brand with above average growth potential and a wide margin of safety. By: Michael Wood www.evansic.com Source: Samsung Investor Day Presentation 2013 Contest Qualification 1. Samsung Electronics (005930 KS Equity) Price: KRW 1,367,000 Shares: 150,777,000 FX rate: 0.0009 USD/KRW Market Cap USD: $185 Billion
Prices as of 06/13/14 Prices as of 06/13/14 How to buy Samsung Electronics All values from here on out are reported in USD All prices and market caps are as of 06/13/14 This report contains forward-looking numbers that could differ from actual results Samsung Electronics is not a suitable investment for all investors and individual circumstances should be taken into consideration This report is intended to provide the investor with research relating to Samsung Electronics and is not a solicitation to buy the stock Disclosure Cheap price Management: honest & skillful capital allocators Dominant and strengthening competitive advantage (low-cost & high-quality manufacturing) Globally recognized brand that is well taken care of (broad and strong associations) Excellent balance sheet protection
Proven Investment Process Market Cap = $ US 186 Billion Non-operating assets (net) = $ US 60.4 Billion Enterprise Value = $ US 125.6 Billion
Q1-2014 Book value = $ US 145.5 Billion 2014E Net Income = $ US 24.0 Billion 2014E Free-cash-flow = $ US 24.0 Billion
EV/FCF2014 = 5.2x (prices as of 06/13/14) Samsung Quick Stats 1. Samsungs businesses are not well understood, as the market is assuming Samsung is only a smartphone company 2. Samsung Semiconductor is worth the enterprise value itself (the market price implicitly assumes mobile is worth -$33B) 3. Samsung trades at more than a 50% discount to peers and intrinsic value 4. Samsung is manufacturing 13 products with global #1 market share that have very defensible market positions 5. Several catalysts are in motion to unlock the trapped value, including IPOing non-core businesses, corporate restructuring and massive share buybacks ($60B net cash) 6. Management has an astounding track record of successfully creating shareholder value Thesis 1. Success of Samsung hinges on the success of the Galaxy S franchise 2. There is no growth left in the smartphone industry (the market is fully saturated) 3. Lenovo will drive Samsungs mobile operating margins to 3% (while Apple will continue to operate in a vacuum) 4. Samsung is a copy-cat and is only successful because they infringe on others patents 5. Samsung is not shareholder friendly and will never return capital to shareholders This presentation seeks to rectify the myths that cloud the investors mindset on Samsung Electronics Dispelling the Myths Apples Portfolio:
DRAM 5% NAND 4% Logic Chipset 5% Mobile Display 5% Large Panel Display 6% Tablets 4% Low-end Smartphones 14% Premium Smartphones 28% Feature phones 3% Networking Equipment 2% Laptop/PC 4% TV/Screen 13% Home Appliances 6% Samsung has a diverse product offering that can withstand the failure of any single product. Even if iPhone wipes out Galaxy S, Apple will still need to buy Samsungs DRAM and NAND memory chips (in larger quantities). Myth 1 Debunked: Sales by Product (2013) 1. Non-core Assets (net) are worth $US 60.4 Billion 2. Samsung Semiconductor is worth $US 125 Billion 3. Samsung Display is worth $US 29.7 Billion 4. Samsung Home Appliance is worth $ US 11.2 Billion 5. Samsung IT & Mobile is worth $ US 208 Billion
Total Equity Value $ US 433B
Upside to current price: 134% Cheap Price: Samsung SOTP Value Cash and Cash Equivalents: $17.0 billion ST Financial Instruments: $38.6 billion ST Available-for-sale FA: $1.9 billion LT Available-for-sale FA: a $7.3 billion Investment in Associates: b $6.1 billion ST Borrowings: -$6.8 billion Debentures: -$1.2 billion LT Borrowings: -$2.5 billion
Non-Operating Assets (Net) $US 60.4 billion
As of Q1 2014 1. Non-core Assets (net) $60.4B (In millions of US Dollar) Mar-14 Dec-13 Equity securities - Listed $ 3,680 ** $ 3,959 Equity securities - Non-Listed 3,088 704 Debt Securities 558 951 Total $ 7,326 $ 5,615 ** Listed Equity Securities: All values in millions of US Dollars Number of Shares Owned Percentage of Ownership Acquisition Cost Book Value March 2014 Samsung Heavy Industries 40,675,641 17.6% $ 195 $ 1,166 Samsung Fine Chemicals 2,164,970 8.4% 41 87 Hotel Shilla 2,004,717 5.1% 13 120 Cheil Worldwide 2,998,725 2.6% 2.6 74 iMarket Korea 647,320 1.8% 0.3 15 SFA 1,822,000 10.2% 34 67 Wonik IPS 7,220,216 9.0% 57 56 ASML 12,595,575 2.8% 653 1,123 CSR - 0.0% - 99 Rambus 4,788,125 4.3% 83 43 Seagate Technology 12,539,490 3.8% 197 669 Wacom 8,398,400 5.0% 56 56 Sharp 35,804,000 3.0% 110 108 Other - 42 49 Total $ 1,484 $ 3,680 1. a. LT Assets Available for Sale Samsung SDS to be spun-off in Q4-2014
All values in millions of US Dollars Investee Acquisition Cost Book Value March 2014 Net Asset Value Samsung Card $ 1,384.69 $ 2,092 $ 2,077 Samsung Electro-Mechanics 323.82 841 840 Samsung SDI 309.02 1,067 1,316 Samsung SDS 136.54 803 783 Samsung Techwin 144.26 363 395 Samsung Corning Advanced Glass 193.41 186 186 Other 766 766 Total $ 6,117 $ 6,362 1. b. Investment in Associates Samsung Semiconductors is worth 9.5x 2015 operating profit This equates to a value of $US 125 Billion Consistent with Micron (@7.8x 2015 OP) and SanDisk (@ 10x 2015 OP) Samsung Semiconductors is worth the enterprise value of the entire company by itself!!!! All values are in $US Billion Samsung Semiconductor 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E Total Revenue 21.4 32.0 33.3 30.7 33.5 41.6 44.9 DRAM 7.5 14.8 12.1 10.6 12.3 16.3 17.5 NAND 5.2 6.7 8.1 7.4 9.1 11.1 12.4 System LSI 3.5 5.9 9.9 11.7 11.4 13.5 14.2 Operating Profit 1.7 8.6 5.8 3.7 6.4 11.4 13.0 Operating Margin 8% 27% 17% 12% 19% 27% 29% 2. Samsung Semiconductor Source: Bloomberg, Company filings, AllianceBernstein #1 global market share in overall memory #1 global market share in Mobile DRAM (49%) #1 global market share in PC DRAM (33%) #1 global market share in NAND (32%) 2. a. Samsung Memory Source: DRAMeXchange Samsung trades at half the valuation of sector Samsung Semiconductor will earn $11.4 billion operating profit in 2014, on par with Intel and Qualcomm Samsung Semiconductor by itself deserves $125 billion valuation, on par with Intel and Qualcomms enterprise values All values are in millions of US Dollars Semiconductor Market Cap P/B 5-Year 2014 2015 2016 Q1 2014 ROE Intel $148,500 $136,577 $53,100 14.8 14.2 12.2 2.6 20.7% Qualcomm $134,170 $102,117 $27,470 14.6 13.5 10.1 3.5 16.4% Micron Tech. $33,360 $26,992 $16,300 9.6 8.8 8.5 3.3 12.7% SK Hynix $32,085 $34,168 $13,238 7.7 6.4 6.8 2.8 10.8% SanDisk $22,280 $19,560 $6,660 15.3 14.7 13.0 3.4 13.4% Sector Average 12.4 11.5 10.1 3.1 15% Samsung Electronics $185,531 $125,110 $232,715 5.2 4.9 4.7 1.4 20.1% P/E ex. net cash Gross Revenue Enterprise Value 2. Samsung Semiconductor Peers Source: Bloomberg, Company filings Consolidation in the DRAM space to 3 competitors has caused DRAM prices to soar and margins to expand Since 2013, Micron is up 410%, SK Hynix +83% and Samsung -10% DRAM Recovery leaves SMSN behind Does a company that is consistently taking share in the semiconductor industry deserve a 50%+ discount to its peers? Source: Gartner Semiconductor Industry by Revenue Samsung Display is worth at least 9x 2014 op. profit, given that their main competitor LG Display trades at 13.7x 2014 operating profit Samsung Display is worth $29.7 billion All values are in $US Billion Samsung Display 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E Total Revenue 20.7 25.4 26.3 29.0 27.8 29.5 31.1 Large Panel 9.8 21.6 20.4 19.5 14.7 13.6 14.3 Small & Medium Panel - 2.3 2.4 2.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 AMOLED (aka OLED) - 1.5 3.4 7.2 12.6 15.3 16.3 Operating Profit 1.4 1.7 (0.3) 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.6 Operating Margin 7% 7% -1% 10% 10% 11% 12% 3. Samsung Display Source: Bloomberg, Company filings, AllianceBernstein Samsung is the dominant player in display with 99% market share in AMOLED Samsung has already announced Super AMOLED, securing a two-stage technology lead on peers Despite the technological edge, Samsung trades at a steep discount to its most comparable peer LG Display
3. Samsung Display #1 Position Samsung Display trades at a 50% discount to its inferior South Korean competitor LG Display Samsung Display deserves a premium to LG Display (7% assumed) This is the basis of the $29.7 Billion valuation All values are in millions of US Dollars Display Market Cap P/B 5-Year 2014 2015 2016 Q1 2014 ROE LG Display $9,591 $12,712 $27,370 16.1 10.2 9.1 1.0 8.6% Samsung Electronics $185,531 $125,110 $232,715 5.2 4.9 4.7 1.4 20.1% P/E ex. net cash Gross Revenue Enterprise Value 3. Samsung Display Peers Source: Bloomberg, Company filings Samsung Home Appliance is worth 7x 2013 operating profit Whirlpool trades at 7.8x 2014 operating profit This is the basis of the $11.2 Billion valuation All values are in $US Billion Samsung Home Appliance 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E Total Revenue 41.0 48.7 42.3 45.0 45.0 52.7 53.4 Visual Display (TV, Monitors) 26.3 28.9 31.3 30.8 29.0 34.0 33.9 Appliance 7.7 10.0 11.0 11.8 13.7 16.1 17.0 Other 7.0 9.8 - 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.6 Operating Profit 2.5 0.4 1.1 2.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 Operating Margin 6% 1% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4. Samsung Home Appliance Source: Bloomberg, Company filings, AllianceBernstein Samsung has been the fastest growing company in the Home Appliance arena Samsung is strategically well positioned to take advantage of the smart-home revolution and the convergence between technology and home appliances
4. Samsung Home Appliance Samsung has been making refrigerators since the 1960s Consistently ranked the highest performance product by Consumer Reports Continues to innovate in the space (Partnership with SodaStream brings carbonated water to the fridge)
4. Samsung Home Appliance Samsung is expecting 5.1% CAGR out to 2017
4. Samsung Home Appliance 4. Samsung Home Appliance TV Samsung has had the best selling TVs for the last 8 years Samsung has the #1 brand awareness globally for TVs
$11.2 Billion valuation for Samsung Home Appliance is a discount to Whirlpools valuation Samsung ought to have a premium valuation due to the disruptive/innovative products and the outsized growth
All values are in millions of US Dollars Home Appliance Market Cap P/B 5-Year 2014 2015 2016 Q1 2014 ROE Whirlpool $10,680 $12,280 $19,410 10.9 9.5 10.1 2.3 13.9% General Electric $270,050 $434,451 $149,580 16.0 15.8 14.9 2.0 10.4% Sector Average 13.4 12.7 12.5 2.2 12% Samsung Electronics $185,531 $125,110 $232,715 5.2 4.9 4.7 1.4 20.1% P/E ex. net cash Gross Revenue Enterprise Value 4. Samsung Home Appliance Peers Non-core Assets = $60.4 billion
Samsung Semiconductor = $117 billion
Samsung Display = $ 29.7 Billion
Samsung Home Appliance = $11.2 Billion Net Asset Value = $ 218.3 Billion Market Cap = $ 185 Billion Implied value Samsung Mobile = -$ 33.3 Billion Samsung valuation so far Is the worlds largest manufacturer of cell phones really worth -$33 Billion? Are the risks so high that a business generating $25 Billion operating profit is worth less than nothing!? Contrarian View: The fear of a mobile implosion has created a wide margin of safety for the contrarian investor, not to mention a potentially lucrative investment opportunity! 5. Samsung IT & Mobile Consensus view: Samsung Mobile generates all of their profit from Galaxy S franchise Lenovo will drive Samsungs operating margins to 3% Apple will be unaffected by this inevitable industry paradigm shift Growth in smartphones has stagnated and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future 5. Samsung IT & Mobile Samsung IT & Mobile is comprised of: Premium smartphones Low-end smartphones Feature phones Tablets Premium PCs and laptops Networking equipment All values are in $US Billion Samsung IT & Mobile 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E Total Revenue 30.1 35.0 60.7 93.1 125.2 143.2 149.7 Mobile/Tablet 27.8 32.4 48.1 81.8 112.7 127.5 132.3 PC/Laptop - - 10.7 7.7 8.1 10.1 11.4 Networking Equipment 2.3 2.6 1.9 3.7 4.3 5.6 6.0 Operating Profit 3.3 3.7 7.3 17.1 22.5 25.8 26.0 Operating Margin 11% 10% 12% 18% 18% 18% 17% 5. IT & Mobile What is in the group? Source: Bloomberg, Company filings, AllianceBernstein Bifurcated strategy: Focused on the (1) high- end and (2) low-end Success in the low-end will continue to drive manufacturing costs lower and bargaining power with suppliers higher Success in the high end will be predicated on high quality products and a strong brand image 5. Samsung Smartphone Strategy Two dominant premium smartphone franchises: (1) Galaxy Note (2) Galaxy S With the Galaxy Note, Samsung pioneered the Phablet space 5. Samsung Premium Smartphones Launched in Q2-2014 Sold 10 million units 10% faster than Samsung Galaxy S4 This successful launch should help dampen the consensus view that the smartphone business is about to implode 5. Samsung Galaxy S5 Selling Well Samsung offers a broad array of low-end phones that each focus on one different main performance feature First phone released with Tizen OS Samsung Z
Samsung Z Samsung Galaxy Young Samsung Galaxy Grand Samsung Galaxy Active Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Samsung Galaxy Star 5. Samsung Low-end Smartphones Growth in smartphone units Ericsson 16.5% unit growth CAGR over 5 years Pricing would have to fall by 16.5% annually for the next 5 years for sales and earnings to remain flat Myth 2 Debunked: Smartphone Growth Samsung is the dominant supplier of smartphones, with 31.2% market share as of Q1-2014 5. Global Smartphone Market Share When one includes premium smartphones, low-end smart phones and feature phones, Samsung still stands out as the dominant supplier for mobile devices to the world: 5. Global Cell Phone Market Share Samsung has a solid line up of premium tablets Samsung recently announced the launch of new tablets with 2K resolution (best on market)
5. Samsung Tablets According to IDC Samsung took 5% market share directly from Apple in 2013 Samsung now has 22.3% market share in tablets Samsung is the only tablet to gain an real traction against Apple 5. Samsung Tablets Taking Share from Apple Apples enterprise value trades at 8.9x 2014 operating profit Samsungs IT & Mobile business is worth at least 8x 2014 (10% discount to Apple) Therefore, Samsung IT & Mobile is worth $208B All values are in millions of US Dollars IT & Mobile Market Cap Net Cash P/B 5-Year (debt) 2014 2015 2016 Q1 2014 ROE Apple $550,930 $133,627 $417,303 $181,382 10.6 10.2 10.0 4.6 27.6% Google $371,340 $53,472 $317,868 $52,280 17.3 14.5 12.3 4.3 18.5% Lenovo $13,271 -$1,500 $14,771 $33,873 16.9 15.2 10.8 4.7 20.3% Microsoft $339,710 $81,100 $258,610 $88,380 11.3 10.5 9.9 4.0 36.3% IT & Mobile Average 14.0 12.6 10.7 4.4 26% Samsung Electronics $185,531 $60,721 $124,810 $232,715 5.2 4.8 4.7 1.4 20.1% P/E ex. net cash Gross Revenue Enterprise Value 5. IT & Mobile Whats it worth? If the consensus is correct and Lenovo is successful in driving down Samsungs operating margins to 3%, then Samsung will still generate $4.3 billion in operating profit for 2014 Using a 15x multiple this business is worth $64 billion in a worst case scenario (Lenovo trades at 18x operating profit) In this scenario Samsung Electronics intrinsic value is $283 Billion Upside to Samsung Electronics in this scenario is still 52%
The worst case is more than priced into the stock. Samsung provides a margin of safety for the prudent investor even in a (highly unlikely) worst case scenario. Myth 3 Debunked: Lenovo drives margins to 3% Samsungs brand ranked #8 th in the world according to Interbands Top 100 Global Brands Samsung has a premium product and scale like just like its peers on this list Samsungs brand power will help protect against Lenovos aggressive pricing This will mitigate the downside scenario that IT & Mobile is only worth $64B Except: Brand Matters to Customers! Samsung pioneered one of the great rebranding efforts of the modern era #1 brand awareness for Smartphones around the world #1 brand awareness for TVs around the world Lenovo is competing against a lower cost operator that is more widely recognized in the global market place they have a tall order ahead of them to try and knock down Samsung Samsung is a premium brand Samsung advertises more aggressively than Coca-Cola (the most prolific advertiser) Samsung advertises 4 times more than Apple Despite this focus on the customer, the consensus believes that Apple is far more immune to competitive pressure on its margins Even if Lenovo or Apple forces Samsung to compete as a low-end player, they will not need to advertise as aggressively (mitigating the impact on operating margins) Samsung takes good care of their brand Samsung is able to advertise more aggressively than Apple because of their commitment to human capital Samsung employs over 325,000 people, more than 4 times what Apple employs To commemorate the chairman's 25 th anniversary, the employees were paid a $2 billion bonus
Source: Investor Presentation 2013 Samsung takes good care of their people Since their venture into the cell phones business in 1992, Samsung has amassed a mobile patent portfolio that consists of 16,000 patents Samsung couldnt possible be a copy-cat if they have amassed nearly 50,000 patents since 1989 (second only to IBM) Despite Apples patent victories in the US, no major victories have been awarded off home-turf The most recent patent ruling found that Apple also infringed on Samsungs patents Myth 4 Debunked: Samsungs Patent Portfolio is Strong Samsung was founded by Lee Byung-Chul (top), is currently chaired by Lee Kun Hee (left), and will be succeeded by Lee Jae-Yong (right) Samsung is a family owned business with the current chairman controlling 49.7% of voting control The Lee family has an impeccable record for allocating capital to growing sectors of technology Each generation has left their unique mark on the company Three Stars of Samsung Source: Bloomberg, Company Filings Proven Track Record Source: Investor Presentation 2013 Excellent Capital Allocation Return on Capx While most struggled to keep their heads above water in 2009, Samsung set the goal to reach $400 billion sales by 2020 So far so good: Management expects more of the same Born: 1910 Died: 1987 (at age 77) Founded Samsung in 1969 Started as a rice-trading operation Transitioned into manufacturing TV sets, electric fans and refrigerators Extended the business in the 1950s to include banking, insurance, real estate and tungsten exporting Invested in microprocessor manufacturing in 1974 by purchasing Korean Semiconductor Company out of bankruptcy
Lee Byung-Chuls philosophy for establishing new businesses: Pounce on them when the market is at rock bottom. Founder: Lee Byung-Chul The companys philosophy promotes the idea that the individual will grow to be a Samsung man by:
1. Acquiring the capability and the courage for empowerment 2. Growing an internationally oriented mind 3. Making use of team spirit and solidarity 4. Reminding the employee of the sovereignty of his existence as the leader, making history for his time 5. Thinking in terms of effectiveness, not to be inhibited by past practices and attitudes 6. Cultivating the pioneering attitude Ahead of their time: Samsungs 1980 Sahoon Age: 72 Chairman since: 1987 Son of Lee Byung-Chul Most notable accomplishment is the 64MB DRAM memory chip, transforming the formerly bankrupt company into the worldwide memory leader Chairman Lee wanted to build a brand, not just a product Today, Samsung has 13 products with #1 global market share all under the Samsung brand Diagnosed with lung cancer in 2000 Suffered a severe stroke in 2014
Current Chairman: Lee Kun-Hee The fabric of the circular holding structure is unraveling 2013: Govt bans cross holding structures, provides tax break for unwinding of circular holding structures 2014: Chairman Lee tragically suffers a severe stroke 2014: Samsung announced IPO of Samsung SDS, Samsung Everland
Catalyst: Corporate Restructuring President Park Geun Hyes government introduced in 2013 legislation banning family-run chaebol businesses from creating new cross shareholdings, which were blamed by the Intarnational Monetary fund for contributing to the nations 1997-1999 financial crisis
The government is also offering tax breaks to encourage the chaebol to unwind existing structures to form more transparent holding companies
Could Jay Lee use this tax break as an opportunity to transfer his fathers assets in exchange for a conversion of Samsung Electronics into a holding company structure? Catalyst: Govt Bans Cross Shareholdings Age: 42 Son of Lee Kun-Hee Graduated from Seoul National University Graduated from Keio University (Japan) PhD from Hardvard University Fluent in Korean, Japanese and English Brokered the licensing deal with Android that enabled Samsungs Mobile division to grow from $35 billion to $135 billion in 5 years Main point of contact for key suppliers and partners (Google, Apple, Sony, HP)
Catalyst: New Chairman Jay Y Lee Announced May 8, 2014 Expected to IPO in Q4 2014 Established in 1985 as a data system and technology consulting company Provides IT and Networking consulting, customized application integration, IT infrastructure outsourcing
Catalyst: Samsung SDS IPO Announced on May 15, 2014 Expected to happen Q1-2015 Everland is a holding company with influential ownership in Samsung Life (the largest shareholder of Samsung Electronics) This IPO marks the unraveling of Samsungs circular holding structure Proceeds are expected to cover estate taxes for Jay Lee and family Catalyst: Samsung Everland IPO Lee Kun Hee began succession planning for Jay Lee Preserving capital became the priority in 2008 as the Lee family planned for succession.
Lee Kun Hee suffers severe stroke Myth 5 Debunked: History of Share Buybacks Chairman Lee Kun-Hee currently has 49.7% voting control of Samsung Electronics Presumed tax bill is $US 6 billion IPO of SDS and Everland are expected to yield $3 billion for the family Jay Lee will need to repurchase up to $US 20 billion worth of shares within Samsung Electronics to retain his fathers current voting control
Catalyst: Inevitable Share Buyback Source: Investor Presentation 2013 Management recognizes valuation disparity Source: Investor Presentation 2013 Samsung is firing on all cylinders Samsung Semiconductor is worth enterprise value Market is ascribing no value to IT & Mobile, Display and Home Appliances #8 Global Brand Value in the world #1 Brand awareness in Smartphones and TVs 13 Products with #1 market share Improving corporate governance Realigned interests with Lee family Massive share buybacks on the horizon Limited downside given $60.4 billion Non-core Assets
Conclusion
14 Rev: $232B 14 Rev: $11.9B
14 FCF: $24B 14 FCF: $3.1B
EV: $129B EV: $159B Samsungs enterprise value is $30 billion cheaper than Facebook yet 8x more profitable!! Valuation Extremes
Whats in your portfolio? By: Michael Wood www.evansic.com