Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
=
m
y m,
y m, EL,
m
y m,
y BM, grid,
EG
EF EG
EF
(4)
Where:
EF
grid,BM,y
=Build margin CO
2
emission factor in year y (tCO
2
/MWh)
EG
m,y
=Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power unit m in year y
(MWh)
FE
EL,m,y
=CO
2
emission factor of power unit m in year y (tCO
2
/MWh)
m =Power units included in the build margin
y
=Most recent historical year for which power generation data is available
7
If this approach does not reasonably reflect the power plants that would likely be built in the absence of the project
activity, project participants are encouraged to submit alternative proposals for consideration by the CDM
Executive Board.
8
If 20% falls on part capacity of a unit, that unit is fully included in the calculation.
9
http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/Deviations
On 7 October 2005 DNV requested guidance for projects in China. The EB guidance was given in a response letter entitled
Several projects in China (application of approved methodology AM0005), see
http://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/A/M/_/AM_CLAR_QEJ WJ EF3CFBP1OZAK6V5YXPQKK7WYJ 2/Several%20projects%2
0in%20China%20%28application%20of%20approved%20methodology%20AM0005%29.pdf?t=d1l8bHhiaWNwfDAhaHh82
kp2O0hQa3Uia-FT While the request for deviation was submitted relating to AM0005, the guidance can also be used for
ACM0002 as this directly replaces AM0005 and all OM and BM calculations in these two methodologies are the same.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 15
As we stated in step 5, the information on the five power plants built most recently is not available.
Therefore, this proposed project uses the alternative method to calculateEF
grid,BM,y
.
The project participants choose between two given options for calculating the Build Margin for the
project, one is ex-ante calculation, and the other is annual ex-post updating in the first crediting period.
For this project the first option is chosen. The Build Margin Emission Factor therefore is based ex-ante on
the most recent information available on plants already built at the time of PDD submission. The
EF
grid,BM,y
therefore is fixed for the first crediting period.
Due to the unavailability of data, some changes have been made and approved by CDM EB. That is to
calculate the incremental installed capacity and the mix of power generating techniques first, and then
calculate the weight of the incremental installed capacity created by all kinds of power generating
techniques and finally calculate emission factors by using the maximized efficiency figures of techniques.
Since the figures of the capacity of coal-fired, oil-fired and gas-fired power generation cannot be
separated from the statistics of thermal power generation, the following measures will be taken in
calculation: first, work out the proportion of CO
2
emission caused by solid, liquid or gas fuels to the total
emission based on the available data of energy balance in the recent year, second, taking the proportion as
the weight, calculate the emission factor of thermal power generation for each grid based on the emission
factor at the maximized efficiency level of techniques; finally, BM of the grid equals to the emission
factor of thermal power generation multiplied the weight of the thermal power installed capacity in the
increase of total installed capacity which is close but not exceeding 20% of existing installed capacity.
The calculation steps and formulas are as follows:
Sub-step 5.1 Calculate the proportion of CO
2
emission caused by solid, liquid and gas fuels in the total
emission respectively:
=
j , i
y , j , i , CO y , i y , j , i
j , COAL e i
y , j , i , CO y , i y , j , i
y , Coal
2
2
EF NCV F
EF NCV F
(5)
=
j , i
y , j , i , CO y , i y , j , i
j , OIL e i
y , j , i , CO y , i y , j , i
y , Oil
2
2
EF NCV F
EF NCV F
(6)
=
j , i
y , j , i , CO y , i y , j , i
j , GAS e i
y , j , i , CO y , i y , j , i
y , Gas
2
2
EF NCV F
EF NCV F
(7)
Where:
F
i,j,y
=the amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by province j in year(s) y
NCV
i,y
=the weighted average net calorific value of the fuel type i in year y (GJ /mass or volume unit)
EF
CO2,i,j,y
=the weighted average CO
2
emission factor of fuel type i in year y (tCO
2
/GJ )
Step 5.2 Calculate the emission factor of thermal power generation
EF
Thermal,y
Coal,y
EF
Coal,Adv,y
+
Oil,y
EF
Oil,Adv,y
+
Gas,y
EF
Gas,Adv,y
(8)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 16
Where:
EF
Coal,Adv,y
, EF
Oil,Adv,y
and EF
Gas,Adv,y
are emission factor proxies of efficiency level of the best coal-fired,
oil based and gas-based power generation technology commercially available in China.
Sub-step 5.3 Calculate BM of the grid
y Thermal,
y Total,
y Thermal,
y BM, grid,
EF
CAP
CAP
EF =
(9)
Where:
CAP
Thermal,y
=the increased installed capacity of thermal power generation;
CAP
Total,y
=the total amount of incremental installed capacity.
The data on different fuel consumptions for power generation and the net caloric values of the fuels are
obtained from the China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2011. The emission factors, oxidation factors and
effective CO2 emission factor (lower value of 95% confidence interval) of the fuels adopted are obtained
from Table 1-4 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Workbook.
Referring to the Notification on Determining Baseline Emission Factor of Chinas Grid, the build
margin emission factor (
grid,BM,y
EF ) of NCPG is calculated ex ante as 0.5940 tCO
2
e/MWh (see
Annex 3 for details).
Step 6. Calculate the combined margin emissions factor
Based on the tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (Version 03.0.0) the combined
margin emissions factor grid,CM,y EF is calculated as follows:
BM
y BM, grid,
OM
y grid,OM,
y CM, grid, w EF w EF EF + = (10)
Where:
y CM, grid, EF =Combined margin CO
2
emission factor in year y (tCO
2
/MWh)
EF
grid, BM, y
=Build margin CO
2
emission factor in year y (tCO
2
/MWh)
y grid,OM,
EF =Operating margin CO
2
emission factor in year y (tCO
2
/MWh)
OM w =Weighting of operating margin emissions factor (%)
BM w =Weighting of build margin emissions factor (%)
The combined margin emissions factor grid,CM,y EF should be calculated as the weighted average of the
Operating Margin emission factor (
grid,OM,y
EF ) and the Build Margin emission factor (
grid,BM,y
EF ), where
OM w =0.75 and BM w =0.25 for wind project (owing to their intermittent and non-dispatchable nature)
for the first crediting period and for subsequent crediting periods. The (
grid,OM,y
EF ) and (
grid,BM,y
EF ) are
calculated as described in Step 4 and 6.
grid,CM,y EF =1.0021*0.75+0.5940*0.25 =0.9001(tCO
2
e/MWh)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 17
B.6.2. Data and parameters fixed ex ante
Data / Parameter
y i,
FC
Unit 10
4
tons, 10
8
m
3
Description Amount of fossil fuel type i consumed in the project electricity system in
year y
Source of data China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2009~2011
Value(s) applied See Annex 4 for details
Choice of data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Official statistical data
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment -
Data / Parameter
NCV
i,y
Unit
GJ /mass or volume unit of a fuel
Description
Net calorific value(energy contents) of the fossil fuel type i in year y
Source of data
China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2009~2011
Value(s) applied
See appendix 4
Choice of data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Official statistical Data; publicly accessible and reliable data source.
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment /
Data / Parameter
EF
co2,i,y
Unit
tC/GJ
Description
The CO
2
emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i in year y
Source of data
2006 IPCC Guideline for National Green House Gas Inventories, Table
1.3, Chapter 1, Volume 2, P
1.21
Value(s) applied
See appendix 4
Choice of data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
IPCC default value because local or national data are not available.
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment /
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 18
Data / Parameter
EG
y
Unit
MWh
Description
Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the project
electricity system (by power unit m), NCPG, in year y
Source of data
China Electric Power Yearbook 2009~2011
Value(s) applied
See appendix 4
Choice of data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Official Statistical Data; publicly accessible and reliable data source.
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment /
Data / Parameter
CAP
Thermal,y
Unit
MW
Description
The newly added thermal power capacity in the project electricity system,
NCPG, in year y.
Source of data
China Electric Power Yearbook 2009~2011
Value(s) applied
See appendix 4
Choice of data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Official Statistical Data; publicly accessible and reliable data source.
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment /
Data / Parameter
CAP
Total,y
Unit
MW
Description
The total newly added capacity in the project electricity system, NCPG, in
year y.
Source of data
China Electric Power Yearbook 2009~2011
Value(s) applied
See appendix 4
Choice of data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Official Statistical Data; publicly accessible and reliable data source.
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment /
B.6.3. Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions
>>
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 19
According to the description in B.6.1 and B.6.2, both project emissions and leakage are zero, therefore
PE
y
=0
As calculated before, the baseline emission factor of the first crediting period is 0.9001 tCO
2
e /MWh, i.e.
y
EF =0.9001tCO
2
e /MWh (more information are shown in Annex 3).
According to the feasibility study of the proposed project, the net electricity generated is approximately
15,580MWh i.e.
styear nd y
EG
21 2 ,
=15,580MWh
As per calculation formulae of baseline emission, the estimated anthropogenic emission of the first
crediting period is as follows:
BE
y
=EG
y
* grid,CM,y EF =14,023tCO
2
e
With the emissions from the proposed project being zero, the emission reductions of the project activity
are equivalent to the emissions of the baseline. The annual emission reduction of the first crediting
period is about 14,023 tCO
2
e.
ER
y
=BE
y
=EG
y
* grid,CM,y EF =14,023tCO
2
e
B.6.4. Summary of ex-ante estimates of emission reductions
Year
Baseline
emissions
(tCO
2
e)
Project emissions
(tCO
2
e)
Leakage
(tCO
2
e)
Emission
reductions
(tCO
2
e)
From 01/02/2014 12,854 0 0 12,854
2015 14,023 0 0 14,023
2016 14,023 0 0 14,023
2017 14,023 0 0 14,023
2018 14,023 0 0 14,023
2019 14,023 0 0 14,023
2020 14,023 0 0 14,023
Unit 31/01/2021 1,169 0 0 1,169
Total 98,161 0 0 98,161
Total number of
crediting years
7
Annual
average over the
crediting period
14,023 0 0 14,023
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 20
B.7. Monitoring plan
B.7.1. Data and parameters to be monitored
Data / Parameter EG
facility,
y
Unit MWh/yr
Description Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project activity to the
grid in year y
Source of data electricity meters
Value(s) applied 14,023
Measurement methods
and procedures
The following parameters will be measured:
(i) The quantity of electricity supplied by the project plant/unit to the
grid(EG
export,
y); and
(ii) The quantity of electricity delivered to the project plant/unit from the
grid (EG
import,y
).
Calculated using the following equation:
EG
facility,y
=EG
export,y
-EG
import,y
The accuracy of electricity meter is not worse than 0.5s as per the national
standard of DL/T 448-2000. According to the relevant technical codes,
measurement meters are tested and maintained periodically (calibrating
frequency is once per year). A CDM monitoring team will be responsible
for the measurements.
Monitoring frequency Continuously
QA/QC procedures The accuracy of electricity meter is not worse than 0.5s as per the national
standard of DL/T 448-2000. According to the relevant technical codes,
measurement meters are tested and maintained periodically (calibrating
frequency is once per year). The metering equipment will be calibrated by
an accredited calibration agency according to the sectoral requirement.
Calibration Certificates and relevant documents will be collected by the
QA/QC unit and transferred to data management unit for archiving.
Crosschecked by the receipt of sales or relevant commercial data, to ensure
the accuracy and integrality of the data collected.
Purpose of data For the calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment -
B.7.2. Sampling plan
>>
Not applicable
B.7.3. Other elements of monitoring plan
>>
The approved monitoring methodology AMS-I.D is used for developing the monitoring plan. Monitoring
tasks must be implemented according to the monitoring plan in order to ensure that the real, measurable
and long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions for the proposed project is monitored and
reported.
1. Description of the monitoring system
Bidirectional main meter (M1) and backup meter (M2) with accuracy no less than 0.5s will be installed at
the outlet of 35kV line of the project activity site in order to measure electricity import from and export to
grid and will be calibrated annually. If the main meter (M1) is failed, the backup meter (M2) will be
monitored to substitute the main meter (M1). Figure B-2 illustrates the connection of monitoring
equipment. The above mentioned monitoring parameters EG
export,y
and EG
import,y
will be measured
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 21
simultaneously. The net electricity generation (EG
facility,y
) is calculated as the electricity delivered to the
grid (EG
export,y
) minus the electricity purchased from the grid (EG
import,y
). Once occurring the emergencies,
such as the solar PV wont generate the electricity, the project owner will import the electricity from the
power grid to use as plant self-consumption. The implementation of the monitoring system will be strictly
in line with the Power Interchange Agreement to be signed between the project company and the grid
company.
Legend:
: power flow
: meter
Figure B-2 Positioning of monitoring equipment
2. Management Structure
A CDM Monitoring Team will be established consisting of three units, which are data recording, data
management and QA/QC. The staffs of the team will be selected from different departments of the project
company. The Team Leader holds the overall responsibilities to the monitoring of the proposed project.
His/her role is to ensure that the data monitored are accurately recorded, properly archived, QA/QC
procedure is timely carried out and the entire monitoring process is strictly in line with the CDM
requirements. He/she will also act as a liaison with the project manager of the consultancy company on a
needy basis. The organizational structure of the CDM Monitoring Team and work scope of each unit is
illustrated in Figure B-4. The details about QA/QC unit are further elaborated in a below separate section.
Solar
cell
array
Inverters
Transformer
Substation of
the grid
NCPG
The project
plant
GHG emission (main
emissions: CO
2
) produced
by fossil fuel fired plants in
the NCPG
Main meter (M1)
Back meter (M2)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 22
Figure B-3 Management Structure of the CDM Monitoring Team
3. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
QA/QC is to ensure the accuracy of data collected through measures including periodic calibration of
monitoring meters, corrective actions, and internal audits.
3.1 Data quality monitoring
QA/QC unit is responsible for comparing daily and monthly data reports with on-site original data,
crosschecking sales receipts or ETNs with data reports to ensure data consistency and accuracy before
transferring data to the data management unit. If problems occur, QA/QC unit manager will report to the
team leader immediately.
Should any reading of the main meter be inaccurate by more than the allowable error, or otherwise
functioned improperly, the monitored data shall be determined by the other meter.
3.2 Calibration
One of the responsibilities of the QA/QC unit manager is to ensure that the meters will be calibrated
according to the requirements of meter manufacturers and national regulations.
Procedure about calibration will be consistent with what is stipulated in the Power Interchange
Agreement. The metering equipment will be calibrated by an accredited calibration agency according to
the sectoral requirement. Calibration Certificates and relevant documents will be collected by the
QA/QC unit and transferred to data management unit for archiving.
3.3 Corrective actions
CDM Monitoring Team
Data Recording Unit
Manually record data
from the meters and
saved in computer
Compile the original
data and prepare daily
and monthly data
reports which will be
regarded as the
directly measured data
during verification.
Data Management Unit
Archive and manage all
data in paper/ electronic
format, at least for two
years after the end of
the last crediting period.
Archived materials
include original
recorded data, daily and
monthly data report,
receipt of sales,
calibration certificate of
the meters, etc.
QA/QC Unit
Monitor data accuracy
and consistency on a
regular basis
Supervise calibration as
required by regulations
Report to the team
leader immediately if
doubts raised about data
quality
Monitor the
implementation of
corrective actions
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 23
If problems which can affect the quality of data occur, the QA/QC unit manager will initiate and
supervise the implementation of corrective actions. For instance, metering equipment installed shall be
inspected by an accredited inspection agency after the repair of all or part of meter caused by the failure
of one or more parts to operate in accordance with the specifications.
If any errors are detected, the project owner shall fix, recalibrate or replace the meter. If reading of the
meter is inaccurate by more than the allowable error, or otherwise functioned improperly, the electricity
supplied to the grid by the proposed project shall be determined according to the relative clauses defined
in PPA.
4. Monitoring Training
Monitoring training is critical to ensure that all members of the CDM Monitoring Team has a thorough
understanding of the monitoring procedure and are able to carry out the monitoring tasks strictly in line
with the CDM requirements. The team leader is responsible for evaluating training outcome. Only
qualified staffs can work on duty. The training will include:
Training on operation and monitoring system of the solar power plant
This is the type of training which are routinely carried out by the solar power plant itself for new
staffs.
Training on CDM basics with focus on monitoring
It will be carried out by the CDM consultancy company before the project is implemented. The
CDM monitoring manual will be used as the primary training materials. The training includes the
following contents:
CDM project cycle and the significance of monitoring
Management structure and work scope of each team member
Components of the monitoring plan
QA/QC procedure
Monitoring report template
Preparation for verification
Questions and answers
Date of completion of baseline and monitoring methodology study: 10/04/2013
The persons involved in baseline study are listed as follows:
Mr. Qiu Shilei, CDM Office of CWEME, E-mail: qiushilei@cweme.com, TEL: +8621 6257 7690
All above are not the project participants.
For the project participants information, please refer to annex 1.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 24
SECTION C. Duration and crediting period
C.1. Duration of project activity
C.1.1. Start date of project activity
>>
No starting date which is not confirmed for the proposed project
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of project activity
>>
25 years and 0 month.
C.2. Crediting period of project activity
C.2.1. Type of crediting period
>>
Renewable crediting period (7years*3)
The first crediting period is 01/02/2014-31/01/2021
C.2.2. Start date of crediting period
>>
01/02/2014 or the date of registration, whichever is later
C.2.3. Length of crediting period
>>
7 years and 0 month (01/02/2014-31/01/2021)
SECTION D. Environmental impacts
D.1. Analysis of environmental impacts
>>
In accordance with the applicable laws and regulations on environmental protection, the Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) report of the proposed project has been approved by Ordos City Environmental
Protection Bureau on 02/07/2012, with the approval number of E Huan Ping Zi[2012] 411. As stated in
the EIA report, the environment impacts of the proposed project on the ambient are summarized as
follows:
Waste water
The total amount of waste water and sewage from daily life and industry will be very small. Before
wastewater and sewage are discharged, they will be processed by using sedimentation pond and septic
tank to reach the class one of Chinese environmental standard, which shows no impact on the surrounding
environment.
Dust and exhaust gas
During the project construction period, dust might be caused by construction process and transportation,
loading and uploading of construction materials. By covering and watering measures, the Project will not
have significant impacts on the surroundings. Besides there are no air pollutants emission sources during
the Project operation period.
Noise
During the Project construction period, the major noise sources involve construction machinery and
transportation vehicle. In order to reduce noise imposed on construction workers and nearby residents, the
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 25
construction unit should select the construction machinery and transport vehicles in line with relevant
national standards, prefer to adopt low-noise construction and technology, and take measures to protect
construction workers. There are no noise sources during the Project operation period.
Solid waste
During the project construction period the project owner will clean construction waste in time, no
significant effect occurs on the environment. Municipal waste generated will be collected and delivered to
landfill.
Ecological impact
The site of the project was in natural wasteland and grassland, with no rare and endangered vegetation
species. After completing construction, the project owner will recover vegetation in the land temporarily
used by the project. So no significant impact occurs.
In summary via adopting measures of pollution protection and control as well as ecological recovery, the
Project will not impact surrounding environment.
No transboundary impacts will occur.
SECTION E. Local stakeholder consultation
E.1. Solicitation of comments from local stakeholders
>>
In 22/10/2012, a public survey was conducted targeted at local residents living around the project site, the
representatives from government and relevant organizations. A total of 50 questionnaires were distributed
based on the principle of representation and randomness in order that the public opinions and concerns
are reflected. All the questionnaires were returned. The background information of the interviewees is as
follows:
Table E1. The background information of the interviewees
Items Amount Proportion (%)
Gender
Male 38 76
Female 12 24
Age
<30 12 24
30~50 35 70
>50 3 6
Education
level
J unior school 3 6
High school 39 78
College or
above
8 16
Occupation
Other 8 16
Worker 15 30
Farmer 27 54
E.2. Summary of comments received
>>
The survey results are shown in the following table E2.
Table E2 the results of the questionnaires
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 26
SN Questions Options Proportion (%)
1 Do you know the project?
Yes 74
A little 26
No 0
2
Which impact will the proposed
project have on the surroundings
during the construction and
operation period?
Noise pollution 68
wastewater 10
Air pollution 0
Solid waste 6
Ecosystem damage 8
Other pollution 0
3
Which benefit will the project
bring to the local society and
economy?
the power supply improvement 92
J ob opportunities 66
Pollution mitigation 62
Tourism resources development 56
the local economy promotion and the
local poverty alleviation
100
4
Does the project improve living
standard of the local residents?
Yes 96
No 0
I dont know 4
5 Is the site selection reasonable?
Yes 100
No 0
6 Do you support the project?
Yes 86
Yes if the measures are taken to
control the pollutions
14
No 0
Based on the above table, all of the respondents know the project to some extent and support the project
where 14% of the interviewees support the project construction when the owner takes some appropriate
measures to control the pollutions generated by the project while 86% of the interviewees support fully
the project. All the respondents have the opinion that the project had the reasonable location and will
improve the local economy.
The survey also shows that the local residents are concerned about the environmental issues generated by
the project. The respondents who thought that the project would bring noise, wastewater and ecological
issues respectively account for 68%, 10% and 8%.
The results indicate that overwhelming majority of the respondents support the construction and operation
of the proposed project. For the environmental impact resulting from the proposed project, the
interviewees reached the consensus that they will support fully the project if the owner should take the
appropriate and effective measures to make the emissions of all the pollutants produced by the project in
compliance with the requirements of the relevant standards.
E.3. Report on consideration of comments received
>>
No significant comments have been received in the survey. Furthermore, the emissions of all the
pollutants produced by the proposed project will fully satisfy the requirements of the applicable laws and
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 27
regulations after the proper actions are taken, as shown in the EIA report of the proposed project.
Consequently, there will be no change on design, construction, and operation of the proposed project. The
project owner will strictly obey all environmental laws and regulations and do their best to improve the
local ecological environment.
SECTION F. Approval and authorization
>>
The letter(s) of approval from Party(ies) for the project activity is under application.
- - - - -
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 28
Appendix 1: Contact information of project participants
Organization name Inner Mongolia Datang International New Energy Co., Ltd.
Street/P.O. Box No.7 Yingbin Road, Xincheng District, Hohht City, Inner Mongolia
Autonomous Region
Building /
City Hohht
State/Region Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
Postcode 010010
Country P.R. of China
Telephone 86 471 6988143
Fax 86 471 6988141
E-mail quanyinan2002@163.com
Website /
Contact person Yinan Quan
Title /
Salutation Mr.
Last name Quan
Middle name /
First name Yinan
Department /
Mobile /
Direct fax 86 471 6988143
Direct tel. 86 471 6988141
Personal e-mail quanyinan2002@163.com
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 29
Organization name Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform
Commission of the People's Republic of China
Street/P.O. Box Room No.38, South Yuetan Street, Xicheng District
Building /
City Beijing
State/Region /
Postcode 100824
Country P.R. of China
Telephone 86 10 68502963
Fax 86 10 68532358
E-mail sunch@ccchina.gov.cn
Website /
Contact person Cuihua Sun
Title Vice Director
Salutation Ms.
Last name Sun
Middle name /
First name Cuihua
Department /
Mobile /
Direct fax 86 10 68532358
Direct tel. 86 10 68502963
Personal e-mail sunch@ccchina.gov.cn
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 30
Appendix 2: Affirmation regarding public funding
No public funding from parties included in Annex I is available to the project activity.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 31
Appendix 3: Applicability of selected methodology
No further information on applicability of selected methodology is provided.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 32
Appendix 4: Further background information on ex ante calculation of emission reductions
To determine the simple OM emission factor (EF
OM,y
) and BM emission factor (EF
BM,y
) of the project,
data recommended in the 2011 Baseline Emission Factors for Regional Power Grids in China issued on
Otc 25
th
,2012 for North China Power Grid are adopted. The following tables summarises the numerical
results from the equations listed in the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system. The
information provided by the tables includes data, data sources and the underlying calculations.
Table A1. The fuel fired electricity generation of North China Power Grid in 2008
Province
Electric
generation(MWh)
Self service rate(%)
Electricity Supplied to the
grid(MWh)
Beijing 24,300,000 7.14 22,564,980.00
Tianjin 39,700,000 7.05 36,901,150.00
Hebei 158,000,000 6.9 147,098,000.00
Shanxi 176,200,000 8.22 161,716,360.00
Shandong 200,800,000 7.96 184,816,320.00
Inner Mongolia 268,900,000 7.14 249,700,540.00
Total 802,797,350
Data source: China Electric Power Yearbook 2009
Table A1-1, Data Concerning Net Generation imported from Northeast to the NCPG in 2008
Net Generation imported from
Northeast to North China
Power Grid (MWh)
Average OM emission factors
in Northeast China Grid
(tCO
2e/MWh
)
Total Power Supply of North
China Grid in 2008 (MWh)
5,286,140 1.10489 808,083,490
Data source: China Electric Power Yearbook 2009
Table A2. The fuel fired electricity generation of North China Power Grid in 2009
Province
Electric
generation(MWh)
Self service rate(%)
Electricity Supplied to the
grid(MWh)
Beijing 24,100,000 6.55 22,521,450.00
Tianjin 41,300,000 6.8 38,491,600.00
Hebei 173,300,000 6.92 161,307,640.00
Shanxi 185,000,000 8.1 170,015,000.00
Shandong 213,500,000 7.82 196,804,300.00
Inner Mongolia 285,800,000 7.43 264,565,060.00
Total 853,705,050
Data source: China Electric Power Yearbook 2010
Table A2-1, Data Concerning Net Generation imported from Northeast to the NCPG in 2009
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 33
Net Generation imported from
Northeast to North China
Power Grid (MWh)
Average OM emission factors
in Northeast China Grid
(tCO
2e/MWh
)
Total Power Supply of North
China Grid in 2008 (MWh)
6,982,610 1.06915 860,687,660
Data source: China Electric Power Yearbook 2010
Table A3. The fuel fired electricity generation of North China Power Grid in 2010
Province
Electric
generation(MWh)
Self service rate(%)
Electricity Supplied to the
grid(MWh)
Beijing 26,300,000 6.2 24,669,400.00
Tianjin 55,600,000 6.63 51,913,720.00
Hebei 199,800,000 6.73 186,353,460.00
Shanxi 210,800,000 8.03 193,872,760.00
Shandong 240,700,000 7.74 222,069,820.00
Inner Mongolia 306,400,000 6.98 285,013,280.00
Total 963,892,440
Data source: China Electric Power Yearbook 2011
Table A3-1, Data Concerning Net Generation imported from Northeast to the NCPG in 2010
Net Generation imported from
Northeast to North China
Power Grid (MWh)
Average OM emission factors
in Northeast China Grid
(tCO
2e/MWh
)
Total Power Supply of North
China Grid in 2008 (MWh)
8,815,880 1.10573
974,757,190
Net Generation imported from
Northwest to North China
Power Grid (MWh)
Average OM emission factors
in Northwest China Grid
(tCO
2e/MWh
)
2,048,870 0.9853
Data source: China Electric Power Yearbook 2011
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 34
Table A4 Fuel consumption and emission of North China Power Grid in 2008
Fuel types unit Provinces in the Regional Grid Subtotal
Effective
Carbon
Emission
Factor
Effective CO2
emission factor
average low
Caloric value
CO
2
Emission
(tCO
2
e)
U Beijing Tianjin Hebei Shanxi Shandong
Inner
Mongolia
FC
i,y
EF
c,i,y
(tC/TJ)
(kgCO2/TJ)
NCV
ij
(MJ/t,m
3
,tce)
L=G*J*K/100000
(mass unit)
L=G*J*K/10000
(volume unit)
U A B C D E F
G=A+B+C+
D+E+F
H J K L
Raw Coal 10
4
t 755.75 1800.12 7353.33 7854.39 12360.75 12607.82 42732.16 25.8 87300 20908 779,976,613
Cleaned Coal 10
4
t 23.88 23.88 25.8 87300 26344 549,200
Other Washed Coal 10
4
t 5.05 134.52 582.39 691.21 66.2 1479.37 25.8 87300 8363 10,800,731
Briquettes 10
4
t 5.66 32.49 45.38 83.53 26.6 87300 20908 1524647
Coke 10
4
t 0.02 6.07 6.09 29.2 95700 28435 165,723
Coke Oven Gas 10
8
m
3
0.11 0.86 8.37 24.55 16.2 3.55 53.64 12.1 37300 16726 3,346,491
Other Gas 10
8
m
3
10.4 9.08 187.54 36 29.76 34.32 307.1 12.1 37300 5227 5,987,440
Crude Oil 10
4
t 0.02 0.02 20 71100 41816 595
Gasoline 10
4
t 0 0 18.9 67500 43070 0
Diesel Oil 10
4
t 0.15 3.08 0.35 3.58 20.2 72600 42652 110,856
Fuel Oil 10
4
t 2.56 0.25 2.81 21.1 75500 41816 88,715
PLG 10
4
t 0 17.2 61600 50179 0
Refinery Gas 10
4
t 0.44 2.93 3.37 15.7 48200 46055 74,809
Natural Gas 10
8
m
3
11.09 0.7 0.97 2.12 14.88 15.3 54300 38931 3,145,563
Other Petroleum Products 10
4
t 1.45 1.45 20 72200 41816 43,777
Other Coking Products 10
4
t 7.97 7.61 15.58 25.8 95700 28435 423,968
Other Energy 10
4
tce 4.9 2.34 61.02 466 141.71 63.72 739.69 0 0 0 0
Total 806,239,126
Data source: China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2009
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 35
Table A5 Fuel consumption and emission of North China Power Grid in 2009
Fuel types unit Provinces in the Regional Grid Subtotal
Effective
Carbon
Emission
Factor
Effective CO2
emission factor
average low
Caloric value
CO
2
Emission
(tCO
2
e)
U Beijing Tianjin Hebei Shanxi Shandong
Inner
Mongolia
FC
i,y
EF
c,i,y
(tC/TJ)
(kgCO2/TJ)
NCV
ij
(MJ/t,m
3
,tce)
L=G*J*K/100000
(mass unit)
L=G*J*K/10000
(volume unit)
U A B C D E F
G=A+B+C+
D+E+F
H J K L
Raw Coal 10
4
t 665.16 1870.36 7623.94 8024.02 12654.05 12538.57 43376.1 25.8 87300 20908 791730246
Cleaned Coal 10
4
t 11.7 11.7 25.8 87300 26344 269080
Other Washed Coal 10
4
t 6.15 247.51 586.04 862.02 104.69 1806.41 25.8 87300 8363 13188417
Briquettes 10
4
t 3.73 31.83 35.56 26.6 87300 20908 649065
Coke 10
4
t 10.43 10.43 29.2 95700 28435 283824
Coke Oven Gas 10
8
m
3
0.13 1.27 8.72 19.48 11.69 3.35 44.64 12.1 37300 16726 2784999
Other Gas 10
8
m
3
10.23 13.43 228.32 35.89 37.21 48.35 373.43 12.1 37300 5227 7280656
Crude Oil 10
4
t 0.13 0.13 20 71100 41816 3865
Gasoline 10
4
t 0.01 0.01 18.9 67500 43070 291
Diesel Oil 10
4
t 0.1 2.38 3.07 2.64 8.19 20.2 72600 42652 253606
Fuel Oil 10
4
t 0.82 0.19 2.63 0.02 3.66 21.1 75500 41816 115550
PLG 10
4
t 0 17.2 61600 50179 0
Refinery Gas 10
4
t 0.83 3.95 3.44 8.22 15.7 48200 46055 182472
Natural Gas 10
8
m
3
13.55 0.63 4.39 0.03 2.03 20.63 15.3 54300 38931 4361086
Other Petroleum Products 10
4
t 1.52 23.18 24.7 20 72200 41816 745721
Other Coking Products 10
4
t 6.62 7.79 5.52 19.93 25.8 95700 28435 542341
Other Energy 10
4
tce 2.11 62.14 570.3 137.68 90.63 862.86 0 0 0 0
Total 822,391,221
Data source: China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2010
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 36
Table A6 Fuel consumption and emission of North China Power Grid in 2010
Fuel types unit Provinces in the Regional Grid Subtotal
Effective
Carbon
Emission
Factor
Effective CO2
emission factor
average low
Caloric value
CO
2
Emission
(tCO
2
e)
U Beijing Tianjin Hebei Shanxi Shandong
Inner
Mongolia
FC
i,y
EF
c,i,y
(tC/TJ)
(kgCO2/TJ)
NCV
ij
(MJ/t,m
3
,tce)
L=G*J*K/100000
(mass unit)
L=G*J*K/10000
(volume unit)
U A B C D E F
G=A+B+
C+D+E+
F
H J K L
Raw Coal 10
4
t 688.66 2499.57 8896.45 9347.83 13605.64 13864.67 48902.82 25.8 87300 20908 892,607,720
Cleaned Coal 10
4
t 0.87 0.87 25.8 87300 26344 20,009
Other Washed Coal 10
4
t 5.38 131.11 620.21 646.71 88.54 1491.95 25.8 87300 8363 10,892,576
Briquettes 10
4
t 1.53 41.98 43.51 26.6 87300 20908 794,174
Coke 10
4
t 0 29.2 95700 28435 0
Gangue 10
4
t 252.29 2120.95 898.03 601.17 3872.44 25.8 87300 8363 28,272,293
Coke Oven Gas 10
8
m
3
0.04 1.75 17.2 20.41 11.86 4.4 55.66 12.1 37300 16726 3,472,515
BF Gas 10
8
m
3
12.89 18.53 295.02 41.74 203.79 49.56 621.53 70.8 219000 3763 51,220,101
Converter Gas 10
8
m
3
8.48 0.07 8.55 46.9 145000 7945 984,981
Other Gas 10
8
m
3
0 12.1 37300 5227 0
Crude Oil 10
4
t 0 20 71100 41816 0
Gasoline 10
4
t 0 18.9 67500 43070 0
Diesel Oil 10
4
t 0.1 2.27 2.66 0.55 5.58 20.2 72600 42652 172,787
Fuel Oil 10
4
t 0.49 0.17 3.24 0.01 3.91 21.1 75500 41816 123,443
Naphtha 10
4
t 0 20.2 72600 43906 0
Lube Oil 10
4
t 0 20 71900 41398 0
Paraffins 10
4
t 0 20 72200 39934 0
Megilp 10
4
t 0 20 72200 42945 0
Petroleum Asphalt 10
4
t 0 21 69300 38931 0
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 37
Petroleum Coke 10
4
t 6.97 12.47 2.82 22.26 26.6 82900 31947 589,535
PLG 10
4
t 0 17.2 61600 50179 0
Refinery Gas 10
4
t 1.37 2.12 2.41 5.9 15.7 48200 46055 130,971
Natural Gas 10
8
m
3
16.08 0.57 0.22 6.16 0.16 0.18 23.37 15.3 54300 38931 4,940,309
Other Petroleum Products 10
4
t 0.85 28.14 28.99 20 72200 41816 875,241
Other Coking Products 10
4
t 7.99 3.4 11.39 25.8 95700 28435 309,948
Other Energy 10
4
tce 20.42 17.07 45.53 34.66 38.56 20.8 177.04 0 0 0 0
Total 995,406,604
Data source: China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2011
Table A7. Calculation of the CO2 emission proportion among the total respectively of solid, liquid and gas fuel used for power generation
Fuel types unit Provinces in the Regional Grid Subtotal
Effective
Carbon
Emission
Factor
Effective CO2
emission factor
average low
Caloric value
CO
2
Emission
(tCO
2
e)
U Beijing Tianjin Hebei Shanxi
Shand
ong
Inner
Mongolia
FC
i,y
EF
c,i,y
(tC/TJ)
(kgCO2/TJ)
NCV
ij
(MJ/t,m
3
,tce)
L=G*J*K/100000
(mass unit)
L=G*J*K/10000
(volume unit)
U A B C D E F
G=A+B+
C+D+E+
F
H J K L
Raw Coal 10
4
t 688.66 2499.57 8896.45 9347.83
13605.6
4
13864.67 48902.82 25.8 87300 20908 892,607,720
Cleaned Coal 10
4
t 0.87 0.87 25.8 87300 26344 20,009
Other Washed Coal 10
4
t 5.38 131.11 620.21 646.71 88.54 1491.95 25.8 87300 8363 10,892,576
Briquettes 10
4
t 1.53 41.98 43.51 26.6 87300 20908 794,174
Coke 10
4
t 0 29.2 95700 28435 0
Gangue 10
4
t 252.29 2120.95 898.03 601.17 3872.44 25.8 87300 8363 28,272,293
Other Coking Products 10
4
t 7.99 3.4 11.39 25.8 95700 28435 309,948
Total 932,896,721
Crude Oil 10
4
t 0 20 71100 41816 0
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 38
Gasoline 10
4
t 0 18.9 67500 43070 0
Diesel Oil 10
4
t 0.1 2.27 2.66 0.55 5.58 20.2 72600 42652 172,787
Fuel Oil 10
4
t 0.49 0.17 3.24 0.01 3.91 21.1 75500 41816 123,443
Petroleum Coke 10
4
t 6.97 12.47 2.82 22.26 26.6 82900 31947 589,535
Other Petroleum Products 10
4
t 0.85 28.14 28.99 20 75500 41816 915,246
Total 1,801,010
Coke Oven Gas 10
8
m
3
0.04 1.75 17.2 20.41 11.86 4.4 55.66 12.1 37300 16726 3,472,515
BF Gas 10
8
m
3
12.89 18.53 295.02 41.74 203.79 49.56 621.53 70.8 219000 3763 51,220,101
Converter Gas 10
8
m
3
8.48 0.07 8.55 46.9 145000 7945 984,981
Other Gas 10
8
m
3
0 12.1 37300 5227 0
Naphtha 10
4
t 0 20.2 72600 43906 0
Lube Oil 10
4
t 0 20 71900 41398 0
Paraffins 10
4
t 0 20 72200 39934 0
Megilp 10
4
t 0 20 72200 42945 0
Petroleum Asphalt 10
4
t 0 21 69300 38931 0
PLG 10
4
t 0 17.2 61600 50179 0
Refinery Gas 10
4
t 1.37 2.12 2.41 5.9 15.7 48200 46055 130,971
Natural Gas 10
8
m
3
16.08 0.57 0.22 6.16 0.16 0.18 23.37 15.3 54300 38931 4,940,309
Total 60,748,877
Other Energy 10
4
tce 20.42 17.07 45.53 34.66 38.56 20.8 177.04 0 0 0 0
Total 995,446,608
Data source: China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2011
According to the table A7 and equations (6)-(8), Coal,y=93.72%, Oil,y=0.18%, Gas,y=6.10% as calculated.
Thus,
Adv Gas Gas Adv Oil Oil Adv Coal Coal Thermal
EF EF EF EF
, , ,
+ + =
=0.7668tCO2/MWh
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 39
Table A8, Installed capacity of the North China Power Grid 2010
Fuel Types
Province
Coal Hydro Nuclear Other (wind) Total
MW MW MW MW MW
Beijing 5140 1050 0 110 6300
Tianjin 10910 10 0 30 10950
Hebei 36640 1790 0 3720 42150
Shanxi 42100 1820 0 370 44290
Shandong 60020 1070 0 1399 62489
Inner Mongolia 54020 850 0 9730 64600
Total 208830 6590 0 15359 230779
Data sources: The State Electric Industry Yearbook 2011
Table A9, Installed capacity of the North China Power Grid 2009
Fuel Types
Province
Coal Hydro Nuclear Other (wind) Total
MW MW MW MW MW
Beijing 5120 1050 0 50 6220
Tianjin 10030 10 0 0 10040
Hebei 35140 1790 0 1360 38290
Shanxi 39150 1610 0 120 40880
Shandong 58860 1060 0 860 60780
Inner Mongolia 48300 830 0 6420 55550
Total 196600 6350 0 8810 211760
Data sources: The State Electric Industry Yearbook 2010
Table 10, Installed capacity of the North China Power Grid 2008
Fuel Types
Province
Coal Hydro Nuclear Other (wind) Total
MW MW MW MW MW
Beijing 4760 1050 0 0 5810
Tianjin 7490 0 0 0 7490
Hebei 29870 1540 0 700 32110
Shanxi 35250 790 0 0 36040
Shandong 55930 1050 0 370 57350
Inner Mongolia 45740 830 0 2300 48870
Total 179040 5260 0 3370 187670
Data sources: The State Electric Industry Yearbook 2009
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 40
Table A 11. BM calculation of the North China Power Grid
Installed
Capacity
2008
Installed
Capacity
2009
Installed
Capacity
2010
2008-2010New
Capacity Additions
Addition
share
MW MW MW
A B C D=C-A
Coal 179040.00 196600.00 208830.00 40282.00 77.46%
Hydro 5260.00 6350.00 6590.00 -270.00 -0.52%
Nuclear 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Other (wind) 3370.00 8810.00 15359.00 11989.00 23.06%
Total 187670.00 211760.00 230779.00 52001.00 100.00%
Account for
Installed
Capacity 2010
81.32% 91.76% 100.00%
EF
BM,y
=0.766877.46%=0.5940 tCO
2e
/MWh
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 41
Appendix 5: Further background information on monitoring plan
No further background information on monitoring plan is provided
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 42
Appendix 6: Summary of post registration changes
The proposed project is underway of the validation process and therefore no post registration
changes are involved.
- - - - -
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM Executive Board Page 43
History of the document
Version Date Nature of revision
04.1 11 April 2012 Editorial revision to change history box by adding EB meeting and annex
numbers in the Date column.
04.0 EB 66
13 March 2012
Revision required to ensure consistency with the Guidelines for completing
the project design document form for small-scale CDM project activities
(EB 66, Annex 9).
03 EB 28, Annex 34
15 December 2006
The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design document for
small-scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD), taking into account CDM-PDD
and CDM-NM.
02 EB 20, Annex 14
08 J uly 2005
The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect guidance and
clarifications provided by the Board since version 01 of this document.
As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC PDD have
been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest version can be found
at <http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.
01 EB 07, Annex 05
21 J anuary 2003
Initial adoption.
Decision Class: Regulatory
Document Type: Form
Business Function: Registration