Defendants must answer the following interrogatories. Defendant officer "state whether $ou" on an$ occasion within five 27. $ears 0rior to the occurrence" #ecame involved in an$ argument" altercation" or have ever #een cited" fined" 0enalized" demoted"
Defendants must answer the following interrogatories. Defendant officer "state whether $ou" on an$ occasion within five 27. $ears 0rior to the occurrence" #ecame involved in an$ argument" altercation" or have ever #een cited" fined" 0enalized" demoted"
Defendants must answer the following interrogatories. Defendant officer "state whether $ou" on an$ occasion within five 27. $ears 0rior to the occurrence" #ecame involved in an$ argument" altercation" or have ever #een cited" fined" 0enalized" demoted"
August Banaza Plaintiff v. Officer Smith and Village of Kenilworth Defendants PLAINTIFF AUGUST BANAZAS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Pursuant to Rule 33 of the ederal Rules of !ivil Procedure" Plaintiff August Banaza #$ their undersigned counsel" re%uests that the Defendants answer the following interrogatories. INTERROGATORIES &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O.,- ,. As to Defendant Officer Smith/s em0lo$ment and em0lo$ments histor$" answer- A. the length of time at $our 0resent em0lo$ment1 B. the names and addresses of all $our em0lo$ers during the 0ast ten 2,3. $ears1 !. the dates of each em0lo$ment1 D. the nature of each em0lo$ment1 ). the average wee4l$ wages of each em0lo$ment1 and . the reasons for termination of each em0lo$ment. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. 5- XXX.XXXXXXXXX.XXX XXXXXX.XXXXXX 5. Defendant Officer Smith" state $our height" weight" the nature of an$ 0h$sical games or s0orts in which $ou regularl$ engage and the num#er of times wee4l$ $ou engage in active e6ercise and or strength training. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. 3- 3. Defendant Officer Smith" state whether $ou" on an$ occasion within five 27. $ears 0rior to the occurrence" #ecame involved in an$ fight" argument" altercation" or have ever #een cited" fined" 0enalized" demoted" or otherwise re0rimanded in which #lows were struc4 or where threats were e6changed with a citizen during a traffic sto0 while $ou were an active dut$ officer for the Village of Kenilworth" and if so" state- A. the nature of each incident1 B. the 0lace where each incident occurred1 and !. the names of all 0arties involved in each incident and their 0resent addresses or wherea#outs" if 4nown. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. 8- 8. Defendant Officer Smith" 0rior to the occurrence" state whether $ou ever uttered an$ threats to commit 0h$sical violence on the 0laintiff or to an$one other than the 0laintiff while on active dut$ with for the 0olice de0artment for the Village of Kenilworth" and if so" state- A. the 0erson or 0ersons to whom $ou uttered the threats1 B. the time and 0lace that each threat was uttered1 and !. what $ou said on each occasion. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. 7- 7. Defendant Officer Smith" state whether $ou have ever #een arrested and charged with the crime of assault and #atter$" whether on dut$ or off" and" if so" state- A. the date of each arrest1 B. where each arrest occurred1 and !. whether $our arrest in each case resulted in a conviction" an ac%uittal" dismissal of charges" or other dis0osition of the charges against $ou. 5 XXX.XXXXXXXXX.XXX XXXXXX.XXXXXX &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. 9- 9. Defendant Village of Kenilworth" identif$ and descri#e the training or e60erience re%uired for an a00ointment as an officer of the 0osition currentl$ held #$ Defendant Officer Smith. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. :- :. Defendant Village of Kenilworth" descri#e an$ educational re%uirements for a00ointment as a 0olice officer in the 0osition currentl$ held #$ Defendant Officer Smith. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. ;- ;. Defendant Village of Kenilworth" identif$ and descri#e an$ suits or com0laints" #oth formal or informal" written or oral" #rought against Officer Smith" charging him with a#use of his lawful authorit$" or use of e6cessive force during his em0lo$ment with the Village of Kenilworth Police De0artment. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. <- <. Defendant Village of Kenilworth" identif$ and descri#e an$ actions ta4en #$ $ou" $our su0ervisor" an$ investigative #od$" or court with res0ect to an$ of the com0laints identified in res0onse to the 0receding interrogatories. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. ,3- ,3. Defendant Village of Kenilworth" descri#e an$ internal administrative 0rocedures in e6istence" on or 0rior to the occurrence" to investigate" 0revent" or determine instances of a#uses of authorit$ or e6cessive use of force #$ 0olice officers in the Police De0artment. &'()RRO*A(OR+ 'O. ,,- ,,. Defendant Village of Kenilworth" &dentif$ and descri#e all 0olice memoranda" documents" circulars" #ulletins" manuals" and general orders of an$ 4ind that indicate the amount of force that is 0ermissi#le in arresting an individual for sus0icion of driving under the influence. DA()D- 'OV)=B)R ,," 5338 B$->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vincent !havarria 3 XXX.XXXXXXXXX.XXX XXXXXX.XXXXXX 797 ?. Adams !hicago" &@ 93,39 8 XXX.XXXXXXXXX.XXX XXXXXX.XXXXXX
Defendant Cynthia Atchison's Responses To Plaintiff's 1st Combined Discovery Requests (7/13/17), Tara Walker Lyons v. Larry Atchison Et Al, Case No. DV 2016-547, Lewis and Clark County, MT
Investigation and Review of The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Handling of Allegations of Sexual Abuse by Former USA Gymnastics Physician Lawrence Gerard Nassar