Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Communicated by Joan V. Ruderman, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, October, 12 2001 (received for review July 8, 2001)
Muscle wasting is a debilitating consequence of fasting, inactivity, muscle atrophy, and that may be responsible for the activation of
cancer, and other systemic diseases that results primarily from protein breakdown, we have used Incyte cDNA microarrays to
accelerated protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome compare mRNA levels in normal mouse muscles to those from
pathway. To identify key factors in this process, we have used atrophying muscles. Because much is known about the enhance-
cDNA microarrays to compare normal and atrophying muscles and ment of proteolysis and other metabolic adaptations to fasting
found a unique gene fragment that is induced more than ninefold (13–15), we initially performed microarray experiments com-
in muscles of fasted mice. We cloned this gene, which is expressed paring poly(A)! RNA from muscles of normal and food-
specifically in striated muscles. Because this mRNA also markedly deprived mice, and we have identified a group of genes whose
increases in muscles atrophying because of diabetes, cancer, and transcripts increase markedly in the atrophying muscles. One
renal failure, we named it atrogin-1. It contains a functional F-box expressed sequence tag was of particular interest because its
domain that binds to Skp1 and thereby to Roc1 and Cul1, the other level increased most dramatically on fasting. Therefore, we have
components of SCF-type Ub-protein ligases (E3s), as well as a cloned this protein and defined its properties. We demonstrate
nuclear localization sequence and PDZ-binding domain. On fasting, here that this protein has the properties of an E3 of the SCF class
atrogin-1 mRNA levels increase specifically in skeletal muscle and and is unusual in being expressed selectively in striated muscle.
before atrophy occurs. Atrogin-1 is one of the few examples of an We have also studied further the expression of this gene on food
F-box protein or Ub-protein ligase (E3) expressed in a tissue- deprivation and in several other models of human diseases in
specific manner and appears to be a critical component in the which there is a marked acceleration of muscle proteolysis.
enhanced proteolysis leading to muscle atrophy in diverse These studies demonstrate the existence of a unique ubiquiti-
diseases. nation enzyme that appears to increase when muscles undergo
atrophy.
data). Both gastrocnemius muscles from 10 control or food- CANSITE (http:""www.cansite.bidmc.harvard.edu) indicated the
deprived mice were harvested and pooled to prepare total RNA presence of four conserved motifs (Fig. 1B). An F-box is present
for the gene microarray, cDNA library preparation, and north- at amino acid 228–267 (Fig. 1D). This highly degenerate motif
ern analyses. Gastrocnemius muscles from uremic and diabetic is found in a family of proteins, most of which function as one
rats and controls were kindly provided by S. R. Price, J. L. Bailey, component of the SCF family of Ub-protein ligases (E3s) (22).
and W. E. Mitch (Emory University, Atlanta). The uremic rats The F-box protein functions as an adaptor that binds proteins to
were prepared by 5"6 nephrectomy and demonstrate marked be ubiquitinated and, through the F-box, associates with the
muscle atrophy and accelerated protein breakdown (18). Acute Skp1 protein (or a homolog) and thus with other components of
diabetes was induced by streptozotocin administration, and the E3 complex (23). Atrogin-1 lacks the common motifs found
muscles were harvested 3 d later when proteolysis was acceler- in other F-box proteins that are known to interact with protein
ated and animals demonstrate marked muscle atrophy (19). substrates (e.g., leucine-rich regions, WD40 repeats). However,
Gastrocnemius muscles from rats implanted with Yoshida As- at its extreme carboxy terminus (amino acids 346–355), atrogin-1
cites Hepatoma and controls were provided by V. Baracos does contain a motif known to interact with proteins containing
class II PDZ domains. PDZ domain-containing proteins bind to 293T cells also expressing Myc5-Skp1, and the cell lysate was
specific sequences at the extreme C-termini of target proteins subjected to a GST pull-down assay. Atrogin-1 was precipitated
(24, 25) and may represent a new type of substrate-binding together with Skp1, as detected by immunoblot analysis (Fig.
region in F-box proteins. By using the convention proposed by 1E). However, both mutant forms that lacked the complete
Cenciarelli et al. (26) and Winston et al. (27), we categorize F-box sequence failed to associate with Skp1 (Fig. 1E, lanes 2
atrogin-1 as an FBXO class of F-box protein, X referring to its and 3). Thus, atrogin-1 can interact directly with Skp1 through
lack of a recognized substrate-binding region. Other features the F-box domain. Further evidence for a direct interaction
also present in the molecule include a potential bipartite nuclear between atrogin-1 and Skp1 was our finding that the abundance
localization sequence (amino acid 267–284) and a cytochrome c of GST-atrogin-1 was increased when it was coexpressed with
family heme-binding site signature (amino acid 317–322). Myc5-Skp1 (data not shown). This in vivo stabilization depended
To demonstrate that the F-box domain in atrogin-1 is func- on the F-box, because the abundance of mutant forms of
tional, we tested whether this protein associates with Skp1, the atrogin-1 lacking the F-box was unaffected by Myc5-Skp1 coex-
classical F-box-binding partner in SCF complexes. For these pression (data not shown).
studies, we also created mutant forms of atrogin-1 in which the To learn whether atrogin-1 exists in cells as part of an SCF
amino acids at positions 227–229 containing the first two highly complex, we tested whether the other components, Cul1 and
conserved residues of the putative F-box were replaced by Roc1, were also associated with GST-atrogin-1 and Skp1. 293T
alanines (atrogin-13A) and a second mutant in which the putative cells were transiently transfected with constructs encoding
F-box was deleted completely ("Fb-atrogin-1). These wild-type FLAG- or HA-tagged versions of these various proteins, the cell
and mutant forms of atrogin-1 were expressed as GST-fusions in lysed, and atrogin-1 was then precipitated. These pellets con-
Expression of Atrogin-1 in Atrophying Muscles. Northern blot anal- the pooled control and fasted muscle at each time point. Atrogin-1 band
ysis of total RNA from various tissues of control and food- intensities were quantitated by densitometry, and membranes reprobed
deprived mice revealed three major transcripts (%2.5, 5.0, and with a mouse GAPDH probe to ensure equal RNA loading. The fold increase
in atrogin-1 mRNA was derived by dividing the corrected atrogin-1 band
7.3 kb) (Figs. 3A and 4). In fed controls, gastrocnemius muscles
intensity (atrogin-1"GAPDH) at each time point with the corrected band
and to a much lesser extent heart were the only tissues expressing intensity at t ' 0. E fed; F fasted. *, Muscle weight loss was significantly
significant amount of these transcripts. Liver, kidney, brain, greater (P ( 0.05) in fasted compared to fed animals after 30 h but not
spleen, and testis (data not shown) contained only trace earlier time points (see text).
amounts. In addition to being restricted to striated muscle
normally, Northern blot analysis showed that after fasting, the
levels of all three transcripts increased at least sevenfold in (see below). For example, polyubiquitin mRNA, whose expres-
skeletal muscles but not in heart or other tissues (Fig. 3A). The sion has served as the benchmark for activation of Ub-mediated
increase in atrogin-1 mRNA is among the largest we have proteolysis in atrophying muscles, is increased typically 2- to
identified for any gene in different types of atrophying muscle 5-fold in muscles during fasting (28, 29).
1. Kettelhut, I. C., Wing, S. S. & Goldberg, A. L. (1988) Diabetes Metab. Rev. 4, 24. Ponting, C. P., Phillips, C., Davies, K. E. & Blake, D. J. (1997) BioEssays 19,
751–772. 469–479.
2. Lecker, S. H., Solomon, V., Mitch, W. E. & Goldberg, A. L. (1999) J. Nutr. 129, 25. Doyle, D. A., Lee, A., Lewis, J., Kim, E., Sheng, M. & MacKinnon, R. (1996)
227S–237S. Cell 85, 1067–1076.
3. Mitch, W. E. & Goldberg, A. L. (1996) N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 1897–1905. 26. Cenciarelli, C., Chiaur, D. S., Guardavaccaro, D., Parks, W., Vidal, M. &
4. Jaspers, S. R. & Tischler, M. E. (1984) J. Appl. Physiol. 57, 1472–1479. Pagano, M. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 1177–1179.
5. Tischler, M. E., Rosenberg, S., Satarug, S., Henriksen, E. J., Kirby, C. R., Tome, 27. Winston, J. T., Koepp, D. M., Zhu, C., Elledge, S. J. & Harper, J. W. (1999)
M. & Chase, P. (1990) Metabolism 39, 756–763. Curr. Biol. 9, 1180–1182.
6. Tawa, N. E., Odessey, R. & Goldberg, A. L. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 197–203. 28. Wing, S. S. & Goldberg, A. L. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, E668–E676.
7. Lecker, S. H., Solomon, V., Price, S. R., Kwon, Y. T., Mitch, W. E. & Goldberg, 29. Medina, R., Wing, S. S. & Goldberg, A. L. (1995) Biochem. J. 307, 631–637.
A. L. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 104, 1411–1420. 30. Goldberg, A. L., Tischler, M., DeMartino, G. & Griffin, G. (1980) FASEB J.
8. Solomon, V., Baracos, V., Sarraf, P. & Goldberg, A. L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. 39, 31–36.
Sci. USA 95, 12602–12607. 31. Kettelhut, I. C., Pepato, M. T., Migliorini, R. H., Medina, R. & Goldberg, A.
9. Hasselgren, P. O. & Fischer, J. E. (2001) Ann. Surg. 233, 9–17. L. (1994) Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 27, 981–993.
10. Attaix, D., Combaret, L., Pouch, M. N. & Taillandier, D. (2001) Curr. Opin.
32. Costelli, P., Carbo, N., Tessitore, L., Bagby, G. J., Lopez-Soriano, F. J., Argiles,
Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 4, 45–49.
J. M. & Baccino, F. M. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 2783–2789.
11. Jagoe, R. T. & Goldberg, A. L. (2001) Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 4,
33. Garcia-Martinez, C., Llovera, M., Agell, N., Lopez-Soriano, F. J. & Argiles, J.
183–190.
M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 217, 839–844.
12. Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425–479.
34. Garcia-Martinez, C., Llovera, M., Agell, N., Lopez-Soriano, F. J. & Argiles, J.
13. Li, J. B. & Goldberg, A. L. (1976) Am. J. Physiol. 231, 441–448.
M. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201, 682–686.
14. Wing, S. S., Haas, A. L. & Goldberg, A. L. (1995) Biochem. J. 307, 639–645.
15. Medina, R., Wing, S. S., Haas, A. & Goldberg, A. L. (1991) Biomed. Biochim. 35. Hasselgren, P. O. (1999) Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2, 201–205.
Acta 50, 347–356. 36. Price, S. R., Bailey, J. L. & England, B. K. (1996) Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 22,
16. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A 72–75.
Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY). 37. Mitch, W. E. (1996) Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 22, 62–65.
17. Church, G. M. & Gilbert, W. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1991–1995. 38. Chrysis, D. & Underwood, L. E. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 5635–5641.
18. Bailey, J. L., Wang, X., England, B. K., Price, S. R., Ding, X. & Mitch, W. E. 39. Fischer, D., Sun, X., Gang, G., Pritts, T. & Hasselgren, P. O. (2000) Biochem.
(1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 1447–1453. Biophys. Res. Commun. 267, 504–508.
19. Price, S. R., Bailey, J. L., Wang, X., Jurkovitz, C., England, B. K., Ding, X., 40. Mathias, N., Johnson, S., Byers, B. & Goebl, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19,
Phillips, L. S. & Mitch, W. E. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 1703–1708. 1759–1767.
20. Baracos, V. E., DeVivo, C., Hoyle, D. H. & Goldberg, A. L. (1995) Am. J. 41. Blondel, M., Galan, J. M., Chi, Y., Lafourcade, C., Longaretti, C., Deshaies, R.
Physiol. 268, E996–E1006. J. & Peter, M. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 6085–6097.
21. Kozak, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19867–19870. 42. Kawai, J., Shinagawa, A., Shibata, K., Yoshino, M., Itoh, M., Ishii, Y., Arakawa,
22. Kipreos, E. T. & Pagano, M. (2000) Genome Biol. 1, 1–7. T., Hara, A., Fukunishi, Y., Konno, H., et al. (2001) Nature (London) 409,
23. Deshaies, R. J. (1999) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 435–467. 685–690.
CELL BIOLOGY