Vicky Pryce Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has moved rapidly from off-stage to centre-stage. It is now an issue that cannot be ignored by business. But responses to date have focused almost entirely on a small group of large listed companies. This article argues that CSR does and should apply to all organisations, regardless of size, sector or even ownership structure. To understand why this is the case, it is important to understand why CSR has moved so quickly to be a must-respond issue for businesses. This has been driven by five forces: customer pressure, changes in business procurement, govern- ment legislation and pressure, the rise of socially responsible investment and the changing expecta- tions of employees. The first source of pressure is the change in customer demands. Brand and price are still of primary importance to customers, but the evi- dence suggests that views of retail customers may be undergoing a fundamental change in focus. The Millennium Poll of 25,000 consumers in 23 countries reports that consumers care more about the perceived corporate responsibility of their supplier or shop than about either brand or price. Even allowing for wishful thinking, corporate responsibility is firmly on the consumer agenda. The recent high-profile consumer boycotts of big brand names such as Nike, Shell and Ford have focussed on a range of issues, from the environ- ment to child labour to claims of racism. But whatever the issue, all of these expressions of consumer anger were targeted at the perceived irresponsible behaviour of the company involved. In all these cases there was real damage to the companys brand, and in some directly to its financial performance. This consumer movement is being powered by a rapid increase of informa- tion about company behaviour available through the Internet. In this environment companies are finding it harder to hide behind two-line market- ing plugs, and are forced to reveal more about the company, its values and activities. This movement is set to grow at a rapid pace. Overall, consumers and their concerns about corporate behaviour are pushing businesses towards more openness. Its not just individual retail consumers either. Business buyers face a very different set of pressures from retail consumers, but responsible purchasing is firmly on the agenda. There has been a rising trend in checking suppliers for some element of ethical performance; Nikes child labour scandal forced the company into an audit of its suppliers, and British Airways recently carried out a survey to check out its suppliers ethical policies. These changes are being driven by ethical investors, activists, and companies themselves with a view to extending responsible behaviour beyond a plaque on the wall in head office into some form of reality. The third source of pressure is the government. As the largest buyer in the UK, governments own screening of suppliers for responsible behaviour will impact on many businesses as direct suppliers and down the supply chain. In addition, the changes in the pension law and the combined codes are pushing CSR firmly onto the corporate agenda. While the government is unlikely to legislate to encourage responsible behaviour it is likely to push for more reporting and disclosure about 140 #Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002. 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA 02148, USA. Volume11 Number 2 April 2002 CSR issues by all businesses. The current review of company law, taken together with the Combined Code and Turnbull, indicates that social, ethical and environmental (SEE) risks and issues are moving into the mainstream. Turnbull requires that all significant risks are identified and assessed on an ongoing basis, including those related to environmental, reputation and business probity issues. While SEE matters are not currently a mandatory part of company reporting, these changes are forcing public companies into vol- untary disclosure and discussion of these issues. The recent consultations on the Company Law Review suggest that a new statutory operating and financial review may be introduced in a few years time. This would require listed and large com- panies to report on their wider relationships (with employees, suppliers and so on), their reputation and their impact on the community and environ- ment. The investment community is also exerting pressure on companies to act responsibly. Most investment funds have some form of ethical investment fund that has moved away from avoiding sector X or sector Y into more sophis- ticated positive criteria such as investing in companies with environmental policies or training policies. In the UK, socially responsible invest- ment represents 3.3 billion of funds under management; this may be only 1% of the total amount of funds under management, but it is a figure that has been doubling about every two years. FTSE International is launching a new set of indices for ethically correct companies. The so-called FTSE4Good is aimed at developing a global standard by which institutional and pension fund investors can identify companies that can be regarded as a socially responsible investment. In addition, changes made to the Pensions Act in July last year contribute to the growing importance of social, economic and environmental (SEE) issues. The Act now requires trustees of occupational pension funds to disclose the extent (if at all) to which they take into account SEE considerations in their investment decisions. This will quite naturally lead companies to report on these types of issues in order to help pension fund investors. Fund managers are already facing increasing demands by investors to know how companies deal with SEE issues. The Association of British Insurers is to adopt guide- lines setting out what information companies should disclose to shareholders, and some fund managers are beginning to state publicly that they will vote against companies who, for example, do not have an environmental report. Finally, employees are putting such pressure on companies to behave responsibly that CSR is be- coming a part of recruitment strategy as busi- nesses seek to attract and retain the best people. Bain and McKinsey have both recently set up not- for-profit consulting arms to do work for not-for- profit organisations, as they believe that this type of community involvement and feel-good is what their brightest MBAs want. This trend is followed by many of the worlds largest companies that have adopted community programmes in order to motivate staff. In a recent survey for the Industrial Society, 82% of UK professionals claimed that they would not work for an organisation whose values they did not believe in. Nearly all employees in fact 99% said that they care whether or not their employer acts responsibly. Among smaller businesses, the survey showed that 62% of owner managers were influenced by their employees to be more socially active. These five forces are moving corporate social responsibility from the fringe into the business mainstream. However, as should be apparent from the nature of these forces, they are affect- ing all organisations, regardless of size, sector or ownership structure. While most of the response to date has been by a small group of high profile listed companies, this is starting to change. The SEE disclosures are pushing CSR into the main- stream for other listed companies. Moreover, this is just starting to be pushed down the supply chain of some of the largest companies into SMEs. For this reason, CSR should not be the preserve of the usual suspects, indeed the world has already moved on. This is why I have been involved in the estab- lishment of GoodCorporation. It is the first ever badge of corporate responsibility. It is designed to allow any organisation to demonstrate that it acts in a responsible manner. It is given credibility # Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002 Business Ethics: AEuropean Review 141 by an easy-to-understand set of processes that any organisation can put in place. It is backed by independent verification. My hope is that Good- Corporation will become an important tool used by a wide range of organisations to demonstrate CSR. The initial indications are that it is succeeding! Volume11 Number 2 April 2002 # Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002 142