Room 165, Arts and Sciences Building 3 Minutes of the Meeting 4 5 Last July 9, 2014, the University of the Philippines Cebu Student Council 2014 6 2015 conducted its 12 th official meeting at the Student Council Office. The meeting was 7 called to order at 4:30PM with 10 members present and 4 absent. The meeting was 8 presided by the Student Council Vice-Chairperson, Mr. France Kevin Degamo. 9 10 The following were present in the meeting: 11 France Kevin Degamo (Vice-Chairperson) 12 Vince Francis Dingding (Councilor) 13 Angel Rose Trocio (Councilor) 14 Chatch Calderon (Councilor) 15 Cristine Hellery Libres (4 th Year Representative) 16 Christine Meriz (4 th Year Representative) late; arrived at 8:30, City Hall event 17 Carmen Jonahville Matarlo (3 rd Year Representative) 18 Patrick Byron Gattoc (2 nd Year Representative) 19 Hannah Lois Tidalgo (2 nd Year Representative) late; arrived at 5:15; went out 20 11pm 21 Damsel Mondido (FA Representative) 22 23 The following were absent in the meeting: 24 April Dyan Gumanao (Chairperson) went home to Kidapawan 25 Darl Octa Henessa Santos (Councilor) went home to Biliran 26 Justine Luis Raphael Balane (3 rd Year Representative) went home to Cagayan 27 de Oro 28 Narlyn Dura (FA Rerpresentative) still in Samar 29 30 I. CALL TO ORDER 31 The meeting was called to order at 4:30PM. Quorum was established. 32 33 A. AGENDA 34 35 After the quorum was reached, the meeting was called to order and Vice 36 Chairperson Degamo presented the following agenda. 37 38 1. Business Arising 39 Reading of the Minutes of the 11 th SC meeting 40 2. STS Reports 41 Appeals 42 Survey 43 Campaign 5:30 44 PM 45 3. Cookout Matters 1 46 hour 47 4. Rise for Education 50 minutes 48 5. SOYA 2014 20 minutes 49 6. USC 4 30 minutes 50 7. RPHER discussion 1 51 hour 52 8. Stand on STS 1 53 hour 54 9. Additional Committees 15 minutes 55 10. OM 30 minutes 56 - Disposal Committee 57 - RAFI Invitation 58 - AYLC 59 - Integrity Forum 60 - Wifi Report 61 62 Councilor Dingding proposed that the RPHER discussion be transferred 63 before STS Stand making to make sure that the other councilors who will be 64 catching up can join the meeting. Vice Chairperson Degamo and Representative 65 Libres added the assignment of additional committees and letter of invitations in 66 the agenda, respectively. 67 68 Councilor Calderon proposed that there has to be a time cap in each of the 69 items to be discussed. Then, Vice Chairperson Degamo assigned estimated time 70 caps to each of the items. (Please refer to the agenda for the summary of the 71 time cap assignments.) 72 73 Representative Gattoc moved to approve the order of the agenda of the 74 meeting with proposed amendments and was duly seconded by Councilor 75 Calderon. 76 77 B. ORDER OF BUSINESS 78 79 1. BUSINESS ARISING 80 a. Reading of the minutes of 11 th SC Meeting 81 82 Councilor Trocio, the acting Secretary General of the 10 th 83 official meeting, presented the minutes she wrote. Vice 84 Chairperson suggested that the summary of the STFAP 85 Discussion by Councilor Dingding should be moved to the 86 appendix. 87 88 Councilor Dingding moved to approve the minutes of the 10 th 89 official meeting with the proposed amendments. The motion 90 was seconded by Representative Gattoc. 91 92 2. STS 93 a. APPEALS 94 95 Last July 7, Councilor Dingding attended the appeals 96 committee meeting to entertain the STS appeals submitted by 97 incoming freshmen students. As the student representative in 98 the committee, he asserted that all of the appeals should be 99 granted. However, out of 13 appeals, only 12 were granted. 100 101 Additionally, Councilor Dingding said that the council is 102 deliberating the appeals subjectively. He reported one case 103 wherein it was so easy for OSA to investigate on a students 104 case since the students sister happens to be a UP Cebu 105 student before; so, it was easy for them to contact his family. 106 107 Vice Chairperson Degamo asserted that this but a very 108 subjective system of entertaining students appeals. There has 109 to be an equal treatment to all students especially to those who 110 are applying for an appeal. 111 112 Also, during the meeting, Councilor Dingding said that 113 Associated Dean for Academic Affairs Almocera said that the 114 appeals committee should take the word of the students written 115 appeals. 116 117 Councilor Dingding said that the council should urge 118 students to appeal because the initial bracket assignments were 119 only based from the AI (Artificial Intelligence)s assessment. 120 121 The committee also talked about the approval of Student 122 Assistants slots for the incoming semester. 123 124 Representative Gattoc said that on July 22, the OSR and 125 KSUP will be conducting a system-wide protest action for the 126 release of STS appeals. The SC is highly encouraged to 127 conduct an activity along with the scheduled activity. 128 129 b. Survey 130 Councilor Trocio reported that only 315 students 131 answered the STS survey through the google form. Majority of 132 the people who answered are batch 2013. She also pointed out 133 that it will be a challenge to the batch reps to distribute the 134 survey. Batch 2011 has the least number of respondents. 135 136 She also reported an initial results of the survey: lesser 137 students are assigned to full discount with stipend. From the last 138 years 15, only 8 are now assigned to the said bracket. 139 140 Also, majority of the respondents were ranting about their 141 STS results according to the survey. Councilor Dingding said 142 that those who answered they were satisfied with their 143 brackets said so because a.) They can afford the tuition and b) 144 they can afford but given the chance, they would still opt to have 145 for a lower bracket. 146 147 Those who answered dissatisfied with their brackets 148 stated the following reasons: a) even if they have large incomes, 149 they will still opt to loan because the tuition is too heavy to pay, 150 b) bracket sliding, c) they did not apply for STS. Additionally, 19 151 students did not apply because they a) are UP Faculty 152 dependents, b) did not apply for STS because they will still be 153 assigned to bracket A. 154 155 c. Campaign 156 Councilor Dingding said that the council shall be posting 157 another #KwentongSTS. 158 159 160 3. Rise for Education 161 162 As the SCs representative during the Rise for Education 163 alliance orientation, it was Representative Gattocs turn to discuss it 164 to the body. He said that the alliance is composed of individuals 165 and organizations who believe that education is a right and it has to 166 be affordable and accessible to all Filipino citizens. 167 168 During the said orientation, the alliance was formed with 10- 169 15 individuals and various organizations based within and outside 170 UP Cebu. 171 172 After the discussion, the floor was opened for 173 manifestations. Councilor Trocio said that the council should join 174 the alliance as it is aligned with the mandate of the Student Council 175 to the constituents and the Filipino people. 176 177 Councilor Calderon said that the alliance can be an aid in 178 protecting the students rights and welfare especially on issues of 179 campus repression, STS flawed implementation. 180 181 Councilor Dingding said that the issues that UP is facing is 182 not isolated to the intensifying crisis on the Philippines educational 183 system. Hence, it is but ample for the council to join the alliance to 184 be able to unite in a common point with other schools and 185 individuals. 186 187 Representative Libres also said that this is one way of 188 getting involved in the issues of the youth sector. 189 190 The body then decided in consensus that the council shall 191 forward its membership to the Rise for Education Alliance. Vice 192 Chairperson Degamo said that he will upload the orientation 193 powerpoint in the SC group for further reference. The council shall 194 be sending a representative to the first R4E meeting this July 11, 195 6pm at McDo JY. 196 197 4. Cookout Matters 198 This agendum is off the record. 199 200 5. SOYA 2014 201 202 Councilor Dingding said that the State of the Youth Address 203 is an activity for the youth to cast a verdict on President Aquinos 204 performance for 2013-2014. 205 206 In addition, the SC shall be holding a SONA Viewing on July 207 28. The Logistics Committee is assigned to reserve either AVR 2, 208 AS Lobby or ILC, whichever is available. The venue is expected to 209 be reserved by July 18. 210 211 Representatives Matarlo and Libres were tasked to write a 212 letter to Dean Corro to allow the UP faculties and workers to have a 213 half-day of work and the SBP students to attend after the pretest for 214 the SONA Viewing. The rationale of the activity and the program 215 should also be attached to the said letter. 216 217 The UP Political Science Society and the UP Workers and 218 Faculties Union will also be invited. 219 220 6. USC 4 and Counting 221 Four USC students are in threat for expulsion because of the 222 solidarity they have shown to the GSO Workers who conducted a 223 picket last May in front of the USC-TC campus. These students are 224 currently facing a case by the USC OSA because they were not on 225 the side of the USC administration. 226 227 Representative Libres said that it is imperative that the council 228 should release a statement of support because as UP students, we 229 fully understand how important it is to have freedom of expression. 230 231 Councilor Trocio said that regardless if they staged a protest or 232 they showed solidarity, it is their basic constitutional right and no 233 one, not even the Catholic Church or the USC Administration or its 234 priests, can bar them from doing so. Councilor Calderon said that 235 this is not isolated to human rights violation. 236 237 Representative Matarlo and Vice Chairperson Degamo 238 volunteered to make the statement. The call-to-actions drop the 239 case, uphold freedom of expression and no to campus repression 240 will be highlighted in the said statement. 241 242 243 Time check: 8:30 PM. Motion for recess for 30 minutes. 244 245 Meeting resumes at 9:11 PM. 246 247 7. RPHER Discussion 248 249 Councilor Trocio was assigned to discuss the Roadmap for 250 Public Higher Education Program, a flagship reform program of the 251 Aquino administration for public Higher Education Institutions 252 (HEIs). The discussion also aims to expose the mechanisms to 253 institutionalize the reform and its effects to public HEIs, such as the 254 Local and State Universities and Colleges. 255 256 Before proceeding to the discussion, Councilor Trocio asked 257 everyones points of expectation and their brief explanation on the 258 importance of SUCs. 259 260 EXPECTATIONS On SUCs 1. Degamo To gain new wisdom since I have read the full-text of RPHER; to know its implications of students who come from different socio- economic status SUCs ask for very cheap tuition, abot kaya and maka- masa 2. Dingding To know if RPHER is the answer to the rising cost of education in the country SUCs is the hope of those who cant afford the high cost of education 3. Calderon Grasp RPHER, its significance and its impact to the students SUCs give accessible education to poor and unfortunate students. Also aids in building the future for countrys national development 4. Trocio To grasp the principle of RPHER; to whom is it serving for; hopefully an interactive discussion; everyone should be attentive Students run to SUCs when they can no longer afford the tuition of other private schools 5. Libres To know what, what for, and implication for whom SUCs cater quality and accessible education for the poor 6. Meriz To know its gist; to discuss advantages and disadvantages; to serve as foundation for our stand SUCs are subsidized thus it makes education accessible 7. Matarlo To be able to recognize the problem and find a solution to address this problem SUCs are for students who can afford cheap yet quality education 8. Gattoc To be able to expose the advantages and disadvantages of the policy SUCs provide education for all; it makes education democratic and accessible; serve poor yet deserving students 9. Tidalgo To be able to understand RPHER and to have deeper knowledge on the policy SUCs provide opportunity that is not only for those who cant afford education; provides cheap and accessible education 10. Mondido To be able to look into the flaws of the policy and to aid the council in making an STS stand SUCs provide cheap yet affordable education 261 To view the full text of Councilor Trocios discussion, please 262 proceed to this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/233913179/A- 263 Discussion-on-the-Roadmap-for-Public-Higher-Education-Reform- 264 RPHER 265 266 After the discussion, councilors expressed their insights on 267 the discussion and the topic. 268 269 Representative Tidalgo said that she is agitated because the 270 RPHER is not serving the mandate of the government to provide 271 state subsidy for SUCs. 272 273 Councilor Dingding said that socialized tuition and financial 274 schemes are institutionalized by RPHER to reduce state subsidy by 275 passing the burden of rich students to pay for the poor students 276 education. 277 278 Representative Meriz expressed that RPHER is weird and 279 ironic. RPHER is manifesting itself as something that is for the 280 people, that it is efficient for the students and SUCs but in reality, it 281 is just for the benefit for the government by giving reasons to lessen 282 the budget for education. 283 284 Representative Gattoc said that RPHER is contrary to what 285 the council has been agreeing during the expectation-setting part of 286 the discussion. President Noys RPHER is giving the burden of 287 SUCs to find mechanism that would somehow cover up with the 288 insufficient budget given by the government. As a result, SUCs are 289 slowly sweeping away those who are in dire need of accessible 290 education. 291 292 Councilor Calderon said that we should look into the 293 misallocation of budget. The government is slowly lessening the 294 budget they allocate to the education sector which is their 295 responsibility. 296 297 Representative Libres expressed her disappointment to the 298 policy because it enables the government to abandon its role to 299 provide a life worth living. She said that education is a tool to get 300 out of the quagmire of poverty and that the government should re- 301 evaluate its priorities such as focus on social services, especially in 302 education. 303 304 8. Councils stand on STS 305 306 Vice Chairperson Degamo proposed that to be able to facilitate 307 the deliberation efficiently, the council should come up with points 308 of agreements on the following points: 309 a. STS as whether or not a manifestation of lack of budget; 310 b. STS as whether or not a manifestation of tuition and other 311 fees increase / income generating project; and 312 c. STS as whether or not a manifestation of state neglect. 313 314 Vice Chairperson Degamo said that the body should not only 315 discuss the principle of STS but also its implementation. 316 317 The body moved to approve on this proposal. Then, the body 318 opened the discussion for each items. 319 320 a. STS as lack of budget 321 322 Councilor Dingding: UP and other SUCs have been experiencing 323 budget cuts through the years. As for UP, we have discovered 324 during the RPHER discussion that there has been a deficit of 9 325 billion pesos from the UPs 18.1 billion pesos proposal. 326 327 Councilor Calderon: Only 2% GNP has been allocated to 328 education, yet according to UNESCO it has to allocate 6% to be 329 able to fully support the education sector. 330 331 Representative Gattoc: The implementation of STS is a mechanism 332 for the UP Administration to support itself from the lack of budget. 333 334 Councilor Trocio: The implementation of STS roots back to 1983 335 when UP no longer receives sufficient budget from the government 336 and as a result, the UP admin is forced to institutionalize tuition 337 schemes to partly pass the burden of making students, Iskolars ng 338 Bayan, to pay for their education. 339 340 Representative Libres: We actually have enough money but there 341 is misallocation. The government prioritizes debt-serving rather 342 than providing more budget to education. 343 344 Councilor Dingding moves that the council approve, in 345 consensus, that STS is a manifestation of state neglect. Motion was 346 seconded by Representative Gattoc. No objections were made. 347 348 b. STS as tuition and other fees increase / income generating 349 project (TOFI/IGP) 350 351 Representative Matarlo: Based on STS history, tuition rate has 352 increased across time. From P40/unit, nahimong P300/unit, then 353 P600/unit base tuition and with STS, P1000/unit base tuition. This 354 goes to show that the government is assuming that we can actually 355 generate income through STS. 356 357 Councilor Dingding: To add up to Rep. Matarlos point, STS serves 358 as a mechanism to cover up the holes in the budget allocation. 359 360 Representative Meriz: It is a wise move for the government to push 361 UP and other SUCs to become self-sufficient. Ilabay sa ka sa dagat 362 para makalearn ka how to swim 363 . 364 Councilor Dingding: President Pascual even admitted that STFAP, 365 now STS, is an income generating program. 366 367 Councilor Calderon: STS in principle is good. It creates equity 368 among students nga dato ug pobre. The problem is in its 369 implementation. 370 371 Vice Chairperson Degamo: Will correct implementation of STS get 372 away from the fact that STS is an income generating mechanism? 373 374 Councilor Calderon: We should first focus and make sure that we 375 get the right budget and subsidy to cover up UPs needs. 376 377 Councilor Trocio: According to RPHER, the socialized tuition fee 378 scheme (STFS) like STS is used as a mechanism for the state to 379 reduce state subsidy so that SUCs could generate own income to 380 make them self-sufficient. STS is the fault itself. 381 382 Representative Libres: STS is a source of social justice. It 383 highlights equitability over equality. STS can also serve as a free- 384 flowing money while there is enough state subsidy. 385 386 Vice Chairperson Degamo: issue on equitability, the fact mismo 387 nga wala pa nato nakuha education kay commodity. Ni exist ani 388 nga scheme tungod sa RPHER 389 390 Representative Gattoc moves that the council approve, in 391 consensus, that STS is IGP/TOFI. Motion was seconded by 392 Representative Matarlo. No objections were made. 393 394 395 396 c. STS as state neglect 397 398 Representative Mondido: Murag chalk, if muhatag og gamay og 399 chalk, luoy jud siya. Gipabayaan sa government. 400 401 Representative Gattoc: STS existence roots from RPHER. As per 402 discussion, we have seen that RPHER has been a tool for state 403 neglect. 404 405 Vice Chairperson Degamo: Accountability of the Aquino 406 administration to provide enough subsidy. 407 408 Councilor Trocio: Revisit RPHERs goal to reduce state subsidy 409 through NFF, STFS and idle assets. Likened the relationship of the 410 state and its people through mother-child relationship. 411 412 Representative Matarlo moves that the council approve, in 413 consensus, tas state neglect. Motion was seconded by 414 Representative Gattoc. No objections were made. 415 416 417 d. Flawed in principle and implementation 418 419 Representative Gattoc: Talking about discrimination, according to 420 SES, UP has the mandate as stated in the up charter to give 421 accessible tuition. Gitawag pa ba tang Iskolar ng Bayan if gi- 422 maintain ang STS? 423 424 Representative Libres moved to extend by 15 minutes. 425 426 Representative Mondido: We should urge government to provide 427 sufficient budget; there is lack of transparency. 428 429 Representative Libres: In principle, a socialized tuition 430 scheme/system is bounded by the concept/principle of Social 431 Justice. The STS that we have now is a flawed system. We should 432 push for Pro-Student reforms. A system that is Pro-Student that will 433 allow poor students to be enrolled in UP for free and get stipend 434 (financial help/material support) and to have students who can 435 afford to pay lower--a genuine socialized tuition system. 436 437 Vice Chairperson Degamo: Given if STS has zero percent flaws, 438 what incentive does that State has to provide SUCs state subsidy if 439 the STS itself is used as a mechanism to reduce state subsidy? 440 441 Councilor Calderon: We should look on the goal of STS. It hopes to 442 help students who cannot afford paying even 0 for their tuition. We 443 should look on the implementation nga dapat sakto siya pagka 444 implement para atong ma make sure nga walay masayop ug assign 445 ug bracket. STS is also beneficial to the students kay daghan ang 446 nag agad sa Free tuition nga mahatag sa STS. 447 448 Councilor Dingding: We are consensus with 3 indicators, which 449 STS exists to cover up the holes of the system. It goes beyond its 450 implementation. If there is sufficient budget, then wa nay reason 451 para mo-exist ang STS. 452 453 Representative Libres moved to extend by 15 minutes. 454 455 Representative Matarlo: The fact nga naay mag loan nga 456 nagpamatuod nga di kaya sa students. Di man siya para sa mga 457 students nga naa pa sa UP kung kinsa pa ang pwede makasulod 458 sa UP. Madato or mapobre, katungod jud ang education. 459 460 Vice Chairperson Degamo: Every Iskolar ng Bayan, once they 461 enter the univ of the people, they are assumed rich until they prove 462 to the administration to be poor 463 464 Representative Gattoc: Agrees with Representative Matarlo. Mas 465 daghan ang students nga makasulod sa UP if naay sufficient 466 subsidy. 467 468 Vice Chairperson Degamo: The top three reasons why UPCAT 469 passers don't continue to UP is because eof high tuition and the 470 STFAP/STS. That is why we have a high no-show rate. 471 472 Councilor Calderon: I believe in social justice. If enough na ang 473 budget sa education, then dili na necessary nga ipasa ang burden 474 sa students. In short, mulessen ang tuition sa tanan. Ang goal sa 475 STS is to help those students who can't afford the daily expenses 476 sa eskwelahan. Imagine nga parehas ra lagi tag gibayran ug tuition 477 pero di man makaya sa uban ang cost of living kaysa sa uban. 478 479 Representative Gattoc: Where is social justice when STS 480 discriminates the students in their paying capability? Where is 481 social justice when STS bars students to entering in UP? Where is 482 social justice when STS deprives us to our right to education? 483 484 Vice Chairperson Degamo: Ang continuing existence sa 12 pesos 485 per unit sa PUP is due to the presence or absence of a socialized 486 tuition scheme? Even if naay proposal to increase 830% increase 487 sa tuition, students were united to opposed such move. Thus, the 488 government is compelled to provide state subsidy to PUP. 489 490 Representative Gattoc moves that the council approve, in 491 consensus, that STS is flawed in implementation and principle. 492 Motion was seconded by Councilor Trocio. Objection by Councilor 493 Calderon. 494 495 Councilor Trocio: Fight for STS is more than just how we see it as 496 our political parties agenda. 497 498 Which is much greater, katungod sa education or social justice? 499 500 Councilor Calderon: Katungod sa education. 501 502 The Student Council stand on STS: 503 Fight for greater state subsidy. 504 No tuition and other fees increase. 505 Yes to a transparent and accountable government 506 No to state abandonment. 507 Junk STS, rollback the tuition. 508 509 Since its already late, Councilor Trocio moved to lay the remaining 510 items on the table. Vice Chairperson Degamo said he will attend the 511 Disposal Committee meeting. Councilor Dingding was tasked to make the 512 councils statement on STS. 513 514 C. ADJOURNMENT OF THE MEETING 515 516 Having the remaining items laid on the table, Vice Chairperson Degamo 517 moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion was approved by Councilor Dingding and 518 seconded by Representative Libres. The meeting was adjourned at 1:00 AM, 519 July 10, 2014. 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 Prepared by: 527 528 ANGEL ROSE C. TROCIO 529 Councilor 530 Acting Secretary General 531