This lab report summarizes the characterization of a CCD sensor in an astronomy camera. Key measurements included:
1) Read noise was determined to be independent of exposure time, with an average value of 2.4 DN.
2) Dark current increased linearly with exposure time and temperature, with slopes of 0.302 DN/sec for frame none and 0.0305 DN/sec for frame only.
3) Gain was calculated to be 1 electron/count from the linear relationship between mean DN and variance.
4) Charge transfer efficiency was determined to be 99.99% from analysis of cosmic ray hits across multiple pixels.
This lab report summarizes the characterization of a CCD sensor in an astronomy camera. Key measurements included:
1) Read noise was determined to be independent of exposure time, with an average value of 2.4 DN.
2) Dark current increased linearly with exposure time and temperature, with slopes of 0.302 DN/sec for frame none and 0.0305 DN/sec for frame only.
3) Gain was calculated to be 1 electron/count from the linear relationship between mean DN and variance.
4) Charge transfer efficiency was determined to be 99.99% from analysis of cosmic ray hits across multiple pixels.
This lab report summarizes the characterization of a CCD sensor in an astronomy camera. Key measurements included:
1) Read noise was determined to be independent of exposure time, with an average value of 2.4 DN.
2) Dark current increased linearly with exposure time and temperature, with slopes of 0.302 DN/sec for frame none and 0.0305 DN/sec for frame only.
3) Gain was calculated to be 1 electron/count from the linear relationship between mean DN and variance.
4) Charge transfer efficiency was determined to be 99.99% from analysis of cosmic ray hits across multiple pixels.
Group B2 BTech Physical Sciences Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology April 16, 2014 0.1 Introduction In this ES431 Astronomy Lab we carried out the following: A. Understanding the working of a CCD. B. Characterization of the IIST KAF0401E CCD in the SBIG ST-7XE Camera 1. Read Noise 2. Dark Current 3. Linearity 4. Gain 5. Charge Transfer Eciency C. Analyzing data using IRAF This involved doing cosmic ray correction of all the ccd characteristic images. Then subracting bias frame from all the frames. Next step was analysis of all the images corresponding to characteristic in IRAF. The charge collected within each pixel is measured as a voltage which is converted into an output Digital Number (DN). We would be using this value for our analysis. 0.2 Data Analysis using IRAF 0.2.1 Read noise Read Noise determined through bias subracted frames of read noise images for dierent exposure times as shown in following table Exposure time: 0.5 sec Sr. no. mean std dev rms mean rms std dev 1 1.547 7.484 2 2.273 6.903 2.4026 6.96 3 3.124 6.457 Exposure time: 1 sec Sr. no. mean std dev rms mean rms std dev 1 2.876 7.311 2 1.147 6.933 2.1849 6.831 3 2.176 6.204 Exposure time: 3 sec Sr. no. mean std dev rms mean rms std dev 1 3.7 7.484 2 2.258 6.903 3.319 6.543 3 3.778 6.786 Observation: Here we notice that there is as such no relation between exposure time and DN values since the values are constant for each case. Thus the read noise is independent of exposure time. 1 0.2.2 Dark Current Exposure Time dependence We have found average DN value of both frame none and frame only cases for dierent exposure times. We tted a line in each case using matlab and found out the slopes of the line, given in gure 1 and 2 respectively Frame None Exposure Time (sec) mean 10 2.869 50 17.59 100 29.9 500 150.7 Figure 1: Dark Current Frame None Slope for Dark Current Frame none = 0.302 dn/sec Frame Only Exposure Time (sec) mean 5 2.776 10 3.434 20 3.513 50 2.483 100 1.742 200 6.426 500 17.95 Slope for dark current frame only = 0.0305 dn/sec Observation: It is quite clear that slope of line for frame none is very much greater than slope for frame none. 2 Figure 2: Dark Current Frame Only 0.2.3 Dark Current Temperature Dependence We found out mean DN values for dierent temperature for 2 dierent exposure times (O second and 100 sec. Figure 3 shows graph DN values v/s temperature for 100 second exposure time). 0 second Exposure Time Temperature ( o C) mean -10 1.763 -5 4.289 5 0.7008 10 0.8036 15 3.277 100 second Exposure Temperature ( o C) mean -10 3.411 -5 7.456 5 11.61 10 17.76 15 21.43 Observation: From the graph we can infer that the DN values increases as the Operating Temper- ature increases. 3 Figure 3: Dark Current DN values v/s Operating Temperature (100 Sec exposure Time) 0.2.4 Gain and Linearity To calculate the gain we will plot the graph between mean and variance of DN values at dierent exposure time. Slope of the graph will be equal to 1 g where g is the gain. Exposure Time (Sec) Mean Variance 1 4425 4008 3 13195 12651 5 21771 20945 7 29557 26906 9 31160 27096 11 27293 27032 13 31566 31235 15 35635 35235 17 38070 37720 20 4402 3984 23 13122 12433 26 21623 20827 29 29462 25904 Figure 4: Variance v/s Exposure Time for dierent exposure time and Linearly tted curve 4 Calculations: Slope of the graph=0.95906 1 g =0.95906 g=1.04268 But gain cannot be fraction. Gain for the CCD = 1 electrons/count. Here in gure 5 we have plotted graph of Mean value v/s exposure time. Figure 5: Mean Value v/s Exposure time Observation: we do not exactly get linear curve here. However the graph seems increasing upto DN value of around 37000. 0.2.5 Charge Transfer Eciency Expression: To calculate Charge Transfer Eciency () we use the following expression. (DN) p (DN p+1 ) =
p(1) Where DN is the pixel value of the cosmic ray hit pixel and p is the pixel number. This can rewritten as: = p(DN p ) p(DN p )+(DN) p+1 Thus value of Charge Transfer Eciency can be calculated. Sr. No. (DN) p (DN) p+1 p Charge Transfer Eciency 1 53524.3 250 633 0.999 2 12652.5 60 127 0.999 3 13597.5 65.3 509 0.999 4 12459.5 61.5 551 0.999 Observation: The value of Charge Transfer Eceincy () is 99.99 5