Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
Received 6 March 2000; accepted 10 May 2000
Abstract
The centrifugal liquid membrane method, which provides an ultra-thin two phase liquid membrane system in a rotat-
ing glass cell, was successfully applied for the kinetic study of the liquidliquid extraction of nickel(II) and zinc(II) with
2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol (5-Br-PADAP) in toluene. The initial extraction rate of the metal(II) com-
plexes depended upon the concentrations of the metal(II) ion and ligand. The rate determining step was revealed as 1:1 chelate
formation of Ni(II) or Zn(II) with 5-Br-PADAP adsorbed at the liquidliquid interface. The interfacial complexation rate
constants of Ni(II)5-Br-PADAP and Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP were determined as (4.10.1)10 and (2.40.6)10
3
M
1
s
1
at pH 6.500.02, respectively. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Liquidliquid extraction; Interfacial complexation; Extraction kinetics; 5-Br-PADAP; Centrifugal liquid membrane method
1. Introduction
Complexation at the liquidliquid interface is an es-
sential subject for understanding the mechanisms in
liquidliquid extraction of metal ions [1]. The study
of interfacial complexation in such extraction systems
provides signicant insight into the mechanism of the
related separation and detection methods, including
liquid membrane separation, ion selective electrodes,
optical sensors, and countercurrent chromatography.
To elucidate the fundamental features of the role of
the liquidliquid interface in the kinetics of chelate
extraction, Watarai et al. [2] have studied the inter-
facial mechanism in the extraction kinetics of Ni(II)
with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol
(5-Br-PADAP) by high-speed stirring spectrophotom-
, is dened in a dilute
solution of HL as
K
=
[HL]
i
[HL]
o
(2)
where [HL]
o
and [HL]
i
are the concentrations of HL
in the organic phase and at the interface, respectively.
From Eq. (1) the value of HL concentration at the in-
terface using S
i
=1.710
4
cm
2
[27] was obtained as
6.6810
13
mol cm
2
at the initial bulk phase con-
centration of 2.010
5
M HL. Therefore, the K
value
for 5-Br-PADAP was calculated as 3.3410
5
cm.
The addition of Zn(II) solution under high-speed
stirring caused a gradual increase of the complex
concentration and decrease of the ligand concen-
tration in the organic phase. A sudden lowering or
increasing of the stirring speed resulted in reversible
desorptionadsorption of the complex from the inter-
face, as shown in Fig. 1. These results indicated that
the zinc complex was adsorbed at the interface.
The initial extraction rate of the complex was
dened as
r
0
=
d
dt
[ZnL
2
]
o
(3)
and was obtained from r
0
obs
. The value of r
0
T
increased
linearly with the initial Zn concentration, as shown in
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The Zn(II) concentration dependence of the total initial
extraction rate of Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP measured by the high-speed
stirring method; [HL]=2.010
5
M, pH 6.50.05.
Y. Yulizar et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 419 (2000) 107114 111
3.3. Extraction prole in centrifugal liquid
membrane measurement
The kinetic extraction proles observed for the
centrifugal liquid membrane measurement are shown
in Figs. 5a and 6a for the Ni(II) and Zn(II) systems,
respectively. The extraction of these complexes was
indicated by a gradual increase of absorbances at the
absorption maximum wavelength,
max
=524 nm for
Ni(II) and 527 nm for Zn(II), accompanied by the de-
crease of 5-Br-PADAP adsorbance at
max
=462 nm.
The initial absorbance increase of the Zn(II) complex
(Fig. 6a) was faster than that of the Ni(II) com-
plex (Fig. 5a). Figs. 5b and 6b show typical spectral
changes during Ni(II) and Zn(II) extraction in the
toluene/water system. Ni(II) complexation reached
equilibrium after ca. 3300 s from the start of the ex-
Fig. 5. Extraction prole of Ni(II)5-Br-PADAP measured by
the centrifugal liquid membrane method. (a) Absorbance changes
at xed wavelengths; (b) spectral change; [HL]=2.6410
4
M,
[Ni(II)]=1.010
2
M, pH 6.49.
Fig. 6. Extraction prole of Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP measured by
the centrifugal liquid membrane method. (a) Absorbance changes
at xed wavelengths; (b) spectral change; [HL]=1.3210
4
M,
[Zn(II)]=1.010
3
M, pH 6.49.
traction, while extraction equilibrium of the Zn(II)
complex was reached at ca. 240 s.
4. Discussion
4.1. Extraction scheme proposed for the
metal(II)5-Br-PADAP system
Metal(II) complexation at the liquidliquid interface
and the extraction mechanism of a metal(II) ion with
the extractant, HL, is schematically shown in Fig. 7.
The HL distributes between the bulk toluene phase and
the interface with the adsorption constant dened by
Eq. (2). In the high-speed stirring condition, the metal
ion in the aqueous phase at rst produced the inter-
mediate complex ML
+
i
at the interface. ML
+
i
further
112 Y. Yulizar et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 419 (2000) 107114
Fig. 7. Scheme for metal(II) complexation at the liquidliquid interface and the extraction mechanism of a metal(II) ion with the extractant,
HL [2].
reacted with the HL
i
to form the uncharged complex
ML
2
adsorbed at the interface and extracted in toluene.
The total initial complexation rate, r
0
T
, was repre-
sented as
r
0
T
=
d
dt
[ZnL
2
]
o
+[ZnL
2
]
i
S
i
/V
o
] (4)
r
0
T
= r
0
1 +
[ZnL
2
]
i
S
i
[ZnL
2
]
o
V
o
(5)
The initial extraction rate has to be analyzed by
taking into account the distribution of the ligand, the
interfacial adsorption of the ligand and complexation
both in the aqueous phase and at the interface. We as-
sumed that the initial reaction proceeded by the fol-
lowing equations:
HL
o
HL
i
HL (6)
Zn
2+
+HL
i
k
i
ZnL
+
i
+H
+
(7)
Zn
2+
+HL
k
ZnL
+
+H
+
(8)
The rate lawfor the production of Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP
was predicted as
r
0
T
=
k[HL] +k
i
[HL]
i
S
i
V
o
[Zn
2+
] (9)
where k and k
i
are the formation rate constants in the
aqueous phase and at the interface. Considering the
distribution constant of HL in toluene, K
D
=10
4.78
[2] and the low concentration of HL in toluene,
k[HL]k
i
[HL]
i
S
i
/V
o
under the high-speed stirring
condition. Therefore, Eq. (9) can be written as
r
0
T
=
k
i
[Zn
2+
][HL]
i
S
i
V
o
(10)
From the slope in Fig. 4 and S
i
=1.710
4
cm
2
, the
value of the formation rate constant of the Zn(II) com-
plex at the interface (k
i
) for the high-speed stirring
method was calculated as (9.50.5)10
2
M
1
s
1
in
the toluene/water system.
4.2. Metal(II) concentration dependence of the
extraction rate
The absorbance increase of the metal(II) complex at
524 nm for NiL
2
or 527 nm for ZnL
2
observed by the
centrifugal liquid membrane method gave the initial
extraction rate, r
0
obs
, dened as
r
0
obs
=
d
dt
[[ML
2
]
o
+[ML
2
]
i
S
i
/V
o
] 2l (11)
where l is the thickness of the organic phase.
Fig. 8 conrms the rate law for metal(II) complexa-
tion since the concentration of HL in the toluene phase
is constant
r
0
obs
= k
obs
[M
2+
] (12)
where k
obs
(s
1
) is the observed rate constant. In the
Zn(II) system, when the initial concentration of Zn(II)
is >8.010
4
M at pH 6.5, Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP com-
plexation was very fast so as to occur before the mea-
surement, so that the observed initial rate was obtained
from the extrapolated absorbance change before the
start of measurement.
Because this method has a small specic inter-
facial area, we assumed that the initial complexa-
tion occurred both in the aqueous phase and at the
interface, as predicted by Eq. (9).
Eq. (12) was correlated to Eq. (13)
r
0
obs
=
k
K
D
+
k
i
K
S
i
V
o
[M
2+
][HL]
o
2l (13)
Y. Yulizar et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 419 (2000) 107114 113
Fig. 8. Metal(II) concentration dependence of the initial extrac-
tion rate measured by the centrifugal liquid membrane method;
[HL]=2.6410
4
M, pH 6.50.02.
By using the values of the interfacial adsorption
constant, K
=3.3410
5
cm, for 5-Br-PADAP in
the toluene/water system obtained by the high-speed
stirring method, the complexation rate constants,
k=5.310
2
M
1
s
1
for Ni(II) [2] and k=4.510
4
M
1
s
1
for Zn(II) [28] in the aqueous phase de-
termined by stopped-ow spectrophotometry, the
distribution constant, log K
D
=4.78, V
0
=0.150 cm
3
and the interfacial area, S
i
=18.8 cm
2
, the values
of the complexation rate constants at the interface,
k
i
, in the toluene/water system were calculated as
(4.20.1)10 M
1
s
1
for Ni(II)5-Br-PADAP and
(2.80.1)10
3
M
1
s
1
for Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP.
4.3. 5-Br-PADAP concentration dependence of
extraction rate
When the concentration of metal(II) ion in the aque-
ous phase is in large excess over the ligand, the initial
rate law for metal(II) complexation was described as
r
0
obs
= k
obs
[HL]
T
(14)
as shown in Fig. 9.
By using Eq. (13) and the slope of the linear plot
in Fig. 9, the values of the complexation rate con-
stant at the interface of the Ni(II) and Zn(II) com-
plexes in the toluene/water system were calculated as
(4.00.1)10 and (2.00.0)10
3
M
1
s
1
, respec-
tively. From both of these concentration dependencies
Fig. 9. 5-Br-PADAP concentration dependence of the observed ini-
tial extraction rate of the metal(II) complex; [Ni(II)]=1.010
2
M,
[Zn(II)]=1.010
3
M, pH 6.50.02.
it was calculated that the percentage of the interfacial
complexation rate compared to the total reaction rate
was 95.2% for the Ni(II) complex and 93.0% for
Zn(II) complex in the toluene/water system.
5. Conclusions
The centrifugal liquid membrane method was
applied to kinetic studies of the extraction of
Ni(II)5-Br-PADAP and Zn(II)5-Br-PADAP in
toluene/water. The metal(II) extraction rates, which
depended on the concentration of 5-Br-PADAP in the
organic phase and the concentration of Ni(II) or Zn(II)
ion in the aqueous phase were measured directly by
spectrophotometry. The values of the interfacial com-
plexation rate constants obtained from the metal ion
and 5-Br-PADAP concentration dependence showed
good agreement, as shown in Table 1. Meanwhile,
the average values of the interfacial complexation
rate constant obtained by the centrifugal liquid mem-
brane method were a little larger than those obtained
by the high-speed stirring method. This may be due
to the difference in the experimental concentrations
between the two extraction systems; the centrifugal
liquid membrane extraction was conducted under
higher concentrations of HL and metal ion.
From all of the results, we proved the advantages
of the centrifugal liquid membrane method over
the high-speed stirring method as: (i) the reactions
114 Y. Yulizar et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 419 (2000) 107114
Table 1
The values of the complexation rate constant of Ni(II) and Zn(II) with 5-Br-PADAP at the toluene/water interface (pH=6.50)
Metal(II) High-speed stirring method Centrifugal liquid membrane method
Metal(II) conc.
dependence
5-Br-PADAP conc.
dependence
Averaged value
of k
i
(M
1
s
1
)
Ni(II) k
i
=1.810 M
1
s
1
[2] k
i
=(4.20.1)10 M
1
s
1
;
[Ni
2+
]=3.010
3
1.010
2
M;
[HL]=2.6410
4
M
k
i
=(4.00.1)10 M
1
s
1
;
[Ni
2+
]=1.010
2
M;
[HL]=3.9610
5
1.9810
4
M
(4.10.1)10
Zn(II) k
i
=(9.50.5)10
2
M
1
s
1
;
[Zn
2+
]=5.010
5
5.010
4
M;
[HL]=2.010
5
M
k
i
=(2.80.1)10
3
M
1
s
1
;
[Zn
2+
]=2.010
5
1.010
3
M;
[HL]=2.6410
4
M
k
i
=(2.00.0)10
3
M
1
s
1
;
[Zn
2+
]=1.010
3
M
[HL]=2.010
5
1.010
4
M
(2.40.6)10
3
in the bulk phase and at the interface can be ob-
served simultaneously; (ii) a fast extraction rate, up to
210
6
Ms
1
, is readily measurable and (iii) small
amount of sample solution is required.
Acknowledgements
This study was nancially supported by a
grant-in-aid for Scientic Research (B) from the Min-
istry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan
(No. 10440222) and for JSPS Fellows (2308).
References
[1] H. Watarai, K. Satoh, Langmuir 10 (1994) 3913.
[2] H. Watarai, M. Gotoh, N. Gotoh, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 70
(1997) 957.
[3] J. Van Hunsel, G. Bleys, P. Joos, J. Colloids Interface Sci.
114 (1986) 432.
[4] J. Van Hunsel, P. Joos, Colloids Surf. 24 (1987) 139.
[5] J. Van Hunsel, D. Vollhardt, P. Joos, Langmuir 5 (1989) 528.
[6] P. Joos, M.V. Uffelen, J. Colloids Interface Sci. 171 (1995)
297.
[7] T. Shioya, S. Nishizawa, N. Teramae, Langmuir 14 (1998)
4552.
[8] H. Nagatani, H. Watarai, Anal. Chem. 70 (1998) 2860.
[9] S.I. Gusev, L.M. Shchurova, Zh. Anal. Khim. 21 (1966)
1042.
[10] J. Miura, Analyst 114 (1989) 1323.
[11] S.I. Gusev, V.A. Vinkova, Zh. Anal. Khim. 22 (1967) 552.
[12] F.S. Wei, P.H. Qu, N.K. Shen, Y. Fang, Talanta 28 (1981)
189.
[13] G.Z. Fang, C.Y. Miao, Analyst 110 (1985) 65.
[14] M. Vitouchova, L. Jancar, L. Sommer, Fresenius J. Anal.
Chem. 343 (1992) 274.
[15] S.I. Gusev, G.G. Shalamova, Zh. Anal. Khim. 23 (1968) 686.
[16] D.A. Johnson, T.M. Florence, Talanta 22 (1975) 253.
[17] A. Ohashi, S. Tsukahara, H. Watarai, Anal. Chim. Acta 364
(1998) 53.
[18] H. Watarai, L. Cunningham, H. Freiser, Anal. Chem. 54
(1982) 2390.
[19] H. Watarai, M. Takahashi, K. Shibata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
59 (1986) 3469.
[20] H. Watarai, K. Sasaki, K. Takahashi, J. Murakami, Talanta
42 (1995) 1691.
[21] Y. Chida, H. Watarai, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 69 (1996) 341.
[22] H. Watarai, K. Takahashi, J. Murakami, Solvent Extraction
Res. Dev., Jpn. 3 (1996) 109.
[23] Y. Onoe, S. Tsukahara, H. Watarai, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 71
(1998) 603.
[24] J.A. Riddick, W.B Bunger, T.K Sakano, Organic Solvent, 4th
Edition, Wiley, New York, 1986, pp. 74, 137.
[25] T. Ozeki, H. Kihara, S. Ikeda, Anal. Chem. 60 (1988) 2055.
[26] B. Wang, G. Tang, K. Huang, Analyst 118 (1993) 205.
[27] A. Ohashi, S. Tsukahara, H. Watarai, unpublished data.
[28] M. Gotoh, H. Watarai, unpublished data.