The day after Christmas most Americans received their 1040 Tax Package in the mail. The IRS must intentionally delay these mailings until after Christmas so we can enjoy giving to one another without being reminded of how much we must give to Uncle Sam.
We have been told by Congress that the new Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA 86) is revenue neutral {the federal government will get the same amount of money). We also have been informed that our tax returns will now be more simplified. The verdict on both of these assertions will be out until our first trial run (1987 Returns).
Título original
1988 Issue 3 - The Tax Reform Act of 1986 From a Christian Perspective - Counsel of Chalcedon
The day after Christmas most Americans received their 1040 Tax Package in the mail. The IRS must intentionally delay these mailings until after Christmas so we can enjoy giving to one another without being reminded of how much we must give to Uncle Sam.
We have been told by Congress that the new Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA 86) is revenue neutral {the federal government will get the same amount of money). We also have been informed that our tax returns will now be more simplified. The verdict on both of these assertions will be out until our first trial run (1987 Returns).
The day after Christmas most Americans received their 1040 Tax Package in the mail. The IRS must intentionally delay these mailings until after Christmas so we can enjoy giving to one another without being reminded of how much we must give to Uncle Sam.
We have been told by Congress that the new Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA 86) is revenue neutral {the federal government will get the same amount of money). We also have been informed that our tax returns will now be more simplified. The verdict on both of these assertions will be out until our first trial run (1987 Returns).
by Larry Ball The day after Christmas most Ameri- cans received their 1040 Tax Package in the mail. The IRS must intentio{lally delay these mailings until after Ouist- mas so we can enjoy givmg to one another without being reminded of how much we must give to Uncle Sam. . We have been told by Congress that the new Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA 86) is revenue neutral {the federal gov- ernment will get the same amount of money). We also have been informed that out tax returns will now be more simplified. The verdict ort both of these assertions will be out until our first trial run (1987 Returns). What does TRA 86 mean to you 1 How will it affect the average American family? More importantly to us, how will TRA 86 affect the typical Chris- tian family? Before we discuss the tax ramifica- tions of this new tax law maybe we should defme the typical Christian fami- ly. I realize the danger of stereotyping, arid there will be exceptions to the pat- tern for various reasons, but certain prin- ciples do govern Christians that tend to give us a model of the Christian home. As a specific example, consider that the married spouses are male and female. This may seem rudimentary to you, but when you consider that ho:inOsexuals are presently petitioning the IRS for re- cognition of their co-habitation as mate grounds for the favored status of "married f.t.ling jointly," even this is . . not rudimentary any more. Larry Ball ls pastor of abe Bridwell Heights Presbyterian Church (PCA) In Kingsport, Tennessee. He Is also a CPA and works part time as an accOURtaht. A number of Christian couples may be categorized as YUPPIES {Young Ur- ban Professionals), but generally they are not DINKS (Double Income - No Kids). The Christ-centered family will often consist of several children which usually necessitates the mother working in the home. They have learned to live on one income (uriless, of course, they have a home business). Because they tithe and possibly send their children to a Christian School, they have less net . spendable income than others with a comparable wage or salary. How then will TRA 86 affect the Christian family? There is both good news and bad news. There are some changes that will be helpful for your family, but Congress has mixed some bitter in with the sweet. One of the negative aspects about TRA 86 is simply that it was enacted. Biblical Christians believe in long-term planning. For long-term planning to be possible we must have confidence in the stability of our laws. When laws change, then our plans and strategies must change. Who has any desire to play the game when the umpire keeps changing all the rules? A constant changing of the tax laws creates havoc not only for accountants and tax pro- fessionals but for all of us as well. TRA 86 is just another step in the direc- tion of a nation that encourages its . people to look only at the short run. . Unfortunately, 1RA 86 also is a con- tinuation of the civil government's inva- sion into our privacy. To get the per- sonal exemption deduction for your children yoti must now register with the United States Government every child five years or older. Registration is not a popular idea among Christians who be- lieve in the biblical parameteiS of a limited civil government. Tax-shelter registration was already a part of the 0 IRS Regulations before TRA 86. The eyes of Uncle Sam are straining for an even closer look into our per- sonal lives. Real estate transactions must now be reported on a Form 1099. As a result of the new tax law, tax- exempt interest must now be listed on Form 1040. There will be increased expectations in regard to record-keeping. Many con- tributors to IRA's will be required to keep more detailed tecords of their con- tributions, distinguishing between de- ductible and non-deductible contribu- tions. Withdrawal of funds from IRA's may become a bookkeeping nightmare. The regulations for claiming entertaiil- nient expenses on Form 2106 are more stringent and therefore will require more detailed veriftcaU.on. The entertainer had better be able to prove he had a "sub- stantial and bona fide business dis cussion." {Maybe he could take a tape-. recorder along.) Even though the gains deduction has been repealed the record-keeping requirements are still tact. Because of these numerous tions perhaps the reader may now under- stand why some are suspicious of the claim that 1RA 86 is to be a tion. It is almost becoming impossible for some tax-payers to do their own re- turns without professional help. Page 22---------------------------The Counsel ofChalcedon, March, 1988 J Even though the number of tax brac- kets are reduced and tax rates are down; TRA 86 has not been so charitable to everyone. Before TRA 86 those out of work and receiving unemployment com- pensation were generally only partially taxed on that income. Now under the new tax law all of their unemployment compensation will be taxed. There is nothing like kicking a man when he is already down. If you have a son or daughter in college on a scholarship, part of the value of that scholarship may now be taxable. For grants made after August 16, 1986, degree candidates may not ex- clude from income scholarship amounts received after 1986 for room and board or travel. During the last several years non- itemiz.ers have been allowed a deduction for charitable contributions (the tithe for Christians). Now this will only be allowed for those who are able to item- ize. Since Christians give benevolently because of the tithe requirement and not because of tax deductibility, this will have little effect on their giving. How- ever, the benefit of this deduction will be taken away from many Christian families because it is becoming more difficult to itemize (a higher standard deduction with increased thresholds for medical and miscellaneous expenses). Sometimes unrecognized in the discussion about reduced tax rates is the increase in social security withholding. Uncle Sam often gives you a dollar in one hand and takes two from the other hand. Most tax-payers will see a five percent (5%) increase in the amount withheld from their paychecks for social security. Those with incomes over the $45,000 limit will see an eight percent (8%) increase over last year's social security withholding because of the rise in the rate and an increase in the upper limit Remember, too, that the em- ployer must match that increase. 'The self-employed (including your pastor who did not opt out of the Social securi- ty System) will have to pay the full percentage without .any matching funds. There are many other negative as- pects of TRA 86 which I will not men- tion here. Business enterprises have been affected much more than in- dividuals. The repeal of the dividends deduction along with the repeal of the capital gains deduction was not a favorable move to encourage invest- ments in American COIJXlrations. You may now be asking if there is anything positive about TRA 86 for the Christian family. The answer to that is yes! For example, the federal govern- ment has finally decided to give a break to those with children . or other de- pendents. The personal exemption for yourself and your dependents has increased from $1,080 to $1,900 for 1987 (to $1,950 for 1988 and to $2,000 for 1989). The standard deduction rises to $5,000 for 1988 (married filing jointly). This means that a married couple with five (5) children will subtract $18,650 from their adjusted gross income for 1988 before applying their tax rate (7 x $1,950 + $5,000). That adds up to quite a savings. Even though depreciation schedules have been changed to slow down write- offs of assets used in a business (the wife's home business), the special frrst year expense allowance (Sec. 179) has been increased from $5.000 to $10,000. 1be consumer interest deduction is being phased out over a four year period (you still can use 65% of your interest as a deduction on your 1987 Schedule A, so don't throw away all those credit card statements). This may help curb the debt problem among Americans; but, because the home mortgage in- terest deduction remains intact, many have put their own homes into a greater risk category by borrowing against it Thus rather than encouraging a reduc- tion of debt, TRA 86 has only encour- aged a shift in debt from one type to another. In conclusion, there are some posi- tive effects of TRA 86 for the Christian family (especially those with several children), but when weighed against other factors, this new law may in the long run be detrimental to our freedom and economic well-being. I have tried to summarize a few obser- vations here to help you understand the impact of TRA 86. For your own in- dividual situation you may need to con- sult a good tax accountant. (Articles on taxes should always have a disclaimer to protect the writer, and I am no ex- ception). Reconstructionists need to study the principles of biblical law so that we may be able to impact civil government in years to come and bring the whole tax field (legitimate as it is) into sub- jection to the truths of the word of God. 0 The Counsel of ChaJcedon, March, 1988 ;..-..--------------------------_.age 23