance with
Laws and Regulations ................................................................10-23
Procedures when Non-compliance is Discovered .......................24-30
Communication/Reporting of Non-compliance ............................31-37
Withdrawal from the Engagement ..................................................38-39
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 40
Appendix

, Consideration of Laws and Regulations in

an Audit of Financial Statements should be read in the context of the
1

Issued in July, 2001

1
Back
SA 250 IV-116
Introduction
on the auditors responsibility regarding consideration of laws and regulations
in an audit of financial statements.
2. When planning and performing audit procedures and in evaluating
and reporting the results thereof, the auditor should recognize that non-
compliance by the entity with laws and regulations may materially affect
the financial statements. However, an audit cannot be expected to detect
non-compliance with all laws and regulations. Detection of non-compliance,
regardless of materiality, requires consideration of the implications for the
integrity of management or employees and the possible effect on other
aspects of the audit.
3. The term non-compliance as used in this SA refers to acts of omission
or commission by the entity being audited, either intentional or unintentional,
which are contrary to the prevailing laws or regulations. Such acts include
transactions entered into by, or in the name of, the entity or on its behalf by
its management or employees. For the purpose of this SA, non-compliance
does not include personal misconduct (unrelated to the business activities of
the entity) by the entitys management or employees.
4. Whether an act constitutes non-compliance is a legal determination that is
ordinarily beyond the auditors professional competence. The auditors training,
experience and understanding of the entity and its industry may provide a
basis for recognition that some acts coming to the auditors attention may
constitute non-compliance with laws and regulations. The determination as to
whether a particular act constitutes or is likely to constitute non-compliance is
generally based on the advice of an informed expert qualified to practice law
but ultimately can only be determined by a court of law.
5. Laws and regulations vary considerably in their relation to the financial
statements. Some laws or regulations determine the form or content of an
entitys financial statements or the amounts to be recorded or disclosures to
be made in financial statements. Other laws or regulations are to be
complied with by management or prescribe the provisions under which the
entity is allowed to conduct its business. Some entities operate in heavily
regulated industries (such as banks, sugar and pharmaceuticals industries).
Others are only subject to the many laws and regulations that generally
relate to the operating aspects of the business (such as those related to
Consideration of Laws and Regulations
SA 250 IV-117
occupational safety and health). Non-compliance with laws and regulations
could result in financial consequences for the entity such as fines, litigation,
etc. Generally, the further removed non-compliance is from the events and
transactions ordinarily reflected in financial statements, the less likely the
auditor is to become aware of it or to recognize its possible non-compliance.
6. This SA applies to audits of financial statements and does not apply to
other engagements in which the auditor is specifically engaged to test and
report separately on compliance with specific laws or regulations.
7. The auditors responsibility to consider fraud and errors in an audit of
financial statements is provided in SA 240, The Auditors Responsibilities to
Consider Fraud & Error in on Audit of Financial Statements
2
.
Responsibility of Management for the Compliance with
Laws and Regulations
8. It is managements responsibility to ensure that the entitys operations
are conducted in accordance with laws and regulations. The responsibility for
the prevention and detection of non-compliance rests with management.
9. The following policies and procedures, among others, may assist
management in discharging its responsibilities for the prevention and
detection of non-compliance with laws and regulations:
Monitoring legal requirements and ensuring that operating procedures
are designed to meet these requirements.
Instituting and operating appropriate systems of internal control.
Developing, publicising and following a Code of Conduct
3
.
Ensuring employees are properly trained and understand the Code of
Conduct.
Monitoring compliance with the Code of Conduct and acting
appropriately to discipline employees who fail to comply with it.

2
Standard on Auditing (SA) 240 was issued as AAS 4, Fraud and Error in June, 1987. This
Standard was revised in 2003 and titled as The Auditors Responsibilities to Consider Fraud and
Error in on Audit of Financial Statements. The Standard has further been revised under the Clarity
Project and titled as The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial
Statements. The Revised Standard is effective for audit of financial statements for periods
beginning on or after April 1, 2009.
3
Code of Conduct in this context means a document containing standard instructions to be
following by employees for ensuring compliance with laws and regulations.
SA 250 IV-118
Establishing a legal department and/or engaging legal advisors to assist
in monitoring legal requirements.
Maintaining a register of significant laws with which the entity has to
comply within its particular industry and a record of complaints in respect
of non-compliance.
In larger entities, these policies and procedures may be supplemented
by assigning appropriate responsibilities to:
An internal audit function
An audit committee
The Auditors Consideration of Compliance with Laws
and Regulations
10. The auditor is not, and cannot be held responsible for preventing non-
compliance. The fact that an audit is carried out may, however, act as a
deterrent.
11. An audit is subject to the unavoidable risk that some material
misstatements of the financial statements will not be detected, even though
the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with SAs and
other generally accepted audit procedures. This risk is higher with regard to
material misstatements resulting from non-compliance with laws and
regulations due to factors such as:
Existence of laws and regulations, relating to the operating aspects of
the entity, that do not have a material effect on the financial statements
and are not captured by the accounting and internal control systems.
The inherent limitations of the accounting and internal control systems
and the testing procedures.
Persuasive rather than conclusive nature of audit evidence, in general.
Deliberate designs, such as collusion, forgery, deliberate failure to
record transactions, senior management override of controls or
intentional misrepresentations being made to the auditor, to conceal non-
compliance.
12. The auditor should plan and performthe audit recognising that the
audit may reveal conditions or events that would lead to questioning
whether an entity is complying with laws and regulations.
SA 250 IV-119
13. In accordance with specific statutory requirements, the auditor may be
specifically required to report as part of the audit of the financial statements
whether the entity complies with certain provisions of laws or regulations. In
these circumstances, the auditor would plan to test for compliance with these
provisions of the laws and regulations.
14. In order to plan the audit, the auditor should obtain a general
understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity
and how the entity is complying with that framework.
15. In obtaining this general understanding, the auditor would particularly
recognise that non-compliance of some laws and regulations may have a
fundamental effect on the operations of the entity and may even cause the
entity to cease operations, or call into question the entitys continuance as a
going concern. For example, a Non-Banking Financial Company might have
to cease to carry on the business of a non-banking financial institution if it
fails to obtain a certificate of registration issued under Chapter III B of the
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and if its Net Owned Funds are less than
the amount specified by the RBI in this regard.
16. To obtain the general understanding of laws and regulations, the auditor
would ordinarily:
Use the existing knowledge of the entitys industry and business.
Inquire of management as to the laws or regulations that may be
expected to have a fundamental effect on the operations of the entity.
Inquire of management concerning the entitys policies and procedures
regarding compliance with laws and regulations.
Discuss with management the policies or procedures adopted for
identifying, evaluating and accounting for litigation claims and
assessments.
17. After obtaining the general understanding, the auditor should
performprocedures to identify instances of non-compliance with those
laws and regulations where non-compliance should be considered
when preparing financial statements, specifically:
Inquiring of management as to whether the entity is in compliance
with such laws and regulations.
Inspecting correspondence with the relevant licensing or regulatory
SA 250 IV-120
authorities.
18. Further, the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence about compliance with those laws and regulations generally
recognised by the auditor to have an effect on the determination of material
amounts and disclosures in financial statements. The auditor should have
a sufficient understanding of these laws and regulations in order to
consider themwhen auditing the assertions related to the determination of
the amounts to be recorded and the disclosures to be made.
19. Such laws and regulations would be well established and known to the
entity and within the industry; they would be considered on a recurring basis
each time financial statements are issued. These laws and regulations may
relate, for example, to the form and content of financial statements, including
industry specific requirements or the accrual or recognition of expenses for
retirement benefits, etc.
20. Other than as described in paragraphs 17, 18 and 19, the auditor need
not test or perform other procedures on the entitys compliance with laws and
regulations since this would be outside the scope of an audit of financial
statements.
21. The auditor should be conscious that procedures applied for the
purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements may bring
instances of possible non-compliance with laws and regulations to the
auditors attention. For example, such procedures include reading minutes;
inquiring of the entitys management and legal counsel concerning litigation,
claims and assessments; and performing substantive tests of details of
transactions or balances.
22. The auditor should obtain written representations that
management has disclosed to the auditor all known actual or possible
non-compliance with laws and regulations whose effects should be
considered when preparing financial statements.
23. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the auditor is entitled to
assume the entity is in compliance with these laws and regulations.
Procedures when Non-compliance is Discovered
24. The Appendix to this SA sets out examples of the type of information
that might come to the auditors attention that may indicate non-compliance.
SA 250 IV-121
25. When the auditor becomes aware of information concerning a
possible instance of non-compliance, the auditor should obtain an
understanding of the nature of the act and the circumstances in which it
has occurred, and sufficient other information to evaluate the possible
effect on the financial statements.
26. When evaluating the possible effect on the financial statements, the
auditor considers:
The potential financial consequences, such as fines, penalties,
damages, litigation, threat of expropriation of assets and enforced
discontinuation of operations, including violation of the going concern
assumption.
Whether the potential financial consequences require disclosure.
Whether the potential financial consequences are so serious as to call
into question the true and fair view given by the financial statements.
27. When the auditor believes there may be non-compliance, the
auditor should document the findings and discuss them with
management. Documentation of findings would include copies of records
and documents and making minutes of conversations, if appropriate.
28. If management does not provide satisfactory information that it is in fact in
compliance, the auditor would consult with the entitys lawyer about the
application of the laws and regulations to the circumstances and the possible
effects on the financial statements. When it is not considered appropriate to
consult with the entitys lawyer or when the auditor is not satisfied with the
opinion, the auditor would consider consulting some other lawyer as to whether
a violation of a law or regulation is involved, the possible legal consequences
and what further action, if any, the auditor would take.
29. When adequate information about the suspected non-compliance
cannot be obtained, the auditor should consider the effect of the lack of
audit evidence on the auditors report.
30. The auditor should consider the implications of non-compliance in
relation to other aspects of the audit, particularly the reliability of
management representations. In this regard, the auditor reconsiders the
risk assessment and the validity of management representations, in case of
non-compliance not detected by internal controls or not included in
management representations. The implications of particular instances of non-
SA 250 IV-122
compliance discovered by the auditor will depend on the relationship of the
perpetration and concealment, if any, of the act to specific control procedures
and the level of management or employees involved.
Communication/Reporting of Non-compliance
To Management
31. The auditor should, as soon as practicable, either communicate
with the audit committee, the board of directors and senior
management, or obtain evidence that they are appropriately informed,
regarding non-compliance that comes to the auditors attention.
However, the auditor need not do so for matters that are clearly
inconsequential or trivial and may reach agreement in advance on the nature
of such matters to be communicated.
32. If in the auditors judgement, the non-compliance is believed to
be intentional and/or material, the auditor should communicate the
finding without delay.
33. If the auditor suspects that members of senior management,
including members of the board of directors, are involved in
non-compliance, the auditor should communicate the matter to the next
higher level of authority at the entity, such as an audit committee or
board of directors. Where no higher authority exists, or if the auditor
believes that the communication may not be acted upon or is unsure as to
the person to whom to report, the auditor may consider seeking legal advice.
To the Users of the Auditors Report on the Financial Statements
34. If the auditor concludes that the non-compliance has a material
effect on the financial statements, and has not been properly reflected
in the financial statements, the auditor should express a qualified or an
adverse opinion.
35. If the auditor is precluded by the entity fromobtaining sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to evaluate whether non-compliance that
may be material to the financial statements has, or is likely to have,
occurred, the auditor should express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer
of opinion on the financial statements on the basis of a limitation on the
scope of the audit.
SA 250 IV-123
36. If the auditor is unable to determine whether non-compliance has
occurred because of limitations imposed by the circumstances rather
than by the entity, the auditor should consider the effect on the
auditors report.
To Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities
37. The auditors duty of confidentiality would ordinarily preclude reporting
non-compliance to a third party. However, in certain circumstances, that duty
of confidentiality is overridden by statute, law or by courts of law (for
example, the auditor is required to report certain matters of non-compliance
to the Reserve Bank of India as per the requirements of Non Banking
Financial Companies Auditors Report (Reserve Bank) Directions, 1988,
issued by the Reserve Bank of India).
Withdrawal fromthe Engagement
38. The auditor may conclude that withdrawal from the engagement is
necessary when the entity does not take the remedial action that the auditor
considers necessary in the circumstances, even when the non-compliance is not
material to the financial statements. Factors that would affect the auditors
conclusion include the implications of the involvement of the highest authority
within the entity which may affect the reliability of management representations,
and the effects on the auditor of continuing association with the entity. In
appropriate circumstances, the auditor may consider seeking legal advice.
39. An outgoing auditor, on receiving communication from the
incoming auditor, should send a reply to himas soon as possible,
setting out in detail the reasons, which according to himhad given rise
to the attendant circumstances but without disclosing any information
as regards the affairs of the client which he is not competent to do.
However, with the permission of the client he may disclose information
regarding affairs of the client to the incoming auditor.
Effective Date
40. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all audits
commencing on or after 1st July, 2001.
SA 250 IV-124
Appendix
Indications That Non-compliance May Have Occurred
Examples of the type of information that may come to the auditors attention
that may indicate that non-compliance with laws or regulations has occurred
are listed below:
Investigation by government departments or payment of fines, additional
taxes or penalties.
Payments for unspecified services or loans to consultants, related
parties, employees or government employees.
Sales commission or agents fees that appear excessive in relation to
those ordinarily paid by the entity or in its industry or to the services
actually received.
Purchases at prices significantly above or below market price.
Unusual payments in cash and other unusual transactions.
Unusual transactions with companies registered in tax havens.
Payments for goods or services made other than to the country from
which the goods or services originated.
Payments without proper exchange control documentation.
Existence of an accounting system which fails, whether by design or by
accident, to provide an adequate audit trail or sufficient evidence.
Unauthorised transactions or improperly recorded transactions.
Media comment.
Back
SA 260 (AAS 27)
COMMUNICATIONS OF AUDIT MATTERS
WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction.........................................................................................1-4
Relevant Persons .............................................................................5-10
Audit Matters of Governance Interest to be Communicated .....11-14
Form of Communications..............................................................15-17
Other Matters ..................................................................................18-19
Confidentiality...................................................................................... 20
Laws and Regulations ....................................................................... 21
Effective Date....................................................................................... 22
,Communications of Audit Matters

with Those Charged with Governance should be read in the context of the
1


1
Back
SA 260 IV-126
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Auditing (SA) is to establish standards on
communications of audit matters arising from the audit of financial statements
between the auditor and those charged with governance of an entity. These
communications relate to audit matters of governance interest as defined in this
SA. This SA does not provide guidance on communications by the auditor to
parties outside the entity, for example, external regulatory or supervisory
agencies.
2. The auditor should communicate audit matters of governance interest
arising fromthe audit of financial statement with those charged with
governance of an entity.
3. For the purpose of this SA, the term governance is used to describe the
role of persons entrusted with the supervision, control and direction of an entity.
Those charged with governance are, ordinarily, accountable for ensuring that the
entity achieves its objectives, financial reporting, and reporting to interested
parties. Those charged with governance include management only when it
performs such functions.
4. For the purpose of this SA, audit matters of governance interest are those
matters that arise from the audit of financial statements and are, in the opinion of
the auditor, both important and relevant to those charged with governance in
overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process. Audit matters of
governance interest include only those matters that have come to the attention of
the auditor as a result of the performance of the audit. The auditor is not
required, in an audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
India
2
, to design procedures for the specific purpose of identifying matters of
governance interest.
Relevant Persons
5. The auditor should determine the relevant persons who are charged
with governance and with whomaudit matters of governance interest are
to be communicated.
6. The structure of governance may vary from entity to entity, depending upon
size and legal constitution. For example, in case of companies, the Board of
Directors and the committees constituted under the Board like the audit
committee, ethics committee; in case of trusts, societies etc., the board of
trustees or the management committee, etc.

2
Paragraph 15 of SA 700, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements describes auditing
standards generally accepted in India.
Communications of Audit Matters
SA 260 IV-127
7. The auditor uses judgement to determine those persons with whom audit
matters of governance interest are communicated, taking into account, the
governance structure of the entity, the circumstances of the engagement and
relevant legislation, if any. The auditor also considers the legal responsibilities of
those persons. The auditor also considers the importance and sensitivity of the
audit matters of governance interest to be communicated. For example, in case
of a company where the board of directors has established an audit committee
under it, the auditor may decide to communicate with the audit committee, or with
the whole board, depending on the importance of the audit matters of
8. When the entitys governance structure is not well defined, or those
charged with governance are not clearly identified by the circumstances of the
engagement, or by legislation, the auditor comes to an agreement with the entity
about with whom the audit matters of governance interest are to be
communicated. Examples include some owner-managed entities, not for profit
organisations, government agencies, etc.
9. To avoid misunderstandings, an audit engagement letter
3
may explain that
the auditor will communicate only those matters of governance interest that come
to attention as a result of the performance of an audit and that the auditor is not
required to design procedures for the specific purpose of identifying matters of
governance interest. The engagement letter may also:
Describe the form in which any communication on audit matters of
governance interest will be made;
Identify the relevant persons with whom such communications will be
made;
Identify any specific audit matters of governance interest which it has been
agreed are to be communicated.
10. The effectiveness of communications is enhanced by developing a
constructive working relationship between the auditor and those charged with
governance. This relationship is developed while maintaining an attitude of
professional independence and objectivity.
Audit Matters of Governance Interest to be Communicated
11. The auditor should consider audit matters of governance interest that arise
from the audit of financial statements and communicate them with those charged
with governance. Such matters may include:

3
Refer Standard on Auditing (SA) 210, Terms of Audit Engagement, issued by the Council of the
SA 260 IV-128
The general approach and overall scope of the audit, including any
expected limitations thereon, or any additional requirements;
The selection of or changes in, significant accounting policies and practices
that have, or could have, a material effect on the entitys financial
statements;
The potential effect on the financial statements of any significant risks and
exposures, such as pending litigation, that are required to be disclosed in
the financial statements;
Adjustments to financial statements arising out of audit that have, or could
have, a significant effect on the entitys financial statements;
Material uncertainties related to events and conditions that may cast
significant doubt on the entitys ability to continue as a going concern;
Disagreements with management about matters that, individually or in
aggregate, could be significant to the entitys financial statements or the
auditors report. These communications include consideration of whether
the matter has, or has not, been resolved and the significance of the
matter;
Expected modifications to the auditors report;
Other matters warranting attention by those charged with governance, such
as material weaknesses in internal control, questions regarding
management integrity, and fraud involving management;
Any other matters agreed upon in the terms of the audit engagement.
12. As part of the auditors communications, those charged with governance
are informed that:
The auditors communications of matters include only those audit matters of
governance interest that have come to the attention of the auditor as a
result of the performance of the audit;
An audit of financial statements is not designed to identify all matters that
may be relevant to those charged with governance. Accordingly, the audit
does not ordinarily identify all such matters.
13. The auditor should communicate audit matters of governance interest
on a timely basis. This enables those charged with governance to take
appropriate action.
14. In order to achieve timely communications, the auditor discusses with those
charged with governance the basis and timing of such communications. In
certain cases, because of the nature of the matter, the auditor may communicate
that matter sooner than previously agreed.
Communications of Audit Matters
SA 260 IV-129
Forms of Communication
15. The auditors communication with those charged with governance
may be made orally or in writing. The auditors decision whether to
communicate orally or in writing is affected by factors such as:
The size, operating structure, legal structure, and communications
processes of the entity being audited;
The nature, sensitivity and significance of the audit matters of governance
interest to be communicated;
The arrangements made with respect to periodic meetings or reporting of
audit matters of governance interest;
The amount of on-going contact and dialogue the auditor has with those
16. When audit matters of governance interest are communicated orally,
the auditor should document in the working papers the matters
communicated and any responses to those matters. This document may
take the form of minutes of the auditors discussion with those charged with
governance. In certain circumstances, depending on the nature, sensitivity, and
significance of the matter, it may be advisable for the auditor to confirm in writing
with those charged with governance any oral communication on audit matters of
17. Ordinarily, the auditor initially discusses audit matters of governance
interest with management, except those matters relating to questions related to
managements competence or integrity. In case of matters relating to questions
related to managements competence or integrity, the auditor discusses the audit
matters with those charged with governance. These initial discussions with
management are important in order to clarify facts and issues, and to give
management an opportunity to provide further information. If management
agrees to communicate a matter of governance interest with those charged with
governance, the auditor may not need to repeat the communications, provided
that the auditor is satisfied that such communications have effectively and
appropriately been made.
Other Matters
18. If the auditor considers that having regard to the facts and
circumstances of the case a modification
4
of the auditors report on
financial statements is required, as described in SA 700, The Auditors

4
Paragraph 31 of SA 700, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements deals with the concept
of modified audit report.
SA 260 IV-130
Report on Financial Statements, communications between the auditor and
those charged with governance cannot be regarded as a substitute.
19. The auditor considers whether audit matters of governance interest
previously communicated may have an effect on the current years financial
statements. The auditor considers whether the point continues to be a matter of
governance interest and whether to communicate the matter again with those
Confidentiality
20. The requirements of professional pronouncements, legislation or regulation
may impose obligations of confidentiality that restrict the auditors
communications of audit matters of governance interest. The auditor refers to
such requirements before communicating with those charged with governance.
In some circumstances, the potential conflicts with the auditors ethical and legal
obligations of confidentiality and reporting may be complex. In these cases, the
auditor may wish to consult a legal counsel.
Laws and Regulations
21. The requirements of professional pronouncements, legislation or regulation
may impose obligation on the auditor to make communications on governance
related matters. For example, the requirements of regulators, such as report
under Section 619 (3) of the Companies Act, 1956, in case of Public Sector
Undertakings and Long Form Audit Report in the case of Public Sector Banks,
may impose obligation on the auditor to make communications on governance
related matters. These additional communication requirements are not covered
by this SA; however, they may affect the content, form and timing of
communications with those charged with governance.
Effective Date
22. This Standard on Auditing is effective for all audits relating to accounting
periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2003.
260
material respects with those set out in ISA 260 Communications of Audit Matters
with Those Charged with Governance.
Back

SA 299 (AAS 12)
RESPONSIBILITY OF JOINT AUDITORS
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Division of Work...................................................................................2-3
Coordination............................................................................................ 4
Relationship Among Joint Auditors.................................................5-11
Reporting Responsibilities .................................................................. 12
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 13

*
, Responsibility of Joint Auditors should be
1
, which sets out
The Statement on the Responsibility of J oint Auditors issued by the Institute
earlier shall stand completely withdrawn in respect of all audits relating to

*
Issued in November, 1996.
1
Back
SA 299 IV-132
Introduction
1. The practice of appointing more than one auditor to conduct the audit of
large entities is in vogue these days. Such auditors, known as joint auditors,
conduct the audit jointly and report on the financial statements of the entity. This
Standard deals with the professional responsibilities which the auditors
undertake in accepting such appointments as joint auditors. The Standard does
not deal with the relationship between a principal auditor who is appointed to
report on the financial statements of an entity and another auditor who is
appointed to report on the financial statements of one or more divisions or
branches included in the financial statements of the entity, e.g., the relationship
between a company auditor appointed under section 224 of the Companies Act,
1956 and a branch auditor appointed under section 228 of the said Act.
2

Division of Work
2. Where joint auditors are appointed, they should, by mutual discussion,
divide the audit work among themselves. The division of work would usually
be in terms of audit of identifiable units or specified areas. In some cases,
due to the nature of the business of the entity under audit, such a division of
work may not be possible. In such situations, the division of work may be
with reference to items of assets or liabilities or income or expenditure or
with reference to periods of time. Certain areas of work, owing to their
importance or owing to the nature of the work involved, would often not be
divided and would be covered by all the joint auditors.
3. The division of work among joint auditors as well as the areas of work to
be covered by all of them should be adequately documented and preferably
communicated to the entity.
Coordination
4. Where, in the course of his work, a joint auditor comes across matters
which are relevant to the areas of responsibility of other joint auditors and
which deserve their attention, or which require disclosure or require
discussion with, or application of judgement by, other joint auditors, he
should communicate the same to all the other joint auditors in writing. This

2
These aspects have been dealt with in Standard on Auditing (SA) 600 (revised 2002), Using the
Work of Another Auditor.
Responsibility of Joint Auditors
SA 299 IV-133
should be done by the submission of a report or note prior to the finalisation
of the audit.
Relationship Among Joint Auditors
5. In respect of audit work divided among the joint auditors, each joint
auditor is responsible only for the work allocated to him, whether or not he
has prepared a separate report on the work performed by him. On the other
hand, all the joint auditors are jointly and severally responsible
(a) in respect of the audit work which is not divided among the joint auditors
and is carried out by all of them;
(b) in respect of decisions taken by all the joint auditors concerning the nature,
timing or extent of the audit procedures to be performed by any of the joint
auditors. It may, however, be clarified that all the joint auditors are
responsible only in respect of the appropriateness of the decisions
concerning the nature, timing or extent of the audit procedures agreed upon
among them; proper execution of these audit procedures is the separate
and specific responsibility of the joint auditor concerned;
(c) in respect of matters which are brought to the notice of the joint auditors
by any one of them and on which there is an agreement among the joint
auditors;
(d) for examining that the financial statements of the entity comply with the
disclosure requirements of the relevant statute; and
(e) for ensuring that the audit report complies with the requirements of the
relevant statute.
6. If any matters of the nature referred to in paragraph 4 above are
brought to the attention of the entity or other joint auditors by an auditor after
the audit report has been submitted, the other joint auditors would not be
responsible for those matters.
7. Subject to paragraph 5(b) above, it is the responsibility of each joint
auditor to determine the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be
applied in relation to the area of work allocated to him. The issues such as
appropriateness of using test checks or sampling should be decided by each
joint auditor in relation to his own area of work. This responsibility is not
shared by the other joint auditors. Thus, it is the separate and specific
responsibility of each joint auditor to study and evaluate the prevailing
SA 299 IV-134
system of internal control relating to the work allocated to him. Similarly, the
nature, timing and extent of the enquiries to be made in the course of audit
as well as the other audit procedures to be applied are solely the
responsibility of each joint auditor.
8. In the case of audit of a large entity with several branches, including
those required to be audited by branch auditors, the branch audit
reports/returns may be required to be scrutinised by different joint auditors in
accordance with the allocation of work. In such cases, it is the specific and
separate responsibility of each joint auditor to review the audit
reports/returns of the divisions/branches allocated to him and to ensure that
they are properly incorporated into the accounts of the entity. In respect of
the branches which do not fall within any divisions or zones which are
separately assigned to the various joint auditors, they may agree among
themselves as regards the division of work relating to the review of such
branch returns. It is also the separate and specific responsibility of each joint
auditor to exercise his judgement with regard to the necessity of visiting such
divisions/branches in respect of which the work is allocated to him.
9. A significant part of the audit work involves obtaining and evaluating
information and explanations from the management. This responsibility is
shared by all the joint auditors unless they agree upon a specific pattern of
distribution of this responsibility. In cases where specific divisions, zones or
units are allocated to different joint auditors, it is the separate and specific
responsibility of each joint auditor to obtain appropriate information and
explanations from the management in respect of such divisions/zones/units
and to evaluate the information and explanations so obtained by him.
10. Each joint auditor is entitled to assume that the other joint auditors have
carried out their part of the audit work in accordance with the generally
accepted audit procedures.
3
It is not necessary for a joint auditor to review
the work performed by other joint auditors or perform any tests in order to
ascertain whether the work has actually been performed in such a manner.
Each joint auditor is entitled to rely upon the other joint auditors for bringing
to his notice any departure from generally accepted accounting principles or
any material error noticed in the course of the audit.
11. Where separate financial statements of a division/branch are audited by

3
Reference may be made in this regard to the Standards on Auditing and other mandatory
Statements relating to auditing matters issued by the Council of the Institute from time to time.
Responsibility of Joint Auditors
SA 299 IV-135
one of the joint auditors, the other joint auditors are entitled to proceed on
the basis that such financial statements comply with all the legal and
professional requirements regarding the disclosures to be made and present
a true and fair view of the state of affairs and of the working results of the
division/branch concerned, subject to such observations as may be
communicated by the joint auditor concerned.
Reporting Responsibilities
12. Normally, the joint auditors are able to arrive at an agreed report.
However, where the joint auditors are in disagreement with regard to any
matters to be covered by the report, each one of them should express his
own opinion through a separate report. A joint auditor is not bound by the
views of the majority of the joint auditors regarding matters to be covered in
the report and should express his opinion in a separate report in case of a
disagreement.
Effective Date
13. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative in respect of all audits
relating to accounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 1996.
Back
SA 300(REVISED)
1

PLANNING AN AUDIT OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for periods beginning on or after 1st April 2008)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction
Scope of this SA .........................................................................................1
Effective Date .........................................................................................2
Objective ........................................................................................3
Requirements
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Member .........................................4
Preliminary Engagement Activities ..............................................................5
Planning Activities ..................................................................................6-10
Documentation .......................................................................................11
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements ............................12
The Role and Timing of Planning ........................................................A1-A4
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members .................................... A5
Preliminary Engagement Activities ......................................................A6-A8
Planning Activities .............................................................................A9-A16
Documentation .............................................................................A17-A20
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements ......................... A21
Appendix: Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit Strategy
Standard on Auditing (SA) 300 (Revised), Planning an Audit of Financial
Statements should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards
on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related
Services
2
, which sets out the authority of Standards on Auditing (SAs).

1
Issued in December, 2007. Earlier known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 8,
Audit Planning.
2
Published in July 2007 issue of the Journal.
Back
Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
SA 300 (Revised) IV-137
Introduction
Scope of this SA
1. This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditors
responsibility to plan an audit of financial statements. This SA is framed
in the context of recurring audits. Additional considerations in initial audit
engagements are separately identified. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Effective Date
beginning on or after 1st April 2008.
Objective
3. The objective of the auditor is to plan the audit so that it will be
performed in an effective manner.
Requirements
Involvement of Key Engagement TeamMembers
4. The engagement partner and other key members of the
engagement team shall be involved in planning the audit, including
planning and participating in the discussion among engagement team
members. (Ref: Para. A5)
Preliminary Engagement Activities
5. The auditor shall undertake the following activities at the beginning
of the current audit engagement:
(a) Performing procedures required by SA 220
3
, Quality Control for
Audit Work regarding the continuance of the client relationship and
the specific audit engagement;
(b) Evaluating compliance with ethical requirements, including
independence, as required by SA 220; and
(c) Establishing an understanding of the terms of the engagement, as

3
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 17, Quality Control for Audit
Work.
required by SA 210
4
, Terms of Audit Engagements. (Ref: Para.
A6-A8)
Planning Activities
6. The auditor shall establish an overall audit strategy that sets the
scope, timing and direction of the audit, and that guides the development
of the audit plan.
7. In establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall:
(a) Identify the characteristics of the engagement that define its scope;
(b) Ascertain the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan the
timing of the audit and the nature of the communications required;
(c) Consider the factors that, in the auditors professional judgment,
are significant in directing the engagement teams efforts;
(d) Consider the results of preliminary engagement activities and,
where applicable, whether knowledge gained on other
engagements performed by the engagement partner for the entity is
relevant; and
(e) Ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to
perform the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9-A12)
8. The auditor shall develop an audit plan that shall include a
description of:
(a) The nature, timing and extent of planned risk assessment
procedures, as determined under SA 315 Identifying and
Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment.
(b) The nature, timing and extent of planned further audit procedures at
the assertion level, as determined under SA 330 The Auditors
Responses to Assessed Risks.
(c) Other planned audit procedures that are required to be carried out
so that the engagement complies with SAs. (Ref: Para. A13)

4
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 26, Terms of Audit
Engagements.
9. The auditor shall update and change the overall audit strategy and
the audit plan as necessary during the course of the audit. (Ref: Para.
A14)
10. The auditor shall plan the nature, timing and extent of direction and
supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work.
(Ref: Para. A15-A16)
Documentation
11. The auditor shall document:
(a) The overall audit strategy;
(b) The audit plan; and
(c) Any significant changes made during the audit engagement to
the overall audit strategy or the audit plan, and the reasons for
such changes. (Ref: Para. A17-A20)
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements
12. The auditor shall undertake the following activities prior to starting
an initial audit:
(a) Performing procedures required by SA 220 regarding the
acceptance of the client relationship and the specific audit
engagement; and
(b) Communicating with the predecessor auditor, where there has been
a change of auditors, in compliance with relevant ethical
requirements. (Ref: Para. A21)
The Role and Timing of Planning (Ref: Para. 1)
A1. Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the
engagement and developing an audit plan. Adequate planning benefits the
audit of financial statements in several ways, including the following:
Helping the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of
the audit.
Helping the auditor identify and resolve potential problems on a timely
basis.
Helping the auditor properly organize and manage the audit
engagement so that it is performed in an effective and efficient manner.
Assisting in the selection of engagement team members with
appropriate levels of capabilities and competence to respond to
anticipated risks, and the proper assignment of work to them.
Facilitating the direction and supervision of engagement team members
and the review of their work.
Assisting, where applicable, in coordination of work done by auditors of
components
5
and experts
6
.
A2. The nature and extent of planning activities will vary according to
the size and complexity of the entity, the key engagement team
members previous experience with the entity, and changes in
circumstances that occur during the audit engagement.
A3. Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit, but rather a continual
and iterative process that often begins shortly after (or in connection
with) the completion of the previous audit and continues until the
completion of the current audit engagement. Planning, however, includes
consideration of the timing of certain activities and audit procedures that
need to be completed prior to the performance of further audit
procedures. For example, planning includes the need to consider, prior
to the auditors identification and assessment of the risks of material
misstatement, such matters as:
The analytical procedures to be applied as risk assessment procedures.
Obtaining a general understanding of the legal and regulatory
framework applicable to the entity and how the entity is complying with
that framework.
The determination of materiality.
The involvement of experts.
The performance of other risk assessment procedures.
A4. The auditor may decide to discuss elements of planning with the

5
The auditor may refer the requirements of SA600, Using the Work of Another Auditor.
6
The auditor may refer the requirements of SA620, Using the Work of an Expert.
entitys management to facilitate the conduct and management of the
audit engagement (for example, to coordinate some of the planned audit
procedures with the work of the entity's personnel). Although these
discussions often occur, the overall audit strategy and the audit plan
remain the auditor's responsibility. When discussing matters included in
the overall audit strategy or audit plan, care is required in order not to
compromise the effectiveness of the audit. For example, discussing the
nature and timing of detailed audit procedures with management may
compromise the effectiveness of the audit by making the audit
procedures too predictable.
Involvement of Key Engagement TeamMembers (Ref: Para. 4)
A5. The involvement of the engagement partner and other key
members of the engagement team in planning the audit draws on their
experience and insight, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and
efficiency of the planning process
7
.
Preliminary Engagement Activities (Ref: Para. 5)
A6. Performing the preliminary engagement activities specified in
paragraph 5 at the beginning of the current audit engagement assists the
auditor in identifying and evaluating events or circumstances that may
adversely affect the auditors ability to plan and perform the audit
engagement.
A7. Performing these preliminary engagement activities enables the
auditor to plan an audit engagement for which, for example:
The auditor maintains the necessary independence and ability to
perform the engagement.
There are no issues with management integrity that may affect the
auditors willingness to continue the engagement.
There is no misunderstanding with the client as to the terms of the
engagement.

7
SA315, Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material
Misstatement, paragraph 10, establishes requirements and provides guidance on the
engagement team's discussion of the susceptibility of the entity to material misstatements of
the financial statements. SA240, The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit
of Financial Statements, paragraph 15 provides guidance on the emphasis given during this
discussion to the susceptibility of the entity's financial statements to material misstatement
due to fraud.
A8. The auditors consideration of client continuance and ethical
requirements, including independence, occurs throughout the audit
engagement as changes in conditions and circumstances occur. Performing
initial procedures on both client continuance and evaluation of ethical
requirements (including independence) at the beginning of the current audit
engagement means that they are completed prior to the performance of
other significant activities for the current audit engagement. For continuing
audit engagements, such initial procedures often occur shortly after (or in
connection with) the completion of the previous audit.
Planning Activities
The Overall Audit Strategy (Ref: Para. 6-7)
A9. The process of establishing the overall audit strategy assists the
auditor to determine, subject to the completion of the auditors risk
assessment procedures, such matters as:
The resources to deploy for specific audit areas, such as the use of
appropriately experienced team members for high risk areas or the
involvement of experts on complex matters;
The amount of resources to allocate to specific audit areas, such as the
number of team members assigned to observe the inventory count at
material locations, the extent of review of other auditors work in the case
of group audits, or the audit budget in hours to allocate to high risk areas;
When these resources are to be deployed, such as whether at an
interim audit stage or at key cut-off dates; and
How such resources are managed, directed and supervised, such as
when team briefing and debriefing meetings are expected to be held,
how engagement partner and manager reviews are expected to take
place (for example, on-site or off-site), and whether to complete
engagement quality control reviews.
A10. The Appendix lists examples of considerations in establishing the
overall audit strategy.
A11. Once the overall audit strategy has been established, an audit plan
can be developed to address the various matters identified in the overall
audit strategy, taking into account the need to achieve the audit objectives
through the efficient use of the auditors resources. The establishment of the
overall audit strategy and the detailed audit plan are not necessarily discrete
or sequential processes, but are closely inter-related since changes in one
may result in consequential changes to the other.
A12. In audits of small entities, the entire audit may be conducted by a
very small audit team. Many audits of small entities involve the engagement
partner (who may be a sole practitioner) working with one engagement team
member (or without any engagement team members). With a smaller team,
co-ordination of, and communication between, team members are easier.
Establishing the overall audit strategy for the audit of a small entity need not
be a complex or time-consuming exercise; it varies according to the size of
the entity, the complexity of the audit, and the size of the engagement team.
For example, a brief memorandum prepared at the completion of the
previous audit, based on a review of the working papers and highlighting
issues identified in the audit just completed, updated in the current period
based on discussions with the owner-manager, can serve as the
documented audit strategy for the current audit engagement if it covers the
matters noted in paragraph 7.
The Audit Plan (Ref: Para. 8)
A13. The audit plan is more detailed than the overall audit strategy that
includes the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed
by engagement team members. Planning for these audit procedures takes
place over the course of the audit as the audit plan for the engagement
develops. For example, planning of the auditor's risk assessment
procedures occurs early in the audit process. However, planning the nature,
timing and extent of specific further audit procedures depends on the
outcome of those risk assessment procedures. In addition, the auditor may
begin the execution of further audit procedures for some classes of
transactions, account balances and disclosures before planning all
remaining further audit procedures.
Changes to Planning Decisions During the Course of the Audit
(Ref: Para. 9)
A14. As a result of unexpected events, changes in conditions, or the audit
evidence obtained from the results of audit procedures, the auditor may
need to modify the overall audit strategy and audit plan and thereby the
resulting planned nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures,
based on the revised consideration of assessed risks. This may be the case
when information comes to the auditors attention that differs significantly
from the information available when the auditor planned the audit
procedures. For example, audit evidence obtained through the performance
of substantive procedures may contradict the audit evidence obtained
through tests of controls.
Direction, Supervision and Review (Ref: Para. 10)
A15. The nature, timing and extent of the direction and supervision of
engagement team members and review of their work vary depending on
many factors, including:
The size and complexity of the entity.
The area of the audit.
The assessed risks of material misstatement (for example, an increase
in the assessed risk of material misstatement for a given area of the
audit ordinarily requires a corresponding increase in the extent and
timeliness of direction and supervision of engagement team members,
and a more detailed review of their work).
The capabilities and competence of the individual team members
performing the audit work.
SA 220 contains further guidance on the direction, supervision and review of
audit work.
A16. When an audit is carried out entirely by the engagement partner,
questions of direction and supervision of engagement team members and
review of their work do not arise. In such cases, the engagement partner,
having personally conducted all aspects of the work, will be aware of all
material issues. Forming an objective view on the appropriateness of the
judgments made in the course of the audit can present practical problems
when the same individual also performs the entire audit. When particularly
complex or unusual issues are involved, and the audit is performed by a sole
practitioner, it may be desirable to consult with other suitably-experienced
auditors or the auditors professional body
8
.
Documentation (Ref: Para. 11)
A17. The documentation of the overall audit strategy is a record of the key
decisions considered necessary to properly plan the audit and to
communicate significant matters to the engagement team. For example, the
auditor may summarize the overall audit strategy in the form of a
memorandum that contains key decisions regarding the overall scope,
timing and conduct of the audit.
A18. The documentation of the audit plan is a record of the planned
nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures and further audit
procedures at the assertion level in response to the assessed risks. It also
serves as a record of the proper planning of the audit procedures that can
be reviewed and approved prior to their performance. The auditor may use
standard audit programs and/or audit completion checklists, tailored as
needed to reflect the particular engagement circumstances.
A19. A record of the significant changes to the overall audit strategy and
the audit plan, and resulting changes to the planned nature, timing and
extent of audit procedures, explains why the significant changes were made,
and the overall strategy and audit plan finally adopted for the audit. It also
reflects the appropriate response to the significant changes occurring during
the audit.
A20. As discussed in paragraph A12, a suitable, brief memorandum may
serve as the documented strategy for the audit of a smaller entity. For the
audit plan, standard audit programs and/or checklists (see paragraph A18)
drawn up on the assumption of few relevant control activities, as is likely to
be the case in a smaller entity, may be used provided that they are tailored
to the circumstances of the engagement, including the auditors risk
assessments.
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements (Ref: Para. 12)
A21. The purpose and objective of planning the audit are the same

8
In India, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India governs the accountancy
profession to provide services of high quality in the public interest which are accepted
worldwide.
whether the audit is an initial or recurring engagement. However, for an
initial audit, the auditor may need to expand the planning activities because
the auditor does not ordinarily have the previous experience with the entity
that is considered when planning recurring engagements. For initial audits,
additional matters the auditor may consider in establishing the overall audit
strategy and audit plan include the following:
Unless prohibited by law or regulation, arrangements to be made with
the predecessor auditor, for example, to review the predecessor
auditors working papers. Any major issues (including the application of
accounting principles or of auditing and reporting standards) discussed
with management in connection with the initial selection as auditor, the
communication of these matters to those charged with governance and
how these matters affect the overall audit strategy and audit plan.
The audit procedures necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding opening balances (see SA 510
9
Initial
EngagementsOpening Balances).
Other procedures required by the firms system of quality control for
initial audit engagements (for example, the firms system of quality
control may require the involvement of another partner or senior
individual to review the overall audit strategy prior to commencing
significant audit procedures or to review reports prior to their issuance).
Material Modifications to ISA 300, Planning an Audit of
The SA 300, Planning an Audit of Financial Statements does not contain
any material modifications vis a vis ISA 300.

9
Hitherto known as AAS 22, Initial Engagements-Opening Balances.
Appendix
(Ref: Para. 6-7 and A9-A12)
Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit
Strategy
This appendix provides examples of matters the auditor may consider in
establishing the overall audit strategy. Many of these matters will also
influence the auditors detailed audit plan. The examples provided cover a
broad range of matters applicable to many engagements. While some of the
matters referred to below may be required by other SAs, not all matters are
relevant to every audit engagement and the list is not necessarily complete.
Characteristics of the Engagement
The financial reporting framework on which the financial information
to be audited has been prepared, including any need for
reconciliations to another financial reporting framework.
Industry-specific reporting requirements such as reports mandated
by industry regulators.
The expected audit coverage, including the number and locations
of components to be included.
The nature of the control relationships between a parent and its
components that determine how the group is to be consolidated.
The extent to which components are audited by other auditors.
The nature of the business segments to be audited, including the
need for specialized knowledge.
The reporting currency to be used, including any need for currency
translation for the financial information audited.
The need for a statutory audit of standalone financial statements in
addition to an audit for consolidation purposes.
The availability of the work of internal auditors and the extent of the
auditors potential reliance on such work.
The entitys use of service organizations and how the auditor may
obtain evidence concerning the design or operation of controls
performed by them.
The expected use of audit evidence obtained in previous audits, for
example, audit evidence related to risk assessment procedures and
tests of controls.
The effect of information technology on the audit procedures,
including the availability of data and the expected use of computer-
assisted audit techniques.
The coordination of the expected coverage and timing of the audit
work with any reviews of interim financial information and the effect
on the audit of the information obtained during such reviews.
The availability of client personnel and data.
Reporting Objectives, Timing of the Audit, and Nature
of Communications
The entity's timetable for reporting, such as at interim and final
stages.
The organization of meetings with management and those charged
with governance to discuss the nature, timing and extent of the
audit work.
The discussion with management and those charged with
governance regarding the expected type and timing of reports to be
issued and other communications, both written and oral, including
the auditors report, management letters and communications to
those charged with governance.
The discussion with management regarding the expected
communications on the status of audit work throughout the
engagement.
Communication with auditors of components regarding the
expected types and timing of reports to be issued and other
communications in connection with the audit of components.
The expected nature and timing of communications among
engagement team members, including the nature and timing of
team meetings and timing of the review of work performed.
Whether there are any other expected communications with third
parties, including any statutory or contractual reporting
responsibilities arising from the audit.
Significant Factors, Preliminary Engagement Activities,
and Knowledge Gained on Other Engagements
The determination of appropriate materiality levels, including:
Setting materiality for planning purposes.
Setting and communicating materiality for auditors of
components.
Reconsidering materiality as audit procedures are performed
during the course of the audit.
Preliminary identification of material components and account
balances.
Preliminary identification of areas where there may be a higher risk
of material misstatement.
The impact of the assessed risk of material misstatement at the
overall financial statement level on direction, supervision and
review.
The manner in which the auditor emphasizes to engagement team
members the need to maintain a questioning mind and to exercise
professional skepticism in gathering and evaluating audit evidence.
Results of previous audits that involved evaluating the operating
effectiveness of internal control, including the nature of identified
weaknesses and action taken to address them.
The discussion of matters that may affect the audit with firm
personnel responsible for performing other services to the entity.
Evidence of managements commitment to the design,
implementation and maintenance of sound internal control,
including evidence of appropriate documentation of such internal
control.
Volume of transactions, which may determine whether it is more
efficient for the auditor to rely on internal control.
Importance attached to internal control throughout the entity to the
successful operation of the business.
Significant business developments affecting the entity, including
changes in information technology and business processes,
changes in key management, and acquisitions, mergers and
divestments.
Significant industry developments such as changes in industry
regulations and new reporting requirements.
Significant changes in the financial reporting framework, such as
changes in accounting standards.
Other significant relevant developments, such as changes in the
legal environment affecting the entity.
Nature, Timing and Extent of Resources
The selection of the engagement team (including, where
necessary, the engagement quality control reviewer) and the
assignment of audit work to the team members, including the
assignment of appropriately experienced team members to areas
where there may be higher risks of material misstatement.
Engagement budgeting, including considering the appropriate
amount of time to set aside for areas where there may be higher
risks of material misstatement.
Back

SA 300 (AAS 8)
AUDIT PLANNING
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-6
Knowledge of the Clients Business ................................................7-10
Development of an Overall Plan .....................................................11-12
Developing the Audit Programme..................................................13-16
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 17

*
, Audit Planning should be read in the
1
authority of SAs.

*
Issued in April, 1989. The date Standard on Auditing (SA) 300 (Revised) comes into effect,
this Standard on Auditing shall stand withdrawn. SA 300(Revised) is effective for audits of
Financial Statements beginning on or after April 1, 2008.
1
Back
Audit Planning
SA 300 IV-151
Introduction
1. Standard on Auditing (SA) 200, Basic Principles Governing an Audit,
states (paragraphs 12-14):
The auditor should plan his work to enable him to conduct an effective
audit in an efficient and timely manner. Plans should be based on a
knowledge of the clients business.
Plans should be made to cover, among other things:
(a) acquiring knowledge of the clients accounting systems, policies
and internal control procedures;
(b) establishing the expected degree of reliance to be placed on
internal control;
(c) determining and programming the nature, timing, and extent of the
audit procedures to be performed; and
(d) coordinating the work to be performed.
Plans should be further developed and revised as necessary during the
course of the audit.
The purpose of this Standard is to amplify the basic principle outlined above.
2. This Standard applies to the planning process of the audit of both
financial statements and other financial information. The Statement is framed
in the context of recurring audits. In a first audit, the auditor may need to
extend his planning process beyond the matters discussed herein.
3. Planning should be continuous throughout the engagement and
involves:
developing an overall plan for the expected scope and conduct of the
audit; and
developing an audit programme showing the nature, timing and extent of
audit procedures.
Changes in conditions or unexpected results of audit procedures may cause
revisions of the overall plan and of the audit programme. The reasons for
significant changes may be documented.

SA 300 IV-152
4. Adequate audit planning helps to:
ensure that appropriate attention is devoted to important areas of the
audit;
ensure that potential problems are promptly identified;
ensure that the work is completed expeditiously;
utilise the assistants properly; and
co-ordinate the work done by other auditors and experts.
5. In planning his audit, the auditor will consider factors such as
complexity of the audit, the environment in which the entity operates, his
previous experience with the client and knowledge of the clients business.
6. The auditor may wish to discuss elements of his overall plan and certain
audit procedures with the client to improve the efficiency of the audit and to
coordinate audit procedures with work of the clients personnel. The overall
audit plan and the audit programme, however, remain the auditors
responsibility.
Knowledge of the Clients Business
7. The auditor needs to obtain a level of knowledge of the clients business
that will enable him to identify the events, transactions and practices that, in
his judgement, may have a significant effect on the financial information.
Among other things, the auditor can obtain such knowledge from:
The clients annual reports to shareholders.
Minutes of meetings of shareholders, board of directors and important
committees.
Internal financial management reports for current and previous periods,
including budgets, if any.
The previous years audit working papers, and other relevant files.
Firm personnel responsible for non-audit services to the client who may
be able to provide information on matters that may affect the audit.
Discussions with client.
The clients policy and procedures manual.
Relevant publications of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
and other professional bodies, industry publications, trade journals,
Audit Planning
SA 300 IV-153
magazines, newspapers or text books.
Consideration of the state of the economy and its effect on the clients
business.
Visits to the clients premises and plant facilities.
8. With respect to the previous years audit working papers and other
relevant files, the auditor should pay particular attention to matters that
required special consideration and decide whether they might affect the work
to be done in the current year.
9. Discussions with the client might include such subjects as:
Changes in management, organisational structure, and activities of the
client.
Current Government legislation, rules, regulations and directives
affecting the client.
Current business developments affecting the client.
Current or impending financial difficulties or accounting problems.
Existence of parties in whom directors or persons who are substantial
owners of the entity are interested and with whom transactions are likely.
New or closed premises and plant facilities.
Recent or impending changes in technology, type of products or services
and production or distribution methods.
Significant matters arising from previous years financial statements,
audit report and management letters, if any.
Changes in the accounting practices and procedures and in the system
of internal control.
Scope and timing of the examination.
Assistance of client personnel in data preparation.
Relevance of any work to be carried out by the clients internal auditors.
10. In addition to the importance of knowledge of the clients business in
establishing the overall audit plan, such knowledge helps the auditor to
identify areas of special audit consideration, to evaluate the reasonableness
both of accounting estimates and management representations, and to make
judgements regarding the appropriateness of accounting policies and
disclosures.
SA 300 IV-154
Development of an Overall Plan
11. The auditor should consider the following matters in developing his
overall plan for the expected scope and conduct of the audit:
The terms of his engagement and any statutory responsibilities.
The nature and timing of reports or other communication.
The applicable legal or statutory requirements.
The accounting policies adopted by the client and changes in those
policies.
The effect of new accounting or auditing pronouncements on the audit.
The identification of significant audit areas.
The setting of materiality levels for audit purposes.
Conditions requiring special attention, such as the possibility of material
error or fraud or the involvement of parties in whom directors or persons
who are substantial owners of the entity are interested and with whom
transactions are likely.
The degree of reliance he expects to be able to place on accounting
system and internal control.
Possible rotation of emphasis on specific audit areas.
The nature and extent of audit evidence to be obtained.
The work of internal auditors and the extent of their involvement, if any,
in the audit.
The involvement of other auditors in the audit of subsidiaries or branches
of the client.
The involvement of experts.
The allocation of work to be undertaken between joint auditors and the
procedures for its control and review.
Establishing and coordinating staffing requirements.
12. The auditor should document his overall plan. The form and extent of
the documentation will vary depending on the size and complexity of the
audit. A time budget, in which hours are budgeted for the various audit areas
or procedures, can be an effective planning tool.
Audit Planning
SA 300 IV-155
Developing the Audit Programme
13. The auditor should prepare a written audit programme setting forth the
procedures that are needed to implement the audit plan. The programme
may also contain the audit objectives for each area and should have
sufficient details to serve as a set of instructions to the assistants involved in
the audit and as a means to control the proper execution of the work.
14. In preparing the audit programme, the auditor, having an understanding
of the accounting system and related internal controls, may wish to rely on
certain internal controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of
required auditing procedures. The auditor may conclude that relying on
certain internal controls is an effective and efficient way to conduct his audit.
However, the auditor may decide not to rely on internal controls when there
are other more efficient ways of obtaining sufficient appropriate audit
evidence. The auditor should also consider the timing of the procedures, the
coordination of any assistance expected from the client, the availability of
assistants, and the involvement of other auditors or experts.
15. The auditor normally has flexibility in deciding when to perform audit
procedures. However, in some cases, the auditor may have no discretion as
to timing, for example, when observing the taking of inventories by client
personnel or verifying the securities and cash balances at the year-end.
16. The audit planning ideally commences at the conclusion of the previous
years audit, and along with the related programme, it should be
reconsidered for modification as the audit progresses. Such consideration is
based on the auditors review of the internal control, his preliminary
evaluation thereof, and the results of his compliance and substantive
procedures.
Effective Date
17. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative in respect of all audits
relating to accounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 1989.
Back

SA 310 (AAS 20)
KNOWLEDGE OF THE BUSINESS
(Effective for all audits commencing on or after April 1, 2000)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
Obtaining the Knowledge....................................................................4-8
Using the Knowledge ........................................................................9-12
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 13
Appendix

, Knowledge of the Businessshould be read

in the context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing,
1
authority of SAs.

Issued in April, 2000. The date Standards on Auditing (SA) 315 and SA 330 come into effect,
this Standard on Auditing shall stand withdrawn. The SA 315 and SA 330 are effective for
audits of financial statements beginning on or after April 1, 2008.
1
Back
Knowledge of the Business
SA 310 IV-157
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard is to establish standards on what is
knowledge of the business, why it is important to the auditor and to members
of the audit staff working on an engagement, why it is relevant to all phases
of an audit, and how the auditor obtains and uses that knowledge.
2. In performing an audit of financial statements, the auditor should
have or obtain knowledge of the business sufficient to enable the
auditor to identify and understand the events, transactions and
practices that, in the auditor's judgment, may have a significant effect
on the financial statements or on the examination or audit report. Such
knowledge is used by the auditor in assessing inherent and control risks and
in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures.
3. The auditor's level of knowledge for an engagement would include a
general knowledge of the economy and the industry within which the entity
operates, and a more particular knowledge of how the entity operates. The
level of knowledge required by the auditor would, however, ordinarily be less
than that possessed by management. A list of matters to be considered in a
specific engagement is set out in the Appendix.
Obtaining the Knowledge
4. Prior to accepting an engagement, the auditor would obtain a
preliminary knowledge of the industry and of the nature of ownership,
management and operations of the entity to be audited, and would consider
whether a level of knowledge of the business adequate to perform the audit
can be obtained.
5. Following acceptance of the engagement, further and more detailed
information would be obtained. To the extent practicable, the auditor would
obtain the required knowledge at the start of the engagement. As the audit
progresses, that information would be assessed and updated and more
information would be obtained.
6. Obtaining the required knowledge of the business is a continuous and
cumulative process of gathering and assessing the information and relating
the resulting knowledge to audit evidence and information at all stages of the
audit. For example, although information is gathered at the planning stage, it
is ordinarily refined and added to in later stages of the audit as the auditor
SA 310 IV-158
and the members of his audit staff learn more about the business.
7. For continuing engagements, the auditor would update and re-evaluate
information gathered previously, including information in the prior year's
working papers. The auditor would also perform procedures designed to
identify significant changes that have taken place since the last audit.
8. The auditor can obtain knowledge of the industry and the entity from a
number of sources. For example:
Previous experience with the entity and its industry.
Discussion with people with the entity (for example, directors and senior
operating personnel).
Discussion with internal audit personnel and review of internal audit
reports.
Discussion with other auditors and with legal and other advisors who
have provided services to the entity or within the industry.
Discussion with knowledgeable people outside the entity (for example,
industry economists, industry regulators, customers and suppliers).
Publications related to the industry (for example, government statistics,
surveys, texts, trade journals, reports prepared by banks and institutions
and financial newspapers).
Legislation and regulations that significantly affect the entity.
Visits to the entity premises and plant facilities.
Documents produced by the entity (for example, minutes of meetings,
material sent to shareholders or furnished to regulatory authorities,
promotional literature, prior years' annual and financial reports, budgets,
internal management reports, interim financial reports, management
policy manual, manuals of accounting and internal control systems, chart
of accounts, job descriptions, marketing and sales plans).
Using the Knowledge
9. Knowledge of the business is a frame of reference within which the
auditor exercises professional judgment. Understanding the business and
using this information appropriately assists the auditor in:
SA 310 IV-159
Assessing risks and identifying problems.
Planning and performing the audit effectively and efficiently.
Evaluating audit evidence.
Providing better service to the client.
10. The auditor makes judgments about many matters throughout the
course of the audit where knowledge of the business is important. For
example:
Assessing inherent risk and control risk.
Considering business risks and management's response thereto.
Developing the overall audit plan and the audit programme.
Determining a materiality level and assessing whether the materiality
level chosen remains appropriate.
Assessing audit evidence to establish its appropriateness and the
validity of the related financial statement assertions.
Evaluating accounting estimates and management representations.
Identifying areas where special audit consideration and skills may be
necessary.
Identifying related parties and related party transactions.
Recognising conflicting information (for example, contradictory
representations).
Recognising unusual circumstances (for example, fraud and non-
compliance with laws and regulations, unexpected relationships of
statistical operating data with reported financial results).
Making informed inquiries and assessing the reasonableness of
answers.
Considering the appropriateness of accounting policies and financial
statement disclosures.
11. The auditor should ensure that the audit staff assigned to an audit
engagement obtain sufficient knowledge of the business to enable them
to carry out the audit work delegated to them. The auditor would also
ensure that the audit staff understand the need to be alert for additional
SA 310 IV-160
information and the need to share that information with the auditor and other
audit staff.
12. To make effective use of knowledge about the business, the
auditor should consider howit affects the financial statements taken as
a whole and whether the assertions in the financial statements are
consistent with the auditor's knowledge of the business.
Effective Date
13. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all audits commencing
on or after 1
st
April, 2000.
SA 310 IV-161
Appendix
Knowledge of the Business - Matters to Consider
This list covers a broad range of matters applicable to many engagements;
however, not all matters will be relevant to every engagement and the listing
is only illustrative.
A. General Economic Factors
General level of economic activity (for example, recession, growth)
Interest rates and availability of finance
Inflation, currency revaluation
Government policies :-
monetary
fiscal
taxation-corporate and other
financial incentives (for example, government grants and subsidies)
tariffs, trade restrictions
Foreign currency rates and controls
B. The Industry - Important Conditions Affecting the Client's
Business
The market and competition
Cyclical or seasonal activity
Changes in product technology
Business risk (for example, high technology, high fashion, ease of entry
for competition)
Declining or expanding operations
Adverse conditions (for example, declining demand, excess capacity,
serious price competition)
Key ratios and operating statistics
Specific accounting practices and problems
Environmental requirements and problems
Legislation and Regulatory framework
Energy supply and cost
Specific or unique practices (for example, relating to labour contracts,
financing methods, accounting methods)
C. The Entity
1. Management and ownership - important characteristics
Structure of entity (corporate and non-corporate) - private, public,
SA 310 IV-162
government (including any recent or planned changes)
Beneficial owners and related parties (local, foreign, business reputation
and experience)
Capital structure (including any recent or planned changes)
Organizational structure
Management objectives, philosophy, strategic plans
Business restructuring - Acquisitions, mergers or disposals of business
activities (planned or recently executed)
Sources and methods of financing (current, historical)
Board of directors - Corporate form
composition
business reputation and experience of individuals
independence from and control over operating management
frequency of meetings
existence of audit committee and scope of its activities
existence of policy on corporate conduct
Members of the Managing Committee (by whatever name called) - non-
corporate entities
composition and election of members
business reputation and experience of individuals
independence from and control over operating management
frequency of meetings
existence of policy on conduct of business by the enterprise
Operating Management
experience and reputation
turnover
key financial personnel and their status in the organization
staffing of accounting department
incentive or bonus plans as part of remuneration (for example,
based on profit)
use of forecasts and budgets
pressures on management (for example, over-extended dominance
by one individual, unreasonable deadlines for announcing results)
management information systems
Internal audit function (existence, quality)
Attitude to internal control environment
2. The entity's business - products, markets, suppliers, expenses,
operations.
Nature of business(es) (for example, manufacturer, wholesaler, financial
SA 310 IV-163
services, import/export)
Location of production facilities, warehouses, offices
Employment (for example, by location, supply, wage levels, union
contracts, pension commitments, government regulation)
Products or services and markets (for example, major customers and
contracts, terms of payment, profit margins, market share, competitors,
exports, pricing policies, reputation of products, warranties, order book,
trends, marketing strategy and objectives, manufacturing processes)
Important suppliers of goods and services (for example, long-term
contracts, stability of supply, terms of payment, imports, methods of
delivery such as "just-in-time")
Inventories (for example, locations, quantities)
Franchises, licenses, patents
Important expense categories
Research and development
Foreign currency assets, liabilities and transactions - by currency
hedging
Legislation and regulation that significantly affect the entity
Information systems - current, plans to change
3. Financial performance - factors concerning the entity's financial
condition and profitability
Key ratios and operating statistics
Trends
Debt structure, including covenants and restrictions
4. Reporting environment - external influences which affect management
in the preparation of the financial statements
5. Legislation
Regulatory environment and requirements
Taxation, both direct and indirect
Measurement and disclosure issues peculiar to the business
Audit reporting requirements
Users of the financial statements
Back

SA 315
1

IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING THE
RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
THROUGH UNDERSTANDING
THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT
for periods beginning on or after April 1, 2008)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction
Scope of this SA........................................................................................ 1
Effective Date ........................................................................................... 2
Objective .................................................................................................3
Definitions ...............................................................................................4
Requirements
Risk Assessment Procedures and Related Activities ............................ 5-10
The Required Understanding of the Entity and Its Environment,
Including the Entitys Internal Control ................................................. 11-23
Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement ............ 24-30
Material Weakness in Internal Control ................................................ 31-32
Documentation ........................................................................................ 33
Risk Assessment Procedures and Related Activities ........................A1-A14

1
Issued in December, 2007. The date this Standard (along with SA 330) becomes effective, the
existing Standard on Auditing (SA) 400, Risk Assessments and Internal Control, SA 310,
Knowledge of the Business, and SA 401, Auditing in a Computer Information Systems
Environment, issued in June 2002, April 2000 and January 2003, respectively, would stand
withdrawn.
Back
Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement
SA 315 IV-165
Including the Entitys Internal Control .............................................A15-A97
Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement.......A98-A123
Material Weakness in Internal Control ........................................A124-A126
Documentation ...........................................................................A127-A130
Material Modifications to ISA 315, Identifying and Assessing the Risks of
Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment

Appendices :
1. Internal Control Components
2. Conditions and Events That May Indicate Risks of Material
Misstatement

Standard on Auditing (SA) 315, Identifying and Assessing the Risks of
Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and Its
Environment should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards
Services
2

2
SA 315 IV-166
Introduction
Scope of this SA
1. This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditors responsibility to
identify and assess the risks of material misstatement in the financial
statements, through understanding the entity and its environment, including
the entitys internal control.
Effective Date
Objective
3. The objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risks of
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial
statement and assertion levels, through understanding the entity and its
environment, including the entitys internal control, thereby providing a basis
for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks of material
misstatement. This will help the auditor to reduce the risk of material
misstatement to an acceptably low level.
Definitions
attributed below:
(a) Assertions Representations by management, explicit or otherwise,
that are embodied in the financial statements, as used by the auditor to
consider the different types of potential misstatements that may occur.
(b) Business risk A risk resulting from significant conditions, events,
circumstances, actions or inactions that could adversely affect an
entitys ability to achieve its objectives and execute its strategies, or
from the setting of inappropriate objectives and strategies.
(c) Internal control The process designed, implemented and maintained
by those charged with governance, management and other personnel to
provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of an entitys
objectives with regard to reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness
and efficiency of operations, safeguarding of assets, and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations. The term controls refers to any
aspects of one or more of the components of internal control.
(d) Risk assessment procedures The audit procedures performed to
SA 315 IV-167
obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the
entitys internal control, to identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement
and assertion levels.
(e) Significant risk An identified and assessed risk of material
misstatement that, in the auditors judgment, requires special audit
consideration.
(f) Material Weakness- A weakness in internal control that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Requirements
5. The auditor shall perform risk assessment procedures to provide a
basis for the identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement
at the financial statement and assertion levels. Risk assessment procedures
by themselves, however, do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence
on which to base the audit opinion. (Ref: Para. A1-A5)
6. The risk assessment procedures shall include the following:
(a) Inquiries of management, and of others within the entity who in the
auditors judgment may have information that is likely to assist in
identifying risks of material misstatement due to fraud or error.
(Ref: Para. A6)
(b) Analytical procedures. (Ref: Para. A7-A8)
(c) Observation and inspection. (Ref: Para. A9)
7. The auditor shall consider whether information obtained from the
auditors client acceptance or continuance process is relevant to identifying
risks of material misstatement.
8. Where the engagement partner has performed other engagements for
the entity, the engagement partner shall consider whether information
obtained is relevant to identifying risks of material misstatement.
9. When the auditor intends to use information obtained from the auditors
previous experience with the entity and from audit procedures performed in
previous audits, the auditor shall determine whether changes have occurred
since the previous audit that may affect its relevance to the current audit.

SA 315 IV-168
10. The engagement partner and other key engagement team members
shall discuss the susceptibility of the entitys financial statements to material
misstatement, and the application of the applicable financial reporting
framework to the entitys facts and circumstances. The engagement partner
shall determine which matters are to be communicated to engagement team
members not involved in the discussion. (Ref: Para. A12-A14)
Including the Entitys Internal Control
The Entity and Its Environment
11. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following:
(a) Relevant industry, regulatory, and other external factors including
the applicable financial reporting framework. (Ref: Para. A15-A20)
(b) The nature of the entity, including:
(i) its operations;
(ii) its ownership and governance structures;
(iii) the types of investments that the entity is making and plans to
make; and
(iv) the way that the entity is structured and how it is financed;
to enable the auditor to understand the classes of transactions, account
balances, and disclosures to be expected in the financial statements.
(c) The entitys selection and application of accounting policies,
including the reasons for changes thereto. The auditor shall
evaluate whether the entitys accounting policies are appropriate
for its business and consistent with the applicable financial
reporting framework and accounting policies used in the relevant
industry. (Ref: Para. A24)
(d) The entitys objectives and strategies, and those related business
risks that may result in risks of material misstatement. (Ref: Para.
A25-A31)
(e) The measurement and review of the entitys financial performance.
The Entitys Internal Control
12. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to
SA 315 IV-169
the audit. Although most controls relevant to the audit are likely to relate to
financial reporting, not all controls that relate to financial reporting are
relevant to the audit. It is a matter of the auditors professional judgment
whether a control, individually or in combination with others, is relevant to the
audit. (Ref: Para. A38-A61)
Nature and Extent of the Understanding of Relevant Controls
13. When obtaining an understanding of controls that are relevant to the
audit, the auditor shall evaluate the design of those controls and determine
whether they have been implemented, by performing procedures in addition
to inquiry of the entitys personnel. (Ref: Para. A62-A64)
Components of Internal Control
Control environment
14. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the control environment.
As part of obtaining this understanding, the auditor shall evaluate whether:
(a) Management, with the oversight of those charged with governance, has
created and maintained a culture of honesty and ethical behavior; and
(b) The strengths in the control environment elements collectively provide
an appropriate foundation for the other components of internal control,
and whether those other components are not undermined by control
environment weaknesses. (Ref: Para. A65-A74)
The entitys risk assessment process
15. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of whether the entity has a
process for:
(a) Identifying business risks relevant to financial reporting objectives;
(b) Estimating the significance of the risks;
(c) Assessing the likelihood of their occurrence; and
(d) Deciding about actions to address those risks. (Ref: Para. A75)
16. If the entity has established such a process (referred to hereafter as the
entitys risk assessment process), the auditor shall obtain an understanding
of it, and the results thereof. Where the auditor identifies risks of material
misstatement that management failed to identify, the auditor shall evaluate
whether there was an underlying risk of a kind that the auditor expects would
have been identified by the entitys risk assessment process. If there is such
a risk, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of why that process failed to
identify it, and evaluate whether the process is appropriate to its
SA 315 IV-170
circumstances or if there is a material weakness in the entitys risk
assessment process.
17. If the entity has not established such a process or has an ad hoc
process, the auditor shall discuss with management whether business risks
relevant to financial reporting objectives have been identified and how they
have been addressed. The auditor shall evaluate whether the absence of a
documented risk assessment process is appropriate in the circumstances, or
represents a material weakness in the entitys internal control. (Ref: Para.
A76)
The information system, including the related business processes, relevant to
financial reporting, and communication
18. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the information system,
including the related business processes, relevant to financial reporting,
including the following areas:
(a) The classes of transactions in the entitys operations that are significant
to the financial statements;
(b) The procedures, within both information technology (IT) and manual
systems, by which those transactions are initiated, recorded, processed,
corrected as necessary, transferred to the general ledger and reported
in the financial statements;
(c) The related accounting records, supporting information and specific
accounts in the financial statements that are used to initiate, record,
process and report transactions; this includes the correction of incorrect
information and how information is transferred to the general ledger.
The records may be in either manual or electronic form;
(d) How the information system captures events and conditions, other than
transactions, that are significant to the financial statements;
(e) The financial reporting process used to prepare the entitys financial
statements, including significant accounting estimates and disclosures;
(f) Controls surrounding journal entries, including non-standard journal
entries used to record non-recurring, unusual transactions or
adjustments. (Ref: Para. A77-A81).
19. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of how the entity
communicates financial reporting roles and responsibilities and significant
matters relating to financial reporting, including:
(a) Communications between management and those charged with
governance; and
SA 315 IV-171
(b) External communications, such as those with regulatory authorities.
Control activities relevant to the audit
20. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of control activities relevant to
the audit, being those the auditor judges it necessary to understand in order
to assess the risks of material misstatement at the assertion level and design
further audit procedures responsive to assessed risks. An audit requires an
understanding of only those control activities related to significant class of
transactions, account balance, and disclosure in the financial statements and
the assertions which the auditor finds relevant in his risk assessment
process. (Ref: Para. A84-A90)
21. In understanding the entitys control activities, the auditor shall obtain
an understanding of how the entity has responded to risks arising from IT.
Monitoring of controls
22. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the major activities that the
entity uses to monitor internal control over financial reporting, including those
related to those control activities relevant to the audit, and how the entity
initiates corrective actions to its controls. (Ref: Para. A94-A96)
23. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the sources of the
information used in the entitys monitoring activities, and the basis upon
which management considers the information to be sufficiently reliable for the
purpose. (Ref: Para. A97)
24. The auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement
at:
(a) the financial statement level; and (Ref: Para. A98-A101)
(b) the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, and
disclosures; (Ref: Para. A102-A106)
to provide a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures.
25. For this purpose, the auditor shall:
(a) Identify risks throughout the process of obtaining an understanding
of the entity and its environment, including relevant controls that
relate to the risks, and by considering the classes of transactions,
account balances, and disclosures in the financial statements;
SA 315 IV-172
(b) Assess the identified risks, and evaluate whether they relate more
pervasively to the financial statements as a whole and potentially
affect many assertions;
(c) Relate the identified risks to what can go wrong at the assertion
level, taking account of relevant controls that the auditor intends to
test; and (Ref: Para. A109-A111)
(d) Consider the likelihood of misstatement, including the possibility of
multiple misstatements, and whether the potential misstatement is
of a magnitude that could result in a material misstatement.
Risks that Require Special Audit Consideration
26. As part of the risk assessment as described in paragraph 24, the auditor
shall determine whether any of the risks identified are, in the auditors
judgment, a significant risk. In exercising this judgment, the auditor shall
exclude the effects of identified controls related to the risk.
27. In exercising judgment as to which risks are significant risks, the auditor
shall consider at least the following:
(a) Whether the risk is a risk of fraud;
(b) Whether the risk is related to recent significant economic, accounting, or
other developments like changes in regulatory environment, etc., and,
therefore, requires specific attention;
(c) The complexity of transactions;
(d) Whether the risk involves significant transactions with related parties;
(e) The degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information
related to the risk, especially those measurements involving a wide range
of measurement uncertainty; and
(f) Whether the risk involves significant transactions that are outside the
normal course of business for the entity, or that otherwise appear to be
unusual. (Ref: Para. A112-A116)
28. When the auditor has determined that a significant risk exists, the
auditor shall obtain an understanding of the entitys controls, including
control activities, relevant to that risk. (Ref: Para. A117-A119)
Risks for Which Substantive Procedures Alone Do Not Provide Sufficient
Appropriate Audit Evidence
29. In respect of some risks, the auditor may judge that it is not possible or
SA 315 IV-173
practicable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence only from
substantive procedures. Such risks may relate to the inaccurate or
incomplete recording of routine and significant classes of transactions or
account balances, the characteristics of which often permit highly automated
processing with little or no manual intervention. In such cases, the entitys
controls over such risks are relevant to the audit and the auditor shall obtain
an understanding of them. (Ref: Para. A120-A122)
Revision of Risk Assessment
30. The auditors assessment of the risks of material misstatement at the
assertion level may change during the course of the audit as additional audit
evidence is obtained. In circumstances where the auditor obtains audit
evidence from performing further audit procedures, or if new information is
obtained, either of which is inconsistent with the audit evidence on which the
auditor originally based the assessment, the auditor shall revise the
assessment and modify the further planned audit procedures accordingly.
(Ref: Para. A123)
Material Weakness in Internal Control
31. The auditor shall evaluate whether, on the basis of the audit work
performed, the auditor has identified a material weakness in the design,
implementation or maintenance of internal control. (Ref: Para. A124-A125)
32. The auditor shall communicate material weaknesses in internal control
identified during the audit on a timely basis to management at an appropriate
level of responsibility, and, as required by SA 260 (Revised),
Communication with Those Charged with Governance
3
, with those charged
with governance (unless all of those charged with governance are involved in
managing the entity). (Ref: Para. A126)
Documentation
(a) The discussion among the engagement team where required by
paragraph 10, and the significant decisions reached;
(b) Key elements of the understanding obtained regarding each of the
aspects of the entity and its environment specified in paragraph 11
and of each of the internal control components specified in
paragraphs 14-23; the sources of information from which the

3
Hitherto known as AAS 27,Communications of Audit Matters with Those Charged with
Governance.
SA 315 IV-174
understanding was obtained; and the risk assessment procedures
performed;
(c) The identified and assessed risks of material misstatement at the
financial statement level and at the assertion level as required by
paragraph 24; and
(d) The risks identified, and related controls about which the auditor
has obtained an understanding, as a result of the requirements in
paragraphs 26-29. (Ref: Para. A127-A130)
Risk Assessment Procedures and Related Activities (Ref: Para. 5)
A1. Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including
the entitys internal control (referred to hereafter as an understanding of the
entity), is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, updating and
analysing information throughout the audit. The understanding establishes a
frame of reference within which the auditor plans the audit and exercises
professional judgment throughout the audit, for example, when:
Assessing risks of material misstatement of the financial statements;
Establishing materiality and evaluating whether the judgment about
materiality remains appropriate as the audit progresses;
Considering the appropriateness of the selection and application of
accounting policies, and the adequacy of financial statement disclosures;
Identifying areas where special audit consideration may be necessary, for
example, related party transactions, the appropriateness of
managements use of the going concern assumption, or considering the
business purpose of transactions;
Developing expectations for use when performing analytical procedures;
Responding to the assessed risks of material misstatement, including
designing and performing further audit procedures to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence; and
Evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence
obtained, such as the appropriateness of assumptions and of
managements oral and written representations.
A2. Information obtained by performing risk assessment procedures and
related activities may be used by the auditor as audit evidence to support
assessments of the risks of material misstatement. In addition, the auditor
SA 315 IV-175
may obtain audit evidence about classes of transactions, account balances,
or disclosures and related assertions and about the operating effectiveness
of controls, even though such procedures were not specifically planned as
substantive procedures or as tests of controls. The auditor also may choose
to perform substantive procedures or tests of controls concurrently with risk
assessment procedures because it is efficient to do so.
A3. The auditor uses professional judgment to determine the extent of the
understanding required. The auditors primary consideration is whether the
understanding that has been obtained is sufficient to meet the objective stated in
this SA. The depth of the overall understanding that is required by the auditor is
less than that possessed by management in managing the entity.
A4. The risks to be assessed include both those due to error and those due
to fraud, and both are covered by this SA. However, the significance of fraud
is such that further requirements and guidance are included in SA 240
(Revised)
4
, The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of
Financial Statements, in relation to risk assessment procedures and related
activities to obtain information that is used to identify the risks of material
A5. Although the auditor is required to perform all the risk assessment
procedures described in paragraph 6 in the course of obtaining the required
understanding of the entity (see paragraphs 11-23), the auditor is not
required to perform all of them for each aspect of that understanding. Other
procedures may be performed where the information to be obtained
therefrom may be helpful in identifying risks of material misstatement.
Examples of such procedures include:
Reviewing information obtained from external sources such as trade and
economic journals; reports by analysts, banks, or rating agencies; or
regulatory or financial publications.
Making inquiries of the entitys external legal counsel or of valuation
experts that the entity has used.
Inquiries of Management and Others Within the Entity (Ref: Para. 6(a))
A6. Much of the information obtained by the auditors inquiries is obtained
from management and those responsible for financial reporting. However, the

4
Standard on Auditing (SA) 240 (Revised), The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an
Audit of Financial Statements, has been published in The Chartered Accountant, December,
2007. SA 240 would be applicable for all audits relating to accounting periods beginning on or after
April 1, 2009.
SA 315 IV-176
auditor may also obtain information, or a different perspective in identifying
risks of material misstatement, through inquiries of others within the entity
and other employees with different levels of authority. For example:
Inquiries directed towards those charged with governance may help the
auditor understand the environment in which the financial statements are
prepared.
Inquiries directed toward internal audit personnel may provide information
about internal audit procedures performed during the year relating to the
design and effectiveness of the entitys internal control and whether
management has satisfactorily responded to findings from those
procedures.
Inquiries of employees involved in initiating, processing or recording
complex or unusual transactions may help the auditor to evaluate the
appropriateness of the selection and application of certain accounting
policies.
Inquiries directed toward in-house legal counsel may provide information
about such matters as litigation, compliance with laws and regulations,
knowledge of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the entity, warranties,
post-sales obligations, arrangements (such as joint ventures) with
business partners and the meaning of contract terms.
Inquiries directed towards marketing or sales personnel may provide
information about changes in the entitys marketing strategies, sales
trends, or contractual arrangements with its customers.
Analytical Procedures (Ref: Para. 6(b))
A7. Analytical procedures may help identify the existence of unusual
transactions or events, and amounts, ratios, and trends that might indicate
matters that have audit implications. Unusual or unexpected relationships
that are identified may assist the auditor in identifying risks of material
misstatement, especially risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
A8. However, when such analytical procedures use data aggregated at a
high level (which may be the situation with analytical procedures performed
as risk assessment procedures), the results of those analytical procedures
only provide a broad initial indication about whether a material misstatement
may exist. Accordingly, in such cases, consideration of other information that
has been gathered when identifying the risks of material misstatement
together with the results of such analytical procedures may assist the auditor
in understanding and evaluating the results of the analytical procedures. SA
SA 315 IV-177
520, Analytical Procedures
5
, establishes requirements and provides
guidance on the use of analytical procedures.
Observation and Inspection (Ref: Para. 6(c))
A9. Observation and inspection may support inquiries of management and
others, and may also provide information about the entity and its
environment. Examples of such audit procedures include observation or
inspection of the following:
The entitys operations.
Documents (such as business plans and strategies), records, and internal
control manuals.
Reports prepared by management (such as quarterly management
reports and interim financial statements) and those charged with
governance (such as minutes of board of directors meetings).
The entitys premises and plant facilities.
Information Obtained in Prior Periods (Ref: Para. 9)
A10. The auditors previous experience with the entity and audit procedures
performed in previous audits may provide the auditor with information about
such matters as:
Past misstatements and whether they were corrected on a timely basis.
The nature of the entity and its environment, and the entitys internal
control.
Significant changes that the entity or its operations may have undergone
since the prior financial period, which may assist the auditor in gaining a
sufficient understanding of the entity to identify and assess risks of
material misstatement.
A11. The auditor is required to determine whether information obtained in
prior periods remains relevant, if the auditor intends to use that information
for the purposes of the current audit. This is because changes in the control
environment, for example, may affect the relevance of information obtained
in the prior year. To determine whether changes have occurred that may
affect the relevance of such information, the auditor may make inquiries and
perform other appropriate audit procedures, such as walk-throughs of
relevant systems.

5
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 14, Analytical Procedures.
SA 315 IV-178
Discussion Among the Engagement Team(Ref: Para. 10)
A12. The discussion among the engagement team about the susceptibility of
the entitys financial statements to material misstatement:
Provides an opportunity for more experienced engagement team
members, including the engagement partner, to share their insights based
on their knowledge of the entity.
Allows the engagement team members to exchange information about the
business risks to which the entity is subject and about how and where the
financial statements might be susceptible to material misstatement due to
fraud or error.
Assists the engagement team members to gain a better understanding of
the potential for material misstatement of the financial statements in the
specific areas assigned to them, and to understand how the results of the
audit procedures that they perform may affect other aspects of the audit
including the decisions about the nature, timing, and extent of further
audit procedures.
Provides a basis upon which engagement team members communicate
and share new information obtained throughout the audit that may affect
the assessment of risks of material misstatement or the audit procedures
performed to address these risks.
SA 240 (Revised) provides further requirements and guidance in relation to
the discussion among the engagement team about the risks of fraud.
A13. It is not always necessary or practical for the discussion to include all
members in a single discussion (as, for example, in a multi-location audit),
nor is it necessary for all of the members of the engagement team to be
informed of all of the decisions reached in the discussion. The engagement
partner may discuss matters with key members of the engagement team
including, if considered appropriate, specialists and those responsible for the
audits of components, while delegating discussion with others, taking
account of the extent of communication considered necessary throughout the
engagement team. A communications plan, agreed by the engagement
partner, may be useful.
A14. Many small audits are carried out entirely by the engagement partner
(who may be a sole practitioner). In such situations, it is the engagement
partner who, having personally conducted the planning of the audit, would be
responsible for considering the susceptibility of the entitys financial
SA 315 IV-179
statements to material misstatement due to fraud or error.
Including the Entitys Internal Control
The Entity and Its Environment
Industry, Regulatory and Other External Factors (Ref: Para. 11(a))
Industry factors
A15. Relevant industry factors include industry conditions such as the
competitive environment, supplier and customer relationships, and
technological developments. Examples of matters the auditor may consider
include:
The market and competition, including demand, capacity, and price
competition.
Cyclical or seasonal activity.
Product technology relating to the entitys products.
Energy supply and cost.
A16. The industry in which the entity operates may give rise to specific risks
of material misstatement arising from the nature of the business or the
degree of regulation. For example, long-term contracts may involve
significant estimates of revenues and expenses that give rise to risks of
material misstatement. In such cases, it is important that the engagement
team include members with sufficient relevant knowledge and experience, as
required by SA 220, Quality Control for Audits of Historical Financial
Information
6
.
Regulatory factors
A17. Relevant regulatory factors include the regulatory environment. The
regulatory environment encompasses, among other matters, the applicable
financial reporting framework and the legal and political environment.
Examples of matters the auditor may consider include:
Accounting principles and industry specific practices.
Regulatory framework for a regulated industry.
Legislation and regulation that significantly affect the entitys operations,

6
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 17, Quality Control for Audit
Work.
SA 315 IV-180
including direct supervisory activities.
Taxation (corporate and other).
Government policies currently affecting the conduct of the entitys
business, such as monetary, including foreign exchange controls, fiscal,
financial incentives (for example, government aid programs), and tariffs or
trade restrictions policies.
Environmental requirements affecting the industry and the entitys
business.
A18. SA 250 (Revised), Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit
of Financial Statements
7
, includes some specific requirements related to the
legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity and the industry.
A19. In case of the audits of certain entities, in addition to legislation or
regulations, there may be government policy requirements and resolutions of
the legislature that affect the entitys operations. Such elements are essential
to consider when obtaining an understanding of the entity and its
environment.
Other external factors
A20. Examples of other external factors affecting the entity that the auditor
may consider include the general economic conditions, interest rates and
availability of financing, and inflation or currency revaluation.
Nature of the Entity (Ref: Para.11(b))
A21. An understanding of the nature of an entity enables the auditor to
understand such matters as:
Whether the entity has a complex structure, for example with subsidiaries
or other components in multiple locations. Complex structures often
introduce issues that may give rise to risks of material misstatement.
Such issues may include whether goodwill, joint ventures, investments, or
special-purpose entities are accounted for appropriately.
The ownership, and relations between owners and other people or
entities. This understanding assists in determining whether related party
transactions have been identified and accounted for appropriately. SA

7
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 21, Considerations of Laws and
Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements.
SA 315 IV-181
550, Related Parties
8
, establishes requirements and provides guidance
on the auditors considerations relevant to related parties.
A22. Examples of matters that the auditor may consider when obtaining an
understanding of the nature of the entity include:
Business operations such as:
Nature of revenue sources, products or services, and markets,
including involvement in electronic commerce such as internet sales
and marketing activities.
Conduct of operations (for example, stages and methods of
production, or activities exposed to environmental risks).
Alliances, joint ventures, and outsourcing activities.
Geographic dispersion and industry segmentation.
Location of production facilities, warehouses, and offices, and
location and quantities of inventories.
Key customers and important suppliers of goods and services,
employment arrangements (including the existence of union
contracts, pension and other post employment benefits, stock option
or incentive bonus arrangements, and government regulation related
to employment matters).
Research and development activities and expenditures.
Transactions with related parties.
Investments and investment activities such as:
Planned or recently executed acquisitions or divestitures.
Investments and dispositions of securities and loans.
Capital investment activities.
Investments in non-consolidated entities, including partnerships, joint
ventures and special-purpose entities.
Financing and financing activities such as:
Major subsidiaries and associated entities, including consolidated

8
Hitherto known as the Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 23, Related Parties. Reference
may also be made to the Accounting Standard (AS) 18, Related Party Disclosures for definition of
related party and related party transactions.
SA 315 IV-182
and non-consolidated structures.
Debt structure and related terms, including off-balance-sheet
financing arrangements and leasing arrangements.
Beneficial owners (local, foreign, business reputation and
experience) and related parties.
Use of derivative financial instruments.
Financial reporting such as:
Accounting principles and industry - specific practices, including
industry - specific significant categories (for example, loans and
investments for banks, or research and development for
pharmaceuticals).
Revenue recognition practices.
Accounting for fair values.
Foreign currency assets, liabilities and transactions.
Accounting for unusual or complex transactions including those in
controversial or emerging areas (for example, accounting for stock-
based compensation).
A23. Significant changes in the entity from prior periods may give rise to, or
change, risks of material misstatement.
The Entitys Selection and Application of Accounting Policies (Ref: Para.11(c))
A24. An understanding of the entitys selection and application of accounting
policies may encompass such matters as:
The methods the entity uses to account for significant and unusual
transactions.
The effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging
areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus.
Changes in the entitys accounting policies.
Financial reporting standards and laws and regulations that are new to
the entity, and when and how the entity will adopt such requirements.
Objectives and Strategies and Related Business Risks (Ref. Para.11(d))
A25. The entity conducts its business in the context of industry, regulatory
and other internal and external factors. To respond to these factors, the
entitys management or those charged with governance define objectives,
SA 315 IV-183
which are the overall plans for the entity. Strategies are the approaches by
which management intends to achieve its objectives. The entitys objectives
and strategies may change over time.
A26. Business risk is broader than the risk of material misstatement of the
financial statements, though it includes the latter. Business risk may arise
from change or complexity. A failure to recognise the need for change may
also give rise to business risk. Business risk may arise, for example, from:
The development of new products or services that may fail;
A market which, even if successfully developed, is inadequate to support
a product or service; or
Flaws in a product or service that may result in liabilities and reputational
risk.
A27. An understanding of the business risks facing the entity increases the
likelihood of identifying risks of material misstatement, since most business
risks will eventually have financial consequences and, therefore, an effect on
the financial statements. However, the auditor does not have a responsibility
to identify or assess all business risks because not all business risks give
rise to risks of material misstatement.
A28. Examples of matters that the auditor may consider when obtaining an
understanding of the entitys objectives, strategies and related business risks
that may result in a risk of material misstatement of the financial statements
include:
Industry developments (a potential related business risk might be, for
example, that the entity does not have the personnel or expertise to deal
with the changes in the industry).
New products and services (a potential related business risk might be, for
example, that there is increased product liability).
Expansion of the business (a potential related business risk might be, for
example, that the demand has not been accurately estimated).
New accounting requirements (a potential related business risk might be,
for example, incomplete or improper implementation, or increased costs).
Regulatory requirements (a potential related business risk might be, for
example, that there is increased legal exposure).
Current and prospective financing requirements (a potential related
business risk might be, for example, the loss of financing due to the
SA 315 IV-184
entitys inability to meet requirements).
Use of IT (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that
systems and processes are incompatible).
The effects of implementing a strategy, particularly any effects that will
lead to new accounting requirements (a potential related business risk
might be, for example, incomplete or improper implementation).
A29. A business risk may have an immediate consequence for the risk of
material misstatement for classes of transactions, account balances, and
disclosures at the assertion level or the financial statement level. For
example, the business risk arising from a contracting customer base may
increase the risk of material misstatement associated with the valuation of
receivables. However, the same risk, particularly in combination with a
contracting economy, may also have a longer-term consequence, which the
auditor considers when assessing the appropriateness of the going concern
assumption. Whether a business risk may result in a risk of material
misstatement is, therefore, considered in light of the entitys circumstances.
Examples of conditions and events that may indicate risks of material
misstatement are indicated in the Appendix 2.
A30. Usually, management identifies business risks and develops
approaches to address them. Such a risk assessment process is part of
internal control and is discussed in paragraph 15 and paragraphs A75-A76.
A31. In case of audits of certain entities, management objectives may be
influenced by concerns regarding public accountability and may include
objectives which have their source in legislation, regulations, and
government directions.
Measurement and Reviewof the Entitys Financial Performance (Ref: Para.11(e))
A32. Management and others will measure and review those things they
regard as important. Performance measures, whether external or internal,
create pressures on the entity. These pressures, in turn, may motivate
management to take action to improve the business performance or to
misstate the financial statements. Accordingly, an understanding of the
entitys performance measures assists the auditor in considering whether
pressures to achieve performance targets may result in management actions
that increase the risks of material misstatement, including those due to fraud
See SA 240 (Revised) for requirements and guidance in relation to the
risks of fraud.

SA 315 IV-185
A33. The measurement and review of financial performance is not the same
as the monitoring of controls (discussed as a component of internal control in
paragraphs A94-A97), though their purposes may overlap:
The measurement and review of performance is directed at whether
business performance is meeting the objectives set by management (or
third parties).
Monitoring of controls is specifically concerned with the effective
operation of internal control.
In some cases, however, performance indicators also provide information
that enables management to identify deficiencies in internal control.
A34. Examples of internally-generated information used by management for
measuring and reviewing financial performance, and which the auditor may
consider, include:
Key performance indicators (financial and non-financial) and key ratios,
trends and operating statistics.
Period-on-period financial performance analyses.
Budgets, forecasts, variance analyses, segment information and
divisional, departmental or other level performance reports.
Employee performance measures and incentive compensation policies.
Comparisons of an entitys performance with that of competitors.
A35. External parties may also measure and review the entitys financial
performance. For example, external information such as analysts reports
and credit rating agency reports may represent useful information for the
auditor. Such reports can often be obtained from the entity being audited.
A36. Internal measures may highlight unexpected results or trends requiring
management to determine their cause and take corrective action (including,
in some cases, the detection and correction of misstatements on a timely
basis). Performance measures may also indicate to the auditor that risks of
misstatement of related financial statement information do exist. For
example, performance measures may indicate that the entity has unusually
rapid growth or profitability when compared to that of other entities in the
same industry. Such information, particularly if combined with other factors
such as performance-based bonus or incentive remuneration, may indicate
the potential risk of management bias in the preparation of the financial
statements.
SA 315 IV-186
A37. Smaller entities often do not have processes to measure and review
financial performance. Inquiry of management may reveal that it relies on
certain key indicators for evaluating financial performance and taking
appropriate action. If such inquiry indicates an absence of performance
measurement or review, there may be an increased risk of misstatements not
being detected and corrected.
The Entitys Internal Control
A38. An understanding of internal control assists the auditor in identifying
types of potential misstatements and factors that affect the risks of material
misstatement, and in designing the nature, timing, and extent of further audit
procedures.
A39. The following application material on internal control is presented in four
sections, as follows:
General Nature and Characteristics of Internal Control.
Controls Relevant to the Audit.
Nature and Extent of the Understanding of Relevant Controls.
Components of Internal Control.
General Nature and Characteristics of Internal Control (Ref: Para. 12)
Purpose of internal control
A40. Internal control is designed, implemented and maintained to address
identified business risks that threaten the achievement of any of the entitys
objectives that concern:
The reliability of the entitys financial reporting;
The effectiveness and efficiency of its operations;
Its compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
Safeguarding of assets.
The way in which internal control is designed, implemented and maintained
varies with an entitys size and complexity.
A41. Smaller entities may use less structured means and simpler processes
and procedures to achieve their objectives.
SA 315 IV-187
Limitations of internal control
A42. Internal control, no matter how effective, can provide an entity with only
reasonable assurance about achieving the entitys financial reporting
objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected by limitations
inherent to internal control. These include the realities that human judgment
in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can
occur because of human error. For example, there may be an error in the
design of, or in the change to, a control. Equally, the operation of a control
may not be effective, such as where information produced for the purposes
of internal control (for example, an exception report) is not effectively used
because the individual responsible for reviewing the information does not
understand its purpose or fails to take appropriate action.
A43. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two or
more people or inappropriate management override of internal control. For
example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that
alter the terms and conditions of the entitys standard sales contracts, which
may result in improper revenue recognition. Also, edit checks in a software
program that are designed to identify and report transactions that exceed
specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.
A44. Further, in designing and implementing controls, management may
make judgments on the nature and extent of the controls it chooses to
implement, and the nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume.
A45. Smaller entities often have fewer employees which may limit the extent
to which segregation of duties is practicable. However, in a small owner-
managed entity, the owner-manager
9
may be able to exercise more effective
oversight than in a larger entity. This oversight may compensate for the
generally more limited opportunities for segregation of duties.
A46. On the other hand, the owner-manager may be more able to override
controls because the system of internal control is less structured. This is
taken into account by the auditor when identifying the risks of material
Division of internal control into components
A47. The division of internal control into the following five components, for

9
Owner-manager refers to the proprietor of an entity who is involved in running the entity on a
day-to-day basis.
SA 315 IV-188
purposes of the SAs, provides a useful framework for auditors to consider
how different aspects of an entitys internal control may affect the audit:
(a) The control environment;
(b) The entitys risk assessment process;
(c) The information system, including the related business processes,
relevant to financial reporting, and communication;
(d) Control activities; and
(e) Monitoring of controls.
The division does not necessarily reflect how an entity designs, implements
and maintains internal control, or how it may classify any particular
component. Auditors may use different terminology or frameworks to
describe the various aspects of internal control, and their effect on the audit
than those used in this SA, provided all the components described in this SA
are addressed.
A48. Application material relating to the five components of internal control
as they relate to a financial statement audit is set out in paragraphs A65-A97
below. Appendix 1 provides further explanation of these components of
internal control.
Characteristics of manual and automated elements of internal control relevant
to the auditors risk assessment
A49. An entitys system of internal control contains manual elements and
often contains automated elements. The characteristics of manual or
automated elements are relevant to the auditors risk assessment and further
audit procedures based thereon.
A50. The use of manual or automated elements in internal control also
affects the manner in which transactions are initiated, recorded, processed,
and reported:
Controls in a manual system may include such procedures as approvals
and reviews of transactions, and reconciliations and follow-up of
reconciling items. Alternatively, an entity may use automated procedures
to initiate, record, process, and report transactions, in which case records
in electronic format replace paper documents.
Controls in IT systems consist of a combination of automated controls (for
example, controls embedded in computer programs) and manual controls.
Further, manual controls may be independent of IT, may use information
SA 315 IV-189
produced by IT, or may be limited to monitoring the effective functioning
of IT and of automated controls, and to handling exceptions. When IT is
used to initiate, record, process or report transactions, or other financial
data for inclusion in financial statements, the systems and programs may
include controls related to the corresponding assertions for material
accounts or may be critical to the effective functioning of manual controls
that depend on IT.
An entitys mix of manual and automated elements in internal control varies
with the nature and complexity of the entitys use of IT.
A51. Generally, IT benefits an entitys internal control by enabling an entity
to:
Consistently apply predefined business rules and perform complex
calculations in processing large volumes of transactions or data;
Enhance the timeliness, availability, and accuracy of information;
Facilitate the additional analysis of information;
Enhance the ability to monitor the performance of the entitys activities
and its policies and procedures;
Reduce the risk that controls will be circumvented; and
Enhance the ability to achieve effective segregation of duties by
implementing security controls in applications, databases, and operating
systems.
A52. IT also poses specific risks to an entitys internal control, including, for
example:
Reliance on systems or programs that are inaccurately processing data,
processing inaccurate data, or both.
Unauthorised access to data that may result in destruction of data or
improper changes to data, including the recording of unauthorised or non-
existent transactions, or inaccurate recording of transactions. Particular
risks may arise where multiple users access a common database.
The possibility of IT personnel gaining access privileges beyond those
necessary to perform their assigned duties thereby breaking down
segregation of duties.
Unauthorised changes to data in master files.
Unauthorised changes to systems or programs.
SA 315 IV-190
Failure to make necessary changes to systems or programs.
Inappropriate manual intervention.
Potential loss of data or inability to access data as required.
A53. Manual elements in internal control may be more suitable where
judgment and discretion are required such as for the following
circumstances:
Large, unusual or non-recurring transactions.
Circumstances where errors are difficult to define, anticipate or predict.
In changing circumstances that require a control response outside the
scope of an existing automated control.
In monitoring the effectiveness of automated controls.
A54. Manual elements in internal control may be less reliable than automated
elements because they can be more easily bypassed, ignored, or overridden
and they are also more prone to simple errors and mistakes. Consistency of
application of a manual control element cannot therefore be assumed.
Manual control elements may be less suitable for the following
circumstances:
High volume or recurring transactions, or in situations where errors that
can be anticipated or predicted can be prevented, or detected and
corrected, by control parameters that are automated.
Control activities where the specific ways to perform the control can be
adequately designed and automated.
A55. The extent and nature of the risks to internal control vary depending on
the nature and characteristics of the entitys information system. The entity
responds to the risks arising from the use of IT or from use of manual
elements in internal control by establishing effective controls in light of the
characteristics of the entitys information system.
Controls Relevant to the Audit
A56. There is a direct relationship between an entitys objectives and the
controls it implements to provide reasonable assurance about their
achievement. The entitys objectives, and therefore controls, relate to
financial reporting, operations and compliance; however, not all of these
objectives and controls are relevant to the auditors risk assessment.

SA 315 IV-191
A57. Factors relevant to the auditors judgment about whether a control,
individually or in combination with others, is relevant to the audit may include
such matters as the following:
Materiality.
The significance of the related risk.
The size of the entity.
The nature of the entitys business, including its organisation and
ownership characteristics.
The diversity and complexity of the entitys operations.
Applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
The circumstances and the applicable component of internal control.
The nature and complexity of the systems that are part of the entitys
internal control, including the use of service organisations.
Whether, and how, a specific control, individually or in combination with
others, prevents, or detects and corrects, material misstatement.
A58. Controls over the completeness and accuracy of information produced
by the entity may be relevant to the audit if the auditor intends to make use of
the information in designing and performing further procedures. For example,
in auditing revenue by applying standard prices to records of sales volume,
the auditor considers the accuracy of the price information and the
completeness and accuracy of the sales volume data. Controls relating to
operations and compliance objectives may also be relevant to an audit if they
relate to data the auditor evaluates or uses in applying audit procedures.
A59. Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised
acquisition, use, or disposition may include controls relating to both financial
reporting and operations objectives. The auditors consideration of such
controls is generally limited to those relevant to the reliability of financial
reporting. For example, use of access controls, such as passwords, that limit
access to the data and programs that process cash disbursements may be
relevant to a financial statement audit. Conversely, safeguarding controls
relating to operations objectives, such as controls to prevent the excessive
use of materials in production, generally are not relevant to a financial
statement audit.
A60. An entity generally has controls relating to objectives that are not
relevant to an audit and therefore need not be considered. For example, an
SA 315 IV-192
entity may rely on a sophisticated system of automated controls to provide
efficient and effective operations (such as an airlines system of automated
controls to maintain flight schedules), but these controls ordinarily would not
be relevant to the audit. Further, although internal control applies to the
entire entity or to any of its operating units or business processes, an
understanding of internal control relating to each of the entitys operating
units and business processes may not be relevant to the audit.
A61. In certain circumstances, the statute or the regulation governing the
entity may require the auditor to report on compliance with certain specific
aspects of internal controls as a result, the auditors review of internal control
may be broader and more detailed.
Nature and Extent of the Understanding of Relevant Controls (Ref: Para. 13)
A62. Evaluating the design of a control involves considering whether the
control, individually or in combination with other controls, is capable of
effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material misstatements.
Implementation of a control means that the control exists and that the entity
is using it. There is little point in assessing the implementation of a control
that is not effective, and so the design of a control is considered first. An
improperly designed control may represent a material weakness in the
entitys internal control.
A63. Risk assessment procedures to obtain audit evidence about the design
and implementation of relevant controls may include:
Inquiring of entity personnel.
Observing the application of specific controls.
Inspecting documents and reports.
Tracing transactions through the information system relevant to financial
reporting.
Inquiry alone, however, is not sufficient for such purposes.
A64. Obtaining an understanding of an entitys controls is not sufficient to
test their operating effectiveness, unless there is some automation that
provides for the consistent operation of the controls. For example, obtaining
audit evidence about the implementation of a manual control at a point in
time does not provide audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the
control at other times during the period under audit. However, because of the
inherent consistency of IT processing (see paragraph A51), performing audit
procedures to determine whether an automated control has been
SA 315 IV-193
implemented may serve as a test of that controls operating effectiveness,
depending on the auditors assessment and testing of controls such as those
over program changes. Tests of the operating effectiveness of controls are
further described in SA 330, The Auditors Responses to Assessed Risks.
Components of Internal ControlControl Environment (Ref: Para. 14)
A65. The control environment includes the governance and management
functions and the attitudes, awareness, and actions of those charged with
governance and management concerning the entitys internal control and its
importance in the entity. The control environment sets the tone of an
organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people.
A66. Elements of the control environment that may be relevant when
obtaining an understanding of the control environment include the following:
(a) Communication and enforcement of integrity and ethical values These
are essential elements that influence the effectiveness of the design,
administration and monitoring of controls.
(b) Commitment to competence Matters such as managements
consideration of the competence levels for particular jobs and how those
levels translate into requisite skills and knowledge.
(c) Participation by those charged with governance Attributes of those
charged with governance such as:
Their independence from management.
Their experience and stature.
The extent of their involvement and the information they receive,
and the scrutiny of activities.
The appropriateness of their actions, including the degree to which
difficult questions are raised and pursued with management, and
their interaction with internal and external auditors.
(d) Managements philosophy and operating style Characteristics such as
managements:
Approach to taking and managing business risks.
Attitudes and actions toward financial reporting.
Attitudes toward information processing and accounting functions
and personnel.

SA 315 IV-194
(e) Organisational structure The framework within which an entitys
activities for achieving its objectives are planned, executed, controlled,
and reviewed.
(f) Assignment of authority and responsibility - Matters such as how authority
and responsibility for operating activities are assigned and how reporting
relationships and authorisation hierarchies are established.
(g) Human resource policies and practices Policies and practices that
relate to, for example, recruitment, orientation, training, evaluation,
counselling, promotion, compensation, and remedial actions.
Audit evidence for elements of the control environment
A67. Relevant audit evidence may be obtained through a combination of
inquiries and other risk assessment procedures such as corroborating
inquiries through observation or inspection of documents. For example,
through inquiries of management and employees, the auditor may obtain an
understanding of how management communicates to employees its views on
business practices and ethical behavior. The auditor may then determine
whether relevant controls have been implemented by considering, for
example, whether management has a written code of conduct and whether it
acts in a manner that supports the code.
Effect of the control environment on the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement
A68. Some elements of an entitys control environment have a pervasive
effect on assessing the risks of material misstatement. For example, an
entitys control consciousness is influenced significantly by those charged
with governance, because one of their roles is to counterbalance pressures
on management in relation to financial reporting that may arise from market
demands or remuneration schemes. The effectiveness of the design of the
control environment in relation to participation by those charged with
governance is therefore influenced by such matters as:
Their independence from management and their ability to evaluate the
actions of management.
Whether they understand the entitys business transactions.
The extent to which they evaluate whether the financial statements are
prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
A69. An active and independent board of directors may influence the
philosophy and operating style of senior management. However, other
SA 315 IV-195
elements may be more limited in their effect. For example, although human
resource policies and practices directed toward hiring competent financial,
accounting, and IT personnel may reduce the risk of errors in processing
financial information, they may not mitigate a strong bias by top management
to overstate earnings.
A70. The existence of a satisfactory control environment can be a positive
factor when the auditor assesses the risks of material misstatement.
However, although it may help reduce the risk of fraud, a satisfactory control
environment is not an absolute deterrent to fraud. Conversely, weaknesses
in the control environment may undermine the effectiveness of controls, in
particular in relation to fraud. For example, managements failure to commit
sufficient resources to address IT security risks may adversely affect internal
control by allowing improper changes to be made to computer programs or to
data, or unauthorized transactions to be processed. As explained in SA 330,
the control environment also influences the nature, timing, and extent of the
auditors further procedures.
A71. The control environment in itself does not prevent, or detect and
correct, a material misstatement. It may, however, influence the auditors
evaluation of the effectiveness of other controls (for example, the monitoring
of controls and the operation of specific control activities) and thereby, the
auditors assessment of the risks of material misstatement.
A72. The control environment within small entities is likely to differ from
larger entities. For example, those charged with governance in small entities
may not include an independent or outside member, and the role of
governance may be undertaken directly by the owner-manager where there
are no other owners. The nature of the control environment may also
influence the significance of other controls, or their absence. For example,
the active involvement of an owner-manager may mitigate certain of the risks
arising from a lack of segregation of duties in a small business; it may,
however, increase other risks, for example, the risk of override of controls.
A73. In addition, audit evidence for elements of the control environment in
smaller entities may not be available in documentary form, in particular
where communication between management and other personnel may be
informal, yet effective. For example, small entities might not have a written
code of conduct but, instead, develop a culture that emphasizes the
importance of integrity and ethical behavior through oral communication and
by management example.
SA 315 IV-196
A74. Consequently, the attitudes, awareness and actions of management or
the owner-manager are of particular importance to the auditors
understanding of a smaller entitys control environment.
Components of Internal ControlThe Entitys Risk Assessment Process (Ref:
Para. 15)
A75. The entitys risk assessment process forms the basis for how
management determines the risks to be managed. If that process is
appropriate to the circumstances, including the nature, size and complexity
of the entity, it assists the auditor in identifying risks of material
misstatement. Whether the entitys risk assessment process is appropriate to
the circumstances is a matter of judgment.
Considerations specific to smaller entities (Ref: Para. 17)
A76. There is unlikely to be an established risk assessment process in a
small entity. In such cases, it is likely that management will identify risks
through direct personal involvement in the business. Irrespective of the
circumstances, however, inquiry about identified risks and how they are
addressed by management is still necessary.
Components of Internal ControlThe Information System, Including the
Related Business Processes, Relevant to Financial Reporting, and
Communication
The information system, including related business processes, relevant to
financial reporting (Ref: Para. 18)
A77. The information system relevant to financial reporting objectives, which
includes the accounting system, consists of the procedures and records
designed and established to:
Initiate, record, process, and report entity transactions (as well as events
and conditions) and to maintain accountability for the related assets,
liabilities, and equity;
Resolve incorrect processing of transactions, for example, automated
suspense files and procedures followed to clear suspense items out on a
timely basis;
Process and account for system overrides or bypasses to controls;
Transfer information from transaction processing systems to the general
ledger;
Capture information relevant to financial reporting for events and
SA 315 IV-197
conditions other than transactions, such as the depreciation and
amortisation of assets and changes in the recoverability of accounts
receivables; and
Ensure information required to be disclosed by the applicable financial
reporting framework is accumulated, recorded, processed, summarised
and appropriately reported in the financial statements.
Journal entries
A78. An entitys information system typically includes the use of standard
journal entries that are required on a recurring basis to record transactions.
Examples might be journal entries to record sales, purchases, and cash
disbursements in the general ledger, or to record accounting estimates that
are periodically made by management, such as changes in the estimate of
uncollectible accounts receivable.
A79. An entitys financial reporting process also includes the use of non-
standard journal entries to record non-recurring, unusual transactions or
adjustments. Examples of such entries include consolidating adjustments
and entries for a business combination or disposal or non-recurring estimates
such as the impairment of an asset. In manual general ledger systems, non-
standard journal entries may be identified through inspection of ledgers,
journals, and supporting documentation. When automated procedures are
used to maintain the general ledger and prepare financial statements, such
entries may exist only in electronic form and may therefore be more easily
identified through the use of computer-assisted audit techniques.
Related business processes
A80. An entitys business processes are the activities designed to:
Develop, purchase, produce, sell and distribute an entitys products
and services;
Ensure compliance with laws and regulations; and
Record information, including accounting and financial reporting
information.
Business processes result in the transactions that are recorded,
processed and reported by the information system. Obtaining an
understanding of the entitys business processes, which include how
transactions are originated, assists the auditor obtain an understanding
of the entitys information system relevant to financial reporting in a
manner that is appropriate to the entitys circumstances.
SA 315 IV-198
A81. Information systems and related business processes relevant to
financial reporting in small entities are likely to be less sophisticated than in
larger entities, but their role is just as significant. Small entities with active
management involvement may not need extensive descriptions of accounting
procedures, sophisticated accounting records, or written policies.
Understanding the entitys systems and processes may therefore be easier in
an audit of smaller entities, and may be more dependent on inquiry than on
review of documentation. The need to obtain an understanding, however,
remains important.
Communication (Ref: Para. 19)
A82. Communication by the entity of the financial reporting roles and
responsibilities and of significant matters relating to financial reporting
involves providing an understanding of individual roles and responsibilities
pertaining to internal control over financial reporting. It includes such matters
as the extent to which personnel understand how their activities in the
financial reporting information system relate to the work of others and the
means of reporting exceptions to an appropriate higher level within the entity.
Communication may take such forms as policy manuals and financial
reporting manuals. Open communication channels help ensure that
exceptions are reported and acted on.
A83. Communication may be less structured and easier to achieve in a small
entity than in a larger entity due to fewer levels of responsibility and
managements greater visibility and availability.
Components of Internal ControlControl Activities (Ref: Para. 20)
A84. Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that
management directives are carried out. Control activities, whether within IT
or manual systems, have various objectives and are applied at various
organisational and functional levels. Examples of specific control activities
include those relating to the following:
Authorization.
Performance reviews.
Information processing.
Physical controls.
SA 315 IV-199
Segregation of duties.
A85. Control activities that are relevant to the audit are:
Those that are required to be treated as such, being control
activities that relate to significant risks and those that relate to risks
for which substantive procedures alone do not provide sufficient
appropriate audit evidence, as required by paragraphs 28 and 29,
respectively; or
Those that are considered to be relevant in the judgment of the
auditor.
A86. The auditors judgment about whether a control activity is relevant to the
audit is influenced by the risk that the auditor has identified that may give rise
to a material misstatement and whether the auditor thinks it is likely to be
appropriate to test the operating effectiveness of the control in determining
the extent of substantive testing.
A87. The auditors emphasis may be on identifying and obtaining an
understanding of control activities that address the areas where the auditor
considers that risks of material misstatement are likely to be higher. When
multiple control activities each achieve the same objective, it is unnecessary
to obtain an understanding of each of the control activities related to such
objective.
A88. The auditors knowledge about the presence or absence of control
activities obtained from the understanding of the other components of
internal control assists the auditor in determining whether it is necessary to
devote additional attention to obtaining an understanding of control activities.
A89. The concepts underlying control activities in small entities are likely to
be similar to those in larger entities, but the formality with which they operate
may vary. Further, small entities may find that certain types of control
activities are not relevant because of controls applied by management. For
example, managements sole authority for granting credit to customers and
approving significant purchases can provide strong control over important
account balances and transactions, lessening or removing the need for more
detailed control activities.
A90. Control activities relevant to the audit of a smaller entity are likely to
relate to the main transaction cycles such as revenues, purchases and
employment expenses.
SA 315 IV-200
Risks arising from IT (Ref: Para. 21)
A91. The use of IT affects the way that control activities are implemented. From
the auditors perspective, controls over IT systems are effective when they
maintain the integrity of information and the security of the data such systems
process, and include effective general IT-controls and application controls.
A92. General IT-controls are policies and procedures that relate to many
applications and support the effective functioning of application controls.
They apply to mainframe, miniframe, and end-user environments. General
IT-controls that maintain the integrity of information and security of data
commonly include controls over the following:
Data center and network operations.
System software acquisition, change and maintenance.
Program change.
Access security.
Application system acquisition, development, and maintenance.
They are generally implemented to deal with the risks referred to in
paragraph A52 above.
A93. Application controls are manual or automated procedures that typically
operate at a business process level and apply to the processing of individual
applications. Application controls can be preventive or detective in nature
and are designed to ensure the integrity of the accounting records.
Accordingly, application controls relate to procedures used to initiate, record,
process and report transactions or other financial data. These controls help
ensure that transactions occurred, are authorised, and are completely and
accurately recorded and processed. Examples include edit checks of input
data, and numerical sequence checks with manual follow-up of exception
reports or correction at the point of data entry.
Components of Internal ControlMonitoring of Controls (Ref: Para. 22)
A94. Monitoring of controls is a process to assess the effectiveness of
internal control performance over time. It involves assessing the
effectiveness of controls on a timely basis and taking necessary corrective
actions. Management accomplishes monitoring of controls through ongoing
activities, separate evaluations, or a combination of the two. Ongoing
monitoring activities are often built into the normal recurring activities of an
entity and include regular management and supervisory activities.
SA 315 IV-201
A95. In many entities, internal auditors or personnel performing similar
functions contribute to the monitoring of an entitys activities. SA 610,
Considering the Work of Internal Audit
10
establishes requirements and
provides guidance on the auditors consideration of the work of internal
auditing. Managements monitoring activities may also include using
information from communications from external parties such as customer
complaints and regulator comments that may indicate problems or highlight
areas in need of improvement.
A96. Managements monitoring of control is often accomplished by
managements or the owner-managers close involvement in operations. This
involvement often will identify significant variances from expectations and
inaccuracies in financial data leading to corrective action to the control.
Sources of information (Ref: Para. 23)
A97. Much of the information used in monitoring may be produced by the
entitys information system. If management assumes that data used for
monitoring are accurate without having a basis for that assumption, errors
that may exist in the information could potentially lead management to
incorrect conclusions from its monitoring activities. Accordingly, an
understanding of:
the sources of the information related to the entitys monitoring activities;
and
the basis upon which management considers the information to be
sufficiently reliable for the purpose;
is required as part of the auditors understanding of the entitys monitoring
activities as a component of internal control.
Assessment of Risks of Material Misstatement at the Financial Statement
Level (Ref: Para. 24 (a))
A98. Risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level refer to
risks that relate pervasively to the financial statements as a whole and
potentially affect many assertions. Risks of this nature are not necessarily
risks identifiable with specific assertions at the class of transactions, account
balance, or disclosure level. Rather, they represent circumstances that may

10
Hitherto known as AAS 7, Relying Upon the Work of an Internal Auditor.
SA 315 IV-202
increase the risks of material misstatement at the assertion level, for
example, through management override of internal control. Financial
statement level risks may be especially relevant to the auditors
consideration of the risks of material misstatement arising from fraud.
A99. Risks at the financial statement level may derive in particular from a weak
control environment (although these risks may also relate to other factors, such
as declining economic conditions). For example, weaknesses such as
managements lack of competence may have a more pervasive effect on the
financial statements and may require an overall response by the auditor.
A100. The auditors understanding of internal control may raise doubts about
the auditability of an entitys financial statements. For example:
Concerns about the integrity of the entitys management may be so
serious as to cause the auditor to conclude that the risk of management
misrepresentation in the financial statements is such that an audit cannot
be conducted.
Concerns about the condition and reliability of an entitys records may
cause the auditor to conclude that it is unlikely that sufficient appropriate
audit evidence will be available to support an unqualified opinion on the
A101. SA 705, Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditors
Report
11
establishes requirements and provides guidance in determining
whether there is a need for the auditor to consider a qualification or
disclaimer of opinion or, as may be required in some cases, to withdraw from
the engagement where this is legally possible.
Assessment of Risks of Material Misstatement at the Assertion Level
(Ref: Para. 24(b))
A102. Risks of material misstatement at the assertion level for classes of
transactions, account balances, and disclosures need to be considered
because such consideration directly assists in determining the nature, timing,
and extent of further audit procedures at the assertion level necessary to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. In identifying and assessing
risks of material misstatement at the assertion level, the auditor may
conclude that the identified risks relate more pervasively to the financial
statements as a whole and potentially affect many assertions.

11
At present, there is no separate Standard on Auditing (SA) corresponding to International
Standard on Auditing (ISA) 705. However, the concept of modified audit report has been
discussed in SA 700, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements.
SA 315 IV-203
The Use of Assertions
A103. In representing that the financial statements are in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework, management implicitly or
explicitly makes assertions regarding the recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of the various elements of financial statements
and related disclosures.
A104. Assertions used by the auditor to consider the different types of
potential misstatements that may occur fall into the following three categories
and may take the following forms:
(a) Assertions about classes of transactions and events for the period
under audit:
(i) Occurrencetransactions and events that have been recorded
have occurred and pertain to the entity.
(ii) Completenessall transactions and events that should have been
recorded have been recorded.
(iii) Accuracyamounts and other data relating to recorded
transactions and events have been recorded appropriately.
(iv) Cut-offtransactions and events have been recorded in the
correct accounting period.
(v) Classificationtransactions and events have been recorded in the
proper accounts.
(b) Assertions about account balances at the period end:
(i) Existenceassets, liabilities, and equity interests exist.
(ii) Rights and obligationsthe entity holds or controls the rights to
assets, and liabilities are the obligations of the entity.
(iii) Completenessall assets, liabilities and equity interests that
should have been recorded have been recorded.
(iv) Valuation and allocationassets, liabilities, and equity interests
are included in the financial statements at appropriate amounts
and any resulting valuation or allocation adjustments are
appropriately recorded.
(c) Assertions about presentation and disclosure:
(i) Occurrence and rights and obligationsdisclosed events,
transactions, and other matters have occurred and pertain to the
SA 315 IV-204
entity.
(ii) Completenessall disclosures that should have been included in
the financial statements have been included.
(iii) Classification and understandabilityfinancial information is
appropriately presented and described, and disclosures are clearly
expressed.
(iv) Accuracy and valuationfinancial and other information are
disclosed fairly and at appropriate amounts.
A105. The auditor may use the assertions as described above or may
express them differently provided all aspects described above have been
covered. For example, the auditor may choose to combine the assertions
about transactions and events with the assertions about account balances.
A106. When making assertions about the financial statements of certain
entities, especially, for example, where the Government is a major
stakeholder, in addition to those assertions set out in paragraph A104,
management may often assert that transactions and events have been
carried out in accordance with legislation or proper authority. Such assertions
may fall within the scope of the financial statement audit.
Process of Identifying Risks of Material Misstatement (Ref: Para. 25(a))
A107. Information gathered by performing risk assessment procedures,
including the audit evidence obtained in evaluating the design of controls and
determining whether they have been implemented, is used as audit evidence
to support the risk assessment. The risk assessment determines the nature,
timing, and extent of further audit procedures to be performed.
A108. Appendix 2provides examples of conditions and events that may
indicate the existence of risks of material misstatement.
Relating Controls to Assertions [Ref: Para. 25(c)]
A109. In making risk assessments, the auditor may identify the controls
that are likely to prevent, or detect and correct, material misstatement in
specific assertions. Generally, it is useful to obtain an understanding of
controls and relate them to assertions in the context of processes and
systems in which they exist because individual control activities often do not
in themselves address a risk. Often, only multiple control activities, together
with other components of internal control, will be sufficient to address a risk.
A110. Conversely, some control activities may have a specific effect on
an individual assertion embodied in a particular class of transactions or
account balance. For example, the control activities that an entity established
SA 315 IV-205
to ensure that its personnel are properly counting and recording the annual
physical inventory relate directly to the existence and completeness
assertions for the inventory account balance.
A111. Controls can be either directly or indirectly related to an assertion.
The more indirect the relationship, the less effective that control may be in
preventing, or detecting and correcting, misstatements in that assertion. For
example, a sales managers review of a summary of sales activity for specific
stores by region ordinarily is only indirectly related to the completeness
assertion for sales revenue. Accordingly, it may be less effective in reducing
risk for that assertion than controls more directly related to that assertion,
such as matching shipping documents with billing documents.
Significant Risks
Identifying Significant Risks (Ref: Para. 27)
A112. Significant risks often relate to significant non-routine transactions
or judgmental matters. Non-routine transactions are transactions that are
unusual, due to either size or nature, and that therefore occur infrequently.
Judgmental matters may include the development of accounting estimates
for which there is significant measurement uncertainty. Routine, non-complex
transactions that are subject to systematic processing are less likely to give
rise to significant risks.
A113. Risks of material misstatement may be greater for significant non-
routine transactions arising from matters such as the following:
Greater management intervention to specify the accounting treatment.
Greater manual intervention for data collection and processing.
Complex calculations or accounting principles.
The nature of non-routine transactions, which may make it difficult for the
entity to implement effective controls over the risks.
A114. Risks of material misstatement may be greater for significant
judgmental matters that require the development of accounting estimates,
arising from matters such as the following:
Accounting principles for accounting estimates or revenue recognition
may be subject to differing interpretation.
Required judgment may be subjective or complex, or require assumptions
about the effects of future events, for example, judgment about fair value.
A115. SA 330 describes the consequences for further audit procedures of
SA 315 IV-206
identifying a risk as significant.
Significant risks relating to the risks of material misstatement due to fraud
A116. SA 240 (Revised) provides further requirements and guidance in
relation to the identification and assessment of the risks of material
Understanding Controls Related to Significant Risks (Ref: Para. 28)
A117. Although risks relating to significant non-routine or judgmental
matters are often less likely to be subject to routine controls, management
may have other responses intended to deal with such risks. Accordingly, the
auditors understanding of whether the entity has designed and implemented
controls for significant risks arising from non-routine or judgmental matters
includes whether and how management responds to the risks. Such
responses might include:
Control activities such as a review of assumptions by senior management
or experts.
Documented processes for estimations.
Approval by those charged with governance.
A118. For example, where there are one-off events such as the receipt of
notice of a significant lawsuit, consideration of the entitys response may
include such matters as whether it has been referred to appropriate experts
(such as internal or external legal counsel), whether an assessment has
been made of the potential effect, and how it is proposed that the
circumstances are to be disclosed in the financial statements.
A119. In some cases, management may not have appropriately
responded to significant risks of material misstatement by implementing
controls over these significant risks. This may indicate a material weakness
in the entitys internal control.
Risks for Which Substantive Procedures Alone Do Not Provide Sufficient
Appropriate Audit Evidence (Ref: Para. 29)
A120. Risks of material misstatement may relate directly to the recording
of routine classes of transactions or account balances, and the preparation of
reliable financial statements. Such risks may include risks of inaccurate or
incomplete processing for routine and significant classes of transactions such
as an entitys revenue, purchases, and cash receipts or cash payments.
A121. Where such routine business transactions are subject to highly
SA 315 IV-207
automated processing with little or no manual intervention, it may not be
possible to perform only substantive procedures in relation to the risk. For
example, the auditor may consider this to be the case in circumstances
where a significant amount of an entitys information is initiated, recorded,
processed, or reported only in electronic form such as in an integrated
system. In such cases:
Audit evidence may be available only in electronic form, and its
sufficiency and appropriateness usually depend on the effectiveness of
controls over its accuracy and completeness.
The potential for improper initiation or alteration of information to occur
and not be detected may be greater if appropriate controls are not
operating effectively.
A122. The consequences for further audit procedures of identifying such
risks are described in SA 330.
Revision of Risk Assessment (Ref: Para. 30)
A123. During the audit, information may come to the auditors attention
that differs significantly from the information on which the risk assessment
was based. For example, the risk assessment may be based on an
expectation that certain controls are operating effectively. In performing tests
of those controls, the auditor may obtain audit evidence that they were not
operating effectively at relevant times during the audit. Similarly, in
performing substantive procedures the auditor may detect misstatements in
amounts or frequency greater than is consistent with the auditors risk
assessments. In such circumstances, the risk assessment may not
appropriately reflect the true circumstances of the entity and the further
planned audit procedures may not be effective in detecting material
misstatements. See SA 330 for further guidance.
Material Weakness in Internal Control (Ref: Para. 31)
A124. The types of material weaknesses in internal control that the
auditor may identify when obtaining an understanding of the entity and its
internal controls may include:
Risks of material misstatement that the auditor identifies and which the
entity has not controlled, or for which the relevant control is inadequate.
A weakness in the entitys risk assessment process that the auditor
identifies as material, or the absence of a risk assessment process in
those cases where it would be appropriate for one to have been
established.
SA 315 IV-208
A125. Material weaknesses may also be identified in controls that
prevent, or detect and correct, error, or those to prevent and detect fraud.
A126. In case of certain audit engagements, there may be additional
communication or reporting requirements. For example, internal control
weaknesses may have to be reported to the regulator.
A127. The manner in which the requirements of paragraph 33 are
documented is for the auditor to determine using professional judgment. For
example, in audits of small entities the documentation may be incorporated in
the auditors documentation of the overall strategy and audit plan that is
required by SA 300 (Revised), Planning an Audit of Financial Statements.
Similarly, for example, the results of the risk assessment may be
documented separately, or may be documented as part of the auditors
documentation of further procedures (see SA 330). The form and extent of
the documentation is influenced by the nature, size and complexity of the
entity and its internal control, availability of information from the entity and
the audit methodology and technology used in the course of the audit.
A128. For entities that have uncomplicated businesses and processes
relevant to financial reporting, the documentation may be simple in form and
relatively brief. It is not necessary to document the entirety of the auditors
understanding of the entity and matters related to it. Key elements of
understanding documented by the auditor include those on which the auditor
based the assessment of the risks of material misstatement.
A129. The extent of documentation may also reflect the experience and
capabilities of the members of the audit engagement team. Provided the
requirements of SA 230
12
, Audit Documentation are always met, an audit
undertaken by an engagement team comprising less experienced individuals
may require more detailed documentation to assist them to obtain an appropriate
understanding of the entity than one that includes experienced individuals.
A130. For recurring audits, certain documentation may be carried
forward, updated as necessary to reflect changes in the entitys business or
processes.

12
Hitherto known as AAS 3, Documentation.
SA 315 IV-209
Material Modifications to ISA 315, Identifying and
Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment
Additions
1. Paragraph 4 of the Requirement part of ISA 315 deals with the definition
of terms, which needs to be defined for the proper interpretation of the
Standard. The definition of the term, Material weakness has been
added in paragraph 4.
Deletions
1. Paragraph A19 of the Application Section of ISA 315 deals with the
entities regarding the effect of ministerial directives, government policy
requirements and resolutions of the legislature on the operations of the
entity. Since as mentioned in the Preface to the Standards on Quality
deleted.
Further, it is also possible that even in case of non public sector entities, the
operation of the entity may be affected by government policy requirements
and resolutions of the legislature. Accordingly, the spirit of erstwhile A19,
highlighting the fact that in some cases, the entitys operations may be
affected by such requirements/resolutions, has been retained.
entities regarding the influence of concerns relating to public accountability,
including objectives having source in legislation, regulations, government
ordinances, etc., on management objectives. Since as mentioned in the
managements objectives are influenced by such aspects. Accordingly, the
spirit of erstwhile A31, highlighting the fact that in some cases, the
SA 315 IV-210
management objectives may be influenced by the concerns relating to public
accountability, including objectives having source in legislation, regulations,
government directions, has been retained.
entities regarding the additional reporting responsibilities of the auditor with
respect to internal control because of any code of practice or compliance with
legislative authorities. Since as mentioned in the Preface to the Standards
Services, the Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board, apply equally to all entities, irrespective of their form, nature and size,
a specific reference to applicability of the Standard to public sector entities
has been deleted.
statute or regulations may require the auditor to report on compliance with
certain specific aspects of internal control. Accordingly, the spirit of erstwhile
A61, highlighting such additional reporting responsibilities of the auditor, has
been retained.
entities regarding the relevance of managements assertions that
transactions and events have been carried out in accordance with legislation
or proper authority, for the financial statement audit. Since as mentioned in
the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other
Further, it is also possible that even in case of non public sector entities,
there may be similar assertions made by the management that may fall within
the scope of the financial statement audit. Accordingly, the spirit of erstwhile
A106, highlighting such fact, has been retained and an example has been
added.
entities regarding the additional communication and reporting requirements
for the auditor. Since as mentioned in the Preface to the Standards on
Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services,
the Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, apply
SA 315 IV-211
deleted.
Further, it is also possible that such additional communication or reporting
requirements may exist even in case of non public sector entities.
Accordingly, the spirit of erstwhile A126, highlighting such fact, has been
retained though a specific reference to public sector entities has been
deleted.
SA 315 IV-212
Appendix 1
(Ref: Paras. 4(c), 14-23 and A65-A97)
Internal Control Components
1. This appendix further explains the components of internal control, as set
out in paragraphs 4(c), 14-23 and A65-A97, as they relate to a financial
statement audit.
Control Environment
2. The control environment encompasses the following elements:
(a) Communication and enforcement of integrity and ethical values. The
effectiveness of controls cannot rise above the integrity and ethical values of
the people who create, administer, and monitor them. Integrity and ethical
behavior are the product of the entitys ethical and behavioral standards, how
they are communicated, and how they are reinforced in practice. The
enforcement of integrity and ethical values includes, for example,
management actions to eliminate or mitigate incentives or temptations that
might prompt personnel to engage in dishonest, illegal, or unethical acts. The
communication of entity policies on integrity and ethical values may include
the communication of behavioral standards to personnel through policy
statements and codes of conduct and by example.
(b) Commitment to competence. Competence is the knowledge and skills
necessary to accomplish tasks that define the individuals job.
(c) Participation by those charged with governance. An entitys control
consciousness is influenced significantly by those charged with governance.
The importance of the responsibilities of those charged with governance is
recognised in codes of practice and other laws and regulations or guidance
produced for the benefit of those charged with governance. Other
responsibilities of those charged with governance include oversight of the
design and effective operation of whistle blower procedures and the process
for reviewing the effectiveness of the entitys internal control.
(d) Managements philosophy and operating style. Managements
philosophy and operating style encompass a broad range of characteristics.
For example, managements attitudes and actions toward financial reporting
may manifest themselves through conservative or aggressive selection from
available alternative accounting principles, or conscientiousness and
conservatism with which accounting estimates are developed.

SA 315 IV-213
(e) Organizational structure. Establishing a relevant organisational
structure includes considering key areas of authority and responsibility and
appropriate lines of reporting. The appropriateness of an entitys
organisational structure depends, in part, on its size and the nature of its
activities.
(f) Assignment of authority and responsibility. The assignment of authority
and responsibility may include policies relating to appropriate business
practices, knowledge and experience of key personnel, and resources
provided for carrying out duties. In addition, it may include policies and
communications directed at ensuring that all personnel understand the
entitys objectives, know how their individual actions interrelate and
contribute to those objectives, and recognise how and for what they will be
held accountable.
(g) Human resource policies and practices. Human resource policies and
practices often demonstrate important matters in relation to the control
consciousness of an entity. For example, standards for recruiting the most
qualified individuals with emphasis on educational background, prior work
experience, past accomplishments, and evidence of integrity and ethical
behavior demonstrate an entitys commitment to competent and trustworthy
people. Training policies that communicate prospective roles and
responsibilities and include practices such as training schools and seminars
illustrate expected levels of performance and behavior. Promotions driven by
periodic performance appraisals demonstrate the entitys commitment to the
advancement of qualified personnel to higher levels of responsibility.
Entitys Risk Assessment Process
3. For financial reporting purposes, the entitys risk assessment process
includes how management identifies business risks relevant to the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with the entitys applicable
financial reporting framework, estimates their significance, assesses the
likelihood of their occurrence, and decides upon actions to respond to and
manage them and the results thereof. For example, the entitys risk
assessment process may address how the entity considers the possibility of
unrecorded transactions or identifies and analyses significant estimates
recorded in the financial statements.
4. Risks relevant to reliable financial reporting include external and
internal events, transactions or circumstances that may occur and adversely
affect an entitys ability to initiate, record, process, and report financial data
consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements.
Management may initiate plans, programs, or actions to address specific
SA 315 IV-214
risks or it may decide to accept a risk because of cost or other
considerations. Risks can arise or change due to circumstances such as the
following:
Changes in operating environment. Changes in the regulatory or
operating environment can result in changes in competitive pressures and
significantly different risks.
New personnel. New personnel may have a different focus on or
understanding of internal control.
New or revamped information systems. Significant and rapid changes in
information systems can change the risk relating to internal control.
Rapid growth. Significant and rapid expansion of operations can strain
controls and increase the risk of a breakdown in controls.
New technology. Incorporating new technologies into production
processes or information systems may change the risk associated with
internal control.
New business models, products, or activities. Entering into business
areas or transactions with which an entity has little experience may
introduce new risks associated with internal control.
Corporate restructurings. Restructurings may be accompanied by staff
reductions and changes in supervision and segregation of duties that may
change the risk associated with internal control.
Expanded foreign operations. The expansion or acquisition of foreign
operations carries new and often unique risks that may affect internal
control, for example, additional or changed risks from foreign currency
transactions.
New accounting pronouncements. Adoption of new accounting principles
or changing accounting principles may affect risks in preparing financial
statements.
Information System, Including the Related Business Processes,
Relevant To Financial Reporting, And Communication
5. An information system consists of infrastructure (physical and hardware
components), software, people, procedures, and data. Many information
systems make extensive use of information technology (IT).
6. The information system relevant to financial reporting objectives,
which includes the financial reporting system, encompasses methods and
SA 315 IV-215
records that:
Identify and record all valid transactions.
Describe on a timely basis the transactions in sufficient detail to permit
proper classification of transactions for financial reporting.
Measure the value of transactions in a manner that permits recording
their proper monetary value in the financial statements.
Determine the time period in which transactions occurred to permit
recording of transactions in the proper accounting period.
Present properly the transactions and related disclosures in the financial
statements.
7. The quality of system-generated information affects managements
ability to make appropriate decisions in managing and controlling the entitys
activities and to prepare reliable financial reports.
8. Communication, which involves providing an understanding of individual
roles and responsibilities pertaining to internal control over financial
reporting, may take such forms as policy manuals, accounting and financial
reporting manuals, and memoranda. Communication also can be made
electronically, orally, and through the actions of management.
Control Activities
9. Generally, control activities that may be relevant to an audit may be
categorised as policies and procedures that pertain to the following:
Performance reviews. These control activities include reviews and
analyses of actual performance versus budgets, forecasts, and prior
period performance; relating different sets of data operating or financial
to one another, together with analyses of the relationships and
investigative and corrective actions; comparing internal data with external
sources of information; and review of functional or activity performance.
Information processing. The two broad groupings of information systems
control activities are application controls, which apply to the processing of
individual applications, and general IT-controls, which are policies and
procedures that relate to many applications and support the effective
functioning of application controls by helping to ensure the continued
proper operation of information systems. Examples of application controls
include checking the arithmetical accuracy of records, maintaining and
reviewing accounts and trial balances, automated controls such as edit
checks of input data and numerical sequence checks, and manual follow-
SA 315 IV-216
up of exception reports. Examples of general IT-controls are program
change controls, controls that restrict access to programs or data, controls
over the implementation of new releases of packaged software
applications, and controls over system software that restrict access to or
monitor the use of system utilities that could change financial data or
records without leaving an audit trail.
Physical controls. Controls that encompass:
The physical security of assets, including adequate safeguards such
as secured facilities over access to assets and records.
The authorisation for access to computer programs and data files.
The periodic counting and comparison with amounts shown on control
records (for example, comparing the results of cash, security and
inventory counts with accounting records).
The extent to which physical controls intended to prevent theft of assets
are relevant to the reliability of financial statement preparation, and
therefore the audit, depends on circumstances such as when assets are
highly susceptible to misappropriation.
Segregation of duties. Assigning different people the responsibilities of
authorising transactions, recording transactions, and maintaining custody
of assets. Segregation of duties is intended to reduce the opportunities to
allow any person to be in a position to both perpetrate and conceal errors
or fraud in the normal course of the persons duties.
10. Certain control activities may depend on the existence of appropriate
higher level policies established by management or those charged with
governance. For example, authorisation controls may be delegated under
established guidelines, such as, investment criteria set by those charged with
governance; alternatively, non-routine transactions such as, major
acquisitions or divestments may require specific high level approval,
including in some cases that of shareholders.
Monitoring of Controls
11. An important management responsibility is to establish and maintain
internal control on an ongoing basis. Managements monitoring of controls
includes considering whether they are operating as intended and that they
are modified as appropriate for changes in conditions. Monitoring of controls
may include activities such as, managements review of whether bank
reconciliations are being prepared on a timely basis, internal auditors
evaluation of sales personnels compliance with the entitys policies on terms
SA 315 IV-217
of sales contracts, and a legal departments oversight of compliance with the
entitys ethical or business practice policies. Monitoring is done also to
ensure that controls continue to operate effectively over time. For example, if
the timeliness and accuracy of bank reconciliations are not monitored,
personnel are likely to stop preparing them.
12. Internal auditors or personnel performing similar functions may
contribute to the monitoring of an entitys controls through separate
evaluations. Ordinarily, they regularly provide information about the
functioning of internal control, focusing considerable attention on evaluating
the effectiveness of internal control, and communicate information about
strengths and weaknesses and recommendations for improving internal
control.
13. Monitoring activities may include using information from
communications from external parties that may indicate problems or highlight
areas in need of improvement. Customers implicitly corroborate billing data
by paying their invoices or complaining about their charges. In addition,
regulators may communicate with the entity concerning matters that affect
the functioning of internal control, for example, communications concerning
examinations by bank regulatory agencies. Also, management may consider
communications relating to internal control from external auditors in
performing monitoring activities.
SA 315 IV-218
Appendix 2
(Ref: Para. A29 and A108)
Conditions and Events that May Indicate Risks of Material
Misstatement
The following are examples of conditions and events that may indicate the
existence of risks of material misstatement. The examples provided cover a
broad range of conditions and events; however, not all conditions and events
are relevant to every audit engagement and the list of examples is not
necessarily complete.
Operations in regions that are economically unstable, for example,
countries with significant currency devaluation or highly inflationary
economies.
Operations exposed to volatile markets, for example, futures trading.
Operations that are subject to a high degree of complex regulation.
Going concern and liquidity issues including loss of significant customers.
Constraints on the availability of capital and credit.
Changes in the industry in which the entity operates.
Changes in the supply chain.
Developing or offering new products or services, or moving into new lines
of business.
Expanding into new locations.
Changes in the entity such as large acquisitions or reorganisations or
other unusual events.
Entities or business segments likely to be sold.
The existence of complex alliances and joint ventures.
Use of off-balance-sheet finance, special-purpose entities, and other
complex financing arrangements.
Significant transactions with related parties.
Lack of personnel with appropriate accounting and financial reporting
skills.
Changes in key personnel including departure of key executives.
SA 315 IV-219
Weaknesses in internal control, especially those not addressed by
management.
Inconsistencies between the entitys IT strategy and its business
strategies.
Changes in the IT environment.
Installation of significant new IT systems related to financial reporting.
Inquiries into the entitys operations or financial results by regulatory or
government bodies.
Past misstatements, history of errors or a significant amount of
adjustments at period end.
Significant amount of non-routine or non-systematic transactions including
intercompany transactions and large revenue transactions at period end.
Transactions that are recorded based on managements intent, for
example, debt refinancing, assets to be sold and classification of
marketable securities.
Application of new accounting pronouncements.
Accounting measurements that involve complex processes.
Events or transactions that involve significant measurement uncertainty,
including accounting estimates.
Pending litigation and contingent liabilities, for example, sales warranties,
financial guarantees and environmental remediation.
Back

SA 320 (AAS 13)
AUDIT MATERIALITY
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-2
Materiality .............................................................................................3-8
The Relationship between Materiality and Audit Risk ...................9-10
Materiality and Audit Risk in Evaluating Audit Evidence ............11-16
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 17

*
, Audit Materiality should be read in the
1
authority of SAs.

*
1
Back
Audit Materiality
SA 320 IV-221
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard is to establish standards on the concept of
materiality and its relationship with audit risk.
2. The auditor should consider materiality and its relationship with audit
risk when conducting an audit.
Materiality
3. Information is material if its misstatement (i.e., omission or erroneous
statement) could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of the financial information. Materiality depends on the size and nature
of the item, judged in the particular circumstances of its misstatement. Thus,
materiality provides a threshold or cut-off point rather than being a primary
qualitative characteristic which the information must have if it is to be useful.
4 The objective of an audit of financial information prepared within a
framework of recognised accounting policies and practices and relevant
statutory requirements, if any, is to enable the auditor to express an opinion
on such financial information. The assessment of what is material is a matter
of professional judgement.
5. The concept of materiality recognises that some matters, either
individually or in the aggregate, are relatively important for true and fair
presentation of financial information in conformity with recognised accounting
policies and practices. The auditor considers materiality at both the overall
financial information level and in relation to individual account balances and
classes of transactions. Materiality may also be influenced by other
considerations, such as the legal and regulatory requirements, non-
compliance with which may have a significant bearing on the financial
information, and considerations relating to individual account balances and
relationships. This process may result in different levels of materiality
depending on the matter being audited.
6. Although the auditor ordinarily establishes an acceptable materiality
level to detect quantitatively material misstatements, both the amount
(quantity) and nature (quality) of misstatements need to be considered. An
example of a qualitative misstatement would be the inadequate or improper
description of an accounting policy when it is likely that a user of the financial
statements would be misled by the description.
SA 320 IV-222
7. The auditor needs to consider the possibility of misstatements of
relatively small amounts that, cumulatively, could have a material effect on
the financial information. For example, an error in a month-end (or other
periodic) procedure could be an indication of a potential material
misstatement if that error is repeated each month or each period, as the case
may be.
8. Materiality should be considered by the auditor when
(a) determining the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures;
(b) evaluating the effect of misstatements.
The Relationship between Materiality and Audit Risk
9. When planning the audit, the auditor considers what would make the
financial information materially misstated. The auditors preliminary
assessment of materiality, related to specific account balances and classes of
transactions, helps the auditor decide such questions as what items to
examine and whether to use sampling and analytical procedures. This enables
the auditor to select audit procedures that, in combination, can be expected to
support the audit opinion at an acceptably low degree of audit risk.
10. There is an inverse relationship between materiality and the degree of
audit risk, that is, the higher the materiality level, the lower the audit risk and
vice versa. For example, the risk that a particular account balance or class of
transactions could be misstated by an extremely large amount might be very
low, but the risk that it could be misstated by an extremely small amount might
be very high. The auditor takes the inverse relationship between materiality
and audit risk into account when determining the nature, timing and extent of
audit procedures. For example, if, after planning for specific audit procedures,
the auditor determines that the acceptable materiality level is lower, audit risk
is increased. The auditor would compensate for this by either:
(a) reducing the assessed degree of control risk, where this is possible,
and supporting the reduced degree by carrying out extended or
additional tests of control; or
(b) reducing detection risk by modifying the nature, timing and extent of
planned substantive procedures.
Audit Materiality
SA 320 IV-223
Materiality and Audit Risk in Evaluating Audit Evidence
11. The auditors assessment of materiality and audit risk may be different at
the time of initially planning the engagement from that at the time of evaluating
the results of his audit procedures. This could be because of a change in
circumstances or a change in the auditors knowledge as a result of the audit.
For example, if the audit is planned prior to period end, the auditor will
anticipate the results of operations and the financial position. If actual results of
operations and financial position are substantially different, the assessment of
materiality and audit risk may also change. Additionally, the auditor may, in
planning the audit work, intentionally set the acceptable cut off level for
verifying individual transactions at a lower level than is intended to be used to
evaluate the results of the audit. This may be done to cover a larger number of
items and thereby reduce the likelihood of undiscovered misstatements and to
provide the auditor with the margin of safety when evaluating the effect of
misstatements discovered during the audit.
12. In forming his opinion on the financial information, the auditor should
consider whether the effect of aggregate uncorrected misstatements on the
financial information is material. Qualitative considerations also influence an
auditor in reaching a conclusion as to whether the misstatements are
material.
13. The aggregate of uncorrected misstatements comprises:
(a) specific misstatements identified by the auditor, including the net effect
of uncorrected misstatements identified during the audit of previous
periods; and
(b) the auditors best estimate of other misstatements which cannot be
specifically identified (that is, projected errors).
14. When the auditor tests an account balance or class of transactions by
an analytical procedure, he ordinarily would not specifically identify
misstatements but would only obtain an indication of whether misstatements
might exist in the balance or class and possibly its approximate magnitude. If
the analytical procedure indicates that misstatements might exist, but not its
approximate amount, the auditor ordinarily would have to employ other
procedures to enable him to estimate the aggregate misstatement in the
balance or class.

SA 320 IV-224
15. When an auditor uses audit sampling to test an account balance or
class of transactions, he projects the amount of known misstatements
identified by him in his sample to the items in the balance or class from which
his sample was selected. That projected misstatement, along with the results
of other substantive tests, contributes to the auditors assessment of
aggregate misstatement in the balance or class.
16. If the aggregate of the uncorrected misstatements that the auditor has
identified approaches the materiality level, or if auditor determines that the
aggregate of uncorrected misstatements causes the financial information to
be materially misstated, he should consider requesting the management to
adjust the financial information or extending his audit procedures. In any
event, the management may want to adjust the financial information for
known misstatements. The adjustment of financial information may involve,
for example, application of appropriate accounting principles, other
adjustments in amounts, or the addition of appropriate disclosure of
inadequately disclosed matters. If the management refuses to adjust the
financial information and the results of extended audit procedures do not
enable the auditor to conclude that the aggregate of uncorrected
misstatements is not material, the auditor should express a qualified or
adverse opinion, as appropriate.
Effective Date
Back

SA 330
1

THE AUDITORS
RESPONSES TO ASSESSED RISKS
for periods beginning on or after April 1, 2008)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction
Scope of this SA ....................................................................................... 1
Effective Date ........................................................................................... 2
Objective..................................................................................................3
Definitions ...............................................................................................4
Requirements
Overall Responses .................................................................................... 5
Audit Procedures Responsive to the Assessed Risks of Material
Misstatement at the Assertion Level ..................................................... 6-24
Adequacy of Presentation and Disclosure ............................................... 25
Evaluating the Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Audit Evidence .... 26-28
Documentation ................................................................................... 29-31
Overall Responses .............................................................................A1-A3
Misstatement at the Assertion Level .................................................A4-A54
Adequacy of Presentation and Disclosure ............................................. A55

1
Issued in December, 2007. The date this Standard (along with SA 315) becomes effective, the
existing Standard on Auditing (SA) 400, Risk Assessments and Internal Control, SA 310,
Knowledge of the Business, and SA 401, Auditing in a Computer Information Systems
Environment, issued in June 2002, April 2000 and January 2003, respectively, would stand
withdrawn.
Back
SA 330 IV-226
Evaluating the Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Audit Evidence A56-A58
Documentation ...................................................................................... A59
Material Modifications to ISA 330, The Auditors Responses to Assessed
Risks

Standard on Auditing (SA) 330, The Auditors Responses to Assessed
Risks should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on
Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related
Services
2

2
The Auditors Responses to Assessed Risks
SA 330 IV-227
Scope of this SA
1. This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditors responsibility to
design and implement responses to the risks of material misstatement
identified and assessed by the auditor in accordance with SA 315,
Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material Misstatement Through
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment in a financial statement audit.
Effective Date
Objective
3. The objective of the auditor is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence about the assessed risks of material misstatement, through
designing and implementing appropriate responses to those risks.
Definitions
attributed below:
(a) Substantive procedure An audit procedure designed to detect material
misstatements at the assertion level. Substantive procedures comprise:
(i) Tests of details (of classes of transactions, account balances, and
disclosures), and
(ii) Substantive analytical procedures.
(b) Test of controls An audit procedure designed to evaluate the operating
effectiveness of controls in preventing, or detecting and correcting,
material misstatements at the assertion level.
Requirements
Overall Responses
5. The auditor shall design and implement overall responses to address
the assessed risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level.
(Ref: Para. A1-A3)
SA 330 IV-228
Misstatement at the Assertion Level
6. The auditor shall design and perform further audit procedures whose
nature, timing and extent are based on and are responsive to the assessed
risks of material misstatement at the assertion level. (Ref: Para. A4-A8)
7. In designing the further audit procedures to be performed, the auditor
shall:
(a) Consider the reasons for the assessment given to the risk of material
misstatement at the assertion level for each class of transactions,
account balance, and disclosure, including:
(i) The likelihood of material misstatement due to the particular
characteristics of the relevant class of transactions, account
balance, or disclosure (i.e., the inherent risk); and
(ii) Whether the risk assessment takes into account the relevant
controls (i.e., the control risk), thereby requiring the auditor to
obtain audit evidence to determine whether the controls are
operating effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the
operating effectiveness of controls in determining the nature,
timing and extent of substantive procedures); and (Ref: Para. A9-
A18)
(b) Obtain more persuasive audit evidence the higher the auditors
assessment of risk. (Ref: Para. A19)
Tests of Controls
8. The auditor shall design and perform tests of controls to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to the operating effectiveness of
relevant controls when:
(a) The auditors assessment of risks of material misstatement at the
assertion level includes an expectation that the controls are operating
effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the operating effectiveness
of controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive
procedures); or
(b) Substantive procedures alone cannot provide sufficient appropriate
audit evidence at the assertion level. (Ref: Para. A20-A24)
SA 330 IV-229
9. In designing and performing tests of controls, the auditor shall obtain
more persuasive audit evidence the greater the reliance the auditor places
on the effectiveness of a control. (Ref: Para. A25)
Nature and Extent of Tests of Controls
10. In designing and performing tests of controls, the auditor shall:
(a) Perform other audit procedures in combination with inquiry to obtain
audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the controls,
including:
(i) How the controls were applied at relevant times during the period
under audit.
(ii) The consistency with which they were applied.
(iii) By whom or by what means they were applied. (Ref: Para. A26-
A29)
(b) Determine whether the controls to be tested depend upon other controls
(indirect controls), and if so, whether it is necessary to obtain audit
evidence supporting the effective operation of those indirect controls.
Timing of Tests of Controls
11. The auditor shall test controls for the particular time, or throughout the
period, for which the auditor intends to rely on those controls, subject to
paragraphs 12 and 15 below, in order to provide an appropriate basis for the
auditors intended reliance. (Ref: Para. A32)
Using audit evidence obtained during an interimperiod
12. When the auditor obtains audit evidence about the operating
effectiveness of controls during an interim period, the auditor shall:
(a) Obtain audit evidence about significant changes to those controls
subsequent to the interim period; and
(b) Determine the additional audit evidence to be obtained for the
remaining period. (Ref: Para. A33-A34)

SA 330 IV-230
Using audit evidence obtained in previous audits
13. In determining whether it is appropriate to use audit evidence about the
operating effectiveness of controls obtained in previous audits, and, if so, the
length of the time period that may elapse before retesting a control, the
auditor shall consider the following:
(a) The effectiveness of other elements of internal control, including the
control environment, the entitys monitoring of controls, and the entitys
risk assessment process;
(b) The risks arising from the characteristics of the control, including
whether it is manual or automated;
(c) The effectiveness of general IT-controls;
(d) The effectiveness of the control and its application by the entity,
including the nature and extent of deviations in the application of the
control noted in previous audits, and whether there have been
personnel changes that significantly affect the application of the control;
(e) Whether the lack of a change in a particular control poses a risk due to
changing circumstances; and
(f) The risks of material misstatement and the extent of reliance on the
control. (Ref: Para. A35)
14. If the auditor plans to use audit evidence from a previous audit about
the operating effectiveness of specific controls, the auditor shall establish the
continuing relevance of that evidence by obtaining audit evidence about
whether significant changes in those controls have occurred subsequent to
the previous audit. The auditor shall obtain this evidence by performing
inquiry combined with observation or inspection, to confirm the
understanding of those specific controls, and:
(a) If there have been changes that affect the continuing relevance of the
audit evidence from the previous audit, the auditor shall test the controls
in the current audit. (Ref: Para. A36)
(b) If there have not been such changes, the auditor shall test the controls
at least once in every third audit, and shall test some controls each
audit to avoid the possibility of testing all the controls on which the
auditor intends to rely in a single audit period with no testing of controls
in the subsequent two audit periods. (Ref: Para. A37-A39)
SA 330 IV-231
Controls over significant risks
15. When the auditor plans to rely on controls over a risk the auditor has
determined to be a significant risk, the auditor shall test those controls in the
current period.
Evaluating the Operating Effectiveness of Controls
16. When evaluating the operating effectiveness of relevant controls, the
auditor shall evaluate whether misstatements that have been detected by
substantive procedures indicate that controls are not operating effectively.
The absence of misstatements detected by substantive procedures, however,
does not provide audit evidence that controls related to the assertion being
tested are effective. (Ref: Para. A40)
17. When deviations from controls upon which the auditor intends to rely
are detected, the auditor shall make specific inquiries to understand these
matters and their potential consequences, and shall determine whether:
(a) The tests of controls that have been performed provide an appropriate
basis for reliance on the controls;
(b) Additional tests of controls are necessary; or
(c) The potential risks of misstatement need to be addressed using
substantive procedures. (Ref: Para. A41)
18. The auditor shall evaluate whether, on the basis of the audit work
performed, the auditor has identified a material weakness in the operating
effectiveness of controls.
19. The auditor shall communicate material weaknesses in internal control
identified during the audit on a timely basis to management at an appropriate
level of responsibility and, as required by SA 260, Communication with Those
Charged with Governance
3
, with those charged with governance (unless all of
those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity).
Substantive Procedures
20. Irrespective of the assessed risks of material misstatement, the auditor
shall design and perform substantive procedures for each material class of

3
Hitherto known as AAS 27, Communication of Audit Matters with Those Charged with
Governance.
SA 330 IV-232
transactions, account balance, and disclosure. (Ref: Para. A42-A47)
Substantive Procedures Related to the Financial Statement Closing Process
21. The auditors substantive procedures shall include the following audit
procedures related to the financial statement closing process:
(a) Agreeing or reconciling the financial statements with the underlying
accounting records; and
(b) Examining material journal entries and other adjustments made during
the course of preparing the financial statements. (Ref: Para. A48)
Substantive Procedures Responsive to Significant Risks
22. When the auditor has determined that an assessed risk of material
misstatement at the assertion level is a significant risk, the auditor shall
perform substantive procedures that are specifically responsive to that risk.
When the approach to a significant risk consists only of substantive
procedures, those procedures shall include tests of details. (Ref: Para. A49)
Timing of Substantive Procedures (Ref: Para.A50)
23. When substantive procedures are performed at an interim date, the
auditor shall cover the remaining period by performing:
(a) substantive procedures, combined with tests of controls for the
intervening period; or
(b) if the auditor determines that it is sufficient, further substantive
procedures only;
that provide a reasonable basis for extending the audit conclusions from the
interim date to the period end. (Ref: Para. A51-A53)
24. If misstatements that the auditor did not expect when assessing the
risks of material misstatement are detected at an interim date, the auditor
shall evaluate whether the related assessment of risk and the planned
nature, timing, or extent of substantive procedures covering the remaining
period need to be modified. (Ref: Para. A54)
Adequacy of Presentation and Disclosure
25. The auditor shall perform audit procedures to evaluate whether the
overall presentation of the financial statements, including the related
SA 330 IV-233
disclosures, is in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework. (Ref: Para. A55)
Evaluating the Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Audit Evidence
26. Based on the audit procedures performed and the audit evidence
obtained, the auditor shall evaluate before the conclusion of the audit
whether the assessments of the risks of material misstatement at the
assertion level remain appropriate. (Ref: Para. A56-A57)
27. The auditor shall conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
has been obtained. In forming an opinion, the auditor shall consider all
relevant audit evidence, regardless of whether it appears to corroborate or to
contradict the assertions in the financial statements. (Ref: Para. A58)
28. If the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as
to a material financial statement assertion, the auditor shall attempt to obtain
further audit evidence. If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence, the auditor shall express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of
opinion.
Documentation
(a) The overall responses to address the assessed risks of material
misstatement at the financial statement level, and the nature, timing and
extent of the further audit procedures performed;
(b) The linkage of those procedures with the assessed risks at the
assertion level; and
(c) The results of the audit procedures, including the conclusions where
these are not otherwise clear. (Ref: Para. A59)
30. If the auditor plans to use audit evidence about the operating
effectiveness of controls obtained in previous audits, the auditor shall
document the conclusions reached about relying on such controls that were
tested in a previous audit.
31. The auditors documentation shall demonstrate that the financial
statements agree or reconcile with the underlying accounting records.
SA 330 IV-234
Overall Responses (Ref: Para. 5)
A1. Overall responses to address the assessed risks of material
misstatement at the financial statement level may include:
Emphasizing to the audit team the need to maintain professional
skepticism.
Assigning more experienced staff or those with special skills or using
experts.
Providing more supervision.
Incorporating additional elements of unpredictability in the selection of
further audit procedures to be performed.
Making general changes to the nature, timing or extent of audit
procedures, for example: performing substantive procedures at the
period end instead of at an interim date; or modifying the nature of audit
procedures to obtain more persuasive audit evidence.
A2. The assessment of the risks of material misstatement at the financial
statement level, and thereby the auditors overall responses, is affected by
the auditors understanding of the control environment. An effective control
environment may allow the auditor to have more confidence in internal
control and the reliability of audit evidence generated internally within the
entity and thus, for example, allow the auditor to conduct some audit
procedures at an interim date rather than at the period end. Weaknesses in
the control environment, however, have the opposite effect; for example, the
auditor may respond to an ineffective control environment by:
Conducting more audit procedures as of the period end rather than at an
interim date.
Obtaining more extensive audit evidence from substantive procedures.
Increasing the number of locations to be included in the audit scope.
A3. Such considerations, therefore, have a significant bearing on the
auditors general approach, for example, an emphasis on substantive
procedures (substantive approach), or an approach that uses tests of
controls as well as substantive procedures (combined approach).
SA 330 IV-235
Misstatement at the Assertion Level
The Nature, Timing and Extent of Further Audit Procedures (Ref: Para.
6)
A4. The auditors assessment of the identified risks at the assertion level
provides a basis for considering the appropriate audit approach for designing
and performing further audit procedures. For example, (as appropriate and
notwithstanding the requirements of this SA)
4
, the auditor may determine
that:
(a) Only by performing tests of controls may the auditor achieve an
effective response to the assessed risk of material misstatement for a
particular assertion;
(b) Performing only substantive procedures is appropriate for particular
assertions and, therefore, the auditor excludes the effect of controls
from the relevant risk assessment. This may be because the auditors
risk assessment procedures have not identified any effective controls
relevant to the assertion, or because testing controls would be
inefficient and therefore the auditor does not intend to rely on the
operating effectiveness of controls in determining the nature, timing and
extent of substantive procedures; or
(c) A combined approach using both tests of controls and substantive
procedures is an effective approach.
A5. The nature of an audit procedure refers to its purpose (i.e., test of
controls or substantive procedure) and its type (i.e., inspection, observation,
inquiry, confirmation, recalculation, reperformance, or analytical procedure).
The nature of the audit procedures is of most importance in responding to the
assessed risks.
A6. Timing of an audit procedure refers to when it is performed, or the
period or date to which the audit evidence applies.
A7. Extent of an audit procedure refers to the quantity to be performed, for
example, a sample size or the number of observations of a control activity.

4
For example, as required by paragraph 20, irrespective of the approach selected, the auditor
designs and performs substantive procedures for each significant class of transactions, account
balance, and disclosure.
SA 330 IV-236
A8. Designing and performing further audit procedures whose nature, timing
and extent are based on and are responsive to the assessed risks of material
misstatement at the assertion level provides a clear linkage between the
auditors further audit procedures and the risk assessment.
Responding to the Assessed Risks at the Assertion Level (Ref: Para. 7(a))
Nature
A9. The auditors assessed risks may affect both the types of audit
procedures to be performed and their combination. For example, when an
assessed risk is high, the auditor may confirm the completeness of the terms
of a contract with the counterparty, in addition to inspecting the document.
Further, certain audit procedures may be more appropriate for some
assertions than others. For example, in relation to revenue, tests of controls
may be most responsive to the assessed risk of misstatement of the
completeness assertion, whereas substantive procedures may be most
responsive to the assessed risk of misstatement of the occurrence assertion.
A10. The reasons for the assessment given to a risk are relevant in
determining the nature of audit procedures. For example, if an assessed risk
is lower because of the particular characteristics of a class of transactions
without consideration of the related controls, then the auditor may determine
that substantive analytical procedures alone provide sufficient appropriate
audit evidence. On the other hand, if the assessed risk is lower because of
internal controls, and the auditor intends to base the substantive procedures
on that low assessment, then the auditor performs tests of those controls, as
required by paragraph 8(a). This may be the case, for example, for a class of
transactions of reasonably uniform, non-complex characteristics that are
routinely processed and controlled by the entitys information system.
Timing
A11. The auditor may perform tests of controls or substantive procedures at
an interim date or at the period end. The higher the risk of material
misstatement, the more likely it is that the auditor may decide it is more
effective to perform substantive procedures nearer to, or at, the period end
rather than at an earlier date, or to perform audit procedures unannounced or
at unpredictable times (for example, performing audit procedures at selected
locations on an unannounced basis). This is particularly relevant when
considering the response to the risks of fraud. For example, the auditor may
SA 330 IV-237
conclude that, when the risks of intentional misstatement or manipulation
have been identified, audit procedures to extend audit conclusions from
interim date to the period end would not be effective.
A12. On the other hand, performing audit procedures before the period end
may assist the auditor in identifying significant matters at an early stage of
the audit, and consequently resolving them with the assistance of
management or developing an effective audit approach to address such
matters.
A13. In addition, certain audit procedures can be performed only at or after
the period end, for example:
Agreeing the financial statements to the accounting records;
Examining adjustments made during the course of preparing the
financial statements; and
Procedures to respond to a risk that, at the period end, the entity may
have entered into improper sales contracts, or transactions may not have
been finalised.
A14. Further relevant factors that influence the auditors consideration of
when to perform audit procedures include the following:
The control environment.
When relevant information is available (for example, electronic files may
subsequently be overwritten, or procedures to be observed may occur
only at certain times).
The nature of the risk (for example, if there is a risk of inflated revenues
to meet earnings expectations by subsequent creation of false sales
agreements, the auditor may wish to examine contracts available on the
date of the period end).
The period or date to which the audit evidence relates.
Extent
A15. The extent of an audit procedure judged necessary is determined after
considering the materiality, the assessed risk, and the degree of assurance
the auditor plans to obtain. When a single purpose is met by a combination of
procedures, the extent of each procedure is considered separately. In
general, the extent of audit procedures increases as the risk of material
SA 330 IV-238
misstatement increases. For example, in response to the assessed risk of
material misstatement due to fraud, increasing sample sizes or performing
substantive analytical procedures at a more detailed level may be
appropriate. However, increasing the extent of an audit procedure is effective
only if the audit procedure itself is relevant to the specific risk.
A16. The use of computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) may enable
more extensive testing of electronic transactions and account files, which
may be useful when the auditor decides to modify the extent of testing, for
example, in responding to the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
Such techniques can be used to select sample transactions from key
electronic files, to sort transactions with specific characteristics, or to test an
entire population instead of a sample.
A17. In certain circumstances, the audit mandate and any other special
auditing requirements may affect the auditors consideration of the nature,
timing and extent of further audit procedures.
A18. In the case of very small entities, there may not be many control
activities that could be identified by the auditor, or the extent to which their
existence or operation have been documented by the entity may be limited.
In such cases, it may be more efficient for the auditor to perform further audit
procedures that are primarily substantive procedures. In some rare cases,
however, the absence of control activities or of other components of control
may make it impossible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
Higher Assessments of Risk (Ref: Para 7(b))
A19. When obtaining more persuasive audit evidence because of a higher
assessment of risk, the auditor may increase the quantity of the evidence, or
obtain evidence that is more relevant or reliable, e.g., by placing more
emphasis on obtaining third party evidence or by obtaining corroborating
evidence from a number of independent sources.
Tests of Controls
Designing and Performing Tests of Controls (Ref: Para. 8)
A20. Tests of controls are performed only on those controls that the auditor
has determined are suitably designed to prevent, or detect and correct, a
SA 330 IV-239
material misstatement in an assertion. If substantially different controls were
used at different times during the period under audit, each is considered
separately.
A21. Testing the operating effectiveness of controls is different from obtaining
an understanding of and evaluating the design and implementation of
controls. However, the same types of audit procedures are used. The auditor
may, therefore, decide it is efficient to test the operating effectiveness of
controls at the same time as evaluating their design and determining that
they have been implemented.
A22. Further, although some risk assessment procedures may not have been
specifically designed as tests of controls, they may nevertheless provide
audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the controls and,
consequently, serve as tests of controls. For example, the auditors risk
assessment procedures may have included:
Inquiring about managements use of budgets.
Observing managements comparison of monthly budgeted and actual
expenses.
Inspecting reports pertaining to the investigation of variances between
budgeted and actual amounts.
These audit procedures provide knowledge about the design of the entitys
budgeting policies and whether they have been implemented, but may also
provide audit evidence about the effectiveness of the operation of budgeting
policies in preventing or detecting material misstatements in the classification
of expenses.
A23. In addition, the auditor may design a test of controls to be performed
concurrently with a test of details on the same transaction. Although the
purpose of a test of controls is different from the purpose of a test of details,
both may be accomplished concurrently by performing a test of controls and
a test of details on the same transaction, also known as a dual-purpose test.
For example, the auditor may design, and evaluate the results of, a test to
examine an invoice to determine whether it has been approved and to
provide substantive audit evidence of a transaction. A dual-purpose test is
designed and evaluated by considering each purpose of the test separately.
A24. In some cases, as discussed in SA 315, the auditor may find it
impossible to design effective substantive procedures that by themselves
SA 330 IV-240
provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence at the assertion level. This may
occur when an entity conducts its business using IT and no documentation of
transactions is produced or maintained, other than through the IT system. In
such cases, paragraph 8(b) requires the auditor to perform tests of relevant
controls.
Audit Evidence and Intended Reliance (Ref: Para. 9)
A25. A higher level of assurance may be sought about the operating
effectiveness of controls when the approach adopted consists primarily of
tests of controls, in particular where it is not possible or practicable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence only from substantive procedures.
Nature and Extent of Tests of Controls
Other audit procedures in combination with inquiry (Ref: Para. 10(a))
A26. Inquiry alone is not sufficient to test the operating effectiveness of
controls. Accordingly, other audit procedures are performed in combination
with inquiry. In this regard, inquiry combined with inspection or
reperformance may provide more assurance than inquiry and observation,
since an observation is pertinent only at the point in time at which it is made.
A27. The nature of the particular control influences the type of procedure
required to obtain audit evidence about whether the control was operating
effectively. For example, if operating effectiveness is evidenced by
documentation, the auditor may decide to inspect it to obtain audit evidence
about operating effectiveness. For other controls, however, documentation
may not be available or relevant. For example, documentation of operation
may not exist for some factors in the control environment, such as
assignment of authority and responsibility, or for some types of control
activities, such as control activities performed by a computer. In such
circumstances, audit evidence about operating effectiveness may be
obtained through inquiry in combination with other audit procedures such as
observation or the use of CAATs.
Extent of tests of controls
A28. When more persuasive audit evidence is needed regarding the
effectiveness of a control, it may be appropriate to increase the extent of
testing of the control. As well as the degree of reliance on controls, matters
SA 330 IV-241
the auditor may consider in determining the extent of tests of controls include
the following:
The frequency of the performance of the control by the entity during the
period.
The length of time during the audit period that the auditor is relying on
the operating effectiveness of the control.
The expected rate of deviation from a control.
The relevance and reliability of the audit evidence to be obtained
regarding the operating effectiveness of the control at the assertion
level.
The extent to which audit evidence is obtained from tests of other
controls related to the assertion.
SA 530 (Revised)
5
, Audit Sampling contains further guidance on the extent
of testing.
A29. Because of the inherent consistency of IT processing, it may not be
necessary to increase the extent of testing of an automated control. An
automated control can be expected to function consistently unless the
program (including the tables, files, or other permanent data used by the
program) is changed. Once the auditor determines that an automated control
is functioning as intended (which could be done at the time the control is
initially implemented or at some other date), the auditor may consider
performing tests to determine that the control continues to function
effectively. Such tests might include determining that:
Changes to the program are not made without being subject to the
appropriate program change controls;
The authorised version of the program is used for processing
transactions; and
Other relevant general controls are effective.
Such tests also might include determining that changes to the programs have
not been made, as may be the case when the entity uses packaged software
applications without modifying or maintaining them. For example, the auditor

5
Hitherto known as Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 15, Audit Sampling.
SA 330 IV-242
may inspect the record of the administration of IT security to obtain audit
evidence that unauthorised access has not occurred during the period.
Testing of indirect controls (Ref: Para. 10(b))
A30. In some circumstances, it may be necessary to obtain audit evidence
supporting the effective operation of indirect controls. For example, when the
auditor decides to test the effectiveness of a user review of exception reports
detailing sales in excess of authorized credit limits, the user review and
related follow up is the control that is directly of relevance to the auditor.
Controls over the accuracy of the information in the reports (for example, the
general IT-controls) are described as indirect controls.
A31. Because of the inherent consistency of IT processing, audit evidence
about the implementation of an automated application control, when
considered in combination with audit evidence about the operating
effectiveness of the entitys general controls (in particular, change controls),
may also provide substantial audit evidence about its operating
effectiveness.
Timing of Tests of Controls
Intended period of reliance (Ref: Para. 11)
A32. Audit evidence pertaining only to a point in time may be sufficient for the
auditors purpose, for example, when testing controls over the entitys
physical inventory counting at the period end. If, on the other hand, the
auditor intends to rely on a control over a period, tests that are capable of
providing audit evidence that the control operated effectively at relevant
times during that period are appropriate. Such tests may include tests of the
entitys monitoring of controls.
Using audit evidence obtained during an interim period (Ref: Para. 12)
A33. Relevant factors in determining what additional audit evidence to obtain
about controls that were operating during the period remaining after an
interim period, include:
The significance of the assessed risks of material misstatement at the
assertion level.
The specific controls that were tested during the interim period, and
significant changes to them since they were tested, including changes in
SA 330 IV-243
the information system, processes, and personnel.
The degree to which audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of
those controls was obtained.
The length of the remaining period.
The extent to which the auditor intends to reduce further substantive
procedures based on the reliance of controls.
The control environment.
A34. Additional audit evidence may be obtained, for example, by extending
tests of controls over the remaining period or testing the entitys monitoring of
controls.
Using audit evidence obtained in previous audits (Ref: Para. 13)
A35. In certain circumstances, audit evidence obtained from previous audits
may provide audit evidence where the auditor performs audit procedures to
establish its continuing relevance. For example, in performing a previous
audit, the auditor may have determined that an automated control was
functioning as intended. The auditor may obtain audit evidence to determine
whether changes to the automated control have been made that affect its
continued effective functioning through, for example, inquiries of
management and the inspection of logs to indicate what controls have been
changed. Consideration of audit evidence about these changes may support
either increasing or decreasing the expected audit evidence to be obtained in
the current period about the operating effectiveness of the controls.
Controls that have changed from previous audits (Ref: Para. 14(a))
A36. Changes may affect the relevance of the audit evidence obtained in
previous audits such that there may no longer be a basis for continued
reliance. For example, changes in a system that enable an entity to receive a
new report from the system probably do not affect the relevance of audit
evidence from a previous audit; however, a change that causes data to be
accumulated or calculated differently does affect it.
Controls that have not changed from previous audits (Ref: Para. 14(b))
A37. The auditors decision on whether to rely on audit evidence obtained in
previous audits for controls that:
SA 330 IV-244
(a) Have not changed since they were last tested; and
(b) Are not controls that mitigate a significant risk;
is a matter of professional judgment. In addition, the length of time between
retesting such controls is also a matter of professional judgment, but is
required by paragraph 14 (b) to be at least once in every third year.
A38. In general, the higher the risk of material misstatement, or the greater
the reliance on controls, the shorter the time period elapsed, if any, is likely
to be. Factors that may decrease the period for retesting a control, or result
in not relying on audit evidence obtained in previous audits at all, include the
following:
A weak control environment.
Weak monitoring of controls.
A significant manual element to the relevant controls.
Personnel changes that significantly affect the application of the control.
Changing circumstances that indicate the need for changes in the
control.
Weak general IT-controls.
A39. When there are a number of controls for which the auditor intends to
rely on audit evidence obtained in previous audits, testing some of those
controls in each audit provides corroborating information about the continuing
effectiveness of the control environment. This contributes to the auditors
decision about whether it is appropriate to rely on audit evidence obtained in
previous audits.
Evaluating the Operating Effectiveness of Controls (Ref: Para. 16 -19)
A40. A material misstatement detected by the auditors procedures may
indicate the existence of a material weakness in internal control.
A41. The concept of effectiveness of the operation of controls recognises that
some deviations in the way controls are applied by the entity may occur.
Deviations from prescribed controls may be caused by such factors as
changes in key personnel, significant seasonal fluctuations in volume of
transactions and human error. The detected rate of deviation, in particular in
comparison with the expected rate, may indicate that the control cannot be
SA 330 IV-245
relied on to reduce risk at the assertion level to that assessed by the auditor.
Substantive Procedures (Ref: Para. 20)
A42. Paragraph 20 requires the auditor to design and perform substantive
procedures for each material class of transactions, account balance, and
disclosure, irrespective of the assessed risks of material misstatement. This
requirement reflects the facts that: (i) the auditors assessment of risk is
judgmental and so may not identify all risks of material misstatement; and (ii)
there are inherent limitations to internal control, including management
override.
Nature and Extent of Substantive Procedures
A43. Depending on the circumstances, the auditor may determine that:
Performing only substantive analytical procedures will be sufficient to
reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level. For example, where the
auditors assessment of risk is supported by audit evidence from tests of
controls.
Only tests of details are appropriate.
A combination of substantive analytical procedures and tests of details
are most responsive to the assessed risks.
A44. Substantive analytical procedures are generally more applicable to
large volumes of transactions that tend to be predictable over time. SA 520
6
,
Analytical Procedures establishes requirements and provides guidance on
the application of analytical procedures during an audit.
A45. The nature of the risk and assertion is relevant to the design of tests of
details. For example, tests of details related to the existence or occurrence
assertion may involve selecting from items contained in a financial statement
amount and obtaining the relevant audit evidence. On the other hand, tests
of details related to the completeness assertion may involve selecting from
items that are expected to be included in the relevant financial statement
amount and investigating whether they are included.
A46. Because the assessment of the risk of material misstatement takes
account of internal control, the extent of substantive procedures may need to

6
Hitherto known as Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 14, Analytical Procedures.
SA 330 IV-246
be increased when the results from tests of controls are unsatisfactory.
However, increasing the extent of an audit procedure is appropriate only if
the audit procedure itself is relevant to the specific risk.
A47. In designing tests of details, the extent of testing is ordinarily thought of
in terms of the sample size. However, other matters are also relevant,
including whether it is more effective to use other selective means of testing.
See SA 530 for additional guidance.
Substantive Procedures Related to the Financial Statement Closing Process
(Ref: Para. 21(b))
A48. The nature, and also the extent, of the auditors examination of journal
entries and other adjustments depends on the nature and complexity of the
entitys financial reporting process and the related risks of material
misstatement.
Substantive Procedures Responsive to Significant Risks (Ref: Para. 22)
A49. Paragraph 22 of this SA requires the auditor to perform substantive
procedures that are specifically responsive to risks the auditor has
determined to be significant risks. For example, if the auditor identifies that
management is under pressure to meet earnings expectations, there may be
a risk that management is inflating sales by improperly recognising revenue
related to sales agreements with terms that preclude revenue recognition or
by invoicing sales before shipment. In these circumstances, the auditor may,
for example, design external confirmations not only to confirm outstanding
amounts, but also to confirm the details of the sales agreements, including
date, any rights of return and delivery terms. In addition, the auditor may find
it effective to supplement such external confirmations with inquiries of non-
financial personnel in the entity regarding any changes in sales agreements
and delivery terms. Substantive procedures related to significant risks are
most often designed to obtain audit evidence with high reliability.
Timing of Substantive Procedures (Ref: Para. 23-24)
A50. In most cases, audit evidence from a previous audits substantive
procedures provides little or no audit evidence for the current period. There
are, however, exceptions, e.g., a legal opinion obtained in a previous audit
related to the structure of a securitisation to which no changes have
occurred, may be relevant in the current period. In such cases, it may be
SA 330 IV-247
appropriate to use audit evidence from a previous audits substantive
procedures if that evidence and the related subject matter have not
fundamentally changed, and audit procedures have been performed during
the current period to establish its continuing relevance.
Using audit evidence obtained during an interim period (Ref: Para. 23)
A51. In some circumstances, the auditor may determine that it is effective to
perform substantive procedures at an interim date, and to compare and
reconcile information concerning the balance at the period end with the
comparable information at the interim date to:
(a) Identify amounts that appear unusual;
(b) Investigate any such amounts; and
(c) Perform substantive analytical procedures or tests of details to test the
intervening period.
A52. Performing substantive procedures at an interim date without
undertaking additional procedures at a later date increases the risk that the
auditor will not detect misstatements that may exist at the period end. This
risk increases as the remaining period is lengthened. Factors such as the
following may influence whether to perform substantive procedures at an
interim date:
The control environment and other relevant controls.
The availability at a later date of information necessary for the auditors
procedures.
The purpose of the substantive procedure.
The assessed risk of material misstatement.
The nature of the class of transactions or account balance and related
assertions.
The ability of the auditor to perform appropriate substantive procedures
or substantive procedures combined with tests of controls to cover the
remaining period in order to reduce the risk that misstatements that may
exist at the period end will not be detected.
A53. Factors such as the following may influence whether to perform
substantive analytical procedures with respect to the period between the
SA 330 IV-248
interim date and the period end:
Whether the period end balances of the particular classes of transactions
or account balances are reasonably predictable with respect to amount,
relative significance, and composition.
Whether the entitys procedures for analysing and adjusting such classes
of transactions or account balances at interim dates and for establishing
proper accounting cutoffs are appropriate.
Whether the information system relevant to financial reporting will
provide information concerning the balances at the period end and the
transactions in the remaining period that is sufficient to permit
investigation of:
(a) Significant unusual transactions or entries (including those at or
near the period end);
(b) Other causes of significant fluctuations, or expected fluctuations
that did not occur; and
(c) Changes in the composition of the classes of transactions or
account balances.
Misstatements detected at an interim date (Ref: Para. 24)
A54. When the auditor concludes that the planned nature, timing or extent of
substantive procedures covering the remaining period need to be modified as
a result of unexpected misstatements detected at an interim date, such
modification may include extending or repeating the procedures performed at
the interim date at the period end.
Adequacy of Presentation and Disclosure (Ref: Para. 25)
A55. Evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements, including
the related disclosures, relates to whether the individual financial statements
are presented in a manner that reflects the appropriate classification and
description of financial information, and the form, arrangement, and content
of the financial statements and their appended notes. This includes, for
example, the terminology used, the amount of detail given, the classification
of items in the statements, and the bases of amounts set forth.

SA 330 IV-249
Evaluating the Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Audit Evidence
(Ref: Para. 26-28)
A56. An audit of financial statements is a cumulative and iterative process.
As the auditor performs planned audit procedures, the audit evidence
obtained may cause the auditor to modify the nature, timing or extent of other
planned audit procedures. Information may come to the auditors attention
that differs significantly from the information on which the risk assessment
was based. For example,
The extent of misstatements that the auditor detects by performing
substantive procedures may alter the auditors judgment about the risk
assessments and may indicate a material weakness in internal control.
The auditor may become aware of discrepancies in accounting records,
or conflicting or missing evidence.
Analytical procedures performed at the overall review stage of the audit
may indicate a previously unrecognised risk of material misstatement.
In such circumstances, the auditor may need to re-evaluate the planned audit
procedures, based on the revised consideration of assessed risks for all or
some of the classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures and
related assertions. SA 315 contains further guidance on revising the auditors
risk assessment.
A57. The auditor cannot assume that an instance of fraud or error is an
isolated occurrence. Therefore, the consideration of how the detection of a
misstatement affects the assessed risks of material misstatement is
important in determining whether the assessment remains appropriate.
A58. The auditors judgment as to what constitutes sufficient appropriate
audit evidence is influenced by such factors as the following:
Significance of the potential misstatement in the assertion and the
likelihood of its having a material effect, individually or aggregated with
other potential misstatements, on the financial statements.
Effectiveness of managements responses and controls to address the
risks.
Experience gained during previous audits with respect to similar
potential misstatements.
SA 330 IV-250
Results of audit procedures performed, including whether such audit
procedures identified specific instances of fraud or error.
Source and reliability of the available information.
Persuasiveness of the audit evidence.
Understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entitys
internal control.
A59. The form and extent of audit documentation is a matter of professional
judgment, and is influenced by the nature, size and complexity of the entity
and its internal control, availability of information from the entity and the audit
methodology and technology used in the audit.
Material Modifications to ISA 330, The Auditors
Responses to Assessed Risks
Deletion
entities regarding the auditors consideration of the nature, timing and extent
of further audit procedures. Since as mentioned in the Preface to the
Related Services, the Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board, apply equally to all entities, irrespective of their form,
nature and size, a specific reference to applicability of the Standard to public
sector entities has been deleted.
Further, it is also possible that even in case of non-public sector entities the
auditor may be required to give special considerations regarding the nature,
timing and extent as a result of the terms of appointment of the auditor or any
other special reporting requirement under the statute or regulation under
which the entity operates. Accordingly, the spirit of erstwhile A17,
highlighting the fact that in some cases, the auditors consideration of the
nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures may be affected by the
audit mandate or any other special auditing requirements, has been retained.
Back

SA 400 (AAS 6)
RISK ASSESSMENTS AND INTERNAL CONTROL
(Effective for all audits related to
accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2002)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ........................................................................................1-11
Inherent Risk ....................................................................................12-13
Accounting and Internal Control Systems ....................................14-21
Control Risk......................................................................................22-40
Relationship Between the Assessments of Inherent
and Control Risks ................................................................................. 41
Detection Risk ..................................................................................42-48
Audit Risk in the Small Business ........................................................ 49
Communication of Weaknesses.......................................................... 50
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 51
Appendi x

*
, "Risk Assessments and Internal Control"
should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality
1
, which
sets out the authority of SAs.

*
Issued in June, 2002. The Standard was originally issued in May, 1988 and was titled Study and
Evaluation of the Accounting System and Related Internal Controls in Connection with an Audit.
The date Standards on Auditing (SA) 315 and SA 330 come into effect, this Standard on
Auditing shall stand withdrawn. The SA 315 and SA 330 are effective for audits of financial
statements beginning on or after April 1, 2008.
1
Back
SA 400 IV-252
Introduction
on the procedures to be followed to obtain an understanding of the accounting
and internal control systems and on audit risk and its components: inherent
risk, control risk and detection risk. The principles laid down in the other SAs,
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, would be applicable,
to the extent practicable, to this SA also. In this Standard, the term 'financial
information' encompasses 'financial statements'. In some circumstances,
specific legislations and regulations may require the auditor to undertake
procedures additional to those set out in this SA.
2. The auditor should obtain an understanding of the accounting and
internal control systems sufficient to plan the audit and develop an
effective audit approach. The auditor should use professional judgement
to assess audit risk and to design audit procedures to ensure that it is
reduced to an acceptably lowlevel.
3. "Audit risk" means the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit
opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated. Audit risk has
three components: inherent risk, control risk and detection risk.
4. "Inherent risk" is the susceptibility of an account balance or class of
transactions to misstatement that could be material, either individually or when
aggregated with misstatements in other balances or classes, assuming that
there were no related internal controls.
5. "Control risk" is the risk that a misstatement, that could occur in an
account balance or class of transactions and that could be material, either
individually or when aggregated with misstatements in other balances or
classes, will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis by
the accounting and internal control systems.
6. "Detection risk" is the risk that an auditor's substantive procedures will not
detect a misstatement that exists in an account balance or class of
transactions that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with
misstatements in other balances or classes.
7. "Accounting System" means the series of tasks and records of an entity
by which transactions are processed as a means of maintaining financial
records. Such systems identify, assemble, analyse, calculate, classify, record,
summarise and report transactions and other events.
Risk Assessments and Internal Control
SA 400 IV-253
8. "Internal Control System" means all the policies and procedures (internal
controls) adopted by the management of an entity to assist in achieving
management's objective of ensuring, as far as practicable, the orderly and
efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to management policies,
the safeguarding of assets, the prevention and detection of fraud and error, the
accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely
preparation of reliable financial information. The internal audit function
constitutes a separate component of internal control with the objective of
determining whether other internal controls are well designed and properly
operated.
9. The system of internal control must be under continuing supervision by
management to determine that it is functioning as prescribed and is modified,
as appropriate, for changes in conditions. The internal control system extends
beyond those matters which relate directly to the functions of the accounting
system and comprises:
(a) "the control environment" which means the overall attitude, awareness
and actions of directors and management regarding the internal control
system and its importance in the entity. The control environment has an
effect on the effectiveness of the specific control procedures and provides
the background against which other controls are operated. A strong
control environment, for example, one with tight budgetary controls and
an effective internal audit function, can significantly complement specific
control procedures. However, a strong control environment does not, by
itself, ensure the effectiveness of the internal control system. Factors
reflected in the control environment include:
The entity's organisational structure and methods of assigning
authority and responsibility (including segregation of duties and
supervisory functions).
The function of the board of directors and its committees in the case
of a company or the corresponding governing body in case of any
other entity.
Management's philosophy and operating style.
Management's control system including the internal audit function,
personnel policies and procedures.
SA 400 IV-254
(b) "control procedures" which means those policies and procedures in
addition to the control environment which management has established to
achieve the entity's specific objectives. Specific control procedures
include:
Reporting and reviewing reconciliations.
Checking the arithmetical accuracy of the records.
Controlling applications and environment of computer information
systems, for example, by establishing controls over:
changes to computer programs
access to data files.
Maintaining and reviewing control accounts and related subsidiary
ledgers.
Approving and controlling of documents.
Comparing internal data with external sources of information.
Comparing the results of physical verification of cash, fixed assets,
investments and inventory with corresponding accounting records.
Restricting direct access to assets, records and information.
Comparing and analysing the financial results with corresponding
budgeted figures.
10. In the audit of financial statements, the auditor is concerned only with
those policies and procedures within the accounting and internal control
systems that are relevant to the assertions made in the financial statements.
The understanding of relevant aspects of the accounting and internal control
systems, together with the inherent and control risk assessments and other
considerations, will enable the auditor to:
(a) assess the adequacy of the accounting system as a basis for preparing
(b) identify the types of potential material misstatements that could occur in
(c) consider factors that affect the risk of material misstatements; and
SA 400 IV-255
(d) develop an appropriate audit plan and determine the nature, timing and
extent of his audit procedures.
11. When developing the audit approach, the auditor considers the
preliminary assessment of control risk (in conjunction with the assessment of
inherent risk) to determine the appropriate detection risk that may be accepted
by the auditor for the assertions made in the financial statements and to
determine the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures for such
assertions.
Inherent Risk
12. In developing the overall audit plan, the auditor should assess
inherent risk at the level of financial statements. In developing the audit
programme, the auditor should relate such assessment to material
account balances and classes of transactions at the level of assertions
made in the financial statements, or assume that inherent risk is high for
the assertion, taking into account factors relevant both to the financial
statements as a whole and to the specific assertions. When the auditor
makes an assessment that the inherent risk is not high, he should
document the reasons for such assessment.
13. To assess inherent risk, the auditor would use professional judgement to
evaluate numerous factors, having regard to his experience of the entity from
previous audit engagements of the entity, any controls established by
management to compensate for a high level of inherent risk, and his
knowledge of any significant changes which might have taken place since his
last assessment. Examples of such factors are:
At the Level of Financial Statements
The integrity of the management.
Management's experience and knowledge and changes in management
during the period, for example, the inexperience of management may
affect the preparation of the financial statements of the entity.
Unusual pressures on management, for example, circumstances that
might predispose management to misstate the financial statements, such
as the industry experiencing a large number of business failures or an
entity that lacks sufficient capital to continue operations.
SA 400 IV-256
The nature of the entity's business, for example, the potential for
technological obsolescence of its products and services, the complexity of
its capital structure, the significance of related parties and the number of
locations and geographical spread of its production facilities.
Factors affecting the industry in which the entity operates, for example,
economic and competitive conditions as indicated by financial trends and
ratios, and changes in technology, consumer demand and accounting
practices common to the industry.
At the Level of Account Balance and Class of Transactions
Quality of the accounting system.
Financial statements are likely to be susceptible to misstatement, for
example, accounts which required adjustment in the prior period or which
involve a high degree of estimation.
The complexity of underlying transactions and other events which might
require using the work of an expert.
The degree of judgement involved in determining account balances.
Susceptibility of assets to loss or misappropriation, for example, assets
which are highly desirable and movable such as cash.
The completion of unusual and complex transactions, particularly, at or
near period end.
Transactions not subjected to ordinary processing.
Accounting and Internal Control Systems
14. Internal controls relating to the accounting system are concerned with
achieving the following objectives:
Transactions are executed in accordance with management's general or
specific authorisation.
All transactions and other events are promptly recorded in the correct
amount, in the appropriate accounts and in the proper accounting period
so as to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with the
applicable accounting standards, other recognised accounting policies and
SA 400 IV-257
practices and relevant statutory requirements, if any, and to maintain
accountability for assets. .
Assets and records are safeguarded from unauthorised access, use or
disposition.
Recorded assets are compared with the existing assets at reasonable
intervals and appropriate action is taken with regard to any differences.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Controls
15. Accounting and internal control systems can provide only reasonable, but
not absolute, assurance that the objectives stated above are achieved. This is
because the internal control systems are subject to some inherent limitations,
such as:
Management's consideration that the cost of an internal control does not
exceed the expected benefits to be derived.
The fact that most internal controls do not tend to be directed at
transactions of unusual nature.
The potential for human error, such as, due to carelessness, distraction,
mistakes of judgement and the misunderstanding of instructions.
The possibility of circumvention of internal controls through the collusion
with employees or with parties outside the entity.
The possibility that a person responsible for exercising an internal control
could abuse that responsibility, for example, a member of management
overriding an internal control.
The possibility that procedures may become inadequate due to changes in
conditions and compliance with procedures may deteriorate.
Manipulations by management with respect to transactions or estimates
and judgements required in the preparation of financial statements.
Understanding the Accounting and Internal Control Systems
16. When obtaining an understanding of the accounting and internal control
systems to plan the audit, the auditor obtains a knowledge of the design of the
accounting and internal control systems, and their operation. For example, an
auditor may perform a "walk-through" test, that is, tracing a few transactions
through the accounting system. When the transactions selected are typical of
SA 400 IV-258
those transactions that pass through the system, this procedure may be
treated as part of the tests of control. The nature and extent of walk-through
tests performed by the auditor are such that they alone would not provide
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support a control risk assessment
which is less than high.
17. The nature, timing and extent of the procedures performed by the auditor
to obtain an understanding of the accounting and internal control systems will
vary with, among other things:
The size and complexity of the entity and of its information system.
Materiality considerations.
The type of internal controls involved.
The nature of the entity's documentation of specific internal controls.
The auditor's assessment of inherent risk.
18. Ordinarily, the auditor's understanding of the accounting and internal
control systems significant to the audit is obtained through previous experience
with the entity and is supplemented by:
(a) inquiries of appropriate management, supervisory and other personnel at
various organisational levels within the entity, together with reference to
documentation, such as procedures manuals, job descriptions, systems
descriptions and flow charts;
(b) inspection of documents and records produced by the accounting and
internal control systems; and
(c) observation of the entity's activities and operations, including observation
of the organisation of computer operations, personnel performing control
procedures and the nature of transaction processing.
Accounting System
19. The auditor should obtain an understanding of the accounting
systemsufficient to identify and understand:
(a) major classes of transactions in the entity's operations;
(b) howsuch transactions are initiated;
SA 400 IV-259
(c) significant accounting records, supporting documents and specific
accounts in the financial statements; and
(d) the accounting and financial reporting process, fromthe initiation of
significant transactions and other events to their inclusion in the
Control Environment
20. The auditor should obtain an understanding of the control
environment sufficient to assess management's attitudes, awareness and
actions regarding internal controls and their importance in the entity.
Such an understanding would also help the auditor to make a preliminary
assessment of the adequacy of the accounting and internal control systems as
a basis for the preparation of the financial statements, and of the likely nature,
timing and extent of audit procedures.
21. The auditor should obtain an understanding of the control
procedures sufficient to develop the audit plan. In obtaining this
understanding, the auditor would consider knowledge about the presence or
absence of control procedures obtained from the understanding of the control
environment and accounting system in determining whether any additional
understanding of control procedures is necessary. Because control
procedures are integrated with the control environment and the accounting
system, as the auditor obtains an understanding of the control environment
and the accounting system, some knowledge about control procedures is also
likely to be obtained, for example, in obtaining an understanding of the
accounting system pertaining to cash, the auditor ordinarily becomes aware of
whether bank accounts are reconciled regularly. Ordinarily, development of
the overall audit plan does not require an understanding of control procedures
for every financial statement assertion in each account balance and transaction
class.
Control Risk
22. After obtaining an understanding of the accounting systemand
internal control system, the auditor should make a preliminary
assessment of control risk, at the assertion level, for each material
account balance or class of transactions.
SA 400 IV-260
Preliminary Assessment of Control Risk
23. The preliminary assessment of control risk is the process of evaluating
the likely effectiveness of an entity's accounting and internal control systems in
preventing or detecting and correcting material misstatements. The preliminary
assessment of control risk is based on the assumption that the controls
operate generally as described and that they operate effectively throughout the
period of intended reliance. There will always be some control risk because of
the inherent limitations of any accounting and internal control system.
24. The auditor ordinarily assesses control risk at a high level for some or all
assertions when:
(a) the entity's accounting and internal control systems are not effective; or
(b) evaluating the effectiveness of the entity's accounting and internal control
systems would not be efficient.
In the above circumstances, the auditor would obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence from substantive procedures and from any audit work carried
out in the preparation of financial statements.
25. The preliminary assessment of control risk for a financial statement
assertion should be high unless the auditor:
(a) is able to identify internal controls relevant to the assertion which
are likely to prevent or detect and correct a material misstatement;
and
(b) plans to performtests of control to support the assessment.
Documentation of Understanding and Assessment of Control Risk
26. The auditor should document in the audit working papers:
(a) the understanding obtained of the entity's accounting and internal
control systems; and
(b) the assessment of control risk.
When control risk is assessed at less than high, the auditor would also
document the basis for the conclusions.
27. Different techniques may be used to document information relating to
accounting and internal control systems. Selection of a particular technique is
a matter for the auditor's judgement. Common techniques, used alone or in
SA 400 IV-261
combination, are narrative descriptions, questionnaires, check lists and flow
charts. The form and extent of this documentation is influenced by the size
and complexity of the entity and the nature of the entity's accounting and
internal control systems. Generally, the more complex the entity's accounting
and internal control systems and the more extensive the auditor's procedures,
the more extensive the auditor's documentation will need to be.
Tests of Control
28. Tests of control are performed to obtain audit evidence about the
effectiveness of the:
(a) design of the accounting and internal control systems, that is, whether
they are suitably designed to prevent or detect and correct material
misstatements; and
(b) operation of the internal controls throughout the period.
Tests of control include tests of elements of the control environment where
strengths in the control environment are used by auditors to reduce control
risk.
29. Some of the procedures performed to obtain the understanding of the
accounting and internal control systems may not have been specifically planned
as tests of control but may provide audit evidence about the effectiveness of the
design and operation of internal controls relevant to certain assertions and,
consequently, serve as tests of control. For example, in obtaining the
understanding of the accounting and internal control systems pertaining to cash,
the auditor may have obtained audit evidence about the effectiveness of the
bank reconciliation process through inquiry and observation.
30. When the auditor concludes that procedures performed to obtain the
understanding of the accounting and internal control systems also provide
audit evidence about the suitability of design and operating effectiveness of
policies and procedures relevant to a particular financial statement assertion,
the auditor may use that audit evidence, provided it is sufficient to support a
control risk assessment at less than a high level.
31. Tests of control may include:
Inspection of documents supporting transactions and other events to gain
audit evidence that internal controls have operated properly, for example,
verifying that a transaction has been authorised.
SA 400 IV-262
Inquiries about, and observation of, internal controls which leave no audit
trail, for example, determining who actually performs each function and not
merely who is supposed to perform it.
Re-performance of internal controls, for example, reconciliation of bank
accounts, to ensure they were correctly performed by the entity.
Testing of internal control operating on specific computerised applications
or over the overall information technology function, for example, access or
program change controls.
32. The auditor should obtain audit evidence through tests of control to
support any assessment of control risk which is less than high. The
lower the assessment of control risk, the more evidence the auditor
should obtain that accounting and internal control systems are suitably
designed and operating effectively.
33. When obtaining audit evidence about the effective operation of internal
controls, the auditor considers how they were applied, the consistency with
which they were applied during the period and by whom they were applied.
The concept of effective operation recognises that some deviations may have
occurred. Deviations from prescribed controls may be caused by such factors
as changes in key personnel, significant seasonal fluctuations in volume of
transactions and human error. When deviations are detected the auditor
makes specific inquiries regarding these matters, particularly, the timing of staff
changes in key internal control functions. The auditor then ensures that the
tests of control appropriately cover such a period of change or fluctuation.
34. In a computer information systems environment, the objectives of tests of
control do not change from those in a manual environment; however, some
audit procedures may change. The auditor may find it necessary, or may
prefer, to use computer-assisted audit techniques. The use of such
techniques, for example, file interrogation tools or audit test data, may be
appropriate when the accounting and internal control systems provide no
visible evidence documenting the performance of internal controls which are
programmed into a computerised accounting system.
35. Based on the results of the tests of control, the auditor should
evaluate whether the internal controls are designed and operating as
contemplated in the preliminary assessment of control risk. The
evaluation of deviations may result in the auditor concluding that the
assessed level of control risk needs to be revised. In such cases, the auditor
SA 400 IV-263
would modify the nature, timing and extent of planned substantive
procedures.
Quality and Timeliness of Audit Evidence
36. Certain types of audit evidence obtained by the auditor are more reliable
than others. Ordinarily, the auditor's observation provides more reliable audit
evidence than merely making inquiries, for example, the auditor might obtain
audit evidence about the proper segregation of duties by observing the
individual who applies a control procedure or by making inquiries of
appropriate personnel. However, audit evidence obtained by some tests of
control, such as observation, pertains only to the point in time at which the
procedure was applied. The auditor may decide, therefore, to supplement
these procedures with other tests of control capable of providing audit
evidence about other periods of time.
37. In determining the appropriate audit evidence to support a conclusion
about control risk, the auditor may consider the audit evidence obtained in prior
audits. In a continuing engagement, the auditor will be aware of the
accounting and internal control systems through work carried out previously
but will need to update the knowledge gained and consider the need to obtain
further audit evidence of any changes in control. Before relying on
procedures performed in prior audits, the auditor should obtain audit
evidence which supports this reliance. The auditor would obtain audit
evidence as to the nature, timing and extent of any changes in the entity's
accounting and internal control systems since such procedures were
performed and assess their impact on the auditor's intended reliance. The
longer the time elapsed since the performance of such procedures the less
assurance that may result.
38. The auditor should consider whether the internal controls were in
use throughout the period. If substantially different controls were used at
different times during the period, the auditor would consider each separately.
A breakdown in internal controls for a specific portion of the period requires
separate consideration of the nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures
to be applied to the transactions and other events of that period.
39. The auditor may decide to perform some tests of control during an
interim visit in advance of the period end. However, the auditor cannot rely
on the results of such tests without considering the need to obtain further
audit evidence relating to the remainder of the period. Factors to be
SA 400 IV-264
considered include:
The results of the interim tests.
The length of the remaining period.
Whether any changes have occurred in the accounting and internal control
systems during the remaining period.
The nature and amount of the transactions and other events and the
balances involved.
The control environment, especially supervisory controls.
The nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures which the auditor
plans to carry out.
Final Assessment of Control Risk
40. Before the conclusion of the audit, based on the results of
substantive procedures and other audit evidence obtained by the auditor,
the auditor should consider whether the assessment of control risk is
confirmed. In case of deviations fromthe prescribed accounting and
internal control systems, the auditor would make specific inquiries to
consider their implications. Where, on the basis of such inquiries, the
auditor concludes that the deviations are such that the preliminary
assessment of control risk is not supported, he would amend the same
unless the audit evidence obtained fromother tests of control supports
that assessment. Where the auditor concludes that the assessed level of
control risk needs to be revised, he would modify the nature, timing and
extent of his planned substantive procedures.
Relationship Between the Assessments of Inherent and
Control Risks
41. Management often reacts to inherent risk situations by designing
accounting and internal control systems to prevent or detect and correct
misstatements and therefore, in many cases, inherent risk and control risk are
highly interrelated. In such situations, if the auditor attempts to assess
inherent and control risks separately, there is a possibility of inappropriate risk
assessment. As a result, audit risk may be more appropriately determined in
such situations by making a combined assessment.
SA 400 IV-265
Detection Risk
42. The level of detection risk relates directly to the auditor's substantive
procedures. The auditor's control risk assessment, together with the inherent
risk assessment, influences the nature, timing and extent of substantive
procedures to be performed to reduce detection risk, and therefore audit risk,
to an acceptably low level. Some detection risk would always be present even
if an auditor were to examine 100 percent of the account balances or class of
transactions because, for example, most audit evidence is persuasive rather
than conclusive.
43. The auditor should consider the assessed levels of inherent and
control risks in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive
procedures required to reduce audit risk to an acceptably lowlevel. In
this regard the auditor would consider:
(a) the nature of substantive procedures, for example, using tests directed
toward independent parties outside the entity rather than tests directed
toward parties or documentation within the entity, or using tests of details
for a particular audit objective in addition to analytical procedures;
(b) the timing of substantive procedures, for example, performing them at
period end rather than at an earlier date; and
(c) the extent of substantive procedures, for example, using a larger sample
size.
44. There is an inverse relationship between detection risk and the combined
level of inherent and control risks. For example, when inherent and control
risks are high, acceptable detection risk needs to be low to reduce audit risk to
an acceptably low level. On the other hand, when inherent and control risks
are low, an auditor can accept a higher detection risk and still reduce audit risk
to an acceptably low level. Refer to the Appendix to this SA for an illustration
of the interrelationship of the components of audit risk.
45. While tests of control and substantive procedures are distinguishable as
to their purpose, the results of either type of procedure may contribute to the
purpose of the other. Misstatements discovered in conducting substantive
procedures may cause the auditor to modify the previous assessment of
control risk. Refer to the Appendix to this SA for an illustration of the
interrelationship of the components of audit risk.
SA 400 IV-266
46. The assessed levels of inherent and control risks cannot be sufficiently
low to eliminate the need for the auditor to perform any substantive
procedures. Regardless of the assessed levels of inherent and control
risks, the auditor should performsome substantive procedures for
material account balances and classes of transactions.
47. The auditor's assessment of the components of audit risk may change during
the course of an audit, for example, information may come to the auditor's attention
when performing substantive procedures that differs significantly from the
information on which the auditor originally assessed inherent and control risks. In
such cases, the auditor would modify the planned substantive procedures based
on a revision of the assessed levels of inherent and control risks.
48. The higher the assessment of inherent and control risks, the more
audit evidence the auditor should obtain fromthe performance of
substantive procedures. When both inherent and control risks are assessed
as high, the auditor needs to consider whether substantive procedures can
provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce detection risk, and
therefore audit risk, to an acceptably low level. When the auditor determines
that detection risk regarding a financial statement assertion for a material
account balance or class of transactions cannot be reduced to an
acceptable level, the auditor should express a qualified opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion as may be appropriate.
Audit Risk in the Small Business
49. The auditor needs to obtain the same level of assurance in order to
express an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of both small and
large entities. However, many internal controls which would be relevant to
large entities are not practical in the small business. For example, in small
businesses, accounting procedures may be performed by a few persons who
may have both operating and custodial responsibilities, and therefore
segregation of duties may be missing or severely limited. Inadequate
segregation of duties may, in some cases, be offset by a strong management
control system in which owner/manager supervisory controls exist because of
direct personal knowledge of the entity and involvement in transactions. In
circumstances where segregation of duties is limited and audit evidence of
supervisory controls is lacking, the audit evidence necessary to support the
auditor's opinion on the financial statements may have to be obtained entirely
through the performance of substantive procedures.
SA 400 IV-267
Communication of Weaknesses
50. As a result of obtaining an understanding of the accounting and internal
control systems and tests of control, the auditor may become aware of
weaknesses in the systems. The auditor should make management aware,
as soon as practical and at an appropriate level of responsibility, of
material weaknesses in the design or operation of the accounting and
internal control systems, which have come to the auditor's attention. The
communication to management of material weaknesses would ordinarily be in
writing. However, if the auditor judges that oral communication is appropriate,
such communication would be documented in the audit working papers. It is
important to indicate in the communication that only weaknesses which have
come to the auditor's attention as a result of the audit have been reported and
that the examination has not been designed to determine the adequacy of
internal control for management purposes.
Effective Date
51. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all audits related to
accounting periods beginning on or after 1
st
April, 2002.
SA 400 IV-268
Appendix
Illustration of the Interrelationship of the Components of Audit Risk
The following table shows how the acceptable level of detection risk may vary
based on assessments of inherent and control risks.

Auditor's assessment of
control risk
High Medium Low
High Lowest Lower Medium
Medium Lower Medium Higher
Auditor's
assessment of
inherent risk
Low Medium Higher Highest

The shaded areas in this table relate to detection risk.
There is an inverse relationship between detection risk and the combined level
of inherent and control risks. For example, when inherent and control risks are
high, acceptable levels of detection risk need to be low to reduce audit risk to
an acceptably low level. On the other hand, when inherent and control risks
are low, an auditor can accept a higher detection risk and still reduce audit risk
to an acceptably low level.
Back

SA 401 (AAS 29)
AUDITING IN A COMPUTER
INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENT
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
Skills and Competence........................................................................... 4
Planning ...............................................................................................5-8
Assessment of Risk ...........................................................................9-11
Audit Procedures ...........................................................................12-13
Documentation ...................................................................................... 14
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 15

, Auditing in a Computer
Information Systems Environment should be read in the context of the
1

Issued in January, 2003. The date Standards on Auditing (SA) 315 and SA 330 come into effect,
this Standard on Auditing shall stand withdrawn. The SA 315 and SA 330 are effective for audits of
financial statements beginning on or after April 1, 2008.
1
Back
SA 401 IV-270
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Auditing (SA) is to establish
standards on procedures to be followed when an audit is conducted in a
computer information systems (CIS) environment. For the purposes of this
SA, a CIS environment exists when one or more computer(s) of any type or
size is (are) involved in the processing of financial information, including
quantitative data, of significance to the audit, whether those computers are
operated by the entity or by a third party.
2. The overall objective and scope of an audit does not change in a CIS
environment. However, the use of a computer changes the processing,
storage, retrieval and communication of financial information and may affect
the accounting and internal control systems employed by the entity.
Accordingly, a CIS environment may affect:
the procedures followed by the auditor in obtaining a sufficient
understanding of the accounting and internal control system.
the auditors evaluation of inherent risk and control risk through which
the auditor assesses the audit risk.
the auditors design and performance of tests of control and substantive
procedures appropriate to meet the audit objective.
3. The auditor should consider the effect of a CIS environment on
the audit. The auditor should evaluate, inter alia, the following factors to
determine the effect of CIS environment on the audit:
(a) the extent to which the CIS environment is used to record, compile and
analyse accounting information;
(b) the system of internal control in existence in the entity with regard to:
(i) flow of authorised, correct and complete data to the processing
center;
(ii) processing, analysis and reporting tasks undertaken in the
installation; and
(c) the impact of computer-based accounting system on the audit trail that
could otherwise be expected to exist in an entirely manual system.
Auditing in a CIS Environment
SA 401 IV-271
Skills and Competence
4. The auditor should have sufficient knowledge of the computer
information systems to plan, direct, supervise, control and reviewthe
work performed. The sufficiency of knowledge would depend on the nature
and extent of the CIS environment. The auditor should consider whether
any specialised CIS skills are needed in the conduct of the audit.
Specialised skills may be needed, inter alia, to
obtain sufficient understanding of the effect of the CIS environment on
accounting and internal control systems;
determine the effect of the CIS environment on the assessment of
overall audit risk and of risk at the account balance and class of
transactions level; and
design and perform appropriate tests of control and substantive
procedures.
If specialised skills are needed, the auditor would seek the assistance of an
expert possessing such skills, who may either be the auditors staff or an
outside professional. If the use of such a professional is planned, the
auditor should, in accordance with SA 620, Using the Work of an
Expert, obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the work
performed by the expert is adequate for the purposes of the audit.
Planning
5. In accordance with the Standard on Auditing (SA) 400, Risk
Assessments and Internal Control, the auditor should obtain an
understanding of the accounting and internal control systems sufficient
to plan the audit and to determine the nature, timing and extent of the
audit procedures. Such an understanding would help the auditor to develop
an effective audit approach.
6. In planning the portions of the audit which may be affected by
the CIS environment, the auditor should obtain an understanding of the
significance and complexity of the CIS activities and the availability of
the data for use in the audit. This understanding would include such
matters as:
SA 401 IV-272
(a) the computer information systems infrastructure [hardware,
operating system(s), etc., and application software(s) used by the
entity, including changes therein since last audit if any].
(b) the significance and complexity of computerised processing in each
significant accounting application. Significance relates to materiality
of the financial statement assertions affected by the computerised
processing. An application may be considered to be complex when,
for example:
the volume of transactions is such that users would find it
difficult to identify and correct errors in processing.
the computer automatically generates material transactions or
entries directly to another application.
the computer performs complicated computations of financial
information and/or automatically generates material transactions
or entries that cannot be (or are not) validated independently.
transactions are exchanged electronically with other
organisations [as in electronic data interchange (EDI) systems]
without manual review for propriety or reasonableness.
(c) determination of the organisational structure of the clients CIS
activities and the extent of concentration or distribution of computer
processing throughout the entity, particularly, as they may affect
segregation of duties.
(d) determination of the availability of data. Source documents,
computer files, and other evidential matter that may be required by
the auditor may exist for only a short period or only in machine-
readable form. Computer information systems may generate reports
that might be useful in performing substantive tests (particularly
analytical procedures). The potential for use of computer-assisted
audit techniques may permit increased efficiency in the performance
of audit procedures, or may enable the auditor to economically apply
certain procedures to the entire population of accounts or
transactions.
7. When the computer information systems are significant, the
auditor should also obtain an understanding of the CIS environment
and whether it may influence the assessment of inherent and control
SA 401 IV-273
risks. The nature of the risks and the internal control characteristics in CIS
environments include the following:
Lack of transaction trails: Some computer information systems
are designed so that a complete transaction trail that is useful
for audit purposes might exist for only a short period of time or
only in computer readable form. Where a complex application
system performs a large number of processing steps, there may
not be a complete trail. Accordingly, errors embedded in an
applications program logic may be difficult to detect on a timely
basis by manual (user) procedures.
Uniform processing of transactions: Computer processing
uniformly processes like transactions with the same processing
instructions. Thus, the clerical errors ordinarily associated with
manual processing are virtually eliminated. Conversely,
programming errors (or other systemic errors in hardware or
software) will ordinarily result in all transactions being
processed incorrectly.
Lack of segregation of functions: Many control procedures that
would ordinarily be performed by separate individuals in manual
systems may become concentrated in a CIS environment.
Thus, an individual who has access to computer programs,
processing or data may be in a position to perform incompatible
functions.
Potential for errors and irregularities: The potential for human
error in the development, maintenance and execution of
computer information systems may be greater than in manual
systems, partially because of the level of detail inherent in these
activities. Also, the potential for individuals to gain unauthorised
access to data or to alter data without visible evidence may be
greater in CIS than in manual systems.
In addition, decreased human involvement in handling transactions
processed by computer information systems can reduce the
potential for observing errors and irregularities. Errors or
irregularities occurring during the design or modification of
application programs or systems software can remain undetected for
long periods of time.
SA 401 IV-274
Initiation or execution of transactions: Computer information
systems may include the capability to initiate or cause the
execution of certain types of transactions, automatically. The
authorisation of these transactions or procedures may not be
documented in the same way as that in a manual system, and
managements authorisation of these transactions may be
implicit in its acceptance of the design of the computer
information systems and subsequent modification.
Dependence of other controls over computer processing:
Computer processing may produce reports and other output that
are used in performing manual control procedures. The
effectiveness of these manual control procedures can be
dependent on the effectiveness of controls over the
completeness and accuracy of computer processing. In turn, the
effectiveness and consistent operation of transaction processing
controls in computer applications is often dependent on the
effectiveness of general computer information systems controls.
Potential for increased management supervision: Computer
information systems can offer management a variety of
analytical tools that may be used to review and supervise the
operations of the entity. The availability of these analytical
tools, if used, may serve to enhance the entire internal control
structure.
Potential for the use of computer-assisted audit techniques: The
case of processing and analysing large quantities of data using
computers may require the auditor to apply general or
specialised computer audit techniques and tools in the
execution of audit tests.
Both the risks and the controls introduced as a result of these characteristics
of computer information systems have a potential impact on the auditors
assessment of risk, and the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures.
8. While evaluating the reliability of the accounting and internal control
systems, the auditor would consider whether these systems, inter alia:
(a) ensure that authorised, correct and complete data is made available for
processing;
SA 401 IV-275
(b) provide for timely detection and correction of errors;
(c) ensure that in case of interruption in the working of the CIS environment
due to power, mechanical or processing failures, the system restarts
without distorting the completion of the entries and records;
(d) ensure the accuracy and completeness of output;
(e) provide adequate data security against fire and other calamities, wrong
processing, frauds etc.;
(f) prevent unauthorised amendments to the programs; and
(g) provide for safe custody of source code of application software and data
files.
Assessment of Risk
9. The auditor should make an assessment of inherent and control
risks for material financial statement assertions, in accordance with SA
400 , Risk Assessments and Internal Control.
10. The inherent risks and control risks in a CIS environment may have
both a pervasive effect and an account-specific effect on the likelihood of
material misstatements, as follows:
The risks may result from deficiencies in pervasive CIS activities such as
program development and maintenance, system software support,
operations, physical CIS security, and control over access to special-
privilege utility programs. These deficiencies would tend to have a
pervasive impact on all application systems that are processed on the
computer.
The risks may increase the potential for errors or fraudulent activities in
specific applications, in specific databases or master files, or in specific
processing activities. For example, errors are not uncommon in systems
that perform complex logic or calculations, or that must deal with many
different exception conditions. Systems that control cash disbursements
or other liquid assets are susceptible to fraudulent actions by users or by
CIS personnel.
11. As new CIS technologies emerge for data processing, they are
frequently employed by clients to build increasingly complex computer
systems that may include micro-to-mainframe links, distributed data bases,
SA 401 IV-276
end-user processing, and business management systems that feed
information directly into the accounting systems. Such systems increase the
overall sophistication of computer information systems and the complexity of
the specific applications that they affect. As a result, they may increase risk
and require further consideration.
Audit Procedures
12. In accordance with SA 400, Risk Assessments and Internal
Control, the auditor should consider the CIS environment in designing
audit procedures to reduce audit risk to an acceptably lowlevel. He
should make enquiries and particularly satisfy himself whether:
(a) adequate procedures exist to ensure that the data transmitted is correct
and complete; and
(b) cross-verification of records, reconciliation statements and control
systems between primary and subsidiary ledgers do exist and are
operative and that accuracy of computer compiled records are not
assumed.
13. The auditors specific audit objectives do not change whether
accounting data is processed manually or by computer. However, the
methods of applying audit procedures to gather evidence may be influenced
by the methods of computer processing. The auditor can use manual audit
procedures, or computer-assisted audit techniques, or a combination of both
to obtain sufficient evidential matter. However, in some accounting systems
that use a computer for processing significant applications, it may be difficult
or impossible for the auditor to obtain certain data for inspection, inquiry, or
confirmation without computer assistance.
Documentation
14. The auditor should document the audit plan, the nature, timing
and extent of audit procedures performed and the conclusions drawn
fromthe evidence obtained. In an audit in CIS environment, some of
the audit evidence may be in the electronic form. The auditor should
satisfy himself that such evidence is adequately and safely stored and
is retrievable in its entirety as and when required.
SA 401 IV-277
Effective Date
15. This Standard on Auditing (SA) becomes operative for all audits
related to accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2003.
401
consistent in all material respects with those set out in International Standard
on Auditing (ISA) 401 on Auditing in a Computer Information Systems
Environment except for the additional requirement related to
Documentation [see paragraph 14]. ISA 401 does not contain any
requirement related to documentation.
Back
SA 402 (AAS 24)
AUDIT CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO
ENTITIES USING SERVICE ORGANISATIONS
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction....................................................................................... 1-3
Considerations for the Auditor of the Client................................ 4-10
Service Organisation Auditor's Reports .................................... 11-18
Effective Date......................................................................................19

, Audit Considerations Relating to

Entities Using Service Organisationsshould be read in the context of the
1

Issued in August, 2002.

1
Back
Enti ti es Usi ng Servi ce Organi sati ons
SA 402 IV-279
Introduction
standards for an auditor whose client uses a service organisation. This SA
also describes the reports of the auditors of the service organisation which
may be obtained by the auditor of the client.
2. The auditor should consider howa service organisation affects
the client's accounting and internal control systems so as to plan the
audit and develop an effective audit approach.
3. Service organisations undertake a wide range of activities, for
example, information processing, maintenance of accounting records,
facilities management, maintenance of safe custody of assets such as
investments, and initiation or execution of transactions on behalf of the
other enterprise. Not all the activities undertaken by the service
organisations are likely, by themselves, to have a significant effect on a
user enterprises financial statements. A client may use a service
organisation such as one that executes transactions and maintains related
accountability or records transactions and processes related data (e.g., a
computer systems service organisation). If a client uses a service
organisation, certain policies, procedures and records maintained by the
service organisation might be relevant to the audit of the financial
statements of the client. Consequently, the auditor would consider the
nature and extent of activities undertaken by service organisations so as to
determine whether those activities are relevant to the audit and, if so, to
assess their effect on audit risk.
Considerations for the Auditor of the Client
4. A service organisation may establish and execute policies and
procedures that affect a client organisation's accounting and internal
control systems. These policies and procedures are physically and
operationally separate from the clients organisation. When the services
provided by the service organisation are limited to recording and
processing transactions of the client and the client retains authorisation and
maintenance of accountability, the client might be able to implement
effective policies and procedures within its organisation. When the service
organisation executes the client's transactions and maintains
accountability, the client may deem it necessary to rely on policies and
Handbook of Audi ti ng Pronouncements-I
SA 402 IV-280
procedures at the service organisation.
5. While planning the audit, the auditor of the client should
determine the significance of the activities of the service organisation
to the client and their relevance to the audit. In doing so, the auditor of
the client would need to consider the following, as appropriate:
Nature of the services provided by the service organisation.
Terms of contract and relationship between the client and the service
organisation.
The material financial statement assertions that are affected by the
use of the service organisation.
Inherent risk associated with those assertions.
Extent to which the client's accounting and internal control systems
interact with the systems at the service organisation.
Client's internal controls that are applied to the transactions processed
by the service organisation.
Service organisation's capability and financial strength, including the
possible effect of the failure of the service organisation on the client.
Information about the service organisation such as that reflected in
user and technical manuals, if any.
Information available on general controls and computer systems
controls relevant to the client's applications.
6. The auditor of the client would also consider the availability of third-
party reports from service organisations auditors, internal auditors, or
regulatory agencies as a means of providing information about the
accounting and internal control systems of the service organisation and
about its operation and effectiveness.
Consideration of the above may lead the auditor to decide that the control
risk assessment will not be affected by controls at the service organisation;
if so, further consideration of this SA is unnecessary.
7. If the auditor of the client concludes that the activities of the
service organisation are significant to the entity and relevant to the
audit, the auditor should obtain sufficient information to understand
SA 402 IV-281
the accounting and internal control systems of the service
organisation and to assess control risk at either the maximum, or a
lower level if tests of control are performed.
8. If the information is insufficient, the auditor of the client would
consider the need to request the service organisation to have its auditor
perform such procedures as to supply the necessary information in the
forms of reports mentioned at paragraph 12. If such reports are not made
available within a reasonable time, the auditor of the client would consider
the need to visit the service organisation to obtain the relevant information.
An auditor of the client wishing to visit a service organisation may advise
the client to request the service organisation to give the auditor of the client
access to the necessary information.
9. The auditor of the client may be able to obtain an understanding of the
accounting and internal control systems affected by the service organisation
by reading the third-party report of the service organisations auditor. In
addition, when assessing control risk for assertions affected by the systems,
controls of the service organisation, the auditor of the client may also use the
service organisation auditor's report. When the auditor of the client uses
the report of a service organisations auditor, the auditor of the client
should consider the professional competence of the other auditor in the
context of specific assignment if the other auditor is not a member of
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
10. The auditor of the client may conclude that it would be appropriate to
obtain audit evidence from tests of control to support an assessment of
control risk at a lower level.
Service Organisation Auditor's Reports
11. When using a service organisation auditor's report, the auditor of
the client should consider the nature of and content of that report.
12. The report of the service organisations auditor will ordinarily be one of
two types as follows:
Type A - Report on Suitability of Design
(a) a description of the service organisation's accounting and internal
control systems, ordinarily prepared by the management of the service
organisation; and
SA 402 IV-282
(b) an opinion by the service organisations auditor that:
(i) the above description is accurate;
(ii) the systems' controls have been placed in operation; and
(iii) the accounting and internal control systems are suitably
designed to achieve their stated objectives.
Type B - Report on Suitability of Design and Operating Effectiveness
(a) a description of the service organisation's accounting and internal
control systems, ordinarily prepared by the management of the service
organisation; and
(b) an opinion by the service organisations auditor that:
(i) the above description is accurate;
(ii) the systems controls have been placed in operation;
(iii) the accounting and internal control systems are suitably
designed to achieve their stated objectives; and
(iv) the accounting and internal control systems are operating
effectively based on the results from the tests of control. In
addition to the opinion on operating effectiveness, the service
organisations auditor would identify the tests of control
performed and related results.
The report of the service organisations auditor will ordinarily contain
restrictions as to its use (generally to management of the service
organisation and its customers, and the specified clients auditor).
13. The auditor should consider the scope of work performed by the
service organisations auditor and should assess the usefulness and
appropriateness of reports issued by the service organisations auditor.
14. While Type A reports may be useful to an auditor of the client in
gaining the required understanding of the accounting and internal control
systems, an auditor would not use such reports as a basis for reducing the
assessment of control risk.
15. In contrast, Type B reports may provide such a basis since tests of
control have been performed. When a Type B report is to be used as
evidence to support a lower control risk assessment, the auditor of the
SA 402 IV-283
client would consider whether the controls tested by the service
organisations auditor are relevant to the client's transactions (significant
assertions in the client's financial statements) and whether the service
organisation auditor's tests of control and the results are adequate. With
respect to the latter, two key considerations are the length of the period
covered by the service organisation auditor's tests and the time since the
performance of those tests.
16. For those specific tests of control and results that are relevant,
the auditor of the client should consider whether the nature, timing
and extent of such tests provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence
about the effectiveness of the accounting and internal control
systems to support the client auditor's assessed level of control risk.
17. The auditor of a service organisation may be engaged to perform
substantive procedures that are of use to auditor of the client. Such
engagements may involve the performance of procedures agreed upon by
the client and its auditor and by the service organisation and its auditor.
18. When the auditor of the client uses a report fromthe auditor of a
service organisation, no reference should be made in the client
auditor's report to the service organisations auditors report.
Effective Date
19. This Auditing and Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all
audits related to accounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 2003.
(ISA) 402
The auditing standards established in these Standards on Auditing are
generally consistent in all material respects with those set out in ISA 402
"Audit Considerations Relating to Entities Using Service Organisations".
Back

SA 500 (AAS 5)
AUDIT EVIDENCE
accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1989)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence............................................2-10
Obtaining Audit Evidence ...............................................................11-17
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 18

*
, Audit Evidence should be read in the
1
authority of SAs.

*
Issued in May, 1988.
1
Back
Audit Evidence
SA 500 IV-285
Introduction
The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence through
the performance of compliance and substantive procedures to enable
him to draw reasonable conclusions therefrom on which to base his
opinion on the financial information.
Compliance procedures are tests designed to obtain reasonable
assurance that those internal controls on which audit reliance is to be
placed are in effect.
Substantive procedures are designed to obtain evidence as to the
completeness, accuracy and validity of the data produced by the
accounting system.
They are of two types:
(i) tests of details of transactions and balances;
(ii) analysis of significant ratios and trends, including the resulting
enquiry of unusual fluctuations and items.
The purpose of this Standard is to amplify the basic principle outlined above.
In this Standard, the term financial information encompasses financial
statements.
Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence
2. Sufficiency and appropriateness are interrelated and apply to evidence
obtained from both compliance and substantive procedures. Sufficiency
refers to the quantum of audit evidence obtained; appropriateness relates to
its relevance and reliability. Normally, the auditor finds it necessary to rely on
evidence that is persuasive rather than conclusive. He may often seek
evidence from different sources or of different nature to support the same
assertion (see paragraphs 5 and 6).
3. The auditor should evaluate whether he has obtained sufficient
appropriate audit evidence before he draws his conclusions therefrom. The
audit evidence should, in total, enable the auditor to form an opinion on the
financial information. In forming such an opinion, the auditor may obtain audit
evidence on a selective basis by way of judgmental or statistical sampling
SA 500 IV-286
procedures. For example, the auditor may select only certain accounts
receivable for confirmation purposes, or make a selection of personnel
records for the purpose of testing that changes in payroll rates have been
properly authorised.
4. The auditors judgement as to what is sufficient appropriate audit
evidence is influenced by such factors as:
(a) The degree of risk of misstatement which may be affected by factors
such as:
(i) the nature of the item;
(ii) the adequacy of internal control;
(iii) the nature or size of the business carried on by the entity;
(iv) situations which may exert an unusual influence on
management;
(v) the financial position of the entity.
(b) The materiality of the item.
(c) The experience gained during previous audits.
(d) The results of auditing procedures, including fraud or error which may
have been found.
(e) The type of information available.
(f) The trend indicated by accounting ratios and analysis.
5. Obtaining audit evidence from compliance procedures is intended to
reasonably assure the auditor in respect of the following assertions:
Existence that the internal control exists.
Effectiveness that the internal control is operating effectively.
Continuity that the internal control has so operated
throughout the period of intended reliance.
6. Obtaining audit evidence from substantive procedures is intended to
reasonably assure the auditor in respect of the following assertions:
Existence that an asset or a liability exists at a given date.
Rights and that an asset is a right of the entity and a liability
Audit Evidence
SA 500 IV-287
Obligations is an obligation of the entity at a given date.
Occurrence that a transaction or event took place which
pertains to the entity during the relevant period.
Completeness that there are no unrecorded assets, liabilities or
transactions.
Valuation that an asset or liability is recorded at an
appropriate carrying value.
Measurement that a transaction is recorded in the proper
amount and revenue or expense is allocated to
the proper period.
Presentation and
Disclosure
an item is disclosed, classified, and described in
accordance with recognised accounting policies
and practices and relevant statutory requirements,
if any.
The extent and nature of substantive procedures to be performed will vary
with respect to each of the above assertions.
Obtaining evidence relevant to one of the above assertions will not
compensate for failure to do so with respect to another matter concerning the
same item, e.g., existence of inventory and its valuation.
7. The reliability of audit evidence depends on its source - internal or
external, and on its nature - visual, documentary or oral. While the reliability
of audit evidence is dependent on the circumstances under which it is
obtained, the following generalisations may be useful in assessing the
reliability of audit evidence:
External evidence (e.g. confirmation received from a third party) is
usually more reliable than internal evidence.
Internal evidence is more reliable when related internal control is
satisfactory.
Evidence in the form of documents and written representations is usually
more reliable than oral representations.
Evidence obtained by the auditor himself is more reliable than that
obtained through the entity.

SA 500 IV-288
8. The auditor may gain increased assurance when audit evidence
obtained from different sources or of different nature is consistent. In these
circumstances, he may obtain a cumulative degree of assurance higher than
that which he attaches to the individual items of evidence by themselves.
Conversely, when audit evidence obtained from one source is inconsistent
with that obtained from another, further procedures may have to be
performed to resolve the inconsistency.
9. The auditor should be thorough in his efforts to obtain evidence and be
objective in its evaluation.
10. When the auditor is in reasonable doubt as to any assertion of material
significance, he would attempt to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to
remove such doubt. If he is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence
he should not express an unqualified opinion.
Obtaining Audit Evidence
11. The auditor obtains evidence in performing compliance and substantive
procedures by one or more of the following methods:
Inspection
Observation
Inquiry and confirmation
Computation
Analytical review
The timing of such procedures will be dependent, in part, upon the periods of
time during which the audit evidence sought is available.
Inspection
12. Inspection consists of examining records, documents, or tangible
assets. Inspection of records and documents provides evidence of varying
degrees of reliability, depending on their nature and source and the
effectiveness of internal controls over their processing. Four major categories
of documentary evidence, which provide different degrees of reliability to the
auditor, are:
documentary evidence originating from and held by third parties;
documentary evidence originating from third parties and held by the
entity;
Audit Evidence
SA 500 IV-289
documentary evidence originating from the entity and held by third
parties; and
documentary evidence originating from and held by the entity.
Inspection of tangible assets is one of the methods to obtain reliable
evidence with respect to their existence but not necessarily as to their
ownership or value.
Observation
13. Observation consists of witnessing a process or procedure being
performed by others. For example, the auditor may observe the counting of
inventories by client personnel or the performance of internal control
procedures that leave no audit trail.
Inquiry and Confirmation
14. Inquiry consists of seeking appropriate information from knowledgeable
persons inside or outside the entity. Inquiries may range from formal written
inquiries addressed to third parties to informal oral inquiries addressed to
persons inside the entity. Responses to inquiries may provide the auditor
with information which he did not previously possess or may provide him with
corroborative evidence.
15. Confirmation consists of the response to an inquiry to corroborate
information contained in the accounting records. For example, the auditor
requests confirmation of receivables by direct communication with
debtors.
Computation
16. Computation consists of checking the arithmetical accuracy of source
documents and accounting records or performing independent calculations.
Analytical Review
17. Analytical review consists of studying significant ratios and trends and
investigating unusual fluctuations and items.
Effective Date
accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1989.
Back
SA 501 (AAS 34)
AUDIT EVIDENCE ADDITIONAL
CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPECIFIC ITEMS
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..................................................................................... 1
Part A : Attendance at Physical Inventory Counting................... 2-19
Part B : Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims...................... 20-28
Part C : Valuation and Disclosure of Long-Term Investments. 29-36
Part D : Segment Information ...................................................... 37-43
Effective Date ................................................................................... 44

, Audit Evidence Additional Considerations For

Specific Items should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on
Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services
1
,
which sets out the authority of SAs.

Issued in March, 2005.

1
Back
Audit Evidence Additional Considerations For Specific Items
SA 501 IV-291
Introduction
on the auditors responsibilities, audit procedures and provide additional
guidance to that contained in SA 500, Audit Evidence, with respect to
certain specific financial statement amounts and other disclosures.
Application of the standards and guidance provided in this SA will assist the
auditor in obtaining audit evidence with respect to the specific financial
statement amounts and other disclosures. This SA comprises the following
parts:
Part A: Attendance at Physical Inventory Counting
Part B: Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims
Part C: Valuation and Disclosure of Long-term Investments
Part D: Segment Information
Part A: Attendance at Physical Inventory Counting
2. The auditor should performaudit procedures designed to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence during his attendance at physical
inventory counting.
Definitions
3. Definitions regarding Inventory are given in Accounting Standard (AS)
2, Valuation of Inventories, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India, and are adopted for the purposes of this SA
2
.
4. Physical verification of inventories is the responsibility of the
management of the entity. Management ordinarily establishes procedures
under which inventory is physically counted at least once in a year (end of
the year, generally, or as near the end of the year as possible) to serve as a

2
Paragraph 3 of the Accounting Standard (AS) 2, Valuation of Inventories, states as follows:
3. The following terms are used in this Statement with the meanings specified:
Inventories are assets:
(a) held for sale in the ordinary course of business;
(b) in the process of production for such sale; or
(c) in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the
rendering of services.
SA 501 IV-292
basis for preparation of the financial statements or to ascertain the reliability
of the perpetual inventory system.
5. When inventory is material to the financial statements, the auditor
should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding its
existence and condition by attendance at physical inventory counting
unless impracticable, due to factors such as the nature and location of
the inventory. The attendance at such physical inventory counting will
enable the auditor to inspect the inventory, to observe compliance with the
operation of managements procedures for recording and controlling the
results of the count and to provide evidence as to the reliability of
managements procedures.
6. If unable to attend the physical inventory count on the date
planned due to unforeseen circumstances, the auditor should take or
observe some physical counts on an alternative date and where
necessary, performalternative audit procedures to assess whether the
changes in inventory between the date of physical count and the period
end date are correctly recorded.
7. Where attendance at the physical inventory counting is
impracticable, the auditor should consider whether alternative
procedures provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence of existence
and condition of inventory to conclude that the auditor need not make
reference to a scope limitation. For example, the auditor should examine a
sample of documents evidencing the movement of inventory into and out of
stores shortly before and after the cut off date, and verify whether the
inventory represented by those documents were included or excluded, as
appropriate during the inventory count.
8. In planning attendance at the physical inventory count or the alternative
procedures, the auditor would consider the following:
The nature of the accounting and internal control systems used
regarding inventory.
Inherent, control and detection risks, and materiality related to
inventory.
Whether adequate procedures are established and proper instructions
issued for physical inventory counting.
The timing of the count.
SA 501 IV-293
The locations at which inventory is held and its nature.
Whether an experts assistance is needed.
When inventory is situated in several locations, the auditor would consider at
which locations attendance is appropriate, taking into account the materiality
of the inventory and the risk of material misstatement and the assessment of
inherent and control risk at different locations.
9. The auditor would review managements instructions regarding:
(a) The application of control procedures, for example, collection of used
stock-sheets, accounting for unused stock-sheets, tagging and count
and re-count procedures;
(b) Accurate identification of the stage of completion of work in progress,
slow moving, obsolete, damaged or rejected items, inventory owned by
a third party, for example, on consignment and inventory in transit; and
(c) Appropriate arrangements made regarding the movement of inventory
between areas and the shipping and receipt of inventory before and
after the cut-off date.
10. The auditor would also consider cut-off procedures including details of
the movement of inventory just prior to, during and after the count to ensure
that such movements are appropriately included and/or excluded, as
applicable from such inventory. For example,
(a) goods purchased but not received are included in the inventories; and
(b) goods sold but not despatched are excluded from the inventories.
11. When the quantities are to be determined by a physical inventory count
and the auditor attends such a count, or when the entity operates a perpetual
inventory system and the auditor attends a count one or more times during
the year, the auditor would ordinarily observe count procedures and perform
test counts.
12. If the entity uses procedures to estimate the physical quantity, such as
estimating a coal pile, the auditor would need to be satisfied regarding the
reasonableness of those procedures.
13. To obtain assurance that managements procedures are adequately
implemented, the auditor would observe physical verification procedures
performed by the employees and perform test counts. When performing
SA 501 IV-294
counts, the auditor would test both the completeness and the accuracy of the
count records by tracing items selected from those records to the physical
inventory sheets and items selected from the physical inventory to the count
records. Where tagging method of physical count of inventory is used, the
auditor would verify the tag reconciliation prior to the counting or before
finalising the count. The auditor would consider the extent to which copies of
such count records need to be retained for subsequent audit procedures,
testing and comparison.
14. For practical reasons, the physical inventory count may be conducted at
a date other than period end. This will ordinarily be adequate for audit
purposes only when the control risk is assessed at less than high. The
auditor would assess whether, through the performance of appropriate audit
procedures, changes in inventory between the count date and period end are
correctly recorded.
15. When the entity operates a perpetual inventory system, which is used to
determine the period end balance, the auditor would assess whether, through
the performance of additional procedures, the reasons for any significant
differences between the physical count and the perpetual inventory records
are understood and the records are properly adjusted.
16. The auditor performs audit procedures over the final inventory listing to
assess whether it accurately reflects actual inventory counts.
17. When inventory is under the custody and control of a third party, the
auditor would ordinarily obtain direct confirmation from the third party/arrange
with the entity for sending requests for such confirmation as to the quantities
and condition of inventory held on behalf of the entity. Further, depending on
materiality of this inventory the auditor would also consider the following:
The conduct of the third party in the past with the entity and
independence of the third party.
Observing, or arranging for another auditor to observe, the physical
inventory count.
Obtaining another auditors report on the adequacy of the third partys
accounting and internal control systems for ensuring that the inventory
is correctly counted and adequately safeguarded.
Inspecting documentation regarding inventory held by third parties, for
example, warehouse receipts.
SA 501 IV-295
Subsequent receipt of goods from third parties.
18. The auditor should obtain a written representation from
management concerning:
(a) the completeness of information provided regarding the inventory;
and
(b) assurance with regard to adherence to laid down procedures for
physical inventory count.
19. If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence concerning the existence of inventory or adequacy of
procedures adopted by the management in respect of physical
inventory count the auditor should make a reference to a scope
limitation in his audit report. If the inventory is not disclosed
appropriately in the financial statements, the auditor should issue a
qualified opinion.
Part B: Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims
Definitions
20(a) "Litigation" means a lawsuit or legal action including all
proceedings therein.
(b) "Claims" means a right to payment or right to an equitable remedy for
breach of performance.
21. Litigation and claims involving an entity may have a material effect on
the financial statements and thus may be required to be disclosed and/or
provided for in the financial statements.
22. The auditor should carry out audit procedures in order to become
aware of any litigation and claims involving the entity which may have a
material effect on the financial statements. Such procedures would
Make appropriate inquiries of management including obtaining
representations.
SA 501 IV-296
Review board /committee minutes and correspondence with the entitys
lawyers.
Examine legal and other relevant expense accounts.
Use any information obtained regarding the entitys business including
information obtained from discussions with in-house legal department, if
any.
23. When litigation or claims have been identified by the management or
when the auditor believes they may exist, and are likely to be material, the
auditor may seek direct communication with the entitys lawyers and such
other professionals to whom the entity engages for litigation and claims.
Such communication will assist in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit
evidence as to whether potentially material litigation and claims are known
and managements estimates of the financial implications, including costs,
are reliable.
24. The letter seeking direct communication with the entitys lawyers
and such other professionals to whomthe entity engages for litigation
and claims should be prepared by management. The auditor should
maintain control over the process of preparation and sending of the
letter. The letter should request the entitys lawyers and such other
professionals to whomthe entity engages for litigation and claims to
communicate directly with the auditor. The letter would ordinarily specify
the following:
A list of litigation and claims.
Managements assessment of the outcome of the litigation or claim and
its estimate of the financial implications, including costs involved.
A request that the entitys lawyer confirm:
the reasonableness of managements assessments;
provide the auditor with further information if the list is considered
to be incomplete or incorrect; and
provide updated information as and when requested by the auditor
upto the date of the audit report.
SA 501 IV-297
25. The auditor considers the status of legal matters up to the date of the
audit report. In some instances, the auditor may need to obtain updated
information from lawyers.
26. In certain circumstances, for example, where the matter is complex or
there is disagreement between management and the entitys lawyers and
such other professionals to whom the entity engages for litigation and claims,
it may be necessary for the auditor to meet with the entitys lawyers and such
other professionals to whom the entity engages for litigation and claims to
discuss the likely outcome of litigation and claims. Such meetings would take
place with managements permission and, preferably, with a representative
of management in attendance.
27. If management refuses to give the auditor permission to
communicate with the entitys lawyers, this would constitute a
limitation on the scope of the auditors work that requires expression of
a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion as the case may be.
Where a lawyer or a professional refuses to respond in an appropriate
manner and the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence by applying alternative procedures, the auditor would consider
whether there is a scope limitation which may lead to a qualified opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion.
management concerning the completeness and adequacy of
information provided regarding the identification of litigation and
claims, estimates of financial implications, including costs, etc.
Part C: Valuation and Disclosure of Long-Term
Investments
sufficient appropriate audit evidence for valuation and disclosure of
long terminvestments.
SA 501 IV-298
Definitions
30. Definition regarding Long Term Investments is given in Accounting
Standard (AS) 13, Accounting for Investments, issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India and is adopted for the purposes of this SA.
3

31. When long-term investments are material to the financial
statements, the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding their valuation and disclosure.
32. Audit procedures regarding long-term investments ordinarily include
obtaining audit evidence with respect to their ownership and existence as to
whether the entity has the ability to continue to hold the investments on a
long term basis and discussing with management whether the entity will
continue to hold the investments as long-term investments and obtaining
written representations to that effect.
33. Other procedures would ordinarily include:
(a) In the case of quoted securities, considering related financial
statements and other information, such as market quotations, which
provide an indication of value and comparing such values to the
carrying amount of the securities up to the date of the auditors report.
(b) In case of unquoted securities, ascertaining the method adopted by the
entity for determining the value of such securities as at the year end.
The auditor should examine whether the method adopted by the entity
is one of the recognised methods of valuation of securities such as
Profit Earning capacity Value method, break-up value method,
capitalisation of yield method, yield to maturity method, etc.
(c) In the case of investments other than in the form of securities, ensuring
that the market value has been ascertained on the basis of authentic
market reports, and /or based on experts opinion, if warranted.
34. If such values do not exceed the carrying amounts, the auditor would
consider whether a write-down is required. If there is an uncertainty as to

3
Paragraph 3 of Accounting Standard (AS) 13, Accounting for Investments, states as follows:
3. The following terms are used in this Statement with the meanings assigned:
A Current Investment is an investment that is by its nature readily realizable and is intended
to be held for not more than one year from the date on which such investment is made.
A long terminvestment is an investment other than a current investment.
SA 501 IV-299
whether the carrying amount will be recovered, the auditor would consider
whether appropriate adjustments and/or disclosures have been made.
management regarding :
(a) the completeness of information provided regarding valuation and
disclosure of long terminvestments;
(b) the valuation of long terminvestments in the financial statements
including adequacy of provision for diminution in such values,
wherever required; and
(c) the intention of the management to continue to hold long-term
investments as long-terminvestments.
evidence concerning the existence, valuation of long terminvestments
or concludes that their disclosure in the financial statements is not
adequate, the auditor should express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer
of opinion in the audit report, as may be appropriate.
Part D: Segment Information
sufficient appropriate audit evidence for appropriate disclosure of
segment information.
Definitions
38. Segment Information means the information to be disclosed in respect
of reportable segments as given in Accounting Standard (AS) 17, Segment
Reporting, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India or as
defined in the financial reporting framework applicable to the entity.
39. When segment information is material to the financial statements,
the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding its disclosure in accordance with the applicable identified
financial reporting framework.
SA 501 IV-300
40. The auditor considers segment information in relation to the financial
statements taken as a whole, and is not required to apply auditing
procedures that would be necessary to express an opinion on the segment
information standing alone. Audit procedures regarding segment information
ordinarily consist of analytical procedures and other audit tests appropriate in
the circumstances.
41. The auditor would discuss with management the methods used in
determining segment information, and consider whether such methods are
likely to result in disclosure in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework and test the application of such methods. The auditor
would consider sales, transfers and charges between segments, elimination
of inter-segment amounts, comparisons with budgets and other expected
results, for example, operating profits as a percentage of sales, and the
allocation of assets and costs among segments including consistency with
prior periods and the adequacy of the disclosures with respect to
inconsistencies.
(a) the completeness of information regarding segments and
disclosure thereof; and
(b) appropriateness of the selected segments based on risks and
returns; and
(c) the organizational structure of an enterprise and its internal
financial reporting systemand any deviations therefrom.
evidence concerning segment information or concludes that their
disclosure in the financial statements is not adequate, the auditor
should express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion in the
audit report, as may be appropriate.
SA 501 IV-301
Effective Date
44. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all audits related
to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2005.

Compatibility with the International Standard on Auditing
(ISA) 501
material respects with those set out in ISA 501, Audit Evidence Additional
Considerations for Specific Items" except the following:
(a) Due to practical reasons, paragraph 23 of the SA requires that when
litigation or claims have been identified by the management or when the
auditor believes they may exist, and are likely to be material, the auditor
may seek direct communication with the entitys lawyers. The auditor
need not necessarily communicate with the entitys lawyers and such
other professionals to whom the entity engages for litigation and claims
in case the auditor is able to obtain the sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding the identification of litigation and claims involving
the entity which may have a material effect on the financial statements.
The ISA on the other hand requires that the auditor should
communicate with the entitys lawyers to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence as to whether potentially material litigation and claims
are known and managements estimates of the financial implications,
including costs, are reliable.
(b) Each part of the SA contains the requirements related to obtaining the
management representations [see paragraphs 18, 28, 35 and 42].
There is, however, no such requirement in the ISA.
Back
SA 505 (AAS 30)
EXTERNAL CONFIRMATIONS
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction .................................................................................. 1-7
Relationship of External Confirmation Procedures to the
Auditor's Assessments of Inherent Risk and Control Risk........ 8-13
Assertions Addressed by External Confirmations.................... 14-18
Timing of External Confirmations .................................................... 19
Design of the External Confirmation Request ................................ 20
Nature of Information Being Confirmed ..................................... 21-23
Prior Experience................................................................................. 24
Form of Confirmation Request-Use of
Positive and Negative Confirmations ......................................... 25-29
Characteristics of Respondents.................................................. 30-31
The External Confirmation Process ............................................ 32-38
Evaluating the Results of the Confirmation Process ..................... 39
Management Requests................................................................. 40-42
Effective Date ................................................................................... 43

, External Confirmationsshould be read in

the context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing,
1
authority of SAs.

Issued in August, 2003.

1
Back
External Confirmations
SA 505 IV-303
Introduction
on the auditor's use of external confirmations as a means of obtaining audit
evidence.
2. The auditor should determine whether the use of external
confirmations is necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
to support certain financial statement assertions. In making this
determination, the auditor should consider materiality, the assessed level
of inherent and control risk, and howthe evidence fromother planned
audit procedures will reduce audit risk to an acceptably lowlevel for the
applicable financial statement assertions. The auditor should employ
external confirmation procedures in consultation with the management.
3. Standard on Auditing (SA) 500, Audit Evidence states that the
reliability of audit evidence is influenced by its source and nature. It
indicates that, in general, audit evidence from external sources is more
reliable than audit evidence generated internally, and that written
(documentary) audit evidence is more reliable than audit evidence in oral
form. Accordingly, audit evidence in the form of written responses to
confirmation requests received directly by the auditor from third parties who
are not related to the entity being audited, when considered individually or
cumulatively with audit evidence from other procedures, may assist in
reducing audit risk for the related financial statement assertions to an
acceptably low level.
4. External confirmation is the process of obtaining and evaluating audit
evidence through a direct communication from a third party in response to a
request for information about a particular item affecting assertions made by
management in the financial statements. In deciding to what extent to use
external confirmations, the auditor considers the characteristics of the
environment in which the entity being audited operates and the practice of
potential respondents in dealing with requests for direct confirmation.
5. The process of external confirmations, ordinarily, consists of the
following:
Selecting the items for which confirmations are needed.
Designing the form of the confirmation request.
Communicating the confirmation request to the appropriate third party.
SA 505 IV-304
Obtaining response from the third party.
Evaluating the information or absence thereof.
6. External confirmations are frequently used in relation to account
balances and their components, but need not be restricted to these items.
For example, the auditor may request external confirmation of the terms of
agreements or transactions an entity has with third parties. The confirmation
request is designed to ask if any modifications have been made to the
agreement, and if so, the relevant details thereof. Other examples of
situations where external confirmations may be used include the following:
Bank balances and other information from bankers.
Accounts receivable balances.
Stocks held by third parties.
Property title deeds held by third parties.
Investments purchased but delivery not taken.
Loans from lenders.
Accounts payable balances.
Long outstanding share application money.
7. The reliability of the evidence obtained by external confirmations
depends, among other factors, upon the application of appropriate
procedures by the auditor in designing the external confirmation request,
performing the external confirmation procedures, and evaluating the results
of the external confirmation procedures. Factors affecting the reliability of
confirmations include the control which the auditor exercises over
confirmation requests and responses, the characteristics of the respondents,
and any restrictions included in the response or imposed by management.
Relationship of External Confirmation Procedures to the
Auditor's Assessments of Inherent Risk and Control Risk
8. Standard on Auditing (SA) 400, "Risk Assessments and Internal
Control" discusses audit risk and the relationship between its components:
inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. It outlines the process of
assessing inherent and control risk to determine the nature, timing, and
extent of substantive procedures to reduce detection risk, and therefore,
audit risk, to an acceptable level.
SA 505 IV-305
9. SA 400 also indicates that the nature and extent of evidence to be
obtained from the performance of substantive procedures varies depending
on the assessment of inherent and control risks, and that the assessed levels
of inherent and control risk cannot be sufficiently low to eliminate the need to
perform any substantive procedures. These substantive procedures may
include the use of external confirmations for specific financial statement
assertions.
10. Paragraph 48 of SA 400 indicates that the higher the assessment of
inherent and control risk, the more audit evidence the auditor needs to obtain
from the performance of substantive procedures. Consequently, as the
assessed level of inherent and control risk increases, the auditor designs
substantive procedures to obtain more evidence, or more persuasive
evidence, about a financial statement assertion. In these situations, the use
of confirmation procedures may be effective in providing sufficient
appropriate audit evidence.
11. The auditor should assess whether the evidence provided by the
confirmations reduces audit risks for the related assertions to an
acceptably lowlevel. In making that assessment, the auditor should
consider the materiality of the account balance and the auditors
assessment of the inherent and control risk. If the auditor concludes
that the evidence provided by the confirmations alone is not sufficient,
he should performadditional procedures.
12. The lower the assessed level of inherent and control risk, the less
assurance the auditor needs from substantive procedures to form a
conclusion about a financial statement assertion. For example, an entity may
have a loan that it is repaying according to an agreed repayment schedule,
the terms of which the auditor has confirmed in previous years. If the other
work carried out by the auditor (including such tests of controls as are
necessary) indicates that the terms of the loan have not changed and has
lead to the level of inherent and control risk over the balance of the loan
outstanding being assessed as low, the auditor might limit substantive
procedures to testing details of the payments made, rather than again
confirming the balance directly with the lender.
13. Unusual or complex transactions may be associated with higher levels
of inherent or control risk than simple transactions. If the entity has entered
into an unusual or complex transaction and the level of inherent and control
risk is assessed as high, the auditor considers confirming the terms of
SA 505 IV-306
transaction with the other parties in addition to examining documentation
held by the entity.
Assertions Addressed by External Confirmations
14. SA 500, Audit Evidence, categorises the assertions contained in the
financial statements as existence, rights and obligations, occurrence,
completeness, valuation, measurement, and presentation and disclosure.
While external confirmations may provide audit evidence regarding these
assertions, the ability of an external confirmation to provide evidence
relevant to a particular financial statement assertion varies.
15. External confirmation of an account receivable provides strong evidence
regarding the existence of the account as at a certain date. Confirmation
also provides evidence regarding the operation of cut-off procedures.
However, such confirmation does not ordinarily provide all the necessary
audit evidence relating to the assertion regarding valuation, since it is not
practicable to ask the debtor to confirm detailed information relating to its
ability to pay the account.
16. Similarly, in the case of goods held on consignment, external
confirmation is likely to provide strong evidence to support the assertions
related to existence and the rights and obligations, but might not provide
evidence that supports the assertions related to valuation.
17. The relevance of external confirmations to auditing a particular financial
statement assertion is also affected by the objective of the auditor in
selecting information for confirmation. For example, when auditing the
assertion regarding the completeness of accounts payable, the auditor also
needs to obtain evidence that there is no material unrecorded liability.
Accordingly, sending confirmation requests to an entity's principal suppliers,
asking them to provide copies of their statements of account directly to the
auditor, even if the entitys records show no amount currently owing to them,
will usually be more effective in detecting unrecorded liabilities than selecting
accounts for confirmation based on the larger amounts recorded in the
accounts payable subsidiary ledger.
18. When obtaining evidence for assertions not adequately addressed by
confirmations, the auditor considers other audit procedures to complement
confirmation procedures or to be used instead of confirmation procedures.
SA 505 IV-307
Timing of External Confirmations
19. The auditor may request external confirmations either as at the date of
the financial statements or as at any other selected date which is reasonably
close to the date of financial statements. The date may be, alternatively,
settled by the auditor in consultation with the management. Where the
auditor decides to request for confirmations as at date which is other than the
date of the financial statements, the auditor would need to examine the
movement in the concerned account(s) that occur between the date of the
confirmations and the date of the financial statements. For example, when
the auditor uses confirmation as at a date prior to the balance sheet to obtain
evidence to support a financial statement assertion, the auditor would obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence that transactions relevant to the
assertions in the intervening period have not been materially misstated. For
practical reasons, when the level of inherent and control risk is assessed at
less than high, the auditor may decide to confirm balances at a date other
than the period end, for example, when the audit is to be completed within a
short time after the balance sheet date. As with all types of pre-year-end
work, the auditor would consider the need to obtain further audit evidence
relating to the remainder of the period also.
Design of the External Confirmation Request
20. The auditor should design external confirmation requests to the
specific audit objective. When designing the request, the auditor considers
the assertions being addressed and the factors that are likely to affect the
reliability of the confirmations. Factors such as the form of the external
confirmation request, prior experience on the audit or similar engagements,
the nature of the information being confirmed, and the intended respondent,
affect the design of the requests because these factors have a direct effect
on the reliability of the evidence obtained through external confirmation
procedures. The other factors which have an effect on the design of an
external confirmation request include effectiveness of the internal control
system of the entity, apparent possibility of disputes, inaccuracies and
irregularities in the accounts, the possibility that the request will receive a
consideration and the materiality of the amount involved.
Nature of Information Being Confirmed
21. In designing the request, the auditor considers the type of information
respondents will be able to confirm readily since this may affect the response
SA 505 IV-308
rate and the nature of the evidence obtained. For example, certain
respondents' accounting systems may facilitate the external confirmation of
single transactions rather than of entire account balances. In addition,
respondents may not always be able to confirm certain types of information,
such as the overall accounts receivable balance, but may be able to confirm
individual invoice amounts within the total balance.
22. The auditors understanding of the clients arrangements and
transactions with the third parties is important in determining the information
to be confirmed. The auditor should obtain an understanding of the
substance of such transactions and arrangements to decide about the
information to be included in the request for confirmation. The auditor
also considers the possibility of oral modifications in the arrangements and
transactions and, accordingly, requests the management to provide him the
details thereof.
23. Confirmation requests ordinarily include authorization of the entitys
management to the respondent to disclose the information to the auditor.
Respondents may be more willing to respond to a confirmation request
containing management's authorization, and in some cases may be unable to
respond unless the request contains such authorization.
Prior Experience
24. The auditor should consider the information fromaudits of earlier
years. This information would, normally, include the misstatements,
inaccuracies or irregularities identified by the auditor or those pointed out by
the third parties in the earlier years, the response rate etc.
Form of Confirmation RequestUse of Positive and
Negative Confirmations
25. The auditor may use positive or negative external confirmation requests
or a combination of both.
26. A positive external confirmation request asks the respondent to reply to
the auditor in all cases either by indicating the respondent's agreement with
the given information, or by asking the respondent to fill in information. The
use of a positive confirmation is preferable when individual account balances
are large, or where the internal controls are weak, or where the auditor has
reasons to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in
dispute or inaccurate or irregular. A response to a positive confirmation
SA 505 IV-309
request is ordinarily expected to provide reliable audit evidence. There is a
risk, however, that a respondent may reply to the confirmation request
without verifying that the information is correct. The auditor is not ordinarily
able to detect whether this has occurred. The auditor may reduce this risk,
however, by using positive confirmation requests that do not state the
amount (or other information) on the confirmation request, but ask the
respondent to fill in the amount or furnish other information. On the other
hand, use of this type of "blank" confirmation request may result in lower
response rates because additional effort is required of the respondents.
27. A negative external confirmation request asks the respondent to reply
only in the event of disagreement with the information provided in the
request. However, when no response has been received to a negative
confirmation request, the auditor remains aware that there will be no explicit
evidence that intended third parties have received the confirmation requests
and verified that the information contained therein is correct or that the
confirmation was sent by the respondent but not received by him.
Accordingly, the use of negative confirmation requests ordinarily provides
less reliable evidence than the use of positive confirmation requests, and the
auditor considers performing other substantive procedures to supplement the
use of negative confirmations.
28. Negative confirmation requests may be used to reduce audit risk to an
acceptable level when:
(a) the assessed level of inherent and control risk is low;
(b) a large number of small balances is involved;
(c) a substantial number of errors is not expected; and
(d) the auditor has no reason to believe that respondents will disregard
these requests.
29. A combination of positive and negative external confirmations may be
used. For example, where the total accounts receivable balance comprises a
small number of large balances and a large number of small balances, the
auditor may decide that it is appropriate to confirm all or a sample of the
large balances with positive confirmation requests and a sample of the small
balances using negative confirmation requests.
SA 505 IV-310
Characteristics of Respondents
30. The reliability of evidence provided by a confirmation is affected by the
respondent's competence, independence, authority to respond, knowledge of
the matter being confirmed, and objectivity. For this reason, the auditor
attempts to ensure, where practicable, that the confirmation request is
directed to an appropriate individual. For example, when confirming that a
covenant related to an entity's long-term debt has been waived, the auditor
directs the request to an official of the creditor who has knowledge about the
waiver and has the authority to provide the information.
31. The auditor also assesses whether certain parties may not provide an
objective or unbiased response to a confirmation request. Information about
the respondent's competence, knowledge, motivation, ability or willingness to
respond may come to the auditors attention. The auditor considers the
effect of such information on designing the confirmation request and
evaluating the results, including determining whether additional procedures
are necessary. The auditor also considers whether there is sufficient basis
for concluding that the confirmation request is being sent to a respondent
from whom the auditor can expect a response that will provide sufficient
appropriate evidence. For example, the auditor may encounter significant
unusual year-end transactions that have a material effect on the financial
statements, the transactions being with a third party that is economically
dependent upon the entity. In such circumstances, the auditor considers
whether the third party may be motivated to provide an inaccurate response.
The External Confirmation Process
32. When performing confirmation procedures, the auditor should
maintain control over the process of selecting those to whoma request
will be sent, the preparation and sending of confirmation requests, and
the responses to those requests. Maintaining control means maintaining
direct communications between the intended recipients and the auditor to
minimize the possibility that the results of the confirmation process will be
biased because of the interception and alteration of confirmation requests or
responses. The auditor may give a list of accounts selected for confirmation
to the management for preparing requests for confirmations, which should be
properly addressed and stamped, alternatively, the auditor may request the
management to furnish duly authorised confirmation letters and fill in the
names, addresses and other relevant details relating to the accounts
selected by him. The auditor should, however, ensure that it is the
SA 505 IV-311
auditor who sends out the confirmation requests, that the requests are
properly addressed, and that it is requested that all replies and the
undelivered confirmations are delivered directly to the auditor. The
auditor considers whether replies have come from the purported
senders.
No Response to a Positive Confirmation Request
33. The auditor should perform alternative procedures where no
response is received to a positive external confirmation request. The
alternative audit procedures should be such as to provide the evidence
about the financial statement assertions that the confirmation request
was intended to provide.
34. When using a confirmation request other than a negative confirmation
request, the auditor, generally, follows up with a second and sometimes third
request to those parties from whom replies have not been received or,
alternatively, contact the recipient of the request to elicit a response. Where
the auditor is unable to obtain a response, the auditor would need to use
alternative audit procedures. The nature of alternative procedures varies
according to the account and assertion in question. In the examination of
accounts receivable, alternative procedures may include examination of
subsequent cash receipts, examination of shipping documentation or other
client documentation to provide evidence for the existence assertion, and
sales cut-off tests to provide evidence for the assertion related to
completeness. In the examination of accounts payable, alternative
procedures may include examination of subsequent cash disbursements or
correspondence from third parties to provide evidence of the existence
assertion, and examination of other records, such as goods received notes,
to provide evidence of the assertion regarding completeness.
Reliability of Responses Received
35. The auditor should consider whether there is any indication that
external confirmations received may not be reliable. The auditor should
also consider the authenticity of the response and performappropriate
procedures to dispel any doubts. The auditor may choose to verify the
source and contents of a response in a telephone call to the purported
sender. In addition, the auditor would also request the purported sender to
mail the original confirmation directly to the auditor. With ever-increasing
use of technology, the auditor needs to consider validating the source of
SA 505 IV-312
replies received in electronic format (for example, fax or electronic mail).
Oral confirmations should be documented in the work papers. If the
information in the oral confirmations or that received though a fax is
significant, the auditor requests the parties involved to submit written
confirmation of the specific information directly to the auditor since in such
cases it is difficult to ascertain the source of the response.
Causes and Frequency of Exceptions
36. When the auditor forms a conclusion that the confirmation process
and alternative procedures have not provided sufficient appropriate
audit evidence regarding an assertion, the auditor should undertake
additional procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. In
forming the conclusion, the auditor considers the:
(a) reliability of the confirmations and alternative procedures;
(b) nature of any exceptions, including the implications, both quantitative
and qualitative of those exceptions; and
(c) evidence provided by other procedures.
Based on this evaluation, the auditor would determine whether additional
audit procedures are needed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
37. Any discrepancies revealed by the external confirmations received or by
the additional procedures carried out by the auditor might have a bearing on
the assertions and the accounts within the given assertion not selected for
external confirmation. The auditor, in such a case, should request the
management to verify and reconcile the discrepancies. The auditor
should also consider what further tests can be carried out to satisfy
himself as to the correctness of related assertion.
38. The auditor should also consider the causes and frequency of
exceptions reported by respondents. An exception might indicate a
misstatement in the entity's records, in which case, the auditor determines
the reasons for the misstatement and assesses whether it has a material
effect on the financial statements. If an exception indicates a misstatement,
the auditor would reconsider the nature, timing and extent of audit
procedures necessary to provide the evidence required. If the responses
received indicate a pattern of misstatements, the auditor should
reconsider his assessment of inherent and control risk and also
consider the effect on his audit procedures.
SA 505 IV-313
Evaluating the Results of the Confirmation Process
39. The auditor should evaluate whether the results of the external
confirmation process together with the results from any other
procedures performed, provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding the financial statement assertion being audited. In conducting
this evaluation, the auditor considers the guidance provided by SA 530,
"Audit Sampling.
Management Requests
40. When the auditor seeks to confirmcertain balances or other
information, and management requests the auditor not to do so, the
auditor should consider whether there are valid grounds for such a
request and obtain evidence to support the validity of management's
requests. The auditor should also ask the management to submit its
request in a written form, detailing therein the reasons for such request.
The management, for example, might make such a request on the grounds
that due to a dispute with the particular debtor, the request for confirmation
might aggravate the sensitive negotiations between the entity and the debtor.
The auditor, in such a case, would examine any available evidence to
support managements request, say, examining the correspondence between
the management and the debtor. If the auditor agrees to management's
request not to seek external confirmation regarding a particular matter,
the auditor should document the reasons for acceding to the
managements request and should apply alternative procedures to
obtain sufficient appropriate evidence regarding that matter.
41. If the auditor does not accept the validity of management's request
and is prevented fromcarrying out the confirmations, there has been a
limitation on the scope of the auditor's work and the auditor should
consider the possible impact on the auditor's report. The auditor should,
however, in this case also, document the request made by the management
along with the reasons given by the management therefor as well as his
own reasons for not acceding to the managements request.
42. When considering the reasons provided by management, the auditor
would apply professional skepticism and consider whether the request has
any implications regarding management's integrity. The auditor would also
consider whether management's request might indicate the possible
existence of fraud or error. If the auditor believes that fraud or error exists,
SA 505 IV-314
the auditor would consider the requirements of SA 240, The Auditors
Responsibility to Consider Fraud and Error in an Audit of Financial
Statements". The auditor would also need to consider whether the alternative
procedures will provide sufficient appropriate evidence regarding that matter.
Effective Date
43. This Standard on Auditing is effective for audits related to accounting
periods beginning on or after 1
st
April, 2003.
(ISA) 505
material respects with the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 505,
External Confirmations, except the following:
(a) The SA requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the
substance of transactions and agreement with the third parties to decide
about the information to be included in the request for confirmation (see
paragraph 22). ISA 505 does not contain any requirements in this
regard.
(b) The SA requires the auditor to consider the information from audits of
earlier years (see paragraph 24). This requirement is not present in ISA
505.
(c) The SA requires the auditor to request the management to verify and
reconcile the discrepancies revealed by the external confirmations
received or by the additional procedures carried out by the auditor. The
SA further requires the auditor to consider what further tests can be
carried out to satisfy him self as to the correctness of related assertions
(see paragraph 37). This requirement is not present in ISA 505.
Back

SA 510 (AAS 22)
INITIAL ENGAGEMENTS - OPENING BALANCES
(Effective for all audits commencing on or after July 1, 2001)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Audit Procedures ...............................................................................5-10
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 13

, Initial Engagements - Opening Balances

should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on Quality
1
, which
sets out the authority of SAs.


1
Back
SA 510 IV-316
Introduction
regarding audit of opening balances in case of initial engagements, i.e.,
when the financial statements are audited for the first time or when the
financial statements for the preceding period were audited by another
auditor. This Standard would also be considered by the auditor so that he
may become aware of contingencies and commitments existing at the
beginning of the current period.
2. Opening balances means those account balances which exist at the
beginning of the period. Opening balances are the closing balances of the
preceding period brought forward to the current period and reflect the effect
of:
(a) transactions and other events of the preceding periods; and
(b) accounting policies applied in the preceding period.
3. For initial audit engagements, the auditor should obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence that:
(a) the closing balances of the preceding period have been correctly
brought forward to the current period;
(b) the opening balances do not contain misstatements that materially
affect the financial statements for the current period; and
(c) appropriate accounting policies are consistently applied.
4. In an initial audit engagement, the auditor will not have previously
obtained audit evidence supporting the opening balances.
Audit Procedures
5. For the purpose of this Statement, the sufficiency and appropriateness
of the audit evidence, the auditor will need to obtain regarding opening
balances, would depend on the following matters:
The accounting policies followed by the entity.
Whether the auditors report contained an unqualified opinion, a qualified
opinion, adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion where the financial
statements for the preceding period were audited.
Initial Engagements - Opening Balances
SA 510 IV-317
The nature of the opening balances, including the risk of their
misstatement in the financial statements for the current period.
The materiality of the opening balances relative to the financial
statements for the current period.
6. The auditor will need to consider whether the accounting policies
followed in the preceding period, as per which the opening balances have
been arrived at, were appropriate and that those policies are consistently
applied in the financial statements for the current period and where such
accounting policies are inappropriate, the same have been changed in the
current period and adequately disclosed.
7. When the financial statements for the preceding period were audited by
another auditor, the current auditor may be able to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence regarding opening balances by perusing the
copies of the audited financial statements. Ordinarily, the current auditor can
place reliance on the closing balances contained in the financial statements
for the preceding period, except when during the performance of audit
procedures for the current period the possibility of misstatements in opening
balances is indicated.
8. When the financial statements of the preceding period were not audited
or the auditor is not satisfied by using the procedures described in paragraph
7, the auditor will need to perform other procedures such as those discussed
in paragraphs 9 and 10.
9. For current assets and liabilities, some audit evidence can ordinarily be
obtained as part of the audit procedures performed during the current period.
For example, the collection/payment of opening accounts receivable/
accounts payable during the current period will provide some audit evidence
as to their existence, rights and obligations, completeness and valuation at
the beginning of the period.
10. For other assets and liabilities, such as fixed assets, investments and
long-term debt, the auditor will ordinarily examine the records underlying the
opening balances. In certain cases, the auditor may be able to obtain
confirmation of opening balances from third parties, for example, for long-
term debt and investments.
SA 510 IV-318
11. If, after performing procedures including those set out above, the
auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
concerning opening balances, the auditor should, as appropriate,
express:
(a) a qualified opinion, or
(b) a disclaimer of opinion.
The auditor may also express an opinion which is qualified or disclaimed
regarding the profit or loss and unqualified regarding state of affairs, as
appropriate.
12. If the opening balances contain misstatements which materially
affect the financial statements for the current period and the effect of
the same is not properly accounted for and adequately disclosed, the
auditor should express a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, as
appropriate.
Effective Date
on or after 1st July, 2001.
Back

SA 520 (AAS 14)
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
Nature and Purpose of Analytical Procedures .................................4-7
Analytical Procedures in Planning the Audit ....................................8-9
Analytical Procedures as Substantive Procedures......................10-12
Analytical Procedures in the Overall Review
at the End of the Audit .......................................................................... 13
Extent of Reliance on Analytical Procedures ...............................14-16
Investigating Unusual Items ...........................................................17-18
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 19

*
, Analytical Procedures should be read in
1
authority of SAs.

*
Issued in December, 1997.
1
Back
SA 520 IV-320
Introduction
on the application of analytical procedures during an audit.
2. The auditor should apply analytical procedures at the planning and
overall reviewstages of the audit. Analytical procedures may also be
applied at other stages.
3. Analytical procedures means the analysis of significant ratios and
trends, including the resulting investigation of fluctuations and relationships
that are inconsistent with other relevant information or which deviate from
predicted amounts.
Nature and Purpose of Analytical Procedures
4. Analytical procedures include the consideration of comparisons of the
entity's financial information with, for example:
Comparable information for prior periods.
Anticipated results of the entity, such as budgets or forecasts.
Predictive estimates prepared by the auditor, such as an estimation of
depreciation charge for the year.
Similar industry information, such as a comparison of the entity's ratio of
sales to trade debtors with industry averages, or with other entities of
comparable size in the same industry.
5. Analytical procedures also include consideration of relationships:
Among elements of financial information that would be expected to
conform to a predictable pattern based on the entity's experience, such
as gross margin percentages.
Between financial information and relevant non-financial information,
such as payroll costs to number of employees.
6. Various methods may be used in performing the above procedures.
These range from simple comparisons to complex analyses using advanced
statistical techniques. Analytical procedures may be applied to consolidated
financial statements, financial statements of components (such as
subsidiaries, divisions or segments) and individual elements of financial
information. The auditor's choice of procedures, methods and level of
Analytical Procedures
SA 520 IV-321
application is a matter of professional judgement.
7. Analytical procedures are used for the following purposes:
(a) to assist the auditor in planning the nature, timing and extent of other
audit procedures;
(b) as substantive procedures when their use can be more effective or
efficient than tests of details in reducing detection risk for specific
financial statement assertions; and
(c) as an overall review of the financial statements in the final review stage
of the audit.
Analytical Procedures in Planning the Audit
8. The auditor should apply analytical procedures at the planning
stage to assist in understanding the business and in identifying areas
of potential risk. Application of analytical procedures may indicate aspects
of the business of which the auditor was unaware and will assist in
determining the nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures.
9. Analytical procedures in planning the audit use both financial and non-
financial information, for example, the relationship between sales and square
footage of selling space or volume of goods sold.
Analytical Procedures as Substantive Procedures
10. The auditor's reliance on substantive procedures to reduce detection
risk relating to specific financial statement assertions may be derived from
tests of details, from analytical procedures, or from a combination of both.
The decision about which procedures to use to achieve a particular audit
objective is based on the auditor's judgement about the expected
effectiveness and efficiency of the available procedures in reducing detection
risk for specific financial statement assertions.
11. The auditor will ordinarily inquire of management as to the availability
and reliability of information needed to apply analytical procedures and the
results of any such procedures performed by the entity. It may be efficient to
use analytical data prepared by the entity, provided the auditor is satisfied
that such data is properly prepared.
12. When intending to perform analytical procedures as substantive
SA 520 IV-322
procedures, the auditor will need to consider a number of factors such as
the:
Objectives of the analytical procedures and the extent to which their
results can be relied upon (paragraphs 14-16).
Nature of the entity and the degree to which information can be
disaggregated, for example, analytical procedures may be more effective
when applied to financial information on individual sections of an
operation or to financial statements of components of a diversified entity,
than when applied to the financial statements of the entity as a whole.
Availability of information, both financial, such as budgets or forecasts,
and non-financial, such as the number of units produced or sold.
Reliability of the information available, for example, whether budgets are
prepared with sufficient care.
Relevance of the information available, for example, whether budgets
have been established as results to be expected rather than as goals to
be achieved.
Source of the information available, for example, sources independent of
the entity are ordinarily more reliable than internal sources.
Comparability of the information available, for example, broad industry
data may need to be supplemented to be comparable to that of an entity
that produces and sells specialised products.
Knowledge gained during previous audits, together with the auditor's
understanding of the effectiveness of the accounting and internal control
systems and the types of problems that in prior periods have given rise
to accounting adjustments.
Analytical Procedures in the Overall Review at the End of
the Audit
13. The auditor should apply analytical procedures at or near the end
of the audit when forming an overall conclusion as to whether the
financial statements as a whole are consistent with the auditor's
knowledge of the business. The conclusions drawn from the results of such
procedures are intended to corroborate conclusions formed during the audit
of individual components or elements of the financial statements and assist
Analytical Procedures
SA 520 IV-323
in arriving at the overall conclusion as to the reasonableness of the financial
statements. However, in some cases, as a result of application of analytical
procedures, the auditor may identify areas where further procedures need to
be applied before the auditor can form an overall conclusion about the
Extent of Reliance on Analytical Procedures
14. The application of analytical procedures is based on the expectation
that relationships among data exist and continue in the absence of known
conditions to the contrary. The presence of these relationships provides audit
evidence as to the completeness, accuracy and validity of the data produced
by the accounting system. However, reliance on the results of analytical
procedures will depend on the auditor's assessment of the risk that the
analytical procedures may identify relationships as expected when, in fact, a
material misstatement exists.
15. The extent of reliance that the auditor places on the results of analytical
procedures depends on the following factors:
(a) materiality of the items involved, for example, when inventory balances
are material, the auditor does not rely only on analytical procedures in
forming conclusions. However, the auditor may rely solely on analytical
procedures for certain income and expense items when they are not
individually material;
(b) other audit procedures directed toward the same audit objectives, for
example, other procedures performed by the auditor in reviewing the
collectibility of accounts receivable, such as the review of subsequent
cash receipts, might confirm or dispel questions raised from the
application of analytical procedures to an ageing schedule of customers'
accounts;
(c) accuracy with which the expected results of analytical procedures can
be predicted. For example, the auditor will ordinarily expect greater
consistency in comparing gross profit margins from one period to
another than in comparing discretionary expenses, such as research or
advertising; and
(d) assessments of inherent and control risks, for example, if internal
control over sales order processing is weak and, therefore, control risk
SA 520 IV-324
is high, more reliance on tests of details of transactions and balances
than on analytical procedures in drawing conclusions on receivables
may be required.
16. The auditor will need to consider testing the controls, if any, over the
preparation of information used in applying analytical procedures. When such
controls are effective, the auditor will have greater confidence in the reliability
of the information and, therefore, in the results of analytical procedures. The
controls over non-financial information can often be tested in conjunction with
tests of accounting-related controls. For example, an entity in establishing
controls over the processing of sales invoices may include controls over the
recording of unit sales. In these circumstances, the auditor could test the
controls over the recording of unit sales in conjunction with tests of the
controls over the processing of sales invoices.
Investigating Unusual Items
17. When analytical procedures identify significant fluctuations or
relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information or
that deviate frompredicted amounts, the auditor should investigate and
obtain adequate explanations and appropriate corroborative evidence.
18. The investigation of unusual fluctuations and relationships ordinarily
begins with inquiries of management, followed by:
(a) corroboration of management's responses, for example, by comparing
them with the auditor's knowledge of the business and other evidence
obtained during the course of the audit; and
(b) consideration of the need to apply other audit procedures based on the
results of such inquiries, if management is unable to provide an
explanation or if the explanation is not considered adequate.
Effective Date
Back

SA 530 (AAS 15)
AUDIT SAMPLING
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Design of the Sample ........................................................................5-17
Selection of the Sample ..................................................................18-19
Evaluation of Sample Results.........................................................20-26
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 27
Appendix 1
Appendix 2

*
, Audit Sampling, should be read in the
1
authority of SAs.

*
1
Back
SA 530 IV-326
Introduction
on the design and selection of an audit sample and the evaluation of the
sample results. This SA applies equally to both statistical and non-statistical
sampling methods. Either method, when properly applied, can provide
sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
2. When using either statistical or non-statistical sampling methods,
the auditor should design and select an audit sample, performaudit
procedures thereon, and evaluate sample results so as to provide
sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
3. "Audit sampling" means the application of audit procedures to less than
100% of the items within an account balance or class of transactions to
enable the auditor to obtain and evaluate audit evidence about some
characteristic of the items selected in order to form or assist in forming a
conclusion concerning the population.
4. It is important to recognise that certain testing procedures do not come
within the definition of sampling. Tests performed on 100% of the items
within a population do not involve sampling. Likewise, applying audit
procedures to all items within a population which have a particular
characteristic (for example, all items over a certain amount) does not qualify
as audit sampling with respect to the portion of the population examined, nor
with regard to the population as a whole, since the items were not selected
from the total population on a basis that was expected to be representative.
Such items might imply some characteristic of the remaining portion of the
population but would not necessarily be the basis for a valid conclusion
about the remaining portion of the population.
Design of the Sample
5. When designing an audit sample, the auditor should consider the
specific audit objectives, the population fromwhich the auditor wishes
to sample, and the sample size.
Audit Objectives
6. The auditor would first consider the specific audit objectives to be
achieved and the audit procedures which are likely to best achieve those
Audit Sampling
SA 530 IV-327
objectives. In addition, when audit sampling is appropriate, consideration of
the nature of the audit evidence sought and possible error conditions or other
characteristics relating to that audit evidence will assist the auditor in defining
what constitutes an error and what population to use for sampling. For
example, when performing tests of control over an entity's purchasing
procedures, the auditor will be concerned with matters such as whether an
invoice was clerically checked and properly approved. On the other hand,
when performing substantive procedures on invoices processed during the
period, the auditor will be concerned with matters such as the proper
reflection of the monetary amounts of such invoices in the financial
statements.
Population
7. The population is the entire set of data from which the auditor wishes to
sample in order to reach a conclusion. The auditor will need to determine that
the population from which the sample is drawn is appropriate for the specific
audit objective. For example, if the auditor's objective were to test for
overstatement of accounts receivable, the population could be defined as the
accounts receivable listing. On the other hand, when testing for
understatement of accounts payable, the population would not be the
accounts payable listing, but rather subsequent disbursements, unpaid
invoices, suppliers' statements, unmatched receiving reports, or other
populations that would provide audit evidence of understatement of accounts
payable.
8. The individual items that make up the population are known as sampling
units. The population can be divided into sampling units in a variety of ways.
For example, if the auditor's objective were to test the validity of accounts
receivables, the sampling unit could be defined as customer balances or
individual customer invoices. The auditor defines the sampling unit in order
to obtain an efficient and effective sample to achieve the particular audit
objectives.
Stratification
9. To assist in the efficient and effective design of the sample, stratification
may be appropriate. Stratification is the process of dividing a population into
sub-populations, each of which is a group of sampling units, which have
similar characteristics (often monetary value). The strata need to be explicitly
SA 530 IV-328
defined so that each sampling unit can belong to only one stratum. This
process reduces the variability of the items within each stratum. Stratification
therefore, enables the auditor to direct audit efforts towards the items which,
for example, contain the greatest potential monetary error. For example, the
auditor may direct attention to larger value items for accounts receivable to
detect overstated material misstatements. In addition, stratification may
result in a smaller sample size.
Sample Size
10. When determining the sample size, the auditor should consider
sampling risk, the tolerable error, and the expected error. Examples of
some factors affecting sample size are contained in Appendix 1 and
Appendix 2.
Sampling Risk
11. Sampling risk
2
arises from the possibility that the auditor's conclusion,
based on a sample, may be different from the conclusion that would be
reached if the entire population were subjected to the same audit procedure.
12. The auditor is faced with sampling risk in both tests of control and
substantive procedures as follows:
(a) Tests of Control:
(i) Risk of Under Reliance: The risk that, although the sample result
does not support the auditor's assessment of control risk, the
actual compliance rate would support such an assessment.
(ii) Risk of Over Reliance: The risk that, although the sample result
supports the auditor's assessment of control risk, the actual
compliance rate would not support such an assessment.
(b) Substantive Procedures:
(i) Risk of Incorrect Rejection: The risk that, although the sample

2
Sampling risk can be contrasted with non-sampling risk which arises when the auditor uses any
audit procedures. Non-sampling risk arises because, for example, most audit evidence is
persuasive rather than conclusive, the auditor might use inappropriate procedures or might
misinterpret evidence and, thus, fail to recognise an error. The auditor attempts to reduce non-
sampling risk to a negligible degree by appropriate planning, direction, supervision and review.
Audit Sampling
SA 530 IV-329
result supports the conclusion that a recorded account balance or
class of transactions is materially misstated, in fact it is not
(ii) Risk of Incorrect Acceptance: The risk that, although the sample
result supports the conclusion that a recorded account balance or
class of transactions is not materially misstated, in fact it is
13. The risk of under reliance and the risk of incorrect rejection affect audit
efficiency as they would ordinarily lead to additional work being performed by
the auditor, or the entity, which would establish that the initial conclusions
were incorrect. The risk of over reliance and the risk of incorrect acceptance
affect audit effectiveness and are more likely to lead to an erroneous opinion
on the financial statements than either the risk of under reliance or the risk of
incorrect rejection.
14. Sample size is affected by the level of sampling risk the auditor is
willing to accept from the results of the sample. The lower the risk the auditor
is willing to accept, the greater the sample size will need to be.
Tolerable Error
15. Tolerable error is the maximum error in the population that the auditor
would be willing to accept and still conclude that the result from the sample
has achieved the audit objective. Tolerable error is considered during the
planning stage and, for substantive procedures, is related to the auditor's
judgement about materiality. The smaller the tolerable error, the greater the
sample size will need to be.
16. In tests of control, the tolerable error is the maximum rate of deviation
from a prescribed control procedure that the auditor would be willing to
accept, based on the preliminary assessment of control risk. In substantive
procedures, the tolerable error is the maximum monetary error in an account
balance or class of transactions that the auditor would be willing to accept so
that when the results of all audit procedures are considered, the auditor is
able to conclude, with reasonable assurance, that the financial statements
are not materially misstated.
Expected Error
17. If the auditor expects error to be present in the population, a larger
SA 530 IV-330
sample than when no error is expected ordinarily needs to be examined to
conclude that the actual error in the population is not greater than the
planned tolerable error. Smaller sample sizes are justified when the
population is expected to be error free. In determining the expected error in a
population, the auditor would consider such matters as error levels identified
in previous audits, changes in the entity's procedures, and evidence
available from other procedures.
Selection of the Sample
18. The auditor should select sample items in such a way that the
sample can be expected to be representative of the population. This
requires that all items in the population have an opportunity of being
selected.
19. While there are a number of selection methods, three methods
commonly used are:
Randomselection, which ensures that all items in the population have an
equal chance of selection, for example, by use of random number tables.
Systematic selection, which involves selecting items using a constant
interval between selections, the first interval having a random start. The
interval might be based on a certain number of items (for example, every
20th voucher number) or on monetary totals (for example, every
Rs 1,000 increase in the cumulative value of the population). When
using systematic selection, the auditor would need to determine that the
population is not structured in such a manner that the sampling interval
corresponds with a particular pattern in the population. For example, if in
a population of branch sales, a particular branch's sales occur only as
every 100th item and the sampling interval selected is 50, the result
would be that the auditor would have selected all, or none, of the sales
of that particular branch.
Haphazard selection, which may be an acceptable alternative to random
selection, provided the auditor attempts to draw a representative sample
from the entire population with no intention to either include or exclude
specific units. When the auditor uses this method, care needs to be
taken to guard against making a selection that is biased, for example,
towards items which are easily located, as they may not be
representative.
Audit Sampling
SA 530 IV-331
Evaluation of Sample Results
20. Having carried out, on each sample item, those audit procedures
that are appropriate to the particular audit objective, the auditor should:
(a) analyse any errors detected in the sample;
(b) project the errors found in the sample to the population; and
(c) reassess the sampling risk.
Analysis of Errors in the Sample
21. In analysing the errors detected in the sample, the auditor will first need
to determine that an item in question is in fact an error. In designing the
sample, the auditor will have defined those conditions that constitute an error
by reference to the audit objectives. For example, in a substantive procedure
relating to the recording of accounts receivable, a mis-posting between
customer accounts does not affect the total accounts receivable. Therefore, it
may be inappropriate to consider this an error in evaluating the sample
results of this particular procedure, even though it may have an effect on
other areas of the audit such as the assessment of doubtful accounts.
22. When the expected audit evidence regarding a specific sample item
cannot be obtained, the auditor may be able to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence through performing alternative procedures. For example, if a
positive account receivable confirmation has been requested and no reply
was received, the auditor may be able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence that the receivable is valid by reviewing subsequent payments from
the customer. If the auditor does not, or is unable to, perform satisfactory
alternative procedures, or if the procedures performed do not enable the
auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the item would be
treated as an error.
23. The auditor would also consider the qualitative aspects of the errors.
These include the nature and cause of the error and the possible effect of the
error on other phases of the audit.
24. In analysing the errors discovered, the auditor may observe that many
have a common feature, for example, type of transaction, location, product
line, or period of time. In such circumstances, the auditor may decide to
identify all items in the population which possess the common feature,
thereby producing a sub-population, and extend audit procedures in this
SA 530 IV-332
area. The auditor would then perform a separate analysis based on the items
examined for each sub-population.
Projection of Errors
25. The auditor projects the error results of the sample to the population
from which the sample was selected. There are several acceptable methods
of projecting error results. However, in all the cases, the method of projection
will need to be consistent with the method used to select the sampling unit.
When projecting error results, the auditor needs to keep in mind the
qualitative aspects of the errors found. When the population has been
divided into sub-population, the projection of errors is done separately for
each sub-population and the results are combined.
Reassessing Sampling Risk
26. The auditor needs to consider whether errors in the population might
exceed the tolerable error. To accomplish this, the auditor compares the
projected population error to the tolerable error taking into account the
results of other audit procedures relevant to the specific control or financial
statement assertion. The projected population error used for this comparison
in the case of substantive procedures is net of adjustments made by the
entity. When the projected error exceeds tolerable error, the auditor
reassesses the sampling risk and if that risk is unacceptable, would consider
extending the audit procedure or performing alternative audit procedures.
Effective Date
Audit Sampling
SA 530 IV-333
Appendix 1
Examples of Factors Influencing Sample Size for Tests of Control
Conditions leading to
Factor Smaller Sample Size Larger Sample Size
Assessment of control risk Higher preliminary
assessment of control
risk
Lower preliminary
assessment of control
risk
Tolerable error Higher acceptable rate
of deviation
Lower acceptable rate
of deviation
Allowable risk of over
reliance
Higher risk of over
reliance
Lower risk of over
reliance
Expected error Lower expected rate of
deviation in population
Higher expected rate
of deviation in
population*
Number of items in
population
Virtually no effect on sample size unless
population is small
*High expected deviation rates ordinarily warrant little, if any, reduction of
control risk and, therefore, tests of controls might be omitted.
SA 530 IV-334
Appendix 2
Examples of Factors Influencing Sample Size
for Substantive Procedures
Conditions Leading to
Factor Smaller Sample Size Larger Sample Size
Assessment of control risk Lower control risk Higher Control risk
Reduction in detection risk
because of other
substantive tests related to
the same financial
statement assertions
Greater use of other
substantive tests
Reduced use of other
substantive tests
Tolerable error Large measure of
tolerable error
Smaller measure of
tolerable error
Expected error Smaller errors or lower
frequency
Larger errors or higher
frequency
Population value Smaller monetary
significance to the
financial statements
Larger monetary
significance to the
financial statements
Number of items in
population
Virtually no effect on sample size unless
population is small
Acceptable level of
detection risk
Higher acceptable
level of detection risk
Lower acceptable level
of detection risk
Stratification Stratification of the
population, if
appropriate
No stratification of the
population

Back

SA 540 (AAS 18)
AUDIT OF ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
(Effective for all audits commencing on or after 1st April, 2000)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Nature of Accounting Estimates ........................................................5-7
Audit Procedures ...............................................................................8-23
Evaluation of Results of Audit Procedures...................................24-26
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 27

*
, Audit of Accounting Estimates, should be
1
, which sets out

*
1
Back
SA 540 IV-336
Introduction
on the audit of accounting estimates contained in financial statements. This
SA is not intended to be applicable to the examination of prospective
2
.
2. The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding accounting estimates.
3. "Accounting estimate" means an approximation of the amount of an
item in the absence of a precise means of measurement. Examples are:
Allowances to reduce inventory and accounts receivable to their
estimated realisable value.
Provisions to allocate the cost of fixed assets over their estimated useful
lives.
Accrued revenue.
Provision for taxation.
Provision for a loss from a lawsuit.
Insurer's liability for outstanding claims.
Losses on construction contracts in progress.
Amortisation of certain items like goodwill and deferred revenue
expenditure.
Provision to meet warranty claims.
Provision for retirement benefits in the financial statements of employers.
4. Management is responsible for making accounting estimates included in
financial statements. These estimates are often made in conditions of
uncertainty regarding the outcome of events that have occurred or are likely
to occur and involve the use of judgement. As a result, the risk of material
misstatement is greater when accounting estimates are involved.

2
In this regard, it may be noted that the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has issued a
Standard on Assurance Engagements (SAE) 3400, The Examination of Prospective Financial
Information.
Audit of Accounting Estimates
SA 540 IV-337
Nature of Accounting Estimates
5. The determination of an accounting estimate may be simple or complex,
depending upon the nature of the item. For example, accruing a charge for
rent may be a simple calculation, whereas estimating a provision for slow-
moving or surplus inventory may involve considerable analysis of current
data and a forecast of future sales. In complex estimates, a high degree of
special knowledge and judgment may be required.
6. Accounting estimates may be determined as part of the routine
accounting system operating on a continuing basis, or may be non-routine,
operating only at the end of the period. In many cases, accounting estimates
are made by using a formula based on experience, such as the use of
standard rates for depreciating each category of fixed assets or a standard
percentage of sales revenue for computing a warranty provision. In such
cases, the formula needs to be reviewed regularly by management, for
example, by reassessing the remaining useful lives of assets or by comparing
actual results with the estimate and adjusting the formula when necessary.
7. The uncertainty associated with an item, or the lack of objective data may
make it incapable of reasonable estimation, in which case, the auditor needs to
consider the same while expressing his opinion on the financial statements.
Audit Procedures
8. The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence as
to whether an accounting estimate is reasonable in the circumstances
and, when required, is appropriately disclosed in the financial
statements. The evidence available to support an accounting estimate will
often be more difficult to obtain and less conclusive than evidence available
to support other items in the financial statements.
9. An understanding of the procedures and methods, including the
accounting and internal control systems, used by management in making the
accounting estimates is often important for the auditor to plan the nature,
timing and extent of the audit procedures.
10. The auditor should adopt one or a combination of the following
approaches in the audit of an accounting estimate:
(a) reviewand test the process used by management to develop the
estimate;
SA 540 IV-338
(b) use an independent estimate for comparison with that prepared by
management; or
(c) reviewsubsequent events which confirmthe estimate made.
Reviewing and Testing the Process Used by Management
11. The steps ordinarily involved in reviewing and testing of the process
used by management are:
(a) evaluation of the data and consideration of assumptions on which the
estimate is based;
(b) testing of the calculations involved in the estimate;
(c) comparison, when possible, of estimates made for prior periods with
actual results of those periods; and
(d) consideration of management's approval procedures.
Evaluation of Data and Consideration of Assumptions
12. The auditor would evaluate whether the data on which the estimate is
based is accurate, complete and relevant. When accounting data is used, it
will need to be consistent with the data processed through the accounting
system. For example, in substantiating a warranty provision, the auditor
would obtain audit evidence that the data relating to products still within the
warranty period, at period end, agree with the sales information within the
accounting system.
13. External evidence is, usually, more reliable for the purpose of an audit
than internal evidence. Accordingly, obtaining external evidence may be
warranted in certain circumstances. For example, where there may be
uncertainties with regard to the anticipated future sales of products requiring
provision for obsolescence of inventories, the auditor, in addition to
examining internal data such as past levels of sales, orders on hand etc.,
may seek external evidence to corroborate the requirement for inventory
obsolescence provision. Similarly, in respect of claims against the entity
arising out of litigation, internal evidence may be required to be corroborated
by making a reference to entity's lawyers, if so required. Internal evidence
relating to provision for gratuity, pension or other terminal benefits for the
staff, where funded by external agencies, may sought to be corroborated by
external evidence.
SA 540 IV-339
14. The auditor would evaluate whether the data collected is appropriately
analysed to form a reasonable basis for determining the accounting estimate.
For example, the analysis of the age of accounts receivable to estimate the
provision for doubtful debts and advances.
15. The assumptions used in the accounting estimate will be specific to the
entity and would be based on internally generated data, while in other cases,
the assumptions may be based on industry or government statistics. The
auditor would evaluate whether the entity has an appropriate base for the
principal assumptions used in the accounting estimate.
16. In evaluating the assumptions on which the estimate is based, the
auditor would consider, among other things, whether they are:
Reasonable in light of actual results in prior periods.
Consistent with those used for other accounting estimates.
Consistent with management's plans which appear appropriate.
The auditor would need to pay particular attention to assumptions which are
sensitive to variation, subjective or susceptible to material misstatement.
17. In the case of complex estimating processes involving specialised
techniques, it may be necessary for the auditor to use the work of an expert,
for example, engineers for estimating quantities in stock piles of mineral
ores. Requirements as to how to use the work of an expert are prescribed in
SA 620, "Using the Work of an Expert."
18. The auditor would review the continuing appropriateness of formulae
used by management in the preparation of accounting estimates. For this
purpose, the auditor's knowledge of the financial results of the entity in prior
periods, practices used by other entities in the industry and the future plans
of management as disclosed to the auditor would be useful.
Testing of Calculations
19. The auditor would test the calculation procedures used by management.
The nature, timing and extent of the auditor's testing will depend on such
factors as the complexity involved in calculating the accounting estimate, the
auditor's evaluation of the procedures and methods used by the entity in
producing the estimate and the materiality of the estimate in the context of
SA 540 IV-340
Comparison of Previous Estimates with Actual Results
20. When possible, the auditor would compare accounting estimates made
for prior periods with actual results of those periods to assist in:
(a) obtaining evidence about the general reliability of the entity's estimating
procedures;
(b) considering whether adjustments to estimating formulae may be
required; and
(c) evaluating whether differences between actual results and previous
estimates have been quantified and that, where necessary, appropriate
adjustments or disclosures have been made.
Consideration of Management's Approval Procedures
21. Material accounting estimates are ordinarily reviewed and approved by
management. The auditor would consider whether such review and approval
is performed by the appropriate level of management and that it is evidenced
in the documentation supporting the determination of the accounting
estimate.
Use of an Independent Estimate
22. The auditor may make or obtain an independent estimate and compare
it with the accounting estimate, prepared by management. When using an
independent estimate, the auditor would ordinarily evaluate the data,
consider the assumptions and test the calculation procedures used in its
development. It may also be appropriate to compare accounting estimates so
made for prior periods with actual results of those periods.
Review of Subsequent Events
23. Transactions and events which occur after period end, but prior to
completion of the audit, may provide audit evidence regarding an accounting
estimate made by management. The auditor's review of such transactions
and events may reduce, or even remove, the need for the auditor to review
and test the process used by management to develop the accounting
estimate or to use an independent estimate in assessing the reasonableness
of the accounting estimate.
SA 540 IV-341
Evaluation of Results of Audit Procedures
24. The auditor should make a final assessment of the reasonableness of
the estimate based on the auditor's knowledge of the business and whether
the estimate is consistent with other audit evidence obtained during the audit.
25. The auditor would consider whether there are any significant
subsequent transactions or events which affect the data and the assumptions
used in determining the accounting estimate.
26. Because of the uncertainties inherent in accounting estimates,
evaluating differences can be more difficult than in other areas of the audit.
When there is a difference between the auditor's estimate of the amount best
supported by the available audit evidence and the estimated amount included
in the financial statements, the auditor would determine whether such a
difference requires adjustment. If the difference is reasonable, for example,
because the amount in the financial statements falls within a range of
acceptable results, it may not require adjustment. However, if the auditor
believes the difference is unreasonable, management would be requested to
revise the estimate. If management refuses to revise the estimate, the
difference would be considered a misstatement and would be considered
with all other misstatements in assessing whether the effect on the financial
statements is material. However, the auditor would also consider whether
individual differences which have been accepted as reasonable are biased in
one direction, so that, on a cumulative basis, they may have a material effect
on the financial statements. In such circumstances, the auditor would
evaluate the accounting estimates taken as a whole.
Effective Date
on or after 1
st
April, 2000.
Back

SA 550 (AAS 23)
RELATED PARTIES
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-6
Existence and Disclosure of Related Parties....................................7-8
Transactions with Related Parties ...................................................9-12
Examining Identified Related Party Transactions ........................13-14
Management Representations........................................................15-16
Audit Conclusions and Reporting....................................................... 17
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 18
Appendix

, Related Parties should be read in the

1
authority of SAs.

Issued in September, 2001.

1
Back
Related Parties
SA 550 IV-343
Introduction
on the auditors responsibilities and audit procedures regarding related
parties and transactions with such parties.
sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the identification and
disclosure by management of related parties and the related party
transactions that are material to the financial statements. However, an
audit cannot be expected to detect all related party transactions.
3. In certain circumstances there are limitations that may affect the
persuasiveness of evidence available to the auditor to draw conclusions on
particular financial statement assertions. Because of the degree of
uncertainty associated with the financial statement assertions regarding the
completeness of information of related parties, the procedures identified in
this SA will provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding those
assertions in the absence of any circumstance identified by the auditor that:
(a) increases the risk of misstatement beyond that which would ordinarily
be expected; or
(b) indicates that a material misstatement regarding related parties has
occurred.
Where there is any indication that such circumstances exist, the auditor
should performmodified, extended or additional procedures as are
appropriate in the circumstances.
4. Definitions regarding related parties are given in Accounting Standard
(AS) 18, "Related Party Disclosures" and are adopted for the purposes of this
SA.
2

5. Management is responsible for the identification and disclosure of
related parties and transactions with such parties. This responsibility

2
Definitions of "Related Party" and "Related Party Transactions" from Accounting Standard (AS)
18 Related Party Disclosures are:
Related Party parties are considered to be related if at any time during the reporting period one
party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party
in making financial and/or operating decisions.
Related Party Transactions a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties,
regardless of whether or not a price is charged.
SA 550 IV-344
requires management to implement adequate accounting and internal
control systems to ensure that transactions with related parties are
appropriately identified in the accounting records and disclosed in the
6. The auditor needs to have a level of knowledge of the entitys business
and industry that will enable identification of the events, transactions and
practices that may have a material effect on the financial statements. While
the existence of related parties and transactions between such parties are
considered ordinary features of business, the auditor needs to be aware of
them because:
(a) the financial reporting framework may require disclosure in the financial
statements of certain related party relationships and transactions, such
as those required by AS 18;
(b) the existence of related parties or related party transactions may affect
the financial statements. For example, the entitys tax liability and
expense may be affected by the tax laws which require special
consideration when related parties exist;
(c) the source of audit evidence affects the auditors assessment of its
reliability. A greater degree of reliance may be placed on audit
evidence that is obtained from unrelated third parties; and
(d) a related party transaction may be motivated by other than ordinary
business considerations, for example, profit sharing or even fraud.
Existence and Disclosure of Related Parties
7. The auditor should reviewinformation provided by the management
of the entity, identifying the names of all known related parties and
should perform the following procedures in respect of the
completeness of this information:
(a) review his working papers for the prior years for names of known
related parties;
(b) reviewthe entitys procedures for identification of related parties;
(c) inquire as to the affiliation of directors and key management
Related Parties
SA 550 IV-345
personnel
3
, officers with other entities;
(d) reviewshareholder records to determine the names of principal
shareholders or, if appropriate, obtain a list of principal
shareholders fromthe share register;
(e) reviewmemorandumand articles of association, minutes of the
meetings of shareholders and the board of directors and its
committees and other relevant statutory records such as the
register of directors interests;
(f) inquire of other auditors
4
of the entity as to their knowledge of
additional related parties and reviewthe report of the predecessor
auditors;
(g) review the entitys income tax returns and other information
supplied to regulatory agencies; and
(h) reviewthe joint venture and other relevant agreements entered into
by the entity.
If, in the auditors judgement, the risk of significant related parties
remaining undetected is low, these procedures may be reduced or
modified as appropriate.
8. Where the financial reporting framework requires disclosure of
related party relationships, the auditor should satisfy himself that the
disclosure is adequate.
Transactions with Related Parties
9. The auditor should reviewinformation provided by directors and
key management personnel of the entity identifying related party
transactions and should be alert for other material related party
transactions.
10. When obtaining an understanding of the accounting and internal
control systems and making a preliminary assessment of control risk,

3
Definition of "Key Management Personnel" from AS 18 is:
Key Management Personnel - those persons who have the authority and responsibility for
planning, directing and controlling the activities of the reporting enterprises.
4
The term "Other Auditors" includes internal auditor, special auditors appointed under any statute,
cost auditors, and concurrent auditors.
SA 550 IV-346
the auditor should consider the adequacy of control procedures over
the authorisation and recording of related party transactions.
11. During the course of the audit, the auditor needs to be alert for
transactions which appear unusual in the circumstances and may indicate
the existence of previously unidentified related parties. Examples include:
Transactions which have abnormal terms of trade, such as, unusual
prices, interest rates, guarantees, and repayment terms.
Transactions which lack an apparent logical business reason for their
occurrence.
Transactions in which substance differs from form.
Transactions processed in an unusual manner.
High volume or significant transactions with certain customers or
suppliers as compared with others.
Rendition of services without receipt or provision of management
services at no charge.
12. During the course of the audit, the auditor carries out procedures which
may identify the existence of transactions with related parties. Examples
include:
Performing detailed tests of transactions and balances.
Reviewing minutes of meetings of shareholders and directors.
Reviewing accounting records for large or unusual transactions or
balances, paying particular attention to transactions recognised at or
near the end of the reporting period.
Reviewing the entity's income tax returns and other information supplied
to regulatory agencies.
Reviewing confirmations of loans receivable and payable and
confirmations from banks. Such a review may indicate guarantor
relationship and other related party transactions.
Reviewing investment transactions, for example, purchase or sale of an
equity interest in a joint venture or other entity.
Examining Identified Related Party Transactions
13. In examining the identified related party transactions, the auditor
should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to whether these
Related Parties
SA 550 IV-347
transactions have been properly recorded and disclosed.
14. Given the nature of related party relationships, evidence of a related
party transactions may be limited, for example, regarding the existence of
inventory held by a related party on consignment or an instruction from a
parent company to a subsidiary to record a royalty expense. Because of the
limited availability of appropriate evidence about such transactions, the
auditor would consider performing procedures such as:
Confirming the terms and amount of the transaction with the related
party.
Obtaining confirmation from persons associated with the transaction,
such as, banks, lawyers, guarantors and agents.
(a) the completeness of information provided regarding the
identification of related parties; and
(b) the adequacy of related party disclosures in the financial
statements.
16. An example of a written representation to be obtained from
management is given as an Appendix to this Standard.
evidence concerning related parties and transactions with such parties
or concludes that their disclosure in the financial statements is not
adequate, the auditor should express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer
of opinion in the audit report, as may be appropriate.
Effective Date
18. This Standard on Auditing becomes operative for all audits related to
st
April, 2001.
SA 550 IV-348
Appendix
Example of a Management Representation Letter
Regarding Related Parties
(Refer Paragraph 16)
The following letter is for use as a general guide in conjunction with the
considerations set forth in this Statement. Representations by management
will vary from one entity to another, and from one year to the next.
Therefore, this letter is not intended to be a standard letter and should be
adapted in the light of individual requirements and circumstances.
[Letterhead of Entity]
[Date]
[Name and Address of the Auditor]
Dear Sir,
This representation letter is provided in connection with your audit of the
financial statements of ____________ for the year ended _______. We
acknowledge our responsibility for preparation of financial statements in
accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act, 1956 and
recognised accounting policies and practices, including the Accounting
Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
We confirm the following representation in respect of related parties:
1. We have identified all the related parties and transactions with all such
parties. The information provided to you is complete in all respects.
2. The disclosures made in the financial statements are adequate having
regard to the framework under which the financial statements have
been drawn.
3. The financial statements are free from material misstatements, including
omissions with regard to related parties and transactions with related
parties.

{Signature of the Authorised Person(s) of the Entity}
Back

SA 560 (AAS 19)
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(Effective for all audits commencing on or after 1st April, 2000)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
Audit Procedures .................................................................................4-7
Effective Date .......................................................................................... 8

*
, Subsequent Events, should be read in the
1
authority of SAs.

*
1
Back
SA 560 IV-350
Introduction
standards on the auditor's responsibility regarding subsequent events. In
this SA, the term "subsequent events" is used to refer to significant events
occurring between the balance sheet date and the date of the auditor's
report. In the context of audit of a component, such as a branch or
division, of an entity subsequent events would refer to significant events
upto the date of the report of the auditor of that component of the entity.
2. The auditor should consider the effect of subsequent events on the
financial statements and on the auditor's report.
3. Accounting Standard (AS) 4, Contingencies and Events Occurring
After the Balance Sheet Date, issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, deals with the treatment in financial statements of
events, both favourable and unfavourable, occurring between the balance
sheet date and the date on which the financial statements are approved by
the Board of Directors in the case of a company, and, by the corresponding
approving authority in the case of any other entity. AS 4 identifies two types
of events:
(a) those which provide further evidence of conditions that existed at the
balance sheet date; and
(b) those which are indicative of conditions that arose subsequent to the
balance sheet date.
Audit Procedures
4. The auditor should perform procedures designed to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence that all events up to the date of the
auditor's report that may require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the
financial statements have been identified. These procedures are in
addition to routine procedures which may be applied to specified transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date to obtain audit evidence as to account
balances as at the balance sheet date, for example, the testing of inventory
cut-off and payments to creditors. The auditor is not, however, expected to
conduct a continuing review of all matters to which previously applied
procedures have provided satisfactory conclusions.
5. The procedures to identify events that may require adjustment of, or
Subsequent Events
SA 560 IV-351
disclosure in, the financial statements would be performed as near as
practicable to the date of the auditor's report and ordinarily include the
following:
Reviewing procedures that the management has established to ensure
that subsequent events are identified.
Reading minutes of the meetings of shareholders, the board of directors
and audit and executive committees held after the balance sheet date
and inquiring about matters discussed at meetings for which minutes are
not yet recorded.
Reading the entity's latest available interim financial statements and, as
considered necessary and appropriate, budgets, cash flow forecasts and
other related management reports.
Inquiring, or extending previous oral or written inquiries, of the entity's
lawyers concerning litigation and claims.
Inquiring of management as to whether any subsequent events have
occurred after the balance sheet date which might affect the financial
statements. Examples of inquiries of management on specific matters
are:
The current status of items that were accounted for on the basis of
preliminary or inconclusive data.
Whether there have been any developments regarding risk areas
and contingencies.
Whether any unusual accounting adjustments have been made or
are contemplated.
Whether any events have occurred or are likely to occur which will
bring into question the appropriateness of accounting policies used
in the financial statements as would be the case, for example, if
such events call into question the validity of the going concern
assumption.
6. When a component, such as a division or a branch, of an entity, has
already been audited by another auditor, the principal auditor would make
similar enquiries as set out in para 5 in respect of events, occurring between
the date of signing of the report of the auditor of the component of the entity
and signing of his report.
SA 560 IV-352
7. When the auditor becomes aware of events which materially affect
the financial statements, the auditor should consider whether such
events are properly accounted for in the financial statements. When the
management does not account for such events that the auditor believes
should be accounted for, the auditor should express a qualified opinion
or an adverse opinion, as appropriate.
Effective Date
on or after 1
st
April, 2000.
Back

SA 570 (AAS 16)
GOING CONCERN
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Appropriateness of the Going Concern Assumption.......................5-7
Audit Evidence ...................................................................................8-11
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 19

*
, Going Concern should be read in the
1
authority of SAs.

*
Issued in October, 1998.
1
Back
SA 570 IV-354
Introduction
on the auditor's responsibilities in the audit of financial statements regarding
the appropriateness of the going concern assumption as a basis for the
preparation of the financial statements.
2. When planning and performing audit procedures and in evaluating
the results thereof, the auditor should consider the appropriateness of
the going concern assumption underlying the preparation of the
3. The auditor's report helps establish the credibility of the financial
statements. However, the auditor's report is not a guarantee as to the future
viability of the entity.
4. An entity's continuance as a going concern for the foreseeable future,
generally a period not to exceed one year after the balance sheet date, is
assumed in the preparation of financial statements in the absence of
information to the contrary. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are recorded
on the basis that the entity will be able to realise its assets and discharge its
liabilities in the normal course of business. If this assumption is unjustified,
the entity may not be able to realize its assets at the recorded amounts and
there may be changes in the amounts and maturity dates of liabilities. As a
consequence, the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities in the
financial statements may need to be adjusted.
Appropriateness of the Going Concern Assumption
5. The auditor should consider the risk that the going concern
assumption may no longer be appropriate.
6. Indications of risk that continuance as a going concern may be
questionable could come from the financial statements or from other sources.
Examples of such indications that would be considered by the auditor are
listed below. This listing is not all-inclusive nor does the existence of one or
more always signify that the going concern assumption needs to be
questioned.
Financial Indications
Negative net worth or negative working capital.
Going Concern
SA 570 IV-355
Fixed-term borrowings approaching maturity without realistic prospects
of renewal or repayment, or excessive reliance on short-term borrowings
to finance long-term assets.
Adverse key financial ratios.
Substantial operating losses.
Substantial negative cash flows from operations.
Arrears or discontinuance of dividends.
Inability to pay creditors on due dates.
Difficulty in complying with the terms of loan agreements.
Change from credit to cash-on-delivery transactions with suppliers.
Inability to obtain financing for essential new product development or
other essential investments.
Entering into a scheme of arrangement with creditors for reduction of
liability.
Operating Indications
Loss of key management without replacement.
Loss of a major market, franchise, licence, or principal supplier.
Labour difficulties or shortages of important supplies.
Other Indications
Non-compliance with capital or other statutory requirements.
Pending legal proceedings against the entity that may, if successful,
result in judgments that could not be met.
Changes in legislation or government policy.
Sickness of the entity under any statutory definition.
7. The significance of such indications can often be mitigated by other
factors. For example, the effect of an entity being unable to make its normal
debt repayments may be counterbalanced by management's plans to
maintain adequate cash flows by alternative means, such as by disposal of
assets, rescheduling of loan repayments, obtaining additional capital or
SA 570 IV-356
having funding arrangements backed by government. Similarly, the loss of a
principal supplier may be mitigated by the availability of a suitable alternative
source of supply.
Audit Evidence
8. When a question arises regarding the appropriateness of the going
concern assumption, the auditor should gather sufficient appropriate
audit evidence to attempt to resolve, to the auditor's satisfaction, the
question regarding the entity's ability to continue in operation for the
foreseeable future.
9. During the course of the audit, the auditor carries out audit procedures
designed to obtain audit evidence as the basis for the expression of an
opinion on the financial statements. When a question arises regarding the
going concern assumption, certain of these procedures may take on
additional significance or it may be necessary to perform additional
procedures or to update information obtained earlier. Procedures that are
relevant in this connection may include:
Analyse and discuss cash flow, profit and other relevant forecasts with
management.
Review events after the balance sheet date for items affecting the
entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
Analyse and discuss the entity's latest available interim financial
statements.
Review the terms of debentures and loan agreements and determine
whether any have been breached.
Read minutes of the meetings of shareholders, the board of directors
and important committees for reference to financing difficulties.
Review the status of matters under litigation and claims.
Confirm the existence, legality and enforceability of arrangements to
provide or maintain financial support with related and third parties and
assess the financial ability of such parties to provide additional funds.
Consider the entity's position concerning unfilled customer orders.
10. When analysing cash flow, profit and other relevant forecasts, the
Going Concern
SA 570 IV-357
auditor would consider the reliability of the entity's system for generating
such information. The auditor would also consider whether the assumptions
underlying the forecast appear appropriate in the circumstances. In addition,
the auditor would compare the prospective data for recent prior periods with
historical results, and would compare the prospective data for the current
period with results achieved to date.
11. The auditor would also consider and discuss with management its plans
for future action, such as plans to liquidate assets, borrow money or
restructure debt, reduce or delay expenditure, or increase capital. The
relevance of such plans to an auditor generally decreases as the time period
for planned actions and anticipated events increases. Particular emphasis is
ordinarily placed on plans that might have a significant effect on the entity's
solvency within the foreseeable future. The auditor would obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence that these plans are feasible, are likely to be
implemented and that the outcome of these plans will improve the situation.
The auditor would ordinarily seek written representations from management
regarding these plans.
12. After the procedures considered necessary have been carried out, all
the information required has been obtained, and the effect of any plans of
management and other mitigating factors have been considered, the auditor
would decide whether the question raised regarding the going concern
assumption has been satisfactorily resolved.
Going Concern Assumption Considered Appropriate
13. If, in the auditor's judgement, sufficient appropriate audit evidence has
been obtained to support the going concern assumption, the auditor would
not qualify his report on this account.
14. If, in the auditor's judgement, the going concern assumption is
appropriate because of mitigating factors, in particular management's
plans for future action, the auditor should consider whether such plans
or other factors need to be disclosed in the financial statements. Where
the auditor concludes that such plans or other factors need to be
disclosed, but have not been adequately disclosed, the auditor should
express a qualified or adverse opinion, as appropriate.
SA 570 IV-358
Going Concern Question not Resolved
15. If, in the auditor's judgement, the going concern question is not
satisfactorily resolved, the auditor would consider whether the financial
statements:
(a) adequately describe the principal conditions that raise substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue in operation for the foreseeable
future;
(b) state that there is significant uncertainty that the entity will be able to
continue as a going concern and, therefore, may be unable to realise
its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business;
and
(c) state that the financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts, or to amounts and classification of liabilities that may be
necessary if the entity is unable to continue as a going concern.
Provided the disclosure is considered adequate, the auditor would not
express a qualified or adverse opinion.
16. If adequate disclosure is made in the financial statements, the
auditor should ordinarily express an unqualified opinion. However, he
should, in his report, add a paragraph that highlights the going concern
problemby drawing attention to the note in the financial statements
that discloses the matters set out in paragraph 15. The following is an
example of such a paragraph:
"We draw attention to Note X in the financial statements. The Company
incurred a net loss of Rs. XXX during the year ended March 31, 19X1
and, as of that date, the Company's current liabilities exceeded its
current assets by Rs. XXX and its total liabilities exceeded its total
assets by Rs. XXX. These factors, along with other matters as set forth
in Note X, raise substantial doubt that the Company will be able to
continue as a going concern."
The auditor is not precluded from expressing a disclaimer of opinion for a
going concern uncertainty.
17. If adequate disclosure is not made in the financial statements, the
auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion, as appropriate.
Going Concern
SA 570 IV-359
The following is an example of the explanation and opinion paragraphs when
a qualified opinion is to be expressed:
"The Company has been unable to renegotiate its borrowings from its
bankers. Without such financial support there is substantial doubt that it
will be able to continue as a going concern. Consequently, adjustments
may be required to the recorded asset amounts and classification of
liabilities. The financial statements (and notes thereto) do not disclose
this fact.
In our opinion, subject to the omission of the information dealt with in
the preceding paragraph, the financial statements give a true and fair
view of the financial position of the Company at March 31, 19X1 and the
results of its operations for the year then ended."
Going Concern Assumption Considered Inappropriate
18. If, on the basis of the additional procedures carried out and the
information obtained, including the effect of mitigating circumstances, the
auditor's judgment is that the entity will not be able to continue in operation
for the foreseeable future, the auditor would conclude that the going concern
assumption used in the preparation of the financial statements is
inappropriate. If the result of the inappropriate assumption used in the
preparation of the financial statements is so material and pervasive as
to make the financial statements misleading, the auditor should express
an adverse opinion.
Effective Date
Back
SA 570 IV-360
Standard on Auditing (SA) 570, Going Concern
{The following is the General Clarification (GC)AASB/3/2004 issued by the
Accountants of India on Standard on Auditing (SA) 570, Going Concern.}
1. The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 has mandated that every
private company existing on 13
th
December 2000 with a paid-up capital of
less than one lakh rupees, shall, within a period of two years from such
commencement enhance its paid up capital to one lakh rupees. Similarly,
every public company existing on 13
th
December 2000 with a paid-up capital
of less than five lakh rupees, shall, within a period of two years from such
commencement enhance its paid up capital to five lakh rupees. Where a
private company or a public company fails to enhance the paid-up capital to
the statutory minimum, as mentioned above, such company shall be deemed
a defunct company within the meaning of section 560 of the Companies Act,
1956 and its name shall be struck off from the register by the Registrar.
2. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of Standard on Auditing (SA) 570, Going Concern
provide as follows:
5. The auditor should consider the risk that the
going concern assumption may no longer be
appropriate.
6. Indications of risk that continuance as a going
concern may be questionable could come from the financial
statements or from other sources.
3. Further, SA 570 also mentions that non-compliance with capital or other
statutory requirements could be an example of an indication of risk that the
going concern assumption may no longer be appropriate.
4. If a company fails to enhance its paid-up capital up to the statutory
minimum, such company shall be deemed a defunct company within the
meaning of section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 and therefore, its name
shall be struck off from the register by the Registrar of Companies. However,
Back
Going Concern
SA 570 IV-361
such an entity may decide not to carry on business or may decide to carry on
the business in some other form of organisation, e.g., partnership, etc. This
situation gives rise to the risk that the going concern assumption may no
longer be appropriate.
5. The auditor, in such a situation, performs the audit procedures as
required by the Standard on Auditing (SA) 570, Going Concern. Unless,
the entity under audit demonstrates otherwise, the auditor should consider
the going concern assumption as inappropriate and report in accordance with
paragraph 18 of SA 570.
Back

SA 580 (AAS 11)
REPRESENTATIONS BY MANAGEMENT
(Effective for all audits relating to a
ccounting periods beginning on or after April 1, 1995)
Contents
Paragraph(s)

Introduction ..........................................................................................1-2
Acknowledgement by Management of its
Responsibility for the Financial Information........................................ 3
Representations by Management as Audit Evidence ......................4-8
Documentation of Representations by Management .....................9-10
Basic Elements of a Management Representation Letter............11-15
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 16
Appendix

*
, Representations by Management should
1
, which sets out

*
Issued in February, 1996.
1
Back
Representations by Management
SA 580 IV-363
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard is to establish standards on the use of
management representations as audit evidence, the procedures to be
applied in evaluating and documenting management representations, and the
action to be taken if management refuses to provide appropriate
representations.
2. The auditor should obtain representations from management, where
Acknowledgement by Management of its Responsibility
for the Financial Information
3. The auditor should obtain evidence that management acknowledges its
responsibility for the appropriate preparation and presentation of financial
information and that management has approved the financial information.
Representations by Management as Audit Evidence
4. The auditor should exercise his professional judgement in determining
the matters on which he wishes to obtain representations from management.
Similarly, the matters on which the auditor wishes to obtain such
representations in writing should also be determined by the auditor using his
professional judgement. However, representations should be obtained from
management invariably in writing on matters material to financial information,
either individually or collectively, when other sufficient appropriate audit
evidence cannot reasonably be expected to exist. Matters which might be
included in a representation letter from management in an audit of financial
statements are contained in the example of a management representation
letter in the Appendix.
5. During the course of an audit, management makes many
representations to the auditor, either unsolicited or in response to specific
enquiries. When such representations relate to matters which are material to
the financial information, the auditor should:
(a) seek corroborative audit evidence from sources inside or outside the
entity;
(b) evaluate whether the representations made by management appear
reasonable and consistent with other audit evidence obtained, including
SA 580 IV-364
other representations; and
(c) consider whether the individuals making the representations can be
expected to be well-informed on the matter.
6. Representations by management cannot be a substitute for other audit
evidence that the auditor could reasonably expect to be available. For
example, a representation by management as to the quantity, existence and
cost of inventories is no substitute for adopting normal audit procedures
regarding verification and valuation of inventories. If the auditor is unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that he believes would be
available regarding a matter which has or may have a material effect on the
financial information, this will constitute a limitation on the scope of his
examination even if he has obtained a representation from management on
the matter.
7. In certain instances such as where knowledge of the facts is confined to
management or where the matter is principally one of intention, a
representation by management may be the only audit evidence which can
reasonably be expected to be available; for example, intention of
management to hold a specific investment for long-term appreciation.
8. If a representation by management is contradicted by other evidence,
the auditor should examine the circumstances and, when necessary,
reconsider the reliability of other representations made by management.
Documentation of Representations by Management
9. The auditor should document in his working papers evidence of
managements representations.
10. A written representation is better audit evidence than an oral
representation and can take the form of:
(a) a representation letter from management;
(b) a letter from the auditor outlining the auditors understanding of
managements representations, duly acknowledged and confirmed by
management;
(c) a duly authenticated copy of relevant minutes of meetings of the board
of directors or similar body.
SA 580 IV-365
Basic Elements of a Management Representation Letter
11. A management representation letter should be addressed to the auditor,
containing the relevant information and be appropriately dated and signed.
12. A management representation letter would normally be dated the same
date as the auditors report on the financial information or a date prior
thereto. However, in certain circumstances, in respect to specific
transactions or events, separate representation letters may also be obtained
during the course of audit.
13. A management representation letter should ordinarily be signed by the
members of management who have primary responsibility for the entity and
its financial aspects, e.g., managing director, finance director.
14. If management refuses to provide representations on any matter that
the auditor considers necessary, this will constitute a limitation on the scope
of his examination. In such circumstances, the auditor should evaluate any
reliance he has placed on other representations made by management
during the course of his examination and consider if the refusal may have
any additional effect on his report.
15. In case management is not willing to give in writing the representations
made by it during the course of audit, the auditor should himself prepare a
letter in writing setting out his understanding of managements
representations that have been made to him during the course of audit and
send it to management with a request to acknowledge and confirm that his
understanding of the representations is correct. If the management refuses to
acknowledge or confirm the letter sent by the auditor, this will constitute a
limitation on the scope of his examination. In such circumstances, the auditor
should evaluate any reliance on those representations and consider if the
refusal may have any additional effect on his report.
Effective Date
SA 580 IV-366
Appendix
Example of a Management Representation Letter
in an Audit of Financial Statements
(Ref. Paragraph 4)
The following letter is for use as a general guide in conjunction with the
considerations set forth in this Standard. Representations by management
will vary from one entity to another and from one year to the next. Therefore,
this letter is not intended to be a standard letter and should be adapted in the
light of individual requirements and circumstances.
[Letterhead of Entity]
[Date]
[Name and Address of the Auditor]
Dear Sir,
This representation letter is provided in connection with your audit of the
financial statements of ................ for the year ended ...... for the purpose of
expressing an opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and
fair view of the financial position of ................ as of ...... and of the results of
operations for the year then ended. We acknowledge our responsibility for
preparation of financial statements in accordance with the requirements of
the Companies Act, 1956
2
and recognised accounting policies and practices,
including the Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered
We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the following
representations:
Accounting Policies
1. The accounting policies which are material or critical in determining the
results of operations for the year or financial position are set out in the financial
statements and are consistent with those adopted in the financial statements
for the previous year. The financial statements are prepared on accrual basis.
Assets
2. The company has a satisfactory title to all assets and there are no liens
or encumbrances on the companys assets, except for those that are

2
or other relevant statute.
SA 580 IV-367
disclosed in Note X to the financial statements.
Fixed Assets
3. The net book values at which fixed assets are stated in the Balance
Sheet are arrived at:
(a) after taking into account all capital expenditure on additions thereto, but
no expenditure properly chargeable to revenue;
(b) after eliminating the cost and accumulated depreciation relating to items
sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed;
(c) after providing adequate depreciation on fixed assets during the period.
Capital Commitments
4. At the balance sheet date, there were no outstanding commitments for
capital expenditure excepting those disclosed in Note X to the financial
statements.
Investments
5. The current investments as appearing in the Balance Sheet consist of
only such investments as are by their nature readily realisable and intended
to be held for not more than one year from the respective dates on which
they were made. All other investments have been shown in the Balance
Sheet as long-term investments.
6. Current investments have been valued at the lower of cost and fair
value. Long-term investments have been valued at cost, except that any
permanent diminution in their value has been provided for in ascertaining
their carrying amount.
7. In respect of offers of right issues received during the year, the rights
have been either been subscribed to, or renunciated, or allowed to lapse. In
no case have they been renunciated in favour of third parties without
consideration which has been properly accounted for in the books of
account.
8. All the investments produced to you for physical verification belong to
the entity and they do not include any investments held on behalf of any
other person.
9. The entity has clear title to all its investments including such
investments which are in the process of being registered in the name of the
entity or which are not held in the name of the entity and there are no
SA 580 IV-368
charges against the investments of the entity except those appearing in the
records of the entity.
Inventories
10. Inventories at the year-end consisted of the following:
Raw Materials (including components) Rs .........
Work-in-Process Rs .........
Finished Goods (including by-products) Rs .........
Maintenance supplies and Stores and Spare Parts Rs .........
Loose Tools Rs .........
Others (specify each major head separately) Rs .........
Total Rs .........
11. All quantities were determined by actual physical count or weight or
measurement that was taken under our supervision and in accordance with
written instructions, on ............ (date/dates of physical verification), except
as follows:
3

........
........
12. All goods included in the inventory are the property of the entity, none of
the goods are held as consignee for others or as bailee, and, except as set
out below, none of the goods are subject to any charge.
........
........
13. All inventories owned by the entity, wherever located, have been
recorded, including goods sent on consignment.
14. Inventories do not include goods sold to customers for which delivery is
yet to be made.

3
Where physical verification of inventories is carried out at a date other than the closing date, this
paragraph may be modified as below:
Inventories recorded in the books as at ...........(date of balance sheet) aggregating to Rs.
......... are based upon the physical inventories taken as at .......... (date of physical
verification) by actual count, weight or measurement. The material discrepancies noticed on
physical verification of stocks as compared to book records have been properly dealt with in
the books of account and subsequent transactions recorded in the accounts fairly reflect the
changes in the inventories up to ........... (balance sheet date).
SA 580 IV-369
15. Inventories have been valued on the following basis/bases:
Raw Materials (including components)
Work-in-Process
Finished Goods (including by-products)
Maintenance supplies and Stores and Spare Parts
Loose Tools
Others (specify each major head separately)
(In describing the basis/bases of valuation, the method of ascertaining
the cost (e.g. FIFO, Average Cost or LIFO) should also be stated.
Similarly, the extent to which overheads have been included in the cost
should also be stated.)
16. The following provisions have been made in respect of excess, slow-
moving, damaged, or obsolete inventories and these, in our view, are
adequate.
....... .......
....... .......
17. No item of inventories has a net realisable value in the ordinary course
of business which is less than the amount at which it is included in
inventories.
18. The basis/bases of valuation is/are the same as that/those used in the
previous year, except as set out below:
Class of inventory Basis of Valuation
This Year Last Year
Effect of change in Basis of
Valuation
..... .... .... ....
..... .... .... ....
Debtors, Loans and Advances
19. The following items appearing in the books as at .......(date of the
Balance Sheet) are considered good and fully recoverable with the exception
of those specifically shown as doubtful in the Balance Sheet.
Sundry Debtors Rs.
Loans and Advances Rs.
SA 580 IV-370
Other Current Assets
20. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, other current assets have a
value on realisation in the ordinary course of the companys business which
is atleast equal to the amount at which they are stated in the Balance Sheet,
except as stated in Note X to the financial statements.
Liabilities
21. We have recorded all known liabilities in the financial statements.
22. We have disclosed in notes to the financial statements all guarantees
that we have given to third parties and all other contingent liabilities.
23. Contingent liabilities disclosed in the notes to the financial statements
do not include any contingencies which are likely to result in a loss and
which, therefore, require adjustment of assets or liabilities.
Provisions for Claims and Losses
24. Provision has been made in the accounts for all known losses and
claims of material amounts.
25. There have been no events subsequent to the balance sheet date which
require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements or notes
thereto.
Profit and Loss Account
26. Except as disclosed in the financial statements, the results for the year
were not materially affected by:
(a) transactions of a nature not usually undertaken by the company;
(b) circumstances of an exceptional or non-recurring nature;
(c) charges or credits relating to prior years;
(d) changes in accounting policies.
General
27. The following have been properly recorded and, when appropriate,
adequately disclosed in the financial statements:
(a) Losses arising from sale and purchase commitments.
(b) Agreements and options to buy back assets previously sold.
(c) Assets pledged as collateral.
28. There have been no irregularities involving management or employees
SA 580 IV-371
who have a significant role in the system of internal control that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
29. The financial statements are free of material misstatements, including
omissions.
30. The company has complied with all aspects of contractual agreements
that could have a material effect on the financial statements in the event of
non-compliance. There has been no non-compliance with requirements of
regulatory authorities that could have a material effect on the financial
statements in the event of non-compliance.
31. We have no plans or intentions that may materially affect the carrying
value or classification of assets and liabilities reflected in the financial
statements.
Back

SA 600 (AAS 10)
USING THE WORK OF ANOTHER AUDITOR
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ....................................................................................... 1-8
Acceptance as Principal Auditor ........................................................ 9
The Principal Auditors Procedures............................................ 10-18
Co-ordination Between Auditors................................................. 19-21
Reporting Considerations............................................................ 22-23
Division of Responsibility ............................................................ 24-25
Effective Date ..................................................................................... 26

*
, "Using the Work of Another Auditor" should
1
, which sets out

*
Issued in April, 1995. Revised in September, 2002.
1
Back
Using the Work of Another Auditor
SA 600 IV-373
Introduction
1. The Standard on Auditing (SA) 200, Basic Principles Governing an
Audit, states (paragraph 9):
When the auditor delegates work to assistants or uses work
performed by other auditors and experts, he will continue to be
responsible for forming and expressing his opinion on the
financial information. However, he will be entitled to rely on work
performed by others, provided he exercises adequate skill and
care and is not aware of any reason to believe that he should not
have so relied. In the case of any independent statutory
appointment to perform the work on which the auditor has to rely
in forming his opinion, such as in the case of the work of branch
auditors appointed under the Companies Act, 1956 the auditors
report should expressly state the fact of such reliance.
to be applied in situations where an auditor (referred to herein as the
principal auditor), reporting on the financial information of an entity, uses the
work of another auditor (referred to herein as the other auditor) with respect
to the financial information of one or more components included in the
financial information of the entity. This Standard also discusses the principal
auditors responsibility in relation to his use of the work of the other auditor.
In this Standard, the term 'financial information' encompasses 'financial
statements'.
3. This Standard does not deal with those instances where two or more
auditors are appointed as joint auditors
2
nor does it deal with the auditors
relationship with a predecessor auditor.
4. When the principal auditor concludes that the financial information of a
component is immaterial, the procedures outlined in this Statement do not
apply. When several components, immaterial in themselves, are together
material in relation to the financial information of the entity as a whole, the
procedures outlined in this Statement should be considered.

2
Standard on Auditing (SA) 299, Responsibility of Joint Auditors, deals with the audit procedures
to be employed where two or more auditors are appointed as joint auditors.
SA 600 IV-374
5. When the principal auditor uses the work of another auditor, the
principal auditor should determine howthe work of the other auditor
will affect the audit.
6. "Principal auditor" means the auditor with responsibility for reporting on the
financial information of an entity when that financial information includes the
financial information of one or more components audited by another auditor.
7. "Other auditor" means an auditor, other than the principal auditor, with
responsibility for reporting on the financial information of a component which
is included in the financial information audited by the principal auditor.
8. "Component" means a division, branch, subsidiary, joint venture,
associated enterprises or other entity whose financial information is included
in the financial information audited by the principal auditor.
Acceptance as Principal Auditor
9. The auditor should consider whether the auditor's own
participation is sufficient to be able to act as the principal auditor. For
this purpose the auditor would consider:
(a) the materiality of the portion of the financial information which the
principal auditor audits;
(b) the principal auditor's degree of knowledge regarding the business of
the components;
(c) the risk of material misstatements in the financial information of the
components audited by the other auditor; and
(d) the performance of additional procedures as set out in this SA regarding
the components audited by other auditor resulting in the principal
auditor having significant participation in such audit.
The Principal Auditors Procedures
10. In certain situations, the statute governing the entity may confer a right
on the principal auditor to visit a component and examine the books of
account and other records of the said component, if he thinks it necessary to
do so. Where another auditor has been appointed for the component, the
principal auditor would normally be entitled to rely upon the work of such
auditor unless there are special circumstances to make it essential for him to
SA 600 IV-375
visit the component and/or to examine the books of account and other
records of the said component.
11. When planning to use the work of another auditor, the principal
auditor should consider the professional competence of the other
auditor in the context of specific assignment if the other auditor is not a
member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
12. The principal auditor should perform procedures to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, that the work of the other auditor
is adequate for the principal auditor's purposes, in the context of the
specific assignment. When using the work of another auditor, the principal
auditor should ordinarily perform the following procedures:
(a) advise the other auditor of the use that is to be made of the other
auditor's work and report and make sufficient arrangements for co-
ordination of their efforts at the planning stage of the audit. The
principal auditor would inform the other auditor of matters such as areas
requiring special consideration, procedures for the identification of inter-
component transactions that may require disclosure and the time-table
for completion of audit; and
(b) advise the other auditor of the significant accounting, auditing and reporting
requirements and obtain representation as to compliance with them.
13. The principal auditor might discuss with the other auditor the audit
procedures applied or review a written summary of the other auditors
procedures and findings which may be in the form of a completed
questionnaire or check-list. The principal auditor may also wish to visit the
other auditor. The nature, timing and extent of procedures will depend on the
circumstances of the engagement and the principal auditor's knowledge of the
professional competence of the other auditor. This knowledge may have been
enhanced from the review of the previous audit work of the other auditor.
14. The principal auditor may conclude that it is not necessary to apply
procedures such as those described in paragraph 13 because sufficient
appropriate audit evidence previously obtained that acceptable quality
control policies and procedures are complied with in the conduct of other
auditor's practice.
15. The principal auditor should consider the significant findings of
the other auditor.
SA 600 IV-376
16. The principal auditor may consider it appropriate to discuss with the other
auditor and the management of the component, the audit findings or other
matters affecting the financial information of the components. He may also
decide that supplemental tests of the records or the financial statements of the
component are necessary. Such tests may, depending upon the
circumstances, be performed by the principal auditor or the other auditor.
17. In certain circumstances, the other auditor may happen to be a person
other than a professionally qualified auditor. This may happen, for instance,
where a component is situated in a foreign country and the applicable laws
permit a person other than a professionally qualified auditor to audit the
financial statements of such component. In such circumstances, the
procedures outlined in paragraphs 10 to 16 assume added importance.
18. The principal auditor should document in his working papers the
components whose financial information was audited by other auditors; their
significance to the financial information of the entity as a whole; the names of
the other auditors; and any conclusions reached that individual components
are not material. The principal auditor should also document the procedures
performed and the conclusions reached. For example, the auditor would
document the results of discussions with the other auditor and review of the
written summary of the other auditor's procedures. However, the principal
auditor need not document the reasons for limiting the procedures in the
circumstances described at 14 above, provided those reasons are
summarised elsewhere in the documentation maintained by the principal
auditor. Where the other auditors report is other than unmodified
3
, the
principal auditor should also document how he has dealt with the
qualifications or adverse remarks contained in the other auditors report in
framing his own report.

3
Standard on Auditing (SA) 700, "The Auditor's Report on Financial Statements", deals with the
concept of "modified audit report". An auditor's report is considered to be modified when it includes:
Matters that do not affect the auditor 's opinion
(a) emphasis of matter
Matters that do affect the auditor 's opinion
(a) qualified opinion,
(b) disclaimer of opinion, or
(c) adverse opinion.
SA 600 IV-377
Co-ordination Between Auditors
19. There should be sufficient liaison between the principal auditor
and the other auditor. For this purpose, the principal auditor may find it
necessary to issue written communication(s) to the other auditor.
20. The other auditor, knowing the context in which his work is to be used
by the principal auditor, should co-ordinate with the principal auditor. For
example, by bringing to the principal auditors immediate attention any significant
findings requiring to be dealt with at entity level, adhering to the time-table for
audit of the component, etc. He should ensure compliance with the relevant
statutory requirements. Similarly, the principal auditor should advise the other
auditor of any matters that come to his attention that he thinks may have an
important bearing on the other auditors work.
21. When considered necessary by him, the principal auditor may require
the other auditor to answer a detailed questionnaire regarding matters on
which the principal auditor requires information for discharging his duties.
The other auditor should respond to such questionnaire on a timely basis.
Reporting Considerations
22. When the principal auditor concludes, based on his procedures, that
the work of the other auditor cannot be used and the principal auditor has
not been able to performsufficient additional procedures regarding the
financial information of the component audited by the other auditor, the
principal auditor should express a qualified opinion or disclaimer of
opinion because there is a limitation on the scope of audit.
23. In all circumstances, if the other auditor issues, or intends to issue, a
modified auditor's report, the principal auditor should consider whether the
subject of the modification is of such nature and significance, in relation to
the financial information of the entity on which the principal auditor is
reporting, that it requires a modification of the principal auditor's report.
Division of Responsibility
24. The principal auditor would not be responsible in respect of the work
entrusted to the other auditors, except in circumstances which should have
aroused his suspicion about the reliability of the work performed by the other
auditors.
SA 600 IV-378
25. When the principal auditor has to base his opinion on the financial
information of the entity as a whole relying upon the statements and
reports of the other auditors, his report should state clearly the division
of responsibility for the financial information of the entity by indicating
the extent to which the financial information of components audited by
the other auditors have been included in the financial information of the
entity, e.g., the number of divisions/branches/subsidiaries or other
components audited by other auditors.
Effective Date
(ISA) 600
The auditing standards established in this Standard on Auditing (SA) are
generally consistent, in all material respects, with those set out in ISA 600
"Using the Work of Another Auditor".
Back

SA 610 (AAS 7)
RELYING UPON
THE WORK OF AN INTERNAL AUDITOR
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-5
Scope and Objectives of the Internal Audit Function ......................... 6
Relationship between Internal and External Auditors .....................7-9
General Evaluation of Internal Audit Function .................................. 10
Coordination.....................................................................................11-12
Evaluating Specific Internal Audit Work........................................13-14
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 15

*
, Relying upon the Work of an Internal
Auditor should be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on
1
,
which sets out the authority of SAs. This Standard on Auditing supersedes
the Guidance Note on Co-ordination between the Internal Auditor and
Statutory Auditors, issued by the Institute in 1979.

*
1
Back
SA 610 IV-380
Introduction
1. Standard on Auditing (SA) 400
**
, Study and Evaluation of the
Accounting System and Related Internal Controls in Connection with an
Audit, states (paragraph 8):
"Internal Control System means all the policies and procedures (internal
controls) adopted by the management of an entity to assist in achieving
management's objective of ensuring, as far as practicable, the orderly
and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to
management policies, the safeguarding of assets, the prevention and
detection of fraud and error, the accuracy and completeness of the
accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial
information. The internal audit function constitutes a separate
component of internal control with the objective of determining whether
other internal controls are well designed and properly operated.
2. The purpose of this Standard is to provide guidance as to the procedures
which should be applied by the external auditor in assessing the work of the
internal auditor for the purpose of placing reliance upon that work.
3. With the introduction of the Manufacturing and Other Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 1988
***
, internal audit function has acquired special
significance as the statutory auditor is required to state, in relation to a
company having a paid-up capital exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs or having an
average annual turnover exceeding Rs. 2 crore for a period of three
consecutive financial years immediately preceding the financial year
concerned to which the Order applies, whether the internal audit system is
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
2

4. In this Standard, financial information encompasses financial
statements.

**
Paragraph 6 of SA 400, Risk Assessments and Internal Controls is the paragraph
corresponding to paragraph 8 of the erstwhile Standard, Study and Evaluation of the Accounting
System and Related Internal Controls in connection with an Audit, issued in May, 1988.
***
The Order has been replaced by the Companies (Auditors) Report Order, 2003, issued by the
Department of Company Affairs in June, 2003 under section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956.
2
Readers attention is also drawn to the Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, for a study of various factors to be
considered by the auditor in evaluating the adequacy of the internal audit system for the purposes
of reporting under the Order.
Relying Upon the Work of an Internal Auditor
SA 610 IV-381
5. While the external auditor has sole responsibility for his report and for
the determination of the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures,
much of the work of the internal audit function may be useful to him in his
examination of the financial information.
Scope and Objectives of the Internal Audit Function
6. The scope and objectives of internal audit vary widely and are
dependent upon the size and structure of the entity and the requirements of
its management.
Normally, however, internal audit operates in one or more of the following
areas:
(a) Review of accounting system and related internal controls: The
establishment of an adequate accounting system and the related
controls is the responsibility of management which demands proper
attention on a continuous basis. The internal audit function is often
assigned specific responsibility by management for reviewing the
accounting system and related internal controls, monitoring their
operation and recommending improvements thereto.
(b) Examination for management of financial and operating
information: This may include review of the means used to identify,
measure, classify and report such information and specific inquiry into
individual items including detailed testing of transactions, balances and
procedures.
(c) Examination of the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of
operations including non-financial controls of an organisation:
Generally, the external auditor is interested in the results of such audit
work only when it has an important bearing on the reliability of the
financial records.
(d) Physical examination and verification: This would generally include
examination and verification of physical existence and condition of the
tangible assets of the entity.
Relationship between Internal and External Auditors
7. The role of the internal audit function within an entity is determined by
management and its prime objective differs from that of the external auditor
SA 610 IV-382
who is appointed to report independently on financial information.
Nevertheless, some of the means of achieving their respective objectives are
often similar and, thus, much of the work of the internal auditor may be useful
to the external auditor in determining the nature, timing and extent of his
procedures.
8. The external auditor should, as part of his audit, evaluate the internal
audit function to the extent he considers that it will be relevant in determining
the nature, timing and extent of his compliance and substantive procedures.
Depending upon such evaluation, the external auditor may be able to adopt
less extensive procedures than would otherwise be required.
9. By its very nature, the internal audit function cannot be expected to have
the same degree of independence as is essential when the external auditor
expresses his opinion on the financial information. The report of the external
auditor is his sole responsibility, and that responsibility is not by any means
reduced because of the reliance he places on the internal auditors work.
General Evaluation of Internal Audit Function
10. The external auditors general evaluation of the internal audit function
will assist him in determining the extent to which he can place reliance upon
the work of the internal auditor. The external auditor should document his
evaluation and conclusions in this respect. The important aspects to be
considered in this context are:
(a) Organisational Status: Whether internal audit is undertaken by an
outside agency or by an internal audit department within the entity itself,
the internal auditor reports to the management. In an ideal situation, he
reports to the highest level of management and is free of any other
operating responsibility. Any constraints or restrictions placed upon his
work by management should be carefully evaluated. In particular, the
internal auditor should be free to communicate fully with the external
auditor.
(b) Scope of Function: The external auditor should ascertain the nature
and depth of coverage of the assignment which the internal auditor
discharges for management. He should also ascertain to what extent
the management considers, and where appropriate, acts upon internal
audit recommendations.
Relying Upon the Work of an Internal Auditor
SA 610 IV-383
(c) Technical Competence: The external auditor should ascertain that
internal audit work is performed by persons having adequate technical
training and proficiency. This may be accomplished by reviewing the
experience and professional qualifications of the persons undertaking
the internal audit work.
(d) Due Professional Care: The external auditor should ascertain whether
internal audit work appears to be properly planned, supervised,
reviewed and documented. An example of the exercise of due
professional care by the internal auditor is the existence of adequate
audit manuals, audit programmes, and working papers.
Coordination
11. Having decided in principle that he intends to rely upon the work of the
internal auditor, it is desirable that the external auditor ascertains the internal
auditors tentative plan for the year and discusses it with him at as early a
stage as possible to determine areas where he considers that he could rely
upon the internal auditors work. Where internal audit work is to be a factor in
determining the nature, timing and extent of the external auditors
procedures, it is desirable to plan in advance the timing of such work, the
extent of audit coverage, test levels and proposed methods of sample
selection, documentation of the work performed, and review and reporting
procedures.
12. Coordination with the internal auditor is usually more effective when
meetings are held at appropriate intervals during the year. It is desirable that
the external auditor is advised of, and has access to, relevant internal audit
reports and in addition is kept informed, along with management, of any
significant matter that comes to the internal auditors attention and which he
believes may affect the work of the external auditor. Similarly, the external
auditor should ordinarily inform the internal auditor of any significant matters
which may affect his work.
Evaluating Specific Internal Audit Work
13. Where, following the general evaluation described in paragraph 10, the
external auditor intends to rely upon specific internal audit work as a basis
for modifying the nature, timing and extent of his procedures, he should
review the internal auditors work, taking into account the following factors:
SA 610 IV-384
(a) The scope of work and related audit programmes are adequate for the
external auditors purpose.
(b) The work was properly planned and the work of assistants was properly
supervised, reviewed, and documented.
(c) Sufficient appropriate evidence was obtained to afford a reasonable
basis for the conclusions reached.
(d) Conclusions reached are appropriate in the circumstances and any
reports prepared are consistent with the results of the work performed.
(e) Any exceptions or unusual matters disclosed by the internal auditors
procedures have been properly resolved.
The external auditor should document his conclusions in respect of the
specific work which he has reviewed.
14. The external auditor should also test the work of the internal auditor on
which he intends to rely. The nature, timing and extent of the external
auditors tests will depend upon his judgement as to the materiality of the
area concerned to the financial statements taken as a whole and the results
of his evaluation of the internal audit function and of the specific internal
audit work. His tests may include examination of items already examined by
the internal auditor, examination of other similar items, and observation of
the internal auditors procedures.
Effective Date
Back

SA 620 (AAS 9)
USING THE WORK OF AN EXPERT
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Determining the Need to Use the Work of an Expert .......................5-7
Objectivity of the Expert ....................................................................8-14
Reference to an Expert in the Auditors Report................................. 15
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 16

*
, Using the Work of an Expert should be
1
, which sets out

*
Issued in December, 1991.
1
Back
SA 620 IV-386
Introduction
When the auditor delegates work to assistants, or uses work
performed by other auditors and experts, he will continue to be
responsible for forming and expressing his opinion on the financial
information. However, he will be entitled to rely on work performed
by others, provided he exercises adequate skill and care and is not
aware of any reason to believe that he should not have so relied. In
the case of any independent statutory appointment to perform the
work on which the auditor has to rely in forming his opinion, such as
in the case of the work of branch auditors appointed under the
Companies Act, 1956, the auditors report should expressly state the
fact of such reliance.
The auditor should carefully direct, supervise and review work
delegated to assistants. The auditor should obtain reasonable
assurance that work performed by other auditors or experts is adequate
for his purpose.
This Standard discusses the auditors responsibility in relation to, and the
procedures the auditor should consider in, using the work of an expert as
audit evidence. In this Standard, the term financial information
encompasses financial statements.
2. The auditors education and experience enable him to be
knowledgeable about business matters in general, but he is not expected to
have the expertise of a person trained for, or qualified to engage in, the
practice of another profession or occupation, such as an actuary or
engineer.
3. An expert (or a specialist), for the purpose of this Statement, is a
person, firm or other association of persons possessing special skill,
knowledge and experience in a particular field other than accounting and
auditing. An expert may be:
engaged by the client,
engaged by the auditor,
employed by the client, or
Using the Work of an Expert
SA 620 IV-387
employed by the auditor.
4. When the auditor uses the work of an expert employed by him, he is
using that work in the employees capacity as an expert rather than
delegating the work to an assistant on the audit. Accordingly, in such
circumstances, he should apply relevant procedures described in this
Statement in satisfying himself as to his employees work and findings.
Determining the Need to Use the Work of an Expert
5. During the audit, the auditor may seek to obtain, in conjunction with the
client or independently, audit evidence in the form of reports, opinions,
valuations and statements of an expert. Examples are:
Valuations of certain types of assets, for example, land and buildings,
plant and machinery, works of art, and precious stones.
Determination of quantities or physical condition of assets, for example,
minerals stored in stockpiles, mineral and petroleum reserves, and the
remaining useful life of plant and machinery.
Determination of amounts using specialised techniques or methods, for
example, an actuarial valuation.
The measurement of work completed and to be completed on contracts
in progress for the purpose of revenue recognition.
Legal opinions concerning interpretations of agreements, statutes,
regulations, notifications, circulars, etc.
6. When determining whether to use the work of an expert or not, the
auditor should consider:
the materiality of the item being examined in relation to the financial
information as a whole,
the nature and complexity of the item including the risk of error therein,
and
the other audit evidence available with respect to the item.
Skills and Competence of the Expert
7. When the auditor plans to use the experts work as audit evidence, he
should satisfy himself as to the experts skills and competence by
considering the experts:
professional qualifications, licence or membership in an appropriate
SA 620 IV-388
professional body, and
experience and reputation in the field in which the evidence is sought.
However, when the auditor uses the work of an expert employed by him, he
will not need to inquire into his skills and competence.
Objectivity of the Expert
8. The auditor should also consider the objectivity of the expert. The risk
that an experts objectivity will be impaired increases when the expert is:
employed by the client, or
related in some other manner to the client.
Accordingly, in these circumstances, the auditor should (after taking into
account the factors in paragraphs 6 and 7) consider performing more
extensive procedures than would otherwise have been planned, or he might
consider engaging another expert.
Evaluating the Work of an Expert
9. When the auditor intends to use the work of an expert, he should
examine evidence to gain knowledge regarding the terms of the experts
engagement and such other matters as :
the objectives and scope of the experts work,
a general outline as to the specific items in the experts report,
confidentiality of the experts work, including the possibility of its
communication to third parties,
the experts relationship with the client, if any,
confidentiality of the clients information used by the expert.
10. The auditor should seek reasonable assurance that the experts work
constitutes appropriate audit evidence in support of the financial information,
by considering:-
the source data used,
the assumptions and methods used and, if appropriate, their consistency
with the prior period, and
the results of the experts work in the light of the auditors overall
knowledge of the business and of the results of his audit procedures.
SA 620 IV-389
The auditor should also satisfy himself that the substance of the experts
findings is properly reflected in the financial information.
11. The auditor should consider whether the expert has used source data
which are appropriate in the circumstances. The procedures to be applied by
the auditor should include:
making inquiries of the expert to determine how he has satisfied himself
that the source data are sufficient, relevant and reliable, and
conducting audit procedures on the data provided by the client to the
expert to obtain reasonable assurance that the data are appropriate.
12. The appropriateness and reasonableness of assumptions and methods
used and their application are the responsibility of the expert. The auditor
does not have the same expertise and, therefore, cannot always challenge
the experts assumptions and methods. However, the auditor should obtain
an understanding of those assumptions and methods to determine that they
are reasonable based on the auditors knowledge of the clients business and
on the results of his audit procedures.
13. Normally, completion of the above procedures will provide the auditor
with reasonable assurance that he has obtained appropriate audit evidence
in support of the financial information. In exceptional cases where the work of
an expert does not support the related representations in the financial
information, the auditor should attempt to resolve the inconsistency by
discussions with the client and the expert. Applying additional procedures,
including possibly engaging another expert, may also assist the auditor in
resolving the inconsistency.
14. If, after performing these procedures, the auditor concludes that:
the work of the expert is inconsistent with the information in the financial
statements, or that
the work of the expert does not constitute sufficient appropriate audit
evidence (e.g., where the work of the expert involves highly technical
matters or where, on grounds of confidentiality, the expert refuses to
make available to the auditor the source data used by him),
he should express a qualified opinion, a disclaimer of opinion or an adverse
opinion, as may be appropriate.
SA 620 IV-390
Reference to an Expert in the Auditors Report
15. When expressing an unqualified opinion, the auditor should not refer to
the work of an expert in his report. If, as a result of the work of an expert, the
auditor decides to express other than an unqualified opinion, it may in some
circumstances benefit the reader of his report if the auditor, in explaining the
nature of his reservation, refers to or describes the work of the expert.
Where, in doing so, the auditor considers it appropriate to disclose the
identity of the expert, he should obtain prior consent of the expert for such
disclosure if such consent has not already been obtained.
Effective Date
Back
SA 620 IV-391
Standard on Auditing (SA) 620, Using the Work of an
Expert
{The following is the General Clarification (GC)-AASB/1/2002 issued by the
Accountants of India on Standard on Auditing (SA) 620, Using the Work of an
Expert.}
1. Paragraph 12 of SA 620 provide as under:
12. The appropriateness and reasonableness of assumptions and
methods used and their application are the responsibility of the expert. The
auditor does not have the same expertise and, therefore, cannot always
challenge the experts assumptions and methods. However, the auditor
should obtain an understanding of those assumptions and methods to
determine that they are reasonable based on the auditors knowledge of the
clients business and on the results of his audit procedures.
2. The auditor while verifying the accrued liability for retirement benefits or for
Group Gratuity Schemes has to use the work of an another expert, i.e.,
actuary or the insurer itself. In such a case, the issue to be considered is
whether it is sufficient for the auditor to rely on the certificate given by
insurer or actuary without establishing the reasonableness of the
assumptions made by the actuary or the insurer based on the auditors
knowledge of the clients business. It is clarified that the auditor should,
while using the certificate issued by the actuary or the insurer, obtain an
understanding of the methods used by the actuary or the insurer in
determining the liability and should also judge the appropriateness and
reasonableness of assumptions, for example, with regard to the following:
(i) Rate of Return
(ii) Number of Employees
(iii) Retirement Age
(iv) Salaries
(v) Promotion Policies
(vi) Age of Employees
Back Back
SA 700 (AAS 28)
THE AUDITORS REPORT
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-4
Basic Elements of the Auditors Report ..........................................5-28
The Auditors Report .......................................................................29-30
Modified Reports..............................................................................31-41
Circumstances That May Result in Other Than
an Unqualified Opinion....................................................................42-47
Effective Date ........................................................................................ 48
Appendix

, The Auditors Report on Financial

Statementsshould be read in the context of the Preface to the Standards on
1
,
which sets out the authority of SAs.

Issued in January, 2003. From the date this SA becomes effective, the Format of Audit Report
(Revised), (published in April, 2002 issue of the The Chartered Accountant, p.1229) and the
Announcement regarding revision of Format of Audit Report, (published in December, 2002 issue of
the The Chartered Accountant, p.616) shall stand withdrawn. Further, the Council, at its 269
th

meeting held from July 18 to 20, 2007, decided to withdraw paragraphs 3.1 to 4.10 of the Statement
on Qualifications in Auditors Report enunciating the principles involved in issuing other than
unqualified reports as well as examples of situations that may give rise to other than a unqualified
opinion and suggested wordings therefore considering the fact that these aspects have been amply
covered in SA 700 and it also contains sufficient examples of situations giving rise to other than
unqualified opinions as well as suggested wordings.
1
Back
The Auditors Report on Financial Statements
SA 700 IV-393
Introduction
on the form and content of the auditors report issued as a result of an audit
performed by an auditor of the financial statements of an entity. Much of the
standards laid down by this SA can be adapted to auditors reports on
financial information other than financial statements.
2. The auditor should reviewand assess the conclusions drawn from
the audit evidence obtained as the basis for the expression of an
opinion on the financial statements.
3. This review and assessment involves considering whether the financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with an acceptable financial
reporting framework applicable to the entity under audit. It is also necessary
to consider whether the financial statements comply with the relevant
statutory requirements.
4. The auditors report should contain a clear written expression of
opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole.
Basi c El ements of the Audi tor s Report
5. The auditors report includes the following basic elements, ordinarily, in
the following layout:
(a) Title;
(b) Addressee;
(c) Opening or introductory paragraph
(i) identification of the financial statements audited;
(ii) a statement of the responsibility of the entitys management and
the responsibility of the auditor;
(d) Scope paragraph (describing the nature of an audit)
(i) a reference to the auditing standards generally accepted in India;
(ii) a description of the work performed by the auditor;
(e) Opinion paragraph containing
SA 700 IV-394
(i) a reference to the financial reporting framework used to prepare
the financial statements; and
(ii) an expression of opinion on the financial statements;
(f) Date of the report;
(g) Place of signature; and
(h) Auditors signature.
A measure of uniformity in the form and content of the auditors report is
desirable because it helps to promote the readers understanding of the
auditors report and to identify unusual circumstances when they occur.
6. A statute governing the entity or a regulator may require the auditor to
include certain matters in the audit report or prescribe the form in which the
auditor should issue his report. In such a case, the auditor should incorporate
in his audit report, the matters specified by the statute or regulator and/or
report in the form prescribed by them in addition to the requirements of this
SA.
Title
7. The auditors report should have an appropriate title. It may be
appropriate to use the term Auditors Report in the title to distinguish the
auditors report from reports that might be issued by others, such as by the
officers of the entity, the board of directors, or from the reports of others.
Addressee
8. The auditors report should be appropriately addressed as required
by the circumstances of the engagement and applicable laws and
regulations. Ordinarily, the auditors report is addressed to the authority
appointing the auditor.
Opening or Introductory Paragraph
9. The auditors report should identify the financial statements
2
of the

2

The Council of the Institute has made Accounting Standard (AS) 3, Cash Flow Statements,
mandatory for certain entities in respect of accounting periods commencing on or after 1.4.2001.
Further, the Council has also decided that AS 3 should also be treated as a specified accounting
standard for the purpose of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 thereby making the Cash Flow
Statements a part of the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account. However, irrespective of the
SA 700 IV-395
entity that have been audited, including the date of and period covered
by the financial statements.
10. The report should include a statement that the financial statements
are the responsibility of the entitys management and a statement that
the responsibility of the auditor is to express an opinion on the
financial statements based on the audit.
11. Financial statements are the representations of management. The
preparation of such statements requires management to make significant
accounting estimates and judgments, as well as to determine the appropriate
accounting principles and methods used in preparation of the financial
statements. This determination will be made in the context of the financial
reporting framework that management chooses, or is required to use. In
contrast, the auditors responsibility is to audit these financial statements in
order to express an opinion thereon.
12. An illustration of these matters in an opening (introductory) paragraph
is:
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of . (Name
of the entity) as at 31st March 2XXX and also the Profit and Loss

Account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the entitys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
Scope Paragraph
13. The auditors report should describe the scope of the audit by
stating that the audit was conducted in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in India. The reader needs this as an

fact that the cash flow statement is considered to be a part of the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss
Account, the opening or the introductory paragraph of the auditors report on financial statements of
such companies and other entities for which AS 3 has been made mandatory, would also identify the
Cash Flow Statement as a part of the financial statements audited apart from the Balance Sheet and
Profit and Loss Account. Similar reporting considerations would also apply to the entities which,
though not required to comply with AS 3 in view of its not being mandatory for them, voluntarily
prepare the cash flow statements. Further, in the above mentioned cases, the auditors report on
financial statements would also contain an expression of opinion on the true and fair view of the cash
flows for the period under audit (refer to Appendix for an illustrative auditors report on the financial
statements in the case of a company for which AS 3 has been made mandatory).
SA 700 IV-396
assurance that the audit has been carried out in accordance with established
standards.
14. Scope refers to the auditors ability to perform audit procedures
deemed necessary in the circumstances. Standard on Auditing (SA) 200A,
Objective and Scope of the Audit of Financial Statements, with regard to
the determination of the scope states (paragraph 5):
The scope of an audit of financial statements will be
determined by the auditor having regard to the terms of the
engagement, the requirements of relevant legislation and
the pronouncements of the Institute. The terms of
engagement cannot, however, restrict the scope of an audit
in relation to matters which are prescribed by legislation or
by the pronouncements of the Institute.
15. The Auditing and Assurance Standards issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India establish the auditing standards generally
accepted in India.
16. The report should include a statement that the audit was planned
and performed to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.
17. The auditors report should describe the audit as including:
(a) examining, on a test basis, evidence to support the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements;
(b) assessing the accounting principles used in the preparation
of the financial statements;
(c) assessing the significant estimates made by management in
the preparation of the financial statements; and
(d) evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
18. The report should include a statement by the auditor that the audit
provides a reasonable basis for his opinion.
19. An illustration of these matters in a scope paragraph is:
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the
SA 700 IV-397
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Opinion Paragraph
20. The opinion paragraph of the auditors report should clearly
indicate the financial reporting framework used to prepare the financial
statements and state the auditors opinion as to whether the financial
statements give a true and fair viewin accordance with that financial
reporting framework and, where appropriate, whether the financial
statements comply with the statutory requirements.
21. The term used to express the auditors opinion, give a true and fair
view, indicates, amongst other things, that the auditor considers only those
matters that are material to the financial statements.
22. Paragraph 3 of Framework of Statements on Standard Auditing
Practices and Guidance Notes on Related Services
**
, issued by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India, discusses the financial reporting
framework. The paragraph reads as under:
Financial Reporting Framework
Financial statements are ordinarily prepared and presented
annually and are directed towards the common information needs
of a wide range of users. Many of those users rely on financial
statements as their major source of information because they do
not have the power to obtain additional information to meet their
specific information needs. Thus, financial statements need to be
prepared in accordance with one, or a combination of:
(a) relevant statutory requirements, e.g., the Companies Act,
1956, for companies;

**
The Framework issued in 2001 has been withdrawn pursuant to the issuance of the Framework for
Assurance Engagements, by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, in July, 2007. The
Revised Framework is applicable from April 1, 2008. The text of the Revised Framework is
reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.
SA 700 IV-398
(b) accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India; and
(c) other recognised accounting principles and practices, e.g.,
those recommended in the Guidance Notes issued by the
23. An illustration of these matters in an opinion paragraph is:

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the financial statements give a true
and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
(name of the entity) as at 31st March 2XXX; and
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit/loss
for the year ended on that date.
24. In addition to an opinion on the true and fair view, the auditors report
may need to include an opinion as to whether the financial statements
comply with other requirements specified by relevant statutes or law. For
example, in the case of companies incorporated under the Companies Act,
1956, section 227(2) of the said Act requires that the auditors report should
state in his audit report, whether in the auditors opinion and to the best of his
information and according to the explanations given to the auditor, the
financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act,
1956 in the manner so required
3.
.
Date of Report
25. The date of an auditors report on the financial statements is the
date on which the auditor signs the report expressing an opinion on the
financial statements. The date of report informs the reader that the auditor
has considered the effect on the financial statements and on the report of the
events and transactions of which the auditor became aware and that
occurred up to that date.

3
Refer to Appendix for an illustration of the opinion paragraph in the case of a company incorporated
under the Companies Act, 1956. Also refer footnote 1 for applicability of AS 3 to an entity and the
auditors duties and responsibilities in this regard.
SA 700 IV-399
26. Since the auditors responsibility is to report on the financial
statements as prepared and presented by management, the auditor
should not date the report earlier than the date on which the financial
statements are signed or approved by management.
Place of Signature
27. The report should name specific location, which is ordinarily the
city where the audit report is signed.
Auditors Signature
28. The report should be signed by the auditor in his personal name.
Where the firmis appointed as the auditor, the report should be signed
in the personal name of the auditor and in the name of the audit firm.
The partner/proprietor signing the audit report should also mention the
membership number assigned by the Institute of Chartered
The Audi tor s Report
29. An unqualified opinion should be expressed when the auditor
concludes that the financial statements give a true and fair viewin
accordance with the financial reporting framework used for the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements. An unqualified
opinion indicates, implicitly, that any changes in the accounting principles or
in the method of their application, and the effects thereof, have been properly
determined and disclosed in the financial statements. An unqualified
opinion also indicates that:
(a) the financial statements have been prepared using the generally
accepted accounting principles, which have been consistently applied;
(b) the financial statements comply with relevant statutory requirements
and regulations; and
(c) there is adequate disclosure of all material matters relevant to the
proper presentation of the financial information, subject to statutory
SA 700 IV-400
30. The following is an illustration of a complete auditors report
incorporating the basic elements set forth and illustrated above. This
report illustrates the expression of an unqualified opinion.
Audi tor s Report
(Appropriate Addressee)
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of .....
(Name of the entity) as at 31st March 2XXX and also the
Profit and Loss Account for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto
4
. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the entitys management. Our
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India
5
:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of
affairs of .. (Name of the entity) as at 31
st
March 2XXX; and
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the
profit/loss for the year ended on that date.

4
Refer to footnote 1.
5
ibid.
SA 700 IV-401
For ABC and Co.,
Auditors Signature
(Name of Member signing the Audit Report)
(Designation
6)

(Membership Number)
Place of Signature
Date
An illustration of auditors report on the financial statements in the case of a
company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 to which AS 3 is
applicable is given in the Appendix.
Modi fi ed Reports
7

31. An auditors report is considered to be modified when it includes:
(a) Matters That Do Not Affect the Auditors Opinion
emphasis of matter
(b) Matters That Do Affect the Auditors Opinion
qualified opinion
disclaimer of opinion
adverse opinion
Uniformity in the form and content of each type of modified report will
enhance the users understanding of such reports. Accordingly, this SA
includes suggested wordings to express an unqualified opinion as well as
examples of modifying phrases for use when issuing modified reports.
Matters That Do Not Affect the Auditors Opinion
32. In certain circumstances, an auditors report may be modified by adding
an emphasis of matter paragraph to highlight a matter affecting the financial

6
7
This SA lays down the basic principles that govern the auditors report on financial statements. The
reporting requirements contained in other SAs issued by the Council of the Institute would also be
applicable.
SA 700 IV-402
statements which is included in a note to the financial statements that more
extensively discusses the matter. The addition of such an emphasis of
matter paragraph does not affect the auditors opinion. The paragraph would
preferably be included preceding the opinion paragraph and would ordinarily
refer to the fact that the auditors opinion is not qualified in this respect.
33. The auditor should modify the auditors report by adding a
paragraph to highlight a material matter regarding a going concern
problem where the going concern question is not resolved and
adequate disclosures have been made in the financial statements.
34. The auditor should consider modifying the auditors report by
adding a paragraph if there is a significant uncertainty (other than
going concern problem), the resolution of which is dependent upon
future events and which may affect the financial statements. An
uncertainty is a matter whose outcome depends on future actions or events
not under the direct control of the entity but that may affect the financial
statements.
35. An illustration of an emphasis of matter paragraph for a significant
uncertainty in an auditors report is as follows:
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note X
of Schedule to the financial statements. The entity is
the defendant in a lawsuit alleging infringement of certain
patent rights and claiming royalties and punitive damages.
The entity has filed a counter action, and preliminary
hearings and discovery proceedings on both actions are in
progress. The ultimate outcome of the matter cannot
presently be determined, and no provision for any liability
that may result has been made in the financial statements.
In our opinion (remaining words are the same as
illustrated in the opinion paragraph-paragraph 30 above .
(An illustration of an emphasis of matter paragraph relating
to going concern is set out in SA 570, Going Concern.)
36. The addition of a paragraph emphasising a going concern problem or
significant uncertainty is ordinarily adequate to meet the auditors reporting
responsibilities regarding such matters. However, in extreme cases, such as
situations involving multiple uncertainties that are significant to the financial
SA 700 IV-403
statements, the auditor may consider it appropriate to express a disclaimer of
opinion instead of adding an emphasis of matter paragraph.
Matters that Do Affect the Auditors Opinion
37. An auditor may not be able to express an unqualified opinion when
either of the following circumstances exists and, in the auditors judgment,
the effect of the matter is or may be material to the financial statements:
(a) there is a limitation on the scope of the auditors work; or
(b) there is a disagreement with management regarding the
acceptability of the accounting policies selected, the method of their
application or the adequacy of financial statement disclosures.
The circumstances described in (a) could lead to a qualified opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion. The circumstances described in (b) could lead to a
qualified opinion or an adverse opinion. These circumstances are discussed
in paragraphs 42 - 47.
38. A qualified opinion should be expressed when the auditor
concludes that an unqualified opinion cannot be expressed but that the
effect of any disagreement with management is not so material and
pervasive as to require an adverse opinion, or limitation on scope is not
so material and pervasive as to require a disclaimer of opinion. A
qualified opinion should be expressed as being subject to or except
for the effects of the matter to which the qualification relates.
39. A disclaimer of opinion should be expressed when the possible
effect of a limitation on scope is so material and pervasive that the
auditor has not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence and is, accordingly, unable to express an opinion on the
40. An adverse opinion should be expressed when the effect of a
disagreement is so material and pervasive to the financial statements
that the auditor concludes that a qualification of the report is not
adequate to disclose the misleading or incomplete nature of the
41. Whenever the auditor expresses an opinion that is other
than unqualified, a clear description of all the substantive reasons
should be included in the report and, unless impracticable,
SA 700 IV-404
a quantification of the possible effect(s), individually and in
aggregate, on the financial statements should be mentioned in the
auditors report. In circumstances where it is not practicable
to quantify the effect of modifications made in the audit report
accurately, the auditor may do so on the basis of estimates made by the
management after carrying out such audit tests as are possible and clearly
indicate the fact that the figures are based on management estimates.
Ordinarily, this information would be set out in a separate paragraph
preceding the opinion or disclaimer of opinion and may include a reference to
a more extensive discussion, if any, in a note to the financial statements.
Ci rcumstances That May Resul t i n Other Than
an Unqual i fi ed Opi ni on
Limitation on Scope
42. A limitation on the scope of the auditors work may sometimes be
imposed by the entity, for example, when the terms of the engagement
specify that the auditor will not carry out an audit procedure that the auditor
believes is necessary. However, when the limitation in the terms of a
proposed engagement is such that the auditor believes the need to express a
disclaimer of opinion exists; the auditor should ordinarily not accept such a
limited engagement as an audit engagement, unless required by statute.
Also, a statutory auditor should not accept such an audit engagement when
the limitation infringes on the auditors statutory duties.
43. A scope limitation may be imposed by circumstances, for example,
when the timing of the auditors appointment is such that the auditor is
unable to observe the counting of physical inventories. It may also arise
when, in the opinion of the auditor, the entitys accounting records are
inadequate or when the auditor is unable to carry out an audit procedure
believed to be desirable. In these circumstances, the auditor would attempt
to carry out reasonable alternative procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence to support an unqualified opinion.
44. When there is a limitation on the scope of the auditors work that
requires expression of a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion,
the auditors report should describe the limitation and indicate the
possible adjustments to the financial statements that might have been
determined to be necessary had the limitation not existed.
SA 700 IV-405
45. Illustrations of these matters are set out below :
Limitation on Scope Qualified Opinion
We have audited ... (remaining words are the same
as illustrated in the introductory paragraph paragraph 30
above).
Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we
conducted our audit in accordance with .. (remaining
words are the same as illustrated in the scope paragraph
paragraph 30 above).
We did not observe the counting of the physical inventories
as at 31st March 2XXX since that date was prior to the time
we were appointed as auditors of .(Name of the
entity). Owing to the nature of the entitys records, we were
unable to satisfy ourselves as to inventory quantities by
other audit procedures.
In our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us, subject to the
effects of such adjustments, if any, as might have been
determined to be necessary had we been able to satisfy
ourselves as to physical inventory quantities, the financial
statements give a . (remaining words are the same
as illustrated in the opinion paragraph paragraph 30
above).
Limitation on Scope Disclaimer of Opinion
We were engaged to audit the attached Balance Sheet of
..(Name of the entity) as at 31st March 2XXX and
also the Profit and Loss Account for the year ended on that
date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the entitys management. (Omit the
sentence stating the responsibility of the auditor).
(The paragraph discussing the scope of the audit would
either be omitted or amended according to the
circumstances.)
SA 700 IV-406
(Add a paragraph discussing the scope limitation as
follows:)
We were not able to observe all physical inventories and
confirm accounts receivable due to limitations placed on the
scope of our work by the entity.
Because of the significance of the matters discussed in the
preceding paragraph, we do not express an opinion on the
Disagreement with Management
46. The auditor may disagree with management about matters such as the
acceptability of accounting policies selected, the method of their application,
or the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements. If such
disagreements are material to the financial statements, the auditor
should express a qualified or an adverse opinion.
47. Illustrations of these matters are set out below:
Disagreement on Accounting Policies-Inappropriate
Accounting MethodQualified Opinion
We have audited ... (remaining words are the same as
illustrated in the introductory paragraph paragraph 30
above).
We conducted our audit in accordance with ..
(remaining words are the same as illustrated in the scope
paragraphparagraph 30 above).
As stated in Note X of Schedule . to the financial
statements, no depreciation has been provided for the
period in the financial statements. This is contrary to
Accounting Standard (AS) 6 on Depreciation Accounting,
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
and the accounting policy being followed by the entity
according to which depreciation is provided on straight line
basis. Had this accounting policy been followed, the
provision for depreciation for the period would have been
Rs............. This short provisioning for depreciation has
SA 700 IV-407
resulted into the profit for the year, fixed assets and
reserves and surplus being overstated by Rs.
Or
As stated in Note X of Schedule .. to the financial
statements, hire purchase sales have been treated as
outright sales by the entity and contrary to accepted
accounting practice, the entire profit thereon has been
taken into account. The profit relating to installment not due
as at the date of the Balance Sheet and included in profit
for the year amounted to Rs.. This has resulted in the
profit for the year, inventories and reserve and surplus
being overstated by Rs
effect on the financial statements of the matter referred to in
the preceding paragraph, the financial statements give a
true and ... (remaining words are the same as illustrated in
the opinion paragraph-paragraph 30 above).
Disagreement on Accounting PoliciesInadequate
Disclosure-Qualified Opinion
We have audited .. (remaining words are the same as
illustrated in the introductory paragraph paragraph 30
above).
We conducted our audit in accordance with .....
On 15th January 2XXX, the .. (Name of the entity)
issued debentures in the amount of Rs.XXX for the purpose
of financing plant expansion. The debentures agreement
restricts the payment of future cash dividends to earnings
after 31st March 2XXX. In our opinion, disclosure of this
information is required by ............
omission of the information included in the preceding
SA 700 IV-408
paragraph, the financial statements give a true and .
(remaining words are the same as illustrated in the opinion
paragraph, paragraph 30 above).
Disagreement on Accounting Policies - Inadequate
Disclosure - Adverse Opinion
(Name of the entity), as at 31st March 2XXX, and also the
Profit and Loss Account for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto
8
. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the entitys management. Our
We conducted our audit in accordance with ...
(Paragraph(s) discussing the disagreement).
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations given to us, because of the effects of the
matters discussed in the preceding paragraph(s), the financial
statements do not give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India
9
:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs
of the company as at 31
st

March 2XXX; and
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the
profit/loss for the year ended on that date.
Effecti ve Date
st
April 2003. Earlier application
of the SA is encouraged.

8
Refer to footnote 3.
9
ibid.
SA 700 IV-409
Compati bi l i ty wi th the Internati onal Standard
on Audi ti ng (ISA) 700
consistent in all material respects with those set out in the International
Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700, The Auditors Report on Financial
Statements, except the following:
(a) Due to the practices prevailing in India, the SA requires the auditor
to mention the Place of Signature instead of the Auditors
Address in the auditors report. The place of signature is the name
of specific location, which is ordinarily the city where the audit report
is signed [see paragraph 27]. According to ISA 700, the expression
Auditors Address means the name of a specific location, which is
ordinarily the city where the auditor maintains the office that has the
responsibility for the audit.
(b) The SA requires the auditor to mention the membership number
assigned by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India [see
paragraph 28]. ISA 700, however, does not contain any
corresponding requirement.
(c) The SA requires that whenever the auditor expresses an opinion
that is other than unqualified, a clear description of all the
substantive reasons should be included in the report and, unless
impracticable, a quantification of the possible effect(s), individually
and in aggregate, on the financial statements should be mentioned
in the auditors report [see paragraph 41]. ISA 700 does not require
the auditor to quantify the possible effect(s) in aggregate on the
SA 700 IV-410
Appendix
Illustrative Auditors Report on the Financial Statements in the Case of a
Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 to which AS 3 is
applicable
10

[see paragraph 30]
Auditors Report
The Members of (name of the Company)
11

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of . (name of the
company), as at 31st March 2XXX, and also the Profit and Loss Account and the
cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As required by the Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report)
Order, 1988
12
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section

10
In case AS 3 is not applicable to a company and such company also does not voluntarily prepare the
cash flow statement, the references to cash flow statement should be deleted fromthe entire report.
11
Reference may also be made to the Statement on Qualifications in Auditors Report and the
Guidance Note on Section 227(3)(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 issued by the Council of the
(The readers may note that the Council, at 269
th
meeting, held fromJ uly 18 to 20, 2007, decided to
withdrawthe Statement on Qualification in Auditors Reportexcept paragraphs 2.1 to 2.30 dealing
with reporting under section 227 (1A) of the Companies Act, 1956 and to rename the Statement as
Statement on Reporting under section 227(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956.)
12
The Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1988 has since been replaced
by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 vide Department of Company Affairs Notification
dated June 12, 2003.
SA 700 IV-411
(4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure
13
a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of
our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept
by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books
(and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit have been
received from the branches not visited by us. The Branch Auditors
Report(s) have been forwarded to us and have been appropriately dealt
with);
14

(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and cash flow statement dealt
with by this report are in agreement with the books of account (and with the
audited returns from the branches);
15

(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and cash flow
statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards
referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on
31
st
March 2XXX and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report
that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2XXX from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section
274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by
the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and
fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India
16
:
company as at 31st March 2XXX;

13
Alternatively, instead of giving the comments on Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 in an
Annexure, the comments may be contained in the body of the main report. Members attention in this
regard is invited to the Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. It may also be noted that requirements of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 2003 have not been reproduced in this illustration.
14
Wherever applicable.
15
ibid.
16
ibid.
SA 700 IV-412
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit / loss
17
for the
year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
For ABC and Co.
Signature
(Name of the Member Signing the Audit Report)
(Designation
18
)
Place of Signature Membership Number
Date

17
Whichever is applicable.
18
Partner or Proprietor, as the case may be.
Back
SA 710 (AAS 25)
COMPARATIVES
Contents
Paragraph(s)

Introduction ....................................................................................... 1-5
Auditors Responsibilities................................................................ 6-9
Reporting ....................................................................................... 10-15
Incoming Auditor-Additional Requirements ................................... 16
Effective Date ..................................................................................... 17
Appendices

, Comparatives should be read in the

1
authority of SAs.

Issued in September, 2002.

1
Back
SA 710 IV-414
Introduction
on the auditors responsibilities regarding comparatives. It does not deal with
situations when summarised financial statements or data are presented with
the audited financial statements.
2. The auditor should determine whether the comparatives comply, in
all material respects, with the financial reporting framework relevant to
the financial statements being audited.
3. The existence of differences in financial reporting frameworks results in
comparative financial information being presented differently in each
framework. Comparatives in financial statements, for example, may present
amounts (such as financial position, results of operations, cash flows) and
appropriate disclosures of an entity for more than one period, depending on
the framework. The frameworks and methods of presentation that are
referred to in this SA are as follows:
(a) Corresponding Figures where amounts and other disclosures for the
preceding period are included as part of the current period financial
statements, and are intended to be read in relation to the amounts and
other disclosures relating to the current period (referred to as current
period figures for the purpose of this SA). These corresponding figures
are not presented as complete financial statements capable of standing
alone, but are an integral part of the current period financial statements
intended to be read only in relationship to the current period figures;
and
(b) Comparative Financial Statements where amounts and other
disclosures for the preceding period are included for comparison with
the financial statements of the current period, but do not form part of the
current period financial statements.
4. Comparatives are presented in compliance with the relevant financial
reporting framework. The essential audit reporting differences are that:
(a) for corresponding figures, the auditors report only refers to the financial
statements of the current period; whereas
(b) for comparative financial statements, the auditors report refers to each
period that financial statements are presented.
Comparati ves
SA 710 IV-415
5. This SA establishes standard on the auditors responsibilities for
comparatives and for reporting on them under the 'corresponding figures'
framework. This SA does not establish standards on the auditor's
responsibilities when the 'comparative financial statements' framework is
used for presentation of comparative financial information. It is recognised
that such framework for presentation of comparative financial information is
not widely prevalent in India. Appendix I to this SA discusses these different
reporting frameworks.
Auditors Responsibilities
6. The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
that the corresponding figures meet the requirements of the relevant
financial reporting framework. The extent of audit procedures performed
on the corresponding figures is significantly less than that for the audit of the
current period figures and is ordinarily limited to ensuring that the
corresponding figures have been correctly reported and are appropriately
classified. This involves the auditor assessing whether:
(a) accounting policies used for the corresponding figures are consistent
with those of the current period or whether appropriate adjustments
and/or disclosures have been made; and
(b) corresponding figures agree with the amounts and other disclosures
presented in the prior period or whether appropriate adjustments and/or
disclosures have been made.
7. When the financial statements of the prior period have been audited by
another auditor, the incoming auditor should assess whether the corresponding
figures meet the conditions specified in paragraph 6 above. The auditor should
also comply with the requirements of Standard on Auditing (SA) 510, "Initial
Engagements-Opening Balances".
8. When the financial statements of the prior period have not been audited,
the incoming auditor nonetheless should assess whether the corresponding
figures meet the conditions specified in paragraph 6 above. The auditor should
also comply with the requirements of Standard on Auditing (SA) 510, "Initial
Engagements-Opening Balances".
9. If the auditor becomes aware of a possible material misstatement in the
corresponding figures when performing the current period audit, the auditor
SA 710 IV-416
should perform such additional procedures as are appropriate in the
circumstances.
Reporting
10. When the comparatives are presented as corresponding figures, the
auditor's report should not specifically identify comparatives because the
auditors opinion is on the current period financial statements as a whole,
including the corresponding figures. However, the auditors report would
make specific reference to the corresponding figures in the circumstances
described in paragraphs 11, 12, 14(b), 15 and 16.
11. When the auditors report on the prior period, as previously issued,
included a qualified opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or adverse opinion
and the matter which gave rise to the modification in the audit report
2
is:
(a) unresolved, and results in a modification of the auditors report
regarding the current period figures, the auditors report should
also be modified regarding the corresponding figures; or
(b) unresolved, but does not result in a modification of the auditors
report regarding the current period figures, the auditors report
should be modified regarding the corresponding figures.
Illustrative audit reports for situations discussed above are given in
Appendix II to this SA.
12. When the auditors report on the prior period, as previously issued,
included a qualified opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or adverse opinion and the
matter which gave rise to the modification is resolved and properly dealt with
in the financial statements, the current report does not ordinarily refer to the
previous modification. However, if the matter is material to the current
period, the auditor may include an emphasis of matter paragraph dealing
with the situation.

2
Standard on Auditing (SA) 700, "The Auditor's Report on Financial Statements", deals with the
concept of "modified audit report". An auditor's report is considered to be modified when it includes:
Matters that do not affect the auditor 's opinion
(a) emphasis of matter
Matters that do affect the auditor 's opinion
(a) qualified opinion,
(b) disclaimer of opinion, or
(c) adverse opinion.
Comparati ves
SA 710 IV-417
13. In performing the audit of the current period financial statements, the
auditor, in certain unusual circumstances, may become aware of a material
misstatement that affects the prior period financial statements on which an
unmodified report has been previously issued.
14. In such circumstances, the auditor should examine that:
(a) appropriate disclosures have been made; or
(b) if appropriate disclosures have not been made, the auditor should
issue a modified report on the current period financials modified
with respect to the corresponding figures included therein.
15. If, in the circumstances described in paragraph 13, appropriate
disclosures have been made in the current period financial statements, the
auditor may include an emphasis of matter paragraph describing the
circumstances and referencing to the appropriate disclosures. Appropriate
disclosures could be in the form of proforma comparative information being
presented in the notes to the financial statements. Proforma comparative
information would help the reader of the financial statements to clearly
perceive the effect of misstatement on the corresponding figures.
Incoming Auditor-Additional Requirements
Prior Period Financial Statements Not Audited
16. When the prior period financial statements are not audited, the
incoming auditor should state in the auditors report that the
corresponding figures are unaudited. Such a statement does not,
however, relieve the auditor of the requirement to perform appropriate
procedures regarding opening balances of the current period. Disclosure in
the financial statements that the corresponding figures are unaudited is
encouraged.
Effective Date
SA 710 IV-418
(ISA) 710
Comparative Financial Statements Framework
This Standard on Auditing does not establish standards on the auditor's
responsibilities when the 'comparative financial statements' framework is
used for presentation of comparative financial information. This is a material
departure from the standards set out in ISA 710 "Comparatives". It is
recognised that such framework for presentation of comparative financial
information is not widely prevalent in India.
Incoming AuditorAdditional Requirements
ISA 710 requires that in situations where the incoming auditor identifies that
the corresponding figures are materially misstated, the auditor should
request management to revise the corresponding figures or if management
refuses to do so, the auditor appropriately modifies the audit report. This
requirement of ISA does not find a place in SA 710 in view of the current
legal position prevailing in the Country under which the auditor is not
expected to request the management to revise the corresponding figures.
ISA 710 recognises that in some reporting frameworks the incoming auditor
is permitted to refer to the predecessor auditors report on the corresponding
figures in the incoming auditors report for the current period. According to
the ISA, when the auditor decides to refer to another auditor, the incoming
auditors report should indicate:
(a) that the financial statements of the prior period were audited by another
auditor;
(b) the type of report issued by the predecessor auditor and, if the report
was modified, the reasons therefor; and
(c) the date of that report.
In India, the incoming auditor is not permitted to refer to the predecessor
auditor's report on the corresponding figures in his audit report. Therefore,
this requirement of ISA has not been made part of SA 710.
The other auditing standards established in this SA are generally consistent
in all material respects with those set out in ISA 710 Comparatives.
Comparati ves
SA 710 IV-419
Appendix I
Discussion of Financial Reporting Frameworks
for Comparatives
1. Comparatives covering one or more preceding periods provide the
users of financial statements with information necessary to identify
trends and changes affecting an entity over a period of time.
2. Under financial reporting frameworks (both implicit and explicit),
comparability and consistency are desirable qualities for financial
information. Defined in broadest terms, comparability is the quality of
having certain characteristics in common and comparison is normally a
quantitative assessment of the common characteristics. Consistency is
a quality of the relationship between two accounting numbers.
Consistency (for example, consistency in the use of accounting
principles from one period to another, the consistency of the length of
the reporting period, etc.) is a prerequisite for true comparability.
3. There are two broad financial reporting frameworks for comparatives:
the corresponding figures and the comparative financial statements.
4. Under the corresponding figures framework, the corresponding figures
for the prior period(s) are an integral part of the current period financial
statements and have to be read in conjunction with the amounts and
other disclosures relating to the current period. The level of detail
presented in the corresponding amounts and disclosures is dictated
primarily by its relevance to the current period figures.
5. Under the comparative financial statements framework, the comparative
financial statements for the prior period(s) are considered separate
financial statements. Accordingly, the level of information included in
those comparative financial statements (including all statement
amounts, disclosures, footnotes and other explanatory statements to
the extent that they continue to be of significance) approximates that of
the financial statements of the current period.
SA 710 IV-420
Appendix II
Illustrative Auditor's Report
Illustration 1. Illustrative Audit Report for the circumstances
described in paragraph 11(a). (Prepared under the
reporting framework of Section 227 of the Companies Act,
1956)
Auditor's Report to the Members of (name of the Company)
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of.(name of
the Company), as at 31
st
March, 20X1 and also the Profit and Loss
Account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto
3
. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
3. As required by the Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditor's
Report) Order, 1988
4
issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956,
we enclose in the Annexure
5
a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to
the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the

3
Refer footnote 1 of SA 700, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements.
4
The Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1988 has been replaced by
the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 by Department of Company Affairs Notification
5
Alternatively, instead of giving the comments on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 in
an Annexure, the comments may be contained in the body of the main report. Members' attention
in this regard is invited to the Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Comparati ves
SA 710 IV-421
purposes of our audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination
of those books (and proper returns adequate for the purposes of
our audit have been received from the branches not visited by us.
The Branch Auditors Report(s) have been forwarded to us and
have been appropriately dealt with);
(iii) The Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account (and with the
(iv) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on 31
st
March, 20X1, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31
st
March 20X1 from being appointed as a director in terms of
clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956;
(v) As discussed in Note YY of Schedule ZZ to the financial statements,
no depreciation has been provided in the financial statements which
practice, in our opinion, is not in accordance with Accounting
Standard 6 on Depreciation issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. This is the result of a decision taken by
management at the start of the preceding financial year and caused
us to qualify our audit opinion on the financial statements relating to
that year. Based on the straight-line method of depreciation and
annual rates of 5% for the building and 20% for the equipment, the
loss for the period ended 31
st
March 20X1 should be increased by
Rs.XXXX and the loss for the previous period ended 31
st
March 20X0
should be increased by Rs.XXXX. The fixed assets as at 31
st
March
20X1 should be reduced by accumulated depreciation of Rs.XXXX
and the fixed assets for the previous period ended 31
st
March 20X0
should be reduced by accumulated depreciation of Rs.XXXX. The
accumulated loss should be increased by Rs.XXXX for the period
ended 31
st
March 20X1 and by Rs.XXXX for the previous period
ended 31
st
March 20X0.
(vi) Except for non-provision of depreciation referred to in the
preceding paragraph, in our opinion, the Balance Sheet and Profit
and Loss Account comply with the accounting standards referred
to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.
5. In our opinion, and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the effect on the financial statements of
non-provision of depreciation referred to in paragraph 4(vi) foregoing, the
SA 710 IV-422
said financial statements, read together with the other notes thereon give the
information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required
and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company,
as at 31
st
March 20X1, and
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the year
ended on that date.
For ABC and Co.

Signature
(Designation
6
)
Address:
Date:

Illustration 2 : Illustrative report for the circumstances described in
paragraph 11(b). (prepared under the reporting framework
of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956)
Auditor's Report to the Members of (name of the Company)
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of.(name of
the Company), as at 31
st
March, 20X1 and also the Profit and Loss
Account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial

6
Comparati ves
SA 710 IV-423
3. As required by the Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditor's
Report) Order, 1988
7
issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956,
we enclose in the Annexure
8
a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to
the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purposes of our audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination
of those books (and proper returns adequate for the purposes of
our audit have been received from the branches not visited by us.
The Branch Auditors Report(s) have been forwarded to us and
have been appropriately dealt with);
(iii) The Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account (and with the
(iv) It was not possible for us to obtain external confirmations about
accounts receivable balances amounting to Rs. XXXXXX as at 31
st

March 20X0. Owing to the nature of company's records, we were
unable to satisfy ourselves about the valuation and existence of
accounts receivable and provisioning thereon. Since provisioning
on accounts receivable enter into the determination of the results
of operations and the balances are included in determination of
state of affairs, we were unable to determine the effect of valuation
and provisioning on the financial statements for the period ended
31
st
March 20X0. Our audit report on the financial statements for
the period ended 31
st
March 20X0 was modified accordingly.
(v) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account dealt
with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in
sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,

7
The Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1988 has been replaced by
the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 by Department of Company Affairs Notification
8
Alternatively, instead of giving the comments on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 in
an Annexure, the comments may be contained in the body of the main report. Members' attention
in this regard is invited to the Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, issued
SA 710 IV-424
as on 31
st
March 20X1, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31
st
March 20X1 from being appointed as a director in terms of
clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956;
5. In our opinion, and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the effect on the corresponding
figures for period ended 31
st
March 20X0 of the adjustments, if any, to
the results of operations for the ended 31
st
March 20X0 and to the state
of affairs as on that date, which we might have determined to be
necessary had we been able to obtain external confirmations about
accounts receivable balances amounting to Rs. XXXXXX as at 31
st

March 20X0, the said financial statements, read together with the other
notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
Company, as at 31 March, 20X1, and
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the year
ended on that date.
For ABC and Co.

Signature
(Designation
9
)
Address:
Date:

9
Back
SRE 2400 (AAS 33)
ENGAGEMENTS TO
REVIEWFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Effective for all review engagements relating to
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction .................................................................................. 1-2
Objective of a Review Engagement ................................................... 3
General Principles of a Review Engagement ................................. 4-7
Scope of a Review................................................................................ 8
Moderate Assurance............................................................................ 9
Terms of Engagement .................................................................. 10-12
Planning .............................................................................. 13-15
Work Performed by Others ............................................................... 16
Documentation ................................................................................... 17
Procedures and Evidence............................................................ 18-22
Conclusions and Reporting ......................................................... 23-30
Effective Date ................................................................................... 31
Appendices

Standard on Review Engagements (SRE) 2400
, Engagements to
Review Financial Statements should be read in the context of the Preface
to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and
Related Services
1

Issued in March, 2005. With the issuance of this Standard on Review Engagement, the
Guidance Note on Engagements to Review Financial Statements issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India in May 2000 stands withdrawn.
1
Back
SRE 2400 IV-426
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Review Engagement (SRE) is to
establish standards and provide guidance on the auditors
2
professional
responsibilities when an engagement to review financial statements is
undertaken and on the form and content of the report that the auditor issues
in connection with such a review.
2. This SRE is directed towards the review of financial statements. However,
it is to be applied to the extent practicable to engagements to review financial
or other related information, for example, interim financial statements prepared
by an entity pursuant to Accounting Standard (AS) 25, Interim Financial
Reporting. This SRE is to be read in conjunction with the Framework of
Statements on Standard Auditing Practices and Guidance Notes on Related
Services issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Objective of a Review Engagement
3. The objective of a review of financial statements is to enable an auditor
to state whether, on the basis of procedures which do not provide all the
evidence that would be required in an audit, anything has come to the
auditors attention that causes the auditor to believe that the financial
statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the
financial reporting framework used for the preparation and presentation of
the financial statements
3
(negative assurance).

2
As explained in the Framework of Statements on Standard Auditing Practices and Guidance
Notes on Related Services (issued in 2001), the SAPs (now AASs) and Guidance Notes use
the term auditor when describing both auditing and related services which may be
performed. Such reference is not intended to imply that a person performing related services
need be the auditor of the entitys financial statements.
(The readers may note that the Framework issued in 2001 has been withdrawn pursuant to
the issuance of the Framework for Assurance Engagements, which is applicable fromApril
1, 2008. The text of the Revised Framework is reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.)
3
Paragraph 3 of Framework of Statements on Standard Auditing Practices and Guidance
Notes on Related Services, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,
discusses the financial reporting framework. The paragraph reads as under:
Financial Reporting Framework
Financial statements are ordinarily prepared and presented annually and are directed
towards the common information needs of a wide range of users. Many of those users rely
on financial statements as their major source of information because they do not have the
power to obtain additional information to meet their specific information needs. Thus,
financial statements need to be prepared in accordance with one, or a combination of:
(a) relevant statutory requirements, e.g., the Companies Act, 1956, for companies;
Engagements to Review Financial Statements
SRE 2400 IV-427
General Principles of a Review Engagement
4. The auditor should comply with the Code of Ethics issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Ethical principles governing
the auditors professional responsibilities are:
(a) Independence;
(b) Integrity;
(c) Objectivity;
(d) Professional competence and due care;
(e) Confidentiality;
(f) Professional conduct; and
(g) Technical standards.
5. The auditor should conduct a reviewin accordance with this SRE.
6. The auditor should plan and perform the review with an attitude of
professional skepticism recognising that circumstances may exist which
cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.
7. For the purpose of expressing negative assurance in the review
report, the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate evidence
primarily through inquiry and analytical procedures to be able to draw
conclusions.
Scope of a Review
8. The term scope of a review refers to the review procedures deemed
necessary in the circumstances to achieve the objective of the review. The
procedures required to conduct a reviewof financial statements should
be determined by the auditor having regard to the requirements of this
SRE, relevant legislation, regulation and, where appropriate, the terms
of the reviewengagement and reporting requirements. The scope of a
review is substantially narrower as compared to an audit in accordance with
the generally accepted auditing standards for the expression of an opinion on
the financial statements. Accordingly, while a review involves the application

(b) accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India; and
(c) other recognised accounting principles and practices, e.g., those recommended in
the Guidance Notes issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
SRE 2400 IV-428
of audit skills and techniques, it does not usually involve a study and
evaluation of internal accounting controls, tests of accounting records and of
responses to inquiries by obtaining corroborating evidential matter through
inspection, observation or confirmation and certain other procedures
ordinarily performed during an audit.
Moderate Assurance
9. A review engagement provides a moderate level of assurance that the
information subject to review is free of material misstatement; this is
expressed in the form of negative assurance. Although the auditor attempts
to become aware of all significant matters, the limited procedures of a review
make the achievement of this objective less likely than in an audit
engagement, thus the level of assurance provided is correspondingly less
than that given in an audit.
Terms of Engagement
10. The auditor and the client should agree on the terms of the
engagement. The agreed terms would be recorded in an engagement letter
or other suitable form such as a contract.
11. An engagement letter will be of assistance in planning the review work.
It is in the interests of both the auditor and the client that the auditor sends
an engagement letter documenting the key terms of the appointment. An
engagement letter confirms the auditors acceptance of the appointment and
helps avoid misunderstanding regarding such matters as the objectives and
scope of the engagement and the extent of the auditors responsibilities.
12. Matters that would be included in the engagement letter include:
The objective of the service being performed.
Managements responsibility for the financial statements.
The scope of the review, including reference to this SRE.
Unrestricted access to whatever records, documentation and other
information requested in connection with the review.
The fact that the engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose
errors, violation of laws or other irregularities, for example, fraud or
defalcations that may exist.
SRE 2400 IV-429
A statement that an audit is not being performed and that an audit
opinion will not be expressed. To emphasise this point and to
avoid confusion, the auditor may also consider pointing out that a
review engagement will not satisfy any statutory or third party
requirements for an audit.
An example of an engagement letter for a review of financial statements
appears in Appendix 1to this SRE.
Planning
13. The auditor should plan the work so that an effective review
engagement will be performed.
14. In planning a reviewof financial statements, the auditor should
obtain or update the knowledge of the business including consideration
of the entitys organisation, accounting systems, operating
characteristics and the nature of its assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses.
15. The auditor needs to possess an understanding of such matters and
other matters relevant to the financial statements, for example, knowledge of
the entitys production and distribution methods, product lines, operating
locations and related parties. The auditor requires this understanding to be
able to make relevant inquiries and to design appropriate procedures, as well
as to assess the responses and other information obtained.
Work Performed by Others
16. When using work performed by another auditor or an expert, the
auditor should be satisfied that such work is adequate for the purposes
of the review.
Documentation
17. The auditor should document matters which are important in
providing evidence to support the reviewreport, and evidence that the
reviewwas carried out in accordance with this SRE.
SRE 2400 IV-430
Procedures and Evidence
18. The auditor should apply judgment in determining the specific
nature, timing and extent of reviewprocedures. The auditor will be guided
by such matters as:
Any knowledge acquired by carrying out audits or reviews of the
financial statements for prior periods.
The auditors knowledge of the business including knowledge of
the accounting principles and practices of the industry in which the
entity operates.
The entitys accounting systems.
The extent to which a particular item is affected by management
judgment.
The materiality of transactions and account balances.
19. The auditor should apply the same materiality considerations as
would be applied if an audit opinion on the financial statements were
being given. Although there is a greater risk that misstatements will not be
detected in a review than in an audit, the judgment as to what is material is
made by reference to the information on which the auditor is reporting and
the needs of those relying on that information, not to the level of assurance
provided.
20. Procedures for the review of financial statements will ordinarily include:
Obtaining an understanding of the entitys business and the
industry in which it operates.
Inquiries concerning the entitys accounting principles, policies and
practices.
Inquiries concerning the entitys procedures for recording,
classifying and summarising transactions, accumulating
information for disclosure in the financial statements and preparing
Inquiries concerning all material assertions in the financial
statements.
SRE 2400 IV-431
Analytical procedures designed to identify relationships and
individual items that appear unusual. Such procedures would
include:
Comparison of the financial statements with statements for
prior periods.
Comparison of the financial statements with anticipated results
and financial position.
Study of the relationships of the elements of the financial
statements that would be expected to conform to a predictable
pattern based on the entitys experience or industry norm.
In applying these procedures, the auditor would consider the types of matters
that required accounting adjustments in prior periods.
Inquiries concerning actions taken at meetings of shareholders,
the board of directors, committees of the board of directors and
other meetings that may affect the financial statements.
Reading the financial statements to consider, on the basis of
information coming to the auditors attention, whether the financial
statements appear to conform to the basis of accounting indicated.
Obtaining reports from other auditors, if any and if considered
necessary, who have been engaged to audit or review the financial
statements of components of the entity.
Inquiries of persons having responsibility for financial and
accounting matters concerning, for example:
Whether all transactions have been recorded.
Whether the financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with the basis of accounting policies indicated.
Changes in the entitys business activities and accounting
principles, policies and practices.
Matters as to which questions have arisen in the course of
applying the foregoing procedures.
Obtaining written representations from management when
SRE 2400 IV-432
Appendix 2to this SRE provides an illustrative list of procedures which are
often used in an engagement to review financial statements. The list is not
exhaustive, nor is it intended that all the procedures suggested apply to
every review engagement.
21. The auditor should inquire about events subsequent to the balance
sheet date that may require adjustment of, or disclosure in the financial
statements. The auditor does not have any responsibility to perform
procedures to identify events occurring after the date of the review report.
22. If the auditor has reason to believe that the information subject to
review may be materially misstated, the auditor should carry out
additional or more extensive procedures as are necessary to be able to
express negative assurance or to confirmthat a modified report is
required.
Conclusions and Reporting
23. The reviewreport should contain a clear written expression of
negative assurance. The auditor should review and assess the
conclusions drawn fromthe evidence obtained as the basis for the
expression of negative assurance.
24. Based on the work performed, the auditor should assess whether
any information obtained during the reviewindicates that the financial
statements do not give a true and fair view(or are not presented fairly,
in all material respects) in accordance with the financial reporting
framework used for the preparation and presentation of financial
statements and relevant statutory requirements, if any.
25. The report on a review of financial statements describes the scope of
the engagement to enable the reader to understand the nature of the work
performed and make it clear that an audit was not performed and, therefore,
that an audit opinion is not expressed.
26. The report on a reviewof financial statements should contain the
following basic elements, ordinarily in the following layout:
(a) Title
4
;

4
It may be appropriate to use the term independent in the title to distinguish the auditors report
from reports that might be issued by others, such as officers of the entity, or from the reports of
SRE 2400 IV-433
(b) Addressee;
(c) Opening or introductory paragraph including:
(i) Identification of the financial statements on which the review
has been performed; and
(ii) A statement of the responsibility of the entitys management
and the responsibility of the auditor;
(d) Scope paragraph, describing the nature of a review, including:
(i) A reference to this SRE applicable to reviewengagements, or
to relevant laws or regulations;
(ii) A statement that a reviewis limited primarily to inquiries and
analytical procedures; and
(iii) A statement that an audit has not been performed, that the
procedures undertaken provide less assurance than an audit
and that an audit opinion is not expressed;
(e) Statement of negative assurance;
(f) Date of the report;
(g) Place; and
(h) Auditors signature and membership number assigned by the
Appendices 3and 4to this SRE contain illustrations of review reports.
27. The reviewreport should:
(a) State that nothing has come to the auditors attention based on the
reviewthat causes the auditor to believe the financial statements
do not give a true and fair view(or are not presented fairly, in all
material respects) in accordance with the framework used for the
preparation and presentation of financial statements (negative
assurance); or
(b) If matters have come to the auditors attention, describe those
matters that impair a true and fair view(or a fair presentation, in all

other auditors who are not required to abide by the ethical requirements laid down by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India.
SRE 2400 IV-434
material respects) in accordance with the framework used for the
preparation and presentation of financial statements including,
unless impracticable, a quantification of the possible effect(s) on
the financial statements, and either:
(i) Express a qualification of the negative assurance provided;
or
(ii) When the effect of the matter is so material and pervasive to
the financial statements that the auditor concludes that a
qualification is not adequate to disclose the misleading or
incomplete nature of the financial statements, give an
adverse statement that the financial statements do not give a
true and fair view(or are not presented fairly, in all material
respects) in accordance with the framework used for the
preparation and presentation of financial statements; or
(c) If there has been a material scope limitation, describe the
limitation and either:
(i) Express a qualification of the negative assurance provided
regarding the possible adjustments to the financial
statements that might have been determined to be necessary
had the limitation not existed; or
(ii) When the possible effect of the limitation is so significant and
pervasive that the auditor concludes that no level of
assurance can be provided, not provide any assurance.
28. The auditor should date the reviewreport as of the date the review
is completed, which is the date on which the auditor signs the review
report. The date of report informs the reader that the auditor has considered
the effect on the financial statements and on the report of the events and
transactions of which the auditor became aware and that occurred up to that
date. Therefore, the review should include performing procedures
relating to events occurring up to the date of the report.
29. Since the auditors responsibility is to report on the financial
statements as prepared and presented by the management, the auditor
should not date the report earlier than the date on which the financial
statements are signed or approved by the management.
SRE 2400 IV-435
30. The auditor should not agree to a change of engagement where
there is no reasonable justification for doing so. If the auditor is unable
to agree to a change of the engagement and is not permitted to
continue the original engagement, the auditor should withdrawand
consider whether there is any obligation, either contractual or
otherwise, to report the circumstances necessitating the withdrawal to
other parties, such as the board of directors or shareholders.
Effective Date
31. This Standard on Review Engagement (SRE) becomes operative for all
review engagements relating to accounting periods beginning on or after 1
April, 2005.
Compatibility with International Standard on Review
Engagement (ISRE) 2400
The auditing standards established in this Standard on Review Engagement
are generally consistent in all material respects with those set out in
International Standard on Review Engagements (ISREs) 2400 on
Engagements to Review Financial Statements except the following:
(a) The SRE does not require the engagement letter to include form of
report to be issued pursuant to the engagement since the format of
report, in some cases, is prescribed by the laws or regulations pursuant
to which the financial statements are required to be reviewed.
(b) Due to the practices prevailing in India, the SRE requires the auditor to
mention the Place instead of the Auditors Address [see paragraph
26] in the report on a review of financial statements. The place of
signature is the name of specific location, which is ordinarily the city
where the review report is signed. According to ISA 700 (which defines
the term), the expression Auditors Address means the name of a
specific location, which is ordinarily the city where the auditor maintains
the office that has the responsibility for the audit.
(c) The SRE requires the auditor to mention the membership number
assigned by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India [see
paragraph 26]. ISRE 2400, however, does not contain any
corresponding requirement.
SRE 2400 IV-436
(d) Paragraph 29 of the SRE requires that the auditor should not agree to a
change of engagement where there is no reasonable justification for doing
so. If the auditor is unable to agree to a change of the engagement and is
not permitted to continue the original engagement, the auditor should
withdraw and consider whether there is any obligation, either contractual or
otherwise, to report the circumstances necessitating the withdrawal to other
parties, such as the board of directors or shareholders. There is no
corresponding requirement in ISRE 2400.
SRE 2400 IV-437
Appendix 1
Example of an Engagement Letter for a Review of
The following letter is for use as a guide in conjunction with the consideration
outlined in paragraph 10 of this SRE and will need to be varied according to
individual requirements and circumstances.
To the Board of Directors (or the appropriate representative of senior
management):
This is with reference to your letter dated_______, appointing us to review
the financial statements for the period ended_______.
This letter is to confirm our understanding of the terms and objectives of our
engagement and the nature and limitations of the services we will provide.
We will perform the following services:
We will review the balance sheet of ABC Company as of March 31, 20XX,
and the related statement of profit and loss and cash flows for the year then
ended, in accordance with the Standard on Review Engagements (SRE)
2400, Engagements to Review Financial Statements issued by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India. We will not perform an audit of such
financial statements and, accordingly, we will not express an audit opinion on
them. Accordingly, we are expected to provide a negative assurance on the
financial statements reviewed by us.
Responsibility for the financial statements, including adequate disclosure, is
that of the management of the company. This includes the maintenance of
adequate accounting records and internal controls and the selection and
application of accounting policies. As part of our review process, we will
request written representations from management concerning assertions
made in connection with the review.
This letter will be effective for future years unless it is terminated, amended
or superseded (applicable only in a continuing engagement).
Our engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose whether fraud or errors,
or violation of laws and regulations exist. However, we will inform you of any
material matters that come to our attention.
We also wish to invite your attention to the fact that our audit process is
subject to peer review under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The
reviewer may examine our working papers during the course of the peer
review.
SRE 2400 IV-438
accordance with your understanding of the arrangements for our review of
XYZ & Co.

(Signature)
(Name of the Member)
(Designation
5
)
ABC Company by
..
(Signature)
Date

5
SRE 2400 IV-439
Appendix 2
Illustrative Detailed Procedures that may be performed in
an Engagement to Review Financial Statements

1. The inquiry and analytical review procedures carried out in a review of
financial statements are determined by the auditors judgment. When the
auditor performs the inquiry and analytical review procedures, the auditor
should use his professional judgement and experience in evaluating the
results of such procedures and their effect on the review report and other
procedures to be performed in connection with the review engagement. The
procedures listed below are for illustrative purposes only. It is not intended
that all the procedures suggested apply to every review engagement. This
Appendix is not intended to serve as a program or checklist in the conduct of
a review.
General
2. Discuss terms and scope of the engagement with the client and the
engagement team.
3. Prepare an engagement letter setting forth the terms and scope of the
engagement.
4. Obtain an understanding of the entitys business activities and the
system for recording financial information and preparing financial statements.
5. Inquire whether all financial information is recorded:
(a) completely;
(b) promptly; and
(c) after the necessary authorisation.
6. Obtain the trial balance and verify whether it agrees with the general
ledger and the financial statements.
7. Consider the results of previous audits and review engagements,
including accounting adjustments made.
8. Inquire whether there have been any significant changes in the entity
from the previous year (e.g., changes in ownership or changes in capital
structure).
9. Inquire about the accounting policies and consider whether:
(a) they comply with accounting standards;
(b) they have been applied appropriately; and
SRE 2400 IV-440
(c) they have been applied consistently and, if not, consider whether
disclosure has been made of any changes in the accounting
policies.
10. Read the minutes of meetings of shareholders, the board of directors
and other appropriate committees in order to identify matters that could be
important to the review.
11. Inquire if actions taken at shareholder, board of directors or comparable
meetings that affect the financial statements have been appropriately
reflected therein.
12. Inquire about the existence of transactions with related parties, how
such transactions have been accounted for and whether related parties have
been properly disclosed.
13. Inquire about contingencies and commitments.
14. Inquire about plans to dispose off major assets or business segments.
15. Obtain the financial statements and discuss them with management.
16. Consider the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements and
their suitability as to classification and presentation.
17. Compare the results shown in the current period financial statements
with those shown in financial statements for comparable prior periods and, if
available, with budgets and forecasts.
18. Obtain explanations from management for any unusual fluctuations or
inconsistencies in the financial statements.
19. Consider the effect of any unadjusted errorsindividually and in
aggregate. Bring the errors to the attention of management and determine
how the unadjusted errors will influence the report on the review.
20. Consider obtaining a representation letter from management.
Analytical Procedures and Inquiry
21. Obtain interim financial information and make the following comparisons
for individual items appearing in the financial statements:
Current period to budgets and forecasts
Current period to immediately preceding period
Current period to same period in preceding year
Current year-to-date to preceding year-to-date
Current period to last audited period, wherever appropriate
SRE 2400 IV-441
22. Inquire about significant changes since the last audited balance sheet in
various items such as:
Capital and reserves
Loans
Current liabilities and provisions
Fixed assets
Investments
Inventories
Current assets
Loans and advances
Deferred revenue expenditure, etc.
23. Obtain or calculate selected ratios on a comparative basis. These
ratios could be:
Current
Quick
Debtors turnover
Inventory turnover
Depreciation to fixed assets
Debt to equity
Gross profit
Net profit
Input output
24. Inquire about the relationship between related items in the statement of
profit and loss as well as the quantitative data relating to production,
purchases, sales, etc. and assess the reasonableness thereof, in the context
of similar relationships for prior periods and other information available to the
auditor.
25. In respect of comparison made in 21 through 24 above, obtain reasons
for significant variances and discuss with management.
Cash and Bank
26. Obtain the bank reconciliation statement. Inquire about any old or
unusual reconciling items with client personnel.
SRE 2400 IV-442
27. Inquire about transfers between cash accounts for the period before
and after the review date.
28. Inquire whether there are any restrictions on cash accounts.
Receivables
29. Inquire about the accounting policies for initial recording of trade
receivables and determine whether any allowances or discounts are given on
such transactions.
30. Obtain a schedule of receivables and verify whether the total agrees
with the trial balance.
31. Obtain and consider explanations of significant variations in account
balances from previous periods or from those anticipated.
32. Obtain an aged analysis of the trade receivables. Inquire about the
reason for unusually large accounts, credit balances on accounts or any
other unusual balances and inquire about the collectibility of receivables.
33. Discuss with management the classification of receivables, including net
credit balances and amounts due from directors and other related parties in
34. Inquire about the method for identifying slow payment accounts and
setting allowances for doubtful accounts and consider it for reasonableness.
35. Inquire whether receivables have been pledged, factored or discounted.
36. Inquire about procedures applied to ensure that a proper cut-off of sales
transactions and sales returns has been achieved.
37. Inquire whether receivables attributable to goods sent on consignment
account have not been included in sales and such goods have been included
in inventories.
38. Inquire whether any large credits relating to revenue recorded have
been issued after the balance sheet date and whether provision has been
made for such amounts.
Inventories
39. Obtain the inventory list and verify that the total agrees with the balance
in the trial balance or other relevant records.
40. Inquire the procedures followed for recording inventory and determine
the necessity of physical count of inventory. For example, a physical count
may not be carried out, in case
A perpetual inventory system is used and periodic comparisons are
made with actual quantities on hand.
SRE 2400 IV-443
An integrated cost system is used and it has produced reliable
information in the past.
41. In case of physical count, inquire about the method for counting
inventory and agree the inventory list with the physical count.
42. Discuss adjustments made resulting from the last physical inventory
count.
43. Inquire about procedures applied to control cut-off and any inventory
movements at the end of the period.
44. Inquire about the basis used in valuing each category of the inventory
and, in particular, regarding the elimination of inter-branch profits. Inquire
whether inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
45. Consider the consistency with which inventory valuation methods have
been applied.
46. Compare amounts of major inventory categories with those of prior
periods and with those anticipated for the current period. Inquire about major
fluctuations and differences.
47. Inquire about the method used for identifying slow moving and obsolete
inventory and whether such inventory has been accounted for at net
realisable value.
48. Inquire whether any inventory has been consigned to the entity and, if
so, whether adjustments have been made to exclude such goods from
inventory.
49. Inquire whether any inventory is pledged, stored at other locations or on
consignment to others and consider whether such transactions have been
accounted for appropriately.
Investments
50. Obtain a schedule of the investments at the balance sheet date and
verify whether it agrees with the trial balance.
51. Inquire about the accounting policy applied to investments.
52. Inquire about the classification of long-term and current investments.
53. Consider whether there has been proper accounting for gains and
losses and investment income.
54. Inquire from management about the carrying values of investments.
Consider whether there is any permanent diminution in value thereof.
SRE 2400 IV-444
Fixed Assets and Depreciation
55. Obtain a schedule of the fixed assets indicating the cost and
accumulated depreciation and verify whether it agrees with the trial balance.
56. Inquire about the accounting policy applied regarding the provision for
depreciation and distinguishing between capital and maintenance items.
57. Discuss with management the additions and deletions to fixed assets
accounts and accounting for gains and losses on sales or retirements.
Inquire whether all such transactions have been accounted for.
58. Inquire about the consistency with which the depreciation method and
rates have been applied and compare depreciation provisions with prior
years.
59. Obtain schedule of repairs and maintenance and inquire about
significant amounts.
60. Consider whether the fixed assets have suffered a material, impairment
in value and adequate provision has been made in respect thereof.
61. Inquire whether there are any liens on the fixed assets.
62. Consider whether lease agreements have been properly dealt with in
the financial statements in conformity with accounting pronouncements.
Prepaid Expenses
63. Obtain schedules identifying the nature of these accounts and discuss
with management the recoverability thereof wherever appropriate.
64. Inquire about the basis for recording these accounts and the adjustment
methods used.
65. Compare balances of related expense accounts with those of prior
periods and discuss significant variations with management.
Intangibles and Other Assets
66. Obtain schedules of intangible and other assets accounts, determine
the nature of these accounts and discuss with management the recoverability
of intangible and other assets, wherever appropriate.
67. Inquire about the basis of recognition of such assets and the methods of
amortisation used for such accounts.
68. Inquire about the consistency with which the amortisation methods have
been applied and compare amortisation provisions with prior years.
SRE 2400 IV-445
Capital and Reserves
69. Obtain and consider a schedule of the transactions in the capital
account and reserves accounts, including new issues, redemption, buy back,
and dividends.
70. Inquire whether there are any restrictions on reserves and surpluses.
Loans Payable
71. Obtain from management a schedule of loans payable and verify
whether the total agrees with the trial balance.
72. Inquire whether there are any loans where management has not
complied with the provisions of the loan agreement and, if so, inquire as to
managements actions and whether appropriate adjustments have been
made in the financial statements.
73. Consider the reasonableness of interest expense in relation to loan
balances.
74. Inquire whether loans payable are secured.
75. Inquire whether loans payable have been appropriately classified
between long-term and short-term.
Trade Payables
76. Obtain a schedule of trade payables and verify whether the total agrees
with the trial balance.
77. Inquire about the accounting policies for initial recording of trade
payables and whether the entity is entitled to any allowances or discounts
given on such transactions.
78. Obtain and consider explanations of significant variations in account
balances from previous periods or from those anticipated.
79. Inquire whether balances are reconciled with the creditors statements
and compare with prior period balances.
80. Consider whether there could be material unrecorded liabilities.
Accrued and Contingent Liabilities
81. Obtain a schedule of the accrued liabilities and verify whether the total
agrees with the trial balance. Inquire about the method of determining
accrued liabilities.
82. Compare major balances of related expense accounts with similar
accounts for prior periods.
83. Determine whether the recognition of major expenses has taken place
in the appropriate periods.
SRE 2400 IV-446
84. Inquire about approvals for such accruals, terms of payment,
compliance with terms.
85. Inquire as to the nature of amounts included in contingent liabilities and
commitments. Inquire whether any actual or contingent liabilities exist which
have not been appropriately dealt with in the financial statements. If so,
discuss with management whether provisions need to be made in the
accounts or whether disclosure should be made in the notes to the financial
statements.
Litigation
86. Inquire from management whether the entity is the subject of any legal
actions-threatened, pending or in process. Consider the effect thereof on the
Income and Other Taxes
87. Inquire from management if there were any events, including disputes
with taxation authorities (both direct and indirect taxes), which could have a
significant effect on the taxes payable by the entity. If yes, determine
whether any provision is required.
88. Consider the tax expense (both current and deferred) in relation to the
entitys income for the period.
89. Inquire from management as to the adequacy of the recorded deferred
and current tax liabilities including provisions in respect of prior periods.
Subsequent Events
90. Obtain from management the latest interim financial statements and
compare them with the financial statements being reviewed or with those for
comparable periods from the preceding year.
91. Inquire about events after the balance sheet date that would have a
material effect on the financial statements under review and, in particular,
inquire whether:
(a) Any substantial commitments or uncertainties have arisen
subsequent to the balance sheet date;
(b) Any significant changes in the share capital, long-term debt or
working capital have occurred up to the date of inquiry; and
(c) Any unusual adjustments have been made during the period
between the balance sheet date and the date of inquiry.
92. Obtain and read the minutes of meetings of shareholders, directors and
appropriate committees subsequent to the balance sheet date.
SRE 2400 IV-447
93. Consider the need for adjustments or disclosure in the financial
statements.
Extraordinary Items
94. Inquire and determine whether there are any extraordinary and unusual
items and if so, whether these have been appropriately disclosed.
Operations
95. Compare results with those of prior periods and those expected for the
current period. Discuss significant variations with management.
96. Discuss whether the recognition of major sales and expenses have
taken place in the appropriate periods.
97. Consider and discuss with management the relationship between
related items in the statement of profit and loss and assess the
reasonableness thereof in the context of similar relationships for prior periods
and other information available to the auditor.
Other Procedures
98. Inquire about:
Changes in key management personnel.
Major interruptions of operations due to strike, casualty, such as
fire, etc.
Significant contracts and agreements entered into/committed
during the period.
Wage settlements, if any.
Changes in legislation that are likely to have material affect on the
entity.
SRE 2400 IV-448
Appendix 3
Formof Unqualified Review Report
REVIEW REPORT TO...
We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of ABC Company at
March 31, 20XX, and the related statement of profit and loss and cash flows
for the year then ended. These financial statements have been approved by
the board of directors of the company and are the responsibility of the
companys management. Our responsibility is to issue a report on these
financial statements based on our review.
We conducted our review in accordance with the Standard on Review
Engagement (SRE) 2400, Engagements to Review Financial Statements
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. This Standard
requires that we plan and perform the review to obtain moderate assurance
as to whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. A
review is limited primarily to inquiries of company personnel and analytical
procedures applied to financial data and thus provides less assurance than
an audit. We have not performed an audit and, accordingly, we do not
express an audit opinion.
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to
believe that the accompanying financial statements do not give a true and
fair view (or are not presented fairly, in all material respects) in accordance
with Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India.
For ABC and Co.,
Auditors Signature
(Designation)
6
(Membership Number)
Place
Date

6
SRE 2400 IV-449
Appendix 4
Examples of Review Reports other than Unqualified
Qualification for a Departure froman Accounting Standard
REVIEW REPORT TO...

Engagements (SRE) 2400, Engagements to Review Financial Statements
procedures applied to financial data and thus provides less assurance than
an audit. We have not performed an audit and, accordingly, we do not
express an audit opinion.
Management has informed us that inventory has been stated at its cost,
which is in excess of its net realisable value. Managements computation,
which we have reviewed, shows that inventory, if valued at the lower of cost
and net realisable value as required by Accounting Standard (AS) 2,
Valuation of Inventories issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India, would have been decreased by Rs. X, and net profit and reserves
would have been decreased by Rs. X.
Based on our review, except for the effects of the overstatement of inventory
described in the previous paragraph, nothing has come to our attention that
causes us to believe that the accompanying financial statements do not give
a true and fair view (or are not presented fairly, in all material respects) in
accordance with the Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India.
For ABC and Co.,
Auditors Signature
Place (Designation)
7
Date (Membership Number)

7
SRE 2400 IV-450
Adverse Report for a Departure froman Accounting Standard

REVIEW REPORT TO...
Engagements (SRE) 2400, Engagements to Review Financial Statements
procedures applied to financial data and thus provide less assurance than an
audit. We have not performed an audit and, accordingly, we do not express
an audit opinion.
As noted in note X, the Company has adopted the method of taking entire
profits on construction contracts to the statement of profit and loss on
entering into the contract. This has resulted in anticipating the profit in cases
where the contracts have not even been commenced or where only a very
minor part of the expenditure relating to the construction contracts has been
incurred. This method of accounting is contrary to the requirements of
Accounting Standard (AS) 7, Accounting for Construction Contracts, issued
Based on our review, because of the pervasive effect on the financial
statements of the matter discussed in the preceding paragraph, the
accompanying financial statements do not give a true and fair view (or are not
presented fairly, in all material respects) in accordance with the Accounting
Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
For ABC and Co.,
Auditors Signature
(Designation)
8
Place (Membership Number)
Date

8
Back
SAE 3400 (AAS 35)
THE EXAMINATION OF
PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Effective in relation to reports on
projections/forecasts issued on or after April 1, 2007)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction .................................................................................. 1-7
The Auditors Assurance Regarding
Prospective Financial Information .................................................. 8-9
Acceptance of Engagement ......................................................... 10-12
Knowledge of the Business ......................................................... 13-15
Period Covered................................................................................... 16
Examination Procedures.............................................................. 17-25
Presentation and Disclosure ............................................................ 26
Documentation ................................................................................... 27
Report on Examination of
Prospective Financial Information .............................................. 28-34
Effective Date ................................................................................... 35
Appendices

Standard on Assurance Engagements (SAE) 3400
, The Examination of
Prospective Financial Information should be read in the context of the
1

Issued in February, 2007. The date this Standard on Assurance Engagement comes into effect,
the Guidance Note on Accountants Report on Profit Forecasts and/or Financial Forecasts, issued
in September, 1982 shall stand withdrawn.
1
Back
SAE 3400 V-2
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Assurance Engagement (SAE) is to
establish standards and provide guidance on engagements to examine and
report on prospective financial information including examination procedures
for best-estimate and hypothetical assumptions. This SAE does not apply to
the examination of prospective financial information expressed in general or
narrative terms, such as that found in managements discussion and analysis
in an entitys annual report, though many of the procedures outlined herein
may be suitable for such an examination
2
. Further, the principles laid down in
the other Standards on Auditing, issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, should be used by the auditor, to the extent
practicable, in applying this SAE.
2. In an engagement to examine prospective financial information,
the auditor
3
should obtain sufficient appropriate evidence as to
whether:
(a) managements best-estimate assumptions on which the
prospective financial information is based are not unreasonable
and, in the case of hypothetical assumptions, such assumptions
are consistent with the purpose of the information;
(b) the prospective financial information is properly prepared on the
basis of the assumptions;

2
The guidance provided in this Standard is in line with the provisions of clause (3) of Part I of the
Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 [as amended by the Chartered
Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2006]. This clause provides that a chartered accountant in practice
shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he permits his name or the name of his
firm to be used in connection with an estimate of earnings contingent upon future transactions in a
manner which may lead to the belief that he vouches for the accuracy of the forecast. As per the
opinion of the Council while finalising the Guidance Note on Accountants Report on Profit
Forecasts and/or Financial Forecasts at its 100
th
meeting held on 22
nd
through 24
th
July 1982, a
chartered accountant can participate in the preparation of profit or financial forecasts and can
review them, provided he indicates clearly in his report the sources of information, the basis of
forecasts and also the major assumptions made in arriving at the forecasts and so long as he
does not vouch for the accuracy of the forecasts. The Council has further opined that the same
opinion would also apply to projections made on the basis of hypothetical assumptions about future
events and management actions which are not necessarily expected to take place so long as the
auditor does not vouch for the accuracy of the projection. (emphasis added)
3
The term auditor is used throughout this SAE when describing services involving examination
of prospective financial information. Such reference is not intended to imply that a member
performing such services need necessarily be the statutory auditor of the entitys financial
statements.
The Examination of Prospective Financial Information
SAE 3400 V-3
(c) the prospective financial information is properly presented and all
material assumptions are adequately disclosed, including a clear
indication as to whether they are best-estimate assumptions or
hypothetical assumptions; and
(d) the prospective financial information is prepared on a consistent
basis with historical financial statements, using appropriate
accounting principles.
3. Prospective financial information means financial information based on
assumptions about events that may occur in the future and possible actions
by an entity. It is highly subjective in nature and its preparation requires the
exercise of considerable judgment. Prospective financial information can be
in the form of a forecast, a projection, or a combination of both, for example,
a one year forecast plus a five year projection.
4. A forecast means prospective financial information prepared on the
basis of assumptions as to future events which management expects to take
place and the actions management expects to take as of the date the
information is prepared (best-estimate assumptions).
5. A projection means prospective financial information prepared on the
basis of:
(a) hypothetical assumptions about future events and management actions
which are not necessarily expected to take place, such as when some
entities are in a start-up phase or are considering a major change in the
nature of operations; or
(b) a mixture of best-estimate and hypothetical assumptions.
Such information illustrates the possible consequences as of the date the
information is prepared if the events and actions were to occur (a what-if
scenario).
6. Prospective financial information can include financial statements or
one or more elements of financial statements and may be prepared:
(a) as an internal management tool, for example, to assist in evaluating a
possible capital investment; or
(b) for the distribution/submission to third parties in, for example:
SAE 3400 V-4
a prospectus to provide potential investors with information about
future expectations.
an annual report to provide information to shareholders, regulatory
bodies and other interested parties.
a document, for example, cash flow forecasts, for the information of
lenders.
7. Management is responsible for the preparation and presentation of the
prospective financial information, including the identification and disclosure
of the sources of information, the basis of forecasts and the underlying
assumptions. The auditor may be asked to examine and report on the
prospective financial information to enhance its credibility, whether it is
intended for use by third parties or for internal purposes.
The Auditors Assurance Regarding Prospective
8. Prospective financial information relates to events and actions that have
not yet occurred and might not occur. While evidence may be available to
support the assumptions on which the prospective financial information is
based, such evidence is itself generally future- oriented and, therefore,
speculative in nature, as distinct from the evidence ordinarily available in the
examination of historical financial information. The auditor is, therefore, not in
a position to express an opinion as to whether the results shown in the
prospective financial information will be achieved.
9. Further, given the types of evidence available in assessing the
assumptions on which the prospective financial information is based, it may
be difficult for the auditor to obtain a level of satisfaction sufficient to provide
a positive expression of opinion that the assumptions are free of material
misstatement. Consequently, in this SAE, when reporting on the
reasonableness of managements assumptions, the auditor provides only a
moderate level of assurance.
Acceptance of Engagement
10. Before accepting an engagement to examine prospective financial
information, the auditor would consider, amongst other things:
the intended use of the information;
SAE 3400 V-5
whether the information will be for general or limited distribution;
the nature of the assumptions, that is, whether they are best-estimates
or hypothetical assumptions;
the elements to be included in the information; and
the period covered by the information.
11. The auditor should not accept, or should withdraw from, an
engagement when the assumptions are clearly unrealistic or when the
auditor believes that the prospective financial information will be
inappropriate for its intended use.
12. In accordance with SA 210, Terms of Audit Engagement, it is
necessary that the auditor and the client should agree on the terms of
the engagement. It is in the interest of both client and auditor that the
auditor sends an engagement letter to help in avoiding misunderstandings
regarding the engagement. An engagement letter would address the matters
in paragraph 10 and set out the managements responsibilities for the
assumptions and for providing the auditor with all relevant information and
source data used in developing the assumptions.
13. The auditor should obtain a sufficient level of knowledge of the
business to be able to evaluate whether all significant assumptions
required for the preparation of the prospective financial information
have been identified. The auditor would also need to become familiar with
the entitys process for preparing prospective financial information, for
example, by considering:
(a) The internal controls over the system used to prepare prospective
financial information and the expertise and experience of those persons
preparing the prospective financial information.
(b) The nature of the documentation prepared by the entity supporting
managements assumptions.
(c) The extent to which statistical, mathematical and computer-assisted
techniques are used.
(d) The methods used to develop and apply assumptions.
SAE 3400 V-6
(e) The accuracy of prospective financial information prepared in prior
periods, if any, and the reasons for any significant variances therein.
14. The auditor should consider the extent to which reliance on the
entitys historical financial information is justified. The auditor requires
knowledge of the entitys historical financial information to assess whether
the prospective financial information has been prepared on a basis
consistent with the historical financial information and to provide a historical
yardstick for considering managements assumptions. The auditor will need
to establish, for example, whether relevant historical information was audited
or reviewed and whether acceptable accounting principles were used in its
preparation.
15. If the audit or review report on prior period historical financial
information was other than a clean report
4
or if the entity is in a start-
up/expansion phase, the auditor would consider the relevant facts and the
effect on the examination of the prospective financial information.
Period Covered
16. The auditor should consider the period of time covered by the
prospective financial information. Since assumptions become more
speculative as the length of the period covered increases, as that period
lengthens, the ability of management to make best-estimate assumptions
decreases. The period would not extend beyond the time for which
management has a reasonable basis for the assumptions. The following are
some of the factors that are relevant to the auditors consideration of the
period of time covered by the prospective financial information:
(a) The operating cycle, for example, in the case of a major construction
project undertaken by a construction company, the time required to
complete the project may dictate the period covered.
(b) The degree of reliability of assumptions, for example, if the entity is
introducing a new product, the prospective period covered could be
short and broken into small segments, such as weeks or months.
Alternatively, if for example, the entitys sole business is owning a
property under long-term lease, a relatively long prospective period
might be reasonable.

4
Alternatively known as the unmodified report in terms of the Standard on Auditing (SA) 700, The
Auditors Report on Financial Statements.
SAE 3400 V-7
(c) The needs of users, for example, prospective financial information may
be prepared in connection with an application for a loan for the period of
time required to generate sufficient funds for repayment. Alternatively,
the information may be prepared for investors in connection with the
issue of securities to illustrate the intended use of the proceeds in the
subsequent period.
Examination Procedures
17. When determining the nature, timing and extent of examination
procedures, the auditor should consider matters such as:
(a) the knowledge obtained during any previous engagements;
(b) managements competence regarding the preparation of
prospective financial information;
(c) the likelihood of material misstatement;
(d) the extent to which the prospective financial information is
affected by the managements judgment;
(e) the sources of information considered by the management for the
purpose, their adequacy, reliability of the underlying data,
including data derived from third parties, such as industry
statistics, to support the assumptions;
(f) the stability of entitys business; and
(g) the engagement teams experience with the business and the
industry in which the entity operates and with reporting on
prospective financial information.
18. The auditor would assess the source and reliability of the evidence
supporting managements best-estimate assumptions. Sufficient appropriate
evidence supporting such assumptions would be obtained from internal and
external sources including consideration of the assumptions in the light of
historical information and an evaluation of whether they are based on plans
that are within the entitys capacity. Examples of external sources are
government publications, industry publications, economic forecast, existing
or proposed legislation, and reports of changing technology. Examples of
internal sources are budgets, the economic substance and viability of the
entity and/or transaction or project of the entity, reputation of management
SAE 3400 V-8
responsible for assumptions underlying the prospective financial information,
wage agreements, patents, royalty agreements and records, sales backlog
records, debt agreements, and actions of the board of directors involving
entity plans, etc.
19. The auditor would consider whether, when hypothetical assumptions
are used, all significant implications of such assumptions have been taken
into consideration. For example, if sales are assumed to grow beyond the
entitys current plant capacity, the prospective financial information will need
to include the necessary investment in the additional plant capacity or the
costs of alternative means of meeting the anticipated sales, such as
subcontracting production.
20. The auditor would need to be satisfied that the hypothetical
assumptions are consistent with the purpose of the prospective financial
information and that there is no reason to believe they are clearly unrealistic.
21. The auditor will need to be satisfied that the prospective financial
information is properly prepared from managements assumptions by, for
example, making checks such as recomputation and reviewing internal
consistency, that is, the actions management intends to take are compatible
with each other and there are no inconsistencies in the determination of the
amounts that are based on common variables such as interest rates.
22. The auditor would focus on the extent to which those areas that are
particularly sensitive to variation will have a material effect on the results
shown in the prospective financial information. This will influence the extent
to which the auditor will seek appropriate evidence. It will also influence the
auditors evaluation of the appropriateness and adequacy of disclosure.
23. When engaged to examine one or more elements of prospective
financial information, such as an individual financial statement, it is important
that the auditor considers the interrelationship of other components in the
24. When any elapsed portion of the current period is included in the
prospective financial information, the auditor would consider the extent to
which procedures need to be applied to the historical information.
Procedures will vary depending on the circumstances, for example, how
much of the prospective period has elapsed.
SAE 3400 V-9
25. The auditor should obtain written representations from
management regarding the intended use of the prospective financial
information, the completeness of significant management assumptions
and managements acceptance of its responsibility for the prospective
financial information. The management is also responsible for identification
and disclosure of uncontrollable factors, outstanding litigations,
commitments, or any other material factors that are likely to affect the
prospective financial information.
Presentation and Disclosure
26. When assessing the presentation and disclosure of the prospective
financial information and the underlying assumptions, in addition to the
specific requirements of any relevant statutes, regulations as well as the
relevant professional pronouncements, the auditor will need to consider
whether:
(a) the presentation of prospective financial information is informative and
not misleading;
(b) the accounting policies are clearly disclosed in the notes to the
prospective financial information;
(c) the assumptions are adequately disclosed in the notes to the
prospective financial information. It needs to be clear whether
assumptions represent managements best-estimates or are
hypothetical and, when assumptions are made in areas that are material
and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty, this uncertainty and the
resulting sensitivity of results needs to be adequately disclosed;
(d) the date as of which the prospective financial information was prepared
is disclosed. Management needs to confirm that the assumptions are
appropriate as of this date, even though the underlying information may
have been accumulated over a period of time;
(e) the basis of establishing points in a range is clearly indicated and the
range is not selected in a biased or misleading manner when results
shown in the prospective financial information are expressed in terms of
a range; and
(f) there is any change in the accounting policy of the entity from that
disclosed in the most recent historical financial statements and whether
SAE 3400 V-10
reason for the change and the effect of such change on the prospective
financial information has been adequately disclosed.
Documentation
27. The auditor should document matters, which are important in
providing evidence to support his report on examination of prospective
financial information, and evidence that such examination was carried
out in accordance with this SAE. The working papers will include the
sources of information, basis of forecasts and the assumptions made in
arriving the forecasts, hypothetical assumptions, evidence supporting
the assumptions, management representations regarding the intended
use and distribution of the information, completeness of material
assumptions, managements acceptance of its responsibility for the
information, audit plan, the nature, timing and extent of examination
procedures performed, and, in case the auditor expresses a modified
opinion or withdraws fromthe engagement, the reasons forming the
basis of such decision.
Report on Examination of Prospective Financial
Information
28. The report by an auditor on an examination of prospective financial
information should contain the following:
(a) Title;
(b) Addressee;
(c) Identification of the prospective financial information;
(d) Reference to the Standards on Auditing applicable to the
examination of prospective financial information;
(e) Statement that management is responsible for the prospective
financial information including the underlying assumptions;
(f) When applicable, a reference to the purpose and/or restricted
distribution of the prospective financial information;
(g) Statement that the examination procedures included examination,
on a test basis, of evidence supporting the assumptions, amounts
and other disclosures in the forecast or projection;
SAE 3400 V-11
(h) Statement of negative assurance as to whether the assumptions
provide a reasonable basis for the prospective financial
information;
(i) Opinion as to whether the prospective financial information is
properly prepared on the basis of the assumptions and is
presented in accordance with the relevant financial reporting
framework;
(j) Appropriate caveats concerning the achievability of the results
indicated by the prospective financial information;
(k) Date of report (which should be the date procedures have been
completed);
(l) Place of signature; and
(m) Signature.
29. Such a report would:
State whether, based on the examination of the evidence supporting the
assumptions, anything has come to the auditors attention, which causes
the auditor to believe that the assumptions do not provide a reasonable
basis for the prospective financial information.
Express an opinion as to whether the prospective financial information is
properly prepared on the basis of the assumptions and is presented in
accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework.
State that:
Actual results are likely to be different from the prospective financial
information since anticipated events frequently do not occur as
expected and the variation could be material. Likewise, when the
prospective financial information is expressed as a range, it would
be stated that there can be no assurance that actual results will fall
within the range; and
In the case of a projection, the prospective financial information has
been prepared for (intended use), using a set of assumptions that
include hypothetical assumptions about future events and
managements actions that are not necessarily expected to occur.
Consequently, readers are cautioned that the prospective financial
SAE 3400 V-12
information should not be used for purposes other than the
abovementioned intended use.
30. The following is an example of an extract from an unmodified report on
a projection:
We have examined the projection of _____________
(project)__________ (name of the entity) for the period from _______ to
______ as given in
5
____ to the Prospective Financial Information from
page __to ___in accordance with Standard on Assurance Engagement
3400, The Examination of Prospective Financial Information, issued by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The preparation and
presentation of the projection including the underlying assumptions, set
out in note ____ to ______ to the prospective financial information, is
the responsibility of the Management and has been approved by the
Board of Directors
6
of the company. Our responsibility is to examine
the evidence supporting the assumptions (excluding the hypothetical
assumption) and other information in the prospective financial
information. Our responsibility does not include verification of the
accuracy of the projections. Therefore, we do not vouch for the
accuracy of the same.
This projection has been prepared for (describe purpose). As the entity
is in a start-up phase the projection has been prepared using a set of
assumptions that include hypothetical assumptions about future events
and managements actions that are not necessarily expected to occur.
Consequently, readers are cautioned that this projection may not be
appropriate for purposes other than that described above.
We have carried out our examination of the prospective financial
information on a test basis. Based on our examination of the evidence
supporting the assumptions, nothing has come to our attention which
causes us to believe that these assumptions do not provide a
reasonable basis for the projection, assuming that ________________
(state or refer to the hypothetical assumptions).
Further, in our opinion the projection is properly prepared on the basis
of the assumptions as set out in Note _____ to the Prospective

5
Provide suitable identification, such as by reference to page numbers or by identifying the
individual schedule.
6
Other corresponding approving authority in the case of entities other than companies.
SAE 3400 V-13
Financial Information and on a consistent basis in accordance with the
historical financial statements, using appropriate accounting principles.
Even if the events anticipated under the hypothetical assumptions
described above occur, actual results are still likely to be different from
the projection since other anticipated events frequently do not occur as
expected and the variation may be material.
A complete illustrative format of an unmodified report on a projection is given
in Appendix 1.
31. The following is an example of an extract from an unmodified report on
a forecast:
We have examined the forecast of ____________________ (project) of
the ______________________ (name of the entity) for the period from
___________ to ___________ in accordance with the Standard on
Assurance Engagements (SAE) 3400, The Examination of Prospective
Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India. The preparation and presentation of the forecast including the
underlying assumptions, set out in Note _____ to the Prospective
Financial Information is the responsibility of the management and has
been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. The sources
of information are set out in Annexure ______ to the prospective
financial information. Our responsibility is to examine the evidence
supporting the forecast. Our responsibility does not include verification
of the accuracy of the forecasts. Therefore, we do not vouch for the
Based on our examination of the evidence supporting the
assumptions, nothing has come to our attention which causes us
to believe that these assumptions do not provide a reasonable
basis for the forecast. Further, in our opinion the forecast is
properly prepared on the basis of the assumptions as set out in
Note ____ and on consistent basis with historical financial
statements, using appropriate accounting principles.
Actual results are likely to be different from the forecast since
anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected and the variation
may be material.
A complete illustrative format of an unmodified report on a forecast is given
in Appendix 2.
SAE 3400 V-14
32. When the auditor believes that the presentation and disclosure of
the prospective financial information is not adequate, the auditor
should express a qualified or adverse opinion in the report on the
prospective financial information, or withdrawfromthe engagement as
appropriate. An example would be where financial information fails to
disclose adequately the consequences of any assumptions, which are highly
sensitive.
33. When the auditor believes that one or more significant
assumptions do not provide a reasonable basis for the prospective
financial information prepared on the basis of best-estimate
assumptions or that one or more significant assumptions do not
provide a reasonable basis for the prospective financial information
given the hypothetical assumptions, the auditor should either express
an adverse opinion setting out the reasons in the report on the
prospective financial information, or withdrawfromthe engagement.
34. When the examination is affected by conditions that preclude
application of one or more procedures considered necessary in the
circumstances, the auditor should either withdrawfromthe engagement
or disclaimthe opinion and describe the scope limitation in the report
on the prospective financial information.
Effective Date
35. This SAE is effective in relation to reports on projections/forecasts,
issued on or after April 1, 2007. However, earlier application of the Standard
is encouraged.
Compatibility with International Standard on Assurance
Engagement (ISAE) 3400
Except for the matters noted below, the basic principles and essential
procedures of this SAE and International Standard on Assurance
Engagement (ISAE) 3400 The Examination of Prospective Financial
Information, are consistent in all material respects:
(a) SAE precludes the auditor from expressing positive assurance
regarding the assumptions as it may tantamount to vouching for the
accuracy of the forecast/projection/hypothetical assumptions. Whereas,
SAE 3400 V-15
the ISAE 3400 permits the auditor to express positive assurance when
in his judgment an appropriate level of satisfaction has been obtained.
(b) The sub points in paragraph 17 (corresponding to paragraph 17 of the
ISAE 3400) have been rearranged. Sub point (e) has been elucidated
for the sake of better understanding of the readers. The sub points (f)
and (g) have been added in the SAE as additional factors to be
considered by the auditor.
(c) In paragraph 20 of the SAE, the phrase although evidence supporting
hypothetical assumptions need not be obtained has been deleted since
it is felt that such a phrase is inconsistent with the necessity for the
auditor to obtain evidence to support his conclusions.
(d) In paragraph 26 (corresponding to paragraph 26 of the ISAE 3400), the
term professional standards has been changed to professional
pronouncements since pronouncements would include standards as
well as other relevant documents, such as Guidance Notes,
announcement(s), issued by the ICAI.
(e) In line with requirement of SA 700, The Auditors Report on Financial
Statements this SAE requires the auditor to include a scope section in
the examination report to explain the nature and extent of the auditors
work. ISAE 3400 does not contain an equivalent requirement.
(f) SAE specifically provides for the documentation required to be done by
the auditor in regard to any engagement of examination of prospective
financial information. However, ISAE 3400 does not contain such
explicit provision.
SAE 3400 V-16
Appendix 1
Illustrative Format of
an Unmodified Report on a Projection
Report on Examination of
Prospective Financial Information
To the (addressee).
We have examined the projection of _____________ (project)__________
(name of the entity) for the period from _______ to ______ as given in
7
____ to
the Prospective Financial Information from page __to ___in accordance with
Standard on Assurance Engagement 3400, The Examination of Prospective
Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
The preparation and presentation of the projection including the underlying
assumptions, set out in note ____ to ______ to the prospective financial
information, is the responsibility of the Management and has been approved by
the Board of Directors
8
of the company. Our responsibility is to examine the
evidence supporting the assumptions (excluding the hypothetical assumption)
and other information in the prospective financial information. Our responsibility
does not include verification of projections. Therefore, we do not vouch for the
This projection has been prepared for _________________ (intended use). The
projection has been prepared using a set of assumptions that include
hypothetical assumptions about future events and managements actions that
are not necessarily expected to occur. Consequently, users are cautioned that
this projection may not be appropriate for purposes other than that described
above.
We have carried out our examination of the prospective financial information on a
test basis. Based on our examination of the evidence supporting the
assumptions, nothing has come to our attention which causes us to believe that
these assumptions do not provide a reasonable basis for the projection,
assuming that ________________ (state or refer to the hypothetical
assumptions).
Further, in our opinion the projection is properly prepared on the basis of the
assumptions as set out in Note _____ to the Prospective Financial Information
and on a consistent basis with the historical financial statements, using
appropriate accounting principles. Even if the events anticipated under the
hypothetical assumptions described above occur, actual results are still likely to

7
8
SAE 3400 V-17
be different from the projection since other anticipated events frequently do not
occur as expected and the variation may be material.
For ABC & Co.,

Signature
(Name of the member signing the report)
Date : (Designation)
9

Place of Signature : Membership Number

9
SAE 3400 V-18
Appendix 2
Illustrative Format of an Unmodified Report on a Forecast
Report on Examination of Prospective Financial Information
To the (addressee).
We have examined the forecast of _________(project)___________of the
_____________ (name of the entity) for the period from ___ to ___ as given
10
in
_____ to ______ of the prospective financial information in accordance with
Standard on Assurance Engagement ___, The Examination of Prospective
Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
The preparation and presentation of the forecast including the underlying
assumptions, set out in Note _______ to the Prospective Financial Information, is
the responsibility of the management and has been approved by the Board of
Directors of the company
11
. The sources of information are set out in Annexure
_____ to the prospective financial information. Our responsibility is to examine the
evidence supporting the forecast. Our responsibility does not include verification
of the forecasts. Therefore, we do not vouch for the accuracy of the same.
This forecast has been prepared for _________________ (intended use). The
forecast has been prepared using a set of assumptions as set out in Note ____
to the prospective financial information.
We have carried out our examination of the prospective financial information on a
test basis.
Based on our examination of the evidence supporting the assumptions, nothing
has come to our attention, which causes us to believe that assumptions do not
provide a reasonable basis for the forecast. Further, in our opinion the forecast,
read with the notes thereon, is properly prepared on the basis of the assumptions
as set out in Note ______ and on a consistent basis with the historical financial
statements, using appropriate accounting principles.
Actual results are likely to be different from the forecast since anticipated events
might not occur as expected and the variation might be material.
For ABC & Co.,
Signature
(Name of the member signing the report)
Date : (Designation)
12

Place of Signature: Membership Number

10
11
12
Back
SRS 4400 (AAS 32)
ENGAGEMENTS TO PERFORM
AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES
REGARDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Effective for all agreed upon
procedures engagements on or after April 1, 2004)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction .................................................................................. 1-3
Objective of an Agreed-upon procedures Engagement ............... 4-6
General Principles of an Agreed-upon
Procedures Engagement .................................................................. 7-8
Defining the Terms of the Engagement ........................................ 9-12
Planning ................................................................................... 13
Documentation ................................................................................... 14
Procedures and Evidence............................................................ 15-16
Reporting .............................................................................. 17-18
Effective Date ................................................................................... 19
Appendices

Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4400
, Engagements to Perform
Agreed-upon Procedures regarding Financial Information should be read in
1
authority of SAs.

Issued in April, 2004. With the issuance of this Standard on Related Services, the
Guidance Note on Engagements to Perform Agreed Upon Procedures regarding
Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India in July
2001, shall stand withdrawn.
1
Back
SRS 4400 VI-2
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Related Services (SRS) is to establish
standards and provide guidance on the auditors
2
professional responsibilities
when an engagement to perform agreed-upon procedures regarding financial
information is undertaken and on the form and content of the report that the
auditor issues in connection with such an engagement.
2. In an engagement to perform agreed-upon procedures, the auditor is
engaged by the client to issue a report of factual findings, based on specified
procedures performed on specified subject matter of specified elements,
accounts or items of a financial statement. For example, an engagement to
perform agreed-upon procedures may require the auditor to perform certain
procedures concerning individual items of financial data, say, accounts
payable, accounts receivable, purchases from related parties and sales and
profits of a segment of an entity, or a financial statement, say, a balance
sheet or even a complete set of financial statements.
3. This SRS is directed towards engagements regarding financial
information. However, it may provide useful guidance for engagements to
perform agreed-upon procedures regarding non-financial information,
provided the auditor has adequate knowledge of the subject matter in
question and reasonable criteria exist on which to base his findings. These
Standards on Auditing is to be read in conjunction with the Framework of
Statements on Standard Auditing Practices and Guidance Notes on Related
Services
3
. The principles laid down in the other SAs, issued by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India, may be used by the auditor, to the extent
practicable, in applying this SRS.
Objective of an Agreed-upon Procedures Engagement
4. The objective of an agreed-upon procedures engagement is for the
auditor to carry out procedures of an audit nature to which the auditor

2
The term auditor is used throughout this SRS when describing services involving
performance of agreed-upon procedures. Such reference is not intended to imply that a
person performing related services need necessarily be the auditor of the entitys
3
The Framework issued in 2001 has been withdrawn pursuant to the issuance of the
Framework for Assurance Engagements, which is applicable from April 1, 2008. The
text of the Revised Framework is reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.
Engagements to Perform Agreed-upon Procedures
SRS 4400 VI-3
and the entity and any appropriate third parties have agreed and to
report on factual findings.
5. As the auditor simply provides a report of the factual findings of agreed-
upon procedures, no assurance is expressed by him in his report. Instead,
users of the report assess for themselves the procedures and the findings
reported by the auditor and draw their own conclusions from the work done
by the auditor.
6. The report is restricted to those parties that have agreed to the
procedures to be performed since others, unaware of the reasons for the
procedures, may misinterpret the results. However, it is possible in certain
circumstances that the report of the engagement may not be restricted only
to those parties that have agreed to the procedures to be performed, but
made available to a wider range of entities or individuals, e.g., in case of
government organisations.
General Principles of an Agreed-upon Procedures
Engagement
7. The auditor should comply with the Code of Ethics, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Ethical principles governing
the auditors professional responsibilities for this type of engagement are:
(a) Integrity;
(b) Objectivity;
(d) Confidentiality;
(e) Professional conduct; and
(f) Technical standards
Independence is not a requirement for agreed-upon procedures engagement,
however, the terms or objective of the engagement may require the auditor to
comply with the independence requirements of the Code of Ethics issued by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Where the auditor is not
independent, a statement to that effect should be made in the report of
factual findings.
SRS 4400 VI-4
8. The auditor should conduct an agreed-upon procedure
engagement in accordance with this SRS and the terms of the
engagement.
Defining the Terms of the Engagement
9. The auditor should ensure with representatives of the entity and,
ordinarily, other specified parties who will receive copies of the report
of factual findings, that there is a clear understanding regarding the
agreed procedures and the conditions of the engagement. Matters to be
agreed include the following:
(a) Nature of the engagement including the fact that the procedures
performed will not constitute an audit or a review and that accordingly
no assurance will be expressed.
(b) Stated purpose for the engagement.
(c) Identification of the financial information to which the agreed-upon
procedures will be applied.
(d) Nature, timing and extent of the specific procedures to be applied.
(e) Limitations on distribution of the report of factual findings. When such
limitation would be in conflict with the legal requirements, if any, the
auditor would not accept the engagement.
10. In certain circumstances, for example, when the procedures have been
agreed to between the regulator, industry representatives and
representatives of the accounting profession, the auditor may not be able to
discuss the procedures with all the parties who will receive the report. In
such cases, the auditor may consider, for example, discussing the
procedures to be applied with appropriate representatives of the parties
involved, reviewing relevant correspondence from such parties.
11. It is in the interests of both the client and the auditor that the auditor
sends an engagement letter documenting the key terms of the appointment.
An engagement letter confirms the auditors acceptance of the appointment
and helps avoid misunderstanding regarding such matters as the objectives
and scope of the engagement, the extent of the auditors responsibilities and
the form of reports to be issued.

SRS 4400 VI-5
12. Matters that would be included in the engagement letter include:
A listing of the procedures to be performed as agreed-upon
between the parties.
A statement that the distribution of the report of factual findings
would be restricted to the specified parties who have agreed to the
procedures to be performed.
An example of an engagement letter appears in Appendix I to this SRS.
Planning
13. The auditor should plan the work so that an effective engagement
will be performed.
Documentation
14. The auditor should document matters which are important in
providing evidence to support the report of factual findings, and
evidence that the engagement was carried out in accordance with this
SRS and the terms of the engagement.
Procedures and Evidence
15. The auditor should carry out the procedures agreed-upon and use
the evidence obtained as the basis for the report of factual findings.
16. The procedures applied in an engagement to perform agreed-upon
procedures may include:
Inquiry and analysis.
Recomputation, comparison and other clerical accuracy checks.
Observation.
Inspection.
Obtaining confirmations.
Appendix II to this SRS is an example report which contains an illustrative
list of procedures which may be used as one part of a typical agreed-upon
procedures engagement.
SRS 4400 VI-6
Reporting
17. The report on an agreed-upon procedures engagement needs to
describe the purpose and the agreed-upon procedures of the
engagement in sufficient detail to enable the reader to understand the
nature and the extent of the work performed. The report should also
clearly mention that no audit or reviewhas been performed.
18. The report of factual findings should contain:
(a) Title;
(b) Addressee (ordinarily, the appointing authority );
(c) Identification of specific financial or non-financial information to
which the agreed-upon procedures have been applied;
(d) A statement that the procedures performed were those agreed-
upon with the recipient;
(e) A statement that the engagement was performed in accordance
with the Standard on Related Services applicable to agreed-upon
procedures engagements;
(g) Identification of the purpose for which the agreed-upon procedures
were performed;
(h) A listing of the specific procedures performed;
(i) A description of the auditors factual findings including sufficient
details of errors and exceptions found;
(j) A statement that the procedures performed do not constitute either
an audit or a reviewand, as such, no assurance is expressed;
(k) A statement that had the auditor performed additional procedures,
an audit or a review, other matters might have come to light that
would have been reported;
(l) A statement that the report is restricted to those parties that have
agreed to the procedures to be performed;
(m) A statement (when applicable) that the report relates only to the
elements, accounts, items or financial and non-financial
information specified and that it does not extend to the entitys
financial statements taken as a whole;
SRS 4400 VI-7
(n) Date of the report;
(o) Place of signature ; and
(p) Auditors signature
The report should be signed by the accountant in his personal name.
Where the firmis appointed, the report should be signed in the personal
name of the accountant and in the name of the firm. The
partner/proprietor signing the report on agreed-upon procedures
should also mention the membership number assigned by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India
Appendix II to this SRS contains an example of a report of factual findings
issued in connection with an engagement to perform agreed-upon
procedures regarding financial information.
Effective Date
19. This Standard on Related Services is applicable to all agreed upon
procedures engagements beginning on or after April 1, 2004.

Compatibility with the International Standard on Auditing
(ISA)
**
920
The standards established in this Standard on Related Services are
generally consistent in all material respects with those set out in the
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 920, Engagements to Perform
Agreed-upon Procedures regarding Financial Information.

**
Now the International Standard on Related Services (ISRS) 4400.
SRS 4400 VI-8
Appendix I
Example of an Engagement Letter for an Agreed-upon
Procedures Engagement
The following letter is for use as a guide in conjunction with paragraph
12 of this Standard on Related Services and is not intended to be a
standard letter. The engagement letter will need to be varied according
to individual requirements and circumstances.
Date
To the Board of Directors (or other appropriate representatives of the
client who engaged the auditor).
This is in reference to your letter dated ________, appointing us to perform
agreed-upon procedures in respect of _______________ (identify the items,
e.g., sales, profit of a segment, accounts receivables, etc., of the entity).
This letter is to confirm our understanding of the terms and objectives of our
engagement and the nature and limitations of the services that we will
provide.
Our engagement will be conducted in accordance with the Standard on
Related Services (SRS) 4400, Engagements to Perform Agreed-upon
Procedures regarding Financial Information, issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India and we will indicate so in our report.
We have agreed to perform the following procedures and report to you the
factual findings resulting from our work:
(Describe the nature, timing and extent of the procedures to be performed,
including specific reference, where applicable, to the identity of documents
and records to be read, individuals to be contacted and parties fromwhom
confirmations will be obtained.)
The procedures that we will perform are solely to assist you in
______________________ (state purpose). Our report is not to be used for
any other purpose and is solely for your information, and/ or for use by
_________________ (in case the terms of reference so require).
The procedures that we will perform will not constitute an audit or a review
made in accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards in India
and, consequently, no assurance will be expressed.
SRS 4400 VI-9
We look forward to your full cooperation and trust that you will make
available to us whatever records, documentation and other information
requested in connection with our engagement.
Our fees will be billed as work progresses.
accordance with your understanding of the terms of the engagement
including the specific procedures, which we have agreed will be performed.
For XYZ & Co

Signature
Designation
4

Date:
Address:

ABC Company by
( signed )
...................
Name and Title
Date
Address

4
SRS 4400 VI-10
Appendix II
Example of a Report of Factual Findings in Connection with Accounts
Receivable
CONFIDENTIAL
Report Of Factual Findings In Connection With
Agreed-upon Procedures Assignment Related To Accounts Receivable
To (those who engaged the auditor)
We have performed the procedures agreed with you and enumerated below
with respect to the accounts receivable of ABC Company as at
_______(date), set forth in the accompanying schedules (not shown in this
example). Our engagement was undertaken in accordance with the
Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4400, Engagements to Perform
Agreed-upon Procedures regarding Financial Information, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The procedures were performed
solely to assist you in evaluating the validity of the accounts receivable and
are summarized as follows:
1. We obtained and checked the addition of the trial balance of accounts
receivable as at __________ (date), prepared by ABC Company, and we
compared the total to the balance in the related general ledger account.
2. We compared the attached list (not shown in this example) of major
customers and the amounts outstanding at ____________ (date) to the
related names and amounts in the trial balance.
3. We obtained customers statements or confirmations from customers to
confirm balances outstanding at ________________ (date).
4. We compared such statements or confirmations to the amounts referred
to in 2 above. For amounts which did not agree, we obtained reconciliations
from ABC Company. For reconciliations obtained, we identified and listed
outstanding invoices, debit notes and outstanding cheques, each of which
was greater than Rs. XXX. We located and examined such invoices and
debit notes subsequently raised and cheques subsequently received and we
ascertained that they have been rightly listed as outstanding on the
reconciliations.
We report our findings below:
SRS 4400 VI-11
(a) With respect to item 1, we found the addition to be correct and the total
amount to be in agreement.
(b) With respect to item 2, we found the amounts compared to be in
agreement.
(c) With respect to item 3, we found there were suppliers statements for all
such customers.
(d) With respect to item 4, we found the amounts agreed, or with respect to
amounts which did not agree, we found the Company had prepared
reconciliations and that the debit notes, invoices and outstanding
cheques over Rs. XXX were appropriately listed as reconciling items
with the following exceptions:
(Detail the exceptions)
Because the above procedures do not constitute either an audit or a review
made in accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards in India,
we do not express any assurance on the accounts receivable as at
_______(date).
Had we performed additional procedures or had we performed an audit or
review of the financial statements in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing standards in India, other matters might have come to our attention
that would have been reported to you.
Our report is solely for the purpose set forth in the first paragraph of this
report and for your information and is not to be used for any other purpose or
to be distributed to any other parties. This report relates only to the accounts
and items specified above and does not extend to any financial statements of
ABC Company, taken as a whole.
Date:
Place:
For XYZ & Co

Signature
(Name of the Member and Membership number)
Designation
5

5
Partner or proprietor as the case may be.
Back
SRS 4410 (AAS 31)
ENGAGEMENTS TO
COMPILE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Effective for all compilation
engagements beginning on or after April 1, 2004)
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction .................................................................................. 1-2
Objective of a Compilation Engagement ........................................ 3-4
General Principles of a Compilation Engagement ........................ 5-6
Responsibility of Management ........................................................ 7-9
Defining the terms of the Engagement ....................................... 10-11
Planning ................................................................................... 12
Documentation ................................................................................... 13
Procedures .............................................................................. 14-18
Special Considerations ................................................................ 19-24
Reporting on a Compilation Engagement .................................. 25-26
Effective Date ................................................................................... 27
Appendices

Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4410
, Engagements to Compile
Financial Information should be read in the context of the Preface to the
Related Services
1

Issued in April, 2004. With the issuance of this Standard on Related Services, the Guidance Note
on Members Duties regarding Engagements to Compile Financial Statements, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, issued in February 2002, shall stand withdrawn.
1
Back
Engagements to Compile Financial Information
SRS 4410 VI-13
Introduction
1. The purpose of this Standard on Related Services (SRS) is to establish
standards on professional responsibilities of an accountant
2
when an
engagement to compile financial statements or other financial information is
undertaken and the form and content of the report to be issued in connection
with such a compilation so that the association of the name of the accountant
with such financial statements or financial information is not misconstrued by
a user of those statements or information as having been audited by him.
2. This SRS is directed towards the compilation of financial information.
However, it should be applied to the extent practicable, to engagements to
compile non-financial information, provided the accountant has adequate
knowledge of the subject matter in question. Engagements to provide limited
assistance to a client in the preparation of financial statements (for example,
selection of an appropriate accounting policy), do not constitute an
engagement to compile financial statements. This SRS should be read in
conjunction with the Framework of Statements on Standard Auditing
Practices and Guidance Notes on Related Services
3
.
Objective of a Compilation Engagement
3. The objective of a compilation engagement is for an accountant to
use accounting expertise, as opposed to auditing expertise, to collect,
classify and summarise financial information. This ordinarily entails
reducing detailed data to a manageable and understandable form without the
requirement to test the assertions underlying that information. The
procedures employed are not designed and do not enable the accountant to
express any assurance on the financial information. However, users of the
compiled financial information derive some benefit as a result of the
accountants involvement because the service has been performed with
professional competence and due care.
4. A compilation engagement would ordinarily include the preparation of
financial statements (which may or may not be a complete set of financial

2
For the purpose of this Standard on Related Services and to distinguish between an audit
and a compilation engagement, the term accountant (rather than auditor) has been used
throughout to refer to a member of the Institute in practice.
3
The Framework issued in 2001 has been withdrawn pursuant to the issuance of the
Framework for Assurance Engagements, which is applicable from April 1, 2008. The text of the
Revised Framework is reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.
SRS 4410 VI-14
statements) but may also include the collection, classification and
summarisation of other financial information, for example, preparation of
quarterly financial results, restatement of financial statements in accordance
with a financial reporting framework other than in accordance with which the
financial statements to be restated are already prepared and presented.
General Principles of a Compilation Engagement
5. The accountant should comply with the Code of Ethics issued by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The ethical principles
governing the accountants professional responsibilities for this type of
engagement are:
(a) Integrity;
(b) Objectivity;
(d) Confidentiality;
(e) Professional conduct; and
(f) Technical standards.
Independence is not a requirement for a compilation engagement. However,
where the accountant is not independent, a statement to that effect
should be made in the accountants report.
6. In all circumstances when an accountants name is associated with
financial information compiled by him, the accountant should issue a
report.
Responsibility of Management
7. The management is responsible for taking reasonable steps to prevent
and detect errors, fraud or other irregularities. This includes:
a) Ensuring that the financial information generated in the entity is correct,
complete and reliable;
b) Maintaining adequate accounting and other records and internal controls
and selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies;
SRS 4410 VI-15
c) Establishing controls designed to safeguard the assets of the entity and
also to deter fraudulent or other dishonest conduct and to detect any
fraud that occurs;
d) Establishing controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity
complies with laws and regulations applicable to its activities, or for
detecting any non-compliance with laws or regulations that occurs.
8. A compilation engagement cannot be regarded as providing assurance
on the adequacy of the clients internal control systems or on the actual
incidence of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations. A
compilation engagement carried out by the accountant does not relieve the
management of these responsibilities.
9. The management is also responsible for preparation and presentation of
financial statements or other financial information in accordance with the
applicable laws and regulations, if any. The accountant should,
accordingly, obtain an acknowledgement fromthe management of its
responsibility for the appropriate preparation and presentation of the
financial statements or other information and of its approval of such
information to be compiled. The accountant should also obtain an
acknowledgement from management of its responsibility for the
accuracy and completeness of the underlying accounting data and the
complete disclosure of all material and relevant information to the
accountant.
Defining the Terms of the Engagement
10. An engagement letter will be of assistance in planning the compilation
work. The scope of a compilation engagement would, normally, be defined by
the instructions of the client, though in certain cases, for example, in case of
compilation of financial statements of a company, the form and content of
such financial statements might be laid down under a statute. The
accountant should, therefore, ensure that there is a clear understanding
between the client and the accountant regarding the terms of the
engagement by means of an engagement letter or such other suitable
formof contract. Thus, it is in the interest of both the accountant and
the entity that the accountant sends an engagement letter documenting
the key terms of the appointment. An engagement letter confirms the
accountants acceptance of the engagement and helps avoid
SRS 4410 VI-16
misunderstanding regarding matters such as the objective and scope of
the engagement and the extent of the auditors responsibilities.
11. The engagement letter would include matters such as the following:
(a) Nature of the engagement including the fact that neither an audit nor a
review will be carried out and that accordingly no assurance will be
expressed.
(b) Fact that the engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose fraud or
defalcations that may exist but that the accountant will bring to the
attention of the management any such matter which might come to his
attention during the course of his engagement.
(c) Nature of the information to be supplied by the client.
(d) Fact that management is responsible for:
the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied to the
accountant, including maintenance of adequate accounting records
and internal controls and selection and application of appropriate
accounting policies.
preparation and presentation of the financial statements of the
entity, in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, if
any.
safeguarding the assets of the entity and also establishing
appropriate controls designed to prevent and detect fraud and
other irregularities.
ensuring that the activities of the entity are carried in accordance
with applicable laws and regulations and that it institutes
appropriate controls to prevent and detect any non-compliance.
ensuring complete disclosure of all material and relevant
information to the accountant.
(e) Intended use and distribution of the information, once compiled.
(f) Basis of accounting on which financial information is to be compiled and
the fact that the basis, and any known departures therefrom, if any will
be disclosed.
(g) The fact that the management is responsible to the users for the
information to be compiled by the accountant.
SRS 4410 VI-17
(h) Unrestricted access to whatever records, documents and other
information is requested in connection with the compilation
engagement.
(i) Basis on which fees would be computed and any billing arrangements.
(j) Request for the client to confirm the terms of engagement by
acknowledging the receipt of the engagement letter.
An example of an engagement letter for a compilation engagement appears
in Appendix I.
Planning
12. The accountant should plan the work so that an effective
engagement will be performed.
Documentation
13. The accountant should document matters, which are important in
providing evidence that the engagement was carried out in accordance
with this Standard on Related Services and the terms of the
engagement.
Procedures
14. The accountant should obtain a general knowledge of the business
and operations of the entity and should be familiar with the accounting
principles and practices of the industry in which the entity operates and
with the formand content of the financial statements/ other financial
information that is appropriate in the circumstances.
15. To compile financial information, the accountant requires a general
understanding of the nature of the entitys business transactions, the form of
its accounting records and the accounting basis on which the financial
information is to be presented. The accountant ordinarily obtains knowledge
of these matters through experience with the entity or inquiry of the entitys
personnel.
16. Other than as noted in this Standard on Related Services, the
accountant is not, ordinarily, required to:
SRS 4410 VI-18
(a) make any inquiries of management to assess the reliability and
completeness of the information provided;
(b) assess internal controls;
(c) verify any matters; or
(d) verify any explanations.
In a compilation engagement, an accountant would normally have to rely on
the management for most of the information needed to compile the financial
statements or other financial information, including accounting estimates as
well as the fact that the information given to the accountant is complete and
reliable. The accountant should request management representation
letter covering significant information or explanations given orally on
which he considers representations are required.
17. If the accountant becomes aware that the information supplied by
management is incorrect, incomplete, or otherwise unsatisfactory, the
accountant should consider performing the procedures listed in
Paragraph 16 and request management to provide additional
information. If management refuses to provide additional information,
the accountant should withdrawfromthe engagement, informing the
entity of the reasons for the withdrawal.
18. The accountant should read the compiled information and consider
whether it appears to be appropriate in formand free fromobvious
material misstatements. In this sense, material misstatements include:
(a) mistakes in the application of the identified financial reporting
framework.
(b) non-disclosure of the financial reporting framework and any known
departures therefrom.
(c) non-disclosure of any other significant matters of which the accountant
has become aware.
The identified financial reporting framework and any known departures
therefromshould be disclosed within the financial information, though
their effects need not be quantified.
SRS 4410 VI-19
Special Considerations
Clients Having an Identified Financial Reporting Framework
19. As far as practicable, in case of compilation of financial statements
prepared within an identified financial reporting framework
4
, the
accountant should ensure that the financial statements or other
financial information compiled comply with the requirements of the
identified financial reporting framework. In case of any material
departures fromthe requirements of the identified financial reporting
framework, the fact should be stated in the Notes to the Accounts or
other compiled financial information as well as in the accountants
report on the compilation.
Clients Having No Identified Financial Reporting Framework
20. In case of clients for whom compliance with an identified financial
reporting framework is not required or the Accounting Standards issued by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India are not mandatory, the client
may specify that the accounts should be compiled on, for example, based on
the requirements of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, since, accounts
are normally assumed to be compliant with the generally accepted
accounting practices, including the Accounting Standards issued by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the different basis of
compilation should be set out in the Notes to the Accounts or other
compiled financial information as well as the report issued by the
accountant on compilation.

4
Paragraph 3 of the Framework for Statements on Standard Auditing Practices and Guidance
Notes on Related Services states as follows:
Financial statements are ordinarily prepared and presented annually and are directed toward the
common information needs of a wide range of users. Many of those users rely on the financial
statements as their major source of information because they do not have the power to obtain
additional information to meet their specific information needs. Thus, financial statements need to
be prepared in accordance with one, or a combination of :
(a) relevant statutory requirements, e.g., the Companies Act, 1956, for companies;
(b) accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India; and
(c) other recognised accounting principles and practices, e.g., those recommended in the
Guidance Notes issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
(The readers may note that the Framework issued in 2001 has been withdrawn pursuant to the
issuance of the Framework for Assurance Engagements, which is applicable fromApril 1, 2008.
The text of the Revised Framework is reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.)
SRS 4410 VI-20
Non-Compliance with the Accounting Standards
21. In the case of a company, the financial statements compiled must
comply with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, including
the Accounting Standards and, accordingly, give a true and fair view.
However, without carrying out the procedures necessary for an audit, the
accountant cannot form any opinion on whether the accounts give a true and
fair view, even though he has compiled these financial statements. The
compilation is based on the information supplied to the accountant by the
client and does not include any verification thereof. However, if the
accountant becomes aware of material non-compliance with any
applicable Accounting Standard(s), the same should be brought to the
attention of the management and, if the same is not rectified by the
management, it should be included in the Notes to the Accounts and
the compilation report of the accountant.
Accounting Estimates Made by Clients
22. Often in compilation engagements, it is necessary for certain items in
the accounts, for example, work in progress, to be based on estimates by the
client. Such estimated items should be so described where material. If,
based on the information provided to the accountant, it appears that
certain estimates are unreasonable, the accountant should drawthese
to the attention of the management for reconsideration.
23. If the accountant becomes aware of material misstatements, the
accountant should persuade the management to carry out necessary
amendments in the financial statements or other compiled financial
information. If such amendments are not made and the financial
statements are still considered to be misleading, the accountant should
withdrawfromthe engagement.
24. The financial statements or other financial information compiled
should be approved by the client before the compilation report is
signed by the accountant. The client should be asked to sign a
statement on the face of the accounts retained by the accountant. The
accountant should ensure that the users of the financial statements or
other financial information so compiled are aware of the extent of
his/her involvement with the accounts so that the users do not derive
unwarranted assurance. Accordingly, the word audit should not be
used in describing the nature of services involving compilation of
SRS 4410 VI-21
financial statements or other financial information, nor the fee for these
services be described as auditors fee, or remuneration in the
accounts, correspondence or any other document. The accountant
should also take note that the financial statements or other financial
information so compiled should not be prepared on the letter-heads or
other stationery of the accountant, carrying his (or firms) name and
address since it is liable to be misinterpreted.
Reporting on a Compilation Engagement
25. It is essential that the accountant clearly brings out the nature of
association with the financial statements and the nature of the work
performed by him. The report on compilation engagements should,
ordinarily, be in the following lay out:
(a) Title: The title of the report should be Accountants Report on
Compilation of Unaudited Financial Statements (and not
Auditors Report);
(b) Addressee: The report should ordinarily be addressed to the
appointing authority;
(c) Identification of the financial information also noting that it is
based on the information provided by the management;
(d) When relevant, a statement that the accountant is not independent
of the entity;
(e) A statement that the management is responsible for:
completeness and accuracy of the underlying data and
complete disclosure of all material and relevant information to
the accountant;
maintaining adequate accounting and other records and
internal controls and selecting and applying appropriate
accounting policies;
preparation and presentation of financial statements or other
financial information in accordance with the applicable laws
and regulations, if any;
establishing controls to safeguard the assets of the entity and
preventing and detecting frauds or other irregularities;
SRS 4410 VI-22
establishing controls for ensuring that the activities of the
entity are carried out in accordance with the applicable laws
and regulations and preventing and detecting any non-
compliance;
(f) A statement that the engagement was performed in accordance
with this Standard on Related Services ;
(g) A statement that neither an audit nor a reviewhas been carried out
and that accordingly no assurance is expressed on the financial
information;
(h) A paragraph, when considered necessary, drawing attention to the
disclosure of material departures fromthe identified financial
reporting framework;
(i) Date of the report;
(j) Place of signature; and
(k) Accountants signature: The report on compilation of financial
information should be signed by the auditor in his personal name.
Where a firm is appointed for the engagement, the report should be
signed in the personal name of the accountant and in the name of the
firm. The partner/proprietor signing the report on compilation of
financial information should also mention the membership number
assigned by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Appendix II to this Standard contains examples of compilation reports.
26. The financial statements or other financial information compiled by
the accountant should contain a reference such as Unaudited,
Compiled without Audit or Review and also Refer to Compilation
Report on each page of the financial information or on the front of the
complete set of financial statements.
Effective Date
27. This Standard on Related Services is applicable to all compilation
engagements beginning on or after April 1, 2004.
SRS 4410 VI-23
**

930
The standards for compilation engagements established in this Standard on
Related Services are generally consistent in all material respects with those
set out in the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 930, Engagements to
Compile Financial Information, except for the additional section titled,
Special Considerations, as given in paragraphs 19 to 22 of this Standard on
Related Services .
The said section has been added to provide guidance to members in respect
of certain typical issues which might be faced by the members in carrying out
compilation engagements. For example, duties and responsibilities of the
accountant in case of clients having an identified financial reporting
framework, such as the Companies Act, 1956 and any material departures
therefrom; clients having no identified financial reporting framework, say,
where the financial statements are based on the requirements of the Income
Tax Act, 1961. The section also provides guidance in respect of situations
where the accountant becomes aware of a material non-compliance with the
applicable Accounting Standards; as also duties of the accountant relating to
accounting estimates made by the client.
Moreover, the Standard on Related Services , in paragraph 24, unlike the
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 930, also requires that the financial
statements should be approved by the client before compilation report is
signed by the accountant. The SRS also requires the accountant to ensure
that the users of the compiled financial statements are aware of the extent of
his/ her involvement with the accounts so that the users do not derive any
unwarranted assurance. The SRS, unlike the ISA, also prohibits the
accountant from preparing the financial statements on his letter head or other
stationery bearing his (or firms) name or address.
In addition, the SRS, unlike the ISA, does not require the accountant to send
a form of expected report to the client alongwith the engagement letter. Also,
the SRS requires the accountant to mention the place of signature in his
report as compared to the ISA which requires the accountants to give his
address.

**
Now the International Standard on Related Services (ISRS) 4410.
SRS 4410 VI-24
Appendix I
Example of an Engagement Letter for a Compilation Engagement
The following letter is for use as a guide in conjunction with the
considerations outlined in paragraph 11 of this Standard on Related Services
. This example is for the compilation of financial statements of a company
and will need to be varied according to individual requirements and
circumstances.
(Date)
To the Board of Directors (or other appropriate representatives of senior
management):
You have, vide your letter dated ________ requested that we compile the
balance sheet of __________(name of the company) as at
______________(date) and the related profit and loss account and the (cash
flow statement)
5
for the year ended on that date. We are pleased to confirm
our acceptance and understanding of the engagement by means of this
letter. As no audit or review engagement procedures would be carried out, no
opinion on the financial statements will be expressed. Further, our
engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose whether frauds or
defalcations, or illegal acts exist. However, we will inform you of any such
matters which might come to our attention in the course of the engagement.
As management, you are responsible for:
(a) the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied to us,
including maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal
controls and selection and application of appropriate accounting policies.
(b) preparation and presentation of the financial statements of the entity, in
accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, if any.
(c) safeguarding the assets of the entity and also establishing appropriate
controls designed to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
(d) ensuring that the activities of the entity are carried in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations and that it institutes appropriate controls
to prevent and detect any non-compliance.
You will confirm that events and transactions are recorded in accordance
with the applicable Accounting Standard(s), issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India and other recognised accounting principles
and practices and inform us of any departures therefrom.

5
Only in cases where relevant.
SRS 4410 VI-25
As part of our normal procedures, we may request you to provide written
confirmations of any information or explanations given to us orally during the
course of our work.
We understand that the intended use and distribution of the information we
have compiled is _________________ (specify).
We look forward to full cooperation with your staff and we trust that they will
make available to us whatever records, documentation and other information
requested in connection with our engagement.
Our fees will be billed as the work progresses.
accordance with your understanding of the arrangements for our compilation
of your financial statements.
XYZ & Co.

Signature
Designation
6

Address:
Date:
For ABC & Co.
Acknowledged on behalf of ______________(name of the company)
----------------
Signature
Date
Address

6
SRS 4410 VI-26
Appendix II
Examples of a Report of an Engagement to Compile Financial
Statements

Illustration 1: Report on Compilation of Financial Statements
ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON COMPILATION OF UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS

To.
On the basis of the accounting records and other information and
explanations provided to us by the management, we have compiled, the
unaudited balance sheet of ..(name of the entity) as at March
31, XXXX and the related profit and loss account and the cash flow
statement
7
for the period then ended.
The management of the _________ (name of the entity) is responsible for:
(a) Completeness and accuracy of the underlying data and complete
disclosure of all material and relevant information to the accountant.
(b) Maintaining adequate accounting and other records and internal controls
(c) Preparation and presentation of financial statements in accordance with
the applicable laws and regulations, if any.
(d) Establishing controls to safeguard the assets of the entity and preventing
and detecting frauds or other irregularities.
(e) Establishing controls for ensuring that the activities of the entity are
carried out in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations and
preventing and detecting any non compliance.
The compilation engagement was carried out by us in accordance with the
Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4410 , Engagements to Compile
Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India.
The balance sheet and the profit and loss account are in agreement with the
books of account. We have not audited or reviewed these financial
statements and accordingly express no opinion thereon.
For ABC & Co.

7
Where applicable.
SRS 4410 VI-27
...
Signature
(Name of the accountant and membership number)
Designation
8

Date:
Place:

Illustration 2: Compiled Financial Statements Where Such Financial
Statements do not Comply with the Generally Accepted Accounting
Practices in India.
ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON
COMPILATION OF UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To
On the basis of the accounting records and other information and
explanations provided to us by the management, we have compiled the
unaudited balance sheet of __________ (name of the entity) as of March 31,
XXXX and the related profit and loss account and the cash flow statement
9

for the period then ended.
The management of the _________ (name of the entity) is responsible for:
(a) Completeness and accuracy of the underlying data and complete
disclosure of all material and relevant information to the accountant.
(b) Maintaining adequate accounting and other records and internal controls
(c) Preparation and presentation of financial statements in accordance with
the applicable laws and regulations, if any.
(d) Establishing controls to safeguard the assets of the entity and preventing
and detecting frauds or other irregularities.
(e) Establishing controls for ensuring that the activities of the entity are
carried out in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations and
preventing and detecting any non-compliance.
The compilation engagement was carried out by us in accordance with the
Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4410 , Engagements to Compile
Financial Information, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India.

8
Partner or Proprietor.
9
Where applicable.
SRS 4410 VI-28
Since the financial statements have been compiled for the Income Tax
Department and have been drawn up on cash basis of accounting to reflect
the necessary adjustments for computation of the income by the Department,
these financial statements, accordingly, do not comply with the generally
accepted accounting principles in India.
The balance sheet and the profit and loss account are in agreement with the
books of account. We have not audited or reviewed these financial
statements and accordingly express no opinion thereon.

Date:
Place:
For ABC & Co.
...
Signature
(Name of the accountant and membership number)
Designation
10

10
Partner or proprietor.
Back

1
STATEMENT ON REPORTING UNDER SECTION
227(1A) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
Announcement on Withdrawal of the
Statement on Qualifications in Auditors Report
[Except Paragraphs 2.1 to 2.30 Dealing with Report under section 227
(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956]
1. Attention of the members is invited to the Statement on Qualifications in
the Auditors Report (the Statement) issued by the Institute in 1981 (revised
in 1984 and 2000). The Statement, primarily, contains guidance on the
following aspects of an auditors report:
i. reporting in terms of the requirements of section 227(1A) of the
Companies Act, 1956; and
ii. issuance of qualified/ adverse/ disclaimer of opinion.
In addition, the Statement also deals with other related aspects such as the
manner of presenting the opinion in the audit report, directors comments on
qualifications, separate report to directors, branch audit reports as also some
examples of situations giving rise to other than unqualified opinion.
2. Members attention is also invited to the Auditing and Assurance Standard
(AAS) 28, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements, issued by the Institute
in January 2003. The said AAS, among other things, discusses in details, the
fundamental principles and considerations involved in issuing various types of
opinions unqualified, qualified, adverse, disclaimer and emphasis of matter.
The Standard also contains illustrations regarding each type of opinion, model
audit report, etc.
3. The Council of the Institute at its 269th meeting held on July 18 to 20,
2007 considered the status of the Statement on Qualifications In Auditors
Report vis-a-vis Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 28. The Council noted
Back
Statement u/s 227(1A) VII-2
that in terms of the announcement of the Council on the authority attached to
the documents issued by the Council, on the issuance of a Standard, any
Statement on the corresponding subject automatically stands withdrawn. This
position could not be applied in case of the Statement on Qualifications in
Auditors Report upon issuance of AAS 28 since, as noted in paragraph 1
above, the Statement contains guidance on certain additional aspects such as,
reporting under section 227(1A), manner of making qualifications, the directors
comments on qualifications, separate report to directors and branch audit
reports.
4. Paragraphs 1.1 to 1.5 of the Statement on Qualifications in Auditors
Report explain the general principles regarding compliance with section 227 of
the Companies Act, 1956, which have become obsolete by now. Also,
paragraphs 2.31 to 2.32 of the Statement deal with the reporting under
Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1975, which
also has become obsolete now. Further, paragraphs 3.1 to 4.10 of the
Statement on Qualifications in Auditors Report enunciate the principles
involved in issuing other than unqualified reports as well as examples of
situations that may give rise to other than a unqualified opinion and suggested
wordings therefor. The Council is of the view that these aspects have been
amply covered in AAS 28 and also that AAS 28 contains sufficient examples of
situations giving rise to other than unqualified opinions as well as suggested
wordings. Accordingly, the Council has decided to withdraw the Statement on
Qualifications in Auditors Report except paragraphs 2.1 to 2.30, dealing with
report under section 227 (1A) of the Companies Act, 1956.
5. The Council further decided to keep the paragraphs 2.1 to 2.30 of the
existing Statement and rename the Statement as Statement on Reporting
under section 227 (1A) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Reporting under Section 227 (1A) of the Companies Act, 1956
Contents
Paragraph(s)
Special Matters in Auditors Report........................................2.1-2.30
Report under Section 227(1A) of the Companies Act ................. 2.1-2.30
Special Matters in Auditors Report
Report under Section 227(1A) of the Companies Act
2.1 Section 227(1A) requires the auditor to make certain specific enquiries
during the course of his audit. This requirement is without prejudice to his
general rights, powers and duties regarding access to books, etc., and
obtaining information and explanations. He is, however, not required to
report on the matters specified in this sub-section, unless he has any special
comments to make on any of the items referred to therein. If he is satisfied
as a result of the enquiries, he has no further duty to report that he is so
satisfied. It should however be noted that the auditor is required to make
only enquiries on the matters specified in the sub-section and is not to
investigate into the matters referred to therein.
2.2 Clauses (a) to (f) of Section 227(1A) of the Companies Act are
discussed in the following paragraphs.
2.3 Clause (a) requires the auditor to inquire:
Whether loans and advances made by the company on the basis of security
have been properly secured and whether the terms on which they have been
made are not prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members.
2.4 This clause applies to loans and advances made by the company during
the financial year under audit, whether they are outstanding on the date of
the Balance Sheet or not. The inquiry should be made in the light of
conditions prevailing when the loan or advance was made.
2.5 Loans and advances have not been defined anywhere in the Act.
However, having regard to the requirement of clause (d) of the sub-section, a
distinction is obviously intended to be made between loans and advances
and deposits. A deposit may be defined as the placing of money or
moneys worth with a third party, either for safe keeping, or by way of
security for the performance of the depositors obligations, or for the purpose
of earning interest; in the last case deposit being with a party who
customarily accepts deposits. Any items required to be disclosed under the
head Loans and Advances in Part I of Schedule VI to the Act which do not
fall within the above definition of a deposit should be construed for the
purpose of this clause as loans and advances.
2.6 The clause applies to all loans and advances made on the basis of
security. Security for this purpose would include any movable or
immovable property, whether belonging to the borrower or not, of which
either physical possession or over which a legally effective charge is given to
lender.
2.7 In order to ascertain that loans and advances are properly secured,
the auditor should make inquiries to ascertain that prima facie:
(a) the company holds a legally enforceable security, and
(b) the value of the security fully covers the amount of the loan or advance
and is reasonably ascertained.
2.8 In order to comply with requirements of paragraph 2.7(a) above, it will
be necessary for the auditor to make appropriate inquiries depending upon
the type of security. A few instances are given below:
Type of Security Documents etc. to be seen
(a) Shares and debentures The scrips duly transferred in the
name of the company.
(b) Government securities, and
other securities, documents of
title which are transferable by
endorsement and delivery,
e.g. Bills of Lading, and
Railway Receipts.
The scrips or other documents duly
endorsed in favour of the lender.
(c) Legal mortgage of immovable
properties.
Duly registered mortgage deed.
(d) Equitable mortgage of
immovable properties.
Title deeds deposited.
In both the above cases, reports on
title by lawyers, showing whether
the title is free from encumbrances
and whether it is marketable, should
be called for.
(e) Life Insurance Policy Assignment of policy in favour of
the lender, duly registered with the
insurer.
(f) Pledge of goods Appropriate record of goods held at
the balance sheet date.
(g) Hypothecation of goods Deed of Hypothecation or other
document creating the charge,
together with a statement of stocks
held at the balance sheet date.
2.9 The valuation of securities which are quoted on a stock exchange would
not normally present any problems. For securities which are not so quoted,
the auditor should call for the last accounts of the company whose shares or
debentures are deposited as security and satisfy himself that prima facie the
valuation placed on the security by the management is reasonable. In the
case of immovable properties, the auditor should satisfy himself that the
valuation placed on the property is prima facie reasonable. In the case of life
insurance policies, the auditor should call for evidence of the surrender value
of the policy. In the case of stocks and other goods held on pledge or
hypothecation, the Auditor should ascertain that prima facie the valuation
placed on the goods is in order.
2.10 The loan agreement or correspondence in regard to the terms of the
loan or advance should be seen. Where the loan or advance is made to a
company, any charge on the assets of such a company should have been
registered under Section 125 of the Act in order to constitute an effective
security.
2.11 Loans and advances on the basis of security would include loans or
advances which are only partly secured from the commencement, or loans or
advances which became partly secured subsequently owing to any reason,
such as fall in the value of the security. In the case of partly secured loans
or advances, it would be advisable to show them separately in the Balance
Sheet as partly secured, indicating the extent to which they are secured.
2.12 The terms on which the loan or advance is made would primarily
include the security, the interest charged and the terms of repayment. It
would be difficult to lay down any general principles regarding the rate of
interest which may be charged on loans and advances. Various
considerations, such as the position and standing of the borrower, type of
security, purpose of the loan, prevailing market rate of interest, etc., would
have to be taken into account. If the loan has been given for business
considerations, e.g., loans to staff for purchase of cars, houses, etc., loans to
suppliers of raw materials or other goods, there may be justification for
interest being charged at a rate lower than the market rate, or even, in
appropriate circumstances, no interest being charged at all. However, when
a loan is given only with a view to earning interest, the interest charged
would be at the commercial rate.
2.13 Particular attention should be paid to loans or advances to concerns in
which the directors of the company or their associates are interested.
2.14 The question whether the terms on which a loan or advance has been
made are prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members is a
difficult one. Obviously, the auditor is not to inquire as to how such
transactions of the company affect the interests of individual members in
their personal capacities. The reference to members should therefore be
construed as a reference to the members of a company as a class, in their
capacity as members. The members of the company would be primarily
interested in a reasonable return on their investment and in the safety of their
capital. The question whether a loan is prejudicial to the interests of the
members should therefore be considered from this angle.
2.15 If loan or advance has been approved by the members of the company
and/or the Government as required by Section 370 of the Act, this would be a
prima facie evidence to show that it is not prejudicial to the interests of the
company or its members.
2.16. It would appear that, in respect of a continuing loan or advance, the
question whether the loan or advance is properly secured would have to be
considered at the end of each accounting year. However, the question
whether a loan is prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members
would have to be considered only at the time when the loan is given, or
renewed.
2.17 Under Clause (b) the auditor has to inquire:
Whether transactions of the company which are represented merely by book
entries are not prejudicial to the interests of the company.
2.18. The transactions of a company are ordinarily matters of fact. The
purpose of book entries is to correctly record transactions which have, in
fact, taken place. If a book entry is passed which is not in accordance with
the facts of the transaction, or is contrary thereto, this should be set right or
reported upon by the auditor. Again, if book entries are passed purporting to
record transactions which have, in fact, not taken place, similar
considerations would apply. The clause is therefore intended to cover
transactions of the company for which the only evidence, or the principal
evidence, is the entry regarding the transactions in the books of account. In
such cases, the auditor should inquire whether such transactions have in fact
taken place and, if so, whether they are prejudicial to the interests of the
company.
2.19 Under Clause (c) the auditor has to inquire:
Where the company is not an investment company within the meaning of
section 372 or a banking company, whether so much of the assets of the
company as consist of shares, debentures and other securities have been
sold at a price less than that at which they were purchased by the company.
2.20 This clause requires the auditor to inquire in all cases where shares,
debentures or other securities have been sold at a price less than their cost.
If, as a result of his inquiries, the auditor is satisfied that the sale is bona fide
and the price realised is reasonable, having regard to the circumstances of
the cases, he has no further duty to report on the matter.
2.21 The clause applies to companies other than an investment company
within the meaning of Section 372 or a banking company. The investment
company referred to in this clause is a company whose principal business is the
acquisition of shares, stocks, debentures or other securities (vide the proviso to
Section 372[10]). It should be noted that clause (c) applies to a company whose
principal business is dealing in shares, stocks, debentures or other securities.
2.22 Where the investments consist of securities of the same class
purchased at various times, and at various prices, the question arises as to
the manner of ascertainment of the price at which they were purchased.
Such price should be determined in accordance with accepted accounting
practice consistently followed by the company.
2.23 Where the cost of shares or debentures or other securities sold is not
ascertainable, the book value thereof at the date of sale may be treated as
the cost for the purposes of this clause.
2.24 The question of treatment of bonus shares would also arise. When
bonus shares are received, the number of shares in the portfolio would be
increased by the bonus shares while the cost of the total portfolio would
remain the same as before. The result would be that the average cost per
unit of the total holding would come down proportionately. The usual
accounting practice for apportioning the cost of a part of the total holding on
the sale thereof is to take it at its average cost.
2.25 Under Clause (d) the auditor has to inquire:
Whether loans and advances made by the company have been shown as
deposits.
2.26 A reference is invited to the definition of a deposit in contradistinction
to that of a loan or advance given in the comments on clause (a) above. It
should be noted that the inquiry to be made is whether loans and advances
have been shown as deposits, and not vice versa.
2.27 Clause (e) requires the auditor to inquire:
Whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue account.
2.28 The practice of meeting certain types of personal expenses of
employees is normal and is recognised both by the Income-tax Authorities
and the Company Law Board. Illustrative of such expenses are the provision
of rent-free quarters, conveyance for personal use, medical expenses,
expenses on leave travel, maternity benefits, canteen facilities, etc. The
charging to revenue of such personal expenses, either on the basis of the
companys contractual obligations, or in accordance with accepted business
practice, is perfectly normal and legitimate and does not call for any special
comment by the auditor. Where, however, personal expenses not covered
by contractual obligations or by accepted business practice are incurred by
the company and charged to revenue account, it would be the duty of the
auditor to report thereon.
2.29 Clause (f) requires the auditor to inquire:
Where it is stated in the books and papers of the company that any shares
have been allotted for cash, whether cash has actually been so received in
respect of such allotment, and if no cash has actually been so received,
whether the position as stated in the account books and the balance sheet is
correct, regular and not misleading.
2.30 It should be noted that the reference is to books and papers. Papers
would presumably refer to the Return of Allotment filed by the company
under Section 75 of the Act. The law on the subject has hitherto been that,
where the consideration for the issue of shares is an adjustment against a
bona fide debt payable in money on demand by the company, the shares are
deemed to have been subscribed in cash (vide the decision in Spargos Case
1873, 8, Ch. A. 407). According to the legal opinion obtained by the
Institute, the expression shares allotted for cash may also include shares
allotted against a debt. Therefore, in cases which are covered by the
decision in Spargos case, no comment is required by the auditor, even
though the company may have in the Return of Allotment under Section 75,
shown such shares as allotted against adjustment of a debt.
Back

2
STATEMENT ON THE COMPANIES
(AUDITORS REPORT) ORDER, 2003
*

Contents
Paragraph(s)
Introduction ..........................................................................................1-3
General Provisions Regarding Auditors Report ..............................4-6
Applicability of the Order ..................................................................7-24
Companies Covered by the Order ..............................................7-9
Companies not Covered by the Order ...................................10-24
(i) Private Limited Company..............................................15-16
(ii) Paid-up Capital and Reserves......................................17-19
(iii) Loan Outstanding........................................................20-21
(iv) Financial Institution........................................................... 22
(v) Turnover............................................................................ 23
(vii) Date of Determination of Limits....................................... 24
Effective Date of the Order..............................................................25-27
Period of Compliance......................................................................28-30
General Approach............................................................................31-42
Matters to be Included in the Auditors Report .............................43-77
Comments [Paragraph 4(i)(a)] ........................................................ 44
Comments [Paragraph 4(i)(b)] ........................................................ 45
Comments [Paragraph 4(i)(c)]......................................................... 46
Comments [Paragraph 4(ii)(a)]........................................................ 47

*
Revised edition, issued in 2005.
Back
CARO, 2003 VII-12
Comments [Paragraph 4(ii)(b)]........................................................ 48
Comments [Paragraph 4(ii)(c)]........................................................ 49
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(a)]....................................................... 50
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(b)]....................................................... 51
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(c)]....................................................... 52
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(d)]....................................................... 53
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(e)]....................................................... 54
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(f)]........................................................ 55
Comments [Paragraph 4(iii)(g)]....................................................... 56
Comments [Paragraph 4(iv)]........................................................... 57
Comments [Paragraph 4(v)(a)] ....................................................... 58
Comments [Paragraph 4(v)(b)] ....................................................... 59
Comments [Paragraph 4(vi)]........................................................... 60
Comments [Paragraph 4(vii)].......................................................... 61
Comments [Paragraph 4(viii)] ......................................................... 62
Comments [Paragraph 4(ix)(a)]....................................................... 63
Comments [Paragraph 4(ix)(b)]....................................................... 64
Comments [Paragraph 4(x)]............................................................ 65
Comments [Paragraph 4(xi)]........................................................... 66
Comments [Paragraph 4(xii)].......................................................... 67
Comments [Paragraph 4(xiii) First Part].......................................... 68
Comments [Paragraph 4(xiii)
Second Part; sub-clauses (a) to (d)]............................................. 69
Comments [Paragraph 4(xiv)]......................................................... 70
Comments [Paragraph 4(xv)].......................................................... 71
Comments [Paragraph 4(xvi)]......................................................... 72
Comments [Paragraph 4(xvii)] ........................................................ 73
Comments [Paragraph 4(xviii)]........................................................ 74
Comments [Paragraph 4(xix)]......................................................... 75
Comments [Paragraph 4(xx)].......................................................... 76
Comments [Paragraph 4(xxi)]......................................................... 77
Form of Report .................................................................................78-95
Boards Report .................................................................................96-98
Statement on the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
CARO, 2003 VII-13
Appendices
Appendix I Text of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
Appendix II Published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary Part II,
Section 3 Sub-section (I)
Appendix III Final Reporting Requirements Under Companies
Appendix IV Amendments Made by the Companies (Auditors
Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 in the Companies
Appendix V CARO, 2003 vis a vis MAOCARO, 1988 A
Comparative Analysis
Appendix VI List of Financial Institutions Covered Under the
Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 1975
Appendix VII Text of the Circular on the Date of Application of
Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
Appendix VIII An Illustrative Checklist on Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 2003[As Amended by Companies
(Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004]
Appendix IX Illustrative List of Questions For Evaluating Internal
Controls
Appendix X Text of Certain Relevant Sections Referred to in the
Statement
Appendix XI Industries Required to Maintain Cost Records Under
Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956
Appendix XII Prudential Norms for Revenue Recognition and
Classification of Assets for Nidhi and Mutual Benefit
Societies
Appendix XIII Specimen Auditors Report to the Members of the
Company

CARO, 2003 VII-14
Introduction
1. The Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred, under
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter
referred to as the Act), issued the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003, (CARO, 2003) vide Notification No. G.S.R. 480(E) dated June 12,
2003. CARO, 2003 contained certain matters on which the auditors of
companies (except of those categories of companies which are specifically
exempted under CARO, 2003) have to make a statement in their audit report.
The text of the CARO, 2003 is given in Appendix I to the Statement. The
Central Government vide Notification No.GSR.766(E) dated November 25,
2004 amended the said Order and issued the Companies (Auditors Report)
(Amendment) Order, 2004 which is reproduced in Appendix II. The term,
Order, as used in the following text refers to the CARO, 2003 issued
originally in June 2003 as amended by the Amendment Order issued in
November 2004. For ease of reference and better understanding of the
readers, the contents of the final Order, after incorporating the requirements
of the Amendment Order is given in Appendix III. A comparative chart of the
requirements of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 vis a vis
Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 is given in
Appendix IV to the Statement.
2. The Order supersedes the earlier Order issued in 1988, viz., the
Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1988
(MAOCARO, 1988). Appendix V to this Statement contains a clause-by-
clause comparison of the reporting requirements of the Order and the
erstwhile MAOCARO, 1988. It would be clear from the comparison that the
Order seeks to rationalise the requirements of MAOCARO, 1988. While the
Order contains certain new clauses, some of the clauses of the MAOCARO,
1988 have not found place in the Order.
3. The purpose of this Statement
1
is to enable the members to comply

1
The Statements are issued with a view to securing compliance by members on matters which in
the opinion of the Council are critical for the proper discharge of their functions. Statements
therefore are mandatory. Accordingly, while discharging their attest function, it will be the duty of
the members of the Institute to ensure that the Statements relating to auditing matters are
followed in the audit of financial information covered by their audit reports. If for any reason a
member has not been able to perform an audit in accordance with such Statements, his report
should draw attention to the material departures therefrom. Attention is invited in this regard to the
Clarification regarding Authority Attached to the Documents Issued by the Institute published in
the December, 1985 issue of the Institutes Journal The Chartered Accountant. The Clarification
CARO, 2003 VII-15
with the reporting requirements of the Order. It should, however, be noted
that the clarifications and explanations contained in this Statement are not
intended to be exhaustive and the auditors should exercise their professional
judgment and experience on various matters on which they are required to
report under the Order.
General Provisions Regarding Auditors Report
4. The requirements of the Order are supplemental to the existing
provisions of section 227 of the Act regarding the auditors report. However,
there are certain points of distinction between the Order and the
requirements of section 227, which are as follows:
(i) the provisions of sub-sections (1A), (2), (3) and (4) of section 227 are
applicable to all companies while the Order exempts certain classes of
companies from its application; and
(ii) the provisions of sub-section (1A) require the auditor to make certain
specific enquiries during the course of his audit. The auditor is,
however, not required to report on any of the matters specified in the
sub-section unless he has any special comments to make on the said
matters. In other words, if he is satisfied with the results of his
enquiries, he has no further duty to report that he is so satisfied. The
Order, on the other hand, requires a statement on each of the matters
specified therein even if he has no comments to make on any of the
matter(s) contained in the Order. In that respect, the provisions of the
Order are similar to the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of
section 227.
5. Another question that arises is about the status of the Order vis a vis
the directions given by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India under
section 619 of the Act. In this regard, it may be noted that the Order is
supplemental to the directions given by the Comptroller and Auditor General
of India under section 619 in respect of government companies. These
directions continue to be in force. Therefore, in respect of government
companies, the matters specified in the Order will form part of the auditors
report submitted to the members and the replies to the questionnaire issued

has also been published in the Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements, May, 2008 Edition, under
the title, Announcements of the Council regarding Status of Various Documents Issued by the
CARO, 2003 VII-16
by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India under section 619 will
continue to be furnished as hitherto.
6. The Order is not intended to limit the duties and responsibilities of
auditors but only requires a statement to be included in the audit report in
respect of the matters specified therein. For example, examination of the
system of internal control is one of the basic audit procedures employed by
the auditor. The fact that the Order requires a statement regarding the
internal control applicable to purchases of inventories, fixed assets and sale
of goods only is no justification for the auditor to conclude that an
examination of internal control regarding the other areas of a companys
business is not important or not required.
Applicability of the Order
Companies Covered by the Order
7. The Order applies to all companies except certain categories of
companies specifically exempted from the application of the Order.
8. The Order also applies to foreign companies as defined in section 591
of the Act. According to sub-section (1) of the aforesaid section, companies
falling under the following two classes are construed as foreign companies:
(a) companies incorporated outside India which, after the commencement
of the Act, establish a place of business within India; and
(b) companies incorporated outside India which have, before the
commencement of the Act, established a place of business within
India and continue to have an established place of business within
India at the commencement of the Act.
In respect of foreign companies, an established place of business in India
would include a liaison office.
9. The Order is also applicable to the audits of branch(es) of a company
under the Act since sub-section 3(a) of section 228 of the Act clearly
specifies that a branch auditor has the same duties in respect of audit as the
companys auditor. It is, therefore, necessary that the report submitted by the
branch auditor contains a statement on all the matters specified in the Order,
except where the company is exempt from the applicability of the Order, to
enable the companys auditor to consider the same while complying with the
provisions of the Order.
CARO, 2003 VII-17
Companies not Covered by the Order
10. Paragraph 2 of the Order provides that it shall not apply to:
(i) a banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);
(ii) an insurance company as defined in clause (21) of section 2 of the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(iii) a company licensed to operate under section 25 of the Companies
Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); and
(iv) a private limited company with a paid-up capital and reserves not
more than rupees fifty lakh and which does not have outstanding loan
exceeding rupees twenty five lakhs from any bank or financial
institution and does not have a turnover exceeding rupees five crores
at any point of time during the financial year.
11. The Order specifically exempts banking companies, insurance
companies and companies which have been licensed to operate under
section 25 of the Act. Section 25 applies to companies which have been
formed or are about to be formed as limited companies for promoting
commerce, art, science, religion, charity or any other useful object and which
apply or intend to apply their profits, if any, or other income in promoting their
objects and prohibit the payment of any dividend to their members. Such
companies are usually in the form of clubs, chambers of commerce, research
institutions, etc. Further, the Order would not also apply in case of non-
banking finance company, which converts into a banking company and as on
the balance sheet date is a banking company.
12. The specific exemption under the Order is given to companies
licensed under section 25 of the Act. However, it would appear that in view
of the provisions of section 656 of the Act, the exemption would also
extend to similar companies registered under any earlier Companies Act.
13. The Order also exempts from its application a private limited company
which fulfils all the following conditions throughout the reporting period
covered by the audit report:
(i) its paid-up capital and reserves are rupees fifty lakh or less;
(ii) its outstanding loan from any bank or financial institution are rupees
twenty five lakh or less; and
CARO, 2003 VII-18
(iii) its turnover does not exceed rupees five crore.
14. A private limited company, in order to be exempt from the applicability
of the Order, must satisfy all the conditions mentioned above cumulatively. In
other words, even if one of the conditions is not satisfied, a private limited
companys auditor has to report on the matters specified in the Order.
(i) Private Limited Company
15. The term private limited company, as used in the Order, should be
construed to mean a company registered as a private company {as defined
in clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Act} and which has a
limited liability. In other words, the Order would be applicable to private
unlimited companies irrespective of the size of their paid-up capital and
reserves, turnover, borrowings from banks/financial institutions
2
.
16. Another important issue to consider in respect of reporting under the
Order is the reporting responsibilities of the auditor of a branch of a private
limited company in case the branch fulfills the conditions for exemption from
the applicability of the Order. In this regard, it may be noted that the
conditions to be satisfied for being exempt from the applicability of the Order
have been laid down in respect of the company taken as a whole. Therefore,
a branch of a company does not qualify to be exempted from the applicability
of the Order, if the Order is applicable to the company. The branch auditor
has the same reporting responsibilities in respect of the branch as those of
the auditor appointed under section 224 of the Act has in respect of the
company. The comments of the branch auditor in respect of the branch are
dealt with by the auditor of the company appointed under section 224 of the
Act while finalizing his report under the Order.
(ii) Paid-up Capital and Reserves
17. Sub-section (32) of section 2 of the Act defines the term paid-up
capital as capital credited as paid-up. The Guidance Note on Terms Used in
Financial Statements, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India, defines the term paid-up share capital as, that part of the subscribed
share capital for which consideration in cash or otherwise has been received.

2
One of the conditions imposed by the Order issued originally in June 2003 for exempting a private
limited company was that it should not have accepted any public deposits. The Amendment Order
issued in November 2004, however, dropped this requirement in view of the fact that by definition,
a private company cannot accept public deposits.
CARO, 2003 VII-19
This includes bonus shares allotted by the corporate enterprise. Paid-up
share capital would include both equity share capital as well as the
preference share capital. While calculating the paid-up capital, amount of
calls unpaid should be deducted from and the amount originally paid-up on
forfeited shares should be added to the figure of paid-up capital. Share
application money received should not be considered as part of the paid-up
capital.
18. The Guidance Note on Terms Used in Financial Statements defines
the term reserve as, The portion of earnings, receipts or other surplus of
an enterprise (whether capital or revenue) appropriated by management for a
general or specific purpose other than provision for depreciation or
diminution in the value of assets or for a known liability. The reserves are
primarily of two types: capital reserves and revenue reserves. Clause
7(1)(b) of Part III of Schedule VI to the Act also defines the term reserve by
way of a negative explanation. According to the said definition, the
expression reserve does not include any amount written off by way of
providing for depreciation, renewals or diminution in the value of assets or
retained by way of providing for any known liability. Thus, a reserve has to be
clearly distinguished from a provision.
19. As mentioned in the preceding paragraph, reserves are primarily of
two typescapital reserves and revenue reserves. According to the
Guidance Note on Terms Used in Financial Statements, the term capital
reserve means a reserve of a corporate enterprise which is not available for
distribution as dividend. The said Guidance Note defines the term revenue
reserve as any reserve other than capital reserve. For determining the
applicability of the Order to a private limited company, both capital as well as
revenue reserves should be taken into consideration while computing the
limit of rupees fifty lakhs prescribed for paid-up capital and reserves.
Revaluation reserve, if any, should also be taken into consideration while
determining the figure of reserves for the limited purpose of determining the
applicability of the Order. The credit balance in the profit and loss account
should also be considered as a part of reserve since the balance in the profit
and loss account is available for general purposes like declaration of
dividend. The debit balance of the profit and loss account, if any, should be
reduced from the figure of revenue reserves only. Therefore, if the company
does not have revenue reserves, debit balance of profit and loss account
cannot be reduced from the figures of paid-up capital, capital reserves and
CARO, 2003 VII-20
revaluation reserves. For example, if the company has Rs. 40 lakhs of paid
up share capital, Rs. 5 lakhs as Revaluation Reserve, Rs. 6 lakhs in Capital
Reserve and Rs. 6 lakhs as debit balance in the Profit and Loss Account, the
amount of Rs. 6 lakhs standing to the debit of Proft and Loss Account cannot
be deducted from the figures of Rs. 11 lakhs, being the total of the
Revaluation Reserve and the Capital Reserve. However, miscellaneous
expenditure to the extent not written off should not be deducted from the
figure of reserves for the purpose of computing the above limit.
(iii) Loan Outstanding
20. Loans from banks or financial institutions are normally in the form of
term loans, demand loans, export credits, working capital limits, cash credits,
overdraft facilities, bills purchased or discounted. Outstanding balances of
such loans should be considered as loan outstanding for the purpose of
computing the limit of rupees twenty five lakhs. Non-fund based credit
facilities, to the extent such facilities have devolved and have been converted
into fund-based credit facilities, should also be considered as outstanding
loan. The figures of outstanding loan would also include the amount of bank
guarantees issued by the company where such guarantee(s) has (have)
been invoked and encashed or where, say, a Letter of Credit has devolved
on the company. In case of term loans, interest accrued and due is
considered as a loan whereas interest accrued but not due is not considered
as a loan. Further, in case the company enjoys a facility, say, a cash credit
facility, whose balance is fluctuating in nature, the Order would apply to the
company in case on any day during the financial year concerned, the amount
outstanding in the cash credit facility exceeds Rs. 25 lakhs. The condition
laid down in the Order is that the outstanding loan from a bank or financial
institution is exceeding Rs. 25 lakh. There is no stipulation in the Order that
the loan should be a long-term loan or a short-term loan or that it should be a
secured loan or an unsecured loan. Therefore, the Order would be
applicable to a private limited company even if the loan outstanding is a
short-term loan. Further, the condition would also apply notwithstanding the
fact that the company has been granted an overdraft facility against, say,
fixed deposits, of the company with the concerned bank. Moreover,
outstanding dues in respect of credit cards would also be considered while
calculating the limit of Rs. 25 lakh in respect of loan outstanding from a bank
or financial institution. It is clarified that since the words used by the Order
are any bank or financial institution, the limit of exceeding twenty five lakh
CARO, 2003 VII-21
rupees would apply in aggregate to all loans and not with reference to each
bank or financial institution. For example, if a private limited company has
three outstanding loans of rupees nine lakhs each from two banks and a
financial institution, the Order would be applicable to such a private limited
company.
21. Another important point to note with respect to loans outstanding is
that even in case where the company had taken a loan from a bank in excess
of Rs. 25 lacs but the year end balance of the same is NIL, the company
would be covered by the Order notwithstanding that it fulfills all other
conditions for exemption from the Order.
(iv) Financial Institution
22. Explanation to sub-clause (xi) of Rule 2(b) of the Companies
(Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 explains the term financial institution.
The term financial institution used in the Order should be construed to have
the same meaning as assigned to it in the explanation to the said sub-clause
in the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975. It may, however,
be noted that a non-banking financial company is not a financial institution.
A list of financial institutions covered under the Rules is given in Appendix
VI to this Statement. Further, private banks or foreign banks are banking
institutions under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Therefore, loans taken
from a private bank or a foreign bank would also be taken into consideration
while examining the applicability of the Order
(v) Turnover
23. The term, turnover, has not been defined by the Order. Part II of
Schedule VI to the Act, however, defines the term turnover as the
aggregate amount for which sales are effected by the company. It may be
noted that the sales effected would include sale of goods as well as
services rendered by the company. In an agency relationship, turnover is the
amount of commission earned by the agent and not the aggregate amount
for which sales are effected or services are rendered. The term turnover is
a commercial term and it should be construed in accordance with the method
of accounting regularly employed by the company. For ascertaining the limit
of rupees five crores:
(a) sales tax collected or excise duty collected should not be taken into
account if they are credited separately to sales tax account or excise
duty account;
CARO, 2003 VII-22
(b) trade discounts should be deducted from the figure of turnover;
(c) commission allowed to third parties should not be deducted from the
figure of turnover;
(d) sales returns should be deducted from the figure of turnover even if
the returns are from the sales made in the earlier years. As a
corollary, any sales returns etc., in respect of the sales made during
the year under report, if received after the end of that year, would not
be deductible from the figure of turnover of such year; and
(e) The income received by way of rent or dividend/interest would not
form part of turnover. However, Part II of Schedule VI to the
Companies Act, 1956 clarifies that in case of companies rendering or
supplying services, gross income derived from services rendered or
supplied, would be shown as turnover. Therefore, in cases where the
principal business of the company is letting out of property of the
company or it is an investment company, the rent or dividend/interest,
respectively, would constitute turnover.
(vii) Date of Determination of Limits
24. The Order clarifies the point of time at which various limits laid down
by the Order are to be tested for determining its applicability to a private
limited company. It clarifies that the Order would become applicable to a
private limited company if, at any point of time, during the financial year
covered by the audit report:
(a) its paid-up capital and reserves exceed the limit of rupees fifty lakh; or
(b) it has loan outstanding exceeding rupees twenty five lakh, or
(c) its turnover exceeds rupees five crore.
Effective Date of the Order
25. The Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (CARO, 2003) was
issued in June 2003 and came into force on the 1
st
day of July 2003. The
said Order, from the date it came into force, superceded the MAOCARO,
1988. Further, the Order requires that every report made by the auditor
under section 227 of the Act on the accounts of every company examined by
him to which the Order applies, for every financial year ending on any day on
or after the commencement of this Order, shall contain matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order. This implies that the auditors report,
CARO, 2003 VII-23
on accounts in respect of financial year ending on or before 30
th
June 2003,
even if issued on or after 1
st
July 2003 is not required to contain report on
matters specified in the CARO, 2003. However, the auditors report, in such
cases, should include a statement on matters specified in the erstwhile
MAOCARO, 1988.
The Ministry of Company Affairs of the Government of India, subsequent to
issuance of the Order, has issued a Circular numbered, GC No. 32/2003 as
regards the date of compliance with the Order. According to the Circular, the
companies to whom the Order is applicable should make serious efforts to
comply with the new CARO, 2003 from the effective date. In the cases of
non-compliance for accounts pertaining to financial year which closes on 31
st
December 2003 or earlier, Government would take a lenient view provided
the accounts at least carry MAOCARO Report, if required. The circular,
however, provides that accounts in respect of financial years ending on 1
st

January 2004 or thereafter, will have to strictly follow the CARO, 2003. The
Circular is reproduced in Appendix VII.
26. The Governments notification notifying the Companies (Auditors
Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 clarifies that the Amendment Order would
be effective from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette; i.e.,
November 25, 2004. Therefore, all audit reports issued on or after
November 25, 2004 are required to comply with amendments contained
herein read with the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 of June 12,
2003.
27. The requirements of the Order apply in relation to full financial year
irrespective of the fact that a part of such year may fall prior to the date of
coming into force of the Order. Under some of the requirements of the Order,
the auditor has to comment on the records maintained by the company,
systems and procedures in vogue. It is possible that during the period prior to
1
st
July 2003, many of the companies might not have maintained such
records or established such systems and procedures as are envisaged in the
Order primarily because such requirements were not part of erstwhile
MAOCARO, 1988 and were thus, not required to be commented upon by the
auditor. It is advisable that in such situations, the auditor should also clearly
mention the fact of non-maintenance of such records or non-existence of
systems and procedures while making comments under the relevant clauses.

CARO, 2003 VII-24
Period of Compliance
28. A question might arise as to the period in relation to which the auditor
should comment or report upon the matters specified in the Order. For
example, several of the questions relate to the maintenance of proper
records. What should be the position of the auditor when records were
improperly maintained for some part of the financial year but have been
properly maintained at the balance sheet date? One view of the matter would
be that no adverse report is necessary since the deficiencies existing during
the year have been rectified before the auditor makes his report. However,
this view does not recognise the fact that maintenance of records is not an
end by itself but is a necessary condition for the auditor to satisfy himself
regarding the authenticity of the transactions on which he is reporting. The
better view, therefore, is to consider that the auditor is reporting on the state
of affairs as they existed during the accounting year and compliance with the
requirements of the Order should be judged with reference to the whole
accounting year and not merely with reference to the position existing at the
balance sheet date or the date at which he makes his report. However, in
deciding whether or not to make an adverse comment, the auditor should
consider what detrimental effect, if any, has been caused by the failure to
comply with the requirements of the Order for any part of the year. For
example, if records for fixed assets were not properly maintained for some
part of the year but were properly maintained at the balance sheet date and
physical verification was made after the records were properly maintained,
there is no detrimental effect on the company. However, if internal control
with respect to the items specified in the relevant clause of the Order was
inadequate during a part of the year, some detrimental effect on the company
could have occurred.
29. At the same time, the auditor cannot ignore the position existing at the
balance sheet date or at the time at which he makes his report. The auditor
might consider, in the light of the circumstances and provided he is able to
satisfy himself regarding the facts, as to whether a reference to the state of
affairs existing at the balance sheet date or at the date when he makes his
report would be necessary to give a more complete picture to the members
to whom he is reporting.
30. It is not necessary that the auditor should refer individually to each of
the transactions throughout the year where there has not been compliance
with the requirements of the Order unless the non-compliance is so
CARO, 2003 VII-25
significant as to merit individual attention. Normally, it should be sufficient if
he indicates in general terms whether or not the requirements have been
complied with.
General Approach
31. In formulating a general approach to the requirements of the Order, it
is necessary to take a view regarding the objective behind the issuance of
the Order. The Order does not replace an audit by an investigation in respect
of the matters specified therein. Several of these matters, in any case, are
covered by an auditor in the normal course of his audit and the emphasis of
the Order is not, therefore, on requiring the auditor to carry out an
investigation but on requiring him to give specific information on certain
aspects of his work.
32. The auditor should, in regard to the requirements of the Order, apply
the same degree of examination, as he would do in a normal audit. Thus, the
degree of examination required should be such as is adequate to enable the
auditor to comment on matters specified in the Order. In this context, the
auditor should also comply with the requirements of the Standards on
Auditing issued by the Institute.
33. It is possible that for the purposes of the Order, the auditor needs
greater information from the management and, therefore, closer interaction
with the management becomes necessary. This will ensure that there is
sufficient advance planning regarding the manner in which the examination
necessary for reporting on matters specified in the Order would be carried
out by the auditor and the form in which the company should maintain its
records so that they provide the necessary information and evidence to the
auditor. An example of this would be the documents and records to be
maintained by the company to provide the requisite evidence to the auditor
regarding verification of fixed assets or inventories. It is, therefore, suggested
that the auditor should intimate to the management, in writing, his
requirements before the commencement of each audit. The auditor should
also consider intimating additional requirements, if any, during the course of
the audit. The auditor should also consider obtaining management
representations, on matters on which the Order requires the auditor make a
statement on certain aspects. An example of this would be the clause
requiring the auditor to state whether the funds raised on short-term basis
have been used for long-term investment.
CARO, 2003 VII-26
34. For a number of reasons, the necessity for preserving working papers
by the auditors assumes greater importance in the context of the
requirements of the Order. Firstly, there should be evidence that the opinion
expressed by the auditor is based on an examination made by him.
Secondly, there should be evidence to show that in arriving at his opinion,
the auditor has given due cognisance to the information and explanations
given by the company and that his opinion is not arbitrary. Thirdly, there
should be evidence to show that the information and explanations obtained
were full and complete, that is, the auditor has called for all the information
and explanations which were necessary to be considered before arriving at
his opinion. Finally, there should be evidence to show that the auditor did not
merely rely upon the information or explanations given by the company but
that he subjected such information and explanations to reasonable tests to
verify their accuracy and completeness.
35. The auditor should comply with the requirements of Standard on
Auditing (SA) 230, Documentation. The auditor may take the following
steps to ensure that he has adequate working papers to support the
conclusions drawn in his report:
(a) submit to the company, a questionnaire on all important matters
covered by the Order.
(b) make specific inquiries in writing on all important matters not covered
by the questionnaire.
(c) insist that replies of the company are furnished in writing and are
signed by a responsible officer of the company.
(d) where the explanations are not already separately recorded, maintain
a record of the discussions with the management.
(e) prepare his own check-list in respect of the requirements of the
Order and record the names of the members of his staff who made the
examination and the name of the companys staff who provided the
information. An illustrative check-list in respect of the requirements of
the Order is given in Appendix VIII to the Statement.
36. Where a requirement of the Order is not complied with but the auditor
decides not to make an adverse comment, he should record in his working
papers the reasons for not doing so, for example, the immateriality of the
item.
CARO, 2003 VII-27
37. The auditor should observe the requirements of the Order in its spirit
and not merely by its letter. This implies that the auditor should not give a
narrow or restrictive interpretation to the Order. Moreover, the mere fact that
the Order is confined to certain specific matters should not be interpreted to
imply that the auditors duties in respect of other matters normally covered in
the course of an audit are in any way limited or abridged by the Order. At the
same time, it should be recognised that the reporting obligations under the
Order are confined to the specific items stated in the Order.
38. It is also necessary that in deciding upon the reasonableness of a
course of action taken by the management, the auditor gives due
consideration to the facts and circumstances existing when the decision was
taken and the information known or available to the management at that
time. He should not allow his judgement to be clouded by hind-sight. He
should examine the transaction in the context of normal business operations
and not in a theoretical or artificial set of circumstances.
39. Many of the matters covered by the Order require exercise of
judgement by the auditor rather than the application of a purely objective
test. For example, the auditor is required to state whether any material
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of fixed assets have been
properly dealt with in the accounts. This requires the exercise of judgement
firstly, in determining whether the discrepancies are material, and secondly,
in deciding whether the accounting treatment is proper.
40. It may be noted that the while reporting on matters specified in the
Order, the auditor should consider the materiality of the item involved in
determining the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be
performed. For example, the auditor, in the case of a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/societies, while reporting, whether the repayment schedule of various
loans granted by the nidhi is based on the repayment capacity of the
borrower, the auditor examines the loan documentation of all large loans and
conducts a test check examination of the rest, having regard to the
materiality.
41. It is necessary to remember that the exercise of judgement is bound
to be a somewhat subjective matter. This is, in fact, recognised by the
provisions of the Act which require the expression of an opinion by the
auditor. When a professional expresses an opinion, he does not guarantee
that his opinion is infallible nor does he hold out that his opinion will
CARO, 2003 VII-28
invariably agree with the opinion of another professional on the same facts.
The test of an auditors liability in a matter which involves the exercise of
judgement is not whether his opinion coincides with that of another person or
authority, but whether he has expressed his opinion in good faith and after
the exercise of reasonable care and skill. No liability can attach to an auditor
in a matter involving the expression of an opinion based on the exercise of
judgement, merely because there is a difference of opinion between him and
some other person or authority or merely because some other person or
authority comes to the conclusion that in expressing the opinion the auditor
committed an error of judgement. The auditor may be liable, however, if it is
found that he expressed his opinion without the exercise of reasonable care
and skill, or without applying his mind to the facts, or if he expressed his
opinion recklessly, in complete disregard of the facts.
42. The Order places a considerable responsibility on the auditor. If he is
to discharge his duties under the Order properly, he should obtain, on the
one hand, the co-operation of the management and on the other, the respect
and confidence of the members to whom he is reporting. He can do so if he
makes his report honestly and fearlessly and if he brings to bear on his work,
the professional qualities of independence, balance of judgement and fair-
play which he possesses as a result of his education, training and
experience.
Matters to be Included in the Auditors Report
43. The matters to be included in the auditors report are specified in
paragraph 4 of the Order. Unlike the MAOCARO, 1988, which required
different sets of statements for different classes of companies, the present
Order requires the auditor of a company to comment upon all the clauses
irrespective of the nature of the companys business. However, in respect of
nidhi/mutual benefit funds/societies, four additional sub-clauses under clause
(xiii) are to be commented upon by the auditor. Further, clause (xiv) applies
only to companies dealing or trading in shares, securities etc.
44. Whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
[Paragraph 4(i)(a)]

Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment whether the company is
CARO, 2003 VII-29
maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including
quantitative details and situation of fixed assets. Accounting Standard
(AS) 10, Accounting for Fixed Assets defines fixed asset as an
asset held with the intention of being used for the purpose of
producing or providing goods or services and is not held for sale in the
normal course of business.
(b) The Order is silent as to what constitutes proper records. In general,
however, the records relating to fixed assets should contain, inter alia,
the following details:
(i) sufficient description of the asset to make identification
possible;
(ii) classification, that is, the head under which it is shown in the
accounts, e.g., plant and machinery, office equipment, etc;
(iii) situation;
(iv) quantity, i.e., number of units;
(v) original cost;
(vi) year of purchase;
(vii) adjustment for revaluation or for any increase or decrease in
cost, e.g., on revaluation of foreign exchange liabilities;
(viii) date of revaluation, if any;
(ix) rate(s)/basis of depreciation or amortisation, as the case may
be;
(x) depreciation/amortisation for the current year;
(xi) accumulated depreciation/amortisation;
(xii) particulars regarding impairment;
(xiii) particulars regarding sale, discarding, demolition, destruction,
etc.
(c) The records should contain the above-mentioned particulars in
respect of all items of fixed assets, whether tangible or intangible,
self-financed or acquired through finance lease. These records
should also contain particulars in respect of those items of fixed
assets that have been fully depreciated or amortised or have been
CARO, 2003 VII-30
retired from active use and held for disposal. The records should also
contain necessary particulars in respect of item of fixed assets that
have been fully impaired during the period covered by the audit report.
Thus, what constitutes proper records is a matter of professional
judgment made by the auditor after considering the facts and
circumstances of each case.
(d) It is necessary that the aggregate original cost, depreciation or
amortisation to date, and impairment loss, if any, as per these records
under individual heads should tally with the figures shown in the books
of account.
(e) It is not possible to specify any single form in which the records
should be maintained. This would depend upon the mode of account
keeping (manual or computerized), the number of operating locations,
the systems of control, etc. It may be noted that with the advent of the
information technology, many companies are maintaining electronic
records. Section 2(1)(t) of the Information Technology Act, 2000
defines the term electronic record as data recorded or data
generated, image or sound stored, received or sent in an electronic
form or computer generated micro fiches. If the records of fixed
assets are maintained electronically, they have to be maintained in a
manner that they can be retrieved in a legible form (which is different
from machine readable form). Records maintained using electronic
media should not be construed to be proper if the records are not
capable of being retrieved in a legible form. Thus, a condition for valid
electronic records of fixed assets is that they can be retrieved in a
legible form. The Information Technology Act, 2000, lays down legal
framework for electronic records and digital signatures. Accordingly,
where any law requires that any information or matter should be in the
typewritten or printed form, then such requirement shall be deemed to
be satisfied if it is in an electronic form. However, it will have to be
ensured that the information contained in the electronic records
remains accessible and unaltered and its origin, destination, date,
etc., can be identified. Moreover, paragraph 34 of SA 400, Risk
Assessments and Internal Control is also noteworthy in this regard.
The paragraph states as follows:
34. In a computer information systems environment, the
CARO, 2003 VII-31
objectives of tests of control do not change from those in a manual
environment; however, some audit procedures may change. The
auditor may find it necessary, or may prefer, to use computer-
assisted audit techniques. The use of such techniques, for
example, file interrogation tools or audit test data, may be
appropriate when the accounting and internal control systems
provide no visible evidence documenting the performance of
internal controls which are programmed into a computerised
accounting system.
The auditor may, therefore, accept electronic fixed assets register if
the following two conditions are satisfied:
(i) The controls and security measures in the company are such that
once finalised, the fixed assets register cannot be altered without
proper authorization and audit trail.
(ii) The fixed assets register is in such a form that it can be retrieved
in a legible form. In other words, the emphasis is on whether it
can be read on the screen or a hard copy can be taken. If this is
so, one can contend that it is capable of being retrieved in a
legible form.
In case the above two conditions or either of the two conditions are
not satisfied, the auditor should obtain a duly authenticated print-out
of the fixed assets register. In case the auditor decides to rely on
electronically maintained fixed assets register, he should maintain
adequate documentation evidencing the evaluation of controls that
seek to ensure the completeness, accuracy and security of the
register.
(f) In cases where the original cost cannot be ascertained,
Schedule VI to the Act provides that the book value as at 1st
April, 1956 may be considered as cost. For the limited purpose
of determining whether proper records are maintained, it should
be considered as sufficient if, in respect of assets acquired prior
to 1st April, 1956 where the original cost cannot be ascertained,
the book value as on that date is considered as the cost.
(g) Schedule XIV to the Act provides that depreciation on assets,
whose actual cost does not exceed rupees five thousand, shall
be provided at the rate of hundred percent. The records of fixed
CARO, 2003 VII-32
assets should include the necessary particulars in respect of
such assets also. However, Schedule XIV to the Act further
provides that where the aggregate cost of the individual items of
plant and machinery costing Rs. 5000/- or less, constitutes more
than 10 percent of the total actual cost of the plant and
machinery, the same would have to be depreciated as per rates
of depreciation provided in item II, Plant and Machinery, of the
Schedule. The auditor should, therefore, examine whether the
company has an appropriate mechanism in place to ensure
compliance with this provision of Schedule XIV.
(h) The purpose of showing the situation of the assets is to make
verification possible. There may, however, be certain classes of
fixed assets whose situation keeps changing, for example,
construction equipment which has to be moved to sites. In such
circumstances, it should be sufficient if record of
movement/custody of the equipment is maintained.
(i) Where assets like furniture, etc., are located in the residential
premises of members of the staff, the fixed assets register
should indicate the name/designation of the person who has
custody of the asset for the time being. In this connection, it may
be necessary for the auditor to consider whether there are good
reasons for the asset to be so located.
(j) While, generally, the quantity, value and situation have to be
recorded item-wise, assets of small individual value, e.g., chairs,
tables, etc., may be conveniently grouped for purposes of entry
in the register. Similarly, for assets having a common rate of
depreciation, it may not be necessary to indicate the
accumulated depreciation for each item; instead, depreciation for
the group as a whole may be shown.
(k) Quantitative details in respect of fixed assets may be maintained
on the following lines:
(i) Land may be identified by survey numbers and by deeds
of conveyance.
(ii) Leaseholds can be identified by individual leases.
(iii) Buildings may, initially, be classified into factory buildings,
office buildings, township buildings, service buildings (like
water works), etc. These may then be further sub-divided.
Factory buildings may be further classified into individual
CARO, 2003 VII-33
buildings which house a manufacturing unit or a plant or
sub-plant. Service buildings may be similarly classified
according to nature of service and location. Township
buildings can be further classified into individual units or
into groups of units taking into consideration the type of
construction, the location and the year of construction.
For example, if a companys township has four categories
of quarters, e.g., A, B, C and D, the fixed assets register
may not record each individual quarter but may have a
single entry for all A type quarters constructed in a
particular year and located in a particular area and show
only the number of quarters covered by the entry.
(iv) Railway sidings can be identified by length and location.
(v) Plant and Machinery may be sub-divided into fixed and
movable. For movable machinery, a separate record may
be kept for each individual item. Movable machinery
would include, for this purpose, items of plant which are
for the moment fixed to the shop-floor but which can be
moved, e.g., machine tools. In respect of fixed plant and
machinery, a sub-division can be made according to the
process, a plant for each separate process being
considered as a separate identifiable unit. A further sub-
division may be useful when within a process, there are
plants which are capable of working independently of
each other. The degree to which a sub-division of fixed
plant and machinery should be made depends upon the
circumstances of each case bearing in mind the twin
objectives of sub-division, namely, the determination of
individual cost and the facility for physical verification.
(vi) The Act does not require electrical installations to be
shown as a separate asset though a number of
companies do so in fact. For purposes of identification,
however, it is suggested that the initial sub-division may
be made according to the user, e.g., factory buildings,
plant, service departments, township buildings, etc. A
further sub-division can be made according to the sub-
division already made for buildings, plant, etc.
(vii) Furniture and fittings and assets like office appliances,
air-conditioners, water coolers, etc., consist of individual
CARO, 2003 VII-34
items which can be easily identified. Some difficulty may,
however, be faced with regard to the large number of
items and their relative mobility. In such cases, a
distinction by value may be necessary, individual
identification being made for high-value items and by
groups for other items.
(viii) Development of property is an asset head which can be
easily sub-divided according to the buildings or plant for
which the development work is undertaken.
(ix) Patents, trade marks and designs are normally
identifiable by the purchase agreements or the letters
granting patent and by registration references in case of
trade marks and designs.
(x) Vehicles can be identified by reference to the registration
books.
(xi) Intangible assets can be identified by reference to the
purchase agreements (in case an intangible asset has
been purchased) and by reference to the records and
documents that substantiate the costs incurred by the
company in the generation and development of an
intangible asset.
(l) In cases where the details regarding allocation of cost over identified
units of assets are not available, it would have to be made by an
analysis of the purchases and the disposals of the preceding years.
Among the difficulties which may be faced could be: (i) records for some
of the years may not be available; (ii) the description in the records may
not be complete; (iii) details of disposals may not have been properly
recorded; (iv) subsequent additions to an existing asset may have been
shown as a separate asset; (v) a single figure of cost may be assigned
to a number of assets which have to be separately identified; (vi) assets
purchased for one department may have been moved to other
departments, and so on. The management, in consultation with the
auditor, should make the best effort possible under the circumstances to
identify the cost of each asset. In doing so, reasonable assumptions or
approximations may be made, where necessary. For example, when
details of disposals are not available, it may be assumed that the asset
sold is the asset which was acquired earliest in point of time. Similarly,
when the individual cost of a large number of small items is not
available, one can estimate the cost of each item and pro-rate the total
CARO, 2003 VII-35
cost in the proportion of the estimated cost of the item to the aggregate
estimated cost.
(m) It may be useful if initial identification of assets is done by persons who
are familiar with them, e.g., the maintenance staff. At the point of
identification, a code number may be affixed on the asset which would
give sufficient details for future identification.
(n) The initial identification of assets will often reveal a number of
discrepancies between the assets as verified and the details compiled
from the records. This may be on account of the features already
considered in (l) above. This may also be due to the fact that assets
might have been scrapped in earlier years but proper documentation
may not have been made or that assets may have been broken up into
smaller units or amalgamated into larger units or otherwise modified
without changing the asset records. The degree of further inquiry
necessary to reconcile these discrepancies would depend upon the
nature of the asset, its cost, the age of the asset, the extent of
accounting or other records available and other relevant factors.
However, the concept of materiality should be borne in mind in making
these further inquiries, greater attention being devoted to assets which
are of large value or of relatively recent purchase. Any adjustments that
finally have to be made should be properly documented. The auditor
should request the appropriate level of management to carry out
necessary adjustments.
45. Whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the
management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies
were noticed on such verification and if so, whether the same have been
properly dealt with in the books of account; [Paragraph 4(i)(b)]

Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment whether the fixed assets
of the company have been physically verified by the management at
reasonable intervals. The clause further requires the auditor to
comment whether any material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification and if so, whether those discrepancies have been properly
dealt with in the books of account.
(b) Physical verification of the assets has to be made by the management
and not by the auditor. It is, however, necessary that the auditor
satisfies himself that such verification was done and that there is
CARO, 2003 VII-36
adequate evidence on the basis of which he can arrive at such a
conclusion. The auditor may prefer to observe the verification,
particularly when verification of all assets can be made by the
management on a single day or within a relatively short period of time.
If, however, verification is a continuous process or if the auditor is not
present when verification is made, then he should examine the
instructions issued to the staff (which should, therefore, be in writing)
by the management and should examine the working papers of the
staff to substantiate the fact that verification was done and to
determine the name and competence of the person who did the
verification. In making this examination, it is necessary to ensure that
the person making the verification had the necessary technical
knowledge where such knowledge is required. It is not necessary that
only the companys staff should make verification. It is also possible
for verification to be made by outside expert agencies engaged by the
management for the purpose.
(c) The auditor should examine whether the method of verification was
reasonable in the circumstances relating to each asset. For example,
in the case of certain process industries, verification by direct physical
check may not be possible in the case of assets which are in
continuous use or which are concealed within larger units. It would not
be realistic to expect the management to suspend manufacturing
operations merely to conduct a physical verification of the fixed
assets, unless there are compelling reasons which would justify such
an extreme procedure. In such cases, indirect evidence of the
existence of the assets may suffice. For example, the very fact that an
oil refinery is producing at normal levels of efficiency may be sufficient
to indicate the existence of the various process units even where each
such unit cannot be verified by physical or visual inspection. It may
not be necessary to verify assets like building by measurement except
where there is evidence of alteration/demolition. At the same time, in
view of the possibility of encroachment, adverse possession, etc., it
may be necessary for a survey to be made periodically of open land.
(d) It is advisable that the assets are marked with distinctive numbers
especially where assets are movable in nature and where verification
of all assets is not being conducted at the same time.
(e) The Order requires the auditor to report whether the management at
CARO, 2003 VII-37
reasonable intervals has verified the fixed assets. What constitutes
reasonable intervals depends upon the circumstances of each case.
The factors to be taken into consideration in this regard include the
number of assets, the nature of assets, the relative value of assets,
difficulty in verification, situation and spread of the assets, etc. The
management may decide about the periodicity of physical verification
of fixed assets considering the above factors. While an annual
verification may be reasonable, it may be impracticable to carry out
the same in some cases. Even in such cases, the verification
programme should be such that all assets are verified at least once in
every three years. Where verification of all assets is not made during
the year, it will be necessary for the auditor to report that fact, but if he
is satisfied regarding the frequency of verification he should also
make a suitable comment to that effect.
(f) The auditor is required to state whether any material discrepancies
were noticed on verification and, if so, whether the same have been
properly dealt with in the books of account. The latter part of the
statement is required to be made only if the discrepancies are
material. The auditor has, therefore, to use his judgement to
determine whether a discrepancy is material or not. In making this
judgement, the auditor should consider not merely the cost of the
asset and its relationship to the total cost of all assets but also the
nature of the asset, its situation and other relevant factors. If a
material discrepancy has been properly dealt with in the books of
account (which may or may not imply a separate disclosure in the
accounts depending on the circumstances of the case), it is not
necessary for the auditor to give details of the discrepancy or of its
treatment in the accounts but he is required to make a statement that
a material discrepancy was noticed on the verification of fixed assets
and that the same has been properly dealt with in the books of
account.
(g) Apart from the audit procedures mentioned above, it would be
appropriate for the auditor to obtain a management representation
letter confirming that the fixed assets are physically verified by the
company in accordance with the policy of the company. The
management representation letter should also mention the periodicity
of the physical verification of fixed assets. The letter should also
CARO, 2003 VII-38
include the details of the material discrepancies noticed during the
physical verification of the fixed assets. If no discrepancies were
noticed during the physical verification, the management
representation letter should also mention this fact clearly.
46. If a substantial part of fixed assets have been disposed off during the
year, whether it has affected the going concern; [Paragraph 4(i)(c)]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to comment, in case where a
substantial part of the fixed assets has been disposed off during the
year, whether such disposal has affected the going concern status of
the company.
(b) Accounting Standard (AS) 1, Disclosure of Accounting Policies
states, the enterprise is normally viewed as a going concern, that is,
as continuing in operation for the foreseeable future. It is assumed
that the enterprise has neither the intention nor the necessity of
liquidation or of curtailing materially the scale of its operations.
(c) The auditor, in the normal course, when planning and performing audit
procedures and in evaluating the results thereof, is required to
consider the appropriateness of the going concern assumption
underlying the preparation of financial statements in accordance with
the requirements of Standard on Auditing (SA) 570, Going Concern.
As a result of such audit procedures and evaluation, if the auditor is of
the opinion that there exists any indication of risk that the going
concern assumption might not be appropriate, the auditor should
gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence to resolve, to his
satisfaction, the question regarding the companys ability to continue
operations for the foreseeable future. It may be noted that the sale of
substantial part of fixed assets is one of the several such indications
of risk. This clause of the Order pre-supposes the existence of such
risk and, therefore, requires the auditor to examine whether the
company has disposed off substantial part of fixed asset(s) during the
period covered by his report and, if yes, whether the disposal of such
part of the fixed assets has affected the going concern status of
company. It should also be noted that this requirement of the Order
does not absolve the auditor from his responsibilities regarding the
appropriateness of the going concern assumption as a basis for
CARO, 2003 VII-39
preparation of financial statements. Since there could be several
other indications of such a risk, the auditor, notwithstanding his
comments under the clause, should also comply with the requirements
of SA 570, Going Concern while discharging his attest function.
(d) Sale of substantial part of fixed assets should be construed to have
affected the going concern if the auditor is not able to resolve, to his
satisfaction, the question regarding the entitys ability to continue in
operation for the foreseeable future keeping in view the sale of
substantial part of fixed assets or if the auditor comes to a conclusion
that sale of substantial part of fixed assets has rendered the going
concern assumption inappropriate.
(e) The Order does not define the word substantial. The response to the
issue as to what constitutes substantial part of fixed assets depends
primarily upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The auditor
should use his professional judgement to determine whether an asset
or group of assets sold by the company is a substantial part of fixed
assets. In this case, the auditor may note that section 293(1)(a) of the
Act deals with the sale, lease or otherwise disposal of the whole or
substantially the whole, of the undertaking of the company. It may be
noted that such a situation may not necessarily tantamount to sale of
substantial part of the fixed assets of the company. However, such an
approval of the shareholders might be an indication that the company
has sold or has the intention of selling substantial part of its fixed
assets. The audit procedures, in such a case, would also include
examination of the minutes of the general meeting(s) where the matter
was discussed and the resolution passed by the shareholders in this
regard.
(f) The auditor should carry out audit procedures to gather sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to satisfy himself that the company shall be
able to continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future despite
the sale of substantial part of fixed assets. These procedures may
include:
(i) discussion with the management and analysis as to the
significance of the fixed asset to the company as a whole;
(ii) scrutiny of the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors
and important committees for understanding the entitys
CARO, 2003 VII-40
business plans for the future (for example, replacement of the
substantial part of the fixed asset disposed off with another
fixed asset having more capacity or for taking up a more
profitable line of business);
(iii) review of events after the balance sheet date for analysing the
effect of such disposal of substantial part of fixed asset on the
going concern.
(g) The auditor should also obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
that the plans of the management are feasible, are likely to be
implemented and that the outcome of these plans would improve the
situation. The auditor should also seek written representation from the
management in this regard.
(h) Where the company has disposed off substantial part of fixed assets,
the auditor should consider whether the disposal of such part of fixed
assets has triggered the risk of going concern assumption being no
longer appropriate. It is possible that such risk is mitigated by factors
such as those referred to in (f)(ii) above. If, in the auditor's
judgement, the going concern assumption is appropriate because of
mitigating factors, in particular because of management's plans for
future action, the auditor, apart from reporting that sale of substantial
part of fixed assets has not affected the going concern, should also
consider whether such plans or other factors need to be disclosed in
the financial statements. Where the auditor concludes that such plans
or other factors need to be disclosed in the financial statements, but
have not been adequately disclosed in the financial statements, the
auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion, as appropriate
in accordance with the requirements of Standard on Auditing (SA)
700, The Auditors Report on Financial Statements, issued by the
(i) An auditor might also come across a situation where the assets have
not been put to use but are being held for sale or have been
abandoned because of non viability of the project or for any other
reason and, therefore, excluded from the schedule of fixed assets and
accordingly, shown under the head sales/ adjustments. Such
abandoned or held for sale fixed assets are shown separately in the
financial statements in terms of paragraph 24 of Accounting Standard
CARO, 2003 VII-41
(AS) 10, Accounting for Fixed Assets. The, auditor in such a case,
should examine the records maintained in respect of these assets in
terms of paragraph 44(c) of the Statement and should consider such
assets also while commenting upon this clause of the Order. It
should, however, be noted that these assets may form substantial part
of fixed assets but their disposal or sale might not affect the going
concern.
(j) Another peculiar situation that might be faced by the auditor in
reporting on this clause is where, say, a substantial change in the
nature of activities being carried on by the company, requiring it to
dispose off its plant and machinery etc. For example, where a
manufacturing company has closed down its manufacturing
operations, sold off its plant and equipment and has converted itself
into a trading company, whether it can still be considered as a going
concern. In resolving this issue, guidance can be drawn from
Accounting Standard (AS) 1, Disclosure of Accounting Policies, which
states that the enterprise is normally viewed as a going concern, that
is as continuing its operation for the foreseeable future. It is assumed
that the enterprise has neither the intention nor the necessity of
liquidation or of curtailing materially the scale of its operations. Thus,
in such a scenario, though the company has disposed off its plant and
equipment, it is still a going concern in the form of a trading company.
The auditor in such cases would also draw guidance from the
principles laid down in the Standard on Auditing (SA) 570, Going
Concern, for assessing the appropriateness of the going concern
assumption.
(k) In case the company has sold a substantial part of the fixed assets
and the going concern question is not resolved to the satisfaction of
the auditor, the auditor should, while commenting on the clause, state
that sale of substantial part of fixed assets has affected the going
concern status of the company. In so far as the opinion of the auditor
on the financial statements is concerned, the auditor should ordinarily
express an unqualified opinion if adequate disclosures
3
in regard to
the going concern problem not having been resolved are made in the

3
Reference may also be made to paragraphs 15 and 16 of Standard on Auditing (SA) 570,
Going Concern.
CARO, 2003 VII-42
financial statements. However, he should, in his report, add a
paragraph that highlights the going concern problem by drawing
attention to the notes to the financial statements. The following is an
example of such a paragraph:
"We draw attention to Note X in the financial statements. The
Company has sold a substantial part of its fixed assets during
the year covered by our report. The company has so far not
made any plans to replace the fixed assets that have been
sold. These factors, along with other matters as set forth in
Note X, raise substantial doubt about the companys ability to
continue as a going concern in the foreseeable future."
(l) In case the going concern question is not resolved to the satisfaction
of the auditor and adequate disclosure is not made in the financial
statements, the auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion,
as appropriate. The following is an example of the explanation and
opinion paragraphs when a qualified opinion is to be expressed:
The Company has sold a substantial part of its fixed assets
during the year covered by our report. According to the
information and explanations given to us, the company has so
far not made any plans to replace the substantial part of fixed
assets that have been sold. There exists a substantial doubt
that without replacement of such substantial part of fixed
assets, the company will be able to continue as a going
concern for the foreseeable future. Consequently, adjustments
may be required to the recorded amounts of assets and
classification of liabilities. The financial statements (and notes
thereto) do not disclose this fact.
In our opinion, subject to the omission of the information dealt
within the preceding paragraph, the financial statements give a
true and fair view of the financial position of the Company at
March 31, 20XX and the results of its operations for the year
then ended.
(m) If, based on the additional procedures carried out and the information
obtained, including the effect of mitigating circumstances, the auditor's
judgment is that the entity will not be able to continue in operation for
the foreseeable future, i.e., going concern assumption considered
CARO, 2003 VII-43
inappropriate, the auditor should comment that the sale of substantial
part of fixed assets has adversely affected the going concern status of
the company. Further, the auditor would also conclude in main report
that the going concern assumption used in the preparation of the
financial statements is inappropriate. If the result of the inappropriate
assumption used in the preparation of the financial statements is so
material and pervasive as to make the financial statements
misleading, the auditor should express an adverse opinion.
47. Whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at
reasonable intervals by the management; [Paragraph 4(ii)(a)]
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment whether the management
has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable
intervals. According to Accounting Standard (AS) 2, Valuation of
Inventories:
Inventories are assets:
(a) held for sale in the ordinary course of business;
(b) in the process of production for such sale; or
(c) in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the
production process or in the rendering of services.
(b) Inventories encompass goods purchased and held for resale, for
example, merchandise purchased by a retailer and held for resale,
computer software held for resale, or land and other property held for
resale. Inventories also encompass finished goods produced, or work
in progress being produced, by the enterprise and include materials,
maintenance supplies, stores and spares, consumables and loose
tools awaiting use in the production process. It may be noted that
packing materials are also included in inventories. Inventories do not
include machinery spares covered by Accounting Standard (AS) 10,
Accounting for Fixed Assets, which can be used only in connection
with an item of fixed asset and the use of which is expected to be
irregular.
(c) Physical verification of inventory is the responsibility of the
management of the company which should verify all material items at
CARO, 2003 VII-44
least once in a year and more often in appropriate cases. It is,
however, necessary that the auditor satisfies himself that the physical
verification of inventories has been conducted at reasonable intervals
by the management and that there is adequate evidence on the basis
of which the auditor can arrive at such a conclusion. For example, the
auditor may examine the documents relating to physical verification
conducted by the management during the year as also at the end of
the financial year covered by the auditors report.
(d) What constitutes reasonable intervals depends on circumstances of
each case. The periodicity of the physical verification of inventories
depends upon the nature of inventories, their location and the
feasibility of conducting a physical verification. The management of a
company normally determines the periodicity of the physical
verification of inventories considering these factors. Normally,
wherever practicable, all the items of inventories should be verified by
the management of the company at least once in a year. It may be
useful for the company to determine the frequency of verification by
A-B-C classification of inventories, A category items being verified
more frequently than B category and the latter more frequently than
C category items.
48. Are the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the
management reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company
and the nature of its business. If not, the inadequacies in such procedures
should be reported. [Paragraph 4(ii)(b)]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to comment on the reasonableness
and adequacy of the inventory verification procedures followed by the
management of the company. In case the procedures of physical
verification of inventories, in the opinion of the auditor, are not
reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and
the nature of its business, the auditor has to report the same. The term
inventory should be construed to have the same meaning as
assigned to it in Accounting Standard (AS) 2, Valuation of
Inventories.
(b) An auditor should obtain reasonable assurance about existence and
condition of inventories. Observation of physical verification/
CARO, 2003 VII-45
examination of records of verification inventory is the primary source of
evidence for the purpose of reporting under this clause. While the
physical verification of inventories is primarily the duty of the
management, the auditor is expected to examine the methods and
procedures of such verification. The auditor may, if considered
appropriate by him, be also present at the time of stock-taking. The
duties and responsibilities of the auditor while attending a stock taking
by the management are governed by the principles laid down in the
Standard on Auditing (SA) 501, Audit Evidence Additional
Considerations for Specific Items, issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. The auditor should establish the
reasonableness and adequacy of procedures adopted for physical
verification of inventories having regard to the nature of inventories,
their locations, quantities and feasibility of conducting the physical
verification. This would require the auditor to make use of his
professional judgement.
(c) There are two principal methods of physical verification of inventories:
periodic and continuous. Under the periodic physical verification
method, physical verification of inventories is carried out at a single
point of time, usually at the year-end or at a selected date just prior to
or shortly after the year-end. Under the continuous physical
verification method, physical verification is carried out throughout the
year, with different items of inventory being physically verified at
different points of time. However, the verification programme is
normally so designed that each material item is physically verified at
least once in a year and more often in appropriate cases. The
continuous physical verification method is effective when a perpetual
inventory system of record-keeping is also in existence. Some entities
use continuous physical verification methods for certain stocks and
carry out a full count of other stocks at a selected date.
(d) Normally, before commencement of verification, the management
should issue appropriate instructions to stock-taking personnel. Such
instructions should cover all phases of physical verification and
preferably be in writing. It would be useful if the instructions are
formulated by the entity in consultation with the auditor. The auditor
should examine these instructions to assess their efficacy. The
auditor while forming his opinion, in addition to finding answers to the
CARO, 2003 VII-46
illustrative questions for evaluating the internal controls mentioned in
the Appendix IX of the Statement, employs several audit procedures,
including examination of the reports of the internal auditor. The
auditor has to use his professional judgement regarding the nature,
timing and extent of the procedures to be applied in forming his
opinion for commenting on this clause. The auditor can rely upon the
work of an internal auditor provided the auditor complies with the
requirements of Standard on Auditing (SA) 610, Relying Upon the
Work of an Internal Auditor, issued by the Institute of Chartered
(e) The auditor should ascertain whether the management has instituted
adequate cut-off procedures. For example, he may examine a sample
of documents evidencing the movement of inventories into and out of
stores, including documents pertaining to periods shortly before and
shortly after the cut-off date, and check whether the inventories
represented by those documents were included or excluded, as
appropriate, during the stock-taking.
(f) The auditor should review the original physical verification sheets and
trace selected items - including the more valuable ones - into the final
inventories. He should also compare the final inventories with stock
records and other corroborative evidence, e.g., inventory statements
submitted to banks.
(g) Where continuous stock-taking methods are being used by the entity,
the auditor should, in addition to performing the audit procedures
discussed above, pay greater attention to ascertaining whether the
management:
(i) maintains adequate stock records that are kept up-to-date;
(ii) has established adequate procedures for physical verification
of inventories, so that in the normal circumstances, the
programme of physical verification will cover all material items
of inventory at least once during the year; and
(iii) investigates and corrects all material differences between the
book records and the physical counts.
(h) The auditor should determine whether the procedures for identifying
damaged and obsolete items of inventory operate properly.
CARO, 2003 VII-47
(i) The auditor may determine the reasonableness and adequacy of the
procedures of physical verification of inventories by examining the
related records and documents. These records and documents would
also include the policy of the company regarding physical verification.
The following are the documents which can be examined by the
auditor in this regard:
(i) written instructions given by the management to the concerned
staff engaged in the verification process;
(ii) physical verification inventory sheets duly authenticated by the
field staff and responsible officials of the company;
(iii) summary sheets/consolidation sheets duly authenticated by the
responsible officials;
(iv) internal memos etc., with respect to the issues arising out of
physical verification of inventory;
(v) any other relevant documents evidencing physical verification
of inventory.
(j) In case where the inventories are material and the auditor is placing
reliance on the records, documents, information and explanations
provided by the management, it would be desirable that the auditor, in
order to substantiate the fact that the physical verification is carried
out in accordance with the procedure explained by the management,
attends the physical verification. Where the auditor is present at the
time of stock-taking, he should observe the procedure of physical
verification adopted by the stock-taking personnel to ensure that the
instructions issued in this behalf are being actually followed. The
auditor should also perform test-counts to satisfy himself about the
effectiveness of the count procedures. In carrying out the test counts,
the auditor should give particular consideration to those inventories
which have a high value either individually or as a category of
inventories.
(k) While commenting on this clause, the auditor should point out the
specific areas where he believes the procedure of inventory
verification is not reasonable or adequate.
49. Whether the company is maintaining proper records of inventory and
whether any material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification and
CARO, 2003 VII-48
if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of
account. [Paragraph 4(ii)(c)]
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment whether the company is
maintaining proper records of inventory. The clause also requires the
auditor to comment whether any material discrepancies were noticed
on physical verification of inventory and if so, whether those material
discrepancies have been properly dealt with in the books of account.
(b) What constitutes proper records has not been defined. However, in
general, records relating to inventories should contain, inter alia, the
following:
(i) particulars of the item like nomenclature, nature, etc.
(ii) identification code of the item;
(iii) details regarding quantity of the receipts, issues, balances and
dates of transactions in a chronological manner;
(iv) relevant document number and department identification, if
any;
(v) location.
(c) If priced stores ledger is maintained, the records of the inventory
should also disclose the prices at which the recording of the issues
and receipts is made.
(d) The records should contain the particulars in respect of all items of
inventories. The auditor should also satisfy himself that the stock
registers are updated as and when the transactions occur. The auditor
should also verify that the transactions entered in stock registers are
duly supported by relevant documents.
(e) The purpose of showing the location of the inventory is to make
verification possible. The record of movement/custody of the inventory
should be maintained.
(f) In cases where a company is maintaining stock records for work-in-
progress, say, for compliance with the requirements of the section
209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, the auditor would normally be
able to obtain relevant information in respect of work-in-progress from
CARO, 2003 VII-49
such records. However, in many cases, it might be impracticable to
maintain stock records for work-in-progress. In such cases, the
auditor should consider the fact whether the company, at any point of
time, can arrive or calculate the quantity and amount involved in the
work-in-progress. Some of the factors that might be used in arriving
at the value of work in progress include the production cycle, input/
output ratio analysis, production and stock records for the immediately
following period. If the company is able to do so, the auditor may form
an opinion that proper records relating to the work-in-progress have
been kept and, accordingly, no adverse comment of the auditor under
this clause would be required. However, before adopting this as an
audit procedure, the auditor should satisfy himself as to the
impracticability of maintenance of stock registers of work-in-progress.
(g) It is not possible to specify any single form in which the records
should be maintained. This would depend upon the mode of account-
keeping (manual or computerized), the number of operating locations,
the systems of control, etc.
(h) The Order further requires the auditor to examine whether material
discrepancies have been noticed on verification of inventories when
compared with book records. Such an examination is possible when
quantitative records are maintained for inventories but in many cases
circumstances may warrant that records of individual issues
(particularly for stores items) are not separately maintained and the
closing inventory is established only on the basis of a year-end
physical verification. Where such day-to-day records are not
maintained, the auditor will not be able to arrive at book inventories
except on the basis of an annual reconciliation of opening inventory,
purchases and consumption. This reconciliation is possible when
consumption in units can be co-related to the production, or can be
established with reasonable accuracy. Where such reconciliation is
not possible, the auditor would be unable to determine the
discrepancies. If the item for which the discrepancy cannot be
established is not material, the discrepancy, if any, will also not be
material. For example, an item categorised as C in ABC analysis
might not be material and therefore, the discrepancy, if any, in regard
to such an item would not be material. In other cases, however, the
auditor will have to report that he is unable to determine the
CARO, 2003 VII-50
discrepancy, if any, on physical verification for the item or class of
items to be specified.
50. Has the company granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act. If so, give the number of parties and amount involved
in the transactions; and [Paragraph 4 (iii)(a)]
Comments
(a) There are seven clauses under paragraph 4(iii) of the Order. It is
clarified that the auditors comments on all the seven clauses are to
be made with reference to the companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
(b) The duty of the auditor, under this clause, is to determine whether the
company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Act. If the company has done so, the clause requires that the
auditors report should disclose the number of parties and amount
involved in such cases. The auditor is required to disclose the requisite
information in his report in respect of all parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Act irrespective of the period to
which such loan relates. The clause covers not only the loan granted
during the year but covers all loans including opening balances.
Further, there is no stipulation regarding the loan being given in cash or
in kind. In the absence of such stipulation, the auditor is required to
disclose the requisite information in his report in respect of all kind of
loans whether given in cash or in kind to the parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
(c) Under section 301 of the Act, every company is required to maintain
one or more registers which contain the particulars of all contracts or
arrangements to which section 297 or section 299 of the Act applies.
The particulars of contracts and arrangements required to be entered
in the register maintained under section 301 include, among other
things, names of the parties to the contract or arrangement. It is,
however, suggested that the auditor should acquaint himself with all
the requirements of sections 297, 299 and 301 of the Act. Text of
sections 297, 299 and 301 is reproduced in Appendix X to the
Statement.
CARO, 2003 VII-51
(d) The auditor should obtain a list of companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act from
the management. The auditor should examine all loans (secured or
unsecured) granted by the company to identify those loans granted to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act.
(e) It may so happen that a party listed in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act might take a loan from the company and repays
it to the company during the financial year concerned. Therefore,
while examining the loans, the auditor should also take into
consideration the loan transactions that have been squared-up during
the year and report such transactions under the clause. For example,
the company has, during the financial year, granted a loan of Rs.
1,00,000/-to a firm in which one of the directors of the company is
interested and the firm repays the loan during the financial year
concerned. The auditor is also required to consider such transaction
while commenting upon this clause of the Order.
(f) Apart from reporting the number of parties, the auditor is also required
to disclose the amounts involved. Since the Order does not clarify
what constitutes amounts involved it would be proper if the auditor
discloses the maximum amount involved during the year in the
transactions covered by this clause. While commenting upon this
clause, the auditor may also consider whether the year-end balance
should also be disclosed in his audit report.
51. Whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans
given by the company, secured or unsecured, are prima facie prejudicial to
the interest of the company; and [Paragraph 4 (iii)(b)]
Comments
(a) This clause, read with Paragraph 4(iii)(a) of the Order, requires the
auditor to examine and comment whether the rate of interest and
other terms and conditions of loans given by the company (whether
secured or unsecured) to companies, firms or other parties covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Act are prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(b) The auditor should examine agreements entered into by the company
with the parties covered in the register maintained under section 301
CARO, 2003 VII-52
of the Act or any other supportive documents available for
ascertaining the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of all
loans granted by the company to such companies, firms or other
parties.
(c) The auditors duty is to determine whether, in his opinion, the rate of
interest and other terms and conditions of the loans given are prima
facie prejudicial to the interest of the company. The other terms
would primarily include security, terms and period of repayment and
restrictive covenants, if any. In determining whether the terms of the
loans are prima facie prejudicial, the auditor would have to give due
consideration to a number of factors connected with the loan,
including its ability to lend, borrowers financial standing, the nature of
the security, prevailing market rate of interest and so on.
(d) It may be mentioned that clause (a) of sub-section (1A) of section 227
of the Act also requires the auditor to inquire whether loans and
advances made by the company on the basis of security have been
properly secured and whether the terms on which they have been
made are not prejudicial to the interests of the company or its
members. The auditors inquiry under the aforesaid clause may also
be useful for the purposes of reporting under this clause.
(e) Further, the auditor may also come across a situation where the
company has a policy of providing loans at concessional rates of
interest to its employees and such a loan has been given to a relative
of the director who is also an employee of the company. In such a
case also, the auditor would be required to examine and comment
whether loan is prejudicial to the interests of the company. It may,
however, be noted that normally such rate of interest as per the policy
followed by the company cannot be said to be prejudicial to the
interest of the company if other employees of the company also
receive the loan at the same rate of interest.
(f) The following is an example of reporting under the clause:
According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of
the opinion that the rate of interest and terms and conditions of loans
given by the company to a firm in which Mr. X, one of the directors of
the company, is interested are prima facie prejudicial to the interest of
the company on account of following reasons:
CARO, 2003 VII-53
(i) the company has granted the loan at an interest rate of X% per
annum which is significantly lower than the interest rate
prevailing in the market; and
(ii) coupled with the (i) above, there are no covenants with regard
to the repayment of the loan.
52. Whether receipt of the principal amount and interest are also regular;
and [Paragraph 4 (iii)(c)]
Comments
(a) This part of the clause requires the auditor to report upon the
regularity of receipt of principal amount of loans and interest thereon.
Again, read with paragraphs 4(iii)(a) and (b) of the Order, the scope of
auditors inquiry under this clause shall be restricted in respect of
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act. The auditor is required to comment on
this clause in regard to receipt of principal amount of loans granted
by the company to companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
(b) The auditor has to examine whether the receipt of principal amount
and interest is regular. The word regular should be taken to mean
that the principal and interest should normally be received whenever
they fall due, respectively. If a due date for receipt of interest is not
specified, it would be reasonable to assume that it falls due annually.
A loan repayable on demand falls due as and when the lender calls
back the loan. The auditor can make an assessment of the regularity
only if the loan is demanded by the company since the question of
regularity would be judged by consequent action of the company
(payment or non-payment). If the lending company has not called
back the loan, the auditor cannot comment under this sub-clause.
(c) The following are some of the procedures that the auditor may apply
to report on the clause:
(i) the auditor, while obtaining an understanding of the terms and
conditions for reporting under paragraph 4(iii)(b) of the Order,
should also take note of repayment schedule;
(ii) if loan agreements are not executed, any other equivalent
documents may be referred to arrive at the terms of receipt of
CARO, 2003 VII-54
interest, for example, letters of understanding,
acknowledgement by the party of the terms and conditions
communicated by the company, etc.;
(iii) the dates of receipt of principal amount and payment of interest
needs to be verified with reference to the books of accounts of
the company to come to the conclusion whether such receipts
are regular; and
(iv) if the results of the procedures mentioned above indicate any
irregularity in receipt of principal and/or interest, the auditor
should mention the fact in his report.
(d) In case where the auditee company is a non banking finance
company, the auditor, for reporting under this clause, would also need
to refer to the policy for demand/ call loans framed under clause 6A of
the NBFCs Prudential Norms (RBI Directions), 1998 issued by the
Reserve Bank of India. The text of clause 6A of the Regulations is
given in Appendix X to the Statement.
(e) Where no stipulation has been made for the recovery of the loan, the
auditor is not in a position to make any specific comments. However,
the auditor should state the fact that he has not made any comments
because the terms of recovery have not been stipulated.
53. If overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh, whether reasonable
steps have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and
interest. [Paragraph 4(iii)(d)]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to state whether reasonable steps
have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and
interest, wherever the overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh.
A loan is considered to be overdue when the payment has not been
received on the due date as per the lending arrangements. In such
cases, the auditor has to examine the steps, if any, taken for recovery
of this amount. It may, however, be noted that the scope of the
auditors inquiry under this clause is restricted to loans given by the
company to parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Act.

CARO, 2003 VII-55
(b) In making this examination, the auditor would have to consider the
facts and circumstances of each case, including the amounts involved.
It is not necessary that steps to be taken must necessarily be legal
steps. Depending upon the circumstances, the degree of delay in
recovery and other similar factors, issue of reminders or the sending
of an advocates or solicitors notice, may amount to reasonable
steps even though no legal action is taken. The auditor is not,
therefore, required to comment adversely on the mere absence of
legal steps if he is otherwise satisfied that reasonable steps have
been taken by the company. The auditor should ask the management
to give in writing, the steps which have been taken. The auditor should
arrive at his opinion only after consideration of the managements
representations.
(c) The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
support the fact that reasonable steps have been taken for recovery of
the principal and interest of loans taken/granted by the company.
54. Has the company taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act. If so, give the number of parties and the amount
involved in the transactions; and [Paragraph 4(iii)(e)]
Comments
(a) The auditor is required to comment on this clause also with reference
to the companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Act.
4

(b) The duty of the auditor, under this clause, is to determine whether the
company has taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies,
firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Act.
(c) Apart from reporting the number of parties, the auditor is also required
to disclose the amounts involved. Since the Order does not clarify
what constitutes amounts involved, it would be proper if the auditor
discloses the maximum amount involved during the year in the
transactions covered by this clause. While commenting upon this

4
Attention of the members is also invited to the guidance given in the Statement on Qualifications
in Auditors Report, in respect of loans shown as deposits and vice versa.
CARO, 2003 VII-56
clause, the auditor may also consider whether the year-end balance
should also be disclosed in his audit report.
(d) Steps to be taken by the auditor are exactly similar as in case of
reporting under loans given by the company, as discussed in
paragraph 50, such as obtaining list of parties, making separate
disclosures, etc., except for the fact that in this case the auditor shall
report in respect of loans taken from instead of loans granted to
specified parties.
55. Whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans
taken by the company, secured or unsecured; are prima facie prejudicial to
the interest of the company; and [Paragraph 4(iii)(f)]
Comments
(a) This clause, read with paragraph 4(iii)(e) of the Order, requires the
auditor to examine and comment whether the rate of interest and
other terms and conditions of loans taken by the company (whether
secured or unsecured) from companies, firms or other parties covered
in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act are prima facie
(b) The auditor should examine agreements entered into by the company
with the parties covered in the register maintained under section 301
of the Act or any other supportive documents available for
ascertaining the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of all
loans taken by the company from companies, firms or other parties
(c) The auditors duty is to determine whether, in his opinion, the rate of
interest and other terms and conditions of the loans taken are prima
facie prejudicial to the interest of the company. The other terms
would primarily include security, terms and period of repayment and
restrictive covenants, if any. In determining whether the terms of the
loans are prima facie prejudicial, the auditor would have to give due
consideration to a number of factors connected with the loan,
including the companys financial standing, financial position,
availability of alternative sources of finance, urgency of borrowing,
ability to borrow, the nature of the security given, prevailing market
rate of interest and so on.
CARO, 2003 VII-57
56. Whether payment of the principal amount and the interest are also
regular. [Paragraph (4)(iii)(g)]
Comments
(a) This sub clause requires the auditor to report upon the regularity of
payment of principal amount of loans taken and interest thereon.
Again, read with paragraph 4(iii)(e) of the Order, the scope of auditors
inquiry under this clause shall be restricted in respect of companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Act.
(b) The auditor has to examine whether the payment of principal and
interest is regular. The word regular should be taken to mean that the
principal and interest should normally be paid whenever they fall due.
If a due date for payment of interest is not specified, it would be
reasonable to assume that it falls due annually.
(c) The following are some of the procedures that the auditor may apply
to report on the clause:
(i) the auditor, while obtaining an understanding of the terms and
conditions for reporting under paragraph 4(iii)(g) of the Order,
should also take note of repayment schedule;
(ii) if loan agreements are not executed, any other equivalent
documents may be referred to arrive at the terms of repayment
and payment of interest, for example, letters of understanding,
acknowledgement by the party of the terms and conditions
communicated by the company, etc.;
(iii) the dates of repayment of principal and payment of interest
needs to be verified with reference to the books of account of
the company to come to the conclusion whether the
repayments of principal and payment of interest are regular;
and
(iv) if the results of the procedures mentioned above indicate any
irregularity in payment of principal and/or interest, the auditor
should mention the fact in his report.
(d) Where no stipulation has been made for the repayment of the loan,
the auditor is not in a position to make any specific comments.
CARO, 2003 VII-58
However, the auditor should, in such situations, bring out the fact of
non stipulation of any terms of repayment, in his audit report. In case
of loans repayable at demand repayment of the loan becomes due as
and when the lender calls back the loan.
57. Is there an adequate internal control systemcommensurate with the
size of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of
inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Whether
there is a continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control
system. [Paragraph 4(iv)]
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment whether there is an
adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the
company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory,
fixed assets and sale of goods and services. Further, the clause also
requires the auditor to report whether there is a continuing failure by
the company to correct major weaknesses in the internal control
system in regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and the sale of
goods and services.
(b) Obtaining an understanding of internal control systems is a normal
audit procedure. While the requirement of the Order is confined only
to internal control procedures regarding purchase of inventory, fixed
assets and sale of goods and services, it does not mean that the duty
of the auditor to examine internal control with regard to other areas is
in any way diminished. It only means that special emphasis has to be
given by the auditor on internal control system with regard to the items
specified in the clause as aforesaid.
(c) Internal Control System means all the policies and procedures
(internal controls) adopted by the management of an entity to assist in
achieving managements objective of ensuring, as far as practicable,
the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence
to management policies, the safeguarding of assets, prevention and
detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the
accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial
information.
(d) Different techniques may be used to document information relating to
internal control systems. Selection of a particular technique is a
CARO, 2003 VII-59
matter of auditors judgement. Common techniques, used alone or in
combination, are narrative descriptions, flow-charts, questionnaires,
check lists, etc. Use of any one of these methods does not preclude
the use of the other and the auditor is free to select any one or more
of the methods that he considers best suited to the circumstances of
the case. Irrespective of the method selected, it is necessary that the
auditor maintains sufficient documentation regarding his study and
evaluation of the internal control system. Further, in a computer
information systems environment, the auditor may find it necessary, or
may prefer, to use computer assisted audit techniques, for example,
file interrogation tools or audit test data, may be appropriate when the
accounting and internal control systems provide no visible evidence
for evaluating the internal controls which are programmed into a
computerised accounting system. In this regard, attention is invited to
the Standard on Auditing (SA) 400, Risk Assessments and Internal
Control issued by the Institute.
(e) In making the evaluation, the auditor has to give due regard not
merely to the size of the company and the nature of its business but
also to the organisational structure. This suggests that whereas
detailed internal control procedures may be absolutely essential for a
large company with a diversified business operating at several
locations, internal control may be less formal in an owner-managed
or a small company where there is a greater degree of personal
supervision. Reference in this regard may also be made to paragraph
49 of the Standard on Auditing (SA) 400, Risk Assessments and
Internal Control.
(f) An illustrative questionnaire which may be used by the auditor in
evaluating the internal controls in regard to purchase of inventory, fixed
assets and sale of goods is given in Appendix IX.
(g) The clause also requires the auditor to comment whether there is a
continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control
system. The auditor, for reporting on this clause, would have to
ascertain the weaknesses in the internal controls in regard to
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services
and then examine whether there is a continuing failure to correct
major weaknesses in internal controls.
CARO, 2003 VII-60
(h) What constitutes major weakness depends upon the facts and
circumstances of each case. The auditor should exercise his
professional judgement in this regard. Ordinarily, any weakness in the
internal controls that exposes the company to a risk of significant loss
or the risk of a material misstatement in the financial statements may
be considered as a major weakness and therefore, may come within
the ambit of reporting under this clause. The auditor should, however,
recognise that some weaknesses are of such nature that individually
they may not seem to be major but when evaluated along with others
might become relevant for the auditor while commenting upon this
clause of the Order.
(i) The auditor should review the reports of internal auditor, if any. The
reports of internal auditors may point out cases of weaknesses in the
design of internal controls and non-observance of the laid down
controls. The auditor should also review the minutes of the meetings
of the board of directors and audit committee, if any, with a view to
determine the cases of weaknesses in internal controls. The auditor
may come across situations where a weakness in internal control
system has been placed before the board of directors or the audit
committee but the same has not been considered. Such cases may
point out the instances where there is a continuing failure to correct a
major weakness in internal control system. The auditor should also
review his previous years working papers to determine the
weaknesses in the internal control system, if any, already
communicated to the management.
(j) It may be noted that paragraph 50 of Standard on Auditing (SA) 400,
Risk Assessments and Internal Control requires that the auditor
should make management aware, as soon as practical and at an
appropriate level of responsibility, of material weaknesses in the
design or operation of the accounting and internal control systems,
which have come to the auditor's attention during the course of the
audit. The auditor should examine the follow-up actions taken by the
management in response to weaknesses communicated to the
management. However, determination of continuing failure in
correcting major weaknesses in internal controls is required to be
done by the auditor and commented upon by him in his report
irrespective of the existence of the internal audit function.
CARO, 2003 VII-61
(k) The auditor while making an evaluation of the internal controls in
regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and
services while carrying out the procedures mentioned at (i) above
might come across a weakness in those internal controls. The auditor
should, in such circumstances, exercise his professional judgement to
determine whether the weakness noted by him is a major weakness in
the internal control. The auditor while commenting on the clause,
makes an assessment whether the major weakness noted by him has
been corrected by the management as at the balance sheet date. If
the auditor is of the opinion that the weakness has not been corrected,
then the auditor should report the fact while commenting upon the
clause. Apart from stating that there has been a continuing failure to
correct major weakness, the auditor should report the weakness and
the steps taken by the management to correct the weakness, if any.
Where the management has not taken any steps for correcting the
weakness, the auditors report should also state this fact. It may also
happen that the weakness is corrected by the date on which the
auditor issues the audit report. In such a case, the auditors report
should state the fact that although as at the balance sheet date, there
was a continuing failure to correct a major weakness on the date of
the financial statements, the weakness has been corrected by the
date the auditor issued his report. It may, however, be noted that the
existence of continuing failure is important for reporting on this clause.
Even if the management has taken reasonable steps to correct the
weakness but the weakness continues, the auditor is required to
report the same under this clause.
(l) In case there is a continuing failure on the part of the company to
correct major weakness in the internal control system, the auditor
should also make a re-assessment of the control risk, at the assertion
level, for each material account balance or class of transactions
related to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and
services so that appropriate audit procedures can be designed to
reduce the overall risk to an acceptably low level. Further, if the
auditor is of the opinion that the major weaknesses in the internal
control system have serious implications on the adequacy or reliability
of the books of account of the company, the auditor should consider
modifying his audit report on the financial statements. Where the
auditor decides to do so, he should comply with the requirements of
CARO, 2003 VII-62
the Standard on Auditing (SA) 700, The Auditors Report on the
Financial Statements in this regard.
(m) It is also important to understand that the requirements in regard to
adequacy of internal controls and continuing failure to correct major
weakness(es) are not inter related. These are two distinct aspects of
the clause. The first requires the auditor to comment on the adequacy
of the internal controls in regard to purchase of inventories, purchase
of fixed assets and sale of goods and services whereas the second
aspect requires the auditor to comment whether there was a
continuing failure to correct a major weakness in such internal
controls. Since these two aspects are not related to each other, it
cannot be concluded that if no major weakness was reported during
the period covered by the audit report, the internal control system is
adequate.
58. Whether the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in
section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register required to be
maintained under that section; and [Paragraph 4(v)(a)]
Comments
(a) This part of the clause requires that the auditor should report whether
the transactions that need to be entered into a register in pursuance
of particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301
of the Act have been so entered. Section 301 of the Act requires that
every company shall keep one or more registers in which shall be
entered separately, particulars of all contracts or arrangements to
which sections 297 and 299 of the Act apply. The following are salient
features of sections 301, 297 and 299 of the Act:
(i) Under section 301 of the Act, every company is required to
maintain one or more registers which contain the particulars of
all contracts or arrangements to which section 297 or section
299 of the Act applies. The particulars of contracts and
arrangements required to be entered in the register maintained
under section 301 include, among other things, names of the
parties to the contract or arrangement.
(ii) Under section 297 of the Act, except with the consent of the
Board of Directors of a company, a director of the company or
his relative, a firm in which, a director or his relative is a partner
CARO, 2003 VII-63
or any other partner in such a firm, or a private company of
which the director is a member or director, shall not enter into
any contract with the company
(a) for the sale, purchase or supply of any goods, materials
or services; or
(b) after the commencement of this Act, for underwriting the
subscription of any shares in or debentures of, the
company.
It may also be noted that in the case of a company having a
paid-up capital of not less than rupees one crore, no such
contract can be entered into without the previous approval of
the Central Government. Whenever a contract, to which
section 297 applies, is entered into, the board of directors
accords its approval by a resolution passed at a meeting of the
Board, before the date the contract is entered into or within
three months of the date on which the contract was entered
into. The particulars of such contracts or arrangements
including names of the parties to the contract or arrangement
are required to be entered into the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act.
(iii) Under section 299 of the Act, every director of a company, who
is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, concerned or
interested in a contract or arrangement, or proposed contract
or arrangement, entered into or to be entered into, by or on
behalf of the company, is required to disclose the nature of his
concern or interest at a meeting of the Board of Directors. The
disclosure required under section 299 of the Act can be made
by a director either at a meeting of the Board under sub-section
(2) or by way of giving a general notice for disclosure of
interest to the Board of Directors under sub-section (3) of
section 299 of the Act. The disclosure of interest is made in
Form 24AA of Companies (Central Governments) General
Rules & Forms, 1956. Based on the disclosures made by
directors in Form 24AA, particulars of contracts and
arrangements including, among other things, the names of the
parties concerned are entered into the register maintained
CARO, 2003 VII-64
under section 301 of the Act.
(b) It is suggested that the auditor should acquaint himself with all the
requirements of sections 297, 299 and 301 of the Act
5
.
(c) It should also be noted that according to section 299(6), section 301 is
not applicable to situations where two companies having common
directors enter into a transaction but none of the director, individually
or together with the other directors, holds more than two percent of
the paid up share capital of the company. Thus, the reporting under
this clause pertains only to the loan transactions with the parties
covered by section 301 of the Act and does not extend to such
situations where loan transactions are entered into with another
company where the directors are common but such directors do not
hold more than two percent of the paid up share capital.
(d) It may, however, be noted that as per section 299(6) of the Act, the
requirements of section 301 of the Act do not apply to a contract or
arrangement entered into or to be entered into between two
companies where any of the directors of one of the company or two or
more of them together holds or hold not more than two percent of the
paid-up share capital in the other company. For example, the mere
fact that a director is a shareholder in a public limited company will not
mean that he is interested unless, of course he, together with other
directors, holds more than 2% or more of the share capital.
(e) Normally, particulars are entered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act based on notices received (Form 24AA) from
the directors of the company under section 299 of the Act. As
mentioned earlier, the directors are required to make a disclosure of
interest either at a meeting of the Board of Directors or by way of a
general notice under sub-section (3) of section 299 of the Act. Entries
are also made in the register on the basis of the approval of the board
of directors accorded in terms of section 297 of the Act. In case the
company is required to obtain prior approval of the Central
Government but has not so obtained, the auditor should state the fact
in his report under the Order. A separate qualification may not be
required in the main audit report provided the necessary provisions to

5
Text of sections 297, 299 and 301 of the Act is reproduced in Appendix Xto the Statement.
CARO, 2003 VII-65
meet the cost of non-compliance has been made and the fact of non-
compliance (including the amounts involved) has been appropriately
disclosed in the financial statements.
(f) The auditor should obtain a list of companies, firms or other parties,
the particulars of which are required to be entered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Act. The auditor should verify the
entries made in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act
from the declarations made by the directors in Form 24AA i.e., general
notice received from a director under sub-section (3) of section 299
and on the basis of the approval of the board of directors under
section 297 of the Act which would be evident from the minutes of the
meetings of the board of directors. The auditor should also obtain a
written representation from the management concerning the
completeness of the information so provided to the auditor. While the
auditor can verify the completeness of the entries in the register
maintained under section 301 from Form 24AA in respect of
transactions or contracts covered by section 297, the auditor should
perform additional procedures to verify the completeness of the
entries in the register to which section 297 of the Act applies. The
auditor should review the information provided by the management.
The auditor should also perform the following procedures in respect of
the completeness of this information:
(i) review his working papers for the prior years, if any, for names
of known companies, firms or other parties the particulars of
which are required to be entered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act; and
(ii) review the entitys procedures for identification of companies,
firms or other parties the particulars of which are required to be
entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
(g) The auditor should verify, on the basis of information provided by the
management and on the basis of the results of the procedures
performed by him, whether transactions that need to be entered into a
register in pursuance of section 301 of the Act have been so entered
or not. The auditor also evaluates whether the register under section
301 is updated and maintained properly. The auditor should also
examine, wherever applicable, secretarial compliance certificate
CARO, 2003 VII-66
issued under section 383A of the Act in regard to the completeness of
the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. The auditor may
also rely upon such a certificate issued by a company secretary
provided the auditor complies with the requirements of Standard on
Auditing (SA) 620, Using the Work of an Expert.
(h) There may be situations where the company has not properly
maintained the register required to be maintained by it under section
301 or has not updated the said register and the necessary
declarations from the directors in Form 24AA are also not available on
record. In such situations, the auditor should state the fact of non-
maintenance/improper maintenance of the aforesaid register, while
reporting under this clause. An example of such a reporting by the
auditor could be:
According to the information and explanation given to us, we
are of the opinion that the company has not entered all the
transactions required to be entered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The following
are the particulars of two such transactions which needed to be
entered into the register but were not so entered:
(i) purchase of plant and machinery costing Rs.2,00,000
from a firm in which one of the directors, Mr. X, is a
partner.
(ii) sale of administrative block building of the company for
Rs.1,00,000 to a relative of Mr. Y, one of the directors of
the company.
59. Whether transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard
to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time. [Paragraph 4(v)(b)]
[This information is required only in case of transactions exceeding the value
of five lakh rupees in respect of any party and in any one financial year.]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to comment upon the reasonableness
of the prices of all the transactions which have been entered in
pursuance of contracts or arrangements covered in the register(s)
maintained under section 301 of the Act if such transactions in respect
CARO, 2003 VII-67
of any party and in any one financial year exceed the value of rupees
five lakhs. The auditor is required to determine the reasonableness of
prices having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant
time. It is clarified here that the scope of the auditors inquiry under
this clause is restricted to such transactions to which sections 297 and
299 of the Act apply and thereby required to be entered in the register
(b) The auditor should, while reporting on this clause of the Order, in the
first instance, determine whether the aggregate value of all the
transactions entered into with any of the companies/firms/parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act
exceed the value of rupees five lakhs. If so, the auditor has to
examine whether each of the transactions entered into with such a
company/firm/party have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(c) The auditor has to examine whether the prices paid for the transactions
examined by him are reasonable, having regard to the prevailing
market prices at the relevant time. The auditor is not expected to make
a roving market inquiry to determine the market prices prevailing at the
time the transactions were entered into. However, he may examine
information such as price lists, quotations, and records relating to
prices at which similar transactions have been entered into with other
parties, etc., at the relevant time. The auditor has to satisfy himself,
taking into account all the relevant information as well as any
explanations given by the management, whether the prices at which
various transactions have been made are reasonable. In determining
the reasonableness of the prices, the auditor should take into account
all the factors surrounding the transactions such as the delivery
period/schedule of implementation, the quality and the quantity of the
product/service, the credit terms, the previous record of
supplier/buyer/client, etc. For example, a company may decide to buy
the goods (not necessarily at the lowest prices) from parties required to
be listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act on
account of the fact that the company finds such parties more reliable in
terms of quality and/ or supply of goods. In a transaction of purchase,
it is not necessary that purchases be made in all cases at the lowest
rates. When the rates paid are higher than the prevailing market prices,
CARO, 2003 VII-68
the auditor has to use his judgement to determine whether the
difference in rates is reasonable having regard to the other factors
mentioned above. This may often be the case where the company
wishes to have more than one source of supply or where there is limit
to the manufacturing capacity of the supplier who quotes a lower price.
Thus, the intention of the clause is to require the auditor to examine
and comment on the reasonableness of the prices at which the
transactions have been entered into.
(d) A difficulty in judging the reasonableness of prices may also arise in
cases where transactions are entered with sole suppliers. In such
cases, the auditor may examine the reasonableness of prices paid
with reference to list prices of the supplier concerned, other trade
terms of the supplier, etc.
(e) The auditor while reporting under this clause in circumstances
outlined in paragraph (c) and (d) above should clearly bring out the
reasons as to why no adverse comment was considered necessary.
60. In case the company has accepted deposits fromthe public, whether
the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of
sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules
framed there under, where applicable, have been complied with. If not, the
nature of contraventions should be stated; if an order has been passed by
Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of
India or any Court or any other Tribunal whether the same has been
complied with or not? [Paragraph 4 (vi)]
6

Comments
(a) The clause, in addition to requiring the auditors to report on
compliance with the requirements of section 58A and the directives of
the Reserve Bank of India for acceptance of public deposits, also
requires the auditor to:
(i) report on compliance with the provisions of section 58AA of the
Act; and
(ii) report on compliance with the order, if any, passed by the
Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or

6
The text of sections 58A and 58AA of the Act is reproduced in Appendix X to this Statement.
CARO, 2003 VII-69
Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal
7
.
(b) Section 58A of the Act empowers the Central Government to
prescribe, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, the limits up
to which, the manner in which and the conditions subject to which
deposits may be invited or accepted by a company either from the
public or from its members. The section does not apply to a banking
company or to such other company as the Central Government may,
after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, specify in that
behalf.
(c) On 3
rd
February 1975, the Central Government issued the Companies
(Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975. The Rules apply only to such
companies as are not banking companies and are also not financial
companies. Thus, financial companies are not covered by the Rules.
Such companies continue to be governed by the directives issued by
the Reserve Bank of India.
(d) The Rules cover the following main items:
(i) the nature of deposits which may be accepted and the terms
thereof;
(ii) the limits up to which the deposits can be accepted;
(iii) the form and particulars of advertisement for deposits;
(iv) the form of application for deposits;
(v) furnishing of receipts to depositors;
(vi) maintenance of register(s) of depositors;
(vii) general provisions regarding the repayment of deposits and
payment of interest;
(viii) the returns to be filed with the Registrar of Companies and the
Reserve Bank of India.
(e) Section 58AA was inserted by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000
with effect from 13
th
December 2000. The section deals with small
depositors. According to the section, a small depositor is a depositor

7
The term Company Law Board has been substituted by the term National Company Law
Tribunal by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.
CARO, 2003 VII-70
who has deposited in a financial year, a sum not exceeding twenty
thousand rupees in a company and includes his successors,
nominees, and legal representatives. The section lays down certain
requirements to be complied with by the companies which have
accepted deposits from such small depositors. Audit considerations
similar to those that have been mentioned for section 58A would apply
in regard to section 58AA also.
(f) The auditor should plan to test for compliance with the provisions of
sections 58A, 58AA of the Act and the Rules made under section 58A.
For such purpose, the auditor should also obtain an understanding of
the requirements of sections 58A and 58AA and those of the relevant
rules. Thereafter, the auditor should ascertain how the company is
complying with the provisions of sections 58A, 58AA and the Rules
made under section 58A.
(g) The auditor should examine compliance by the company with regard
to all the matters specified in the sections and the Rules and not
merely to the limits of the deposits. Where the number of deposits is
very large, it is obviously not feasible for the auditor to satisfy himself
that every single deposit complies with the rules. He should, therefore,
examine the system by which deposits are accepted and records are
maintained and make a reasonable test check to ensure the
correctness of the system. The auditor may also make a check list to
ensure that all the requirements of the Rules regarding the records to
be maintained, returns to be filed, etc., are complied with.
(h) The auditor should examine the efficacy of the internal controls instituted
by the company so that the deposits accepted by the company remain
within the limits. It may be difficult for the auditor to ascertain that deposits
accepted by the company are within the limits on each day of the
accounting year. He would, therefore, be justified in making a reasonable
test check to ensure that the company has not accepted deposits during
the year in excess of the limits. For financial companies, the auditor
should make a similar examination having regard to the Reserve Bank
directives in force from time to time. In this connection, attention is invited
to section 45MA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. The section is
reproduced in Appendix X to the Statement.
(i) Non-compliance of section 58AA would occur in the event when a
CARO, 2003 VII-71
company fails to intimate the Company Law Board any default in
repayment of deposit made by small depositors or part thereof or any
interest thereupon. The auditor has to, therefore, first determine
whether there is a default in any repayment of such deposits. This
would require the auditor to examine all the accounts related to small
depositors. In case where a company has large number of deposits
accepted from small depositors, it may not be feasible for the auditor
to first verify each account for default in repayment and then check
whether the company has complied with the requirements of section
58AA of the Act. The auditor, in such a case, should examine the
internal control in place in this regard and determine its efficacy. The
auditor should obtain a schedule of repayment of loans taken from
small depositors from the management of the company. The auditor,
thereafter, should make reasonable test checks of the repayments
made by the company. In case the results of the test check reveal
that the management has defaulted in repayment of deposits made by
small depositors or part thereof or interest thereupon, the auditor
should examine whether the same has been intimated to the
Company Law Board.
(j) Apart from the audit procedures mentioned above, the auditor should
also enquire of the management about the possible instances of non-
compliance with sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions
of the Act and the relevant rules. The auditor should also enquire the
management about any order passed by the Company Law Board or
National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any
Court or any other Tribunal for contravention of sections 58A, 58AA or
any other relevant provision(s) of the Act and the relevant rules. The
auditor should obtain a management representation to the effect
whether:
(a) the company has complied with the directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and the provision of section 58A and
58AA of the Act and the relevant rules; and
(b) where an order has been passed by any of the relevant
authorities mentioned in the clause, the company has complied
with the requirements of the Order.

CARO, 2003 VII-72
(k) In case where the auditor is of the view that any kind of contravention
of sections 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act
or relevant rules, has taken place, the auditor should state in his
report that the provisions of section(s) 58A and/or 58AA and/or
relevant rules, as the case may be, have not been complied with. The
auditor should also report the nature of contraventions in case the
company has not complied with the relevant directives of the Reserve
Bank of India or the provisions of section 58A or with the provisions of
section 58AA of the Act and the relevant rules
8
.
(l) The auditor, under this clause, is required to verify whether the
company has complied with the order passed by Company Law Board
or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any
Court or any other Tribunal. Where any of such authorities has passed
an order, the auditor should examine the steps taken by the company
to comply with the said order. If the company has not complied with
the order, the same is to be reported stating therein the nature of
contravention and the fact that the company has not complied with the
order issued by the Company Law Board or National Company Law
Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
61. In the case of listed companies and/or other companies having a paid-
up capital and reserves exceeding Rs.50 lakhs as at the commencement of
the financial year concerned, or having an average annual turnover
exceeding five crores rupees for a period of three consecutive financial years
immediately preceding the financial year concerned, whether the company
has an internal audit systemcommensurate with its size and nature of its
business. [Paragraph 4(vii)]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to comment whether the company has
an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of the
business. The clause is required to be commented upon by the
auditor in case of companies having a paid-up capital and reserves
exceeding rupees 50 lakhs as at the commencement of the financial
year concerned, or having an average annual turnover exceeding five

8
The concept of materiality which is fundamental to the entire auditing process should be
borne particularly in mind while reporting on this clause as in the case of other clauses of the
Order.
CARO, 2003 VII-73
crores rupees for a period of three consecutive financial years
immediately preceding the financial year concerned. Financial year
concerned means the financial year under audit.
(b) This clause has a mandatory application for the listed companies
irrespective of the size of paid-up capital and reserves or turnover. It
may be noted that the Order does not specify the date with reference
to which the listing status of the company should be determined. In
this regard, it is clarified that if the company is listed on a recognised
stock exchange as on the date of the balance sheet, it should be
considered as listed for the purpose of this clause. In respect of non-
listed companies the clause is applicable only if:
(i) the paid-up capital and reserves of the company are more than
rupees fifty lakhs as at the commencement of the financial
year; or
(ii) average annual turnover exceeds rupees five crores for a
period of three consecutive financial years immediately
preceding the financial year concerned.
(c) In other words, companies which have a paid-up capital and reserves
of rupees fifty lakhs or less as at the commencement of the financial
year as well as the companies which have an average annual turnover
of rupees five crores or less for a period of three consecutive financial
years immediately preceding the financial year concerned are
excluded from the applicability of the clause.
(d) It may be noted that the limit of rupees fifty lakhs applies to the total
capital and reserves and not to merely the equity capital. Reference
should also be made to paragraphs 17 to 19 of this Statement which
specify the considerations for determination of limit of paid-up capital
and reserves for determining the applicability of the Order to a private
limited company.
(e) While in respect of companies which are excluded, there is no
necessity to make any specific mention in the audit report, the auditor
would still be well-advised to make inquiries regarding internal audit
since it forms an integral part of the system of internal control which
the auditor normally examines as a part of the audit function.

CARO, 2003 VII-74
(f) The term turnover has been explained in paragraph 23 of this
Statement. Reference may be made to the said paragraph for the
meaning of the term turnover for the purposes of this Order.
(g) A company may be covered by this clause on the turnover criterion in
one year and may not be so covered in another year. Moreover, since
average turnover of three financial years immediately preceding the
financial year under audit is to be considered, it would follow that a
company cannot be covered by this clause during the first three years
of its operation on the basis of the turnover criterion. It may also be
noted that the financial year may comprise of a period more or less
than 12 months.
(h) A company may either have its own internal audit department or
entrust the work of internal audit to an outside agency. In the case of
a group of concerns, it is also quite common to have a central internal
audit department. The arrangement which is more suitable will depend
upon the circumstances of each company but generally, where a
company is small, it may find it expensive to have its own internal
audit department staffed by personnel having the requisite
qualifications.
(i) The auditor has to examine whether the internal audit system is
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business. The following are some of the factors to be considered in
this regard:
(i) What is the size of the internal audit department? In
considering the adequacy of internal audit staff, it is necessary
to consider the nature of the business, the number of operating
points, the extent to which control is decentralised, the
effectiveness of other forms of internal control, etc.
(ii) What are the qualifications of the persons who undertake the
internal audit work? Internal auditing, as its name implies, is an
aspect of audit and, therefore, it is reasonable to expect that
the internal audit department should normally be headed by a
chartered accountant and that, depending upon the size of the
department, it employs other qualified persons. In deciding the
adequacy of the internal audit department, it is, therefore,
necessary that there is adequate number of qualified
CARO, 2003 VII-75
personnel.
(iii) To whom does the internal auditor report? In general, the
higher the level to which the internal auditor reports, the
greater will be his independence.
(iv) What are the areas covered by the internal audit? Internal audit
can cover a large number of areas including operational
auditing, organisation and methods studies, special
investigations and the like. For the purposes of the Order,
however, the important areas which should be covered by
internal audit are the examination of the operating systems to
ensure that the systems are adequate and functioning in
practice. The exact areas to be covered by the internal audit
would depend upon the circumstances of each case but the
statutory auditor should ask the internal auditor to provide the
programme of his work and should determine whether, in his
opinion, the coverage is adequate. If he feels it is not, he may
suggest to the internal auditor to extend the programme in the
required direction.
(v) Has the internal auditor adequate technical assistance? In a
number of companies, where the operations are highly
technical in nature, an internal auditor cannot function
effectively unless he has adequate technical assistance. This
can be provided either by having full-time technically qualified
persons in the internal audit department or by such persons
being deputed to the internal audit department for specific
assignments. Similar considerations would apply where a large
part of the transactions are computerised. In such cases, the
internal auditor should have the assistance of persons who are
able to audit computer systems.
(vi) What are the reports which are submitted by the internal
auditor or what other evidence is there of his work? It is
important that the auditor should satisfy himself that not merely
does an internal audit system exist but also that it is functioning
effectively. He can do so by examining the reports submitted by
the internal auditor.

CARO, 2003 VII-76
(vii) What is the follow-up? It is not sufficient that the internal audit
system should point out errors in operation or deficiencies in
the internal control system. It is equally necessary that there is
an adequate follow-up system to ensure that the errors pointed
out are corrected and remedial action taken on the deficiencies
reported upon.
(j) The auditor should examine the minutes of the meetings of the Board
of Directors and audit committee, if any. These minutes would
provide the auditor useful evidence regarding the efficiency and
efficacy of the internal audit system.
(k) It is important to note that the Act does not require a company to
necessarily have an internal audit system. However, where such a
system does not exist, the Order requires the auditor to mention the
fact in his report. Moreover, since this part of the Order refers only to
such companies which are either listed or companies having a paid-up
capital and reserves in excess of rupees 50 lakhs or an average
annual turnover in excess of rupees 5 crores for a period of three
consecutive financial years immediately preceding the financial year
concerned, it is desirable that such a company has an internal audit
system.
(l) It is equally important to note that the internal audit system is a part of
the overall internal control system. Therefore, the scope of the internal
audit and the extent of its coverage will, to some extent, depend upon
the existence or otherwise of other forms of internal control. This is
also a factor to be considered when evaluating the adequacy of the
internal audit system.
62. Where maintenance of cost records has been prescribed by the
Central Government under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the
Act, whether such accounts and records have been made and maintained.
[Paragraph 4(viii)]
Comments
(a) Section 209 (1) (d) of the Act requires a company pertaining to a class
of companies engaged in production, processing, manufacturing or
mining activities to maintain proper books of account showing
particulars relating to utilization of material or labour or to other items of
cost as may be prescribed, if the Central Government requires such
CARO, 2003 VII-77
class of companies to maintain such records. Pursuant to this
requirement and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1)
of section 642 of the Act, the Central Government has made rules in
respect of a number of classes of companies. These books of account
and records form part of the books of account of the company within the
meaning of section 209. A list of classes of companies in respect of
which maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) has been
prescribed up to September 29, 2004, is given in Appendix XI.
(b) The Cost Accounting Records Rules issued for various industries
contain requirements relating to two matters:
(i) maintenance of proper books of account relating to materials,
labour, and other items of cost; and
(ii) preparation of cost statements at the end of the financial year
in accordance with the rules specific to the industry concerned.
While the records relating to materials, labour, etc., are required to be
maintained on a day-to-day basis, the cost statements have to be
prepared periodically.
(c) Section 233B of the Act provides that where, in the opinion of the
Central Government, it is necessary to do so in relation to any
company required by section 209(1)(d) to maintain the particulars
prescribed under that section, it may order an audit to be conducted of
its cost accounts.
(d) It will be noticed that while a cost audit can be done only in respect of
companies governed by the Rules made under section 209(1)(d), cost
audit is not necessary in respect of every company which is required
to maintain cost records.
(e) The Order requires the auditor to report whether cost accounts and
records have been made and maintained. The word made applies in
respect of cost accounts (or cost statements) and the word
maintained applies in respect of cost records relating to materials,
labour, overheads, etc. The auditor has to report under the clause
irrespective of whether a cost audit has been ordered by the Central
Government. The auditor should obtain a written representation from
the management stating (a) whether cost records are required to be
maintained for any product(s) of the company under section 209(1)(d);
CARO, 2003 VII-78
and (b) whether cost accounts and records are being made and
maintained regularly. The auditor should also obtain a list of
books/records made and maintained in this regard. The Order does
not require a detailed examination of such records. The auditor
should, therefore, conduct a general review of the cost records to
ensure that the records as prescribed are made and maintained. He
should, of course, make such reference to the records as is necessary
for the purposes of his audit.
(f) It is necessary that the extent of the examination made by the auditor
is clearly brought out in his report. The following wording is, therefore,
suggested:
We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for
the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the
Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie, the
prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
(g) Where the auditor finds that the records have not been written up or
are not prima facie complete, it will be necessary for the auditor to
make a suitable comment in his report.
63. Is the company regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues
including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, CustomDuty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of the arrears of outstanding
statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period
of more than six months fromthe date they became payable, shall be
indicated by the auditor.[Paragraph 4(ix)(a)]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to report upon the regularity of the
company in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state
insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, custom duty,
excise duty, cess and any other statutory dues to appropriate
authorities. If the company is not regular in depositing the above
mentioned undisputed statutory dues, the auditor is required to state
the extent of arrears of statutory dues which have remained
CARO, 2003 VII-79
outstanding as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) It may be noted that the use of the words any other statutory dues
indicates that the clause covers all type of dues under various statues
which may be applicable to a company having regard to its nature of
business. Apart from the statutory dues listed, the auditor is required
to report on the regularity of the company in depositing any other
statutory dues payable by the company to appropriate authorities
under the statutes applicable to the company.
(c) The intention of the Government, in this clause is to ascertain how
regular the company is in depositing statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities. Since the emphasis of the clause is on the
regularity, the scope of auditors inquiry is restricted to only those
statutory dues, which the company is required to deposit regularly to
an authority. The auditor is not required to ascertain whether the
company is regular in depositing amounts, which may be levied by an
appropriate authority from time to time upon occurrence or non-
occurrence of certain events and therefore are not required to be paid
regularly. Any sum, which is to be regularly paid to an appropriate
authority under a statute (whether Central, State or Local or foreign)
applicable to the company, should be considered as a statutory due
for the purpose of this clause. In other words, obligation to pay a
statutory due is created or arises out of a statute, rather than being
based on an independent contractual or legal relationship. Thus,
examples of statutory dues would include municipal taxes, taxes
deducted at source, fees payable to the licensing authority in respect
of business being carried on under license granted by an authority,
say a cinema hall. Accordingly, any sum payable to an electricity
company as electricity bill would not constitute a statutory due despite
the fact that such a company has been established under a statute.
This is so because the due has arisen on account of contract of
supply of goods or services between the parties. However, care shall
have to be taken that in case any dues are recoverable as arrears of
land revenue by the concerned authority, the same shall be treated as
a statutory due.
(d) With reference to regularity, it is also important to distinguish amongst
the various items stated in the clause. The auditor should very clearly
CARO, 2003 VII-80
understand the nature of each statutory due payable by the company
while examining the aspect of regularity before commenting on the
same. For instance, the regularity is a normal feature in case of
certain statutory dues such as, provident fund, employees state
insurance, sales tax, etc., because the companies are required to
deposit the money with appropriate authorities on a monthly or
quarterly basis. But this is not the case in respect of, say, custom
duty on import of goods or demands arising on account of assessment
orders etc., which a company is required to pay as and when an event
giving rise to the liability of the company occurs. Such dues should be
construed to have been paid regularly if the company deposits them
as and when they become due. However, the auditor would be
required to comment upon the regularity of the company in depositing
the installments, if any, granted by an authority in respect of a
demand against the company.
(e) An important issue to consider is the question of regularity of payment
of import duty where the goods had been imported, say, five years
back and were placed in the bonded warehouse and even till the end
of the financial year under audit, the goods have not been removed
from such warehouse. It may be noted that when the imported goods
are lodged in a bonded warehouse, the payment of import duty is to
be made when the goods are removed from the bonded warehouse.
Till the time
9
the importer opts to remove the goods from the
warehouse, the importer is required to incur the rent and interest
expenditure on the amount of customs duty payable. Since the
payment of the custom duty is not due in the current case, the
question of regularity does not arise in respect of custom duty.
However, it may be noted that the interest and rent that are required
to be incurred under section 61 of the Customs Act, 1962 would come
under other statutory dues and the auditor would have to examine and
comment upon the regularity of the company in depositing such
interest and rent.

9
It may be noted that section 62 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that any goods deposited in
the warehouse may be stored upto a period of one year in the bonded warehouse. The time limit is
five years in case of capital goods intended for use in any 100%EOU. The said Act, however, also
provides for extension of the warehousing period by the relevant authorities subject to certain
prescribed conditions.
CARO, 2003 VII-81
(f) Non-payment of advance income tax would constitute default in
payment of statutory dues. It may, however, happen that the
company might not have any taxable income on the due dates on
which advance tax is required to be paid. If such a company has an
income after the last date on which the advance tax was required to
be paid and consequently the company incurs interest under the
relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it should not be
construed that the company is not regular in depositing advance tax.
(g) It may be noted that at present, no Rules relating to the amount of
cess for rehabilitation or revival or protection of assets of sick
industrial companies, payable by a company under section 441A of
the Act have been notified by the Central Government. Thus, it would
not be possible for the auditor to comment on the regularity or
otherwise about the cess till the time relevant rules or regulations are
issued. However, till the time such Rules are prescribed, the auditor
should also state in his report under this clause that the Government
has not notified any Rules under section 441A of the Companies Act,
1956 and therefore the auditor is unable to comment on this particular
issue.
(h) It may be noted that the auditor has to report on the regularity of deposit
of statutory dues irrespective of the fact whether or not there are any
arrears on the balance sheet date. This is because there may be
situations where a company has deposited the relevant dues before the
end of the year while it has been in default in the matter for a significant
part of the year. In cases where there are no arrears on the balance
sheet date but the company has been irregular during the year in
depositing the statutory dues, the auditor should state this fact in his
audit report.
(i) For the purpose of this clause, the auditor should consider a matter as
disputed where there is a positive evidence or action on the part of
the company to show that it has not accepted the demand for payment
of tax or duty, e.g., where it has gone into appeal. For this purpose,
where an application for rectification of mistake (e.g., under section
154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961) has been made by the company, the
amount should be regarded as disputed. Where the demand
notice/intimation for the payment of a statutory due is for a certain
amount and the dispute relates only to a part and not the whole of
CARO, 2003 VII-82
such amount, only such amount should be treated as disputed and the
balance amount should be regarded as undisputed. It is not necessary
for the auditor to examine the sustainability or otherwise of the claim
of the company regarding disputed amounts. It is sufficient for his
purpose if the evidence available shows that the amount is disputed
by the company. It may also be noted that the Order has clarified that
mere representation to the concerned Department does not constitute
the dispute.
(j) Another question that arises is that when do the statutory dues
become payable. There can be two views with regard to the question.
On the one hand, it can be argued that the statutory dues referred to
in this clause become payable on the last date by which payment can
be made without attracting penalty and/or interest under the relevant
law. On the other hand, it can also be argued that the amounts
referred to in the clause become so payable as at the date of the
expiry of the stay granted by the authorities or, where instalments
have been granted for the payment of statutory dues referred to in the
clause, the date on which the default occurs and the amount becomes
payable to the authorities. As the purpose of this clause is to indicate
the amounts which have become actually payable and are outstanding
as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more
than six months from the date they became payable, the latter view
seems to conform more closely to the requirements of the Order.
(k) It may be noted that penalty and/or interest levied under the
respective laws would be covered within the term amounts payable.
(l) The report should be restricted to the actual arrears and should not
include the amounts which have not fallen due for payment to
appropriate authority and have been recognised as outstanding dues
at the balance sheet date.
(m) It is possible that in a large company where there are a number of
departments with separate payrolls and where payments are spread
over a number of days, the collection of data regarding the provident
fund/employees state insurance collections and the companys
contribution thereto may take some time. In order to ensure that
deposit of the dues is made in time, the company may make lump-
sum deposits of estimated amounts and adjust the excess or deficit
CARO, 2003 VII-83
against the following months deposit. If this method is consistently
followed and the difference between the total dues and the lump-sum
deposit is not significant, it need not be considered that dues have not
been regularly deposited and no adverse comment is necessary.
10

(n) The auditor should make plans to test whether the company is regular
in depositing undisputed statutory dues. The auditor, in order to be
able to comment on this clause, should have a general understanding
of the various statutes governing the company and the dues payable
by the company under those statutes. The auditor should also enquire
of the management of the company about the statutes under which
the company is required to pay any statutory dues. The auditor should
also discuss with the management, the policies or procedures adopted
for identification and payment of statutory dues. The auditor may also
obtain from the management or himself prepare a calendar of dates
for submission of various statutory dues by the company for his
reference.
(o) The information necessary to comply with this requirement of the
Order may be obtained from the company in the form of a statement.
The statement should contain a list of various statutes under which
the company is required to make payments regularly to appropriate
authorities, the kind of payments under each statute, the due date for
making the payment to the appropriate authority, the date on which
the payment is made by the company, the arrears not due and the
arrears over due for more than six months. The auditor should verify
the statement provided by the management with the underlying
documents and records. The auditors general understanding of the
various statutes governing the company and the dues payable by the
company under those statutes would help the auditor in assessing the
completeness of the statement. The auditor should recognise that
there could be a situation that a statutory due might have become
payable but has not been captured by the accounting and internal
control systems established by the enterprise and, therefore, the
auditor should perform procedures to mitigate risk arising from such a
situation.

10
This concept of materiality which is fundamental to the entire auditing process should be
borne in mind while reporting on this clause as in case of other clauses of the Order.
CARO, 2003 VII-84
(p) The auditor should obtain a written representation with reference to
the date of the balance sheet from the management:
(i) specifying the cases and the amounts considered disputed;
(ii) containing a list of the cases and the amounts in respect of the
statutory dues which are undisputed and have remained
outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable; and
(iii) containing a statement as to the completeness of the
information provided by the management.
(q) While the auditor has to report upon the regularity of the deposit, he is
not required to specify in detail each instance where there has been a
delay or the extent of the delay. It should be sufficient if he indicates
whether generally the deposits have been regular or otherwise. The
following are examples of the wordings, which may be used in
relevant situations:
undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, or employees state insurance, income-
tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess
have been regularly deposited by the company with the appropriate
authorities in all cases during the year.
education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-
have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though there has been a slight delay in a few cases.
have not generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though the delays in deposit have not been serious.
have not been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities and
there have been serious delays in a large number of cases.
CARO, 2003 VII-85
(r) If the auditor is of the opinion that the company is not regular in
depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance,
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate
authorities, the extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as
at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more
than six months from the date they became payable, are required to
be mentioned by the auditor in his audit report. In indicating the
arrears, the period to which the arrears relate should also preferably
be given and further, wherever possible, the fact of subsequent
clearance or otherwise may also be indicated. The following is the
format in which the auditor may report the extent of the arrears of
outstanding statutory dues:
Statement of Arrears of Statutory Dues Outstanding for More than Six Months
Name of
the
Statute
Nature of
the Dues
Amount
(Rs.)
Period to which
the amount
relates
Due
Date
Date of
Payment

64. In case dues of Income Tax/ Sales Tax/ Service Tax/ Customs Duty/
Wealth Tax/ Excise Duty/ Cess have not been deposited on account of any
dispute, then the amounts involved and the forumwhere dispute is pending
shall be mentioned. [Paragraph 4(ix)(b)]
{A mere representation to the Department shall not constitute the dispute.}
Comments
(a) This clause requires that in case of disputed statutory dues, the
amounts involved should be stated along with the forum where the
dispute is pending.
(b) The audit procedures applied by the auditor for commenting on the
previous clause, including obtaining a statement from the
management in regard to the matters specified in the clause, would
help the auditor in determining the dues of sales tax/income
tax/custom duty/wealth tax/service tax/excise duty/cess that have not
been deposited on account of any dispute, the amounts involved and
the forum where dispute is pending. The auditor should also obtain a
CARO, 2003 VII-86
management representation about the disputed dues, the amounts
involved and the forum where the dispute is pending. The auditor
should carry out necessary audit procedures to verify the information
provided by the management.
(c) It is clarified here that mere representation to the concerned
Department does not constitute dispute. According to the Order, it is
necessary that there should be an appeal before the relevant
appellate authority. It is, however, reiterated that where an application
for rectification of mistake (e.g., under Section 154 of the Income tax
Act, 1961) has been made by the company, the amount should be
regarded as disputed.
(d) A show-cause or similar notice generally contains the
requirements/queries of the assessing officer. Normally, issuance of a
show cause notice by the concerned department should not be
construed to be a demand payable by the company. However, in
some cases, a show cause notice and demand may be combined in
one document. Normally, in such cases, the demand would not be
construed to have arisen till the time the assessee has disposed off
the requirements of the show cause order. Hence, it would be
necessary to evaluate each situation individually.
(e) Tax demands that have been set aside are clearly not dues.
Similarly, if a demand has been referred for reassessment and the
effect of such referral is the cancellation of the earlier demand, this
too would not constitute an amount due. The wording of the order
would be of significance; if the demand is not cancelled, it will remain
disputed dues. As far as demands that have been stayed are
concerned, these should be regarded as disputed dues. These should
be disclosed along with a disclosure of the fact of stay. The fact that a
stay has been granted does not mean that the authority granting the
stay has held that the amount in question is not a valid demand
against the company. The stay normally is a concession that the
amount may not be deposited immediately or that it may be deposited
in installments. Sometimes a stay is granted if the assessee provides
a bank guarantee. It may also be noted that there may be a situation
that the appellate authority has decided a case in favour of the
company but the Department may prefer to make an appeal to a
higher authority. In such a case, there is considered to be no dispute
CARO, 2003 VII-87
until the time the Department makes an appeal to the relevant
appellate authority. Further, in case where the amount under the
dispute is pending for an appeal to be filed and the time limit for filing
the appeal has lapsed, the disputed amount would become a statutory
due and the reporting responsibilities of the auditor as are applicable
to any other undisputed statutory due under clause 4(ix)(a) of the
Order would become applicable. Further, in case where the amount
under dispute has not been paid before filing the appeal and no
appeal is filed within the time allowed and the time limit for filing the
appeal has expired, the disputed amount would become a statutory
due.
(f) It is possible that in respect of same nature of statutory dues, there
may be more than one dispute pertaining to different periods for
which, appeals might have been filed separately. For example,
different years income tax liabilities might have been disputed at
different levels of appellate authorities. Hence, in such cases, the
information required by the clause should be given separately in
respect of each period. In the case of a large company having a
number of manufacturing and marketing divisions, it would be quite
normal that many cases relating to sales tax, income tax, excise,
customs etc., are disputed and are pending at various stages. It
cannot be the intention of the clause that each case is listed
separately. It is, therefore, proper to summarise the cases stage-wise
under each broad head, e.g., sales tax, income-tax, custom duty,
excise duty, wealth tax, cess and give the particulars as indicated in
paragraph (g) below.
(g) The information required by the clause may be reported in the
following format:
Statement of Disputed Dues
Name of
the
Statute
Nature of
the Dues
Amount
(Rs.)
Period to which
the amount relates
Forumwhere
dispute is pending

(h) Further, a plain reading of the clause suggests that the amounts to be
reported under clause 4(ix)(b) of the Order are those which have not
CARO, 2003 VII-88
been deposited on account of any dispute, irrespective of the
treatment of such disputed amounts in accounts. It is quite possible
that an amount is disputed and has not been deposited but on
consideration of the likely outcome of the dispute, a provision has
been made in the accounts. Such an amount will need to be reported,
notwithstanding that it has been provided for. Similarly, even if it had
not been provided for, it would have to be reported as long as it is not
deposited. It is also possible that an amount is disputed, has been
deposited and on consideration of the likely outcome of the dispute,
has been shown as a recoverable. Though such an amount is not
contemplated for reporting under the clause, since it has been
deposited, the fact of such deposit having been made under protest
should be brought out by the auditor in his report under the clause.
Whether a disputed amount should be provided for in the accounts or
not will need to be judged in the context of Accounting Standard (AS)
4, Contingencies and Events Occurring After the Balance Sheet Date
and/or Accounting Standard (AS) 29, Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
65. Whether in case of a company which has been registered for a period
not less than five years, its accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year are not less than fifty per cent of its net worth and whether it has
incurred cash losses in such financial year and in the immediately preceding
financial year. [Paragraph 4(x)]
Comments
(a) The clause is applicable to all the companies, whether manufacturing,
trading or service, that have been in existence for five years or more
from the date of registration till the last day of the financial year
covered by the auditors report. The clause requires the auditor to
report:
whether the accumulated losses at the end of the financial year
are not less than 50% of its net worth; and
whether the company has incurred cash losses during the period
covered by the report and in the immediately preceding financial
year covered by the report.
(b) The auditor should compute the accumulated losses and the net worth
CARO, 2003 VII-89
to verify whether the accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year are more than 50% of the companys net worth.
(c) A question arises about the exact connotation of the term loss for
ascertaining the amount of accumulated losses. More specifically, the
issue is whether, for the purpose of reporting by the auditor, the net
loss shown by the profit and loss account should be taken as the loss
or whether any adjustments need to be made in the figure of such net
profit/loss. The term loss should be construed to mean the net
profit/loss shown by the profit and loss account of the company as
adjusted after taking into account qualifications in the audit report to
the extent the qualifications are quantified.
(d) Section 2(29A) of the Act defines the term net worth as sum total of
the paid-up capital and free reserves after deducting the provisions or
expenses as may be prescribed. The explanation to the definition
further provides that for the purpose of this definition, free reserves
means all reserves created out of profits and share premium account
but does not include reserves created out of revaluation of assets,
write back of depreciation provisions and amalgamation. The
provisions or expenses to be deducted from the paid-up capital and
reserves for calculating net-worth have not yet been prescribed. It,
therefore, implies that the net worth is the sum total of the paid-up
capital and free reserves until the provisions or expenses to be
deducted therefrom are prescribed under section 2(29A) of the Act.
The figure of net worth computed from the balance sheet of the
company should also be adjusted for the effect of qualifications in the
audit report to the extent the qualifications are quantified.
(e) The auditor is also required to report whether the company has
incurred cash losses during the period covered by the report and in
the financial year immediately preceding the period covered by the
report. In order to determine the figure of cash loss for the financial
year, the figure of profit/loss shown by the profit and loss account is
adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature such as
depreciation, amortisation, deferred tax expenses, etc.
(f) The figure of cash loss of the company for the financial year covered
by the audit report and the immediately preceding financial year
should also be adjusted for the effect of qualifications in the respective
CARO, 2003 VII-90
audit reports to the extent the qualifications are quantified.
(g) The auditor while reporting on this clause should indicate that his
opinion on the matters specified in the clause has been arrived at after
considering the effect of the qualifications on the figures of accumulated
losses, net worth and cash losses. Where any of the qualifications in the
audit report is not capable of being quantified, the auditor should state
that the effect of such unquantified qualification(s) has not been taken
into consideration for the purpose of making comments in respect of this
clause.
(h) Further, a situation may be there where the company has suffered
cash losses in only one of the years referred to in the clause. In such
a situation, the auditor is well advised to comment on the two years
separately. Thus, for example, it would be proper to report that the
company has incurred cash losses only during the preceding year but
has not incurred any cash loss during the current financial year.
66. Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution or bank or debenture holders? If yes, the period and
amount of default to be reported. [Paragraph 4 (xi)]
Comments
(a) Under this clause, the auditor is required to report whether the
company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution
or bank or to debenture holders. If the answer is in the affirmative, the
auditor is also required to mention the period of default and the
amount of default. A question that arises is whether the scope of the
auditors inquiry would cover defaults made by the company during
the year only or whether the defaults committed in previous years and
continuing uptil the year end would also be covered. It is clarified that
the auditor should report the period and amount of all defaults existing
at the balance sheet date irrespective of when those defaults have
occurred.
(b) Dues to financial institutions
11
, banks or debenture holders would
include the principal as well as any interest on any kind of dues
payable to the financial institutions, banks or debenture holders.

11
Reference may be made to paragraph 22 of the Statement, which describes financial
institutions for the purpose of the Order.
CARO, 2003 VII-91
(c) The auditor should obtain a schedule of repayments to banks,
financial institutions and debenture holders from the management of
the company. The schedule should indicate the amount and the due
dates of the payments that the company is required to make to banks,
financial institutions and debenture holders.
(d) The auditor should examine the agreement or other documents
containing the terms and conditions of the loans and borrowings of the
company from banks and financial institutions. The auditor should also
examine the debenture trust deed. This examination would enable the
auditor in verifying the amount and due dates of the payments
mentioned in schedule of repayments provided by the management of
the company. The auditor should then verify whether the repayments
as per the books of account are in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the relevant agreement. The auditor should also satisfy
himself that the repayment have actually been made to the party
concerned.
(e) Though the word default has not been defined, in this regard, the
word default would mean non-payment of dues to banks, financial
institutions or debenture holders on the last dates specified in loan
documents or debentures trust deed, as the case may be. For
example, in the case of term loans, fixed dates are prescribed for
repayment in the agreement or terms and conditions of the loans. The
dates prescribed for repayments would operate as the last date of
payments and any delay after this fixed date would amount to default.
(f) It may happen that the company might have submitted application for
reschedulement/restructuring proposals to the lenders, which may be
in different stages of processing. Submission of application for
reschedulement/restructuring does not mean that no default has
occurred. Accordingly, in such situations also the auditor should report
the period of default and the amount of default. However, if the
application for reschedulement of loan has been approved by the
concerned bank or financial institution or if the default has been made
good by the company during the accounting period covered by the
auditors report, the auditor should state in his audit report the fact of
reschedulement of loan or the fact of default having been made good.
(g) The auditor may come across a situation where there may be disputes
CARO, 2003 VII-92
between the company and the lender on certain issues relating to
repayments. In all such situations, the auditor should give a disclaimer
that since there is a dispute between the company and the lender; he
is unable to determine whether there is a default in repayment of dues
to the lender concerned.
(h) The following is an example of negative reporting under the clause:
The company has defaulted in repayment of dues to debenture
holders. Debentures amounting to Rs.50,00,000/- became due
for redemption on 30
th
May 20X3 which were redeemed by the
company on 15
th
March 20X4.
67. Whether adequate documents and records are maintained in cases
where the company has granted loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities; If not, the
deficiencies to be pointed out. [Paragraph 4 (xii)]
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment on the adequacy of
documents and records maintained in cases where the company has
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge
of shares, debentures and other securities. If the auditor is not
satisfied about the adequacy of documents and records, he has to
report the inadequacies and point out deficiencies in maintenance of
records.
(b) This requirement is confined to loans and advances which are
secured by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities,
and does not extend to other forms of security, e.g., hypothecation,
guarantee, etc.
(c) Pledge implies that the physical possession of the security must be
transferred to the company along with a power to sale of the security
in the case of default. This transfer can be actual or constructive. For
example, the share or debenture may be physically in the custody of
the company or it may be with a person like a bank which holds it on
behalf of the company.
(d) A question may arise as to the exact meaning of the term other
securities. The term, other securities may be construed to mean
bonds or promissory notes issued by a government or semi-
CARO, 2003 VII-93
government authority. In a broader sense, it can include any other
asset which is given as security for repayment of a loan or fulfillment
of an obligation. However, the term other securities is used along
with shares and debentures and, therefore, for the purpose of this
clause, consideration will have to be confined to securities which are
similar to shares or debentures.
(e) The auditor has to report whether adequate documents and records
have been maintained. What records would be considered adequate
depends upon the nature of the security and the party to whom the
loan or advance is granted. But the records should generally include
the following particulars:
(i) the full name and address of the borrower;
(ii) the amount of the loan or advance;
(iii) stipulations regarding period of repayment, the rate of interest,
the security to be pledged and all other terms of the loan or
advance;
(iv) the record of the disbursements, repayments towards the loan
or advance and recovery of the interest;
(v) full particulars of the security pledged, for example, if the
security consists of shares, the particulars would include the
names of the companies, number of shares, class of shares,
distinctive numbers of the shares, particulars of the parties in
whose names the shares stand, etc.;
(vi) the documents needed to transfer the ownership of the security
in case of need;
(vii) periodical acknowledgements from the parties confirming the
balances due;
(viii) proof that the party has power to borrow, e.g., in case the
borrower is a company, its memorandum of association, board
resolution or shareholders resolution; etc.
(f) The clause does not cast a duty upon the auditor to examine the
adequacy of the security on the basis of which loans have been
granted. This may be due to the fact that an inquiry in this regard has
to be made by the auditor in terms of section 227 (1A) of the Act. In
CARO, 2003 VII-94
any event, it remains the duty of the auditor to ensure by physical
verification that, where a loan or advance is given on the basis of a
pledge of shares, debentures or other securities, the securities are in
the custody of the company and that the market value of the securities
is adequate to cover the outstanding amount of the loan and interest.
The auditor should also physically verify the securities pledged by
reference to either the physical securities or statements from
depository participants. In the case of securities in dematerialized
form, the auditor should also obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence that the company has a valid right to sell the shares kept as
security in the case of a default from the borrower. There may be
several ways with which the auditor can verify the said right of the
company, for example, the auditor may obtain a certificate to this
effect from the depository participant.
(g) The auditor, apart from reviewing and examining regular books of
account, has to examine various documents and records as referred
above and list out the deficiencies, if any. The deficiencies could be
absence of noting of lien, insufficient margins, registers not being
updated, absence of data relating to market value of securities, etc.
The auditor should also report the deficiencies so found.
68. Whether the provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund
have been duly complied with? [Paragraph 4(xiii) First Part]
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to comment whether the provisions of
any special statute applicable to chit fund have been complied with. It
may be noted that clause is required to be commented upon by the
auditor only in case of a chit fund company. Therefore, the auditor
should determine whether the company is carrying on the chit fund
business. It may be noted that the Order contains a single definition
of the terms chit fund company, nidhi company or mutual benefit
company. According to the Order, chit fund company, nidhi
company or mutual benefit company means a company engaged in
the business of managing, conducting or supervising as a foreman or
agent of any transaction or arrangement by which it enters into an
agreement with a number of subscribers that every one of them shall
subscribe to a certain sum of instalments for a definite period and that
CARO, 2003 VII-95
each subscriber, in his turn, as determined by lot or by auction or by
tender or in such other manner as may be provided for in the
agreement, shall be entitled to a prize amount, and includes
companies whose principal business is accepting fixed deposits from,
and lending money to, members.
(b) Though the Order defines the terms chit funds, nidhis and mutual
benefit society using a single definition but these entities are
governed by different laws and regulations and different meanings
have been attached to these terms under the relevant laws and
regulations. For example, a chit fund company is a company that
carries on the business of chit funds within the meaning of the Chit
Funds Act, 1982. Clause (b) of section 2 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982
defines the chit as a transaction whether called chit, chit fund, chitty
kuri or by any other name by or under which a person enters into an
agreement with a specified number of persons that every one of them
shall subscribe a certain sum of money (or a certain quantity of grain
instead) by way of periodical instalments over a definite period and
that each such subscriber shall, in his turn, as determined by lot or by
auction or by tender or in such other manner as may be specified in
the chit agreement, be entitled to the prize amount. Explanation to the
clause provides that a transaction is not a chit within the meaning of
this clause, if in such transaction:
(i) some, but not all, of the subscribers get the prize amount
without any liability to pay future subscriptions; or
(ii) all the subscribers get the chit amount by turn with a liability to
pay future subscriptions.
(c) This is a very wide requirement and taken literally would mean that
the auditor has to ensure that the company complies with all the
requirements of the relevant special statutes. Obviously, this cannot
be the intention. A more rational interpretation would, therefore, be
that the auditor has to satisfy himself and report that the company has
complied with all the provisions of the special statutes in so far as they
are applicable to the accounts of the chit fund company. It is
necessary that the audit report should clearly state the above
interpretation. The following is an example of the report:
According to the information and explanations give to us, the
CARO, 2003 VII-96
company has complied with the provisions of ..................... in
so far as those provisions are applicable to the accounts under
report.
(d) It may also be noted that special statutes applicable to chit fund
companies vary from State to State. This is because of the fact that
the Central Government enacted the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (Act No. 40
of 1982) which extends to the whole of India except the State of
Jammu and Kashmir. According to section 1(3) of the Chit Funds Act,
1982, it comes into force on such date as the Central Government
may, by notification in the official gazette, notify and also that different
dates may be notified for different States. So far, the Central
Government has notified the date of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 coming
into force in respect of certain States and Union Territories only
12
. In
respect of States and Union Territories for which no date for the Chit
Funds Act, 1982 coming into force has been notified, the respective
States/Union Territories have either enacted relevant Act and rules in
this regard or have adopted the Chit Funds Act, 1982 as it is. The
auditor should obtain an understanding of the relevant Acts and the
rules which are applicable to the company situated in a particular
State/Union Territory. It may also happen that the companys
branches may be situated in more than one State, in which case, the
provisions of different States Acts and rules may be applicable to the
respective branches/offices.
69. In respect of nidhi/mutual benefit fund/societies:
(a) whether the net-owned funds to deposit liability ratio is more than 1:20
as on the date of balance sheet;
(b) whether the company has complied with the prudential norms on
income recognition and provisioning against sub-
standard/doubtful/loss assets;
(c) whether the company has adequate procedures for appraisal of credit
proposals/requests, assessment of credit needs and repayment

12
The States and Union Territories for which the dates have been notified by the Central
Government are Karnataka, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli,
Lakshadweep, Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Orissa, Goa, Daman
and Diu, Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Pondichery, Meghalaya, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan,
Bihar and Punjab.
CARO, 2003 VII-97
capacity of the borrowers;
(d) whether the repayment schedule of various loans granted by the nidhi
is based on the repayment capacity of the borrower. [Paragraph 4(xiii)
Second Part; sub-clauses (a) to (d)]
Comments
(a) The sub-clause (a) requires the auditor to report whether, in the case
of a nidhi and mutual benefit society, net-owned funds to deposit
liability ratio is more than 1:20 as on the date of balance sheet.
(b) It may be noted that nidhis or mutual benefit societies are the
companies which are notified by the Central Government to be a
nidhi or a mutual benefit society under section 620A of the Act. It
may also be noted that a company which is declared as a nidhi or a
mutual benefit society by the Central Government under section
620A cannot carry on the business of chit fund, hire purchase finance,
leasing finance, insurance or acquire shares or debenture issued by
any body corporate except the shares of another nidhi, unless
specifically permitted by the Central Government.
(c) It may be noted that a nidhi or a mutual benefit society may accept
deposits not exceeding twenty times of its net owned funds as per last
audited balance sheet
13
.
(d) According to the directions issued by the Central Government vide
notification number GSR 555(E) dated 26
th
July, 2001 [as modified by
notification number GSR 308(E) dated 30
th
April, 2002], the term net
owned funds means the aggregate of paid-up equity capital and free
reserves as reduced by accumulated losses and intangible assets
appearing in the last audited balance sheet of the company. A
reserve is considered as a free reserve if it is available for
distribution as dividend. Further, the amount representing the
proceeds of issue of preference shares shall not be included for
calculating net-owned funds. However, for nidhis or mutual benefit
societies existing on or before 26
th
July, 2001, the proceeds of issue
of preference shares shall be included for calculation of net-owned
funds up to the financial year 31
st
March 2004.

13
Directions issued by the Central Government vide notification number GSR 555(E) dated 26th
July 2001.
CARO, 2003 VII-98
(e) A nidhi or a mutual benefit society can accept fixed deposits, recurring
deposits accounts and savings deposits from its members in
accordance with the directions notified by the Central Government.
The aggregate of such deposits is referred to as deposit liability.
(f) The auditor should ask the management to provide the computation of
the deposit liability and net-owned funds on the basis of the
requirements contained herein above. This would enable him to verify
that the ratio of deposit liability to net owned funds is in accordance
with the requirements prescribed in this regard. The auditor should
verify the ratio using the figures of net owned funds and deposit
liability computed in accordance with what is stated above. The
comments of the auditor should be based upon such a statement
provided by the management and verification of the same by the
auditor.
(g) The sub-clause (b) requires the auditor to state whether, the company
has complied with the prudential norms on income recognition and
provisioning against sub-standard/doubtful and loss assets. This
requirement is in addition to the audit procedures that the auditor
normally performs in respect of advances for obtaining evidence on
the assertions about their existence, completeness, valuation and
disclosure.
(h) Nidhis and mutual benefit societies can give loans to its shareholders
or members against the security of gold, silver, jewellery, immovable
property, fixed deposit, kisan vikas patra, national savings certificates,
insurance policies and other Government securities. The Central
Government, vide notification number GSR 309 (E) dated 30
th
April
2002 issued prudential norms for revenue recognition and
classification of assets in respect of mortgage or loans. The text of
the Circular is reproduced in Appendix XII to the Statement
14
.
(i) The auditor should examine whether the prudential norms for revenue
recognition and classification of assets have been complied with by the
nidhi or mutual benefit society in the preparation and presentation of the
financial statements. However, these norms should be construed as
laying down the minimum provisioning requirements and wherever a

14
The directions issued by the Government of India are subject to change from time to time.
CARO, 2003 VII-99
higher provision is warranted in the context of the threats to recovery,
such higher provision can be made. If a company makes such higher
provision, it should not be construed that the company has not complied
with the prudential norms. Where the nidhi or the mutual benefit society
has not complied with the prudential norms, the auditor should state the
fact while reporting on the clause.
(j) The sub-clause (c) requires the auditor to comment upon whether the
company has adequate procedures for appraisal of credit
proposals/requests, assessments of credit needs and repayment
capacity of the borrowers. The auditor should study the procedures
regarding appraisal of credit proposals/requests, assessment of credit
needs and repayment capacity of the borrowers. It may so happen
that a company might have a separate set of procedures for appraisal
of credit proposals/requests of employees. The auditor should also
study the same. Such procedures should normally include steps to be
followed for detailed verification of the proposal to assess need of
credit and the repayment capacity of the borrower. Study of the
individual borrower files would indicate whether proper systems and
procedures have been followed. Based on his assessment, the auditor
has to form an opinion about the adequacy of procedures in the credit
department and accordingly comment on this clause. The auditor can
gather the requisite evidence by examining relevant documents (such
as loan application forms, supporting documentation, sanctions,
security documents, etc.) and by obtaining information and
explanations from the management in appropriate cases.
(k) The sub-clause (d) requires the auditor to comment on whether the
repayment schedule of various loans granted by the nidhi is based on
the repayment capacity of the borrower. It may be noted that the
scope of the auditors enquiry for this clause is limited to examination
of the documentation available with the company in regard to grant of
loans. Based on his examination of the documentation in regard to
grant of loans, the auditor would form an opinion whether the
repayment schedule of various loans granted by the nidhi is based on
the repayment capacity of the borrower. Where the number of loans
granted by the company is very large, it is obviously not feasible for
the auditor to satisfy himself that every single loans repayment
schedule granted by the nidhi is based on the repayment capacity of
CARO, 2003 VII-100
the borrower. It is important to note that the auditors comments on
this clause would have to be based on the auditor's examination of the
documentation of all large loans, say, exceeding a particular limit
determined by the auditor having regard to the concept of materiality
and a test check of the documentation of other loans with a view to
determine that the repayment schedule of various loans granted by
the nidhi is based on the repayment capacity of the borrower.
(l) There could be several cases where the auditor may come to a
conclusion that the repayment schedule of a particular loan is not
based on the repayment capacity of the borrower, the same should be
reported by the auditor under this clause.
70. If the company is dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures
and other investments, whether proper records have been maintained of the
transactions and contracts and whether timely entries have been made
therein; also whether the shares, securities, debentures and other
investments have been held by the company, in its own name except to the
extent of the exemption, if any, granted under section 49 of the Act.
[Paragraph 4(xiv)]
Comments
(a) The requirement applies to companies which deal or trade in shares,
debentures and other securities. To deal or trade implies a purchase
or sale with a view to make profit. Therefore, this requirement does
not apply to companies which are not dealing or trading in
investments but which purchase investments with a view to hold such
investments and earn income from dividend or interest thereon.
(b) This requirement can be considered in three parts, namely:
(i) whether records regarding transactions and contracts are
maintained;
(ii) whether timely entries have been made in such records; and
(iii) whether the investments are in the companys own name.
(c) Some of the factors that may be considered to determine whether the
company is dealing or trading in investments or whether it is merely
holding investments are as follows:
(i) The objects of the company as stated in the Memorandum of
CARO, 2003 VII-101
Association.
(ii) The period of time for which individual investments are held
before they are sold.
(iii) The reasons, to the extent they can be determined, for
purchase or sale of an investment.
(iv) Internal procedure, orders or directives regarding purchase and
sale of investments.
(v) Method of valuation of investments for balance sheet purposes.
For example, if investments are treated as stock-in-trade for
the purposes of valuation, the indication would be that the
company is an investment company.
(vi) The status given to the company in its tax assessments, that is,
whether it is treated as a dealer in investments (profits being
subjected to tax as business profits) or whether it is treated as
an investor (profits being subjected to tax as capital gains).
(d) In deciding whether records have been properly maintained, the
auditor has to examine both, whether the form in which records are
maintained is adequate and also whether the records themselves are
properly written up and preserved. The adequacy of the records has to
be tested in the light of their ability to give details of (i) purchases and
sales and the profit or loss arising on sale, (ii) the stock of
investments and their valuation, and (iii) the amounts due for sales
and payable for purchases. Some of the features to be examined in
this connection would be the following:
(i) Details regarding the purchase and sale, that is, the particulars
about the person from whom or to whom the purchase or sale
was made, the rate at which the purchase or sale was made,
the number of shares or other investments with full details
regarding class, distinctive numbers, number of certificates,
etc., and the document, for example, bought note or sale note
evidencing the sale.
(ii) The adjustment, if any, necessary when securities are
purchased or sold and whether the quotations are exclusive of
interest accrued or, when shares are purchased or sold ex-
dividend whether dividend has to be paid or received.
CARO, 2003 VII-102
(iii) The details of holdings in individual companies, the classes of
investments (e.g., equity shares, preference shares,
debentures, etc.), the basis on which the closing stock is
valued and the profit or loss on sale is to be computed.
(iv) The recording of shares received as bonus shares; the
accounting of rights subscribed for or sold.
(v) The individual accounts of the parties from whom moneys are
due for sale or to whom moneys are payable for purchases and
the settlements made there against.
(e) The auditor is also required to examine whether timely entries are
made in the records. This may be done by one or more of the
following methods:
(i) a surprise inspection of the records;
(ii) an examination of the system of internal control with particular
reference to the manner in which and the time at which entries
are made in the records; and
(iii) an examination of the internal audit reports to ensure if the
programme of internal audit specifically covers an inspection of
the records to determine whether entries are made in time.
(f) Section 49 of the Act requires that all investments have to be made
and held in the companys own name. The exemptions provided by
the section are:
(i) where a person is appointed as a nominee of the company on
the board of directors of another company and such nominee is
required to hold qualification shares, then to the extent of such
qualification shares;
(ii) where a company has a subsidiary and it is necessary to
ensure that the number of members of the subsidiary is not
reduced below seven in the case of a public company and two
in the case of a private company;
(iii) in the case of a company whose principal business consists of
the buying and selling of shares or securities;
(iv) in the case of investments deposited with a bank for collection
CARO, 2003 VII-103
of dividend or interest or for transfer into such banks name to
facilitate transfer; and
(v) in the case of investments pledged as security for loans or for
performance of obligations.
(g) The auditor is required to report whether the investments are held in
the companys own name in respect of companies which deal or trade
in investments. However, section 49(4) specifically exempts
companies whose principal business is the buying and selling of
shares or securities from that requirement. It seems, therefore, that
the requirement to report will arise when the buying and selling of
shares or securities is not the principal business of the company but it
does such business along with some other business.
(h) When a company deals or trades in investments it is possible that
investments which are intended or contracted to be sold immediately
may not have been transferred to the companys own name. The
auditor should, therefore, use his discretion to ascertain whether, in
the circumstances of each case, the failure to transfer the investments
to the companys name is understandable.
71. Whether the company has given any guarantee for loans taken by
others frombank or financial institutions, the terms and conditions whereof are
prejudicial to the interest of the company. [Paragraph 4 (xv)]
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to determine whether the company
has given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or
financial institutions and if yes, whether the terms and conditions of
the guarantee are prejudicial to the interest of the company. The
scope of the auditors inquiry under the clause does not extend to the
guarantees given by the auditee company for loans taken by others
from sources other than bank or financial institutions.
(b) It may be noted that several types of guarantees are in vogue. The
type of guarantee within the scope of the clause is the one which the
company has provided to a bank or financial institution in respect of
loans taken by a third party. In other words, the company has a legal
binding to indemnify the bank or financial institution if the third party,
on behalf of whom the guarantee has been furnished, fails to fulfill the
CARO, 2003 VII-104
conditions subject to which the loan was granted by the bank or
financial institution. Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
defines a contract of guarantee as a contract to perform the promise,
or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his default.
(c) Guarantee given by a company is a contingent liability. In respect of
contingent liabilities, the auditor is normally concerned with seeking
reasonable assurance that all contingent liabilities are identified and
properly valued and disclosed as an off-balance sheet item. The
auditor should obtain a written representation from the management
that:
(i) there are no guarantees issued up to the year-end which are
yet to be recorded; and
(ii) all obligations in respect of guarantees have been duly
recorded in the register of guarantees and disclosed.
(d) The auditor should examine the Memorandum of Association of the
company with a view to determine whether the company can give a
guarantee. It may be noted that if a company provides any guarantee
without having a clause in this regard in the Memorandum of
Association, the act of providing guarantee would be ultra vires. The
auditor, in such a situation, should make necessary disclosure in the
audit report.
(e) The auditor should also examine the register of guarantees, if any,
maintained by the company. The auditor should also obtain a list of
the guarantees issued by the company during the year from the
management of the company which should be checked with the
register of guarantees. The auditor should perform appropriate
procedures and examine records like the minutes book of the board
meetings, and general meetings to determine that all the guarantees
given by the company have been included in the list. The auditor
should also ascertain whether the guarantees have been issued by or
under sanction of the competent authority.
(f) The auditor should review the issuance of guarantee(s) to establish
the reasonableness thereof in the light of previous experience and
knowledge of the current year's activities. In determining whether the
guarantee is prejudicial to the interest of the company, the auditor
would have to give due consideration to a number of factors
CARO, 2003 VII-105
connected with the guarantee, including the financial standing of the
party on whose behalf the company has given the guarantee, partys
ability to borrow, the nature of the security offered by the party, the
availability of alternative sources of finance and the urgency of the
borrowing, if available, for which the company has given guarantee
and so on. The auditor should obtain this information from the
management.
(g) The auditor should also verify whether the company has complied with
the requirements of sections 295 and 372A of the Act. If the company
has obtained the previous approval of the Central Government under
section 295, it should be construed that the guarantee is not
(h) If the auditor is unable to comment on the clause because of the
absence of the necessary board resolution or the register or other
relevant records, the auditor should issue a disclaimer with regard to
the clause and should also state the reasons for such a disclaimer.
72. Whether the termloans were applied for the purpose for which the
loans were obtained. [Paragraph 4 (xvi)]
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to examine whether term loans were
applied for the purpose for which these loans were obtained. First of
all, the auditor should ascertain whether the company has taken any
term loans. Term loans normally have a fixed or pre-determined
maturity period or a repayment schedule. In the banking industry, for
example, loans with repayment period beyond 36 months are usually
known as term loans. Cash credit, overdraft and call money
accounts/deposits are, therefore, not covered by the expression term
loans. Terms loans are generally provided by banks and financial
institutions for acquisition of capital assets which then become the
security for the loan, i.e., end use of funds is normally fixed.
(b) The Order is silent as to whether this clause also covers term loans
obtained from entities/persons other than banks/financial institutions.
A strict interpretation of the clause would mean that the term loan
obtained from entities/persons other than banks/financial institutions
would also have to be examined by the auditor for the purpose of
reporting under the clause.
CARO, 2003 VII-106
(c) The auditor should examine the terms and conditions subject to which
the company has obtained the term loans. The auditor may also
examine the proposal for grant of loan made to the bank. As mentioned
above, normally, the end use of the funds raised by term loans is
mentioned in the sanction letter or documents containing the terms and
conditions of the loan. The auditor should ascertain the purpose for
which term loans were sanctioned. The auditor should also compare the
purpose for which term loans were sanctioned with the actual utilisation
of the loans. The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding the utilisation of the amounts raised. If the auditor
finds that the funds have not been utilized for the purpose for which
they were obtained, the auditors report should state the fact.
(d) It is not necessary to establish a one-to-one relationship with the
amount of term loan and its utilisation. It is quite often found that the
amount of term loan disbursed by the bank is deposited in the
common account of the company from which subsequently the
utilisation is made. In such cases, it should not be construed that the
amount has not been utilised for the purpose it was raised.
(e) It may happen that the company might have acquired improved
version/model of assets as against the assets for which the loan had
been sanctioned. For example, if out of a loan sanctioned for
purchase of machinery to be used for manufacture of shoe upper is
instead used to purchase a machine, which apart from manufacturing
shoe uppers has certain additional manufacturing facilities. In such
cases, it should not be construed that the loan has not been applied
for the purpose for which it was raised.
(f) Normally, the term lenders directly make the payment to the
vendors/suppliers. In such cases, it becomes easier for the auditor to
comment on the application of term loans.
(g) During construction phase, companies, generally, temporarily invest
the surplus funds to reduce the cost of capital or for other business
reasons. However, subsequently the same are utilised for the stated
objectives. In such cases, the auditor should mention the fact that
pending utilisation of the term loan for the stated purpose, the funds
were temporarily used for the purpose other than for which the loan
was sanctioned but were ultimately utilised for the stated end-use.
CARO, 2003 VII-107
(h) It may so happen that the term loans taken during the year might not
have been applied for the stated purpose during the year, for
example, the loan was disbursed at the fag end of the year. In such a
case, the auditor should mention in his audit report that the term loan
obtained during the year has not been utilised. This also implies that
the auditor, while making inquiry in respect of this clause, should also
consider the term loans which although were taken in the previous
accounting period but have been actually utilised during the current
accounting period.
(i) In case of term loans from banks, raised against title deeds, long term
FDRs, NSCs etc., where the bank is not concerned with the purpose
for which it is being obtained, the auditor should clearly mention the
fact that in absence of any stipulation regarding the utilization of loans
from the lender, he is unable to comment as to whether the term loans
have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained. It
may, however, be noted that the auditor, in such cases, should verify
that the company has not invested or utilized the money for purposes
that are prohibited under the law.
(j) Where the auditor concludes that the term loans were not applied for
the purpose for which the loans were obtained, the auditor mentions in
his report that the amount of term loan as well as the fact that the term
loan was not utilised for the purpose for which it was obtained.
73. Whether the funds raised on short-termbasis have been used for
long-terminvestment. If yes, the nature and amount is to be indicated.
[Paragraph 4 (xvii)]
Comments
(a) The principles of financial management suggest that the long-term
assets of an enterprise should be financed from long-term funds. The
genesis of the principle is that if funds raised from short-term sources
are used for long-term investments, the enterprise can face liquidity
problems as soon as the short-term sources fall due for payment.
However, an exception to the principle would be the situation where
an enterprise is able to generate sufficient funds from long-term
sources either through its operations or other means to meet the
working capital requirements arising from the event of short-term
sources falling due for payment. The application of the principle is
CARO, 2003 VII-108
considered to be of utmost importance for the financial health of an
enterprise. The clause requires the auditor to comment whether the
funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment, so that the readers can assess whether the company has
followed the above-mentioned principle of financial management.
Examples of use of funds raised on short-term basis and used for
long-term purposes would include investing money from overdraft
facilities in long-term investments in shares of
subsidiaries/associates/joint ventures or investing money raised from
public deposits due for repayment in three years in a project whose
pay back period is ten years. Further, cash from operating activities
represent a long term source of funds.
(b) The auditor uses the data contained in the balance sheet to ascertain
whether the funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-
term investment. Short-term sources of funds include temporary
credit facilities like cash credits, overdraft. Reduction in current assets
or increase in current liabilities are also sources of short-term increase
in funds. Long-term application of funds includes investment in fixed
assets, long-term investments in share, debentures and other
securities and other assets of similar nature, repayment of long-term
loans and advances or redemption of long-term debt or securities, etc.
Application of funds which is not long-term may be categorised as the
short-term application. Increase in current assets or decrease in
current liabilities also indicate short-term application of funds.
(c) The auditor should determine the long-term sources and the long-term
application of funds by a company using the data contained in the
financial statements. It should also be noted that the clause requires
the auditor to state whether the company has utilized short-term funds
for long-term application. It should be noted that funds, whether
generated from long-term sources or short-term sources, would,
generally, result in an increase in current assetswhether in the form
of increase in cash and bank balances or may be in the form of
increase in receivables, etc. If the quantum of long-term funds of a
company is not significantly different from the long-term application of
funds, it is an indication that the long-term assets of the company are
financed from the long-term sources. However, if the quantum of long-
term funds is significantly less than the long-term application of funds,
CARO, 2003 VII-109
it is an indication that short-term funds have been used to finance the
long-term assets of the company. The difference between the figures
of long-term funds and long-term assets of the company indicate the
extent to which short-term funds have been used to finance long-term
assets of the company.
(d) Working capital is normally understood to be a short-term application
of funds which keeps on changing its form throughout the working
capital cycle. It may, however, be noted that core or permanent
working capital of an enterprise should be financed from long-term
funds (preferably the owners capital). Core or permanent working
capital is that component of the working capital of the enterprise that
always remains invested in business and is never allowed to exit.
Therefore, if the quantum of long-term funds is significantly more than
the long-term application of funds, the auditor should determine
whether long-term funds have been used to finance the core working
capital of the company. For this purpose, the auditor should compute
the figure of working capital and compare it with the difference
between the quantum of long-term funds and long-term applications of
funds. Still, if the long-term funds are more than the working capital of
the company the auditors report should state that the company has
used long-term funds to finance current assets.
(e) Certain companies deploy funds based on their respective maturity
pattern as a risk management technique. In case a company does so,
it would be easier for the auditor to comment upon the clause since a
comparison of sources of funds with their deployment based on their
respective maturity patterns would be a significantly more
sophisticated way of analysing whether short-term funds have been
used to finance long-term assets of the company. To take a highly
simplified example, if an enterprise has a long term debt that is to
mature within the next 12 months and an equivalent amount in a long-
term investment that would mature after 3 years, the maturity pattern
analysis would indicate the potential inability to meet the liability on
the debt on due date, but the traditional analysis would not do so.
(f) The clause also requires the auditor to state the nature of application
of funds if the company has financed long-term assets out of short-
term funds. The nature of application of funds can be determined only
if the funds raised can be directly identified with an asset. The
CARO, 2003 VII-110
determination of direct relationship between particular funds and an
asset from the balance sheet may not be feasible. Further, such
movement in funds should be supported by relevant documentation. A
more practical approach would be to determine the overall picture of
the sources and application of funds of the company unless an evident
trail is available that enables the auditor in establishing a direct
relationship between sources and applications of funds.
(g) Another question that arises in this context is whether this clause is
relevant in the case of branches of Indian companies. There are a
number of clauses in the Order, which can be properly answered only
in the context of the company as a whole, for example, the clause
relating to preferential allotment of shares. Similarly, the clause
relating to use of funds should also be evaluated in the context of the
enterprise as a whole and the branch auditor may merely state that
the clause is not relevant at the branch level. However, in the case of
a branch of a foreign company, this clause would be applicable.
(h) An example of reporting under the clause is as follows:
According to the information and explanations given to us and
on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company,
we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been
used for long-term investment by the company.
(i) An example of negative reporting under the clause is as follows:
According to the information and explanations given to us and
on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company,
we report that the company has used funds raised on short-
term basis for long-term investment. The company has
accepted public deposits amounting to rupees 5 crores which
would fall due for repayment two years from the date of their
acceptance. The company has invested the money for the
increase of the production capacity which would be completed
in the next four years.
74. Whether the company has made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section
301 of the Act, and if so whether the price at which shares have been issued
is prejudicial to the interest of the company. [Paragraph 4 (xviii)]

CARO, 2003 VII-111
Comments
(a) The clause requires the auditor to report whether the company has
made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies
Further, if the company has made any preferential allotment of shares
to such parties, the auditor has to give his opinion whether the price at
which shares have been issued is prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
(b) It may be noted that the term preferential allotment is not defined
under the Act. It may also be noted that the clause requires the
auditor to report on the preferential allotment only in the case of
shares issued by the company and not on preferential allotment of
other securities issued by the company. The term shares includes
both equity as well as preference shares. For the purpose of this
clause, preferential allotment of shares would mean an allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act in preference to others. The preference
can be with regard to the price or other terms and conditions
associated with the allotment.
(c) In the case of a listed company, preferential allotment of securities is
governed by the SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines,
2000. A listed company can make preferential issues of equity
shares, fully convertible debentures, partly convertible debentures or
any other instrument which may be converted into or exchanged with
equity shares at a later date. A listed company can issue shares on a
preferential basis at a price not less than the higher of the following:
(i) the average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of
the related shares quoted on the stock exchange during the six
months preceding the relevant date;
or
(ii) the average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of
the related shares quoted on a stock exchange during the two
weeks preceding the relevant date.
(d) In the case of a listed company, if the pricing of the shares issued in a
preferential allotment is in accordance with the requirement of the
CARO, 2003 VII-112
Guidelines laid down in this regard by the Securities and Exchange
Board of India, the auditor may conclude that the price at which
shares have been issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the
company. In such a case, the auditor should gather sufficient
appropriate audit evidence that the company has complied with the
Guidelines issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in
this regard.
(e) It is also important to consider the question whether the clause
applies to issue of shares under the Employees Stock Option Scheme
by private companies constitute preferential allotment for the purposes
of this clause. As has been mentioned in the foregoing paragraphs, in
the case of a listed company, if the pricing of the shares issued in a
preferential allotment is in accordance with the requirement of the
Guidelines laid down in this regard by the Securities and Exchange
Board of India, the auditor may conclude that the price at which
shares have been issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the
company. Thus, as far as a listed company is concerned, only
preferential allotment of shares covered under the SEBI (Disclosure
and Investor Protection) Guidelines 2000, is to be examined. In the
case of a private company and an unlisted public company, the
auditor would have to examine whether the price at which the
company has made the preferential allotment of shares is prejudicial
to the interest of the company. In so far as the price at which
preferential allotment is made is concerned, it may be noted that
valuation of shares of a company involves use of judgment,
knowledge of the business, analysis and interpretation and the use of
different methods, which may result in assigning different values
based on different methods. There are certain basic factors, which
affect the value of a companys shares for which the price calculated
is adjusted. The factors are earnings, dividends declared, asset value
and goodwill of the company
15
. Methods generally used for
determining the fair value of the business by the company, which take
into consideration one or more factors mentioned above are:

15
This is not an exhaustive listing of the factors influencing the price of the shares. There could be
numerous other factors like the nature of the companys business, the caliber of managerial
personnel, prospects of expansion, financial structure, cash flows, patents, franchises, incidence of
taxation, competition, size of the holding, government policy, prevailing political climate, risk of
obsolescence of items manufactured, etc., may also affect the price of the shares of a company.
CARO, 2003 VII-113
(i) Net Assets Basis considers the valuation of assets,
subtracting therefrom liabilities, etc., to arrive at the value of
the equity shares.
(ii) Maintainable Profits Basis this is based on the future
maintainable profits/earnings of the company.
(iii) Yield Basis this method recognises the yield/dividends as a
base for arriving at the fair value of the shares.
(iv) Discounted Cash Flow Method this method estimates the
value of shares by estimating the future cash flows from
operations and discounting the cash flows at a specified rate.
(f) It is not rare to find a combination of different methods used in the
context of valuation of shares; for example, an averaging of
maintainable profits basis and the net assets basis.
(g) The auditor should examine the method used for valuation of shares
of the company and should also ascertain the reasonableness of the
assumptions underlying the calculation. If necessary, the auditor may
use the services of an expert. Whether the price of the shares for
preferential allotment is prejudicial to the interests of the company is a
question that would require the use of professional judgement by the
auditor. The auditor should give due consideration to the factors which
affect the value of a companys shares for which the price calculated
is adjusted. Some of the main factors are mentioned at paragraph (e)
above. On an examination of the methods and various factors, the
auditor may come to a conclusion that better price for the shares
issued could have been obtained if the difference between the price
that could have been obtained and that has actually been received by
the company is so significant that no reasonable person would have
allotted shares at the price at which the preferential allotment has
actually been made. The auditor should also obtain a representation
from the management as to why the company considers that the price
of the shares issued under preferential allotment is not prejudicial to
the interest of the company. If the auditor does not find the
explanation convincing, it will be necessary for him to state that the
price at which preferential allotment of shares has been made by the
company is prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(h) Companies sometimes do make allotment of shares based on the
CARO, 2003 VII-114
valuation reports issued by experts in this field. While the auditor
uses the report of an expert to determine whether the price for the
preferential allotment of share is not prejudicial to the interest of the
company, the auditor should also comply with the requirements of
Standard on Auditing (SA) 620, Using the Work of an Expert.
(i) In case, the company has made preferential issue of shares by
passing an ordinary resolution under clause (b) of sub-section (1A) of
section 81 of the Act, apart from examining the method used for
valuation of shares of the company and ascertaining the
reasonableness of the assumptions underlying the calculation, the
auditor should also examine the Order of the Government as to its
satisfaction that the proposal is most beneficial to the company.
Where the Government is satisfied in this regard, the auditor need not
make his assessment as to the reasonableness of the prices of the
shares for the preferential allotment of shares. The auditor, however,
is not precluded from doing so. If the auditor forms his opinion on the
basis of the Order issued by the Government, he should state the fact
of his reliance on the Government Order for the purpose of reporting.
75. Whether security or charge has been created in respect of debentures
issued? [Paragraph 4(xix)
Comments
(a) The auditor, under this clause, is required to examine whether the
company has created any security or charge for the debentures
issued by it. The auditor is required to comment upon the creation of
security or charge in respect of debentures issued by the company by
creating proper charges on the assets of the company.
(b) Where the company has issued any debentures, the auditor should
also examine the debenture trust deed executed under section 117A
of the Act. The auditor should pay particular attention to verify whether
proper security has been created in favour of the debenture trust. The
security creation can be verified by examining the relevant documents
creating the charge in favour of the trustees for the debentureholders
duly registered in the concerned Registrars office if the security is an
immovable property. Readers attention is also invited to the Guidance
Note on Certification of Documents for Registration of Charges issued
CARO, 2003 VII-115
(c) If the debentures have been issued towards the end of the year and
the securities are created subsequently then, to present a complete
and balanced picture while reporting the fact that the security in
respect of debentures is yet to be created, the auditor would be well
advised to also mention the reason for the same, viz., that the
debentures have been issued only recently (specify the month of
issue) and that the company is taking steps to create the security.
However, he should report as above only where, as a result of his
enquiries, he is satisfied that the non-creation of security is not due to
deliberate or inadvertent delay on the part of the company and that it
is in fact in the process of creation of security.
(d) If the company has not created any security, the auditor should report
the fact in his report.
76. Whether the management has disclosed on the end use of money
raised by public issues and the same has been verified. [Paragraph 4(xx)]
Comments
(a) In case the company has made a public issue of any of its securities
like shares, preference shares, debentures and other securities, the
auditor is required to report upon the disclosure of end-use of the
money by the management in the financial statements. The auditor is
also required to state whether he has verified the disclosure made by
the management in this regard.
(b) Currently, there is no legal requirement under the Act to disclose the
end use of money raised by public issues in the financial statements.
The companies, however, make such a disclosure in the Boards
Report. Schedule VI to the Act requires that only unutilized amount of
any public issue made by the company should be disclosed in the
financial statements of a company. In the absence of any legal
requirement of such disclosure, it appears that the clause envisages
that the companies should disclose the end use of money raised by
the public issue in the financial statements by way of notes and the
auditor should verify the same.
(c) It may also be noted that according to the SEBI (Disclosure & Investor
Protection) Guidelines, 2000, in case the issue exceeds Rs. 500
crores, the issuer company is required to make arrangements for the
use of proceeds of the issue to be monitored by financial institutions.
CARO, 2003 VII-116
The monitoring agency so appointed is required to submit its report to
the SEBI, on a half-yearly basis, till the completion of the project. In
case, the company has appointed a monitoring agency for the
purpose of the issue, reports of the monitoring agency would also be
helpful to the auditor while reporting under the clause.
(d) During construction phase, companies, generally, temporarily invest
the surplus funds to reduce the cost of capital or for other business
reasons. However, subsequently the same are utilised for the stated
objectives. In such cases, the auditor should mention the fact that
pending utilisation of the funds raised through public issues for the
stated purpose, the funds were temporarily used for the purpose other
than for which they were raised but were ultimately utilised for the
stated end-use.
(e) Normally, the companies do mention the end-use of the money
proposed to be raised through the public issues in the prospectus. An
examination of the prospectus would provide the auditor an
understanding of the proposed end-use of money raised from public.
The auditor should verify that the amount of end-use of money
disclosed in the financial statements by the management is not
significantly different from the proposed and actual end use. The auditor
should obtain a representation from the management as to the
completeness of the disclosure with regard to the end-use of money
raised by public issues. If the auditor is of the opinion that adequate
disclosure with regard to end use of money raised by public issue has
not been made in the financial statements, the auditor should state the
fact in his audit report. If, for any reason, the auditor is not able to verify
the end-use of money raised from public issues, he should state that he
is not able to comment upon the disclosure of end-use of money by the
company since he could not verify the same. He should also mention
the reasons which resulted in the auditors inability to verify the
disclosure.
(f) It may be noted that while reporting under this clause, the auditor
should also have regard to the SEBI (Disclosure and investor
Protection) Guidelines, which contain a number of disclosure
requirements in the balance sheet with respect to utilization of
proceeds of monies raised from public, whether by shares or
debentures, as also disclosure requirements in respect of unutilized
CARO, 2003 VII-117
monies from such proceeds. From a perusal of the above mentioned
Guidelines of SEBI, it would be apparent that the details have to be
given of both utilised and unutilised monies. Since the purpose is to
provide a picture to the reader of utilisation of issue proceeds, it is
only logical that the sum total of utilised and unutilised portions equal
the total issue size. This implies that the figure of utilised money
should be cumulative. A company can, however, present greater
details by showing the break-up of year-end cumulative figures into
opening figures and monies utilised during the year.
(g) Another point to consider with respect to this clause is whether it
applies to monies raised from capital markets through ADR route. It
may be noted that neither the Order nor the Act contains the definition
of public issue.
SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines define a public
issue as an invitation to public to subscribe to the securities offered
through a prospectus.
It seems that strictly in terms of the above guidelines, monies raised
from foreign capital markets may not fall within the scope of the term
public issue as defined above. The Guidelines seem to be in the
context of issues to Indian public. For example, one of the mandatory
requirements is to have collection centres in the four metropolitan
cities. It can be argued that for a company raising funds on a foreign
capital market, this requirement would be redundant or out of context.
On the other hand, it can also be argued that since depository receipts
issued pursuant to capital issue in a foreign market are convertible
into normal listed securities of the company, effectively their issuance
is equivalent of issuance of securities to public in India. Further in
case a project is financed partly from Indian public issue and partly
from ADR, it would be difficult to argue that the utilisation of only
Indian issue proceeds should be given. The auditor should adopt this
view as, in any case, that would result in meeting the intent behind the
clause.
77. Whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported
during the year. If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be
indicated. [Paragraph 4(xxi)]
CARO, 2003 VII-118
Comments
(a) This clause requires the auditor to report whether any fraud has been
noticed or reported either on the company or by the company during
the year. If yes, the auditor is required to state the amount involved
and the nature of fraud. The clause does not require the auditor to
discover the frauds on the company and by the company. The scope
of auditors inquiry under this clause is restricted to frauds noticed or
reported during the year. The use of the words noticed or reported
indicates that the management of the company should have the
knowledge about the frauds on the company or by the company that
have occurred during the period covered by the auditors report. It
may be noted that this clause of the Order, by requiring the auditor to
report whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or
reported, does not relieve the auditor from his responsibility to
consider fraud and error in an audit of financial statements. In other
words, irrespective of the auditors comments under this clause, the
auditor is also required to comply with the requirements of Standard
on Auditing (SA) 240, The Auditors Responsibility to Consider Fraud
and Error in an Audit of Financial Statements.
(b) The term "fraud" refers to an intentional act by one or more individuals
among management, those charged with governance, employees, or
third parties, involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or
illegal advantage. Although fraud is a broad legal concept, the auditor
is concerned with fraudulent acts that cause a material misstatement
in the financial statements. Misstatement of the financial statements
may not be the objective of some frauds. Auditors do not make legal
determinations of whether fraud has actually occurred. Fraud
involving one or more members of management or those charged with
governance is referred to as "management fraud"; fraud involving only
employees of the entity is referred to as "employee fraud". In either
case, there may be collusion with third parties outside the entity. In
fact, generally speaking, the management fraud can be construed as
fraud by the company while fraud committed by the employees or
third parties may be termed as fraud on the company.
(c) Two types of intentional misstatements are relevant to the auditor's
consideration of fraudmisstatements resulting from fraudulent
financial reporting and misstatements resulting from misappropriation
CARO, 2003 VII-119
of assets.
(d) Fraudulent financial reporting involves intentional misstatements or
omissions of amounts or disclosures in financial statements to deceive
financial statement users. Fraudulent financial reporting may involve:
Deception such as manipulation, falsification, or alteration of
accounting records or supporting documents from which the
financial statements are prepared.
Misrepresentation in, or intentional omission from, the financial
statements of events, transactions or other significant
information.
Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to
measurement, recognition, classification, presentation, or
disclosure.
(e) Misappropriation of assets involves the theft of an entity's assets.
Misappropriation of assets can be accomplished in a variety of ways
(including embezzling receipts, stealing physical or intangible assets,
or causing an entity to pay for goods and services not received); it is
often accompanied by false or misleading records or documents in
order to conceal the fact that the assets are missing.
(f) Fraudulent financial reporting may be committed by the company
because management is under pressure, from sources outside or
inside the entity, to achieve an expected (and perhaps unrealistic)
earnings target particularly when the consequences to management of
failing to meet financial goals can be significant. The auditor must
appreciate that a perceived opportunity for fraudulent financial
reporting or misappropriation of assets may exist when an individual
believes internal control could be circumvented, for example, because
the individual is in a position of trust or has knowledge of specific
weaknesses in the internal control system.
(g) While planning the audit, the auditor should discuss with other
members of the audit team, the susceptibility of the company to
material misstatements in the financial statements resulting from
fraud. While planning, the auditor should also make inquiries of
management to determine whether management is aware of any
known fraud or suspected fraud that the company is investigating.
CARO, 2003 VII-120
(h) The auditor should examine the reports of the internal auditor with a
view to ascertain whether any fraud has been reported or noticed by
the management. The auditor should examine the minutes of the audit
committee, if available, to ascertain whether any instance of fraud
pertaining to the company has been reported and actions taken
thereon. The auditor should enquire of the management about any
frauds on or by the company that it has noticed or that have been
reported to it. The auditor should also discuss the matter with other
employees of the company. The auditor should also examine the
minute book of the board meeting of the company in this regard.
(i) The auditor should obtain written representations from management
that:
(i) it acknowledges its responsibility for the implementation and
operation of accounting and internal control systems that are
designed to prevent and detect fraud and error;
(ii) it believes the effects of those uncorrected misstatements in
financial statements, aggregated by the auditor during the audit
are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the
financial statements taken as a whole. A summary of such
items should be included in or attached to the written
representation;
(iii) it has disclosed to the auditor all significant facts relating to any
frauds or suspected frauds known to management that may
have affected the entity; and
(iv) it has disclosed to the auditor the results of its assessment of
the risk that the financial statements may be materially
misstated as a result of fraud.
(j) Because management is responsible for adjusting the financial
statements to correct material misstatements, it is important that the
auditor obtains written representation from management that any
uncorrected misstatements resulting from fraud are, in management's
opinion, immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate. Such
representations are not a substitute for obtaining sufficient appropriate
audit evidence. In some circumstances, management may not believe
that certain of the uncorrected financial statement misstatements
aggregated by the auditor during the audit are misstatements. For
CARO, 2003 VII-121
that reason, management may want to add to their written
representation words such as, "We do not agree that items and
. constitute misstatements because [description of reasons]."
(k) Where the auditor discovers that any fraud on or by the company has
been noticed by or reported to the management, the auditor should,
apart from reporting the existence of fraud, also report the nature of
fraud and amount involved. The following is an example of reporting
under the clause:
We have been informed that the accountant of the company
had misappropriated funds amounting to rupees ten lakhs
during the preceding year and the year under audit.
Investigations are in progress and the accountant has been
dismissed and arrested. The company has withheld his
terminal benefits and it is estimated that the amount
misappropriated may not exceed the terminal benefits due to
the accountant. The company is also adequately covered by
fidelity insurance cover.
Formof Report
78. The Order requires that the auditor should make a statement on all
the matters contained therein. This requirement applies even where the
answers to any of the questions are unfavourable or qualified. The Order
further provides that where an auditor is unable to express any opinion, he
should indicate such fact. The auditor is also required to give reasons for any
unfavourable or qualified answer or for his inability to express an opinion on
any of the matters specified in the Order.
79. It is necessary to consider whether any comment in the audit report is
necessary when the company whose accounts are being reported upon is not
a company to which the Order applies. While a comment is not strictly
necessary, the auditor might consider whether the interpretation, which he
gives to the Order in this respect, can be subject to doubt or whether it is
beyond doubt that the Order is not applicable. As a measure of prudence, it
is suggested that the audit report includes a remark on the following lines:
This report does not include a statement on the matters specified in
paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, issued
by the Department of Company Affairs, in terms of section 227(4A) of
CARO, 2003 VII-122
the Companies Act, 1956, since in our opinion and according to the
information and explanations given to us, the said Order is not
applicable to the company.
However, In the case of companies which have been exempted from
the applicability of the Order unconditionally i.e., banking companies,
insurance companies; and companies licensed to operate under
section 25 of the Act, the auditor need not mention anything about the
exemption from the applicability of the Order in his report. However, in
the case of a private limited company it would be appropriate for the
auditor to mention in this report that the company is exempted from
the applicability of the Order.
80. There may be situations where one or more of the clauses are not
applicable. For example, the requirement regarding internal audit system
does not apply in case of all the companies. In such situations, it would be
appropriate for the auditor to make a suitable comment in his report bringing
out the fact of non-applicability of a particular clause. To illustrate, where the
maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed by the Central
Government under section 209(1)(d) of the Act, the auditor may state:
The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost
records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for any of
the products of the company.
81. A question may also arise whether it is necessary for the auditor to
include in his report the managements explanation for any matter on which
he makes an adverse comment. Normally, such an explanation need not be
included but there may be circumstances where the auditor feels such
inclusion is necessary. Examples of such circumstances would be:
(a) to make the comment itself more meaningful and complete. For
example, physical verification of inventories, though planned, may not
have been carried out because of a strike or a lockout. An adverse
comment without this explanation would be misleading;
(b) to explain the fact why in spite of an adverse comment, the true and
fair view of the financial statements is not vitiated. For example,
physical verification of a part of the inventories at the year-end may
not have been carried out, but there is sufficient other evidence
produced by the management which satisfies the auditor regarding the
existence, condition and value of the inventories.
CARO, 2003 VII-123
82. In making his report, the auditor has to understand fully the inter-
relationship between the different requirements of various sub-sections of
section 227 of the Act. In terms of sub-section (1A), the auditor has to make
specific inquiries regarding the matters specified therein but he has no
obligation to report upon such matters unless his inquiries reveal an
unsatisfactory state of affairs on which he feels a report is necessary. Under
the Order, he has to report on all the matters specified in the Order. In
making this report, he should, therefore, take into account the results of
inquiries made by him in terms of sub-section (1A). The requirements of sub-
section (1A) do not, however, in any way diminish the auditors
responsibilities under sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of the section. Therefore,
in framing his report under sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of the section, the
auditor has to take into account the inquiries made by him under sub-section
(1A) and the report made by him under the Order.
83. It is suggested that the sequence of the items as appearing in the
report should be: first, the comments, if any, under sub-section (1A); second,
the comments under the Order; and finally, the report under sub-sections (2),
(3) and (4) of section 227. The comments under the Order may, alternatively,
be given in the form of an Annexure to the report. However, when the
comments are given in an Annexure, it is necessary to refer to the Annexure
in the main report and it is advisable to sign the Annexure in addition to
signing the main report.
84. If any of the comments on matters specified in the Order are adverse,
the auditor should consider whether his comments have a bearing on the true
and fair view presented by the financial statements and, therefore, might
warrant a modification in the report under sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of
section 227. For example, in case where a company has disposed off a
substantial part of fixed assets and consequently the going concern
assumption is not resolved, the auditor apart from giving an appropriate
comment under the Order, should also make a suitable qualification in the
audit report on the financial statements. Another example of such a situation
would be a case where a nidhi or a mutual benefit society has not complied
with the prudential norms for revenue recognition and classification of assets.
Another example in this regard would be of a situation where the company
has used funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
purposes. It may be noted that fixed term borrowings approaching maturity
without realistic prospects of renewal or repayment is an indication of risk
CARO, 2003 VII-124
that the going concern assumption may no longer be appropriate. In such a
situation, the auditor would have to comply with the requirements of SA 570,
Going Concern.
85. If the auditor is of the opinion that any of the adverse comments on
matters specified in the Order results in a qualification under sub-sections
(2), (3) and (4) of section 227 the auditor may prefer to preface his report
under those sub-sections by stating the qualification(s). Such a
qualification(s) should be made against the specific item which is being
qualified.
86. Even where there are no adverse comments under the Order, it may
be advisable for the auditor to preface his report under sub-sections (2), (3)
and (4) of section 227 with the words:
Further to our comments in the Annexure, we state
that...........................
87. It should not, however, be assumed that every adverse comment
under the Order would necessarily result in a qualification in the report under
sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of section 227. Firstly, the adverse comment
may be regarding a matter which has no relevance to a true and fair view
presented by the financial statements, for example, the failure of the
company to deposit provident fund dues in time or to comply with the
requirements regarding acceptance of deposits. Secondly, while the non-
compliance may be material enough to warrant an adverse comment under
the Order, it may not be material enough to affect the true and fair view
presented by the financial statements. Finally, the non-compliance may be in
an area which calls for remedial action on the part of the management, for
example, a lack of internal control in a specific area regarding sale of goods,
and may be important for that reason but may not be sufficiently important in
the context of the report under sub-sections (2), (3) and (4). In deciding,
therefore, whether a qualification in the report under sub-sections (2), (3) and
(4) is necessary, the auditor should use his professional judgement in the
facts and circumstances of each case.
88. Where there is a qualification both under sub-section (1A) and under
the Order, it is suggested that the qualification under sub-section (1A)
precede the qualification under the Order.
89. It is important to note that replies to many of the requirements of the
Order will involve expression of opinion and not necessarily statement of
CARO, 2003 VII-125
facts. It is necessary, therefore, that this is indicated when making the report
under the Order. This can be done in either of the following ways:
(a) By a general preface to the comments under the Order on the
following lines:
In terms of the information and explanations given to us and the
books and records examined by us in the normal course of audit and
to the best of our knowledge and belief, we state
that..............................
or
(b) by a preface to individual comments, for example,
In our opinion or In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us during the course of the audit...
90. The Order requires that where the answer to a question is
unfavourable or qualified, the auditors report should also state the reasons
for such unfavourable or qualified answer. The requirement is similar to the
requirement of sub-section (4) of section 227 and the same considerations
would apply. Thus, while it is not necessary for the auditor to give very
detailed reasons for an unfavourable or qualified answer, he is expected to
explain the nature of the qualification or adverse comment in clear and
unambiguous terms. For example, if the auditor reports that the companys
internal audit system is not commensurate with its size and nature of its
business, he need not report every single shortcoming of the system but may
indicate the general reasons why he considers the system as not
commensurate, for example, that the internal audit department is not
adequately staffed or that its coverage is not adequate, etc.
91. Similar considerations would apply when the auditor is unable to
express an opinion. For example, if the internal audit department is unable to
produce any audit programme, working papers, report, or other evidence of
work done, the auditor may not be in a position to report whether the system
is commensurate with the size and nature of the business of the company. In
such circumstances, he should clearly state that he is unable to express an
opinion because such records or evidence have not been produced before
him.
92. In expressing an opinion, auditor should be quite clear as to whether
the circumstances of the case warrant a negative answer or whether his
CARO, 2003 VII-126
opinion can be expressed subject to a qualification. To illustrate, if the
system of internal audit has basic defects which render it totally ineffective,
for example, due to grossly inadequate number of qualified staff, then the
answer may be unfavourable. However, if there are minor defects in the
system, for example, if the coverage is inadequate in certain areas, the
auditor may state in his report that the coverage is inadequate in a particular
area (to be specified) but otherwise the system is commensurate with the
size of the company and the nature of its business.
93. Section 227(3)(e) of the Act requires that the auditors report should
also state in thick type or in italics the observations or comments of the
auditor which have any adverse effect on the functioning of the company.
The auditor should also consider whether any observations or comments
made by the auditor in his report under the Order contain such matters,
which, in his opinion, might have any adverse effect on the functioning of
the company. If so, the auditor should give his comment in thick type or
italics as required by the said section. An example in this regard may be
where accumulated losses of the company at the end of the financial year
are more than fifty per cent of its net worth and it has incurred cash losses
in period covered by the audit report and in the immediately preceding
financial year also.
94. The auditors report under sub-section (3) of section 227 is required
to state whether the auditor has obtained all the information and
explanations which, to the best of his knowledge and belief, were
necessary for the purposes of his audit. The term audit would include the
reporting requirements under the Order. Therefore, when making his
report, the auditor has to consider whether he has obtained the information
and explanations needed not merely for the purposes of normal audit, but
also for the purpose of reporting in terms of the Order. If he has not
received the information and explanations necessary for reporting in terms
of the Order, he should mention that fact both when reporting on the
specific question in the Order and also when reporting generally in terms of
sub-section (3) of section 227.
95. A specimen form of report is given in Appendix XIII. It will be
noticed that the comments under the Order are given in the form of an
Annexure, as stated in paragraph 83 above. Where an Annexure form is
not used, the comments will appear in the body of the report itself.
CARO, 2003 VII-127
Boards Report
96. Section 217 of the Act requires that the board of directors shall be
bound to give in its report the fullest information and explanations
regarding every reservation, qualification or adverse remark contained in
the auditors report. The auditors comments in terms of the Order form part
of his report and, therefore, the board will be bound to give in its report the
fullest information and explanations regarding every adverse comment
therein.
97. The auditors comments in terms of the Order may be in respect of
matters of fact or they may be an expression of opinion. It is necessary that
there should be no inconsistency in the facts as stated by the auditor and
as explained in the boards report. It is, therefore, suggested that wherever
possible, a draft report should be submitted to the board to verify and
confirm the facts stated therein.
98. It is, however, possible that, on the same facts, there may be a
genuine difference of opinion between the auditor and the board. In such a
case, each is entitled to hold his or its view. Therefore, the expression of a
different opinion in the boards report should not be regarded as any
reflection on the opinion expressed by the auditor.
CARO, 2003 VII-128
Appendix I
Text of the
Published in the Gazette Of India
Extraordinary Part II, Section 3 - Sub-Section (i)
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Company Affairs)
NewDelhi, the 12
th
June, 2003
G.S.R.480(E)In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), read with the
Notification of the Government of India in the Department of Company
Affairs, number G.S.R.443(E), dated 18th October, 1972, as amended from
time to time and in supersession of order number G.S.R.909(E), dated 7th
September, 1988, published in the Gazette of India, part II, section 3, sub
section (i), except as respects things done or omitted to be done before the
supersession, and after consultation with the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India [constituted under the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949 (38 of 1949)], in regard to class of companies to which this order
applies and other ancillary matters, the Central Government hereby makes
the following Order, namely:
1. Short Title, Application and Commencement
(1) This order may be called the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003.
(2) It shall apply to every company including a foreign company as
defined in section 591 of the Act, except the following:
(i) a Banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);
(ii) an insurance company as defined in clause (21) of section 2 of
the Act;
(iii) a company licensed to operate under section 25 of the Act; and
(iv) a private limited company with a paid up capital and reserves
not more than fifty lakh rupees and has not accepted any public
deposit and does not have loan outstanding ten lakh rupees or
more from any bank or financial institution and does not have a
turnover exceeding five crore rupees.
CARO, 2003 VII-129
(3) It shall come into force on the 1st day of July, 2003.
2. Definitions
In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a) Act means the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(b) chit fund company, nidhi company or mutual benefit
company means a company engaged in the business of managing,
conducting or supervising as a foreman or agent of any transaction
or arrangement by which it enters into an agreement with a number
of subscribers that every one of them shall subscribe to a certain
sum of instalments for a definite period and that each subscriber, in
his turn, as determined by lot or by auction or by tender or in such
other manner as may be provided for in the agreement, shall be
entitled to a prize amount, and includes companies whose principal
business is accepting fixed deposits from, and lending money to,
members;
(c) finance company means a company engaged in the business of
financing, whether by making loans or advances or otherwise, of any
industry, commerce or agriculture and includes any company
engaged in the business of hire-purchase, lease financing and
financing of housing;
(d) investment company means a company engaged in the business
of acquisition and holding of, or dealing in, shares, stocks, bonds,
debentures, debenture stocks, including securities issued by the
Central or any State Government or by any local authority, or in
other marketable securities of a like nature;
(e) manufacturing company means a company engaged in any
manufacturing process as defined in the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of
1948);
(f) mining company means a company owning a mine, and includes
a company which carries on the business of a mine either as a
lessee or as occupier thereof;
(g) processing company means a company engaged in the business
of processing materials with a view to their use, a sale, delivery or
disposal;
(h) service company means a company engaged in the business of
supplying, providing, maintaining and operating any services,
facilities, conveniences, bureaux and the like for the benefit of
others;
CARO, 2003 VII-130
(i) trading company means a company engaged in the business of
buying and selling goods.
3. Auditors Report to Contain Matters Specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5
Every report made by the auditor under section 227 of Act, on the accounts
of every company examined by him to which this Order applies for every
financial year ending on any day on or after the commencement of this
Order, shall contain the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5.
4. Matters to be Included in the Auditors Report
The auditors report on the account of a company to which this Order
applies shall include a statement on the following matters, namely:
(i) (a) whether the company is maintaining proper records showing
full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of
fixed assets;
(b) whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by
the management at reasonable intervals; whether any
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification and
if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the
books of account;
(c) if a substantial part of fixed assets have been disposed off
during the year, whether it has affected the going concern;
(ii) (a) whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted
at reasonable intervals by the management;
(b) are the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the company and the nature of its
business. If not, the inadequacies in such procedures should
be reported;
(c) whether the company is maintaining proper records of
inventory and whether any material discrepancies were
noticed on physical verification and if so, whether the same
have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
(iii) (a) has the company either granted or taken any loans, secured
or unsecured to/from companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Act. If so, give the number of parties and amount involved in
the transactions.
(b) whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
loans given or taken by the company, secured or unsecured,
are prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company;
CARO, 2003 VII-131
(c) whether payment of the principal amount and interest are also
regular;
(d) if overdue amount is more than one lakh, whether reasonable
steps have been taken by the company for recovery/payment
of the principal and interest;
(iv) is there an adequate internal control procedure commensurate with
the size of the company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods.
Whether there is a continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in
internal control;
(v) (a) whether transactions that need to be entered into a register in
pursuance of section 301 of the Act have been so entered;
(b) whether each of these transactions have been made at prices
which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market
prices at the relevant time;
(This information is required only in case of transactions exceeding
the value of five lakh rupees in respect of any party and in any one
financial year).
(vi) in case the company has accepted deposits from the public, whether
the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the
provisions of sections 58A and 58AA of the Act and the rules framed
there under, where applicable, have been complied with. If not, the
nature of contraventions should be stated; If an order has been
passed by Company Law Board whether the same has been
complied with or not?
(vii) in the case of listed companies and/or other companies having a
paid-up capital and reserves exceeding Rs.50 lakhs as at the
commencement of the financial year concerned, or having an
average annual turnover exceeding five crore rupees for a period of
three consecutive financial years immediately preceding the financial
year concerned, whether the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business;
(viii) where maintenance of cost records has been prescribed by the
Central Government under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section
209 of the Act, whether such accounts and records have been made
and maintained;
(ix) (a) is the company regular in depositing undisputed statutory
dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax,
Sales-tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, cess and
CARO, 2003 VII-132
any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and
if not, the extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues
as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period
of more than six months from the date they became payable,
shall be indicated by the auditor.
(b) in case dues of sales tax/income tax/custom tax/wealth
tax/excise duty/cess have not been deposited on account of
any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum where
dispute is pending may please be mentioned.
(A mere representation to the Department shall not constitute the
dispute).
(x) whether in case of a company which has been registered for a
period not less than five years, its accumulated losses at the end of
the financial year are not less than fifty per cent of its net worth and
whether it has incurred cash losses in such financial year and in the
financial year immediately preceding such financial year also;
(xi) whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution or bank or debenture holders? If yes, the period
and amount of default to be reported;
(xii) whether adequate documents and records are maintained in cases
where the company has granted loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities; If not, the deficiencies to be pointed out.
(xiii) whether the provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund
have been duly complied with? In respect of nidhi/ mutual benefit
fund/societies;
(a) whether the net-owned funds to deposit liability ratio is more
than 1:20 as on the date of balance sheet;
(b) whether the company has complied with the prudential norms
on income recognition and provisioning against sub-standard/
default/ loss assets;
(c) whether the company has adequate procedures for appraisal
of credit proposals/requests, assessment of credit needs and
repayment capacity of the borrowers;
(d) whether the repayment schedule of various loans granted by
the nidhi is based on the repayment capacity of the borrower
and would be conducive to recovery of the loan amount;
(xiv) if the company is dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures
and other investments, whether proper records have been
maintained of the transactions and contracts and whether timely
CARO, 2003 VII-133
entries have been made therein; also whether the shares, securities,
debentures and other securities have been held by the company, in
its own name except to the extent of the exemption, if any, granted
under section 49 of the Act;
(xv) whether the company has given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from bank or financial institutions, the terms and conditions
whereof are prejudicial to the interest of the company;
(xvi) whether term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained;
(xvii) whether the funds raised on short-term basis have been used for
long term investment and vice versa; If yes, the nature and amount
is to be indicated;
(xviii) whether the company has made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under
section 301 of the Act and if so whether the price at which shares
have been issued is prejudicial to the interest of the company;
(xix) whether securities have been created in respect of debentures
issued?
(xx) whether the management has disclosed on the end use of money
raised by public issues and the same has been verified;
(xxi) whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or
reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved
is to be indicated.
5. Reasons to be Stated for Unfavourable or Qualified Answers
Where, in the auditors report, the answer to any of the questions referred
to in paragraph 4 is unfavourable or qualified, the auditors report shall also
state the reasons for such unfavourable or qualified answer, as the case
may be. Where the auditor is unable to express any opinion in answer to a
particular question, his report shall indicate such fact together with the
reasons why it is not possible for him to give an answer to such question.

(File No.2/ 28 /2002-CL.V)

RAJIV MEHRISHI
Joint Secretary
CARO, 2003 VII-134
Appendix II
Published in the Gazette of India
Extraordinary Part II, Section 3 Sub-section (I)
Government of India
Ministry of Company Affairs
Notification
NewDelhi, the 25th November, 2004
G.S.R. 766(E): In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and after consultation
with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India [constituted under the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949)], the Central Government
hereby makes the following amendments in Companies (Auditors Report)
Order, 2003, namely:-
1. (1) This Order may be called the Companies (Auditors Report)
(Amendment) Order, 2004.
(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the
Official Gazette.
2. In the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, -
(1) In paragraph 1, in sub-paragraph (2), for clause (iv), the
following clause shall be substituted, namely:
(iv) a private limited company with a paid up capital and
reserves not more than rupees fifty lakh and which
does not have loan outstanding exceeding rupees
twenty five lakh from any bank or financial institution
and does not have a turnover exceeding rupees five
crore at any point of time during the financial year.
(2) in paragraph 2, the clauses (c) to (i) shall be omitted;
(3) in paragraph 4,
(a) for clause (iii), the following clause shall be
substituted, namely:
(iii) (a) has the company granted any loans,
secured or unsecured to companies, firms
or other parties covered in the register
If so, give the number of parties and
amount involved in the transactions; and
CARO, 2003 VII-135
(b) whether the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions of loans given by
the company, secured or unsecured, are
prima facie prejudicial to the interest of
the company; and
(c) whether receipt of the principal amount
and interest are also regular; and
(d) if overdue amount is more than rupees
one lakh, whether reasonable steps have
been taken by the company for recovery
of the principal and interest;
(e) has the company taken any loans,
secured or unsecured from companies,
firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of
the Act. If so, give the number of parties
and the amount involved in the
transactions; and
(f) whether the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions of loans taken by
the company, secured or unsecured, are
prima facie prejudicial to the interest of
the company; and
(g) whether payment of the principal amount
and interest are also regular.
(b) for clause (iv), the following clause shall be
substituted, namely:
(iv) is there an adequate internal control
system commensurate with the size of the
company and the nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory and fixed
assets and for the sale of goods and
services. Whether there is a continuing
failure to correct major weaknesses in
internal control system;
(c) in clause (v), for sub-clauses (a) and (b), the
following clauses shall be substituted, namely:-
(a) whether the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301
of the Act have been entered in the
CARO, 2003 VII-136
register required to be maintained under
that section; and
(b) whether transactions made in pursuance
of such contracts or arrangements have
been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to the
prevailing market prices at the relevant
time;;
(d) in clause(vi),
(i) for the words, figures and letters
sections 58A and 58AA of the Act , the
words, figures and letters sections 58A,
58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Act shall be substituted.
(ii) for the words Company Law Board, the
words Company Law Board or National
Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any Court or any other
Tribunal shall be substituted;
(e) in clause (ix)
(i) in sub-clause (a), for the words Wealth
tax, the words Wealth tax, Service tax
shall be substituted;
(ii) for sub-clause (b), the following sub-
clause shall be substituted; namely:-
(b) in case dues of Income tax/ Sales
tax /Wealth tax/ Service tax/ Custom
duty/ Excise duty/cess have not been
deposited on account of any dispute, then
the amounts involved and the forum
where dispute is pending shall be
mentioned.
(f) in clause (x), for the words in the financial year
immediately preceding such financial year also
the words in the immediately preceding
financial year shall be substituted;
(g) in clause (xiii);
(i) in sub-clause (b), for the word default
the word doubtful shall be substituted;
CARO, 2003 VII-137
(ii) in sub-clause (d), the words and would
be conducive to recovery of the loan
amount shall be omitted;
(h) in clause (xiv), for the words other securities,
the words other investments shall be
substituted;
(i) in clause (xvii), the words and vice-versa
shall be omitted.
(j) in clause (xix), for the words securities have,
the words security or charge has shall be
substituted.

File No: 2/28/2002-CL-V

Jitesh Khosla
Joint Secretary
Note: The Principal Order was issued vide notification number GSR 480(E)
dated the 12th June, 2003.
CARO, 2003 VII-138
Appendix III
Final Reporting Requirements
Under Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
{after incorporating the amendments made by the Companies (Auditors Report)
(Amendment) Order, 2004
16
dated 25
th
November, 2004}
Matters to be included in the auditors report. The auditors report on the
account of a company to which this Order applies shall include a statement on
the following matters, namely:
(i) (a) whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets;
(b) whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the
management at reasonable intervals; whether any material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so, whether
the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
(c) if a substantial part of fixed assets have been disposed off during
the year, whether it has affected the going concern;
(ii) (a) whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at
reasonable intervals by the management;
(b) are the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management reasonable and adequate in relation to the size
of the company and the nature of its business. If not, the
inadequacies in such procedures should be reported;
(c) whether the company is maintaining proper records of inventory and
whether any material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification and if
so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
(iii) (a) has the company granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Act. If so, give the number of
parties and amount involved in the transactions; and
(b) whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans
given by the company, secured or unsecured, are prima facie prejudicial to the
interest of the company; and
(c) whether receipt of the principal amount and interest are also
regular; and

16
DCA Notification No. GSR 766(E).
CARO, 2003 VII-139
(d) if overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh, whether
reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery of
the principal and interest;
(e) has the company taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
parties and the amount involved in the transactions; and
(f) whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
loans taken by the company, secured or unsecured, are prima
facie prejudicial to the interest of the company; and
(g) whether payment of the principal amount and interest are also
regular.
(iv) is there an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size
of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of
inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services.
Whether there is a continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in
internal control system.
(v) (a) whether the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in
section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register required
to be maintained under that section; and
(b) whether transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time;
(This information is required only in case of transactions exceeding the
value of five lakh rupees in respect of any party and in any one financial
year).
(vi) in case the company has accepted deposits from the public, whether the
directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of
sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the
rules framed there under, where applicable, have been complied with. If
not, the nature of contraventions should be stated; If an order has been
passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or
Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal whether the
same has been complied with or not?
(vii) in the case of listed companies and/or other companies having a paid-up
capital and reserves exceeding Rs.50 lakhs as at the commencement of
the financial year concerned, or having an average annual turnover
exceeding five crore rupees for a period of three consecutive financial
years immediately preceding the financial year concerned, whether the
CARO, 2003 VII-140
company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and
nature of its business;
(viii) where maintenance of cost records has been prescribed by the Central
Government under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Act,
whether such accounts and records have been made and maintained;
(ix) (a) is the company regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues
including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, cess and any other
statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and if not, the
extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last
day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated by
the auditor.
(b) in case dues of Income tax/ Sales tax /Wealth tax/ Service tax/
Custom duty/ Excise duty/ cess have not been deposited on
account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum
where dispute is pending shall be mentioned.
(A mere representation to the Department shall not constitute a dispute).
(x) whether in case of a company which has been registered for a period not
less than five years, its accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year are not less than fifty per cent of its net worth and whether it has
incurred cash losses in such financial year and in the immediately
preceding financial year;
(xi) whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution or bank or debenture holders? If yes, the period and amount of
default to be reported;
(xii) whether adequate documents and records are maintained in cases where
the company has granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities; If not, the
deficiencies to be pointed out.
(xiii) whether the provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund have
been duly complied with? In respect of nidhi/ mutual benefit
fund/societies;
(a) whether the net-owned funds to deposit liability ratio is more than
1:20 as on the date of balance sheet;
(b) whether the company has complied with the prudential norms on
income recognition and provisioning against sub-
standard/doubtful/loss assets;
CARO, 2003 VII-141
(c) whether the company has adequate procedures for appraisal of
credit proposals/requests, assessment of credit needs and
repayment capacity of the borrower;
(d) whether the repayment schedule of various loans granted by the
nidhi is based on the repayment capacity of the borrower;
(xiv) if the company is dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments, whether proper records have been maintained of the
transactions and contracts and whether timely entries have been made
therein; also whether the shares, securities, debentures and other
investments have been held by the company, in its own name except to
the extent of the exemption, if any, granted under section 49 of the Act;
(xv) whether the company has given any guarantee for loans taken by others
from bank or financial institutions, the terms and conditions whereof are
prejudicial to the interest of the company;
(xvi) whether term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were
obtained;
(xvii) whether the funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long
term investment; If yes, the nature and amount is to be indicated;
(xviii) whether the company has made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section
301 of the Act and if so whether the price at which shares have been
issued is prejudicial to the interest of the company;
(xix) whether security or charge has been created in respect of debentures
issued;
(xx) whether the management has disclosed on the end use of money raised
by public issues and the same has been verified;
(xxi) whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported
during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be
indicated.
CARO, 2003 VII-142
Appendix IV
Amendments Made by the
Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
in the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
1. The Central Government of India, in exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956)
and after consultation with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
[constituted under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949)], has
issued circular no G.S.R. 766(E) the Companies (Auditors Report)
(Amendment) Order, 2004 making certain changes the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 2003. The Order has come into force on 25th
November 2004.
2. The following table highlights the changes brought in by the
Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004.
(Text shown in strikethrough format in left hand side table is omitted by the
Amendment Order, 2004. The text substituted by the Amendment Order is
shown against that clause in right hand side of the table.)
CARO, 2003 Amendment Order, 2004
1. Short Title, Application and
Commencement
(1) This Order may be called the
Companies (Auditors Report)
Order, 2003.
(2) It shall apply to every company
including a foreign company as
defined under section 591 of
the Act, except the following:
(i) a Banking company as
defined in clause (c) of
section 5 of the Banking
Regulation Act, 1949
(10 of 1949);
(ii) an insurance company
as defined in clause (21)
of section 2 of the Act;
(iii) a company licensed to
operate under section

CARO, 2003 VII-143
25 of the Act; and
(iv) a private limited
company with a paid up
capital and reserves not
more than fifty lakh
rupees and has not
accepted any public
deposit and does not
have loan outstanding
ten lakh rupees or more
from any bank or
financial institution and
does not have a
turnover exceeding five
crore rupees.
(3) It shall come into force on the 1
st

day of July, 2003.
2. Definitions
In this Order, unless the context
otherwise requires-
(a) Act means the Companies
Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(b) chit fund company, nidhi
company or mutual benefit
company means a company
engaged in the business of
managing, conducting or
supervising as a foreman or
agent of any transaction or
arrangement by which it enters
into an agreement with a
number of subscribers that
every one of them shall
subscribe to a certain sum of
instalments for a definite period
and that each subscriber, in his
turn, as determined by lot or by
auction or by tender or in such
other manner as may be
provided for in the agreement,

SUBSTITUTED BY:
(iv) a private limited company with a
paid up capital and reserves not more
than rupees fifty lakh and which does
not have loan outstanding exceeding
rupees twenty five lakh from any bank
or financial institution and does not
have a turnover exceeding rupees five
crore at any point of time during the
financial year.

CARO, 2003 VII-144
shall be entitled to a prize
amount, and includes
companies whose principal
business is accepting fixed
deposits from, and lending
money to, members;
(c) finance company means a
company engaged in the
business of financing,
whether by making loans or
advances or otherwise, of
any industry, commerce or
agriculture and includes any
business of hire-purchase,
lease financing and financing
of housing;
(d) investment company means a
business of acquisition and
holding of, or dealing in,
shares, stocks, bonds,
debentures, debenture stocks,
including securities issued by
the Central or any State
Government or by any local
authority, or in other marketable
securities of a like nature;
(e) manufacturing company
means a company engaged in
any manufacturing process as
defined in the Factories Act,
1948 (63 of 1948);
(f) mining company means a
company owning a mine, and
includes a company which
carries on the business of a
mine either as a lessee or
occupier thereof;
(g) processing company means a

CLAUSES (c) TO (i) OF
PARAGRAPH 2 OMITTED

CARO, 2003 VII-145
business of processing
materials with a view to their
use, a sale, delivery or
disposal;
(h) service company means a
business of supplying,
providing, maintaining and
operating any services,
facilities, conveniences,
bureaux and the like for the
benefit of others;
(i) trading company means a
business of buying and selling
goods.
3. Auditors report to contain
matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5
Every report made by the auditor
under section 227 of Act, on the
accounts of every company examined
by him to which this Order applies for
every financial year ending on any day
on or after the commencement of this
Order, shall contain the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5.
4. Matters to be included in the
auditors report.
The auditors report on the account of
a company to which this Order applies
shall include a statement on the
following matters, namely:
(i) (a) whether the company is
maintaining proper
records showing full
particulars, including
quantitative details and
situation of fixed assets;

CARO, 2003 VII-146
(b) whether these fixed
assets have been
physically verified by the
management at
reasonable intervals;
whether any material
discrepancies were
noticed on such
verification and if so,
whether the same have
been properly dealt with
in the books of account;
(c) if a substantial part of
fixed assets have been
disposed off during
the year, whether it
has affected the going
concern;
(ii) (a) whether physical
verification of
inventory has been
conducted at
reasonable intervals
by the management;
(b) are the procedures of
physical verification of
inventory followed by
the management
reasonable and
adequate in relation to
the size of the company
and the nature of its
business. If not, the
inadequacies in such
procedures should be
reported;
(c) whether the company
is maintaining proper
records of inventory
and whether any
material discrepancies

CARO, 2003 VII-147
were noticed on
physical verification
and if so, whether the
same have been
properly dealt with in
the books of account;
(iii)(a) has the company either
granted or taken any loans,
secured or unsecured
to/fromcompanies, firms or
other parties covered in the
register maintained under
section 301 of the Act. If so,
give the number of parties
and amount involved in the
transactions.
(b) whether the rate of interest and
other terms and conditions of
loans given or taken by the
company, secured or
unsecured, are prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the
company;
(c) whether payment of the
principal amount and interest
are also regular;
(d) if overdue amount is more
than one lakh, whether
reasonable steps have been
taken by the company for
recovery/payment of the
principal and interest;

SUBSTITUTED BY:
iii) (a) has the company granted
any loans, secured or
unsecured to companies, firms
or other parties covered in the
section 301 of the Act. If so,
give the number of parties and
amount involved in the
transactions; and
(b) whether the rate of interest
and other terms and conditions
of loans given by the company,
secured or unsecured, are
prima facie prejudicial to the
(c) whether receipt of the
are also regular; and
(d) if overdue amount is more
than rupees one lakh, whether
reasonable steps have been
taken by the company for
recovery of the principal and
interest;
(e) has the company taken any
loans, secured or unsecured
from companies, firms or other
parties covered in the register
CARO, 2003 VII-148

(iv) is there an adequate internal
control procedure
commensurate with the size
of the company and the
nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and
fixed assets and for the sale
of goods. Whether there is a
continuing failure to correct
major weaknesses in internal
control;

(v)(a) whether transactions that need
to be entered into a register in
pursuance of section 301 of the
Act have been so entered;
(b) whether each of these
transactions have been made
at prices which are
reasonable having regard to
the prevailing market prices
at the relevant time;
(This information is required only in
maintained under section 301
of the Act. If so, give the
number of parties and the
amount involved in the
transactions; and
(f) whether the rate of interest
and other terms and conditions
of loans taken by the company,
(g) whether payment of the
are also regular.

SUBSTTUTED BY:
control system commensurate
with the size of the company
and the nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory
and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services.
Whether there is a continuing
failure to correct major
weaknesses in internal control
system;

SUBSTITUTED BY:
(v) (a) whether the particulars of
contracts or arrangements
referred to in section 301 of the
Act have been entered in the
register required to be
maintained under that section;
and
(b) whether transactions made in
pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made
at prices which are reasonable
CARO, 2003 VII-149
case of transactions exceeding the
value of five lakh rupees in respect
of any party and in any one financial
year).

(vi) in case the company has
accepted deposits from the
public, whether the directives
issued by the Reserve Bank of
India and the provisions of
sections 58A and 58AA of the
Act and the rules framed there
under, where applicable, have
been complied with. If not, the
nature of contraventions should
be stated; If an order has been
passed by Company Law
Board whether the same has
been complied with or not?
(vii) in the case of listed
companies and/or other
companies having a paid-up
capital and reserves
exceeding Rs.50 lakhs as at
the commencement of the
financial year concerned, or
having an average annual
turnover exceeding five crore
rupees for a period of three
consecutive financial years
immediately preceding the
financial year concerned,
whether the company has an
internal audit system
commensurate with its size
and nature of its business;
(viii) where maintenance of cost
records has been prescribed by
the Central Government under
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
section 209 of the Act, whether
having regard to the prevailing
market prices at the relevant
time;

SUBSTITUTED BY:
(vi) 58A, 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Act

Company Law Board or National
Company Law Tribunal or Reserve
Bank of India or any Court or any other
Tribunal

CARO, 2003 VII-150
such accounts and records
have been made and
maintained;
(ix)(a) is the company regular in
depositing undisputed statutory
dues including Provident Fund,
Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees
State Insurance, Income-tax,
Sales-tax, Wealth Tax, Custom
Duty, Excise Duty, cess and
any other statutory dues with
the appropriate authorities and
if not, the extent of the arrears
of outstanding statutory dues
as at the last day of the
financial year concerned for a
period of more than six months
from the date they became
payable, shall be indicated by
the auditor.
(b) in case dues of sales
tax/income tax/custom
tax/wealth tax/excise duty/cess
have not been deposited on
account of any dispute, then
the amounts involved and the
forum where dispute is pending
may please be mentioned.
(A mere representation to the
Department shall not constitute the
dispute).

(x) whether in case of a company
which has been registered for a
period not less than five years,
its accumulated losses at the
end of the financial year are not
less than fifty per cent of its net
worth and whether it has

SUBSTITUTED BY:

Wealth Tax, Service tax

SUBSTITUTED BY:
(b) in case dues of Income tax/
Sales tax /Wealth tax/ Service
tax/ Custom duty/ Excise duty/
cess have not been deposited
on account of any dispute, then
the amounts involved and the
forum where dispute is pending
shall be mentioned.

SUBSTITUTED BY:
in the immediately preceding financial
year

CARO, 2003 VII-151
incurred cash losses in such
financial year and in the
financial year immediately
preceding such financial year
also;
(xi) whether the company has
defaulted in repayment of dues
to a financial institution or bank
or debenture holders? If yes,
the period and amount of
(xii) whether adequate documents
and records are maintained in
cases where the company has
granted loans and advances on
the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures
and other securities; If not, the
deficiencies to be pointed out.
(xiii) whether the provisions of any
special statute applicable to chit
fund have been duly complied
with? In respect of nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/societies;
(a) whether the net-owned
funds to deposit liability
ratio is more than 1:20
as on the date of
balance sheet;
(b) whether the company
has complied with the
prudential norms on
income recognition and
provisioning against
sub-
standard/default/loss
assets;
(c) whether the company
has adequate
procedures for appraisal

SUBSTITUTED BY:
doubtful

CARO, 2003 VII-152
of credit
proposals/requests,
assessment of credit
needs and repayment
capacity of the
borrowers;
(d) whether the repayment
schedule of various
loans granted by the
nidhi is based on the
repayment capacity of
the borrower and would
be conducive to
recovery of the loan
amount;
(xiv) if the company is dealing or
trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other
investments, whether proper
records have been maintained
of the transactions and
contracts and whether timely
entries have been made
therein; also whether the
shares, securities, debentures
and other securities have been
held by the company, in its own
name except to the extent of
the exemption, if any, granted
under section 49 of the Act;
(xv) whether the company has given
any guarantee for loans taken
by others from bank or financial
institutions, the terms and
conditions whereof are
company;
(xvi) whether term loans were
applied for the purpose for
which the loans were obtained;
(xvii) whether the funds raised on

SUBSTITUTED BY:
other investments

CARO, 2003 VII-153
short-term basis have been
used for long term investment
and vice versa; If yes, the
nature and amount is to be
indicated;
(xviii) whether the company has
made any preferential allotment
of shares to parties and
companies covered in the
Register maintained under
section 301 of the Act and if so
whether the price at which
shares have been issued is
company;
(xix) whether securities have been
created in respect of
debentures issued?
(xx) whether the management has
disclosed on the end use of
money raised by public issues
and the same has been
verified;
(xxi) whether any fraud on or by the
company has been noticed or
reported during the year; If yes,
the nature and the amount
involved is to be indicated.
6. Reasons to be stated for
unfavourable or qualified answers.
Where, in the auditors report, the
answer to any of the questions referred
to in paragraph 4 is unfavourable or
qualified, the auditors report shall also
state the reasons for such
unfavourable or qualified answer, as
the case may be. Where the auditor is
unable to express any opinion in
answer to a particular question, his
report shall indicate such fact together

SUBSTITUTED BY:
security or charge has

CARO, 2003 VII-154
with the reasons why it is not possible
for him to give an answer to such
question.

CARO, 2003 VII-155
Appendix V
CARO, 2003 vis a vis MAOCARO, 1988
A Comparative Analysis
The following is a, clause by clause, comparison of the requirements of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended by the CARO
(Amendment) Order, 2004) and the corresponding requirements of
MAOCARO, 1988.
The major additions/modifications in the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 as compared to MAOCARO, 1988 are shown in boldletters. Those
clauses of the CARO which are substantially different from the corresponding
clauses of the 1988 Order are also shown in bold letters. It may be noted that
mere verbal or grammatical changes have not been highlighted.
CARO, 2003 MAOCARO, 1988
1. Short Title, Application
and Commencement
(1) This Order may be called
the Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 2003.
1. Short Title, Application and
Commencement
(1) This Order may be called
the Manufacturing and
Other Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 1988.
2. It shall apply to every
company including a foreign
company as defined in section 591
of the Act, except the following:

2. (a) It shall apply to every
company including a
foreign company as
defined in section
591 of the
Companies Act, 1956
(1 of 1956) which is
engaged or proposes
to engage in one or
more of the following
activities, namely:
(i) manufacturing,
mining or
processing;
(ii) supplying and
rendering
services;
(iii) trading; and
CARO, 2003 VII-156
(iv) the business
of financing,
investment,
chit fund, nidhi
or mutual
benefit
societies.
(b) It shall not apply to:
(i) a banking company as
Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of
1949);
(i) a banking company as
Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of
1949);
(ii) an insurance company as
defined in clause (21) of
section 2 of the Act;
(ii) an insurance company as
defined in section 2(21) of
the Companies Act, 1956 (1
of 1956); and
operate under section 25 of
the Act; and
operate under section 25 of
of 1956).
(iv) a private limited company
with a paid up capital and
reserves not more than
rupees fifty lakh and
which does not have loan
outstanding exceeding
rupees twenty five lakh
fromany bank or financial
institution and does not
have a turnover exceeding
rupees five crore at any
point of time during the
financial year.

CARO, 2003 VII-157
(3) It shall come into force on
the 1st day of J uly, 2003
**
.
(3) It shall come into force on
the 1st day of November,
1988.
2. Definitions
In this Order, unless the context
otherwise requires,
(a) Act means the Companies
Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
2. Definitions
In this Order:
(b) chit fund company, nidhi
company or mutual benefit
company means a
business of managing,
conducting or supervising as
a foreman or agent of any
transaction or arrangement
by which it enters into an
agreement with a number of
subscribers that every one
of them shall subscribe to a
certain sum of instalments
for a definite period and that
each subscriber, in his turn,
as determined by lot or by
auction or by tender or in
such other manner as may
be provided for in the
agreement, shall be entitled
to a prize amount, and
includes companies whose
principal business is
accepting fixed deposits
from, and lending money to,
members;
(a) Chit fund, nidhi or
mutual benefit company
means a company engaged
in the business of
managing, conducting or
supervising as a foreman or
agent of any transaction or
arrangement by which it
enters into an agreement
with a number of
subscribers that every one
of them shall subscribe a
certain sum of instalments
for a definite period and that
each subscriber, in his turn,
as determined by lot or by
auction or by tender or in
such other manner as may
be provided for in the
agreement, shall be entitled
to a prize amount, and
includes companies whose
principal business is
accepting fixed deposits
from, and lending money to,
members;

**
Readers may note that this column of the comparative table also incorporates the amendments
to CARO, 2003 brought in by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004. The
Amendment Order is effective from 25
th
November, 2004.
CARO, 2003 VII-158
Omitted (b) finance company means a
business of financing,
whether by making loans or
advances or otherwise, of
any industry, commerce or
agriculture and includes any
business of hire-purchase,
lease financing and
financing of housing;
Omitted (c) investment company
in the business of
acquisition and holding of,
or dealing in, shares,
stocks, bonds, debentures,
debenture stocks, including
securities issued by the
Central or any State
Government or by any local
authority, or in other
marketable securities of a
like nature;
Omitted (d) manufacturing company
in any manufacturing
process as defined in the
Factories Act, 1948 (63 of
1948);
Omitted (e) mining company means a
company owning a mine,
and includes a company
which carries on the
business of a mine either as
a lessee or occupier thereof;
CARO, 2003 VII-159
Omitted (f) processing company
in the business of
processing materials with a
view of their use, sale,
delivery or disposal;
Omitted (g) service company means a
business of supplying,
providing, maintaining and
operating any services,
facilities, conveniences,
bureaux and the like for the
benefit of others;
Omitted (h) trading company means a
business of buying and
selling goods.
3. Auditors Report to
Contain Matters Specified in
Paragraphs 4 and 5
under section 227 of Act, on the
accounts of every company
examined by him to which this
Order applies for every financial
year ending on any day on or after
the commencement of this Order,
shall contain the matters specified
3. Auditors Report to
Contain Matters Specified in
Paragraphs 4 and 5
under section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956)
on the accounts of every company
examined by him to which this
Order applies for every financial
year ending on any day on or after
the commencement of this Order,
shall contain the matters specified
4. Matters to be Included in
the Auditors Report
4. The Matters to be Included
in the Auditors Report
The auditors report on the account
of a company to which this Order
applies shall include a statement
on the following matters, namely:
The Auditors Report on the
accounts of a company to which
this Order applies shall include a
statement on the following matter,
namely:
CARO, 2003 VII-160
(A) In the case of a
manufacturing, mining or
processing company:
(i) (a) whether the company
is maintaining proper
records showing full
particulars, including
quantitative details
and situation of fixed
assets;
(b) whether these fixed
assets have been
physically verified by
the management at
reasonable intervals;
discrepancies were
noticed on such
whether the same
have been properly
dealt with in the
books of account;
(i) whether the company is
maintaining proper records
showing full particulars,
including quantitative details
and situation of fixed
assets; whether these fixed
assets have been physically
verified by the management
at reasonable intervals;
discrepancies were noticed
on such verification and if
so, whether the same have
been properly dealt with in
the books of account;
(ii) whether any of the fixed
assets have been revalued
during the year, if so, the
basis of revaluation should
be indicated;
(c) if a substantial part of
fixed assets have been
disposed off during the
year, whether it has
affected the going
concern;

(ii) (a) whether physical
verification of
inventory has been
conducted at
reasonable intervals
by the management;
(iii) whether physical verification
has been conducted by the
management at reasonable
intervals in respect of
finished goods, stores,
spare parts and raw
materials;
(b) are the procedures of
of inventory followed
by the management
(iv) are the procedures of
physical verification of
stocks followed by the
management reasonable
CARO, 2003 VII-161
reasonable and
adequate in relation
to the size of the
company and the
nature of its
business. If not, the
inadequacies in such
procedures should be
reported;
and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and
the nature of its business? If
not, the inadequacies in
such procedures should be
reported;
(c) whether the
company is
maintaining proper
records of inventory
and whether any
material
discrepancies were
noticed on physical
whether the same
have been properly
dealt with in the
books of account;
(v) whether any material
discrepancies have been
noticed on physical
verification of stocks as
compared to book records,
and if so, whether the same
have been properly dealt
with in the books of
account?
(vi) whether the auditor, on the
basis of his examination of
stocks, is satisfied that such
valuation is fair and proper
in accordance with the
normally accepted
accounting principles? Is the
basis of valuation of stocks
same as in the preceding
year? If there is any
deviation in the basis of
valuation, the effect of such
deviation, if material, should
be reported;
{please see sub clauses (f) and (g)
of paragraph 4(iii)}
(iii) (a) has the company
granted any loans,
secured or unsecured
(vii) if the company has taken
unsecured, from companies,
firms or other parties listed
in the register maintained
CARO, 2003 VII-162
to companies, firms
or other parties
covered in the
register maintained
under section 301 of
the Act. If so, give
the number of
parties and amount
involved in the
transactions; and
(b) whether the rate of
interest and other
terms and conditions
of loans given by the
company, secured or
unsecured, are prima
facie prejudicial to
the interest of the
company; and
(c) whether receipt of
the principal
amount and interest
are also regular;
and
(d) if overdue amount
is more than rupees
one lakh, whether
reasonable steps
have been taken by
the company for
recovery of the
(e) has the company taken
unsecured from
companies, firms or other
parties covered in the
section 301 of the Act. If
so, give the number of
parties and the amount
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of
1956), and/or from the
companies under the same
management as defined
under sub-section (1B) of
section 370 of the
1956), whether the rate of
interest and other terms and
conditions of such loans are
interest of the company;
(viii) if the company has granted
unsecured, to companies,
firms or other parties listed
in the register(s) maintained
under section 301 and/or to
the companies under the
same management as
defined under sub-section
(1B) of section 370 of the
1956), whether the rate of
interest and other terms and
conditions of such loans are
CARO, 2003 VII-163
involved in the
transactions; and
(f) whether the rate of
interest and other terms
and conditions of loans
taken by the company,
prima facie prejudicial to
the interest of the
company; and
(g) whether payment of the
principal amount and
interest are also regular.

(ix) whether the parties to whom
the loans, or advances in
the nature of loans, have
been given by the company
are repaying the principal
amounts as stipulated and
are also regular in payment
of the interest and if not
whether reasonable steps
have been taken by the
company for recovery of the
control system commensurate
with the size of the company
and the nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory
and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services.
Whether there is a
continuing failure to correct
major weaknesses in
(x) is there an adequate
internal control procedure
commensurate with the size
of the company and the
nature of its business, for
the purchase of stores, raw
materials, including
components, plant and
machinery, equipment and
other assets, and for the
sale of goods;
CARO, 2003 VII-164
internal control system.
(v) (a) whether the
particulars of
contracts or
arrangements
referred to in section
301 of the Act have
been entered in the
register required to
be maintained under
that section; and

(b) whether transactions
made in pursuance of
such contracts or
arrangements have
been made at prices
which are reasonable
having regard to the
prevailing market
prices at the relevant
time;
(This information is
required only in case of
transactions exceeding
the value of five lakh
rupees in respect of any
party and in any one
financial year).
(xi) whether the transactions of
purchase of goods and
materials and sale of goods,
materials and services,
made in pursuance of
contracts or arrangements
entered in the register(s)
maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act,
1956 (1 of 1956) as
aggregating during the year
to Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty
thousand) or more in
respect of each party, have
been made at prices which
are reasonable having
regard to prevailing market
prices for such goods,
materials, or services or the
prices at which transactions
for similar goods or services
have been made with other
parties;
(xii) whether any unserviceable
or damaged stores, raw
CARO, 2003 VII-165
materials, or finished goods,
are determined and whether
provisions for the loss, if
any, have been made in the
accounts;
(vi) in case the company has
public, whether the
directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and
the provisions of sections
58A, 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the
Act and the rules framed
there under, where
applicable, have been
complied with. If not, the
nature of contraventions
should be stated; If an
order has been passed by
Company Law Board or
National Company Law
Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any Court or
any other Tribunal
whether the same has
been complied with or
not?
(xiii) in case the company has
public, whether the
directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and
the provisions of section
58A of the Companies Act,
1956 and the rules framed
thereunder, where
applicable, have been
complied with. If not, the
nature of contraventions
should be stated;
(xiv) is the company maintaining
reasonable records for the
sale and disposal of
realisable by-products and
scraps, where applicable;
CARO, 2003 VII-166
(vii) in the case of listed
companies and/or other
companies having a paid-
up capital and reserves
exceeding Rs.50 lakhs as
at the commencement of the
turnover exceeding five
crore rupees for a period of
three consecutive financial
years immediately
preceding the financial year
concerned, whether the
company has an internal
audit system commensurate
with its size and nature of its
business;
(xv) in the case of companies
having a paid-up capital
exceeding Rs.25 lakh as at
the commencement of the
turnover exceeding Rs.2
crores for a period of three
consecutive financial years
immediately preceding the
financial year concerned;
whether the company has
an internal audit system
commensurate with its size
and nature of its business;
(viii) where maintenance of cost
records has been prescribed
by the Central Government
under clause (d) of sub-
section (1) of section 209 of
the Act, whether such
accounts and records have
been made and maintained;
(xvi) where maintenance of cost
records has been prescribed
by the Central Government
under section 209(1)(d) of
of 1956), whether such
accounts and records have
been made and maintained;
(ix) (a) is the company
regular in depositing
undisputed statutory
dues including
Provident Fund,
Investor Education
and Protection Fund,
Employees State
Insurance, Income-
tax, Sales-tax, Wealth
(xvii) is the company regular in
depositing Provident Fund
and Employees State
Insurance dues with the
appropriate authority and if
not, the extent of arrears of
Provident Fund and
Employees State Insurance
dues shall be indicated by
the auditor;
CARO, 2003 VII-167
Tax, Service Tax,
CustomDuty, Excise
Duty, cess and any
other statutory dues
with the appropriate
authorities and if not,
the extent of the
arrears of
outstanding statutory
dues as at the last
day of the financial
year concerned for a
period of more than
six months fromthe
date they became
payable, shall be
indicated by the
auditor.
(b) in case dues of
Income tax/ Sales tax
/Wealth tax/ Service
tax/ Custom duty/
Excise duty/ cess
have not been
deposited on account
of any dispute, then
the amounts
involved and the
forum where
dispute is pending
shall be mentioned.
(A mere representation to
the Department shall not
(xviii) whether any undisputed
amounts payable in respect
of income tax, wealth tax,
sales tax, customs duty and
excise duty were
outstanding, as at the last
day of the financial year
concerned, for a period of
more than six months from
the date they became
payable; if so, the amounts
of such outstanding dues
should be reported;
CARO, 2003 VII-168
constitute the dispute)
(xix) whether personal expenses
have been charged to
revenue account; if so, the
details thereof should be
reported;
(xx) whether the company is a
sick industrial company
within the meaning of clause
(o) of sub-section (1) of
section 3 of the Sick
Industrial Companies
(Special Provisions) Act,
1985 (1 of 1986); if so,
whether a reference has
been made to the Board for
Industrial and Financial
Reconstruction under
section 15 of the Act.
(x) whether in case of a
company which has been
registered for a period not
less than five years, its
accumulated losses at the
end of the financial year
are not less than fifty per
cent of its net worth and
whether it has incurred
cash losses in such
financial year and in the
immediately preceding
financial year;
(xi) whether the company has
defaulted in repayment of
dues to a financial
institution or bank or
debenture holders? If yes,
the period and amount of
(xii) whether adequate

CARO, 2003 VII-169
documents and records are
maintained in cases where
the company has granted
loans and advances on the
basis of security by way of
pledge of shares,
securities; If not, the
deficiencies to be pointed
out.
(xiii) whether the provisions of
any special statute
applicable to chit fund
have been duly complied
with? In respect of nidhi/
mutual benefit
fund/societies;
(a) whether the net-owned
funds to deposit liability
ratio is more than 1:20 as
on the date of balance
sheet;
(b) whether the company has
complied with the
prudential norms on
provisioning against sub-
standard/doubtful/loss
assets;
(c) whether the company has
adequate procedures for
appraisal of credit
proposals/requests,
needs and repayment
capacity of the borrowers;
(d) whether the repayment
schedule of various loans
granted by the nidhi is
based on the repayment
CARO, 2003 VII-170
capacity of the borrower;
(xiv) if the company is dealing
or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and
other investments,
whether proper records
have been maintained of
the transactions and
contracts and whether
timely entries have been
made therein; also
whether the shares,
securities, debentures and
other investments have
been held by the
company, in its own name
except to the extent of the
exemption, if any, granted
Act;
(xv) whether the company has
given any guarantee for
loans taken by others
from bank or financial
institutions, the terms and
conditions whereof are
prejudicial to the interest
of the company;
(xvi) whether termloans were
applied for the purpose
for which the loans were
obtained;
(xvii) whether the funds raised
on short-termbasis have
been used for long term
investment; If yes, the
nature and amount is to
be indicated;
(xviii) whether the company has
made any preferential
allotment of shares to
CARO, 2003 VII-171
parties and companies
covered in the Register
maintained under section
301 of the Act and if so
whether the price at which
shares have been issued
is prejudicial to the
(xix) whether security or
charge has been created
in respect of debentures
issued?
(xx) whether the management
has disclosed on the end
use of money raised by
public issues and the
same has been verified;
(xxi) whether any fraud on or
by the company has been
noticed or reported during
the year; If yes, the nature
and the amount involved
is to be indicated.
(B) In the case of a service
company:
(i) all the matters
specified in clause
(A) to the extent to
which they are
applicable;
(ii) whether the company
has a reasonable
system of recording
receipts, issues and
consumption of
material and stores
and allocating
materials consumed
to the relative jobs,
commensurate with
CARO, 2003 VII-172
its size and nature of
its business;
(iii) whether the company
has a reasonable
system of allocating
man-hours utilised to
the relative jobs,
commensurate with
its size and nature of
its business;
(iv) whether there is a
reasonable system of
authorisation at
proper levels, and an
adequate system of
internal control
commensurate with
the size of the
company and the
nature of its
business, on issue of
stores and allocation
of stores and labour
to jobs.
(C) In the case of a trading
company:
(i) all the matters
specified in clause
which they are
applicable;
(ii) have the damaged
goods been
determined and if the
value of such goods
is significant, has
provision been made
for the loss.
(D) In the case of a finance,
investment, chit fund,
CARO, 2003 VII-173
nidhi or mutual
benefit company:
(i) all the matters
specified in clause
which they are
applicable;
(ii) whether adequate
documents and
records are
maintained in a case
where the company
has granted loans
and advances on the
basis of security by
way of pledge of
shares, debentures
and other securities;
(iii) whether the
provisions of any
special statute
applicable to chit
fund, nidhi or mutual
benefit society have
been duly complied
with; and
(iv) if the company is
dealing or trading in
shares, securities,
investments, whether
proper records have
been maintained of
the transactions and
contracts and
whether timely
entries have been
made therein; also
whether the shares,
securities,
CARO, 2003 VII-174
investments, have
been held by the
company in its own
name except to the
extent of the
exemption, if any,
granted under section
49 of the Companies
Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).
5. Reasons to be Stated for
Unfavourable or Qualified
Answers.
Where, in the auditors report, the
answer to any of the questions
referred to in paragraph 4 is
unfavourable or qualified, the
auditors report shall also state the
reasons for such unfavourable or
qualified answer, as the case may
be. Where the auditor is unable to
express any opinion in answer to a
particular question, his report shall
indicate such fact together with the
reasons why it is not possible for
him to give an answer to such
question.
5. Reasons to be Stated for
Unfavourable or Qualified
Answer
Where, in the Auditors Report, the
answer to any of the questions
referred to in paragraph 4 is
unfavourable or qualified, the
Auditors Report shall also state
the reasons for such unfavourable
or qualified answer, as the case
may be. Where the auditor is
unable to express any opinion in
answer to a particular question, his
report shall indicate such fact
together with the reasons why it is
not possible for him to give an
answer to such question.

CARO, 2003 VII-175
Appendix VI
List of Financial Institutions Covered Under
the Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 1975
1. Explanation to Rules 2(b)(xi) of the Rules state that for the purpose of this
sub-clause, the term 'financial institution' shall mean-
(a) a public financial institution specified in or under section 4A of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(b) a State Financial, Industrial or Investment Corporation;
(c) the State Bank of India or a subsidiary bank as defined in the State
Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (38 of 1959);
(d) a nationalised bank, that is to say, a corresponding new bank as
defined in section 2 of:-
(i) the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of
Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970); or
(ii) the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of
Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980);
(e) the General Insurance Corporation of India established in pursuance
of. the provisions of section 9 of the General Insurance Business
(Nationalisation) Act, 1972 (57 of 1972);
(f) the Industrial Reconstruction Corporation of India;
17
or
(g) any other Institution which the Central Government may, by
notification, specify in this behalf;
2. Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956 contains a list of institutions which
are to be construed as public financial institutions for the purpose of the Act.
The list is as follows:
(i) the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited;
(ii) the Industrial Finance Corporation of India;
(iii) the Industrial Development Bank of India;
(iv) the Life Insurance Corporation of India;
(v) the Unit Trust of India;
(vi) the Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited;

17
NowIndustrial Reconstruction Bank of India.
CARO, 2003 VII-176
3. Sub-section (2) of section 4A of the Act, subject to the provisions of sub-
section (1) empowers the Central Government to notify in the Official gazette
such other institution as it may think fit to be a public financial institution. In
exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2), the Central Government has
notified the following 46 public financial institutions:
(i) The Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India established under the
Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984.
(ii) The General Insurance Corporation of India, formed and registered
under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1984.
(iii) The National Insurance Company Limited, formed and registered
under the Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) The New India Assurance Company Limited, formed and registered
(v) The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Limited, formed
and registered under the Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) The United Fire and General Insurance Company Limited, formed
and registered under the Companies Act, 1956.
(vii) The Shipping Company and Investment Company of India Limited.
(viii) Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited, formed and
registered under the Companies Act, 1956.
(ix) IFCI Venture Capital Funds Limited formed and registered under
the Companies Act, 1956.
(x) Technology Development and Informations Company of India
Limited, formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956.
(xi) Power Finance Corporation Limited, formed and registered under
the Companies Act, 1956.
(xii) National Housing Bank, established under the NHB Act, 1987.
(xiii) Small Industries Development Bank of India Limited established
under the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989.
(xiv) Rural Electrification Corporation Limited formed and registered
(xv) Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited, formed and registered
(xvi) Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited, formed and
registered under the Companies Act, 1956.
(xvii) Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation.
CARO, 2003 VII-177
(xviii) Assam Financial Corporation.
(xix) Bihar State Financial Corporation.
(xx) Delhi Financial Corporation.
(xxi) Gujarat Financial Corporation.
(xxii) Haryana Financial Corporation.
(xxiii) Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation.
(xxiv) Jammu and Kashmir State Financial Corporation.
(xxv) Karnataka State Financial Corporation.
(xxvi) Kerala Financial Corporation.
(xxvii) Madhya Pradesh Financial Corporation.
(xxviii) Maharashtra State Financial Corporation.
(xxix) Orissa State Financial Corporation.
(xxx) Punjab Financial Corporation.
(xxxi) Rajasthan Financial Corporation.
(xxxii) Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited.
(xxxiii) Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation.
(xxxiv) West Bengal Financial Corporation.
(xxxv) Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited.
(xxxvi) North Eastern Development Finance Corporation Limited.
(xxxvii) Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited.
(xxxviii) Export and Import Bank of India.
(xxxix) National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD).
(xl) National Co-operative Department Corporation (NCDC).
(xIi) National Dairy Development Bank (NDDB)
(xIii) The Pradeshiya Industrial Development and Investment Corporation
Limited.
(xliii) Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Limited.
(xliv) The State Industrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra
Limited.
(xlv) West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Limited.
CARO, 2003 VII-178
(xlvi) Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Limited.
CARO, 2003 VII-179
Appendix VII
Text of the Circular on the Date of Application of
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Company Affairs)

5
th
floor, `A Wing, Shastri Bhavan,
Dr. R.P. Road, New Delhi.
General Circular No:32/2003

Dated: 10th November, 2003

To
All Regional Directors
All Registrars of Companies
Subject: Compliance of Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
effective from 1
st
July, 2003
Sir,
As you are aware, vide notification number G.S.R. 480(E) dated 12th June
2003, Government have issued the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 [Order] which came into force on 1st July, 2003. The new Order
replaces the Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
1988(MAOCARO) issued vide Notification No: G.S.R. 909(E) dated 7th
September, 1988.
2. Subsequently the Government have received representations stating
the difficulty in complying with the new Order at short notice, in view of the
absence of a Guidance Note from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India, and in view of the need for maintaining records of a company in a
manner that will ensure the compliance of the Order, Government have given
consideration to the difficulty expressed. It has been decided that it is not
possible, at this point of time, to review the Order, or postpone the effective
date as issued, for accounts prepared in respect of financial year ending on
the 1st July, 2003 or thereafter.
3. However, keeping in view the difficulties of the companies as well as
the professionals involved, it has also been decided that while companies to
whom the Order is applicable, should make serious efforts to comply with the
CARO, 2003 VII-180
new Order from the effective date, cases of non compliance for accounts
pertaining to financial year which closed on 31st December, 2003 or earlier,
Government would take a lenient view provided the accounts at least carry
MAOCARO Report, if required.
4. However, accounts in respect of financial years ending on 1st
January, 2004 or thereafter, will have to strictly follow CARO, 2003.
Companies and professionals who do not comply with the Order will be liable
for action as per law.
5. Kindly acknowledge receipt of this letter, a copy of which is being
endorsed to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and major
Industry Associations.

Yours faithfully,

(E. Selvaraj)
Joint Director (Trg.)
Ph: 2338 3452
CARO, 2003 VII-181
Appendix VIII
This checklist does not formpart of the Statement and is only illustrative in nature.
Members are expected to exercise their professional judgment while making its use
depending upon facts and circumstances of each case and read this check list in
conjunction with the Statement on Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003.
An Illustrative Checklist
on Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
[As Amended by Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004]
Client :
Audit Period :
Manager In-Charge:
Claus
e no.
Particulars
Remar
ks
Working Paper Reference
4(i)(a) Whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(a) Whether records of Fixed
Assets (tangible,
intangible and leased
assets) are maintained
showing the following
particulars:

(i) Sufficient
description
(distinctive numbers,
purchase
agreement,
documents, records
and registration
references, etc.) of
the asset to make
identification
possible.
(ii) Classification, that
is, the head under
which it is shown in
the accounts, e.g.,
plant and

CARO, 2003 VII-182
machinery, office
equipment, etc.
(iii) Location/situation.
(iv) Quantity, i.e.,
number of units.
(v) Original cost.
(vi) Year of purchase.
(vii) Adjustment for
revaluation or for
any increase or
decrease in cost,
e.g., on revaluation
of foreign exchange
liabilities.
(viii) Date of revaluation,
if any.
(ix) Rate and basis of
depreciation,
particulars regarding
amortisation and
impairment
(x) Depreciation,
amortisation and
impairment for the
current year.
(xi) Accumulated
depreciation,
amortisation and
impairment loss.
(xii) Particulars
regarding sale,
discarding,
demolition,
destruction etc.
(xiii) Particulars of fixed
assets that have
been retired from
active use and held
for disposal.
(xiv) Particulars of fixed
CARO, 2003 VII-183
assets that have
been fully
depreciated or
amortised or
impaired.
(b) Whether aggregate
original cost, depreciation
or amortisation to date
and impairment loss, if
any, as per the
register/records agrees
with General Ledger
balances? If not, note the
disagreements in respect
of each class of assets.

Conclusion:
4(i)(b) Whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the
management at reasonable intervals; whether any material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so,
whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of
account.
(a) (i) Whether Fixed
Assets were
physically verified
at any time during
the year or earlier
years according to
a phased
program?
(ii) What is the
periodicity of
physical
verification and
whether the same
is reasonable?
(iii) Whether assets
physically verified
agreed/ reconciled
with book figures?
If not, note the
discrepancies against

CARO, 2003 VII-184
each class of assets in
terms of value, and
state how the
discrepancies have
been dealt with.
(iv) Instructions to
officials for
carrying out
physical
verification to
include
procedures,
timing,
competency of
team members,
countsheets/tags,
formats etc.
(b) Physically verify few
items from the fixed
asset register & vice
versa.

(c) Whether management
representation is
obtained confirming
that:
fixed assets are
physically verified
by the company in
accordance with
the policy of the
company.
periodicity of the
of fixed assets.
details of the
material
discrepancies
noticed during the
of the fixed assets.
If no discrepancies

CARO, 2003 VII-185
were noted during
physical
verification, the
same should be
clearly mentioned.
Conclusion:
4(i)(c) If a substantial part of fixed assets have been disposed off during
the year, whether it has affected the going concern.
(a) Whether the company
has disposed off
substantial part of fixed
assets during the
accounting period? If
yes, whether the
disposal of such part of
the fixed assets has
triggered the risk of
going concern
assumption being no
longer appropriate? Is
such risk mitigated by
factors such as the
managements plan to
adopt a more profitable
line of business, or
where the sale of fixed
assets is for generating
funds for fresh
acquisition of fixed
assets?

(b) Whether sufficient and
appropriate audit
evidence obtained
(General Meeting
minutes, Board minutes,
minutes of committees,
representation from
management etc.) that
plans of the
management are
feasible, are likely to be
implemented, and that

CARO, 2003 VII-186
the outcome of these
plans would improve the
situation.
(c) Whether going concern
assumption is
appropriate due to
mitigating factors?
i. If yes, whether
plan or factors
that need to be
disclosed have
been disclosed?
ii. If no, whether
adequate
disclosure has
been made in the
financial
statement and the
fact been
highlighted in the
Report?

Conclusion:
4(ii)(a) Whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at
reasonable intervals by the management.
(a) Has the management
physically verified the
inventory, as defined in
AS 2? Inventory
normally includes-
Raw materials and
Components
Packing materials
Maintenance
supplies
Work in progress
Finished Goods
Stores and Spares
Consumables and
Loose tools

(b) Whether evidence of
CARO, 2003 VII-187
physical verification has
been seen and
reasonableness of
periodicity and
procedure of physical
verification evaluated? If
yes, verify:
written instructions
issued by the
management.
duly authenticated
sheets.
duly authenticated
summary sheets/
consolidation sheet
internal memo etc.
regarding issues
arising on physical
verification.
any other
documents
evidencing physical
verification.

Conclusion:
4(ii)(b) Are the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed
by the management reasonable and adequate in relation to the
size of the company and the nature of its business? If not, the
inadequacies in such procedures should be reported.
(a) Whether stock-taking
procedures were
reasonable and
adequate in relation to
the size of the
Company, nature of its
business and volume of
stock? If not, list out the
inadequacies / weak-
nesses so observed.

CARO, 2003 VII-188
(b) Whether the
management has
instituted adequate cut-
off procedures?

(c) Whether the original
sheets have been
reviewed and selected
items traced into the
final inventories?
(including the more
valuable ones as per
ABC classification)

(d) Whether the comparison
of final inventories with
stock has been done?
Whether records and
other corroborative
evidence, e.g. inventory
statements submitted to
banks?

(e) Whether the procedures
for identifying damaged
and obsolete items of
inventory operate
properly?

(f) Instructions issued by
the management

(g) In case of continuous
stock taking method,
whether management:

(i) maintains
adequate and up-
to-date stock
records;
(ii) has established
adequate
procedures for
physical
verification of
inventories, so that

CARO, 2003 VII-189
in the normal
circumstances, the
programme of
physical
verification will
cover all material
items of inventory
at least once
during the year;
and
(iii) investigates and
corrects all
material
differences
between the book
records and the
physical counts.
Conclusion:
4(ii)(c ) Whether the company is maintaining proper records of inventory
and whether any material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt
with in the books of account.
(a) Proper records, in
general, should contain,
among other things, the
following particulars:
details regarding
quantity of the
receipts, issues,
balances and dates
of transactions in a
chronological
manner;
particulars of the
item, like
nomenclature,
nature, etc.
relevant document
no. & department
identification, if any;
identification code

CARO, 2003 VII-190
of the item;
physically verified
quantities;
location/situation;
valuation details; if
any.
(b) Whether the
transactions entered in
stock registers are duly
supported by relevant
documents.

(c) Whether stock register
is updated and value of
inventory extracted from
above said records tally
with the books of
account.

(d) If any material
discrepancies were
found as compared to
stock records, what
were the extent of
discrepancies (in terms
of value) and how the
same have been dealt
with in the books of
account as well as in
the stock records?

Conclusion:
4(iii)(a) Has the company granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
parties and amount involved in the transactions; and
(i) Has the Company
granted any loans
(Secured or
Unsecured) to
companies, firms
or other parties
listed in the
register

CARO, 2003 VII-191
maintained under
Section 301 of the
Act? If yes, give
number of parties
and the maximum
amount involved at
any time during
the year.
(ii) Where the
company has
granted any loans
to section 301
parties and
squared off during
the year, give
details of such
transactions ?
Conclusion:
4(iii)(b) Whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
loans given by the company, secured or unsecured, are prima
Whether the terms of
loans are prima facie
prejudicial, due
consideration to be
given to the factors
mentioned below:
terms & condition
of the loan
repayment, rate of
interest, restrictive
covenants etc.,
companys financial
standing, its ability
to lend,
the nature of the
security,
prevailing market
rate of interest etc.

Conclusion:
CARO, 2003 VII-192
4(iii)(c) Whether the receipt of principal amount and interest are also
regular; and
(a) Whether principal
amount and interest
thereon are received
regularly on the due
date or immediately
thereafter or annually in
case due date is not
specified?

(b) If not, the same should
be reported.

Conclusion:
4(iii)(d) If overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh, whether
reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery
of the principal and interest.
(a) Whether reasonable
steps taken for recovery
of loan?

(b) Following documents
may be seen for
verification of
reasonableness of
steps taken by the
company for recovery of
principal and accrued
interest on loan granted:
Facts of each case
including amounts
involved
Issue of reminder
Sending of
advocates or
solicitors notice
In absence of legal
steps whether auditor is
satisfied that
reasonable steps have
been taken

(c) Obtain managements
CARO, 2003 VII-193
representation
regarding steps that
have been taken for
recovery of overdue
amounts exceeding
rupees one lakh.
Conclusion:
4(iii)(e) Has the company taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
parties and the amount involved in the transactions; and
(i) Has the company taken
any loans (secured or
unsecured) from
companies, firms or
other parties listed in
the register maintained
Act? If yes, give
number of parties and
the maximum amount
involved at any time
during the year.

(ii) Where the company
has taken any loans
from section 301 parties
and squared off during
the year, give details of
such transactions?

Conclusion:
4(iii)(f) Whether the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
loans taken by the company, secured or unsecured, are prima
Whether the terms of
loans are prima facie
prejudicial, due
consideration to be
given to the factors
mentioned below:
Terms and
conditions of the

CARO, 2003 VII-194
loan repayment,
rate of interest,
restrictive
covenants, etc.
Companys
financial standing,
its ability to
borrow.
The nature of the
security
The availability of
alternative sources
of finance.
The urgency of
borrowing
The purpose of the
loan
Prevailing market
rate of interest,
etc.
Conclusion:
4(iii)(g) Whether payment of the principal amount and interest are also
regular.
(a) Whether principal
amount and interest
thereon are paid
regularly on the due
date or immediately
thereafter or annually in
case due date is not
specified?

(b) If not, the same should
be reported.

Conclusion:
4(iv) Is there an adequate internal control procedure commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business, for
the purpose of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of
goods and services? Whether there is a continuing failure to
correct major weaknesses in internal control.
(a) Complete the standard
CARO, 2003 VII-195
questionnaire in respect
of:
Inventory
Fixed Assets
Sales
Services
(refer Appendix IX)
(b) Prepare Summary
statements for each
section showing the
major weakness in the
system which calls for
our reservations.
Note:
(Major weakness
depends upon facts and
circumstances.
Ordinarily, any
weakness in the internal
control that may result
into a significant loss to
the company or may
result in a material
misstatement is
considered to be a
major weakness.)

(c) Whether continuing
failure is with reference
to the weakness that
existed at the time of
previous years audit
and known to the
management and not
corrected on the date of
Balance Sheet?

(d) Whether there was a
continuing failure to
correct major weakness
in the internal control
system, is corrected at

CARO, 2003 VII-196
the time of issuance of
report, state the fact.
(e) Whether management
has taken reasonable
steps to correct major
weakness in the internal
control system, but
weakness continues, if
yes, report the
weakness and steps
taken for correcting the
weakness.

(f) Whether the report of
internal auditors,
minutes of the meeting
of the audit committee if
any, previous years
working paper have
been reviewed in order
to determine
weaknesses in the
internal controls already
communicated to
management?

(g) Whether the existence
of any major weakness
in the internal control
that has adverse effect
have been considered
for reporting
appropriately?

Conclusion:
4(v)(a) Whether the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to
in Section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section; and
(a) Whether a written
representation from the
management has been
obtained concerning the
completion of the
entries in the register

CARO, 2003 VII-197
required to be
maintained under
section 301 of the Act?
(b) Whether the
completeness of the
entries as stated above
have been verified with
reference of the
following:

review of working
papers for the prior
years;
review the entitys
procedures for
identification of
parties;
review Form 24AA,
and ensure
compliance with
provisions of
section 297 & 299
Tracing
transactions in the
books of Account

c) In case the company
has not maintained the
register required to be
maintained by it under
Section 301, mention
the fact of non-
maintenance/ improper
maintenance of the
aforesaid register.

Conclusion:
4(v)(b) Whether transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
Arrangements have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(This information is required only in case of transactions
exceeding the value of five lakh rupees in respect of any party
and in any one financial year.)
CARO, 2003 VII-198
(a) Whether
reasonableness of the
prices of transactions,
exceeding the value of
Rs. 5,00,000/- in
respect of any party and
during the financial
year, entered in
pursuance of contracts
or arrangements
entered in the
register(s) maintained
u/s 301 of the Act,
ensured on the basis of
prevailing market prices
at the relevant time and
all the factors
surrounding the
transactions such as the
delivery period/
schedule of
implementation, the
quality of the product/
service, the quantity,
the credit terms, the
previous record of
supplier/ buyer/ client,
Quotation analysis
reasons for not taking
lowest / highest prices
etc.

(b) In cases where
transactions are entered
with sole suppliers also
ensure that the fact is
stated in the report,
examine the
reasonableness of
prices paid with
reference to list prices
of the supplier
concerned, other trade

CARO, 2003 VII-199
terms of the supplier,
etc.
Conclusion:
4(vi) In case the company has accepted deposits fromthe public,
whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and
the provisions of sections 58A , 58AA or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, where
applicable, have been complied with. If not, the nature of
contraventions should be stated; if an order has been passed by
Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or
Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal whether
the same has been complied with or not?
(a) If the Company has
accepted deposits from
the public state
whether:

(i) The directives
issued by the
Reserve Bank of
India have been
complied with and
also that:
(ii) The provisions of
Section 58A or
any other
provisions of the
Companies Act,
and the rules
framed there
under have been
complied with.
(iii) List out
contraventions, if
any.

(b) Whether there is
noncompliance of
section 58AA, failure of
the company to intimate
the tribunal any default
in repayment of deposit
made by small investors

CARO, 2003 VII-200
or part thereof or any
interest thereon.
(c) Where an order has
been passed by the
CLB or National
Company Law Tribunal
or Reserve Bank of
India or any Court or
any other Tribunal in
respect of above,
examine the steps
taken by the company
to comply with the
order, and if not, report
briefly stating there in
the nature of
contravention and the
fact that Company has
not complied with the
order.

Conclusion:
4(vii) In the case of listed companies and/or other companies having a
paid-up capital and reserves exceeding Rs.50 lakhs as at the
commencement of the financial year concerned, or having an
average annual turnover exceeding five crores rupees for a
period of three consecutive financial years immediately
preceding the financial year concerned, whether the company
has an internal audit systemcommensurate with its size and
nature of its business.
Have you considered
the following factors to
determine whether the
internal audit system is
commensurate with the
size of the company
and nature of its
business:

(a) Is there an internal
audit system in the
Company? (Mere
internal check

CARO, 2003 VII-201
should not be
considered as
internal audit).
(b) Has the internal
audit been
conducted by a
separate internal
audit department
or by outside
professional firm?

(c) Is the internal
audit department
sufficient in size
and properly
manned to
perform the
internal audit
function?

(d) Is the head of the
internal audit
department a
member of the
Institute of
Chartered
Accountants of
India?

(e) Is it independent
of the accounting
and custody
departments?

(f) To whom the
department is
responsible?

(g) Are the audits
conducted in
accordance with
the generally
accepted auditing
standards?

(h) Do the Internal
Auditors have

CARO, 2003 VII-202
questionnaires or
guide manual?
(i) Whether audit
work is carried out
according to a
plan and
programme and, if
so what are the
areas covered this
year?

(j) Whether adequate
files and records
are maintained by
the Internal
Auditors?

(k) Do the Internal
Auditors Reports
give:
Conclusions on
the audit?
Exceptions to the
Account and
Records?
Recommendations
on the internal
control and
procedures?

(l) With respect to the
Internal Auditors
Reports:
are they sent to an
appropriate
operating official?
is corrective/
remedial action
initiated?
do internal auditors
follow up to see
that appropriate
action is taken?

CARO, 2003 VII-203
do the files indicate
that appropriate
action was taken?
Conclusion:
4(viii) Where maintenance of cost records has been prescribed by the
Central Government under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), whether such accounts and records have
been made and maintained.
Whether cost
accounting records
have been prescribed
for the company under
section 209 (1)(d) of the
Companies Act? If so
verify whether proper
cost accounts and
records are made and
maintained by the
Company as
prescribed.

Conclusion:
4(ix)(a
)
Is the company regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues
including provident fund, investor education and protection fund,
employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax,
service tax, customduty, excise duty, cess and any other
statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and if not, the
extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last
day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six
months fromthe date they became payable, shall be indicated by
the auditor.
(a) Whether a list of
statutory dues which
company is required to
deposit regularly has
been obtained.

(b) In case where there are
no arrears on the
balance sheet date but
the company has been
irregular during the year
in depositing the

CARO, 2003 VII-204
statutory dues, the fact
should be stated.
(c) Whether the Company
has been generally
regular in depositing
statutory dues or
otherwise, indicate the
same.

Note: A matter is
disputed where there is
a positive evidence or
action on the part of the
company to show that it
has not accepted the
demand for payment of
tax or duty, e.g., where
it has gone into appeal.

(d) Whether penalty and/or
interest levied under the
respective law is
included under amounts
payable.

(e) Ensure that disclosure
is restricted to the
actual arrears and
should not include the
amounts which have not
fallen due for deposit
and have been shown
as arrears at the
balance sheet date.

(f) Whether the information
about arrears of
outstanding statutory
dues is provided in the
format:
Name of the
Statute
Nature of the dues
Amount (Rs.)
Period to which

CARO, 2003 VII-205
amount relates
Due date
Date of Payment
(g) Whether a written
representation with
reference to the date of
the balance sheet from
the management
obtained:
specifying the
cases and the
amounts
considered
disputed;
containing a list of
the cases and the
amounts in respect
of the statutory
dues which are
undisputed and
have remained
outstanding for a
period of more than
six months from the
date they became
payable;
containing a
statement as to the
completeness of
the information
provided by the
management.

(h) Whether any register of
significant laws with
which the entity has to
comply within its
particular industry and a
record of complaints in
respect of non-
compliance been
maintained

CARO, 2003 VII-206
Conclusion:
4(ix)(b
)
In case dues of income tax/sales tax/ wealth tax/service tax/
custom duty/excise duty/cess have not been deposited on
account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum
where dispute is pending shall be mentioned. (A mere
representation to the department shall not constitute a dispute.)
(a) Review internal audit
report, minutes of the
meeting of the board of
Directors and audit
committee

(b) Ensure that information
about arrears of
disputed statutory dues
is provided in the
format:
Name of the
Statute
Nature of the dues
Amount (Rs.)
Period to which
amount relates
Forum where
dispute is pending

4(x) Whether in case of a company which has been registered for a
period not less than five years, its accumulated losses at the end
of the financial year are not less than fifty per cent of its net worth
and whether it has incurred cash losses in such financial year
and in the immediately preceding financial year .
(a) Whether the Company
is in existence for more
than five years

(b) Whether the
accumulated losses at
the end of the financial
year exceed 50% of the
net worth or not?

(c) Whether the company
has incurred cash
losses in current year?

CARO, 2003 VII-207
(d) Whether the company
has incurred cash
losses in the
immediately preceding
financial year?

(e) Whether effect of
qualification on the
figure of accumulated
losses, net worth and
cash losses
considered? In case
qualification is not
capable of being
quantified, whether the
fact is stated in the
Report?

Conclusion:
4(xi) Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution or bank or debenture holders? If yes, the
period and amount of default to be reported.
(a) Whether all defaults
existing at the balance
sheet date are reported
irrespective of when
those defaults have
occurred.

(b) If application of
reschedulement of loan
has been
made/accepted or
default has been made
good during the
accounting period,
whether the fact has
been stated.

(c) Whether the disputes
between the company
and the lender on
various issues give rise
to disclaimer stating the
fact there is a dispute

CARO, 2003 VII-208
between the company
and the lender and
auditor is unable to
determine whether
there is a default in
repayment of dues to
the lender concerned.
Conclusion:
4(xii) Whether adequate documents and records are maintained in
cases where the company has granted loans and advances on
the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and
other securities; If not, the deficiencies to be pointed out.
(a) Has the company
maintained the following
documents & records:

full name and
address of the
borrower.
amount of the loan
or advance.
Stipulations
regarding period of
repayment, the rate
of interest, the
security to be
pledged and all
other terms of the
loan or advance.
The record of the
disbursements,
repayments
towards the loan or
advance and
recovery of the
interest.
Full particulars of
the security
pledged.
documents needed
to transfer the

CARO, 2003 VII-209
ownership of the
security in case of
need.
Periodical
acknowledgements
from the parties
confirming the
balances due.
Proof that the party
has power to
borrow, e.g., in
case the borrower
is a company, its
memorandum of
association, board
resolution or
shareholders
resolution.
Information about
market value of
securities such as
stock exchange
quotations.
(b) Whether physical
verification of security
pledged carried on.

(c) Whether security is in
the custody of company
and market value of
security is adequate to
cover the outstanding
amount of loan and
interest.

(d) Whether there is any
deficiency, observed at
the time of examining
various documents and
record as referred
above? if yes, report the
same.

Conclusion:
CARO, 2003 VII-210
4(xiii) Whether the provisions of any special statute applicable to chit
fund have been duly complied with?
(a) Enquire whether
company is carrying
on the chit fund
business? (a
transaction is not a
chit within the
meaning of this
clause, if in such
transaction:
Some alone, but
not all, of the
subscribers get
the prize amount
without any
liability to pay
future
subscriptions; or
All the
subscribers get
the chit amount
by turn with a
liability to pay
future
subscriptions.)

(b) Ensure that the
company has
complied with all the
provisions of the
special statutes,
relating to of the chit
fund company and
state the same.

In respect of nidhi/mutual benefit fund/societies:
(a) whether the net-owned funds to deposit liability ratio is
more than 1:20 as on the date of balance sheet;
(b) whether the company has complied with the prudential
norms on income recognition and provisioning against
sub-standard/ doubtful/loss assets;
(c) whether the company has adequate procedures for
CARO, 2003 VII-211
appraisal of credit proposals/ requests, assessment of
credit needs and repayment capacity of the borrowers;
(d) Whether the repayment schedule of various loans granted
by the nidhi is based on the repayment capacity of the
borrower.
(a) Whether, in the case of a
nidhi and mutual benefit
society, net-owned funds
to deposit liability ratio is
more than 1:20 as on the
date of balance sheet?
(i) Net owned funds in
the case of a nidhi
or a mutual benefit
society means the
aggregate of paid-
up equity capital and
free reserves as
reduced by
accumulated losses
and intangible
assets appearing in
the last audited
balance sheet of the
company.
(ii) Free reserves is a
reserve is
considered as a
free reserve if it is
available for
distribution as
dividend.
(iii) The amount
representing the
proceeds of issue of
preference shares
shall not be included
for calculating net-
owned funds.
However, for nidhis
or mutual benefit

CARO, 2003 VII-212
societies existing on
or before 26
th
July
2001, the proceeds
of issue of
preference shares
are to be included
for calculation of
net-owned funds up
to the financial year
31st March 2003.
(iv) Deposit liability
would mean the
aggregate deposits
accepted by the
company.
(b) Ensure that ratio is
computed by using the
figures of net owned
funds and deposit liability
computed in accordance
with as stated under this
clause.

(c) Sub Clause (b) of the
Order requires, whether,
the company has
complied with the
prudential norms on
provisioning against sub-
standard/doubtful and
loss assets.

(d) Whether the prudential
norm for revenue
recognition and
classification of assets
has been complied with
by the nidhi or mutual
benefit society in the
preparation and
presentation of the
financial statements? If
not state the fact in

CARO, 2003 VII-213
report.
(e) Examine, as per sub-
clause (c) of the order
study and analyse the
various procedures
prevailing in the company
for appraisal of credit
proposals/requests,
needs and repayment
capacity of the borrowers
and their follow up.

(f) As per sub-clause (d) of
the order whether the
repayment schedule of
various loans granted by
the nidhi is based on the
repayment capacity of the
borrower. Scope is limited
to the examination of
documents available with
the company in regard to
loan.

(g) Ensure that the system,
policies and procedures
are complied with based
on the examination of all
large loans and a test
check of other loans.

(h) Have we examined the
documentation available
with the company with
regard to large loans.

Conclusion:
4(xiv) If the company is dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments, whether proper records have
been maintained of the transactions and contracts and whether
timely entries have been made therein; also whether the shares,
securities, debentures and other investments have been held by
the company, in its own name except to the extent of the
exemption, if any, granted under section 49 of the Act.
CARO, 2003 VII-214
Note: The clause is not
applicable to a company
which invest its surplus
funds with a view to earn
income from investment
of surplus funds.

(a) Whether:
records regarding
transactions and
contracts are
maintained;
timely entries have
been made in such
records; and
the investments are
in the companys own
name.

(b) Whether the form in which
records have been
maintained is adequate,
properly written up and
preserved?

(c) Whether adequacy of the
records maintained can
be verified from the
following:
purchases and sales
and the profit or loss
arising on sale,
the stock of
investments and their
valuation, and
the amounts due for
sales and payable for
purchases.

(d) To ascertain that timely
entries are made in the
records, have you applied
any of the following
methods:

CARO, 2003 VII-215
a surprise inspection
of the records;
an examination of the
system of internal
control with particular
reference to the
manner in which and
the time at which
entries are made in
the records; and
an examination of the
internal audit reports
to ensure if the
programme of
internal audit
specifically covers an
inspection of the
records to determine
whether entries are
made in time.

(e) In case investments
which are intended to be
sold immediately may not
have been transferred in
the name of the company,
whether, in the
circumstances of each
case, the failure to
transfer the investments
to the companys name is
understandable.

Conclusion:
4(xv) Whether the company has given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from bank or financial institutions, the terms and
conditions whereof are prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(a) Whether the company has
given any guarantee for
loans taken by others from
bank or financial
institutions? If yes, examine
the terms and conditions of

CARO, 2003 VII-216
guarantees given by the
company for loans taken by
other.
(b) Ensure on the basis of
examination of
Memorandum of Association
whether company can issue
guarantees?

(c) Obtained a list of
guarantees issued by the
company during the year
from the management.

(d) Whether there are adequate
internal controls over
issuance of guarantees?

(e) Review the guarantees to
ensure the reasonableness
thereof in view of previous
experience and knowledge
of current years activities.

(f) Whether the tangible/
intangible benefits flowing to
the company due to
furnishing of guarantee are
commensurate with risk
undertaken by the company
in doing so.

(g) Whether on the basis of
examination carried out, the
company could have
provided the guarantee on
better terms and conditions,
obtain the companys
explanation in writing as to
why the company considers
that the terms obtained are
not prejudicial to the interest
of the company.

(h) In case the explanation
given above is not
convincing, state that the

CARO, 2003 VII-217
terms and conditions on
which the company has
given the guarantees are
prejudicial to the interests of
the company and also
disclose the amount
involved in such guarantee.
(i) Whether compliance with
the provisions with sections
295 and 372A of Companies
Act ensured?

(j) Whether a written
representation from the
management obtained that:

all obligations in respect
of guarantees have
been duly recorded in
the register and
disclosed;
there are no guarantees
issued up to the year-
end which are yet to be
recorded; and
disclosed contingent
liabilities do not include
any contingencies
which are likely to result
in a loss and which,
therefore, require
adjustment of assets or
liabilities.

Conclusion:
4(xvi) Whether the termloans were applied for the purpose for which
the loans were obtained.
(a) Whether the company has
taken any term loan?

(b) Examine the terms and
conditions subject to which
the company has obtained
the term loans including
purpose for which term

CARO, 2003 VII-218
loans were sanctioned?
(c) Compare the purpose for
which term loans were
sanctioned with the actual
utilisation of the loans and
obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence regarding the
utilisation of the amounts
raised.

(d) In case during a
construction phase surplus
funds were temporarily
invested, however,
subsequently the same are
utilised for the stated
objectives, mention the fact
that the funds were
temporarily used for the
purpose other than for which
the loan was sanctioned but
were ultimately utilised for
the stated end-use.

(e) Whether term loans taken
were not applied for stated
purpose during the year for
any reason? If yes, mention
the facts and amount. Also
disclose the fact about
utilization of term loan of
earlier year in current year.

(f) Whether the fund flow
statement has been
reviewed where one to one
correlation was not possible.

Conclusion:
4(xvii) Whether the funds raised on short-termbasis have been used for
long terminvestment. If yes, the nature and amount is to be
indicated.
(a) Whether movement of funds of
company can be examined and
verified and such movement

CARO, 2003 VII-219
also be supported by relevant
documentation, direct
relationship between particular
funds and an asset from the
balance sheet can be
ascertained.
(b) Whether trail is available to
show that movement of source
and application of funds and a
direct relationship between
them? If not, determine
movement and application of
funds on an overall basis.

(c) Whether funds raised for short
term have been applied for
long-term requirements of the
company?

Conclusion:
4(xviii) Whether the company has made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the Register
maintained under Section 301 of the Act, and if so whether the
price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to the
interest of the company.
(a) Whether pricing of shares in
case of listed company allotted
preferentially is in accordance
with the guidelines issued by
SEBI? If yes, it may be
concluded that shares have
been issued at a price which is
not prejudicial to the interest of
the Company.

(b) In case of unlisted or private
companies, where any of the
four pricing methods (Net
Asset Basis, Maintainable
Profit Basis, Yield Basis &
Discounted Cash flow Method)
have been followed, it may be
concluded that the share price
is not prejudicial to the interest

CARO, 2003 VII-220
of the Company.
(c) In case an expert opinion has
been relied upon ensure
compliance SA 620 Using the
work of expert

(d) Whether opinion is formed on
the basis of the Order issued
by the Government, state the
fact of reliance on the
Government Order.

(e) Obtain a representation from
the management as to why the
company considers that the
price charged is not prejudicial
to the interest of the company.
If the explanation is not
convincing, state that the price
charged by the company is
company.

Conclusion:
4(xix) Whether security or charge has been created in respect of
debentures issued?
(a) Where the company has
issued any debentures,
examine the debenture trust
deed executed under section
117A of the Act.

(b) Whether proper security or
charge has been created in
favour of the debenture trust?
Verify the relevant documents.

(c) Whether provisions of Section
125 and 130 of the Companies
Act, 1956 have been complied
with regarding creation of
charge?

Conclusion:
4(xx) Whether the management has disclosed the end use of money
raised by public issues and the same has been verified.
CARO, 2003 VII-221
(a) Whether complete disclosure
of the end use of money raised
by public issues has been
made in the Financial
Statements? If not, state the
fact.

(b) Whether the end use of money
raised from public issues is
capable of being determined?
If not state the fact.

(c) Whether the end-use of
money disclosed in the
financial statements by way of
a Note is significantly different
from the actual end use? If so,
state the fact.

(d) Examine the various
documents submitted to SEBI,
offer document and also
examine the report of board of
directors, if available, to find
out whether funds raised have
been utilized for the purpose
for which they were raised.

(e) Whether a representation of
the management has been
obtained as to the
completeness of the
disclosures with regard to the
end-use of moneys raised by
public issues?

(f) Whether the fund flow
statement has been reviewed
where one to one correlation is
not possible.

(g) In case of a listed company
where the issue size is more
than Rs.500 croes ensure
monetary agency is appointed

Conclusion:
4(xxi) Whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or
CARO, 2003 VII-222
reported during the year. If yes, the nature and the amount
involved is to be indicated.
(a) Has SA 240 been complied
with?

(b) Examine the following to
ascertain whether any fraud
has been reported or noticed
by the management?

the reports of the internal
Audit
the auditor should enquire
from the management
about any frauds on or by
the company that it has
noticed or that have been
reported to it.
discuss the matter with
other employees of the
company.
examine the minutes book
of the board meeting, audit
committee etc., of the
company in this regard.

(c) Where any fraud on the
company or by the company
has been noticed or reported,
determine the nature and
amount of frauds and disclose
the same. Obtain management
representation to this effect.

Conclusion:

Discussed with
Designation
Date

CARO, 2003 VII-223
Appendix IX
Illustrative List of Questions
For Evaluating Internal Controls
18

A. Purchases and Creditors
1. Is purchasing centralised in the Purchase Department?
2. (a) Are purchases made only from approved suppliers?
(b) Is a list of approved suppliers maintained for this purpose?
(c) Does the master list contain more than one source of supply
for all important materials?
3. Are the Purchase Orders based on valid purchase requisitions duly
signed by persons authorised in this behalf?
4. (a) Are purchases made on behalf of employees?
(b) If so, is the same procedure followed as for other purchases?
5. Is special approval required for:
(a) Purchase from employees, Directors and Companies in which
Directors are interested?
(b) Purchases of capital goods?
6. Are purchases based on competitive quotations from two or more
suppliers?
7. Is comparative quotation analysis sheet drawn before purchases are
authorised?
8. If the lower quotation is not accepted, is the purchase approved by a
senior official?
9. If the price variation clause is included, is it approved by a senior
official?
10. Are purchase orders pre-numbered and strict control exercised over
unused forms?
11. Are purchase orders signed only by employees authorised in this
behalf?
12. Do purchase orders contain the following minimum information:
(a) Name of supplier?
(b) Delivery terms?

18
Extracts fromInternal Control Questionnaire, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India. Members attention is invited to para 6of the Internal Control Questionnaire for the
appropriate format of the Questionnaire.
CARO, 2003 VII-224
(c) Quantity?
(d) Price?
(e) Freight terms?
(f) Payment terms?
(g) Any extra term as applicable?
13. Is revision of terms of purchase orders duly authorised?
14. (a) Are copies of purchase orders and revisions forwarded to
Accounts and Receiving Departments?
(b) If yes, do the copies show the quantities ordered?
(c) If no, is there an adequate procedure for the Receiving
Department to be notified to accept deliveries?
15. Is a list of pending purchase orders compiled by the Purchase
Department at least once every quarter?
16. Are the materials, supplies, etc., received only in the Receiving
Department?
17. If they are received directly by User Department/
Processors/Customers, is there a procedure of obtaining
acknowledgement for the quantity received and the condition of the
goods?
18. Are persons connected with receipt of materials and the keeping of
receiving records denied authority to issue purchase orders or to
approve invoices?
19. Are materials, supplies inspected and counted, weighted or
measured in the Receiving Department?
20. Are quantities and description checked against purchase order (or
other form of notification) and goods inspected for condition?
21. (a) Does the Receiving Department deliver or supervise the
delivery of each item received to the proper Stores or
Department location?
(b) Are acknowledgements obtained from suppliers for
goods/containers returned to them?
22. Are all receipts of materials evidenced by pre-numbered Goods
Received Notes?
23. Are copies of Goods Received Notes forwarded to Accounts
Department and a list of goods received to Purchase Department?
24. Are all cases of materials returned, shortages and rejections advised
to the Accounts Departments, for raising Debit Memos on suppliers
or claim bills on carriers/insurance companies, as the case may be?
CARO, 2003 VII-225
25. Are all debit notes, etc.
(a) pre-numbered?
(b) numerically controlled?
(c) properly recorded (in the financial accounts or in
memorandum registers, as the case may be)?
26. (a) Are all suppliers invoices routed direct to the Accounts
Department?
(b) Are they entered in a Bill Register before submitting them to
other department for check and/or approval?
(c) Are advance and partial payments entered on the invoices
before they are submitted to other department?
27. Does the system ensure that all invoices and credit notes received
are duly processed?
28. In respect of raw materials and supplies, are reconciliation made of
quantities and/or values received, as shown by purchase invoices,
with receipts into stock records?
29. Are duplicate invoices marked immediately on receipt to avoid
payment against them?
30. If payments are made against duplicate invoices even occasionally,
are adequate precautions taken to avoid duplicate payments?
31. Does the Accounts Department match the invoices of suppliers with
Goods Received Notes or acknowledgements received as per Q.17
and purchase orders?
32. (a) Are Goods Received Notes and receiving records regularly
reviewed for items for which no invoices have been received?
(b) Are all such items investigated and is provision made for the
liability in respect of such items?
(c) Is such review/investigation done by a person independent of
those responsible for the receipt and control or goods?
33. Do all invoices bear evidence of being checked for prices, freight
terms, extensions and additions?
34. Is the relative purchase order attached to the invoice for payment?
35. Where the client both buys from and sells to a person regularly, is a
periodic review made of all amounts due from that person to
determine whether any set-off is necessary?
36. (a) Is a special request used for making payments in advance or
against documents through Bank?
(b) Thereafter, are the invoices processed in the normal course?
CARO, 2003 VII-226
37. (a) Are all advance payments duly authorised by persons
competent to authorise such payment?
(b) Is a list of pending advances made at least every quarter and
is a proper follow-up maintained?
38. Are all adjustments to creditors accounts duly approved by those
authorised in this behalf?
39. Is a list of employees, by designation, with limits of authority in
respect of several matters referred to in this section maintained?
40. Are all suppliers statements compared with ledger accounts?
41. Is there any follow-up action to investigate differences, if any,
between the suppliers statements and the ledger accounts?
42. Is a list of unpaid creditors prepared and reconciled periodically with
the General Ledger Control account?
43. Is there a system of ensuring that cash discounts are availed of
whenever offered?
B. Stocks
1. Are stocks stored in assigned areas?
2. If so, is access to these areas limited?
3. Are stocks insured against the following risks:
(a) fire?
(b) strike, riot and civil commotion?
(c) flood?
(d) hail damage where applicable?
4. If the answer to any of the above is negative, is it due to specific
decision taken by a senior official?
5. Is a record maintained for the insurance polices?
6. Is the record reviewed periodically?
7. Is there an official who decides on the value for which the stocks are
to be insured?
8. Is the adequacy of the insurance cover reviewed periodically?
9. Are perpetual stock records kept for:
(a) raw materials?
(b) work-in-progress?
(c) finished goods?
(d) stores?
10. Are they periodically reconciled with accounting records?
CARO, 2003 VII-227
11. Is there a system of perpetual inventory for stocks of:
(a) raw materials?
(b) work-in-progress?
(c) finished goods?
(d) stores?
12. Where there is a system of perpetual inventory count:
(a) Is there a periodical report of shortages/excess?
(b) If so, are these differences investigated?
(c) Are these differences adjusted in the stock records and in the
financial accounts?
(d) Is written approval obtained from a responsible official to
adjust these differences?
13. Are there norms for stock levels to be held?
14. Is there a periodic reporting of:
(a) Slow-moving items?
(b) Damaged items?
(c) Obsolete items?
(d) Over-stocked items?
15. Is there a well-laid out written procedure for inventory count?
16. (a) Are stocks physically verified once in a year?
(b) Is this done by a person independent of persons who are
responsible for maintaining these records or the storekeeper?
(c) Are written instructions prepared for guidance of
employees engaged in physical stock taking to cover:
(i) Proper identification and arrangement of stocks?
(ii) Cut-off points of receipts and deliveries?
(iii) Recording of the condition of the stocks?
(iv) Compliance with the conditions warranties in the rela-
tive insurance policies?
17. Are the physical inventory records, such as tags, cards, tally sheets,
under numerical control?
18. Are the clerical steps in the preparation of stock sheets checked
independently for:
(a) Summarisation of quantities?
(b) Unit rates?
(c) Additions?
CARO, 2003 VII-228
(d) Extensions?
(e) Unit conversions?
(f) Summarisation of cards and/or sheets?
19. Are the quantities shown in the stock sheets compared with the
quantities declared to banks or insurers, where possible?
20. If there are significant variations between the actual stocks and book
stocks:
(a) Are they investigated?
(b) Is a recount made where necessary?
(c) Is the stock book corrected with proper authority?
21. Are the following stocks checked:
(1) Physically by the companys staff?
(2) With certificates from concerned holders of the stocks?
(a) Stock in public warehouses?
(b) Stocks with consignees?
(c) Stocks with sub-contractors for fabrication, etc.?
(d) Stocks with customers, on approval?
(e) Stocks in bonded warehouses?
(f) Stocks pledged with third parties?
22. Is stock on hand relating to third parties, such as customers stocks
and consignments physically segregated or properly identified?
23. Are the procedures relating to record keeping and stock-taking made
applicable to third also?
24. Are confirmations obtained from the third parties for stocks held on
their behalf?
25. Are records maintained for:
(a) Scrap available for sale?
(b) By-products?
(c) Returnable containers?
26. Is there an adequate recording procedure for:
(a) Stocks with outsides?
(b) Stocks of outsiders held by the company?
27. Is there a system of job/production orders for control of production?
28. Does the storekeeper issue raw materials, stores etc., only against
Requisition Notes signed by properly authorised officials?
CARO, 2003 VII-229
29. Does the storekeeper acknowledge in writing the quantity of finished
goods received from the Factory?
30. Is the stock record periodically checked with such
acknowledgments?
31. Does the cost system provide for obtaining units or job order costs
for:
(a) Work-in-progress?
(b) Finished goods?
32. Is the cost system integrated with/or reconciled to General Ledger
controls as regards:
(i) Material?
(ii) Labour?
(iii) Overheads?
33. Does the cost system provide for detailed units or job order costs in
terms of:
(i) Raw material costs?
(ii) Direct labour?
(iii) Overheads?
(iv) Physical quantities?
(v) Unit rates?
34. Are similar records kept for service departments also?
35. Are overhead rates:
(a) Reviewed periodically by designated employees?
(b) Adjusted in the light of current experience?
36. Are separate control accounts maintained for stock of:
(a) Work-in-progress?
(b) Finished goods?
37. In a job order industry, are the estimates of costs compared with
actual costs?
38. If standard cost system exists:
(i) Are variances investigated?
(ii) Are standards reviewed periodically?
C. Fixed Assets
Purchases and Disposals
1. Are budgets for capital expenditure approved by the Board?
CARO, 2003 VII-230
2. Are approved budgets communicated in writing to:
(a) Purchase Department?
(b) Accounts Department?
(c) Department originating the request?
3. Are written authorisations required for incurring capital expenditure
for items included in the budget?
4. Is the authority to incur capital expenditure restricted to specified
officials?
5. Are purchases of capital items subject to same controls as are
applicable to purchases of raw materials, stores etc.?
6. Are receipts of capital items subject to same procedures as
applicable to raw materials, stores, etc.?
7. Is there proper check to see that amounts expended do not exceed
the amount authorised?
8. Are supplemental authorisation required for excess expenditures?
9. Is there an established procedure for moving plant and machinery
from the location to another?
10. (i) Is written authority required for:
(a) scrapping fixed assets?
(b) selling fixed assets?
(ii) Is the authority to permit scrapping/selling of fixed assets
restricted to specified officials
(iii) Are limits specified in this regard?
(iv) Are sales of fixed assets subject to same procedures as are
applicable to sales of finished goods?
11. Are reports issued promptly in respect of:
(a) units sold?
(b) units scrapped?
(c) units moved from one location to another?
Records
12. Are fixed assets under construction:
(a) subject to separate control account in General Ledger?
(b) controlled by job number?
13. Is expenditure on wages, materials and stores charged to capital
account on reasonable basis?
14. Is there any official responsible for ensuring that allocation of
expenditure between capital and revenue is in accordance with the
CARO, 2003 VII-231
companys accounting policy?
15. Is a register of all fixed assets (including fully depreciated assets)
maintained?
16. Is the register regularly written up throughout the year?
17. Is the register periodically tallied with the financial accounts?
18. Is the following information available, in the register?
(a) Suppliers name
(b) Date of purchase.
(c) Cost (including additions, improvements, exchange rate
adjustments etc.).
(d) Location and identification number
(e) Rate of depreciation and estimate life
(f) Accumulated depreciation
(g) Estimated salvage value
19. Is a record maintained of equipment used by the company, but
owned by others?
20. Is the register of patents or trade marks maintained up-to-date?
21. Is there a list of title deeds for the landed properties and buildings?
22. Are title deeds of properties kept in safe place?
23. If they are lodged as security, are certificates obtained to that effect
periodically?
24. Are registration books of vehicles periodically verified?
Verification
25. Are fixed assets verified periodically?
26. Is there a written procedure for such verification?
27. Does the procedure provide for verification/confirmation of fixed
assets with third parties?
28. Does the procedure provide for verification of compliance with the
warranties and conditions in the relevant insurance policies?
29. Are reports prepared on such verification?
30. Do such reports indicate damaged/obsolete items of fixed assets?
31. (a) Are discrepancies disclosed by such reports investigated?
(b) Are the records and financial accounts corrected, with proper
authority?
32. Are damaged/obsolete items disclosed by such reports, removed
from the records and financial accounts with proper authority?

CARO, 2003 VII-232
Moulds, Patterns, Jigs. Fixtures, Tools etc.
33. Is there satisfactory control over the acquisition and write-off of such
items?
34. Are there physical safeguards against theft or loss of tools and other
movable equipment?
35. Are records maintained for:
(a) items treated as stock?
(b) items treated as fixed assets?
Insurance
36. (i) Are the following risks covered in respect of buildings and
machinery:
(a) Fire
(b) Strike, riot and civil commotion
(c) Flood
(d) Earthquake
(e) Nuclear risks
(f) Malicious damage
(g) War risks
(ii) If the answer to any of the above is negative, is it due to a
specific decision taken by a senior official?
37. Is there an adequate procedure to ensure that assets acquired
between two renewal dates are also covered by insurance?
38. Is there an official who decides on the value for which policies are
taken?
39. Are the fixed assets insured at re-instatement basis?
40. Does the official who decides on the value for which policies are
taken, review periodically the adequacy of the insurance cover?
41. (i) Is there loss-of-profits insurance cover?
(ii) Is there machinery-breakdown insurance cover?
(iii) If the answer to (i) or (ii) is negative is it due to a specific
decision taken by a senior official?
D. Sales and Debtors
1. Are standard price lists maintained?
2. Are prices which are not based on standard price lists, required to
be approved by a senior executive outside the Sales Department?
3. Are written orders from customers received in all cases?
4. If oral/telephonic orders are received, are they recorded immediately
CARO, 2003 VII-233
in the clients standard forms?
5. Is there a numerical control of all customers orders?
6. Are credit limits fixed in respect of individual customers?
7. Are these limits approved by an official independent of the Sales
Department?
8. Are credit limits reviewed periodically?
9. Are customers credit limits checked before orders are accepted?
10. Is this done by a person independent of the Sales Department?
11. If sales to employees are made at concessional prices:
(a) Is there a limit to the value of such sales?
(b) Is there an adequate procedure to see that these limits are
not exceeded?
(c) Are the amounts recovered in accordance with the terms of sale?
12. Are dispatches of goods authorised only by Dispatch Notes/Gate
Passes or similar documents?
13. Do such Dispatch Notes/Gate Passes or similar documents bear
preprinted numbers?
14. Are they under numerical control?
15. Are they prepared by a person independent of:
(a) the Sales Department?
(b) the processing of invoices?
16. Except when all documents are prepared in one operation, are the
Dispatch Notes/Gate Passes matched with:
(a) Excise Duty records?
(b) Sales invoices?
(c) Freight payable to carriers (where applicable)
17. Are unmatched Dispatch Notes/Gate Passes reviewed periodically?
18. Are the goods actually dispatched checked independently with the
Dispatch Notes/Gate Passes and Customers Orders?
19. Are acknowledgements obtained from the customers for the goods
delivered?
20. Are the customers orders marked for goods delivered?
21. Are shortages in goods delivered to the customers investigated?
22. Are credits to customers for shortages, breakages and losses in
transit match with claims lodged against carriers/insurers?
23. Are sales invoices pre-numbered?
24. Are all invoice numbers accounted for?
CARO, 2003 VII-234
25. Are invoices checked for:
(a) prices?
(b) calculations (including excise duty and sales tax)?
(c) terms of payment?
26. Are no charge invoices authorised by a person independent of the
custody of goods or cash?
27. Are invoices mailed direct to the customers promptly?
28. Are credits customers for remittances posted only from the entries in
the cash book (or equivalent record)?
29. Does cashier notify immediately:
(a) Sales Department,
(b) Debtors Ledger Section and
(c) Credit Controller:
(i) of all dishonoured cheques or other negotiable
instruments?
(ii) of all documents sent through bank but not returned by
the customers?
30. Is immediate follow-up action taken on such notification?
31. Are bills of exchange (or other negotiable instruments) accepted by
customers recorded?
32. Are the bills of exchange, etc., as per such record periodically
verified with the bills on hand?
33. (a) Is a record of customers claims maintained?
(b) Are such claims properly dealt with in the accounts?
34. Does the Receiving Department count, weigh or measure the goods
returned by customers?
35. Does the Receiving Department record them on a Sales Returns
Note?
36. Are copies of Sales Returns Notes sent to:
(a) Customer?
(b) Sales Department?
(c) Debtors Ledger Section?
37. Are the returned goods taken into stock immediately?
38. Is a Credit Note issued to a customer for the goods returned?
39. Are all Credit Notes pre-numbered?
40. Are Credit Notes numerically controlled?
41. Are Credit Notes authorised by a person independent of:
CARO, 2003 VII-235
(a) Custody of goods?
(b) Cash receipts?
(c) Debtors ledger?
42. Are Credit Notes:
(a) compared with Sales Returns Notes or other substantiating
evidence?
(b) checked for prices?
(c) checked for calculations?
43. Are corresponding recoveries of sales commissions made when
Credit Notes are issued to customers?
44. Are units of sales (as per sales invoices) correlated and reconciled
with the purchases (or production) and stocks on hand?
45. Is the Sales Ledger balanced periodically and tallied with the
General Ledger Control account?
46. Are ageing schedules prepared periodically?
47. Are they reviewed by a responsible person?
48. Are statements of accounts regularly sent to all customers?
49. Are the statements checked with the Debtors Ledger before they
are issued?
50. Are the statements mailed by a person independent of the ledger-
keeper?
51. Are confirmations of balances obtained periodically?
52. Are the confirmations verified by a person independent of the ledger-
keeper and the person preparing the statement?
53. Is special approval required for:
(a) Payment of customers credit balances?
(b) Writing off bad debts?
54. Is any accounting control kept for bad debts written off?
55. Is any follow-up action taken for recovering amounts written off?
56. In the case of export sales:
(a) is a record maintained of import entitlements due?
(b) does the record cover the utilisation/disposal of such
entitlements?
(c) is there a procedure to ensure that claims for incentives etc.,
receivable are made in time?
57. Are sales of scrap and wastage subject to the same procedures and
controls as sales of finished goods?
CARO, 2003 VII-236
Appendix X
Text of Certain Relevant Sections
Referred to in the Statement
A Fromthe Companies Act, 1956
58A. Deposits not to be invited without issuing an advertisement.
(1) The Central Government may, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of
India, prescribe the limits up to which, the manner in which and the
conditions subject to which deposits may be invited or accepted by a
company either from the public or from its members.
(2) No company shall invite, or allow any other person to invite or cause to
be invited on its behalf, any deposit unless
(a) such deposit is invited or is caused to be invited in accordance
with the rules made under sub-section (1),
(b) an advertisement, including therein a statement showing the
financial position of the company, has been issued by the
company in such form and in such manner as may be
prescribed, and
(c) the company is not in default in the repayment of any deposit or
part thereof and any interest thereupon in accordance with the
terms and conditions of such deposit.
(3) (a) Every deposit accepted by a company at any time before the
commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974, in
accordance with the directions made by the Reserve Bank of
India under Chapter III B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
(2 of 1934), shall, unless renewed in accordance with clause (b),
be repaid in accordance with the terms and conditions of such
deposit.
(b) No deposit referred to in clause (a) shall be renewed by the
company after the expiry of the term thereof unless the deposit is
such that it could have been accepted if the rules made under
sub-section (1) were in force at the time when the deposit was
initially accepted by the company.
(c) Where, before the commencement of the Companies
(Amendment) Act, 1974, any deposit was received by a company
in contravention of any direction made under Chapter IIIB of the
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), repayment of such
deposit shall be made in full on or before the 1
st
day of April,
1975, and such repayment shall be without prejudice to any
action that may be taken under the Reserve Bank of India Act,
CARO, 2003 VII-237
1934 for the acceptance of such deposit in contravention of such
direction.
(3A) Every deposit accepted by a company after the commencement of the
Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, shall, unless renewed in
accordance with the rules made under sub-section (1), be repaid in
accordance with the terms and conditions of such deposit.
(4) Where any deposit is accepted by a company after the commencement
of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974, in contravention of the rules
made under sub-section (1), repayment of such deposit shall be made
by the company within thirty days from the date of acceptance of such
deposit or within such further time, not exceeding thirty days, as the
Central Government may, on sufficient cause being shown by the
company, allow.
(5) Where a company omits or fails to make repayment of a deposit in
accordance with the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (3), or in the
case of a deposit referred to in sub-section (4), within the time specified
in that sub-section,
(a) the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less
than twice the amount in relation to which the repayment of the
deposit, has not been made, and out of the fine, if realised, an
amount equal to the amount in relation to which the repayment of
deposit has not been made, shall be paid by the Court, trying the
offence, to the person to whom repayment of the deposit was to
be made, and on such payment, the liability of the company to
make repayment of the deposit shall, to the extent of the amount
paid by the Court, stand discharged;
(b) every officer of the company who is an default shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to
five years and shall also be liable to fine.
(6) Where a company accepts or invites, or allows or causes any other
person to accept or invite on its behalf, any deposit in excess of the
limits prescribed under sub-section (1) or in contravention of the manner
or condition prescribed under that sub-section or in contravention of the
provisions of sub-section (2), as the case may be, -
(a) the company shall be punishable,-
(i) where such contravention relates to the acceptance of
any deposit, with fine which shall not be less than an
amount equal to the amount of the deposit so accepted;
(ii) where such contravention relates to the invitation of any
deposit, with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees but
shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees;
CARO, 2003 VII-238
(b) every officer of the company who is in default shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to
five years and shall also be liable to fine.
(7) (a) Nothing contained in this section shall apply to, -
(i) a banking company, or
(ii) such other company as the Central Government may,
after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, specify
in this behalf.
(b) Except the provisions relating to advertisement contained in
clause (b) of sub-section (2), nothing in this section shall apply to
such classes of financial companies as the Central Government
may, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, specify in
this behalf.
(8) The Central Government may, if it considers it necessary for avoiding
any hardship or for any other just and sufficient reason, by order, issued
either prospectively or retrospectively from a date not earlier than the
commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974 (41 of
1974), grant extension of time to a company or class of companies to
comply with, or exempt any company or class of companies from, all or
any of the provisions of this section either generally or for any specified
period subject to such conditions as may be specified in the order:
Provided that no order under this sub-section shall be issued in relation
to a class of companies except after consultation with the Reserve Bank
of India.
(9) Where a company has failed to repay any deposit or part thereof in
accordance with the terms and conditions of such deposit, the Tribunal,
may, if it is satisfied, either on its own motion or on the application of the
depositor, that it is necessary so to do to safeguard the interests of the
company, the depositors or in the public interest, direct, by order, the
company to make repayment of such deposit or part thereof forthwith or
within such time and subject to such conditions as may be specified in
the order.
Provided that the Tribunal may, before making any order under this
sub-section give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the
company and the other persons interested in the matter.
(10) Whoever fails to comply with any order made by the Tribunal under sub-
section (9) shall be punishable with imprisonment may extend to three
years and shall also be liable to a fine of not less than rupees five
hundred for every day during which such non-compliances continues.
CARO, 2003 VII-239
(11) A depositor may, at any time, make a nomination and the provisions of
sections 109A and 109B shall, as far as may be, apply to the
nomination made under this sub-section.
Explanation: For the purposes of this section deposit means any
deposit of money with, and includes any amount borrowed by, a
company but shall not include such categories of amount as may be
prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.
58AA. Small Depositors
(1) Every company, which accepts deposits from small depositors, shall
intimate to the [Tribunal] any default made by it in repayment of any
such deposits or part thereof or any interest thereupon.
(2) The intimation under sub-section (1) shall, -
(a) be given within sixty days from the date of default,
(b) include particulars in respect of the names and addresses of
each small depositor, the principal sum of deposits due to them
and interest accrued thereupon.
Explanation: For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the
intimation under this section shall be given on monthly basis.
(3) Where a company has made a default in repayment of any deposit or
part thereof or any interest thereupon to a small depositor, the Tribunal,
on receipt of intimation under sub-section (1) shall, -
(a) exercise, on its own motion, powers conferred upon it by sub-
section (9) of section 58A;
(b) pass an appropriate order within a period of thirty days from the
date of receipt of intimation under sub-section (1):
Provided that the Tribunal may pass order after expiry of the period of
thirty days, after giving the small depositors an opportunity of being
heard:
Provided further that it shall not be necessary for a small depositor to
be present at the hearing of the proceeding under this sub-section.
(4) No company shall, at any time, accept further deposits from small
depositors, unless each small depositor, whose deposit has matured,
had been paid the amount of the deposit and the interest accrued
thereupon:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to
(a) any deposit which has been renewed by the small depositor
voluntarily; or
(b) any deposit, whose repayment has become impracticable due to
the death of the small depositor or whose repayment has been
stayed by a competent court or authority.
CARO, 2003 VII-240
(5) Every company, which has on any occasion made a default in the
repayment of a deposit or part thereof or any interest thereupon to a
small depositor, shall state, in every future advertisement and
application form inviting deposits from the public, the total number of
small depositors and amount due to them in respect of which such
default has been made.
(6) Where any interest accrued on deposits of the small depositors has
been waived, the fact of such waiver shall be mentioned by the
company in every advertisement and application form inviting deposits
issued after such waiver.
(7) Where a company had accepted deposits from small depositors and
subsequent to such acceptance of deposits, obtains funds by taking a
loan for the purposes of its working capital from any bank, it shall first
utilise the funds so obtained for the repayment of any deposit or any
part thereof or any interest thereupon to the small depositor before
applying such funds for any other purpose.
(8) Every application form, issued by a company to a small depositor for
accepting deposits from him, shall contain a statement to the effect that
the applicant had been apprised off
(a) every past default by the company in the repayment of deposit or
interest thereon, if any, such default has occurred; and
(b) the waiver of interest under sub-section (6), if any, and reasons
therefor.
(9) Whoever knowingly fails to comply with the provisions of this section or
comply with any order of the Tribunal shall be punishable with
imprisonment which may extend to three years and shall also be liable
to fine for not less than five hundred rupees for every day during which
such non-compliance continues.
(10) If a company or any other person contravenes any provision of this
section, every person, who at the time the contravention was
committed, was a director of the company, as well as the company,
shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be
proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(11) The provisions of section 58A shall, as far as may be, apply to the
deposits made by a small depositor under this section.
Explanation: For the purposes of this section, a small depositor means
a depositor who has deposited in a financial year a sum not exceeding
twenty thousand rupees in a company and includes his successors,
nominees and legal representatives.

CARO, 2003 VII-241
295. Loans to directors, etc.
(1) Save as otherwise provided in subsection (2), no company (hereinafter
in this section referred to as "the lending company" without obtaining
the previous approval of the Central Government in that behalf shall,
directly or indirectly, make any loan to, or give any guarantee or provide
any security in connection with a loan made by any other person to, or
to any other person by -
(a) any director of the lending company, or of a company which is its
holding company or any partner or relative of any such director;
(b) any firm in which any such director or relative is a partner;
(c) any private company of which any such director is a director or
member;
(d) any body corporate at a general meeting of which not less than
twenty-five per cent of the total voting power may be exercised
or controlled by any such director, or by two or more such
directors, together; or
(e) any body corporate, the Board of directors, managing director, or
manager whereof is accustomed to act in accordance with the
directions or instructions of the Board, or of any director or
directors, of the lending company.
(2) Sub-section (1) shall not apply to-
(a) any loan made, guarantee given or security provided-
(i) by a private company unless it is a subsidiary of a public
company, or
(ii) by a banking company;
(b) any loan made by a holding company to its subsidiary company;
(c) any guarantee given or security provided by a holding company
in respect of any loan made to its subsidiary company.
(3) Where any loan made, guarantee given or security provided by a
lending company and outstanding at the commencement of this Act
could not have been made, given or provided, without the previous
approval of the Central Government, if this section has then been in
force, the lending company shall, within six months from the
commencement of this Act or such further time not exceeding six
months as the Central Government may grant for that purpose, either
obtain the approval of the Central Government to the transaction or
enforce the repayment of the loan made, or in connection with which the
guarantee was given or the security was provided, notwithstanding any
agreement to the contrary.
CARO, 2003 VII-242
(4) Every person who is knowingly a party to any contravention of sub-
section (1) or (3), including in particular any person to whom the loan is
made or who has taken the loan in respect of which the guarantee is
given or the security is provided, shall be punishable either with fine
which may extend to fifty thousand rupees or with simple imprisonment
for a term which may extend to six months.
Provided that where any such loan, or any loan in connection with
which any such guarantee of security has been given or provided by the
lending company, has been repaid in full, no punishment by way of
imprisonment shall be imposed under this sub-section; and where the
loan has been repaid in part, the maximum punishment which may be
imposed under this sub-section by way of imprisonment shall be
proportionately reduced.
(5) All persons who are knowingly parties to any contravention of sub-
section (1) or (3) shall be liable, jointly and severally, to the lending
company for the repayment of the loan or for making good the sum
which the lending company may have been called upon to pay in virtue
of the guarantee given of the security provided by such company.
(6) No officer of the lending company or of the borrowing body corporate
shall be punishable under sub-section (4) or shall incur the liability
referred to it sub-section (5) in respect of any loan made, guarantee
given or security provided after the 1
st
day of April, 1956 in
contravention of clause (d) or (e) of sub-section (1) unless at the time
when the loan was made, the guarantee was given or the security was
provided by the lending company, he knew or had express notice that
that clause was being contravened thereby.
297. Board's sanction to be required for certain contracts in which
particular directors are interested
(1) Except with the consent of the Board of directors of a company, a
director of the company or his relative, a firm in which such a director or
relative is a partner, any other partner in such a firm, or a private
company of which the director is a member or director, shall not enter
into any contract with the company-
(a) for the sale, purchase or supply of any goods, material or
services; or
(b) after the commencement of this Act, for underwriting the
subscription of any shares in, or debentures of, the company:
Provided that in the case of a company having a paid-up share capital
of not less than rupees one crore, no such contract shall be entered into
except with the previous approval of the Central Government.

CARO, 2003 VII-243
(2) Nothing contained in clause (a) of sub-section (1) shall affect-
(a) the purchase of goods and materials from the company, or the
sale of goods and materials to the company, by any director,
relative, firm, partner or private company as aforesaid for cash at
prevailing market prices; or
(b) any contract or contracts between the company on one side and
any such director, relative, firm, partner or private company on
the other for sale, purchase or supply of any goods, materials
and services in which either the company or the director,
relative, firm, partner or private company, as the case may be,
regularly trades or does business.
Provided that such contract or contracts do not relate to goods and
materials the value of which, or services the cost of which, exceeds five
thousand rupees in the aggregate in any year comprised in the period of
the contract or contracts; or
(c) in the case of a banking or insurance company any transaction in
the ordinary course of business of such company with any
director, relative, firm, partner or private company as aforesaid.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and (2) a
director, relative, firm, partner or private company as aforesaid may, in
circumstances of urgent necessity, enter, without obtaining the consent
of the Board, into any contract with the company for the sale, purchase
or supply of any goods, materials or services even if the value of such
goods or cost of such services exceeds five thousand rupees in the
aggregate in any year comprised in the period of the contract; but in
such a case, the consent of the Board shall be obtained at a meeting
within three months of the date on which the contract was entered into.
(4) Every consent of the Board required under this section shall be
accorded by a resolution passed at a meeting of the Board and not
otherwise; and the consent of the Board required under sub-section (1)
shall not be deemed to have been given within the meaning of that sub-
section unless the consent is accorded before the contract is entered
into or within three months of the date on which it was entered into.
(5) If consent is not accorded to any contract under this section, anything
done in pursuance of the contract shall be voidable at the option of the
Board.
(6) Nothing in this section shall apply to any case where the consent has
been accorded to the contract before the commencement of the
Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960.

CARO, 2003 VII-244
299. Disclosure of interests by director
(1) Every director of a company who is in any way, whether directly or
indirectly, concerned or interested in a contract or arrangement, or
proposed contract or arrangement, entered into or to be entered into, by
or on behalf of the company, shall disclose, the nature of his concern or
interest at a meeting of the Board of directors.
(2) (a) In the case of a proposed contract or arrangement the
disclosure required to be made by a director under sub-section
(1) shall be made at the meeting of the Board at which the
question of entering into the contract or arrangement is first
taken into consideration, or if the director was not, at the date of
that meeting, concerned or interested in the proposed contract or
arrangement, at the first meeting of the Board held after he
becomes so concerned or interested.
(b) In the case of any other contract or arrangement, the required
disclosure shall be made at the first meeting of the Board held
after the director becomes concerned or interested in the
contract or arrangement.
(3) (a) For the purposes of sub-sections (1) and (2), a general
notice given to the Board by a director, to the effect that he is a
director or a member of a specified body corporate or is a
member of a specified firm and is to be regarded as concerned
or interested in any contract or arrangement which may, after the
date of the notice, be entered into with that body corporate or
firm, shall be deemed to be a sufficient disclosure of concern or
interest in relation to any contract or arrangement so made.
(b) Any such general notice shall expire at the end of the financial
year in which it is given, but may be renewed for further periods
of one financial year at a time, by a fresh notice given in the last
month of the financial year in which it would otherwise expire.
(c) No such general notice, and no renewal thereof, shall be of
effect unless either it is given at a meeting of the Board, or the
director concerned takes reasonable steps to secure that it is
brought up and read at the first meeting of the Board after it is
given.
(4) Every director who fails to comply with sub-section (1) or (2) shall be
punishable with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees.
(5) Nothing in this section shall be taken to prejudice the operation of any
rule of law restricting a director of a company from having any concern
or interest in any contracts or arrangements with the company.
CARO, 2003 VII-245
(6) Nothing in this section shall apply to any contract or arrangement
entered into or to be entered into between two companies where any of
the directors of the one company or two or more of them together holds
or hold not more than two per cent of the paid-up share capital in the
other company.
301. Register of contracts, companies and firms in which directors are
interested
(1) Every company shall keep one or more registers in which shall be
entered separately particulars of all contracts or arrangements to which
section 297 or section 299 applies, including the following particulars to
the extent they are applicable in each case, namely:
(a) the date of the contract or arrangement;
(b) the names of the parties thereto;
(c) the principal terms and conditions thereof,
(d) in the case of a contract to which section 297 applies or in the
case of a contract or arrangement to which sub-section (2) of
section 299 applies, the date on which it was placed before the
Board;
(e) the names of the directors voting for and against the contract or
arrangement and the names of those remaining neutral.
(2) Particulars of every such contract or arrangement to which section 297
or, as the case may be, sub-section (2) of section 299 applies, shall be
entered in the relevant register aforesaid:
(a) in the case of a contract or arrangement requiring the Board's
approval, within seven days (exclusive of public holidays) of the
meeting of the Board at which the contract or arrangement is
approved,
(b) in the case of any other contract or arrangement, within seven
days of the receipt at the registered office of the company of the
particulars of such other contract or arrangement or within thirty
days of the date of such other contract or arrangement
whichever is later, and the register shall be placed before the
next meeting of the Board and shall then be signed by all the
directors present at the meeting.
(3) The register aforesaid shall also specify, in relation to each director of
the company, the names of the firms and bodies corporate of which
notice has been given by him under sub-section (3) of section 299.
(3A) Nothing in sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) shall apply-
(a) to any contract or arrangement for the sale, purchase or supply
of any goods, materials or services if the value of such goods
CARO, 2003 VII-246
and materials or the cost of such services does not exceed one
thousand rupees in the aggregate in any year; or
(b) to any contract or arrangement (to which section 297 or, as the
case may be, section 299 applies) by a banking company for the
collection of bills in the ordinary course of its business or to any
transaction referred to in clause (c) or sub-section (2) of section
297.
(4) If default is made in complying with the provisions of sub-section (1), (2)
or (3), the company, and every officer of the company who is in default,
shall, in respect of each default, be punishable with fine which may
extend to five thousand rupees.
(5) The register aforesaid shall be kept at the registered office of the
company; and it shall be open to inspection at such office, and extracts
may be taken therefrom and copies thereof may be required, by any
member of the company to the same extent, in the same manner, and
on payment of the same fee, as in the case of the register of members
of the company; and the provisions of section 163 shall apply
accordingly.
372A. Inter-corporate loans and investments
(1) No company shall, directly or indirectly-
(a) make any loan to any other body corporate;
(b) give any guarantee or provide security, in connection with a loan
made by any other person to, or to any other person by, any
body corporate; and
(c) acquire, by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise the
securities of any other body corporate,
exceeding sixty per cent of its paid-up share capital and free reserves,
or one hundred per cent of its free reserves, whichever is more:
Provided that where the aggregate of the loans and investments so far
made, the amounts for which guarantee or security so far provided to or
in all other bodies corporate, along with the investment, loan, guarantee
or security proposed to be made or given by the Board, exceeds the
aforesaid limits, no investment or loan shall be made or guarantee shall
be given or security shall be provided unless previously authorised by a
special resolution passed in a general meeting:
Provided further that the Board may give guarantee, without being
previously authorised by a special resolution, if,-
(a) a resolution is passed in the meeting of the Board authorising to
give guarantee in accordance with the provisions of this section;
(b) there exists exceptional circumstances which prevent the
CARO, 2003 VII-247
company from obtaining previous authorisation by a special
resolution passed in a general meeting for giving a guarantee;
and
(c) the resolution of the Board under clause (a) is confirmed within
twelve months, in a general meeting of the company or the
annual general meeting held immediately after passing of the
Boards resolution, whichever is earlier:
Provided also that the notice of such resolution shall indicate clearly
the specific limits, the particulars of the body corporate in which the
investment is proposed to be made or loan or security or guarantee to
be given, the purpose of the investment, loan or security or guarantee,
specific sources of funding and such other details.
(2) No loan or investment shall be made or guarantee or security given by
the company unless the resolution sanctioning it is passed at a meeting
of the Board with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting
and the prior approval of the public financial institution referred to in
section 4A, where any term loan is subsisting, is obtained.
Provided that prior approval of a public financial institution shall not be
required where the aggregate of the loans and investments so far
made, the amounts for which guarantee or security so far provided to or
in all other bodies corporate, alongwith the investments, loans,
guarantee or security proposed to be made or given does not exceed
the limit of sixty per cent specified in sub-section (1), if there is no
default in repayment of loan instalments or payment of interest thereon
as per the terms and conditions of such loan to the public financial
institution.
(3) No loan to any body corporate shall be made at a rate of interest lower
than the prevailing bank rate, being the standard rate made public
under section 49 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. (2 of 1934)
(4) No company, which has defaulted in complying with the provisions of
section 58A, shall, directly or indirectly,-
(a) make any loan to any body corporate;
(b) give any guarantee or provide security in connection with a loan
made by any other person to, or to any other person by, any
body corporate; and
(c) acquire, by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise the
securities of any other body corporate,
till such default is subsisting.
(5) (a) Every company shall keep a register showing the
following particulars in respect of every investment or loan made,
CARO, 2003 VII-248
guarantee given or security provided by it in relation to any body
corporate under sub-section (1), namely:
(i) the name of the body corporate;
(ii) the amount, terms and purpose of the investment or loan
or security or guarantee;
(iii) the date on which the investment or loan has been made;
and
(iv) the date on which the guarantee has been given or
security has been provided in connection with a loan.
(b) The particulars of investment, loan, guarantee or security
referred to in clause (a) shall be entered chronologically in the
register aforesaid within seven days of the making of such
investment or loan, or the giving of such guarantee or the
provision of such security.
(6) The register referred to in sub-section (5) shall be kept at the registered
office of the company concerned and-
(a) shall be open to inspection at such office; and
(b) extracts may be taken therefrom and copies thereof may be
required,
by any member of the company to the same extent, in the same
manner, and on payment of the same fees as in the case of the register
of members of the company, and the provisions of section 163 shall
apply accordingly.
(7) The Central Government may, prescribe guidelines for the purposes of
this section.
(8) Nothing contained in this section shall apply,-
(a) to any loan made, any guarantee given or any security provided
or any investment made by-
(i) a banking company, or an insurance company, or a
housing finance company in the ordinary course of its
business, or a company established with the object of
financing industrial enterprises or of providing
infrastructural facilities;
(ii) a company whose principal business is the acquisition of
shares, stock, debentures or other securities;
(iii) a private company, unless it is a subsidiary of a public
company;
(b) to investment made in shares allotted in pursuance of clause (a)
of subsection (1) of section 81;
CARO, 2003 VII-249
(c) to any loan made by a holding company to its wholly owned
subsidiary;
(d) to any guarantee given or any security provided by a holding
company in respect of loan made to its wholly owned subsidiary;
or
(e) to acquisition by a holding company, by way of subscription,
purchases or otherwise, the securities of its wholly owned
subsidiary.
(9) If default is made in complying with the provisions of this section, other
than sub-section (5), the company and every officer of the company
who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment which may
extend to two years or with fine which may extend to fifty thousand
rupees:
Provided that where any such loan or any loan in connection with
which any such guarantee or security has been given, or provided by
the company, has been repaid in full, no punishment by way of
imprisonment shall be imposed under this sub-section, and where such
loan has been repaid in part, the maximum punishment which may be
imposed under this sub-section by way of imprisonment shall be
appropriately reduced
Provided further that all persons who are knowingly parties to any
such contravention shall be liable, jointly and severally, to the company
or the repayment of the loan or for making good the same which the
company may have been called upon to pay by virtue of the guarantee
given or the securities provided by such company.
(10) If default is made in complying with the provisions of sub-section (5),
the company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be
punishable with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees and also
with a further fine which may extend to five hundred rupees for every
day after the first day during which the default continues.
Explanation: For the purposes of this section,-
(a) "loan" includes debentures or any deposit of money made by one
company, with another company, not being a banking company;
(b) "free reserves" means those reserves which, as per the latest
audited balance sheet of the company, are free for distribution as
dividend and shall include balance to the credit of the securities
premium account but shall not include share application money.

CARO, 2003 VII-250
(A) Fromthe Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
45MA. Powers and duties of auditors
(1) It shall be the duty of an auditor of a non-banking institution to inquire
whether or not the non-banking institution has furnished to the bank
such statements, information or particulars relating to or connected with
deposits received by it, as are required to be furnished under this
chapter, and the auditor shall, except where he is satisfied on such
inquiry that the non-banking institution has furnished such statements,
information or particulars, make a report to the bank giving the
aggregate amount of such deposits held by the non-banking institution.
(1A) The bank may, on being satisfied that it is necessary so to do, in the
public interest or in the interest of the depositors or for the purpose of
proper assessment of the books of accounts, issue directions to any
non-banking financial company or any class of non-banking financial
companies or non-banking financial companies generally or to the
auditors of such non-banking financial company or companies relating
to balance sheet, profit and loss account, disclosure of liabilities in the
books of accounts or any matter relating thereto.
(2) Where, in the case of a non-banking financial company the auditor has
made, or intends to make, a report to the bank under sub-section (1), he
shall include in his report under sub-section (2) of section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the contents of the report which he
has make, or intends to make, to the bank.
(3) Where the bank is of the opinion that it is necessary so to do in the
public interest or in the interest of the non-banking financial company,
or in the interest of depositors of such company it may at any time by
order direct that a special audit of the accounts of the non-banking
financial company in relation to any such transaction or class of
transactions or for such period or periods, as may be specified in the
order, shall be conducted and the bank may appoint an auditor or
auditors to conduct such special audit and direct the auditor or the
auditors to submit the report to it.
(4) The remuneration of the auditors as may be fixed by the bank, having
regard to the nature and volume of work involved in the audit and the
expenses of or incidental to the audit, shall be borne by the non-banking
financial company so audited.
45MB. Power of bank to prohibit acceptance of deposit and alienation of
assets
(1) If any non-banking financial company violates the provisions of any
section or fails to comply with any direction or order given by the bank
CARO, 2003 VII-251
under any of the provisions of this Chapter, the bank may prohibit the
non-banking financial company from accepting any deposit.
(2) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any agreement or
instrument or any law for the time being in force, the bank, on being
satisfied that it is necessary so to do in the public interest or in the
interest of the depositors, may direct, the non-banking financial
company against which an order prohibiting from accepting deposit has
been issued, not to sell, transfer, create charge or mortgage or deal in
any manner with its property and assets without prior written permission
of the bank for such period not exceeding six months from the date of
the order.
NBFC Prudential (Reserve Bank of India) Directions, 1988
6A. Need for Policy on Demand/Call Loans
(1) The Board of Directors of every NBFC granting/intending to grant
demand/call loans shall frame a policy for the company and
implement the same.
(2) Such policy shall, inter alia, stipulate the following, -
(i) A cut off date within which the repayment of demand or call
loan shall be demanded or called up;
(ii) The sanctioning authority shall, record specific reasons in
writing at the time of sanctioning demand or call loan, if the
cut off date for demanding or calling up such loan is
stipulated beyond a period of one year fromthe date of
sanction;
(iii) The rate of interest which shall be payable on such loans;
(iv) Interest on such loans, as stipulated shall be payable either
at monthly or quarterly rests;
(v) The sanctioning authority shall, record specific reasons in
writing at the time of sanctioning demand or call loan, if no
interest is stipulated or a moratoriumis granted for any
period;
(vi) A cut off date, for reviewof performance of the loan, not
exceeding six months commencing from the date of
sanction;
(vii) Such demand or call loans shall not be renewed unless the
periodical reviewhas shown satisfactory compliance with
the terms of sanction.
CARO, 2003 VII-252
Appendix XI
Industries Required to Maintain Cost Records
Under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956
Sl.
No.
Industry Products
1. Cement Cement, Clinker
2. Cycles Cycles, component of cycles
3. Caustic Soda, Caustic soda in all forms
4. Tyres & Tubes Rubber tyres and tubes for all types of vehicles
5. Air-Conditioners

Air conditioning system or device by which air is
controlled for the fulfillment of required condition of
the confined space through controlling temperature,
humidity, air purity and air motion for human
comforts
6. Refrigerators Refrigerators
7. Batteries other than
Dry Cell Batteries
Batteries of all types other than Dry Cell Batteries
8. Electric Lamps Electric lamps of all types
9. Electric Fan Any type of electric fan
10. Electric Motors All types of electric motors
11. Motor Vehicles 1. All types of passenger cars, jeeps and
station wagons
2. All types of commercial vehicles, delivery
and pick up vans
3. Motor cycles, scooters, scooterettes &
mopeds
4. Three-Wheeler Vehicles
5. All types of tractors
6. Heavy Earth Moving Equipments
12. Aluminium 1. Alumina
2. Aluminium
3. Aluminium ingots in any form or Alloy
4. Aluminum rolled products including foil
CARO, 2003 VII-253
5. Aluminum extruded products
6. Properzirod or Aluminum wire rod
7. Any other aluminium product or its alloy
13. Vanaspati Refined vegetable oils and vegetable oil including
industrial hard oil
14. Bulk Drugs Bulk Drugs under any system of medicine including
Ayurvedic, Homeopathic, Siddha and Unani Systems
of medicine and Intermediates thereof.
15. Sugar Sugar by vacuum pan process and excludes jaggery
and Khandsari
16. Industrial Alcohol 1. Absolute Alcohol
2. Rectified spirit
3. Denatured and special denatured spirit
4. Power alcohol
17. Jute Goods Jute goods Yarn, Twine, Fabrics or any other
product made wholly from, or containing not less
than 50% by weight of, jute including bimlipattam
jute or mesta fibres
18. Paper Paper-used for printing, writing and wraping,
newsprint, paperboard and exercise note books
19. Rayon 1. Viscose staple fibre in all forms
2. Viscose filament yarn
3. Viscose tyre yarn/cord/Fabric
4. 100% Viscose Yarn Fabric
5. Acetate yarn/fibre
6. Rayon film (Cellophane Film)
20. Dyes Acid dyes, basic dyes, direct dyes, sulphur dyes, vat
dyes, azoic dyes ingrained dyes, metal complex
dyes, disperse dyes, reactive dyes oil dyes, and
water soluble dyes
21. Soda Ash Soda Ash in all forms
22. Polyester 1. Polyester fibre
2. Polyester filament yarn
3. Polyester Chips
4. Polyester Fibre Fill (PFF)
CARO, 2003 VII-254
5. Partially Oriented Yarn (POY)
6. Processed Polyester yarn (texturised,
twisted, dyed, crimpted, etc.)
7. 100% Polyester fabric
23. Nylon 1. Nylon chip
2. Nylon fibre
3. Nylon filament yarn
4. Nylon partially oriented yarn
5. Nylon tyre yarn or cord
6. Nylon tyre cord fabric
7. 100% Nylon fabrics
24. Textiles Any art silk cloth, cloth, cotton yarn or cotton cloth,
processed yarn and processed cloth, man-made
fibre yarn or man made fibre cloth, silk yarn or silk
cloth, wool, woolen yarn or woollen cloth, yarn or
other textiles products.
25. Dry Cell Batteries All types of dry cell batteries & Components thereof
26. Sulphuric Acid Sulphuric acid in the various grades-Technical
(Commercial), Battery, Pure, Analytical etc.
27. Steel Tubes and
Pipes
Steel Tubes & Pipes (Including stainless steel) both
black & galvanized
28. Engineering 1. Power driven pumps
2. Internal combustion engines
3. Diesel Engines
4. All type of automotive parts and accessories
5. Power Transformers
6. Electric generator
7. Machine tools
29. Electric Cables and
Conductors
1. Power cables (All types PILC, PVC, XLPE
etc.)
2. VIR/Rubber covered cables & flexible wires of
all types
3. PVC insulated cables, flexible wires of all types
including switchboard wires & cables
CARO, 2003 VII-255
4. Enameled covered wires & strips
5. Wire & strips covered with paper, glass, silk &
any other types of insulating materials
6. AAC/ACSR Conductors
7. Telecommunication cables
30. Bearings Bearings of various types e.g. ball & roller bearings,
needle bearing of various sizes
31. Milk Food Any type of Milk food including infant Milk
complementary or supplementary food of infants and
children, energy food or food drink under any brand
name, derivatives of milk such as ice-cream,
chocolates, desi ghee under any brand name
32 Chemical 1. Ethylene
2. Ethylene Oxide
3. Ethylene Glycol
4. Diethylene Glycol
5. Polyethylene Glycol
6. Ethylene Dechloride
7. Propylene
8. Isopropanol
9. Acetone
10. Diacetone Alcohol
11. Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIK)
12. Butanol
13. 2 Ethyl Hexanol
14. Butadiene
15. Benzene
16. Toluene
17. Synthetic Resins & Plastics
18. Synthetic Rubber
19. Boric Acid
20. Sodium Tripoly Phosphate
21. Aluminium Fluoride
CARO, 2003 VII-256
22. Calcium Carbide
23. Carbon Black
24. Titanium Dioxide
25. Acetic Acid
26. Acetic Anhydride
27. Aniline
28. Chloro Methanes
29. Formaldehyde
30. Linear Alkyl Benzene
31. Maleic Anhydride
32. Methanol
33. Methyl Ethyl Ketone
34. Nitrobenzene
35. Ortho Nitro Chloro Benzene
36. Para Nitro Chloro Benzene
37. Polypropylene
38. Polyethylenes viz. LDPE, HDPE, LLDPE
39. Penta Erithritol
40. Phenol
41. Xylenes
33. Formulations All formulations under any system of medicine
including Ayurvedic, Homeopathic, Siddha and
Unani
34. Steel Plant Steel & steel products, Steel products include Ingot
Steel, Blooms, Billets, Slabs (code as well as semi-
finished); steel products produced by backward
integration like Coal based Sponge Iron, Gas based
hot briquetted Iron, steel products produced by
forward integration like Beams Angles, Tees, Sees,
Channels, Pilings, Rails, Crane Rails, Joint Bars,
Bare (Round, Squares, Hexagonal, Octagonal, Flat,
Triangular, Half Round); Wire, Wire Ropes, Nails,
Wire Fabrics, Plates, Pipes and Tubes, HR
Coils/Sheets, CR Coils/Sheets
35. Insecticides 1. Insecticides
CARO, 2003 VII-257
2. Fungicides
3. Redenticides
4. Nematicide
5. Weedicide
6. Plant growth Regulant
7. Herbicides
8. Fumigants
9. Bio-pesticides
36. Fertilizers 1. Straight Nitrogenous Fertilizers
2. Straight Phosphatic Fertilizers
3. Straight Potassic Fertilizers
4. N.P. Fertilizers
5. N.P.K. Fertilizers
6. Micro Nutrients
7. Fortified Fertilizers
37. Soaps & Detergents Cleansing material used for washing, bathing/toilet
purposes and include soaps and detergents
(whether in the form of cake, powder or liquid)
38. Cosmetics &
Toiletries
Powders, Creams, Toothpastes, Toothpowders,
Shaving Creams, After shave lotions, Shaving
soaps, Shaving foams, Perfumes, Hair oils, Hair
creams, Oxidation hair dyes, Mouthwash, Cologne,
Shampoos-soap based, Shampoos-synthetics,
detergent based, Room fresheners, Deodorants,
Surfactants
39. Footwear Shoes, boots, sandals, chappals, slippers, play
shoes & moccasins
40. Shaving Systems 1. Shaving blades
2. Razors
3. Any part or component thereof
4. Any other shaving instrument
41. Industrial Gases Oxygen, Gas, Nitrogen Gas, Acetylene Gas,
Hydrogen Gas, Nitrous Oxide Gas, Argon Gas,
Helium Gas, Carbon di-oxide Gas
42. Mining and List of products (metals and non-metals, their
CARO, 2003 VII-258
Metallurgy minerals, ores and alloys)
1. Uranium
2. Thorium
3. Zirconium
4. Titanium
5. Lead
6. Copper
7. Zinc
8. Nickel
9. Cobalt
10. Chromium
11. Gallium
12. Germanium
13. Platinum
14. Molybdenum
43. Electronic Products 1. All Consumer electronics such as television
both black & white and colour, video cassette
recorder, video cassette player, audio compact
disc player, video compact disc player, digital
video compact disc player, radio receiver, tape
recorder & combination, electronic watch and
electronic clock, etc.
2. Industrial electronics including all control
instrumentation and automation equipment.
3. Computer including personal computer, laptop,
note book, server, workstations,
supercomputers, data processing equipment
and Peripherals like monitors, keyboards, disk
drivers, printers, digitizers, SMPs, modems,
networking products and add-on cards.
4. Communication and broad-casting equipment
including cable television equipment.
5. Strategic electronics and systems such as
navigation and surveillance systems, radars,
sonars, infra-red detection and ranging system,
disaster management system, internal security
system, etc.
6. Other electronic component and equipment
CARO, 2003 VII-259
such as picture tube, printed circuit board, etc.
44. Electricity Industry
1. Generation of Electricity from-
(a) Thermal power,
(b) gas turbine,
(c) hydro electric power,
(d) atomic power,
(e) solar power,
(f) wind power,
(g) any other source of energy
2. Transmission and bulk supply of electricity
3. Distribution and retail supply of electricity
45. Plantation Products 1. Tea and tea products
2. Coffee and coffee products
3. Other commercial plantation products including
seeds thereof.
46. Petroleum Industry Crude oil, gases (including Liquefied natural Gas
and re-gasification thereof) or any petroleum
products:
47. Telecommunication
1. Basic telephony:
(a) Telephone access
(b) Local call
(c) Subscriber trunk dialing (STD)
(d) International subscriber dialing (ISD)
2. Cellular Mobile;
3. Telex;
4. Telegraphy;
5. Voice Mail / Audiotex service;
6. Internet operations including gateway
service/Email;
7. Packet switched public data network (PSPDN)
service;
8. Wireless in local loop (WILL) service;
9. Public mobile radio trunk Service;
10. Very Small Aperture Terminal service;
11. Global mobile personnel communication
services;
12. Leased circuits;
CARO, 2003 VII-260
13. Internet ports;
14. National Long Distance Operator;
15. Internet Telephony;
16. Radio Paging;
17. Any other telecommunication service for
commercial use.

CARO, 2003 VII-261
Appendix XII
Prudential Norms for
Revenue Recognition and Classification of Assets
for Nidhi and Mutual Benefit Societies
Government of India
Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs
Department of Company Affairs
NOTIFICATION

New Delhi the 30th April, 2002
GSR 309(E) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section
637 A of the Companies Act, 1956 ( 1 of 1956), and in supersession of
Notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company
Affairs (Department of Company Affairs) No GSR 556(E) dated 26.7.2001,
except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession,
the Central Government hereby directs that-
1. Every company declared as a Nidhi or Mutual Benefit Society under
section 620A of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as such
Nidhi or Mutual Benefit Society) after the publication of this Notification
shall adhere to the following prudential norms for revenue recognition and
classification of assets in respect of mortgage loans or jewel loans,
namely:
(i) income including interest or any other charges on non-performing
assets shall be recognised only when it is actually realised. Any
such income recognised before the asset became non-performing
and remaining unrealised shall be reversed in the current years
profit and loss account;
(ii) classification of assets
(a) Mortgage Loan:
Nature of Asset Provision Required
Standard Asset No provision
Sub-standard Asset 10% of the aggregate outstanding amount
Doubtful Asset 25% of the aggregate outstanding amount
Loss Asset 100% of the aggregate outstanding amount
Explanation: In this direction,-
(1) Standard Asset means the asset in respect of which no default in
repayment of principal or payment of interest is perceived and which does
CARO, 2003 VII-262
not disclose any problem nor carry more than normal risk attached to the
business;
(2) Sub-Standard Asset will be that borrowal account which is a non-
performing asset. Reschedulement or Renegotiation or Replacement of
the loan instalment or interest payment would not change the
classification of assets unless the borrowal account has satisfactorily
performed for at least 12 months after such reschedulement or
renegotiation or rephasement;
(3) Doubtful Asset will be that borrowal account which remained non-
performing for more than two years but up to three years;
(4) Loss Asset will be that borrowal account which remained non-
performing for more than three years or where as per the opinion of the
Nidhi or its internal auditor or by the inspecting authority during the course
of its inspection a shortfall in the recovery of the loan account is expected
because the documents executed may become invalid if subjected to
legal process or for any other reason;
(5) Non-Performing Asset will be that borrowal account where interest
income and/or instalment of loan towards repayment of principal amount
remained unrealised for 12 months:
provided that the Nidhi companies or Mutual Benefit Societies
incorporated on or before 26.7.2001 shall adhere to the prudential
norms as per table given below:
TABLE
Mortgage loans given up to and
outstanding as on
Compliance date i.e., date of the
balance sheet
(a) 31.3.2000 31.3.2005
(b) 31.3.2001 31.3.2006
(c) 31.3.2002 31.3.2007

(b) Loans against Jewellery, Government Securities or own deposits, etc.
The aggregate outstanding amount of loan granted against the security of gold,
jewellery etc., should be either recovered or renewed within next three months
after the due date of repayment specified at the time of grant of such loans. If
the loan is not recovered or the security is not sold within the given time, the
company should make 100% provision against current years Profit and Loss
Account to the extent of unrealised amount or aggregate outstanding amount of
loan as applicable. No income shall be recognised on such loans outstanding
after the expiry of three months period or sale of jewellery, whichever is earlier.
2. The above prudential norms for revenue recognition and classification of
assets shall be applicable to all Nidhi companies or Mutual Benefit Societies
CARO, 2003 VII-263
notified under section 620 A of the Companies Act, 1956 before or after the
publication of this notification.
3. The Central Government if satisfied that the circumstances have arisen and
if found in public interest, after recording the reasons in writing, may relax any of
the directions mentioned above either generally or for any specified period,
subject to such terms and conditions, as that Government may specify, for
avoiding any hardship to any Nidhi or any Mutual Benefit Society or class of
Nidhis or class of Mutual Benefit Societies.
(Rajiv Mehrishi)
Joint Secretary
CARO, 2003 VII-264
Appendix XIII
Specimen Auditors Report to the
Members of the Company
The Members of (name of the Company)
19

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of . (name of
the company), as at 31st March 20XX, the profit and loss account and also
the {cash flow statement}
20
for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
21
issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227
of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure
22
a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of
our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those
books (and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit have

19
Reference may also be made to the Standard on Auditing (SA) 700, The Auditors Report on
Financial Statements, Statement on Qualifications in the Auditors Report and the Guidance Note
on Section 227(3)(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, issued by the Institute of Chartered
20
21
All references made in this Specimen Auditors Report to Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 should be construed as being to the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as amended
by Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004.
22
Alternatively, instead of giving the comments on Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 in an
Annexure, the comments may be contained in the body of the main report.
CARO, 2003 VII-265
been received from the branches not visited by us. The Branch
Auditors Report(s) have been forwarded to us and have been
appropriately dealt with)
23
;
(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and {cash flow statement}
24

dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account
(and with the audited returns from the branches)
25
;
(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and {cash
flow statement}
26
dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on
31
st
March 20XX and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report
that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31
st
March 20XX from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section
274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31
st
March 20XX;
(b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit/loss
27
for
the year ended on that date; and
(c) {in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.}
28

For ABC and Co.
Signature
(Designation)
29

Membership Number
Place of Signature
Date

23
24
25
26
27
Whichever is applicable.
28
29
CARO, 2003 VII-266
Annexure
Re:Limited
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date,
(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All the assets have not been physically verified by the
management during the year but there is a regular
programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable
having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its
assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
(c) During the year, the company has disposed off a substantial
part of the plant and machinery. According to the information
and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the
sale of the said part of plant and machinery has not affected
the going concern status of the company.
(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification
is reasonable.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed
by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation
to the size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical
stocks and the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) The company has granted loan to two companies covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year
was Rs.20 crores and the year-end balance of loans granted
to such parties was Rs. 20 crores.
(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the
interest of the company.
(c) The parties have repaid the principal amounts as stipulated
and have also been regular in the payment of interest to the
company.
(d) There is no overdue amount in excess of Rs. 1 lakh in respect
of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in
CARO, 2003 VII-267
Act, 1956.
(e) The company had taken loan from five companies covered in
Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year
was Rs.50 crores and the year-end balance of loans taken
from such parties was Rs. NIL.
(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions on which loans have been taken from companies,
firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 are not, prima facie,
(g) The company is regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and
with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of
our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct
major weaknesses in internal control system of the company.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or
arrangements that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
have been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance
of contracts or arrangements entered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any
party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has complied with the provisions of
sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public.
No order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National
Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any
other Tribunal.
CARO, 2003 VII-268
(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to
materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company
pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the
prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
(ix) (a) The company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education protection fund, employees state
insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax,
custom duty, excise duty and other material statutory dues
applicable to it.
Further, since the Central Government has till date not
prescribed the amount of cess payable under section 441A of
the Companies Act, 1956, we are not in a position to
comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the company in
depositing the same.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, sales
tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty and excise duty
were in arrears, as at............ for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the information and explanation given to us,
there are no dues of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service
tax, customs duty and excise duty which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute.
(x) In our opinion, the accumulated losses of the company are not more
than fifty percent of its net worth. Further, the company has not
incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit
and the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to
a financial institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) We are of the opinion that the company has maintained adequate
records where the company has granted loans and advances on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the
CARO, 2003 VII-269
Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report)
Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the company has
given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions are not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(xvi) In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for
which they were raised.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for
long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties and
companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Act. In our opinion, the price at which shares have been issued
is not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the
period covered by our audit report, the company had issued
1,00,000 debentures of Rs. 100 each. The company has created
security in respect of debentures issued.
(xx) We have verified the end use of money raised by public issues from
the draft prospectus filed with SEBI, the offer document and as
disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud
on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For ABC and Co.,
Signature
(Designation)
30

Membership Number
Place of Signature
Date

30
Back

3
STATEMENT ON PAYMENTS
TO AUDITORS FOR OTHER SERVICES

Announcement on Withdrawal of the
Statement on Payments to Auditors for Other Services
Attention of the members is invited to the Statement on Payments to
Auditors for Other Services (hereinafter referred to as the Statement)
issued by the Institute in 1975. The Statement deals with the
performance of other services, apart from audit, for a company by the
statutory auditor of that company, and also the disclosure of payments
made by the company to the auditor for those other services performed
by him.
Members attention is also invited to Circular No. 29/76, dated 27-8-1976
issued by the Department of Company Affairs (now known as Ministry of
Corporate Affairs) wherein the Department of Company Affairs has
specifically prohibited a statutory auditor of a company from becoming
the internal auditor of the same company. Members attention is further
invited to the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute, which also prohibits
a statutory auditor to accept an internal audit engagement of the same
auditee.
The Council of the Institute at its 268th meeting held on April 30 through
May 2, 2007 considered the need to retain the Statement on Payments
to Auditors for Other Services in the light of the legal and professional
requirements as on date. The Council noted that the Statement on
Payments to Auditors for Other Services provided for disclosure of the
payments to auditors under following heads:
i. for taxation matters;
ii. for company law matters;
Back Back
Payments to Auditors for Other Services
Statement IV-271
iii. for management services;
iv. for internal audit; and (emphasis added)
v. for other services.
The Council noted that in the light of above legal and professional
requirements, a statutory auditor of a company could not be the internal
auditor of the same company. The Council further noted that Part II of
Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, exhaustively covered the
disclosure requirements for payments to auditor in other capacities.
Accordingly, the Council has decided to withdraw the Statement on
Payments to Auditors for Other Services.

Back Back
Reconciliation of the International Standards on Quality
Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related
Services, issued by the International Federation of
Accountants with the Standards, issued by ICAI
(as on May 29, 2008)

(A) International Standards issued by the International
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
of the International Federation of Accountants
(IFAC)

(I) International Standards on Quality Control (ISQC
1)
(II) International Standards on Auditing (ISAs)
(III) International Standards on Review
Engagements (ISREs)
(IV) International Standards on Assurance
Engagements (ISAEs)
(V) International Standards on Related Services
Engagements (ISRSs)
1

32
2

2

2
Grand Total 39
(B) Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board (AASB) of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI)

(I) Standards on Quality Control (SQC 1) 1
Back Back Back
(II) Standards on Auditing (SAs)
(i) Two AASs correspond to one ISA i.e., AAS
1 and AAS 2; hence one to be reduced.
(ii) AAS corresponding to which no
International Standard has been issued
(AAS 12, Responsibility of Joint Auditors)
(iii) 3 AASs correspond to 2 ISAs that have
now been withdrawn by IAASB; hence one
AAS to be reduced.
1. AAS 06, Risk Assessment and Internal
Control
2. AAS 20, Knowledge of the Business
3. AAS 29, Auditing in a Computer
Information Systems Environment
31
(1)

(1)

(01)

28

(III) Standards on Review Engagements (SREs) 1
(IV) Standards on Assurance Engagements
(SAEs)
1
(V) Standards on Related Services Engagements
(SRSs)
2
Total 33
(C) (I) International Standards corresponding to which
Standards are under preparation / under
consideration of the AASB

06
Grand Total 39

Back

Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements Vol. I FINAL

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements Vol. I FINAL

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

vii

, Terms of Audit Engagement should be

Issued in January, 2003.

, Consideration of Laws and Regulations in

Issued in July, 2001

,Communications of Audit Matters

Issued in January, 2003.

, Knowledge of the Businessshould be read

, Audit Considerations Relating to

Issued in August, 2002.

, Audit Evidence Additional Considerations For

Issued in March, 2005.

, External Confirmationsshould be read in

Issued in August, 2003.

, Initial Engagements - Opening Balances

Issued in July, 2001.

, Related Parties should be read in the

Issued in September, 2001.

, The Auditors Report on Financial

, Comparatives should be read in the

Issued in September, 2002.

Você também pode gostar