Affidavit of the Applicant Arlene Lowery

For Reconsideration of Application for Leave to Appeal

as per the Supreme Court of Canada, Rule 73: subrule 3(b) to (d) inclusive.

2

1. Exceedingly Rare Circumstances to warrant this court to reconsider the
Applicants application To Take Leave are as follows:

i. It is exceedingly rare that the court would either with or
without intent, misrepresent the facts and the damages
incurred of this case in their summary judgment, without
appreciation of the injurious impact this would have on
the Applicant and the 4 infant children she represents,
having put this out to the public domain. See Applicants
Argument attached.
Exhibit 1 attached: Summary of the decision by the
Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) justices named, which
was posted on the SCC website and other websites.
ii. It is exceedingly rare that the courts were unable to fairly
represent the damages incurred by the Applicant and the 4
infant children she represents.
Exhibit 2 attached: Summary judgment that was posted to
the public domain having revisions in red or grey text as
the case may be, which more accurately represents the
true facts, damages incurred and the case history of her
Statement of Claim as Amended (Fresh Copy).
iii. Further it is necessary to add 3 documents for this courts
consideration in this application. These documents are 2
medical reports on Charlene Dobson on December 1996
and on April 14
th
, 1997 and one report on Jonathan
Dobson on April 14
th
, 1997, all examinations conducted
by Dr. C. Norman and attached as Exhibit 3.
iv. Exhibit 4: Summary of Damages claimed by the
Applicant and for the 4 infant children (proposed) to
validate their occurrence and impact. This summary is to
support her revised summary of this judgment at Exhibit 2
beginning part way down beginning with Although
several issues were before the court such as a new
pleading added of a wrongful death of her infant granddaughter
(while in the care of the Saskatchewan Government), and her
alleging that illegal and irregular improprieties occurred by
court officials and lawyers that warrant discipline or
prosecution and further alleges her rights and freedoms as per
the Canadian Charter were violated.
v. Exhibit 5: Updated Curriculum Vitae of the Applicant.
During the course of this lawsuit counsel has swayed
opinion of judges involved in this case as to not only the
Applicants mental health but her professional
qualifications of which she has proof of this occurring.
Affidavit of the Applicant Arlene Lowery
For Reconsideration of Application for Leave to Appeal
as per the Supreme Court of Canada, Rule 73: subrule 3(b) to (d) inclusive.

3
Recently I updated my Curriculum Vitae to attach to a
report for a lawyer with Saskatchewan Legal Aid and I
submit my Curriculum Vitae for the sole purpose of
affirming my credentials to this court so the judiciary in
particular can appreciate that my lifetime professional
background and expertise in the medical and human
services fields has equipped me to recognize when
negligence and malpractice and injurious actions have
occurred, and to further appreciate when these injuries
should be culpable.
2. Denying the Applicant leave to appeal and strapping her with costs of her
action by simply reiterating what the Saskatchewan Queens Bench judges
decision was in your summary, and agreeing with the Court of Appeal justices
when I went to great lengths to meticulously lay out my argument, is unjust
and punitive.
3. This judgment summary as it stands has created only further embarrassment,
grief, hardship, pain and suffering for the Applicant and the 4 infant children
she represents.
4. On September 12
th
, 2009 the Saskatchewan Chief Justice Klebuc directly
addressed me at the beginning of oral arguments and at the end.
5. I paid particular attention to what he said and both times he indicated that I
had written very clearly what had transpired here and thanked me and further
added We (the appellate judges) know (exactly) what has happened here.
6. I too know exactly what has happened here and this court must also know.
7. To date the public domain does not know what exactly happened here and
they need to know.
8. I have been as respectful and as patient as is humanly possible throughout the
nearly 6 years that this lawsuit has been before the courts.
9. My hope still remains that the judiciary would ensure that justice was served.
Affidavit of the Applicant Arlene Lowery
For Reconsideration of Application for Leave to Appeal
as per the Supreme Court of Canada, Rule 73: subrule 3(b) to (d) inclusive.

4

10. The Supreme Court of Canada is my final avenue to go to receive justice, at
least on planet earth.
11. My long and arduous fight has come to an end; with the exception of this
application for this court to reconsider my application To Take Leave.
12. Whatever the final decision on this my last application to it, I will rely on my
Higher Power, the one whose death and resurrection we Christians will
celebrate this weekend.
13. Whatever happens, I as a Christian, will prayerfully stand on the following
Holy Scripture and believe that this court will be an instrument for me and
the infant children to bring about the conclusion of this matter, will rule
justly without partisanship, bias, prejudice and the like.
The Conclusion of the Matter
13
Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter:
Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the duty of all
mankind.
14
For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every
hidden thing, whether it is good or evil.
Ecclesiastes Chapter 12: verses 13 to 14
I prayerfully and respectfully submit my sworn affidavit, with its exhibits and
Argument attached for your careful reconsideration of same.
Sworn before me this 20
th
day of April, 2011 A.D. in the City of Regina and the
Province of Saskatchewan.
_________________________ __________________________
Commissioner of Oaths Arlene Lowery, Applicant
Commissioner of Oaths
in and for the
Province of Saskatchewan.
My Commission expires __________.

Arlene Lowery, Applicant/Appellant (Plaintiff)
203-1808 Smith Street
Regina, SK CAN. S4P 2NP
Affidavit of the Applicant Arlene Lowery
For Reconsideration of Application for Leave to Appeal
as per the Supreme Court of Canada, Rule 73: subrule 3(b) to (d) inclusive.

5
Telephone number: (306) 205-4160
Fax Number: (306) 205-4161

AND TO:
Deputy Minister of Justice and
Attorney General, Saskatchewan Government
Saskatchewan Justice
Civil Law Division
9
th
Floor - 1874 Scarth Street,
Regina, SK, Canada,
S4P 4B3
Telephone number: (306) 787-8953
Fax Number: (306) 787-0581