> thank you justin for your answer which you said:

> "the aim of life is to follow God's word and bring

> others to Christ."
>
> but let us to exam: is that aim is true?
>
> if the bible is Gods word then there will be no
> contraditions.
>
> let us to check the bible:
>
> ! think for this answer we need to use our mind
> without affection of emotion. ! think in this way we
> must to exam to find the truth without emotional
> lie.
>
> "ere is my examination #i think there is some
> fanatic $eo$le will not agree with me in this way
> but it is the way to find the truth%:
>
> &s we know' in the bible there is four gos$els' two
> of these gos$els are (atthew and )uke. *he scholars
> claim that these gos$els are written by "oly +$irit
> through (atthew and )uke. !t means it written from
> same source.
>
> ,ow' let us ha-e a dee$ly look on these gos$els:
>
> *he Genealogy of .esus Christ:
>
> !t mentioned in #(atthew /:/0/1% and in #)uke
> 2:32024%
> 5hen you read these you will ha-e these 6uestions:
>
> /% "ow could (atthew and )uke $ut genealogy for the
> Christ e-en we know and belie-e he was born by his
> -irgin mother' (ary without father?7
>
> 3% !f we count the genealogy in (atthew from &braham
> to .esus the result will be 8/ names but in )uke it
> will be 9: names. !t means )uke added /9 names or
> (atthew lacked /9 names.
>
> 2% !n #(atthew /:/1%
> /8 generations from &braham to ;a-id'
> /8 generations from ;a-id to the exile to <abylon'
> /8 generations from exile to .esus
> it means the total will be 83
> but if we count it will be 8/
> the generations from exile to .esus is /2 not /8
> does not "oly +$irit know how to count?7
>
> 8% !n (atthew .esus belongs to +olomon son of
> ;a-id
> !n )uke .esus belongs to ,athan son of
> ;a-id
> *o know' +olomon and ,athan are not one
> $erson
> but they are brothers as in #3 +amuel
> 9:/20/8%.
> !s "oly +$irit confused about who is the forefather
> of .esus?7
>
> 9% !n (atthew' =erubbable and his father +healtiel
> are fore fathers of >liakim.
> !n )uke' >liakim is forefather of =erubbable and
> +healtiel77
>
> :% !n (atthew' .ose$h the Car$enter is the son of
> .acob
> !n )uke' .ose$h the Car$enter is the son of "eli7
>
> 5ho is the father of .ose$h?
>
> 1% if (atthew and )uke wrote by same source #"oly
> +$irit%' then why there is contradictions?7
> ?or the answer we do not ha-e only to choose one of
> two choices:
> a% "oly +$irit is liar.
> b% @r these gos$els were written by human hands
> using in-estigations which risk to right or wrong
> and no $rincibility of "oly +$irit.
> ! think u will choose the second answer which $ro-ed
> by )uke in his intruduction:
> A/(any ha-e undertaken to draw u$ an account of the
> things that ha-e been fulfilled among us' 3just as
> they were handed down to us by those who from the
> first were eyewitnesses and ser-ants of the word.
> 2*herefore' since ! myself ha-e carefully
> in-estigated e-erything from the beginning' it
> seemed good also to me to write an orderly account
> for you' most excellent *heo$hilus' 8so that you may
> know the certainty of the things you ha-e been
> taught.B
> #)uke /:/08%
>
> ,ow let us be more aware to say that we trick
> oursel-es about "oly +$irit.
>
>
> your faithfull'
>
> hashem