Basic motion to dismiss Brett Kimberlin's silly and abusive RICO suit. The reasons for it is attached in accompanying memo, also in my scribd account. Get the whole story at http://allergic2bull.blogspot.com/
Basic motion to dismiss Brett Kimberlin's silly and abusive RICO suit. The reasons for it is attached in accompanying memo, also in my scribd account. Get the whole story at http://allergic2bull.blogspot.com/
Basic motion to dismiss Brett Kimberlin's silly and abusive RICO suit. The reasons for it is attached in accompanying memo, also in my scribd account. Get the whole story at http://allergic2bull.blogspot.com/
Southern Division * BRETT KIMBERLIN, * Plaintiff * v. CASE NO.: !H"#$"$%&' * NATIONAL BLOERS CLUB, (t al., * D(f(n)ant* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEFENDANT +ALKER,S RE-ISED MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CONDITIONAL RE.UEST FOR A HEARIN NOW COMES Defendant Aaron J. Walker, Esq. and moves to dismiss the Plaintiffs Seond Amended Com!laint "ith !re#$die. %he Plaintiff has asserted laims that the Defendants have violated federal la" $nder this o$rts ori&inal #$risdition and laims that the Defendants have violated state la" $nder this o$rts s$!!lemental #$risdition $nder '( ).S.C. *+,-./a0. %he federal laims sho$ld 1e dismissed !$rs$ant to 2ederal 3$le of Civil Proed$re +'/10/-0 for fail$re to state a laim. Mean"hile, the state laims sho$ld 1e dismissed either !$rs$ant to 2ed. 3. Civ. P. +'/10/+0 for lak of s$1#et4matter #$risdition or !$rs$ant to 3$le +'/10/-0. S!eifiall5, there is no at$al diversit5 of iti6enshi!, the Plaintiff does not !ro!erl5 alle&e the #$risditional amo$nt, and he has not stated a laim for "hih relief an 1e &ranted. Alternativel5, if this o$rt sho$ld find that +0 all federal laims sho$ld 1e dismissed, 1$t that '0 there is diversit5 of iti6enshi!, ,0 that the !laintiff has alle&ed the #$risditional minim$m and 70 that he has stated a laim $!on "hih relief an 1e &ranted relief an 1e &ranted for his state la" laims, Mr. Walker res!etf$ll5 req$ests a hearin& to test the #$risditional amo$nt $nder Zander v. United States, '8+' W9 77.,:' /D.Md. '8+'0. 2inall5, Mr. Walker req$ests that s$h dismissal 1e &ranted "ith !re#$die and, $!on f$rther motions, that this o$rt &rant santions $!on the Plaintiff inl$din& o$rt osts and other a!!ro!riate osts, and an in#$ntion delarin& that the Plaintiff is a ve;atio$s liti&ant and req$irin& that he o1tain !relearane 1efore filin& an5 liti&ation in the f$t$re. %he reasons for this Motion are f$ll5 set o$t in the aom!an5in& Memorand$m of Points and A$thorities in S$!!ort. W<E3E2O3E Defendant Walker req$ests= %hat all federal laims are dismiss $nder 2ed. 3. Civ. P. +'/10/-0, %hat all state laims are dismissed $nder 2ed. 3. Civ. P. +'/10/+0 or /-0, %hat if all federal laims are dismissed, 1$t an5 state laim s$rvives this motion, a hearin& 1e &ranted to test the #$risditional amo$nt, %hat s$h dismissals 1e &ranted "ith !re#$die, %hat this o$rt sho$ld onsider motions for santions and, $!on s$h motions, &rant monetar5 santions, and in#$ntive relief a!!ro!riate for a ve;atio$s liti&ant, and All other relief as a!!ro!riate. ' %$esda5, J$l5 +>, '8+7 3es!etf$ll5 s$1mitted,
Application For An Extension of Time Within Which To File A Petition For A Writ of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit