2014714 Understanding unloading valves Part 1

http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/print/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/84768/TechZone-HydraulicValves 1/5
print | close
Understanding unloading valves Part 1
Jack Johnson, P.E.
Mon, 2009-09-14 (All day)
By Jack L. Johnson, P. E.
The last several editions of Motion Control explored open-center valve design concepts and showed
that the term open center is considered as a misnomer by some observers. This is because the 4-way
lands are often all closed, with pump pressure relieved only because of a separate bypass path, whereas
the more conventional interpretation has all the 4-way lands open. In spite of the conventional wisdom
and interpretation, the valves are useful because shifting of the spool not only opens the 4-way lands,
but also closes the bypass path. This allows pressure to build up to meet load requirements and relieves
pump pressure with all spools centered.
Figure 1. The unloader design concept uses a separate
bypass, normally open spool to perform the pump
relieving function with all spools centered; however, the
unloader spool must be synchronized with the 4-way
spools so that it closes with 4-way spool shift.
Are there other means for performing the bypass and center relieving function? The answer is, yes, and
Figure 1 introduces the concept. Here, the valve is equipped with a separate unloader spool that
bypasses the pump flow when the 4-way spools are centered. The red double arrows in the illustration
imply that the bypass spool, labeled Bypass unloader, is linked, or synchronized with the 4-way lands.
There are three possible ways to achieve this synchronization:
mechanically, with cams and followers, thus mimicking the conventional designs discussed previously,
hydraulically, using piloting methods, or
electronically with proportional solenoids.
2014714 Understanding unloading valves Part 1
http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/print/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/84768/TechZone-HydraulicValves 2/5
Synchronizing operation
Of the three methods, the hydraulic piloting method is the most common. However, as
electrohydraulics gains acceptance in mobile equipment, the electronic method will become
increasingly popular. Electronic methods also offer the greatest possible flexibility and tailoring of
valve operational characteristics. However, they will not be dealt with here, because the technology has
yet to emerge definitively and with full industry acceptance.
Figure 2. Using cams and followers, the motion of the 4-
way spools can shift the unloader spool, however, design
and manufacturing are complex and costly, therefore of
doubtful value. The valve is shown here as a concept,
practicality notwithstanding.
Figure 2 shows a possible mechanical linkage system that uses a series of cams connected to the 4-way
spools so that as a 4-way spool shifts, the bypass land is likewise shifted. The arrangement of the cams
and followers gives control of the bypass spool to the 4-way spool with the greatest amount of shift,
while spools with lesser shifts are ignored. Changes in cam design can modify the amount of shift
required of each spool to control the bypass flow. The configuration in Figure 2 is the parallel hydraulic
connection. Its performance characteristics including the apparent dead zone caused by load
pressure are essentially the same as the more conventional design discussed in previous editions of
Motion Control.
Sensing load pressure
The bypass unloader is drawn off to the side in Figure 2 to conveniently illustrate the mechanical
linkage. In fact, the unloader spool is normally located within the inlet section of the valve stack. It
neednt be.
At least one manufacturer offers a fixed-displacement gear pump with the unloader spool integrated
with the pump. The bypass spool is not operated mechanically; rather, pilot pressure is used. However,
bypass spool control can also be accomplished electronically with pump unloading. In addition, the
pump-mounted unloader spool requires a load-pressure sense or pilot line connected from the 4-way
valve stack to the pump, just as with load-sense pumps. In fact, the external characteristics mimic a
loadsense pump, but without the attendant higher efficiency.
The conventional bypass valve design (with bypass lands at each spool), has the disadvantage of
requiring the bypass flow to go through all the lands on its way to the tank. This either requires
relatively large bypass lands or results in a higher pressure loss in neutral. Also, the individual bypass
lands interact during partial, simultaneous spool shifts. This makes prediction of pressures and flows a
2014714 Understanding unloading valves Part 1
http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/print/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/84768/TechZone-HydraulicValves 3/5
complex mathematical process normally requiring a computer to solve. Such processes are beyond the
scope of this discussion.
The only significant advantage the design concept of Figure 2 has over more conventional open-center
stack valve designs is the potential for less neutral pressure loss. However, higher manufacturing costs
offset this advantage, so the method is not commercially viable.
With the unloader designs, only one bypass land services all spools in the stack. It can be sized to
provide the necessary neutral pressure, commensurate with the pump output flow at maximum pump
speed. Bypass flow still must thread its way through oftentimes intricate pathways within manifolds and
subplates. However, those are passive paths, not active as in the spool type bypass designs. Greater
opportunity exists to lessen neutral pressure drops with the unloader designs. Also, there are more ways
in which to link the unloader action to the 4-way spool shift.
Figure 3. Cutaway diagram of the unloader spool and 4-
way valve as a variable orifice, showing how the unloader
spool senses the differential pressure across the powered
land.
Figure 3 is a simplified diagram and schematic consisting of the unloader spool in cutaway with the 4-
way valve characterized only as a simple variable orifice, K
VPL
. A sense line connects the load to the
spring cavity on one side of the unloader spool. Meanwhile, another sense line connects to the opposite
side of the unloader spool. Other spools in the stack and other lands in the valve are omitted for
simplicity in illustrating the operating principle behind unloading valve operation.
Note that the unloader spools bias spring, labeled K
S
, biases the unloader spool in the closed position.
That is, the unloader function is normally closed. The unloader spool will not open until the pressure
through the pump sense line exceeds the load sense pressure by the amount of bias spring plus flow
forces acting on the unloader spool.
Valve designers select the spring so that the differential pressure required for cracking the unloader
spool (just starting to open) requires from about 50 psi to as much as 250 psi. The higher pressure
provides for better control, but it also results in higher unloading pressure and, thus, lower efficiency of
the valve system.
Unloader valve issues
A few issues with unloader-type valves are worth discussing. The first is that the unloader spool
2014714 Understanding unloading valves Part 1
http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/print/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/84768/TechZone-HydraulicValves 4/5
processes two pressure signals in a way that attempts to maintain a constant pressure across the
powered land, K
VPL
. In so doing, the unloader spool regulates the flow to the load, at least in this
simplified scenario.
This raises the second point: As the load pressure changes, the powered lands pressure drop is
maintained, and flow tends to remain at a value determined by the degree of shift of the 4-way spool
not by the load or even pump pressure variation. This kind of control is easy for even the novice
operator to use because of the nearly independent nature of the flow control. A human operator need
not compensate for load pressure changes; the unloader does it automatically, somewhat.
However, this is a somewhat idealized description. Practical aspects bring us to a third point: Although
many designers of these valves insist that the pressure drop across the powered land remains constant,
indeed, it does not. When tested at a variety of loads and K
VPL
settings (differing amounts of 4-way
spool shift), the differential pressure will vary between the cracking value up to as much as twice that
amount. Nonetheless, the differential pressure drop will not, in this simple, single function scenario,
vary by any large amount from the design cracking value.
This brings up a fourth point: Because the differential pressure drop is maintained at a relatively low
level at all operating conditions, the flow forces acting on the 4-way spool are small, making it easier to
shift and maintain than in other designs of previous discussions. This results in less operator fatigue,
and when electrically activated with proportional solenoids, it also means that the solenoid current
determines the flow, not the load and supply pressure. This contributes to operator friendliness of these
valves.
A fifth point is that the flow regulation is imperfect. It can vary depending on supply pressure and load
pressure, but not nearly as much as without the unloader function. Also, flow forces act to close the
unloader valve and, in essence, make the bias spring seem stiffer than it is. The result is
overcompensation; that is, as load pressure approaches the pressure rating of the valve, the load flow
decreases.
Figure 4. ISO schematic diagram for the simplified
unloading compensator valve with 4-way powered land
shown as a variable orifice.
This conclusion has been witnessed through countless tests and confirmed through math modeling and
simulation studies. None of this is meant to denigrate these valves. Rather, the intent is merely to
explain certain idiosyncrasies in the hopes that the valves are understood and more appropriately
applied.
Figure 4 is included simply to illustrate that there are conventional ISO symbols for the unloader
compensator. It should be compared to Figure 3.
2014714 Understanding unloading valves Part 1
http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/print/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/84768/TechZone-HydraulicValves 5/5
Handbook serves electrohydraulic system designers
The fourth edition of the Designers Handbook for
Electrohydraulic Servo and Proportional Systems contains
even more useful information than its predecessor, the highly
successful third edition, which has become the Bible for
electrohydraulics technology.
Now you can learn even more about electrohydraulic systems and
their design, including:
how to calculate and control pressure losses in plumbing,
subplates, and manifolds,
how to analyze and control a variety of mechanical loads, including
conveyors and belts and triangulated loads,
valve dynamic properties and how to include them in your system,
electronics, especially transducers and signal conditioning, and mobile equipment electrical
systems, including batteries and charging systems.
There is no limit as to how electrohydraulics is going to revolutionize our industry, so order your copy
to secure your career in this dynamic technology. And if certification in electrohydralics is your goal,
the fourth edition of the Designers Handbook is essential to your preparation. Dont risk being left
behind in a world where the only constant is rapid change.
To order, visit our website at www.hydraulicspneumatics.com, and click on the Bookstore button.
Print the PDF order form, fill it out, and mail, fax, or e-mail it to us.
Source URL:
http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/84768/TechZone-
HydraulicValves