A popularly elected global peoples assembly could provide a forum for the world's citizens to express their aspirations and grievances outside the traditional nation-state context. The assembly could lobbY governments for the first time outside the traditional nationstate context. It could push for the democratization of the global order, a goal that govements are reluctant to promote.
A popularly elected global peoples assembly could provide a forum for the world's citizens to express their aspirations and grievances outside the traditional nation-state context. The assembly could lobbY governments for the first time outside the traditional nationstate context. It could push for the democratization of the global order, a goal that govements are reluctant to promote.
A popularly elected global peoples assembly could provide a forum for the world's citizens to express their aspirations and grievances outside the traditional nation-state context. The assembly could lobbY governments for the first time outside the traditional nationstate context. It could push for the democratization of the global order, a goal that govements are reluctant to promote.
^t(O Tltf I|ISHINGI6- FAS'T FRIDAY. NOYEMBER I1.. 199? EDITORALS/OPff{TO,ry For a GlobalPeoples Asse*bgY rT TILMINGTON. Delaware \ry - The recent dramatic announcements of record-set- tine contributions to interna- tioial causes by Ted Tumer and George Soros suggest tremen- dous nossibilities for the fururc- Thise t rro men signify the rise of a new'breed of global phil- anthropist active in fashionin_g an international civil socierY. It was globa.lization that gave them the ouoortunities to arnass ex- traorciihary u'ealth. It ftow orovides them and others with a irttiqu. oppomrniry b contribute to human well-bchg. This includes pushing for the democratization of the global order, a goal that govefitments are reluctant to promotc. Such indivicluals could do this most imaginativelY bY 'omvidine funds for thc esub- iisttm"niof a popularly elected Global Peoples AssemblY' which would provide the world's citizens for the Frst time with a forum to exPrcss their planeury' aspirations and grievances outside the tradi- tional nation-state context. Elections for this assemblY could be organized and admin- istered by an international cit- izens' commiRec and oversccn by the respected Swedish or- ganization lnternational Demo- cratic Elections Assistance, or IDEA. Once established, the as- sembly could lobbY govern- ments for formal recognition within the UN system. To be gin with, however, such an assembly would have al il- ternational -legal starus similar to that of nongovernmcntal or- ganizations like the Red Cross or Amnesry International. Un- like them, however, it could laY claim to speak on behalf of the rreooles of the world. As the tnly such body, it would have By Andrew Strause and Richard Fslk the potcntial to be highlY in- flueitial even before receiving formal rccognition. Specifically, how would this asscimblv make its influence felt? Li(e the UN General As' sembly, whose official Fowers are lirgelY recommendatorY' , rch ar assemblY would con- tribute to the creation of Plan- etarv norms of bebavior bY is- suine resolutions and Pro- claniations, and morc generallY by expressing views on critical issued of global PolicY. ' ln a more and more integra- ted world that increasinglY ascribes to democratic Prin- ciples, the casc for such an as- semUlv secms unassailable. Firsq becausc thc globaliza- don of rhe world economY inevi- tably requires the develrcPment of giouat regulatory instinitions, rhJ oreservltion of fretdonx nowi:njoycd derrands w9 \Sn to strubf,ure these msuruhons alone democratic lines. SJcond, the very existence of a citizen<ontrollcd internation- al assemblv would both ideo- logically ind' prracticallY re- inforce democratic Practices within countries and undcrmine authoritarianism. Third, allowing rePrcsenh- tives from different coun[ries and civilizations tJo work togeth- er to advanc mutual interess and discuss differences in an as- sembly sctring would helP Pro' mote a clirnatc of civilirY in glots ' al affairs, encouraging universal values to prevail over more Pa- rochial conccrns, as well as over sectarian loyalties and beliefs. Finally, the cstablishment of such a global assembly with di- rect electoral accountabilirY to workers, peasants and other cit- izens would give currentlY vul- nerablc grouPs.a voice and helP them regain some of the Power lost to i-itcnrational capital as a result of clobalizatiost. The mijor argument likelY to be advanced against such an un- denaking is that it is naive' idealistic and, at bcst. Prema- rure. To be sure, logistical Prob- lems would have to be over- corrle. Worldwide elections would havc to be indePendentlY organized. A voting formula based upon one Prson, one vote would liave to be Put into Place, and elections would need to'be certifiable as free and fair. There would, of course, be elitches. Some govenunents iould undoubtedlY not allow such elections to occur on their territories, and until sufficient pressurc could be brought to bear their citizens would have to so unreDresented. But these proil"tnt would not be fatal to the endeavor. Therc is no reason to think this lies bevond the realm of the oossible. fndeed, a bold, vis- ionary undertaking at the snrt of a iew millennium might ac- tivatc the Political and moral imagination of all those who asoiie to construct a world order m6rc r"sponsive to the values associated with democracY. Those wilh the resources have the capacirY to make this proposal a rialirY bY seizing the initiative and Promoting the democratization of the emerg- ins intcmational order. Dernoc- .uEv at the global level is neided and long overdue' Mr. Strauss and Mr. Falk' in- ,rriiu,""t-ii p*luttort or [190] Widener and Princeton Uni' ve rsities, respeuively, crtntrilt- uted this to rhe HeraldTrihune- :'.. ,.' 24 l,egil Frameworlc, Instifu tional StructurEs, and Financial Unired Nolions System ' Itroin cd o*g Birdffiik SuJrgmiecd . . oJ fid bosd OtlEa*rild7dgn dd Etotd bo*6 IAEA I'EE io.o,l Ah|;c Ergy AgEr/ rto hb.Edtrd t6bdr Orgmid;n FAO rc.J c'J &'ia,trn qno$ub .l *{ U;bd Nor;ir* UNESCO U^tEd t\bnd'E4,diffi|,. S<idi6< ond Culsot Gitsidim w}to wdld BcolA O.gtridioo ID,A. hbtuisxJ Dr*lcerrr* ISRD l^h.rcds<J 8.nl tu Rffitu;n o6d D-Jlrd lwortd Bo.t) rFc lib"Eriood Fn@ Cop* IMF l''Ed;ihlAlr*ry rcAo ,nh.Eridd Ch1 Avi<rih Ostr;id;on Uru (h;-*Fl pBd unid ITU lcl<mmkdcn Un;o wMo wdu ^l.koi,gico, Orgaoid;on tMo hlfuihltrbititu ()196idioo wPo weH l^ilkhEl hFry GF;d;on IFAD lnenuiad FrnJ fcr A.ioJh'. D.claplw UNIDO Udbd t rdin, hd*iJ DgdcpftdOwtdigi - GATT Grrcl Agw m t6i[f, o.J I6J. A4I.{JRSO' t}';rld I'td;6 ^/Fsion Ir *ri A.foqrl- I W* S;ilo oF{J ^oZ udhd Ndi6 Op6dnd hla@'b:sE Or.nJSAL *$.dtld;6C66 ,fid6 h d SoLdda. L.n fAVElvl I t};r/ trtdi(E Ancl, vEiidi6}l'$; I $.JDOf tjr;hetbi6Ditu O6ftfm ti{FICYP third NdiG f.*L.P;hs FsehCr LA.TIRT trrihd Ndir hbtn UNIKONT UrftJ hrd;d Lqxffiir O6diiMirh UN,INOGP t nibJ Ndid! AlfrE, CS* Gq h hi5o ohd poljb A.losoni t}r*!d Ndids Op.di<i h gFolii UNPROFOR t nibJ Ndids L'NIAC t nir.J tldiqB tffiiib.J AdEit h Ccr$odo UNTSO tlnibJFb;6Il\E n,ryi:;onG!m'# . UNRWA th;bJ M;{il R.tJ di wd{J ,h tq Po.Ld;m R.fr in ** NJ ro;l INSTRAW rnbdENdd R.ffil ood Tftinh rhde lc' il{ AdqdJwd-i UNCIAD uitihd,.reh:do, C6lE4c 6 trc& @J Dctlnftd tj\lDP bh.J Fr6:od OodoFdhog'@ UNEP un;tJ FrdiN &wilwProgrrm UNFPA Lh;bJ ftdio , PPloto FwJ UNHCR (>Fr. ot ili h,Ed Nd;n t{SfiC(,d!;ffi tc. R.fug \VFP Jdd LrN/fao wqH Food PEg'@ UNlcEF Ubikd rjd;on, c}t;[]6! Ferd UNITAR UnitJ ;ro6"* 3""* t T.o;; o"J n s.<h u'lu UnieC No.ar Gi*;r;r/ wrc WqU Food Cox;l .UNDRO OS<c ol *. UnibJ Nd;6r D;otun ltCd$rw Q *;*;p"t -s-, * *i LhihJ Nd63 . orIE iJturJltds sogw ond agor -+'e9m.96o66rwrdnxrbL p.;riPd asm liprt,dbi lic di) O Sp+cifccJ egm;tr dJ o*E ffi . dgoidid $,+,;o *.,Fh ' Ad.tilEs.c# F@l Regionol Ctriniie'on5 FlnstiOr.rol Cmiiiisior Sessionol ond stonding cmitter Experf, od hx ond relo',ed bodie The UN System .1. From fiqg= and plano, The Unite ^ i Nations: (2nd ed. 3.994 @ 6pxfu7 I1l
PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL BANK (Formerly INSULAR BANK OF ASIA AND AMERICA), Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and FORD PHILIPPINES, INC. and CITIBANK, N.A., Respondents.