Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PROJECT OWNER:
Antonio Guiteras Sugar Mill
Ministerio del Azúcar (Minaz) – Cuba
Content
Background
The BIG-GT technology
The Antonio Guiteras project
The project site
The project
Legal and financial structure
Financing of the Power Plant
Operation and maintenance
Financial and economical analysis
Cost reduction for future plants
Environmental impacts
Socio-economic impacts
Background
Cuba depends on oil for 75% of its electricity generation
Local and global pollution, dependence on oil import
Large Cuban sugar sector
Large amount of bagasse and sugar cane trash available for
energy generation
BIG-GT Technology
Significantly more efficient and advanced technology for
turning biomass into energy than what is being used in Cuba
today
The feasibility study
A feasibility study has been made to explore the technical and
economical conditions of implementing a demonstration using
the BIG-GT technology
The BIG-GT Technology
Precise technical denomination:
Biomass Integrated-Gasifier/Gas Turbine
Combined Cycle
Enables significantly higher electricity production
than conventional steam boiler and steam
turbine technology
Technology ready to be proven under
commercial conditions after several years of
research and development by various
companies
The BIG-GT Technology
BAGASSE
&
TRASH
From sugar mill
Power Plant
Gas turbine 8 000
Steam cycle 4 381
Compressor 2 260
Auxiliaries @ 19% 5 262
Civils @ 6% 1 937
EPC contractor @ 6% 3 050
Start-up @ 3% of investment 1 805
Temp facilities, permitting @ 2% 744
Project development @ 5% 4 019
Contingency @ 10% 4 290.1
Total 48 996.1
Operation and maintenance
The operation and the maintenance of the demonstrative plant will
be hired by the JV from the Sugar Company Antonio Guiteras that in
turn will subcontract technical support likewise for the first years of
operation
For the capital and specialized maintenance of the facilities it will be
subcontracted to national specialized companies.
In the case of gas turbine service will be included in the supply
contract.
The management of the demonstration plant will be carried out by
the Council of Direction that will be constituted by members named
by the Council of Shareholder
The total energy exported to the Grid will be sale to Electric National
Union (UNE), according to the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)
that must be arranged between the SPC and UNE
Environmental impacts
CO2-reduction
110 000 tons/year, included in financial
analysis
Local environmental benefits:
Particulates
96% lower
SO2 96% lower
NOx 92% lower
Technological and economic
impacts
Fewer power outages
currently 120 h/year
Gaining knowledge of technology
Next generation of plants will gain
Less need for imported oil
3,300 tons heavy oil/year, 740,000 $/year
Local employment and expertise
122 man-years during construction incl. multiplier
effect
67 man-years annually incl. multiplier effect
Cost-benefit analysis of
environmental impacts
Reduction in SO2 @ 331 $/ton USD 1.216.000,-
NOx emissions @ 206 $/ton, USD 60.000,-
Particulate matter @ 336 $/ton USD 6.000,-
Excluding burning of residues in field
Reduction in power outages USD 300.000,-
30 ¢/kwh
100 2,5
80 2
60 1,5
40 1
20 0,5
0 0
1st Nth Nth 1st Nth Nth 1st , Nth Nth
high low high low high high, low,
eff. high high
eff. eff.
Plant number
Conclusions
Antonio Guiteras is a highly efficient but expensive plant.
At a power price of 5.2 ¢/kWh it needs 38% grant ($18.5
million) to give 8% real rate of return
Or power price of 7.5 ¢/kWh
Or higher steam price, currently at 1.3 ¢/kg
Including value of environmental benefits and power loss
gives 7% real rate of return
Plus it contributes to the nth of a kind plant having 20%
real rate of return
Plus net value of imported oil savings (gross value
740,000 $/year in Nov 2004)
The plant has higher benefits than costs, what are
the barriers?