1. SCOPE DEFINITION The project to be undertaken by PM Consultants is to prepare a report at feasibility level on the upgrading of the Johannesburg Urban Collar. The collar encompasses the following areas. Brixton/Mayfair/Fordsburg in the West Hillbrow/Johannesburg City/Dorrnfontein in the Center Malvern/Bezhuidenhout Valley/Bertams in the East Many of the areas in the Johannesburg Urban Collar are categorized as great risk areas by banking institutions with regard to the issuing of loans in the forms of mortgage bonds. This is due to the following factors: High Crime Rates Building Hijacking General Area Degradation High Instances of Loan Defaultment The focus of the prepared report is, taking the above factors into account, to evaluate innovative financial methods to achieve this developmental objective. The report must also give adequate attention to the culture of non-repayment with regard to services rendered and the problems associated with bond defaultment. It is expected that this report will be read and evaluated by professionals and laypersons alike and so should be self explanatory and technical jargon should be avoided where possible, explained if needed and used wisely if necessary. Other requirements are that the solutions proposed must account for existing projects aimed at the upgrading of any area in the Johannesburg Collar, namely the current Urban Development Zone initiative extending from Fordsburg through the center and towards Bertams. It is essential that any methods put forward do not negatively impact existing initiative to upgrade the Johannesburg Urban Collar. The key stakeholders involved are: CEO and Chairman of the PM Consultants, National Government, 4
Municipality of Johannesburg, Project Sponsor, PM Consultants- Engineering and Technology Department CEO, PM Consultants- Engineering and Technology Department Principal Engineer, PM Consultants- project team appointed to complete the project, PM Consultants-Project Team (7 Junior Engineers), Sub-consultants and Specialists, Customers that will be using the final system (Locals affected), In addition to these above mentioned stakeholders, other external bodies that form part of the sphere of influence of the project, include: Regulatory Authorities, Trade Unions, Lobby Groups, Government Agencies, Socialists, Economists, Media outlets, Banking institutions. The projects five main areas are: 1. Planning, 2. Developing Financial Solutions, 3. Projects Close Out, 4. Compilation of Project Report, 5. Handover of Report to Sponsor. Each of these work areas will be approached in a unique manner and will be further divided into smaller and more manageable work packages. Thus, allowing the project team to identify all items of work required to be carried out to complete the project, in addition to providing an easy means of establishing if the Clients criteria for acceptance are satisfied. The work areas will be divided into smaller work packages through research and interaction with experienced persons. A benefit of establishing the work packages in this manner ensures 5
areas of high importance and the activities which are not explicitly included in the project are accounted for. The project is to be undertaken by junior engineers within PM Consultants. They are expected to complete all required work relating to the projects five main areas given above with limited guidance from experienced project managers, by attending Project Management seminars and making use of prescribed and other textbooks. The junior engineers are to perform research into the current situation of degradation, high crime rates, building hijackings and loan defaultment and to provide innovative financial solutions to help upgrade the areas. They are also required to looking the effects of bond defaultments and the culture of nonpayment with regard to services. They are to compile this information into a structured, easy to follow report, and after following all close out procedures, to hand this report to the client no later than 29 th of November 2013 at a cost of between R600,000-00 to R900,000-00.
6
2. SCOPE STATEMENT The scope statement will be logically set out using the Logical Framework Analysis (LFA) technique as it is easy to understand and will ensure all aspects are covered as well as ensuring all unnecessary topics are left out. The 7 steps are: 1. Participation Analysis 2. Problem Tree Analysis 3. Objectives Tree Analysis 4. Alternative Analysis 5. Project Elements 6. External Factors 7. Indicators
7
PROJECT LFA 1. PARTICIPATION ANALYSIS Institutions Interest Groups Other Banking Institutions Media Government Big Business Local Residents Local Businesss Investors Groups needing more in depth analysis are: Government Local Residents and Local Businesses Government Local Residents and Local Businesses Problem Low Economic activity Decentralization Population lack access to funding to invest in area General Area degradation Concentration of Illegal Immigrants Building Hi Jacking Non-repayment
Lack access to mortgage bonds High Bad Debt concentration Properties are devaluating as general area degrade No investment in area Crime Building Hi Jacking
Interests Increase Economic Activity Access to financing Upgrade of Area Potentials Policy making has largest influence
Have a big influence over effectiveness of methods implemented Linkages Need to collaborate with local residents, local businesses and big business to increase the economic activity in the stated areas This will upgrade areas and lower risk of investing and to the access of mortgage bond loans. Lowering of the risk from high risk category is dependent on implementation of Methods proposed
This Participation Analysis shows that the Primary focus should be on the Government and their influence over the situation. The government has the greatest potential impact on all the relevant stakes and so will ensure that all requirements are met. 8
Areas High Risk For Banks and Lack of Investment Opportunities 2. PROBLEM TREE ANALYSIS
HIGHER LEVEL EFFECT DIRECT EFFECTS DIRECT CAUSES ROOT CAUSE HIGH CRIME RATES BUILDING HI JACKING AREA DEGREDATIO N LOAN DEFAULTMEN TS RECKLESS LENDING (HIGH LEVELS OF BAD DEBT)
MOVEMENT OF ECONOMIC HUB OUT OF CITY CENTER
LACK OF DISPOSABLE INCOME
LOW INCOME PEOPLE AND ACTIVITIES MOVING INTO COLLAR
DECENTRALIZATION OUT OF COLLAR
LOW ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN COLLAR
SMALLER BUSINESSES STRUGGLING FROM LOWER TURNOVERS GLOBAL ECONOMY SLOWED
TREND OF CORPORATE INVESTERS MOVE OUT OF CBD GLOBAL RECESSION
LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF DEBT AND ASSOCCIATED OBLIGATIONS AND EFFECTS
FOCAL PROBLEM 9
AREAS RISK LEVEL REDUCED AND INCREASE ATTRACTIVNESS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR EXTERNAL INVESTMENT
3. OBJECTIVES TRESS ANALYSIS
HIGHER LEVEL EFFECT DIRECT EFFECTS FOCAL OBJECTIVE REDUCE CRIME RATES RECLAIM HI JACKED BUILDINGS UPGRADE AREAS REDUCE INSTANCES OF LOAN DEFAULTMENTS STOP SUB PRIME LENDING
HIGHER INCOME PEOPLE AND ACTIVITIES ATTRACTED BACK INTO THE COLLAR
INCRESE DISPOSABLE INCOME ATTRACT CORPORATE INVESTORS AND BIG BUSINESS INTO COLLAR INCREASED ECONMONIC ACTIVITY IN URBAN COLLAR
RECENTRALOZATION INTO URBAN COLLAR JOB OPPORTUNITIES OPEN UP AND SMALLER BUSINESSES FLOURISH
EDUCATE EXISTING PEOPLE ON DEBT AND ITS EFFECTS
REDUCE EFFECT OF GLOBAL RECESSION
ESTABLISH GOOD MORALS TO AVOID RECKLESS LENDING
ESTABLISH GOOD MORALS TO AVOID RECKLESS LENDING
MOVEMENT OF ECONMOIC HUB BACKMINTO CENTER 10
11
4. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Alternative 1: Deals with changing the behavior of people involved to stimulate the economy Alternative 2: Deals with attracting economy stimulating activities into the area Criteria Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Remarks Chances of Success Low High Extremely difficult to change the current culture which has become common place Cost High High Both costs will be high Cost/benefit Low High Greater benefit from Alternative 2 as brings needed external investment in to solve the problem and stimulate growth. Time Horizon Long Medium Alternative 1 will take generations to fix the problem. Capacity of PM Consultants No Yes Alternative 1 will require external social and behavior specialists. Alternative 2 requires a facilitation role in implementing. Social Risk High Low Alternative 1 seeks to change social behavior which could have adverse impacts
Alternative 1 seeks to change the behavior of the people that resulted in the current situation. Even if it is successful it will only stop or slow the current rate of decline and will take many generations to first recover from the defecate before any improvement can occur. Therefore Alternate 2 will be the focus going forward.
12
5. PROJECT ELEMENTS 6. EXTERNAL FACTORS 7. INDICATORS DEVELOPMENTAL OBJECTIVE Upgrade the Johannesburg Urban Collar INDICATORS High risk category removed EXTRENAL FACTORS Increasing economic activity will upgrade collar
IMMEDIATE OBJECTIVE Identify all relevant factors and alternate financial solutions for input into developing implementation plan All required documents received Can influence current policies
OUTPUTS Analysis of current situation Proposed financial solutions Analysis of proposed solutions Report containing all of the above Report completed and to required schedule Credible resources required Current economic stability
ACTIVITIES Research current situation Research problems with bond defaultment and culture of non payment Research innovative financial solutions Identify most appropriate solutions Assess feasibility of most appropriate solutions Prepare report INPUTS Funds to prepare report 200- 300hours Meeting and discussions Success dependent on willingness of corporations to participate