Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
JEWISH QUESTION
Published by
The Jewish Socialists' Group, Manchester.
1975
PRICE
20p
Preface 1 - 7
Introduction 8 - 13
I National & Cultural Questions 14 - 46
II Zionism - Jewish Nationalism 47 - 82
III The Misleading Propaganda of the
Left
83 - 127
IV The Palestinians and the Israelis 128 - 148
V Fascism - The Common Enemy 149 - 156
Appendix
128 On June 23rd. 1974 the Ambassador of the Syrian Arab Republic
in London, Mr. A. Omran, gave an interview to several of our
members on the subject of the Middle East and associated
questions. This interview arose out of a written request from
us for a precise definition of the 'Pa1estinian rights' which,
among so many others, the Government of Syria claimed to support.
129 Our report on the interview was circulated later to a number
of political centres in Britain and abroad and has been the
subject of some press correspondence. We reiterate here the
gist of the Ambassador's remarks to us and of some of the
discussion that followed.
130 "Essentia1ly, he told us, the, Syrian
government adhered to its historical
refusal to accept, in principle, the
existence of the State of Israel. Israel had
been set up as an act of colonial robbery
by the big imperialist powers so as to make
the Arabs pay for the crimes of the Europeans
against the Jews. With Jews as individuals
there was sympathy and friendship but the
principle of Jewish national rights was not
recognised by Syria since the Jews were not
a nation, merely a religious group.
131 However, he went on, what Syria held to in
principle she was prepared to set aside in
practice for the sake of peaceful
co-existence. She would therefore accept
Israel in practical terms subject only to
a settlement of the Palestinian question
which would meet with the approval of the
Palestinians themselves. He thought that
the majority of the Palestinians would be
prepared to settle now for less than the
whole of Palestine, that is for what has come
to be known as a West Bank state, plus Gaza
etc. If Israel agreed to this the
possibility of peace would be brought much
nearer.
132 We also discussed Egypt's defection to the
imperialist camp about which the Ambassador
confessed himself 'disappointed' and the
question of the position of the Jews of
Syria".
133 On the Palestinian issue, what the Ambassador had to say seemed
to be so much of a step forward from the then known position
of the Palestinian terror organisations that it seemed to us
advisable to communicate the message far and wide, which, as
indicated, we did.
134 At the same time, we took the step of writing directly to the
P.L.O. office in London requesting their own definition of
Palestinian rights and hoping for confirmation of the
Ambassador1s view. This letter was written on July 30th and we
have to say with regret that at the time of going to press no
reply has been received.
135 As far as the Ambassador's general arguments on the question
of the origins of Israel and Jewish national rights are concerned,
naturally we acquainted him with what we regard as the facts
which are referred to in the foregoing pages, and in our relaying
of the report of the interview we made clear our regrets that
distortions about these matters should represent the official
position of his government.
136 Supporters of the Palestinian cause are rather fond of
suggesting that their misfortunes are due to the fact of the
creation of the State of Israel. On the contrary, it was the
unwarranted rejection of this fact by a group of reactionary
Arab states which set in train the events which have brought
so much suffering to Jews and Palestinian Arabs alike.
137 But what of the Palestinians themselves? Irrespective of the
causes of their misfortunes, theirs is an urgent human problem.
They say they are a nation. It has been argued, probably correctly,
that no-one has ever made a serious objective historical
analysis of this claim. Nevertheless, we Jewish Socialists, who
stand firm on the right of Jews to regard themselves as a nation,
are not rushing in to deny this right to the Palestinians. We
think an analysis of their claim is necessary; meanwhile we are
prepared to take their word for it.
138 Where then is this nationhood to find a place in which to express
itself? This is the question to which Mr. Omran sought to give
us an answer by indicating that the Palestinians might now
favour a state on the principle of the original U.N. partition
resolution of 1947, i.e. side by side with Israel.
139 Our elation at this apparently favourable development in
Palestinian thinking was of course tempered by the failure of
the P.L.O. to reply to our query. Nevertheless, up to as late
as November 13th. we were prepared to believe that there might
be something in it. We understood that there were divisions in
the ranks of the P.L.O; we recognised the desire of the ordinary
Palestinian people for peace; we saw indications that the Soviet
Union was apparently veering towards the two-state idea.
140 On, November 13th. however, Yasir Arafat mounted the rostrum
of the United Nations with a gun at his hip and clearly repeated
the old, familiar demand for a "democratic secular state" to
cover the whole of Palestine, in other words for the elimination
of the state of Israel. (Perhaps this is why we did not, receive
a reply from the P.L.O. in London!!).
141 It would seem, therefore, that irrespective of how one may
justifiably criticise the failure of the government of Israel
to accept the principle of a separate West Bank etc. state (a
question apart from that of who is acceptable as representing
the Palestinian people) there can be little doubt, after
Arafat's speech, that the leaders of the P.L.O. have rejected
the path of rational compromise and have opted for the path of
terror and bloodshed to the bitter end.
142 If it is not this then they are playing a game of political
huckstering and blackmai1 which, because it involves the
deep-seated insticts for survival of the people of Israel, is
fraught with the most dangerous consequences.
Has the Left learned the lesson?
143 During the past year developments in the Middle East have thrown
sections of the British Left into some confusion. The turn to
imperialism by Arab bourgeois nationalism, a development which
we in the Jewish Socialists' Group had foreseen but which appears
to have surprised everyone on the pro-Arab Left, has produced
a sense of shock and unease.
144 If, because of this, there is now some re-thinking going on, all
well and good.
145 The collapse of a policy based on the notion that the cause of
anti-imperialism can be served by supporting those who are bound
to betray that fight, should be an incentive to re-examine that
policy.
146 If we have done something in this pamphlet to show that the Jewish
people are an historical reality; that the Zionist movement is
a normal nationalist movement with a right and a left wing; that
Jews have a right to the Land of Israel, a right based on a
continuous presence; of mankind expressed through the United
Nations, then we are content.
147 If we have been able to show also that the fight for national
liberation in which both Jews and Arabs are engaged and which
involves struggle against reactionaries on both sides, is one
that must be waged in unity but on the basis of mutual respect
for national rights, then we are more than content.
148 If we have further done anything to persuade the Left to drop
its one-sided approach to the Middle East, to begin to try to
persuade the Arab Liberation movement to drop its
self-stultifying chauvinism; to begin to differentiate and to
support any elements in the Arab world who may begin to show
tolerance and a spirit of respect for Jewish national rights,
then we are overwhelmed. For this is what is needed. This, in
our view, is the present political task of the British Left in
relation to the Middle East.
Chapter 5.
FASCISM - The Common Enemy.
149 We have referred a time or two in this pamph1et to our "comrades
on the Left". We are not just using a figure of speech. We are
speaking to those who, we believe, share our long term aim of
the ending of capitalist society and the establishment of a just,
peaceful Socialism over the whole world.
150 We are speaking therefore to comrades who, we believe, have gone
astray on a fundamental question of national identity in
relation to the Jews. However, there are other questions of
concern to Jews on which our comrades on the < Left have views
which we heartily share. Fascism is one such issue and one which
is moreover of the highest importance to Jews in Britain.
151 We are appreciative of the fight against Fascism by all
organisations of the Left now and in the past. We aim to win
the Jewish people as a whole to support of the progressive
movement. Israel is very much a part of our scene but we are
not, as a group, Israe1-centred. That is to say, we understand
that millions of Jews, who may never even see Israel, will
continue to have social problems to contend with in non-Jewish
societies.
152 We are not a Zionist organisation although some of our members
are Socialist Zionists who accept that even if a majority of
Jews did eventually find their way to Israel, generations might
pass before this happened. In other words, generations of
problems would still face Jews allover the world, problems which
they would have to share with non-Jews.
153 We do not therefore judge the problems of the Jews of Britain
solely in relation to the problems of Israel. We are not, for
instance, going to follow in reverse the examp1eof the
pro-Palestinian faction at an anti-fascist conference in
Manchester in Hay 1974 who tied themselves into procedural knots
before they could bring themselves to register some sort of a
vote protesting against the appointment of an Arab Ambassador
to Britain who was known to have had connections with leading
British Fascists.
154 If and when we are able to do the job we formed ourselves to
do, namely to bring the Left to a correct understanding of the
Jewish question, we would then disband and content ourselves
with the roles we have played as individuals, in some cases for
decades, in one section or another of the Labour movement.
155 We therefore ask our comrades on the Left once again to understand
the deep desire of the Jewish people to identify in some measure
with the history of their forefathers and to accept them in the
struggle for social progress on that basis and not on the basis
of demands for cultural assimilation; in other words accept them
as Jews and not as something else.
156 For our part and as long as the Jewish Socialists' Group exists,
we pledge our efforts to persuade the Jewish people that their
future, no more than anyone else's lies not with capitalism but,
whatever the problems which may have to be sorted out on the
way, with the forces of the future, of Socialism.
Appendix 1.
Movements of population.
157 There has never been a time in the history of mankind when there
has not been some movement or other of populations.
158 The past fifty years or so have probably seen greater movements
of population in terms of sheer number than any comparable period
before it. Millions of Russians, Germans, Poles, Africans,
Indians, Pakistanis, Jews and Arabs have resumed or ended their
lives in places other than those of their births.
159 The case of the Palestinian Arab refugees is however unique.
Alone among history's refugees they have the verbal and
propaganda and indeed military support of those in the Arab oil
empires who are rich beyond the dreams of Croesus but who refuse
to do anything to improve the lives of the refugees, to assist
them, to absorb them or to re-settle them.
160 The suspicion must therefore arise that when those who talk about
the sufferings of the Palestinian refugees and who have the power
to end those sufferings and who spend money like water on
propagandising about those sufferings but spend nothing to
alleviate them, they are intent only on maintaining the
sufferings as a political weapon against Israel, as a means of
diverting the attention of the Arab masses from the real causes
of their problems.
161 We feel that the following summary of some facts about the
movement of Jews and Arabs into and out of Palestine might be
of some help in assessing the truth of the propaganda line that
the core of the Middle East problem is an historical robbery
of one people (Palestinian Arabs) by another (Jews from
abroad).
Palestine
Who Came? Who Went?
162 The Romans expelled the Jews from Palestine about two thousand
years ago. The Arabs invaded it about six centuries later.
Subsequently, the country, a crossroads on the major trade
routes between Europe, Africa and Asia, was invaded by the
Crusaders, the Turks, the French and the British. At no time
was the Jewish link with Palestine broken and in fact it reached
substantial proportions relative to the total population at one
time and another.
163 For example; in 1845 the Prussian Consul in Jerusalem reported
that the Jewish population of the city was almost half the total,
exceeding that of the Moslems and other groups.
164 Census figures prior to the first World War show that in the
five major towns of Jerusalem, Tiberias, Safad, Jaffa and Haifa
there was a total of 57,000 Jews; this would be about one in
fourteen of the total population and of course it leaves out
of account the Jewish populations of many other, smaller towns,
of agricultural settlements and so on - to add all these might
possibly alter the proportion to one in eight or nine.
165 During the period of the British Mandate there was a great deal
of immigration and emigration of both Jews and Arabs. Much has
been made in pro-Arab propaganda of the so-called "Jewish
invasion" but nothing about the movement of Arabs into and out
of the country. Yet statistics are available in plenty; an
analysis of the principal documents of the various mandatory
organs for the period 1925 to 1945, the best covered period,
show the following:
166 From 1925 to 1945 a known 60,000 Arabs entered Palestine
illegally. Of these 10,000 were deported by "order". Net.
illegal immigration 50,000, who have produced at least 250,000
children.
167 Of the Arabs who left voluntarily during the period, 14,000 were
unrecorded entries and hence cannot be subtracted from the above
total of illegal entry. Moreover, the existence of unrecorded
immigrants raises the whole question of illegal immigration
which is in fact the major component in the situation. It was
tacitly recognised and accepted in the founding documents of
UNWRA which was to care for all who had "lived in Palestine for
at least two years prior to 1948 and had been deprived of their
livelihood" by the fighting of that year.
168 For, a thousand Arabs were "summarily" deported as illegal
immigrants every year during the twenty year period, i.e. 10,000
total illegals. There was also an annual seasonal flow of 14,000
to and fro across the Mandatory frontiers.
169 What proportion of the total undiscovered illegal immigration
do the deportations represent we cannot of course know precisely
but we can make an estimate by looking at the figures of
deportations of illegal Jewish immigrants.
170 According the Mandate police records, during 1945 (a "good" year
for catches of Jewish i11ega immigrants) 317 Jews were deported
out of what was estimated by the police (an estimate endorsed
by the Jewish Agency) of about 3,000 illegal immigrants
altogether, a "catch" rate of s1ightly more than one in ten.
171 Applying this proportion to the Arabs (and it is likely to be
an under-estimate since Jewish access was mainly by sea and that
of the Arabs was across long, mostly unchecked land frontiers)
would give a total of 9,000 per year uncaught illegal Arab
immigrants, i.e. 180,000 for the period 1925-1945. But there
is more.
172 There was a steady legal immigration of Arab brides, fifty per
cent in excess of the legal immigration of males, and this raises
the question of the cumulative effect of i1legal immigration
enhanced by lower infant mortality (due to British and Jewish
sanitation measures). When one adds to this the fact that
Egyptians who came to work, in many cases for the British forces,
were 1isted in the statistics not as Arabs but as "others" it
is hard1y possib1e to resist the conclusion that over the entire
period of the Mandate a minimum of a quarter of a million Arabs
were illegal immigrants to Palestine from other Arab countries
or were the children of such immigrants, even allowing for
duplication of cases. The Arab population of Palestine in 1945
was approx. 1,100,000 and the Jewish population approx. 580,000.
173 The estimated figure of at least a quarter of a million illegal
Arab immigrants (or the children of such) lends itself to some
further interesting analyses.
174 For instance, ninety per cent of it was to sub-districts
("counties") being developed along the coast by the Jewish
community.
175 Further, even if the estimate were to be reduced to half by reason
of re-emigration and natural deaths (which would be rather
drastic in view of the very low average age of the immigrants,
half of whom would have been in the country for ten years or
less) what would be left would constitute the following
proportions:
12% of the total Palestine Arab population
(one in eight)
36% of the Arab population in that part of
Palestine allocated to Israel under the
Partition Resolution (135,000 is 90% of
150,000 and 500,000 Arabs were included in
the Jewish State).
Equivalent to 25% of the total number of
Palestinian Arab refugees in 1948 (650,000
actually moved to the Arab side of the
Armistice Line). Equivalent to nearly 40%
of those refugees who left
partition-allocated Israel. (150,000
Arabs remained in Israe1 in 1949. 40,000
joined them before 1967 on the family
re-union scheme).
176 These calculations are confirmed by the ease with which
two-thirds of the refugees (forty percent of the Palestinian
nation) integrated into fair1y we11 estab1ished 1ife in their
"new" homes often with the help of relations who had remained
behind. This point is conceded by Leila Khaled in her
autobiography in which she says that her family left Haifa and
re-joined her mother's people in the Lebanon. It is doubly
confirmed by the Israeli census July 1967 of occupied territory.
Of the total (995,000) 313,000 orginated from inside the
Armistice Line and 40,000 (13%) had birthplaces outside the
Mandatory frontier.
177 During 1948 there was a large emigration of Palestinian Arabs.
We quote in the section on "Mis1eading Propaganda of the Left"
statements from two Arab newspapers showing that the
Palestinians had been actively encouraged to leave by Arabs in
surrounding countries. To bring this point properly home we
quote these further iterms;
178 The Beirut Telegraph of Sept. 6th 1948,
carried a report of an interview with Mr.
Emile Ghoury, Secretary of the Palestine
Arab Higher Committee, who said, "the fact
that there are these refugees is the direct
consequence of the act of the Arab states
in opposing partition and the Jewish
state".
179 A British police report to Jerusalem
headquarters on, Apri1 26th 1948 stated
"Every effort is being made by the Jews to
persuade the Arab population to stay and
carryon with their norma1 1ives".
180 In Haifa on April 27th the Arab National
Committee refused to sign a truce and
reported thus in, a memorandum to Arab
League governments; "when the delegation
entered the conference room it proudly
refused to sign the truce and asked that
the evacuation of the Arab population and
their transfer to neighbouring Arab
countries be facilitated… The military and
civil authorities and the Jewish
representatives expressed their profound
regret. The Mayor of Haifa (Mr. Shabtai
Levi) adjourned the meeting with a
passionate appeal to the Arab population
to reconsider its decision…"
181 We may grant that there were elements on the Jewish side who
not only welcomed but even encouraged this flight of Arabs, but
who can doubt that the original and the main cause of the
Palestinian refugee problem was the determination of a host of
reactionary Arab states to undo the U.N. partition by aggression,
an aggression that has never yet been condemned by any
progressive Arab leader.
182 In the years that fo11 owed the setting up of the State of Israel
almost three-quarters of a million Jewish refugees entered the
Jewish state from Arab countries whence they came not because
of Zionist propaganda but because they were driven out by fear,
by persecution, by wholesale expropriation and by terror.
183 This then is some of the background to the Arab propaganda story,
background which you will never hear in the versions circulated
by the Arab oil emperors for the purpose of convincing millions
of youthful idealists that the story of Palestine is the story
of a crude unilateral dispossess ion of the land of one people
at the hands of another.
Appendix 2.
Oil.
184 We have earlier touched briefly on the question of oil, which
has always been one of the root factors in the Middle East
situation; the connection with outside imperialist powers is
well-known and obvious. However, foreign imperialist control
of and maneouvres around the production and distribution of oil
has never been the only factor. Foreign interests infiltrated,
seized control of or came to terms with local reactionary
interests; they did not invent them. The struggle of the Arab
peoples has therefore never been merely to win freedom from
foreign domination but from the complex of foreign supported
local reaction, a complex whose local component has now become
dominant. It is this local component, the Arab ruling classes
whose strategy for survival has been the age-old one of finding
a scapegoat, Israel, to occupy the minds of their peoples.
185 The strength of the role which is now being played by local Arab
reaction, not only in the Middle East but throughout the
capitalist world, has lately become very clear indeed. For who
can doubt that oil is now not so much a tool of foreign
imperialists but of local interests whose imperialist character
is indisputable.
186 The subject of the penetration of the capitalist world by Arab
imperialism is too complex to permit of adequate treatment in
these pages but we recommend it for study by the Left and
meanwhile would like to pose these questions for urgent
consideration.
187 1 . If imperialism can be defined as the
export of capital, where do Arab, oil
interests rank in the table of finance
imperialists?
188 2. Do we believe that Arab oil/finance
imperialism is seriously concerned about
the fate of the Palestinians? If it were
would it not be doing something to assist
in their re-settlement in the Arab
countries or at least in helping to make life
in their camps more tolerable?
189 3. Are the Arab oil/finance imperialists in
favour of a "Palestine Democratic Statet"?
If not, for what purpose is Faisal backing
Al Fatah?
190 4. Would the role being played by Arab oil
money in the international money markets
not pre-dispose the Arab oil/finance
imperialists to support measures to save
capitalism? What connection is there
between (a) Arab oil money support for A1
Fatah (b) friendly attitudes by European
fascist organisations towards Al Fatah? For
instance the neo-Nazi National States
Rights party in the U.S.A. lauds the Arab
cause in its magazine "Thunderbolt". Al
Fatah manifestoes are distributed by the
Italian neo-fascist paper "La Nazione".
Jean Thiart's monthly magazine, advocate of
a fascist Europe, ranges itself alongside
the Arabs in a joint struggle against "the
Zionist fifth column in Europe and the
Middle East". The Deutsche National Zeitung
appears to have won some praise in certain
parts of the Arab world.
191 We commend the above questions for the
urgent attention of all our comrades on the
Left.
If this pamphlet has been of interest or has provoked a new train of
thought, or if you have criticisms or there is anything you want to
say, we would be glad to hear from you. If you feel able to identify
sufficiently with our aims to want to join us, please fill in the
membership application form below:-
Donations to help us to carry on our work should be sent to the address
on the application form. Cheques etc. made out to 'Jewish Socialists'
Group'.
Please note also the following pamphlet and broadsheets which we would
be glad to send you on request sent with s.a.e.
"Questions and Answers on the Middle East"
"The role of the Kibbutz in Israeli society"
"Bonaparteist tendencies in Arab society"
'
I wish to become a member of the Jewish Socialists Group. Please send
me further details.
Name .............................................................
Address .........................................................
.........................................................
MANIFESTO
of the Jewish Socialists' Group
1. We stand for and look eradicate lingering traces of
forward to the victory of Socialism antiSernit isrn in the minds of
all over the world. ordinary people,
(c) from advocacy by the Left of
2. We stand for the maintenance of assimilation as a solution to
Jewish national rights, based on the age-old problem of
the Jewish heritage (which anti-Semitism. We reject
expresses itself in many forms assimilationism as being a
and in many countries, denial of the fundamental
including, today, in a State form right of a people to enjoy its
in' Israel) and for the cultural heritage in peace and
participation of Jews as Jews, in security. It is not a solution to
whichever country they inhabit, the problem of anti-Semitism.
in the struggle for Socialism. The operation of a policy of
forcible assimilation in the
Soviet Union has done great
3. We estimate the dangers to harm to Jewish cultural rights,
Jewish national and cultural a fact which has been
rights as follows: recognised by many friends of
the Soviet Union, and it has
(a) from Fascism and Right-wing been directly responsible for
chauvinism, which we the desire of many Soviet
understand generally as Jews to leave for Israel.
manifestations of the dying (d) from Arab nationalists of the
capitalist system, and we urge Left and the Right, whose
Jewish people everywhere to common nationalism
cooperate with all genuine transcends their political
Socialist and democratic forces differences in denying the
in the struggle against these right to exist of the country
manifestations. which embodies Jewish rights
(b) from anti-Semitism in Socialist to self-determination in a
countries. We regard this as an State form, Israel. We observe
aberration. a violation of the an alliance between Left-wing
fundamental principles of Arabs who seek to rationalise
Socialism. We call on the their denial of Israel's right to
authorities in Socialist exist in terms of Socialist
countries to crush all such principles, and the
manifestations and to improve assimilationists referred to
educational work in order to above, who look for support
in one another's' theories. world. This, combined with
(e) from Israeli Right-wing total hostility from the Arab
leaders, chauvinists and Left as well as the Right, has
annexationists, and supporters impeded the growth of
of imperialism, who seek to tie socialist and progressive
Israel to a dying capitalist forces in Israel and, through
system and who express their the threat to the physical
reactionary views by their security of the Israeli people,
denial of Palestinian national has ensured that there could
rights, and whose desire to be no political unity between
maintain the occupation of Israeli and Arab progressive
territory endangers the security forces We call on the
of Israel by increasing her International Left to
isolation. understand this and to bring
4. (i) We believe that the question pressure to bear on
of the Middle East is crucial for progressive Arab force-s to be
the peace of the world and for prepared to recognize the
social progress in general as State of Israel in order to
well as for the future of the create the necessary basis for
Jewish people- in particular. We an appeal to Israeli
believe that wrongs have been progressives for a united front
committed on both sides, the aimed at both Arab and Israeli
Arab and the Israeli, but we reaction.
must insist that the major cause 5. (i) ZIONISM. We
of the situation was the Arab recognise the view on the Left
refusal to accept the U.N. which sees Zionism as a dis-
partition proposal in 1947 traction from united progressive
struggle against capitalism. but we
reject any view of Zionism which
(ii) The struggle between Israel and does not differentiate between
the Arabs has taken place in Zionists who are reactionary and
the context of the global try to use the Jewish people as
struggle between capitalism tools assist in the propping up of
and Socialism, but w e reject capitalism, and Zionists who are
the analysis which projects a progressive and who see a mass
simple picture of an Israeli US return of the Jewish people to a
puppet fighting progressive country of their own as necessary
Arab states. This analysis for the establishment of a national
ignores the pro-imperialist base from which Jews may play
forces in the Arab world who their part in the general struggle
have successfully used the for Socialism.
anti- Israel struggle to divert
attention from themselves and
have thus strengthened the (ii) What we are concerned with is
position of Arab reaction. the participation all over the
world of Jews in the
(iii) The almost unconditional progressive struggle on the
support extended by the basis of Jewish identity, and
International Left to the Arab so, while we reject
side has objectively assisted Right-wing or reactionary
the strengthening of reaction Zionism, we accept that
both in Israel and the Arab
Socialist or progressive (iv) We therefore call on the
Zionism represents a legi- progressive forces all over the
timate position for Jews to world recognize the Jewish
occupy in this struggle. people in the above terms and
(iii) Whatever may be the outcome to extend a fraternal hand to
of this argument, at the all Jews wishing to play their
moment the Jews are an part In social struggle.. to
identifiable people, playing a affirm support for Israel's
role in society from a number right to exist. To raise their
of positions and bases. Their voices in support of Soviet
safety and security is the Jews' religious and cultural
concern of everyone, just as rights, to reject
everyone's safety and security assimilationism and
is their concern Their right LO anti-Israel chauvinism while
a State, as enjoyed by other reserving the right to criticize
peoples, was claritie d by t h e Israel's rulers if necessary and
United Nations in 1947 with to demand a Middle East
the leadmg support of the peace based on U.N.
Soviet Union and has in any Resolution 242 and on the
case been justified by the secure national rights of both
events of the European the Jewish and the Palestinian
Holocaust and the Warsaw peoples.
Ghetto resistance.