Quentin-E: Thornton Attorney in Fact for Secured Party &

ens legis, DEBTO o!erates as an acti"ity of co##on ight se!arate and a!art fro#
Federal E$uity% This #atter has &een ad'udicated%
Sch(are "% Board of E)a#iners, *+* ,%S% -*., -*/% %%0The !ractice of la( 1#edicine etc%2 is not (ithin the
States grace to regulate%0 The practice of law (medicine etc.) is an occupation of
common right as per Sims v. Ahrens, 271 S.W. 72 (1!2")% 3o State in the
,nion of the ,nited States of A#erica licenses la(yers, only the State Bar, (hich issues
a !ri"ate cor!oration ty!e of 0,nion 4ard05certificate for !ay#ent of dues5fees% 1See also
E)Parte "% 6arland, 7 8all ***, *9: 1;.<<2, (hich authori=es only the !ractice of la( in
the courts as an officer of the court and a #e#&er of the 'udicial &ranch of go"ern#ent,
to re!resent (ards of the court such as infants and !ersons of unsound #ind and as a
!u&lic defender in cri#inal cases%2 %%%#annot license an occupation of common
right ...$edfield v. %isher, 2!2 &. '1(, '17)'1!
0Occu!ations of co##on right AE not ta)a&le% The !ractice of #edicine and la( are
occu!ations of co##on right% An income ta* is neither a propert+ ta*, nor a ta* on
occupations of common right, ,ut is an e*cise ta*. %%%06ross inco#e ta)
unconstitutional%0 1See also Sch(are "% Board of E)a#iners, *+* ,S -*., -*/% %%%That an
attorne+ cannot represent an+ private citi-en nor an+ ,usiness as the State cannot
license the practice of law. ....That an attorne+ can onl+ ,e allowed to practice law
in the courts to represent .wards. of the court such as infants and persons of
unsound mind as per #orpus /uris Secundum, 0ol. 7, Sect. 1..)
The definition of an e)cise ta) is found in the su!re#e 4ourt case of Flint "% Stone Tracy,
--: ,S ;:9: %%0E)cises are ta)es laid u!on the #anufacture, sale or consu#!tion of
co##odities (ithin the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations and
upon corporate privileges> the re$uire#ent to !ay such ta)es in"ol"es the e)ercise of
privilege and if ,usiness is not done in the manner descri,ed, no ta* is pa+a,le, and
it is this privilege which is the su,2ect of the ta* and not the mere ,u+ing, selling, or
handling of goods3 See +* A?*d ;;<* for the "alidity and construction of statutes or
rules conditioning right to !ractice la( u!on residence or citi=enshi!% 1Occu!ations of
natural5co##on right are 45T a su,2ect of an e*cise6income ta*..'1 #./.S. art. 122)
The definition of an e)cise ta) is found in the su!re#e 4ourt case of Flint "% Stone Tracy,
--: ,S ;:9: %%0E)cises are ta)es laid u!on the #anufacture, sale or consu#!tion
of co##odities (ithin the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations
and upon corporate privileges> the re$uire#ent to !ay such ta)es in"ol"es the
e)ercise of privilege and if ,usiness is not done in the manner descri,ed, no ta* is
pa+a,le, and it is this privilege which is the su,2ect of the ta* and not the mere
,u+ing, selling, or handling of goods3 See +* A?*d ;;<* for the "alidity and
construction of statutes or rules conditioning right to !ractice la( u!on
residence or citi=enshi!% 1Occu!ations of natural5co##on right are 45T a
su,2ect of an e*cise6income ta*..'1 #./.S. art. 122)
Attorney at la( "ersus 4ounsellor at la(% @t is a&solutely a#a=ing (hat has &een
unco"ered%
First there (ere &arristers 1counsellors-at-la( in A#erica2 and attorneys-at-la(% @n so#e
of the states initially they (ere Ae!t se!arate, &ut then they started using attorneys and
counsellors-at-la( together in one !erson and he (ould ad'ust to the !articular issue%
They (ere ad#itted BlicensedC to !ractice in the courts &y the 'udges or 'ustices of that
!articular court, (ith the 'udges &eing !u&lic officers in that ti#e fra#e%
Attorne+ at law7
;% e!resents only - stands in your !lace or stead in &usiness or legal issues%
-% 4o attorne+s allowed in a criminal trial, e)ce!t to #aAe &ail%
*% Das Attorney fees - costs #oney and can use Attorney ?ien%
7% Officer of the court
+% 4an not challenge the court (ithout e)!osure to sanctions such as 'udge &eing a !u&lic
officer, etc%
<% TaAes o"er the case and you are at his #ercy on ho( the case is run%
9% De (ill raise no issue that he dee#s the 'udge (ill &e unha!!y (ith usually%
.% 4o-counsel is the sca# they atte#!t to use to "alidate the lacA of Assistance of
4ounsel% Eou can not counsel your self%
#ounsellor at law7
;% Assists onl+ and is to protect and defend his client, can not represent%
-% 4ounsellors at la( are used in cri#inal trials - access to is an a&solute !art of a Trial &y
Fury fro# the first !art of arraign#ent on%
a% 4an asA $uestions on your &ehalf,
&% 4an instruct you (hat $uestions to asA
c% @f the client instructs the 4ounsellor at la( to challenge the 'udge or court, he can do it
(ithout &eing sanctioned 1done correctly of course2
7% Officer of the court%
+% Does not charge, (orAs on gratuity% 4an not sue for Attorney fees%
<% @s learned in the la(%
9% @t is a !osition of Donor to &e a 4ounsellor at ?a(%
.% @t is a le"el a&o"e an Attorney at la(%

,nlicensed Practice of ?a(

There is a &ig difference &et(een a Pri"ate Attorney and a P,B?@4 ATTO3EE% A
Pri"ate Attorney o!erates &y and through an assigned Po(er-of-Attorney instru#ent
for a s!ecific or general function% A Pri"ate Attorney is also Ano(n as an Attorney-in-
Fact% The P,B?@4 ATTO3EE is an officer of the court in $uestion and re!resents
the trust created &y Statute or the Statutorily 4onstructed Sche#e through the fascist
1i%e% !ri"ate &usiness controlled2 go"ern#ent that has !ut u! a &onding syste# for
each cri#e &e they #alu# in se or regulatory infraction% The &89:;# ATT5$4<=
re!resents the &89:;# 0<SS<: created &y and through the Social Security grantor
trust agree#ent co##only Ano(n &y the ,%S% Treasury as the P,B?@4 GESSE?
1PG2% The PG o!erates through E$uity and (ithin S!ecial Hariti#e5Ad#iralty
'urisdiction 1la( for#2 and therefore affects the #an in his ca!acity as the Authori=ed
e!resentati"e% Only #e#&ers of the State BA Associations are authori=ed to
re!resent the PG as the ,SA6 is the Trustee for the PG% This is (hy #e#&ers of ice
and Associates cannot re!resent the P,B?@4 GESSE?% This is (hy #e#&ers of ice
and Associates can re!resent and assist the #an in ca!acity as the Authori=ed
e!resentati"e 1A2 for the P,B?@4 GESSE?% Do(e"er, the secular courts and the
P,B?@4 A6E34@ES that regulate the P,B?@4 GESSE?S do not usually se!arate the
PG fro# the A% So ho( far can a non-Bar #e#&er go in re!resentationI
The case of Hale vs. Sawyer, 13E2 79 &ar&% ;;< 1;.<<2, illustrates ho( far that
Pri"ate relationshi! #ay go% J@t is $uite clear that it is the s!irit and intent of the
constitution, of the statutes, and the !ractice of the courts, that no !erson shall !ractice
as an attorney or counsellor in actions in the courts &ut such as ha"e &een found
$ualified, u!on e)a#ination &y the Su!re#e 4ourt% The a!!lication for that !ur!ose
#ust &e &ased u!on citi=enshi!, the age of t(enty-one years, and good #oral
character% These $ualifications, follo(ed &y an order of the court for ad#ission, after
the court &eco#e satisfied of the !ossession of sufficient learning and a&ility, and the
signing of the roll, and su&scri&ing and taAing the constitutional oath, constitute the
right, and authori=e the !ractice, &y attorneys and counsellors in all the courts of
record of this state% % % %But this case need not e"en &e !ut u!on that ground% @f this
case (as in a court of record, the signing this notice in the #anner as e)!lained &y the
affida"its, @ thinA, (ould ha"e &een (ithout o&'ection, and (ould &e no "iolation of
the letter or s!irit of the constitution, the statute, or the rules of !ractice% A person
ma+ ,e an attorne+ in fact, for another, without ,eing an attorne+ at law3 a
distinction well understood as e*isting in all >inds of ,usiness transactions. They
are so#eti#es distinguished &y attorneys in fact, or !ri"ate attorneys, and attorneys at
la(, or pu,lic attorne+s% The for#er is one (ho is authori=ed &y his !rinci!le,
either for so#e !articular !ur!ose, or to do a !articular act, not of a legal character%
The latter is e#!loyed to a!!ear for the !arties to actions, or other 'udicial
!roceedings, and are officers of the courts%K
This case 1Hale vs. Sawyer2 is a&out a !arty that signed !leadings on &ehalf of a
defendant% Do( close to the line can a !ri"ate Attorney goI A !leading Jsigned as
LH%S%, Defendant, 8%F%S%, Dis Attorney,M is "alid, though 8%F%S% is not an attorney at
la(%K
@t is truly a#a=ing ho( #any P,B?@4 ATTO3EES do not Ano( the difference
&et(een P,B?@4 and Pri"ate Attorney status% @ ha"e had to !ersonally !ro"ide
&riefings on this su&'ect and the su&'ect of the ,%S% citi=en agree#ent to a nu#&er of
P,B?@4 ATTO3EES% Part of the ans(er to this dile##a can &e found in 4or&in
on 4ontracts in 4ha!ter -/%
Dr% Pe!!er 4o% "% 4ro(, <-; S%8%-d 7<7,7<+ 1Te) A!!%N8aco ;/.;, no (rit2%
0Plaintiff !lead defendant (as a cor!oration% Defendant did not deny &y "erified
!leading !ursuant to BT4PC +- and /* %%% that it (as not a cor!oration> thus, such fact
(as esta&lished%0 Therefore, you are !resu#ed that you are a cor!oration 1i%e% a trust2
until you !ro"e other(ise%
Bl% 4o## Gol ;, 4h ;., all trusts are cor!orations and "ice "ersa%
T@T?E ;. - 4@HES A3D 4@H@3A? PO4ED,E, PAT @ - 4@HES,
4DAPTE ; - 6E3EA? POG@S@O3S, Section /% Gessel of the ,nited States
defined, ??vessel of the 8nited States??, as used in this title, means a "essel &elonging
in (hole or in !art to the ,nited States, or an+ citi-en thereof, or any cor!oration
created &y or under the la(s of the ,nited States, or of any State, Territory, District,
or !ossession thereof%