Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
i
=Cov(r
i
,r
M
)/
2
M
E(r
i
)-r
f
=[Cov(r
i
,r
j
)/
2
M
][E(r
M
)-r
f
]=
i
[E(r
M
)-r
f
]
9-19
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
Then, the expected return-beta relationship
gives us the CAPM
] ) ( [ ) (
f M GE f GE
r r E r r E
This formula can be used to measure the
appropriate risk premium for the individual
securities in an environment where everyone
holds the same identical risky portfolio.
9-20
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
What about the portfolios?
If the expected return-beta relationship holds for any
individual asset, it must hold for any combination of
assets. Thus the CAPM becomes:
n
1 k
k k P
n
1 k
k k P
f M P f P
w
r E w r E
where
r r E r r E
) ( ) (
,
] ) ( [ ) (
9-21
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
This equation also holds for the market portfolio.
1
r r Cov
where
r r E r r E
2
M
2
M
2
M
M M
M
f M M f M
) , (
,
] ) ( [ ) (
Beta greater than 1 are named as aggressive. High-beta
stocks entails above-average sensitivity to market volatility.
In an efficient market security prices already reflect public
information about a firms prospects thus only the risk of
the company (beta in the CAPM) should affect its expected
return.
Thus investors receive high expected returns only if they
are willing to bear risk.
9-22
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
Beta in the CAPM shows the risk of the
security because beta is proportional to
the risk that the security contributes to the
optimal risky portfolio.
The expected return-beta relationship is
known as security market line as can be
seen on a graph in Figure 9.2.
9-23
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
] ) ( [ ) (
f M i f i
r r E r r E
Slope of the SML is the risk
premium of the market
portfolio.
9-24
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
Comparison between CML and SML
CML graphs the risk premium of efficient
portfolios (market portfolio and risk-free assets)
as a function of portfolio standard deviation
The standard deviation is the valid measure of risk for
efficiently diversified portfolios that are candidates for
an investors overall portfolio
SML graphs the individual asset risk premiums as
a function of asset risk.
Beta is the valid measure of risk for individual assets
since it shows the contribution of the asset to the
portfolio variance
SML is valid for both efficient portfolios and individual
assets
9-25
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
SML provides a benchmark for the evaluation of
investment performance
Given the risk (beta) what should be the rate of
return on the investment?
Fairly priced assets should lie on the SML.
If an asset is underpriced then it will be plotted
above the SML. It provides an expected return in
excess of its fair return.
If an asset is overpriced then it will be plotted
below SML.
9-26
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Continued)
Alpha () is the difference
between the fair and actually
expected rates of return on a
stock.
9-27
Is the CAPM Practical?
CAPM has two predictions as a model:
The market portfolio is efficient.
The security market line (expected return-beta
relationship) accurately describes the risk-return
trade-off, which is alpha values are zero.
However testing these predicitions is not that
easy.
The hypothesized market portfolio is not
observable.
The market portfolio in CAPM includes all risky
assets that can be held by investors.
including bonds, real estate, foreign assets,
privately held businesses and human capital
9-28
Is the CAPM Practical? (Continued)
In statistical tests, CAPM fails. The data
rejects the hypothesis that alpha values are 0.
The reasons of the failure
Data problems
Validity of the market proxy
Statistical methods
9-29
Extensions of the CAPM
The Zero-Beta Model
Merton and Roll (1972) state that:
Any portfolio that is a combination of two frontier
portfolios is itself on the efficient frontier.
The expected return of any assets can be
expressed as an exact linear function of the
expected return on any two efficient-frontier
portfolios P and Q
9-30
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
Every portfolio on the efficient frontier, except the
global mimum-variance portfolio, has a companion
portfolio on the inefficient half of the frontier with
which it is uncorrelated. The companion portfolio is
referred to as zero-beta portfolio of the efficient
portfolio since they are uncorrelated.
Fisher (1972) shows that if there is a restriction on
borrowing and /or lending in the risk-free asset then
some investors might choose portfolios on the
efficient frontier but not the market portfolio and
their zero-beta portfolio component.
9-31
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
Labor Income and Nontraded Assets
Unfortunately all risky asset classes are not
traded as assumed by CAPM.
Labor income (human capital)
Mayers (1972) tries to incorporate the labor
income into the CAPM model and drives the
equilibrium expected return-beta equation for an
economy in which individuals are endowed with
the labor income of varying size relative to their
nonlabor capital
9-32
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
A Multiperiod Model and Hedge Portfolios
Merton (1992) relaxes the single period
assumption in CAPM.
In his model the investors have a lifetime
consumption/investment plan and adapt their
consumption/investment decisions to current
wealth and planned retirement age.
Thus investors have multiperiod to think of, not
just a single one.
9-33
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
When uncertainty about portfolio returns are the
only source of risk and investment opportunities
remain unchanged through time then ICAPM
(intertemporal capital asset pricing model) predicts
the same expected return-beta relationship as
CAPM for single-period.
However if there are other sources of risk
Changes in future risk-free rate, expected returns and
the risk of the market portfolio (vairance in its return).
Changes in the parameters describing investment
opportunities.
9-34
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
Changes in the prices of the consumption goods
that can be purchased with any amount of
wealth such as inflation risk.
Then investors will change their
consumption/investment plans by taking into
account these changes.
9-35
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
A Consumption-Based CAPM
Rubinstein (1976), Lucas (1978) and Breeden
(1979) suggests a model that investors must
allocate current wealth between todays
consumption and investment for the future.
In a lifetime comsumption plan, the investor must
in each period balance the allocation of current
wealth between todays consumption and the
savings and investment that will support future
consumption.
Investors will value additional income more highly
during difficult economic times (when
consumption opportunities are scarce)
9-36
Extensions of the CAPM (Continued)
An asset will be viewed risker if it has a positive
covariance with consumption growth. Its payoff is
higher when the consumption is already high.
So, equilibrium risk premiums for this asset will be
greater.
9-37
Liquidity and the CAPM
Liquidity: The ease and speed with which an
asset can be sold at fair market value.
Cost of engaging in the transaction:
i.e. The bid-ask spread
Price impact: the adverse movement in price one
would encounter when attempting to execute a
large trade.
Immediacy: the ability to sell the asset quickly
without reverting to fire-sale prices.
9-38
Liquidity and the CAPM (Continued)
The security dealers contribute to overall market
liquidity by adding new shares to their inventory
or selling shares from their inventory.
The fee they earn for supplying this liquidity is
the bid-ask spread.
The spread, cost of transaction in a security, is a
component (measure) of liquidity.
Spread is lower in more liquid assets.
Note: the spread also gives information related to
the asymmetric information.
9-39
Liquidity and the CAPM (Continued)
What is asymmetric information?
The potential for one trader to have private
information about the value of the security that is
not known to the trading partner.
Asymmetric information affects the markets
Buyers who suspects asymmetric information
wants to decreae the prices since they suspect
that there is something wrong which they do not
know.
In extreme cases trading may cease altogether
e.g. Akerlofs lemons
9-40
Liquidity and the CAPM (Continued)
Why do investors trade securities?
Noninformational motvies
These sorts of trading are not motivated by the
private information related to the traded security.
They are executed to raise cash (for liquidity
purposes) for another investment or rebalancing
the portfolio.
9-41
Liquidity and the CAPM (Continued)
Informational motives
These transactions are motivated by the private
information known only to seller or buyer
(asymmetric information)
These kinds of trading widens the spread.
Since one of the parties in an advantegeous
situation in this kind of trading traders posting a
limit order wants to protect themselves against the
possibility that other party knows more. Thus they
increase the limit-ask prices and decrease limit-bid
orders.
They ask for a higher price to sell and offer a lower
price to buy.
9-42
Liquidity and the CAPM (Continued)
Illiquidity: can be measured by the discount from
fair market value a seller must accept if the
asset is to be sold quickly.
The discount increases with the number of
transaction for a given spread.
Investors who trade less frequently will be less
affected from the high trading costs. The
reduction in the rate of return due to trading costs
is lower the longer the security is held.
In equilibrium investors with long holding periods
will hold more of the illiquid securities, while
short-horizon investors will prefer liquid securities.
9-43
Liquidity and the CAPM (Continued)
What about unexpected changes in the liquidity?
Investors demand compensation for the liquidity
risk.
Depending on overall conditions in the securities
market the bid-ask spreads and ability to sell the
security changes.
If asset liquidity fails then an investor will ask for
more price discount beyond that required for the
expected cost of illiquidity.
Thus, Acharya and Pedersen (2005) incorporates
this unexpected changes in the liquidity into the
CAPM.
9-44
The CAPM and the Index Model
Since the CAPM depends on expectations in
order to make it testable we need more
assumptions.
The connection from expected to the realized
returns is the Single-index model.
In excess return form
2
M
M i
i
2
M i M i
f i i
i M i i i
R R Cov
R R Cov
r r R
where
e R R
) , (
) , (
,
9-45
The CAPM and the Index Model (Continued)
Thus,
INDEX
=
CAPM
We replace the theoretical (unobservable)
market portfolio of the CAPM with the
observable market index.
9-46
The CAPM and the Index Model (Continued)
] ) ( [ ) (
) (
] ) ( [ ) (
) (
:
f M i i f i
i f M i i f i
f M i f i
i f M i f i
r r E r r E
e r r r r
Index Single
r r E r r E
e r r r r
CAPM
Thus, CAPM predicts that
i
should be 0 for all assets.
The alpha of a stock is its expected return in excess of (or
below) the fair expected return as predicted by CAPM.
If the stock is fairly priced then its alpha must be 0.
9-47
The CAPM and the Index Model (Continued)
CAPM relates expected return to risk
Expected risk premium on any asset is
proportional to the expected risk premium on the
market portfolio with beta as the proportionality
constant.
It has problems however:
Expectations are unobservable
Market portfolio includes every risky asset and
unobservable as well
9-48
The CAPM and the Index Model (Continued)
To overcome these problems
Single-Factor Model
Assumes one economic factor, F shows the
only common influence on the security
retuns.
Security returns beyond F are affected from
independent, firm-specific factors.
Single-Index Model
Assumes F can be replaced by a broad-
based index of securities that can proxy
CAPMs theoretical market portfolio.