USCA-DCC 13-5059-OP Motion For Judicial Notice and Renewal of Original Proceeding

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
13-5059-0P
In re: Harold Van Allen
Motion for judicial notice
USDC-DCD 14-cv-995-RJL "Strunk and Van Allen v US
Department of State, et al" as a related case- see "Exhibit A"-
- and Motion to renew and reargue this original proceeding
(RE: ineligible non-citizen and unconstitutional POTUS/CINC
(chief executive) controlling a void 2010 census. This
Mandamus seeks a special three judge district court and a trial
regarding the unconstitutionality and validity of 2010 national
Census and resulting 2012 congressional re-apportionment
and 2012 congressional elections including New York State
and all other individual state congressional federal
redistricting for now pending and future federal elections of
representative(s) with oversite of Department of Veterans
Affairs- including health care delivery as well as related
compensation and pension (New York Regional Office) and
the Department of Defense (Board for Correction of Naval
Records- disability retirei'W!IIol:ll,.,. ....
Certification of service July 16, 2014 via email and USPS Priority Mail on R. Craig
Lawrence AUSA 555 4th Street, NW; Washington DC 20530
USCA Case #13-5059 Document #1503973 Filed: 07/17/2014 Page 1 of 238
General Docket
United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit
Court of Appeals Docket#: 13-5059
In re: Harold Van Allen
Docketed: 02/19/2013
Termed: 04116/2013
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid
I Case Type Information:
1
1) Orig. Proceeding US
2) Mandamus
3)
Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:12-cv-01538-ESH
Trial Judge: Ellen Segal Huvelle, U.S. Senior District Judge
Prior Cases:
None
Current Cases:
None
I Panel Assignment: Not available
In re: Harold W. Van Allen
In re - Petitioner
Harold W. Van Allen
Direct: 845-389-4366
Email: hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
[NTC ProSe]
Firm: 845-389-4366
351 North Road
Hurley, NY 12443
R. Craig Lawrence
Email: craig.lawrence@usdoj .gov
[NTC Gvt Atty USAO/AUSA]
U.S. Attorney's Office
(USA) Civil Division
Firm: 202-252-2500
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530
I In re: Harold W. Van Allen,
In re - Petitioner
02/19/2013
r
02/19/2013
r
Opg,O KB
02/21/2013
r

0 pg, 0 KB
02/22/2013
r g
8 pg, 624.63 KB
o212212013 r
o212212013 r
03/04/2o 13 r
03/04/2013
r g
1 pg, 48.95 KB
03/07/2013
r
Ei
54 pg, 2.82 MB
03/27/2013
r

4 pg, 185.09 KB
04/16/2013
r
1 pg, 40.32 KB
US CIVIL ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [13-5059]
PETITION filed [1421173] by Petitioner Harold W. Van Allen for
writ of mandamus. [Service Date: 02/19/2013 by CMIECF NDA]
Pages: 16-20. [13-5059]
SUPPLEMENT [1422128] to petition for writ of mandamus
[1421173-2] filed by Harold W. Van Allen [Service Date:
02/25/2013 ] [13-5059]
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1421974] directing party to file payment
of docketing fee PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due
03/25/2013; directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in
forma pauperis. PETITIONER motion to proceed IFP in this court
due 03/25/2013, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the
case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order
to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st
class mail. [13-5059]
FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1421980] of order [1421974-2],
[1421974-3] to petitioner [13-5059]
CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1421981] with return receipt requested
[ReceiptNo.7007 0710 0004 7191 0749] of order [1421974-2],
[1421974-3]. Certified Mail Receipt due 03/25/2013 from Harold
W. Van Allen. [13-5059]
NOTICE FILED [1423373] by Harold W. Van Allen for payment of
docketing fee on 2/25/2013. [Case Number 13-5059: Fee Paid]
[Service Date: 03/04/2013 ] [13-5059]
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1423668] RECEIVED from Harold
Van Allen [signed for on 03/01/2013] for order [1421981-2] sent to
Petitioner Harold W. Van Allen [13-5059]
03/11/2013 ] [13-5059]
03/25/2013 ] [13-5059]
PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1431075] denying petition for writ of
mandamus [1421173-2]; No mandate shall issue. Before Judges:
Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [13-5059]
05/13/2013
r
MOTION filed [1436113] by Harold W. Van Allen to extend time
Opg, 0 KB to file petition (Response to Motion served by mail due on
05/31/2013) [Service Date: 05/15/2013 by CMIECF NDA] Pages:
1-10. [13-5059]
06/1112013
r

CLERK'S ORDER filed [1440731] granting motion to extend time
1 pg, 37.43 KB time to file petition for rehearing en bane [1436113-2]; The petition
is now due August 1, 2013. [13-5059]
06/11/2013
r
FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1440768] of order [1440731-2] to
petitioner [13-5059]
06/11/2013
r
CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1440769] with return receipt requested
[Receipt No.7007 0710 0004 7191 1418] of order [1440731-2].
Certified Mail Receipt due 07/11/2013 from Harold W. Van Allen.
[13-5059]
06/27/2013
r
a CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1444144] RECEIVED from Harold
==
1 pg, 53.46 KB Van Allen [signed for on 06/25/2013] for order [1440769-2] sent to
Petitioner Harold W. Van Allen [13-5059]
08/01/2013
r -
=
5 pg, 214.63 KB to file petition (Response to Motion served by mail due on
08/15/2013) [Service Date: 07/31/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10.
[13-5059]
08/06/2013
r g
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1450143] Upon consideration of
1 pg, 37.94 KB petitioner's motion for extension of time to file petition for
rehearing en bane, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted. The
petition is now due September 3, 2013. [1449752-2] [13-5059]
09/03/2013
r
=
=:I
43 pg, 2.16 MB to file petition [Service Date: 09/04/2013] Pages: 1-10. [13-5059]
09/04/2013
r g
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1454734] granting motion to extend time
1 pg, 37.95 KB [1454710-2]. Any petition is now due November 4, 2013. No further
extensions of time will be granted by the Clerk. [13-5059]
09/25/2013
r
NOTICE FILED [1458502] by Harold W. Van Allen. [Service
29 pg, 4.71 MB Date: 09/27/2013] [13-5059]
10115/2013
r

NOTICE FILED [1461891] by Harold W. Van Allen, styled as
3 pg, 109.54 KB "Consolidated Motion for Judicial Notice of an Order in Other
Court ... ". [Service Date: 10/18/2013] [13-5059]
10/21/2013
r g
MODIFIED EVENT--NOTICE FILED [1462519] by Harold W.
11 pg, 843.57 KB Van Allen, styled as "Consolidated Motion for Judicial Notice of
Motion for Summary Judgment in other court". [Service Date:
10/23/2013] [13-5059]--[Edited 10/23/2013 by A Y]
10/24/2013 r ii PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1462959] granting motion ifp in this
2pg,49.02KB Court [1452669-2] in 13-5160, [Case Number 13-5160: IFP];
denying motion to consolidate [1445715-2] in 13-5160. 13-5160
(Pending Consolidation termed 10/24/2013) with 13-5059; directing
that appellant show cause why the district court's dismissal and
reconsideration orders, Van Allen v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs,
925 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2013), recons. denied, 2013 WL
1335742 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2013), should not be summarily affirmed.
Response to Order due 11/25/2013. Response may not exceed 20
pages. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack
of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant
by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail.
Before Judges: Henderson, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [13-5160, 13-
5059]
11/25/2013 r s RESPONSE FILED [1468170] by Harold W. Van Allen to order
II pg,4I4KB [1462959-4] [Service Date: 11/27/2013 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk]
Pages: 1-10. [13-5059]
Olnurt nf J\ppttls
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 13-5160
RECEIVED
Mail Room
A 172014
Umted Court of Appeals
District of Columbia Ctrcuit
Harold W. Van Allen,
Appellant
v.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
and United States Department of the Navy,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
(BCNR),
Appellees
No. 13-5059
In re: Harold W. Van Allen,
Petitioner
September Term, 2013
1: 12-cv-01538-ESH
Filed On: October 24, 2013
BEFORE: Henderson, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon consideration of the amended motion to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis (IFP), and the motion to consolidate Nos. 13-5160 and 13-5059, it is
ORDERED that the motion to proceed on appeaiiFP in No. 13-5160 be granted.
It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to consolidate be denied. By order filed
April 16, 2013, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus in No. 13-5059. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that appellant show cause,
within 30 days of the date of this order, why the district court's dismissal and
reconsideration orders, Van Allen v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, 925 F. Supp. 2d 119
(D.D.C. 2013), recons. denied, 2013 WL 1335742 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2013), should not be
Qinurt nf J\ppa:ls
No. 13-5160 September Term, 2013
summarily affirmed. The response to the order to show cause may not exceed 20
pages. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the appeal for lack of
prosecution. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to appellant both by certified
mail, return receipt requested, and by first class mail.
Per Curiam
2
,.A
CLOSED,JURY,PROSE-NP,TYPE-D
U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
STRUNK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE Date Filed: 06/10/2014
et al
Assigned to: Judge Richard J. Leon
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
v.
Defendant
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
STATE
Defendant
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY
Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Defendant
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
Date Terminated: 06/16/2014
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: U.S. Governtnent Defendant
represented by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue
PMB 281
Brooklyn, NY 1123 8
(845) 901-6767
PROSE
represented by HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
351 North Road
Hurley, NY 12443
845-3 89-4366
PROSE
Defendant
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF
ELECTIONS
Defendant
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
US General
/ Date Filed I # j Docket Text
I
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II,
I 06/10/2014
I
i
1 COMPLAINT against CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ERIC .H HOLDER, JR,
t j U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Filing fee
I ' $ 400, receipt number 4616064154) with Jury Demand filed by CHRISTOPHER EARL
I STRUNK, HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit,# 2 Civil Cover
!
1
Sheet)Uf) (Entered: 0611112014)

l 06/10/2014 SUMMONS (7) Issued as to CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ERIC H.
l HOLDER, JR, NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BARACK HUSSEIN
I ! OBAMA, II, u.s. COPYRIGHT OFFICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
j STATE and U.S. Attomey.Uf) (Entered: 06/11/2014)
! 06110/2014 2 MOTION for Prelitninary Injunction by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
j (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)Uf, ) (Entered: 06/11/2014)
1
1
06/10/2014 1 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK. Case related to
Case No. 08-2234. (jf,) (Entered: 06/11/2014)
I
j 06/16/2014 1 MEMORANDUM ORDER: It is ordered that the plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of
Mandamus and 2. Motion for Preliminary Injunction Hearing are DENIED; and it is
further ordered that the plaintiffs' complaint is DISM.ISSED: Signed by Judge Richard J.
Leon on 06113114. (tb,) Modified on 6/16/2014 (tb, ). (Entered: 06116/2014)
I o6/16/2014
i
I
I
i
i
l
!
i
I
I
I
I

RETURN OF SERVICE/ AFFIDAVIT of Suminons and Complaint Executed.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY served on 6/16/2014; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR
served on 6116/2014; NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS served on
6/13/2014; BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ll served on 6/17/2014; U.S. COPYRIGHT
OFFICE served on 6/13/2014; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on I
6/13/2014, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed
on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney II
Genera16/16/14., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT ofSutnmons and Complaint
Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney
1
1
on 6/17/2014. (Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/16/2014.)
(Attachments:# 1 Obama, # 2 NY State Holder,# 1 Copyright,# !i I
CIA,# 1 US Attorney)(td,) (Entered: 06/17/2014)
1
1 06/30/2014
I
l
.Q MOTION to Reargue The Order To Dismiss and Supplement The Complaint re 1 Order,
by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (Attachments: # l Exhibit Part I of 3, # 2. Exhibit
Part 2 of3, # 1 Exhibit Part 3 of3)(jf,) (Entered: 06/30/2014)
----------- -- ---------
II
PACER Service Center
I
!L
I
Transaction Receipt
I
II
06/30/2014 23:50:22
I
!!PACER Login: llpsll36 Jlclient Code: II
I
llnescription: !!Docket Report llsearch Criteria: 111:14-cv-00995-RJL I
!!Billable Pages: 112 llcost: 110.20 _j
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
-----------------------------------------------------------x Case No.: 14-cv -0099 5 (RJL)
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-901-6767 chris@strunk. ws,
and H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
351 North Road Hurley NY 12443
845-389-4366 hvanallen@hvc.1T.com
Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF MOTION
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
101 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20530
--------------------------------------------------------------X
TO REARGUE THE
ORDER TO DISMISS
AND SUPPLEMENT THE
COMPLAINT
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the rumexed affidavit of Christopher-Earl: Strunk affirmed
June 25. 2014 with exhibits and proposed First Supplement to the Con1plaint annexed, will move
as of right in compliance with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules to Reargue the
Order to Dismiss entered June 16, 2014 in order to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014
with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(l)(A), and Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B), heard before the Honorable
Richard J. Leon USDJ at the designated Courtroom in the Courthouse at 333 Constitution

I'VIail l{oum
Avenue NW Washington DC 20001, on a day of June 2014, at a time designated by the Court or
Dated: Brookli(: New York
June , 2014
SERVICE LIST:
Chr s opher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor
for the Express Deed In Trust To The United
States OfAmerica, located at
593 Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281
Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238
Cell: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS)
with JOHN F. KERRY (SOS)
2201 C Street NW
DC 20520
with JOl-IN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington DC 20500 :
101 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000
THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
Albany, NY 12207-2729
ERIC HOLDER, US AITORNEY
GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington DC 20530
The US Attorney for
Washington District of Columbia
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Washington DC 20530
Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General for
The State of New York
120 Broadway 25th Floor
New York, New York 10271
H. William Van Allen
351 Nmih Road
Hurley, New York 12443
NrrCHAELSHRIMPTON
8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Strunk et al. v US DOS et al USDC DC 14-cv-00995 (RJL)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day June, 2014, I caused a true and correct copy
of the Plaintiff STRUNK's NOTICE OF MOTION TO REARGUE THE ORDER
TO DISMISS AND SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT with Supporting Affidavit
affirmed 25
1
h June 2014 with exhibit and proposed First Supplement to the Complaint
with exhibits and copy of the Complaint filed 10 June 2014 annexed to be served upon
Defendants and or their Counsel by first class United States Postal Service mail postage
prepaid marked for delivery to:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS)
with JOHN F. KERRY (SOS)
ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY
GENERAL
220 I C Street NW
AGENCY
with JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington DC 20500 :
101 fudependence A venue SE
Albany, NY 12207-2729
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington DC 20530
The US Attorney for
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Washington DC 20530
Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General for
The State of New York
120 Broadway 25th Floor
New York, New York 10271
351 North Road
Hurley, New York 12443
NOCHAELSHJUMWTON
8 Jusons Glebe,
I declare, certify, verify, and state under that the foregoi
:/
Dated: June '2, 5': 2014 '
Brooklyn New York
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris agent
593 Vanderbilt A venue - 281
Brooklyn, New York 11238
Phone- 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws
----------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.: 14-cv -00995 (RJL)
845-901-6767 chris@strunk.ws,
845-389-4366 hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
Plaintiffs,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TIY:l-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
950 Pennsy1vania Ave NW Washington DC 20530
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO
REARGUE THE ORDER TO DISMISS AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT
STATEOFNEWYORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS )
Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
Affidavit in support of Motion to Reargue Page 1 of 10
RECEIVED
Mail Room
~ 3 2 1
Angela D. Caesar, Clerk of Court
TT <: n.c:lrirf rnurl l)i.;:trirt nr r'nlnmhiA
Case Document 6 Filed 06/30/14 Page 5 of 15
1. Movant is Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, public officer Executor for the
Express Deed in Trust to the United States of America under 12 USC 95 with 50 USC App.
5(b) and related Law explained in Complaint Exhibit 13, affinns this affidavit in support if
his Notice of Motion in cotnpliance with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules to
Reargue the Order to Dismiss by the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ and entered June 16,
2014 (see Exhibit A), and as of right to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014 with
Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(l)(A), and Rule 19(a)(I)(A)(B) (see the proposed First
Suppletnent with Exhibit 14 tlnu 20 to the Complaint with Exhibits 1 tlnu 13 filed on June
10,2014.
2. That Affirmant wishes to comply with the Order to Dismiss entered on June 16, 2014 with
the demand that the Complaint having been filed requires a more "sin1ple, concise, and
direct" definite statement in keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d)(l) and to include all
essential parties-in-interest with Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON with
Christopl1er Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary agent for debtor trust
transtnitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK Plaintiff (STRUNK), and Harold
William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), hereinafter known as the Petitioners, that bring this C01nplaint with
Petition for a Wiit of mandamus and preliminary injunction for hearing the facts of the
cOin plaint for equity relief under 28 USC 220 I and 2202, and it being alleged that there is a
matter oftnalicious infringement of fundamental rights of the posterity of private citizens of
the United States that inter alia tmder color of law is a matter of diversity by interference
with a contract and judicial process that with such wrongful acts of perjury, spoliation,
concealment, intimidation, forgery, use of false instruments, aiding and abetting the enemy
while under a state of war or national emergency, is misprision of felony, misprision of
treason and treason per se done individually and or jointly by the captioned Defendants; and
hereinafter upon information, belief and or with direct knowledge Petitioners allege of
Defendants and Supplemental Defendants with five (5) Exhibits 14 thru 18 as to: RANDOM
HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. and MICHAEL
GREAVES as to entities RANDOM HOUSE, INC. and THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK
CO., INC. (aka TIMES BOOKS INC"); ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC.; and
JANE D. DYSTEL, individually and severally that:
3. That Mr. SHRIMPTON had solely intended to testify as an expert witness as to facts
and direct experience related to the ineligibility of Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II to the Office of President of the United States (POTUS), and as sworn to
May 1, 2014 by the Affidavit shown in the Complaint as Exhibit 4, and as to
transactions of this case however was maliciously blocked from doing so and were the
Order to Dismiss to remain unchallenged Mr. SHRIMPTON and Plaintiffs would be
barred by the Doctrine of res adjudicata and collateral estoppel from further litigation.
4. There is a requirement under the Rules that all essential parties be joined by necessity
and therefore Affirmant complies with FDCvP Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B) and applies as follows:
Rule 19. Required Joinder of Parties
(a) PERSONS REQUIRED TO BE JOINED IF FEASIBLE.
(1) Required Party. A person who is subject to service of process and whose
joinder will not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction must be joined as
a party if: (A) in that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief
among existing parties; or (B) that person claims an interest relating to the
subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's
absence may: (i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person's ability to
protect the interest; or (ii) leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of
incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the
interest.
Affidavit in supp011 of Motion to Reargue Page 3 of 10
5. There is a requirement under the Rules that all essential parties be joined by Court
Order with FDCvP Rule 19(a)(2) and applies to Mr. SHRIMPTON under the present
circumstances as follows:
(2) Joinder by Court Order. If a person has not been joined as required, the court
must order that the person be made a party. A person who refuses to join as a
plaintiff may be made either a defendant or, in a proper case, an involuntary
plaintiff.
6. There is a requirement under the Rules that the Court determine whether or not all
essential parties be joined by necessity and therefore Affirmant complies with FDCvP
Rule 19(b) and applies as follows:
(b) WHEN JOIN"'DER IS NOT FEASIBLE. If a person who is required to be
joined if feasible cannot be joined, the court must determine whether, in equity
and good conscience, the action should proceed among the existing parties or
should be dismissed. The factors for the court to consider include:
(1) the extent to which a judgment rendered in the person's absence might
prejudice that person or the existing parties;
(2) the extent to which any prejudice could be lessened or avoided by:
(A) protective provisions in the judgment; (B) shaping the relief; or
(C) other measures; (3) whether a judgment rendered in the person's absence
would be adequate; and (4) whether the plaintiff would have an adequate
remedy if the action were dismissed for nonjoinder.
7. That according to 28 U.S. Code 1332- Mr. SHRIMPTON is a nonimmigrant has a
Diversity of citizenship as alleged in the Cmnplaint First through Fifth Cause of Action in
regards to his scheduled expert testimony effecting his publishing costs for "SPYHUNTER:
The Secret History of German Intelligence" in the United States and elsewhere that amount
in a controversy under section (a) "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all
civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive
of interest and costs, and is between- (2) citizens of a State (New York and Washington
District of Columbia) and citizens or subjects of a foreign state (United Kingdom); and (3)
citizens of different States (New York and Washington District of Columbia) and in which
Affidavit in support ofMotion to Reargue Page 4 of 10
citizens or subjects of a foreign state (United Kingdom) are additional parties;
B. That as for supplemental defendants relevant to the overall gravamen of this complaint is for
the Court to determine whether Plaintiff STRUNK as a public officer as I contend has raised
sufficient evidence that is readily available to the Court to declare that Plaintiffs have proven
that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not eligible to hold the office of
President of the United States (POTUS) under the Constitution for the United States Article 2
Section 1 Clause 5, and in that regard Plaintff Strunk wishes to add additional supplemental
Defendants to provide a preponderance of evidence for the Court to so Declare ineligibility.
9. That Defendant RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., a Delaware Corporation filed September 20,
1994 in New York with designated agent KATHERINE J. TRAGER C/0 RANDOM
HOUSE LLC 1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10019
10. That Defendant ~ N G U I N RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. a Delaware
Corporation filed September 20, 1994 in New York with designated agent JACQUELINE
CHASEY, ESQ. c/o BERTELSMANN, INC. 1745 Broadway New York, New York, 10019;
11. That Defendants RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., and PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE
FOUNDATION, INC are liable entities for the merger with RANDOM HOUSE INC.
12. That RANDOM HOUSE, INC. published the Book "Dreams From My Father" in 1995.
13. That THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK CO., INC. (aka "TIMES BOOKS INC.") had a role
in the publishing of the Book "Dreams From My Father" in 1995 ;
14. That Defendant MICHAEL GREAVES was the agent for RANDOM HOUSE INC. and
TIMES BOOKS INC. that on October 30, 1995 filed the copyright application with the US
Copyright Office for "Dreams From My Father'' in conjunction with JANE D. DYSTEL.
15. That Defendant JANE D. DYSTEL is the literary agent for the Book "Dreams From My
Father" published in 1995 for the author Barack Hussein Obama II, and done while
incorporated with ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, TNC. of 79 Fifth Avenue New
York, NY 1 0003; and that now is the entity Defendant JANE DYSTEL LITERARY
MANAGEMENT INC. located at Union Square West #904 New York, New York, 10003
16. That in 1995 in conjunction with the publishing of the Book ''Dreams From My Father"
Defendants DYSTEL and GREAVES used the biography given by the author BARACK
HUSSEIN OBAMA II, in the publication, copyright and sales of the Book for 17 years,
and therein stated that the author Barack Obama was Born in Kenya shown as the
Supplement Exhibit 14.
17. That starting in December 2013, STRUNI{ attempted to obtain a copy of the Copyright
filed with the US Copyright Office on October 30, 1995 to no avail has been withheld.
18. That in January 2014 STRUNK received a PDF by email purported to be the copy of the
actual copyright for "Dream From My Father" of 1995 shown as Supplement Exhibit 15.
19. That during January 2014 Defendant DYSTEL suggested that she falsely manufactured
the biography for the author Barack Hussein Obama II with the allegation that he had
been born in Kenya when in fact DYSTEL was certain he was born in the USA.
20. That the purported replica of the actual copyright for "Dreams From My Father" shown
as Exhibit 15 is a crude falsified instrument with so many errors and anomalies that
only further heightens the suspicion that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II was as Mr.
Shrimpton contends by the sworn affidavit shown as Exhibit 4 that in fact Defendant
OBAMA was born in KENYA not the USA.
21. That the above evidence gives credence for further suspicions raised since 2008 that is
alleged as the Complaint Seventh Cause of Action that Defendant OBAMA is not born
in Hawaii as is further supported by the analysis of document expert PAUL EDWARD
IREY who on December 4, 2012 swore to an affidavit that the purported Certificate of
Live Birth (CoLB) presented by Defendant OBAMA and his agents at a White House
Press Conference on April27, 2011, and is in fact proven to be a crude falsified
instrument that was thereafter used to obtain Ballot access at the 2012 General
Election shown as Supplement Exhibit 16.
22. That since December 4, 2012 Mr. IREY has done further analysis of the false
instrument shown as Exhibit 16, and is further proof of a crime involves the purported
CoLB by the false instrument of JOHANNA SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE.
23. That on June 23, 2014 Mr. IREY forwarded to me his expert analysis of the further
proof that the same forger did both false instruments of JOHANNA SOLANGE
SIERRA OK-HEE ANNEE and those used by Defendant OB.Al\1A shown as Supplement
Exhibit 17.
24. That STRUNK alleges as to the Sixth Cause of Action that a false instrument purported
to be the copyright of 1995 shown as Exhibit 15 had first been faxed to whomever forged
or tendered the instrument and that based upon the anomaly left by the faxed roll paper
"low" stripe on the left side of both pages that it had been there before the forger added
photoshoped appliques that is proven by the stark difference in the before and after
letter I line degradation, alleges Mr. OBAMA was born in the USA rather than Kenya.
25. That in addition to the proof of the false instrument shown as Exhibit 15 being faxed
and leaving a signature of that mechanical operation, Mr. IREY performed an analysis
shown as Supplement Exhibit 18 with the same methods used as shown with Exhibit 16
and Exhibit 17.
26. That STRUNK as the public officer Executor for the Express Deed in Trust to the United
States of America, as explained in Exhibit 13 has standing to challenge any incumbent and or
candidate who by preponderance of evidence is not eligible under the Constitution for the
United States Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 for office of POTUS, has an obligation to the
beneficiaries of the Deed in Trust to seek and obtain equity relief by this Court based upon
the evidence that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not eligible to be POTUS.
27. That STRUNK, unlike Mr. VAN ALLEN, is a private citizen of the United States entitled to
the full and complete protection of the Constitution for the United States of America and its
associated amendments unlike those who remain the surety-indenture to the U.S. Public
Citizen debtor entities by operation of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) with related Jaw by
the Usurper's annual renewed national etnergency or state of war Orders are void ab initio.
28. That STRUNK has been outrageously ha1n1ed by the sanction in the total amount of more
than $177,000 by Order of Judge Arthur M. Schack Justice of the New York Supreme Court
in the County ofKings in case Strunk v NYS Board o(Elections et al. Index No. 6500-2011
for having alleged that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is ineligible to occupy
the Office ofPresident of the United States Executive and Commander-in-chief would be
exonerated of such sanction were Supplemental Plaintiff's expert testimony, cross
examination and further discovery as to the truth of his allegations were presented at trial.
29. That STRUNK alleges and has proven the ineligibility ofBARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II,
is not born on soil of even of one US Citizen parent much less two (as defined in Exhibit 13)
and Mr. OBAMA is willfully culpable with those Defendants and agents who promoted
the 2008/ 2012 usurpation of POTUS commander-in-chief office in charge of the defacto
Federal and State's Court system by operation of law by void ab initio Executive Orders.
30. That for STRUNK to exonerate hin1self requires a trial by JURY, in light of the Courfs
reluctance to honor STRUNK's public duty to the posterity of the Deed in Trust.
31. That the records and index of Mr. OBAMA's foreign student funding while attending
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6 Filed 0 6 3 0 ~ 4 Page 12 of 15
Columbia University in New York is recorded at the NYS Higher Education Services
Corporation associated with Federal funds, have been withheld shown as Supplement
Exhibit 19, and is the subject of the request for subpoenas now before the Honorable
David I. Schmidt in Strunk v. Paterson et al. NYS SC Kings County Index No 29642-
2008, shown as Supplement Exhibit 20.
32. That STRUNK at trial requires the testimony of Mr. SHRIMPTON, Mr. IREY, and by
the Defendants as to facts and documents requested by subpoena issued by this Court.
33. Plaintiff STRUNK wishes by the above aforementioned supplemental reasons and
those of the Complaint, that this Court Mandate and Order the U.S. Department of
State to provide a non-immigrant visa to Mr. SHRIMPTON, that the US Copyright
Office release the actual certified copy of the 1995 copyright of"Dreams From My
Father", and or Defendants' agencies under their control release documents proving
ultra vires acts of Defendants and or their agents to spoliate conceal and destroy records
and interfere with the conduct of judicial proceedings and provision of justice; and that
this court take supplemental jurisdiction over the NYS BOE to immediately order the
turn-over of the documents referred to above regarding the outrageous use of the "born
a citizen" term rather than the Constitutionally mandated use of the ''natural-born
Citizen" term of art to be used exclusively as to the eligibility of a "natural-born Citizen"
private citizen of the United States for POTUS and who is no longer surety-indenture of
the debtor owned by the United States in service of the creditors to the United States'
debt under the provision of martial process with 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) and
related law, and that the expert testimony by MICHAEL SHRIMPTON and PAUL
EDWARD IREY be scheduled for hearing in regards to a preliminary injunction for a
declaratory judgment stating simply "that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not eligible
for the Office of POTUS according to the Constitution for the United States Article 2
Section 1 Clause 5'', and letting the chips fall where they may fall as matter of grave
national security for Congress to remedy exclusively, and that the Court for the other
causes of action provide for further and different relief including a jury trial.
WHEREFORE. Plaintiff STRUNK wishes the Court to grant this motion to reargue the
Order to dismiss and that essential parties to this instant action be added, along with the
additional transactions being germane herein for justice to be done, and that the changes to
the caption of the Supplement as to existing defendants be incorporated into the court
record for the issuance of additional summons to each defendants and for a preliminary
hearing be scheduled by the court along with subpoenas with further and different relief as
the court deems necessary.
I have read the foregoing along with the annexed First Supplement to the Complaint with
Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents;
the facts stated in the Petition are tiue to 1ny own personal knowledge, except as to the matters
therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be
true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon inf01mation and belief are as
follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. except as to those stated upon
information and belief, which I believe to be true.
Sworn to before 1ne
This of June 20 I 4
KAMAL P. SONI
Notary Public, State of New York
No. o 1 806089949
Qualified in Kmgs County
commiSSIOn ExPires March 31. 2015

Affidavit in support of Motion to Reargue Page 10 of I 0
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6 Filed 06/30/14 Paqe 14 of 15
Case 1:14-c\ J995-RJL Document 4 Filed 06/1 . ~ Page 1 of 2
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, et al,
Plaintiffs,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Case No. 14-995 (RJL)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF STATE, etal,
Defendants.
~
MEMORANDUM ORDER
(June ~ 2 1 4 ; Dkt. #1)
FILED
JUN 1 6 2014
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Courts for the District of Cclumbic,
Prose plaintiffs Christopher Earl Strunk and H. William Van Allen (together
"plaintiffs") filed the instant action on June 10, 2014. See Complaint with Petition for
Writ of Mandamus and PreJitninary Injunction Hearing [Dkt. #I]. Upon consideration of
the facts alleged in the plaintiffs' papers and the relevant law, the Court DENIES
plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary Injunction Hearing and
DISMISSES plaintiffs' Complaint.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are clear that although "[n]o technical form
is required," pleadings must be "silnple, concise, and direct." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(l).
The Court is mindful, of course, that complaints filed by prose litigants are held to less
stringent standards than those applied to fonnal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines
v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Despite this less stringent standard, however, I am
unable to glean from the plaintiffs' papers any legitimate grounds for granting the relief
Case 1:14-c'. J995-RJL Document 4 Filed 06/1 4 Page 2 of 2
they are seeking. Furthermore, the statements contained in the plaintiffs' pleadings fall
well short of the "simple, concise, and direct" requirements of Rule 8( d)(l ).
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary
Injunction Hearing is DENIED, and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.
2
Document Selection Menu
Select the document you wish to view.
Document Number: 2 15 pages
Attachment Description
1
2
.3_
Exhibit Part 1 of 3 100 pages
Exhibit Part 2 of 3 104 pages
Exhibit Part 3 of3 6 pages
0.7mb
6.81nb
13.1mb
389 kb
Note: You must view each docutnent individually because the combined PDF would be over the 20MB size
limit.
CLOSED,JURY,PROSE-NP,TYPE-D
U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
STRUNK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE Date Filed: 06/10/2014
et al
Assigned to: Judge Richard J. Leon
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
V.
Defendant
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
STATE
Defendant
AGENCY
Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Defendant
Date Terminated: 06/16/2014
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
represented by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
PMB 281
Brooklyn, NY 1123 8
(845) 901-6767
PROSE
represented by HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
351 North Road
Hurley, NY 12443
845-389-4366
PROSE
Defendant
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF
ELECTIONS
Defendant
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
US Attorney General
I#
-
1 Date Filed Docket Text
I
I 06/10/2014
1
COMPLAINT against CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR,
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II,
i U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee
I
;
1
$ 400, receipt number 4616064154) with Jury Demand filed by CHRISTOPHER EARL
l
I
STRUNK, HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN. (Attachments:# lExhibit, # 2 Civil Cover
I
Sheet)Uf) (Entered: 06/11/2014)
I
06/10/2014 SUMMONS (7) Issued as to CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ERIC H.
'
j
HOLDER, JR, NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BARACK HUSSEIN
I
OBAMA, II, U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
I
I
STATE and U.S. Attomey.Gf) (Entered: 06/11/2014) I
i 06/10/2014 2.
MOTION for Prelitninary Injunction by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
I
I
(Attachments:# 1 Text of Proposed Order)Uf,) (Entered: 06/11/2014)
l 06110/2014 3.
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK. Case related to
I
Case No. 08-2234. Uf,) (Entered: 06/1112014)
I
06/16/2014

MEMORANDUM ORDER: It is ordered that the plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of
!
Mandamus and 2. Motion for Preliminary Injunction Hearing are DENIED; and it is
further ordered that the plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Richard J.
Leon on 06/13/14. (tb,) Modified on 6/16/2014 (tb, ). (Entered: 06/16/2014)
06/16/2014

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT ofSununons and Complaint Executed.
I CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY served on 6/16/2014; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR
I
served on 6/16/2014; NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS served on
6/13/2014; BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II served on 6/17/2014; U.S. COPYRIGHT I
l
j
OFFICE served on 6/13/2014; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on
I
6/13/2014, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVITofSumn1ons and Complaint Executed
I on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney
Genera16116/14., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint
Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney
on 6/17/2014. (Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/16/2014.)
I
(Attachments: # 1 Obruna, # 2. NY State Board,# 1 Holder,# 4 DOS, # 5. Copyright,# Q.
I
I
I CIA,# 1 US Attomey)(td,) (Entered: 06/17/2014) I
I I
'
I I
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 100
-------------------------------------M-------------------------x Case No.: 14-cv-00995 (RJL)
845-901-6767
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON 8 Jusons Glebe,
Plaintiffs,
. v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) and
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339
and JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
\Vashington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500
1 01 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THE
COMPLAINT with PETITION
for WRIT OF MANDAMUS
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
FOR EQUITY RELIEF OF
28 USC 2201 and 2202
RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN RANDOM
HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC., MICHAEL GREA YES,
1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10019
JANE DYSTEL LITERARY MANAGEMENT INC. and
JANE D. DYSTEL 1 UNION SQUARE WEST
#904 NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10003
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
NOW COMES CHRISTOPHER EARL STRl.JNK, public officer Executor for the
Express Deed in Trust to the United States of America under Fed. R. Cjv. P. Rule 15(a)(l)(A),
SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPLAINT- Page I of 1 0
and Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B), with this First Supplement to the Complaint filed on June 10,2014 (see
annexed with Exhibits 1 thru 13), wishing to comply with the Order to Dismiss signed June 13,
2014 by the Honorable Richard J. Leon entered on June 16, 2014 with the demand that the
Complaint having been filed requires a more "simple, concise, and direcf' definite statement in
keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d)(l) include all essential parties-in-interest with
Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON with Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent for debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff (STRUNK), and Harold William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for
debtor trust H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), hereinafter known as the
Petitioners, that bring this Complaint with Petition for a writ of mandamus and preliminary
injunction for hearing the facts ofthe complaint for equity relief under 28 USC 2201 and 2202,
and it being alleged that there is a matter of malicious infringement of fundamental rights of the
posterity of private citizens of the United States that inter alia under color of law is a matter of
diversity by interference with a contract and judicial process that with such wrongful acts of
perjury, spoliation, concealment, intimidation, forgery, use of false instruments, aiding and
abetting the enemy while under a state of war or national emergency, is misprision of felony,
misprision of treason and treason per se done individually and or jointly by the captioned
Defendants; and hereinafter upon information, belief and or with direct knowledge Petitioners
allege of Defendants and Supplemental Defendants with five (5) Exhibits 14 thru 18 as to:
RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. and
MICHAEL GREA YES as to entities RANDOM HOUSE, INC. and THE NEW YORK TIMES
BOOK CO., INC. (aka TIMES BOOKS INC"); ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC.;
and JANE D. DYSTEL, individually and severally that:
SUPPLEMENT TO THE C0Iv1PLAINT- Page 2 of 1 0
1. That Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON, Esquire, is a British Subject and
a British Citizen, born on the 9th day of March 1957, with my place of business located
at 8 Jusons Glebe, Wendover, ofBuckinghamshire, United Kingdom HP22 6PF.
2. 'rhat Mr. SHRIMPTON is a barrister in independent practice, called to the Bar by
Gray's Inn at Michaelmas 1983. I am also an independent intelligence consultant and
author, formerly a member of the Adjunct Faculty of the American Military University
(AMU), which is accredited to the Department of Defense. I taught at AMU on the
Masters in Strategic Intelligence progra1n (since this affidavit is being used in an
American court, as a courtesy, I am using American English, or what I fondly imagine
to be American usage). My book Spyhunter: A Secret Hl:story of German Intelligence was
published in England by June Press (Totnes, in the County of Devonshire) on April 15th
2014. Spyhunter is a 711 page intelligence text (see the annexed blurb). I also write a
weekly intelligence column for www.VeteransToday.com and have had a peer-reviewed
article published in the Journal of lnte1'national Secu.rit.Y Affairs, published by the
reputable Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). I have participated in
JINSA expert panels on counterterrorism in Washington and at the Simon Wiesenthal
Center in o ~ Angeles. I was a speaker at both the Intelligence Conference at Crystal
City, VA in 2005 and the Intelligence Summit, at the same venue, the following year.
Shortly after the Summit concluded the United States Navy were gracious enough to fly
me out to the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65) at sea, in a
Northrop Grumman C-2A Greyhound, as part of their Distinguished Visitor Prog1am. I
am a member in good standing of the Royal United Services Institute and the United
States Naval Institute. I was invited to join British Mensa in 2012 and am SIGSec of
their Intelligence and National Security Special Interest Group. I attended the launch
SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPLAINT- Page 3 of 10
of the United Kingdom National Defence Association in 2007, am a founder member and
a member of their advisory council, which has gone through various guises since being
set up (it is a largely honorific post and the council does not meet as a body). A number
of former Chiefs of the UK Defence Staff are Patrons ofUKNDA, whose main aim is to
encourage support for our fighting services and press for an increase in their lamentably
low budget, even lower than the Pentagon's, I a1n sorry to say.
3. That in 1992 1\llr. SHRIMPTON was appointed a part-time Chairman of the
Immigration Appeal Tribunal (IAT) by the then Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain,
Lord Mackay of Clashfern. The IAT heard immigration appeals from all over the
United Kingdom, including Scotland, and the Islands. It was both an appellate and fh'st
instance tlibunal, with legally qualified chairmen sitting with lay members, usually
two. The lay members tended to have military, intelligence or colonial experience, but
they came from all walks of life and had varied backgrounds. First instance cases were
heard under s.3(5)(b) of the Immigration Act 1971 (Imp.) and consisted of appeals
against decisions to deport on the ground that it was conducive to the public good,
usually following a sentence of imprisonment for a serious crime, such as narcotics
trafficking.
4. That in 1995, lVIr. SHRIMPTON was appointed additionally to serve as an ltnmigration
Adjudicator and Special Adjudicator. Special Adjudicators, now known as Immigration
Judges, heard appeals against refusal of political asylum in the United Kingdom. The
IAT was abolished not long afte1 I retixed f1om it in 2005. It is right to say that I was
prevented from sitting after November 2003 and that when I resigned I was in dispute
with the Lord High Chancellor of Great Britam and Secretary of State for
Constitutional Affairs, Lord Falconer of Thoroton QC. This is not the place to go into
the rights and wrongs of that dispute, but it flowed from my intelligence work and
followed a bad faith complaint in June 2002 to my professional body, the Bar Council, by
a Citizen ofthe Islamic Republic of Iran, whom I was advised was connected to the1r
intelligence service, VEV AK. That complaint in turn followed my successful
representation of an officer of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) who had been
instrumental in expanding the CIA's network inside Iran afte1 the 1979 Iranian
Revolution. VEV AK, working with the Iraqi Mukhabarat, were involved in the
prosecution of this officer, indeed it transpired that VEVAK had an asset inside the
Crown Prosecution Service, E. I was partially responsible for the exposure ofE, who
was thought to have an Iraqi background but whose family in fact came from Iran. ~ y
former client had a distinguished CIA ca1eer and was formerly a Lockheed U-2 pilot,
indeed he was on the U-2 shakedown progtam.
5. That lVIr. SHRIMPTON intends to testify as an expert witness as to facts and direct
eA-perience related to the ineligibility of Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II to
the Office ofP1esident of the United States (POTUS), and as sworn to May 1, 2014 by
the Affidavit shown in the Complaint as Exhibit 4, and as to transactions of this case.
6. That according to 28 U.S. Code 1332- Mr. SHRfMPTON as a nonimmigrant has a
Diversity of citizenship as alleged in the Complaint First through Fifth Cause of Action in
regards to his scheduled expert testimony effecting his publishing costs for "SPYHlffilTER:
The Secret History of German Intelligence" in the United States and elsewhere that amount
in a controversy under section (a) "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all
civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive
of interest and costs, and is between- (2) citizens of a State (New York and Washington
District of Columbia) and citizens or subjects of a foreign state (United Kingdom); and (3)
citizens of different States (New York and Washington District of Columbia) and in which
citizens or subjects of a foreign state (United Kingdom) are additional parties;
7. That Defendant RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., a Delaware Corporation filed September 20,
1994 in New York with designated agent KA THERlNE J. TRAGER C/0 RANDOM
HOUSE LLC 1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10019
8. That Defendant PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. a Delaware
Corporation filed September 20, 1 994 in New York with designated agent JACQUELINE
CHASEY, ESQ. c/o BERTELSMANN, INC. 1745 Broadway New York, New York, 1 0019;
9. That Defendants RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., and PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE
FOUNDATION, INC are liable entities for the merger with RANDOM HOUSE tNC.
10. That RANDOivi HOUSE, INC. published the Book "Dreams From My Father" in I 995.
11. That THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK CO., INC. (aka "TIMES BOOKS INC.,) had a role
in the publishing ofthe Book "Dreams From My Father" in 1995;
12. That Defendant MICHAEL GREAVES was the agent for RANDOM HOUSE INC. and
TIMES BOOKS INC. that on October 30, 1995 filed the copyright application with the US
Copyright Office for "Dreams From My Father'' in conjunction with JANE D. DYSTEL.
13. That Defendant JANE D. DYSTEL is the literary agent for the Book "Dreams From My
Father" published in 1995 for the author Barack Hussein Obama II, and done while
incorporated with ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC. of 79 Fifth Avenue w
York, NY 10003; and that now is the entity Defendant JANE DYSTEL LITERARY
MANAGEMENT INC. located at Union Square West #904 New York, New York. 10003
14. That in 1995 in conjunction with the publishing of the Book "Dreams From My Father"
Defendants DYSTEL and GREAVES used the biography given by the author BARACK
HUSSEIN OBAl\1A II, in the publication, copyright and sales of the Book for 17 years,
and therein stated that the author Barack Obama was Born in Kenya (see Exhibit 14).
15. That starting in Decen1ber 2013, STRUNK attempted to obtain a copy of the Copyright
filed with the US Copyright Office on October 30, 1995 to no avail has been withheld.
16. That in January 2014 STRUNK received a PDF by email purpol"ted to be the copy of the
actual copyright for "Dream From My Father" of 1995 (see Exhibit 15).
17. That during January 2014 Defendant DYSTEL suggested that she falsely manufactured
the biography for the author Bru.ack Hussein Obama II with the allegation that he had
been born in Kenya when in fact DYSTEL was certain he was born in the USA.
18. That the purported replica of the actual copyright for ''Dxeams Frmn My Father" shown
as Exhibit 15 is a crude falsified instrument with so many e1-rors and anomalies that
only further heightens the suspicion that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II was as 1VIr.
Shrimpton contends by the sworn affidavit shown as Exhibit 4 that in fact Defendant
OBAMA was born in KENYA not the USA.
19. That the above evidence gives credence for further suspicions raised since 2008 that is
alleged as the Complaint Seventh Cause of Action that Defendant OBAM.J\ is not born
in Hawaii as is further supported by the analysis of document expert PAUL ED\VARD
IREY who on December 4, 2012 swore to an affidavit that the purported Certificate of
Live Birth (CoLB) presented by Defendant OBAMA and his agents at a \Vhite House
Press Conference on April 27, 2011, and is in fact ptoven to be a crude falsified
Instrument that was thereafter used to obtain Ballot access at the 2012 General
Election (see Exhibit 16).
20. That since December 4, 2012 Mr. IREY has done further analysis of the false
instrument shown as Exhibit 16, and is further proof of a crime involves the purported
CoLB by the false instrument of JOHANNA SO LANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE.
21. That on June 23, 2014 Mr. IREY forwarded to me his expert analysis of the further
p1oof that the same forger did both false instruments of JOHANNA SO LANGE
SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE and those used by Defendant OBAMA (see Exhibit 17).
22. That STRUNK alleges as to the Sixth Cause of Action that a false instrument purported
to be the copyright of 1995 shown as Exhibit 15 had first been faxed to whomever forged
or tendered the instrument and that based upon the anomaly left by the faxed roll pape1
"low" stripe on the left side of both pages that it had been there before the forger added
photoshoped appliques that is proven by the stark difference in the before and after
letter I line degradation, alleges Mr. OBAMA was born in the USA rather than Kenya.
23. That in addition to the proof of the false instrument shown as Exhibit 15 being faxed
and leaving a signature of that n1echanical operation, Mr. IREY performed an analysis
(see Exhibit 18) with the same methods used as shown with Exhibit 16 and Exhibit 17.
24. That STRUNK as the public officer Executor for the Express Deed in Trust to the United
States of America, as explained in Exhibit 13 has standing to challenge any incumbent and or
candidate who by preponderance of evidence is not eligible under the Constitution for the
United States Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 for office of POTUS, has an obligation to the
beneficiaries ofthe Deed in Trust to seek and obtain equity relief by this Court based upon
the evidence that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBArvlA II is not eligible to be POTUS.
25. That STRUNK, unlike Mr. VAN ALLEN, is a private citizen of the United States entitled to
the full and complete protection of the Constitution for the United States of America and its
associated amendments unlike those who remain the surety-indenture to the U.S. Public
Citizen debtor entities by operation of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. S(b) with related law by
the Usurper)s annual renewed national emergency or state of war Orders are void ab initio.
26. That STRUNK has been outrageously harmed by the sanction in the total amount of more
than $177,000 by Order of Judge Arthur M. Schack Justice ofthe New York Supreme Court
in the County of Kings in case Strunk v PlYS Board o(Elections et al. Index No. 6500-2011
for having alleged that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is ineligible to occupy
the Office of President of the United States Executive and Commander"in-chiefwould be
exonerated of such sanction were Supplemental Plaintiffs expert testimony, cross
examination and further discovery as to the truth of his allegations were presented at trial.
27. That STRUNK alleges and has proven the ineligibility of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAfvlA II,
is not born on soil of even of one US Citizen parent much less two (as defined in Exhibit 13)
and Mr. OBAMA is willfully culpable with those Defendants and agents who promoted
the 2008/2012 usurpation ofPOTUS commander-in-chief office in charge of the defacto
Federal and State's Court system by operation of law by void ab initio Executive Orders.
28. That for STRUNK to exonerate himself requires a trial by JURY, in light of the Court's
reluctance to honor STRUNK's public duty to the posterity of the Deed in Trust.
29. That the records and index of Mr. OBAMA's foreign student funding while attending
Columbia University in New Yo1k is recorded at the NYS Higher Education Services
Corporation associated with Federal funds, have been withheld see Exhibit 19, and is
the subject of the 1equest for subpoenas now before the Honmable David I. Schmidt in
Strunk v. Paterson et al. NYS SC Kings County Index No 29642-2008, see Exhibit 20.
30. That STRUNK at trial requires the testimony of Mr. SHRIMPTON, Mr. IREY, and by
the Defendants as to facts and documents requested by subpoena issued by this Cmnt.
\VHEREFORE, Plajntiff STRUNK wishes by the above aforementioned supplemental
reasons and those of the Complaint, that this Court Mandate and Order the U.S.
Department of State to provide a non-immigrant visa to Mr. SHRIMPTON, that the US
Copyright Office release the actual certified copy of the 1995 copyright of "Drearns From l.Vly
Father", and or Defendants' agencies under their control1elease documents p1oving ultla
vires acts of Defendants and or their agents to spoliate conceal and destroy records and
interfere with the conduct of judicial proceedings and provision of justice; and that this
court take supple1nental jurisdiction over the NYS BOE to immediately order the turn-over
of the documents referred to above regarding the outrageous use of the "born a citizen" term
rather than the Constitutionally mandated use of the "natural-born Citizen" term of art to
be used exclusively as to the eligibility of a "natural-born Citizen" private citizen of the
United States for POTUS and who is no longer surety-indenture of the debtor owned by the
United States in service of the creditors to the United States' debt under the provision of
martial process with 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) and related law, and that the expe1t
testimony by MICHAEL SHRIMPTON and PAUL EDWARD IREY be scheduled for
hearing in regards to a preliminary injunction fot a declaratory judgment stating simply
uthat BARACK HUSSEIJ.l OBAMA II is not eligible for the Office of POTUS according to the
Constitution for the United States Article 2 Section 1 Cla.use 5", and letting the chips fall
where they may fall as matter of grave national security for Congress to remedy
exclusively, and that the Court for the other causes of action provide for further and
different relief including a jury trial.
I, Christopher Earl Strunk, depose and state under penalty of perjury with 28 USC 1746
and USDC for the Distlict of Columbia Local Civil Rule 11.2-2, that I declare under penalty
of perjury that the foreg.oing is true and 1 ( )
2014 ['
Brooklyn, New York - - J
593 Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281
845-901-6767 email chris@strunk.ws
Attached:
Supplemental Exhibits 14 thru 20, and
A copy of the Complaint filed 10 June 2014
SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPLAINT- Page 10 of 1 0
----------------------------------------------------------------X
CHJUSTOPHEREARLSTRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC. NY 11238
845-90 l-6767 chris@strunk.ws,
\endover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
Plaintiffs,
v.
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
Case No.: 14-cv-00995 (RJL)
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC., MICHAEL GREAVES,
1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 100"19
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
- - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
Exhibit 14
reiiltGd.
....

- u .llmlrbm
..,.. flrMnr;!t "'iN '1111.
WAtlt.i<l,. a
illaJ 4dla:-

.. rid ...

..
DCirn:ltm:::Jt tn1&f IOd
wet! 11111 ....
1M lo.ll. tn
All ... 'WMa
-------------------------------------------------------------X
:MICHAEL SHRIMPTON 8 Jusons Glebe,
vVendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
Plaintiffs,
v.
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
#904 NE\V YORK, NE\V YORK, I 0003
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 15
Additional Certificate (17 706\
Certificate of Registration
FORMTX
For a literary Work
1
Thts Certificate issued under the seal of the Copyright
Office in accordance with title 17, United States Code,
attests that registration has been made for the work
Identified below. The information on thlS certificate has
been made a part of the Copyright Office records.
Register of Copyrights, United States of America
TITLE OF THIS WORK
DllEAHS FROM MY FATHER
PREVIOUS OR ALTERNATIVE TITlES 'Y
UNITED STATES ,...,..,..., __
OF
, NOV a 0
Yay
TE CONTINUATION SHEET.
PUBLICATION AS A CONTRIBUTION 1r thit: wurk w.lS pubhsh ..J ''" .1 contnbutkn tu ,, pcriudk.ll. (lr ..-ulk'Ctiun. lnturmallon ,,boo ... t the
collective work in wh1ch lhs: contribution Titlt of Work Y
--- - ... ... .
If publisht.-d In a pcriodic1111'' I(IVC Volume 't' Numbt:'t' lssucD.1te 't' OnPagu;Y
2
NAMEOFAUTHOR 'Y DATESOFBIRTHANODEATH
a
Year Born..,. Died Y
Barack Obama USA
Wulhis contribution to the! wurk a AUTHOR*S NA TIONALITV OR DOMICILE __ IB-UTI--0-N-T-0-
NOTE
.... , " .... ..,....
leave the
1pac:e lor d3tu
of birth and
oeeth DleniL.
"work made for Nama of Counuy THE WORK II !he.,...,. 10 Chef
OYt.-5 oR{Citir.enof. ___ __llSA ___ . Anonymow? DYes
IS No Domiciled in ... _ _liSA_ Pseudonymous? n YL'S inslruclions
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP Bric::Ov d ..,c;nb.: of matL'Iial created by author m which copyright is ,
Entire work excluding quotes from other sources
NAMEOFAUTHOR 'Y
Was this contribution to the worlc a
"work madu for hire"1
OYt.'S
ONo
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
NAME Of AUTHOR..,.
DATES OF BIRTH AND DEATH
Year Born Year Died
AUTHOR'S NATIONALITY OR DOMICILE WAS THIS AUTiiOR'S CONTRmUTION TO
Name cl Countty THE WORK llltle anrowet to erther
Anonymous? OYC!S 0
OonliciiL'ti in----------- 0 O No cnsli1Jellona
\leliCTibt! nature of material crt'at"'CI by this author in which copyright is claimed. "f'
DATES OF BIRTH AND DEATH
Year Bom..,. Year Died Y
Wos thlsrontrlhullun to tht wurk .a AUTHOil'S NATIONALITY OR DOMICILE WAS THIS AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTION TO
"work mad.: Cnr 01 Couiii'Y THE WORK R the aRSWif 10 lllhef
0 Yell OR { Ciht(n of ----- Anol\)lmous? 0 Yl!s 0 No
0 No rJomtdll!d inti!: . Psc::udonvmuus? 0 Y<.>s 0 No 11\Structiona
NA TlJRE OF AUTHORSHIP Bril!flv dt.'lK'ribc n.,turto o( m.aterial by llllthor in which cup)'TIJ;ht I . ..,
YEAR IN WHlCH CREATION OF THIS b DATE AND NATION Ot= FJRST PUBUCA TlON OF THIS PA RTICUI.A R Js>RK
a
WORK WAS COMPLETED Tllltlfllonnetlon Corrfl;le111Jtlnfomaatlon Monlh ... - L __ . __ b __ v .... __ _
__ _1995 . . USA _ --
4
COPYRIGHT CLAIMANTCS, Name ,,nd addfl'SS must be givl.'n t'vcn if the claim,,nt is APPLICATION RECEIVED
. ., Barack Obama clo NIDJ..l0.J9 9..5
Acton ,Dy s te 1 ,Leone & Jaffe ffi!:; ONE DEPOSIT RECEIVED
79 5th: Xnnae
___ _ ____ NY __ RY ___ I o_o_o_J _ A_t_t_n_:_ J_a_n_e_ Dy _ s_t_e_l ___ iWCiOEPostTs AECElvEo __ _

TRANSFER If thl? clnim.1nl(!l) l'lnmL-d '" 4 (:ul!) JfCenmt from th. olUih<>r(!l) n.uno:.i n
2. give .l brief sl.tll.'fl'll)ntuf hmv th<? obt.1lncd owncn;hip uf thl' "f'
MORE ON BACK_. Cofllplete aU applicable space5 (numbaut 511) an lhl reve..,a $Ide ot th5 Pll!l
l:>06 deaa. eo Son the lofm a11ina 10
ooMtN7:"oav. .. ..
vv fORMTX

CHECKED BY
0
CORRESPONDENCE
Yes
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE. IF YOU NEED MORE SPACE, USE A SEPARATE CONTINUA noN SHEET.
PREVIOUS REGISTRATION HilS regi3tralion f(IJ' .this wurlt. or fur .an \'\!f"i''lll\ uf this wo:k, tk'Cn molifc in Offie\!?
0 Yes !X No If yuur .1nswt'C' Is "Yl.'S; wby is ilnolhtr n'ftistrJtiun 50UJ;hl? CChJc .tppmprii1IC! bull> Y
0 Thbi Is publism'\1 of a work prt:\iuu.'lly rq;i:sllml In f\lmt.
b. c Thi.-1 i:> the first ipplicatitln by thi!! .iuthur as ropyright dainwnl
c. 0 Thi11 i:o dung,Oo&J wllUon 1'1flh<.- work. ;u: !lht1wn hy "f"k"-' 11 on this 'Prll(';)lion.
!I your ;maWQf U. "Y .. -5." Pntv.iou. Kqi.ltrlion Numbrr T Yurof Rqlst,..ion Y
OEKIVA TIVE WORK OR COMPILATION l><th 6-l.:tnd loll fnr .t wnrk: cumplctc w'lly fib w a complloltlnn.
a. o111ypt\.'\'lf!Stlng wmk ur th.ltthi:l w&>rk un ,,, iru:atporJtl'S. T
__ source.!_ _ _ _ .... - .. _ _ _ .. -- ----
b. Martrt&l Added to This Work il brief, Sl'flL'tal of tne nMteri;lltholl h.u; bt."Cn &\ddcd to this work and ia which Cllpyri,;bt i.5 dilirru.od.. Y
___ E_ntire text e!-cludin uotes fr .. other sourc!!. ___ -------- --- ------
-space deleted-
ltEPRODtJCfiON FOR USE OF BLIND OR PHYSICAU. Y HANDiCAPPED 1N01VIDUALS A thill funn tO and a cl\Kk in one
of tlu! boxes herr lnSp.lCe 8 col\litllutw" M!WlldU!Iivci sr.tnt ur to ll'it: Ubr;ary of CungrM "' ;mu iOk:ly f,n the blind .and physiaUy
houtdkppc:d ami undl.'r tlw conditJons and limitatinns pn."S<llbed by tht! n
0
ultiON ol C\'P>'"S"t Offlc Ul C9f>lt.'fo lh<' wurk in 1 of this
in Br.ailla (Ol slmlln Uctilt symbols); or (2) embodying & fiutil;lll ( ll tl!:\dins; uf worlo., M 13) both
a 0 CopWs 1nd PhonotKords c 0 Phonnrecords Only
DEPOSIT ACCOliNT I( rezlltratlcm rte II to b\! chlltgl-d to. Oepotlt Account HlabltshC!d In thC! Copyright Offlcl!, glw and of AccounL
Name Account Number Y
Randam Bouse Inc 59757
CORRESPONDENCE Clve and add,_ to whic:h atrrwpondence about this appficJ!lon should bexRt. Addn....,/ Apt/City/Stai1!/ZIP Y
Miehael Grevaes. Random Bouse Inc
Clwclt only o.M 0 otlwr cnryri&}lt claimilnt
0 llWOl'r' of exclusive risJlt(s}
CERTIFICA TION r, thj! hL-reby aor1ify Chll am {0 author
of work idt.'f\HfiL'<i In thi! .:and th4t st.ltcml.'nts rn:ado.: 11 .authuiizl!d agl.'llt of - .
by me In ltlla olpplictltian oro: conoo th..- 'bc:st td my knnw\ .. 'dac. Name ol.uli>ot 01 01 CMn8l
Typed or prlniid rwoe and dtt Y {f I hi olpplicolliun il of pub!IC'.llion In 3, du nol sign and submit il b\'fore that lintc.
'GuNA/7. . ... Io-3o-9S
MAtt
CERTJFf.
CATETO
Certlflc81e
WiUM
mti!Hin
window

---- -
I N;a,;;- - . - -
j Michael Grevaes. Times Books, Inc.

N\II7IMf 9
1 20 J Bast SOt:h Street
--------
! New YOrk 1ft 1 0022
'===

j . .
F. ,
FOR
COPYRIGHT
OFFICE
USE
ONLY
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t 7 II .S.C. J 506(e): 1J81*1n wno kiiOfritlgly mellelalabe repruen:alion of; mNriel in !he .,_lion IDr CQPVfiOIU fiOISiratlon ptowidtd lor by secii11 <1, 01 in 81'fl W1lllltl mtllftllnlllklcllll CQIIII!CIICWl
1'lillt 1111 ba flNid no&mor. 1t1an S2.50il.
.U, 1tii-4QQ.000 * PRINTED ON Rt'CTCLfD PAPER GOVEANUENT PAINTING OffiCE
----------------------------------------------------------------X
Plaintiffs,
v.
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ll
I 01 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
for WRIT OF MAl\TDAMUS
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
FOR EQIDTY RELIEF OF
28 USC 220 1 and 2202
1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NE\V YORK, 10019
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US A1TORNEY GENERAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 16
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA
) ss.
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
J, Paul Edward lrey, being duly sworn, depose and say underpenalty of
perjury:
1. I am over the age of 18 years old, am a resident of Florida located
at Delray Beach and have been previously accepted by the courts as an
expert witness and have testified as such expert to the information
contained in this affidavit is based on my personal knowledge and,
if caJied as a witness, I could testify completely thereto.
2. I have 57 years experience in graphics. first in serving with the U.S. Air
Force being trained as a clerk typist, two of those years with the
National Security Agency for which I had a Top Secret security
clearance during the years 1957 and 1958.
3. Following that I was employed in Manhattan, New York on the art
staff of the Hearst trade journal American Druggist. I was employed at
various advertising agencies in Manhattan until 1968 when I started
my own business in Ft. Lee, New Jersey named Bergen Graphics.
4. By the mid seventies I employed 60 people as graphic artists, typesetters,
camera and darkroom workers doing pre-press services for major retail
and printing firms in the New York city area such as Montgomery Ward
Catalogs and weekly newspaper ads nationwide, Acme markets
newspaper ads for the entire supermarket chain in the northeast, Hearst
Blue Book Auto Repair manuaJs, Key Food Stores of New York and Long
Page 1
Jsland, Diana stores, Great Eastern Stores, Finest Supermarkets, Hills
Supermarkets, Grand Union Supermarkets, etc.
5. In addition to overall knowledge of typography,Photography, four-color
stripping and all facets of film preparation for offset printing, I have 26
years experience in desktop publishing with Macintosh Computers since
their inception and have used Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator on a
daily basis since their inceptions in 1987 and 1989.
6. The first Exhibit "A" annexed herewith is a page from a recent issue of
my latest graphic production was published by the the Washington Times
weekly edition that contains much of the evidence that I will explain in this
affidavit.
7. I prepared and wrote this full page shown as Exhibit A myself and attest
that the evidence contained therein is accurate and represents evidence of
forgery of what on 27 April at the Press Conference presentation by
White house Consel Bob Bauer, While Press Secretary Jay Carney and
Barack Obama himself allege is Obama's long form birth certificate.
8. The actual document I used for examination of the Obama birth certificate
is described in the following chain of evidence contained in Exhibit "B" ...
page 1 & 2 & 3 anneexed herewith, and
9. That shown as Exhibit "8" page 1 and 2 is the proof of purchase of a 14" x
16" reproduction print from Associated Press through their division called
"Replay Photos" that sells photographic items from their news service and
that shown as Exhibit "B" page 3 is a copy of that page purchased as a
true and accurate copy of what the ASSOCIATED Press acquired from the
White House at the news conference on the morning of 27 April 2011.
Page 2
Paragraph 10
Shown below is an enlarged section of the Obama long form birth certificate that was released online at
whitchousc.gov on 27 April 20 II. No admission has been made as to who actuaHv scanned and converted this
to an Adobe Acrobat PDF file and posted it on the official White House website. It is not known if it was
someone at the White House or someone at the Honolulu department of health that had previously provided
two copies of Obama's birth certificate that were hand-carried from Hawaii to the White House.
The important feature to obscr\'c is that cveq'thing in black is outlined in white. This will be referred to as
"The White Halo".
The Honolulu dept. of health alleges that the procedure for making copies of birth certificates is to take the
binder where the birth certificates are stored and open it up to the one they copy, place it face down on an
ordinary copy machine and simp])" copy the document to green securit)' paper instead of white paper.
Given that this is the normal procedure, I sec no reason for the white halo. I have seen many other birth
certificates from Honolulu in the rear and a half that I have spend examining this issue of forgery, and can
attest that none of those other birth certifinltes from Hawaii had a white halo.
BARACK
3.
Thi
;
Birth
If I
Wa
TwlnO Tri
tetD
lD
r Blrtha Otyt Town or Rural Location
Honolulu
r 'RoiPhil or lnlltullon ( lr noa ta JK;,aail . or in!
I
.olani Maternity & Gynecolo1
of Mother: Clty, Towia 01' Rul'al
Honolulu
.ddrat
I
6085
Kalanianaole Higl
page 3
Paragraph 11
Shown below is what we should have seen if the birth certificate original form was
actualy copied to the green security paper and we would see no white halo. Copiers
do not print white, which is the only way white could be seen anywhere over this
green security paper. I was able to purchase this special paper on the internet. The
green color and hash marks are dye printed through to the other side. In other words
the paper is green on both sides and there is no white anywhere.
BARACK
3. Thi BJrth

If
of Blrtha Oty, Town or Rural Location
Honolulu
or otplt .,1
Maternity & Gyneoolo
R.t enee of Mother: City., Towa or Rurallr:atlon
Honolulu
6085
Kalanianaole High
fame of Faaher

HUSSEIN
page 4
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30114 Page 17 of 104
Case 1:14-cv-L J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L .-l Page 17 of 109
DNA test on then Senator Obama. I also passed on concerns in the UK
intelligence community about the Senator's eligibility for the office of President of
the United States. The CIA with respect seemed to recognize my expertise within
the field. At any rate my opinion was sought, and as an ally I gave it freely,
although they paid for the lunch.
9. In addition to my intelligence and immigration law expertise I had specific
expertise in DNA fingerp1-inting. I believe that I was only the second lawyer in
the world to make use of it, in 1985, in an immigration case, consulting Dr. Alec
Jefferies, as he then was, by telephone at the University of Leicester (I was
practising as a barrister in Leicester at the time, as a 'poor persons' lawyer in a
law center). As the court will be aware DNA or genetic finge1-printing had only
recently been discovered, by Dr. Jefferies, now Sir Alec, the previous year. I was
aware that he had used it successfully in a 'relationship as claimed' immigration
case. There were many such cases and by the late 1990s the IAT and Immigration
Adjudicators had built up a considerable body of expertise in the field. I was well
used to considering DNA fingerprinting reports judicially by the year 2000.
10. I understand of course that ultimately these are matters for the proper U.S.
judicial authorities and, if so advised, the United States Congress under the 25th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which of course has power to
impeach any President who has misled state electoral authorities, Congress itself
and the American electorate as to his or he1 eligibility for office. It would also be a
matter entirely for the House of Representatives or the Senate as to whether they
appointed special counsel to inquire into the issue of whether or not President
Obama fulfills the eligibility requirements for the office of P1esident and require a
DNA test if so advised.
11. As the issue may have political ramifications it is right that I should disclose my
membership of the Consetvative and Unionist Party in Great Britain, although I
am not presently an office-holder within the Party. I was formerly a member of
Page 6 of 15
Paragraph 12
To answer the question as to how the white halo happened, I show the example below.
On the left is a copy from the White House release. On the right is my example of a
computer created halo. I have put a white halo on paragraph 11 using the unsharp
mask filter found in Adobe Photoshop. The settings I used
are seen here to the right. As I see it, the forger made the
forgery on a computer, used a scan of the security paper
and included it in the file with the other elements of the
forgery. Then after flattening all the layers, applied the
unsharp mask filter to sharpen up the soft edges of the type.
The forgers serious mistake was to flatten the layers before
applying the sharpening filter. This filter that I have been
using for 22 years chokes back the black edges and leaves
white to create a sharper edge. You see it everywhere even
around the form type and rules. There is no other way in
graphics science to create the white halo seen on both
documents below, the forgers and mine. Proof of forgery.
BARACK
Amount 500
tmcels
Threshold 45 levels
BARACK
)
B. Thla Birth I( 4-.. If T 3. Thit Birth ."" ,_ 4-.. If
w.. w
Tri letO le10 B SiD erJ TwlnO Tri letO letO
of Blrtha City, Town or Runl Location
Honolulu
Rftl enee of Mother: a.,. .. Towa 01' Rural LpcaUon RMI tMe of Mother: Clay, Towa OJ' Rural
Honolulu Honolulu
Addreu Addrua
6085 Kalanianaole High, 6085 K8lanianaole Hi
'ame of Fatlter
HUSSEIN
:ACK HUSSEIN
tither 11. Birthpl (laland, State or foreip Cow.u r Father 11. Birthplano (ldand. Slllte Of FMtriJII
enya, East Africa 7' !5 enya
1
East Africa ,-.
lalden Name or Molher
'ANLEI
f Mother 16. Blrthpl.ce (lt.lud, cw lortiat' Count t Mother 16. Blrthpt.ee (1tland. .,. Porft.ln
8
Wichita A.anaas .8 Wichita A.anaas

page 5
Paragraph 13
To view a closer and better look at the comparisons shown in paragraph 14 of the
deposition, see below still showing the original PDF released by the White House on the
left against my own example of a computer creation of the white halo seen on the right.
BARACK BARACK
3. Thi1 Birth -: 3. Thi BJrth )(
s
S e [J Twin 0 Tri Si e [J Twin 0 Tri
1ha Ot:rt Town or Rural Loe ha Oty, Town or Rural Loeat
Hone Hono
aplaal or lnllltutlon (If nol ID pllal or ln .. ltutlon (lr noa Ia
mi Maternity & 0 ni Maternity & Q
~ n e e of Mother: -Cit,., Town or I tee of Molher: City, Towa or I
Honolulu Honolulu
.. I
6085 Kal.anians 6085 Kalaniana
r Father Father
Hl]
HU
er 11. BirthpiKI' (Island. Scac r 11. Birthplac (faland. Sr.tt
enya, East Aft enya, _East Afr
Nallle ol Mother ~ r n e of Mother
AN
page 6
Paragraph 14
The chain of evidence for the white halo is proven with this enlarged section of the
Associated Press purchased print referred to in Exhibit us 1 & 2" that came from the
Xerox copy made at the White House of one of the two originals sent from the Honolulu
Dept. of Health, according to the description made during the news conference at the
White House on 27 April 2012. The White House black and white copier would have
normally dropped out the green security color background along with the white halo.
However I found that by darkening the background of the Associated Press copy, we
are still able to see reminents of the white halo. This shows us that the white hato must
also be on the original sent from the department of health in Honolulu. We now have
new evidence on this issue when a Los Angeles law firm requested that the Honolulu
Dept. of Health confirm that what is currantly downloaded from whitehouse.gov website
is thier document. See the next paragraph 15 of this affidavit.
ATE OF HAWAII
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE I
BARACK
Male
I
Plue of Blrtlu atJ, Town or Rural Loeallon
Honolulu
ty, Town ar
Honolu1u
lb. Hldcle Nuae
HUSSEIN
6085 Kalanianaole Highway
Mother' M.Wa1 Addnst
HUSSEIN
BirthpJac (ldand. Smae or forelp Cataaar)
Oahu
OBW
East Africa -r . Student
page 7
Paragraph 15
The first picture at the bottom left is a section of the original PDF file released on
whitehouse.gov on 27 April 2012. It represents the color appearance we have been
looking at for 1 1/2 years. The middle picture at the bottom center is a section of the
document sent to the attorneys for the Mississippi Democratic Party in Taitz et al v.
Democratic Party of Mississippi No. 3:12-cv-00280-HWT-LRA (S.D. Miss.) See
attachment "C", the letter from the registrar of births for the
state of Hawaii, Alvin Onaka.
It is my understanding and belief that Attorney Tepper
requested a confirmation from the director of the Honolulu
Dept. of Health, Lorretta Fuddy, that the PDF file released
on whitehouse.org on April 27, 2011 came from their office
and Loretta Fuddy passed it on to Alvin Onaka who replied
to Tepper with letter "C". Tepper passed that on to Begley.
Begley, who is a MS lawyer, filed it with the court, along with
the altered PDF file that we must assume came from Onaka.
if not altered.
SECTION OF ORIGINAL PDF
,.
SAME SECTION OF
ALTERED VERSION
(T,pe
BAi
nu;e
11.

Pt-.. fill IUttlaa at,, T ...
..,... JJ
hj ...
lapiolani Mat.e1
page 8
HUE/SATURATION FILTER
H<lt 8
--
+10
. LEVELS FILTER
ChtnMI Cyan ::i:}
InpUt 36 1. 42 US
L1
.
BLUR TOOL
History Acttons

..:"ll-
li!.-t"IS
11
Blur
"
Cal! I
Lo.ul
TOP OF OUR VERSION SHOWING
STEPS TAKEN TO MATCH
1
.. GIW flnt Nuae (TJi
BJ
Se-
Male
Pl-=e of Bl"la ae,., Tcno
a;r;;r ....

lapiolani Hate
That I, Paul Edward lrey, am willing to testify as an expert witness to the
accuracy of every statement above in any venue permissible as the same
is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be
alleged on information and and as to those matters I llelieve it to be
true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon
information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books anti records, and
personal knowledge.

Paul Edward lrey
Delray Beach, Florida
Sworn to before me
This _i_ day of December 2012

Notary Public
MICHAELGeRUCK
HoWry Putllc, ol f'lorid8
MvComm. exp!ta. New. 29,2013
No. 00943089
page 9
Case Document Filed 06/30/14 Page 26 of 100
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.:
Paul Edward Irey's AFFJDA VIT
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT "A"
rr - .. -.
a Closer LDDk at thE! Dbami Long Form Birth certiFicate Rnd ThE!n R5k ... "Wh!t Hasn't cur congress Taken a eraser Laak?"
Thr nnpnnanlloi.'\11<Ulll Ob.11N lull!;! 1111 m blllh
1'\lhpln)'\'il loc-h ow .md l"'f:!C'
W<"- lnund 19 (trtlfl/l Ill Ill" " '
1111 :uul au: 7 .aro ..t uUJ umlo.'l\l:l:ld
,., i.k-11\'\' hn<' 'YI'"''Lqlll\'1"' """ .1 '"''rnh"""
o)J 111 yc1IJ'i 1-n.':IIUlh! and rll:amullni! uuJ "'' n
.Juo:Umetll' ahmJ.: \\llh Cl(p!lb..._. in .,._-:ulnantz. 91aphk 181-..
phni>Jr.IPbY. pnnllnj! .l.lnd '"'' ntdudtnl!
thr 11..: ultht- ui.J 'lllmJ! \"Jb
RntlnainJ! uur ""11
U.'\:\"'olulll>tNnc<o rtnpk}'lllf ,.,.._"!""Ill I)
ID I
1
Jhl,;a lh"di"-'UIIlClll<tll :a lunu.
hut \'\ I.JI:'PI."C """"'l'"'lhl blllh \'CIIdl\41:" \\ol\
l:a\1 ull ;\l;&o.' lltl"\b -.('ndillj! I\\ 1< O:"fliC' 1>1
hnn 111 th1.' I'"""' Til- Wh1h." "'"'..,. tho:n p..Jc.J
.1 ''II) :mol fa\t' 1r1ul ,,'1*', tnlh4 mttliu that
'' '""' hlf uut c.bm. We '"'""'r lha hw..,.,.,.
.Jo...unnl uumull:l' )buukl Ill lDm.h"CIJ ID th Our
UllnnpiN IIH'mpll1y :US l7/Rn hlf<'R'K
olo"-'l>IB!nl c1:amut<'l" m ,.,.,. c<,_J}". Allnl them 1&1Uoal b
c1thc Ill"' dt-cu" the ObaltLI bmb
1-.x.:u .... -. !lJ"Cil \\'Cf"C "I tk"'"l.: lur lhr pn\.rllmt'IU- or i
U)tptlll Olt;m ... " ott mll'll to IlK" ottjsin.tl-Wr hnrr
foalll rlrl.s bi.lfh tml/kotr to o lNNIIy fiM ff111ltrY
1. Miss-Matched Typed Letters 2. The Bent Cap "H" 3. The Certificate Number
II nllk.'UII\' 1:.1 h hUJ;e a tllllh
l't'tlllt.:ollr r ... a pel""' 1111:) \\nui.J ltcnl ;a bnth
-rtlllt.:niC numbcf lh:tl \\ll 11uN 1n Ilk- IWol t'la
A b:lby bmn wy u1II:I\\:U1 "'' UaJ:11:l..
Ob;w;& dl\-.1 lb.: nnt 11:1> Wr bdt.'W
w ... 61 10641 llle iAIIIth
ft\jUt'>IA:\1 bn llolb ;uuJ """'I hi.' -lttll
liwm "'ilh u nwnbcT 0111 ul 1bcy lho:n
rtqUt"\\CLI lht: hllllllm.l wrn: rC'Iwal. nte)
:a b\\,..au bcll>n"l'-' ll:rw;ui:m ''"'"'- h
"""' lkmc&l. wilh lht' .:uw1 that dn:
Htlh>lulu Ocpt I do.'l:idc 11 lhl..y
\\":&Jtlcd II> pnI;Jiko tlr birth ,,.. d-.,
lk\'t'II-N baby lJl nut. ._a,
STATE OF HAWAII CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRT.H
' o.lbHed & c!afied ttl st1aw filii While IG m1.ao 151
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 10S.U
ale
-KaoioJ.ani
4. The Start of Une Error
1111: ,.h;,,ui.J be cX<l\:11)'
un.J.:r I be w"rd " Mule:" , 1/ot a lut/f spore>
1'hi.flr pron/tif f ol'fl'Y r\h" tlw
fuo:llh:U nn\ .. urhc lint"> ;m: nu..tt ... the: left ,.
.u.pidnu .. No 1llhcr hinl1 cr rt(f1r:nlll'
this prcallal' sr,l
OBAMA, li
""''T'ifcij..;;- -------
DUNHAM C8UCl\ISi81l
Trp of Ocnt,.lioll Oultlth H'*'c D\!ri111 p,...,._,. lib. 0.1" lollii1Verioc6
Ncne
5. Irregular Line Spacing
J1u, b!nh"'''"h. lunll ""'YP'-
""kl ... , ttw '"'":'" 11mc !h.: po;Ur.J Q ,
r<-tum, tl uuu!ol
lb.! lui h11c 1"hl \\ .. .. M It .dlh-111'
nt..J.h l)f'<"''"'l'" w .... ..
bpth 11\0mlla""" W1ih um ,.,,; h111.
hL 1hi <nr "TJitrrrr/"n dullrll ah1lblt
Thi is pruuf of f'"lltf] .
EXHIBIT "B" ... page 1
From: ordersOreplayphotos.com
Sent: Wednesdfly, October 05, 2011 9:37AM
To: putnamOmotionsystam.com
Subject: Replay Photos Order Shtpped
rour Order from Replay Photos has been
If your order contained multiple products. nottficanon about shtpment of the other products m
your order may arrive in a separate email.
If you need to reach Replay Photos with a Questton about your Order. please ematl us at
mailto:orders@replayphotos.com?subiect:;Ordero/u20#278149. If you prefer to speak to
someone. please call us at 877-421-2300. Our busmess hours are Sam to 4pm ET Monday
through Fnday If you don't reach us. please teave us a message w1th your name and telephone
number. We w1H respond to emal and voice ma11 promptly. In order to exped1te your ematl or
call. please have your Order reference number handy.
As a reminder. your Order reference number 1s 278149
Thank you for your busmess
The Replay Photos Team
www.replayphotos.com
Replay Photos ard the Photos Logo arc registered trademarks of RcplayPhotos.com
905 "N. Mair Stroot Surtc 23C Durham NC 27701 Ph 677 421 2300
From: REPLAYPHOTOS COM
Sent: vVednesday, October 05, 2011 9. 38 AM
To: Thomas Putnam
Subject: Payment Rccetpt: 89067 Confirmation frorn REPLA YPHOTOS COM
EXHIBIT "B" ... page 2
From: REPLAYPHOTOS COM
Sent: Wednesday, October OS, 2011 9:38AM
To: Thomas Putnam
Subject: PClyrnent Rccc1pt 89067 Con&jrmat,on fron1 RCPLAYPHOTOS COM
REPLA YPHOTOS COM
Your Purchase has been approved
Th1s receipt confrnns payment for your purchase from REPLAY PHOTOS LLC This order WJII appear
on your credit card statement as REPLAYPHOTOS COM To contact us. pfease send an e-mail to
orders@replaychotos.com or call 919-688-2100
Transaction Time:
Gateway 10:
Receipt Number:
Sales Order u m b e r ~
Transaction Type:
Authorization Code:
Oct 05. 2011 09 38 AM
51243
1342166417 4181
89067
Ma1I/Phone Order
295471
Receipt
Billing Information
Name: Thomas Putnam
Company (Optional): Motion Systems
Card Type:
Card Number:
AM
xxxxxxxxxxx3099
Order Details
Quanti Daecrl on UnIt Price Subtotal
mnltrans 1 order 278149 expedtted shrpping 16 00
US Dollar Total
16 00
16.00
EXHIBIT "B" pag 3
,!
STATE OF HAWAII
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
151
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 10641
lb. Mldclla Name lc. Lal Name
HUSSEIN
Honolulu
Stud Addtua
6085 Kalanianaole Highway
Mol her' Malliq Addrua
fuJJ Name of F&lhtr
BARACK
HUSSEIN
10.
Apof Yethu n. Birtbptuf' Cleland, Salt a.J fom&n Covncq) l2a.
25
{eqya, East Africa "Y
u. Full Name or
STANLEY ANN
15. Aae of Motha 16. Bl"hflaca (bland. Sutc oc forclan Cou!Jtry
18
1 that the above atated
lafannall Ia 'rao and cotted
to the !.at of "'' krsowtedsr.
l9a,
I hudty cutlly lht atria child _.,
Ml'll ll 011 the i ul
hear 11ated
APR 2 5 ,2011
1b. bled
Oahu
OBAMA
cupallon
DUNHAM
Moalh
August
(..)
9.
l2b.
14.
Oah11
Y60
....
R.cc o[ Father
African
Kind or Bulneu or a tUII'J
Universit,y

Raee of rtfolher
Caucasian
Typr of Outllde Homt Ourlftl PnpantJ 17b. Dte Lut Worited
None
I CERTIFY THlS IS A TRUE COPY OR
ABSTRACT aF 'neE RECORD ON FILE IN
THE HAWAU STATE DEPARTMENT OF K!Al.TH
T. "Ph.J).
R&GI8TRAR
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Paul Edward lrey's AFFIDAVIT
Exhibit C
Case Document 35-2 Fileu Page 1 of 1
------------------------='----------------------------
Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu Hawa11 96813
STATE OF HAWAII
Office of Health Status Momtoring
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu. Hawaii 96801
VERIFICATION OF BIRTH
Recipient of Verification. Scott J. Tepper and Samuel L. Begley, attorneys for the
Mississippi Democratic Party in Taitz et al v. Democratic
Party of Mississippi [sic], et al, No. 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA
(S.D. Miss.)
Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-14.3, I verify the following
1 The origtnal Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, ts on file
with the State of Hawaii Department of Health.
2. The information contained in the "Certificate of Uve Birth" published at
t!!!Q:I/www. 1 i 104127 /presldent-obamas-long-form-
birth-certificate and reviewed by me on the date of this verification, a copy of
which is attached with your request, matches the information contained 1n
the original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II on file with
the State of Hawaii Department of Health
............................................. to11' ... ,4
I certify that the information contamed
1n the vital record on fife with the
Department of Health was used to
verify the facts of the vital vent.
Alvin T Onaka, Ph.D
State Regtstrar
--- -
OHSM FORM V01 (08/01/01}
Date Issued: May 31, 2012
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Paul Edward Irey's AFFIDA \'!T
Exhibit D
Re: binder 11 ... - 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ...
I of3
Re: binder 11 ... Tuesday, December4, 2012 11:26 AM
From: "Henry Wayland Blake" <hwblake@bellsouth.net>
To: "Paul Irey" <pauledwardirey@gmail.com>, "Doug Vogt" <Diehold@comcast.net>,
orly.taitz@gmail.com, cestrunck@yahoo.com, "Chito Papa" <rajska7@grnaH.com>
3 Files (1688KB)
1051324... 1051324... 1051324 ...
Dear Paul,
I think you have proposed the most probable scenario based on the creation and tile dates of the
associated court documents.
1. The paper copy of the Tepper to Fuddy 3-page letter was dated 05/26/2012.
2. The electronic version of this 3-page letter appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012
3. The Tepper four-page electronic 10513240131.pdf (same as 35-1.pdf) was created on
06/04/2012 and was last modified on 06/06/2012. Pages 1-3 of this document are the 3 electronic
pages of the Tepper to Fuddy letter that appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012. The 4th electronic page is
the Tepper page 4, LFCOLB. This four-page document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.
4. We really don't know when the Tepper page 4lFCOLB was created.
5. The paper copy of the one-page Onaka to Tepper verification letter was dated 05/31/2012.
6. The electronic version, which is court document 35-2, was created on 06/04/2012 and was last
modified on 06/06/2012. This one-page electronic document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.
I believe that the most likely scenario is that Tepper created a paper copy of his three-page letter to
Fuddy on 05/26/2012. He attached a paper printout copy of the original WH LFCOLB and mailed this
four-page paper copy to Fuddy.
Tepper and Onaka then collaborated to alter the WH LFCOLB to create the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB.
On 06/04/2012, Tepper created the documents 10513240131.pdf (same as 35-1} and 35-2.
He then filed the two documents 35-1 and 35-2 in MS on 06/06/2012.
We really don
1
t know the individual actions of either Tepper or Onaka with regards the modifications of
the WH LFCOLB PDF image file to create the altered LFCOLB PDF image file. Onaka may have modified
the WH LFCOLB and then sent the altered PDF image to Tepper as a one-page PDF image file. There is
12/4/2012 3:13PM
Re: binder ll ... - Yaho&aa 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ...
2of3
nothing in his verification letter that indicates that he attached this altered LFCOLB to his verification
letter. However, his letter does refer to the LFCOLB copy that was purportedly attached to the four-page
request letter from Tepper to Fuddy.
Alternatively, Tepper might have had someone else modify the WH LFCOLB PDF image to create the
altered PDF image. That might explain why the METADATA was not entirely erased from his four-page
electronic document. We know that a scanner was used so Tepper's forger would have had to have
some means of re-sizing a scanned and altered image of the WH LFCOLB back to the correct size to
match a real1961 Certificate of Live Birth printed form.
I am now certain that the 21 added objects which are invisible in Adobe Reader pre-existed before
06/04/2012 as a separate PDF image. The 21 objects include 12 line segements, 2 broad-line strikeouts
and 7 Black redaction rectangles. This "redaction" page is smaller than the LFCOLB image page size. I
have successfully separated this smaller "redaction" image from the flattened and altered WH LFCOLB
image in both Adobe Illustrator CS6 and lnkscape. I have attached my latest screenshots from Adobe
Illustrator as proof. The screenshot [105132401131_ss3.jpg] attached shows the "redaction" page slid
off the LFCOLB image page to the right. The background of the "redaction" page is transparent.
So an alternative scenario would be that Tepper had his forger modify the WH LFCOLB and Onaka
provided the "redaction" image to assist Tepper's forger re-size his scanned image. This would lessen
Onaka's involvement with the creation of the fraudulent LFCOLB Tepper page 4 LFCOLB.
So scenario A would be that Onaka did the deed and scenario B would be that they collaborated to do
the deed.
Either way they both are guilty of attempting to pull off a bait and switch on Judge Wingate. They
substituted the Tepper page 4LFCOLB for the WH LFCOLB and didn't tell Judge Wingate about the
switch.
I can provide a notarized copy of my sworn affidavit whenever you need it. Also, I can provide any of my
screen shots as required. I would prefer not to testify because of personal reasons. I also believe that. if
I were to testify, then I would quickly become a "punching bag" for the defense because I don't have an
IT certificate and l have never testified as a forensic expert.
Sincerely,
Henry
From: Paul lrey
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:54AM
To: doug@vectoroub.com; orly.taitz@qmail.com; cestrunck@yahoo.com; hwblake@bellsouth.net
Subject: binder 11 ...
____ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204)
12/4/2012 3:13PM
-------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.: 14-cv-00995 (RJL)
845-901-6767 chris@strunk.ws.
\-Vendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
Plaintiffs.
v.
JOliN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
1 01 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NE\V YORK, 10019
#904 NEW YORK, NEW YORK. 10003
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 17
l'M DON'E ... -Yahoo 1\Gase 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ...
1 of2
Christopher Profile Sign 0-.1: Home
i'M DONE ...
From: "Paullreyu <paufll'eysecret@gmail.com>
To: 'Polycentrism <cestrunck@yahoo.com>
12 Files 6MB Download All
thlnday. June 23, 2014 4 14 AM
JPG 1 11.8 JPG 43gK2 JPG 284KB JPG 1 M! JPG I M:! JPG 513KB JPG l95KB JPG 332KB JJIG 3<2l<B JPG 2KB JPG 2.82KB
Save Save Save Save Save Save
JPG 2571<S
so .. o
Chns
I'm ready to testify tomorrow if needed.
I finshed everything with exhibit 7 .. so I don't have to outline what I want to say.
Just print it out. and give it to any judge wiUing to take it . read it or hear of 1t.
The JUdge that can take this testimony in colrt would be very brave.
I want them to realize that I put a copyright for a reason.
Save Save Save Sava Save
I want them to know that after they deny it's existence the wortd may see 1t and we will declare what JUdge covered his eyes as in Asee no evir.
I will publish it somewhere along with a lot more when that time. comes.
20 po!nts of that 130 federal judges were afraid to even read ... or admit they read 1t ... 1s enough for me to know that we were taken over
already and this is just an exercise in futility against a pack of cowards willing to sell out their nation and stonswall the most ob1110us truth of the crime
of a man pretending to be the president of 1he US .. standing on a forged document That is a very serious cri'tle rn a sane world
Even Johanna wBioot get arrested for an in your face forgery
The judge who admit the birth certificate is a forgery does not exist
I think they wBI just go tlvough the motions until gov. tells them which rubber stamp to use
My principal point now is that we hava found the forger.
I have hammered that issue hard
The evidence is overwhelming because of her stupidity . but that wont matter.
Judges seem to be speccalists in avoiding the truth ... instead of finding rt
Exhibit 3 attached had a few changes I made today . so use the new one attached to replace what you have
All the Exhibits are attached
exhibit 7 is more text than usual because rt's a 2 page summery with pres
And that's it. Coming to you now for review at 410 am
I have included one support document for e>et\ibit 7 a sample birth certifiCate. I will have more when I get the maa from Doug
Review them and Jet me know how to attach them to the affidavit because I never got the e-mail tn text form and can't open the Microsoft \Nord
Tomorrow I will send you my study of the copyright form.
Simon and Shuster has a copy of what they sent the US Copyright originaQy I'm sure but wiU they p!ay trsrtor like Kapio;oni Hospital . and
refuse to even tell us what country it says he was born in.
See hOW many people help out .. or are afraid
After aft .. there are 2,000 forensic examiners in this country . and aU are afratd to look at it also.
Except for Reed Hayes .. but do we have his report? Why did he allow secrecy?
6i23/2014 2:43PM
rM DONE ... - Yahoo l\Gase 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ...
Media tsn't allowed to say he exists . e..en though he says "It is the most flawed document he has ever seen"' also he says it is ''defindely a
forgery
819 news reaUy But it was the best proof of TOTAL MEDIA CONTROL we have seen so far.
And that is an accomplishment for my purposes . which was to force them to overplay their hand
Paul
2 of2 6/23/2014 2:43 PM
pul11n ullhc hm
htnh .:ctiJik:'llo! '' Ul\)llii)L'tl :>IILI .-nl;llt-'l.'tl In
Ill flu-. IJi!;,:l: \\'1 au: l\\tl \l' l) l)' JIU
nhnhnlt" huml ZIJproqftoffOTRl'l') un
I til Llt>t.'lllllC'IIt .. , lin hnWtn): 7 :11\.'il' l
nut unt.lccland L"\' 1\l<'lk"\! \Vc lnunJ
lhi hulh l'l.'thlll."Ut<' In be :& b:adly lnrl!CI) :and
\\!.'lilt' !lc>\\ h.clll\il)' thnll!J!h 01 lntk 11 Ill\' Ubjt','l
m 1%1 . -11)11"''""'' pttdU..<-.1 thl"
Uol\'lllt14.'Jll ..... "hnm yt':tl \\(' 11\'1\llol
\\"llh .Jil11111) \\'tlh .1 lu \''\.!QUill:
llml nK lkpt Ill h..- ,JIIh lhc111 r.lu .... d tu
IL'I U \'XIUnlll<' II "prirtlt)'" ll)!ht' I II\
<' \ kt..'llt'\' ..b.l\h lh th;ll lbo ok.. UJII<"nl \\a. no.JIL'\1
l.1<1 )'l.'lll uu u .-nmpulct ;a :nul
'l'lllliOJ! ll\11 \' OI(Ii.:' h>lll<' Wh\1(' 11 >11"" .
'l'b, Whll( huu ... ' "'P''" tu dk Olntltls.JI
,, ... ..... .: .. hl IIIII ('.l.Jnl . Wt IL'\:lii\1/L'IIi;JI IIIJ'('IIIo:
t.lt,"UDlo:lll t:1,;111llll<'l' ...tlllUid be 111\o-J\,;cJ en 1111 Out
i!llltll) .ilhmplnl lu 'Uiplll)' Om' 200 2/ilNJ
\'C:t11lll.'d lo!l('n-.1\' UUo.tnn!'lll o.nnlln('f)o In this
All 1 lhtUitdiN.'<l ht t'\l'll ltMI. :.U on di,..lK' lit,
Ob;lm;t binh E.\ctt-c " I
<lu MJt lnr lh\' \If I -uppnll OtQm.t
1. Miss Matched Typed Letters
C"umv;ato: o:nhllj:\'ll hum luth ,.,'llilimlc. \\',
h;c\'t' ,.h,...,n "tlh "t>luo:> t.hl the- 'lll!!tnilllt.lll'l
lhC' unc -.ell !'rum lb. \\1>1\1 "Siudml''th.JI
1'\bihil 1\\'n t.!tffo.n'l\1 ''Y"' nl 1111 t" in tho.- '-LIJ\<' '.1'\IIJ Th" "IJ'J1t'"' nUl
.-.. n1t:nt1uu c.'a'f)to:t.l and ,,......_.m\!I,.J lrun1<iillc.-ll'RI
lltii.'IIRK'Ilh. ='irlll'lho. 'IN :mt..l ha(l'.' dtllt'fl.'tll'l" lbo.,, kucr' ,-uuiL.I "'''
ha\-.:.:unl\' In >en -.:unc 1Yfll'\\1ilcl . Tlris i.t
2. The Bent Cap "H"
Wo: h;nc.: lhl' 11.111\C'
"ll llSSrt'l" h..lr\\ '" Jl""" tlllllb
Mltlctlp"' H"' It hlllllllRII\U.alloor
IYJll'\\lllt,. kl14'h h> I'll l>ttn Tllty
atl/ ultcn h.!nl \\ll<.'lllho: 1)111'-l l_:t:l<
;! !-.:) \ \llll .. 11'}.'\.'lhtt ami 11\UI pull
lllt'm :&p:n1 llu. 1\' a .. m llu' t
""J..-nu: I h lh.l rhr
EE 66 11
Ulllrr/lctJp'"I/''J.WIIIlirbinlt
aa ee
crnijiMttartnrm,clu.llll
11.111.'1 "t-.nl 11
AA II S
r-, K u .. -:.nIIYI!.-I><'nllnllh.
n n
'- )! .. h:n,r;ulllllK'Ill!'
U ll.t.'li '" t)p111!! 11
ss tt yy ii KU HUSSEIN
SfATE OF HAWAII CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRJH
"Dsrtcened & elarged tD show the White Halo 151
6085
3. The Certificate Number
II <ull\CI>llC' LIC\.'IIklllll.l }'l':ll ' "
IHr th o.'<"llil'it-:tll' fur:. jll'r"<ll!.lhry \\nuhl
a bulh ccrtilk.lli' llUI\Ib...-r th:rl "'
t:cnnml' anti W;j' 1\\tv:tl in til(' IlK> I m1.
:\ th:tt "'''hum thf. tb)' tn
!lai\:Jil ;a, ll;n::u:k Ob;u11a tliLd lilt" II<' \ I
.J:1y. We bciK'W oumbo.1 \\;c
61 \V(.' il'k\'d tht' IR<>Iho.J hti\'\IIK"I
her hulh t.:L'f1ihcntc ;ml.llhey p:nc 111:1 th.:
'hull ICJIII\ "ith i\ number "ll)' o.l\11 "'
Wljii('II<'C' lur ll\1. 111<111111 Su lk a\l..clllut
lho. lunncul\1 I<'IU>CLl.
ht<lU,!!hl :c IlK'
O:IIUII' ml\1 \\ lll.ltth\'
Htlfl\IIUiu Ucpl . nl Health ,uuld IIC\."Hk 11
I he) n;rm.,oltc pnn ilk tho: bmh ..nc
ut tla.: o.l..'l.T.J-..'tl b;tln '" 1hc IUullll.'l nul
o:J-..&ALTH
61 10641
OBAMA, li

v ... O r-oor23

4. The Start of Une Error
OB.AMA
Uw.ol CJtruP"Ii"" 1a. Kid 11r lndufUJ
University
------------
DUNHAM CSUCF.SiBD
Type of Qmap-tioll Ou!ritlt: He.- Durm1 Prqunq 11ft. Do14 Lut W.,.,rd
NGne
5. Irregular Line Spacing
B.AHACK
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
lb. ltiddl!!. Name
BENT" H" -+ U S S I ~
FILE 151
NUMI1l
Monh
August
le ..
BENT
CAP
UH"
S T R I G ~
CAP--,
"H"
Found in locations 1b and 7d
on the Obama birth certificate
HU HU HU HU HU HU HU
HUHUHUHUHUHUHU
In this test above I used my own typewriter to type a normal
set of the 'HU" combination.
Before typing the second line I bent the arm of the cap H
by hand to replicate how this affects a tetter. I bent it a
little to far . .. . but the results show my point ..
One thing is certain. The old manual typewriters could allow
a letter to be bent and once it is bent . it stays bent
until it is straightened out.
The existance of a bent H and a straight H on the same
document clearly indicates the forgery of the Obama long
form birth certificate released on the 27th of April, 2011.
A Kunawai Lane
.lH'liEE
The outline of this box roughly
illustrates the type of distortion I
am describing.
This happens on a copier when the
rollers on one side are worn and slip
pulling one side of the paper more
than the other.
HUSSEIN OB.AMA
The outline of this box roughly
illustrates the type of distortion I
am describing.
This happens on a copier when the
rollers on one side are worn and sJ;p
pulling one side of the paper more
than the other.
JOHANNASOLANOESIERRAOK-HEEAH
1
NEE
FemaleAugust23,196112:3?
Honolulu Oahu
Kapiolani Maternity& Gynecological
HonoluluOahuRonolulu,Hawaii
623AKunawaiLane
JAMES KAOHU AH
1
NEE Hawn-Cau
29Honolulu,OahuChiefReeferStaamshipCompany

36Honolulu,OahuNone
HE EE AH NE it ne wn hi
HE EE A.H NE it ne , : wn hi
an Ha aw Ho on no hu ollu :--. ah ef
an Ha aw : Ho on no hu ollu :. ah (_'. .. ' J.a ef
an Ha aw Ho on no hu ollu ' _- . ah as Ch aa
an aw . Ho on no hu ollu -::: ah as Ch ea
an Ca : :: Ho on no ollu
an Ca . Ho on ol lll
ollu 38 sets
Typewriters 0 BOt do tills. This Is 1 u 14 are 0 K
fllure aftll for.erta , ...... tile lu 25 are not (black)
letters s predsely s typewriter does. lu
The premise as to why some of the letters on Johanna's birth certificate do not match
for size or angle is that the forger .... not using a real typewriter to create the forgery ...
copied the typed letters from more that one existing birth certificate and pasted the
doucument up letter-by-letter resulting in a variety of letters from different documents.
It is well established in typewriter forensics that no two typewriters are the same simply
because the long arms of the typebars that strike the letters are easity bent. Bending
would frequently happen when a fast typist would get two keys stuck together before
striking and then they would need to be manually pulled apart . oftf'Jn resulting in bend-
ing. This factor has been used many times to positively identify any particular typewrit-
er that may have been used in the commision of a crime.
This is wh:y the forger might have for example ... picked a letter from a document with a
straight cap H" and then may have used another cap ''H'' from a different document
where that letter was bent. I show 9 examples of this below that are all from Johanna's
birth certificate proving forgery because when a letter is bent .. it stays bent ... and does
not vary in angle at different times on a single document.
The attached source document shows
all the text as is seen on the birth
certificate ... and then this text was
arranged alphabet1cally to compare
the tetters. The results are these 9
examples of forgery color keyed
to match the location on the
document they came from.
To the right is a
cap A'' marked
as green that is
much wider
and shorter than
the A'' marked
in pjnk.
The ~ on the left
is straight & the one
on the right is bent.
The uf" on the left The ~ r o n the left The ''H" on the left
In this case the
letter u;,. on the
left is larger.

1

is straight & the one is straight & the one is straight & the one
on the right is bent. on the right is bent. on the right is bent.
Here the letter ''K"
on the right is
larger.

The "p" on the
left is straight
and the one on
the right is bent .
The R" on the left
is bent & the one on
the right is straight.
c
0
-o .
c.&::
s ~
OIV
"-E
"'
Cl.l....,
uO
taC
c..o
"'-a
"' ....
era
0
__ .c
...,...,
rau
c
--al
..Q"'
e ~
o"'
u
I-ta
CU.c
..,o
t:----
-
I
N
000
rzlt:J 0 0 00
JOHANNASOLANGE SIERRAOK-HEEAH
1
NEE

femaleAugust23,196112:3?
Honolulu Oahu
lapiolani Maternity & Gynecological

623AKunawatLane
0
Po>
Hespital

(')
<F
0
0
(0
(0
JAMES KAOHU AH' NEE

J6Honolulu,OahuNone
CJ1
I
;o
c.....
r

AAAAlAlAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

;
;
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnOOOOOOOO
0

0
222233366699

-SHOWS DISTORTION OF PAGE
r"T ""w'*" CERTIFICA n oF LIVE DIPARTMINT Of " .... T ..
.. ISl "G1. OT
... ............. ,. .. M.J .. ti... I.MI-"-e
OK-HEI AHlfBS TD\JCiitNG
1.. The red horizo11tal rules show that all the typed Jines are perfectly straight but we see
that the fom1 lines are not and one might think that the form was simply not straight in the
typewriter but thats not it. The lines on the form are not perfectly straignt because of the
curve of the form into u,e binder. The left side curves up slightly because the form Is in a
binder that does not lay completely flat. See diagram here:
BIRTH CERTIFICATE
COPIERS GLASS SURFACE
page 1 of 2 C 2013
2.. This style of typing seen on both birth certificates is not normal for a form. What r see on the other
birth certificates from Hawaii (see examples) is that the typist puffs the carriage retum to start a new
line and begins typing from the beginning at the left margin. What we see on both of these documents
is random placement of the words or possibley an attempt to center each word in it's box. Other typist
do not do this. When I typed forms for the U.S. Air Force on similiar manual typewriters I would atways
type from the left margin and set my tab bar to jump to the next box. Everything was aligned left.
3. If you took at Obamas form In box 6a you will see that If this was actually typed, the typist using an
old manual 1961 era typewriter would have had to hit the space bar 20 times to create the margin we
see. To someone placing the letters down by computer, the word starts are ooly a matter of where
the forger decides to physically place the first letter.
4. So there are 7 simillaraties between Obama and Johanna's birth certifteates:
1. Both have the same page dJstortwn a.l the lower left corner.
2. Both have 11 begmnmg of word lltatc'ring
3. Both have vertiCal line spacing 1rregu1artt1es.
4- Both nave rrregular letrerspacing.
5. Both llave bent ana strast;rtt vers1ons of tne sa1nc letter on tl'rter bfrt.h cert1fteates.
6. Botllhave Bates StatJlfJ certiffcate flwnbers irnpossibly touctling
1. Both are Health Dept. tJ1rth certificate torgerJes.
If you count the 11 beginning of line coincidences as 11 similiarities ... you have
a total of 17 matching slmfllaritles between the two birth certificates.
Truly a statistically impossibility. These two documents are tied together ... obviously because the
same person tllade thern both using the same flawed techniques.
&. Johanna made her forgery to give Jeny Corsi because he had claimed that the Nordyke twins
had been born a day later than Obama and yet they had a lower certificate number. She forged her
own bogus certificate and Inserted an out of sequence number to pretend that her number was
also out of sequence. Jerry would notice that on his own and decide that his theory must be wrong.
Here below are details of the line spacing problems. I have taken 4 lines from the birth certificate
and placed them all below with each showing the distance from the bottom of the form bo)C. The
distances you see vary and they should not. The form is designed for a typewriter. Pulling the
carriage return when the line spacing is set for 2 line spaces would result in a 2 pica distance
each time. These samples here show that those distances are uneven.
Feule August 1961 Honolulu Oahu Honolulu 62.3 A Kunavai
...
ON SAME tiNE ON SANE UNE
8. The photograph of
the mechanism on the
left side of the typewrit-
er
shows the precise gear
that controls this dis-
tance 'o aUow for a
one ... two .. or lhree
pica vert4c1e line space.
My studies of other
birth certificates from
Hawaai show consistant
--
ON SAME liNE
IIIISSAA
I quoto Dno18.,- -
.V.0 wkJ!you optM ttl doCIIIMttt Itt lldolle
PbotothOJJ nd copy tile IIS4 frcm ttw 008
1/Bo, It ow.r tho othM uampJe of
U.U. t!JeJ' Nne up pelfK'67. IJ11our u
mplft ol USA up e.roctly 111d lh only
conelu.lon ls they ldei'IIIIUIL

4 TALL
Barack Obama c/o LEAVING
Acton,Dystel,Leone & Jaffe (PROBLEM
79 5th;.A9ena.e
NY NY 10003 Attn: Jane Dystel
1. The typewriter forensic grid ..
This represents the width of This represents one carriage
FIGURE 1
one Elite typewritten character
-
1--
return or one tine space
I
_r-
l
a "'
aaa
...
a e a
Ia a as 8
1. The vertical rules match the space for the Elite typewritten letters.
1. Ttnr usA" under year Born" without the date Is the same paste up not In the same line as sarack Obama- on the 2a line
4
Namv of
2. The usA": pasted In below are not lined up to resemble typing on a form one above the other under the Author's Nationality or Domicile
3. The uUSA" shown below from line lis the element used ln thll paste-up In line 2a above and Is not In the same line as 1995
4. The Une 4 use of earack Obama cto is at an angle to the "Acton, Dystel . Leon &
Jaffe below lt. And it appears that "whlteout was actually used below In the address.
I
I
I
I

... ,
01
MAWA.It CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH OJ "'ALTH
I___ - __ 7 ..... -...-=-- 61
... _ .........
-a;.- pff4J" Flnl r'IMI 1T,.. r ..... .-. ......... lllr -...... "'-f .
.. 9PLO! W L HE NDEA SON
u..
Aud.r
--
"'
36
I,...,, fiiiM IIIIH .._,. .. 111111111
............... ,....
..... '-"t .t r ..
I ....., etftiiJ 1\lt
. ..,. ............ ,. ......
................. ,
JL Ill ... jl t.y L&K .... }21 ..
j
t
a t ... ...... IUIII' er
...... D., vnr
25 1961 A
..,
Oahu
'11 r. ............ l"tt' "'- ,:, ., ... .U...:U.?
_.,... ___ _
tl ..-.6ni .-.rHI,
, Va....!JJlfJ " . _ ____ _ _ __
:c .... _
.. ........_ I -,_ cq.,..p...,.Ji_oR'Y_.fe-;-.....;; ,... -....- _ _. - .-..
I
rii<Jro
.. ---..! -.. .... H I..Wtt

--.. :-y --
...
- - ' !!CLH!t
Negro
1.. "'''"' .,.wrlw-n; -"::-... .,.j,; ...
()

('0

I

I
0
0
<.0
<.0
CJ1
I
;o
c.....
r
0
0
("')
c
3
('0
:::l
-Q')
I

J:1.
co
c..
0
Q')
-
w
0
-

""0
Sl)
tC
('0
CJ1

0
'""1'\

0
0
---------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.: 14-cv-00995 (RJL)
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY I 1238
and H. \VILLIAM VAN ALLEN
845-3 89-4366 hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
Plaintiffs.
v.
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at2201 C StreetN\V
\Vashington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339
\\'ashington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
JANE D. DYSTEL I UN]ON SQUARE WEST
Albany> NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 18
Re: Fw: forged .l:l'4rlm6-00995-RJL Document ...
1 of2
Christopher Proroo Sign Out Home
Re: Fw: forged copyright form ....
From: "Paullrey" <pau!ireysecret@gmait corn>
To: Polycentrism " <cestrunck@yahoo.com>
3 Files 14MB Download 1-Jr
JPG 5 M3 JPG 6 f..B JPG 3 IVE!
Save Save Save
Chris.
Attached are 3 files related to the copyright
.....
Mor.da'/. June 23, 2014 3:48PM
The 2 fun pages have a typewriter forensic grid on them and indications of which typed words are not following the grid.
On a typed page using the old manual typewnters that are only typed In mono-space mode .. meaning that the carriage return would always move 6
points to the left after a letter is typed 6 points more space is allowed for the next letter. Proportional spacetl typing became widely available dunng
the 1960's when the IBM Selectric came into use .. and by the seventes. it was rare for a business to use the old manual typewriters
Document forensic exarrr.ners would purchase specially made glass or plastic sheets with grid markings on them to assure that a manual typewriter
actually typed a document ... and other things. These days software like Adobe Photoshop Is used to do the same thing much easier because the
program allows one to create a grid line in any color at any s1ze
I might add that there were two types of the old manual typewriters MPica SIZed letters and "Elite" SIZed letters. The larger size . 'P1caw was more
common. Both the Hawaiian birth certificates ... and the copyright dOC\Jillent was coincidentany done m nEiite"
If all the letters on a documer.t do not align with the grid only two possibilities are suggested ... the typist pltled the paper out of the typev1riter in the
middle of typing and put it back . or it was not typed .. but instead pasted up Jetter by letter ... possibly to make a document look like it was typed
but the gnd exposes that plan I have attached a full graphic descriptton of a gnd on the page called "List of Problems".
That single fault of letters bemg off the grid ... found on both the front and back of the copyright form is actually the biggest problem and indicates
clear fraud
The possibility of any typed document exhibiting typed letters of different sizes is also dearly a fraud
I think the messy appearance of over-strikes or typed letters was done deliberately to make the document appear to be genuine ... but of course it Is
not
I've been down this road before . this is a "false instrument" pretending to be a typed document.
Why anyone would do that is obvious in this case
As Obama's publicist declared for 15 years Barack Obama said he was born in Kenya and ra1sed in lrnloneisia
Then In 2011 ... when he was forced to make a rush job on a forged birth certificate to ma1ntam his cred1bllity he d!d not forget the his copyright form
that asked for the country of birth and his said ''Kanya".
What to do about that was simply to re-make a substitute copyright form and replace what was in the copyright offiCe
I wonder if Simon and Shuster also replaced the copy they had on fde?
Probably not . but we should request a copy from them to see how they would respond
Probably like Kapiolani Hosptial did when they refused to provide any record of birth data on the premise of med1cal confidentiality .. and become the
first hospital ever to do that where a president was irMIIved The rest brag . "This is where our pres.dent was bom' Obama sent them a letter
thanking them for being his hospital of birth It's not displayed anywhere in the hospital
Then we have the interesting situation where the US Copyright offiCe .. probably for the f1rst time m h1story .. demes a pubiic document beulg gnten
out
Someone has the real one .... it was out there for 15 years and we can bet our bottom doDar that it declares that Obama was bom in Kenya
If we can finrl it .. big problems for Obama
If this mess we came across is actually what they now have on file I can understand why they would refuse to give 1t out
The editor that signed it "Greaves" .. had his name on the document twice Once time it is speUed wrong What klld of' editor" of a publishing
company woud aUow his r.ame to be miss-spelled on a legal document that he knew he had to sign? Greaves died in Brooklyn at 58 years old in
2006.
We need to know what kind of excuse Simon and Shuster will give in order to pre\lent us from gettir.g a copy of this copynght from their off'tce,
6/23/2014 4:06PM
Re: Fw: forged Document ...
2 of2
The suspiCion that Johanoa Ahnee already shown to have definitely forged her cwn birth certlfrcate and most certainly forging Obama's birth
certificate also . was called to duty to re-make Obama's copyright rorm r:"l order to only have one forger lessening the chance of a confession from
one of two forgers. So not having a typewriter ... she used her collecton of letters given to her fo forgery from the dept of health in Honoluu and
that's V.'hy we see all the faiT'Jiar problems aga!n just like the two fcrgertes she did already Elote type .. letters off the grid . tilted letters . and
securing the original from Vle'.V.
i still need to check it for letter-spacing problems and that wul wrap up the rssue
How I determine letter spacing problems is to find more than one two-letter combtnation ana ccmpare them to see if the space between the letters as
the same or different I will do that next. I've been too busy lately.
I'm waiting to hear from you regarding put'Jng the affidavit together with my evidence
I can't open Microsoft at this time
Pau
On Sun, Jun 22. 2014 at 4:38 PM, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sut Jl.lfis agent <cestrunc;k@Naho9 com> wrote:
I have done a quick analysiS of the copyright forgery anomalies do they coincide with your analysis?
1. The USA"llllder year Born without the date is the same paste-up not m the same line asaarack Obama" on the 2a line "Name of Author
2. The "USA": pasted rn below are not lined up to resemble typing on a form one above the other under the Author's Nationality or
3. The "USA" shown below from line 3 is the element used in the paste-up n line 2a above and is not in the same line as "1995"
4. The hne 4 use of "Barack Obama cia" is at an angle to the "Acton, Dystel, Leon & Jaffe" below it. And it appears that "whiteout was actually used
below 'n the address.
5 I believe that the PDF has layers.
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
transmitting ut:lity TMCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Plaintiff I Petitioner in NYS SC Kings Cty Index Nos
29042-2008, 6500-2011, 21948-2012, Strunk v US DOS
USOC DCO 14-0995 (RJL} am the Executor and Settlor for
tl".e Express Deed In Trust To The United States Of Amenca,
located at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - PMB 281
Cell 845-901-6767 Eman: chrjs@strunk.wssuRETY NO MORE" WEBSITE:httpl/assoclahonforsovareiqnhomerulewithin.orgl
--On Mon. 1/27/14, PaUl trey <pauedwardlrey@yahoo.com> wrote
> From: Paullrey <pauledwardjrey@yahoo..J:Q.!!l>
> Subject: forged copyright form .. ..
"> To "cestrunck@yahoO.com" <cestrunck@Nahoo.com>
> Date: Monday January 27, 2014, 8:12 PM
>Chris,
>See
> attached the PDF of the forged copyright form
> Pau!
> lrey
6.23/2014 4:06PM
Additional C&rtificate (17
TH5 GRAY BQ)(5
AR A t;RI'O I
Certificate of Registration
FORMTX
For a Lllefary Work
1
This Certificate issued under the seal of the Copyright ""
in accordance with title 17, United Stares Code,
attests that registration has been made for the work
identified below. The information on this certificate has
been made a part of the Copyright Office records.
Regisler of Copyrights, United Srares of America
Tl'rLE OF THIS WORK Y
UNITED STATES ,...r-,...,._
en:C)r(vW,:e OF
NOV a 0 \99)
TE CONTINUATION SHEET.
DlWMS PROM MY PATHRR aFF TH GRIO
PREVJOUS OR ALTERNATIVE TITLES Y
PUBLICATION AS A CONTRIBUTION 11 thi11 work ,. ..lS "'., .:ontnbutu>n '" ,, r-ri.ldk.,l.,..,ri.,J, "' lnhllrmalkm .'l\lc>UI
COJI\.'Cti\'1:' wnrlr; in wh:rh lhl.' coolnbulion of Wodc Y
-
II publbhL.-d m o1 pt"riadicalrar )!I\' I!: Voli.ID\1!" OnPagu,.
a Baraclt Obama f-OFF'THGRrD
DATES Of BIRTH AND DEATH
Yeor Born " Year Otcd Y
USA
2
NAME OF AUTHOR Y
\Ya!t this contribution to the W\)l'k 1 AUTHOR'S NATIONALITY OR DOMICILE WAS TH1S AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTION TO
NnTE
lf ... ,., --
....... .,.
IIJIU for d4111
ol b11tb nil
Gllllh Dlanll
work Cor hin:-? Of CDimi'Y eJN WORK H Dlt anew. to llilbtr
0 OR { f'illll 'tl ol ... - _]]SA OFF :rH 0 Yrs cz
IZNo '".. - USA .mtiiiE.GRID'UJOnl'mOV!I? r: YL'S GNo I\SlrucliOiw
NATURE OF J .. Qf by 1h1..., '"hd copyright is cl.ltrncd.
Ent1re work exclud1ng fTom otbeT souTces
NAME OF AUTHOR Y
wa, this contrihutiun lo the wmic oil
uwmk far hi h."?
DYes
ONo
NATURE OF AUTHORSHII'
NAME OF
w.,, thl!! nmtrihutiun t.alh wtm..
W"lk
0YN.
QNo
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
ON THE
DATES Of BIRTH AND DEATH
Year Born "' Year Died "
AUTHOR'S NATIONALITY OR DOMICilE WAS THIS AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUllON TO
Narne al Counuy THE WORK t1 Ute ll'lrnr 10 liltler
oR{Cttiunottl- --- - - --- Anonymous? DYes 0 ll:o
.... _ _ -- ----- 1-.,..,oulhr!vmnull' 0 No
Dr "-'fly dL'Knre uf crcat\.'d by this ulhnr 1n whtCh Is claaned.
AUTHOR'S NATIONAliTY OR IJOMJCill!
N;!me Ol COUOlf)'
OA {. Cti;o:('n ul ...
tn ..
DATI:S OF BIRTH AND DEATH
Year Born " Year OiE.'d 'Y
flUS AUTHOR'S CONT.RlBUTJON TO
THEWORK
J\1'1t>f\)l\t1.1U!., , . ,..,. ...1 Nt>
P.<:'l.n.l.,nvm.u"'' 0 0 Nn 111Slr\1CtJ0!1s
YEAR IN WHICH CREATION OF TH. IS b DATE AND N ATJON OF FIRST rU_8LtCATION OF THIS PARTICUlAR WORK
a
WORK WAS COMPLETED T1titlnfcmwllon Ccmo!ntllllnlotmallon __ ,,_I_ -....3li. _ o
11
... _ YNt .. _
_ _ ____ -- .fv.,., ON T.tt _ .. t. -. _G_R_. 11?---'7 USA _ Nltl
4
S.JMINCtlons
011018 C:Ompiii""<J

COrYRIGHT CLAIMANTIS' Naml! .1nd adJress must be given even If tht! ciJim.,nt is thf as APPLICATION FIECEIVEO
th.:.a.w.IN"IJw.:otn .. pJ(\'2.,. Barack Obama clo NITL3JlJ 9 9.5 ... -----
ftJ.J. Acton
7
Dyatel
11
Leone & Jaffe ONEOEPOSITRECEIVEO
ONTHE ---:T 79 5th-Xnnae
GRIO NY HY 10003 Attn: Jane Dyatel TWODEPOSITSRECEIVED
_T_R_A_N_S_FE_R_r_f f-r.,-m-1-hc- .,..-u-th-.-w-!-11)-n-.,m.:-:od-i-n
Q Cl t;
2. give" brkf uf hnw d.lfmilnUrol obl.llnl.od :f
0
\1: E'fvEft
MORE ON 8AC1<... Complall all applicable spaces tnumbers S 11) on 1111 reverso s.de ollliJS page
SM tftllrut'!lon:a S.gn lorm .at bna 10

'1

0
CORRESPONDENCE
Yes
FOR
COPYAIGHT
OFFICE
use
ONLY
.. U._NEIIIIiED-MOR-E-=SPACE.i'IIIU-.SEAIIIiS.:.EPAia.RaiAIIIIiTE-CIIiOaNTI-NiiiUA:.InONiiiiiiia:SHiiiEaETa.
PRVIOUS RECJSTRATION lio'lS ror thb w.tr\., ur fur .m \'\'fSillllllf nus Wf\fk. .aln..hJJI bn.'fJ an Ilk OfTin!?
0 \'tt (J:No If )'uur o1nSWt'f' Is y""; why is ;uwtht.r '-'tng lMlll,;hl? .tppropri.Jtc bull} Y
A. 0 Thia u; tbl. tmrot publilll'lll."&i "odltlun t'lf wur 1"'-"iuuHY n.,;U.t .. on'\1 in unpublisJ"'od fulm
b. C Thl'\ is the ftl'llt pplicttun Mabmilll'd by this iUihot 111 clain&ant.
c. 0 Thi b. 11 w,.i,. wcri:. IIIINutwn hy sp.k'l. It un
II your .lrts-.>r i$ W'-V. Prftlou1 Rf'l.lru.uion Nurabrr 'Y or
b. Mattrbl Addtd to Thla Work GIVe II bricl', gcn"'fal SI14'Ril'Rl ul thl.' m.lc."''i:IJ thll fws b..'!aldds.td lolhh \0\lfk ..00 in whech cnpyns;ht ""cbima,J 9
. __ other sourc:!! -------
-space deleted-
REPRODUCTION FOR USE OF BLIND OR PH\'SICALLY HANDICAPPED JNOlVIDUAlS 1\sir.n.tu..-eon lhiSfunn IDand dlrcltlnolk'
ol bn\\OS lwr(' U\ tp,lt't 8 t"\'lr.tiiiUII.'"\.t gr.tnl ut l\l lht llbnny of Congi'\'U to n.opruduce and distribUh:JOicly fur t)w blind a.nd physinlly
hin&lllAJI"oU """' Ulni\'1 clw ("(UidiiiO"-In&J llmJlohlln' b) !Itt: rt'l)\ilalkqt), "' 1Jtv Cnpyright orr.c\!: Ul ropk's t11thc wurk idL'ftllfh.-d in SpiW l ollhi:r.
appll<.ai!Qtllll Br,II!L (or .liJnUar IM:t11uymbob); Ot (2.! a r'laoltion 1\!aiiRJl ul th.IIIIIOI't; or (ll bnth.
1 0 Cop"-'s .anJ PhunOMUrds b 0 Copto Only ct:l
DSPOSIT ACCOUNT If &he! C'fllMrttlol\ II to Dvpoall Account naabtlshl'\1 In t'"-' Otficv. runw nd numb or 1\cwunt
Namr '9' Acco11at Number '9'
Random Houee
CORRESroNDENCE GIYr nanw 1nd a.dt.il'fte cv whrm about rtns appl&atton Mlt Name/ Add"',.,' AptiCtr/Stal\./ZIP
Michael Grevaes, Raadaa House Inc
--20 I -E-;st 50th-S.t.uet.. __ -: ( __
New Yorkl tn' __ I002L.___ ---
,... ..
CERTIFICA. noN ' ttlg Ulldlmigrwd. hnvby Cl'ftify lhatl.am llwt {Oauthor ON TK
Cht.donlyon._..., Oolhl-'fMJ'yrishtdlltlNill . 1 .
(l OWtk'f of rff;i\t!sl ""
of IM work in lhl' .,ppllr.mon and th.1t m.1d tiS of - RAndota BQU&..!L
by In(' In this .lppUctlun cor ri."CJ In'"'" kosi or my ot ...-.ot OfelhoW CllpyfiiiN o1 UCiuSne ,.,.._,,
Typed or prlnttd rwne .lnd If ,, JJIL ol rubl . tr In sp.lCt' l. du nul MSn Submtt it llul
_____ Michael Greaves Otj,J: IJ) - ONI.H _ 16-30-95
UAfL
eEAnr:t-
cATETo
' Name .. - - - - - - - . 1
1
Michael Grevaea,. Times Books, lnr:. '
t- -- -- '
Nvlllt.-1&he'l.l1fMI'4 NumMt.. .L...
201 Baat 50th Street
10022
I Ot
1
1Si"a;z""ii ---
l Hew YOrk, HY
t--
'hr S.T
:d I , t::.Cn t
f:J r, tr p,.r; ... #"' :. r
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
'f7 US C. f Sl)6ff): A,., i!nO'n9r lllaMI Alt&M l"lllrtMn:.lbO<t at IW., Ill far reosltal.Cil IQr by 4171, 01_,, wr111n ,_, lftCOIIfii!CtiQrl
be 1WliG 1101 fl'.ole!Nf\ U.500
JTit (j PflilWTfD ON RECYClED PAPfH -.uS COVERNUENT PRINTWG OFFICt tltil :M2-5a2.-eG.OlO
CRiS BONAZA OF EViDENCE
New YOrk:. RY 10022 Barack Obama o
. - -
New York, NY 10022 Barack Obama
201 East 50th Street Ent:ire work excluding quotes t
20 I East 50th Street Entire text excluding quotes
- -- -- <.0
Random Bouse Inc Gr-eaves-Random Bouse
Random Bouse Inc Grevaes House Inc r
Randoa ftouse _ Michael Grevaes s
3
('[)
IS THERE ANYON ON THE PLANET THAT WILL
CLAIM THAT ONE SINGLE TYPEWRITER TYPED
ALLTHIS?
Q
RANDOM HOUSE WOULD NOT LIKE TO SEE :
THIS - AS IT DOES NOT REPRESENT A MAJOR
PUBLISHER TRYING TO FILL OUT A COPYRIGHT
FORM ON AN ANCIENT TYPEWRITER IN 1995!
0
BUT OF COURSE IT'S NOT A TYPEWRITER.

845-389-4366 hvanaHen@hvc.rr.com
MICHAEL SHRil\1PTON 8 Jusons Glebe,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 220 I C Street NW
1 0 1 Independence A venue SE
Washingtont DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN RANDOM
1745 BROADWAY NE\V YORK. NEW YORK, 10019
.JANE D. DYSTEL I UNION SQUARE WEST
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW \Vashington DC 20530
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 19
Workspace Webmail :: 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ..
l of2
f.!i!:!! I Close Window
Subject: your original FOIL request
From: John Fraser <John.Fraser@hesc.ny.gov>
Date: Fri, May 30,20141:17 pm
To: CHRIS@STRUNK.WS
Attach: pic19169.gif
ecblank.gif
Attached below. as you requested.
John W. Fraser, Esq.
Senior Attorney, Office of Counsel, Room 1350
New York State Higher Education Services Corporation
99 Washington Avenue 1 Albany, New York 112255
T: (518) 473-1581 IF: (518} 486-6515
John Fraser@hesc.ny.gov 1 www.HESC.ny.gov
Cal Srvr/HESC@HESCNOTES
05/22/2014 1115 AM
Please respond to
"CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK"
<Ct-IRIS@STRUNK. WS>
To: FOIL Record Access Officer
From: CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Subject: FOIL Request
Documents Requested
RECORDS ACCESS OFFICER,
To
foil@hesc,
FOIL Request
I hereby request all index listings of any type of student loan applications and the actual copy of the loan records for a
student who either in preparation and or attendance at Columbia University in New York City for the period from 1979
thru 1983 of the person or persons using the names "BARRY SOETORO", "BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA", "BARRY
ALLEN OWENS", "BARRY DUNHAM", "STEVE DUM-tAM", "SOEBARKAH"
And that it is my understanding that the complete record of attendance by any student including foreign students
whether having attained loan assistance is a requirement for there to be Federal or States funds assistance directed
to the respective school of attendance per se.
e-Mail Address: CHRIS@STRUNK.WS
Telephone number: (845) 901-6767
Address:
PMB 281
Brooklyn, NY 11238
513012014 4:32 PM
Workspace Webmail :: 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ....
2 of2
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein ts prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please destroy all copies of the message, whether in electromc or hard copy format, as well as attachments. and immediately
contact the sender by replying to this e-mail or by phoning. Thank you. Visit us on the Web at http://www.hesc.ny.gov
Copyright 2003-2014. All rights reserved.
5/30/2014 4:32PM
Workspace Webmail :: 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document ...
l ofl
Print 1 Close Window
Subject: FOIL
From: John Fraser <John.Fraser@hesc.ny.gov>
Date: Fri, May 30, 2014 10:48 am
To: CHRIS@STRUNK.WS
Cc: Sharon Forbes <Sharon.Forbes@hesc.ny.gov>
Attach: Strunk FOIL response 5-30-14.doc
(See attached file: Strunk FOIL response 5-30-14.doc)
John W. Fraser, Esq.
Senior Attorney, Office of Counsel, Room 1350
New York State Higher Education Services Corporation
99 Washington Avenue 1 Albany, New York 112255
T: (518) 473-1581 IF: (518) 486-6515
John Fraser@hesc.ny.gov 1 www.HESC.ny.gov
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, andlor
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please destroy all copies of the message, whether in electronic or hard copy fonnat. as well as attachments, and immediately
contact the sender by replying to this e-mail or by phoning Thank you. Visit us on the Web at http://www.hesc.ny.gov
Copyright 2003-2014 All rights reserved
5/30/2014 4:33PM

Help People Pay For Coll ege
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY
Christopher Earl Strunk
PMB 281
Brooklyn, NY 11238
Dear Mr. Strunk:
May 30,2014
This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request that was
originally dated and received by the New York State Higher Education Services Corporation
(HESC) on May 2014 and which you resubmitted to HESC on May 29, 2014.
Your request seeks access to information related to student loan accounts that may exist
for specific individuals listed in your request. The information requested is of a personal nature
related to the subjects of your request and is protected by federal and state law and regulation.
New York's FOIL Law is contained in the Public Officers Law Article 6. In pertinent part,
Section 87 addresses access to Agency records, including records that are exempt from
disclosure pursuant to FOIL. Section 87 (2) (a) and (b) reads:
Each agency shall, in accordance with its published rules, tnak.e available for public
inspection and copying all records, except that such agency may deny access to records
or portions thereof that:
(a) are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute;
(b) if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy under the
provisions of subdivision two of section eighty-nine of this article;
In order for you to obtain records related to an individual student loan borrower, the
borrower would be required to authorize HESC in writing to release records related to their
account to you. In the absence of such written authorization, HESC is prohibited from releasing
any information related to the individuals. Upon receipt of such authorization from any of the
individuals listed in your request, HESC will undertake a review of its records to determine
whether any responsive records exist.
Based on the foregoing, HESC is unable to provide any information related to the
individuals listed in your FOIL request.
NEW YORK STATE HI G HER EDUCATION SERVICES CORPORATlON
9? Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12255 888-NYS-HESC www.hesc.org
Pursuant to Section 89 ( 4) of FOIL, the person requesting records may appeal the denial
of access to responsive records that may ex.ist. An appeal n1ust be made within thirty days of
receipt of this written notice and submitted to Thomas Brennan, General Counsel and Records
Appeals Officer, HESC, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12255.
Sincerely yours,
Is/ John Fraser
John Fraser
Records Access Officer
(518) 473-1581
----------------------------------------------------------------X
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC. NY 1 1238
845-901-6767
Plaintiffs,
v.
BARACK HUSSEIN II
1 0 I Independence A venue SE
\Vashington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000

and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC., MJCIIAEL GREAVES,
1745 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK. 10019
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER> US ATTORNEY GENERAL

Exhibit 20
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
~ ~ ~ ~ l t
Christopher Earl Sttunk, Index No.: 29642 I 08
Plaintiff, I.A.S. Part 47
-against-
David A. Paterson et al. JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
Defendants. DUCES TECUM
----------------------------------------------------------------------lt
The People of the State of New York
TO: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each of
you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
Supreme Court for the County of Kings at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of Jtme, 2014 at o'clock, in the
___ noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, any legally certified proof of your place of birth and the citizenship status of
both parents at your birth now in your custody, and all other evidences and writings,
which you have in your custody or power.
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said Court,
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the ____ day of ___ . 2014.
Christopher Earl Strunk, Plaintiff
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281
(845) 901-6767 chris@strunk.ws
Case 1: 14-cv-00995-RJ L Document 6-1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 66 of 100
COUNTY OF KINGS
~ ~ .. ~ X
Christopher Earl Strunk,
-against-
David A. Paterson et al.
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
Index No.: 29642 I 08
I.A.S. Part 47
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
----------------------------------------------------------------------x
TO: TODD VALENTINE of the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at 0
1
clock, in the
___ n.oon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
aforesaid, all correspondence with the office of Attorney General and office of Governor
rega1ding the 2008 and 2012 General Election for President and Vice President, and
for all correspondence regarding the Board of Elections official Website docu1nentation
and records for the posted notification of qualifications required for any candidate for
the Office of President and or Vice President of the United States for the period of 1
August 2008 through 30 May 2014 now in your custody, and all other evidences and
writings, which you have in your custody or power.
at 360 Ada1ns Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the day of , 2014.
COUNTY OF KINGS
.... _______ ..
Christopher Earl Strunk, Index No.: 29642 I 08
-against-
Defendants.
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
TO: DAVID LOOMIS of the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock, in the
___ noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testin1ony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and at the time and place
all Board of Elections official Website documentation and records for the
posted notification of qualifications required for any candidate for the Office of
President and or Vice President of the United States for the period of 1 August 2008
through 30 May 2014 now in your custody, and all other evidences and writings,
which you have in your custody or power.
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said Court!
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the day of , 2014.
Brooklyn, New Yo1k 11238
COUNTY OF KINGS
-------------------------------------- __ $ ________ -----------x
-against-
Defendants.
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
TO:ANDREWMARKCUOMO
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each
of you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock. in the
___ noon, and at any Tecessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
aforesaid, a certain official memorandums and correspondence with agents and or
members of the New York State Board of Elections covering the pe1iod from 1 August
2008 through 1 January 2010 while New York State Attorney General and the period
from 1 January 2010 through the 30 May 2014 while New York State Governor now
in your custody, and all other evidences and writings, which you have in your custody
or power, concerning the General Election of 2008, 2012 and legislation to enact a
winner take all election of pl,esident and vice president ..
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the day of , 2014.
Brooklyn
7
New Yo1,k 11238
(845) 901-6767 chris@strunk. ws
COUNTY OF KINGS
-------v------------------------------------------------------------X
-against-
David A. Paterson et al. JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
Defendants. DUCES TECUM
--- -- - -------- - -- v X
TO: JOHN FRASER and l\TYS HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICES CORPORATION
you appear and attend before the Ron. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18
1
h day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock, in the
___ n.oon, and at any recessed or adjotuned date to give testimony in this action on
aforesaid, all index listings of any type of student loan applications and the actual
copy of the loan records for a student who either in preparation and or attendance at
Columbia University in New York City for the period fron1 1979 thru 1983 of the
person or persons using the names "BARRY SOETORO"r "BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA", "BARRY ALLEN OWENS'',
11
BARRY DUNHAM", "STEVE DUNHAM",
"SOEBARKAH" now in your custody, and all other evidences and writings, which you
have in your custody or power.
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said o u r t ~
at 360 Ada1ns Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the ____ day of ___ , 2014.
Cluistopher Earl Strunk, Plaintiff
593 Vanderbilt Avenue Pl\!IB 281
(845) 901-6767 ch1is@strunk.ws
COUNTY OF KINGS
-----------------------------------------------------------------1[
Christopher Earl Strunk,
-against-
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
Index No.: 29642 I 08
I.A.S. Part 4 7
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
The People ofthe State of New York
TO: DAVID A. PATERSON
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each
of you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
Supreme Court for the County of Kings at 360 Adan1s Street Brooklyn New York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock
1
in the
____ noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testi1nony in this action on
aforesaid, a certain official memorandums and correspondence with agents and or
members of the New York State Board of Elections cove1ing the period from 1 August
2008 through 1 January 2010 while New York State Governor now in your custody,
and all other evidences and writings, which you have in your custody or power,
concerning the General Election of 2008.
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the ____ day of ___ , 2014.
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PlVIB 281
Co N\fLArNI F'1 LeD
1 o Ju,v(:;' ;tC I t1
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 72 of 100 "-
Case 1:14-cv-u0995-RJL Document 1-2 Filed Page 1of t 'f
(b) COVNTY Of RESIDENCE Of fiRST LISTED Pl.AitmFF
(EXCEPT IN PL.A INTIF,. CASES)
II. OF JURISDICTION
(PLACE AN x fH ONE BOX ONLY)
0 t U S OOYenJmcnl
PlamlttT
l U S OovcmmcnJ
Oefendanl
0 l Qvesuon
f\1 $ Ocwcmmen1 Nof I Puly)
0 4 Otver.SJI)'
{lndi"tc Cllltcn.sbrp of
PtJ1tet tn 1tcm II f)
CIVIL COVER SHEET
Case: 1 :14-cv-00995
Assigned To: Leon, Richard J.
Assign. Date: 6/10/2014
TROJPI
F(Jl--
JU CJ'IlZENSHJP OF PRINCIPAL PARTJESm..ACEANxJHONEBOX
PLAJlmPF AND ON D&FENMNT) fOR orrnpu gsq
PTF DPT P17 D'fT
CtiJZcn of llus Sllte Q I lncorponlcd or PQnapaJ Plan Q 4 4
ofBustncu an ThiS State
Ctlac:n cf Another Stale.. l Q l
Ola:en or SubJecl oh 0 l .Q l
fontp CoiJlltry
Jncorponled and Pnncrpal Place 0 .S 0 .S
ofBusmess tn AncllhCf State
FORrgn Walton 0 6 0 6
IV. CASE ASSIGNI\1ENT AND NATVRE OF SUIT
0 A. Antitrust 0 B.
Malpractice
0 UO AnlftruJI 0 310 AJrplnc
0 JJ5 Alrpltne Pf'OdullJatlntly
CJ 320 Atiault, LSbct 41 Stt11dtr
D .UO Fclcnl Empfo)'en UtbiiUy
0 J40MnJne
0 145 Mulne Prod act Utblllty
0 lSO Motor Vebkle
D l55 1\-toror VehJde p,oducr U.blHty
0 l'O Other PcnonallnJ"'7
CJ J6l Mcdfc.tJ .Malprullct
0 365 Product LJablJIIy
c:J l6J AJbCSIOJ Product LbbUif)'
0 E. General Civil (Other) OR
81nlcrUDICJ'
0 C. Atlmlnlstratlve Agency
Review
0 151 MectfearcAcr
lal: I
16J JJJ.A ((JJ95fl}
an sractt L"JJ& (913)
163 DIWCIDIWW
D 164 SSID Tfllt XVI
D 165 RSI (405(&)
Otbrt l.:nutn

SP1 Apfndtu,..JAcll
Act
UJ
D ''4 Eeru AIJontJon Acr
D 890 O&bcr SlalltlDJ7 ActJom or
.A'dmiDblrath'c A&rnct b lavoJrcd)
F. ProSe General Civil
Rplll't Of)CJI)'
B
ZIO t .a nd Conllemn:ulon
2ZO
0 421 Appullll USC 158
0 41J Wlrbdrawal 28 USC JS7
Forrdturt.1Pe11ally
a
610 A&rttuiiUre
610
0 61S Dru& Sclzurt c:J:ZlO Rut, Lnu &
Q Z40 Torts- to Ltnd
0 245 1"or1 Prodocl Uablllty
AU Other Rul Property

0 .'J70 Olher Froud
Q J71 Truth Jn unding
0 Jao Other Properly lhmgr
CJJ 85 rroprr1y 02m2( Producll.bbillly
i'fi\O"C'I" l'(fifiont
0 515 Dutb Penalty
lji"SHI Mandamus & Other
LJ SSO Civil RlCbiS
D 555 Prbon Condition
F'cdcr:al Tax Sull5
0 870 Tncs {US pl2inliff or
ddtod:ant
lJ 871 IRS-Third P:arty 26
liSC 7609
of PropCJ1)' U USC 811
D 6)0 Uquor Laws
0 641) RR & Tnsrk
0 650 AlrHnc Rt,s
D 660 Occupatwnal
Srccy/Hallb
0690 Other
Qlhr:r St)lfllc:t
0 400 Suce Rtappor1lonmenl
0 4JO D2nks & B:anJUng
0 450 CommtrccJJCC
lbleslclc.
0 460 Ocporution
Temporary Restraining
Order/Prdlmlnary
Injunction
Any nnnc ofsutr from 7 ult&OI1 mr
be nlecctd ror tbb atqory or case
usfcnmtnL
'(It Antitrust, then A govcms)
a
462 N:aluralwtlon AppJJuUon
465 Olhtr lmmlgra lion .Aclions
D 470 Radttteer lnnutnr:ed &
Corrupt Org:nJiullons
D .J80 ConJumer Crt\liJ
0 490 CbJtJS:uelflle TV
0 IJO Selccllve Scrvlct
D !SO
Exrb:ange
D B7S c'"'omcr Challenge f2 usc
J410
0 900 Appcsl oC fee delcrminallon
under equalaccm to Juslicc
D '50 Conllirucion:aliry or Sit It
SIAIUICS
0 890 Other StalUiory Actions {iC
nol adminisrraliYt
rcvicl'l or Act
0
case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 73 of 100
case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-2 Filed 06/..A-u/14 Page 2 of 2
G. !labeas Corpus/ 0
H. Employment 0 I. FOIAJPRJVACY 0 J. Student Loan
22S5 D/scrimlnalion ACT
D ISl Recovery orDdaulttd
D 1515 YrttdomofJnformallonAd 0 530 Jbbtu Corpus.Ccncnl 0 -4_.1 CivSI Rlcbts-EmploYJMol SJodenl Loans
0 190 Ollttr Stahetory Acliosu 8 SJO Mo!lofti'Vac:re Senltnte (crileril; nee, ,mdrrlsa, (otludlll& Ytttnms)
463 Jhbns Corpus-Allen IJJifobal orf&Jn, (If PriY.aq Att) :. .
Delafnce dlscrlmlatlon, dballlllt)'
2ce. reHclon. rmJblfoD)
'(JI pro .se, sdctllbb &leek)
6
(lfpA leo ldCct Ibis deck)'
0 K. Labor/ERISA 0 L. Other Civil Rights 0 M. Contract 0 N. Three .. Judge Court
(non-employmenO (non-employmenO
0 110 lruun11 0 441 CMJ Rlpts-Vodna
0 129 MartDe (lrYodoc Rl&biJ Acl)
B 7 r 0 Fair ,ubor Standanb 2'\n 0 41 Volln&(ftaol Volln&Ricllts
130 MUJcr Acl
7lD LabodMJmL RcblloiiS Act) 140 Nea.,hble JII.Stnnm:nt
CJ 7JD LabortMpL RepoiimJ &
Olsctorurc Acl
;; 140 Ubor Rollwq Ad
1SID Otbcr Labor
1M Enapl. RcL Inc. SenrfJJ Ad
W
I GIN
Ori,&insl 0 J Re!JIO'Yed
. fro Stile
Co11r1
B 44J
Wdfate
D -440 Ol!er QvJI RJPls
0 44S AMCrlttat

0 ""' Amertc.na
Other
0 3 Rcm2ndc.ct lr4m
Appclfwre Courc
0 4 Rcirutlri
or Reopened
: IS& RctoYCIJ ofOnrpaJmCQf II
or Judpeal
D lSJ itcconr,orOYcrparmcRtor
Vdcfta*a Bcadib
D so
D UD OIHI'Coulracts
0 J9S Conrntt Prvduc:t Lbbllll7
0 196 Fnltdlbc
0 5 l'ntm
no&kcr cUstric:l

0 ' MJtl district
Utfaalhm
0 7AppCIIfo
Dlttrfet Judge
n-om Mc. Judcc
VII. REQUESTED IN cneo:rFnUSJSACLA.SS DEMAND.S
COMPL JNT CJ ACI"lON UNOERFR.C.P 2J JURY DEMAND: YES N
vnr. RELATED CASE(S) YIS @NO D Jtycs. plwecorilpJetonlakcS"caororm
IF ANY of-i:.'V- 'Z.
ll'fSTRUC'nONS FOR COMPLETING mJL COVER SHEET Js-44
CrVll Sheet
The JS.-44 CIVIl c:ovcr shttt and lito infomt."'llun colllDiuc:d heren nenbc:r oor supplrn1:nts libn's nnd or olmpape:f) as n:qum:d by
bw. C.'CC(pl by Jocnl ar C:>DLII1 Thts fortfl. AJ1pnwtd by chdutJu:tal .. r lhc \Jnnc:d In 1971).1.s rcqumd ronbc we o(lhc Clc-lk or
Coun rot rrte purpose or 111lll4hl1& I he CIVIl docl:c:l $heel COt12Cquenlly :l CIVIl CO\ICr ihtc:l I) $\lbmmeu to lhc Cletk or Coun ror e3Ch t1Vl1 compliiiJII filed.. l.lSied bl:low ate usn
for tornpleung Ute CJvll cover llfJJ c.QJI\Cidr with II!C norru.n Numc:nIJ on llu; Corer Sheet
I. COUNTY OF RE'SJDENC6 OF fiRST LISTED (b) County Use J JOOJ 1o mlbcale pJmllrTt.SRS16cnl of
Wast11n1ton. 0 C. !1!18 tfplamutrr.s rmdenl ol'tllc Urnttd Sblcsbur not orWastunston. DC. rfplalntdTtsoutstdc abe Umled Stares.
. Jfl. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES Thts secrron as c:ompJelc:d 2!!!l 1f davemcy of was u the Basrs of Jurudscbon undet Seetaon
II
IV. CASE ASSlONM ENT AND NATURE OF SUIT The asSICflmenl ofa Judge lo yout case wdl depend Gn the cate,ory you select that best the
P.!l!!l!!!:I cause or a ell on found in your comph!unr You may select only m tiiC:COI)' also cornspondJng nature or SUII foun4 under
lhc: category or cue:
VI. CAUSE OF AcTION Clle lhe US Cml Stature undcr wlur;h you arc lil1ng and wntc: a bnefstalement of the pnmary
Vll r. RELATED CASES. JF ANY If you mdicaled lhallhere rs a related c:asc, you must complele a retared ease ronn. whJeh may be ob!Bmed from the Cler1c"s
ornc:-e.
Because oflhc need for accurate and complcre 1nfonnation. you should ensure tht; accuncy or the rnfonnarron provtdcd pnor to srgmng rhe fcinn
Case 1:14-cv-J0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/h ....... 4 Page 1 of 27
---------------------------------- -- --------" .. -- ---------.. -X
v
Plaintiffs,
U.S.DEPARTMENTOFSTATEby
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l .. S00-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 .
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
OF ELECTIONS by its agents at
40 NORTH PEARL STREET, SUITE 5
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US A TTORl'lEY GENERAL
-. ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - ~ - -----------.. ---------------x
Case No.:
II! LED
JUN I 0 201t
, . ~ U.l . DJttrlot I Btnkruptcy
vvw fOIIIIIINIII1clllf CaWinbla
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Case: 1: 14-cv-00995
Assigned To : Leon, Richard J.
Assign. Date : 6/1 0/2014
Description: TRO/PI
NOW COMES Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary agent for
debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK Plaintiff, and Harold
William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of Mandamus- Page 1 of26
Case 1:14-cv-J0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL _4 Page 2 of 27
Plaintiff, hereinafter known as the Petitioners, bring this Complaint with Petition for a writ of
mandamus and preliminary injunction for hearing the facts of the complaint for equity relief
under 28 USC 2201 and 2202, and it being alleged that there is a matter of malicious
infringement of fundamental rights of the posterity of private citizens of the United States that
inter alia under color of law is a matter of diversity by interference with a contract and judicial
process that with such wrongful acts of perjury, spoliation: concealment, intimidation! forgery,
use of false instruments, aiding and abetting the enemy while tmder a state of war or national
emergency, is misprision of felony, misprision oftreason and treason per se done individually
and or jointly by the captioned Defendants; and hereinafter upon information, belief and or with
direct knowledge Petitioners allege of Defendants individually and severally that:
VENUE
This Complaint with Petition regarding Venue arises under:
28 U.S. Code 1391 (b) (1) (2) for Washington District of Columbia is the district where
defendants acts of omissions and or commission also apply with section (e) for actions where
defendant is officer or employee of the United States;
28 USC 1402 (b) for any civil action on a tort claim against the United States under
subsection (b) of section 1346 of this title may be prosecuted only in the judic.ial district ...
wherein the act or omission complained of occurred; and
28 U.S. Code 1400 as applies for matters involving- Patents and copyrights, mask
works, and designs under subsection (b) for any civil action for patent (copyright) infringement
may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant r e s i e s ~ or where the defendant has
committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business; and
further as with 28 U.S. Code 2401 Time for commencing action against United States.
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ ofrv1andamus- Page 2 of26
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/h ........ 4 Page 3 of 27
(a) Except as provided by chapter 71 oftitle 41, every civil action commenced against the United
States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action tirst
accrues. The action of any person under legal disability or beyond the seas at the time the claim
accrues may be commenced within three years after the disability ceases. (b) A tort claim
against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the
appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun
within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final
denial ofthe claim by the agency to which it was presented; and
That 28 U.S. Code 2671 Definitions. As used in this chapter and sections 1346 (b)
and 2401 (b) of this title, the term "Federal agency" includes the executive departments, the
judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the
United States, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies ofthe United
States, but does not include any contractor with the United States. "Employee of the
gove111ment" includes (1) officers or employees of any federal agency, members of the military
or naval forces of the United States, members of the National Guard while engaged in training or
duty under section 115, 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32, and persons acting on behalf of a
federal agency in an official capacity, temporarily or permanently in the service of the United
States, whether with or without compensation, and (2) any officer or employee of a Federal
public defender organization, except when such officer or employee performs professional
services in the course of providing representation under section 3006A of title 18. "Acting within
the scope of his office or employmenf', in the case of a member of the military or naval forces of
the United States or a member of the National Guard as defined in section 101 (3) of title 32,
means acting in line of duty.
COMPLAfNTwith Petition for Writ of Mandamus- Page 3 of26
Case 1:14-cv-u0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lt,. _4 Page 4 of 27
JURISDICTION
This Complaint with Petition regarding Jurisdiction arises under:
28 U.S. Code 1331 -Federal question. The district courts shalt have original
jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution) laws, or treaties of the United
States;
28 U.S. Code 1332- Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs (a) The
district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy
exceeds the sum or value of$75,000: exclusive of interest and costs, and is between- (1)
citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state,
except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an
action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully
admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3)
citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional
parties;
U.S. Code> Title 28 >Part IV> Chapter 85 > 1338- Patents, plant variety protection,
copyrights, mask works, designs, trademarks, and unfair competition subsection (a) the district
coutts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress
relating to patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trademarks;
28 U.S. Code 1343 -Civil rights and elective franchise (a) The district courts shall have
original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1)
To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any
right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any
conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of Mandamus- Page 4 of 26
Case 1:14-c\i-00995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/1'-..... 4 Page 5 of 27
fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which
he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent:
28 U.S. Code 1346- (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction. concurrent
with the United States Court of Federal Claims, of: (2) Any other civil action or claim against
the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any
Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department;
28 U.S. Code 1361 -Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his
duty. The district courts shalt have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus
to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereofto perform a duty
owed to the plaintiff;
28 U.S. Code 1367- Supplemental jurisdiction (a) Except as provided in subsections
(b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action ofwhich the
district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction
over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction
that they form part ofthe same case or controversy under Article III of the United States
Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or
intervention of additional parties.
PARTIES
1. Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris a private citizen of the United States secured
beneficiary agent for debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Plaintiff (STRUNK) is registered to vote with place for service located at 593 Vanderbilt
Avenue PMB 281 Brooklyn New York zipcode excepted 11238 with telephone: 845-901-
6767 Email: and recorded with the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar
Case 1:14-c\t-u0995-RJL Document 1 Filed .... 4 Page 6 of 27
County at BPA BOOK 30 PAGES 763 thru 800 on December 5, 2013 at 9:54AM thereafter
duly registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury accepted there on January
21,2014 at
2. That STRUNK is the duly appointed Executor public officer for the Express Deed in Trust to
the United States of America duly recorded with the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar
County at BPA BOOK 32 PAGES 716 thru 754 on April29, 2014 at I :20PM.
3. That STRUNK's duty to the beneficiaries of the Express Deed in Trust to the United States
of America with a claim of beneficial interest in and over all the public and private real,
personal, tangible and intangible property within the organic UNITED STATES OF
AM.ERICA geographic border to safeguard and secure for the posterity of WE the People of
the United States of America in the nation given by GOD for securing each private Citizen's
unalienable rights and beneficial interest in pursuit of life liberty and happiness in perpetuity,
and with the Executor and Beneficiaries duty to this DEED in TRUST shall guarantee that all
incumbents and future candidate(s} for the Office of President or Vice President ofthe
United States (POTUS) shall be a bonafide Natural-Born Citizen (NBC) private citizen of the
United States agent who is surety no more to the Debtor Trust Entity in compliance with the
United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5, either under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC
App. 5(b) with the Military Government authority of renewed annual National Emergency or
otherwise.
4. That STRUNK is the Plaintiff in New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings
active Cases: Strunky Paterson et al Index No: 29642-2008 that is scheduled for a pre-trial
conference on 13 June 2014 and Strunk v Jefferies et al Index No.: 21948-2012 tentatively
scheduled for a non jury trial on 18 June 2014 with a motion to consolidate the trials taken on
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Page 6 of 26
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/1\.. ... 4 Page 7 of 27
submission on 28 March with decision pending, and that STRUNK has arranged the
testimony of (2) two expert witnesses for the trial: U.S. Citizen Paul Edward Irey (document
expert and publisher), and British Subject, Michael Shrimpton, a Barrister to the
Queens,s Bench and expert Intelligence Analyst, a Consultant to the Intelligence Community
at large with the book ''SPY HUNTER: The Secret History of German Intelligence" (2014).
5. That STRUNK is an Appellant in Appeal Cases 2012-05515,2013-06335 and 201400297
taken from orders issued in the New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings
Strunk v NYS Board o(Elections et al. Index no.: 6500-20 11, that on 4 March 2014 the New
York State Supreme Court Appellate Division for the Second Department Judicial panel
sitting in review of Appellant's Amicus motion demand that it provide "for civilian due
process of law" rather than the continued martial due process of law under statutory direct
authority of the POTUS Commander-in-chief over the de facto Federal and New York State
Unified Court System courts under statutory authority of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. S(b)
ORDERED to deny provision ')or civilian due process of law" (see Exhibit 1).
6. That STRUNK has a FOIA case directly related to the above cited active New York State
cases 29642-2008, 6500-20 11 and 21948-2012, that was filed in the USDC for the District of
Columbia on November 22,2088 with Case No.: 08-cv-2234 (RJL) to obtain the Passport
applications for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro and having received such filed on 29
July 2010, it was dete1mined that there were no applications on filed with DOS before 1965.
7. That Harold William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H. \VILLIAM
VAN ALLEN Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), self represented, is registered to vote with place for
service located at 351 North Road Hurley NY 12443 with Telephone: email:
hvanallen@hvc.rr.com.
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ ofi\1andamus- Page 7 of26
Case 1:14-cv-u0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 0 6 1 ~ . .J.4 Page 8 of 27
8. That VAN ALLEN is the Plaintiff in the Election Law case Van Allen v NYS BOE et al. in
the NYS Supreme Court for the County of Albany with Index No.: ___ directed by order
of the Court to seek relief in the case Strunk v. Paterson et al. Index No: 29642-2008;
9. That VAN ALLEN is a proposed Plaintiff -intervener in the case 29642-2008 by motion
taken on submission and decision pending since 28March 2014.
10. Defendant the UNITED STATES DEPARTh1ENT OF STATE (DOS), by the DOS
Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry as a public officer as well as the private surety-
indenture for the Public U.S. Citizen Debtor Trust JOHN F. KERRY (Mr. KERRY), located
at2201 C StreetNW Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339, with authority over the
actions of DOS agents at the U.S. Embassy in London acting under color of USC Title 8
CFR Part214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law (INA 214(b));
11. That the History of Immigration and Naturalization Agencies according to FDR's Ex. Ord.
No. 6166, 14, June 1 0 ~ 1933, set out as a note under section 901 of Title 5, Government
Organization and Employees, consolidated the two formerly separate bureaus known as the
Bureau of Immigration and the Bureau ofNaturalization to form the Immigration and
Naturalization Service under a Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, which was
subsequently transferred from the Department of Labor to the Department of Justice by 1940
Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F.R. 2223, 54 Stat. 1238, set out in the Appendix to
Title 5. See note set out under section 1551 of this title: and
L2. Further, the US Code Title 8 CPR Part 214 falls under the authority of functions vested by
law in Attorney General ERlC HOLDER) at the Department of Justice, or any other officer
or any agency of that Department, with respect to inspection at regular inspection locations at
ports of entry of persons, and documents of persons, entering or leaving United States; and
C01viPLAINTwith Petition for Writ of Mandamus- Page 8 of26
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1 Filed .A.4 Page 9 of 27
13. Further, functions of all other officers of Department of Justice and functions of all agencies
and employees of such Department, with a few exceptions, transferred to Attorney General,
with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his
functions by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by 1950 Reorg. Plan No.2, 1,
2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3173, 64 Stat. 1261, set out in the Appendix to Title 5. See
sections 509 and 510 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure; and that the abolition of
Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related
references, see note set out under section 1551 of title 8.
14. Defendant the United States' CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA), the CIA
Director of Intelligence John Owen Brennan as a pllblic officer and the private surety-
indenture for the Public US Citizen Debtor Trust JOHN 0. BRENNAN (Mr. BRENNAN)
with his place for service at D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800;
15. Defendant Barack Hussein Obama II (aka Bany Soetoro, Barack SOEBARKAH, Steven
Dunham, Barry Obama, Barry Allen Owens) located at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington DC 2050, is the usurper posing as the POTUS Commander-in-chief while the
private surety-indenture for the enemy and or ally rebel or belligerent person BARACK
HUSSEIN OBAMA II (Mr. OBAMA) as detlned acting under color of 12 USC 95(a) and 50
USC App. 5(b) and the Constitution for the United States of America especially Article 2
Section 1 Clause 5 as to the eligibility of a natural person to assume the office of President or
Vice President of the United States (POTUS) with related law that for eighty-one years now
requires provision of martial process renewal by POTUS' Executive Order under the
National Emergency Act of 1976 (NEA) and International Economic Emergency Powers Act
of 1977 (IEEP A) and related law for authority over conquered territories, property and
Case 1:14-cv-v0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL. _4 Page 10 of 27
persons held as collateral by the U.S. Secretary of Treasury, Alien Property Custodian, for
repayment of the debt of the Untied States owing to its creditors;
16. Defendant the U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE at 101 Independence Avenue SE Washington,
DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000 maintains the original and microfilm copies of copyrights.
17. Defendant the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS by its agents with two
Chairmen and two Commissioners located at 40 North Pearl t r e e t ~ Suite 5 Albany, NY
12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068 is a Quasi private entity with members of the Democratic
and Republican party appointed by the Governor with agreement ofthe Leaders of the
Legislature and Democratic Party and Republican Party and are responsible for the conduct
of the General Election for POTUS in 2008, 2012 and 2016.
18. That Petitioners complain of Defendants with seven causes of action with the First requiring
a preliminary injunction as time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm as follows:
AS AND FOR THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION DOS DEFENDANTS ARBITRARILY
DENIED MICHAEL SHRIMPTON A NONIMMI.GRANT VISA with INA 214(b)
19. That Petitioners as to each and e v e r ~ allegation contained in the foregoing introduction and
paragraphs 1 through 18, repeats such with the same force and effect as though herein set
forth at length, but omits such for the sake of brevity, and further alleges as and for the first
cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR. KERRY
arbitrarily denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under color of US Code
Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law.
20. That STR'(J.\JK contacted MlCHAEL SHRIMPTON to have him testify on June 18, 2014 in
the non-jury trial case Strunk v Paterson et al. 29642-2008 regarding his expertise in the
matter of DNA tests taken by the U.S, Defense Intelligence Agency {DIA) and CJA of then
US Senator BARACK HUSSEIJ\ OBAMA II between 2007 and 2008.
COMPLATNTwith Petition for Writ ofMandamus- Page 10 of26
Case 1:14-cv-v0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL.- .-+ Page 11 of 27
21. That STRUNK on 19 April2014 arranged for !VIr. SHRIMPTON to receive the Delta
Airlines ticket 0062181 0842483 that is good until 19 APR 2015 for round trip travel between
Heathrow Airport Britain and JFK Airport New York City for 17 June 2014 and return on 21
June 2014, see Exhibit 2.
22. That on 27 April2014, Mr. SHRIMPTON applied electronically to the US Embassy in
London for a Non immigrant Bl/B2 Visa, see Exhibit 3.
23. That on I May 2014, Mr. SHRIMPTON affirmed his affidavit for STRUNK under NYS
CPLR 31 Ol(d) to establish his expettise at trial for case Strunk v. Paterson et al. 29642-2008,
see Exhibit 4; and germane herein at page 11 of the affidavit Mr. SHRIMPTON states:
20. To the best of my knowledge and belief the DNA test was done and Senator
Obama's claim to be the son of Stanley Ann Dunham could not be supported. I
cannot say to the court that etther CIA or DIA came back to me and said so in tetms.
I would not expect them to and it would be contrary to good intelligence practice. I
would however expect to be told if my advice had led to either agency wasting tin1e
or resources, not to mention the cost of a good lunch.
21. 'I'he outcome of the DNA test, as I understood it to be, was consistent with what I
knew of then Senator Obama's background. It was my understanding then, and still
is, that he was born in I\1ombasa in what was then the Kenyan Protectorate, on or
about August 4th 1960. So far as I know that is the internal view of both MI5 and
MI6. The President's claimed father was known to British intelligence in 1960 due
to his connection with the Mau Mau terrorist organization. There is no evidence
that Stanley Ann Dunham went to Kenya in 1960, that is to say she cannot have
been the mother, assuming the intelligence about the birth in Morobasa to be
correct.
24. That on 13 May 2014 STRUNK filed a \tiotion for Judicial Notice to all parties in
(23 parties and or their counsels) with a motion return date of30 May 2014 in all the cases:
Strunk v Paterson et al, Strunk v. Jeffories et al. and Strunk v l\TJ'S BOE et al. with exhibits
that included: the Affidavit of expert MICHAEL SHRlMPTON under CPLR 3 1 01 (d). the
Note oflssue for the Petition 21948-2012; STRUNK Appellant's Brieffor Appeal2013-
06335, and the Redacted Express Deed In Trust To The United States O(America.
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ 11 of26
Case 1:14-cV-v0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL. _-f Page 12 of 27
25. That on the 30 May 2014 motion return date for Strunk v Paterson et al. Index no.: 29642-
2008 wjth STRUNK IV AN ALLEN and counsels in appearance before the Hon. David I.
Schmidt J.S.C. the Court signed a slip order acknowledging the Expert witness status of Mr.
SHR1MPTON, see Exhibit 5.; and although Plaintiff contested did seek further relief states:
"Plaintiff filed this motion to give notice that he has an expert. He does not seek other
relief. Notice is taken."
26. That on 2 June 2014. Mr. SHRIMPTON appeared at his interview at the US Embassy in
London to obtain his non-immigrant Visa in order to travel to testify, and the DOS denied
such visa under color of INA 214(b ), see Exhibit 6 in relevant part states:
"Dear Visa Applicant:
"Thank you for your interest in traveling to the United States. Unfortunately, we are
unable to issue a visa to you today because you were found unqualified under Section
214(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act. Under Section 214(b), applicants are
presumed to be intending immigrants unless they credibly demonstrate, to the consular
officer's satisfaction, that their economic, family, and social ties outside the United States
are strong enough that they will depart at the end of their authorized stay and that their
intended activities in the United States will be consistent with the visa status.
"Because you either did not show strong ties outside the United States today or did not
demonstrate that your intended activities in the United States would be consistent with
the visa status, you have not met the legal standard to qualify .... "
27. On June 2, 2014, STRUNK applied with an Original Proceeding Index No.: 2014-05468 for
an Order to Show Cause at the NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division for the Second
Judicial Department to expedite preparation of the trial in 29642-2008 with decisions of two
motions pending, pre-trial conference scheduled for 13 June 2014 and Hon. David I. Schmidt
declined to sign subpoenas in preparation for a t r i l ~ and was also declined (see Exhibit 7).
28. On 6 June 2014, STRUNK applied electronically to DOS at the US Embassy in London (see
Exhibit 8) for reconsideration of its arbitrary 2 June 2014 decision shown as Exhibit 6, and
in the application for reconsideration STRUNK stated:
COMPLAINT with Petition for \Vrit of Mandamus- Page 12 of26
Case 1:14-cv-u0995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/10, --+ Page 13 of 27
a I am CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, a private Citizen of the United States being the
sponsor for the B-1 Visa application completed 27 APR 20 14 by British Subject
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON who had a confinnation AA0041FB3G with the interview of2
June 2014 having been outrageously absurd and politically biased refusal of entry with
use of S .214; and as such 1 request reconsideration as time is of the essence, involves a
matter of grave national security with irreparable harm that requires that I concurrently
seek relief in V.lashington DC USDC Court on Tuesday 10 June 2014 for Secretary Kerry
I US DOS, John Brennan of the CIA and Barack Hussein Obama the acting commander-
in-chief to show cause why it should not immediately grant the Subject Bl/B2 Non-
immigrant Visa for the purpose of testimony at trial on or about 18 June 2014 and further
ordered by the Court accordingly. A timely response to this request for reconsideration is
required."
29. That DOS at the London Embassy, in coordination with ERIC HOLDER and or his agent at
the Justice Department when it reviews a non-immigrant visa application with INA Section
214(B) and immigrant intent, INA 214(b) is the number one reason for nonimmigrant visa
denials. It is referred to as ''failure to establish entitlement to nonimmigrant status," or more
commonly, ''presumption of immigrant intent" because the majority of214(b) denials are
applied to intending immigrants; and that the DOS issued 6.5 million nonimmigrant visas in
2008, but also rejected 2.1 million visa applications. Among them, almost 1.5 million (70%)
were denied based on INA 214(b).
30. The Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA) states under Section 214(b) that:
Every alien shall be presumed to be an immigrant until he establishes to the satisfaction
of the consular officer, at the time of application for admission, that he is entitled to a
nonimmigrant status ...
31. That DOS and or its consular agent at based upon the evidence made available by Mr.
SHRlMPTON at the interview on 2 June 2014 represented a preponderance of proof that the
consular officer must view Mr. SHRIMPTON as if every non-immigrant visa applicant was
NOT intending as an immigrant as HE is planning to visit based upon giving court testimony
and NOT intending to then permanently stay in the U.S. as the round trip ticket shown as
Exhibit 2 thru 5 proves.
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ ofivlandamus- Page 13 of 26
Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 06/lt.. 4- Page 14 of 27
32. That despite a preponderance of evidence proving that INA 214(b) does not apply to Mr.
SHRHvlPTON, therefore supports the suspicion that the consular officer was under
extraordinary instruction to arbitrarily reject the visa application to prevent Mr.
SHRIMPTON from testifying, as a malicious arbitrary act done to benefit Defendants.
AS AND FOR THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION J\IIALICIOUSLY
DENIED MICHAEL SHRL\iPTON A NONIMMIGRANT VISA with INA 214(b) AS
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND INTERFERENCE WITH A WITNESS AT TRIAL
33. That Petitioners as to each and every allegation contained in the foregoing introduction and
forth at length, but omits such for the sake of brevity, and further alleges as and for the
Second cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority oflVIR.
KERRY, ERlC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and
or their agents maliciously denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under
color of US Code Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and
related taw as obstruction of justice and interference with a witness to appear at trial.
34. That a subpoena issued for the internal correspondence between Federal Defendants from 27
April2014 and 2 June 2014 between DOS its agents and the other Federal Defendants and or
their agents wiil show malice and is disserving of discovery by order of the Court.
AS AND FOR THE THIItD CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENDANTS MALICIOUSLY
DENIED MICHAEL SHRIMPTeN A NeNIMMIGRANT VISA with INA 214(b) AS
INTERFERENCE WITH THE CONTRACT WITH STRUNK
paragraphs 1 through 34) repeats such with the same force and effect as though herein set
forth at length, but omits such for the sake of brevity, and further alleges as and for the third
Case 1:14-cv . J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL. + Page 15 of 27
cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR. KERRY!
ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and or their
agents denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under color of US Code
Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law as
interference with the Contract between STRlJNK and SHRIMPTON.
36. That Mr. SHRIMPTON appointed STRUNK as his American agent to facilitate the
publishing of SPY HUNTER in the American market in hard and soft cover, and
electronically in NOOK for Barnes and Noble, and for the translation of SPY HUNTER in to
Italian and Russian accordingly; and that STRUNK invested in attendance at the BOOK
EXPO Javits Center in New York City from 28 May thru 31 May 2014 (see Exhibit 9);
3 7. That STRUNK arranged for meetings with publishers, translators, and media interviews for
television, radio and newspapers during the time that Mr. SHRIMPTON would be .in New
York to testify at the Strunk v Paterson et a/29642-2008 non-jury Trial between 17 June
2014 and 21 June 2014.
AS AND FOR THE FeURTH CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENDANTS DENIED MICHAEL
SHRIMPTON A NeNJl\<tMlGRANT VISA with INA 214(b) TO INFRINGE STRUNK'S
FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SPEECH, PUBLISH AND ASSOCIATE
paragraphs l through 37, repeats such with the same force and effect as though herein set
Fourth cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of NIR
KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and
or their agents denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under color of US
Code Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law
Case 1:14-cv .:.J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL._ + Page 16 of 27
intended to infringe STRUNK's First amendment right to speech, publish and associate.
39. That Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER,
JOl-IN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and or their agents action
under color of law to infringe STRUNK's First amendment right violates the provisions of 42
U.S. Code 1985{1) as to conspiracy to interfere with civil rights by preventing the DOS
consular officer from performing duties in that there was more than sufficient evidence that
the DOS US Embassy Consular officer had to overcome INA 214(b) presumption otherwise
was directed to deny ivtr. SHR1MPTON his visa to be able to testify.
40. That MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia conspired to prevent
the London Consular officer from approving the non-immigrant visa for Mr. SHRIMPTON,
by intimidation, or threat of any person holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under
the United States, from discharging any duties thereof officer required to be on
account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office while engaged in the lawful
discharge thereof, to molest, interrupt, hinder. or impede him in the discharge of his official
duties otherwise prohibited by 42 USC 1985( l );
4l.ln that MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BREl\TNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia acted to obstruct
justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror prohibited under 42 USC 1985(2).
AS AND FOR THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENDANTS DENIED J\IIICHAEL
SHRIMPTON A NONIMMIGftA.l\iT VISA witb INA 214{b) TO INFRINGE STRUNK'S
FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER LAW
paragraphs 1 thtough 41, repeats such with the same force and effect as though herein set
Case 1:14-cv ... J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lG.-=- + Page 17 of 27
Fourth cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR.
KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and
or their agents denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under color of US
Code Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law
intended to infringe FIFTH amendment right to equal protection of the law.
43. In that MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN. and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA H and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia conspired to prevent
the London Consular officer from approving the non-immigrant visa for Mr. SHRIMPTON
conspired to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the
United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein,
freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on
account of his having so attended or testified, or to inOuence the verdict, presentment, or
indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person
or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by
him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of
justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to citizen STRUNK the equal protection
of the laws. or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce,
the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws as a fifth
amendment infringement of STRUNK's fundamental rights under the Constitution;
44. That IvlR. KERRY, ERlC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia acted to Deprive
Case 1:14-cv ... J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/1L._4 Page 18 of 27
STRUNK and SHRJMPTON their unalienable rights or privileges when Defendants conspire
for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of
the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for
the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory
from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of
the Jaws prohibited under 42 USC 1985(3).
AS AND FOR THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENDANTS WITH THE NYS BOE
TO INFRINGE PETITIONERS' FffiST FOURTH FIFTH NINTH AND TWELFfll
AMENDMENT RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE ONE PERSeN ONE VeTE
Fourth cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR.
KERRY, ERIC HOLDER: JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ll and
or their agents with the NYS BOE and its agents acted to infringe Petitioners' FIRST,
FOURTH, FIFTH, NINTH, TWELFTH and Section 1 Fourteenth amendment right as to
NYS BOE state action to an effective one person one vote expectation at the 2008 and 2012
General Election for POTUS by changing the eligibility qualification for any candidate
running for the office ofPOTUS from "natural-born Citizen'' to Hborn a citizenn on the NYS
BOE website after the 2008 election to misconstrue the outcome of the court action in the
case Strunk v NYS BOE et q[. Index No.: 6500-2011 and having refused to reverse its
unlawful change of e-ligibility for POTUS as is currently on the NYS BOE Webpage and for
the full page see Exhibit 10:
Case 1:14-cv _,J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lG,-_ _,. Page 19 of 27
Requirements to Hold Office
!OFFICE --I CITIZENSHIP I AGE fRESIDENCY--
jPresrdent of the iom a citizen r-1-4-y-ea_r_s-in_c_o_u_n_try ____ _
(sTATUTE .
United States
C:onstitulton Art. It!
'1
llJmted States yems
I
46. That Federal Defendants with the NYS BOE conspired to advocate for Barack Hussein
Obama II by intimidation, involving any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving
his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully
qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President; in any case of conspiracy set
forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act
in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is damaged in his person or
property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the
United States, the party so damaged or deprived may have an action for the recovery of
damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the
conspirators prohibited under 42 USC 1985(3).
AS AND FOR TIE SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENDANTS OBAMA,
BRENNAN AND HeL.ER ACTED TO SPOLIATE AND CONCEAL DOCUMENTS AT
THE US CePYRIGHT OFFICE
paragraphs 1 through 46, repeats sueh with the same force and effect as though herein set
Fourth cause of action, that Defendant OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN,
and or their agents acted to spoliate the Copyright document filed in 1995 by the Publisher
for BARACK HUSSE[N OBAMA Il's autobiography "Dreams From My Father'\.
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of l'v1andamus- Page 19 of26
Case 1:14-c\1 Document 1 Filed 06/1(.,, Page 20 of 27
48. That STRUNK has attempted since December 2013 to obtain a certified copy of the
c.opyright document from the US Copyright Office using an established Patent, Trademark
and Copyright attorney who regularJy practices in Washington; and to date the agency has
denied a certified copy even though it would only cost $35.
49. The subject document as filed originally said Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Kenya.
50. The Document was change during 2008 to state that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in
Hawaii, and that the graphic techniques used are exactly the same used by the forger of the
2008 and 2011 supported Certificate of Live Birth presented by Barack Hussein Obama II.
51. That 42 USC 1985(3) and 1986 infringement of Petitioners' rights under the Constitution for
the United States of America relates to the case 08-cv-2234 (RJL) Freedom of Information
Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552, wherein on 29 July 2010 a response from the DOS counsel
released the Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro the first such application of 13 August 1968 (see
Exhibit 12) wherein the 1965 according to the 1968 document involved spoliation and
conccaJment alleged done by the General Services Administration (GSA) but STRUNK
alleges done by the DOS CIA sub-contractor, John 0. Brennan, to cauterize, conceal and or
destroy any passport applications and records for Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Hussein
Obama II, John Sidney McCain and Hillary Rodham Clinton that proves Barack Hussein
Obama II is not a citizen; and that proof of which is that the 1965 passport application was
destroyed according to DOS Counsel which has a logical set of conclusions to be drawn jn
favor of the DOS Counsel as if He made truthful statements.
52. That based upon the pending testimony of MICHAEL SHRIMPTON. Barack Hussein
Obama Junior was born no later than August4, 1960 not on August 4, 196] for which the
legend was manufactured so that somehow Junior would be calculated as born in Hawaii
CON1PLATNT with Petition for \Vrit of Mandamus - Page 20 of 26
Case 1:14-cv -vJ995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lu, _4 Page 21 of 27
rather than being brought in as the child of a couple married in February 1961 in Hawaii was
created by Madelyn Dunham as the only proof by the newspaper article that was then used by
the Hawaii Department ofHealth to record a birth in Hawaii by the members of the SUBUD
cult in which Obama Junior was inducted as a member along with Stanley Ann Soetoro from
their time in Indonesia and He was given the Javanese name "SOEBARKAH".
53. There is a Customs statistical entry record of a white women and one year old black child
entering the USA from Africa in 1961 and presumed taken to Seattle Washington in August
to live with his father's new wife Stanley Ann Obama when she attended the University of
Washington; and the child was described as big for his age during an babysitter interview.
54. STRUNK contend that in regards to the document marked PI shown in Exhibit 12, that an
honest review of the small print on the sworn oath on the 13 August 1 968 document
instrument is necessary to draw the right conclusion other than the absurd contention that
somehow the Vice Counsel of the Djakarta Consulate Alfonso F. La Porta was sloppy or
careless in preparation of a sworn document and was offering legal advice -is absurd.
55. The Affirmant Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro on P-1 swears that
a. al have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or
documentation has), mce acquiring United States citizenship;
b. been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state;
c. taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a
foreign state;
d. entered or served in the armed forces of a foreign state;
e. accepted or performed the duties of any office, post, or employment under a
government of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof;
f. voted in a political election in a foreign state or participated in an election or
plebiscite to determine the sovereignty over foreign territory;
g. made a formal renunciation of nationality either in the United States or before a
Case 1:14-cv-uu995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/101.4 Page 22 of 27
diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in a foreign state;
h. ever sought or claimed the benefits of the nationality of any t a t e
i. or been convicted by a court or court martial of competent jurisdiction of committing
any act of treason against, or
j. attempting by force to overthrow, or
k. bearing anns against, the United States, or
1. conspiring to overthrow, put down or
m. to destroy by force, the Government of the United States.
n. "(If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply
to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or document, the
portion which applies should be struck out, and a supplementary explanatory
statement under oatb (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is
applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.)"
56. There was no passport application earlier than 1965 meaning that Stanley Ann Soetoro never
had a passport in the name of Stanley Ann Obama or even Stanley Ann Dunham before.
57. That Petitioners have suffered an infonnational injury as a voter and member of the public;
and the lack of information on Mr. Barry Soetoro's citizenship, caused by the State
Departments action, limited the information available to him as a voter and impaired his
ability to influence and inform the public and policymakers. If a party is denied information
that will help it in making a voting decision that party is obviously damaged in fact; and as
stated in Akins, the court noted that:
t'[a] voter deprived of useful information at the time he or she votes suffers a particularized
injury in some respects unique to him or herself just as a government contractor, allegedly
wrongfully deprived of information to be made available at the time bids are due, would
suffer a particularized injury even if all other bidders also suffered an injury."
58. These issues can be easily resolved; the documents requested will either prove that Barry
Soetoro is in fact a "natural born" U.S. Citizen or they will prove he is not, at which point he
will have to be removed as the incapacitated POTUS Commander-in-chief under the 25th
Amendment and will require U.S. Department of Homeland Security with control of the
Case 1:14-c\i .... J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lL . .:_-f Page 23 of 27
Bureau of Customs and Border Control to enforce U.S. Title 8 and related laws as to Mr.
Barry Soetoro, and the living person using the SSN: 535-40-8522 accordingly in
coordination with the U.S. Department of Justice.
59. For the above aforementioned reasons, the above requested expert testimony of Mr.
SHRlM.PTON related to the fact that since 2007 /2008 the CIA J Mr. BRENNAN I DOS/
Mr. KERRY has proof that Mr. OBAMA is not NBC nor even a US Citizen and the expert
testimony of Mr. PAUL EDWARD IREY related to the three forged documents the 2008 J
2011 forgeries and copyright forgery are of great public interest and without receiving said
documents and or such testimony our Country is at risk as a grave matter of national security
until a eligible and qualified private citizen of the United States who is no longer the surety-
indenture of the debtor trust owned by the United States may serve as POTUS.
60. The court determines whether disclosure is warranted by "halanc[ing] the public interest in
disclosure against the [privacy] interest Congress intended the Exemption to protect.
11
Dep't
o(Justice v. Reporter.\' Comm. fOr Freedom o[Press, 489 U.S. 749, 776 (1989). The public
interest in disclosure lies in
11
open[ing] agency action to the light of public scrutiny,"
Reporters Comm., 489 U.S. at 772.
61. That at trial the Court must subpoena a DOS agent to testify as to the nuances of Exhibit 12.
62. That the Court is requested to notif-y the other courts with matters associated herein of efforts
to hear the e.vidence that would effect those cases directly in regards to whether or not
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is an actual natural born citizen born in the United States
of US Citizens parents. and therefore eligible to be POTUS Commander-in-chief with direct
authority over the defacto Federal and States judiciary under martial rule that for 81 years
under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) is renewed by POTUS Executive Order.
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of l'v1andamus- Page 23 of26
Case 1:14-cv .... J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/1L, _4 Page 24 of 27
WHEREFORE, Petitioners wish for the above aforementioned reasons, this Court should
Mandate and Order the U.S. Department of State to provide a non-immigrant visa, US Copyright
Office release the actual certified copy of the 1995 copyright of "Dreams From My Father" and
or agencies under its control to release documents proving ultra vires acts of defendants and or
their agents to spoliate conceaJ and destroy records and interfere with the conduct of judicial
proceedings and provision of justice; and that this court take supplemental jurisdiction over the
NYS BOE to immediately order the turn-over of the documents referred to above regarding the
outrageous use of the "born a citizen" tenn rather than the Constitutionally mandated use of the
"natural-born Citizen, term of art to be used exclusively as to the eligibility of a "natural-born
Citizen" private citizen of the United States for POTUS and who is no longer surety-indenture of
the debtor owned by the United States in service of the creditors to the United States' debt under
the provision of martial process with 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) and related law, and that
the expert testimony by MICHAEL SHRIMPTON and PAUL EDWARD IREY be scheduled
for hearing in regards to a preliminary injunction and for further and different equity relief.
Dated: June '1 , 2014
Brooklyn, New York
Dated: June 7' . 2014
Hurley, New York
Attached Exhibits 1 through 13
Respectfully submitted by,
,
{ J _ ~ n J ~ ~ ~
Respectfully submitted by,
Case 1:14-cv _J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lG. _ _..+ Page 25 of 27
VERIFICATION
STATEOFNEWYORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS )
Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of
l . That this Complaint with Petition of mandamus relief is directly related to the evidence
that I obtained with great difficulty here in Washington DC with the FOIA case Strunk v
DOS and DHS USDC DCD 08-cv-2234, and that as a matter of comity and economy of
schedule with the efforts related to the obtained documents for more than three years
before the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ that this case be assigned to Judge Leon; and
2. Executor is obligated to provide judicial notice as to the Express Deed in Trust to the
United States of America recorded with the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar County
at BPA BOOK 32 PAGES 716 thru 754 on April29, 2014 at 1:20PM (see Exhibit 13).
3. I have read the attached Complaint with Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of
a Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents; the facts stated in the Petition are true to my
own personal knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on
information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my
beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties,
books and records, and personal knowledge. except as to those stated upon information
and belief, which I believe to be true. { f ... (
'-U. '-- \. c\
Sworn to before me
This :J...!::day of June 2014
EDDIE HAMPTON JR.
Notary PublicJ State of New York
No.01HA6044027
Qualified In Kings County
Commission Expires June 26, 20 Jlf
COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Page 25 of 26
Case 1:14-c\r Document 1 Filed 06/lL: _4., Page 26 of 27
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) 88.
COUNTY OF ULSTER )
Accordingly, I, H. -William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty
of perjury:
While this instant civil action seeks an emergency time critical mandamus ordering the
US State Department granting of a travel visa to Michael Shrimpton, Esq for the purpose
appearing in NYSUCS Kings Civil Supreme in the matter of "Strunk v Paterson et al" pending
my intervention motion fully briefed and heard March 28 2014. I direct this court's attention to
the attached EXHlBITS #11 A-E of my own related cases now before USCA-DCC and
SCOTUS with pending stay motions -until the NYSUCS and now this court rules on the
Shrimpton appearance and his expert witness testimony. All this regarding adjudication of
immigration status using DNA including the national secwity implications of I to ClNC/POTUS
and executive control of all federal agencies including: DOD (Defense) I DON (Navy) I OVA
(Veterans) DOC I (Census) and especially DOJ (Justice) and DOS (State).
Ergo, I have read the attached Complaint with Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the
Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents; the facts stated in the Petition are true to
my own personal knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information
and belief: and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as o all
matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and
personal knowledge. Except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I believe to be
true.
Sworn 7 before me
This day of June 2014
Case 1:14-cv J995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/lu. 4 Page 27 of 27
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ULSTER )
Accordingly, I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of
perjury:
While this instant civil action seeks an emergency time critical mandamus ordering the US State
Department granting of a travel visa to Michael Shrimpton, Esq for the purpose appearing in
NYSUCS Kings Civil Supreme in the matter of "Strunk v Paterson et ar pending my
intervention motion fully briefed and heard March 28 2014, I direct this court's attention to the
attached EXHffiiT #11 of my own related cases now before USCA-DCC and SCOTUS pending
stay motions - until the NYSUCS and now this court rules on the Shrimpton appearance and his
expert witness testimony regarding adjudication of immigration status using DNA including the
national security implications to CINC/POTUS and executive control of all federal agencies
including DOD (Defense) I DON (Navy) I DVA (Veterans) and especially DOJ (Justice) and
DOS (State).
Ergo, I have read the attached Complaint with Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a
Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents; the facts stated in the Petition are true to my own
personal except as to the matters therein stated to he a11eged on information and
belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters
not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal
knowledge. Except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I believe to be true.
Sworn to before me
This _j_ day of June 2014
./
/I/
,'- l.ll) I <
_,-Lt ... .= ..._ 1 I \: .! . \
NotarYPublic ' ;
d
Van Allen
Case 1:14-cv-vu995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1.:.. -'-4 Page 1 of 109
------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
845-90 I -67 67 chris@strunk. ws,
V.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE by
Plaintiffs,
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202

Case 1:14-cv-uu995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1'-. -'-4 Page 2 of 109
jJupr.emt atnurt Df tlJ.e .&tate of N.em Work
.Apptllate iliui.sinn: &tantb :Dubtdal ihpartm.ent
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
Ml70416
E/sl
2012-05515,2013-06335,2014-00297 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Christopher-Earl Strunk, appellant,
v New York State Board of Elections,
et al., respondents.
(Index No. 6500/11)
Motion by the appellant prose, inter alia, "for civilian due process f l w ~ on appeals
from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated Aprilll, 2012, March 29,2013, and
December 9, 2013, respectively.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition
thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal
from the order dated March 29, 2013 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2013-0633 5), is enlarged until
May 5, 2014, and the record or appendix and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or
before that date.
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
~ ~ ~
Clerk of the Court
March 4, 2014
STRUNK v NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
--------- .....
Case 1:14-cv-Lu995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 0 6 / 1 ~ . ~ 4 Page 3 of 109
---------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
v.
Plaintiffs,
Washington, DC 20520 TfY:l-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
1 01 Independence Avenue SE
\Vashington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------- -------.-. ----------X
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Ex ib t
Case 1:14-cv-uv995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\.:. i4 Page 4 of 109

delta.rom My "fiips Earn Mles
YOUR ITINERARY AND RECEIPT
Scan this barcode at a
Della SeJf-Servlce Kiosk to
access your reservation.
Please review this Information before your trip.
If you need to contact Delta or check your flight
Information, go to delta.com, can 1-800-221-1212. for
a complete liSt of worldwide phone numbers, please
visit www.dett.a.com/contact _us.
Changes to Award Tickets must be made at feast n
hours prior to the departure ttme of the flrght being
changed. Award Tickets booked within 72 hours of
departure are nonrefundable and cannot be
redeposited or reissued unless prohibited by local law.
You can exchange, reissue and refund eligible
electronic tickets at detta.com.
You can check In for your flight up to 24 hours prior
to departure time. Check in onHne by dlcldng the link
below or download the Fly Delta app here. You can
also use the app to change seats, track your bag,
view your flight status and so much more.
'l'hanka for choosing Delta.
FOght Confirmation #: GIVLAX I Tlc:ket #: 00611810842483
Your Flight Information
Tue17JUN
LV 5:30pm
Set21JUN
LV 8:30pm
LONDON-
HEATHROW
NYC-KENNEDY
AR8:25pm NYC-KENNEDY
AR 8:45am LONDON-
**SUn 22JUN HEATHROW
*Arrival date Is different than departure date.
DELTA3
BUSINESSEUTE (0)
Dinner
DELTA402
BUSINESSEUTE (OK)
OJ Mer
Please note that sefec.t Delta flights - Including this upcoming flight - now operate from
LondonHeathrow (LHR) Termlnal3. For more information about thfs Important airport update and
our partnership with Virgin Atlantlc, visit delta.com.
Case Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14 Page 5 of 104
Case 1:14-cv-uu995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed . .L.4 Page 5 of 109
Gate informaUon Is avalfable hours prior to your flight's departure via Online Cbeck-!n .EJjgbt
the Av Deta agp.
Please note that select Defte flights -Including thll upcoming flight - now operate from
L.ondOnHeathrow (UiR) Termlnal3. For more fnfcrmltfon about this Important airport update and
CD OLD' partnership With VIrgin Atlantic, viSit detbu;pm.
Gate Information Is available 21/a hours prior to your flight's departure via Online Cbeck-jn. f1!Qbt
the Ffv !)efta aoo.
Your Flight Details Manage Trip ,.
......... Detdl
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
SkyMiles #*******047

DELTA 3
DElTA402
seats
Not Assigned
Not Assigned
If you purchased an Economy Comfort seat or a Trip Extra, please vtslt My Trips to access a receipt of your
purchase.
Reqlllptlnlonnatlon
Billing Datal ..
Paaenger:

FARE:
Taxes/Carrlerimposed Fees:
ncket Amount:
VAUD ON OLISM OAL/PNLTY FORCHGS
Payment Method:
AX***********S008
USD
708.70
708.70USD
Fare Difference:
Taxes/carrier-imposed Fees:
Service Charge/Fees:
Total atarged:
Ticket Number:
00621810842483
0.00 uso
708.70USD
O.OOUSD
708.70USD
This ticket Is nonrefundable unless Issued at a fully refundable fare. Some fares may not allow changes.
If allowed, any change to your itinerary may require payment of a change fee and Increased fare. Failure
to appear for any flight without notice to Delta will result in cancellation of your remaining reservation.
Note: When using certain vouchers to purchase tickets, remaining credits may not be refunded.
Additional charges and/or credits may apply and are displayed in the sections below.
2
Case 1:14-cv-uu995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1v .l.4 Page 6 of 109
Mllellge Details
Original Mileage: 225000
We have partnered with The Nature Conservancy to allow you to offset your carbon emissions for
this trip. Go to delta.com/C02 to calculate your C02 emissions and learn more about offsetting.
Note: When using certain vouchers to purchase tickets, remaining credits may not be refunded.
Additional charges and/or credits may apply and are displayed In the sections below.
Medallion status listed reflects a member's status at the time of ticketing
1
which may differ from the
actual status at ltle time of flight departure.
This ticket is non-refundable unless issued at a fully refundable fare. Any change to your Itinerary may
require payment of a change fee and Increased fare. Failure to appear for any flight without notfce to
Delta will result In cancellation of your remaining reservation
. ncketlna Details
Passenger: Ticket #: Place of Issue: Issue Date:
MICHAa SHRIMPTON 00621810842483 CVGRES 19APR14
Details- TaXM/canier-lmpoled Fees
Tot.l: 708.70
Itemized: 2.50 AY 5.00 XA 7.00 XV 5.50 YC 230.80 GB 66.50 UB 356.40 YR
35.00 us
Fare Datal ..
Expiration
Date:
19APR15
LON DL NYCO.OOCSM625/FT231 DL lONO.OOCSK1625/FK231 NUCO.OOEND ROE1.00
EXEMPTX
Baggage Fees
1 hank yeti IPr /IE' ng 11 v ..'llucd <u,lorn::-' n,: bciLr:. U'l 'lf..JLil t.'llylil"JI: cket PLIICii.!';t:
0 Jl<'!lrcl'n. :t I'L'LI"I;;hf'l !u1 :IC.:.' u; c''rCr:cO !.:dD(::>;:h. i11rS :.!il [,tf,.:n ll1t: iJr, :)lrll \'!1::: 11
',011\.1\L'(_!; 1;1,
Airline Rule Ortgln Destination Baggage 1U Total
Applied
. '
Tue 17lun 2014
DELTA LHR JFK
fREE ' FREE FREE
0.00 0.00
CAAft'fON fiRST SECO!fD
Visit detta.com for details on baggage embargos that may apply to your itinerary.
0.00
3
Case 1:14-cv-uv995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed . .t4 Page 7 of 109
Sat 21Jun 2014
DELTA JFK LHR
FREE
CAAAVOH
FREE

58.10
secOND
0.00 58.10
VIsit delta.com for details on baggage embargos that mav apply to your Itinerary. 58.10
ton Delta operated flights, you may carry on one bag and a small personal Item at no charge. cany-on
allowances may differ and fees may apply for fJfghts operated by carriers other than Delta. Contact the
operating carrier for detailed carry-on limitations and charges.
BusinessEifte/FfrstJBusfness aass weight allowance reverts to 50 lbs for au checked bags beyond regular
free allowance.
At the time of check fn with Delta, SkyMIIes Medallion members, SkyTeam Elite & Elite Plus, Alaska MVP
& MVP Gold and active US Mllltary personnel are eligible for fee waivers and other benefits. For more
detans, visit delta.com/baggage. Basic cardmembers with a Gold, Platinum, or Reserve Delta SkyMiles
Credit Card from American Express are eligible for the first bag fee waiver. More details on the program
can be found at defta.com/flrstbagfree.
A standard thecked bag with Delta mav be up to 50 lbs and 62 linear inches (per piece). Additional fees
apply far oversize, overweight, and/or additional pieces of checked baggage. Please review Delta's
baggage guidelines for details. Weight and size restrictions may vary when checking baggage on canters
other than Delta. contact with the operating carrier for detailed checked baggage allowances.
Do you have comments about our service? Please eman us to share them.
Questions regarding your upcoming flight? Please oontact us at the folloWing:
Delta 18002211212 I Air France 1-800-237-2747 I Mitalla I KLM 1-8Q0.618-o104
ADUY.I
SkYMILES@
BUY & TRANSFER
MILES.,.
Need more miles? Buy
and transfer miles on
delta.com.
Terms It Conditions
Conditions of Carriage
HILTON HHONORS. "
Earn up to 500 mftes
per stay or 1 mile per
eligible doUar spent
with Hilton HHonors.
HERlZ.,.
Save up to 40% and
eam 3,400 miles or
more with this best-In-
market Hertz offer.
TRIP INSURANCE. >
Protect your bip
against trip
cancellations and
Interruptions wJth
valuable insurance from
Allianz Global
Assistance.
Air transportation on Delta and the Delta Connection carriers Is subject to Delta's conditions of carriage. They indude
terms governing for example:
Umlts on our liability for personal injury or death of passengers, and for loss, damage of delay of goods and
baggage.
Claim restrictions including time periods within which you must file a claim or bring action against us.
Our right to change terms of the contract.
Checkin requirements and other rules established when we may refuse carriage.
Our rights and limits of our liability ror delay of failure to perform service, including schedule change,
substitution of alternative air carriers or aircraft, and rerouting.
Our policy on overbooking flights, and your rights If we deny you hoarding due to an oversold flight.
4
Case 1:14-cv-uv995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1-- .1.4 Page 8 of 109
---------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
845-90 16767 chris@strunk. ws,
v.
Plaintiffs.
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street N\V
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:I-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Ex
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION BEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Nonimmigrant Visa- Document lftk:ttfa!mhJdfM1n!r-dl:4 Data/Skype/My Sky ...
1 of2
D
Select Tooltip Language I
Online Nonimmigrant Visa Application (DS-160)

Confirmation
This confirms the submission of the Nonimmigrant
visa application for:
Applicant photo
THIS IS NOT A VISA
Name Provided:
Date OfBirth:
Place ofBirth:
Gender:
Country/Region of
Origin (Nationality) :
Passport Number:
Purpose ofTravel:
Completed On:
Confirmation No:
SHRIMPTON, MICHAEL
09 MAR 1957
RAF HOSPITAL ELY, GREAT
BRITAIN AND NORTHERN
IRELAND
Male
GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN
IRELAND
508207017
BUSINESS/PERSONAL (B IIB2)
27 APR2014
AA0041FB3G
Location
Selected:
LND
U.S. Embassy
-London
24 Grosvenor
Square
London, WIA
2LQ
United
Kingdom
Version
01.02.01
f
Print Confinnation Print Application Email Confinnatton
-- -- -- ------- --l
I
j
Note: Electronically submitting your DS-160 online application is the FIRST STEP in the visa application
process. The next step is to review the internet page of the embassy or consulate where you plan to apply for
your visa. Most visa applicants will need to schedule a visa interview, though some applicants may qualify for
visa renewal. The embassy or consulate information may include specific local instructions about scheduling
interviews, submitting your visa application, and other frequently asked questions.
YOU MUST BRING the confirmation page and the following document(s) with you at all steps during the
application process:
Passport
You may also provide any additional documents you feel will support your case.
6/6/2014 11 :49 AM
Nonimmigrant Visa- Document ... .4 Data/Skype/My Sky ...
2 of2
Instructions
YOU MUST SUBMIT the confinnation page with a clear and legible barcode at the time of your interview.
If you do not have access to a printer at this time, select the option to email your confirmation page to an
email address. You may print or email your application for your own records. YOU DO NOT need to submit
the application at the time of the interview.
Please note that you will be required to provide proof that you have paid the visa application fee and any
other fees associated with your appJication. There may be other fees associated with the visa application
process. Please check your country's Reciprocity Schedule for any other fees you may owe.
If you have further questions, or to find out how to contact the Consular Post, please go to
http://london.usembassy.gov/ or http://traveJ.state.gov.
NOTE: Unless exempt from an interview, you will be required to sign your application by providing a
biometric signature, i.e. your fingerprint before a consular officer. By providing this biometric signature you
are certifying under penahy of perjury that you have read and understood the questions in your nonimmigrant
visa application and that all statements that appear in your nonimmigrant visa application have been made by
you and are true and complete to the best of your knowledge and belief. Furthermore at the time of your
you will be required to certify under penalty of perjury that all statements in your application and
those made during your interview are true and compete to the best of your knowledge and belief.
You electronically signed your application on 4/27/2014 6:01:49 PM (GMT-05:00). You were required to
electronically sign your application yourself, unless otherwise exempt by regulation, even if the application
was prepared by someone other than yourself. Your electronic signature certifies that you have read and
understood the questions in this application and that your answers are true and correct to the best of your
knowledge and belief. The submission of an application containing any false or misleading statements may
r.esult in the permanent refusal of a visa or the denial of entry into the United States. All declarations made in
this application are unsworn declarations made under penalty of perjury. (28 U.S.C. 1746).
The information that you have provided in your application and other information submitted with your
application may be accessible to other government agencies having statutory or other lawful authority to use
such information, including for law enforcement and immigration law enforcement purposes. The photograph
that you provide with your application may be used for employment verification or other U.S. law purposes.
This site is managed by the Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State. External links to other
Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.
Copyright Information Disclaimers Paperwork Reduction Act
(110)
6/6/201411:49 AM
Case 1:14-cv-uud95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1t.. _4 Page 11 of 109
----------------------------------.. ----------------------------x Case No.:
V.
Plaintiffs,
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
10 I Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THENEWYORKSTATEBOARD
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------x
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
FOR EQIDTY RELIEF OF
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Case 1:14-cv-0099.5-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14 Page 12 of 104
Case 1:14-cv-L"-195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L ..... 4 Page 12 of 109
FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS
Index No.: 29642 I 08
Christopher Earl Strunk, Plaintiff, I.A.S. Part 47
H. William Van Allen, Intervener - Plaintiff. (Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C.)
-against-
David A. Patetson (NYS Governor), Andrew Cuomo
(NYS Attorney General}, Thomas P. DiNapoli
(NYS Comptroller), Sheldon Silver (NYS Speaker of
the Assembly), Malcolm Smith (NYS Senator),
Hakeem Jeffries (NYS Assemblyman for the 57th AD),
Christine Quinn (NYC Speaker of the Council),
William Thompson (NYC Comptroller),
Jim Tedisco (NYS Assemblyman), Dean Skelos
(President pro tempore of the NYS Senate) in their
Official Capacities and individually, the Democrat
Candidate Presidential Electors as a class, in their official
Capacity and individually; The New York State Board
of Elections and John Does and Jane Does
Defendants,
New York State Unified Court System Office of Court
Administration by the Honorable GAIL PRUDENT!, J.S.C.,
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and NEW YORK CITY
BOARD OF ELECTIONS and its commissioners.
Supplemental Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------x
FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS
----------------------------------------------x
Christopher-Ea.1l: Strunk in esse Petitioner,
-against-
Hake em Jeffries, Grace Meng, Felix Ortiz, Bill DeBlasio,
Walter Cooper, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn,
William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske,
Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie Spigner, George Gresham,
Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Mario Cilento;
Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown; Robert Duffy;
Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone;
Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand
Respondents.
Page 1 of 15
Index No.: 21948/2012
Case 1:14-cv-t _ -195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _4 Page 13 of 109
AFFIDAVIT OF EXPERT WITNESS
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
C P L R 3 1 0 1 (d)
Accordingly, I, Michael Shrimpton, Esquire, being duly sworn, depose and say
under penalty of perjury:
1. /, Michael Shrimpton, Esquire, am a British Subject and a British Citizen, born on
the 9th day of March 1957, with my place of business located at 8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, in the County ofBuckinghamshire, United Kingdom HP22 6PF.
2. I am a barrister in independent practice, called to the Bar by Gray's Inn at
Michaelmas 1983. I am also an independent intelligence consultant and author,
formerly a member of the Adjunct Faculty of the American Military University
(AMU), which is accredited to the Department of Defense. I taught at AMU on the
Masters in Strategic Intelligence program (since this affidavit is being used in an
American court, as a cou1tesy, I am using American English, or what I fondly
imagine to be American usage). My book Spyhunter: A Secret History of German
Intelligence was published in England by June Press (Totnes, in the County of
Devonshire) on April 15th 2014. Spyhunter is a 711 page intelligence text (see the
annexed blurb). I also write a weekly intelligence column for
www.VeteransToday.com and have had a peer-1eviewed article published in the
Joztrnal of International Security Affairs, published by the reputable Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). 1 have participated in JINSA
Page 2 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-u ... :J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _4 Page 14 of 109
expert panels on counterterrorism in Washington and at the Simon Wiesenthal
Center in Los Angeles. I was a speaker at both the Intelligence Conference at
Crystal City, VA in 2005 and the Intelligence Summit, at the same venue, the
following year. Shortly after the Summit concluded the United States Navy were
gracious enough to fly me out to the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS
Enterptise (CVN-65) at sea, in a Northrop Grumman C-2A Greyhound, as part of
their Distinguished Visitor Program. I am a member in good standing of the
Royal United Services Institute and the United States Naval Institute. I was
invited to join British Mensa in 2012 and am SIGSec of their Intelligence and
National Security Special Interest Group. I attended the launch of the United
Kingdom National Defence Association in 2007, am a founder 1nember and a
membe1 of theh advisory council, which has gone through various guises since
being set up (it is a largely honorific post and the council does not meet as a body).
A numbe1 of former Chiefs of the UK Defence Staff are Patrons of UKNDA, whose
main aim is to encourage support for our fighting services and press for an
increase in their lamentably low budget, even lower than the Pentagon's, I am
sorry to say.
3. In 1992 I was appointed a part-time Chairman of the Immigration Appeal
Tribunal (IAT) by the then Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, Lord Mackay of
Clashfern. The IAT heard immigration appeals from all over the United Kingdom,
including Scotland, and the Islands. It was both an appellate and first instance
tribunal, with legally qualified chairmen sitting with lay members, usually two.
The lay members tended to have milita1y, intelligence or colonial experience, but
they came from all walks of life and had varied backgrounds. First instance cases
were heard under s.3(5)(b) of the Immigration Act 1971 (Imp.) and consisted of
appeals against decisions to deport on the ground that it was conducive to the
public good, usually following a sentence of imp1isonment for a serious crime, such
as narcotics trafficking.
Page 3 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-L ... -.195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L._4 Page 15 of 109
4. In 1995 I was appointed additionally to serve as an Immigration Adjudicator and
Special Adjudicator. Special Adjudicators, now known as Immigration Judges,
heard appeals against refusal of political asylum in the United Kingdom. The IAT
was abolished not long after I retired from it in 2005. It is right to say that I was
prevented from sitting after November 2003 and that when I resigned I was in
dispute with the Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain and Secretary of State for
Constitutional Affairs, Lord Falconer of Thoroton QC. This is not the place to go
into the rights and wrongs of that dispute, but it flowed from my intelligence work
and followed a bad faith complaint in June 2002 to my professional body, the Bar
Council, by a Citizen of the Islamic Republic of Iran, whom I was advised was
connected to their intelligence service, VEVAK. That complaint in turn followed
my successful representation of an officer of the US Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) who had been instrumental in expanding the CIA's network inside Iran
after the 1979 banian Revolution. V E V ~ working with the Iraqi Mukhabarat,
were involved in the prosecution of this officer, indeed it transpired that VEV AK
had an asset inside the Crown Prosecution Service, E. I was partially responsible
for the exposure of E, who was thought to have an Iraqi background but whose
family in fact came from Iran. hlfy former client had a distinguished CIA career
and was formerly a Lockheed U-2 pilot, indeed he was on the U-2 shakedown
program.
5. I understand that Plaintiffs intent is to call me as an expert witness, with the
leave of the court. I have been asked to make myself available to give evidence in
New York on June 18th and 19th 2014. As a courtesy I have supplied copies of my
legal and national security resumes to the Plaintiff and they can be made
available to the court and other parties. After the failure of an assassination
attempt upon me in 1999 I have been subjected to a volley of bad faith accusations,
both professional and criminal. These have all either failed or are sub judice at
this time. I am content to supply further details if asked, but would respectfully
Page 4 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-L-..:195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L.._4 Page 16 of 109
caution all parties that each accusation has involved hostile intelligence agencies,
usually G02, the covert German opetation in London set up at the end of World
War II, and some have involved fabrication of evidence and tampering with my
computer equipment.
6. At the behest of Plaintiff Christopher Earl Strunk, I understand that I am
swearing this affidavit under New York State Civil Practice Law Rules Section
3101(d) as to my expert witness qualifications to testify at the hearing scheduled
to be heard before the Honorable David I. Schmidt, Justice of the Supreme Court
for the County of .Kings, in the above Caption tentatively as consolidated cases.
7. I am also of the understanding that there is a related case with orders from the
New Ymk State Supreme Cou1t for the County of Kings with Index No.: 6500-2011
now with active consolidated appeal cases with No's: 2012-05515, 2013-06335 and
2014-00297 in the Appellate Division for the Second Department with submission
pending the outcome of this matter herein. There is clearly some procedural
complexity here and I will not pretend to the court that I have fully understood
how the various cases relate to each other, nor the procedural basis for the hearing
in June. I comprehend at least this much, that each of the cases turns in pru.t on
the question of fact as to whether or not President Barack Hussein Obama Junior
was born in either of the hospitals in Honolulu in the State of Hawai'i in which he
claims to have been born and the mixed question of fact and law as to whether or
not President Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States within the
meaning of Article ll of the United States Constitution. For the avoidance of
doubt, whilst I hold myself out as a constitutional lawyer, I do not pretend to be an
expe1t on the United States Constitution.
8. To a limited extent I accept that I am also a witness of fact, limited to the specific
issue of advice I gave in late 2007 to the Central Intelligence Agency and the
Defense Intelligence Agency in London, also made available to those very nice
people with respect, the National Security Agency, concerning the advisability of a
Page 5 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-t.._-.:195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/ll.. _4 Page 18 of 109
the Labou1 Pru.ty and stood for Parliament in the Labour interest, for the Division
of Horsham in the County of West Sussex, in 1987 and the European Parliament
for the Eu1-opean Division of West Sussex in 1989. I defected to the Tory Party,
largely but not solely on the issue of UK membership of the European Union,
shortly after the 1997 General Election in Britain.
12. Fm the avoidance of doubt it is possible in England to be both an active member of
a political party and a judicial officer at the same time, indeed at one time it was
quite common for Members of Parliament to sit as Recorders (part-time judges) in
the Crown Court. I well recall a particularly pleasant jury trial before the late Sir
Peter Archer QC MP at the then Crown Court at the Middlesex Guildhall, e.g., in
the late 1990s, after I had left his party for the Tories. He was if I may say so a
deeply honorable man and would not have dreamt of allowing such political
differences as we might have had to influence his conduct of the trial. Similarly,
when I sat as an immigration judge, I did not allow such opinions as I had on the
issue of British membership of the European Union to affect the exercise of my
judicial discretion when I was asked to refer questions of community law to the
Court of Justice of the European Communities under Article 177 of the Treaty of
Rome, indeed I became the first immigration judge to 1efer questions of law to the
ECJ in Luxembourg, and went across to Europe to observe the proceedings.
13. I cannot conceive that the requirements on an expert witness in New Y mk State
are any less onerous than they are in England. I have not given evidence in an
American court before, nor prepared an expe1t's report for use in an American
court, although I count a number of American lawyers as friends and a friend who
is a Superior Court judge in Los Angeles was kind enough to invite me to watch
proceedings in his court. I have also been privileged to have met with a small
number of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States ove1 the years,
including that nice man with respect the late Chief Justice Rehnquist. Whilst I
a1n not an offtce1 of the New York State Supreme Court, as a matter of comity and
Page 7 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-0099?-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14 Page 19 of 104
Case 1:14-cv-t, _495-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/l\ ........ 4 Page 19 of 109
out of respect for the court, I would not regard my duties to an American court to
be any less onerous than my duties to a court in my own countly.
14. I respectfully adopt the observation of Tomlin J. in Graigola Me,-thyr v. Swansea
Corporation [1928] 1 Ch. 31 that an expert witness has a "special duty to the
colllt". I also respectfully adopt the statement by Hodgkinson in Expert Evidence:
Law and Practice (London: Sweet & Maxwell, }at. ed., 1990), at page 90, that "the
expert witness has a principal and overriding duty, not to the party by whom he is
retained, but to the cou1t".
15. For the avoidance of doubt, bearing in mind my own political beliefs and President
Obama's ethnicity, I accept the cardinal importance of avoiding any political or
racial bias in coming to my conclusions as an intelligence expert. As it happens, I
came to the same conclusion as regarding his eligibility for the office of President
of the United States in respect of President Obama's white Republican opponent,
Senator McCain, as I did in relation to then Senator Obama. In relation to
Senator McCain that was by reason of his birth in the Republic of Panama. So far
as I know my conclusions as regards Senator McCain are in the public domain.
16. I deal firstly with my role in tendering inf01mal advice to the CIA and the DIA. As
the court will understand, with respect, intelligence agencies work on a quite
different p1inciple to courts and lawyers. Whereas the latter emphasize
transparency and rightly so, the intelligence community (INTELCOM) favors
deniability. When the CIA invite you to lunch they do not usually send out an
embossed invitation. By the time President Obama joined the 2008 presidential
race, on Feb1uary lOth 2007, I would like to think that I was well-known to the
CIA. It was not, I suspect, a secret inside INTELCOM that my opinion was that
Senator Obama, as he then was, was born in Mombasa in what is now the
Republic of Kenya. My success in relation to a paternity test on a British
politician was also probably widely known inside INTELCOM. The lunch was
held at Claridges Hotel in Brook Street, Mayfair, London on Wednesday October
Page 8 of 15
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L .... 4 Page 20 of 109
lOth 2007. A senior DIA officer was also present. Officially this was purely a
social occasion. I would not be offended were either the CIA or the DIA to deny
that the lunch had ever happened, or that I had tendered advice on the
desilability of a DNA test and how best to conduct it, indeed that would be
standard operating procedure. In fact however, although the advice I gave has
been in the public domain since 2008, there has been no denial from either the
CIAorDIA.
17. I do not name the names of Allied intelligence officers with whom I have had
dealings. There are several reasons for that. I could not function as an
intelligence expert if intelligence officers felt they could not repose trust in me not
to blow their identities. It is also discourteous and thoroughly bad practice and
can expose the officers with whom you are dealing to unnecessary risk. In relation
to American intelligence officers it might also involve a breach of the Intelligence
Identities Protection Act (liP A). I am familiar with IIP A as the act was abused in
a with respect misconceived prosecution, United States u. Libby, during the Bush-
Cheney Presidency in relation to a CIA analyst, Valerie Plame, who was not in
fact protected by liP A. As she had had dealings with the Secret Intelligence
Service (MI6) and I was aware that the prosecution was without foundation I
passed a warning on to attornies for Karl Rove, whom I believed was the primary
target for the opexation, and Lewis Libby, the ultimate defendant. Just because a
CIA or DIA officer does not happen to be operating undercover when you have
dealings with the1n it does not follow that they are not unde1cover at the present
time. I would be most unwilling to name the officers and if I were to be asked that
question I would be grateful for the courtesy of notice, so that I might consult with
the offices of Gene1al Counsel to the CIA and General Counsel to the DIA. I am
known to a number of former General Counsel to US intelligence agencies,
including that very nice man with respect William Allard, formerly a
distinguished General Counsel to the DIA, and the excellent American Bar
Page 9 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-t,._.:J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. . ..._4 Page 21 of 109
Association Committee on Law and National Security, who were kind enough in
2010 to invite me to one of their working breakfasts in Washington DC.
18. Some years prior to the lunch I had tendered informal advice to the Security
Service (MI5) after concerns arose that a senior member of the Labour
Gove1nment, B, might be a blackmail risk, as a result of claiming a child, L, to be
his. To preserve deniability, not least in cilcumstances whe1e the advice was
politically sensitive, the informal advice was given over lunch at a military facility
to retired office1s of the Service. I gave my analysis as to the true father and
suggested a means by which the intelligence might be verified, verification of
course being critical. A dinner was held to which myself, the mother, Mrs B, and
the suspected father, F, were invited. I believe that Ml5 had an asset inside the
caterers, a Sikh. The operational concept was that this asset would secrete the
wine glasses used by Mrs B and F for DNA comparison with DNA retrieved from L
(the baby's) saliva. I had a fair understanding of DNA testing by this time and
readily appreciated that you did not need to draw blood, which might be
distressing for baby and might amount to a criminal assault upon a minor,
something I advised MI5 against. So far as I am aware the test excluded Bas a
candidate for the father of L. At any tate MI5's budget went up shortly thereafter,
two brief later encounters with the then Director-General ofMI5 were surprisingly
amicable and I heard no more about it, except that F sought to cause me
professional difficulties and B did not place me on his Christmas card list.
19. I explained all this to the intelligence officers at the Claridges lunch. My
recollection is that the DIA officer was surprised and that the CIA officer just
smiled. The technique, which was non-invasive, lawful and quite simple, provided
not just sufficient DNA for a reliable test, but a chain of evidence, as the glasses
also had the user's fingerprints. Senator Obama's yurported mother, Stanley Ann
Dunham, sadly had died, aged 53, on November 7th 1995. Maternity was of
greater interest then than pate1nity, as the claimed father, Barack Hussein
Page 10 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-u ... Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _...J. Page 22 of 109
Obama Senior had no claim to citizenship of the United States, that is to say then
Senator Obama's claim to be a US citizen 1ested on his claimed relationship with
Stanley Ann Dunham. My respectful suggestion, therefore, was to acquire the
DNA of Stanley Ann Dunham's mother, Madelyn Lee Dunham, along with that of
Senator Obama. That could most easily be done, in my opinion, by using the glass
technique successfully trialed by MIS. I also advised checking for photographs of
Stanley Ann Dunham, whom I believe was known to the CIA in any event from
her days in US AID, in particular from the summer of 1961, when she was
supposed to have been pregnant, and her medical records, and Dunham's
FBI file, which I believed dated from 1944, and Boeing security file, if extant, in
connection with Abwehr sabotage activities on the B-29 Supe1-fortress line at
Boeing's Wichita, Kansas plant.
20. To the best of my knowledge and belief the DNA test was done and Senator
Obama's claim to be the son of Stanley Ann Dunham could not be supported. I
cannot say to the court that either CIA or DIA came back to me and said so in
terms. I would not expect them to and it would be contrary to good intelligence
practice. I would however expect to be told if my advice had led to either agency
wasting time or resources, not to mention the cost of a good lunch.
21. The outcome of the DNA test, as I understood it to be, was consistent with what I
knew of then Senator Obama's background. It was my understanding then, and
still is, that he was born in Mombasa in what was then the Kenyan Protectorate,
on or about August 4th 1960. So far as I know that is the internal view of both
MI5 and MI6. The President's claimed father was known to British intelligence in
1960 due to his connection with the Mau Mau terrorist organization. The1e is no
evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham went to Kenya in 1960, that is to say she
cannot have been the mother, assuming the intelligence about the birth in
Mombasa to be correct.
22. I should explain to the court that in 1960 the Kenyan Protectorate was not part of
Page 11 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-<..,. .. 'J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL. + Page 23 of 109
the British Empire proper. It was not a British imperial possession, but formed
part of the tetritory of His Highness the Sultan of Zanzibar, who very sensibly had
placed his territory under British protection. His Highness's subjects as a
consequence enjoyed the status of British Protected Persons. The Protectorate
was a narrow coastal strip, about ten miles wide, from the Ruvuman River in the
south to the Tana River in the north. Kenya Colony lay to the west. The two were
merged into mode1n Kenya by the Kenya Independence Act 1963 (Imp.),
citizenship of Kenya being conferred on former B1itish Protected Persons by
reason of Section 1(1) ofthe Independence Constitution of Kenya.
23. I did not have cause to change my opinion when the White House promulgated a
purported long form birth certificate online in 2011. I am not a computer
specialist but I was not surprised when the document was questioned by forensic
computer experts. Long experience as an immigration judge caused me to
approach free-standing birth certificates, that is to say without a counterpart, with
caution. A genuine birth certificate should have a counterpart entry in the
register of live births. Of course any intelligence analysis must be reviewed in the
light of new developments, but the electronic facsimile copy of the birth certificate,
in my albeit humble expert opinion, was not a material development.
24. I am aware that the senior official of the Hawai'i Department of Health, Ms.
Loretta Fuddy, who authenticated the facsimile birth ce1iificate, purportedly died
in the crash of a Makani Kai Air Cessna Grand Caravan at or about 3.45 pm on
December lith 2013, on a short flight from Molokai to Oahu, allegedly following
engine failure. I cannot express a concluded view, as I have not made a detailed
study of the incident, but there are a number of anomalies that I should draw to
the court's attention. The engine is said to have failed, but the Grand Caravan is
powered by a Pratt and Whitney Canada PT6A turboprop, a highly reliable and
well-proven motor, nor is it clear why the engine failed. Modern engines do not
fail without a reason. No PT6A-engined airplanes were grounded as a result of
Page 12 of 15
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L . Page 24 of 109
the incident and I am unaware of any modification program to the airplane or
engine as a result of the incident. Mak.ani Kai Air are a reputable company, with
a good safety record, going back many years. Moreover post-crash photographs of
the airplane do not appear to me to show damage consistent with ditching.
25. I should explain that it is essential when ditching an airplane to keep the nose up.
In a successful ditching the first part of the aircraft to make contact with the
water should be the ventral or lower rear fuselage. I have had some limited flight
experience, having flown first solo with the University of Wales Air Squadron
(RAFVR) in 1979 and hold myself out as an aviation sabotage expert. I was of
course trained in ditching procedure. A number of aviation incidents are covered
in Spy hunter. It is exceedingly rare for an airplane to ditch without causing some
airframe damage. As presently advised I do not accept the official version of
events, but I say no more than that.
26. I am aware that Stanley Ann Dunham later married an Indonesian citizen, who
appears to have adopted Barack Hussein Obama Junior. It would not be unusual
for a minor step-child to take the step-father's nationality, in addition to that of
the mother, on re-marriage. Whilst I am not an expert on US nationality law I am
an expert in UK immigration and nationality law and am used to considering
other countries' immigration and nationality law. Stanley Ann Dunham was a
minor when she allegedly gave birth to the president and the claimed father's
alleged marriage to her was admittedly bigamous, as he had married a Kenyan
woman, Kezia, in 1954. I cannot take the court to a record of a divorce between
Barack Hussein Obama Senior and Kezia Obama. It would have been unusual in
1961 for an unmarried minor, applying the defmition of minor then in force (21, in
Hawai'i), to have been able to transmit her nationality to her child. That is a
matter requiring expert evidence on US nationality law and the laws ofHawai'i on
majority, but it is right that I should flag up the issue. On the president's own
account there appears to me to be a triable issue as to whether or not he was a US
Page 13 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-L_ Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\:. Page 25 of 109
citizen at birth. To my knowledge he never naturalized, that is to say his claim to
US citizenship rests in its entirety on his claim to have been born to Stanley Ann
Dunham on US soil in 1961, and that clailn may not be sufficient in any event
having regard to his claimed father's subsisting marriage to Kezia Obama and the
age of his claimed mother at the material time.
27. In my opinion the nationality status of President Obama at birth was that of a
subject of His Highness the Sultan of Zanzibar and British Protected Person,
becoming a citizen of the Republic of Kenya on December 12th 1963. In my further
opinion there was a subsequent acquisition of the nationality of the Republic of
Indonesia, following the marriage of Stanley Ann Dunham to an Indonesian
nationaL I am respectfully unable to support the president's claim to be a citizen
of the United States. I express no view as to the claimed pate1nity, which is not
material to any issue which I believe to be before the court.
28. The following space is left blank deliberately, so that my verification statement
and the signatures of both myself and the notary public appear on the same page.
Page 14 of 15
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1lJ . ...:4 Page 26 of 109
The foregoing is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated
to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those mattere as an expert I believe to be
true. The grounds of my belief as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are
as follows: S!d parties, books and records, and personal know ledge.
That 1 am willing and able to appear under oath to provide testimony as to the truth
of the statements affirmed to before the Court and for examination by Parties; and
That I appear without reservation of my own free will, and without expectation of
payment for such testimony.
Sworn to before me
This 12th day of May 2014
Michael Shrimpton, LLB <Hons),
Esquire, of Gray's Inn, Barrister
james Richard Couzens
Notary Public - England and Wales
Addn::ss: The Friarage, 25a Rickford's Hill
. ,. -.: Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
United Kingdom HP20 2RT
? ,,... Telephone: +44 1296 3 J 8536
Email: james@aylesburynotary.co.uk
Page 15 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-v.;d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1l:i .... 4 Page 27 of 109
Spyhunter: The Secret History of German Intelligence
Spyhunter, by the renowned
barrister and intelligence
specialist Michael Shrimpton,
is one of the most fascinating
books you will ever read.
Riveting to the end. Sex,
drugs, and rock & roll-with
prominent politicians chasing
their rent boys and girls across
London- some with fatal
consequences.
Drugs are in abundance, but
here they are used to
assassinate, or, as in the case
of Michael Shrimpton.
attempted murder-because he
knew too much; with the rock
and roll jazz provided by Hugh
Masekela-reminiscening back
to Michael's days as a
volunteer Steward with the
Anti-Apartheid Movement in
London.
His role, as a Barrister, in
assisting General Pinochet exit
his unlawful detention in the
UK was known to me at that
time as we often met up
socially for drinks and a chat.
His prediction to me In 2002 that the Euro would collapse the precise way that it did was so
incredible at that time, I thought he had 'lost it.'
The paedophile life of Chairman Mao and his use of under-age boys for sex to blackmail
political opponents is covered as are the honey traps his successors use to target prominent
individuals who shape political and financial opinions in Europe, America and Australasia.
His theories about Princess Diana's murder and the gay life of Edward Heath have yet to be
proved. 9/11 was a milestone for many-including MichaeL Again, his theory has yet to be
proven.
The book covers spy rings through the centuries, blackmail, false flags, international leaders'
sexual proclivities and appetites-which made them vulnerable and compromised security
and the lives of troops and assets. KGB sex training schools for spies, gay and straight, to
1
Case _.J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1l- .4 Page 28 of 109
make them lovers par excellence. Sleepers and deep cover agents with m1ss1ons in
hibernation spanning decades, waiting to be activated, it's all there. Nothing can be
concealed from the Spyhunter.
An intelligence specialist with deep sources in the Pentagon, the CIA and elsewhere,
Michael was also consultant for the TV series 'Spooks.
Most of his contacts
worldwide are vetted
through Washington and
Langley, at least that
element of Langley who
are, as Michael would say,
'the Good Guys and Gals'.
His fife has been in danger
many times and checking
under his Bentley each
morning for bombs is a
regular occupation. A must
for every bookstore,
university and school
library-where sixth formers
and university under-
graduates are guaranteed
to be kept more awake
during history lessons by
Michael's titillating
revelations than any porn
page on the internet-or
dusty geriatric history
lecturer, whichever is the
greater. It's what history has
been waiting for-an
alternative wake-up book to
challenge the status quo-
and start a fierce debate.
Whether you agree or disagree, whether what Shrimpton says is so incredulous you are
stupefied in disbelief, anger, rage, or just on the floor with uncontrollable laughter, the 700-
page Spyhunter is a fascinating alternative look at the history of espionage from the 11th
century to the present day.
Spyhunter: The Secret History of German Intelligence. by Michael Shrimpton;
Publishers: June Press
www.JunePress.com 2014
2
Case 1:14-cv-liv::}95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/i'L . ~ o o 4 Page 29 of 109
----------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
845-3 89-4366 hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
v.
Plaintiffs,
JOHN F. KERRY at2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TIY:l-800-877-8339
by JOl-IN 0. BRENNAN
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
5
Case 1:14-cv-L...,d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L ...... 4 Page 30 of 109
PRESENT:
At an I.A.S. Trial Term, Part of the Supreme
Court of the State of New York, held in and ror the
County of Jaap. at tbe Courthouse, lt)tlted at
Civic Ceater, Berou&h of Brooklyn, City aDd State
dayof /7 7 20 J 1
-) II r1
Bon. !
4
'1/ .--
c::::v
1
Justlu
against
f trf-e. ,---J D .. .....;
Plaluliff(s)
Delcndant(s)
Cal. No.
Index No.
The following papers numbered I to read on this motlou Papen Numbered
Notice ofMotion- Order to Show Cause
and Affidavits(Affinnations) Annexed'---------------------
Answcring AflidaYit (Affirmation)!.-------------------t-----
RcpJy AfJidavit
_____ __.AffidaYit(Affirrnation) ____________ --t-----
Pleadings
Stipulationl Minutes:..-..-------------------r-----

{V.e .. u -c!.J,
I
/ _ _)
N -d.,,.;
-- f'e /' J- .
;,Le

For Clerks use only
MG_
MD_
Motion Seg. f#
EJV -rev 11-04

(J
(; .. Q_ ..
J.S.C.
HON. DAVID I. SCHMtOT
_____ ...,_ _____________________________ ,
Case 1:14-cv-L_.::J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL _4 Page 31 of 109
---------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
v.
Plaintiffs,
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:J-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
1 0 I Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Case 1:14-cV-L-:.d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed
Dear Visa Applicant:
Embassy of the United States of Amerjca
Visa Branch, 5 Upper Grosvenor Street, London, W1A 2JB
0 1 JUN 2014
Date: --------
Ref:
:rhank you for your interest in traveling to the United States. Unfortunately, we are unable to
issue a visa to you today because you were fotmd unqualified under Section 214{b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act. Under Section 214(b), applicants are presumed to be
intending immigrants unless they credibly demonstrate, to the consular officer's satisfaction,
that their economic, family, and social ties outside the United States are strong enough that
they will depart at the end of their authorized stay and that their intended activities in the
United States will be consistent with the visa status.
Because you either did not show strong ties outside the United States today or did not
demonstrate that your intended activities in the United States would be consistent with the
visa you have not met the legal standard to qualify.
Issuance of a nonimmigrant visa is not primarily a document-based decision. The visa
I
application and a brief interview are often all that are required for the officer to determine
whether an applicant qualifies.
Today's decision is final and cannot be appealed. While you are not prohibited from reapplying
for a visa
1
unless you can show credible
1
new, and compelling ties outside the United States,
and that ypur intended activities in the United States are consistent with the visa class, a
different outcome is unlikely.
If after reading this and the FAQs on the back of this form you to reapply,_ you must
schedule a new Interview and pay a new visa application fee.
Sincerely,
Consular Officer
Nonimmigrant Visa Section
Embassy ofthe Unfted States
NIV 2.14b
April 2012
http:/ /london.usembassy.gov '
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2 Filed Page 33 of 104
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1lu .... 4 Page 33 of 109
-----------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC. NY 11238
v.
Plaintiffs,
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
U.S. COPYRlGJIT OFFICE
1 0 l Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------x
COMPLAINT witb PETITION
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Ex 1bi 7
ase : -cv-C_d95-RJ[ Document 11 Filed 06/lL _4 Page 34 of
APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
FEE PAID
-$I (if
.. --"'"""""'"----X
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK,
Petitioner,
Versus
The Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C., Et al.
Respondents.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Appellate Division Docket No.:

n.,f:!<o
'- :n
z c:: m
c.{:: z -
t :. (")
N !!!
:J> ....
:z: <
-------------------------.............................................................. ___ x . ;..c: fi3 m
. .. 0
. ,..,_
Upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher Earl Strunk agent, .
I ;
and the papers annexed thereto,
LET the Honqrable DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C., I.A.S. Part 4 7, the Honorable
ARTHUR M. SCHACKJ.S.C., I.A.S. Part 23. and the Honorable GAIL PRUDENT! J.S.C.,
SHOW CAUSE BEFORE THIS COURT, at the courthouse thereof., located at 45 Monroe
Place, Brooklyn, New York 11201, on the ___ day of June, 2014, at 9:30 o'clock in the
forenoon of that date or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, why an order
not be made and entered:
1. The Bar by .Justice Schack for a case filed before 2011 is inapplicable;
2. Justice Schmidt be ordered to proceed to provide a trial on transactions stemming
from the 2008 General Election;
3 .. Justice Schmidt be ordered to approve subpoenas for records possessed by the
State of New York, and or its agents and for the principals with authority over such records
to testify in open court as to those records;
4 .. Justice Prudenti be ordered to guarantee the strict legal provision of Martial Due
process of law with 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) and related law under a commander-
Case 1:14-cv-L..,d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1t,. _4Page 35 of
in-chief who is eligible for POTUS or othewise shall remstit"ute provision- civilian
process of law under the full force ofthe Federal and State constitutions accordingly.
5. Trial on the facts be joined with the June 18, 2014 trial for a bench trial;
6. Granting such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable.
SUFFICIENT CAUSE THEREFOR APPEARING, it is
ORDERED that pending the hearing and determination of this instant action that the
order that Petitioner, JUROR INDEX 247060746, serve on a jury that must start on June 3,
2014 is stayed; and it is further,
ORDERED that service of a copy of this order to show cause and the papers upon
which it was made upon the Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C., I.A.S. Part 4 7
7
the
Honorable ARTHUR M. SCHACK J.S.C., I.A.S. Part 23 , and the Honorable GAIL
PRUDENT! J.S.C and JOSHUA PEPPER Assistant Attorney General of the New York
State by_ personal delivery pursuant to CPLR 2103(b)(l) _office delivery pursuant to
CPLR 2103(b)(3) __ overnight delivery service pursuant to CPLR 2103(b)(6) on or before
June , 2014, shall be deemed sufficient service thereof.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
June .1::._, 2014
Associate Justice
Appellate Division 2nd Department
Case 1:14-cv-L. ..... -:195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L.:_4 Page 36 of 109

APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
------ ---------------------------------------------------------x
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Petl tioner, Appellate Division Docket No.:
Versus
The Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C., Et al.
Respondents.
-----------------------------.. -a-----X
PETITIONER AFFIDAVIT In Support OfOSC with TRO and Stay affirmed June 2, 2014
EXIDBIT A: NOTICE OF MOTION with CPLR 3101(d) and Judicial Notice of Status W
Plaintiff's AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
EXHIBIT 1: Affidavit of expert MICHAEL SHRIMPrON under CPLR 3101(d)
EXIllBIT 2: Note of Issue for the Petition 21948-2012
EXHIBIT 3: Appellant's Brieffor Appeal2013-06335
EXHIBIT 4: Redacted Express Deed In Trust To The United States Of America
EXIHBIT B : 30 May 2014 SLIP ORDER by Hon. David I Schmidt in 29642-08
EXHIBIT C : Plaintiffs Subpoenas for Case Strunk v Paterson Index 29642-08
EXHIBIT D : Strunk Affidavit Letters to Congressmen 1 May 2014 re 29642-08
EXHIBIT E: 24 January 2014 SLIP ORDER by Hon. David I Schmidt in 29642-08
EXIDBIT F : 11 April 2012 Decision and Order by Hon. Arthur M. Schack in 6500-2011
EXIDBIT G: 4 March 2014 M 170416 Decision and Order on Motion by Appellate Panel
EXIDBIT B: 27 January 2014 Response by NYSUCS 2nd JD to 16 Jan 2014 COMPLAINT
EXIDBIT I: 30 May 2014 NYS HESC Response to Strunk FOIL re 29642-08
::ITJ:
2014 l.-1/
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris {' '/v v
transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor
for the Exvress Deed In Trust To The United
States OfAmerica, located at
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - PMB 281
Case 1:14-cv-t. ..:J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lt. _4 Page 37 of 109
~ -------------x Case No.:
V.
Plaintiffs.
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
l 0 1 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
~ ~ X
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 220 1 and 2202
Exhibit 8
U.S. Embassy London Filed 06/lt..... ..
I of2
Embassy of the United States
U.S. EMBASSY LONDON VISA UNIT - CONTACT FORM
6
u.s. Embassy London Visa Unit - Contact Form
0 I need to know which visa is required for travel
0 I wish to reschedule my immigrant or K visa Interview
0 I wish to know the status of my immigrant or fiance visa application
0 I would like to add the name of my U.S. citizen spouse/child to my IV appointment
0 My inquiry concerns immigrant visas and is not covered by information on your website
0 My inquiry concerns nonimmigrant visas and is not covered by your website
Please provide your FULL NAME (as it appears on the DS-160 or In your passport).
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
(150 characters)
Please provide BRIEF details of additional information relevant to your question:
I am CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, a private
Citizen of the United States being the
sponsor for the B-1 Visa application
completed 27 APR 2014 by British Subject
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON who had a confirmation
AA0041FB3G with the interview of 2 June 2014
{1000 characters)
Please provide your contact email address:
chris@strunk.ws
(150 characters)
The information you provide is used solely by the Visa Branch of the U.S. Embassy London. In
order to process certain types of requests, we may have to ask for your full name as it
appears in your passport and contact information. You may decline to provide such
Information, but that could inhibit our ability to answer your questions or assist you with your
request. Any Information provided on our web form is not retained and Is used only In order to
process your current request or answer your current questions. The Visa Branch works in
accordance with Consular Affairs procedures as well as the Paperwork Reduction Act _(44
U.S. C. 3501 et seq.) and the Privacy Act of 1974.
Emails and Privacy
Email is not secure and any information you provide on this online inquiry form cannot be
guaranteed safe from potential loss. If you choose to send us any Personally Identifiable
Information in your email enquiry, it will be removed from the email before we send our
reply.
Submit
6/6/2014 1:52PM
Case Document 1-1 Filed Page 39 of 109
-------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
V.
Plaintiffs,
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C StreetNW
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
0 F ELECTIONS by its agents at
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARlNG
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Exhib. 9
- ----- Case 1:14-cv-uu::J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lu ...... 4 Page 40 of 109
Stan Cheren
!tc-01 Ltttlt> Lrrd,. l' . t lll R.l ,,,.l . 2;"iiC'
WW\V.mn.:hopnrk . :,.ttn f'..:iP:h..f''
....... .... M-..L.JH. !?t'- f.:'ll'
ENIGMA BOOKS
L MIC..LEil
EDIT()R!PENICO ... A.BOOKS COM
12 EAST 86TH STitEIET 308
NII:W YOIIIIK NV I 0028
2.12 988 13\0
646 246 SOlO
Cardinal Publishers Group
Tom Doherty
President
2402 North Sl\adeland Ave . SUite A
JndlanapoiJs, IN 46219
Phone (317J 352-8200. Fa" {317)
800-296-0481
-mall: tdoherty@lcardlnalpub.com
www.cardlnalpub.com
CHRISTOPHER STRUNK
JOURNALIST
THE WASHINGTON CHRONICLE
NEW YORK, NY
II
68- 172- 47
RC:PR RIIION: BH:CWR
Entertainment Images Archive
515 Madison A\enue
Frank Pohole
212-810-9433
----- ------
22nd floor
New York, NV 10022
Henry Hewes
212-750-8891
e
\
1
Case 1:14-cv-uv995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1t.J,_.4 Page 41 of 109
PUBliCATIONS
AMBER SERMENO
66' 1 Waldo Avenue. Et Cerrito. CA 94530
510.680.6.400 sgentry@lit11eparrolpubs.com
NAUSlCAA AENNER
ASSOClAT WEB EDJTOR
NAUSICAA@BOSTONREVJEW NET
8173241352
PO BOX 425786 I CAMBRJOGE. MA 02142
BOSfONREVJE.WNET
JOHN ROBLEOO
Produdlon Oill!\':101
Advottislng MllhZQGI
1&0casslaWay.D50B
Heroef!.On NV USA 890
OFFIC .u02 5650746 xtU03
r:mruLc .1 102 :m noo
FAX I 702 567 242S
iiJiln@smalamwe\'ll!f:l com

vttM Sfll!liArmsOIThaYJolld com
;:
- -.

t

.:
t 4
:
- :.
r
:..
...
...
'
CHI POll

-
c
2

-
en
....

-
'/
-
.....
=:: -
-
.....
;:
-
7

. ... '!
U.S. NAVAL JNSTITliTt:
Susan Todd Brook
-"niw :\' tf"''iliun., fllllurSul,.;iclifln llll!llt!>. lmJJur/s
:'\lia\;lllnsliluh: Pms:.
2!11 \\'uucl Ruad
:\nnup11lk 1\10:.! 140:!
"''' ur:.:
It}: ol1U.2!15.JO:r;
4 IU.:.!!I!i. Ulol

';l1t. 1:!. .:,
''I.I\IIC'II\ ttl 1111'\lll'
I' n 1 ''
';;; '-.tttlh' l,,J., .,,,, ,.,
L' h,u11p.ug11. Ill moot',. a'; .
: 1 :;'..: lof II t
..:1- .:H 1\\
!tll\!ll'\"i!:lJIIItllhl'olu
'' \\" ...... \illn', du
Kevin Moran
0
f'f.
\
1r
- c....
...
.:!
-

Q
r

" "- i
,.
=.
""
:::
J

z
, :;-
en
IIIIi}
,
-
,.
J
;:
7
RRENDA M. SMOTiiFRMAN
Ill fclltllltl\1 f>CoHI,J.II!I
..u .. ,. 615 74962%
..

In . .. . : '
20 I E1glllh Avenup. South
Nashville. TN 372'0.'\
AbingoonPress com
c .. .... ,. ,
Case 1:14-cv-L.;.:-195-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/h .. _4 Page 42 of 109
---------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
v.
Plaintiffs,
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
U.S. COPYRJGHT OFFICE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------x
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Ex ibit 10
New York State Board Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL. _4
1 ofl3
Running for Office
Requirements to Hold Office
jOFFICE jjCITIZENSHIP,AGE !RESIDENCY jSTATUTE
i President of the j Bom a citizen _______ ;-U-n-ite_d_S_t_a_te-s--
1
; United States i 'years Art II
l
I ___
1
United States 1 Citizen
9 30
Resident of state when elected Constitution Art. I
I Senator
1
years years! .
3
I NYS Governor/ R-e-s-id-e-nt_o_f-st-a-te_S_y_e_a_rs_i_mm_e_di-at-e-ly-.,;.N-e-w-Yo_rk_S-ta-te-
1
I
Lt. Governor l preceding election Constitution Art.
Attorney General I IV 2 and Art. V
I Comptroller i 1
I R t t
. Citizen 7 Fl5 !i-R-e-si-de_n_t_o_f s-t-at_e_w_h-en-el_e_ct-ed-----r-U-n-it-ed_S_t_a-tes--
1
;
1
in Congress years years l Constitution Art. 1
I ! 2
I New York State IFB ji-::R:-e-si:-de_n_t_o-=-f s-ta_t_e-:-fo-r-=5-y-e-ar_s_a_n_d ----rN_e_w_'(i_o_rk_S_t-at_e_
1
i Senator years i resident of district for 12 months Constitution Art.
I
; New York State limmediately preceding election. (In a Ill 7
Assembly redistricting year, may be a resident of
1
county for 12 months immediately Public Officers
, preceding the elecUon.) Law 3
General Information on Petitions
These sample forms were prepared by the State Board of Elections. They are all in Acrobat PDF
format. You will need the Adobe (TM) Acrobat Reader to view and print them.
These forms can be printed and filled out by hand.
Electronic signatures are not acceptable.
SAMPLE DESIGNATING PETITION 39KB) (print on legal size paper)
SAMPLE INDEPENDENT NOMINATING PETITION 62KB) (print on legal size paper)
SAMPLE OPPORTUNITY TO BALLOT PETITION (-,.:_ 63KB) (print on legal size paper)
SAMPLE VILLAGE DESIGNATING PETITION ('1:: 30KB) (print on legal size paper)
SAMPLE VILLAGE DESIGNATING PETITION- COUNTY(-,:_ 31KB) (to be used If Election is
run by the County Board of Elections) (print on legal size paper)
SAMPLE VILLAGE INDEPENDENT NOMINATING PETITION 31KB) (print on legal size
paper)
SAMPLE VILLAGE INDEPENDENT NOMINATING PETITION -COUNTY ('1;. 30KB) (to be
used if Election Is run by the County Board of Elections) (print on legal size paper)
SAMPLE COVER SHEETS (-J;: 11KB)
SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE (1:: 23KB}
SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF 23KB)
SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTITUTION (-,:_ 944KB)
6/8/2014 4:50PM
Case Document 1-1 Filed . .1.4 Page 44 of 109
------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
84 5-3 89-4 366 hvanallen@hvc.rr .com
V.
Plaintiffs.
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C StreetN\V
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:I-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
I 01 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (51 8) 486-4068
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------x
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 220 1 and 2202
Exhibit 1
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL . 4 Page 45 of 109
USCA case #13-5160 Document #1493255 Filed: 05/14/2014 1 of 189
UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLU BIA CIRCUIT
0 10 (F
TO fDIUE E
E. Barrett Prettyman
u.s. Courthouse and
William B. Bryant Annex
Constitution Ave., NW washington ... DC 20001
eterans Affairs et I
IEF-
Judicial otice of SCOTUS Applications for Second Expansions of Time to
file petitions of certiorari in SCOTUS Docket 13A979 H. WiBiiam Van Allen
v ew YorkS ate Board of Elections and SCOYUS ocket 13A980 .
William Va Allen v Silver et al. (Attached IE hibits &B)
Judidal otice of Status in rreiate case(s) in YSUCS Kings Cim1 Supreme
Court and Appellate Dovlsion Second Department Including attached
Notice of Motion for Judidal Notice of Affidavit of Michael Shrimpton Esq.
(Exhibit C)
Judici I Notice of reBated appellate eases on USCA-DCC (Dr. Orly Taotz Esq
and Christopher EarD Strunk both appearanc ro se in their individMa!
case(s) listed ewo
tJ .Judicial Notice of letter from Sydney Eisi& DDS rregarrdlng April17 2013
non-VA (Columltia University CeO'Itf!r) jaw mdvaneemem surgery.
(Exhibit D)
NVS\l.ll e.-courts active cases with Van AilleiJ'I as pencdloll\lg fintervener
1ll STRUNK.CHr.JSTOPHER :tDfAISTOPm!ll PATERSON,f.)AVlO 06}13/l014;MYJD
' EARL I!AIU. S'm.UNtt - A,
Prase !(PT. 47)
+
13 rungs .Adiva lsrRUI\lC<, C:HRrSTOP:lR- BOARD GF
iCKIUST.PHI!R.ARL ;'EAJU. SIRUNK - l!lJ!CilON3
PI'osle
01AKEB1:1 G6/1S/2014'tteN--JUIW
Jm:FRJJ!$ ' :TJUAL
:_ Pll1le.2 ! :READINess D
PART
_j
------ .. - -----
;.
Case 1:14-cv-LvJ95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\... Page 46 of 109
!JSCA Case tt13-5160 Document #1493255 Ftled: 05i1412014 Pn.CJC 7 of 189
USC A-District of Columbia Circuit Case Selection Page
Laert
Case Number Opening
Party Docket
Originating Case Number
Title Date
Entry
;ortgln
11-5304
0090-1 :
Orly 05/0312013
Taitz v. Michael 10/31/2011
Taitz 13:54:27
United States District Court for the

District of Columbia

0090-1 :
Orly 07/24/2012
Orl!l Taitz v. 11/02/2011
Taltz 14:04:35
Ruemmler
District of Columbia
. 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-01421-RCL
11-5329 Orly 01/23/2012
In re: Orly Taitz. et a!
11/17/2011
Taitz 15:29:25
10-5092
Christopher Strunk v.
Department of State. et al
12-5289
USA v. Barack Obama. et

12-5414
Christopher Strunk v.
Department of State. et al

!!l._!_e: Christopher
Case Number
Title
13-5059
In re. Harold Van Allen
13-5160
Harold Van Allen v.
DeQartment of Veterans
Affairs. et al
i District of Columbia
Christopher Eart 01/14/2011
090
-
1
:
1
:0S-cv-0
2234
-RJL
03/31/2010 Strunk
17
.
41
.
13
United States District Court
for the District of Columbia
Christopher Eari .11/21/2013

09113/2012 Strunk
14
.
26
.
27
umted States 01stnct Court
12/28/2012
;christopher Earl 02114/2013 '
0090
-
1
:
1
:0S-cv-0
2234
-RJL
Strunk
15
.
01
.
30
0110712013
'Christopher Earl 11/13/2013 :U led Stat
0
. tri C
Strunk 161354 m es IS ct ourt
Opening
Last
Originating Case Number
PQlrty Docket
Date
Entry
Origin
HaroldW. 1112712013
ooso-1: 1:12-cv-01538-ESH
02/19/2013
Van Allen 09
.
26
.2
3
0510512014
:
05/31/2013
:HaruldW.
:VanAllen 16
.
37
.
04
Umted States Orstrict Court
---- ---- ----
- ... ... -- . ------"
Case 1 : 1 4 c v ~ ... d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL: :...4 Page 47 of 109
USCA Case #135160 Document #1493255
SERVICE CERTIFICATION this date electronically upon
R Craig lawrence AUSA,
Dionne Shy AUSA,
NVSOAG,
Orfy Taltz Esq,
1
J
Fifed: 05/14/2014 Page 3 of 189
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/ll;. Page 48 of 109
@nurt .of j\ppea:lz
No. 13Q5160
Harold W. Van Allen,
Appellant
v.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
and United States Department of the Navy,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
(BCNR),
Appellees
September Term, 2013
1 :12 .. cv-01538-ESH
Filed On: May 20, 2014
ORDER
Upon consideration of appellant's motion to extend time to file petition for
rehearing en bane styled as "motion for additional (second) expansion of time to file en
bane reconsideration brief-until at least June 20, 2014," it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted. Any petition for rehearing en bane is
now due on or before June 20, 2014.
----------
- ------ --------
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/
Amy Yacisin
Deputy Clerk
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\.... Page 49 of 109
-Page 1 of 1
No.13A1183
Title:
Docketed:
LowerCt:
Case Nos.:
SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATES
H. William Van Allen, Applicant
v.
Eric K Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
May 29,2014
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(14-7058)
-Date- ----Proceedings and Orders-----------
May 27 2014 Application (13A 1183) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 11. 2014
to September 14, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.
May 29 2014 Application (13A1183) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 14,
2014.
-----Address----------------
--Phone---
Attomeys for Petitioner:
Party name: H. William Van Allen
Attomeys for Respondent:
Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
351 North Road
Hurley, NY 12247
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Party name: Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13al183.htm
(202) 514-2217
6/9/2014
----------------- - ------
Case 1:14-cv-00_995-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14 Page 50 of 104
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\.s ..... .4 Page 50 of 109
Page 1 ofl
No.13A980
Title:
Docketed:
LowerCt:
Case Nos.:
SUPREME COURT
OF THE rNTTED STATES
H. WiHiam Van Allen, et al., Applicants
v.
Sheldon Silver, et al.
March 26. 2014
Court of Appeals of New York
(Mo. no. 2013-1150)
-Date--- ----Proceedings and Orders-------------
Mar 20 2014 Application (13A980} to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April14, 2014 to
May 14,2014, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Mar 28 2014 Application (13A980} granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until May 14, 2014.
May 13 2014 Application (13A980} to extend further the time from May 14, 2014 to June 13, 2014, submitted to
Justice Ginsburg.
May 30 2014 Application (13A980} denied by Justice Ginsburg.
-------------
-Name--------------
Attorneys for
Party name: H. Wlliam Van Allen. et al.
----Address------
351 North Road
Hurley, NY 12247
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13a980.htm
--Phone---
6/9/2014
Case Document 1-1 Filed . ..4 Page 51 of 1n..q
-Page I of 1
No. 13A979
Title:
Docketed:
LowerCt:
Case Nos.:
SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATES
H. William Van Allen, Applicant
v.
New York State Board of Elections
March 26, 2014
Court of Appeals of New York
{2013-1185)
-Date-- ----Proceedings and Orders-----------
Mar 20 2014 Application (13A979) to extend the time to 1ile a petition for a writ of certiorari from Aprll14, 2014 to
May 14, 2014, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Mar28 2014 Application (13A979) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until May 14, 2014.
May 13 2014 Application {13A979) to extend further 'the time from May 14,2014 to June 13,2014, submitted to
Justice Ginsburg.
May 30 2014 Application (13A979} denied by Justice Ginsburg.
--Name- -----Address---------- --Phone--
Attorneys for Petitioner:
H. Wdliam Van Allen
Party name: H. William Van Allen
351 North Road
Hurley, NY 12247
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13a979 .htm
---------------
6/9/2014
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\.. ..... 4 Page 52 of 109
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB A
--------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.:
593 VanderbiltAvenuePMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-90 J -6767 chris@strunk.ws.
V.
Plaintiffs.
Washington, DC 20520 TTY: 1-800-877-8339
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
BA.RACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 2201 and 2202
Exh b t 2
Case 1:14-cv-L, .J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL._-1. Page 53 of 109
*
-
f
.
United States Department of Stale
Woshinsfon,. D.C. 20520
JUL 2 9 2011
In reply refer to:
CA/PPT/L/LE - Case Control Number: 200807238
Christopher E. Strunk
593 Vanderbilt Avenue, #281
Brooklyn, NY 11238
Dear Mr. Strunk:
The following is in response to your request to the Department of
State, dated November 22, 2008, requesting the release of material under the
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
We have completed a search for records responsive to your request.
The search resulted in the retrieval of six documents that are responsive to
your request. After careful review of these documents, we have determined
that alJ six documents may be released in full.
We did not locate a 1965 passport application referenced in an
application for amendment of passport that is included in the released
documents. Many passport applications and other non-vital records from
that period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance
from the General Services Administration.
Passport records typically consist of applications for United States
passports and supporting evidence of United States citizenship. Passport
records do not include evidence of travel such as entrance/exit stamps, visas,
residence pen:nits, etc., since this information is entered into the passport
book after issuance.
Case 1:14-cv-L . Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL. A Page 54 of 109
This completes the processing of your request.
Enclosures:
As stated
Jonathan M. olbin, Director
Office of Legal Affairs and Law Enforcement Liaison
Bureau of Consular Affairs
Passport Services
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14
Case 1:14-cv-L ... .j95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L ..... 4
Page 55 of 104
Page 55 of 109
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
JI'ORiiiCN EIIIYIC:It OP THIS: UNITI!:D STATES OP" AMltRIC:A
APPLICATION FOR
RENEWAL 0 AMENDMENT 0 EXTENSIOI'l
OF
ASSPORT 8 CARD OF IDENnTY
EGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF _!fENTITY
Document No. .F 7777 '$" 8 Dote ... u.d Jw._v I r<P
FORM ,t.PPROVItO
aUoGIE"r BUAIEAU NO. t7.6
PosT __ n_j_a._ka_rt_a_,.;..._I_n_d_o_n_e_s_1a __ _
D REFERRED TO FOR ACTION
litiRENEWED TO Jul.18,1970
D AMENDED AS REQUEST&t:l
s 5.00 FEI! COLLECTED
0 NO IOEE: COLLECTED
PROPOSED TRAVEL PLANS IF RETURNING TO U.S. COMPLETE THIE FOLLOWING
I \NTIEND TO RETURN TO PER'MANENTLY TO I*OftT OP" DI!PAftTUJ\1[
RISJDII WITHIN --VWfll.JU._.,;._e __ MONTWS
1 INTIENO TO CONTINUE TO AIEatOIE ABROAD P"O'fl THil I'OLLOWI.NO NAMa 01" .SHIP OR AIRLINE
PlfUOO ANO IN ()J:F'//V',+TE - /11All2/EJ)
/?) AN /Jtl DO 1\/IE.S /4/t/ CIT/ ZEN 1-D-A ....
I ba" a01 (aad no omer 11erIHI 1aclud" ot 10 lie included Ia dut paasport or \locWDernarioo hu), shu:e acquum lloited Stares chi-
zerushlp, beem nanualized a cid&eo of a foreitn swe; rakeo an oath or made u affimurtioa or ()(bet (ormal dedaratioa or allesiace
to a fo.Ni1a ecacr, ogcered or aerved io tbe armctd force of (orcip. aure; eccesnod or perfOrmed rhe dudes of uy ofliee. pon
1
or ear
ploymeor uoder lh111 peraraent of a forelsn ssare ar ;poliric:al ubdivl&loo rbl!reof; vored in polfdc:al eJecdoa in a (orclp state or l)&P
deipatad lll IUl elccdoo or plebltc:hc co ch:ulminc the sovcrelpcv or foroJp tercitory; made formal rt:DIIDcladoa of oarioaaJitY either
io ahe Ualred Sunu or before dipJomdc: or coru1ulac officer af the United States la e foteiso atatr. ever sou,lht or claimed the bene-o
flta of dlo uadosutliey of aGy foleip erate; or beea c:oavic:ccd by a court or c:oGrt mutl&l of compercot iuriadictioa of c:omDictios uy ac:r
of ueaaau aploar. or nemptlua by focee to overthrow. or bearina arms aaioat, the United Sutea, or co11plrio to over1hrow. do1m
or to do1110Y by &>rcet, lho Govet11mcar of the Uolrc:d Srarca,
(tl at)' of rhtJ allayeoomantlaned oct or condition a htNe boon pw(alfQd by 01 oppJy 10 the applicant, or to any other pr*'" lnc:luJ.d
In fhe po""' or d.lcu,...tarlon, ,_ potflon wlalch applies ahou1J be arrucJt our, onil o upplamantol)' -.l .. .rGf*'-'f under oDfft
(or afllrmatfonJ ht-'fha petaolt the portion Is appllllable lrould be ottodcl anJ o 11m ol fhlc oppllcotlon.)
Snbsaibed ud Swom to(afUimed) before: me rhis
(SBAl.J
Vice Coosu! of rbe Uoi
(The Ocpa,nmant will aaaume rhat cbe uffir.ct, rwo(d rbe applic:adoo for rbe deciaioo, is ful}J htified u
ro the appllc:eDt' lclea.tlly uoleaa a ootatloll to du: .;ootrary i e.)
FORM FS-299
7. 64
?l
Case 1:14-cv-L"d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lv,..4 Page 56 of 109
AMEND TO INCLUDE (EXCLUDE) fWIFl(HUSBAND)
---- .,._. __
NA ... I! BIRTHPLACE BIRTHOATE
PAGE Z
-
WA$ PF!ltVIOU.LV TO PREVIOUS MI.RRIAiiE TERMINATED OV
--
Cl DIVORCE CJ O&:ATH
NUMDEA 0,. MV ,POutta PAll. "'IOu:!ll DISPOISITION OF MY lSPOUSiiS PREVIOUS P"Sili.>ORT
PASIPORl' / 't/ Oc"J
0 C.l CANCELt=:O
ICIATBJ
AMEND TO INCLUDE !EXCLUDE) Ci-IILDREN
NAMES RESIDENCE 151A'rHP\.ACE BIATHOAT&:
r ... ft "
-------
\
-- -- --
AMEND TO READ IN MARRIED NAMl'C
NAtoiiE
DATe: MARRII!:O PLACIE MARRIED NARRII0 TO
CITtZ.ENSHIP OF HUS8ANO
D u.s. CITIZEN D ALIIN-ClTIZ.ItN OF
OTHER AMENDMENTlSl tDESCRrliUL IN DETAIL ACTION REOUESTEDJ
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO BYCONSULAROFFJCBR
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE SEEN AND RETURNED T"O APPLICANT BY
OF ACTION BY POST UPON OEPARTI41tHTS AUTHORIZATION fTo be ectcuterl only In cennectJon with coseJS refei'P'ef/" OPf.)
X
I

= lal
ra

c.:
I<

I
lt
TI1S OP .. SSPORT D AENEWEO TO DATE
D CAAO Ojlr IOilNTIYY WA8 D AMENDED AS REQUIUITED
0 CltRTIFrJC.-Til D lt.KTENDitD TO
AUTHORITY li:'onsuJ o; 1M United :Stu ol Aatei'ICCJ}
WboiO rcquirM far irtdruiotts)
X OPINION OF CONSULAR OFFICER
STAPLE ONE PHOTO HERE
DO NOT MAR FACE
The pusspon. photos must
be DpprollirMfcly2H bv 211 in

be on thin paper, show full fronc
view ot appUcllnl with 11 plain, Jishr bad- :!!
ground: !Uld ha\'1! beetJ uskeo whhin 2 )"C!'au
:.,
r::
ol suluniucd. 'lhco dependents ate in Pl
c:luded they :should be shown in o,sroup pbo
!II
l
rosraph. The cons11l w.fll not acc..,t photos
l
mat are not 5 &OOd likeness. Colat phoro
are aeeoprnble.
not RIXnJii photo. Attach
loosrl;t by pnpn clip.
X
(Consul or fh Unlt.d Stotoa of Amt:rlr:oJ
..
ln r:ertDIO casas spt!Cihc ISUtltc;nnuoa by rhe be cequuad. In these c:aaes an C:lnr c:opy of the form sbou!cf
be prepcucrd. l!pon reC'4'1JU of the f'epallment's tcrpl) the exun copy b ua6smlned wirb a ooto:lon ol rhe acriC\n raJ:en.
A
B
c
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2 Fi led 06/30/14
1:14-CV-1.. _ 495-RJL
AVOID Tf:IE L'\ST
Document 1-1 Filed _4
(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT) ..
MINUT!i.ftUSH , ,
-:!P ;'T ,.1-T!_
APPLIC>\ TI0:-1 Fur:: P.t.,SSP0f.T 3Y
four pt'lviaus wHht' J IIS1 :iJin y.e::r!i, I''I'' J.So1cr:l
pholoGr<:phs <Jfld rh::: l,c ol 510 MUST \ll:;i:tnpr.ny thl5
i l'>li.)?<F!!C'T TO 'fh;(E TRIP
l _y.;.,. j N<1 IJ; "0. 'Ill THIN I_ 11 ' ""'
t."'7'. 2. Y(I GI ... l ""-.r::.h
'' DSPB2
Page 57 of 104
Page 57 of 109
OON'T PI!T IT Off
APPLY NOW
fl
-
. ... . l
.. , 11)

J
Case 1:14-cv-L _.:J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL: ... 4 Page 58 of 109
DEPARTMENT OF
.. .
REQUEST BY UNJTED STATES NATIONAL FOR AND REPORT OF
EXCEPTION TO 53.L TITLE 22 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

i l : bee_n rnform!d that my passporr ss 11oc and that a valid passport is required by law to the
I!' 'it:tC.:;;. l rf!'.:}'Jes: thar an e.c=eprJOn
1
be granr:d to me, as provided in Section 53.1(h), Title 22 of the Code
I
'
1
I::Jf'r:t! I undc!"$t:tnd th:!t a. f:!e of $25 IS cequited under Section 53.2(h) and 1 will remH such fee
;,, lt .. f-'.1!>-:porc ,::FfH;o! Department of State, \l/ashing:on. D. wi:hin,JQ days.C' f /} J
1
/_/ (Si&lloture)
i- ------ REPORT Pursuant f() Se.:tion 215 of the !:nmig:r:ti.o"'n and Nationality Act of 1952
IT:.
l.J1rec.:cor, Passport Office
Dt:parnnent of State
Washingron, D. C 20524
Acrn: PT/AC
BIRTHO.\TE
Nov. 29
9
1942
t----
BIR .... HPLACE
1
1"i chi ta:, Kansas
L --
iDA TE: PLACE OF
I
PASSPORT NO., DATE AND PLACE OF ISSUANCE
F 777788

Honolu!t'; Hawii
DEPARTURE FROM UNITED ST Ar.TES
DESTINATION
_ _ _ _____ __,,__ _D_J_a.k_ar_ta_,_I_l"dl_o_n _e_s_i_a __________
NUMBER OR VESS!:L NAME OF CARRieR
JaFen Airlines

DATE AND P!..ACE OF DE PARTUifE FROM ABRCAD IDENTITY DOCUMENTS PRESEN'f'ED
Passport as shown above

October 20 1971, Djakarta
1
Indonesia
FLIGHT NUMBER OR VESSEL
------------------------1
PAA 812
DATE AND PLACE OF ENTRY
October 21 , 1971 , Honolulu l' Haw"H.ii
Identity and citizenship established.
Exception granred under l2 CFR 53. 2(h)
NAME OF CARRIER
Pan .American Airways
DESTINATiON
Honolulu, Hawii
ACTION TAKEN
CC/2 .L t'171
(lnspoclat"s Stamp)
--------------T------- --------------------i
SIGNATURE (lrnmigratlon Officer' PLACE (Immigration and Noturali.zdtfon Service)
HONOLuLU,
I
I ..
- I
l."
-
I
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14
Case 1:14-cv-L _ J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed _4
Page 59 of 104
Page 59 of 109
FOI 1VED &IHJ'"'E r BUREAU .n
l
! ,Posspon Use Onlrl
APPLIC TIOH FOR AMEMDMEMT OF PASSPORT Amend as shown in soctiom
oa oc oo OF
lj
INSTRUCTIONS: All request-s lor Inclusion of ;>"rscns most be swom to (or oFFirmed) be-
0
0 Add viso 110gos.
foro on Agent ol lhto t>epurtment ol 5uno .... Cldrk a: Court. Photographs, which meel tho
bcolaw, oncJ ovidoncn of rnust bo submitted for all penonc to be
i 11 cludorJ by Jhls.. omendmcrnf, If such porsons; hove had, or been Included In, a r,rovious
passport, II should b .. subml11od inslo..: of orhor dat:urnents, Sactlon G comp etad.
IN CARE OF
(PLAS PRINT NAMr. IN J:ULLI
(Frr$t ..-] {Middlo nqmcJ
P3
BIRTH CIUtTIFICATEfSI SEEN
Crttl.CIIfli!.14J'" IIWISI'I:'SI IHUSII4"1P':I)
FI1.2D :lA CR CITY I'ILiiC s-. Cr:t CITV
C:lii:RT. , ...... l"l:'N. Cli:C'IT.J D 0TttR
Q?:loFI QS6R
(
\
....... _ ,.
[J .,y- .. "' 1
r..-t
. ft.: .
D excLUDE PERSCNS, AS FOLLOWS:
QMV WIFE
0MY HUSBAND
0 MY CHILDREN (Cihra ncrll'lil'(ll))
WHO IS/ARE
Q TO APPL.V SEPARATE Pt\SSPORT
D NOT TO hCCCMPANY
0
E f CHANGE TO READ IN MARRIED NAME, AS FOLLOWS:
I MARRIED NAME 17 I /7J fJ e:.. -.-: t'
...
CHANGE TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
ICHIL.OIRENI'SI (WIFE'S! (HUSBANO'S) L.A&T U.S. PASSPORT
NUMBER
IN tUM OF
FOAM DSP-19
7. 64
DATE ISSUED
Q tS SUSMIT'FED HER!iWITH-
0 OTHliR OISPOSITIOI'f(rfllfrr)
(OVER)
;::
!
l
0
1'
+
'l
":

H
J
I
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2
Case 1:14-cv-\. _ J95-RJL Document 1-1
Filed 06/30/14
Filed 06/1\... _4
Page 60 of 104
Page 60 of 109
TO BE COMPLETED BY AN APPLICANT REQUESTING INCLUSION IN THE PASSPORT OF A RELATIVE WHO ACQUIRED CITIZENSHIP
THROUGH NATURALIZATION
MY lf,IMIORA TED TO
THE: 1,1. S. ON (Month, ooy, year)
U.S. Cl'tl%NSHIP TI-!FtOUGH THE N-"TURAl.IZATION OF
ON CMonrh. :lay, )"JOr)
PAGE" 2
OsELF Qr>AAENT 0 FORMER HUSBAND
WkO WAS NATURAl.! 'ZED BEFORE (N..,.. of court)
AS 5HOWN BY THE ACCOMPANYING OF N.\TURAl.IZATION NO.
TO BE COMPLETED BY AN APPLICANT WHOSE WIFE WAS PREVIOUSLY MARRIED BEFORE MARCH 3. 1931, AND WHO IS TO BE INCL.UDED
IN PASSPORT (If married more thcl'l twoco, set forth facts In o supplementol 5tohm17n'l)
f4e:A MAIDti NAMe: WAS
NAME OF FORMER HI,ISSAND
FORMER HUSBAND'S PL.AC OF Dll'tl"H
IN THE OF DI!A'tl't 011 ACCIDENT NOTIFY
NAIIA 11'1 FULL

PLACE OF MAFIAIAO&:
MARRIAGE WA5 T!:RioiiNATED BY
Oca:ATH D
AELA"t IONSkiP 9TREitT AOCRESS. C:tTv. STAT
1 not (and no ocher person included ot to be included in the passport has), acquiring Unired Starea citizenship,
been naturalized as 11 of a foreitn taken an oath or made an affi.rmacion or other formal declaratjon of allegiance to a
foreisn state; or served iu the armed forces ot a foreign :wile; accepted or performed the duries uf 111\y office, post, or t!:m
unc.lcr the: BQvcrnmen t oi :s tort:"ign scate or pol iricul subdivi&ion thereof; voted in a polit1cnl io 11 foreign sc;ue ot
pa.n:icipate-d ir lUI electiQn or ple:btscire to detennine tlle sovereignty over hueoisn rettirory; made a fonnaJ renunciauon of national
ity either in t!&c United Stnte:.: or before a diplomatic or nlfu:r.r uf the- Unlred States in a. Eoreign st11te; ever sough or claim
ed the benefits of the nationality of any furC'isn stare; or been convicted by a ::ourt or court m111ti11l of competent jurisclic:rion of corn-
mitring any act of treasoa against. or attempting by force to overthrow, or benrin! arms againstt the United Stares, or conspiring co
o'\'erthrol!(, pur down or to destroy by force, the Govemmenr of the United
(If any of !he above-mencialled acu or eondition& Aaue been performed by or apply Co the applic11nt. ot t.:J any oUier in-
duderl or to ba included in. the pa.ssopnrt, the portion which applie:; should be J:truck ou.t, and a supplernentary explanatluy ri.O.tement
1
.u,t.ler oath (or affirmation) by the to w/lom che portlort is be atlr&ched and mode o p11rt of cppli.:atlon.)
I solemnly sweat (affinn) that the herein made an: true and that I hllve not previously asked tO have rhese addi
tiona! person!> included in my passport; that they are nor: now in possession of valid passports, and that they h ave not made appli
cation for passports and been refused.
Subscnbed nod swom m {affumed) before: me: tlHs __________ aay of------------
.l9 __ _
Daportm.:ra of Stcdl! or Clerk o.f Court)

DSP l9 III).S
A
c
Case 1:14-cv-L J95-RJL Document 1-1
Filed 06/30/14
Filed 06/l\ ... _4
Page 61 of 104
Page 61 of 109
PlEASE PJiJNT OR TYPE PENCIL NOT ACCEPTABL.E)
r-- 1 ______ __,
for Decision
OE;::JARTMENT OF STATE
LOcAno
111
Jakarta, Indonesia
APPUCA TION FOR ! . PASSPORT 0 REGISTRATION
ALl. n ollnctlol\s that opFIY to you. If tniormotion ia
wrlte .. Unknown'"'. Do not leavv blonk spac:es. additional
Where provldod Is nat odoqua!e.
POST ACTION +' J.j
PASSPORT APPROVE J
Na. Z2433l00 Dare ------
TO BE COMPLETED SV AlL APPUCANTS
Data June 2 , 19 7 6 e .. p; ... -------
1 I 19 81 CARD Of: 10MTITY AND RiC.
(First 1ama) (Middle name} tLasl namel
-.:ft.,'-H4-<"1
0U Application loe :ollot:tod
5:J''s10 Fa eolloered
No.--------
0 l'lo Fa., posparr "U ,{
Dato -----=---
:J Official po upert
0 $3 fe eellcd (lor cord)
048IIOU pauparf
MY '-"'ST PASSPORT WAS OOT AINED FROM
ltlo'-: 11 incluclr:cl In o"othor'.s paaaport, ato no..,. a/

[.J Ohot dlspotition (ucno)
MY LAST M A Cll I% EN
OF THE UNITED STATES WAS APPROVED
H,\VE YOU fVER BEEk RE'f"USED A PASSPOitT. OA REG:STRAT
IF ANSWER IS "'t'ES'', EXPLAIN WliEN AND WHY
TO BE COMPLETED BY AN APPUCANT WHO BECAME A CITIZErt THROUGH NATURALIZATION
IIMMIGAAT!O TO tHE U.S. I RESIDED CONTINUOUSL.YIN THE U.S. NAIURAI.IZATION CERTIFICATE NO.
CMonrh. vearl Fr0111 (Year) To (Yva) O SllbMinOd herowlh
0 Seen and roturl'led
0 Ptevio.-slr aubmirtll:l
Pl.AC:! NATURAL ZED (Cit}', etole) NATURALIZAliON COURT DATE NATURALIZED
COMPLETE ONLY IF OTHERS ARE TO Sf INClUDED IN PASSPORT DR RE&ISTRATtDN AND IT GROUP PHDTOGRAPM
IIYIFE
0
S) (HUSIUND'$} LEGAL NAME 0NATIVE BORN Flt;ATE NO.
0NATURAUZED 0Seon and
NAtURALIZATION COL"RT
PUCE N-'TURALIZED (Cltv, atoto)
(HUSB.lN!:JS) PLACe OF BIRTH (CltS', Stata or Povlnco, Ccuntrrl
(
NAME IN FULL. OF CHILDREN INCL.UDEO
PLACE OF BIRTH (City, arotc/pr011lnce, covnny)
DATE OF BlliTiot
(Month, doy, l'or)
I R!SICI!D IN U.S, (FromTo)
EVIDEE OF PRIOR DOCUMEKTAnON OF ABOVE AMED PERSONS TO BE HICLUDEO (For completion by Corsul;r OtJice)
C4NCEI.ED OR DATE OF Ri;GIHRJ.
NAMeS PASSPORT NO. OA"T! Of' IS SUI! OTHeR TION OR
DISPOSITION REPORT
OTHER EVIDENC:E OF U.S. CIT'IlcN5Hlfl PRESENT EO IStoto dlaposltlo")
LOCATION OF
OFFICe
(OVER YOU MUST C(JIJPLETE PAGE 2)
i"'Oi'IM APPftOVl!:D DUDOET StiREA 1.1 NO. q1ADOIZ
F
G
Case 1:14-cv-\,. J95-RJL Document 1-1
FORM FS-176
l'UNN M

D'A TE NA TURALIZ0
. NOT TERMINATED
0 ilECEASIID
TJ!r/1. li?ESIOING AT
!:J MARRJAGE TERMINAiED BY 0 DEATH (J OIIIOIIC! Qlll
Filed 06/30/14
Filed 06/1L _4
Page 62 of 104
Page 62 of 109
ll:'.l"!"HER RESIDED IN u.s.
Ftorn l(.tlf/
T-
it
01

id
NAMe Of SHIP OR AIRLINE

WI
sh
ce
11!1
WARNING: False statements made knowingly and willrully in passpllrt awlicatlons or in affidavits or otlter supporti!Ji uucumsnrs suoouttao meraw1111 are purnsniiUte
117
fine and /or lmpri!Oflment under the provisions of 18 USC 1001 and/or 18 USC 1542. AlteratiM or mutilation of a passpOit rssued pursuant to tills appllc:ation is punish
able by flne umter the provisions of 19 USC 1543. The use of a passport In violation or the restrictions contained thetein M or 111e passport 1egula.
punishable by flpe aniVor lmprisonmBII! under 18 USC 1544. .
I halli! not (and no nlher pe1son included In the arpllcalion has). since acquuing United cihl01Ship, l>een naiUJahzed as a citizao of 8 roreign slate; taken an oath or
ade an afllnnalion or olher lormat declaration o alloRJanco lo a torc!gn slate; entered 01 scJVed in llle armed f(l(ces of a foreign slale; accepted or pe!1armallhe dulio:s of
any office, posl, or employment under Uta government or a stale 111 political subdiYiSIOIIIMumr; made a lotmal renuncraliao ot nationality erltlns in lhe \Jlii\00 Slal!!!i
or before a diplomatic or consular officer of lhe United Slates in a foraign slate: ever so1.1ghlm lire benerils of the naliooality ol any 'orelgn state: or bean conv1cled
y a court or court narlial of competent jurlsdicliorl ol committing any acl ollteoson agnmsl, or allelllpllog by force lo ove11hroY1, or bearmg i!lms agamsl, \he United Stalos,
r consplllng lo OYe!lhlfiW, pnl down or lo destroy by fDJce, !he Govetnmenl of lhe United Slates.
If any o( t/10 cbovd,..,_I;Cli,.,J Or ooen pc:rfon1teU by or rppl1 IO lhf!' oppfiCOIII, or 10 C!Y afflor persiJtl IO be lrtr:/utiet/ In the pascport Ot' reogfsfratfon, tha
itPt \ll!lch Cflllll' sl.a111rl f. c. :slrvclt aut, oncl a .RIPIJlr:rnenfaiY elll)fl710fory undl!f' om!, (or aHirtrttttiOtt) by Ia wllam tho IJOrflan I shou/J
oftoeh<td atd 111G1:1a opwf of litis 4JPIIcotlll<l.}
1 solemnly swear (or affirm) that the statements mads on alllha pages of Ibis application are true and that the pholo&raph attached is a likeness of me and of persons
to be Included In the passport.
k.
: /17 I ' t 1{
" ( A/lL.} .' :J,I/i JJ I ;hL't(l'-'
(T':> L.is r/gn!Ki by lit pf\'sance of P4f"lot aclm/nlsterittQ aCJJh1
Subscribed and sworn to (arrirm!d) berore me this __ day of , { .. 191i.._.
AJfred _____ ____
..
(Seat) V {
Consul ________ of tlle United States at a=------
IDeNTIF\'fNG DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED (Soet 8 FAM 243 Proc<Jdur ... l
l}t
Case 1:14-cv-( J95-RJL Document 1-1
Filed 06/30/14
Filed 06/lL. :_4
r
Page 63 of 104
Page of 109
1. ! ."/
POST L.OCATION V':ikarta,
POST ACTION:
hD all ceatiOM that IJIIIIy Co v-u. If infvnft8tlon II unknawn.
-ulrUtniOWn.- Do not a.ve blank...._ Utili ..,itiDMI-..... wtlere .-oe
JrGVId .. II notldeqatL PftiNT OR TVP ENTIIJ&S.
PASSPORT ISSUED
No. 7221
Dato 4/28/al
Explrn 4/2 7/86
IFtmn.em)
STANLEY
Photo must bit ONL V of pcnam
to be Included luther mon JIIIISIPOrt
..,.,...). WhM1 mew tt111n an par.an
ts 10 be Jneludad, group phOtoo
ansh of !h lnciiiSiontla required.
C::ONSULATi WLL STAPLE
PHOTO OF INCLUSIONS
HERE.
DO NDT IMPRESS SEAl. ON

(Lst nama)
ANN DUNHAM

CHILOIREN)'S NAMe IS)
tN FULL
a cltlzon
I::l $3 AppJicst:lon fe
ooltctad
f9 S1Q Fee collected
0 No Fw PBIIJPOrt
[J OfflcJel paaport
REGISTRATION APPROVED
Dfte ______________ _
explr...,_ _______ _
CAI"' OP IDeNTlTV Aflel REG.
No. ___________ _

Cl $5 fee collecud lfor card)
0 4-page 0 96-piQe
0 Submitted Herewith
o;rfenc:eled 81 RetUrnad
0 Setn & Re11.1rned
0 Submit'tt!ld Herawlth
8
C.ncelac:t II Return.-
S.en a Returned
I hovll' not land ra> othl)r porson JllcluctGd in thl' epplicatfan hl!!l), dnce IICQuirJng United cltl%cnshlp, narformod onv of tho at:tllllatl!ld In aatlon 1
on tho roverao of this oppllcatlon fonn lunlea axplanatory lrtctomollt laolcunnly awo;,r lor affirm) thc>t tho 9'(atomsr>m mlldo on etJI of tha
of thla 111'0 uuu and 'tho photosrphfl attached Ia laTa) & lllconass of me and o1 . P&nlons 10 btt In In th& ,..penport.
' I
. . .
(SEAL)
(To bo ai;ned at sam tt,.,... by hulband/wlfe U be inoludad ln
Consul----------- of 1M Unl18dSun.t at
OPfiONAL FORM 178
(FQAMIRLY FS.t'78)
R YOU MUST COMP&.Ii1' PAGE 2J
Dept. of State
D
PAOli urouo Gase Document 1-1 Filed 06/1u,.L4 Page 64 of 109
TO BE COM, iED BY AN APPUCANT WHO BECAME A CI1'1ZEI\. .
I IMMIGRATED TO THE I RESIDED CONTINUOUSLY IN THE NATURALIZATION CERTIFICATE NO.
u.s. lMonlh. year) U.S. Frcm IV earl To (Year) 0 tlarwwlth
PLACE 'JATURALlZEO ICitv, natoJ
0 Seen and returnad
0 Jtravlouelv submlttod
NATURALIZATION COURT
TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPUCANlS
OCCUPATION VISIBLE DISTINGUISHING MARKS
PROGRAM OFFICER, FORO FOUNDATION none
NATURALIZED
L! V'QtEN MUST c::GNPLETE FOLLaJVING IF CHILDREN QF A PREVJOUJ MARRIAGE ARE NCLUDED OR IF MARRIED BeRlRE MNKJ13, 1831
I WAS PR!VIOlJSL. Y MARRIED ON TO (Fult legal nema) WAS BOF\N AT fCitV. Stata. Counuy)
ON (Date af birth) 0FORMER HUSBAND WAS u.s. CITIZIN TPAEVlOUS MARRIAGE TERMINATED BY ODEATH ODIVORCI
0FOAMEFI HUSBAND WAS NOT U.S. CJTlZENjON [Data)
- c::rJMIL.Er IF AJIPI.I:AN1' OR ANY PEf9lN flll::l.IA)B> lN SECTION B WAS i\OT lRN IN THE UNrta;J stATES AND CLAIMS cmzEI'&fF T1-IKJUGH PARENTI!
ENT&AilD THE U.S. (Month) (Year} tF FATHER NATURALIZED: IF KNOWN. FATHER'S PIIBIDeNC!
0 Applicant D.ne No. PHYSICAL PRESENCE IN U.S.
Cl Wlf From (Year) To (Ya.r)
Cl Hu1band Before !Name of Court) Pteco (Cit:v, S1.atel
0Chlld
Rii;SIDeNCE/CONTINUOUS PHYStCAL IF MOTHER NATURALIZED: If' kNOWN. MOTHER'S RESIOENC!
PRESENCE IN U.S. From(Yoar) To (Vear)
PRESENCe IN U.S.
0 ApptiCIIn'C From {Vear) To IVaar)
0 Wife t
aHuaband \
G,chltd i
Before (Name of Court)

1 INTEND TO CONTINUE TO RESIDE ABROAD FOA T .. li FOLLOWING PllAIOO AND PURPOS&
Two years contract with Ford Foundation from January 1981 - December 1982.
l.!f"'[END TO RETURN TO Tt-fE UNITED STATES Pi:AMANENTL V
,T\ WITHIN , YEARS MONTHS
OATt= OJe DEPARTURE
__ A_CT __ __ EN __ T ________________________________ _
Tho Information sollclUid on U11& rdm Is autnorlzsd by. not ITmlUid to, tha 1 c:odifiod In Titles 8, 106 end 22, .ncl ell
pNdec.sor atatU1111 Wha1t111r ar not o.:odlflod. nd II rcaulatlon hsued pul'$lJant to Ordar 11288 of A118Uit 15, 1968. TIM primary punJo. for
IOJII:ttlna 1h Is to eaublllh oltl&onshipr Identity enctentltl.,ent 10 llluanc ate Unl'-d Saa.s P.aport or rela1Bdic111ty# and to properly
lldm ln..,_ ond emorco the porutntng thoretg.
Tha lnfannodon 11 mMIO .vall to as o routine u on na&d-10-l(now bals to per10nrtel ot ttl Oeplll'tmont at Stam nd o'dr eovnmnt -a-neta hwln1
or other euthority to such In 1h performence of 1hir official dutlea; pursuant 110 a.bpaena or aourt order; and,
est forth rn Prtrt &e. TJtle 22. Code of Federal (See FederDI Aegimr Votume 40, P<10U 45758, 45768, 47419 and 47420),
Faflura ta provide 1ht JtrfonnGtlOt1 waqutlld on thh form may result ln the denial of Unltad States PII:!Part, ,.laid or rvloe tD 1he
indhlldual leflif!G IUCh puspon_ dooumont ar aervioe.
NOTE: The dlsciOIUrw of your 8Gel1l S..:urity cr ot the ond location of permn to bit no1lfiad In ttt went tlf dee,., or ccldent It
entlraly voluntary. Howwer. fallure to prov1do thllt lntorm1fan may provnt the DPIIrtmtnt ot from pi'CWidlng you Wlttl Umely IISfttance or
prouaotlon In 1ha 81111nt vou II10Uid mncuunUir an ami!J'UIIIncv shuaT' ., wPIIll ousCM 'mtt Unitad
ACTS Ofl CONDIT! ONS
Itt .nv of the below.mentlonod octs or comihlonD iunra bnn pmormod DV or apply 10 tho appllCIIllt, or to 11nv o1h p...,n to be '"eluded Jn ma
pa:aport, the pan.IDI' whJeh applias should be str\lck out. and o supplemontltiV explsrt.rrv .natllment und oedt (or by the pllf'SOft 10 whom
the portion h tPPikwble ahouh.l bu ot'tAChod and enode o of thlt applk:Mlon.)
1 nat {and no othor parson includl)(l in 1hls 1JPpllc:3tlon hu.s, tlnco ilcqulrlng Unllltd cltlaGnshlp, n.rrturallzad .u a chfzon at efororon ltate;
tskon an oath or made nn IJHirmotJon or othor formal dociCJrotion ot D!lvglanc:c 10 a forofo't suue: ontarod or r.an161d In tllG armed torcaa of D sta18;
accapwd or poriormed 1hlll dutloa. ot 11ny offici!. pOIIt, or omplayrnont undor thfl novorrtmonT of o farolp una or pollti.:ul wbdiullllon thllf'ODf: made
formal of n\\donglltv oithar in tho United Swta:s or beforo o dtplomatlc or officer of me United StatBt Jn a forolfn atatll; (fllfff' IDUGht
or claJmod tho benatlu of tho notional! tv of i!lfly fOreign or baon convlctQd llV a court or court mort:lol of c:ompotant Jurlcdlctlon of comrnlnlna anv
act of 1Teason agaiMt, or anornptlog bV torc:o co ouonhrow. or ooaring arms agaii'\St, tho United or conspiring to overthrow, put down ar to
destroy by 1orco. tho Govarnmant of thQ United Stotii!L
WARNt NG FOIIIO n'HJdo knowingly o!Utcl wUifully In PI:SIPOrt appllcotlon' ur In alfitl!svhs CJr ather supporrTng documentaiiJbmlttlld 1tleNWtm
o.ro punisheblD by ilne lmprla.onmut\\ undt:r the of 16 USC 1001 0110/0r 18 USC '9542. AltarlltlCfl or rnut118l!Dft of a JUIIIIPOrt llaiiHI
punuant to IJPPii,. .. ,;nn ;, pnnlshl!ble bv flne and/or Imprisonment under tho provl2ion2 ot 18 USC 1543. Th u of p.-port Jn vloletlon of th
ros1rletlons conrolnod therein 01 of tho pussport TI!Qulatlons I punithebht by fino onCI/or imprbortment un 18 USC 1644.. Alt .surttmef\ta and
dacumonu 5ubmlned aro suujec\ to vorific.ltlLn.
CPOR USE OF OFFICE TAKING AJIPLJCATION)
APPLfCANTs IOiNTIFYING
0
Crfl'flcata of Natural
lzatJon or Citizenship
0 Peupon
0 Crlver's Llc8me
0 "ther IS$:ttclfv):
No,:
laue DtJtS:
Placo ot lsaue:
luued In Name of:
I DENTIFVINI3 DOC:UMENTCSJ OF WIFE/HUSBAND TO BE INCLUDED
IN PASSPORT
0
Csrttflcam of NaturI-
J.zatlon ar Citizenthlp
0 PMSPort
0 Crfvers LlcenM
0 cs,.clfvl:
t
No.:
lstua Dare:
Pleae of Issue:
leauDd in Name of:
uMw as.e Docum nt 1-1
_ . Ni Al l
\.- l\1 t ... - .
Filed 06/30/14
Filed _4
Page 65 of 104
Page 65 of 109
o o:::;u
i ON tlACK OF FORM
l '\ fW"E 'mf" PRIII.'r IN tNK IN WHITE v:-Jl
/ ....
(
!; r[
I :
c;;.
: :-T,. ,
f: C(.:1f .0; '!N5rJ.?j V S/1
COLOR Of- HAIA - COl.OR OF t! EC HUME Pt10NE
51
0 ('P
Issue
D:11e
'
I
SOCIAl. StCUAIT'I NUMi::IE

f.liiSI'>If.SS ?HllNE
I I I I
&!<.OWN
'!aT Inches

t,\m;t C<KI"' Are.:. Conel
.,
;r,.t(' or bC.uh C:C!''iH. !Ot! Lr ., , ... ,.. !n.i h. I
Uroited Stllhl!l. Ill .;oh1Ui<lf;i I) tr.rL:rlluCa !JJ! Jt .. ,
OCCUf>ATiuN
CONSLJLrltNf'
DEPAfHURE OA TE
.,. .
J .S
PROPOSED TRAVEL PLANS AND EPAERGENCV ADDRESS Nm Mudntovl
LEN(;Tit Or ST."-'; COIJNTR!ES TO BE VISITED
I WE.JSJ:::.
TO Nl)TI(-"f :N ::A5t- "Jf EMiHGUKY tNot './\ltl Y,, ... ,
NAME IN FULL
sr A-tvLE-"
fr[/9-{)ELY N pt)ll)/fr)IVI
ADORES
/{; /c7 S'c B!,ee. -p1N 1/t #/oog
PHONE "'UMfiER
;, t>t<Jiett41912t51 /17
RElATIONSHIP PI9R.:EAJ TS
OATH AND SIGNATURE rlt iiO" or"'" ud.,w <t.:t:. w .:odmur!. r>uvto bt.>tlii p,;rfomtt!d In or apply 11.1 :hu
.:nnt tho Plll'ttQn wlliGh applii!S -.hr,.Jicl ha hnnrl :n,: ono , SUlllll'1111o:"'ill't ii!<I>IJIII'Ilo\ shoulrl bo Artllched. niQnurJ :\ltd ll'IAcJ
a Pllll oi thl$ SPJ..th:.euun.l
t I l ( ; .:h'(; .,Cif 1111' t IJ1.iJll- I ,Iff.. I \ .. r,J.... ';;.!t.' :h.'"'!!'"' tnt . :1-i '-''rt . .;_.: IIDU!j ..1ft ;iUiun.)
::aU Jll'(, :_1'1..11 .,;f "i.'IH._-:-.. t'"' :!u, Ll .. of!!
.,, ' ''' 'fl .,n,l .. t' .lit, ''-' .,: n .. t: i: t ...t .1. :lt.J1t.! v !J,;Iit- .. LhfJt\."t.U nlth..f
'! f tf Ht hH.CP .of"\... 1 , .::f ,H t .. rr ;t 1 I
4
.. : 3: u .. \'' !f:i' in il
, :' ; .. ... : "-,'t.: u , t , l .t 1 i,t ,,. :,,., ,,u ..- 1n ...hr:lu('"" l'u n'r>o; .Jt;r1t;vt! u1
WARNIIIIG: !lfatuments ma\19 knowhtijl\1 .snrt wtlllullt '" i.J:t!.,:POII i!pplhlll'ol"' ,,, u ... thor 'i .. '"'' pu:.niJ[jk: Li) frne .mu. o ur .. Jlit lht:
---- Pl<ll.wons ot 18 US(; 1()()1 aodol 19 USC 15-;l Th., ;.ilo<llull vt mulil.)llin at " ,:s:;,,,.-Q r.rrrsudr.t :u 5 punl)toabW by tlnl': anu 1:1 inmrisonnt&Ol
undo. 'B USC 1&&3 The ul .a io nolr.ltf.m ,,, '..- tl>cwu .. ll h: by r11an "''U '"''-'"svnmurtt uulor 1ft USC 1!)&4
uEC\.ARATION I ltii11118 rn,l:ft: flo :ht lPIIUI .,U'fr 1:'.1'! "'"' ''' 111: l<::. or! "W t..Pu\h::!;e u.tJ !;wl:!l "'" :tl!ithi.'o1 ol"l i H,o
of ana incl ,,,.,, I hile .h)l O..Ocu !JI ir.clauJ!'.j .,. n l'il"l.."l"''' ... CIIefi IO '""' !<ut:rut:f.(l !wr.::ir
.x X.
DiJI"' I ,. "11'1111(..111' 1\t.il 'J .. >ll;llf'"'l I\ ;IIJIJhf"n'
FOlLOW INS1 AUGTtON5 CAfiEFULL. -INt:OMPLHf Uk VNACCEPlAf:JLE Af>l'l.H;,HIOt.JS WILl.\{;;:, 'f YHE ISSlJ A.\!Cf Of 'rOUH i'ASSPOR f
Case 1:14-cv-.. J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 0 6 1 ~ _4 Page 66 of 109
. .... lJ 0 l::, o
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _4 Page 67 of 109
FOR THE DISTRlCT OF COLUMBIA
----------------------------------------------------------------x Case No. :
84 5-90 I -67 67 chris@strunk. ws,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMEl\TT OF STATE by
Plaintiffs,
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
10 I Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.

and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
28 USC 220 1 and 2202
Ex bit 3
Jl QorJment 1 -1 Filed 06/1 t _4
DEPUTY CLERK
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AS THE EXECUTOR/ SETTLOR OF THE.
EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PI.EASE TAKE NOTICE that thiB is the acceptance by Cluistopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris
private citizen of the United States the secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility
n.tCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK. otthe April28, 2014 appointment to perform the public
duties of EXECUTOR and SE'M'LOR for the EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST TO THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA as the beneficial claim by its Beneficiary(ies): in esse Sui
juris private citizen of the United States the secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting
utility , see the Original DEED in TRUST herewith labeled by SE'M'LOR at the
lower left hand corner of each of fifteen pages uE:xhibit A" (TRUST); and on April 25, 2014 by the
BENEFICIARY AMENDMENT TO THE EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA as the beneficial claim by Beneficiary in esse Sui juris private
citizen of the United States the secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility
........... .. ;see the Original BENEFICIARY AMENDMENT herewith labeled
by SETTLOR at the lower left hand corner "Exhibit A-2t'
I. Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility TMCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK have by
my amended status publicly recorded same with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar
County at BPA BOOK 30 PAGES 763 thru 800 on December 5, 2013 at 9:54AM that thereafter is duly
registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury accepted there on January 21, 2014 at
4:22AM in recognition of and for account Accrual and
and am located for service at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 Brooklyn, New
York zip code excepted 11238 Cell Phone: 845-901-6767 Email: cbris@strunlt.ws,
I, Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent, based upon the condition of his natural birth and the terms of the definition of
"natural-born Citizen (NBC} according to the DEED in TRUST shown in Exhibit A, am NBC evidenced
by the above duly recorded and registered filing, and am eligible to be SETTLOR herein.
I, Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent hereby accept the responsibilities and duties necessary to duly serve this TRUST
publicly without beneficial interest until further written notice unanimously approved by undersigned
Beneficiaries and he reimbursed for my duly recorded time and expense acceptable to the Beneficiaries.
I. Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent as is my public duty as EXECUTOR and SETTLOR (SETTLOR) to notify the
Beneficiaries in writing of my actions to enact rules, change rules, communication involving the
enforcement of the claim necessary to maintain the beneficial interest in the TRUST and will seek
approval for all affirmative challenges to be undertaken in the enforcement of the TRUST mandate
expressed in the document shown as Exhibit A, and report monthly to Beneficiaries in writing.
I. the SE'M'LOR am acting in a public capacity having no beneficial interest in the TRUST per se for
the benefit of the Beneficiaries who may remove SETTLOR at will, and for all those canatural-born
1 of3
"'- -
- - - - - - - - - c - - - ' - -
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 6-2 Filed 06/30f14 Page 69 of 104
Case 1:14-cv-oD995-RJL Document f-1 F1led 0671L:_4 Page 69 of 109
LAMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT

BPA BOOK $e PAGES:1/.!L.
DEPUTY CLERK
Citizens" other than who are private citizens of the United States who have a secured beneficial interest
in the TRUST but have not become a beneficiary. with the understanding that as directed by the
Beneficiaries that more beneficiaries may be added as directed to be reported monthly in writing.
I, the SETI'LOR prior to this acceptance has ascertained, and hereby certify that I have reviewed and will
review the Status of all DEED in TRUST Beneficiaries now and in the future, and must find each is a
"naturalborn Citizen" who is the in esae Sui juris private citizen of the United States secured beneficiary
agent for the Debtor Trust Transmitting Utility registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury.
and will maintain a record of the Beneficiaries. present and future status, and report monthly to Beneficiaries
in writing to include any new member of the DEED in TRUST Beneficiaries by amendment.
I. the SE'ITLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that prior to this acceptance and becoming the secured
beneficiary agent of Debtor Trust CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, that on January 23, 2009, did duly
privately fire BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMI\ II, for being ineligible for the Office of President of the United
States (POTUS) and duly served notice upon he and his agents accordingly to no avail of
law to date see the eight (I) page.document marked by me as .. Exhibit B" at the lower left hand corner of each
of the pages preceded by SETTLOR's AfWavit of Truth as to being a true and accurate copy of the original.
I. the SETILOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that in anticipation of the necessity of my full time devotion to
remove the POTUS USURPER sought early beneficial use of Social Security funds vested since 1990 rather
than wait until age 67, and as. such have dwindled my life time expectation as an expense for which I gave
notice to the USURPER. Attorney General, Secretary of Commerce and Secretary ofTreasury of intent to file a
replevin demand for my USA property beneficial interest as personal damages that on November 10, 2009
Plaintiff in (RJL), lOcvOO.(Ii (RCL) did file in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia Judicial Notice of Replevin Demand with compensatory damages of$21,656,250.00 in the
Washington District of Columbia as a result of damages incurred by Petitioner from after January 20. 2009
with the USURPER incumbent ineligibility to office of POTUS failure to leave office when "fired" herewith
marked as E hibit C by SE'nLOR.
I. the SETTLOR hereby notuy Beneficiaries that there has been a complete absence of legal remedy to
date to remove the POTUS USURPER, and therefore with Beneficiaries' permission SETTLOR intends to seek
pure equity relief in the Washington District of Columbia United States District Court to enforce and protect
the Beneficiaries' equity claim to this DEED in TRUST at the earliest time possible and will report monthly in
writing of the status of such undertaking.
I, the SETILOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that on 4 March 2014 the New York State Supreme Court
Appellate Division for the Second Department Judicial panel sitting in teview of Appellant's Amicus motion in
Appeal Cases 201205515, 201306335 and 2014-00297 from orders in the trial court for Index No: 6500-2011,
to my demand that it provide "for civilian du.e process of law" rather than the continued martial due process of
law under statutoty direct authority of the POTUS Commander-inwchief over the de facto Federal and New
York State Unified Coul1; System courts under statutory authority of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b}
ORDERED to deny "for civilian due process of law" (see Eithibit D).
I. the SEITLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that he ia the Plaintiff in New York State Supreme Court for
the County of Kings active Cases with Index No's: 29642-2008 and 21948-2012 that are scheduled for a non
jury trial on 18 June 2014. in that SETTLOR intends to enforce and protect the Beneficiaries' equity claim to
this DEED in TRUST therein also; and SETTLOR at the earliest time possible will report monthly in writing
ofthe status of such undertaking, with the understanding that SETTLOR has secured the expert testimony of
(2) two expert witnesses for the trial: U.S. Citizen Paul Edward Irey (reti.l"ed document expert and publisher),
2of3
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1t... Page 70 of 109
DEPUTY
and the British Subject, Michael Shrimpton, Esq., a Barrister to the Queens's Bench and expert Intelligence
Analyst, a Consultant to the Intelligence Community at large with the published book "$PY HUNTER' (2014).
I. the SETTLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that as a matter of fact based upon the evidence that
before Kenya became an independent state in 1963, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II aka BARRY
SOETORO aka SOEBARKAH has admitted in the 1996 autobiography "Dreams From My Father" based
upon his own biography used by the Publisher to promote Book sales for 16 years, that he was born in
Mombasa Kenya of a natural father who was both a subject of the British Throne and of the Sultanate of
Zanzibar, and, according to a knowledgeable member of the intelligence community consulting with
SETTLOR herein. is born of a mother. out of wedlock to his natural father. who is a Indonesian citizen,
and as such renders the incumbent of the POTUS. a USURPER, because in keeping with the DEED in
TRUST by the NBC definition shown in Exhibit A. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not NBC.
I, the SETTLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that this original tiocument and the original dccuments
including amendment(s) to which this DEED in TRUST is based including my Affidavit of Truth as to
those documents annexed in Exhibit that are true and accurate copies shall be filed with the Clerk of the
Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar County before any further JIUblic action by SETTLOR shall take
place, and that upon such recording color copies of the original shall be provided to the Beneficiaries
acoordingly along with SETTLOR's next status repmf }
Further Affiant Sayeth Not. (/ J /_, c\
1
A-- ----
L , . f--.1..-.-
.
ci'iristopher Earl Strmnk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary
agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility
TMCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Private Citizen of the United States of America
Private Citizen of the State of New York
Private Resident of the County of Kings
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
THE STATE OF NEW YORK )
}ss
THE COUNTY OF KJINGS )
BEFORE ME, on this day personally appeared Christopher Earl Strunk known to me to be the
person described herein NOTJ[CE OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS THE EXECUTOR
I SETTLOR OF THE EXPRESS DEED 1IN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
and who solemnly affirmed under the penalties of perjury that every statement given above was the
whole truth to the best of his knowledge.
Subscribed and Sworn befme me on this tJ"-day of April, 2014.
3 of3
KAMAL P. S0"-11
Ptrl)f;c. Swte ot New
No 01800089949
Ouahued in K1nns County
Co111m1SS10f't Exo1ms March 31. 2015
. ---------------
ase : -cv- 995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL . .-:4 Page 71 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WITH BENEFICIARY DISCRETION FOR PRIVATE CITIZENS OF THE UNRTlED STATES WHO
ARE TRliJE NATURAL-BORN Cl11ZJENS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1l CLAUSE 5 AND NOT SURETY-INDENTUltES FOR THEIR
RESPECTIVE DEBTOR TRUST ENTITY UNDER 12 USC 9li AND 60 USC APP. 5(b) MARTIAL
GOVERNMENT WITH A CONTINUJlNG NATIONAL EMEltGENCY
'fbis Express Deed in Trust is a claim of beneficial interest nn and over all the public and private
real, personal, tangible and intangible Property within THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA geographic
border to safeguard and secure for the posterity of WE the People of the United States of America in the
nation given by GOD fo1 securing each private Citizen's unalienable rights and beneficial interest in
pursuit of life liberty and happiness in perpetuity, and with the Executor and Beneficiaries duty to this
Ttust shall guarantee that all incumbents and future candidate(s) for the Office of President or Vice
President of the United States (POTUS) shall be a bonafide Natwal-Born Citizen (NBC) private citizen of
the United States agent who is surety no more to the Debtor Trust Entity in compliance with the United
States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5. either under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App.o(b) with the
Military Government authority of renewed annuaD National Emergency or otherwise (!DEED in TRUST).
Tha:1t thils NATION of THE UNITJED STATES OF AME.llf.ICA fis a gift from GOD, 1:1ot men, according
to the Declaration of Independence in CONGRESS. July 4, 1776 ao the unanimous Declaration of the
Freemen of the thirteen united States of America state, quote:
"Wher& in. the Cou.rse of human. etrents, z:t becomes necessary for one people to d.issolue the political bands
which have connected them with another, an.d to assume among lhe powers of tll.e earlh. the separate and
equ.al station to which the Laws of Nature an.d of Natul"e's God entitle them, a decent respect to the
opinions of mankind requires that they shoztld declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
f'We hold these tru.ths to be self-evident that all men gre created equal. that they are endowed by tlu!ir
Creg{.or with certain. unalienable Rights. that among these are Life. Liberty the .,friuit of HaPPiness.
"Tht:Jilo secure llr.ese rights, Governments al'e instituted among Men. derilJinc their just powers from the
consent of tiM toverned. That whenever any Form of Gove1nm.ent becomes destructive of these ends, it is th.e
Right of llae People to alter or to abolish it. and to neu la.1ing i./s fomulution 011 ::ul'h
principles and mganizi.n.g its powers in such fom, as lf1 tlwm .-:hall /o llwil Srt{t.l:;.
and Happiness. Prttdence, indeed, will dictate that should 1iol be rhall!.JNl
for ligl&t. and transient causes; or&d accordingly all Jwtll slreun. l.htJ/ numhirul uwn
1
dispmwrl
to suffer, while evil.s are sufferable, than to right themseltt:'s fJy ulm!isbi,.g /.he form.-; to whidt they art"
accu.stomed. But when a long trair1. of abuses and u.swpations, pwsuing in.variably the same Object evinces
a design lo reduce tl&em under absolute Desootism. it is their right. it is their du.ty, to throw offsrtch
Government. ar1.d to pP'OVide new Guards for their fu.ture security ... "
The Preamble to the Constitutlion of the Unfited Stmtes provides Authority and purpose declares:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Ju,stice. insure
domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and ou.r Poste1ity. do orda.in and establish this Constitution for the United
Stales of America.
Exlblilbnt A Page 1t of 15
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L.. _-J. Page 72 of 109
That WE the People are only those private Citizens under GOD, not public citizens under men, and that
guarantee within this Nation that each Private Citizen's unalienable rights and beneficial interest is
secure in perpetuity as long as the Sovereign People of this Nation act under GOD as expressed in the
Book of Isaiah Chapter 55 Verse l th1u 5, hereafter quoting from the King James Version of the Bible:
1. Ho. every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters. and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and
eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.
2. Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which
satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me. and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight
itself in fatness.
3. Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and I will make an everlasting
covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David.
4. Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.
5. Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee
shall run unto thee because o!f' the LORD thy God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he
hath glorified thee.

!(,u.:>IQJ !".....,.>.....,'-'*"-" CIUIAO)
Exhibit A Page 2 ofli.G
Case 1:14-cv-OU995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _4. Page 73 of 109
DEPUTY CLERI<
StaUi Populate on t..ancl Area ' GOV 8metl land PRIVATE
,
AJI United Stoite5 308 7 13n t5eeuare : parcent
mllnl 1
. ownedland
:::; (Sq Mi)
That the "natural-born Citizen,
Clause expressed in the ratified U.S .
Constitution Article 2 Section 1
Clause 5 waa imposed by the People
of New York with emphasis that was
expressed as displeasure in the July
26. 1788 ratification document of
what should have been, quote:
3.537.438 i
4 'i79 . I ]J 9% . . 4?, '41
A&l!Ha . . !3.4.t020
!f.WaDQ 6.392 01 T 113,fl:35 ! 5i h% fl4.544 s)9,090
8M!!qe 2.915.918 52.066j 17.30% 9.008 43.060
CaUfomlc 37.253.956 155.959 i 52 10% 61.255 74.705 :
Coloradp 5,029J96 103.718 i 43.30% 44.910 58.808 "That no Persons except natural born
CuoncctJcut 3,574,097 43,6t65 i 300 : Citize11.s, or such as were Citizens on
t ,954 ' 7 145 . 1,GG-3 . or be{01e the fourth day of July one
nu, ..... ,., 1S.G01.3H1

:.:'9. 2rrx- Fi--'4i-----.. 38.1mf'
... ,.. thousand. seven hundred and seventy
Qtorllia 9,661.553 57.908 1
9
7
0%
5
517 52
289
si.x. or such as held Commissions
IW!d
1
.360,30i .
6
.4
23
1
19 00016

1
220 5
202
wul.er the Un.ited States dztring the
ldahi'* 1.557.582 e2.?47j 70.40% 24,493
12,e30!632 55,5641 4.10% 2,279: 53,305: !tar. and haue at ally time since the
lntti&!W 6.48a.602 35.867 i 1,614 :M.25:l fourth day of Jrtly one thousand seven
3.048.355 55,869 i 2.60% 1 .54i-4 54)05 hu.n.dred and seventy six become
2,85.1,118 81,S1S! 1,554 80,280: Citizerr.a of one or other of the United
!qntucbv 4,339,367 39.728
1
j1
1
.80% -1,698 35.0
40
.. States, and who shall be Freeholders.
Lm.Utul!nn 4.533.372 4'$,562. 1 10.71% 4,661 :.M.i,SOt - -- --- - -- - -
.M!ilmt . t-:-32t:i.35i . -3o:a82":!,s:7tY.'f 1 )59" - 52 shall be eligible to the Places of
Mitrylsna 5,773:ss2 fh.774 1.68% r43 9.031 President. Vice Presid,ent. or Members
.gol__ _ _ .. of either House of the Congress of the
Mk!ll:t'{i;u1 9.f?_8-3tG4:1 .! U1tited States. n
5.303.925 79.610 ! ZJ SQ'tJi t a. 70t1 60.902
Mja!jMjpRL 2.967\:297 46.907 j 5,113 41.794! And the People of New York
Mtswuri s.aaa.e21 61;8 111 1.115 a1.t11 wmrtued:
Montana 989,415 S4,582 00,970
N@brtst!Jt._.. __ .... .. i. 2. iS;,t 74.720. That t.he Powers of Government may
. 2,700 551 109.6;.?6187 oo:-.127- 13:iGff: b.e reassumed by the Peovle.
W!W..O!lftif\'

Ni!W Yatt<
:
Ngrl!) Qafof!

orca on
:. eiiiiiiiUt&.!la ..
BJ.t.octc lalamt
ScnM CNAUpm
.. ileldh paJmtij
. Inom>al1!i
a fll)tn>JUtb p.
WAAtViminia --
l!V'i!}consin
Wygnlng
Exh.iibitA
1.Jli,47Q 8.968 I 18.00.. i';61.! 1,354

1
whensoever ie shall become
8, 791 ,894 . I ..,.u 6,lJSO
2,059.179 121.356
1
47.40"- 57.523 i 63.833 necessary to their HqQRiness: that
19,:rrB.H>2 47.214! 37 11% every Power, Jurisdiction and right,
s:s35.4&3 which is not by the said
.672.591 60,976 i 9.1 6.277 62.699 . c t 'tut 1 l del t d t tl
11 !536,504. i 1,720 J9X?9. ons '. r.on c ear :y ega e o lR
_.... ----.... Congress of the United States, or the
depmtment.s of the Government
12.702 l19 44:817l161W 31.60t theveof, rem.ain.s to the People of the
---------Til-- -:;-;-029 seueral States. or to their respective
4.525.334 30. H)S
1 1 1
8ft
215
557
: State Governments to wlwm they
814
'aq.
mav have granted lhe some. And

41.217 G,512 :.15,40C, J
25,145.561 261.7971 4.20% 10.995 :zso.aoz; thai those Clauses in said
j , Constilrttion. which declare. that

ti.'n't :;
2
.
82
:., Congress shall nol have or exercise
6
-
00
' ,uZ'1. - - -" .. - - - -

certa.in Powers. do not imply that

, t 4! L V.- ..:..U Uv
601.723 61 75.00'>0 46 15 Congress is entitled to any Powers
1t:i 3.973 20.1 OE ttot gi1ren by the said Constitution;
s:6e6.9o5 1f80% 9,661 44.6:;13 bu.t such Clauses are to be canst rued
-583,626 97,100; 55 !Km 54.279 42.821 either as e.:u:epti.ons to certain
:::;:nJ!Ic.r::;:gl::
specified Powers, or as inserted
merely fm greater Caution..
TQtal Prlv.a.te sq 2,i30,4J4
Page 3 ofl5
Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14 Page 74 of 104
Case 1:14-cv-ou995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. .. _4 Page 74 of 109
I..Afth,.,., COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COUR'f
c&
BPA BOOJ< Cf2 PAGES
DEPUTY ClERK
That the Natural-lter:n Citizea clause does NOT deirive from tile term ()f art "natural-
boi'n Subject", but instead was derived from ancient consideration of GOD's Natural Law as expressed
in Greece by the works of Aristotle and carried forward for use in Roman law by the works of Cicero.
Aristotle did not define citizenship like the English did in the English com01on law in which they
did not give any relevancy to the citizenship of the child's parents, provided the parents were not
diplomats or military invaders. Aristotle included in the definition of a "citizen" a person "of whonr. both
the parents are citizens." u> It is this definition which was handed down through the millennia through
the law of nations and which the Founders and Framers adopted for the new republic. We also see that
the then Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162
(1875) <Minor) (decided after the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted in 1868) held that "all children
born in. a country of pal'ents who were its citi.zens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These
were natives m natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigner:i' informed that a person
who became a citizen by being born in the country to "citizen" parents was known in common law with
which the Framers were familiar as a "natural-born citizen.'' How do we know that the Founders and
Framers looked to Aristotle's view of citizenship? We learn from the historical1ecord that Supreme Court
Justice James Wilson wrote in 1791: "'Generally speaking,' says the great political authority, Aristotle, a
citizen is one p,artahinz equally of power and of subordination..' ... In Wilson's view, "a citize1t of
Pennsylvania is he, who has resided in the sf.ate two years; and, within that time, has paid a state or
county tar or he is between the ages of twenty one and twent.y two years, and the son of a citizen. James
Wilson. 1st commentaries on the Constitution. Here we clearly see Wilson referring to what could only be
a "natural born Citizen" as "the son ofa citizen."
We alse know that the Founders and Framers studied Roman law. The Framers were well read in
the Roman and Greek classics as is expounded upon in their writings in the Federalist Papers. Jefferson
1
Alistotle also gave us a definition of a "natural born Citizen." In "Politics, Book Three, Part II. Arietotle. writing in
350 B.C.E., as translated by Benjamin Jowett, gave us his definition of citizenship:
"Part II
But in practice citizen i1 d&fined to be qne of Whom both the parcntq are citizens; others insist on
going further back; say to two or three or more ancestors. This is a short and practical definition but there
are eome who raise the further question: How this third or fourth ancestor came to be a citizen? Gorgias of
Leontini, partly because he was in a difficulty. partly in il"ony, said- 'Mortars a1e what is made by the
mortar-makers; and the citizens of Larissa are those who are made by the magistrates; for it is their trade to
make Larissaeans. Yet the question is really simple, for. if according to the definition just given they shared
in the government, they were cit1zena. This is a better definition than the othet. For the words. 'born of a
father or mother who is a citizen,' cannot possibly appiy to the first inhabitants or founders of a state.
There is a greater difficulty in the case of those who have been made citizens after a revolution, as by
Cleiethenes at Athens after the expulsion of the tyrants, for he enrolled in tribes many metics, both
strangers and slaves. The doubt in these cases is, not who is, but whether he who is ought to a citizen;
and there will still be a furthering the state, whether a certain act is or is not an act of the state; for what
ought not to be is what is false. Now. there are some who hold office, and yet ought not to hold office, whom
we describe as ruling, but ruling unjustly. And the citizen was defined by the fact of his holding some kind of
rule or he who holds a judicial or legislative office fulfil.1a our definition of a citizen. It is evident,
therefore, that the citizens about whom the doubt has arisen must be called citizens."
... http://classi:Jllit.edu/AIiatotle/politics.htn.\l .
Exhibit A
Page 4 oflt
DEPUTY
and other Founders had a love for Roman history and education. The Founders and Framers were great
admirers of Cicero and read many of his works. It is not inconceivable that they would have read this
English translation of The Proposalt
2
> and seen the clause "natural born Citizen., This shows that they
did not need to borrow the clause from Engli&h common law's .. natural born subject." Rather, they had
sources that they read which contained the exact clause, "natural born Citizen," which clause also had its
own meaning which was different from that of an English "natu,ral born subject'" which allowed children
born in the King's dominion and under his allegiance to aliens to be English "natural bo1n subjects."
A definition of a bol'n. Citizen" was also provided by the world-renowned, Emer de Vattel in
his The Law ofNations, Section 212 (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatell758). Vattel had a great
influence on the Founders and Framers in their constituting the new republic and writing the
Constitution. See, for example, J.S. Reeves, The lnflu&nce of the Law of Nature Unon International Law
in the United States, 3 Am.J. lnt'l L. 547 et. aeq. passim (1909) <V;attel exerted such a profound political
influence that it is often pointed out that his theo1'ies served as the backbone for American independence)
Lee A. Casey, David B. Rivkin, Jr. and Darin R. Bartram. Unlawful Belligerency and Its
Under International Law. .; .. OI't!.iPIIhlwat !i.!.!ll"}l'uhll> 1 (concerning U.S.
constitutional analysis ... Vottel is highly important. He was probably the international law expert most
widely read among the Framers"). In fact, Vattel continued to be practically applied in our nation for wsll
over 100 years after the birth of the republic; F.S. Ruddy, The Aoomtance of Vattel, Grotian Society
Papers (1972) (Vattel was mainstream political philosophy during the writing of the Constitution. The
Law ofl\
1
ations was significantly the most cited legal source in America jurisprudence between 1789 and
1820). The Founders and Framers studied and were greatly influenced by Vattel. R.G. Natelson, The
OriaincJl Constitution 49 and 6! (2010) (''Vattel was probably the Fou.nders' favorite authority on
international law ... : and his, treatise, The Law ofNations, was their favorite).
What Minor said about a ''natural born Citizen' was confirmed in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark. 169 U.S.
649 (1898) (acknowledging and confirming Minor's American common law definition of a "natural-born
citizen,. but adding based on the English common law that since m[t]he child of an alien, if born in the
country. is as rnuclr. a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle
[birth in the country]'" (bracketed information supplied), a child horn in the United States to domiciled
alien parents was a Fourteenth Amendment "citizen of the United Statesu)_ This American common law
definition of a .. natural born Citizen" has never been changed, not even by the Fourteenth Amendment
(only uses the clause "citizen of the United Sta.tes" and does not mention nnatural born Citizen.") or by
Wong Kim Ark, and therefore still p1evails today. Both those U.S. Supreme Court cases define a "natural
born Citizen" as a child born in a country to parents who are citizens of that country.
Roman law provtded: ''Lex MENSIA. 'l'hat a child bt"! if either of the pt.uents
waB so. But if both pat'ents were Romans aud mattied, children always oftbe
(patrem sequuntur liberi. Liv. iv. 4.) and if unmarried. of the mother, Uipian." Alexander Adam. Roman antiquities:
or, An account of the manners and customs of the Romans 210 (6th ed. corrected 1807). Cicero wrote in A Proposal:
''The Colophonians claim Homer as their own free Denizen, the Chians challenge him as theirs, the Salaminians
demand him again for their own. but the Smyrneane assert him to be their natural born Citizen; and therefore have
also dedicated a Temple to him in their Town of Smyrna. There are a great many besides at Daggers-drawing among
themselves. and contend for him."
A Proposal For Prir1ting in English. The Select Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, According to the last Oxford
Edition 17 (Henry Eel beck trans. London 1 720).
Exhibit A Page 5 of 15
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1t,: .... 4 Page 76 of 109
GA. SUPERIOR COURT
FILED & RECORDED IN
[\PR 2 9 2014 .f\T I:
BPA BOOK gg
DEPUTY CLEHI<
tp;l!t{'
In the matter of Rome's Coup d'etat over the "Accursed" United. States of America
by Ell"ic Jon Phelps with edits by Christopher Earl Strunk (2014)
On March 4, 1933 Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) assumes the Office of President of the
United States, and with his Inaugural Address seizes and gives ALL Property and persons as
collateral for the debt of the United States in national "consecration" to its prime Creditors, the
Vatican State and Crown's City of London, and as Comms.nd.er in chief FDR issues
Proclamation 2039 on March 69 1933, as the Military Conqueror as if he were "Augustus
Caesar' of the American Republic, decla1ing a state of National Emergency based upon
The "Trading With the Enemy of October 6, 1917 (40 Statute Law 411);
Congress at the demand of every Governor on Marcia 9, 1933 passes the "Emergency Banking
Relief Act" (12 USC 95a), Aaeading the notorious World War I Statute ''Trading Wnth
the Enemy Act, of ectober 6, 1917, (50 USC .t\pp. 5(b)) (TWEA) , and then FDR issues
Proclamation 2040 on March 9, 1933, also by "Emer ency Banking Relief Act"
(12 USC 95b) and riApng the TWEA inian4, imposing Military Government
This Amended WWI Statute in fact tegards all "PERSONS,' "Within the United States" as
seized prope:a.ty of the federal government to be treated as an "enemy' and "enG!:my ellyn or
"belligerents and rebels, by the Conqueror's Militat'Y Government.
These ''btenligerents aad reltels" are publicly residing in the Several States Now considered
to be "conqUiered territories."
e By 1939 all Ametican Common Law Civil Process will be gone. In its place will be Roman
Civil Law Martial Process imposed on all "PERSONS'' (natural and artificial) subject to
the Conqueror
7
s facto Equity Jtall"isdiction of the uulnl.ited States."
o This Martial will apply tO all Public uU1mited States Citizeas."
o This Maniian cannot apply to Private "Cntizen of the United States," Privately
residing on the land at Common Law, while holding Private State Citizenship pursuant to
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
"The Emergency Banllting ltelief (EBRA) ( 41 Statute Law 1)
This Act accomplished the Design of the Society of Jesus in "the Company's" Great Conspiracy
against the Liberties of the United States set forth in Samuel Morse's Nineteenth century
masterpiecet Foreign Conspiracy Mainst the Liberties of the United States (1835). Just as the Order
had brought the British Admiralty (possessing both a criminal and civil jurisdiction unlike American
Admiralty with only a civil jurisdiction) inland in the days of ruled King Charles Stuart I of
England thereby attempting to do away with the English Common Law on the land, the Jesuits
accomplished essentially the same thing here in America with this wicked Act aided by the
1
'Roosevelt Court."
ase : -cv-uvd95-RjL Document 1-1 F1led 06/lt,. _4 Page 77 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
In the passing of this Act which the emotionally distressed Congress never read, the following must
be understood:
1. The ctTrading With the Enemy Act,,, as passed originally in 1917 and amended in 1918, was
made to apply to any "enemy" of the United States.
2. The "enemy" was defined to be "any individual, partnership, or othe1 body of individuals of
any nationality, resident within the territory of any nation with which the United States is at
war.''
3. Other enemy "indl.nvid\uaDs" wel'e defined as "natives, citizens, or subject.s of any nation with
which the United States is at war, other than citizens oftJhre Uaited Stmtes." These
"citizens of the United States in 1917 held Private citizenship of the United States without
having been reduced to the inferior citizenship status of being property of and surety for the
State-created Public "citizen of' the United States," which public citizenship status was
imposed on March 9, 1933.
4. The "Trading With the Enemy Act" also defined the tetm "person., A "pll!rson" was '"deemed
to mean an individual, partnership, association, company, or other unincorporated body of
individuals, or corporation or body politic." Therefore in 1917 a could mean both a
natural person/Private Citizen of the U i1.ited States and an artificial person!Public citizen of
the United States in ptivi.lege.
5. Therefore, a "person" as defined by the "rrrading with the Enemy Act'" DJID INCLUDE a
"citizen of the United States, .. which at the time was a Private "citizen of the United States."
6. The "Emergency Banking Relief Act" ofMareh 9, 1933, amended the r'Trading With the
Enemy Act" of 1917 (p1eviously amended fourteen times from March 26, 1918, to March 10,
1930), bringing the "T1ading With the Enemy Act" inside the United States applying it to "any
place subject to the jurisdiction thereof' [all the States within tlte United States] when
previously, under the "''l'rading With the Enemy Act,, all transactions c'efteuted wholly
within the United States .. were excluded;
7. The "Eme1-gency Banking Relief Act" defined any to mean "an individual,
partnership, association or corporation." The term "person" was defined to mean a Public
"citizen of the United States." The term "person" excludes a Private "citizen of the United
States."
8. Therefore, the t(Trading with the Enemy Act" defined a "personH to include a Private Citizen of
the United States. The ''Emergency Banking Relief Act" defined a "per&on" to be an artificial
Exhibit A
Page 7 ofl6
Case i:l4-cv-L ... d5-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _-I- Page 78 of 109
lAM/'\" COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT

BPA BOOK I&
DEPUTY CLERK
entity (obviously being a partnership, association, or corporation) to include an "individual"
t'person" to be treated as an artificial entity which cannot include the Private Citizen of the
United States.
9. For that "nndlividual" American to be t1eated as an artificial entity, his Private "citizenship of
the United States" had to be reduced by an implied, constructive contract by operation of law
to the inferior grade of quasi-corporate citizenship.
10. The corporation that is a citizen is a "Public" citizen of the United States. It is created for the
benefit of the public. The corporation is not a "Private" Citizen of the United States. Only
individual Men and Women can be "Private'' Citizens of the United States as intended by
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
11. Therefore, the Private "citizen of the United States" is protected in his citizenship status by
Section l of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Federal
statute 12 USC 95a amending and resting upon 50 USC 5(b) does not apply to the Private
Citizen of the United States.
12. Because the individual Private "Citizen of the United States" is protected by Section 1 of the
Fourteenth Amendment) he was specifically EXCLUDED by definition from the "Emergency
. Banking Relief Act,, which act ofFDR's Emetgency War Powers Congtess (by way of the
amended "Trading With the Enemy Act/ Section 17), imposed a martial p:rrocess upon the
courts, federal and state, after April 25, 1938.
13. Therefo1e the good news is, all Private "Citizens of the United States'' are protected in their
private right to a civi!ialnl dlue pit.cess of law on a federal level by the Fifth Amendment, and
to a civillimn due pll'ocess on a state level by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
14. Therefore every Private of the United States" is neithe1 a ''person,' nor "propert.y',
'subject to the jurisdiction of the Uni.tttd Stotes'' refe1red to in the Emergency Banking
Relief Act (12 USC 95a) passed by the Emergency War Powers Congress on March 9. 1933.
15. And therefore, all Private "citizens of the United States" are not subject to the provisions of
the "Emergency Banking Relief Act" (12 USC 95a) having amended the "Trading With the
Enemy Act,, of October 6, 1917, as previously amended on March 28, 1918, now codified as 50
USC App. 5(b)), including a martial due purocess of law imposed by the amended ''Trading
With the Enemy Act" upon any artificial "peirson" within the United States and to
the jurisdiction thereof/' i.e, "subject to the de lacto Emergency War Powers jmisdiction
thereof.,
Exhibit A
Page 8 ofl5
ase 1:14-cv-Lv::ffiS-RJL Document 1-1 Ftled Page 79 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
A Wer. fer Word ComJtJarison
:at!twee 50 USC App. Section 5(b) of the
uThe Tradin&With tJae Enellly Act" ofOctober 6, 1l917, 40 Stat. Law 4111
as Amended on March 28, 1118, anti Section 5(b) of the ''Tratlin.r With the Enemy Act"
"The Emergency Banking Relief Act" of M8.1l"ch 9, 1133, <68 Stat!' Law 1
--- - --
This Word for Word Comparison is critical in understanding how "The Emergency Banking Relief
Act'' (1933) Amended "The Trailing Witb the Enemy Act" (1917) as Amended in substance making
"The Trading With the Enemy Act" the Law of the Land of the United States of America.
"The Trading With the Enemy Act" as Amended on March 9, 1933, imposed a de facto Emergency
War Powers Military Government, while ousting de jure Civilian Constitutional Government.
All Courts, Federal and State, now impose a Martial Due Process instead of a Civilian Due Process
on every "Person Within. th..e United States," Natural and Artificial.
"Jl'mding With t1Be Enemy Act," Sect!on 5(11:). 40 Statute 1Law 411
1911. 7-"'fl&at the illay investiaate. replate, or )lrellil.it,
t.irne of \\'at' or during .nny nther pt..ri,;d of nHti()aHd
the J.l>l!'sident .r y. tluough nn,y l!genc,Y that h(> rn.oy design.at.e. ur
n!ffivestigare, stegui2W'l or [Dl"ohibit,
Chaatfe 1.. 'IWEA is now im)tesed insitle the eot.fraphic United! States durring a dleeiared
of natioaal
Chaat(e 2. The President may now create to
4
'investtarrat!l!, rreguiate or ibit."
Tlaeae agencies willlbe created the 1930s. The axnd Exch .. Je
Co-.issi is CJreateel nn 1933; its fix-st tlirector is JKnight of Malta Joe Kenae y. A l&ost of
otla!!!r enncies willlte as a .lt"esult of the Jesuiit Fabian Socialist New Deal.
1917-"under such ruies allld regulations as he may pre.scrribe, by means ofliceases or
1933-"LIIndeir such rules anti reculations aEI he may prescribe, by means of Bicenses or
19ll7-"otherwise, any uan.sactiolllf'J in foreign exchange, expo1rt or <eaJr-markings of gold
Exhibit A Page 9 oflo
Case 1:14-cv-Lvd95-RJL Document 1-1 Fried
I.AMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
FILED & Ri:COROEO IN CLERKS OFFICE
29201<! AT
:2
DEPUTY CLERI< ...
or payments by banking institutions as defined by the P1resident. enport.
Cllace 3. aakin inatitutiens witiaia tile United States are totally replatedl by
Conpess witheut li.aitatiea. Ne "lallividual"may "hoard" his gold. All goid will be taken
from person within the United Sttetl
11
on June 5, 19839 via HJR-192 C
8
).
1917-"or silver coin or r.uUien or currency, transfers of credlit in mnv form (other than
credits relating to transactions to be executed wholl:_within the United
teountries. by any persen witllin the Uaited States;
1938--"oll" sillver coin or V.ulliorm or cun.rency, lty any person within tlae United States
3
When the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 out1awed the use of gold, such contracts
became sources of controversy.ln the gold clause case Norman vs. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 294 U.S. 240 (1935).
Supreme Court ruled that gold clauses were invalid. However. Congress later reinstated the option to use gold clauses for obligations
(new contracts) issued mfterOctober 1977 in accordance with 31 U.S.C . ..i!J.l{d)(2).
The United States Gold iUseii'Ye Act of Jaauary 30, U934 required that all gold and gold certificates held by the Federal
SWTendered and vested in the sole title oflhe United States Department of the Treasury.
The Gold Reserve Act outlawed nlost private possession of gold, forcing individuals to sell it to the Treaswy. after which it
was stored in UniWI States Bullion Depositozy at Fort Knox and other locations. The aca also changed the nominal price of gold &om
$20.67 per troy ounce to $35.
A year earlier, in 1933, Executive Order 6102 had made it a criminal offense for U.S. citizens to own or trade gold anywhere
in the world, with exceptions for some jewelty and collector's coins. These prohibitions were relaxed starting in 1964- gold
certificates were again allowed for private investors on April24, 1964, although the obligation to pay the certificate holder on demand
in gold specie would not be honored. By 1975 Americans could again freely own and trade gold.
The Gold Reserve Act authorized the Exchange Stabilization fund to use such assets as were not needed for exchange market
stabilization to deal in gOvernment securities.
The Gold Reserve Act had economic ramifications far beyond national finance. At that time many contracts stipulated that
their monetruy tenns could be demanded in gold. Such gold clauses were intended to protect against the United States devaluing the
dollar. When the Ememency Banking 1\ct of 1933 and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 outlawed the use of gold, such contracts bec:ame
sources of controversy. In the gold clause case Norman vs. Baltimore&: Ohio Railroad Co . 294 U.S. 240 (1935). the U.S. Supreme
ruled that gold clauses were invalid. However. Congress later reinstated the option to use gold clauses for obligations (new
contracts) issued after October 1977 in accordance with 3 I U.S.C . .illl{d)(2).
The 2008 decision 2 I 6 Jamaica A1en11e, LLC vs S&R Pl'f)lhouse Realty Co. established that a goJd clause in contracts signed
before 1933 was only suspended not erased, and under certain limited circumstances might be reactivated.
Document 6-2 Filed 1_0;;.._4 ______ _
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. ... _4 Page 81 of 109
LAMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COU"T
FILED. & RECORDED IN
1114 .1\T f ZO.J::_Pj
lli'A al K . ag . f>AGES::::J:gz
DEPUTY Ct.ERK t:AI!
Chan.re " The provisiea eclutii& the TWEA of ectobe.Jr 6t 1117, e.s ameatieti hem
reaulatinl trans&ctiioas executed wlllly witlaia tile Uaitetl States is elliaiaate. All
foreil aa411111ioestnc transactions of "eny ,eraen within the Unitetl Sttes" is to lte
replatedl er pJreltibitetl.
1917-"and may require any such person engaged in &my such transaction to furnish
1933-''ot any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and the President may reqadre
any penon in any transaction referred to in this subdivision to furnish
Chapge o. The "new jurisd4ction of the United Sta11tes" established by tllte emergency war
powers military gover .. ent of the Uaitetl States under Proclamation 2041 approved and
confirmed by the EBRA amealiinl the TWEA, aow extends to all states -' territories.
1917-''uDder oath, complete infrmatien relative thereto, bnchncUnB' tllle )troduction
1933--'under oath, complete infonnati rei tive thereto, inchuiling tlae roduction
1911.7-"of any boob of account, contracts, lettell"S or othetr in connection
1933--''of any books of account, contracts, letters or other papers, in connection
1917-"therewitla ia tllle custoy er co:ntrel of such pelt' son, ;aefore or after
1!.933-"tllerewith in the cultoy or coatrol of such person, either before orr after
1917-"such transaction is corc.tplete .
1933-"sucb transactio;a cornplete .
1917-[End of Statute}
Jl93S-''Wboever wilful!y violates any of the prtt>viions of this subdivision o2 of any
license, otder, rule or regulation issued ther.eunden. shall. upon conviction, be
fined not mo1e than $10,000
1
ot. Jif a natural person, rnay be irnpR-isoned for not
mote than ten years, OP.' both; an any officer. dhector. o11 agent of any
who knowingly participates in such violation he punished by a
like fine, or both .. As ut;ed iu this subdivision the ternl person'
n'leants an individual, paatnership, a-ssociation, or corporation." (lEnd ofStatute]
Exhibit A
Page 11 of 15.
Case Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL. Page 82 ofl09
DEPUTY CLERK
Change 6. New penaltnes are imposed for vnoRatililg the amendetl TWEA extended into the
United State .. ecting '
1
any person within the United States" (111atural or artificial)
"subject to to the newly impose , aen-civRlian,
emergency war pewers, IJllartial jurisdiction of the United Stalltes.
Note: "Pei"aen" as defined under the 1WEA is identical to s "Pel!'sea" defined in the EBRA.
However, an individual natural "Person,' under the TWEA was a Private Citizen of the
United States under Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. The natural "Person" under the
EBRA amending the TWEA and thereby extending the TWEA into the United States is a
Public
6
'1U.S. citizen'" treated like a corporation in commercial privilege.
CONCLUSION
Citizenship Status Slnd Ju:Jrisdnction of the United States
I. Private Citizenship of the United States, Section 1, 14th Amendment
"All persons born or> naturalized in the United and aubject to the jurrisdiction
thereoJ; citizens of the United States mnd of the Sfmte wherein they
A. An individual is a natural "person."
B. That individual natural is "born or naturalized in the United States" (the
geographic "United States', composed of the states in union under the Constitution of the
United States).
C. That individual natural ''perHn." is "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," the jurisdiction
of the United States.
D. The "jurisdiction thereof' (jurisdiction of the United States) is the constitutionally
established, <:onstitutionally-limitcd, de jure, civilian jurisdiction of the United States that
began on March 4, 1789, and that ended on March 6, 1933, confirmed and approved on
March 9, 1933, by the E111ergency Banking Relief Act.
E. The citizenship of the "citizen of the United States" is private, not public.
F. Therefore, the Private "citizen of the United States" under Section 1 of the 14th
Amendment is a "person .. .. o subject to the jurisdiction of United Staaes." That
jurisdiction is a civilian jurisdiction.
Exhibit A Page 12 of15
- - v::J95-RJt Document 1-1 Filed 109
DEPUTY CI.Ef.!K
II. Public Citizenship of the United States, Section 1, 14th Amendment
A. A corporation is a "person,. under Section 1, 14th Amendment.
B. A corporation is a "citizen" under Section 1. 14th Amendment.
C. A corporation is created by a state for the benefit of the public.
D. A corporation is a public "citizen of the United States."
E. By operation of law. the Certificate of Live Birth, on the day it was filed with a public office
of the state of natural birth, created an individual corporate/trust entity. a Public "citizen
of the United States ... its property being the Private "citizen of the United States."
F. On March 6, 1933 (approved and confirmed on March 9, 1933, via the EBRA). all
registered propertY (land, labor and businesses) were seized as "booty of war" by
Proclamation 2039 of President Franklin D. Roosevelt acting under the World War I
statutory authority of the "Trading With the Enemy Act" of October 6, 1917, as amended
14 times up to and includinc March 10. 1930.
G. On March 6, 1933 (appreved and confirmed on March 9, 1933, via the EBRA), the
constitutional. limited, de jure, civilian government of the United States was ousted and
replaced with a statutory. unlimited, de facto, military government of the United States.
H. On March 6, 1933 (approved and confirmed on March 9. 1933, via the EBRA), the civilian
'jurisdiction of the United States" under Section 1 of the 14th Amendment was removed
and replaced with the military ''jurillfli.ction of the Unitefl SttJJtes" under the
"Emergency Banking Relief Act, now codified as 12 USC 95a based upon the military
"Trading With the Enemy Act" now codified a 50 USC App. 5(b).
I. Therefore. the Public of the United Stctes" under Section I of the 14t.h
Amendment is a "person .... saa.bject to the jurisdiction I' the Vnieetl Stater/' under
the ''Emergency Banking Relief Act" ( 12 USC 95a) based upon the "Trading With the
Enemy Acf' (50 USC App. 5(b)). That jurisdiction is a military jurisdiction imposing
martial process in every action, state and federal, civil and criminal.
FiNAL CONCLUSION
The Private ''citizen of the United States" is a "personS! subject to the constitutional. de jure.
peacetime, jurisdiction of the United States under Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
That peacetime jurisdiction of the United States is a civilnm:n using civilian process
to gain in personam jurisdiction.
Exbibii.t A Page 13 of15
Case 1:14-cV-L _J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1"- .4 Page 84 of 109
On the othel' hand:
The Public "citizen o{th.e United States" is a ''person" subject to the statutory, de facto, wartime
jurisdiction of the United States under the "Emergency Banking Relief Act" (codified as 12 USC 95a)
based upon the military "Trading With the Enemy Act .. (codified as 50 USC App. 5(b)). All actions,
federal and state, criminal and civil, using martial process to confer in personam. jurisdiction of the
emergency war powers courts are founded upon these two statu tea.
That wartime jurisdiction of the United States is a military jurisdiction using martial process to
gain in personam jurisdiction.
You either 111 Constitutional Private "citize111 ot the United States"
Or
You are a Statutory Public ttcitizen of the United States"
You are eithell" m "perBof!" under SectDon 1 of the 14th Amexullmelllt
Or
You al'e a ccl&!1i!l1!" under the commercial "Emergency Banking Relief Act" (1933)
(12 USC 95a)
Exhibit A
Based upon the martial "Trading With the Enemy Act" (1917)
(50 USC App. 5(b))
You are entber subject to m civiiaflll ''jl8risdicti.on of the United States"
Unde.ll' 11. 14th Ame1mdment
Or
You are subject to a martial "jurisdiction of the United States"
Undea- the "Emergency Banking Relief Act" (1933) and
The "Trading With the Enemy Act" (1917)
(12 USC 95a and 50 USC App. 5(b))
You are one of the SoveJreign People of the Unfi.1ted States of Amel!'ica
Or
You are one of the conquered people of the United States of Amel'ica
The End
Page 14 of' 15
Case 1:14-cV-\... ... d95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. _4 Page 85 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
That for the expressed tlbove, noLwit.hslanding whether a nat. ural person is born within a
State of the United States of married citizen parents, the_Executor and Beneficiaries of this EXPRESS
DEED lN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are of a singular class separate and apart
from those who are either naturalized or born a citizen, and are unable to certify as eligible for POTUS
one of the conquered pegple of the United States of America as long as the dejure citizen of the United
States remains the surety-indenture for the Debtor trust with beneficial interest in the surety, for that
natural person is the property of the United States and is a slave unable to fulfill the duties ofPOTUS.
Therefore, the Executor and Beneficiaries are bound by their registered status as private citizens
of the United States with their bonafide status as a natural-born Citi7..en within the dutieR and
obligations of this DEED in TRUST to only certifY a candidate is eligiblE" based upon the foregoing and
shall seek equity relief of a chancellery court for attempt to USURP the POTUS to the contrary.
That the Beneficiaries for this DEED in TRUST are private citizens of the United StateH in respect
to the debtor trust entity registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury with acceptance
confumed for each respective package by Certified Mail with numbers for their account in regards to
the period ending before the filing of this DEED in TRUST and that the undersigned Beneficiaries are
certified natural-born Citizens capable of rendering a decision as to the status of a POT US candidate.
That Executor and Settlor who privately is of equal beneficial interest to the
Beneficiaries or any member of the class defined above in the execution ofthc obligations of this DEED
in TRUST. is Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States. the
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility rMCHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK as duly registered with the United States Secretary of the Tl'easury with account ....
._Accrual and and located at 593 Vanderbilt
Avenue PMB 281 Brooklyn, New York zip code excepted 11238 Cell Phone: 845-901-6767 Email:
chriS@strunk.ws, who upon his acceptance will duly serve this Trust publicly without beneficial
interest until further written notice unanimously approved by undersigned Beneficiaries and be
reimbursed for his time and expense acceptable to the Bt-neficiaries.
The undersigned Beneficiaries hereby this EXPRESS DEED IN 1'RUS'r and tbe SETTLOR:
in esse Sui
prhate citizen of the United States,
the secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility
Dated: , "'(/- ;
/ -. ., )t'//
,
I _..
..,.- ...... . - - . . - - .
1- - -
Case 114-CV-t .i95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1, ... 4 Page 86 oiJJ)_9:----
BENEJc,ICIARY AMENDMENT TO THE EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST TO
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WITH BENEFICIARY DISCRETION FOR PRIVATE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES
WHO ARE TRUE NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS UNDER THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 CLAUSE 5 AND NOT SURETY-INDENTURES FOR
THEIR RESPECTIVE DEBTOR TRUST ENTITY UNDER 12 USC 95 AND 60 USC APP. li(b)
MARTIAL GOVERNMENT WITH A CONTINUING NATIONAL EMERGENCY
This is a Beneficiary Amendment to the Express Deed in Trust claim of beneficial interest
in aud over all the public and prhate tcnl. hlllt#ihll! and mt.nngihlc Propetty within THE
UNITED &'TATES OF AMERICA geographic border to safeguatd and st.ctne for the postetity of WE
the People of the United States of Americn in the nation given by GOD fm securing each private
Citizen's unalienable righttt and beneficial intereHt in punmit of life liberty and happiness in
perpetuity, and with the Exectttor and Beneficia1ies duty to this Trust shall guarantee that all
incumbents and future candidate(s) for the Office of President or Vice President of the United St.ates
{POTUS) shall be a bonafide Natural-Born Citize11 (NBC) private cit.izen of the United States agent
who is surety no mote to the Debtor Ttust. Ent1t.y in compliance with thf:l United States Constitution
Article 2 Section t Clautre 5, eithe1 undet" 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) with the Military
Government authmity of renewed annual National Emergency m othenvise (DEED in TRUST).
That tor the reasons expressed above, notwithstl\nding whether n uaturnl person is bo1n within a
81 ate of the United StateB of married citizen parents. and Aeneficia1.ies of EXPRFJI.()S
DEED lN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are of a "'ingular class and apart
from those who are either naturalized or horn a citizen. and are unable to certizy as eligible for POTUS
one ofthe conouered people of the U11ited States uf aM long the dejme citizen of the United
States remains the Rurctyindentme fot the Dehtot ttust with beneticial interest in the surety. for that
natural person is the property oft.he United States and is n slave unable to fulfill the duties of PO'rUS.
Theretore. the undersigned il' bound r.o the nales and intent of this
OEED in TRUST by the decisiun of the SJt;T'rLOR C"hristop her Earl Strunk nnd
Beneficiary have authuaized me tn a L)[t;Eo in TRUS'f Benefichuy baaed upon
my registered status aM pl-i\ntc citi1:en of the United St.atcs with a hcmafide naturalborn Citizen
within the dut-ies nnd of this DEE I) in TRUS1' fo only certifY a cnnd1datt- is eligible baNcd
UJ>on tht- foaegoing and shall eqmty relief ofn chancf.!lleay COUI'l tor any mcumhent and or at.templ
to USURP the P01'US to the contl'ary.
1. . the undel'signed Accept tmm,.;. condi1 ions and duties n
HNll!ticitu-y to this gx.PRESS DEED IN TRUST.
llilllllllllll .. in Sui juris
citizen of the United
tIll' hendicia y agent of the Trust
transmitting utility -'lllliilllllllillilllliiiiiBIlt
"I - ot - - - - .- -
1-::... - . - . ',. .
Case 1:14-cv-\.. J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1\.. _4 Page 87 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
AFFIA VIT OF TllUTH
For a anti correct eo)ty ef the Original
I. Christopher Earl Struk. in esse Sui juris, solemnly affirm, depose and declare under the
penalties of perjury that the attached NOTICE Te THE AGENT IS NOTJrCE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NeTICE TO :AGENT ltE: OFFER OF CONTRACT Received
20 January 2009 and .treceiveli 21 January 2011 Felt THE RECORD :RETURN and
REDRAFT TIMELY WITHOUT DI!!IfleNell WITH THE RESTRICTED SPECIAL-
APPEARANCE NOT A CeltP ltATieN The Living-Soul, wita *eatla of ZO
January 2009 offeR' for centr ct /fteturne lc ltedrafted, *Oath ef21 Jaauary 201 er
for contract I Returnetl A Retlraftetl. Notice to the Clerk of Records Judicial Netice
(page 1 cf 2), Judicial Notice (:Jiage 2 ef 2); aloag with the proof of service lty
mail, and that on January 23, 2009, Affirmant privately did duly fire BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II, for being ineligible to POTUS and Commander-in-chief, and did duly serve notice
upon he and his agents accordingly to no avail of law to date see the eight (8) page document
marked by me as "Exhibit B" at the lower left hand corner of each of the pages is an exact. true
and correct copy of the original.
Further Affiant Sayetb Not.
Acknowledgment:
Christopher Earl Strunk in ease Sui juris secured
beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility
YMCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Private Citizen of the United States of America
Private Citizen of the State of New York
Private Resident of the County of Kings
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
TJHIE STATE OF NEW YORK )
}ss
THE COUNTY 01F KlfNGS )
BEFORE ME, on this day personally appeared Christopher Emrn Strunk known to me
to be the person described herein and who solemnly affirmed under the penalties of
perjw-y that every statement given above was the whole truth to the best of his
knowledge.
Subscribed and Sworn before me on this day of April. 2014.
t) SCINI
Notarv P: 1: q .. -; : vorl<
f .. :
t), I - ! .. l.llt\y
t>. ;. - . : .. ;.ldl\..11 31.201$
Notary Public
Case 1:14-cv-l._J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/h ... .:4 Page 88 of 109
7
B.-uach Hu.- Obaum m essf1.
t\:k;a. Bnrry SvetOirO iH !?Js4->.
a ka Ban\ Du.nham m :.;si!.
<tl k-a Bru:'i'\' Dt!rb<ui.t ;r;
DBA BARACf\: HCSS.ED..; OB.t\1\liA I:JC
Atit-.\
!,.)r
tilt: AGD:Y tK CH.A.RGE OF TrlE
t.::\TfED SlATES SECRET SER\ 1C'E
qfjit:.tl t)f (1!)1-'l1l'i1Wait1 a;d Plti.Jiic .if._tt1;:.>
:!-b bJ!mra;.: Dr.i'rr.:
Btaliling :l 0.
\Vns.wngro!1. DC ::0.223

In.Cnrr of:
s9J"Vanlerbllr:Axel1uoe - ::st
Brooklyn. Nevi York
ltp Code e>xe-mpi 0!\1:\.11 ::2-32
Strunk C'
8 t;.:OtpO.C"i\tlO.O.
Soul
DeclaHmt
N'e. Tlurrl Pt'tl-rtYes
. l-',::,::- I' ;
,".;OIIt'J !O IHF F 1'0 :'\iUTIC[ IOPRJNCll
0
Ai
IS Nr t1 It I I U ,\OF' I
ExhiibitB
l :: unT tc.. OF rR At r
. :d and rt:"cci\eJ 2 l
g:t T !H! E U:t i:(: fJ H
RETlRN :\l\U RFHRAFT
Y, 'If
'nTH ttiFS'l i!iC H:n
f\bfDT .-\ <
Tht-
"' ( 1ath ,,r l:tmmn 1.\lfl.'r li'r & Rt!tlratkd
o lath .. ,, 21 .hntmr., 204JlJ tl.1r &
o '- ll' thl' Ckrk iif Ri:'conls
o :--J,,ctct'
f) .luJkial \.t;cc 1p:tgt:.:! of:!. I
., !
! ;
Case 1:14-cv-'-- .:.:J95-RJL Document 1-1
!
, ..
Filed 06/30/14 Page 89 of 104
Filed 06/lC _4 Page 89 of 109
l . '
.'
.A COUN'fV. GA. SUPERlOR COURT
CI.E:R s . 0:
BPABOOK 82 PAGES

1 .. i .; ; : l
...
.... , .. ;"'
r. ;.
:1' ,,..
\ 11
,-
I I
'"'",it
....
..... .:
I "I ,.1
' .. {
! 't.. ....
!" :. I"
t
Case 1:14-cv-.: ' J95-RJL Document 1-1
... , t
.,
ExbibitB
:.Y
.............. "''\.1
, .. ...,.-... , . r:- -,.
..-:<II ~ I I
1 ~ t ~ \ .,_(t 't .....
.
-:...
'.
...
DEPUTY CLERK
..
t.f .....
, .., ....
... .: ,(.. ' ,.J
, ~ ,. ~ ' ! ,
'\
~ c-,
.\. ;, ~ ..'". .....
::: \ ~ ... 1 ~
,. . .(... ..
'
,.t.
l !t l
I(' : t I
case 1: 14-cv-00995-RJ L Document 6-2 Filed 06/30/14
1 1
DEPUTY CLERK
lllt minute )'t'MJ r:oNl. dne.rmrm. pap11T. maJl, boo\:. nr mbcr Uull,l). dq'IOStlc-d Wtlh
you. }'11\llil'e ccm1uilling u:ndc:r Rc\'Sfit:tl StatUtC'I of the t lnit.W States finl Slimt
-n 540:t. S4U1 cmr.l up to S9,tHW in incs Of! ro l2
:?ffid!l\ir }' .. 'U fiul r.o record. Tit\t'! I R USC !O':' 1 fmcs. imp1 and
disqwllitkation of oW... If yow cowu)' auunu:y lultt )1lU not cu Jifc any dot.."ttmenll hke mine, you nrr
;un tc:sponsiblc, aal oo Any ltltorncy. di!dricl nnmney. or anyone
ttOIU 19\\.'ymng .-oft AfC tdl iJiird .. (U'Itics nnd dn rtUi l\ 10 IJ ln
sbi5 mmu:r UJi they du not rliiJIIftllb=IU Me illW dt.: WIUllf &Jo ool Lhe nulhunty w n:prt:Mml
Mc: ... Aiid pc:rtorn dutia I will hut.tn
tecmd an Afllibvit ofC"riminra.l ('omplAinl qail:".at Y Clar and =nd c;up_y td Your wmpru1y.
Titl&r l.XX.-CRIMJ$,--CH .. 4. CftL\!CS AOAil\iS T JUSTICE
SF.C540l. f.\'l!l')' vihn wlUMiy d&."'A-U'OYJS tll Ul di.'SUuy. ua. w1lh inletlllo or
a.ud carrio.J tlWAY Ml). remrd. p11pcr .. u.r prottrdiOB of n coun t.'f justice. filal or tkposite{i wilh on}
ch.'ll; or officer ofsuctt C:CW"l. or any paf'l!t. at doc"ntmt.. ar rcawd filed ar deposit] i 11ny public
nr wich !\HY juriiciat m' pubH& mill. witbuUL rdC!nm\lc: to llw \'Wtn Dfihe Jl)c.:Uml!'ut
. vr w pey fllie or not mwc tlw1 tW(b thom.:md lhlUm. or suffer imttrlgonmcnt, at
htooc, 001 tncn-lhl'lG fR't.ycaB, orl'I:!Odt [S('t< IJ Tide t X%-- C'H
CRTMES ,\G.AlNST JUSTfCE (Ocsw}'iltg. .
SEC.$407. fftwc ormOR: 41\)' S.tnte ur Tt:rtitor} t.'OruipiN fm tl&a pW'p\1(;: Qfimpedinz;
hindautg. u'beru.rune or ckr..ting, m :!Uy !.he due ..-oi.U$e of jwtic:e in cwy .Smge: 'f
intent tn tO d:tr.m d!:c 'l!qUftl Of lbJ! lilA'S, tlf ki injl!!C bini 4}f prRpcrty ror
OJ kJ enibrco, &rut riht of any pwf'finn. or clsss "" the Cl1UUI fTiUII:GUun ()r
lhc etch of auch pct&On .,. piAninhed by a fi.ne of not leu lb1m i'ivr: nor more: Uum five
thooand dollarn. or hy imrmnonm!:l1t_ v.ith or lmrd lab.'lr. 11ot lCS' lb.llft mK mnnth.'f nor roorc than
tttx. urbybtuh fin.- tuul tlnptintrunmt. Soe f 897'-IV9l,ltlD:4:uun . .S$06-.SSW.I LXX.
- C'Rit\.1ES . .- CH. C'IUMES AOAJNST JUSTICE f("cmpitacy to det"tat nfthe 1nws .,
SEC S4flR. E\t:ry ("'fficer. 1\'ilvinl!l ibe CiJStOOy fJf JUW N:C(ft'd, dotatrnml, ft2pc:r, m- ptric ... -rotng 11pedfi1d '"
5cau.m fifty. fnw- nnd who riau.dlllently b'dtca awn). ,},- wilhdrot'\"5. 6i dt:3trO)'S 'lilY such
papf:r, or pro."Cedtng m lur. onia: Wtth h1m Of ut lus sh;U
J2flY C'lf ruN ftlt:\l'i: dum twn tlllllnnt, ot wffer !m[trinn.-nf!IU etluml tabnr not more than thrt'IC
ur boll'- wtd !:h.:ul morouvcr. forfmilllllS otli.:c wu11Kl fire.,u; nflQ\\;I.fd di$.!U41Hiod flvtn
my offie&:: und lh( Oovcma\eij'i of Unitai Sllllleti. c OL>ttroying by offir;a- in
IU) W1\0C'l'C"'f wntf\liiy :md unlnwfull;y mu!JlillC"e>, M 11;
altern tu do on. or, wHh lu d.., m .nnd nw:1y :my ll!:COrd, t'meell!ng. mnp,
hoo;;.. jll!pt:f'. nJ uthar thing. filed ur dqiO&ticl \ U1 any clerk l){ o!lir;er of all}' e-.run of
lhc llr with any or of l.hc
mudl be renee.; lllldCI' ihiR 1ilfc 4\Y' imjlfur.stfd l1fl! ih.tm lhrt.<c nr
I h) ht.wmg ct.UltJdy t..Lt ttny ntt19- hn.."lk,. d!E!!:Wnt:nl- papef. or
uthet lhm.u. w1Uful1) nnd ur.luwrun)! onnotmi!t. rtmlll\.'4:.!!, ohtitG>mcs, cr
K:ime. s.bull be filled unde-r th* .Ut!o m nut UIJJTt: tlulll Ul!et: ur bnth; ruld shall
tnrfuit t-Js office nnd bt.: disqul!.lifioo from hitlWtt!J Any offi,c undr:r 11'-..; Sl.91es 'I.ACd in
lhis RUh.'iCCttM, lht! lerm .. dot::9 nu1 Hid \Ida the nell:! b_v .!lf!Y flcr3(1n 8S II rct;rcd afliocr
.1flhe Annt'd ofrbu Unitud
.. .
. '! f: .:,, .: , ,: '
...J:.. ...
Exllibit :n
--- -- -ease--t:-14-::cv-. . J95--Rjt -E>o-cumenrt-::j:-t=iled _4 --J=>age-92-ofi:t>9-------
U\MAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT

BPA BOOK ;:)g
DEPUTY ClERl< t)Jf;l/ ...
t Wtnk rnc nf a lllenal fu. pust or ma)'
1M 1lD or Wit) IGL or t;orn;.:ttlmcilll wbic;h
;a (,reach ofle:U3f dul}. or . iutill)' repmed artd is injwioo$ ro
, .. r h)- '"-hich advamaac is taken of annther. mit) become ihe foondarion for
of hud.. ud ss tJ my to spr.a tke of a muerial
ma) be v;romgfW SLI\ a Tex. Aa)p. 1 Q4'J
Rt1ulhn.-/J. t. Hrmt. i 71 R95. utJ'umt.:d I '96 S6t'1J iJ81 loBJ Ui':'i 150 of. L R .
.... f
tPany havins 4iupartor ksmwledgf; who mdvlUit of of
taw teo doceivo him by or Ct!91 ..
,ihle lor rh:u CH1dta:t. r C:lt. l 7. F inu lm:. \' -J/111/(lii#J NIJJIImt!lf ':' :r,
''lt"!tl JJ,
I tmve n6'! more riglht 4'0 detlirte the nf jmisdia:rion wb;da i}D\Ien
nhB!\> will in..:ludc cuunay of record jw.lae VA{; tor ClriOfto) dum ao usurp thAt
which if\ nul ghtt:n. Ott: nnl: tn tbe ulhcs he ln:uun au CvnMlBttAliulll
Y I irgJnw. 6 26J. (/ !121 J. US. v. W1ll. J9gJ US. 100. !
(''( n .. parmer in MY rmdin 3 comp it
w ii Ike of lb-!!1 of lis soveteiggu ehc!mcier. &lid
dMii oe'o privaRc ciriZClm . it Ull tJ lew:& wiib wtftkn w&anm at
ilicl f. cm4 the wbtc:b bt!le11f1g In iRs .II:UtXi821CS to !Uie bu!&ineSts
Or llll be BwrA tt( Unilttd .. 'foalle.-s \'. Pltmtan BcvmA fl/jr;ttJrr}lltJ
.!1 t. :o'i. Wl-ltNIJJJ.J
t l'lu: Uni Stale$ as of' stM Ei jn n dhlerem thaau
"The 1 dtttt:' crt bw:IoneE!S g""lTRs. Bfl is not
fiwn uh rolc:s trne ri ts malt uliefi of by thf:
of i dealin and i hn,ift ro c"9&1fily lilft: oa; te do fftlh!! i1f dom: a
prinetpall in ,ersnn wauld lcr.ive li1n roorn lfcr doubr: C'cur7/ir.4J l'ru.<sl C ;, t'nitr:.J
"iitllt's. JJJII S.
I-Ct.>W'i.tJ mrare su.truks do &i!t!Jl hm wilili!iilisieri!lSU:V. n nu
judicial imuumi!)'. emd unlike (l)fUw. do nat.ttaain jMtistllcdun 0.}1
pme;""!t omr h,l r\rres: C ompgftlt\19 ! hu. llawalrd
1 Jtt fIN)
! ' Wli '}l fiOl nti hjl r;f[ tJrlietol:
!. lit. t_/..'i. JUJ . . HJ I
1
.in[12i
, il'otJi :. reno.n;e
Exhnlhit B
_,.
l{-f:_ ?1.
,:. e
:=
__ J95 RJL DSGHffteAt i l Filed 06/1._ .:4 -Pae-93 of 109
f Judidal Noiiera 1
DEPUIY Cl.ERK
t. ("A judgmena rendered in viola.tion of du.e process is World W'ide
Woad'>eH. o444 U.S. 286,. 291; Nalim'fal Bonlc v. Wiley, 19S US 257; Pennoyer v. Nej
95 us 7 !4.ij
f " ... the requirements of .. ue pnleeSs must be met before Ute court praperly assert in
persoNJm jurisdiction . .,, Wells Fargo v. Wells Fargo, 556 F2d 406. 416.J
f. Notification of legal tesponsibilhy is firse essential uf dlue process of taw."
Ctmn.ally "- Oeneral ConstrB:Jclion Co. 2691 US J85J91J
[. st:atr.rte which forbids or requires doiu of oo acs in term!! so vag"Ue tfa.!ilf.
men of common imclHgence mu..qt gv.ess at ias m ing antd differ s to &m
application, violates rht first essential of dul'! p5"0Ce.ss of !.t. Genua/
Com;tn.u.:tion CJJ . 269 U.S. 385..39 1
[. i& 2PLHUS tM1 the co..-t m.der the court is
obliged to dism.iss the Willy v. L .. oa:;tal Corp . 503 U.S. iJ 1 1 36--37; U.S. v.
'l'e.xas. 252 f. So.xpp 234, .254]
f. "Once jurisdbction is the oou.rt when ftt dearly appears
the court lacks juris ktiori., ahe oot.mt !uthorit}' ao reach merits, but, rather
should the aetion.' .. Melo v. U.S.\' 505 F.2d. !0261
. . -;.>: .. t.}
..,l ""l!' l t .. ;, :,. , s,. lif:.r ...ft l .. f
Filed ... 4 Page 94 of 109
UNITE.fJ STilT$
NSTIJL SEJfV1Cf
.. - .. - ..
LGboi#RecEllJit NurnbM: eoau s
!Oelhmred
DEPUTY CLERK
-----
1 Tmck & Conftma

Your itom was d &imcd m 8:07AM on Jal'tU8f]l27. 2009 in
WASHINGTON. DC 202.23.
Trsdt & Conflnn by Gmall
Gel am&nt S\lent lnfDmltllloft or upda18i1 rm your lmm sam eo l'OU cr 01ttafS bll an.
. --------
ExhibitB
Deeurneflt 1"'1 Rfed-e6fi'" -Page-95-of-1:09
Date stamp
0.. ;,R COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
IN 0 CE
. AT 0
SPA BOOK 3Q . PAGES
-=====--= Soles tpt
Product Sale llntt Final
Dacrtptton City Prtce Price
l1ASIII TON DC 20m .59
Zono-3 First-Class
Letter
1.80 Ol,
Return (Green $2.20
Card)
.... Reg1stered 10.00
Insured Value : 10.00
Artic1a Value : .00
L&bal a: RE4000018D8US
Issue PYX:
12.19
========!'!
Total:
Paid bv:
Cis.fot
C!mnge Cue:
S12.79
$20.00
-81.21
- save th1a recei>t 11s evidlnct of
insurGnCe. For tnforest1an reeardiiiQ
cbl.sstic fn&Ur&nce. visit cur
ctebaito at
U8ilS .com/tnsutinCI/&WStofftce .ht
Order st . at U.S. 1 or
caH 1-801-St 4. Go to
lSPS. cHiknlhfp to print
shippi"' l ls L1ith NStage. For
other inforNtioo ca li
1 .. 80Q-AS .. LPSPS.
Bi UlB:1 752
Clark:34
All sal final on st s and
PostQI
fMfuntis for rant oorvt M 1 v
Thantt you for u1

..
HElP IS SERVE YOO BmtR
Go to: http://gx .ga
TEll US ISOUT VOUR ReCENT
POSTAl EmXEHCE
YOU lPittiOH ectoo'S
'-
Case 1:14-cv-L _ J95-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/1... _4 Page 96 of 109

--------- - ------------------x
Christopher-Earl: Strunk C in esse. )
)
l'laintiff. )
v. )
)
U.S.DEPARTMENTOFSTAm and )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OP HOMELAND )
SECUJUoTYv )
Defendant. )
-------.
-------------- ------------x
In tbe toe Wmuto matter ofihe
United States of America and ex relator
CHi a:s om
poacB t
-----------------.. ------x
lAMAR COUNTY, GA. SUPERIOR COURT
IN <?fi1Ci
dg PAGES:5.4
CLERK /i!J!e1
CBvU Adin o.: (RJL)

2oflltolntor.,sfteplavinDamaod
of tho Unrper Balack Hussein ......_ witii.CC ch..- 37 16-3701 ; (ii) copy of R.clator's
Iteplevin Demand of Gary F ,e lAche the U51111JM1''1 of the Unimd States Depmtment of
eel Chafter 37 16o370J .. Ift an acti oflRepJe'vin lllrougbt to ll'eCOVer pmmaol whch
1M piointiff is entitiM. *nt i9 alleged to havo beelll wnmgftdly taken by or to be m the poueuion of d
W!Hifi,llly .,. dt1 dafeuadrmt. it il to cleuumd poooeuion of the property befme
Winaina tt.. actien; COBle of the acaion mey be. :wwded u the oouri ordem.
c - { (0
Case 1:12J:-cv-L _ J95=RJL----uo-cumenrr::1-File-d-o611-- Page97 at-ron--------
LAMAR COUNTY, GA. SUPERIOR COURT
PJUIO & RECORDEO IN CLER s FICE
m 21 21u:x : o M
iPABO K PAGES
wilh 8CC Chqtrw 31 16-37tl (iii) aeepy ofltelaQr'u Pruz rJiil'
.. ithnerU.. UQIU)IOI"'s efthe UnitM States TNIDUiy with liCC Cha,...37fi6-371L
lebllr GriM !art : Sbak in ese. lwy Speciai ..
uner of,ajwy wif1 2 USC J 746:
(I) ht Plaintiff I Rolrator duly served the respective demand u,.. each ltespcmdeal/ Debror
by CntifiN ltnlm lteceipt:
.-..,-Barack Huuein Obanw in esse .. Receipt No; 71192250000365615338
anter- Clmy l ye Locke in eno ... Receipt No: 70092250000365615277
0 ....... "'Timothy FtanZ Geithner in esse . Receipt No: 7009225000036S61S34S
(2) dlat Plaintiff I Reiator duly serves hereby notice of die respective denumd of each debtor
named hove upon the State ofNew York Seci0tuy of State UDder the Uniform Commeteial Code
Section 9-SOB that pvems pl&1 oftllinJ. Subsectkm (a) (2) the ftnancina statement is filed u a fbdure
filing and the coUateral is goods th aw or are.to become faxtuNs. Sub3ection (a) (2) provides that tho
office in which to file financing st\bmlent to perfect t2 security is cbe office of the Secnwy of
Stato in all other cues. Pursuant eo IUMetion (b) fiitwe filiag for a 1ransmitt. utility would al be
filed with dae Secre!aiy ofSt&W.
(3) That the respective State of New York Secretary of State oversees the U.S. Treasury
Dilirict that haa authority over the property where Plaintiff is in esse d8micile resides.
(4) That a copy ofthoa Neliee is filed with the State ofNew Ymk Secretuy of along
with Ten DoUarfilin fee
.-vember/0, f- -
roe ewY
c Brigham John Bowen. AUSA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF nJSTICE
20 Mas8a:chusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20S38
k Hussein C>bama in esse
c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylwnia Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20SOO
ao s, ............. ""..,... ....
S93 V derbDt A

Wynne P. Kel1y, AUSA
Office of the U.S. Attmmey fcrr the
WasbiJlston Diskict of Colllmilbia
SSS 4th St., N.W.
Daniel E. Shapho
Fl,st J)eputy Secretllr)l ofSrlale
State ofNew York of Sate
One CornrneR:e Plaza
99 Washington A-ve
9
AlbauyD NY 12231..000
Cert RIR No: 70083230000005905"8
- .... .:195---::mtL>ncurnentJ.-=1-r=ile"d C611l _4 Page 98 of 109
til ean or:
E 37 ;
STS ... In an action or replevin btought to recover persomd property to whkb the plaintiff is
entitled, 1hat is alleged to have been wrongfully taken by OTto be in the possession of and
wrongfully detained by the defendant, it is not nec:essay to demand possessicm of the property
before bringing the action; but the costs of the action may be awmded as the conrt onlers.
1t ol 2
r;!XHfBtT C- 3 tJriO
r.?-"-----(I!J.......,....,,.....-t-:l"Zt-=""'Cv=t. .... d95-RJLL>o-corrren-n::1-Fi1erd-ostl'- _4 - Page-99 of 109
STATIEO NEWVO }
)
COVNTY OF KINGS )
DEPUTY CLERK
d
OlFPROP RTV
l1lLING
The .Plaintiff gues the DefeUuts for unjustly detaini ahe P!Bintitrs goods and chattels, the
Usurper. is I le to be Pl'eliMrlt of the Ullited States Tmllee/ AdmiDi8ttator
over r United States Deparbnts S..-ries wilb .._ay ...,.."bilities and the Uuutper havi.Da been
deuied use of Pl&intitrs power of Aamey on January 23, 2009 bias by Usurpers <:Ontinued actions lha1 are void
ab initio, inclllldiaa the waiwn iiJiuell ta Swnitaifi pil Plaiatifrs peraoaa1
pmporty to wit
A) tho Plaintiff's a.nd issLIM upon his birth certifiCate of CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK after the
bil1b ift New YQd( City on J 23, 1947 iua the amount of D9617.511'0y OUJIOIS of ld;
8) tho Plai&tifrs J'riwate D!CCOUDt the US Treasury is secUJed by the Plaintiff's numbencl Bond kept It
&he U.S. Department of Commerce with the Bond number issued by the SociaiSecw'ity Adm.inialralion; and
C) 1be iaf&elt aoarued upoa lbe PlaiatiJra mv . .... year of 1963 duu DOW
coiculaled upon the reccml by the Social EamiDga Staremeat OCJIDFOillldd IDDU8Ily sa the aespeclive
8DDual U.S. Treasury Bend Raie from J963.
ADd the ff c . kdte be mlam liom the Defendant& delivcnd to Piaiadfl; or. if they
Bl'8 eloiped. Ploiotiff 111QY v judDfSft! of their vl!liuo end sU mesne pofitu and damages. whldl be
estimates at dae present value of$21.656,250.00 doliars based upon the cUB'Ient market vaJue of gold
widl aut preHPt value of S.ll7 t!JoY oam.cal of aold, 909 of JBid aoeumulalod iDiaut aa
Plaindft's inveslllllmtintoiXIIIII1JeiVC sin<:e 1963 RL-
Chri!ltopher-Ettrl:
593 V elflt!Bt A.v a W.ZSI

Zl Code exei!!lll
.Emmi: e
Und r rve with tt copy--claim
without. prejudice.

@ln..,_
l"tM a I II
Deet:m=teflt-4-1- Rled 0611& . .:.-+
g

;
"' In an action of replevin brought to ftlCOver nai property m which the pi ndff is
entided. thai i1 alleged to have been wrongftdiy taken by or to be in the possessfion of and
wronsfully detained by the defcndamo it is not necessary to demand possession of the property
before bringing the Qetion: but the costs of the Bdion may bs wmded the oourt olders.
e:l<.H.t81T c - S
.. P-at]e-G-4-100 ------
DEPUTY
&1!9JlllWlJI!., I, Dai'IGtlu-lr beiDB du.ly swam, depose ud y:
v.
OF PROPER'n/
8'\lt\!UlT.II'II FWNG
The PJcimitfsues the IS for unjuady detabf tbe P ntiffs pods and c
Usurper, HuSB'ein is inellga1tlo to be the PN&Ddant oftlae United SQrda 1i I A4lmini
ovet any United Stilet and Secaamies widl ftducimy ibilities die Usurper
denied .-ofPiabdifrs pGWer of AtbJmey on J8!JUSI)' 23. 2009 has by Uswpers contfftUIICI sc:dcms
b including the lv iseued as to Defendant pit P intifi's l*'l!lODI:
propeaty to wit
A) the Plaintifrs Bondi issued upon his birdt eertificatB of CHRISTO HER BAKL STR.UNK the
biJth m New YOltk City on I 23, 1947 in the t of 19687.5troy ofplclt
B) tho Plaintifrs privato the US TIW8UI')' is 80CU!W by tho PIUDtifl's Bead kept
the U.S. Department of Commace with the Bond number issued by the Social Security Admin on: and
C) The . aGC8'IIOd upon the IWntifr Do oinoo tbe ,_.of 19Q DOW
ubded upoa the reDOnl by die Soc" Security Bemiop S compounded 11 the NSpiCiivo
mmual U.S. Treasmy Jaoncl Rs1@ &om 1963.
And Plaimitfcllims abe taken fiom tbe deli
eloigrled, t1mt Plaintift" e jadpent of their value tmd U mesne pzvtii!J which
esdmates at the present value of$21,656.250.00 dollms upon the eqalwlent cummt mllbt volae or ld
with a liCit pnsont v. of SJII7 troy oonctl8 of pld.lmd 909 troy oamtoes of pMiaccanP*"' . oa
inwstmeutinlo-llillcoo 1963

t
Gi :y

Public, State of New
No. 01AN5070990
1msd 10 County I
canamealoft EJrplri8 .1M. e. e 2 e 2
IE'Jt!HIBIT c- Of-/0
93Vo A 11201
. - - Docu111e11t 1-1 Filed 06ti-t: .. ---F>age-102 ofJ.09-----
0:

.tic
of:
593 V erbilt venue- 281
rrooVdya, New Y rk
Zop Code oempi MM lll-32
Chmttopheii"-Earl: Stnank o hi esse
Net carpor io
LfiviliDrt-SuB 1 Am nt
No Thiinll P rrties
LAMAR COUNTY, GA. SUPERIOR COURT
p . fE2
1
JN
PA BOOK .
OEPUtv CLERK (pJPJtl
ON;
_ ..... , ......... - In an aedoo of replevin brought to recover parsoll81 property to which the plaintiff is
entitled, that is alleged to have been wrongfully taken by or to be in the possession of and
Wl'Oil8fully detained by the defendant, it is not neceumy to demaud possession of the property
before bringing the action; but the oosts of the action may be awarded as the cowt orders.
Attachment:
s em s E'"'.uru....-
e Lftvaaa SouD
Uftder fesstVe wi1h the copy-claim

Bv. eae
not a Ctlrporatlon lMng-Sout
- - + Page 103 of 109 -
S HOP YORX)
)
.
.
COUNTY 0 KJINCGS )
DEPUTY Cl CRt<
being duly 8WOn'l;a d !a)'!

D CT OJi' COLUJMBn.\
"
11la Plainlitr st1111 the Defend an for unjustly detaining aile Plaintiffs goods and cb Is. 1M
UA , ill ia iitWglb to be dte PNaidAt of U - TrutJiee I Acbilillildmtor
over a.y Unita S tWi liducimy mpouibilities aDd the Usurpr ltavio& beea
4eni_, use ofPIIintifrs pnrer of Attcmey oa Jan1Jaf)l23, 2009 has by usurper-s contin acti0111 void
milio, iMIHin&IU WaMHs. to pa p . tift's pemoul

A) die Plaintiti's ..0 i__. upn his uta certificate EARL STRUNK after die
llirfa in 'New Vedt City Ju 23. I 947 in IMamsuat of I 7.S ny .unces of lei;
D) Plainlift"s vm. h US k1 OMUIM tht PlaintiWs num Bond
the u.s. t ofeonun.cc with -.ea... wnw iu_. 1w the S.Cial Seamy Admlnislmticm;
C) 1'118 ia ._... a inv iale sinco )'e8l' of1t6J t1uu now
. the Secial Security EanD Slllnant ltdad armaally tit$
I U.S. TNU'MI)' ._.. ftmn 1963.
ANI the irllift' dai tlaat
el...._ t Ploint havejuct&rDintofthair val Gil ,mfats ciaii8QiiiG.,
<lllllllfiiiU 11 the lue ofS21,6S6,250.00 dollarl buetl u,.a tile -.w flVWI'Mt WihllfJ of ld
wilh 1111
PI tift's fimlt 1ince 1963 IDMiM costs.
By:
notmoorporatlan
- - \,. .J90-RJL Document 1-1 Flied 06/!L. .. Page 104 of-ro9' ___ _
-----------....,. , COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
PI LSD & RECORDED IN ICE
OhiVUIOH \iiAilttN
New York
1 i2205313
3568080331..()097
11/10/2009 (718)7480685 12:02:20 PH

Product Sale Uhft Final
Daacr1ption Qty Prtca .Price
OIASHINGTON DC 20230
lone-3 F1rst-Class
Letter
0.70 oz.
Return Rcpt (Green
Card)
0.44
2.30
Certiftad
02 80
l be 1 ft: 10092250000365685277
lssua PVI:
DC 20500 .
Zone-3 F1rst-c1ass
letter
0.10 oz.
Retum Rcpt (Green
Card)
02.30
Certified
Label :
$2.80
10092250000385685338
Issue PVI:
t1ASHINGTDH DC 20220
Zcna--3
letter '
0.70 oz.
.44
-- ----- ,.
Return RCllt (Green 2 30
.
Certified 2.80
Leba 1 : 70092250000385115345
:====::
ISSUI PVI:
.54
$l Wisdo:J 4 1.00 4".00
PSA
=====:::aa
Tota'l:
$21.12
Patd by:
Cash

Order ste at USPS.COS/shop or
call t-800-St 24. Go to
USPS.com/cl11knsh1p to print
eht,..ift{IJ lUlls PJith postllge. For
athlr tnfo tton call
1-f1QO...ASK-ImPS
. JB111f:1 IIIIIIB682
Cl;rk:04
12xHri2>rr c- 't e:>rtO
GES

R&IWn Rf({t!!!l ,.-00
CJ ....... _ ..... 1- - t.2.JO I
R veryP'oo
c (l:ft Q
U'J
Rf $

r ! Gsa-y Fmye wdre In esse :---y
-,.... D/B/A:. UNlTEDSTA'fi!SS'eCRETARY .-] . . l
OF ntE DEPARTM!NTOF COMMERCE.
c:, SUPERVISOR(S), HRlR.S(S), AGENT(S),
ASSJGN(S) In care of:
U.S. gf Com.DlCJ''
t40l Con!titudou N.W.
Wohington, OC 10230

Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Case 1:14-cv-0"'.J95-RJL
UoS. District Court for the District of
in re Strunk Vo U.S. Depmrtment of State et at Sl 08-cv-2234 (RJL)
CER'Im ATEOF RVICJZ
On November 10, 2009, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under pemslty pmswmt to 28 USC
17461)
Am the petitioner herein being pro se without being an auomey caused the !ei'Vice of three (3)
complete 8eiS of the Attachmenlls annexed to JUD Cil N CE declared November I 0
11
2009,
and did place complete feel in ealed folder properly addressed with proper postap to be served
by USPS mail upon:
Wynne P. Kelly, AUSA
Office of the U.S. for the
SSS 4th Sto N.W.
Was11inpm. D.C. 20530
Brigham John Bowco. AUSA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF RJSTICB
20 MassEhusetts Avenue, NW
1Salrac Hwmein Obama
c/o The White Howe
U 600 Pemmyllwxnia Avetnlllle NW
w hinswn, oc :rosoo
JDiiKOel E. Slllelpn
Firat Deputy Secretary ofState
S Ymt.Depetmeot ofS'Wt@
One Commertee P'l.aD
99 WuhBDgtcn
Albawy, NY 12231-0001
Cert RJR No: 70013230000005905998
rBt T c - tCJ or f
0
Document 1-1 - Filed 06/1-c. __ 4 Page 106 of 109
IJ\f\ COUNTY. GA SUPERIOR COURT
.Fi l e & OHDED IN CLERI$
I AL
BPA BOOK Z
CRourt of dJrt of Nei!D
J\pptliatt utakm: ecoa1ll ubldal
PErfF.R 8. SKELOS, J.P.
TIIOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
L. PRISCllLA HALL. JJ.
Ml70416
1-:/51

Cluis\Opber-Eut Stnmk, ppeUanl,
DECISION &. OROF.R. ON MOTION
v New Vork State Bon.rd of Blectioahl,
ct al., retpOndenls.
(IndeK No. 6500/11)
Motkln by tlho sppcl1mll pm se. inter alia, "fcrlllivilitm dw: on nppoals
from three orders of lhe Supreme Court. Kin6s County, daled April I B. 2012, March 29, 2013. and
December 9. 2013, reDpectively.
Upon the papers filed in suppon of the motion and the PBPC"' in opposition
thento, it is
ORDERED thsllhe fi\OIWD il denied; and it is fUnher.

fromthootdurdawd Mmcb 29,20\3 (AppeUatet>iwion Docket No. 20U-0633S). isenhqr:dwti\
Mny S, 2014. and the record or apptndiK and me appellant's brief must be served and filed on or
befon:1 that dote.
SKU)S, .U.P., DICKERSON, Lf.VENTHAL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Clerk of the court
Man:h 4, 2014
STRL'NK vNE\V YORX.STATEBOARD OF
EXliiXBJr'Ir D
'/IN z. .
Case 1:14-cv-CJ .... Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL_ 't Page 107 of 109
Subject Fw: NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE: USDOJ new case filing USDC-DCD OSC June 10, 2014 in matters related to US-DOS and pending appeals USCA-DCC
andSCOTUS
From: Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris agent (cestrunck@yahoo.com)
To: Brigham.Bowen@usdoj.gov;
Cc: hvanallen@hvc.rr.com; mlchael@mshrimpton.co.uk; paufireysecret@gmail.com;
nycjohn123@msn.com; jnsampson@netecin.net; jrlc@optonline.net; ForexJon@comcaslnet; tweety@fastm8l1.us; leo young 1999@yahoo.com;
Bee: unpopularwisdom@gmaY.com; liforjone@hotmail.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com; pamelabarnett@hushmail.com; jonlevy@hargray.com; apuzzo@erols.cam;
marco@enktesis com: aprelle@hush.com;
Date: Monday, June 9, 2014 1:49PM
Dear Mr. Bowen,
This is notice of our intent to apply for an order to show cause before the
Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ as we have related to the FOIA case
08-cv-2234 tomorrow morning at 11:30 AM Tuesday or as soon as counsel may be heard
in the early afternoon for Petitioners wish for the above aforementioned reasons,
this Court should Mandate and Order the U.S. Department of State to provide a
non-immigrant visa, US Copyright Office release the actual certified copy of the
1995 copyright of "Dreams From My Father" and or agencies under its control to
release documents proving ultra vires acts of defendants and or their agents to
spoliate conceal and destroy records and interfere with the conduct of judic1al
proceedings and provision of justice; and that this court take supplemental
jurisdiction over the NYS BOE to immediately order the turn-over of the documents
referred to above regarding the oulrageous use of the "born a citizen" Lerm rather
than the Constitutionally mandated use of the "natural-born Citizen" term of art to
be used exclusively as to the eligibility of a "natural-born Citizen" private
citizen of the United States for POTUS and who is no longer surety-indenture of the
debtor owned by the United States in service of the creditors to the United States'
debt under the provision of martial process with 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. S(b) and
related law, and that the expert testimony by SHRIMPTON and PAUL EDWARD
IREY be scheduled for hearing in regards to a preliminary injunction and for further
and different equity relief.
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
transmitting utility cHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Plaintiff in NYS SC Kings Cty Index Nos.: 29642-2008,
6500-2011, 21948-2012, the Executor and Settlor for
the Express Deed In Trust To The United States Of America,
located at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - PMB 281 --
"SURETY NO MORE" WEBSITE:
http: I org/
On Friday, June 6, 2014 3:32 PM, Orfy Taitz <orly taltz@gmaif.com> wrote:
Please, see attached.
United Kingdom is one of 38 countries for which US visas are not required at all. So, I am questioning why Mr. Shrimpton would state
that he was denied US visa, if visas are not required for the British citizens
search button
Case
Document 1-1 Filed 06/1L. -+ Page 108 of 109
Sl:!t Locationgraphic
Create a profile to customize visa information for temporary
visitors to the United States.
Where will you apply for a nonimmigrant visa?
What country/authority issued your passport?
I
&. O.OSC l I
____ __,_ c ear Form
Close X
Print
Email
Visa Waiver Program
Chile Joins Visa Waiver Program
Beginning March 31, 2014, Chileans meeting the criteria of the Visa
Waiver Program may travel to the United States for business or
tourism, for up to 90 days, without a visa.
The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) allows citizens of participating countries* to
travel to the United States without a visa for stays of 90 days or less, when
they meet all requirements explained below. Travelers must be eligible to use
the VWP and have a valid Electronic System for Travel Authorization
(ESTA)approval prior to travel.
If you are eligible to travel on the VWP, but prefer to have a visa in your
passport, you may still apply for a visitor (B) visa.
Requirements for using the Visa Waiver Program (VWP)
You must meet all of the following requirements tQ travel to the United States
on the VWP:
Expand All
Case 1:14-cv-L .... -::195-RJL
Document 1-1 Filed 06/lL. .+ Page 109 of 109
Travel Purpose Must be Permitted on a VISitor (B) Visa
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:32AM, Bill Van Allen <hvanallen@hvc.rr.com> wrote:
RE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/224589500/USCA-DCC-13-5160-Van-Allen-v-DVA-Et-AI-Date-Stamped-Filed-Motion-of-Additionai-
Expansion-of-Time-to-File-en-Bane-Brief
Dear D<BbrJJ&:Office for the District of Columbia
This Is NOTICE OF INTENT to jointly file along with Christopher Earl Strunk SRL a new federal district court case with an
Order to Show Cause in US District Court for the District of Columbia District as early as next Tuesday June 10 2014.
In the matter of US Department of State refusing to grant a visa to Michael Shrimpton - British Barrister- to travel to the
United the purpose of appearing as an expert witness in NYSUCS Kings Civil Supreme (Strunk v Paterson and related
state caseS).-
Regarding British and international immigration law adjudication including immigration court use of DNA evidence to establish
citizenship familiar relationship and specifically related to the legal probability and the current and intense federal and state
constitution!t .. controversies involviQa DOS. DOD and OVA and regarding the constitutional vetting of current CINC/POTUS.
Ti'avd Purposes Not Permiftea on VISa Wa1ver Program-
Examples:
Is/ Citizen or National of a VWP Designated Country*

national of VWP-participant The following

351 Nal\\f es are Visa Waiver Program participants:
Hurley, NY 12443
845

Flag of Australia Australia
Flag of Austria Austria
B
Flag of Belgium Belgium
Flag of Brunei Brunei
H
Flag of Hungary Hungary
I
Flag of Iceland Iceland
Flag of Ireland Ireland
Flag of Italy Italy
J
Dr Orly Flag of Japan Japan
29839 ste 100
Rancho Sao\bl CA 92688 L
ph Flag of Latvia Latvia
orlytaitzey,q.com Flag of
Liechtenstein Liechtenstein
Flag of Denmark Denmark Flzsg of Lithuania Lithuania
Flag of
E Lithuania LUxembourg
Flag of Estonia Estonia
F
Flag of Finland Finland
Flag of France France
G
Flag of Gennany Germany
Flag of Greece Greece
M
Flag of Malta Malta
Flag of Monaco Monaco
N
Flag of
Netherlands Netherlands
Flag of New Zealand New
Zealand
Flag of Norway Norway
p
Flag of Portugal Portugal
s
Flag of San Marino San
Manno
Flag of Singapore Singapore
Flag of Slovakia Slovakia
Flag of Slovenia Slovenia
Flag of South Korea South
Korea
Flag of Spain Spain
Flag of Sweden Sweden
Flag of
Switzerland Switzerland
T
"n!llwan 1\:llwan
u
Flag of United
Kingdom United Kingdom

USCA-DCC 13-5059-OP Motion For Judicial Notice and Renewal of Original Proceeding

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

USCA-DCC 13-5059-OP Motion For Judicial Notice and Renewal of Original Proceeding

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

mav have granted lhe some. And

national of VWP-participant The following

Você também pode gostar