08.12.14 PC Final Packet

Planning Commission August 12, 2014 - Page 1
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011
CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)
Mayor Pro-Tem Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)
Councilman Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell

COMMISSIONERS

Gus W. Flangas, Chair
Todd L. Moody, Vice Chair
Byron Goynes
Richard Truesdell
Vicki Quinn
Trinity Haven Schlottman
Richard P. Bonar

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. If you need an accommodation
to attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at (702) 229-6301 and advise of
your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.

August 12, 2014
6:00 PM

ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM CHRYSTAL J ACOBS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3
RD

FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITYS WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1
st
Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.

ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:
1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.

2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staffs conditions of
approval.

3. If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staffs condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.

4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.

5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups
of interested parties.

6. After all objectors input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.

7. Following the applicants response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in
for the record unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.

BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OF J ULY 8, 2014

6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.

CONSENT ITEMS:
CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.

7. TMP-54802 - TENTATIVE MAP - SAVONA AT SUMMERLIN - APPLICANT: WOODSIDE HOMES OF
NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative
Map FOR A 135-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 28.58 acres on the northwest corner of
Desert Foothills Drive and Antelope Ridge Drive (APN 137-27-813-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone [SF3 (Single-
Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ -54566]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

8. EOT-54461 - EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE HOTEL GROUP,
LLC - For possible action on a request for an Extension of Time of a previously approved Variance (VAR-45114) TO
ALLOW 74 PARKING SPACES WHERE 87 SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW ONE LOADING SPACE
WHERE THREE ARE REQUIRED on 1.83 acres at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-004), T-C (Town Center)
Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -54451]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

9. EOT-54462 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-54461 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE HOTEL GROUP, LLC - For possible action on a request for an Extension of
Time of a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-45116) FOR A HOTEL, MOTEL OR MOTEL SUITES WITH
A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE SEPARATION OF 82 FEET FROM A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
DWELLING WHERE 330 FEET IS REQUIRED at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-004), T-C (Town Center)
Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -54451]. Staff

10. EOT-54463 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-54461 AND EOT-54462 - SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE HOTEL GROUP, LLC - For possible action on a request
for an Extension of Time of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-45115) FOR A PROPOSED
FOUR-STORY, 55-FOOT TALL, 87-UNIT, 50,478 SQUARE-FOOT HOTEL WITH WAIVERS OF THE
STREETSCAPE AND SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MANUAL, INCLUDING ALLOWING A 65-FOOT TALL PYLON SIGN WHERE 24 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM
ALLOWED on 1.83 acres at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-004), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service
Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -54451]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE
THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.

11. SUP-54578 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY
I, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit TO ADD A DUAL DRIVE-THROUGH LANE AT AN
EXISTING RESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THROUGH) at 7150 West Craig Road (APN 138-03-611-003), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ -54396]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

12. SUP-54786 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ALEXANDER ALEXANDROV -
OWNER: GREAT WASH PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT IN CONJ UNCTION WITH AN EXISTING 2,161 SQUARE-
FOOT RESTAURANT WITH A 65 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 141-
FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CITY PARK WHERE 400 FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED at 420
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150 (APN 138-32-615-001), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ -
54720]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

13. SUP-54827 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS
VEGAS, INC - OWNER: SAHARA CROSSING, LP - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment of an
approved Special Use Permit (SUP-45965) FOR A PROPOSED 12,770 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION TO AN
EXISTING THRIFT SHOP USE at 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120 (APN 162-06-411-004), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ -54723]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

14. MSP-54794 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SMITH'S FOOD AND
DRUG CENTERS, INC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Master Sign Plan
(CHR-0019-05) TO ALLOW SIGNAGE ON A FUEL CANOPY at 7050 North Durango Drive (APN 125-20-510-011),
T-C (Town Center) Zone [UC-TC (Urban Center Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ -54774]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
15. ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - VAR-53871 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
DENNIS PRITCHARD - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
(CLASS II) TO BE LOCATED NINE FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED
AND FIVE FEET FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.36 acres at 9109 Ghost
Mountain Avenue (APN 138-05-411-053), R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 4
(Anthony) [PRJ -53797]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

16. ABEYANCE - SUP-53624 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WALGREEN CO. -
OWNER: PPLAND, LP - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR AN ACCESSORY PACKAGE
LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN AN EXISTING 14,820 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT
at 7755 North Durango Drive (APN 125-17-611-002), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town
Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -53329]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

17. MOD-54816 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RYAN O'NEILL - For
possible action on a request for a Major Modification of the Town Center Land Use Plan FROM: SX-TC (SUBURBAN
MIXED USE - TOWN CENTER) AND SC-TC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL - TOWN CENTER) TO: GC-TC
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL - TOWN CENTER) on 1.77 acres at 7610 Oso Blanca Road (APN 125-17-210-448), Ward
6 (Ross) [PRJ -54764]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

18. ZON-54561 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMY PAN - OWNER: SANTA GOLD
REALTY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: P-R (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND
PARKING) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 0.44 acres located at 1704 and 1710 Santa Paula Drive (APNs 162-
03-311-003 and 004), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ -54200]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

19. VAR-55026 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ELITE MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS
VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 92-FOOT TALL OFF-PREMISE SIGN
WHERE 75 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED at 3100 Stewart Avenue (APN 139-36-604-001), C-V
(Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ -54759]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

20. SUP-54828 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-55026 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ELITE
MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3100 Stewart Avenue (APN 139-36-604-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ -54759]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


22. SUP-54829 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-55027 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ELITE
MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3100 Stewart Avenue (APN 139-36-604-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ -54759]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.


24. VAR-53657 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ERIK MARTONOVICH - OWNER: BCNV,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW TWO EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
(CLASS II) TO BE 16 FEET AND 37 FEET IN HEIGHT WHERE TEN FEET, SIX INCHES IS THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT ALLOWED on 2.07 acres at 5636 Donald Road (APN 125-24-104-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ -52356]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

25. VAR-54750 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DONNER 2002 TRUST - For possible
action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE TEN FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 540 SQUARE-FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [POOL HOUSE] on
0.68 acres at 3020 Campbell Circle (APN 139-32-212-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ -
54651]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

26. VAR-54820 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAURIE NADY FAMILY TRUST -
For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE
FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING PATIO COVER on 0.15 acres at 4530 Dover Place (APN 139-31-410-026),
R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ -54754]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

27. WVR-54398 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WOLF T.H., LLC - OWNER: JAMES R. MARSH
- For possible action on a request for a Waiver of the Town Center Sign Standards TO ALLOW A PYLON SIGN TO
ADVERTISE ONE TENANT WHERE MULTIPLE TENANTS ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 73-FOOT
TALL FLAG POLE WHERE 40 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED on 1.50 acres at 6775 North Durango
Drive (a portion of APN 125-20-301-027), T-C (Town Center) Zone [GC-TC (General Commercial - Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -53401]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

28. WVR-54400 - WAIVER RELATED TO WVR-54398 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WOLF T.H., LLC -
OWNER: JAMES R. MARSH - For possible action on a request for a Waiver of the Town Center Development
Standards TO ALLOW NINE PARKING LOT TREES WHERE A MINIMUM OF TEN TREES ARE REQUIRED AND
TO ALLOW 12-FOOT TALL MEXICAN FAN PALMS WHERE A COMBINATION OF 36-INCH BOX RIO
GRANDE ASH TREES AND 25-FOOT TALL MEXICAN FAN PALMS ARE REQUIRED on 1.50 acres at 6775 North
Durango Drive (a portion of APN 125-20-301-027), T-C (Town Center) Zone [GC-TC (General Commercial - Town
Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -53401]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

29. WVR-54824 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ROBERT SINA - OWNER: CENTENNIAL
HILLS MOB OWNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver of the Town Center Development
Standards Streetscape Requirements TO ALLOW AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN on 23.61 acres at 6100 North Durango
Drive (APN 125-29-512-001), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ -54685]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

30. SUP-54788 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OVATION DEVELOPMENT -
OWNER: DAVID AND JESSICA LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW APARTMENTS ON THE GROUND
FLOOR WHERE NONE ARE PERMITTED, A PRIMARY RESIDENT OR GUEST ENTRYWAY IN CONJ UNCTION
WITH COMMERCIAL USES AND A FRONT ELEVATION THAT DOES NOT HIGHLIGHT THE DIFFERENCE IN
USES at 6705 West Lone Mountain Road (APNs 138-02-101-002 and 015), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4
(Anthony) [PRJ -54521]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

31. SDR-54789 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-54788 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: OVATION DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: DAVID AND JESSICA LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED THREE-STORY, 60-UNIT
SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE
BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PERIMETER AND A FOUR-FOOT WIDE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE
SOUTH PERIMETER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FOUR-FOOT WIDE BUFFER ALONG THE
NORTH PERIMETER WHERE FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 3.03 acres at 6705 West Lone Mountain Road (APNs
138-02-101-002 and 015), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ -54521]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

32. SUP-54766 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SMART & FINAL PROPERTIES 1,
LLC - OWNER: CHARLESTON VEGAS NO. 1, LLC - For possible action on a request FOR A PROPOSED RETAIL
ESTABLISHMENT WITH ACCESSORY PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN A PROPOSED 36,800
SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 243-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 4440 East
Charleston Boulevard (APN 140-32-401-013), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ -54496]. Staff

33. SUP-54783 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: KOSTER FINANCE, LLC -
OWNER: ALTA MIRA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
A PROPOSED 1,573 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO TITLE LOAN USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A
120-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 4990 West
Craig Road, Suite #1 (APN 138-01-619-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ -54667]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

34. SUP-54825 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL
OF NEVADA - OWNER: 6122 W. SAHARA AVE., LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at 6150-6168 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-02-802-004), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ -54722]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
35. ABEYANCE - TXT-54664 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF
LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action regarding a request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.12 related to Permitted
Uses and Chapter 19.18 related to Definitions and Measures to consolidate various liquor uses and to provide for other
related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:
36. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE J URISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJ ECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJ ECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJ ECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Agenda tem No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: AUGUST 12, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: FLINN FAGG

SUB1ECT:
CALL TO ORDER

Agenda tem No.: 2.


SUB1ECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

Agenda tem No.: 3.


SUB1ECT:
ROLL CALL

Agenda tem No.: 4.


SUB1ECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Agenda tem No.: 5.


SUB1ECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 8, 2014

Agenda tem No.: 6.

DIRECTOR: FLINN FAGG Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
Any items Irom the Planning Commission, staII and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or held
in abeyance to a Iuture meeting may be brought Iorward and acted upon at this time.

Agenda tem No.: 7.


SUB1ECT:
TMP-54802 - TENTATIVE MAP - SAVONA AT SUMMERLIN - APPLICANT: WOODSIDE
HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Tentative Map FOR A 135-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 28.58 acres on the northwest corner oI Desert Foothills
Drive and Antelope Ridge Drive (APN 137-27-813-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone |SF3
(Single-Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 2 (Beers) |PRJ-
54566|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 9/17/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Summerlin Design Review Committee Approval Letter

TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: AUGUST 12, 2014
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: WOODSIDE HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC -
OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC

`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``

CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
TMP-54802 StaII recommends APPROVAL.

`` CONDITIONS ``

IMF-54802 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI the Tentative Map shall be Ior no more than Iour (4) years. II a Final Map is
not recorded on all or a portion oI the area embraced by the Tentative Map with Iour (4)
years oI the approval oI the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation oI the subject common-interest
community, and prior to recordation oI the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions 'CC&R),
or conveyance oI any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a
Declaration oI Private Maintenance Requirements ('DPMR) as a covenant on all
associated properties, and on behalI oI all current and Iuture property owners. The DPMR
is to include a listing oI all privately owned and/or maintained inIrastructure improvements,
along with assignment oI maintenance responsibility Ior each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brieI
description oI the required level oI maintenance Ior privately maintained components. The
DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City oI Las Vegas Department oI Field
Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment Ior all associated costs should private maintenance
obligations not be met, and the City oI Las Vegas be required to provide Ior said
maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement oI obligation oI compliance with
the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies oI the recorded
DPMR and CC&R documents to the City oI Las Vegas Department oI Field Operations.
TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

Conditions Page Two
August 12, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. All development shall conIorm to the Conditions oI Approval oI Rezoning (Z-0119-96),
the Summerlin West Development Agreement and the Summerlin Development Standards.

4. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City`s Street Naming Regulations.

5. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

6. All development is subject to the conditions oI City Departments and State Subdivision
Statues.

Public Works

7. Unless already constructed or guaranteed by the adjacent developer to the north (Parcel
BB), construct the Iull width oI the private entry street adjacent to this site concurrent
with development oI this site. II this site develops prior to the site to the north (Parcel
BB), appropriate easements outside the bounds oI this Tentative Map Ior Iull construction
oI the entry street and Ior complete access Irom the entry street shall be granted by
separate document prior to the approval oI construction drawings Ior this site or the
recordation oI a map, whichever may occur Iirst. Extend all required underground
inIrastructure past the limits oI the Iully constructed entry iI this site develops beIore the
site to the south. II the Final Map Ior this site records prior to the Iinal map Ior the
adjacent subdivision to the north (Parcel BB) it must grant an access easement through
the shared entry on the Iinal map Ior this site.

8. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map Ior this site as Public Utility
Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements with
private maintenance by the Homeowner`s Association.

9. Appropriate public easements (Sewer, Drainage, Emergency Access, etc.) over adjacent
Common Lot 9 and Common Lot 13 oI the Summerlin Village 23B Unit No. 2 Final Map
(book 145 page 83) shall be granted to the City oI Las Vegas by separate document as
determined by the Department oI Public Works prior to the recordation oI a Final Map
Ior this site requiring these easements. These easements are outside the boundary oI this
Tentative Map and are to be privately maintained.

10. The Common Element between lots 23 and 24 shall be a Public Sewer and Public
Drainage Easement to be privately maintained by the Homeowner`s Association. No
structures, and no trees or vegetation taller than three Ieet, shall be allowed within the
Public Sewer Easement. Additionally, the easement shall provide paved, drivable access
to all manholes.
TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

Conditions Page Three

11. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this Site Plan Prior to submittal oI construction drawings Ior
this site.

12. All landscaping shall be situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility
obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all development access drives and abutting street
intersections.

13. Prior to the release oI a Final Map Ior recordation on this site, the property owner must
contact the Special Improvement District Section oI the Department oI Public Works
(229-2136) and sign a notarized aIIidavit acknowledging and agreeing to a per lot
assessment oI all lots that will be created through a Final Map Ior this site. The City shall
prepare an apportionment report Iollowing recordation oI the Final Map and this
apportionment report must be signed by the property owner prior to the release oI any
building permits Ior this site.

14. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by
the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits,
submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as are recommended by the
City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development oI this site.

15. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions oI approval Ior Summerlin
Village 23B, SV-0018-01, Z-0119-96 and all other applicable site-related actions.

16. The approval oI all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is
in concept only. SpeciIic design and construction details relating to size, type and/or
alignment oI improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainage
improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval oI the construction plans by the City.
No deviations Irom adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless speciIic written
approval Ior such is received Irom the City Engineer prior to the recordation oI a Final
Map or the approval oI subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur Iirst.
Approval oI this Tentative Map does not constitute approval oI any deviations. II such
approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing
elimination oI such deviations.

TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK
Staff Report Page One

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing a 135-lot single-Iamily residential subdivision on a 28.58-acre
undeveloped site within Summerlin Village 23B, speciIically located on the northwest corner oI
northwest corner oI Desert Foothills Drive and Antelope Ridge Drive. The map has been
reviewed and tentatively approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee and conIorms
to the Summerlin Development Standards, applicable NRS statutes and Title 19 requirements;
thereIore, staII recommends approval with conditions. II denied, a Iinal map subdividing the
subject property cannot be accepted or approved.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0119-96) Irom N-U (Non-Urban)
to P-C (Planned Community) on 8,318 acres along the west side oI Clark
County 215, between Charleston Boulevard and Lake Mead Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. 01/27/97
The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DA-0001-96) Ior the
area known as Summerlin West, which includes the subject site. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
01/16/02
The City Council approved a Master Development Plan Review (SV-0018-
01) establishing land use designations within Summerlin Villages 23A and
23B (The Paseos). The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
07/16/12
Department oI Planning staII approved a Minor ModiIication (MOD-45960)
to the Master Development Plan Review (SV-0018-01) Ior Village 23A and
23B.
09/11/12
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-46270) Ior a 20-
lot subdivision on 440 acres at the northwest corner oI Alta Drive and Desert
Foothills Drive. StaII recommended approval.
03/12/13
A Parcel Map (PMP-47903) Ior a three-lot subdivision on 5,920 acres at the
southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215 was
recorded.
03/26/13
An application was approved Ior a Final Map (FMP-48545) Ior a Iive-pod
single Iamily residential subdivision with one Community Open Space parcel,
one private open space parcel and one school parcel on 289.58 acres at the
northwest corner oI Desert Foothills Drive and Alta Drive. This map deIines
the boundaries oI the subject Parcel. The Final Map was recorded 08/28/13.
TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

Staff Report Page Two

Most Recent Change of Ownership
12/18/97 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
No related permits on Iile.

Pre-Application Meeting
06/11/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements Ior a Tentative
Map application Ior Summerlin.

Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
07/03/14 StaII visited the site and Iound raw desert in its natural state.

Details of Application Request
Site Area
Gross Acres 28.58

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
Undeveloped

SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
North
Undeveloped

SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
South
Single-Family,
Detached
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
East
Single-Family,
Detached
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
West
Undeveloped

SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

Staff Report Page Three

Master Plan Areas Compliance
Summerlin Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
P-C (Planned Community) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to the Summerlin Development Standards, the following standards apply:
Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
P-C |SF3| 10 du/ac 286

Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks:
Front (garage)
Side Load (garage)
Side
Corner
Rear

18 Feet
18 Feet
5 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet

23 Feet
18 Feet
5 Feet
15 Feet
20 Feet

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Desert Foothills Drive N/A N/A 100 N/A
Antelope Ridge Drive N/A N/A 44 N/A

19.4.4 Connectivity
1ransportation Aetwork Element # Links # Aodes
Internal Street 11
Intersection Internal 7
TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

Staff Report Page Four

19.4.4 Connectivity
1ransportation Aetwork Element # Links # Aodes
Cul-de-sac Terminus 1
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
Easements
.5
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted .5
Total 11.5 8.5
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Aodes): N/A 1.4

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Single Family,
Detached
135 du
2 spaces
per du
270

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 270

270

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 270 0 270 0 Y

ANALYSIS

The subject property is part oI Summerlin West, which is governed by a Development
Agreement between the Master Developer and the City oI Las Vegas, as well as the Summerlin
Development Standards. The proposed Tentative Map was reviewed and approved by the
Summerlin Design Review Committee on 07/17/14, prior to submittal to the City Ior review.

The Summerlin Development Standards designate the subject property as SF3 (Single Family,
Detached), which allows up to 10 residential units per gross acre. The proposed density oI 4.73
dwelling units per gross acre Ialls well within the maximum allowed. As this site is part oI a
master plan with its own improvement standards, it is not subject to Title 19.04 street section
requirements. Although it is not subject to connectivity requirements, the design oI the
subdivision has a Connectivity Score oI 1.4, which exceeds the preIerred ratio oI 1.30.

The proposed lots range in size Irom 6,050 square Ieet to 17,032 square Ieet. Site access is
proposed Irom the west end oI the site Irom Antelope Ridge Drive. This street will have access
to Alta Drive. Interior circulation is provided by 37-Ioot wide private streets with sidewalks on
one side with the use oI L-type curbs. No required trails are adjacent to the site. No
neighborhood parks are proposed.
TMP-54802 PR1-54566]
YK

Staff Report Page Five

The maximum retaining wall on the revised plans is Iour Ieet. The Summerlin wall standards
allow a maximum 10 Ieet oI exposure thereIore, they are within standards. The plans are
showing a maximum 2.5-Ioot retaining wall on the north property line with no retaining on the
south property line. They also are showing a maximum 4-Ioot retaining wall on the east properly
line and no retaining wall on the west property line. All walls are within allowable limits.

The Clark County School District projects that approximately 73 primary and secondary school
students will be generated by the proposed development on this site. OI the three schools
serving the area (Givens Elementary School, Rogich Middle School and Palo Verde High
School), the District notes that only Palo Verde was not over capacity Ior the 2013-14 school
year, and no new schools are planned in this area at this time.

FINDINGS (TMP-54802)

The proposed Tentative Map conIorms to Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 19 and the Summerlin
Development Standards, and has been approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee.
ThereIore, staII recommends approval with conditions.

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 17

NOTICES MAILED N/A
06/26/14
PRJ-54566
TMP-54802
06/26/14
PRJ-54566
TMP-54802
08/12/14 PC
06/26/14
PRJ-54566
TMP-54802
0
7
/
1
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
6
6
T
M
P
-
5
4
8
0
2

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
6
6
T
M
P
-
5
4
8
0
2

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
6
6
T
M
P
-
5
4
8
0
2

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
6
6
T
M
P
-
5
4
8
0
2

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
School Development Tracking Form
Date Filed Application Number Entity
Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Approved Disapproved
Real Property Management
4190 McLeod Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Single-Family Units (1) x 0.195 = x 0.102 = x 0.135 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.135 = x 0.056 = x 0.062 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property
Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School
Total
(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD
Name
Schools Serving the Area*
Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date
07/03/2014 TMP-54802, PRJ-54566 LV
Woodside Homes of Nevada LLC
Savona
Desert Foothills & Antelope Ridge
137-27-813-002
135 26 14 18
0 0 0
26 14 18
Givens ES 655 Park Vista Dr K-5 788 945 05/16/14
Rogich MS 6-8 235 N. Pavillion Center Dr 1664 1821 05/16/14
Palo Verde HS 333 S. Pavillion Center Dr 9-12 2944 2779 05/16/14
Givens ES, Rogich MS and Palo Verde HS are over capacity for the 2013-14 school year.
No new schools are planned for the area.
T
M
P
-
0
Z

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
O
D
S
I
D
E

H
O
M
E
S

O
F

N
E
V
A
D
A

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

H
O
W
A
P
D

H
U
S
H
E
S

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

D
E
S
E
P
T

F
O
O
T
H
I
L
L
S

D
P
I
V
E

A
N
D

A
N
T
E
L
O
P
E

P
I
D
S
E

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/26/14
PRJ-54566
TMP-54802
07/17/14
PRJ-54566
TMP-54802

Agenda tem No.: 8.


SUB1ECT:
EOT-54461 - EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE
HOTEL GROUP, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior an Extension oI Time oI a
previously approved Variance (VAR-45114) TO ALLOW 74 PARKING SPACES WHERE 87
SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW ONE LOADING SPACE WHERE THREE
ARE REQUIRED on 1.83 acres at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-004), T-C (Town
Center) Zone |SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|,
Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-54451|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps - EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 |PRJ-54451|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 |PRJ-54451|
3. Supporting Documentation - EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 |PRJ-54451|
4. Photos - EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 |PRJ-54451|
5. JustiIication Letter - EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 |PRJ-54451|
6. Action Letter Ior VAR-45114

EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE HOTEL GROUP, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
EOT-54461
EOT-54462
EOT-54463

N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

EOI-5441 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. This Variance (VAR-45114) shall expire on June 12, 2016 unless another Extension oI
Time is approved by the Planning Commission.

2. ConIormance to the conditions oI approval oI Variance (VAR-45114) and all other site
related actions as required by the Department oI Planning and Department oI Public Works.

EOI-5442 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. This Special Use Permit (SUP-45116) shall expire on June 12, 2016 unless another
Extension oI Time is approved by the Planning Commission.

2. ConIormance to the conditions oI approval oI Special Use Permit (SUP-45116) and all other
site related actions as required by the Department oI Planning and Department oI Public
Works.
EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG

Conditions Page Two

EOI-5443 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. This Site Development Plan Review (SDR-45115) shall expire on June 12, 2016 unless
another Extension oI Time is approved by the Planning Commission.

2. ConIormance to the conditions oI approval oI Site Development Plan Review (SDR-45115)
and all other site related actions as required by the Department oI Planning and Department
oI Public Works.

EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site is undeveloped land with a previously approved Variance (VAR-45114), Special
Use Permit (SUP-45116) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-45115) Ior a proposed Iour-
story, 55-Ioot tall, 87-unit, 50,478 square-Ioot hotel with waivers to allow a distance separation
oI 82 Ieet Irom a single Iamily dwelling, where 330 Ieet is required, the streetscape and sign
requirements oI the Town Center Development Standards manual, including allowing a 65-Ioot
tall Pylon Sign where 24 Ieet is the maximum allowed. There is an associated Variance (VAR-
45114) to allow 74 parking spaces where 87 are required and to allow one loading space where
three are required on 1.83 acres at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive. No plans have been submitted Ior
review nor have any building permits been issued Ior the proposed development. As there have
not been any signiIicant changes in land use or development in the surrounding area and this is
the Iirst request Ior an Extension oI Time. StaII is recommending approval with a two-year time
limit.


09/20/89
The City Council approved a request Ior a Rezoning (Z-0083-89) Irom N-U
(Non-Urban) and C-2 (General Commercial) to R-3 (Limited Multiple
Residential), R-PD6 (Residential Planned Development), R-PD18
(Residential Planned Development) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) oI
property located on the southeast corner oI Rancho Drive and Tropical
Parkway Ior an Apartment Retirement Community Townhomes and Shopping
Center. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
10/03/95
The City Council approved a request Ior Rezoning (Z-0064-95) Irom C-2
(General Commercial) and N-U |(Non-Urban) under Resolution oI Intent to
R-E (Residence Estates)| to C-1 (Limited Commercial oI property located on
the north side oI Ann Road between Tenaya Way and Rancho Drive Ior a
proposed 96,900 square-Ioot Mini-Storage Facility and 171,000 square-Ioot
Commercial Center. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
05/02/07
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-19097) Ior a Iour-story, 50,478 square-Ioot Hotel with a waiver to
allow perimeter landscape buIIer width oI 14 Ieet Ior a three-Ioot section
where 15 Ieet is the minimum required on 1.83 acres at the southwest corner
oI Tenaya Way and Sky Pointe Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval and staII recommended denial.
EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG

The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-19100)
Ior a Hotel with a waiver to allow a distance separation oI 80 Ieet Irom a
residential use where 330 Ieet is the minimum required at the southwest
corner oI Tenaya Way and Sky Point Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval and staII recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-19447) to allow a
Iour-story hotel where two-stories are the maximum permitted on 1.83 acres
at the southwest corner oI Tenaya Way and Sky Point Drive. The Planning
Commission recommended approval and staII recommended denial. 05/02/07
The City Council approved a request Ior a Master Sign Plan (ARC-20049)
and waivers oI the Town Center Development Standards Manual Ior a 65-Ioot
tall pylon sign where 24 Ieet tall is the limit; to allow a pylon sign advertising
one tenant where multiple tenants is required; and Ior a 12-Ioot tall monument
sign where eight Ieet tall is the limit Ior a commercial development, located
on the southwest corner oI Tenaya Way and Sky Point Drive. The Town
Center Architectural Committee recommended approval and staII
recommended denial.
05/21/08
The City Council approved a request Ior the Petition to Vacate (VAC-27172)
a portion oI a 10-Ioot wide public drainage easement at 5701 Sky Pointe
Drive. The Planning Commission and staII recommend approval.
06/17/09
The City Council approved a request Ior Extension oI Time (EOT-34375,
EOT-34413 and EOT-34376) Ior a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
19097) Ior a Iour-story, 50,478 square-Ioot Hotel with a Waiver to allow a
perimeter landscape buIIer width oI 14 Ieet Ior a three-Ioot section where 15
Ieet is the minimum required; Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-19100) Ior a
Hotel with a Waiver to allow a distance separation oI 80 Ieet Irom a
residential use where 330 Ieet is the minimum required; and Ior a Variance
(VAR-19447) to allow a Iour-story hotel where two-stories are the maximum
permitted on 1.83 acres at the southwest corner oI Tenaya Way and Sky
Pointe Drive. StaII recommended approval.
05/25/10
A code enIorcement case (91243) was processed Ior tall weeds, trash and
debris on a vacant lot at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive. The case was resolved on
06/25/10.
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-45114) to
allow 74 parking spaces where 87 spaces are required and to allow one
loading space where three are required at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive. The
Department oI Planning recommended denial.
06/12/12 The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-
45116) Ior a Hotel, Motel or Motel Suites with a Waiver to allow a distance
separation oI 82 Ieet Irom a Single Family, Detached dwelling where 330 Ieet
is required at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive. The Department oI Planning
recommended denial.
EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG


The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-45115) Ior a proposed Iour-story, 55-Ioot tall, 87-unti, 50478
square-Ioot Hotel with waivers oI the streetscape and sign requirements oI the
Town Center Development Standards manual, including allowing a 65-Ioot
tall Pylon Sign where 24 Ieet is the maximum allowed at 5701 Sky Pointe
Drive. The Department oI Planning recommended denial.


No plans have been submitted Ior review, nor have any building permits or business licenses
been issued Ior the proposed project.

A pre-application meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
06/26/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the subject site and Iound a Ienced vacant lot
with overgrown weeds, trash and debris.

Site Area
Gross Acres 1.83

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Undeveloped
SC-TC |Service
Commercial (Town
Center)|
T-C (Town Center)
EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
North
General Retail Store,
Other than Listed
SC-TC |Service
Commercial (Town
Center)|
T-C (Town Center)
South
Ann Road (Right-oI-
Way)
ROW (Right-oI-Way) ROW (Right-oI-Way)
East
Other than Listed
SC-TC |Service
Commercial (Town
Center)|
T-C (Town Center)
West
Liquor
Establishment
Tavern)
SC-TC |Service
Commercial (Town
Center)|
T-C (Town Center)

Town Center Master Plan Y
T-C (Town Center) District Y
Trails N/A

ANALYSIS

This is the Iirst request Ior an Extension oI Time oI a previously approved Variance (VAR-
45114), Special Use Permit (SUP-45116) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-45115) Ior a
proposed Iour-story, 55-Ioot tall, 87-unit, 50,478 square-Ioot hotel with waivers to allow a
distance separation oI 82 Ieet Irom a single Iamily dwelling, where 330 Ieet is required, the
streetscape and sign requirements oI the Town Center Development Standards manual, including
allowing a 65-Ioot tall Pylon Sign where 24 Ieet is the maximum allowed. The associated
Variance (VAR-45114) is to allow 74 parking spaces where 87 are required and to allow one
loading space where three are required on 1.83 acres at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive. No plans have
been submitted Ior review nor have any building permits been issued Ior the proposed
development.

Title 19.16.100, Title 19.16.110 and Title 19.16.140 deems a Site Development Plan Review,
Special Use Permit and a Variance exercised upon the issuance oI a building permit Ior the
principal structure on site.
EOT-54461, EOT-54462 and EOT-54463 PR1-54451]
JG


FINDINGS

The Site Development Plan Review, Special Use Permit and a Variance have not been exercised
in accordance with the requirements oI Title 19.16.100, Title 19.16.110 and Title 19.16.140 as a
building permit has not been issued Ior the proposed development. The applicant is requesting
an Extension oI Time, as the approved entitlements would expire prior to the Iinalization oI an
agreement between the applicant and Marriott International Incorporated. Because the applicant
is working toward an agreement with Marriott International Incorporated, staII recommends
approval oI this request with a two-year time limit. ConIormance to the conditions oI approval
oI Variance (VAR-45114), Special Use Permit (SUP-45116) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-45115) shall be required.

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED N/A

NOTICES MAILED N/A
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54461
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54461
08/12/14 PC
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
0 6 / 1 0 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 1
E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
1
,

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
2

&

E
O
T
-
5
4
4
6
3
E
O
T
-
4
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
4
1
j

-

E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N

O
F

T
I
M
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

E
O
T
-
Z

A
N
D

E
O
T
-
4
4
3

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

H
O
T
E
L

S
P
O
U
P

L
L
C

7
0
1

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

E
O
T
-
4
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
4
1
j

-

E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N

O
F

T
I
M
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

E
O
T
-
Z

A
N
D

E
O
T
-
4
4
3

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

H
O
T
E
L

S
P
O
U
P

L
L
C

7
0
1

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

E
O
T
-
4
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
4
1
j

-

E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N

O
F

T
I
M
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

E
O
T
-
Z

A
N
D

E
O
T
-
4
4
3

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

H
O
T
E
L

S
P
O
U
P

L
L
C

7
0
1

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

E
O
T
-
4
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
4
1
j

-

E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N

O
F

T
I
M
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

E
O
T
-
Z

A
N
D

E
O
T
-
4
4
3

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

H
O
T
E
L

S
P
O
U
P

L
L
C

7
0
1

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54461, EOT-54462 & EOT-54463
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54461
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54461

Agenda tem No.: 9.


SUB1ECT:
EOT-54462 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-54461 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE HOTEL GROUP, LLC - For possible action on a request
Ior an Extension oI Time oI a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-45116) FOR A
HOTEL, MOTEL OR MOTEL SUITES WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE
SEPARATION OF 82 FEET FROM A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING WHERE
330 FEET IS REQUIRED at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-004), T-C (Town Center)
Zone |SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6
(Ross) |PRJ-54451|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Backup - ReIer to EOT-54461
3. Action Letter Ior SUP-45116
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54462
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54462
08/12/14 PC
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54462
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54462

Agenda tem No.: 10.


SUB1ECT:
EOT-54463 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-54461 AND EOT-54462 - SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKY POINTE HOTEL GROUP,
LLC - For possible action on a request Ior an Extension oI Time oI a previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-45115) FOR A PROPOSED FOUR-STORY, 55-FOOT TALL,
87-UNIT, 50,478 SQUARE-FOOT HOTEL WITH WAIVERS OF THE STREETSCAPE AND
SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MANUAL, INCLUDING ALLOWING A 65-FOOT TALL PYLON SIGN WHERE 24 FEET
IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED on 1.83 acres at 5701 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-
004), T-C (Town Center) Zone |SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use
Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-54451|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON


RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Backup - ReIer to EOT-54461
3. Action Letter Ior SDR-45115
paper use, backup
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54463
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54463
08/12/14 PC
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54463
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54463
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54463
06/10/14
PRJ-54451
EOT-54463

Agenda tem No.: 11.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54578 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
ARCHLAND PROPERTY I, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit
TO ADD A DUAL DRIVE-THROUGH LANE AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT (WITH
DRIVE-THROUGH) at 7150 West Craig Road (APN 138-03-611-003), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54396|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-54578 PR1-54396]
YK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY I, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-54578 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-54578 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI
Iinal approval.

2. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-54579) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

4. The stacking oI two vehicles per drive-through lane is hereby approved.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
SUP-54578 PR1-54396]
YK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to add an additional drive-through lane at an existing restaurant at
7150 West Craig Road. This is located within a shopping center. The applicant is not meeting
the minimum conditions Ior a dual drive-through, since only two vehicle stacking per lane is
being provided. Due to the age oI the existing shopping mall and the location oI the restaurant,
staII does not see a circulation problem with the lack oI stacking with this request. ThereIore,
staII recommends approval with conditions.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit (SUP-54788) is required to allow a dual drive-through without the
required three-vehicle stacking per lane.


12/15/93
The City Council approved a reclassiIication (Z-0105-93) Irom N-U (Non-
Urban) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) Ior a proposed shopping center. The
original request was Ior C-2 (General Commercial), but City Council
amended the request to C-1. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
10/02/96
The City Council approved a Reinstatement and Extension oI Time |Z-0105-
93(2)| on property located on the northeast corner oI Craig Road and Tenaya
Way Ior an approved 146,600 square-Ioot commercial center. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
07/03/14
The Planning Department staII approved a Site Development Plan Review,
Minor (SDR-54579) Ior elevation and parking lot improvements Ior an
existing restaurant at 7150 West Craig Road.

SUP-54578 PR1-54396]
YK


12/12/00
A CertiIicate oI Occupancy (#327812) was issued Ior a restaurant at 7150
West Craig Road.
06/26/14
A building permit (#263714) Ior a Tenant Improvement at 7150 West Craig
Road was applied Ior. The permit is pending Planning Department approval.

06/02/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the proposal to add another drive-
through lane. This will require a Special Use Permit since the stacking
requirement is not being met. The Iaade improvements and minor square-
Iootage additions will be processed via a Site Development Plan Review,
Minor application.


Field Check
07/03/14
StaII visited the site and Iound an open Iast Iood restaurant with a single
drive-through lane. The site was clean and well maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.78

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East
U.S. 95 Right-oI-
way
U.S. 95 Right-oI-way U.S. 95 Right-oI-way
Financial Institution O (OIIice) O (OIIice)
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-CL (Single Family,
Compact-Lot)
West
Pet Cemetery
RS (Residential
Suburban) Clark County
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential District) Clark
County
SUP-54578 PR1-54396]
YK


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet) Y
Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Craig Road Primary Arterial Planned Streets and
Highways Map
100 Y
Tenaya Way Secondary
Collector
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
67,904 SF
1 per 250
SF
272


295

Y
Loading
Spaces
4 4 Y

ANALYSIS

The Drive-Through use is deIined as 'The use oI a dedicated drive lane that, incidental to a
principal use, provides access to a station, such as a window, door or mechanical device, Irom
which occupants oI a motor vehicle receive or obtain a product or service. The proposed use
meets the deIinition as described in the justiIication letter. There are no minimum Special Use
Permit conditions Ior this use.
SUP-54578 PR1-54396]
YK


A Special Use Permit is being requested as the requirement to provide a three-vehicle stacking
lane Ior each oI the drive-through lanes is not being provided. The site only has room to provide
stacking oI two vehicles per lane. There are three ingress/egress points to the parking lot where
the drive-through will be located. II there are vehicles stacked greater than two in each lane, this
will block one oI the ingress/egress points. StaII doesn`t view this as a major concern, since
there will be two remaining ways Ior customers to come and go Irom the restaurant. Also, no
parking spaces will be blocked, just one oI the aisles.

FINDINGS (SUP-54578)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The existing restaurant will remain compatible with the surrounding area, as it is adjacent
to similar commercial uses. The applicant will increase the drive-through capacity, which
will reduce congestion within the existing shopping center parking lot.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The proposed dual drive-through use is located within an existing shopping center, which
is suitable Ior the proposal.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The site is accessed via drive aisles Ied Irom Craig Road and Tenaya Way. The on-site
circulation will improve with a redesigned, dual drive-through lane that allows a queuing
oI vehicles in a more eIIicient manner. The restaurant will maintain a single pick-up aisle,
but will include a split lane with two menu boards, thus reducing the overall length oI
vehicle queuing.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

This approval will not compromise the public health, saIety, or welIare since permits and
inspections by staII will ensure compliance.
SUP-54578 PR1-54396]
YK


5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

There are no conditions Ior a Drive-Through with an approved Special Use Permit.


NOTICES MAILED 360

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
06/16/14
PRJ-54396
SUP-54578
06/16/14
PRJ-54396
SUP-54578
08/12/14 PC
0
6
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
3
9
6
S
U
P
-
5
4
5
7
8
0
6
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
3
9
6
S
U
P
-
5
4
5
7
8
0
6
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
3
9
6
S
U
P
-
5
4
5
7
8
Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Total
Name
07/03/2014 SUP-54578, PRJ-54396 LV
Spectrum Services
McDonalds
7150 Craig Rd
138-03-611-003
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
no comment
S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
4
3
9
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

A
P
C
H
L
A
N
D

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
Y

I

L
L
C

7
1
0

W
E
S
T

C
P
A
I
S

P
O
A
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
4
3
9
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

A
P
C
H
L
A
N
D

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
Y

I

L
L
C

7
1
0

W
E
S
T

C
P
A
I
S

P
O
A
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/16/14
PRJ-54396
SUP-54578
06/16/14
PRJ-54396
SUP-54578

Agenda tem No.: 12.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54786 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ALEXANDER
ALEXANDROV - OWNER: GREAT WASH PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior
a Special Use Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT IN
CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING 2,161 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH A 65
SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 141-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CITY PARK WHERE 400 FEET IS THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED at 420 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150 (APN 138-32-615-001), C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) |PRJ-54720|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
4. Photos
6. Protest/Support Postcards

SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ALEXANDER ALEXANDROV - OWNER:
GREAT WASH PARK, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5478 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use.


3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.


5. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI a liquor license.
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

Conditions Page Two

6. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or Iermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate Irom the bar in conIormance with Title 6.50.

7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.50 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.


SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment Ior an existing restaurant located in an existing mixed-use development at 420
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150. The restaurant establishment is 2,161 square Ieet in size
with a 65 square-Ioot outdoor seating area. The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use will be ancillary
to the existing restaurant. As this request can be conducted in a compatible and harmonious
manner within the existing mixed-use development, staII recommends approval oI this
application. II denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-
Sale establishment at this location.

ISSUES

The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
A distance separation Waiver is required to allow the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use 141 Ieet
Irom a City park where 400 Ieet is the minimum required. StaII supports the Waiver Ior
distance separation as the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use has no pedestrian access
to the existing park.


04/19/06
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770)
Ior a 10-story Mixed-Use Development consisting oI 699,000 square Ieet oI
commercial space and 340 residential units and a Variance (VAR-10773) to
allow 3,995 parking spaces where 4,961 parking spaces are required at the
northeast corner oI Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive. Planning Commission
recommended approval. StaII recommended denial.
10/01/08
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-28998) Ior a Supper
Club and a Waiver to allow a 141-Ioot separation Irom a City Park where 400
Ieet is the minimum required at the northeast corner oI Rampart Boulevard
and Alta Drive. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

12/17/08
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-30583) Ior a proposed
12,195 square-Ioot Supper Club with a waiver to allow a 141-Ioot distance
separation Irom a city park where 400 Ieet is required at 440 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suite #120. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
07/01/09
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-34175) Ior a proposed
Liquor Establishment (Tavern) with waivers to allow a distance separation oI
141 Ieet Irom a City Park and to allow no distance separation Irom a similar
use where 1,500 Ieet is required at 330 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #215.
StaII recommended approval.
09/23/10
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-39146) Ior a
Liquor Establishment (Tavern) with waivers to allow a distance separation oI
141 Ieet Irom a City Park and to allow no distance separation Irom a similar
use where 1,500 Ieet is required at 440 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #180.
StaII recommended approval.
10/21/10
Supper Club with a waiver to allow a 141-Ioot distance separation Irom a City
Park where 400 Ieet is required at 420 South Boulevard, Suite #180 and a
Special Use Permit (SUP-39441) Ior a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) with
waivers to allow a distance separation oI 141 Ieet Irom a City Park and to
allow no distance separation Irom a similar use where 1,500 Ieet is required at
440 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #B190. StaII recommended approval.
12/16/10
proposed Supper Club with a waiver to allow a 141-Ioot separation distance
Irom a City Park where 400 Ieet is required at 400 South Rampart Boulevard,
Suite #190. StaII recommended approval.
04/12/11
proposed 2,946 square-Ioot Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use
with a waiver to allow a 141-Ioot distance separation Irom a City Park where
400 Ieet is required at 410 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120. StaII
05/10/11
Liquor Establishment (Tavern), located at located at 430 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suites #B160, B170 and B181 and a Special Use Permit (SUP-
40749) Ior a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) at 430 South Rampart Boulevard,
Suite #B130. StaII recommended approval.
05/08/12
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-
43957) to allow an Indoor Swap Meet at 420 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#150. StaII recommended approval.
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB


07/10/12
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-45533) to
allow a Supper Club at 430 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 170. StaII
08/14/12
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-45933) to
allow a Beer/Wine/Cooler On- And OII-Sale Establishment use at 420 South
Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150. StaII recommended approval.
09/11/12
46271) to allow a Supper Club at 430 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 110.
StaII recommended approval oI the request.
02/12/13
47802) Ior a supper club in conjunction with an existing 21,239 square-Ioot
restaurant and beer/wine/cooler on and oII-sale establishment with a waiver to
allow a 141-Ioot distance separation Irom a city park where 400 Ieet is the
minimum required at 420 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150.
07/09/13
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior an Extension oI Time
(EOT-49284) oI an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-41304) Ior a proposed
13,122 square-Ioot liquor establishment (tavern) within a 28.44-acre mixed-
use development with waivers to allow a distance separation oI 141 Ieet Irom
a park where 1,500 Ieet is required and no distance separation Irom a similar
use where 1,500 Ieet is required at 430 South Rampart Boulevard, Suites #150
and #230. StaII recommended approval oI the request.
08/01/13
The Planning Department administratively approved a request Ior Special Use
Permit (SUP-50286) Ior a Minor Amendment to an approved Special Use
Permit (SUP-30583) Ior a proposed reduction in Iloor area to a supper club at
440 South Rampart Boulevard, Suites #120.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Master Sign Plan (MSP-50954) Ior
a Major Amendment oI an approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-40230) Ior an
existing mixed-use development on 28.43 acres at the northeast corner oI Alta
Drive and Rampart Boulevard. StaII recommended denial oI the request.
12/18/13
The City Council approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-50955) to allow 10
proposed Ireestanding signs to be spaced 35 Ieet apart where six signs spaced
at least 100 Ieet apart are allowed on 28.43 acres at the northeast corner oI
Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard. StaII recommended denial oI the request.
01/14/14
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-52089) Ior a Major Amendment oI an approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-10770) to reduce the southeast side yard
setback Irom 115 Ieet to 65 Ieet and to reduce the number oI residential units
Irom 340 to 300 oI an existing mixed-use development on 28.43 acres at 330,
340, 350 and 360 South Rampart Boulevard. StaII recommended approval oI
the request.
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

07/08/14
The Planning Department administratively approved a request Ior Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-54397) Ior a Minor Amendment oI an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770) to remove building
13, incorporate building 14 into building 15, decrease total net Iloor area Irom
793,925 square Ieet to 775,890 square Ieet and allow minor Iaade
improvements at an existing mixed use development on a portion oI 28.43
acres at 280, 320 and 340 South Rampart Boulevard.


09/12/13
A business license (#R10-01311) was issued Ior Iood services (The Crepe) at
420 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #150. The license is still active

06/25/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit Ior
a proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale establishment use.

A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
07/03/14
The site contains an existing well maintained mixed-use development, with
six buildings currently existing on the south side oI the development.

Site Area
Net Acres 28.43
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Mixed-Use
Development
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North
Commercial
Recreation and
Amusement
(Outdoor)
PR-OS
(Parks/Recreation/Open
Space)
C-V (Civic)
South
Undeveloped
|approved Shopping
Center and Multi-
Family
Development|
SC (Service
Commercial)
PD (Planned
Development)
East
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
West Hotel/Casino
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Trails (Pedestrian Path) Y


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Rampart Boulevard Primary Arterial
Master Plan oI Streets &
Highways
100 Y
Alta Drive Major Collector
Master Plan oI Streets &
Highways
80 Y
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

Staff Report Page Six

Pursuant to SDR-54397, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Mixed-Use 775,890 SF
Shared
parking
model
as
originally
approved
by SDR-
10770
3,760

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 3,760

3,877

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 3,712 48 3,817 60 Y

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
A 400-Ioot minimum separation
distance is required Irom any
City park.
To allow a 141-Ioot
separation distance
Irom a City park
Approval

ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use Ior an existing
restaurant located in an existing mixed-use development at 420 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#150. The subject site is located with the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. The existing
restaurant is 2,161 square Ieet in size with a 65 square-Ioot outdoor seating area and has seating
Ior 60 people. The restaurant is located within a portion oI a suite which has been approved as an
indoor swap meet per Special Use Permit (SUP-43957). The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use will
be ancillary to the existing restaurant. The applicant has indicated in the justiIication letter that
the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use will allow the existing restaurant to attract more
customers and provide better service to its patrons.

The subject site is located within an existing 775,890 square-Ioot mixed-use development. The
existing development provides shares access and parking throughout the subject site. The
proposal adheres to all minimum parking requirements.
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

Staff Report Page Seven

A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use is described in Tile 19.12 as: 'An establishment whose license
to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale oI beer, wine and coolers only Ior consumption
on the premises where the same is sold.

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:
1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment (hereinaIter
'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship, school,
individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use aoes meet this requirement, as the proposea site is locatea 141 feet away of
from a City park lana use. The applicant has requestea a Waiver to this aistance separation
requirement.

2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line oI that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line
reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site parking and which
has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

Distances have been measurea from Plat Book 143, Page 49.

3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the structure in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center or
other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest
property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located,
without regard to intervening obstacles.

Not applicable, the subfect site is not locatea on a parcel of at least 80 acres of si:e, the assessor
list the subfect property at 28.43 acres.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also requires a
waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into
consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation to the City Council,
state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support oI the
decision.
SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

Staff Report Page Eight

The proposea site is locatea 141 feet away of a City park, where 400 feet is requirea, which
represents a 65 reauction from coae requirements. In aaaition, the subfect property is
separatea from the existing City park lana use ana proviaes no peaestrian access. Staff has
aeterminea that since there is no peaestrian access there is ample separation from the existing
City park lana use.

5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:
a. An establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having
200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort hotel having in
excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space.

This conaition is not applicable as the subfect site is not locatea within a an establishment which
has a non-restrictea gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms
or a proposea establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space.

* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50.

The proposea use will be subfect to all business licensing requirements outlinea in LJMC
Chapter 6.50 if approvea.

The proposed use is located within 141 Ieet oI City park to the northeast where a 400-Ioot
minimum distance separation is required. The proposed location oI this use Iails to comply with
the minimum distance separation requirements Ior a Special Use Permit. The requested Waiver
to allow a 141-Ioot distance separation Irom a City park use represents a 65 reduction Irom the
required 400-Ioot separation mandated by Title 19. StaII has determined that since there is no
reasonable means oI access Irom the City Park to the Mixed-Use development within the 141-
Ioot distance separation there is ample separation Irom the existing City park land use. StaII has
added a condition oI approval requiring the business conIorm to all provisions oI LVMC Chapter
6.50 with regards to running a restaurant and alcohol license. It has been determined that the
proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible with
the surrounding land uses, thereIore, staII is recommending approval, as the use is considered
appropriate Ior the surrounding area.



SUP-54786 PR1-54720]
JB

Staff Report Page Nine

The subject suite was previously approved to operate as an Indoor Swap meet,
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale and OII-Sale use, and Supper Club. This request is Ior one
tenant within the overall suite which Iunctions as a restaurant. The proposed
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use will be ancillary to the existing restaurant use at the subject
site. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be conducted
in a manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.


The subject site is located within an existing mixed-use development that is physically
suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.


Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property Irom Rampart
Boulevard a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial; and Alta Drive a 80-Ioot Major Collector, as
classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways

General Plan.

Approval oI this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health saIety and
general welIare oI the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions.


With the exception oI the Waiver, the project meets the conditions oI Title 19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 802

APPROVALS 6

PROTESTS 1
06/26/14
PRJ-54720
SUP-54786
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 6/30/2014 3:31:35 PM
Applicant Email: halixand@gmail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Aleksandrov
Rep First Name: Aleksandar
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: 702-885-7354
Applicant Zip: 89129
Rep Address: 3736 Crescent Canyon St.
Rep Email: halixand@gmail.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-885-7354
Rep Zip: 89129
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13832615001
Project Name THE CREPE (BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE) - SPECIAL USE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 2 (BOB BEERS)
Application Number: PRJ-54720
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 420 SOUTH RAMPART BLVD SUITE 150
Application/Petition For: The Crepe (Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale) - Special Use Permit
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Aleksandar
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 3736 Crescent Canyon St.
Applicant Last Name: Aleksandrov
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-54786
Page 2 of 2 6/30/2014 3:31:35 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
GREAT WASH PARK L L C 9525 HILLWOOD DR #100 LAS VEGAS, NV 89134-0596
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Aleksandar Aleksandrov The Crpe Owner halixand@gmail.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
SUP-54786
06/26/14
PRJ-54720
SUP-54786
06/26/14
PRJ-54720
SUP-54786
K
I
T
C
H
E
N
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
60 SEATS
Indoor: 2161 sq.ft.
Outdoor: 65 sq.ft.
60 SSSEAT AA S
IInddddoor: 22116611 sq.fftt fff .
Ouutdoor: 65 sq.ft ff .
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
I
T
KK
I
TT
C
T
CC
H
C
HHH
EE
NNNN
KKKKKKKKKK
I
TT
CC
HH
E
NN
06/26/14
PRJ-54720
SUP-54786
S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
Z
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
L
E
X
A
N
D
E
P

A
L
E
X
A
N
D
P
O
V

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
P
E
A
T

W
A
S
H

P
A
P
k

L
L
C

4
Z
0

S
O
U
T
H

P
A
M
P
A
P
T

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

0

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
Z
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
L
E
X
A
N
D
E
P

A
L
E
X
A
N
D
P
O
V

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
P
E
A
T

W
A
S
H

P
A
P
k

L
L
C

4
Z
0

S
O
U
T
H

P
A
M
P
A
P
T

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

0

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

June 9, 2014

To whom it may concern,

I, Alexander Alexandrov, owner of The Crpe, am requesting a special use permit
allowing me to provide alcohol beverages with meals in the connes of my leased
space under the permitted use of the Beer, Wine and Cooler On-sale permit.

The Crpe specializes in gourmet crpes and provides nightly entertainment to our
guests who are accustomed to and expects us to provide them a selection of beer
and wine along with their food. We are a small restaurant completely funded by my
wife and I, thus the additional prots from selling alcohol will allow us fund an
expansion, hire more people, attract more customers and provide better service to
our guests.

We provide unique events and entertainment to our guests such as weekly live jazz
sessions on Fridays and Saturdays. We feature local musicians and support the
UNLV jazz program graduates by giving them a place to perform. We host an art
night on Wednesdays where local artists and beginners come and paint. We host
art exhibits featuring a new artist every few weeks. Mondays we work with an
improv group where local actors come and perform clean comedy.

All of the events we host provide different entertainment to suit the diverse
population of Summerlin and Las Vegas. By providing beer and wine we will attract
more people to our nightly events helping support local artists, musicians and
creating more jobs.

Sincerely yours,

Alex Alexandrov
702-885-7354
alex@thecrepelasvegas.
com

420 S. Rampart Blvd.,
#150
Las Vegas, NV
89145
ROCKETHSIP 8, LLC DBA THE CRPE
06/26/14
PRJ-54720
SUP-54786

Agenda tem No.: 13.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54827 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY LAS VEGAS, INC - OWNER: SAHARA CROSSING, LP - For possible action
on a request Ior a Major Amendment oI an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-45965) FOR A
PROPOSED 12,770 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING THRIFT SHOP USE
at 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120 (APN 162-06-411-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-54723|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS VEGAS, INC -
OWNER: SAHARA CROSSING, LP


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-54827 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a ThriIt Shop use.

2. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI Iinal
approval.

3. ConIormance to the approved conditions Ior Special Use Permit (SUP-45965).


SaIety.
SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR

Conditions Page Two


7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.


SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has requested a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-
45965) to add approximately 12,770 square-Ioot oI additional space to a ThriIt Shop use at 4580
West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120. The requested area will expand an existing not-Ior-proIit ThriIt
Shop Irom 13,948 square Ieet to 26,718 square Ieet. StaII recommends approval oI the proposed
amendment, as the expansion meets the minimum Title 19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use
and can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the surrounding area. II
denied, the applicant will not be allowed to expand the use; however, the existing 13,948 square-
Ioot ThriIt Shop may remain open at 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120.

ISSUES

A Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-45965) is required to expand
an existing ThriIt Shop use by more than 50 percent in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district.


08/05/87
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0057-87) request Irom R-1 (Single
Family Residence), R-3 (Limited Multiple Residence) and C-1 (Limited
Commercial) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) Ior this site as part oI a larger
overall request. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
05/12/88
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0057-87) request
Ior a Shopping Center on the property located on the northeast corner oI
Decatur Boulevard and Sahara Avenue under Resolution oI Intent to C-1
(Limited Commercial). StaII recommended approval.
01/24/08
The Planning Department administratively approved a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-25837) request Ior proposed exterior modiIications to an
existing shopping center at 4580 West Sahara Avenue.
12/13/11
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-43700)
request Ior a ThriItshop, Non-ProIit use at 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite
08/14/12
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-45965)
request Ior a ThriItshop, Non-ProIit use at 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite
SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR

09/05/12
The City Council adopted Ordinance 6210 that combined and removed a
number oI land use in Title 19.12. The ThriItshop and ThriItshop, Non-ProIit
uses were consolidated to become the ThriIt Shop use.


04/10/95
A building permit (#95372959) was issued Ior a shell building at 4580 West
Sahara Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 07/28/95.
11/17/99
A business license (N36-00006) was issued Ior a Non-ProIit ThriIt Store at
4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #110. The license is active as oI 07/01/14.
08/15/13
A building permit (#217747) was issued Ior a tenant improvement at 4580
West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120. The permit was Iinalized on 01/09/14.
A business license (N31-90100) was issued Ior a Non-ProIit ThriIt Store at
4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120. The license is active as oI 07/16/14.
02/28/14
A business license (C25-90099) was issued Ior a Contractor at 4580 West
Sahara Avenue, Suite #120. The license is active as oI 07/16/14.
06/16/14
A building permit (#262698) was issued Ior a 13,948 square-Ioot expansion
oI 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120. The permit has not been issued as
oI 07/16/14.

06/24/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant`s designated
representative and discussed the Special Use Permit submittal requirement to
amend an existing use permit Ior a not-Ior-proIit ThriIt Store use at 4580
West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120.


Field Check
07/03/14
A Iield inspection was conducted on the subject site, which revealed that the
existing thriIt shop is in operation and the site is well maintained. It is noted
that there are a number oI directional signs on site that meet current code
requirements.
SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR


Site Area
Net Acres 6.15

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
South Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
West Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI Regional SigniIicance Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
74,349 1/250 SF 298


396

Y
SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR


Proposed and existing locations and size
4580 West Sahara Avenue Suite Size
Existing 120 13,948 SF
Percentage oI increase/decrease
Proposed 120 26,718 SF 91.5 increase

ANALYSIS

Special Use Permit (SUP-54827) was approved Ior a ThriItshop, Non-ProIit use; however, that
use has become a ThriIt Shop use by Ordinance Number 6210 adopted by the City Council on
September 5, 2012. The requirements Ior the Special Use Permit Ior a ThriItshop, Non-ProIit
use and ThriIt Shop are the same.

The ThriIt Shop use is deIined as 'A retail Iacility that sells any new or used merchandise
that has been donated to the Iacility.

The applicant is a not-Ior-proIit organization with other thriIt shops in the valley where donated
used merchandise is sold. The applicant plans to expand this location by 12,770 square Ieet.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

1. No outdoor display or sales oI any merchandise shall be permitted (non-waivable
condition).

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as the submittea site plan ana floor plan
show conformance to this conaition, ana it is a conaition of approval of the Special Use
Permit.

2. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Title 6 (non-waivable
condition).
The proposea use will meet this requirement, as it is a conaition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.

3. Donations shall be accepted only during normal business hours, unless otherwise speciIically
approved in connection with the Special Use Permit. Where aIter-hours donation oI items is
approved, donation areas and containers, whether or not enclosed or screened, must be designed
so that donated items are not visible to the general public.

Per the fustification letter aatea stampea 07/09/1, aonatea items will only be receivea
Monaay thru Friaay from 8.00 am to 6.00 pm ana Saturaay from 9.00 am to 4.00 pm.
SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR


The applicant has requested a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-
45965) to add approximately 12,770 square Ieet oI additional space Ior a not-Ior-proIit ThriIt
Shop use. The site is located at 4580 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #120. The requested area will
expand an existing tenant space and ThriIt Shop use Irom 13,948 square Ieet to 26,718 square
Ieet.

The subject site is located within 500 Ieet oI a city boundary and is a Major Amendment to a
Special Use Permit; thereIore, this is a Project oI Regional SigniIicance. The required documents
have been completed and distributed to the appropriate agency; however, no responses were
received.

StaII recommends approval oI the proposed amendment to Special Use Permit (SUP-45965), as
the use continues to meet the minimum Title 19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use and can
continue to be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the surrounding
neighborhood. II denied, the applicant will not be allowed to expand the use; however, the
existing 13,948 square-Ioot not-Ior-proIit ThriIt Shop may remain open at 4580 West Sahara
Avenue, Suite #120.




The proposed expansion oI an existing ThriIt Shop use can continue to be conducted in
compatible and harmonious manner with the existing and Iuture surrounding land uses.


The site is physically suitable Ior the type and intensity oI land uses proposed, as the use
would be located within an existing multi-tenant building with ample parking. The site is
designed to accommodate a number oI uses such as oIIices, retail shops, thriIt shops and
other uses.

SUP-54827 PR1-54723]
MR


The site has direct access to Sahara Avenue, which is a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial as
classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. The right-oI-way provides adequate
capacity to serve the proposed use.

General Plan.

The existing ThriIt Shop use is subject to regular inspections and will not compromise the
public health and saIety.


The use meets all Title 19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use and no Waivers are
required.


NOTICES MAILED 242

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
06/26/14
PRJ-54723
SUP-54827
06/26/14
PRJ-54723
SUP-54827
08/12/14 PC
0
7
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
2
3
S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
7
0
7
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
2
3
S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
7
07/09/14
PRJ-54723
SUP-54827
0
7
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
2
3
S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
7
Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Total
Name
07/03/2014 SUP-54827, PRJ-54723 LV
Pacific Design Concepts
Habitat for Humanity
4580 W. Sahara
162-06-411-004
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
no comment
S
U
P
-
Z
7

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
Z
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

H
A
I
T
A
T

F
O
P

H
U
M
A
N
I
T
Y

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

I
N
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
H
A
P
A

C
P
O
S
S
I
N
S

L
P

4
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
I
T
E

1
Z
0

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-
Z
7

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
Z
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

H
A
I
T
A
T

F
O
P

H
U
M
A
N
I
T
Y

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

I
N
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
H
A
P
A

C
P
O
S
S
I
N
S

L
P

4
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
I
T
E

1
Z
0

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

07/09/14
PRJ-54723
SUP-54827

Agenda tem No.: 14.


SUB1ECT:
MSP-54794 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SMITH'S
FOOD AND DRUG CENTERS, INC - For possible action on a request Ior a Major Amendment
to an approved Master Sign Plan (CHR-0019-05) TO ALLOW SIGNAGE ON A FUEL
CANOPY at 7050 North Durango Drive (APN 125-20-510-011), T-C (Town Center) Zone |UC-
TC (Urban Center Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross)
|PRJ-54774|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Postcards

MSP-54794 PR1-54774]
YK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG
CENTERS, INC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
MSP-54794 StaII recommends APPROVAL.

`` CONDITIONS ``

MSF-5474 CONDIIIONS

Planning

pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time application may be
Iiled Ior consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

2. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan and sign elevations, date
stamped 06/26/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

3. Any Iuture sign proposals or modiIications that meet Title 19 and Town Center
Development Standards signage requirements may be approved administratively by
Department oI Planning staII.

SaIety.

Ior building permits.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,

MSP-54794 PR1-54774]
YK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to add signage to an approved Iuel dispensing canopy in the
Montecito Town Center Shopping Center at 7050 North Durango Drive. The proposed signage
adheres to Title 19 and Town Center Development Standards. However, since a Master Sign
Plan was approved Ior this site, an amendment application is required. A condition has been
added to allow Iuture signage that meets all code requirements to be administratively approved
by staII. StaII recommends approval, with conditions. II denied, no signage would be permitted
on the Iuel dispensing canopy.


05/20/64
The City Council approved an annexation (A-0003-64) oI land generally
located north oI Cheyenne Avenue and west oI Decatur Boulevard, containing
approximately 10,136 acres, including the 40-acre east portion oI the subject
site. The eIIective date was 05/29/64.
12/07/98
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) to T-C (Town Center) oI
a 1,468-acre portion oI the Northwest, including the east 40-acre portion oI
the overall subject site. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
01/17/01
The City Council approved an annexation (A-0003-99) oI land generally
located west oI El Capitan Way and east oI Hualapai Way between Grand
Teton Drive and Rome Avenue, containing approximately 615 acres,
including the west Iive acres oI the subject site. The eIIective date was
01/26/01. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
12/19/02
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Tentative Map (TMP-
1244) Ior a three-lot commercial subdivision on 80 acres on the east side oI
the El Capitan Way alignment (Durango Drive) between Elkhorn Road and
Deer Springs Way. StaII recommended approval.
04/07/04
related to a Major ModiIication oI the Montecito Town Center Development
Agreement (MOD-3763) and Rezoning (ZON-3840) Ior a proposed 587,750
square-Ioot mixed-use commercial development on 45.6 acres in Montecito
Town Center, adjacent to the southeast corner oI Elkhorn Road and Durango
Drive. Additionally, the Iollowing Special Use Permits were also approved:
(SUP-3765) Ior Liquor Sales on Pad A, (SUP-3767) Ior Gaming (Incidental)
MSP-54794 PR1-54774]
YK


on Pad A, (SUP-3769) Ior a Drive-through Facility on Pad A, (SUP-3770) Ior
a Drive-through Facility on Pad HH, (SUP-3788) Ior a Drive-Through Iacility
on DD, and (SUP-3789) Ior a Drive-through Facility on EE. The Planning
02/16/05
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5731) Ior
a 380,000 square-Ioot commercial development on 45.6 acres adjacent to the
southeast corner oI Durango Drive and Elkhorn Road. Planning Commission
and StaII recommended approval.
03/01/05
The Centennial Hills Architectural Review Committee (CHARC) approved a
Master Sign Plan (CHARC-0019-05) Ior a shopping center at the southeast
corner oI Durango Drive and Elkhorn Road. StaII recommended approval.
04/19/06
The City Council approved a Major Amendment to a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-11702, amended Irom SDR-5731) to allow the modiIication oI
pads G, I through O, R, U, and V on 21.48 acres at the southeast corner oI
Durango Drive and Elkhorn Road. Planning Commission recommended
approval. StaII recommended denial.
04/19/06
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-11710) to allow 1,032 parking
spaces where 1,209 parking spaces is the minimum number oI parking spaces
required on 21.48 acres at the southeast corner oI Durango Drive and Elkhorn
Road. Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII recommended
denial.
07/19/06
The City Council approved Special Use Permit (SUP-13501) Ior a proposed
Supper Club adjacent to the east side oI Durango Drive, approximately 1,100
Ieet south oI Elkhorn Road. The Planning Commission and staII
The Planning Commission approved Special Use Permit (SUP-50121) Ior a
proposed service station at 7050 North Durango Drive. StaII recommended
approval.
08/13/13
The Planning Commission approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
50120) Ior a proposed gas sales canopy on 1.44 acres at 7050 North Durango
Drive. StaII recommended approval.


A building permit (#252943) Ior a Iuel dispensing canopy was approved Ior
7050 North Durango Drive. It has not been Iinalized.
A building permit (#252948) Ior a Iuel dispensing kiosk was approved Ior
7050 North Durango Drive. It has not been Iinalized.
06/09/14
A building permit (#252949) Ior on-site improvements was approved Ior 7050
North Durango Drive. It has not been Iinalized.
MSP-54794 PR1-54774]
YK


06/25/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the need to amend the Master Sign
Plan (CHR-0019-05).


Field Check
07/03/14
StaII visited the site and Iound a Iuel canopy and kiosk under construction.
The site was Ienced.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.45

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
North Undeveloped
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
South Hospital
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
East OIIice, Medical
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
Restaurant
Financial Institution,
General
Liquor
Establishment
West
Undeveloped
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
MSP-54794 PR1-54774]
YK


Montecito Town Center Y
Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification
of Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Elkhorn Road Primary Arterial Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways / Town Center
Development Standards Manual
100 Y
Durango Drive Parkway
Arterial
Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways / Town Center
Development Standards Manual
120 Y

Wall Signs for Smith's Fuel Canopy
Standards Allowed Provided
Maximum Number Per approved MSP Six (6)
Maximum Area 50 SF / Sign 50 SF or Less/Sign
Maximum Projection 2 Feet 1 Foot
Illumination Internal/External Internal

ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing six signs (two Iuel price, two Smith`s name and logo and two logos
only) to an approved Fuel Canopy in a shopping center at 7050 North Durango Drive in the
Montecito Overlay oI Town Center. There is an approved Master Sign Plan (CHARC-0019-05)
Ior this shopping center; thereIore, this amendment is required. The application has been
conditioned so any Iuture signage Ior this shopping center that meets all Title 19 and Town
Center Development Standards may be administratively reviewed by Planning Department staII.
MSP-54794 PR1-54774]
YK


The two Iuel price signs will be located on the east and west elevations along with the Smith`s
name and logo signs. The two logo only signs will go on the north and south elevations.

The signs range in size Irom 17.5 square Ieet up to 45.5 square Ieet, all within code
requirements. The signs and logo are not unsightly and will assist customers in Iinding the Iuel
pumps in this shopping center. Since Durango Drive is elevated above the shopping center on
the west and there are several Iree-standing buildings throughout the site, the signage is needed.
The signs are internally illuminated and are appropriate in size and number Ior the use.

FINDINGS (MSP-54794)

The proposed changes to the approved Master Sign Plan (CHARC-0019-05), meet the standards set
by the previous approval or conIorm to current Title 19 standards. For these reasons, staII
recommends approval oI this amendment.


NOTICES MAILED 702

APPROVALS 3

PROTESTS 0
06/26/14
PRJ-54774
MSP-54794
06/26/14
PRJ-54774
MSP-54794
08/12/14 PC
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
7
4
M
S
P
-
5
4
7
9
4
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
7
4
M
S
P
-
5
4
7
9
4
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
7
4
M
S
P
-
5
4
7
9
4
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
7
4
M
S
P
-
5
4
7
9
4
M
S
P
-
4
7
9
4

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
7
4
j

-

M
A
S
T
E
P

S
I
S
N

P
L
A
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
M
I
T
H
'
S

F
O
O
D

A
N
D

D
P
U
S

C
E
N
T
E
P
S

I
N
C

7
0
0

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

M
S
P
-
4
7
9
4

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
7
4
j

-

M
A
S
T
E
P

S
I
S
N

P
L
A
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
M
I
T
H
'
S

F
O
O
D

A
N
D

D
P
U
S

C
E
N
T
E
P
S

I
N
C

7
0
0

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

M
S
P
-
4
7
9
4

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
7
4
j

-

M
A
S
T
E
P

S
I
S
N

P
L
A
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
M
I
T
H
'
S

F
O
O
D

A
N
D

D
P
U
S

C
E
N
T
E
P
S

I
N
C

7
0
0

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/26/14
PRJ-54774
MSP-54794

Agenda tem No.: 15.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - VAR-53871 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: DENNIS PRITCHARD - For possible action on a request Ior a
Variance TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) TO BE LOCATED NINE
FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED AND FIVE
FEET FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.36 acres at
9109 Ghost Mountain Avenue (APN 138-05-411-053), R-PD2 (Residential Planned
Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-53797|. StaII recommends
DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

4. Photos

VAR-53871 PR1-53797]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DENNIS PRITCHARD


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-53871 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-53871 CONDIIIONS

Planning


SaIety.

Ior building permit.


VAR-53871 PR1-53797]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Variance to allow a proposed 861 square-Ioot workshop/casita to be
located nine Ieet Irom the rear property line where ten Ieet is minimum required; and Iive Ieet
away Irom the side property line where ten Ieet is minimum required by Title 19.06. The site is
located at 9109 Ghost Mountain Avenue, in an R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2
Units per Acre) zoning district. No unique or extraordinary evidence has been presented to
warrant the requested Variance. As such, the hardship is selI-imposed and; thereIore, staII
recommends denial oI this request.

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow an Accessory Structure (Class II) to be nine Ieet Irom the
rear property line where ten Ieet is minimum required; and Iive Ieet away Irom the side
property line where ten Ieet is minimum required by Title 19.06.


08/15/01
The City Council approved a request Ior an Annexation (A-0020-01) to annex
approximately 53.90 acres oI land located on the northeast corner oI Fort
Apache Road and Alexander Road. The Planning Commission recommended
approval oI the request.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Variance (V-0055-01) to allow
0.88 acres oI open space where 1.78 acres oI open space is the minimum
allowed on the northeast corner oI the intersection oI Alexander Road and
Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission recommended denial oI the
request.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Rezoning (Z-0050-01) Irom U
(Undeveloped) |DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) General Plan
Designation| to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre)
on approximately 52.5 acres on the northeast corner oI the intersection oI
Alexander Road and Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission
recommended denial oI the request.
09/19/01
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review |Z-
0050-01(1)| Ior a proposed 105-lot single-Iamily subdivision on
approximately 52.50 acres on the northeast corner oI the intersection oI
Alexander Road and Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission
recommended denial oI the request.
VAR-53871 PR1-53797]
JB



12/27/02
A building permit (#2022893) was issued Ior a single Iamily dwelling at 9109
Ghost Mountain Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 06/19/03.
11/12/03
A building permit (#3024016) was issued Ior masonry work at 9109 Ghost
Mountain Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 12/03/03.
04/19/11
A building permit (#184808) was issued Ior a pool and spa at 9109 Ghost
Mountain Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 04/28/11.
04/15/14
A building permit (#258388) was processed Ior a casita. The permit is still in
review and has not been issued.

04/22/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal
requirements Ior a Variance. The Variance is required Ior a proposed
Accessory Structure (Class II) that is located nine Ieet Irom the rear property
line where ten Ieet is minimum required; and Iive Ieet away Irom the side
property line where ten Ieet is minimum required by Title 19.06.


Field Check
05/01/14
A Iield check was conducted on the subject property and revealed a well
maintained single-Iamily residence.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.36

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Single-Family
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
Density Residential)
R-PD2 (Residential
Planned Development 2
Units per Acre)
VAR-53871 PR1-53797]
JB

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special Land
Use Designation
North
Single-Family
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)
South
Single-Family
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-PD5 (Residential
Units per Acre)
East
Single-Family
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)
West
Single-Family
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)

Trails N/A


Pursuant to 1itle 19., the following standards apply:
Min. Setbacks (Accessory Structure)
Side
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
5 Feet
9 Feet
N
N
Min. Distance Irom the principle dwelling 6 Feet 12 Feet Y

VAR-53871 PR1-53797]
JB


ANALYSIS

This application is a request Ior a Variance to allow a proposed 861 square-Ioot Accessory
Structure (Class II) to be located nine Ieet Irom the rear property line where ten Ieet is minimum
required; and Iive Ieet away Irom the side property line where ten Ieet is minimum required by
code. The site is located at 9109 Ghost Mountain Avenue, in an R-PD2 (Residential Planned
Development 2 Units per Acre) zoning district. The submitted elevations and Iloor plan
indicate that the structure will be 14 Ieet in height measured to the mid-point oI the eave and be
utilized as a workshop and casita with an outdoor shower. There are no kitchen Iacilities
associated with the proposal. The accessory structure has been designed to aesthetically match
the principle dwelling with exterior stucco a tile rooI and decorative light Iixtures to match the
existing residence.

Accessory structures in this residential development must adhere to Title 19.06 Development
Standards as the Site Development Plan Review |Z-0050-01(1)| conditions oI approval omit
minimum setback requirements Ior accessory structures. The subject property lot size is 15,682
square Ieet in size, which is consistent with the R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted)
zoning district. Title 19.06 requires accessory structures in the R-D (Single Family Residential-
Restricted) zoning district to maintain a minimum distance separation oI ten Ieet Irom the rear
and side property lines. No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested
Variance. The proposed structure can be redesigned to meet current code requirements. As such,
the hardship is selI-imposed and; thereIore, staII recommends denial oI this request.

FINDINGS (VAR-53871)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.
VAR-53871 PR1-53797]
JB


No evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a selI-imposed hardship by proposing to construct a 861 square-Ioot Accessory
Structure (Class II) to be located nine Ieet Irom the rear property line where ten Ieet is minimum
required; and Iive Ieet away Irom the side property line where ten Ieet is minimum required by
code. The proposed Accessory Structure could be placed within an alternative location that will
allow Ior conIormance to Title 19 requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships imposed
by the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is preIerential
in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.


NOTICES MAILED 237

APPROVALS 4

PROTESTS 1
04/24/14
PRJ-53797
VAR-53871
04/24/14
PRJ-53797
VAR-53871
06/10/14 PC
R
E
A
R

P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y

L
I
N
E

-

1
1
2
'
F
R
O
N
T

P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y

L
I
N
E

-

1
1
2
'

S I D E P R O P E R T Y L I N E - 1 4 1 '
G
H
O
S
T

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

A
V
E
N
U
E
W
.

A
L
E
X
A
N
D
E
R

R
O
A
D
G
R
A
S
S

G
R
A
S
S
D
R
I
V
E

W
A
Y
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
P
A
V
E
D
S
I
D
E

Y
A
R
D
P
O
O
L
S
P
A
E
X
T
E
N
D
E
D
D
R
I
V
E

W
A
Y
G
R
A
S
S

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N

P
O
O
L
E
Q
U
I
P
.
W
M
P
O
R
C
H

C
O

T
O
C
IT
Y
S
E
W
E
R

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
O
U
T
D
O
O
R
K
I
T
C
H
E
N
G
M
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N
T h e P r i t c h a r d R e s i d e n c e
D E T A C H E D A D D I T I O N
0
4
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
7
9
7
V
A
R
-
5
3
8
7
1
0
4
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
7
9
7
V
A
R
-
5
3
8
7
1
0
4
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
7
9
7
V
A
R
-
5
3
8
7
1
V
A
P
-
7
1

[
P
P
J
-
3
7
9
7
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

D
E
N
N
I
S

P
P
I
T
C
H
A
P
D

9
1
0
9

S
H
O
S
T

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
7
1

[
P
P
J
-
3
7
9
7
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

D
E
N
N
I
S

P
P
I
T
C
H
A
P
D

9
1
0
9

S
H
O
S
T

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

04/24/14
PRJ-53797
VAR-53871
04/24/14
PRJ-53797
VAR-53871
04/24/14
PRJ-53797 VAR-53871

Agenda tem No.: 16.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-53624 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
WALGREEN CO. - OWNER: PPLAND, LP - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use
Permit FOR AN ACCESSORY PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN AN
EXISTING 14,820 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT at 7755 North
Durango Drive (APN 125-17-611-002), T-C (Town Center) Zone |SC-TC (Service Commercial
- Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-53329|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: WALGREEN CO. - OWNER: PPLAND, LP


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5324 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior an Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use.


SaIety.



Municipal Code.


SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This application is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use within an existing 14,820 square-Ioot retail building at 7755 North
Durango Drive. The applicant is requesting 50 square Ieet oI Iloor space dedicated to the sale oI
alcoholic beverages, which represents less than one percent oI the total retail Iloor space. The
subject site is an existing shopping center, which provides cross-access and shared parking
throughout the entire commercial center. The proposed use meets the Minimum Special Use
Requirements and is not within 400 Ieet oI any protected uses. As such, staII recommends
approval with conditions. II denied, no alcohol may be sold on the premises.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor OII-Sale use in the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) Special Land
Use designation.
The proposed Iloor area dedicated to the package liquor use is 175 square Ieet, which is
less than two percent oI the 14,820 square Ieet oI total retail Iloor area.


12/07/98
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) on property located
within the area designated as Town Center Irom U (Undeveloped), R-E
(Residence Estates), R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development 7 Units per
Acre), R-PD11 (Residential Planned Development 11 Units per Acre), R-
PD13 (Residential Planned Development 13 Units per Acre), R-PD18
(Residential Planned Development 18 Units per Acre), R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2 (General
Commercial), C-V (Civic) and PD (Planned Development) zones to T-C
(Town Center) on approximately 1,468 acres. Planning Commission and staII
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK

01/07/04
a 23,320 square-Ioot commercial building with a waiver oI the Town Center
Build-To-Street standards on 4.91 acres located at the northwest corner oI
Durango Drive and El Capitan Way. Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial.
01/22/04
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-3272) Ior a two-
lot commercial subdivision on 4.91 acres located at the northwest corner oI
Durango Drive and El Capitan Way. StaII recommended approval.
04/30/04
StaII administratively approved a Final Map (FMP-4252) Ior a two-lot
commercial subdivision located at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and
El Capitan Way. The Final Map was recorded on 01/13/05.
03/15/06
The City Council approved a Major Amendment (SDR-11203) oI a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-3191) to eliminate
pad sites 'B and 'C and substitute with three pad sites, 'B, 'C and 'D to
consist oI 40,220 square Ieet oI retail space with oI waiver oI the Town
Center Build-To-Line Standards on 4.91 acres located at the northwest corner
oI Durango Drive and El Capitan Way. Planning Commission and staII
Ior a 14,028 square-Ioot General Retail building with a waiver oI perimeter
landscape standards to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer where eight Ieet is
required along 64 Ieet oI the east property line. The entitlement combined pad
sites 'B and 'C Irom a previously approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-3191) with subsequent amendments, bringing the total square-Iootage
oI the shopping center to 44,948 square Ieet on 4.91 acres located at the
northwest corner oI Durango Drive and El Capitan Way. Planning
Commission and staII recommended denial.
11/07/07
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-23108) to allow a 20-Ioot
residential adjacency setback where 87 Ieet is the minimum required Ior a
14,028 square-Ioot general retail building located at the northwest corner oI
Durango Drive and El Capitan Way. Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial.
08/18/10
The City Council denied a Special Use Permit (SUP-38211) Ior a 74 square-
Ioot Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use within an existing 14,820
square-Ioot retail establishment at 7755 North Durango Drive. Planning
Commission recommended denial. StaII recommended approval.
06/10/14
The request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with
Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use within an existing 14,820 square-Ioot
retail building at 7755 North Durango Drive was abeyed at the applicant`s
request. The request was placed on the 07/08/14 Planning Commission
meeting.
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


07/08/14
The request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with
Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use within an existing 14,820 square-Ioot
retail building at 7755 North Durango Drive was abeyed at the applicant`s
request. The applicant has amended the request. The applicant was previously
requesting 175 square Ieet oI Iloor space to be dedicated to the Accessory
Package Liquor use, however, the applicant has reduced the request to 50 total
square Ieet dedicated to the Accessory Package Liquor use. The request was
placed on the 07/08/14 Planning Commission meeting. The request was
placed on the 08/12/14 Planning Commission meeting.


06/09/04
A building permit (#4014747) was issued Ior a certiIicate oI occupancy Ior a
14,820 square-Ioot commercial building at 7755 North Durango Drive. The
permit was Iinalized on 02/25/05.
06/09/04
A building permit (#4014746) was issued Ior on-site hardscapes. The permit
never received a Iinal inspection and expired on 12/11/04.
07/07/04
A building permit (#4017017) was issued Ior onsite sewer, water and Iire. The
permit never received a Iinal inspection and expired on 05/07/05.
03/09/05
A business license (C05-02366) was issued Ior general retail (Tobacco) at
7755 North Durango Drive. The license is still active.
03/09/05
A business license (D11-00211) was issued Ior general retail (Drug Store) at
03/09/05
A business license (P55-00145) was issued Ior general retail (Pharmacy) at

03/18/14
StaII met with the representative to discuss the proposal to locate an
Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use within an existing retail
establishment. StaII concluded that a Special Use Permit would be required to
do so. The submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit were discussed.
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


05/29/14
Meeting Start Time: 6:30 pm Meeting End Time: 7:15 pm
Attendance: 2 members oI the public
4 members oI the development team
2 members oI Planning
Concerns:
Citizen was opposed to the Special Use Permit (SUP) as the additional
use would lead to the oversaturation oI package liquor, which in turn
leads to an increase in crime, as well as chronic inebriation.
The addition oI alcohol leads to the degradation neighborhoods over
the course oI time.
Comments pertaining to the City utilizing saturation standards were
made and the example oI Fremont Street was brought up.
A citizen stated that the 'they wanted to be good neighbors and hope
that Walgreens will be too.
A citizen recalled that the original representation oI the Walgreens in
2000 to 2001 presented that there would be no alcohol at this location.
The applicant stated that they will reduce the size oI the area already
submitted to Planning StaII. StaII advised the applicant that a revised
justiIication letter and Iloor plan would be required by the morning oI
June 2nd, 2014.

Field Check
05/01/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained shopping
center Iree oI trash and debris.

Site Area
Gross Acres 4.91

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center T-C (Town Center)
SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center)
North
Single Family
Residence
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
South Shopping Center T-C (Town Center)
SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center)
East Shopping Center
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
West
Single Family
Residence
T-C (Town Center)
SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center)

Trails Y


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Durango Drive Parkway
Town Center
Development Standards
Manual

120 Y
El Capitan Way Primary Arterial
Town Center
Manual
100 Y
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
44,948 SF 1:250 180


190

Y

ANALYSIS

The proposed use is located within the Town Center Master Plan area. The property is zoned SC-
TC (Service Commercial Town Center), which intends to encourage low to medium intensity
retail, oIIice or other commercial uses. The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use is permissible in the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.

In 2010, City Council denied an identical request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-38211) Ior an
Accessory Package Liquor use within the same 14,820 square-Ioot retail establishment at 7755
North Durango Drive. Planning Commission recommended denial. StaII recommended approval,
oI the original request, as the proposed use met all Title 19 minimum requirements.

The applicant is again requesting an Accessory Package Liquor use within a 14,820 square-Ioot
retail establishment at 7755 North Durango Drive. The Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use is deIined as 'a retail establishment:

1. Whose license to sell alcoholic beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and
not Ior resale, in original sealed or corked containers, Ior consumption oII the premises
where the same are sold; and

2. In which the sale oI alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the retail use, and in which no
more than 10 percent oI the retail Iloor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising oI alcoholic beverages.

This use includes an establishment that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting iI
the licensee also holds a wine, cordial and liqueur tasting license Ior that location.
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


The proposed use meets the deIinition outlined above, as the provided Iloor plan and justiIication
letter detail the intent to sell alcoholic beverages in conjunction with an existing retail
establishment. Furthermore, the applicant has indicated 50 square Ieet oI the existing 14,820
square Ieet oI retail Iloor area would be utilized Ior packaged liquor, which represents less than
one percent oI the total Iloor area.

1. Except as otherwise provided, no retail establishment with accessory package liquor oII-sale
(hereinaIter 'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship,
school, individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as there are no protectea uses within 400 feet of the
subfect property.

* 2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line oI that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line
reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:


b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on site parking and
which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing property line
of the commercial subaivision locatea at the northeast corner of Durango Drive ana El Capitan
Way.

* 3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:

a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the structure
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or

b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center
or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the existing use to the
nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will
be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the parcel on which it is proposea is less
than 80 acres in si:e.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also requires a
waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into
consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation to the City Council,
state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support oI the
decision.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as no aistance separation waiver is
necessary.


a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or

b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space.

Neither conaition applies to the proposea use.

* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50.

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as a conaition of approval requires the
conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las Jegas Municipal Coae.

7. The minimum distance requirements set Iorth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
nonwaivable under the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:

a. In accordance with the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C) Ior any establishment which
is proposed to be located on a parcel within the Downtown Casino Overlay District;

b. In accordance with the applicable provisions oI the 'Town Center Development
Standards Manual Ior any establishment which is proposed to be located within the T C
(Town Center) Zoning District and which is designated MS TC (Main Street Mixed Use)
in the Town Center Land Use Plan;

c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000 square Ieet and
50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space; or
SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK


d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square Ieet oI retail
Iloor space, iI the area to be used Ior the sale, display or merchandising oI alcoholic
beverages and each use to be protected are separated by a highway or a right oI way with
a width oI at least 100 Ieet.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the use meets Requirement 1 outlinea
above.

The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use would be
located within an established shopping center with retail and restaurant uses located on the site
interior. The existing shopping center provides cross-access and shared parking throughout the
entire commercial center. No additional parking is required Ior the proposed use, as the parking
requirements were addressed during the original development oI the site. There are no protected
uses within 400 Ieet oI the subject property and the proposed use adheres to all Minimum Special
Use Requirements as outlined in Title 19.12. As such, the use is compatible with the surrounding
land uses and staII recommends approval with conditions.




The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use is located
within a shopping center with similar uses and can be operated in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with Iuture
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.


The proposed intensity oI a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale
use is suitable Ior this location and the surrounding uses.

SUP-53624 PR1-53329]
GK

Staff Report Page Ten

Access to the subject site is provided by Durango Drive, a 120-Ioot wide Parkway and El
Capitan Way, a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial as designated by the Town Center
Development Standards. The streets provide adequate access Ior the proposed Retail
Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use.

General Plan.

Approval oI a Special Use Permit Ior the Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor OII-Sale use will not compromise the public health, saIety, or general welIare as
the use would be subject to regular inspections and licensing requirements.


The Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use meets the
applicable minimum requirements oI the Town Center Development Standards and Title
19.


NOTICES MAILED 781

APPROVALS 4

PROTESTS 4
04/09/14
PRJ-53329
SUP-53624
04/09/14
PRJ-53329
SUP-53624
06/10/14 PC
0
4
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
3
2
9
S
U
P
-
5
3
6
2
4
06/02/14
PRJ-53329
S
U
P
-
5
3
6
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
06/02/14
PRJ-53329
SUP-53624 - REVISED
S
U
P
-
Z
4

[
P
P
J
-
3
3
Z
9
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
A
L
S
P
E
E
N

C
O
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
P

L
A
N
D

L
P

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

06/02/14
PRJ-53329
SUP-53624 - REVISED
06/02/14
PRJ-53329
SUP-53624 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 17.


SUB1ECT:
MOD-54816 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
RYAN O'NEILL - For possible action on a request Ior a Major ModiIication oI the Town Center
Land Use Plan FROM: SX-TC (SUBURBAN MIXED USE - TOWN CENTER) AND SC-TC
(SERVICE COMMERCIAL - TOWN CENTER) TO: GC-TC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL -
TOWN CENTER) on 1.77 acres at 7610 Oso Blanca Road (APN 125-17-210-448), Ward 6
(Ross) |PRJ-54764|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

4. Photos

MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: RYAN O'NEILL


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
MOD-54816 StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Major ModiIication oI the Town Center Land Use Plan Irom the SX-TC
(Suburban Mixed Use Town Center) and the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) land
use districts to the GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center) land use district. The subject
site consists oI 1.77 acres located adjacent to the southeast corner oI Farm Road and Oso Blanca
Road. There are no development plans proposed at this time. StaII recommends approval oI the
request, as the proposed change is a logical extension oI the existing GC-TC (General
Commercial Town Center) Land Use designation Irom the south and is in line with the goals
and objectives oI the Town Center Development Manual.

ISSUES

The applicant has not submitted any development plans Ior the subject site at this time.


06/05/02
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0004-02) to
amend a portion oI the Town Center Plan Irom SC-TC (Service Commercial
Town Center) to SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use Town Center) on
approximately 26 acres adjacent to the west side oI I-95, north oI the Farm
Road alignment. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
a 741-lot single-Iamily residential development with a waiver oI the Town
Center Street Section, retaining wall height, suburban mix use buIIer and
building height restriction standards on 67.41 acres adjacent to the northeast
corner oI Farm Road and Fort Apache Road. Planning Commission
recommended approval. StaII recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-3488) to allow one parking
space per single-Iamily dwelling where a minimum oI two spaces per single-
Iamily dwelling is required on 67.41 acres adjacent to the northeast corner oI
Farm Road and Fort Apache Road. Planning Commission recommended
02/18/04
The City Council approved a Waiver (WVR-3492) oI Title 18.12.105(A) to
allow private drives to exceed 200 Ieet where a maximum length oI 150 Ieet
is allowed on 67.41 acres adjacent to the northeast corner oI Farm Road and
Fort Apache Road. Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII
recommended denial.
MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK

05/13/04
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-4055) Ior a 749-
lot single-Iamily cluster subdivision on 67.41 acres adjacent to the northeast
corner oI Farm Road and Fort Apache Road. StaII recommended approval.
10/17/07
Ior a 110,773 square-Ioot commercial center on 11.3 acres at the intersection
oI Oso Blanca Road and Severence Lane. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval. The entitlement expired on 10/17/09.
09/25/08
StaII administratively approved a Minor Amendment (SDR-29378) to a
previously Site Development Plan Review (SDR-23483) Ior a 111,398
square-Ioot shopping center on 11.3 acres at the southeast corner oI US-95
and Farm Road.
01/08/09
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-31246) Ior a
Iive-lot commercial subdivision on 15.80 acres at the southeast corner oI
Farm Road and U.S. 95. StaII recommended approval. The entitlement
expired on 01/08/13.


There are no building permits or business licenses associated with the subject site.

06/25/14
StaII conducted a pre-application conIerence with the owner and
representative to discuss the submittal requirements Ior a Major ModiIication
to the Town Center Land Use Map.

07/17/14
A neighborhood meeting was held at the Centennial Hills YMCA, 6601 North
BuIIalo Drive Irom 6:00 pm to 6:30 pm. The meeting was attended by one
member oI the development team, one member oI the City Council oIIice, one
member oI the Department oI Planning and Iour members Irom the public.
The Iollowing concern was discussed:

Would not support packaged liquor at this location
MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK


Field Check
07/03/14
A Iield check was conducted by staII and revealed that the subject site is
currently undeveloped, and is adjoined by similar sized undeveloped parcels
to the south.

Site Area
Gross Acres 1.77

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town
Center)
SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
North U.S. 95 right-oI-way U.S. 95 right-oI-way U.S. 95 right-oI-way
South Undeveloped
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
East U.S. 95 right-oI-way U.S. 95 right-oI-way U.S. 95 right-oI-way
West
Single-Family
Residential
SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)

Trails N/A
MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Oso Blanca Road
Town Center
Collector
Town Center
85 Feet Y

ANALYSIS

The 1.77-acre site has a General Plan designation oI TC (Town Center) and a zoning category oI T-
C (Town Center), identiIying the property within the Town Center Special Purpose and Overlay
District. The subject site is currently designated SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use Town Center) and
SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) by the Town Center Land Use Map. The Service
Commercial land use district allows low to medium intensity retail, oIIice or other commercial uses
that are intended to serve primarily the Centennial Hills Area and does not include more intense
general commercial characteristics. Examples include neighborhood shopping centers, theaters,
bowling alleys and other places oI public assembly and public/quasi-public uses.

The Suburban Mixed Use land use district can be characterized as being similar to the previously
described Service Commercial land use district with the addition oI medium density residential
being a permitted use and is intended to enable development with imaginative adjacency standards.

The applicant is requesting a Major ModiIication (MOD-54816) to change the Town Center
Special Land Use designation Ior the subject site to GC-TC (General Commercial Town
Center) land use district. The General Commercial Town Center land use district allows all
types oI retail, automotive service, oIIice and other general business uses oI a more intense
commercial character.

The applicant has not proposed any development or uses on this site to determine the precise
compatibility with the surrounding uses at this time. As such, staII must make the Iindings oII oI the
most intense uses allowed within the proposed zoning district. The existing land uses to the west oI
this development are designated SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use Town Center) and the land uses to
the south are designated GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center). The requested Major
ModiIication would match the land use designation to the south and Iurther serve as a major retail
corridor Ior the residential properties to the west; thereIore, staII recommends approval.

FINDINGS (MOD-48831)

In order to approve the Major ModiIication application, pursuant to Town Center Development
Standards Manual (A)(3)(B) and Title 19.16.090, the Planning Commission or City Council must
aIIirm the Iollowing:
MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK


1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed Major ModiIication is in conIormance with the TC (Town Center)
designation under the Centennial Hills Sector Plan oI the General Plan. The change in
growth and development patterns within the neighboring community would now support
the commercial uses typically allowed in the GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center)
land use designation.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The applicant has not proposed any development or uses on this site to determine the
precise compatibility with the surrounding uses at this time. As such, staII must make
the Iindings oII oI the most intense uses allowed within the proposed zoning district.
The existing land uses to the west oI this development are designated SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town Center) and the land uses to the south are designated GC-TC
(General Commercial Town Center). The requested Major ModiIication would match
the land use designation to the south and Iurther serve as a major retail corridor Ior the
residential properties to the west.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

A shiIt in the growth and development Iactors has pointed towards the need to change
the land use designation to the GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center) district.
The existing GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center) land use district located to
the south oI the subject property would mean a continuous retail corridor servicing the
residential properties to the west, iI this request is approved. In addition, the commercial
properties would provide a buIIer Irom U.S. 95 and the residences to the west.

size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The subject property is adjacent to Oso Blanca Road, which is designated as an 85-Ioot
wide Town Center Collector. No plans have been submitted showing site access to Oso
Blanca Road.


NOTICES MAILED 228
MOD-54816 PR1-54764]
GK


APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
06/26/14
PRJ-54764
MOD-54816
Page 1 of 2 6/30/2014 5:12:06 PM
Applicant Email: ryan@oneillinc.com
Applicant Fax: 702-474-0909
Rep Last Name: Genzer
Rep First Name: Bob
Applicant State: UT
Rep Address: 9612 Hawksbill Ct.
Rep Email: genzerconsulting@cox.net
Rep Fax: 702-254-4733
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-256-6022
Rep Zip: 89117
Project Name MAJOR MOD FROM SX-TC TO GC-TC
Correct:
No
Ward #: WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
Applicant City: St. George
ProjectAddress (Location): 7610 OSO BLANCO ROAD
Application/Petition For: Major Modification from SX-TC to GC-TC at 7610 Oso Blanca Road
If no, ...change what Major Modification from SX-TC and SC-TC to GC-TC
Applicant First Name: Ryan
Applicant Address: 1224 S. River Road, Suite B215
Applicant Last Name: O'Neill
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres: 1.77
MOD-54816
Page 2 of 2 6/30/2014 5:12:06 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: No
If no, ...change what Last name of applicant is O'Neill (two "l's")
I Accept:
Yes
RYAN B. O'NEIL 1224 S. RIVER ROAD #B215 SAINT GEORGE, UT 84790
Bob Genzer Genzer Consulting Owner genzerconsulting@cox.net
MOD-54816
I
n
t
e
r
l
a
c
e

S
t
V
i
v
i
d

V
a
i
l

S
t
Shady Pines Dr
Balcony Trellis Ave
B
o
k
h
a
r
a

S
t
H
a
n
d
W
o
v
e
n

S
t
C
a
l
i
c
o

F
i
e
l
d
s

S
t

Embroidery Ave
F
a
b
l
e
d

F
i
l
i
g
r
e
e
S
t
Careful Canvas Ave

Gabardine Ave
T
e
n
d
e
r

T
a
s
s
e
l
s

S
t
B
r
o
c
a
d
e

C
t
T
w
i
r
l
i
n
g

Y
a
r
n

C
t
Red Tapestry Ct
Merry Mullion Ct
N

D
u
r
a
n
g
o

D
r
O
s
o
B
l
a
n
c
a

R
d
Farm Rd
Gilcrease Ave
N

E
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
n

W
a
y
MOD-54816
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
FROM SX-TC AND

SC-TC TO GC-TC
Date: Tuesday, J ul y 01, 2014
GIS ma ps are normally produced
only t o mee t the need s of t he City.
Due t o co ntin uous de ve lopment act ivity
this ma p i s fo r ref erence on ly.
Geographic Information System
Pla nning & Devel opment Dept .
702-229-6301
City Limits
1000ft Buffer
Subject Property
Town Center Land Use
General Commercial (GC-TC)
Service Commerci al (SC-TC)
Urban Center Mixed-Use (UC-TC)
Suburban Mixed-Use (SX-TC)
Main Street Mi xed-Use (MS-TC)
Employment Center Mixed-Use (EC-TC)
Low Resident ial (L-TC)
Medium Residenti al (M-TC)
Medium-Low Resi dential (ML-TC)
Medium-Low Attached Residenti al (MLA-TC)
Publi c Faci li ties (PF-TC)
Ri ght of Way (ROW)
General Plan Amendment
PCD - Pl anned Communi ty
Development
ML - Medi um - Low
o
B
l
a
n
c
a
R
d
wwwwww Resident ial (L-TC)
ddddddddium Residenti al (M-TC)
ddddddddddddddddddddddddiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm---LLLLLLLLLLoooooooooowwwwwwwwww RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRReeeeeeeeesssssssssiiiiiiiiii dddddddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnttttttttttttttttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll (((((((((MMMMMMMMMLLLLLLLLLL---TTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCC)))))))))
dium-Low Attached Residenti al (MLA-TC)
bli c Faci li ties (PF-TC)
ht of Way (ROW)
07/16/14
PRJ-54764
M
O
D
-

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
4
j

-

M
A
J
O
P

M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
Y
A
N

O
'
N
E
I
L
L

7
1
0

O
S
O

L
A
N
C
A

P
O
A
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

June 25, 2014
Mr. Flinn Fagg, AICP, Director

City of Las Vegas Department of Planning
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Re: APN: 125-17-210-448
Dear Mr. Fagg:
This letter is submitted as justification for an application for a Major Modification of the
Town Center Land Use Plan. The parcel is located in Ward 6, on the east side of Oso
Blanca Road, and northwest of the Durango Drive/US-95 interchange. The adjacent land
uses are single family residential and a condominium (apartment) complex on the west
side of Oso Blanca. The US-95 southbound off-ramp to Durango Drive bisects the east
side of the property.
The existing land use designations for the property are SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use-
Town Center) and SC-TC (Service Commercial-Town Center). The SC-TC portion of
the property is severed by and east of the US-95 off-ramp which makes it virtually
unusable. The Suburban Mixed Use, which constitutes the usable portion of the property,
is characterized as being reflective of suburban development that utilizes vertical and
horizontal character elements to maximize employment and housing opportunities in
developments with imaginative adjacency standards. In reviewing the current land uses
within the area it is our belief that SX-TC was a proper designation for the property had it
been developed as part of the single family homes on the west side of Oso Blanca Road,
but in its current somewhat triangular configuration of only 1.77 acres it cannot be
developed with SX-TC uses and standards.
The applicant is requesting to change the land use plan to GC-TC (General Commercial-
Town Center) to allow development of the property with an as yet undetermined
commercial use. GC-TC is the designation of the adjacent property to the south, the
northern portion of which was approved for a mini-storage facility by the Planning
Commission on February 11, 2014 (SDR-52440). Our research has further shown that at
one time this relatively small parcel was part of a proposed retail center (SDR-23483)
which was approved by the City Council on October 17, 2007, so there is a history of
potential commercial use for the property.
here is a history of
06/26/14
PRJ-54764
MOD-54816
As the applicants representative for this application I will be happy to provide any
additional information you may require or respond to any questions you may have.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Robert S Genzer
Robert S Genzer
Genzer Consulting
9612 Hawksbill Ct.
Las Vegas, NV
89117-0646
702-256-6022 or 702-281-7496
06/26/14
PRJ-54764
MOD-54816

Agenda tem No.: 18.


SUB1ECT:
ZON-54561 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMY PAN - OWNER:
SANTA GOLD REALTY, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Rezoning FROM: P-R
(PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND PARKING) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 0.44
acres located at 1704 and 1710 Santa Paula Drive (APNs 162-03-311-003 and 004), Ward 3
(CoIIin) |PRJ-54200|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL.

4. Photos
6. Protest Postcard

ZON-54561 (PR1-54200)
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: AMY PAN - OWNER: SANTA GOLD REALTY,
LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
ZON-54561 StaII recommends DENIAL.

`` CONDITIONS ``

ZON-54561 (PR1-54200)
GK
August 12, 2014 - Planning Commission

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to rezone 0.44 acres comprised oI two separate parcels Irom a P-R
(ProIessional OIIice and Parking) zoning district to a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.
Currently, the subject site is comprised oI an undeveloped lot and a vacant commercial building.
The applicant has indicated that the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district will help
Iacilitate redevelopment and reinvestment at the subject property. StaII recommends denial, as
the requested change to the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is too intense and intrusive
Ior the surrounding properties, particularly the residentially zoned properties to the south and
east. II denied, the property would remain zoned P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking).

ISSUES

The C (Commercial) land use category allows Iour zoning districts: O (OIIice), P-O
(ProIessional OIIice), C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial).
There are no proposed development plans submitted with this request at this time.


07/03/68
The Board oI City Commissioner approved a Variance (V-0014-68) to allow
a business oIIice use on property with a zoning designation oI R-4 (Apartment
Resident District) at 1706 Santa Paula Drive. The Board oI Zoning
Adjustment and staII recommended denial.
06/27/74
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved a Variance (V-0038-74) to allow
a beauty shop on property with a zoning designation oI R-4 (Apartment
Resident District) at 1704 Santa Paula Drive. StaII recommended denial.
05/21/75
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0011-75) Irom R-
4 (Apartment Resident District) to P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) at
1704-1712 Santa Paula Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval. StaII recommended approval.
04/27/89
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved a Variance (V-0028-89) to allow
a commercial child care Iacility on property with a zoning designation oI P-R
(ProIessional OIIice and Parking), where such a use is not allowed at 1704-
1712 Santa Paula Drive. StaII recommended approval.
ZON-54561 (PR1-54200)
GK

05/24/90
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved an Extension oI Time (V-0028-
89) on an approved Variance (V-0028-89) which allowed a commercial child
care Iacility use on property with a zoning designation oI P-R (ProIessional
OIIice and Parking) at 1704-1712 Santa Paula Drive. StaII recommended
approval.
05/23/91
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved an Extension oI Time (V-0028-
89) on an approved Variance (V-0028-89) which allowed a commercial child
care Iacility use on property with a zoning designation oI P-R (ProIessional
OIIice and Parking) at 1704-1712 Santa Paula Drive. StaII recommended
approval.
11/03/93
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0087-93) Irom P-R (ProIessional
OIIice and Parking) to R-4 (Apartment Resident District) at 1704 - 1712
Santa Paula Drive. Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII
recommended approval. The Resolution oI Intent was approved with a twelve
month time limit. The entitlement expired on 11/04/94.


c. 1950 The existing building was constructed at 1704 Santa Paula Drive.
06/20/06
A building permit (#67833) was issued to demolish the existing duplex
building at 1710 Santa Paula Drive. The permit received a Iinal inspection on
10/05/06.
08/08/12
A code enIorcement case (#118183) was issued Ior graIIiti on the building at
1704 Santa Paula Drive. The case was resolved on 08/23/12.
09/04/12
10/31/12
05/29/13
A building permit (#236936) was issued Ior a wrought iron Ience at 1704
Santa Paula Drive. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 09/10/13.
05/29/13
A building permit (#236945) was issued Ior a wrought iron Ience at 1710
Santa Paula Drive. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 09/10/13.

05/20/14
requirements Ior a proposed Rezoning oI the subject properties 0.44 acres
Irom a P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) zoning district to a C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district.
ZON-54561 (PR1-54200)
GK


A neighborhood meeting is not required Ior this application, nor was one held.

Field Check

StaII conducted a Iield check oI the subject property and noted a vacant
building with graIIiti, trash and weeds.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.44

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Vacant
Subject Property
Undeveloped
C (Commercial)
P-R (ProIessional OIIice
and Parking)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
North
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
C (Commercial)
P-R (ProIessional OIIice
and Parking)
South Vacant C (Commercial)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
Multi-Family
Residential
East
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
H (High Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
Auto Repair, Major
General Retail
West
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)

Master Plan Areas Yes Ao Compliance
Master Plan Area
Beverly Green / Southridge Neighborhood X N
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Yes Ao Compliance
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 Ieet) X Y
Trails X N/A
Rural Preservation Overlay District X N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area X Y
Development Impact Notification Assessment X N/A
Project of Regional Significance X N/A
ZON-54561 (PR1-54200)
GK


ANALYSIS

According to the provided justiIication letter, the applicant is requesting to rezone 0.44 acres
comprised oI two separate parcels Irom the P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) zoning district
to the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. One parcel oI the subject site is undeveloped
while the second parcel has a vacant building. The applicant has indicated that the proposed C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district will help Iacilitate redevelopment and reinvestment at the
subject property.

The adjacent land uses consist oI high density residential to the south and east, as well as oIIice
uses to the north. The proposed zoning district oI C-1 (Limited Commercial) is too intense Ior
the area. According to Title 19.08.070, the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is intended
to provide most retail shopping and personal services, and may be appropriate Ior mixed use
developments. The district should be located on the periphery oI residential neighborhoods and
should be conIined to the intersections oI primary and secondary thoroughIares along major
retail corridors. The subject site is not conIined to a primary or secondary thoroughIare
intersection, nor is it located along a major retail corridor. In Iact, the surrounding area is
predominantly residential.

The existing P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) zoning district is designed to be a transitional
zone to allow low intensity administrative and proIessional oIIices characterized by low volumes
oI direct daily client and customer contact. The goal oI the district is to allow Ior oIIice uses in
an area which is predominantly residential. The oIIice uses typically permitted in the P-R
(ProIessional OIIice and Parking) zoning district require less parking and vehicle trips than the
more intense uses allowed in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. For these reasons,
the existing P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) zoning district is more appropriate, as it
provides a better transition Irom the residentially zoned properties to the south and east. As such,
staII recommends denial.

FINDINGS (ZON-53065)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The existing Downtown Area Land Use General Plan designation oI the subject site is C
(Commercial), which allows Ior commercial uses that are normally allowed within the
O (OIIice), SC (Service Commercial) and GC (General Commercial) General Plan land
use categories. The proposed Rezoning to C-1 (Limited Commercial) is consistent with
the current General Plan designation.
ZON-54561 (PR1-54200)
GK


2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The uses allowed in C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning districts are too intense and
would be incompatible with the adjacent R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district
located to the south and east oI the subject site.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The subject site consists oI an undeveloped parcel and a vacant building. Although the
applicant is not proposing to develop the site at this time, Iuture development would
represent an inIill commercial parcel primarily surrounded by existing residential
development. It is more appropriate to develop the site as oIIice uses or residential uses
and allow the retail corridor along Las Vegas Boulevard and Oakey Boulevard to serve
the existing residences surrounding the subject site.

size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The property is located along Santa Paula Drive. Santa Paula Drive has been identiIied
as a 51-Ioot wide Local Street by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. At this time
no development plans have been submitted showing any alterations to the existing site.


NOTICES MAILED 207

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1
06/11/14
PRJ-54200
ZON-54561
Page 1 of 2 6/30/2014 5:14:38 PM
Applicant Email: soybeanpan@hotmail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: PAM
Rep First Name: AMY
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: (702)686-3372
Rep Address: 3309 BARNSTAPLE CT
Rep Email: soybeanpan@hotmail.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: NV
Rep City: LAS VEGAS
Rep Phone: (702)686-3372
Rep Zip: 89129
Assessors Parcel #(s): 16203311003, 16203311004, 16203311005
Project Name REZONING R-4 AND P-R TO C-1
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN)
Applicant City: LAS VEGAS
ProjectAddress (Location): 1704, 1710, 1714 SANTA PAULA DRIVE
Application/Petition For: Rezoning from R-4 (High Density Residential) and P-R (Professional Office and Parking) to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) on three parcels located at 1704, 1710, and 1714 Santa Paula Drive.
Applicant First Name: AMY
Applicant Address: 3309 BARNSTAPLE CT
Applicant Last Name: PAM
Zoning District: Proposed: C-1 - Limited Commercial
General Plan Designation: Proposed: C
Lots/Units: 1704/1710/1714 Santa Paula DR
Gross Acres: 0.68
ZON-54561
Page 2 of 2 6/30/2014 5:14:38 PM
I Accept:
Yes
SANTA GOLD REALTY L L C 3309 BARNSTAPLE CT LAS VEGAS, NV 89129-6709
Amy Pan Santa Gold Realty LLC ms soybeanpan@hotmail.com
ZON-54561
5
t
h
P
l
E St Louis Ave
R
e
x
f
o
r
d

D
r
B
e
v
e
r
l
y
W
a
y
R
e
x
f
o
r
d
P
l
W

e
l
d
o
n
P
l

S
a
n
t
a

P
a
u
l
a

D
r
Barbara Way
H
o
u
s
s
e
l
s
A
v
e
Ellen Way
E Utah Ave
Bonita Ave
Canosa Ave
S

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r
B
l
v
d

Grif fith Ave
E Wyom ing Ave
Bracken Ave
El Centr o Pl
S

3
r
d

S
t
W Utah Ave
W Wyoming Ave
S
weeney Ave
S
L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
B
l
v
d
S

M
a
i
n

S
t
E Oakey Blvd
S
4
t
h
S
t

W Oakey Blvd
ZON-54561
SUBJECT
PROPERTY

FROM P-R TO C-1
Date: Monday, June 30, 2014
GIS ma ps are normally produced
only t o mee t the need s of t he City.
Due t o co ntin uous de ve lopment act ivity
this ma p i s fo r ref erence on ly.
Geographic Information System
Pla nning & Devel opment Dept .
702-229-6301
City Limits
1000ft Buffer
Subject Property
Zoning
R-2 - Medium-Low
Density Residential
R-3 - Medium Density
Residential
R-4 - High Density
Residential
R-MH - Mobile/Manufactured
Home Residence
R-5 - Apartment
R-MHP - Residential Mobile/
Manufactured Home Park
P-R - Professional Offices
and Parking
P-O - Professional Office
N-S - Neighborhood Service
O - Office
C-D - Designed Commercial
C-1 - Limited Commercial
C-2 - General Commercial
C-PB - Planned Business
Park
C-M - Commercial/ Industrial
M - Industrial
C-V - Civic
P-C - Planned Community
T-D - Traditional Development
PD - Planned Development
T-C - Town Center
R-E - Residential Estates
U - (GPADesignation)
Undeveloped
R-A- Ranch Acres
R-D - Single-Family
Residential-Restricted
R-PD - Residential
Planned Development
R-1 - Single Family
Residential
R-CL - Single-Family
Compact-Lot
W
S
a
n
El Centro rr PPl
P-O - Prof oo essional Office
N-S - Neigghborhood Service
O - Office
C-D - Designed Commercial
C-1 - Limited Commercial
C-2 - General Commerc rr ial
C-PB - Planned Business
Park
C-M - Commerciaaaaaa
M - Industrial
C-V - Civic
P-C - Planned Co
T- TT D - Traditional D
PD - Planned Dev
T- TT C - Tow oo n Center
07/16/14
PRJ-54200
Z
O
N
-
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
Z
0
0
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
M
Y

P
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
N
T
A

S
O
L
D

P
E
A
L
T
Y

L
L
C

1
7
0
4

A
N
D

1
7
1
0

S
A
N
T
A

P
A
U
L
A

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

Z
O
N
-
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
Z
0
0
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
M
Y

P
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
N
T
A

S
O
L
D

P
E
A
L
T
Y

L
L
C

1
7
0
4

A
N
D

1
7
1
0

S
A
N
T
A

P
A
U
L
A

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

Z
O
N
-
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
Z
0
0
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
M
Y

P
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
N
T
A

S
O
L
D

P
E
A
L
T
Y

L
L
C

1
7
0
4

A
N
D

1
7
1
0

S
A
N
T
A

P
A
U
L
A

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

6/10/2014
Dear planner,
APN# 162-03-311-003 (1704 Santa Paula) and APN# 162-03-311-004(1710 Santa Paula) are the 2 properties here I
propose to be rezoned to C1. I have purchased the total of 4 properties back in Dec 2012 with 1714 Santa Paula Dr and
1804 Weldon pl. Currently the 1804 Weldon and 1714 Santa Paula have been remodeled and rented as residential;
however, there are a lot of residential rentals in that area but not many commercial buildings. I do see this creates
demands for the commercial business to grow in that area which also will help to balance the development in the area.
1704/1710 Santa Paula properties are joined to each other with Fire Stone auto shop on the west and PR offices on the
north which are good to be combined and converted as C-1 zoning. The potential development for all three parcels
after combining them can best be utilized as mini storages, RV Park or commercial office buildings. Allowing this type of
growth of business will also keep traffic and noises for that area moderate. These two parcels have been vacant for
almost five years and I really would like to start building a new business on them to bring more activities to the area
instead of having homeless people occupying the gated lot.
I have successfully remodeled 1804 Weldon and 1714 Santa Paula within the supervised authorization of the city
inspectors. I am privileged so far of working with the city on this future development and would like to start up and
complete upon your approval.
I would like to find out what your requirements are for rezoning and ensure that your expectations are met. If you
require any further information, please let me know.
Thank you in advance for considering this request. I look forward to meeting with you to discuss this opportunity.
Sincerely,
Amy Pan
Santa Gold Realty LLC
06/25/14
PRJ-54200 ZON-54561

Agenda tem No.: 19.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-55026 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ELITE MEDIA - OWNER:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A 92-
FOOT TALL OFF-PREMISE SIGN WHERE 75 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
ALLOWED at 3100 Stewart Avenue (APN 139-36-604-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3
(CoIIin) |PRJ-54759|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-55026 and SUP-54828 |PRJ-54759|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - VAR-55026, SUP-54828, VAR-55027 and SUP-55829 |PRJ-
54759|
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-55026, SUP-54828, VAR-55027, SUP-55829 and VAR-
55028 |PRJ-54759|
4. Photos - VAR-55026, SUP-54828, VAR-55027 and SUP-55829 |PRJ-54759|
5. JustiIication Letter - VAR-55026, SUP-54828, VAR-55027, SUP-55829 and VAR-55028
|PRJ-54759|

VAR-55026, SUP-54828, VAR-55027 and SUP-54829 PR1-54759]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ELITE MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-55026 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-54828
VAR-55027 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-54829

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-5502 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Special Use Permit
(SUP-54828).


SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.
GK

Conditions Page Two


Planning

1. ConIormance to all OII-Premise Sign Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12.


SaIety.

submitted Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license
application.

5. This Special Use Permit shall be reviewed in Iive (5) year(s), at which time the City
Council may require the OII-Premise Sign be removed. The applicant shall be
responsible Ior notiIication costs oI the review. Failure to pay the City Ior these costs
may result in a requirement that the OII-Premise Sign be removed.

6. The OII-Premise Sign and its supporting structure shall be properly maintained and kept
Iree oI graIIiti at all times. Failure to perIorm the required maintenance may result in
Iines and/or removal oI the OII-Premise Sign.

7. The property owner shall keep the property properly maintained and graIIiti-Iree at all
times. Failure to perIorm required maintenance may result in Iines and/or removal oI the
OII-Premise Sign.

8. Only one advertising sign is permitted per sign Iace.

9. Bird deterrent devices shall be installed on the sign.

GK



Planning

(SUP-54829).


SaIety.



SbF-5482 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all OII-Premise Sign Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12.


SaIety.
GK

Conditions Page Four

submitted Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license
application.

5. This Special Use Permit shall be reviewed in Iive (5) year(s), at which time the City
Council may require the OII-Premise Sign be removed. The applicant shall be
responsible Ior notiIication costs oI the review. Failure to pay the City Ior these costs
may result in a requirement that the OII-Premise Sign be removed.

6. The OII-Premise Sign and its supporting structure shall be properly maintained and kept
Iree oI graIIiti at all times. Failure to perIorm the required maintenance may result in
Iines and/or removal oI the OII-Premise Sign.

7. The property owner shall keep the property properly maintained and graIIiti-Iree at all
times. Failure to perIorm required maintenance may result in Iines and/or removal oI the
OII-Premise Sign.

8. Only one advertising sign is permitted per sign Iace.

9. Bird deterrent devices shall be installed on the sign.


GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is applying Ior two Special Use Permits to install two OII-Premise Signs at the
City Detention Center, a C-V (Civic) zoned, City property at 3100 Stewart Avenue. In 2013, the
Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) Ior an OII-Premise sign on
the subject site. The proposed OII-Premise Signs would be the second and third at the subject
site. The proposed oII-premise signs meet all minimum code requirements with the exception oI
overall height. The applicant is requesting Variances (VAR-55026 and VAR-55027) to allow
each sign to be 92 Ieet tall where the maximum height allowed is 75 Ieet. The proposed OII-
Premise signs would be located adjacent to an elevated Ireeway and its accompanying 20-Ioot
tall sound attenuation wall. The additional height is necessary to achieve Iull sign visibility Irom
the Ireeway; thereIore, staII supports the request. II denied, the two proposed OII-Premise Signs
would not be allowed on this site.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required Ior an OII-Premise Sign in a C-V (Civic) district. The
applicant is proposing two OII-Premise Signs; thereIore two Special Use Permits are
required.
The applicant is requesting an overall height oI 92 Ieet Ior both OII-Premise Signs;
thereIore, two Variances are required.


04/15/64
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0024-64) Irom R-1 (Single Family
Residential) and R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to C-V (Civic) Ior
property located on the northeast corner oI Mohave Road and Stewart
Avenue.
11/04/81
The City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (CV-0002-81) Ior
an adult misdemeanor detention Iacility on the northeast corner oI Mohave
Road and Stewart Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
11/07/90
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0017-89) Ior the
expansion oI an existing detention Iacility on the northeast corner oI Mohave
GK

07/09/13
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) Ior
an OII-Premise Sign at 3100 Stewart Avenue. StaII recommended approval.
07/24/14
StaII administratively approved a Minor Amendment (SUP-55029) oI a
previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) to increase the height
oI an existing OII-Premise Sign by less than 50 oI the original approval.
08/12/14
The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear a request Ior a Variance
(VAR-55028) to raise the height oI the existing OII-Premise Sign Irom 75
Ieet to 92 Ieet at 3100 Stewart Avenue.

Circa 1954 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.

12/12/13
A building permit (#249810) was issued Ior an oII-premise sign at 3100
Stewart Avenue. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.

01/16/13
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements Ior an OII-
Premise Sign Special Use Permit application.

No neighborhood meeting was required nor was one held.

Field Check
06/03/13 StaII visited the site and Iound a well maintained City property.

Site Area
Net Acres 11.69

GK


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use Per
1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject
Property
City Detention Center PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
North U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way
School PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
Industrial/Research)
M (Industrial)
South
Undeveloped
LI/R (Light
M (Industrial)
East U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way
West Undeveloped M (Industrial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

C-V (Civic) District Y
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Mohave Road Primary Arterial
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
100 Y
Stewart Avenue Primary Arterial
and Highways
100 Y
U.S. 95 Freeway
and Highways
200 Y
GK


Standards Code Requirements Provided Compliance
Location No OII-Premise Sign may be
located within public right-oI-
way
The signs are not in public
right-oI-way, nor are they in
the OII-Premise Exclusionary
Sign Zone
Y
Zoning OII-Premise Signs are permitted
in C-V (Civic) district iI the
parcel is operated or controlled
by an agency oI local, state or
Iederal government.
The signs are located in a C-V
(Civic) zoning district, which
is controlled by the City oI
Las Vegas.
Y
Area No OII-Premise Sign shall have
a surIace area greater than 672
square Ieet, except that an
embellishment oI not to exceed
Iive Ieet above the regular
rectangular surIace oI the sign
may be added iI the additional
area contains no more than 128
square Ieet.
The signs are both 672 square
Ieet in size and have a 60-Ioot
embellishment.
Y
Height No higher than 40 Ieet Irom
grade at the point oI
construction: may be raised to
be 30 Ieet above an adjacent
elevated Ireeway.
The signs are both adjacent to
an elevated Ireeway and 92
Ieet tall, which is more than
30 Ieet taller than the elevated
Ireeway.
N
Screening All structural elements oI an
OII-Premise Sign to which the
display panels are attached shall
be screened Irom view.
All structural elements oI the
signs are screened Irom public
view.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
At least 750 Ieet to another OII-
Premise Sign along US-95 or at
least 300 Ieet to another OII-
premise Sign (iI not along US-
95)
The signs are more than 750
Ieet Irom another OII-Premise
Sign and at least 750 Ieet
Irom each other.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
At least 300 Ieet to the nearest
property line oI a lot in any 'R
or U zoned districts.
The signs are more than 600
Ieet Irom any property line
zoned either 'R or 'U.
Y
Other All OII-Premise Signs shall be
detached and permanently
secured to the ground and shall
not be located on property used
Ior residential purposes.
The signs are permanently
attached to the ground and
detached Irom any other
structures.
Y
GK


ANALYSIS

The OII-Premise Sign use is deIined as 'OII-premise signs are to be considered primarily a
speciIic type oI land use rather than as an incidental use to an existing land use. OII-premise
signs generally produce revenue to the property owner(s) as a land use as compared to on-
premise signs which in themselves do not produce revenue but are incidental to revenue
producing land use. However, because oI the special characteristics oI oII-premise signs as
compared to other types oI land uses and structures, certain qualiIications and requirements are
set Iorth in connection with oII-premise signs as a permitted use in certain zoning districts. The
proposed use meets the deIinition, since the property owner will be obtaining revenue Irom the
proposed signage.


1. No oII-premise signs shall be erected in the public right-oI-way.
The proposea signs are not locatea in the public right-of-way.

2. No oII-premise sign certiIicate oI any kind shall be issued Ior an existing or proposed sign
unless the sign is consistent with all requirements oI this Title (including those protecting
existing signs).
The proposea signs meet all minimum requirements for an Off-Premise Sign, with the
exception of overall height. The applicant has requestea two associatea Jariances to
allow overall heights of 92 feet for each Off-Premise Sign.

3. Except as provided in Paragraph (12) below, oII premise signs are permitted in the C-1,
C-2, C-M and M Zoning Districts only.
Per Paragraph (12), an Off-Premise Sign is permittea in the C-J (Civic) aistrict if it is
controllea by a local government. The parcel meets the criteria.

4. No oII-premise sign shall have a surIace area greater than 672 square Ieet, except that an
embellishment oI not to exceed Iive Ieet above the regular rectangular surIace oI the sign
may be added iI the additional area contains no more than 128 square Ieet. Any
embellishment may include lettering, text, numerals or images, but only to the extent that
such items do not exceed IiIty percent oI any linear side oI the sign.
The proposea signs are 672 square feet, with a 60-foot embellishment.

5. OII-premise signs which are within 660 Ieet oI the right-oI-way and which can be read
Irom Interstate 15, US 95 Irom the north city limits to the Oran K. Gragson Highway, the
Oran K. Gragson Highway or Interstate 515 shall be no closer than 750 Ieet (measured
along the highway Irontage) to any other oII-premise sign along the same Irontage. Each
side oI the highway shall be considered a separate Irontage. The sign and all other oII-
premise signs not oriented toward the same highway shall be no closer than 300 Ieet in any
direction to any other oII premise sign, wherever located, including an oII premise sign
that is situated outside the corporate boundaries oI the City.
GK


The nearest Off-Premise Sign is more than 750 feet to the east of the proposea signs. In
aaaition, the proposea signs are at least 750 feet away from each other.

6. OII-premise signs shall be no higher than 40 Ieet Irom grade at the point oI construction,
except that an oII-premise sign within 60 Ieet oI the right-oI-way line oI the street to which
it is oriented which, at a height oI 40 Ieet, will have a signiIicant portion oI its display
surIace obscured Irom view Irom the travel lanes oI the street may be increased to a
maximum oI 55 Ieet when authorized by the City Council.
The proposea signs are aafacent to the U.S. 95 Freeway ana are 92 feet tall. Jariance
applications are requirea to allow the aaaitional height.

7. OII-premise signs shall not be located closer than 10 Ieet to the right-oI-way line oI a
Ireeway nor closer than 50 Ieet to the intersection oI the present or Iuture rights-oI-way oI
any two public roads, streets or highways.
The proposea signs are more than 10 feet from a right-of-way line ana more than 280
feet from the nearest intersection.

8. No oII-premise sign shall be allowed within 300 Ieet Irom the nearest property line oI a lot
in the 'U zoning district or any 'R zoning district.
The nearest 'R` :onea property is locatea at least 600 feet to the west of the proposea
signs.

9. An oII-premise sign may be permitted in the C-V (Civic) District iI in each case the parcel
or use is operated or controlled by an agency oI local, state or Iederal government, or by
any Iraternal, veteran, civic or service organization.
The proposea signs are locatea on a aetention center ownea ana controllea by the City
of Las Jegas.

The proposed OII-Premise Signs are designed within all Title 19 code standards, with the
exception oI overall height. The applicant is requesting Variances (VAR-55026 and VAR-
55027) to allow each sign to be 92 Ieet tall where the maximum height allowed is 75 Ieet. The
proposed OII-Premise signs would be located adjacent to an elevated Ireeway and its
accompanying 20-Ioot tall sound attenuation wall. The additional height is necessary to achieve
Iull sign visibility Irom the Ireeway. In addition, the proposed signs are aesthetically pleasing
and compatible with the area. The 2020 Master Plan, Fiscal Management Policy 6.1.6 states:
'That the City, where possible use public/private partnerships to pay Ior public capital
improvements. This project supports this policy as a revenue source. For these reasons, staII
recommends approval oI both Special Use Permit applications and associated Variance
applications, with conditions.
GK





resolution.

The applicant has provided evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance, in that the
existing elevated Ireeway located to the north oI the subject site contains a 20-Ioot tall sound
attenuation wall. The request to construct a 92-Ioot tall OII-Premise Sign is necessary to obtain
Iull visibility over the existing sound wall. In view oI this hardship imposed by the site`s
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is not preIerential in nature,
and it is thereby within the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.




GK


resolution.





The OII-Premise Sign can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible
with the surrounding land uses.


The C-V (Civic) zoned, Detention Center site is suitable Ior the proposed use.


Site access is provided Irom Stewart Avenue, a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial Street and is
adequate in size to accommodate the proposed OII-Premise Sign use.

General Plan.

Approval oI the proposed Special Use Permit will be consistent with the objectives oI
the General Plan and all code requirements.
GK



The proposed OII-Premise Sign use complies with all Title 19 requirements with the
exception oI overall height. An associated Variance application has been requested to
allow a 92-Ioot tall OII-Premise sign where 75 Ieet is the maximum height allowed




The OII-Premise Sign can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible
with the surrounding land uses.


The C-V (Civic) zoned, Detention Center site is suitable Ior the proposed use.


Site access is provided Irom Stewart Avenue, a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial Street and is
adequate in size to accommodate the proposed OII-Premise Sign use.

General Plan.

Approval oI the proposed Special Use Permit will be consistent with the objectives oI the
General Plan and all code requirements.


The proposed OII-Premise Sign use complies with all Title 19 requirements with the
exception oI overall height. An associated Variance application has been requested to
allow a 92-Ioot tall OII-Premise sign where 75 Ieet is the maximum height allowed.
GK



NOTICES MAILED 220 |VAR-55026 & SUP-54828|
220 |VAR-55027 & SUP-54829|

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
Page 1 of 2 7/16/2014 8:06:28 AM
Applicant Email: chad.mccullough@elitemediainc.com
Applicant Fax: (702)
Rep Last Name: Parry
Rep First Name: Maren
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: (702)
Rep Address: 100 N. City Parkway, #1750
Rep Email: parrym@ballardspahr.com
Rep Fax: (702) 410-7411
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 471-7000
Rep Zip: 89106
Project Name OFF-PREMISE SIGNS
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN)
Applicant City: Henderson
ProjectAddress (Location): 3100 STEWART AVENUE
Application/Petition For: Two Special Use Permits for Two Off-Premise Signs at 3100 Stewart Avenue
PREAPP2014-000701 AND 702
Applicant First Name: Elite Media
Applicant Address: 145 Brightmoor Court
Applicant Last Name:
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
VAR-55026, SUP-54828, VAR-55027, SUP-54829 & VAR-55028
Page 2 of 2 7/16/2014 8:06:28 AM
I Accept:
Yes
CITY OF LAS VEGAS 333 N RANCHO DR 8TH FL LAS VEGAS, NV 89106-3703
Maren Parry Ballard Spahr LLP Associate ParryM@ballardspahr.com
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
F
o
r

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
P
u
r
p
o
s
e
s

o
n
l
y
.

D
o
e
s

n
o
t

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
i
g
h
t

l
i
n
e
.
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
9
V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
6
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
7
,

S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
9

&

V
A
R
-
5
5
0
2
8

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
V
A
P
-
0
Z

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
9
j
-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
U
P
-

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
L
I
T
E

M
E
D
I
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

3
1
0
0

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
0
Z

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
9
j
-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
U
P
-

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
L
I
T
E

M
E
D
I
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

3
1
0
0

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
0
Z

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
9
j
-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
U
P
-

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
L
I
T
E

M
E
D
I
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

3
1
0
0

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

07/15/14
PRJ-54759
REVISED
07/15/14
PRJ-54759
REVISED
07/15/14
PRJ-54759
REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 20.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54828 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-55026 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: ELITE MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a
request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3100 Stewart
Avenue (APN 139-36-604-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-54759|. StaII



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Backup - ReIer to VAR-55026
2. Special Map
paper use, backup

Agenda tem No.: 21.


SUB1ECT:



RECOMMENDATION:

2. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-55027 and SUP-54829 |PRJ-54759|
paper use, backup

Agenda tem No.: 22.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54829 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-55027 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: ELITE MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a
request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3100 Stewart
Avenue (APN 139-36-604-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-54759|.



RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVAL

2. Special Map
paper use, backup

Agenda tem No.: 23.


SUB1ECT:



RECOMMENDATION:

5. Photos
paper use, backup
VAR-55028 PR1-54759]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ELITE MEDIA - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-55028 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning

(SUP-55029) shall be required, iI approved.

2. ConIormance to the approved conditions Ior Special Use Permit (SUP-49534).


SaIety.



VAR-55028 PR1-54759]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

In 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) Ior a 75-Ioot tall
OII-Premise sign at 3100 Stewart Avenue. The applicant is requesting to amend the previously
approved OII-Premise Sign and raise the height to 92 Ieet where a maximum height oI 75 Ieet is
allowed. A Variance is required to raise the overall height beyond 75 Ieet. The existing 75-Ioot
tall OII-Premise Sign is located adjacent to an elevated Ireeway and its accompanying 20-Ioot
the Ireeway; thereIore, staII supports the request. II denied, the existing 75-Ioot tall OII-Premise
Sign would not be allowed to increase in overall height.

ISSUES

The applicant is requesting an overall height oI 92-Ieet Ior the OII-Premise Sign;
thereIore, a Variance is required.


04/15/64
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0024-64) Irom R-1 (Single Family
Residential) and R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to C-V (Civic) Ior
property located on the northeast corner oI Mohave Road and Stewart
Avenue.
11/04/81
The City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (CV-0002-81) Ior
an adult misdemeanor detention Iacility on the northeast corner oI Mohave
11/07/90
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0017-89) Ior the
expansion oI an existing detention Iacility on the northeast corner oI Mohave
07/09/13
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) Ior
an OII-Premise Sign at 3100 Stewart Avenue. StaII recommended approval.
07/24/14
StaII administratively approved a minor amendment (SUP-55029) oI a
previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) to increase the height
oI an existing OII-Premise Sign by less than 50 oI the original approval.
VAR-55028 PR1-54759]
GK

The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear a request Ior a Special Use
Permit (SUP-54828) Ior an OII-Premise Sign at 3100 Stewart Avenue. An
associated Variance (VAR-55026) will also be heard to allow an overall
height oI 92 Ieet where 75 Ieet is the maximum height allowed.
08/12/14
The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear a request Ior a Special Use
Permit (SUP-54829) Ior an OII-Premise Sign at 3100 Stewart Avenue. An
associated Variance (VAR-55027) will also be heard to allow an overall
height oI 92 Ieet where 75 Ieet is the maximum height allowed.

Circa 1954 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.

12/12/13
A building permit (#249810) was issued Ior an oII-premise sign at 3100
Stewart Avenue. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.

01/16/13
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements Ior a Variance
application.

No neighborhood meeting was required nor was one held.

Field Check
06/03/13 StaII visited the site and Iound a well maintained City property.

Site Area
Net Acres 11.69

VAR-55028 PR1-54759]
GK


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use Per
1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject
Property
City Detention Center PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
North U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way
School PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
M (Industrial)
South
Undeveloped
LI/R (Light
M (Industrial)
East U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way U.S. 95 Right-oI-Way
West Undeveloped M (Industrial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

C-V (Civic) District Y
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Mohave Road Primary Arterial
and Highways
100 Y
Stewart Avenue Primary Arterial
and Highways
100 Y
U.S. 95 Freeway
and Highways
200 Y
VAR-55028 PR1-54759]
GK


Standards Previously Approved
(SUP-49534)
Proposed Compliance
Location The sign is not in public right-
oI-way, nor is it in the OII-
Premise Exclusionary Sign
Zone
The sign is not in public right-
oI-way, nor is it in the OII-
Premise Exclusionary Sign
Zone
Y
Zoning The sign is located in a C-V
(Civic) zoning district, which is
controlled by the City oI Las
Vegas.
The sign is located in a C-V
(Civic) zoning district and is
controlled by the City oI Las
Vegas.
Y
Area The sign is 672 square Ieet in
size and has a 60-Ioot
embellishment.
The sign is 672 square Ieet in
size and has a 60-Ioot
embellishment.
Y
Height The sign is 75 Ieet tall and
adjacent to an elevated Ireeway.
The sign is 92 Ieet tall and
adjacent to an elevated
Ireeway.
N
Screening All structural elements oI the
sign are screened Irom public
view.
All structural elements oI the
sign are screened Irom public
view.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
The sign is more than 3500 Ieet
Irom another OII-Premise Sign.
The sign is more than 3500
Ieet Irom another OII-Premise
Sign.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
The sign is more than 400 Ieet
Irom any property line zoned
either 'R or 'U.
Sign is more than 400 Ieet
Irom any property line zoned
either 'R or 'U.
Y
Other The sign is permanently
attached to the ground and
detached Irom any other
structures.
Sign is permanently attached
to the ground and detached
Irom any other structures.
Y

ANALYSIS

In 2013, the Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-49534) Ior a 75-Ioot tall
OII-Premise sign at 3100 Stewart Avenue. The applicant is requesting to amend the previously
approved OII-Premise Sign and raise the height to 92 Ieet where a maximum height oI 75 Ieet is
allowed. A Variance is required to raise the overall height beyond 75 Ieet. The existing 75-Ioot
tall OII-Premise Sign is located adjacent to an elevated Ireeway and its accompanying 20-Ioot
the Ireeway. Title 19 allows Ior OII-Premise signs to increase in height by up to 40 Ieet when
adjacent to an elevated Ireeway. The intent oI the regulation is to allow Ior greater sign visibility.
The existing 20-Ioot tall sound attenuation wall is taller than typical sound walls Iound
throughout the Las Vegas Valley. As a result, the allowance to increase the sign height by up to
VAR-55028 PR1-54759]
GK


40 Ieet is not suIIicient enough to improve visibility at the subject site. StaII supports the request
to increase the existing OII-Premise Sign to 92 Ieet, as doing so maintains the original intent oI
Title 19, which is to improve overall visibility when signs are adjacent to elevated Ireeways.




resolution.



NOTICES MAILED 220

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
V
A
P
-
0
Z

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
9
j
-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
L
I
T
E

M
E
D
I
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

3
1
0
0

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
7
/
Z
3
/
I
4

Agenda tem No.: 24.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-53657 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ERIK MARTONOVICH -
OWNER: BCNV, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW TWO
EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (CLASS II) TO BE 16 FEET AND 37 FEET IN
HEIGHT WHERE TEN FEET, SIX INCHES IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED on
2.07 acres at 5636 Donald Road (APN 125-24-104-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6
(Ross) |PRJ-52356|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ERIK MARTONOVICH - OWNER: BCNV, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-5357 CONDIIIONS

Planning


SaIety.



Public Works

5. Prior to construction, obtain approval Irom the Southern Nevada Health District to insure
there is no conIlict with the existing Individual Sewage Disposal System (Septic Tank).

VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site consists oI a 1,092 square-Ioot single Iamily residence, a horse corral and horse
stables located at 5636 Donald Road. The applicant is requesting a Variance to address a citation
issued by Code EnIorcement Ior excessive accessory structure height. The applicant constructed
a 16-Ioot tall and a 37-Ioot tall horse training apparatuses that exceed the height oI the main
dwelling unit. The horse training apparatuses were constructed without proper building permits.
StaII recommends denial, as the applicant has presented no evidence oI a unique or extraordinary
circumstance pursuant to Title 19.16.140 that would justiIy the request.

ISSUES

A code enIorcement case is active on this property Ior two unpermitted accessory
structures being taller than the primary dwelling unitThe citation also includes excessive
junk cars, scrap metal, trash, and a grandstand built without permits at the subject site.


05/06/64
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Petition to Annex (A-0003-64)
approximately 5,000 acres located north oI Lone Mountain Road and west oI
Decatur Boulevard. The annexation recorded on 05/20/64.
06/10/14
The request Ior a Variance (VAR-53657) was pulled Irom the 06/10/14
Planning Commission meeting Ior missing ownership documents. The case is
scheduled to be heard at the 07/08/14 Planning Commission meeting.
07/08/14
The request Ior a Variance (VAR-53657) was pulled Irom the 07/08/14
Planning Commission meeting Ior missing ownership documents. The case is
scheduled to be heard at the 08/12/14 Planning Commission meeting.

VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK


c. 1974 The existing 1,092 square-Ioot single Iamily residence was constructed.
01/31/11
A code enIorcement citation (#97700) was issued Ior junk cars, scrap metal,
trash, and an open Iire pit in the Iront yard at 5636 Donald Road. The citation
was resolved on 03/01/11.
07/02/13
A code enIorcement citation (#130630) was issued Ior junk cars, scrap metal,
garbage and unpermitted horse trapeze and grandstands at 5636 Donald Road.
The citation remains unresolved.

12/17/13
StaII met with the representative to discuss the existing horse apparatuses at
5636 Donald Road. StaII concluded that a Variance would be required to
allow the accessory structures to remain on-site. The submittal requirements
Ior an accessory structure were discussed.


Field Check
05/01/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check at 5636 Donald Road and noted debris
and scrap metal within the rear and side yards.

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.07

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Single Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
North Undeveloped
L (Low Density
Residential)
South
Single Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
East
Single Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
West Undeveloped
R (Rural Density
Residential)
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK


Rural Preservation Overlay District Y
Trails N/A


Pursuant to 1itle 19., the following standards apply:
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 89,975 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 295 Feet Y
Accessory Structure Min. Setbacks
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
15 Feet
10 Feet
200 Feet
57 Feet
55 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Accessory Structure Max. Building Height

Feet
Feet
16 Feet
37 Feet
N
N

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Donald Road Collector Street
and Highways
34 Feet N

ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting approval oI a Variance to address a citation issued by Code
EnIorcement Ior excessive accessory structure height at 5636 Donald Road. The subject site is
approximately two acres in size, contains a 1,092 square-Ioot single Iamily residence and two
horse stables located within the rear yard. The property has a current zoning designation oI R-E
(Residence Estates), which allows Ior the accommodation oI horses. The applicant constructed
two accessory structures, a 16-Ioot tall and a 37-Ioot tall horse training apparatuses that exceed
the height oI the main dwelling unit. According to the applicant`s justiIication letter, the heights
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK


oI the accessory structures are required to saIely train the horses Ior 'trick riding. The applicant
is a competitive vaulter, which is the sport oI gymnastics on horseback. He started the company
Big Horse Productions, which travels across the United States perIorming equestrian acrobatic
shows. Big Horse Company is based in Las Vegas where the horses stay at 5636 Donald Road
while not traveling. The applicant resides at the location and uses the two-acre site to train his
personal horses. The letter Iurther explains that although no commercial events take place on the
subject site, the applicant does invite neighbors to watch the training at any time.

The proposed accessory structures meet all other Title 19 requirements regarding location,
setbacks, and building area. However, the applicant has presented no evidence oI unique or
extraordinary circumstances pursuant to Title 19.16.140 that would justiIy the request.
ThereIore, staII recommends denial.




resolution.

has created a selI-imposed hardship by constructing the accessory structures without Iirst
obtaining required entitlements and building permits. Alternative design oI the structure would
allow conIormance to the Title 19 requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships
imposed by the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is
preIerential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI
Variances.
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK



NOTICES MAILED 112

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
06/10/14 PC
07/22/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
07/22/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
07/22/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
0 4 / 1 4 / 1 4
P R J - 5 2 3 5 6
V
A
R
-
5
3
6
5
7
V
A
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C

N

V

L
L
C

D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C

N

V

L
L
C

D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C

N

V

L
L
C

D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C

N

V

L
L
C

D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4

04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
To Whom it May Concern,
We would like to apply for a Variance to allow a 16-foot and 37-foot tall
accessory structure where Title 19.06.060 limits the height to that of the main
dwelling unit.
The purpose of our variance Backyard Toys. We use our 37 apparatus
for training purposes with our horses. This allows us to safely train for the
trick riding we do. This is intended for personal use and there will be no
public event taking place at this property where we invite people to watch
at any time. There is also a 10 tall structure, which is a seating structure
for us to watch the training. There is also a 20 structure, which is a pole
with a light on it (the light does not work or have power to it).
We believe the variance should be approved because it is not affecting
anyone in a negative way. It is not obstructing any view, as most of the
surrounding properties are vacant lots. There are already 6 telephone poles
of similar hight existing on the property that were put up by NV Energy.
Several of our neighbors also have light poles that exceed the height of
their homes as well. There is no reason we should be treated differently.
The apparatus is over 100 from the house and over 50 from the closest
property line. This ensures it has no way of causing any damage to any
structure on the property. We have collected 44 signatures from our closest
neighbors stating that they are not effected by these apparatuses in any
negative way. In addition to that, we speak to many of them on a daily
basis and they enjoy walking by and seeing us train our horses.
Sincerely, Erik Martonovich
05/08/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657

Agenda tem No.: 25.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-54750 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DONNER 2002
TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT REAR
YARD SETBACK WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 540 SQUARE-
FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) |POOL HOUSE| on 0.68 acres at 3020
Campbell Circle (APN 139-32-212-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
|PRJ-54651|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Letters

VAR-54750 PR1-54651]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DONNER 2002 TRUST


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
conditions:
N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning


SaIety.



VAR-54750 PR1-54651]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Variance to allow a Iive-Ioot rear yard building setback where 10 Ieet is
the minimum requirement Ior a proposed 540 square-Ioot Accessory Structure (Class II) |pool
house|. The site is located at 3020 Campbell Circle, in an R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
district. No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Variance. As such,
the hardship is selI-imposed and staII must recommend denial oI this request.

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow a Iive-Ioot rear yard building setback Ior an (Accessory
Structure (Class II) |pool house| structure where 10 Ieet is the minimum required.


06/19/02
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0047-01)
request Iorm R (Rural Density Residential) to DR (Desert Rural Density
Residential) in accordance with the recommendations oI the Rancho
Charleston Land Use Study and Strategic Plan. The Planning Commission
and staII recommended denial.


1976 The principal dwelling was constructed.
12/13/05
A complaint (#36906) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior the construction
oI a block wall without permits. The complaint was resolved on 12/30/05.
03/17/14
A building permit (#256359) was issued Ior interior demo. The permit has not
been Iinalized as oI 07/16/14.
04/09/14
A building permit (#257834) was issued Ior a room addition and patio cover.
The permit has not been Iinalized as oI 07/16/14.
VAR-54750 PR1-54651]
MR

04/09/14
A building permit (#257835) was issued Ior a block wall. The permit has not
04/28/14
A building permit (#258970) was issued Ior a block wall. The permit has not
06/04/14
A building permit (#261732) was issued to raise the wall height oI the rear
wall Irom Iive-Ioot, six-inches to seven Ieet. The permit has not been
Iinalized as oI 07/16/14.
05/22/14
A building permit (#260819) was issued Ior a 540 square-Ioot pool house
with a rear yard setback oI 10 Ieet. The permit has not been Iinalized as oI
07/16/14.

06/17/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant`s designated
representative to discuss the submittal requirements Ior a setback variance.

A neighborhood was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
07/03/14
A Iield inspection was conducted on the subject site, which revealed the
Ioundation Ior the proposed structure is Iormed approximately Iive-Ioot Irom
the property line and the entire site is under construction.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.68

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Single-Family,
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
North
Single-Family,
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
South
Single-Family,
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
VAR-54750 PR1-54651]
MR


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
East
Single-Family,
Detached
DR (Desert Rural
West
Single-Family,
Detached
DR (Desert Rural

Rural Preservation Overlay District Y
Trails N/A


Pursuant to 19.. for Accessory Structures, the following standards apply:
Min. Setbacks

Side
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
34 Feet
5 Feet
Y
N
Min. Separation Distance 6 Feet 32 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage oI side and rear yard 50 6 Y

ANALYSIS

This application is a request Ior a Variance to allow a 540 square-Ioot Accessory Structure
(Class II) |pool house| to be constructed Iive-Ioot Irom the rear property line. The pool house
will cover approximately six percent oI the rear and side yard area. As proposed, the structure
will encroach Iive Ieet into the side yard setback, which represents a 50 percent setback
reduction. Building Permit (#260819) was issued with a rear yard setback oI 10 Ieet Ior this
proposed pool house. II this Variance is approved, then Building Permit (#260819) may be
revised to reIlect the reduced setback.
VAR-54750 PR1-54651]
MR


This application has been properly noticed to governmental and outside agencies. The Las Vegas
Valley Water District (LVVWD) was the only agency that responded with the comments below:

'The property is currently served but plumbing calculations Ior the proposed pool house/casita
will need to be submitted to LVVWD to determine iI the existing meter can meet the additional
demand.

The requested Variance does not comply with setbacks Ior R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
district and the reduced setback is not consistent with the characteristics oI single-Iamily homes
on large lots in the Rural Preservation Overlay District. Additionally, the lot is not irregular in
shape and there are no unique site characteristics. This application is the result oI a selI-imposed
hardship; thereIore, staII recommends denial this request.




resolution.

has created a selI-imposed hardship by proposing to construct an Accessory Structure (Class II)
|pool house| in the required rear yard setback. Alternatively, the pool could be constructed with
the required 10-Ioot rear yard setback as approved by Building Permit (#260819) and in
conIormance with Title 19 requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships imposed by
the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is preIerential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.
VAR-54750 PR1-54651]
MR



NOTICES MAILED 140

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750
06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750
08/12/14 PC
06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750
06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750
C O N T R A C T O R
E L E C T R I C A L N U M B E R
C O N T R A C T O R S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E O R
M A S T E R O R Q . I . I F P L U M B I N G O R
S I G N A T U R E P L A N S P R E P A R E D B Y
C O N T R A C T O R L I C E N S E #
C O M P A N Y N A M E
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

T H E S E P L A N S A R E P R E P A R E D A N D S U B M I T T E D B Y T H E C O N T R A C T O R A S A C A T E G O R Y
A U T H O R I Z E D U N D E R N R S 6 2 4 .
B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
P
o
o
l

H
o
u
s
e

-
S
i
t
e

P
l
a
n
A
S
1
.
0
0
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

N
o
t
e
s
:
K
e
y
n
o
t
e
s
:
0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
C O N T R A C T O R
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
P
o
o
l

H
o
u
s
e

-
S
i
t
e

P
l
a
n
A
S
1
.
0
0
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

N
o
t
e
s
:
K
e
y
n
o
t
e
s
:
0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
C O N T R A C T O R
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
P
o
o
l

H
o
u
s
e

-
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
2
.
0
0
0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
C O N T R A C T O R
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
P
o
o
l

H
o
u
s
e

-
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
2
.
0
0
0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
C O N T R A C T O R
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
S
o
u
t
h

a
n
d

E
a
s
t
A
2
.
0
0
0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
C O N T R A C T O R
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
N
o
r
t
h

a
n
d

W
e
s
t
A
2
.
0
1
0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
C O N T R A C T O R
D
a
te
:
D
e
s
c
rip
tio
n
D
a
te

M
a
rk

B
re
slin
B
u
ild
e
rs sh
a
ll h
a
ve
n
o
lia
b
ility fo
r u
se
o
f th
is in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
w
ith
o
u
t th
e
ir w
ritte
n
co
n
se
n
t. C
o
p
yrig
h
t (c) 1
9
9
9
- 2
0
1
4
. U
se
o
f th
e
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
co
n
ta
in
e
d
in
th
is in
stru
m
e
n
t fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e
s
p
e
c
ific
p
u
rp
o
s
e
fo
r w
h
ic
h
it w
a
s
in
te
n
d
e
d
a
n
d
fo
r o
th
e
r th
a
n
th
e

clie
n
t
fo
r
w
h
o
m

it
w
a
s
p
re
p
a
re
d

is
fo
rb
id
d
e
n

u
n
le
ss
e
xp
re
ssly
p
e
rm
itte
d

in

a
d
va
n
ce

b
y
B
re
slin

B
u
ild
e
rs.

T
h
e
se
d
ra
w
in
g
s sh
a
ll b
e
u
se
d
fo
r o
n
e
p
ro
je
ct o
n
ly.
D
E
S
IG
N
A
N
D
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
5
5
2
5
P
O
L
A
R
IS
A
V
E
N
U
E
, S
U
IT
E
B
(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
7
7
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
E
V
A
D
A
8
9
1
1
8
F
A
X

(
7
0
2
)

7
9
8
-
3
9
0
8
P
ro
je
c
t N
o
.:
D
o
n
n
e
r

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
3
0
2
0

C
a
m
p
b
e
ll
C
ir
c
le
L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
7
A
P
N
:

1
3
9
-
3
2
-
2
1
2
-
0
0
1
D
e
s
ig
n
e
d
B
y
:
C
h
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
L
IC
E
N
S
E
#
0
0
1
8
1
6
9
L
IC
E
N
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
P
o
o
l

H
o
u
s
e

-
F
l
o
o
r

P
l
a
n
R
o
o
f

P
l
a
n
A
1
.
0
0
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

N
o
t
e
s
:
P
l
a
n

N
o
t
e
s
:
A
t
t
i
c

V
e
n
t
i
l
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
:

0
6
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
5
1
V
A
R
-
5
4
7
5
0
V
A
P
-
4
7
0

[
P
P
J
-
1
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

D
O
N
N
E
P

Z
0
0
Z

T
P
U
S
T

3
0
Z
0

C
A
M
P
E
L
L

C
I
P
C
L
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
4
7
0

[
P
P
J
-
1
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

D
O
N
N
E
P

Z
0
0
Z

T
P
U
S
T

3
0
Z
0

C
A
M
P
E
L
L

C
I
P
C
L
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750
06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750
06/24/14
PRJ-54651
VAR-54750

Agenda tem No.: 26.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-54820 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAURIE NADY
FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING PATIO
COVER on 0.15 acres at 4530 Dover Place (APN 139-31-410-026), R-1 (Single Family
Residential) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-54754|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Petition/Postcards

VAR-54820 PR1-54754]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: LAURIE NADY FAMILY TRUST


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
conditions:
N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning


SaIety.



VAR-54820 PR1-54754]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Variance to allow a zero-Ioot side yard setback where Iive Ieet is required
Ior an existing patio cover located at 4530 Dover Place. The site is in an R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zoning district. The hardship is selI-imposed. The structure does not conIorm to
code and was built without permits. For these reasons, staII recommends denial oI this request. II
this request is denied, then the patio cover must be reconIigured to conIorm to current code
requirements or be removed.

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow a zero-Ioot side yard building setback Ior an existing patio
cover where Iive Ieet is the minimum required.


11/13/51
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0001-51) Irom R-
A (Ranch Estates) to R-1(Single Family Residence) Ior the Hyde Park Tract
Ior the property described as the SW1/4 oI Section 31 Township 20 South
Rang 61 East MDB& M. The Regional Planning Commission recommended
approval.
05/22/52
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Tentative Map request Ior
approximately 645 single-Iamily homes on 160 acres oI the land described as
the SW1/4 oI Section 31 Township 20 South Rang 61 East MDB& M.
12/23/52
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Final Map request Ior a portion
oI Hyde Park Subdivision #3. The Planning Commission recommended
approval.
03/07/11
A complaint (#98672) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior the Iront yard
covered in weeds and a broken window. The complaint was resolved on
08/02/11.
01/26/12
A complaint (#109747) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior work being
perIormed without permits. The complaint was resolved on 08/07/12.
10/15/12
perIormed without permits and conversion oI a single Iamily structure to
multi-Iamily dwelling. The complaint was resolved on 12/13/12.
VAR-54820 PR1-54754]
MR

10/16/12
perIormed without permits and conversion oI a shed to an Accessory
Structure (Class II). The complaint was resolved on 10/16/12.
12/18/12
A complaint (#123347) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior a rubble pile oI
concrete stored in the Iront yard. The complaint was resolved on 08/07/12.
02/04/13
A complaint (#124589) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior overgrown
weeds in the Iront yard. The complaint was resolved on 02/05/13.
04/02/14
A complaint (#139545) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior construction oI
a patio cover and carport with permits. The complaint has not been resolved
as oI 07/23/14.

06/03/09
A building permit (#140759) was issued Ior two storage sheds. The permit
was Iinalized on 12/29/09.
08/06/12
A building permit (#215677) was issued Ior an interior remodel and
Accessory Structure (Class II) |laundry room|. The permit was Iinalized on
05/28/13.
11/08/12
A building permit (#223551) was issued Ior plumbing to the laundry room.
The permit was Iinalized on 11/08/12.
04/04/13
A building permit (#232969) was issued Ior block wall repairs. The permit
was Iinalized on 05/29/13.


06/24/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant`s designated
representative to discuss the submittal requirements Ior two setback Variances
Ior an existing patio cover and Accessory Structure (Class II) |Shed|.

A neighborhood was not required, nor was one held.
VAR-54820 PR1-54754]
MR


Field Check
07/03/14
A Iield inspection was conducted on the subject site revealed that the
carport/patio cover exists and is close to iI not over the existing property line.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.15

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
North
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
South
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
East
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
West
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Ieet) Y
Meadows Walkable Community Plan Y
Trails N/A


Pursuant to 19..4 and 19..7 for a Patio Cover the following standards apply:
Min. Setbacks
Side
Rear
5 Feet
5 Feet
0 Feet
59 Feet
N
Y
Max. Building Height 12 Feet 8 Feet Y
VAR-54820 PR1-54754]
MR


ANALYSIS

There was some conIusion to what the residential development standards are Ior this property.
The development standards Ior the Hyde Park Tract were established over a halI-century ago in
1951 when a tract oI land was Rezoned Irom R-A (Ranch Estates) to R-1(Single Family
Residence). Chapter 24 oI 'The code oI the City oI Las Vegas Nevada 1949 determined the
permitted uses and building requirements Ior this development. The required building setback Ior
a building in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district was 'ten percent oI the width oI
the lot, but such side yard not exceed twenty-Iive Ieet and shall not be less than Iive Ieet in
width. Chapter 24 Section 12 (D)(b) states: 'Cornices, canopies, eaves or other similar Ieature
not providing additional Iloor space within the building may extend into a required yard not to
exceed two Ieet. The zoning code has changed a number oI times over year since the original
approval. This patio cover/carport was constructed within the last year and thereIore; Title
19.060.040 and 19.060.070 detail the development standards (setbacks) Ior this patio
cover/carport.

This application is a request Ior a Variance to allow an existing patio cover on the east property
line where Iive Ieet is required. The patio cover is on the side yard property line, which
represents a 100 percent setback reduction. The requested Variance does not comply with the
minimum side yard setback Ior a R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district and is not
consistent with the characteristics oI single-Iamily homes throughout the valley.

Several patio covers exist in the required setback area on Dover Place; however, only one
received approval oI a setback Variance. Every Variance is evaluated separately and the approval
oI one Variance does not guarantee the approval oI another. This requested setback Variance is
on a lot that is not irregular in shape and there are no unique site characteristics. The patio cover
was constructed without permits and Iails to meet code. This is a selI-imposed hardship. StaII
recommends denial oI this request. II this Variance is denied, then the patio cover must be
removed or reconIigured to conIorm to current code requirements.



VAR-54820 PR1-54754]
MR


resolution.

has created a selI-imposed hardship by constructing a patio cover on the property line without
permits. Alternatively, the patio cover could be reduced in size and in a manner that would allow
conIormance to the Title 19 requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships imposed by
the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is preIerential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.


NOTICES MAILED 314

APPROVALS 46

PROTESTS 0

06/26/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
08/12/14 PC
8 ' - 1 " ( R E F )
3 3 ' - 9 "
1
3
'-
3
"
1
0
'-
5
"

3 0 ' - 5 "
2 1 ' - 6 "
P
L
P
L
P
L

P
L
C
A
R
P
O
R
T

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

R
O
O
F

S
Y
S
T
E
M

N
E
W

R
O
O
F
A
T
C
A
R
P
O
R
T
A
N
D
F
R
O
N
T

P
O
R
C
H
T
.
O
.
P
.

F
.
F
.

P
L

A
1

0
6
.
2
6
.
1
4
.
.
.
.
R e v S H E E T T I T L E :
J O B N A M E :
D
A
T
E

S
C
A
L
E

S
H
E
E
T
N
O
.
D e s c r i p t i o n B y D a t e
N
O
T
E
D
T H E N A D Y L A U R I E F A M I L Y T R U S T
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 0 7
4 5 3 0 D O V E R P L A C E
F
R
O
N
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N
D

O

V

E

R

P

L

A

C

E
R
O
O
F

L
I
N
E
(
S
)
(
R
E
F
)
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

S
I
N
G
L
E
S
T
O
R
Y

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
F
R
O
N
T

P
O
R
C
H
C
A
R
P
O
R
T

M A S O N R Y W A L L
P

R

O

P

O

S

E

D

C

A

R

P

O

R

T

I

N

T

O

S

I

D

E

S

E

T

B

A

C

K
R

E

Q

U

I

R

E

M

E

N

T

F

O

R
T

H

E

N

A

D

Y

L

A

U

R

I

E

F

A

M

I

L

Y

T

R

U

S

T
7 . 1 5 . 1 4 C i t y o f L a s V e g a s S D R
0
'
2
'
4
'
8
'
/Volumes/Projects/1 3.063 JayNadyResidential Homes/DWGS/1 3.063 JayNadyResidential Homes.pln; 7/1 5/1 4; 3:20 PM; Edrick Ferreras
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
111111111111111111111111111111111111111
0
6
.
2
6
.
1
D
A
T
A
E
S
C
A
L
EE
S
H
E
E
TT
N
O
.
N
O
T
E
D
8
'
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
5
4
V
A
R
-
5
4
8
2
0

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
V
A
P
-
Z
0

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
4
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

L
A
U
P
I
E

N
A
D
Y

F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

4
3
0

D
O
V
E
P

P
L
A
C
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
Z
0

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
4
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

L
A
U
P
I
E

N
A
D
Y

F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

4
3
0

D
O
V
E
P

P
L
A
C
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
Z
0

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
4
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

L
A
U
P
I
E

N
A
D
Y

F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

4
3
0

D
O
V
E
P

P
L
A
C
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

V
A
P
-
Z
0

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
4
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

L
A
U
P
I
E

N
A
D
Y

F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

4
3
0

D
O
V
E
P

P
L
A
C
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

07/16/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820 - REVISED
07/16/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820 - REVISED
1
Mark Rex
From: Kristen Goodell <Kristen@aptusgroup.com>
Sent: Tuesday, J uly 01, 2014 2:16 PM
To: Mark Rex
Subject: Fwd: Dover place
Kristen G. Goodell, AIA

APTUS
1200 S. 4th Street, Suite 206
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
P 702.839.1200
F 702.839.1213
M 702.501.6825
kristen@aptusgroup.com
aptusgroup.com
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kristen Goodell <kristen@aptusgroup.com>

Subject: Fwd: Dover place
Date: July 1, 2014 1:33:14 PM PDT
To: mrex@cityoflasvegas.gov
Kristen G. Goodell, AIA

APTUS
1200 S. 4th Street, Suite 206
P 702.839.1200
F 702.839.1213
M 702.501.6825
kristen@aptusgroup.com
aptusgroup.com
07/01/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
2
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bruce Bilyeu <bruce@mosaicbg.com>

Subject: Dover place
Date: July 1, 2014 12:58:23 PM PDT
To: Kristen Goodell <kristen@aptusgroup.com>
Shed. 8' eave. 10' ridge

House 8' eave. 13' ridge.
07/01/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754 VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754 VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820
06/26/14
PRJ-54754
VAR-54820

Agenda tem No.: 27.


SUB1ECT:
WVR-54398 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WOLF T.H., LLC - OWNER:
JAMES R. MARSH - For possible action on a request Ior a Waiver oI the Town Center Sign
Standards TO ALLOW A PYLON SIGN TO ADVERTISE ONE TENANT WHERE
MULTIPLE TENANTS ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 73-FOOT TALL FLAG POLE
WHERE 40 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED on 1.50 acres at 6775 North
Durango Drive (a portion oI APN 125-20-301-027), T-C (Town Center) Zone |GC-TC (General
Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-53401|. StaII
recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps - WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 |PRJ-53401|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 |PRJ-53401|
3. Supporting Documentation - WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 |PRJ-53401|
4. Photos - WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 |PRJ-53401|
5. JustiIication Letter - WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 |PRJ-53401|
6. Support Postcard - WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 |PRJ-53401|

WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: WOLF T.H., LLC - OWNER: JAMES R. MARSH


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
WVR-54398 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

WVR-54400 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

WVk-5438 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
50105) shall be required.


3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan and elevation plans, date
stamped 06/02/14, and the landscape plan, date stamped 07/08/14 except as amended by
conditions herein.

4. A Waiver Irom the Town Center Development Standards Section (F) is hereby approved, to
allow a pylon sign with a 1-Ioot setback where Iive Ieet is the minimum required.

allow a pylon sign advertising one tenant, in which the tenant does not occupy 20,000
square Ieet oI gross Iloor area.

allow a 73-Ioot tall Ilag pole where the maximum height allowed is 40 Ieet.
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK

Conditions Page Two

SaIety.



WVk-54400 CONDIIIONS

Planning

50105) shall be required.


3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan and elevation plans, date
stamped 06/02/14, and the landscape plan, date stamped 07/08/14 except as amended by
conditions herein.

4. A Waiver Irom the Town Center Development Standards Section C is hereby approved to
allow 12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms as street trees along Durango Drive and Deer Springs
Way where a minimum oI 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms are required.

5. A Waiver Irom the Town Center Development Standards Section C is hereby approved to
allow 9 parking lot trees where 10 trees are required.

SaIety.



WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

Currently, the 1.55-acre subject site is undeveloped at 6775 North Durango Drive. In 2013, the
City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50105) Ior a 3,940 square-Ioot
convenience store (with Iuel pumps) and a 1,996 square-Ioot car wash, Iull service with a waiver
oI the Town Center Development Standards to allow the gas station to be oriented away Irom
public right-oI-way. The applicant is proposing to amend the original approval by requesting to
eliminate one parking lot tree and replace the previously approved Rio Grande Ash street tree
species located along Durango Drive and the previously approved 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan
Palms located along Durango Drive and Deer Springs Way with 12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms.
A Waiver oI the Town Center Development Standards is required to eliminate the parking lot
tree and replace the required street tree species.

The applicant is also proposing to construct a 24-Ioot tall pylon sign on property designed to
advertise one tenant in which that tenant occupies less than 20,000 square Ieet oI gross Iloor
area. In addition, the applicant is proposing the pylon sign to have a 1-Ioot setback where Iive
Ieet is required. The applicant also proposes a 73-Ioot tall Ilag pole where 40 Ieet is the
maximum height allowed. A second Waiver application Irom the Town Center Sign Standards is
required Ior the pylon sign and Ilag pole.

ISSUES

A Waiver oI the Town Center Development Standards (C)(2)(B) is required to replace
the previously approved 36-inch box Rio Grande Ash street trees located along Durango
Drive and the 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms located along Durango Drive and Deer
Springs Way with 12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms.
A Waiver oI the Town Center Development Standards (C)(2)(B) Streetscape Planting
Requirements is required to allow Ior alternate streetscape planting to consist oI a
combination oI a shade tree or palm tree every 35 Ieet where one shade tree and two palm
trees planted 35 Ieet on center in an alternating pattern is required.
A Waiver oI the Town Center Development Standards (C)(2)(B) is required to allow 9
parking lot trees where 10 trees are required.
A Waiver oI the Town Center Sign Standards (F)(2)(A) is required to allow a 24-Ioot tall
pylon sign advertising one tenant, in which the tenant does not occupy 20,000 square Ieet
oI gross Iloor area.
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


A Waiver oI the Town Center Sign Standards (F)(2)(A) is required to allow the proposed
pylon sign to be set back 1-Ioot Irom the property line where at least Iive Ieet is required.
A Waiver oI the Town Center Sign Standards (F)(2)(D) is required to allow a 73-Ioot tall
Ilag pole where a maximum height oI 40 Ieet is allowed.


01/17/01
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (A-0003-99) 622.50 acres
generally located north oI Rome Boulevard and west oI El Capitan Way. The
annexation became eIIective on 01/26/01.
The City Council approved a Major ModiIication (MOD-48831) oI the Town
Center Land Use Plan to amend the Special Land Use Designation Irom UC-
TC (Urban Center Mixed Use Town Center) to GC-TC (General
Commercial Town Center) on 3.96 acres at the southwest corner oI Deer
Springs Way and Durango Drive. Planning Commission recommended
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-50104) Irom U (Undeveloped)
to TC (Town Center) on 3.96 acres at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs
Way and Durango Drive. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
Ior a 3,940 square-Ioot convenience store (with Iuel pumps), a 1,996 square-
Ioot car wash, Iull service and an associated encroachment agreement into the
public right-oI-way, with a waiver oI the Town Center Development
Standards to allow the gas station to be located away Irom public right-oI-way
on 1.50 acres at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs Way and Durango
Drive. Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII recommended
denial.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-50107) Ior a
Convenience Store (with Iuel pumps) at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs
Way and Durango Drive. Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-50109) Ior a
Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment at the southwest corner oI Deer
Springs Way and Durango Drive. Planning Commission recommended
10/16/13
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-50110) Ior a LPG
installation at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs Way and Durango Drive.
Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII recommended denial.
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-50111) Ior a gaming
establishment, restricted use at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs Way and
Durango Drive. Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII
recommended denial.
01/02/14
StaII administratively approved a two-lot Parcel Map (PMP-52372) on 3.98
acres at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs Way and Durango Drive. The
Parcel Map was recorded on 04/08/14.
02/19/14
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-50106) a 1,300 square-
Ioot section oI public right-oI-way (an existing bus turn out) generally located
along the west side oI Durango Drive, approximately 100 Ieet south oI Deer
Springs Way. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.


02/28/13
A code enIorcement citation (#125533) was issued Ior political signs at the
subject property. The citation was resolved on 03/05/13.
05/21/14
A building permit (#254641) was issued Ior the convenience store building at
6775 North Durango Drive. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.
05/21/14
A building permit (#254648) was issued Ior the car wash building at 6775
North Durango Drive. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.
05/21/14
A building permit (#258067) was issued Ior onsite hardscapes at 6775 North
Durango Drive. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.
06/30/14
A building permit (#256083) was issued Ior a Iuel canopy at 6775 North
Durango Drive. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.

03/24/14
StaII conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discuss
proposed changes to the previously approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-50105). The applicant proposed a reduction in required parking lot
landscaping, a replacement oI street tree species, the installation a 24-Ioot tall
pylon sign and a 73-Ioot tall Ilag pole. StaII concluded that a Waiver
application would be required Ior the proposed landscaping changes and an
additional Waiver would be required Ior the pylon sign and Ilag pole.

WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


Field Check
07/03/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check oI the subject site and noted an
undeveloped parcel Iree oI trash or debris.

Site Area
Gross Acres 1.55

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
North General Retail
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
South Undeveloped
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
East General Retail
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
West Undeveloped
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
U (Undeveloped)

Town Center Master Plan N
T-C (Town Center) District N
Trails Y
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK



Pursuant to the 1own Center Development Standards Manual, the following standards apply:
Standard Approved (SDR-515) Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 172,498 SF 172,498 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Front (Durango)
Side
Corner
Rear
79 Feet
10 Feet
40 Feet
41 Feet
79 Feet
10 Feet
40 Feet
41 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 7 7 Y
Max. Building Height 1 Story/22 Feet 1 Story/22 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a
RooI or Trellis
Screened,
Gated, w/ a
RooI or Trellis
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened
Parapet
screened Y

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and the 1own Center Development Standards Manual, the following
standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Approved (SDR-515)
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Trees
3 Trees
0 Trees
0 Trees
1 Trees
6 Trees
0 Trees
0 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 4 Trees 7 Trees Y
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
10 Trees 9 Trees N
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West

Approved (SDR-50105)
15 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
0 Feet
15 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
0 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Wall Height Not Required
No Walls
proposed
N/A
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


Open Space - 1own Center
Approved (SDR-515) Provided Compliance 1otal
Acreage
Density
Percent Area Percent Area
65,527 SF N/A 20 13,364 SF 20 13,364 SF Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Town Center
Parkway
Town Center
Durango Drive
Parkway Arterial
and Highways
130 Y
Town Center
Arterial
Town Center
Deer Springs Way
Major Collector
and Highways
45 N

Streetscape
Standards
Required Approved (SDR-
515)
Proposed Compliance
9.5-Ioot sidewalk 9.5-Ioot sidewalk 9.5-Ioot sidewalk Y
5-Ioot amenity zone 5-Ioot amenity zone
5-Ioot amenity
zone
Y
36-inch box Rio
Grande Ash
alternating with 25`
BTH Mexican Fan
palm tree pairs at 35-
Ioot intervals
36-inch box Rio
Grande Ash
alternating with 25`
BTH Mexican Fan
palm tree pairs at 35-
Ioot intervals
12-Ioot tall
Mexican Fan
Palm at 35-Ioot
intervals
N
Town Center
Parkway
(Durango
Drive)
Scored sidewalk/scroll
pattern
pattern
Scored
sidewalk/scroll
pattern indicated
Y
9.5-Ioot sidewalk 5-Ioot sidewalk 5-Ioot sidewalk Y
5-Ioot amenity zone 3-Ioot amenity zone
3-Ioot amenity
zone
Y
36-inch box Rio
Grande Ash or 25-Ioot
tall Mexican Fan Palm
36-inch box Rio
Grande Ash at 30-Ioot
intervals
Alternating 36-
inch box Rio
Grande Ash and
12-Ioot tall
Mexican Fan
Palm at 30-Ioot
intervals
N
Town Center
Arterial
(Deer Springs
Way)
pattern
pattern indicated
Scored
sidewalk/scroll
pattern indicated
Y
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Convenience
Store
3,940 SF
1 space
per 175
SF GFA
23
Car Wash,
Full Service
1,996 SF
1 space
per 150
SF GFA
14


37

Y
Loading
Spaces
5,936 SF
Less than
10,000 SF
1 1 Y

Pylon Sign: (Town Center Development Stanaaras)
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number 1 per street Irontage 1 sign Y
Maximum Height 24 Feet 24 Feet Y
Minimum Setback 5 Feet 1-Foot N
Illumination Illumination Permissible Illuminated Y
Minimum GFA
Advertises at least one tenant who
occupies 20,000 square Ieet or
greater oI GFA
5,936 SF N

Flag Pole: (Town Center Development Stanaaras)
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number 1 Ilag per parcel oI land 1 Flag Y
Maximum Height 40 Feet 73 Feet N

Waivers
Town Center Development Standards
(C)(2)(B), 25` tall Mexican Fan Palms
or 36-inch box Rio Grande Ash
12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms Denial
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK

Waivers
Town Center Development Standards
(C)(2)(B), 1 parking lot tree Ior every
6 parking spaces.
To allow 9 parking lot trees
where ten trees are required
Denial
Town Center Sign Standards
(F)(2)(A), pylon signs advertising one
tenant must be located on property in
which the tenant occupies at least
20,000 SF oI GFA.
To allow the tenant to occupy
5,936 SF where a minimum oI
20,000 SF is required.
Denial
(F)(2)(A), 5-Ioot minimum setback Ior
pylon signs.
To allow a 1-Ioot setback where
at least Iive Ieet is required.
Denial
(F)(2)(D), a government Ilag cannot
be Ilown Irom a pole oI which is more
than 40 Ieet in height.
To allow a 73-Ioot tall Ilag pole
where 40 Ieet is the maximum
height allowed.
Denial

ANALYSIS

Development on this site is subject to the Town Center Development Standards. Currently, the
1.55-acre subject site is undeveloped at 6775 North Durango Drive. In 2013, the City Council
approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50105) Ior a 3,940 square-Ioot convenience
store (with Iuel pumps) and a 1,996 square-Ioot car wash, Iull service with a waiver oI the Town
Center Development Standards to allow the gas station to be oriented away Irom public right-oI-
way.

The applicant is currently proposing to amend the original Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
50105) by requesting landscaping alterations. SpeciIically, the applicant proposes to eliminate
one parking lot tree Irom the original approval. According to the submitted justiIication letter,
the removal oI the tree was necessary to Iacilitate a request made by the city oI Las Vegas Fire
Department to relocate the previously approved propane Iacility. The propane Iacility would
relocate to the northeast corner oI the subject site and would maintain its minimum distance
separation oI 330 Ieet Irom any single-Iamily residential dwelling. In an eIIort to mitigate the
loss oI one parking lot tree, the applicant has proposed an additional three 36-inch Rio Grande
Ash trees adjacent to the previously approved car wash building. As a result, the overall site
would gain an additional two trees Irom the original approval.
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


In addition, the applicant is proposing to replace the previously approved street tree species
along Durango Drive and Deer Springs Way. Previously, a combination oI 36-inch box Rio
Grande Ash and 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms were to be planted along Deer Springs Way and
Durango Drive. The applicant is requesting to eliminate both the 36-inch box Rio Grande Ash
trees and 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms along Durango Drive and replace them with 12-Ioot
tall Mexican Fan Palms. In addition, the applicant is requesting to replace the 25-Ioot tall
Mexican Fan Palms along Deer Springs Way with 12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms. The
previously approved 36-inch box Rio Grande Ash trees along Deer Springs Way would remain.

According to the Town Center Landscaping Standards Iound in section (C)(2)(B), the Mexican
Fan Palms are a permissible species Ior use as street trees, however, the section requires that the
Mexican Fan Palms be at least 25 Ieet in height. A Waiver oI the Town Center Landscape
Standards is required to eliminate the parking lot tree and replace the street tree species. StaII
cannot support the requested Waiver, as the applicant`s justiIication letter omits any validation
Ior proposing 12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms rather than 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms.

Furthermore, the previously approved landscape plan, which was in compliance with Town
Center Standards, was also in compliance with the Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED) program. This design program is deIined as 'the proper design and eIIective
use oI the built environment that can lead to a reduction in the Iear and incidence oI crime and an
improvement in the quality oI liIe. The program goals are to reduce opportunities Ior crime that
may be inherent in the design oI structures or in the design oI neighborhoods. The program
includes the use oI Iour overlapping strategies; access control, natural surveillance, territorial
reinIorcement and maintenance. The previously approved landscape plan (SDR-50105), was in
compliance with these Iour strategies. SpeciIically, the natural surveillance strategy uses the
design oI an area so as to allow increased visibility in an eIIort to increase the chances that a
crime could be witnessed and reported. The strategy details trimming bushes that are lower than
42 inches in height and trees that are taller than seven Ieet in height to increase visibility,
however the program does not stipulate the removal or replacement oI tree species as a method
to do so.

The applicant is also proposing to construct a 24-Ioot tall pylon sign at the northeast corner oI
the subject site. The proposed pylon sign does not conIorm to all minimum requirements as
outlined in the Town Center Sign Standards Section (F)(2)(A). According to the submitted
elevation plans, the pylon sign would only advertise one tenant. Pylon signs advertising only one
tenant are permissible in the GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center) special land use
designation, however, that tenant must occupy a minimum oI 20,000 square Ieet oI gross Iloor
area. According to the submitted site plan, the applicant only occupies 5,936 square Ieet oI gross
Iloor area. The applicant states in the submitted justiIication letter that the remaining
undeveloped Iuture commercial property is not ready Ior development, thus the pylon sign would
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK


only be utilized by the single user. However, the submitted elevation plans illustrate that the
pylon sign is to be utilized to advertise gasoline prices, leaving no available space Ior any Iuture
tenants at any time. Any additional Iuture tenants would be Iorced to construct a second pylon
sign and possibly seek the same Waiver request. StaII cannot support the request, as it would
hinder Iuture development options.

In addition, all pylon signs are required to be set back Iive Ieet Irom any property line. The
applicant is proposing a 1-Ioot setback Irom the property line at the northeast corner oI the
subject site. StaII cannot support the setback request, as shiIting the proposed pylon sign to the
south would allow compliance with the Iive-Ioot setback requirement.

The applicant is also proposing a 73-Ioot tall Ilag pole to be located 24 Ieet east oI the previously
approved car wash building. According to the submitted elevation plans, the proposed 73-Ioot
tall Ilag pole would Ily a 600 square-Ioot oIIicial American Ilag. The proposed Ilag pole does not
conIorm to the minimum requirements as outlined by the Town Center Sign Standards Section
(F)(2)(D). According to Section (F)(2)(D), oIIicial Ilags oI governments shall not be Ilown Irom
a pole, the top oI which is more than 40 Ieet in height. According to the applicant`s justiIication
letter, the applicant is seeking a waiver to allow the additional 33 Ieet in height so the Ilag is
visible Irom Interstate 215. StaII cannot support the request, as the subject site is not in close
proximity to the elevated right-oI-way, which is approximately 850 Ieet south oI the subject site.

FINDINGS (WVR-54398)

The Town Center Development Standards Section (F), speciIically outlines the minimum
requirements Ior both a pylon sign and Ilag pole. The proposal to construct the pylon sign one-
Ioot Irom the property line and construct a Ilag pole 33-Ieet above the maximum height allowed
is preIerential in nature. The applicant Iails to substantiate either request. In addition, the request
to allow a pylon sign to be utilized by one tenant, in which the tenant does not occupy at least
20,000 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area, would severely hinder any Iuture commercial
development on the commercial subdivision with plans to utilize a pylon sign. This proposal
does not meet the minimum requirements as outlined by the Town Center Development
Standards and the applicant Iails to adequately justiIy the requests; thereIore, staII recommends
denial.


The Town Center Development Standards Section (C), require landscaping standards that the
applicant could install without the need Ior Waivers. The elimination oI the parking lot tree could
be avoided with minor site design adjustments. In addition, the applicant Iailed to provide any
type oI validation in the justiIication letter to substantiate the request to replace 36-inch Rio
WVR-54398 and WVR-54400 PR1-53401]
GK

Staff Report Page Eleven

Grande Ash and 25-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms with 12-Ioot tall Mexican Fan Palms. This
project does not meet the minimum requirements as outlined by the Town Center Development
Standards; thereIore, staII recommends denial.


NOTICES MAILED 310

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0
06/02/14
PRJ-53401
WVR-54398
06/02/14
PRJ-53401
WVR-54398
08/12/14 PC
0
6
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
6
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
7
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
6
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
6
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
6
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
7
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
0
6
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
3
4
0
1
W
V
R
-
5
4
3
9
8

&

W
V
R
-
5
4
4
0
0
W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

W
V
P
-
4
3
9

[
P
P
J
-
3
4
0
1
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

W
V
P
-
4
4
0
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
O
L
F

T
,
H
,

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P
,

M
A
P
S
H

7
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
I
4
/
I
4

SUZANA RUTAR Architect, Ltd.
A Professional Corporation
1950 E. Warm Springs Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

Phone: (702) 263-6176 Fax: (844) 361-2582
Email: Simona@SRutar.com
July 7, 2014
City of Las Vegas

Department of Building and Safety-Permits Review
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Attn: Flinn Fagg, AICP

Director of Planning
Re: WVR-54398 (PRJ-53401)-SIGNAGE

Arco AMPM C-Store and Carwash at SW Corner of Durango and Deer Springs
6775 N. Durango Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89149
APN# 125-20-301-009
Dear Flinn Fagg,
Per your conversation with our client Raymond J. Shapiro, Gregory E. Borgel with Moreno &
Associates, Inc, and office of Councilman Steve Ross, the changes to the monument/ directional
sign at the drive-cut on Deer Springs have been made to show conforming sign at 7'-0" with 12
square feet of signage area. Also, per your conversation, the changes to the sign will not require
for the application to be heard at public hearings, but rather be approved administratively.
Please refer to attached updated elevation of the sign (PRJ53401-EV004) to show the changes.
Thank you. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at
(702) 263-6176 or Fax at (844) 361-2582.
Sincerely,
Simona Stephens
Project Manager
11111111111111111111111111111111111111199999999
07/08/14
PRJ-53401
WVR-54398

Agenda tem No.: 28.


SUB1ECT:
WVR-54400 - WAIVER RELATED TO WVR-54398 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
WOLF T.H., LLC - OWNER: JAMES R. MARSH - For possible action on a request Ior a
Waiver oI the Town Center Development Standards TO ALLOW NINE PARKING LOT
TREES WHERE A MINIMUM OF TEN TREES ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW 12-
FOOT TALL MEXICAN FAN PALMS WHERE A COMBINATION OF 36-INCH BOX RIO
GRANDE ASH TREES AND 25-FOOT TALL MEXICAN FAN PALMS ARE REQUIRED on
1.50 acres at 6775 North Durango Drive (a portion oI APN 125-20-301-027), T-C (Town Center)
Zone |GC-TC (General Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6
(Ross) |PRJ-53401|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Backup - ReIer to WVR-54398
paper use, backup
06/02/14
PRJ-53401
WVR-54400
06/02/14
PRJ-53401
WVR-54400
08/12/14 PC
SUZANA RUTAR Architect, Ltd.
A Professional Corporation
1950 E. Warm Springs Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

Phone: (702) 263-6176 Fax: (844) 361-2582
Email: Simona@SRutar.com
July 7, 2014
City of Las Vegas

Department of Building and Safety-Permits Review
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Attn: Flinn Fagg, AICP

Director of Planning
Re: WVR-544008 (PRJ-53401)-TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Arco AMPM C-Store and Carwash at SW Corner of Durango and Deer Springs
6775 N. Durango Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89149
APN# 125-20-301-009
Dear Flinn Fagg,
Per your conversation with our client Raymond J. Shapiro, Gregory E. Borgel with Moreno &
Associates, Inc, and office of Councilman Steve Ross, the changes to the landscape plan have
been made to replace three (3) proposed Mexican Fan Palms with Rio Grande Ash trees along the
Deer Springs.
Please refer to attached updated landscape plan (PRJ53401-LP001) to show the changes.
Thank you. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at
(702) 263-6176 or Fax at (844) 361-2582.
Sincerely,
Simona Stephens
Project Manager
11111111111111111111111111111111111111199999999
07/08/14
PRJ-53401
WVR-54400

Agenda tem No.: 29.


SUB1ECT:
WVR-54824 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ROBERT SINA - OWNER:
CENTENNIAL HILLS MOB OWNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Waiver oI
the Town Center Development Standards Streetscape Requirements TO ALLOW AN
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN on 23.61 acres at 6100 North Durango Drive (APN 125-29-512-001),
T-C (Town Center) Zone |SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use
Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-54685|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ROBERT SINA - OWNER: CENTENNIAL HILLS
MOB OWNERS, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
WVR-54824 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

WVk-54824 CONDIIIONS

Planning

8066) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two (2) years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised

SaIety.

4. A Waiver Irom Town Center Development Streetscape standards to allow no trees within
portions oI the amenity zone adjacent to North Durango Drive is approved.

5. A Waiver Irom Town Center Development Streetscape standards to allow Chitalpa accent
trees within the amenity zone instead oI Rio Grande Ash shade tree which is required is
denied.


WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has requested a Waiver oI the Town Center Development Streetscape standards
associated with approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-8066); to allow an alternative
design adjacent to North Durango Drive. An existing underground utility conduit runs adjacent
to North Durango Drive underneath the proposed streetscape amenity zone Iound at the back oI
curb to the landscape area and is preventing the installation oI larger vegetation. The applicant
has requested to relocate the required streetscape trees Irom the amenity zone to the landscaping
buIIer behind the sidewalk. The applicant has also requested to replace required Rio Grande Ash
shade tree, with a Chitalpa accent tree. StaII has determined that the proposal to relocate the
required amenity zone trees adjacent to North Durango Drive to the landscaping buIIer behind
the sidewalk can be supported due to the existing site conditions. However, staII does not
support the requested Waiver to allow Chitalpa accent trees in place oI the required Rio Grande
Ash shade tree. StaII, thereIore recommends approval oI the request with conditions. II denied,
the previously approved Site Development Plan Review will remain in place and the revision to
relocate the required amenity zone trees will not be allowed.

ISSUES

An existing underground utility conduit is preventing the installation oI required streetscape
trees within a portion oI the North Durango Drive streetscape amenity zone.
Applicant has also requested to replace required Rio Grande Ash shade tree, with a Chitalpa
accent tree.


05/28/98
The Planning Commission approved a petition Ior Annexation (A-0010-98)
on property generally located at the northwest corner oI Azure Way and
Durango Drive containing approximately 30 acres oI land.
01/28/99

on property generally located between Azure Way and Tropical Parkway and
between El Capitan Way and Durango Drive, containing approximately 15
acres oI land.
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB


on property generally located between Centennial Parkway and Tropical
Parkway and between Durango Drive and El Capitan Way, containing
approximately 74.55 acres oI land.
10/06/99
(SD-0020-99) Ior a proposed new car dealership on property located adjacent
to the southwest corner oI the intersection oI Centennial Parkway and
Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the
request.
The City Council approved a request Ior a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
0019-02) Ior the area along the north side oI the Durango Drive S-Curve oI
which the subject parcel is a part.
08/21/02
The City Council approved a request Ior a Rezoning (Z-0043-02) Ior a
Rezoning FROM: U (Undeveloped) |L (Low Density Residential) General
Plan Designation|, U (Undeveloped) |ML (Medium Low Density Residential)
General Plan Designation| and U (Undeveloped) |ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) General Plan Designation| under Resolution oI Intent to C-2
(General Commercial) TO: TC (Town Center).
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0097-02)
Ior a restaurant with drive-thru adjacent to the southwest corner oI Centennial
Parkway and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
Ior a convenience store with Iuel pumps adjacent to the southwest corner oI
Centennial Parkway and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval oI the request.
09/18/02
(SD-0034-02) Ior a convenience store with Iuel pumps and restaurant with
drive-thru on 1.26 acres adjacent to the southwest corner oI Centennial
Parkway and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
02/05/03
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex the subject property (A-0038-
02) located at the southeast corner oI Regena Avenue and Riley Street. The
eIIective date was 02/14/03. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval on 10/24/02.
11/17/04
(SDR-4985) and Rezoning (ZON-4991) Ior a medical/proIessional/retail
development on 22.31 acres adjacent to the southeast corner oI Regena
Avenue and Riley Street. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB


08/17/05
(SDR-6939) Ior a proposed 39,053 square-Ioot commercial building and
waivers oI the perimeter, parking lot and Ioundation landscaping requirements
on 19.52 acres adjacent to the southeast corner oI Centennial parkway and
Riley Street. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
11/16/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Major ModiIication (MOD-8064)
oI section oI the Town Center Development Standards Manual to allow a
building height oI three stories where two stories is the maximum height
allowed and a General Plan Amendment (GPA-9072) oI section 3.4.2(B) oI
the Centennial Hills Sector Plan to allow three-story buildings within the SC-
TC (Service Commercial Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|.
12/01/05
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map For Centennial Hills
Center (TMP-9910) Ior a one lot commercial subdivision, which includes the
subject site as well as the oIIice development immediately to the north. The
approval oI a commercial subdivision map allows Ior cross-access and
parking over the entire site.
12/06/05
The Centennial Hills Architectural Review Committee approved (ARC-
10390) a request Ior approval oI a master sign plan amendment Ior the
northwest corner oI Grand Montecito Parkway and Durango Drive.
12/07/05
(SDR-8066) Ior a proposed 239,400 square-Ioot oIIice complex on 23.5 acres
adjacent to the northwest corner oI Grand Montecito Parkway and Durango
Drive, in the north portion oI the subject site. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval.
11/02/06
Ior a drive-through Iacility within the west portion oI a proposed shopping
center on 4.49 acres at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and Grand
Montecito Parkway. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
12/20/06
Ior a drive-through Iacility in conjunction with a bank within a proposed
shopping center on 4.49 acres at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and
Grand Montecito Parkway. The Planning Commission and staII
12/04/07
The Centennial Hills Architectural Review Committee approved (ARC-
25688) a request Ior a Major ModiIication to an approved Master Sign Plan
(CHR-0010-03) and Waivers to allow wall signage above the rooIline and to
allow wall signage above the second Iloor window sill at northwest corner oI
Durango Drive and Grand Montecito Parkway.
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB


12/20/06
(SDR-16952) Ior a 42,500 square-Ioot shopping center on 4.49 acres at the
northwest corner oI Durango Drive and Grand Montecito Parkway. The
08/06/08
Ior a proposed 145,254 square-Ioot convalescent care Iacility in an approved
medical oIIice/commercial development at the northwest corner oI Durango
Drive and Grand Montecito Parkway. The Planning Commission and staII


10/11/07
A building permit (#99582) was issued Ior rough grading at 6100 North
Durango Drive.
A building permit (#106128) was processed Ior retail shell building #1 at
6120 North Durango Drive. A stop work order was placed on the permit. An
extension to complete the project was granted on 10/10/08. On 02/08/10 a
letter was received to cancel the project.
04/15/08

A building permit (#106131) was processed Ior on-site improvements at 6102
North Durango Drive. A stop work order was placed on the permit. An
02/02/10
A code enIorcement case (#86091) was processed Ior 8 vacant oIIice
buildings with unsecured broken windows, waste inside and several homeless
individuals staying inside at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and
Grand Montecito Parkway. The case was resolved on 06/10/10.
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB

01/10/11
A code enIorcement case (#97170) was processed Ior a building inspection
due to a Iire at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and Grand Montecito
Parkway. The case was resolved on 05/05/11.
08/17/11
A code enIorcement case (#104924) was processed Ior vandalism to the
vacant buildings at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and Grand
Montecito Parkway. The case was resolved on 08/18/11.
09/07/11
A code enIorcement case (#105558) was processed Ior weeds/grass and dead
plants between sidewalk and street at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive
and Grand Montecito Parkway. The case was resolved on 11/28/11.
08/28/12
A code enIorcement case (#119003) was processed Ior graIIiti on building
and broken windows at the northwest corner oI Durango Drive and Grand
Montecito Parkway. The case was resolved on 10/24/12.

06/23/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Waiver.

A neighborhood meeting is not required Ior this application, nor was one held.

Field Check
07/03/14
During a routine Iield check conducted by staII. StaII observed that the
subject site was currently under construction and vacant. Street trees were
being installed in the landscaping area behind the sidewalk adjacent to North
Durango Drive during the visit.

Site Area
Net Acres 23.61

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
OIIice/Retail/Medical
Development

|SC-TC (Service
Commercial - Town
Center) Special Land
Use Designation| T-C (Town Center)
North
Automobile Dealer
and Residential
|GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation Existing Zoning District
City Park PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Church/House oI
Worship PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic) South
Undeveloped
L (Low Density
Residential) U (Undeveloped)
Undeveloped
|GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
East
Undeveloped
|PF-TC (Public
Facilities Town
West
Undeveloped
|SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use-Town

Town Center Master Plan N
Trails Y


Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance
Town Center Streetscape
Standards
Trees to be installed 35-
Ieet on center in an
alternating pattern
consisting oI one shade
tree and two palm trees
within Parkway and
Primary Arterial amenity
zones
To allow no trees
within a portions oI the
amenity zone adjacent
to North Durango
Drive
N
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB


Waivers
To allow no trees
within a portions oI the
amenity zone adjacent
to North Durango
Drive
Approval Trees to be installed 35-Ieet on
center in an alternating pattern
consisting oI one shade tree and
two palm trees within Parkway
and Primary Arterial amenity
zones
To allow Chitalpa
accent trees within
amenity zone instead oI
the Rio Grande Ash
shade tree
Denial

ANALYSIS
The subject site is located within a SC (Service Commercial) special land use designation that
allows Ior low to medium intensity retail, oIIice and other commercial uses. The site was the
subject oI a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-8066) Ior a proposed
239,400 square-Ioot oIIice complex on the subject site.

Town Center Streetscape Development Streetscape standards require trees to be installed 35-Ieet
on center in an alternating pattern consisting oI one shade tree and two palm trees along Parkway
and Primary Arterial amenity zones. In addition, Iive gallon planting material shall be planted to
reach 75 percent coverage within three years.

The applicant has requested a Waiver oI the Town Center Development Streetscape standards to
allow an alternative design adjacent to North Durango Drive. An existing underground utility
conduit runs adjacent to North Durango Drive underneath the proposed streetscape amenity zone
Iound at the back oI curb to the landscape area that is preventing the installation oI larger
vegetation. The applicant has requested to relocate the required streetscape trees Irom the
amenity zone to the landscaping buIIer behind the sidewalk. The applicant has also requested to
replace required Rio Grande Ash shade tree, with a Chitalpa accent tree due to root system issues
and large canopy size. All required shrubs will also remain in the amenity zone.

StaII has determined that the proposal to relocate the required amenity zone trees adjacent to
North Durango Drive to the landscaping buIIer behind the sidewalk can be supported due to the
existing site conditions. However, staII does not support the requested Waiver to allow Chitalpa
accent trees in place oI the required Rio Grande Ash shade tree. It`s been determined that the
replacement oI required shade trees will create inconsistency with existing and Iuture streetscape
improvements. StaII, thereIore recommends approval oI the request with conditions. II denied,
the previously approved Site Development Plan Review will remain in place and the revision to
relocate the required amenity zone trees will not be allowed.
WVR-54824 PR1-54685]
JB



As the proposed Waiver can be justiIied due to the existing underground utility conduit, staII
recommends approval oI the request with conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 53

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
06/26/14
PRJ-54685
WVR-54824
Page 1 of 2 6/30/2014 3:36:21 PM
Applicant Email: myoung@hrep.us
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Young
Rep First Name: Michael
Applicant State: NV
Rep Address: 12 Sandy Bunker Ln
Rep Email: myoung@hrep.us
Rep Fax:
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-604-6209
Rep Zip: 89148
Project Name WAIVER OF TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - STRE
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
ProjectAddress (Location): 6100 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE
Application/Petition For: WAIVER OF TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - STREETSCAPE (PARKWAY) STANDARDS
Applicant First Name: Michael
Additional Information: 7-SINGLE STORY BUILDINGS & 1-TWO STORY BUILDING COMPLETE (113,500SQ.FT.)
Applicant Address: 12 Sandy Bunker Ln
Applicant Last Name: Young
Lots/Units: COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION
Gross Acres: 23.5
WVR-54824
Page 2 of 2 6/30/2014 3:36:21 PM
I Accept:
Yes
CENTENNIAL HILLS MOB OWNERS
LLC
1935 COMMERCE LN #3 JUPITER, FL 33458-5858
Mike Young IREPLV, LLC Developer myoung@hrep.us
WVR-54824
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
0 6 / 2 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 6 8 5
W
V
R
-
5
4
8
2
4
W
V
P
-
Z
4

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

W
A
I
V
E
P

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

P
O
E
P
T

S
I
N
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L

H
I
L
L
S

M
O

O
W
N
E
P
S

L
L
C

1
0
0

N
O
P
T
H

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/26/14
PRJ-54685
WVR-54824

Agenda tem No.: 30.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54788 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OVATION
DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: DAVID AND JESSICA LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For possible
action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT USE
WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW APARTMENTS ON THE GROUND FLOOR WHERE NONE
ARE PERMITTED, A PRIMARY RESIDENT OR GUEST ENTRYWAY IN CONJUNCTION
WITH COMMERCIAL USES AND A FRONT ELEVATION THAT DOES NOT HIGHLIGHT
THE DIFFERENCE IN USES at 6705 West Lone Mountain Road (APNs 138-02-101-002 and
015), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54521|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 |PRJ-54521|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 |PRJ-54521|
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 |PRJ-54521|
4. Photos - SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 |PRJ-54521|
5. JustiIication Letter - SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 |PRJ-54521|

SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: OVATION DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: DAVID
AND JESSICA LIVINGSTON, ET AL


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SDR-54789 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-54788

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Senior Citizen
Apartments use.

2. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI
Iinal approval.

3. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval oI Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-54789) shall be required.


5. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow apartments on the ground Iloor
where none are permitted.

6. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a primary resident or guest
entryway in conjunction with commercial uses.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

Conditions Page Two

7. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a Iront elevation that does not
highlight the diIIerence in uses.

SaIety.


10. Sign and record a deed restriction with language determined to be satisIactory by the City
Attorney which restricts the use oI the site to an age-restricted community Ior those
persons 55 years oI age or older, to the Iull extent oI the law.


SDk-5478 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Special Use Permit (SUP-
54788) shall be required, iI approved.


3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 06/26/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver Irom Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, allow a zero-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer along the west perimeter and a Iour-Ioot wide buIIer along a portion oI the south
perimeter, where eight Ieet is required.

5. A Waiver Irom Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a Iour-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer along the north perimeter, where IiIteen Ieet is required.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


6. An Exception Irom Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow Iive trees within the perimeter
buIIer along the west property line where spacing requires 24 trees.

7. All trash enclosures Ior this project shall be built per code requirements to include a gate
and rooI or trellis.

SaIety.


10. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

11. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the
same time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler
system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory manner; the
landscape plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping shall not
impede visibility oI any traIIic control device.

12. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

13. Prior to or at the time oI submittal Ior any building permit, the applicant shall provide
written veriIication by the FAA and/or the Clark County Department oI Aviation oI the
Iollowing:
a. Applicant is required to Iile a valid FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice oI Proposed
Construction or Alteration" with the FAA, in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77,
or submit to the Clark County Director oI Aviation a 'Property Owner`s
Shielding Determination Statement and request written concurrence Irom the
Clark County Department oI Aviation;
b. No Building Permit or other construction permit shall be issued Ior any
structure greater than 35 Ieet above the surIace oI land that, based upon the
FAA`s 7460 airspace determination (the outcome oI Iiling the FAA Form 7460-
1) would (a) constitute a hazard to air navigation, (b) would result in an increase
to minimum Ilight altitudes during any phase oI Ilight (unless approved by the
Department oI Aviation), or (c) would otherwise be determined to pose a
signiIicant adverse impact on airport or aircraIt operations.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK
Conditions Page Four

c. Applicant is advised that FAA`s airspace determinations are dependent on
petitions by any interested party and the height that will not present a hazard as
determined by the FAA may change based on these comments.
d. Applicant is advised that the FAA`s airspace determinations include expiration
dates and that the separate airspace determinations will be needed Ior
construction cranes or other temporary equipment.

14. Prior to the submittal oI a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department oI Planning staII to develop a comprehensive address plan Ior the subject site.
A copy oI the approved address plan shall be submitted with any Iuture building permit
applications related to the site.

15. Sign and record a deed restriction with language determined to be satisIactory by the City
Attorney which restricts the use oI the site to an age-restricted community Ior those
persons 55 years oI age or older, to the Iull extent oI the law.

16. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be

Public Works

17. Dedicate the appropriate right-oI-way Ior completion oI the proposed bus turnout on
Lone Mountain Road adjacent to this site and construct the bus turnout on Lone
Mountain Road as directed by the City TraIIic Engineer concurrent with onsite
development activities. Additionally, grant a Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail
Easement Ior all portions oI the required trail that are outside the Lone Mountain Road
public right-oI-way concurrent with development oI this site.

18. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, construct all incomplete halI-
street improvements including the bus turn out on Lone Mountain Road adjacent to this
site concurrent with development oI this site as required by the Department oI Public
Works. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored
at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development oI this site.

19. A joint access agreement shall be recorded with adjacent parcel #138-02-101-015 that
provides a perpetual irrevocable access easement Ior this site to Rainbow Boulevard
prior to the issuance oI permits unless a mapping action records that provides perpetual
irrevocable access to this site with access to Rainbow Boulevard.

20. This site shall have its own connection to the City oI Las Vegas sewer system in Lone
Mountain Road unless an acceptable mapping action combines this site with parcel
#138-02-101-015.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

Conditions Page Five

21. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services
to discuss Iire requirements Ior the proposed use oI this Iacility.

22. All landscaping and private improvements, iI any, installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular
traIIic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

23. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by
the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading
permits, submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing
this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be
responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as
are recommended by the City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and
approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development oI this site.

SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to develop a second phase to the Senior Citizen Apartment complex
located on the parcel adjacent to the west. This project will be integrated into the existing
complex and share amenities, parking and cross access. The parcel is zoned C-1 (Limited
Commercial), which allows such development with conditions. Few oI the conditions are being
met with this project and thereIore, several Waivers and Exceptions are required. The lot is
challenging to development, since there is really no access to the lot except Irom the adjacent lot
due to a bus turnout located on Lone Mountain Road. StaII supports these applications. II
denied, a Senior Citizen Apartment use could not be development on this site.

ISSUES

A Waiver oI Title 19.08.070 is required to allow a zero-Ioot wide landscape buIIer along the
west perimeter and a Iour-Ioot wide buIIer along a portion oI the south perimeter, where
eight Ieet is required. StaII supports this request.
A Waiver oI Title 19.08.070 is required to allow a Iour-Ioot wide landscape buIIer along the
north perimeter, where IiIteen Ieet is required. StaII supports this request.
A Waiver oI Title 19.12 is required to allow apartments on the ground level, where they are
not allowed. StaII supports this request.
A Waiver oI Title 19.12 is required to allow the Iront entrance to not be oriented to the street.
StaII supports this request.
A Waiver oI Title 19.12 is required to allow the Iront elevations to not highlight the
diIIerence in uses. StaII supports this request.
An Exception oI Title 19.08 is required to allow5 trees within the perimeter buIIer along the
west property line where spacing requires 24 trees. StaII supports this request.


06/05/63
The Board oI Commissioners approved a request Ior Annexation (A-0003-63)
oI approximately 150 acres oI land generally located on the south side oI
Gowan Road, between Tonopah Highway (now Rancho Drive) and Decatur
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. The
Annexation became eIIective on 06/14/63.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

04/02/03
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-1363) to
change portions oI the Centennial Hills Sector Plan and the Southwest Sector
Map Irom GC (General Commercial), SC (Service Commercial) and DR
(Desert Rural Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial), O (OIIice),
PF (Public Facilities), ML (Medium-Low Density Residential) and DR
(Desert Rural Density Residential) on property located on, or in close
proximity to, both sides oI Rancho Drive Irom Vegas Drive to the northern
City limits at Moccasin Road. The Planning Commission and staII
03/10/05
A Parcel Map (PMP-5221) Ior three residential lots on 20.39 acres located on
the southeast corner oI Rainbow Boulevard and Lone Mountain Road was
recorded.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-37599) to
amend the land use designation Irom GC (General Commercial) to SC
(Service Commercial) on 1.25 acres adjacent to the south side oI Lone
Mountain Road, approximately 120 Ieet east oI Rainbow Boulevard. The
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-37600) Irom C-2 (General
Commercial) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 3.02 acres at the southeast
corner oI Lone Mountain Road and Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-37601) Ior a Senior
Citizen Apartment use with Waivers to allow apartments on the ground Iloor
where none are permitted, a primary resident or guest entryway in conjunction
with commercial uses and a Iront elevation that does not highlight the
diIIerence in uses at the southeast corner oI Lone Mountain Road and
Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
11/17/10
Ior a proposed three-story, 37-Ioot tall, 152-unit Senior Citizen Apartment
complex on 3.02 acres at the southeast corner oI Lone Mountain Road and
Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission approved Special Use Permit (SUP-41039) Ior a
Major Amendment oI a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-37601)
Ior a 75-unit senior citizen apartment complex, where a 152-unit senior
citizen apartment complex was approved at the southeast corner oI Rainbow
Boulevard and Lone Mountain Road. StaII recommended approval.
04/12/11
The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-41197) to allow 56
parking spaces where 57 are required on 1.77 acres at the southeast corner oI
Rainbow Boulevard and Lone Mountain Road. StaII recommended approval.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK



The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
41043) Ior a proposed three-story, 75-unit senior citizen apartment complex
with Waivers to allow a zero-Ioot wide landscape buIIer along portions oI the
south and east perimeters where six Ieet is required on 1.77 acres at the
southeast corner oI Rainbow Boulevard and Lone Mountain Road. StaII


There are no related permits on this site.

06/10/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the proposed senior citizen
apartment project. It was noted that this project will compliment and be
operated in conjunction with the existing senior citizen apartment project
adjacent on the west. A cross access and parking agreement will be recorded
to allow the proposed apartment building to utilize the existing driveways oII
Lone Mountain Road and Rainbow Boulevard. Several Waivers and
Exceptions were pointed out and the applicant was asked to minimize these as
best as possible given the unique location and shape oI the parcel.


Field Check
07/03/14
StaII visited the site and Iound an undeveloped parcel oI land. There were
some weeds located throughout the site.

Site Area
Net Acres 3.03
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Parking Lot
(accessory to
Hotel/Casino)
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South
Multi-Family
Residential
(Condominiums)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
East Undeveloped
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West
Senior Citizen
Apartments
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District 175 Feet Y
Trails Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Min. Lot Size N/A 1.25 acres N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front (Lone Mountain Road)
Side
Corner
Rear
20 Feet
10 Feet
15 Feet
20 Feet
50 Feet
10 Feet
N/A
20 Feet
Y
Y
N/A
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 44.8 Y
Max. Building Height N/A 35 Feet Y
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Screened By condition
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to 1itle 19.12, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
9 Trees
7 Trees
19 Trees
24 Trees
10 Trees
7 Trees
19 Trees
5 Trees
Y
Y
Y
N
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 59 Trees 41 Trees N
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
0 Trees 8 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
North
South
East
West
15 Feet
8 Feet
8 Feet
8 Feet
4 Feet
4 Feet
10 Feet
0 Feet
N
N
Y
N
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Lone Mountain
Road
Primary Arterial Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
100 Y
Rainbow Boulevard Secondary
Collector
and Highways
90 Y

SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Senior Citizen
Apartments
60 units
0.75
spaces per
unit
45


49

Y

Waivers
To provide an eight-Ioot wide
landscape buIIer along the
south and west perimeters.
To provide a Iour-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer along a portion oI the south
perimeter and a zero-Ioot buIIer along
the west perimeter.
Approval
To provide a IiIteen-Ioot wide
landscape buIIer along the
north perimeter.
To provide a Iour-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer along the north perimeter.
Approval
To not allow apartments on
the ground level.
To allow apartments on the ground
level.
Approval
To orient the Iront entrance
toward the street.
To allow a Iront entrance to not be
oriented to the street.
Approval
To highlight the diIIerences in
use on the Iront elevations.
To allow the Iront elevations to not
highlight the diIIerence in uses.
Approval

Exceptions
To install 24 trees in the west
perimeter landscape buIIer.
To only install Iive trees in the west
perimeter landscape buIIer.
Approval

ANALYSIS

The Senior Citizen Apartment use is deIined as 'An apartment house or other multi-Iamily
dwelling in which each unit is occupied by at least one person 55 years oI age or older, or in
which the units are intended and operated Ior occupancy by persons 55 years oI age or older.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


This use includes an apartment house or other multi-Iamily dwelling that qualiIies as 'housing
Ior older persons under the provisions oI Federal law, including without limitation housing
developments that: 1. Provide signiIicant Iacilities and services speciIically designed to meet the
physical or social needs oI older persons; and 2. Publish and adhere to policies and procedures
that demonstrate an intent to provide housing Ior persons 55 years oI age or older to the extent
allowed by applicable State or Federal law..

The proposed use meets the deIinition as indicated by the applicant`s justiIication letter.


1. For any development that is over three stories in height: a .The structures shall be
compatible with the scale and massing oI the types oI development allowed in the
applicable zoning district and shall provide a transition to less intensive development. b.
RooIlines and Iaade elements shall be articulated in order to break down the apparent
massing oI the structures.
This conaition aoes not apply as the builaing is only three stories in height.

2. The use shall be developed and operated only in connection with ground-level
nonresidential development. In the case oI a multi-Iloor structure, the apartments
themselves must be located above the ground Iloor, but access ways, entryways and
community rooms may be located on the ground Iloor. (C-1 only)
The proposea use aoes not meet this requirement. The applicant has requestea a Waiver
to allow a 100 percent resiaential builaing with no grouna floor commercial uses.

3. The primary resident or guest entryway to the apartments must be independent oI ground
Iloor commercial uses, and must be directly accessible Irom and oriented to a street. (C-1
only)

4. The overall architecture oI the Iront elevation shall highlight the diIIerence in uses
through variations in volume and proportion, and shall be treated as a cohesive whole
through Iinishes and colors. (C-1 only)

5. For any development that, in accordance with LVMC 19.08.050, is allowed to exceed the
maximum lot coverage provisions set Iorth in that Section, all landscape buIIer
requirements, and all minimum setback requirements Ior the C-1 District, shall be met.
(C-1 only)
This conaition aoes not apply as the builaing aoes not exceea lot coverage.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


The proposed development is located within the Airport Overlay District with a 175-Ioot height
restriction, with which the development is in conIormance. No other special plan areas or
overlay districts apply to this site.

Comments received Irom the Clark County Department oI Aviation included the Iollowing:

Federal Aviation Regulations (Title 14, Part 77) require that the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) be notiIied beIore the construction or alteration oI any building or
structure greater than 200 Ieet in height ( 77.13(a)(1)) or that will exceed a slope oI 100:1
Ior a distance oI 20,000 Ieet Irom the nearest point oI any airport runway greater than 3,200
Ieet in length ( 77.13 (a)(2)(i)). Such notiIication allows the FAA to determine what
impact, iI any, the proposed development will have upon navigable airspace, and allows the
FAA to determine whether the development requires obstruction marking or lighting.

The proposed development will exceed the 100:1 notice requirement Ior the North Las Vegas
Airport (VGT). ThereIore, as required by 14 CFR Part 77, the FAA must be notiIied oI the
proposed construction or alteration.

A condition oI approval has been added to address this issue.

It is noted that a multi-use transportation trail is required along the south side oI Lone Mountain
Road adjacent to this site. The site plan depicts the required 10-Ioot wide bi-directional concrete
path, as well as Iive Ieet oI landscaping on either side oI the path except where adjacent to a
required bus turnout lane. The Transportation Trails Element oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan
states that when adjacent to a bus turnout lane, the 10-Ioot wide concrete path is allowed to abut
the right-oI-way without an intervening landscape buIIer. A general plan amendment to amend
the Transportation Trails Element is thereIore not required. The Department oI Public Works
will require dedication oI an easement Ior all portions oI the trail outside oI the right-oI-way
concurrent with site development. The Regional Transportation Commission is requiring a
modiIied bus turnout be completed as a condition oI approval.

Access to the site is provided by a driveway on the adjacent west parcel at Rainbow Boulevard
with an exit only to Lone Mountain Road. Seventeen oI the parking spaces are accessed directly
Irom the drive aisle and the remainders are oII two new drive aisles. The parking and circulation
layout is adequate, given the irregular shape oI the site. A recorded cross access agreement is
required.

This project will add approximately 209 trips per day on Lone Mountain Road, Rancho Drive
and Rainbow Boulevard. Lone Mountain Road is currently at 45 percent oI capacity; Rancho
Drive is at 49 percent oI capacity; and Rainbow Boulevard is at 23 percent capacity. The
existing streets are designed to handle the traIIic generated by this project.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


The building will have a similar architecture style as the existing apartment building to the west
creating a seamless aesthetic Ior the joined projects. The three-story building has balconies and
several architectural pop-outs creating a lively and interesting Iaade. Since no commercial or
retail space is on the ground Iloor as normally required Ior a Senior Citizen Apartment building
in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone, several Waivers have been requested. StaII supports these
Waivers due to the unique shape and location oI the parcel and the Iact that the project is being
developed as a second phase oI the adjacent project to the west.

The impact oI the requested Exception Ior a reduced number oI perimeter landscape trees will be
minimal since the project is being developed as a second phase oI the apartments to the west. As
such, the parking lot and drive aisle cross the parcel line along the west and thereIore, the need
Ior the Exception. A condition has been added that remapping may be required.

Given the inIill nature and shape oI the parcel, this project is ideal Ior the location. Although
several Waivers and Exceptions are required, staII recommends approval Ior both applications.




The proposed Senior Citizen Apartment use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses and with Iuture
surrounding land uses. The proposed use will be an appropriate buIIer between the
existing multi-Iamily residences to the south and the commercial properties to the north
and east.


The site is suitable Ior a Senior Citizen Apartment complex. Access and circulation have
been designed to accommodate the shape oI the site and to increase saIety.


Lone Mountain Road and Rainbow Boulevard are both built to capacity and are adequate
in size to meet the requirements oI the Senior Citizen Apartment use.
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK


General Plan.

The site will be subject to permitting, inspections and licensing by the City oI Las Vegas,
and will not compromise the health, saIety, and welIare, or the overall objectives oI the
General Plan.


The proposed Senior Citizen Apartment use is consistent with the requirements oI LVMC
Title 19.04, except Ior those requirements that are Waived per the approval oI this
application, which included allowing apartments on the ground Iloor where none are
permitted, a resident or guest entryway in conjunction with commercial uses, and a Iront
elevation that does not highlight the diIIerence between residential and commercial uses.

FINDINGS (SDR-54789)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and development in
the area. In particular, the development will provide a buIIer between the existing
residences to the south and the existing commercial development to the north.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is consistent with the SC (Service Commercial) General Plan
designation. Minimal landscape Waivers and a landscape Exception are necessary Ior
approval oI this site, which staII supports. The proposed development is in conIormance
with all other Title 19 requirements.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;
SUP-54788 and SDR-54789 PR1-54521]
YK

Staff Report Page Eleven

Site access is provided by a driveway at Rainbow Boulevard with an exit only to Lone
Mountain Road. The parking and circulation layout is adequate, given the irregular shape
oI the site, and will not negatively impact the adjacent roadways.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The building elevations and landscape materials are similar to those previously approved
on the adjacent site and remain appropriate Ior this area oI the city.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The building elevations are not unsightly or obnoxious, and will be compatible with
development in the area. The building is designed to match the existing building adjacent
on the west to create a uniIormed campus appearance.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

The site will be subject to permitting, inspections and licensing by the City oI Las Vegas,
and will not compromise the health, saIety, and welIare oI the public.


NOTICES MAILED 77

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SUP-54788
06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SUP-54788
08/12/14 PC
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
2
1
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
8

&

S
D
R
-
5
4
7
8
9
Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Total
Name
07/03/2014 SUP-54788, SDR-54789, PRJ-54521 LV
Ovation Development
Lone Mountain II Senior Apartments
Rainbow & Lone Mountain
138-02-101-002
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
no comment
S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
1
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
4
7
9

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
V
A
T
I
O
N

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
A
V
I
D

A
N
D

J
E
S
S
I
C
A

L
I
V
I
N
S
S
T
O
N

E
T

A
L

7
0

W
E
S
T

L
O
N
E

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

P
O
A
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
1
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
4
7
9

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
V
A
T
I
O
N

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
A
V
I
D

A
N
D

J
E
S
S
I
C
A

L
I
V
I
N
S
S
T
O
N

E
T

A
L

7
0

W
E
S
T

L
O
N
E

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

P
O
A
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
Z
1
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
4
7
9

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
V
A
T
I
O
N

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
A
V
I
D

A
N
D

J
E
S
S
I
C
A

L
I
V
I
N
S
S
T
O
N

E
T

A
L

7
0

W
E
S
T

L
O
N
E

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

P
O
A
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

I
I
m
m
p
p
u
u
l
l
s
s
e
e 5135 Camino Al Norte, Suite 284 PHONE 702-853-6702
Civil Engineering & Planning North Las Vegas, NV 89031 FAX 702-853-6703

Page 1
May 27, 2014
City of Las Vegas Planning Department

333 North Rancho Drive
Re: Justification Letter for

Lone Mountain Senior Apartments Phase 2, SUP, SDR, Waivers, Variance, &
Exceptions
To Whom it May Concern:
Impulse Civil Engineering represents Ovation Development (the Applicant) on behalf of

Lone Mountain Seniors LLC and David & Jessica Livingston. The Applicant is currently
negotiating with their partners on the development of this project and all parties are
aware of this request. We are respectfully requesting a site development plan review,
special use permit, exceptions, waivers, and a variance for a proposed senior housing
project generally located on the southeast corner of Lone Mountain Road and Rainbow
Boulevard, particularly known as APN: 138-02-101-002 (the Site). The Site is
approximately 1.25 acres with a proposed 60 unit building. In conjunction with the site
development plan review, the Applicant is seeking a special use permit, waivers,
variance, and exceptions.
Special Use Permit to Allow Senior Housing

The Applicant is proposing a senior housing project. Senior housing is an appropriate
use within a C-1 zoned district with a use permit. There is a multi-family, R-3
development located adjacent to the south of the Site, a proposed Senior housing project
located adjacent to the west of the Site (SUP 41039, SDR 41043), and existing
commercial located to the east of the Site. A senior housing development located near
commercial uses and other multi-family uses are compatible. The Applicant is seeking a
waiver from the following special use permit requirements. Since there is a shortage of
senior housing in the Las Vegas Valley, these waivers are appropriate because the
project will be primarily residential with no commercial uses open to the public.
The use shall be developed and operated only in connection with ground-
level nonresidential development. In the case of a multi-floor structure, the
apartments themselves must be located above the ground floor, but access
ways, entryways and community rooms may be located on the ground
floor.
The primary resident or guest entryway to the apartments must be
independent of ground floor commercial uses, and must be directly
accessible from and oriented to a street.
apartments must
nd must be dire
06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SUP-54788 & SDR-54789
Justification Letter for Lone Mountain Senior Apartments Phase 2, May 27, 2014
SUP, SDR, Waivers, Variance, & Exceptions
Page 2
The overall architecture of the front elevation shall highlight the difference
in uses through variations in volume and proportion, and shall be treated as
a cohesive whole through finishes and colors.
Site Development Plan Review

The Applicant is proposing a 60 unit senior housing project. Approximately 20 units will
be located on the first floor and approximately 20 units will be located on the second and
third floors, respectively. The proposed development provides easy access off of
Rainbow Boulevard with an exit only sliding gate onto Lone Mountain Road. The
Applicant is proposing to reconfigure the west bound left turn lane in Lone Mountain
Road at Rainbow Boulevard to facilitate the proposed configuration. The multi-family
building will be three (3) stories and approximately 39' in height. The building will have
elevator access to the living units. The site design and architecture are consistent with
the existing multi-family units to the south. Additionally, the Site will provide amenities
such as a pool and spa, facilities for meetings and social gatherings, a game room, a
salon, exercise room and a library/computer room. There will also be a common area
kitchen available for residents' use during social events.
The Applicant is seeking exceptions for the following requirements:
Parking lot landscaping. In order to reduce parking deficiencies, the Applicant

cannot provide landscape diamonds within the parking lot.
The Applicant is seeking the following waivers:
Reduced landscape buffer. Due to the parking requirements and the odd shape
of the site, the six foot (6) landscape buffer cannot be maintained throughout the
site. It is reduced to three feet (3) where a proposed finger of parking is proposed
at the southwest corner. This comprises of approximately seventy linear feet (70
lf) where a reduced landscape buffer is requested resulting in a reduction of
approximately four hundred and twenty square feet (210 sf) of landscape area. In
the southeast corner and the northeast corner of the site, we have an opportunity
to provide extensive landscape areas with amenities. In addition, the required
trees that would have been planted in this location are provided throughout the
site.
Elimination of the required six foot (6) landscape strip along the east property line
of the Site and the west property line of the adjacent parcel (138-02-101-015).
Since SDR 41042 and this project will act as a single project with shared
amenities and access, the required landscape strip does not serve a purpose.
Time to permitting and funding restraints prohibit the ability to combine the two
project with sha
not serve a purpo
y to combine the t
06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SUP-54788 & SDR-54789
Justification Letter for Lone Mountain Senior Apartments Phase 2, May 27, 2014
SUP, SDR, Waivers, Variance, & Exceptions
Page 3
parcels. This waiver allows us to open up the current site plan and provide
additional usable open space.
We thank you in advance for your time and consideration of this matter. Should you have
any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Impulse Civil Engineering
Peter J. Laas, P.E.

Principal
cc: Jan Goyer, Ovation Development

06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SUP-54788 & SDR-54789

Agenda tem No.: 31.


SUB1ECT:
SDR-54789 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-54788 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: OVATION DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: DAVID AND JESSICA
LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
FOR A PROPOSED THREE-STORY, 60-UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT COMPLEX
WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE
WEST PERIMETER AND A FOUR-FOOT WIDE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE
SOUTH PERIMETER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FOUR-FOOT WIDE
BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER WHERE FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED on
3.03 acres at 6705 West Lone Mountain Road (APNs 138-02-101-002 and 015), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54521|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Backup - ReIer to SUP-54788
paper use, backup
06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SDR-54789
06/26/14
PRJ-54521
SDR-54789
08/12/14 PC
SDR 54789
Ovation Development
SEC Lone Mountain Rd. & Rainbow Blvd.
Proposed 60 unit senior housing complex.
Traffic produced by proposed development:
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
SENIOR ADULT HOUSING-ATTACHED
[OCC.DWELL]
60
3.48 209
AM Peak Hour 0.13 8
PM Peak Hour 0.16 10
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Lone Mountain Rd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 15,600
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,248
Rancho Dr.
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,035
Rainbow Blvd.
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 303
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Lone Mountain Rd. 34,500
Rancho Dr. 51,800
Rainbow Blvd. 16,300
This project will add approximately 209 trips per day on Lone Mountain Rd., Rancho Dr. and Rainbow Blvd. Lone
Mountain is currently at about 45 percent of capacity, Rancho is at about 49 percent of capacity and Rainbow is at about
23 percent of capacity. After this project, Lone Mountain is expected to be at about 45 percent of capacity, Rancho to be
at about 50 percent of capacity and Rainbow to be at about 25 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 10 additional cars, or one every six minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda tem No.: 32.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54766 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SMART &
FINAL PROPERTIES 1, LLC - OWNER: CHARLESTON VEGAS NO. 1, LLC - For possible
action on a request FOR A PROPOSED RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT WITH ACCESSORY
PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN A PROPOSED 36,800 SQUARE-FOOT
GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A
243-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 400 FEET
IS REQUIRED at 4440 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 140-32-401-013), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-54496|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Protest Postcard

SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SMART & FINAL PROPERTIES 1, LLC -
OWNER: CHARLESTON VEGAS NO. 1, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-54766 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-547 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Retail
Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use.


3. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 243-Ioot distance separation Irom
a House oI Worship where a 400-Ioot distance is required.

SaIety.



Municipal Code.

SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This application is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed a Retail Establishment with
Accessory Package Liquor use within a proposed 36,800 square-Ioot General Retail Store, Other
Than Listed (grocery store). The site is located at 4440 East Charleston Boulevard within an
established shopping center in a C-1(Limited Commercial) zoning district. There is a distance
separation Waiver that accompanies this application to allow an alcohol use 243 Ieet Irom a
House oI Worship where 400 Ieet is the minimum distance required. StaII is recommending
approval oI the requested distance separation Waiver, as there is a barrier (a six-Ioot wall)
between the protected use (a house oI worship) and proposed use. The existing site conditions
should be suIIicient such that the protected use should not be adversely impacted iI this use
permit is approved. Additionally, the Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use
can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and land uses. StaII recommends approval oI this Special Use Permit. II this
application is denied, then the grocery store can still open; however, no alcohol may be sold.

ISSUES

The Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use is permitted in the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver oI the distance separation requirement is needed to allow a 243-Ioot separation
Irom a House oI Worship where 400 Ieet is required.


05/22/63 The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0083-63) request
Irom R-1 (Single Family Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
and C-1 (Limited Commercial) and a Plot Plan Review (Z-0083-63) Ior a
shopping center on the northeast corner oI East Charleston Boulevard and
Lamb Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the
request.

06/17/09
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-33973) request Ior
proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use
at 4440 East Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval. This entitlement expired on 10/01/12.
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR



1979 The shopping center was constructed.
12/29/05 A business license (G05-00591) was issued Ior a Grocery Store at 4440 East
Charleston Boulevard. This license was marked out oI business on 12/05/07.
01/20/09 A building permit (#131845) was issued Ior non-structural demolition and
sewer investigation at 4440 East Charleston Boulevard. This permit was
Iinalized on 07/21/09.
03/02/09 A building permit (#134584) was issued Ior a tenant improvement at 4440
East Charleston Boulevard. This permit was Iinalized on 07/21/09.
03/05/09 A building permit (#134655) was issued Ior tenant improvement at 4440 East
Charleston Boulevard. This permit was Iinalized on 07/21/09.
05/06/09 A building permit (#138951) was issued Ior tenant improvement at 4440 East
Charleston Boulevard. This permit was Iinalized on 06/11/09.
05/19/09 A business license (G60-00070) was issued Ior a Grocery Store at 4440 East
Charleston Boulevard. The license was marked out oI business on 12/03/13.
05/2009 A business license (L15-00046) was issued Ior Package Liquor at 4440 East
Charleston Boulevard. The license was marked out oI business on 04/01/12.

06/10/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant and the applicant`s
designated representatives to discuss the Special Use Permit submittal
requirements Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use
at 4440 East Charleston Boulevard.


Field Check
07/03/14
A Iield inspection was conducted on the subject site revealed that the
proposed tenant space is vacant.

Site Area
Net Acres 6.93
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Mini-Storage
Facility
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Undeveloped
Restaurant
Auto Repair, Major
C-2 (General
Commercial) Clark
County
Restaurant
South
Other Than Listed
CG (Commercial
General) Clark County
C-1 (Local Business)
Clark County
East Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Single-Family,
Attached
ML (Medium Low
R-PD6 (Residential
Units per Acre)
Multi-Family
Residences
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
OIIice, Other than
Listed
West
Other Than Listed
SC (Service
Commercial) C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

Trails N/A
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
106,943 SF 1/250 SF 433


433

Y

Floor area dedicated to the sale of alcohol
Allowed Requested Area in Square
Feet
1otal Floor
Area in Square
Feet
Percentage of
Floor Area of
Alcohol sales
10 percent oI the retail Iloor
space is regularly devoted to
the display or merchandising
oI alcoholic beverages
1,470

36,800

3.99

Waivers
The minimum distance
separation distance Irom a
House oI Worship is 400 Ieet.
To allow a 243-Ioot
distance separation
Irom a House oI
Worship where 400
Ieet is required.
Approval

ANALYSIS

A Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use is deIined as a Retail
Establishment:

1. Whose license to sell alcoholic beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and
not Ior resale, in original sealed or corked containers, Ior consumption oII the
premises where the same are sold; and
2. In which the sale oI alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the retail use, and in which no
more than 10 percent oI the retail Iloor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising oI alcoholic beverages.
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR


This use includes an establishment that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting iI
the licensee also holds a wine, cordial and liqueur tasting license Ior that location.

The proposed use meets the deIinition above, as the provided Iloor plans show approximately
1,471 square Ieet oI shelI space dedicated Ior the sale oI alcohol (beer, wine and liquor)
throughout the store. The total Iloor area dedicated Ior alcohol sales is approximately Iour
percent.


1. ` Except as otherwise provided, no retail establishment with accessory package
liquor off-sale (hereinafter ~establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any
church, synagogue, school, child care facility licensed for more than 12 children, or
City park. non-waivable per LVMC 19.12.050 (C)]

The proposea use aoes not meet this requirement, as there is a Church/House of Worship
locatea 243 feet from the subfect property. A Waiver of the minimum aistance separation
accompanies this application. The Waiver can be appliea for per requirement 7(c) below.

2. ` Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between
two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which
is closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being
the property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment.
The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening
obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term ~property line refers to property
lines of fee interest parcels and does not include the property line of:
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1. non-waivable per LVMC19.12.050(C)]

The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing
property line of Lot 1-A of Parcel Map File 31 Page 18, locatea on the northwest corner
of Lamb Boulevara ana Charleston Boulevara.

3. ` In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80
acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured
in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles; or
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR

b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the
existing use to the nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
|nonwaivable per 19.12.050 (C)|

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the subfect site is locatea on a
parcel that is less than 80 acres in si:e.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its
recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should
be waived and the reasons in support of the decision.

This requirement contains instructions for the Planning Commission.


a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor
space.

This requirement aoes not apply, as the proposea tenant space is 36,800 square feet in
si:e.

6. ` All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provision of
LVMC Chapter 6.50. nonwaivable per 19.12.050 (C)]

The proposea use meets this requirement, as beer, wine, ana spiritea alcohol will be sola
for off-premises consumption only. Also, conformance to LJMC Chapter 6.50 is a
stanaara conaition of approval that cannot be waivea.

7. The minimum distance requirements set for in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
non-waiveable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:

a. In accordance with the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C) Ior any
establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. In accordance with the applicable provisions oI the 'Town Center
development Standards Manual Ior any establishment which is proposed to
be located within the TC (Town Center) Zoning District and which is
designated MS-TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use
Plan;
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR

c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000 square
Ieet and 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space; or
d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square Ieet
or retail Iloor space, iI the area to be used Ior the sale, display or
merchandising oI alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or right oI way with a width oI at least 100 Ieet.

The applicant has requestea a aistance separation Waiver from a Church/House of
Worship unaer Provision (c) above. The si:e of the proposea retail establishment is 36,800
square feet.

The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use will be located within a
proposed grocery store. Per site plan date stamped 07/08/14, there is adequate parking Ior the
primary use oI a General Retail Store, Other Than Listed and no additional parking is required
Ior the proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use. Additionally, per
Iloor plan date stamped 06/25/14, the Iloor area dedicated to the sale oI alcohol is approximate
1,471 square Ieet or Iour percent oI the total Iloor area.

StaII supports the requested separation Waiver, as the use will be located within an established
10.06-acre shopping center designed to accommodate a variety oI uses, including a grocery store
with an a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use. Additionally, there is a six-
Ioot block wall between the proposed use and the protected use (a House oI Worship) that
prevents direct access to the protected use. The closest pedestrian or vehicle entrance is
approximately 800 Ieet west oI the proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor use.

The subject site is located within 500 Ieet oI a city boundary; thereIore, the request is deemed a
Project oI Regional SigniIicance. The required documents have been completed and distributed
to the appropriate agency. The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) submitted the
Iollowing comments:

The property is currently servea for both fire ana aomestic however neither have the requirea
backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil plans incluaing the existing ana proposea
plumbing fixture scheaule ana proposea fire sprinkler aesign will neea to be submittea to
LJJWD.

The approval oI a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor
use is appropriate in this C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The religious Iacility should
not be negatively impacted, as the closest entrance is approximately 800 Ieet away Irom the
proposed use. In summation, the proposed use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious
and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and land uses; thereIore, staII recommends
approval oI this use permit. II this application is denied then the proposed General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed may open Ior business; however, no alcohol can be sold at this location.
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR




The proposed location Ior this Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use is
compatible with the SC (Service Commercial) land use designation and staII supports the
distance separation Waiver Irom a protected use (House oI Worship). The proposed Retail
Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use can be conducted in a harmonious and
compatible manner with the existing and Iuture surrounding land uses.


The proposed use will operate within an established shopping center in a proposed
discount grocery store that is designed to accommodate the sale oI various retail related
products such as Iood, drink, alcohol and other consumable goods.


Site access is Irom Charleston Boulevard and Lamb Boulevard. Both are 100-Ioot wide
Primary Arterials that have adequate capacity to Iacilitate the proposed use.

General Plan.

The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use will be subject to
regular inspections by regulatory agencies Ior business licensing. The proposed use will
not compromise the public health, saIety and welIare, or the overall objectives oI the
General Plan.


The proposed use does not meet all oI conditions per Title 19.12. SpeciIically, the
applicant is requesting a waiver to allow a 243-Ioot distance separation Irom the nearest
religious Iacility where a 400-Ioot separation is required. StaII supports the requested
Waiver.
SUP-54766 PR1-54496]
MR



NOTICES MAILED 749

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1
06/25/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766
06/25/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766
08/12/14 PC
06/25/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766
0
7
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
9
6
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
6
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
6
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
9
6
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
6
6
08/05/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766 - REVISED
6' Perimeter Wall
Church
Church
Entrance
Delivery Truck
Entrance
Customer
Entrance
Proposed Smart & Final Extra!
08/05/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766 - REVISED
Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Total
Name
07/03/2014 SUP-54766, PRJ-54496 LV
Amor Architectural Corporation
Smart & Final
4440 E. Charleston Blvd
140-32-401-013
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
no comment
S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
4
4
9
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

S
M
A
P
T

&

F
I
N
A
L

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

1

L
L
C

4
4
4
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
4
4
9
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

S
M
A
P
T

&

F
I
N
A
L

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

1

L
L
C

4
4
4
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

07/16/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766 - REVISED
07/16/14
PRJ-54496
SUP-54766 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 33.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54783 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: KOSTER
FINANCE, LLC - OWNER: ALTA MIRA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC - For possible action on
a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,573 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO TITLE
LOAN USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION
FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 120-
FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 4990 West Craig Road, Suite #1 (APN 138-01-619-005), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54667|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Protest Postcards

SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: KOSTER FINANCE, LLC - OWNER: ALTA MIRA
SHOPPING CENTER, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-54783 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Auto Title Loan
use.


SaIety.

4. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI an Auto Title Loan
business license



SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed 1,573 square-Ioot Auto Title
Loan use within an existing shopping center at 4990 West Craig Road, Suite #1. This application
is accompanied with a Waiver request to allow a zero-Ioot distance separation Irom a residential
property where a 200-Ioot distance separation is required and to allow a 120-Ioot distance
separation Irom a Financial Institution, SpeciIied where a 1,000-Ioot minimum distance
separation is required. StaII recommends denial oI the requested Special Use Permit and
accompanying Waivers, as the proposed Auto Title Loan use cannot be conducted in a manner
that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding land uses, as exempliIied by the
requested Waivers.

ISSUES

The Auto Title Loan use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district
with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
A distance separation Waiver is required to allow the Auto Title Loan use zero Ieet Irom
a residentially protected property where 200 Ieet is the minimum required and to allow a
120-Ioot distance separation Irom a Financial Institution, SpeciIied where a 1,000-Ioot
minimum distance separation is required. StaII does not support the distance separation
as the required Waiver reinIorces the incompatibility oI the proposed Auto Title Loan
Use with the surrounding neighborhood.


10/16/96
The City Council accepted the withdrawal request by the applicant Ior Special
Use Permit (U-0036-96) Ior a tavern in conjunction with a proposed
restaurant in a proposed retail shopping center; and a request Ior a waiver oI
the 1,500 Ioot distance separation Irom a child care Iacility.
02/26/98
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-
0011-98) Ior a liquor establishment (oII-premise consumption - packaged
liquor) in conjunction with a proposed 60,818 square-Ioot grocery store
(Lucky`s) on property located on the northwest corner oI Craig Rd and
Decatur Blvd.
SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB

The City Council approved a request Ior a Rezoning |Z-0108-88(12)| Ior a
Site Development Plan Review on property located on the northwest corner oI
Craig Road and Decatur Boulevard Ior a proposed 144,807 square-Ioot retail
center. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request
02/12/98.
03/09/98
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0137-97) to
allow packaged liquor sales in conjunction with a proposed 17,157 square-
Ioot Sav-On drug store on property located on the northwest corner oI Craig
Road and Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended
approval oI the request 02/12/98.
06/02/98
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved Variance (V-0015-98) to allow a
proposed 21,690 square-Ioot retail building to be 20 Ieet Irom the side yard
setback where 54 Ieet is the minimum required side yard setback.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Rezoning |Z-0108-88(14)| Ior a
Site Development Plan Review Ior a proposed 123,221 square-Ioot shopping
center located on the northwest corner oI Craig Road and Decatur Boulevard.
The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request 04/13/00.
Ior the sale oI gasoline in conjunction with a proposed Albertson's
convenience store on the northwest corner oI Craig Road and Decatur
Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request
04/13/00.
05/17/00
Ior an automated car wash in conjunction with a proposed Albertson's
convenience store on property located on the northwest corner oI Craig Road
and Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI
the request 04/13/00.
06/13/00
The Hearing OIIicer approved Variance |V-0015-98(1)| Ior an Extension oI
Time on an approved Variance that allowed a commercial building to have a
20 Ioot side yard setback where residential adjacency standards require the
building be setback 54 Ieet at the northwest corner oI Craig Road and Decatur
Boulevard.
07/05/01
Ior the sale oI packaged liquor in conjunction with a proposed Albertson's
supermarket and a Waiver oI the 400-Ioot separation requirement between a
liquor establishment and a protected use (daycare) on the northwest corner oI
Craig Road and Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended
approval oI the request 04/13/00.
SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB


11/21/01
Ior the secondhand sales oI children's clothing, Iurniture, toys and related
items in conjunction with a proposed retail store (just kid's stuII) at 4990 West
Craig Road The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request
10/04/01.
05/01/02
Ior the oII-premise sale oI beer and wine in conjunction with a proposed
Albertson's convenience store on the northwest corner oI Craig Road and
Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the
request 04/13/00.


05/08/01
A building permit (#1008112) was issued Ior commercial buildings and on-
site improvements at 4990 West Craig Road. The permit was Iinalized
12/10/2001.
10/09/01
A building permit (#1017921) was issued Ior a tenant improvement Ior a
speculative suite at 4990 West Craig Road, Suite #1. The permit has not been
Iinalized.
12/07/01
A building permit (#1021271) was issued Ior a sign (Dairy Queen) at 4990
West Craig Road, Suite #1. The permit has not been Iinalized.
03/04/02
A building permit (#2003698) was issued Ior a sign (Dairy Queen) at 4990
West Craig Road, Suite #1. The permit was Iinalized 06/14/02.
03/18/02
A building permit (#2004733) was issued Ior tenant improvement Ior
certiIicate oI occupancy (Dairy Queen) at 4990 West Craig Road, Suite #1.
The permit was Iinalized 06/17/02.

06/19/14
requirements Ior a proposed Special Use Permit Ior an Auto Title Loan. StaII
identiIied the need oI waivers to allow a distance separation oI zero Ieet Irom
a residential property where 200 Ieet is required and to allow a 120-Ioot
distance separation Irom a Financial Institution, SpeciIied where 1,000 Ieet is
required.
SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB



Field Check
07/0314
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the subject property and noted the site was
well maintained shopping center.

Site Area
Net Acres 12.55

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Single Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
R-PD7 (Residential
Units per Acre)
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East General Retail
Mixed Use Commercial
- North Las Vegas
Designation
C-1 (Neighborhood
Commercial) North Las
Vegas Designation
West
Single-Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
R-PD7 (Residential
Units per Acre)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (105 Feet) Y
Trails N/A
SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB



Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Decatur Boulevard Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map

100 Feet Y
Craig Road Parkway Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map

120 Feet Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
115,131 SF 1:250 SF 461

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 461 557 Y

Waivers
A 200-Ioot minimum distance
separation is required Irom any
residentially zoned property.
To allow a zero-Ioot distance
separation Irom a residentially
zoned property. (north/west)
Denial
A 1,000-Ioot minimum distance
separation is required Irom any
other Financial Institution,
SpeciIied uses.
To allow a 120-Ioot distance
separation Irom a Financial
Institution, SpeciIied. (south)
Denial

ANALYSIS

The Auto Title Loan use is deIined by Title 19.18 as, 'A business whose primary Iunction is to
lend money on security oI the title to a motor vehicle rather than on the security oI the vehicle
itselI.
SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB



*1. The use shall comply with all applicable requirements oI LVMC Title 6.

The proposea use will meet this requirement as the proposea site is subfect to business licensing
inspections.

*2. The building design and color scheme shall be subject to review by the Department to ensure
that it will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area.

The proposea use meets this stanaara as the use will be locatea in a Shopping Center use that is
aesthetically compatible with remaining stores locatea in the general retail builaing.

3. No temporary signs (as described in LVMC 19.14.090) such as balloons, inIlated devices,
searchlights, pennants, portable billboards, portable signs, streamers, trucks parked Ior signage
purposes, or other similar devices are permitted, except that banners announcing a 'grand
opening or that a business is 'coming soon may be approved administratively Ior a period not to
exceed 30 days.

The proposea use meets this conaition, as the existing location is vacant ana any sign or
temporary signs will require a permit.

4. Windows shall not:
a. Cover more than 20 percent oI the area oI all interior windows;
b. Include Ilashing lights or neon lighting; or
c. Include any text other than text that indicates the hours oI operation and whether the
business is open or closed.

The proposea use meets this conaition, as the proposea location is vacant ana will have a
number of inspections throughout the builaing permit ana business licensing process.
Aaaitionally, the site will unaergo ongoing annual inspections through licensing.

5. The hours oI operation shall not extend beyond the hours oI 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as the applicant states in the fustification letter that
they will operate the use at 8.00 a.m. ana close at 11.00 p.m. on Monaays Sunaay.

6. The building or portion thereoI that is dedicated to the use shall have a minimum size oI 1,500
square Ieet, and shall be designed to have suIIicient interior space to provide Ior adequate
customer waiting areas, customer queuing, and transaction space (such as 'teller windows or
desks).
SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB


The proposea use meets this requirement, as the proposea Auto Title Loan use operates with
1,573 square feet of floor area.

7. No auto title loan use may be located closer than 200 Ieet Irom any parcel used or zoned Ior
residential use. In addition, no auto title loan use may be located closer than 1,000 Irom any
other auto title loan use, auto pawn use or speciIied Iinancial institution use. For purposes oI this
Requirement 7, distances shall be measured in a straight line Irom property line, without regard
to intervening obstacles. The term 'property line reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels
and not leasehold parcels.

The proposea use aoes not meet this requirement, as the proposea site is locatea :ero feet away
from a resiaentially :onea parcel ana within 120 feet of a Financial Institution, Specifiea use.
The applicant has requestea a Waiver from these aistance requirements.

The applicant proposes to add an Auto Title Loan use to an existing Shopping Center use at 4990
West Craig Road, Suite #1. The applicant has indicated that the proposed Auto Title Loan use
will open Ior business at 8:00 a.m. and close at 11:00 p.m., which adheres to the operating hours
listed in Title 19.12 Ior the Auto Title Loan use. The proposed use is located zero Ieet Irom a
residentially-zoned property to the north and west where a 200-Ioot minimum distance
separation is required and is located 120 Ieet Irom a Financial Institution, SpeciIied use to the
south where a minimum 1,000-Ioot distance separation is required.

The proposed location oI this use Iails to comply with the minimum distance separation
requirements Ior a Special Use Permit. The requested Waivers to allow a zero-Ioot residential
distance separation and 120-Ioot Financial Institution, SpeciIied distance separation, represent a
100 and 12 reduction respectively Irom the required 200 and 1,000-Ioot separation mandated
by Title 19. As such, the required distance separation Waiver reinIorces the unsuitability oI this
site, Ior the Auto Title Loan use, with the surrounding neighborhood thereIore; staII recommends
denial oI the Special Use Permit.



SUP-54783 PR1-54667]
JB


The proposed Auto Title Loan use is compatible with the SC (Service Commercial)
General Plan land use designation and is located within an existing shopping center.
However, the proposed use requires Waivers oI the Residential and Financial
Institution, SpeciIied distance separation requirement, reinIorces the unsuitability oI this
site Ior the proposed Auto Title Loan use. The use cannot be conducted in a manner that
is harmonious or compatible with the surrounding uses.


The proposed use will be located within an established shopping center. There is no
evidence oI a physical constraint to the proposed uses on the subject site.


Primary site access is Irom North Decatur Boulevard, a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial
and West Craig Road, a 120-Ioot Parkway Arterial. The rights-oI-way provide adequate
capacity to serve the proposed use.

General Plan.

The proposed Auto Title Loan use will be subject to regular inspections by regulatory
agencies Ior business licensing and will thereIore not compromise the public`s health,
saIety or general welIare, or the overall objectives oI the General Plan.


The use does not comply with the minimum distance separation requirements required
per Title 19.12, as the applicant has requested Waivers oI residential and Financial
Institution, SpeciIied distance separation. StaII does not support the applicant`s request
Ior a Waiver.


NOTICES MAILED 382

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 2
06/26/14
PRJ-54667
SUP-54783
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
6
7
SUP-54783
Page 1 of 2 6/30/2014 3:26:55 PM
Applicant Email: psmith@kosterfinance.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Smith
Rep First Name: Paul
Applicant State: Nevada
Applicant Phone: (702) 296-6324
Rep Address: 4310 Cameron Street, Suite 9
Rep Email: psmith@kosterfinance.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 296-6324
Rep Zip: 89103
Project Name KOSTERS CASH LOANS - SPECIAL USE PERMIT W/ WAIVERS
Correct:
No
Ward #: WARD 4 (STAVROS S. ANTHONY), WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
ProjectAddress (Location): 4990 W CRAIG ROAD SUITE# ???
Application/Petition For: Kosters Cash Loans (Auto Title Loan) - Special Use Permit W/ Waivers of Distance seperation
If no, ...change what Suite# 1
Applicant First Name: Paul
Applicant Address: 4310 Cameron Street, Suite 9
Applicant Last Name: Smith
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-54783
Page 2 of 2 6/30/2014 3:26:55 PM
I Accept:
Yes
ALTA MIRA SHOPPING CENTER L L
C
P O BOX 847 CARLSBAD, CA 92018-0847
Paul Smith Koster Finance, LLC d/b/a
Koster's Cash Loans
Executive Administrative Assistant psmith@kosterfinance.com
SUP-54783
P
a
r
k
i
n
g

S
p
a
c
e
s

-

5
4
1

r
e
g
u
l
a
r

s
p
a
c
e
s

-

1
6

H
a
n
d
i
c
a
p

s
p
a
c
e
s
4
9
9
0

W
.

C
r
a
i
g

R
d
.
S
u
i
t
e

1
(
1
7
0
7

s
q
.

f
t
.
)
PPPP
a
r
kkk
iiii
n
gggggggggggggg
S
ppppp
a
c
e
s
-
5
4
111
r
e
gggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
u
-
1
6
H
a
n
d
iiiiii
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
6
7
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
3
1
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
6
7
S
U
P
-
5
4
7
8
3
Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Total
Name
7/3/2014 SUP-54783, PRJ-54667 LV
Koster Finance LLC
Koster's Cash Loans
4990 W. Craig Rd., Ste. 1
Las Vegas, NV
138-01-619-005
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
no comment
S
U
P
-
4
7
3

[
P
P
J
-
7
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

k
O
S
T
E
P

F
I
N
A
N
C
E

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

A
L
T
A

M
I
P
A

S
H
O
P
P
I
N
S

C
E
N
T
E
P

L
L
C

4
9
9
0

W
E
S
T

C
P
A
I
S

P
O
A
D

S
U
I
T
E

1

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

06/26/14
PRJ-54667
SUP-54783

Agenda tem No.: 34.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-54825 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ODYSSEY
CHARTER SCHOOL OF NEVADA - OWNER: 6122 W. SAHARA AVE., LLC - For possible
action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at
6150-6168 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-02-802-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-54722|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL OF NEVADA -
OWNER: 6122 W. SAHARA AVE., LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Public School,
Primary use.


SaIety.


SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK

Conditions Page Two

Public Works

6. As directed by the City TraIIic Engineer, install school zone Ilashers on Jones Boulevard
and possibly on West Sahara Avenue concurrent with onsite development. Any school zone
Ilashers Ior this site must also obtain the approval oI the Nevada Department oI
Transportation prior to installation.

SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Public School, Primary use to be located within an existing 14,483 square-
Ioot building at 6150-6168 West Sahara Avenue. Currently, the subject site consists oI two oIIice
buildings, a 21,856 square-Ioot oIIice building and a 14,483 square-Ioot oIIice building. The
proposed school use would only replace the existing 14,483 square-Ioot oIIice use. The applicant
is not proposing any exterior alterations to the existing 14,483 square-Ioot building. However,
the proposal includes the elimination oI 11 parking spaces adjacent to the east side oI the
building. The parking spaces would be removed to provide a saIe pick-up and drop-oII area Ior
the children, as required by Title 19.12.

The proposed Public School, Primary use has a less intense parking requirement then that oI the
existing oIIice use. As such, the removal oI the 11 parking spaces does not hinder the sites ability
to meet minimum parking standards. The proposed use adheres to all requirements as outlined by
Title 19.12; thereIore, staII recommends approval. II denied, the proposed Public School,
Primary use could not operate at the subject site.

ISSUES

A Public School, Primary use is permissible in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with approval oI a Special Use Permit.
Per Title 19.12, a Public School, Primary use shall provide an adequate on-site pick-up
and drop-oII area. The proposed school provides the pick-up and drop-oII area.


04/01/87
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (A-0012-86) property
generally located on the north side oI Sahara Avenue between Torrey Pines
Drive and Decatur Boulevard. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval. The annexation became eIIective on 06/12/86.
04/05/89
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0008-89) Irom N-U (Non-Urban)
to C-1 (Limited Commercial) Ior a one-story 37,400 square-Ioot commercial
oIIice center on property located on the north side oI Sahara Avenue and west
oI Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK

12/18/13
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-51436) Ior an Auto
Title Loan Use within an existing Financial Institution, SpeciIied with
waivers to allow a zero-Ioot distance separation Irom a residential property
where 200 Ieet is required and to allow a zero-Ioot distance separation Irom a
Financial Institution, SpeciIied use where 1,000 Ieet is required at 6122 West
Sahara Avenue. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.


10/10/89
A building permit (#90055510) was issued Ior a new building at 6120 West
Sahara Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 04/06/90.

06/24/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant`s representative to
discuss the proposal to locate a Public School, Primary use at the subject site.
StaII concluded that a Special Use Permit would be required. StaII also noted
that the site was parking impaired, however based on the proposal oI only
Iour classrooms, the proposed school use had a less intense parking
requirement then that oI the previous oIIice use. As such, on-site parking is
adequate.


Field Check
07/03/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the subject property and noted the site was
well maintained.

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.66
SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Clark County CG
(Commercial General)
Clark County C-2
(General Commercial)
Restaurant
East
Shopping Center
C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Single-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
West
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial
and Highways
150 Y

SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
OIIice, Other
Than Listed
32,620 SF 1:400* 82
Financial
Institution,
SpeciIied
4,780 SF 1:250 20
OIIice, Other
Than Listed
-18,483 SF 1:400* -47
Public School,
Primary
4 Classrooms
3 per
classroom
12


120

Y
*Pursuant to Z-0008-89, parking was calculatea at one space for every 400 square feet.

ANALYSIS

This is a request Ior a Public School, Primary use to be located within an existing 14,483 square-
Ioot building at 6150-6168 West Sahara Avenue. The Public or Private School, Primary use is
deIined as 'an institution that provides kindergarten through 8th grade education and is
supported by a public, religious or private organization. The proposed use meets this deIinition,
as the proposed institution is a state accredited school Ior education.


1. Adequate pick-up and drop-oII areas must be provided on-site.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as a small area for stuaent pick-up ana arop-off is
proviaea onsite. The proposal woula not require stuaents to cross any streets or ingress/egress
areas in oraer to be pickea-up ana aroppea-off for school.

Currently, the subject site consists oI two oIIice buildings, a 21,856 square-Ioot oIIice building
and a 14,483 square-Ioot oIIice building. The proposed school use would only replace the
existing 14,483 square Ioot oIIice use. The applicant is not proposing any exterior alterations to
the existing 14,483 square-Ioot building. The interior build-out will be subject to building permit
review and result in oIIices and Iour classrooms.
SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK


The original Site Development Plan Review (Z-0008-89) approved two buildings totaling 37,400
square Ieet oI oIIice space. At that time, the two oIIice buildings required 94 parking spaces.
Currently, the subject site provides 132 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to eliminate
11 parking spaces adjacent to the east side oI the building to provide the saIe pick-up and drop-
oII area Ior the children, as required by Title 19.12. The proposed Public School, Primary use has
a less intense parking requirement then that oI the existing oIIice use. As such, the removal oI
the 11 parking spaces does not hinder the sites ability to meet minimum parking standards.

As the Special Use Permit request is located within 500 Ieet oI the City`s boundary with
unincorporated Clark County, the proposal is considered a Project oI Regional SigniIicance
pursuant to Title 19.16.010. An impact assessment was completed by the applicant and
distributed to local and regional agencies Ior comment. No comments were received Irom the
aIIected agencies.

As the proposal meets Title 19.12 use requirements and Title 19.06 zoning standards and can be
operated in a manner that is compatible with surrounding uses, the proposed Public School,
Primary will be appropriate Ior the subject property. StaII thereIore recommends approval, with
conditions.




The proposed Public School, Primary will be a small, Iour-classroom Iacility that will have
little impact on the adjacent commercial and residential properties.


The subject site contains two existing oIIice buildings totaling 37,400 square Ieet. The
proposed Public School, Primary use would locate within one oI the oIIice buildings and
replace 18,483 square Ieet oI oIIice space. The applicant proposes to eliminate 11 parking
spaces to provide the saIe pick-up and drop-oII area Ior the children, as required by Title
19.12. The proposed Public School, Primary use has a less intense parking requirement
then that oI the existing oIIice use. As such, the removal oI the 11 parking spaces does not
hinder the sites ability to meet minimum parking standards.
SUP-54825 PR1-54722]
GK



Primary access to the site is provided by Sahara Avenue, a 150-Ioot wide Primary Arterial
as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. The existing street is adequate to
meet the intensity oI the proposed Public School, Primary use.

General Plan.

The proposed Public School, Primary at the subject location will be subject to state
licensing requirements and will not compromise the health, saIety and welIare oI the
public.


The proposed use meets the minimum requirement to provide adequate pick-up and drop-
oII areas on the site.


NOTICES MAILED 213

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
06/30/14
PRJ-54722
SUP-54825
REVISED
06/30/14
PRJ-54722
SUP-54825 - REVISED
06/30/14
PRJ-54722
SUP-54825
08/12/14 PC
REVISED
06/30/14
PRJ-54722
SUP-54825 - REVISED
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
2
2
S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
5
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
2
2
S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
5
0
6
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
7
2
2
S
U
P
-
5
4
8
2
5
S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
Z
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
D
Y
S
S
E
Y

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

O
F

N
E
V
A
D
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

1
Z
Z

W
,

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
,

L
L
C

0
-

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
4
7
Z
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
D
Y
S
S
E
Y

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

O
F

N
E
V
A
D
A

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

1
Z
Z

W
,

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
,

L
L
C

0
-

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
7
/
0
3
/
I
4

07/09/14
PRJ-54722
SUP-54825 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 35.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - TXT-54664 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action regarding a
request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.12 related to Permitted Uses and Chapter 19.18 related to
DeIinitions and Measures to consolidate various liquor uses and to provide Ior other related
matters. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM


RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

None

Agenda tem No.: 36.


SUB1ECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

08.12.14 PC Final Packet

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

08.12.14 PC Final Packet

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Planning Commission August 12, 2014 - Page 1

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

Careful Canvas Ave

FROM SX-TC AND

June 25, 2014

Mr. Flinn Fagg, AICP, Director

Re: APN: 125-17-210-448

Dear Mr. Fagg:

Kristen G. Goodell, AIA

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kristen Goodell <kristen@aptusgroup.com>

Kristen G. Goodell, AIA

Begin forwarded message:

From: Bruce Bilyeu <bruce@mosaicbg.com>

Shed. 8' eave. 10' ridge

1950 E. Warm Springs Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

City of Las Vegas

Attn: Flinn Fagg, AICP

Re: WVR-54398 (PRJ-53401)-SIGNAGE

Dear Flinn Fagg,

1950 E. Warm Springs Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

City of Las Vegas

Attn: Flinn Fagg, AICP

Re: WVR-544008 (PRJ-53401)-TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Dear Flinn Fagg,

City of Las Vegas Planning Department

Re: Justification Letter for

To Whom it May Concern:

Impulse Civil Engineering represents Ovation Development (the Applicant) on behalf of

Special Use Permit to Allow Senior Housing

Site Development Plan Review

The Applicant is seeking exceptions for the following requirements:

Parking lot landscaping. In order to reduce parking deficiencies, the Applicant

The Applicant is seeking the following waivers:

Peter J. Laas, P.E.

cc: Jan Goyer, Ovation Development

Você também pode gostar