America's leaders at all levels of government have violated their sacred oaths of

office in failing to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, “the
supreme Law of the Land” (U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph II). This has
been done under the pretext of peace and safety. The framers of our Constitution
established a separation of powers to further protect the people from possible
government abuse of power. George Washington warned his nation in 1796 against the
usurpation of power by one department of government over another. Washington said
in his farewell address the following. “It is important, likewise, that the habits
of thinking, in a free country, should inspire caution in those intrusted with its
administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional
spheres, avoiding, in the exercise of the power of one department, to encroach
upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all
the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a
real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it,
which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of
this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks, in the exercise of political
power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and
constituting each the guardian of public weal against invasions by the others, has
been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and
under our own eyes.” (A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of
Independence, L. Carroll Judson, 1839, p. 319). George Washington also warned the
people of the United States against “the insidious wiles of foreign influence”. He
said, “As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are
particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many
opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the
arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public
councils? Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful
nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.” Washington believed
that America should have “as little political connection as possible” with foreign
nations. Washington said, “The unity of government which constitutes you one
people, is also now dear to you. It is justly so; for it is a main pillar in the
edifice of your real independence;... But as it is easy to foresee, that from
different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many
artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this
is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal
and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly
and insidiously) directed” (A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of
Independence, L. Carroll Judson, 1839, pp. 315, 321, 322).

From the highest to the lowest levels of government, America's leaders have sold
out their communities and their nation to the interests of foreign governments,
world bankers and other foreign entities. Noah Webster defines treason as “the
offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the
offender owes allegiance, or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign
power.... In the United States, treason is confined to the actual levying of war
against the United States, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and
comfort.” (American Dictionary of The English Language, 1828). Are the actions of
our leaders not treasonous? Leaders who are willing to turn over U.S. sovereignty
to foreign powers? Leaders who are willing to allow private U.S. citizens to be
tried and convicted in the wicked tribunal of the “World Court”? Leaders who are
passing unconstitutional “hate crime” legislation destroying our freedoms? Leaders
who have “hijacked the role of our Grand Jury and the courtroom jury and,
henceforth, embarked on a mission of misinformation, distortions, and blatant lies
to convince the American people, and the entire legal community, that it is the
government that determines what is right and what is wrong” ? ("Runaway" Grand
Juries vs. The Runaway State, Mark S. McGrew). Most of America's elected, hired
and appointed officials have sold out their country for personal gain. As Patrick
Henry said, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price
of chains and slavery?” Will patriotic Americans sit idly while our elected and
appointed officials destroy our Constitution? Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
wrote, “Day by day, case by case, the Supreme Court is busy designing a
Constitution for a country I do not recognize.” Will we allow Congress to continue
to pass unconstitutional laws, such as “hate crime” laws, and revert back to the
dark ages when it was a criminal offense, punishable by excommunication or death,
to even utter a word that was not in conformity with the ruling
political/religious hierarchy? Patrick Henry said, “I know of no way of judging
the future but by the past.” (A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of
Independence, 1839, p. 308). When Nero, Marcus Aurelius, Diocletion, the Saxons,
the Danes, the Normans, Kings Henry the IV, V, and VIII, and Queen (Bloody) Mary,
who were among the many Roman emperors, English monarchs and others that destroyed
scriptures made from the time of the apostles, the charge against Christians and
their scriptures was odio humani generis, Latin for ‘hate crimes’ (lit. hatred of
the human race). There is an agenda behind “hate crime” laws. Hate-crime
legislation is an attempt at thought control. It is another tool in the arsenal of
the ruling elite to divide and conquer the nations and peoples of the world. It is
one more nail in the coffin to bury our freedoms – freedom of thought, of
conscience, of religion and of speech. Thanks to unconstitutional “hate crime”
laws in our once free and enlightened nation, simple civil offenses are now
considered felony crimes. A time of “gross darkness” is enveloping the earth (Jer.
13:16; Joel 2:2; Zeph. 1:15). Poet George Santayana said, “Those who cannot
remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” (The Life of Reason, George
Santayana, 1917, p. 284). The nineteenth century Constitutional scholar and
Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story said, “This constitution of government, must
perish, if there be not that vital spirit in the people which alone can nourish,
sustain, and direct all its movements. It is in vain that statesmen shall form
plans of government in which the beauty and harmony of a republic shall be
embodied in visible order, shall be built upon solid substructions, and adorned by
every useful ornament, if the inhabitants suffer the silent power of time to
dilapidated its walls or crumble its massy supporters into dust, if the assaults
from without are never resisted and the rottenness and mining from within are
never guarded against. Who can preserve the rights and liberties of a people when
they shall be abandoned by themselves? Who shall keep watch in the temple when the
watchmen sleep at their post? Who shall call upon the people to redeem their
possessions and revive the republic, when their own hands have deliberately and
corruptly surrendered them to the oppressor and have built the prisons or dug the
graves of their own friends ? This dark picture, it is to be hoped, will never be
applicable to the republic of America. And yet it affords a warning, which, like
all the lessons of past experience, we are not permitted to disregard.”(Christian
Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States, 1864, p. 269)
In his famous speech at Richmond, Virginia, March 23, 1775, American patriot
Patrick Henry said, “This is no time for ceremony. The question before the house
is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing
less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of
the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we
can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfil the great responsibility which we hold to
God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear
of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my
country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere
above all earthly kings.”(American Patriotism: Speeches, Letters, and Other
Papers, 1880, p. 108) In 1851 The Family Christian Almanac stated: “If truth be
not diffused, error will be; if God and His Word are not known and received, the
devil and his works will gain the ascendancy.” (The Family Christian Almanac for
the United States, 1851, p. 34). Daniel Webster stated that “If we and our
posterity shall be true to the Christian religion, —if we and they shall live
always in the fear of God and shall respect his commandments,... —we may have the
highest hopes of the future fortunes of our country;... But if we and our
posterity neglect religious instruction and authority, violate the rules of
eternal justice, trifle with the injunctions of morality, and recklessly destroy
the political constitution which holds us together, no man can tell how sudden a
catastrophe may overwhelm us that shall bury all our glory in profound
obscurity.”(Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United
States, 1864, p. 270). Alexis De Tocqueville, the French political philosopher who
recognized America's source of liberty and greatness wrote, “...not until I went
to the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflamed with righteousness did I
understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is
good; and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”
Historian Charles A. Goodrich said in 1830, “Thus it is evident that wickedness
and infidelity are certainly, though sometimes slowly, punished by Him who is
just, although merciful: and if he has hitherto graciously refrained from visiting
the sins of this nation with the punishment which they deserve, let us not be vain
of that exemption: let us not attribute it to any merit of our own; but rather let
it afford an additional motive to our gratitude and praise; let us unfeignedly
thank him for his tender mercies daily vouchsafed to us;” (Book Of Martyrs, 1830,
pages 66-67). Our U.S. house of representatives summed it up well in a resolve
passed in 1854: “The great and vital element in our system is the belief of our
people in the pure doctrines and divine truths of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”
Daniel Webster said in a speech on June 3, 1834, “God grants liberty only to those
who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.” (Speeches and Forensic
Arguments, Daniel Webster, Vol. II, p. 363).