9/3/13 Obama`s Climate Action Strategy | Brookings Institution

www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/25-obama-climate-change-agenda-hultman 1/6
Previous | Next
Nathan Hultman | June 25, 2013 5:36pm
Obumu`s CIImuLe AcLIon SLruLegy
President Obama today released his long-awaited climate action strategy. This strategy
addresses three elements of U.S. climate policy: domestic actions to reduce pollution leading to
climate change; investments in U.S. physical infrastructure and institutions to improve resilience
to extreme weather and climate hazards; and increased engagement with the international
community in a global approach to reduce the impacts of climate change.
While this is the first time that the Obama administration has released a comprehensive climate
strategy, most of the individual policies described within it represent repackaged ideas that have
already been either proposed or enacted (see my earlier note on "What to Watch for for
additional details). There were no major surprises, although several new goals and minor
initiatives were introduced. Overall, then, the strategy's value is in synthesizing the many
individual actions that have been initiated by the president, thereby creating a comprehensive
picture and roadmap for the current American approach to climate change. n itself, then, the
9/3/13 Obama`s Climate Action Strategy | Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/25-obama-climate-change-agenda-hultman 2/6
strategy adds additional clarity for U.S. businesses, state and local governments, and the
international community about the direction and ambition of U.S. federal policy for the next few
years.
The strategy is laid out in a 21-page document withdepending on how you count themover 60
policy proposals. Several of these stand out:
1. Regulations for power plant emissions. This is probably the item that was most discussed
in advance, and it is no surprise that Obama is pushing for these rules. The new strategy
says simply that Environmental Protection Agency will "work expeditiously to enact
standards on both existing and new sources. These rules (see "What to Watch for) would
preclude the construction of new coal-fired electricity, unless it has carbon capture and
sequestration (CCS) technology and would likely mandate some moderate efficiency
upgrades for the most egregious existing electricity generators.
2. Electricity grid upgrades. New infrastructure investment in the nation's electricity grid and
expansion of the capacity to transport power is important not only for energy security but
also for enabling certain approaches to demand management and renewable energy
generationboth of which would contribute to emissions reduction goals.
3. Targeted support for CCS. Carbon capture and sequestration technology, which captures
and buries CO2 from fossil fuel combustion, is technically proven but remains expensive.
The strategy proposes loan guarantees for technology development and deployment.
4. Quadrennial energy review. The strategy establishes a periodic review of the nation's
energy situation and energy policies. While it seems relatively mundane, this exercise might
be valuable for allowing some strategic oversight of the nation's widely disparate energy-
related activities and their consequences for energy security and the environment.
5. Increased fuel economy standards for heavy-duty vehicles. The past four years have
seen increased stringency for fuel efficiency for cars and light trucks out to 2025 and for
heavy trucks to 2018. This new initiative will set standards for heavy trucks out to 2025.
9/3/13 Obama`s Climate Action Strategy | Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/25-obama-climate-change-agenda-hultman 3/6
6. Reducing emissions of HFC. Hydrofluorocarbon is a potent greenhouse gas and the U.S.
is already working with other international partners to limit and gradually reduce its use.
7. Reducing methane emissions. The U.S. is a heavy user and producer of natural gas, and
this usage is likely to continue expanding with increased utilization of shale gas. The
methane in natural gas is also a potent greenhouse gas, so reducing leaks can help lower
climate impacts. The strategy sets out an interagency process to improve the national gas
system through regulation and industry partnerships.
n addition, there are a few programs that should be useful but are somewhat more moderate in
scope:
1. An explicit strategy for organizing federal, state and local institutions to prepare for
hazardous or damaging climate and weather events. t is clear that there will likely be some
consequences for the U.S. due to climate change and continued weather variability, and the
new approach seeks to systematize the planning and response strategies across the wide
number of agencies and institutions that will have to be involved.
2. Clean energy permitting. The strategy calls for an additional 10 gigawatts of new
renewables to be permitted on federal lands. n addition, it encourages the upgrading of
existing dams with new hydroelectric capacity.
3. New energy efficiency goal. The U.S. has had a long track record of success with low-
cost efficiency improvements due to gradually ratcheting federal standards. This new policy
sets an aggregate target to reduce carbon emissions by at least 3 billion tons by 2030
through the standards set under Obama's two terms in office.
4. New federal goals for renewable energy. The strategy increases the U.S. federal
government's target for renewable energy use from 7.5 percent to 20 percent by 2020.
5. Standardized energy efficiency contracts. While it seems potentially niche, this small
provision buried in the strategy has great potential. One of the barriers to energy efficiency
investment is not its financial paybackwhich tends to be quite healthybut rather the
9/3/13 Obama`s Climate Action Strategy | Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/25-obama-climate-change-agenda-hultman 4/6
difficulty in aggregating finance for what amounts to millions of small but profitable changes.
Advocates hope that standardizing contracts will do for energy efficiency what standardized
mortgages did for the housing marketmake the investment attractive for big financial
institutions who need to invest large sums easily.
6. International finance for clean energy. The strategy clearly prioritizes clean energy for
international energy assistance.
7. Continued engagement in international discussions. The strategy expects any
international post-2015 climate agreement to have legal force and be applicable to all
countriesnot just developed ones. n addition, it outlines continuation of existing
engagement across multiple negotiation forums such as the Major Economies Forum and
various bilateral discussions with key global emitters.
There is one more new item apparent from Obama's speech: A sharper focus on the broader
human values side of climate change. Obama used this event to situate our response to rising
emissions not only in the policy realm of technology and economics, but also in the area of
religious values and a responsibility to others within and outside the U.S. Given that a broad-
based congressional response is needed to go beyond the policy elements sketched out in
Obama's new climate strategy, this anchoring of climate change within human values may prove
to be a particularly helpful direction toward building the necessary support.
nterestingly, while the official strategy released by the White House has no mention of the
controversial Keystone XL pipeline, President Obama did mention it during his speech. He
promised that if the administration found that Keystone would "significantly increase U.S. CO
emissions, they would not find it in the national security interest of the United States and would
reject it. t is important to note that much of the discussion within the U.S. government so far has
revolved around the likelihood that if Canadian oil sands petroleum were not exported to the U.S.
via the pipeline, it would migrate to the U.S. in other ways (such as via rail and through various
sea ports). Much therefore depends on the calculation of what would happen to the oil if the XL
pipeline were not built. Overall, this statement does not seem to change the tone substantially
from what we have heard before, although it is a clearer statement of the carbon criterion.
2
9/3/13 Obama`s Climate Action Strategy | Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/25-obama-climate-change-agenda-hultman 5/6
The new climate strategy therefore succeeds in presenting the Obama administration's activities
in a comprehensive frameworktouching on reducing domestic emissions, preparing for
weather-related impacts and engaging with the international community. While most of the
policies presented are extensions of existing work, the consolidation and communication of the
approach as an overall strategy can help place these individual policies in their broader context
and therefore undergird the logic for pursuing them. The power plant pollution standards are
clearly a central element of this strategy, and this makes it more likely that we will see both
existing and new source standards in the coming years. The standardized energy efficiency
contracts are a small piece of the strategy, but deserve careful monitoring because of their
potential to be innovative for bringing in new sources of finance. n addition, several new
initiatives like the new coordination on resilience, the interagency process for methane and the
quadrennial energy review are likely to help improve the clarity and efficiency of our federal
government's response to climate change.
The net result of these many administration actions could be to help U.S. domestic emissions
meet Obama's stated target of a 17 percent reduction, relative to 2005 levels, by the year 2020.
For that, the strategy provides a solid approach that is likely to succeed. The bigger question, of
course, is whether this strategy brings the U.S. in line with where we would ideally want to be
either up to 2020 or beyond it. Unfortunately, to reach the levels of emissions necessary for
climate stabilizationon the order of a 50 percent global reduction by 2050 and up to an 80
percent reduction by 2100 his strategy is insufficient. With this strategy, the president is
essentially pulling out all the stops that are available to him. Unfortunately, with an uncooperative
Congress, that is not enough. Only Congress really has the power to implement the fundamental
regulatory and fiscal changessuch as carbon taxes or broad-based energy policythat would
put the U.S. on an aggressive path toward a low-carbon pathway. As such, Obama's strategy is
best seen as a push to keep us close enough to that pathway so that, if Congress does choose
to implement some more substantive measures, the costs of making the transition will be
relatively moderate, particularly compared to the likely damages from climate change.
Nathan Hultman
Nonresident Fellow, Global Economy and Development
@natehultman
9/3/13 Obama`s Climate Action Strategy | Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/25-obama-climate-change-agenda-hultman 6/6
Nathan Hultman is a fellow in the Global Economy and Development Program. He specializes in international
climate policy, carbon markets, and their relation to low-carbon energy investment decisions.
More Posts from Nathan > | View Expert Page >
0 comments
Comments for th|s thread are now c|osed.
What's this? ALSO ON THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Is South Sudan on the Verge of
Co||apse?
3 comments 15 days ago
Dr A|eu Garang - lt is a wrong reading,
speculative and lucks any in depth
analysis of the current reality of .
Syr|a Cr|s|s and M|||tary Act|on: What
Shou|d Be Done, Why and How
22 comments 7 days ago
Andre - After 12 years since 9/11 tragic
events, it is ironic to see the United
States Army fighting wars .
Brook|ngs Data Now: Syr|a, Co|omb|a
Trade, Ch||dren D|sp|aced, .
19 days ago
The NSA Documents, An Introduct|on [
Brook|ngs Inst|tut|on
12 days ago

Best Commun|ty

Share
No one has commented yet.
Comment feed Subscr|be v|a ema||
0