This is a case for unlawful detainer filed by Frederica Arevalo to eject Rowena Bustamante and recover physical possession of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 4567. Bustamante was the lessee of the subject premises under a month-to-month contract with Maria Mercedes Salcedo. Arevalo alleges she purchased the property from Salcedo and sent demand letters for Bustamante to vacate. The issues to be resolved are whether Bustamante should be ejected and if an alleged last will and testament of the prior owner prevents ejectment. Arevalo submits documentary evidence like deeds of sale and affidavits to prove her claims and will present
This is a case for unlawful detainer filed by Frederica Arevalo to eject Rowena Bustamante and recover physical possession of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 4567. Bustamante was the lessee of the subject premises under a month-to-month contract with Maria Mercedes Salcedo. Arevalo alleges she purchased the property from Salcedo and sent demand letters for Bustamante to vacate. The issues to be resolved are whether Bustamante should be ejected and if an alleged last will and testament of the prior owner prevents ejectment. Arevalo submits documentary evidence like deeds of sale and affidavits to prove her claims and will present
This is a case for unlawful detainer filed by Frederica Arevalo to eject Rowena Bustamante and recover physical possession of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 4567. Bustamante was the lessee of the subject premises under a month-to-month contract with Maria Mercedes Salcedo. Arevalo alleges she purchased the property from Salcedo and sent demand letters for Bustamante to vacate. The issues to be resolved are whether Bustamante should be ejected and if an alleged last will and testament of the prior owner prevents ejectment. Arevalo submits documentary evidence like deeds of sale and affidavits to prove her claims and will present
Eighth Judicial Region Tacloban Cit !"anch # FREDERICA N. AREVALO, Plaintiff$ % &e"sus % CI'IL CASE NO( ))))))))))))))) *o"+ UNLA,*UL -ETAINER ,IT. APPLICATION *OR PREL( INJ( ROWENA L. BUSTAMANTE, AN- TRO Joined b he" .usband M"( !USTAMANTE$ And ALL PERSONS CLAIMIN/ RI/.TS UN-ER .ER$ -efendants( 0 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 0 PRE-TRIAL BRIEF PLAINTI**$ b counsel$ "espectfull sub1its he" P"e%TRIAL !"ief as follo2s+ I. Brief Statement of Plaintiffs Case This is a case fo" Unla2ful -etaine" filed b the Plaintiff in o"de" to e3ect the -efendant and "eco&e" the phsical possession of the pa"cel of land co&e"ed b TCT No( 4567 1easu"ing #89 s:ua"e 1ete"s and the "esidential house e"ected the"eon located at !l; < Lot =# Ne2 >o"; St($ '?/ Subdi&ision$ Tacloban Cit @he"eafte" ASub3ect P"e1isesB( -efendant 2as the lessee of the Sub3ect P"e1ises( The"e 2as no 2"itten cont"act bet2een the Plaintiff and -efendant$ and if the"e 2as an$ the sa1e has e0pi"ed( Thus$ the cont"act 2as on a 1onth%to%1onth basis( Plaintiff sent de1and lette"s to -efendant fo" the latte" to &acate the Sub3ect P"e1ises$ 1a;ing the fu"the" sta on the Sub3ect P"e1ises of -efendant illegal( II. Proposed Stipulation of Facts Plaintiff p"oposes the follo2ing facts to be ad1ittedCstipulated b the othe" pa"t( =( -efendant has been paing "ent of P<$499 to Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo f"o1 =DD< to =DD4E #( -efendant has been paing "ent of P4$999 to Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo f"o1 =DD4 to #995 @the ti1e of death of *e"nando Jose SalcedoBE <( -efendant has been paing "ent of P4$499 to Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo f"o1 #996 up to the p"esentE 8( -efendant "ecei&ed the de1and lette"$ dated *eb"ua" D$ #9=9E 4( Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo is the 2ife of *e"nando Jose SalcedoE 5( -efendant Ro2ena !usta1ante issued chec;s in fa&o" of Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo fo" the ea" #99DE 6( -efendant !usta1ante "ecei&ed the lette" of Att( A"naldo Loola$ dated Janua" #8$ #99D$ info"1ing defendant that Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo has sold the Sub3ect P"e1ises to PlaintiffE 7( -efendant !usta1ante "ecei&ed the lette" of Att( A"naldo Loola$ dated Janua" <9$ #99D$ "etu"ning the t2el&e chec;s issued b defendant in fa&o" of Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo "ep"esenting "ental pa1ents$ and D( -efendant e0ecuted an Affida&it of E0istence$ dated Jul #9$ #99D( III. Issues to be Tried or Resolved Plaintiff "espectfull sub1its the follo2ing issues to be t"ied o" "esol&ed b this .ono"able Cou"t( 1. ,hethe" o" not -efendant should be e&icted f"o1 the Sub3ect P"e1isesE 2. ,hethe" o" not an alleged Last ,ill and Testa1ent of *e"nando Jose P( Salcedo 2hich has not been app"o&ed on p"obate and 2hich is 1ate"iall defecti&e fo" containing onl t2o 2itnesses could p"e&ent the E3ect1ent of -efendants( IV. ocumentar! "#$ibits Plaintiff "espectfull sub1its the follo2ing docu1ents fo" 1a";ing as follo2s and as he" e0hibits( Exhibit Description E0hibit AAF TCT No( 4567 Pu"pose+ This E0hibit is being offe"ed to p"o&e that the pa"cel of land is "egiste"ed in the na1e of *e"nando Jose P( Salcedo( E0hibit A!F Ta0 -ecla"ation No( 9<899456 Pu"pose+ This E0hibit is being offe"ed to p"o&e that the one%sto"e "esidential house is still in the na1e of *e"nando Jose P( Salcedo( E0hibit ACF -eed of Absolute Sale$ dated Janua" =D$ #99D$ e0ecuted b Att( A"naldo P( Loola in "ep"esentation of Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo co&e"ing the Sub3ect P"e1isesE E0hibit A-F Special Po2e" of Atto"ne$ dated *eb"ua" =6$ #997$ e0ecuted b Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo in he" o2n behalf in fa&o" of Att( A"naldo Loola autho"iGing the latte" to sell the Sub3ect P"e1isesE E0hibit AEF Ac;no2ledg1ent$ dated Janua" =D$ #99D$ e0ecuted b A"naldo P( Loola in behalf of Ma"ia Me"cedes O( SalcedoE Pu"pose+ These E0hibits a"e being offe"ed to p"o&e the sale of the Sub3ect P"e1ises to the Plaintiff( E0hibit A*F -e1and Lette" to &acate$ dated *eb"ua" 7$ #9=9E E0hibit A*%=F Regist" Receipt No( <<84E E0hibit A*%#F Regist" Retu"n ReceiptE Pu"pose+ These E0hibits a"e being offe"ed to p"o&e that a de1and to &acate 2as 1ade upon the -efendant( E0hibit A/F Affida&it of Self%Ad3udication of the Estate of *e"nando Jose Salcedo$ dated Ma 8$ #995$ e0ecuted b Ma"ia Me"cedes O( SalcedoE Pu"pose+ This E0hibit is being offe"ed to p"o&e that the Sub3ect P"e1ises 2e"e ad3udicated to the sole hei" of *e"nando Jose Salcedo( E0hibit A.F Affida&it of E0istence$ dated Jul #9$ #99D$ e0ecuted b Ro2ena !usta1anteE Pu"pose+ This E0hibit is being offe"ed to p"o&e that defendant has no inte"est o&e" the Sub3ect P"e1ises( E0hibit AIF Lette"$ dated Janua" =4$ #99D$ add"essed to Att( A"naldo P( Loola f"o1 Ro2ena !usta1anteE E0hibit AI%=F Mailing en&elopeE Pu"pose+ These E0hibits a"e being offe"ed to p"o&e that defendant !usta1ante 2as paing "entals to Ma"ia Me"cedes O( Salcedo and ac;no2ledged that she 2as the o2ne" of the Sub3ect P"e1ises( E0hibit AJF Lette"$ dated Janua" <9$ #99D$ add"essed to M"s( Ro2ena !usta1ante f"o1 Att( A"naldo P( LoolaE E0hibit AJ%=F Regist" Receipt No( 997D9=E E0hibit AJ%#F Regist" Retu"n ReceiptE E0hibit AJ%<F Regist" Retu"n Receipt$ do"sal po"tionE E0hibit AHF Lette"$ dated Janua" #8$ #99D$ add"essed to M"s( Ro2ena !usta1ante f"o1 Att( A"naldo P( LoolaE E0hibit AH%=F Regist" Receipt No( 997D9#E E0hibit AH%#F Regist" Retu"n ReceiptE E0hibit AH%<F Regist" Retu"n Receipt$ do"sal po"tionE Pu"pose+ These E0hibits a"e being offe"ed to p"o&e that defendant !usta1ante 2as info"1ed b the o2ne" that the Sub3ect P"e1ises had been sold to the Plaintiff( E0hibit ALF Nota"ial Page of Att( !eat"iG >ulo sho2ing that docu1ent no( #8# has no ent"E Pu"pose+ This E0hibit 2ould be offe"ed to p"o&e that the alleged Last ,ill and Testa1ent of *e"nando Jose Salcedo 2as not nota"iGed b Att( >ulo and that the sa1e 2as not sub1itted to the Cle"; of Cou"t( E0hibit ANF Affida&it$ dated Ma"ch ==$ #9=9$ of the PlaintiffE E0hibit ALF Affida&it$ dated June =7$ #9=9$ of Att( A"naldo P( Loola and se"ies and attach1entsE Pu"pose+ These E0hibits 2ould be offe"ed to constitute as the testi1on of the Plaintiff and of Att( A"naldo P( Loola to p"o&e the allegations of the Co1plaint( Plaintiff "ese"&es the "ight to p"esent othe" docu1ents f"o1 Att( A"naldo P( Loola and such othe" 2itnesses dee1ed 1ate"ial( V. %itnesses to be Presented Plaintiff "espectfull sub1its the follo2ing pe"sons as he" 2itnesses+ =( Plaintiff 2ill sub1it he" affida&it to p"o&e the allegations of the Co1plaint( #( Att( A"naldo Loola 2ill e0ecute an affida&it to p"o&e that Ma"ia Me"cedes Salcedo is the o2ne" of the Sub3ect P"e1ises$ that -efendants ac;no2ledged said o2ne"ship and that -efendants 2e"e info"1ed of the sale of the Sub3ect P"e1ises to the Plaintiff( Plaintiff "ese"&es the "ight to p"esent additional 2itnesses as 1a be needed( VI. Possibilit! of &micable Settlement Plaintiff is 2illing to ha&e this case a1icabl settled unde" te"1s that a"e fai" and "easonable( Specificall Plaintiff 2ill gi&e the -efendant a g"ace pe"iod of about th"ee to fou" 1onths to &acate the Sub3ect P"e1ises( VII. &pplicable 'a(s and )urisprudence Plaintiff "espectfull sub1its that the follo2ing la2s and 3u"isp"udence a"e applicable( =( P"o&isions of the Ci&il Code on Lease$ Lease Cont"acts$ Rentals$ and E3ect1entE #( P"o&isions of the Ci&il Code on the Statute of *"audsE <( P"o&isions on Unla2ful -etaine" found in the Rules of Cou"tE and 8( Rule =<=$ Sec( #@bB$ Rules of Cou"tE 4( Ju"isp"udence applicable to this case( VIII. *odes of iscover! Plaintiff is not a&ailing he"self of the 1odes of disco&e" at this ti1e( I+. &vailable Trial ates Plaintiff "espectfull "e:uests that t"ial dates be set in the p"esence of counsels and pa"ties in o"de" to a&oid conflict of schedule( Respectfull sub1itted( Tacloban CitE June #=$ #9=9( /ENE'IE'E MARIE T( ARSENIO ROLL O* ATTORNE>IS NO( <D997 I!P ROLL NO( 9DDDDE 96%=8%D4 MCLE Co1pliance No( III%9998=9#E Jul 9<$ J9D PTR NO( #99D459E 9=%95%9DE Tacloban Cit Mobile No( 9D=D=#<8456 E1ail Add"ess+ gene&ie&e1a"ieKahoo(co1 Cop *u"nished+ Att( LA'INIA !( COTON Counsel fo" -efendant =58 A&enida 'ete"anos Tacloban Cit
Criminal Complaint filed with The Bergen County Prosecutor's Office against the Officers of the Bergen County Superior Court in regard to Docket No: BER-L-8966-11 ( Richard Tomko; Elmwood Park BOE Et Al)