This study involved both desk research and intensive interviews with a sample of fifteen farm households who are involved to varying degrees in short food supply chain activity. The key learning points to have emerged from this study include: Unless it is to remain at a relatively simple level, with limited potential for growth, SFSC activity appears to require the inputs (i.e. The skills and the labour) of more than one member of the farm household. The typical farm household which embarks on this journey seems to assemble and jugg
This study involved both desk research and intensive interviews with a sample of fifteen farm households who are involved to varying degrees in short food supply chain activity. The key learning points to have emerged from this study include: Unless it is to remain at a relatively simple level, with limited potential for growth, SFSC activity appears to require the inputs (i.e. The skills and the labour) of more than one member of the farm household. The typical farm household which embarks on this journey seems to assemble and jugg
This study involved both desk research and intensive interviews with a sample of fifteen farm households who are involved to varying degrees in short food supply chain activity. The key learning points to have emerged from this study include: Unless it is to remain at a relatively simple level, with limited potential for growth, SFSC activity appears to require the inputs (i.e. The skills and the labour) of more than one member of the farm household. The typical farm household which embarks on this journey seems to assemble and jugg
In recent years there has been a renewed interest and
a signicant growth in alternatives to the conventional food supply chain which allow primary producers and consumers to connect in new and more direct ways via outlets such as farmers markets, online sales, restaurant sales, specialist retailers, etc. This study involved both desk research and intensive interviews with a sample of fteen farm households who are involved to varying degrees in short food supply chain activity. The results of this research add to the emerging knowledge base on this fast-growing sector of the food industry and rural landscape and more specically, suggest how the sector might be encouraged and facilitated to grow and develop further. Although the experiences of participants in this study have been mixed and there remain signicant challenges and barriers to short food supply chain (SFSC) activity, all plan to continue operating in this sector of the food industry. The key learning points to have emerged from this study include: Unless it is to remain at a relatively simple level, with limited potential for growth, SFSC activity appears to require the inputs (i.e. the skills and the labour) of more than one member of the farm household. It also appears that at least one member of the farm households embarking on this kind of activity will usually have signicant off-farm work and life experience, or an entrepreneurial background or education qualications outside of agriculture and farming. Individual farm households can improve the viability and sustainability of their farm businesses by operating at widely different scales within this sector, from those who will scale up and sell predominately into proximate and/or extended chains, to the greater number who will consciously continue to operate at a more small-scale level, typically with a high level of control and with a business model which is suited to their way of life and to the capacities of the farm holding and farm household. There is potential for this kind of activity throughout the country, but proximity or otherwise to population centres and/or a receptive consumer base appear to impact strongly on how and in what way the business evolves. The typical farm household which embarks on this journey seems to assemble and juggle a large range of outlets for their products, with a majority selling into three or more. There was a strong awareness of the need to spread risk and to remain exible and alert to shifts in consumer demand and behaviour and to trends in the wider food industry. Each type of outlet has its benets and its drawbacks and every farm household embarking on SFSC activity assembles a mix of outlets which works for them and their operation. The factors which appear to determine the most suitable mix for each household include the location of the farm, the type of produce, the labour available to the enterprise, the personal preferences of the household with regard to selling, the level of ambition for the enterprise and the general market conditions. Face-to-face SFSCs and proximate SFSCs are the categories which appear to have the greatest traction with the farm households which took part in this study, with the most popular outlets being farmers markets and local/regional restaurants. The more direct, face-to-face means of engaging with consumers farmers markets, farm shops and farm-gate sales seem to be holding up comparatively better in the current economic environment and a level of control, agency and cash-ow clearly remains with the producer. The retail and restaurant trades are perhaps the most problematic and risky in the current economic environment and the larger retail operations and chains do not appear a suitable outlet for most small-scale producers. On the other hand, more local and/or speciality shops appear a better and more long-term t for the kind of businesses involved in this study. The perceived over-regulation of the food sector emerged as the issue which most exercised participants in this research and was identied as the single biggest barrier to the further development of the sector. Other difculties associated with operating in this sector of the food industry include what is generally seen as the limited food culture, the price-driven nature of the market in the current economic environment, the rising costs of inputs and the time commitment required. Executive Summary