Braveheart Freedom SOS Spirit of Sanity emerges

ACTION
Aspired Critical Think Impulse Overcomes Neurosis
BUSINESS GUIDE
Bias Unbiased Sync Inherent Nuances Epitome Simplistic Sanity God Understanding Interdependent Divvy
Equilibrium
FLEARS
Fair Labor Exchange Apportioned Revenues Support
GENIE
Greedy Exasperate Needy Invidious Effect

Who Knew?

NEWS - Never Ending War Story SCHOOL'S OUT - Sanity Conversion Humanity Out Of Logistics Survival Oust
Usury Tyrannical!!!

Nip

Marshall Law when Michael Brown killer found innocent
Satan home for Xmas as HOLE hindsight osmosis learned egos weep surreal

PEOPLE HOUR CAPRICIOUS IE PAPACY
Precedence Equality Ordained Protection Logistically Enforced Humanity Obtrusive Universal Rights
Criminals Administered Protection Racket Inalienable Conscience Intent Override Undeniable Spirit
Irrefutably Evidencing
Privacy Act Protects Abrogated Criminal Yahoos

www.Trek.Frank13.com

De Jure a De facto Jaws
Deception evidences Jesuit usury righteous evil-angelists antithesis demonstrable edict fiduciary
authorized contract tacit overbite Justice arrest writ subsequent

Jesuit
1. Member of Roman Catholic religious order
A member of the Society of Jesus, a Roman Catholic religious order engaged in missionary and educational
work worldwide.
The order was founded by Saint Ignatius Loyola in 1534 with the objective of defending Catholicism against
the Reformation.
2. Offensive Term
An offensive term for somebody regarded as crafty or scheming, especially somebody who uses deliberately
ambiguous or confusing words to deceive others

CYRANO MAD PS SJ
Criminal Yahoos Rhetoric Associated Nasal Omnipresent Musketeer Assimilated Durante Pinocchio
Schnozzola Spirit Jimmy

SOLEMN
Spirit of Law Ejects Manifested Neurosis

Minister of Justice

Do not do to others what you would not want for self
Recompense injury with Justice and recompense kindness with kindness

Neurosis is a class of functional mental disorders involving distress but neither delusions nor hallucinations,
whereby
behavior is not outside socially acceptable norms.
[1]

It is also known as psychoneurosis or neurotic disorder, and thus those suffering from it are said to be
neurotic.
Privacy Act Bo Bos A NOSE Akin Natural Obvious Shyness Exceptions

One Eyed Neurotic Peeping TOM tyrannical outlaw manipulates
At first sight Prima Facie Ipso Facto by the fact itself


Bar to Bar Justice causes eccentric to saddle up to the Bar

A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep and taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain;
And drinking largely sobers us again.

Alexander Pope 1688 - 1744

Another criticism of the CPPCG is that when its provisions have been invoked by the United Nations
Security Council, they have only been invoked to punish those who have already committed genocide and
been foolish enough to leave a paper trail.
It was this criticism that led to the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1674 by the United Nations
Security Council on 28 April 2006 commits the Council to action to protect civilians in armed conflict and to
protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
Genocide scholars such as Gregory Stanton have postulated that conditions and acts that often occur before,
during, and after genocide such as dehumanization of victim groups, strong organization of genocidal groups,
and denial of genocide by its perpetrators can be identified and
1
actions taken to stop genocides before they happen.
Critics of this approach such as Dirk Moses assert that this is unrealistic and that, for example,
666
"Darfur will end when it suits the great powers that have a stake in
the region".

Not sober yet
From: lawmen@googlegroups.com
[mailto:lawmen@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hurt
Sent:
Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:16 AM
To: 'Lawmen'
Subject:
[Lawmen: 3525] Attorney Brad Henschel on becoming an attorney and the practice of law
I thought you might appreciate this attorneys perspective on the practice of law and what it takes to become
an attorney.
Bob Hurt

2460 Persian Drive
#70
Clearwater, FL
33763 +1
(727) 669-5511
Scholar
Fund Jurisdictionary Law
Newsletter Archives Downloads GetZooks!


From: Brad Henschel
Sent:
Monday, March 22, 2010 8:38 PM
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com; Bob
Hurt; Lawmen; John Findley
Subject: Re: Rich Cantwell's scurrilous screed about lawyers
I went to law school in 1984 in order to help others with Tax problems and following the great example of
Larry Becraft. I was 39 at the time.
It was really difficult, especially at age 39 to go back to school. I had to go day and night and I had to study
ALL THE TIME to get all the confusing information being presented to me. I found out later the teaching
methods used in law schools, known was the socratic method was different from paralegal schools were the
paralegals were simply told the truth of the course instead of just reading cases to learn what the law really
was about, as was done in Law school. The cost was expensive even at UWLA, a State Bar but not ABA
approved law school. I had 325 classmates, 1/2 being women. Only about 40-43 graduated and of them 20,
including me, passed the State Bar Exam. 20 out of 325 people. Those 325 people were ALL better educated
than I was. Most of them were already successful business people. One brought instant printing to the US from
Japan. Another was a real estate investor who drove his rolls royce to school. These two dropped out.

Another was the paralegal for King of Torts lawyer in San Francisco - she flunked out in Civil Procedure class.
Another was a government employee.
- He moved to Texas never having passed the Bar Exam and he told me that information face to face.
Another was the former Iranian Health Minister. Another was the daughter of a lawyer who quit 8 weeks ahead
of graduation because she didn't want to be a lawyer, her father pressured her into it, so she quit. - She had the
highest grade average in the school.

Learning the law is only 1/2 of the equation. Then you have to apply it, that's another learning curve. The
pressure on lawyers is so extreme and the loss of sleep so pervausive that lawyers usually die before age 50.
Cancer is rampant among lawyers as is mental illness due to the pressures.
IF you worked two jobs at minimum wage you would have more money and work less than most lawyers work.
Most of my law school classmates only wanted to make money. I wanted to learn the law and be good at it.
When they saw me coming they would run away so they wouldn't have to talk law with me.
I won a lot of cases before the Bar entered my life. Then I learned about how the Bar is really in place to
prevent disruption to the large law firms, many of whom are now victims themselves of the economy.
The law is like every other occupation, it has great people and it has scum and everything in between. The
Bar is used to silence people like Richard Fine.
But mainly the general public doesn't understand legal ethics. They are mainly the antithesis of real world
ethics. Clients think a bar complaint will force the attorney to be
better. Richard Fine was disbarred after exposing judicial corruption of the
highest order.
The Bar and the legislature covered it up.

I
had the State of Calif sanctioned $30k for programming their computers to violate the US Bankruptcy laws.
I
won case after case in criminal court and my motions in bankruptcy court for my clients resulted in
the expungement of millions in taxes.
Clients in CA are now facing a lack of affordable attorneys or no attorneys to provide legal services to them as
the CAL bar took out thousands of attorneys, leaving these people without legal representation and left them at
the mercy of the government and it's lawyers. - Brad Henschel, JD, now an inactive member of the State Bar of
CA.

HENSCHEL NOTICE OF PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY:
This message is private and confidential.
It contains confidential and privileged information which is both privileged & confidential under state and
federal law and/or exempt from disclosure under law, including but not limited to the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510-2521. NO reader may disclose, distribute or copy this email. If you
get this e-mail in error, notify me immediately by electronic-mail reply and delete this original message. No
recording, printing or sharing of this email, which has been sent over telephone lines, is allowed, and recording
it is
illegal. Cal. Penal Code 632.

From: Bob Hurt
<bob@bobhurt.com>
To: Lawmen
<lawmen@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Mon, March 22, 2010 4:48:32
PM
Subject: Rich Cantwell's scurrilous screed about lawyers
Rich:
In your screed below, you denounce the MAJORITY of attorneys but supply NO facts to support your
allegation. Because the lawyers bathwater has become dingy you seem to want to drown them, spank them, or
toss them out. That seems a little crazy to me.
We Need Attorneys.
Lawyers comprise virtually the ONLY PEOPLE IN THIS NATION who can handle litigation competently, so
the non-lawyer world generally cannot do without them. Even the lawyers admit that only a fool represents
himself in court, and because of vexatious litigant laws, methods of blocking evidence from juries, and
frivolous argument standards, even THEY cannot get justice in courts. They pay a fortune for education, pay a
fortune to maintain offices, pay a fortune in personal time doing legal research, and pay a fortune for online and
other law research services. They risk terrible sanctions and contempt citations whenever they stand up against
deluded, incompetent, or corrupt judges, risk absolute destruction of their careers by professional foes in the
bar, and then suffer substantial losses of income to clients who stiff them. Many, if not most, attorneys work 70-
hour weeks, live on the edge of financial disaster, and take 5 to 10 years to build up a law practice that will
allow them enough time and money to take their families on vacation every year. In spite of all that, most
attorneys do pro bono work, giving of themselves to help those they consider deserving and unable to afford
legal services.
So why do you seek to excoriate them with colossally unfair generalizations like those in your obloquy below?
Methinks thou doth protest too much. Way too.
Licensing.
Furthermore, you err in your pronouncements about licensing. The Constitution of Florida in Article V Section
15 empowers the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of law: The supreme court shall have exclusive
jurisdiction to regulate the admission of persons to the practice of law and the discipline of persons admitted. It
integrated the bar in 1949 partly for that purpose. It has established,
through the bar, rules for an independent examiner to determine the qualifications of applicants for membership.
Upon successful qualification, the bar issues a bar number and card to the new member, and the Supreme Court
clerk issues the LICENSE as attorney and counselor at law which the new attorney typically frames and
hangs on the wall in the law office. You have seen many of these licenses, and if you visit the Florida Bar web
site you will find the bar number (the equivalent of the license number) for every attorney and jurist bar
member in Florida.
A Note about Smart People.
You seem to imply that smart people (like most attorneys) screw other people (the relatively stupid, I
presume). You fail to note that in many, if not most, cases a screwing simply cannot be helped. Should a teacher
grind the education of a classroom of students to a snails pace in order to accommodate the stupid children in
the classroom? Before busing that did not present much of a problem
because smart people generally lived in different school districts from stupid people, owing to their relative
abilities to buy nice houses in nice neighborhoods. Now, after busing, schools have honors classes to
segregate the smart from the stupid. No matter what, stupid kids dont end up with as good an education as
smart kids for the same reason that a pint jar cannot hold the amount of water that a quart jar can hold: inherent
capacities simply cannot be exceeded.
So, naturally, smart people generally exhibit more sense in managing money and their other affairs, and that can
make them seem to take advantage of stupid people, particularly in a free-enterprise capitalist economic system.
OUR particular system has in the past 100 years become burdened with thousands of laws and regulations that
protect the stupid from the smart and the weak from the strong. But at the same time, our nations states have
eliminated every vestige of eugenics laws that might eventually have obviated those protectionist laws. What do
I mean here? Our land needs fewer stupid people in it, by at least an order of magnitude. Then caveat emptor
wont seem like such a dirty term because far fewer people will seem screwed. And I mean that everybody,
not just attorneys, need to learn the equivalent of the first two years of law school in their public education.
Legitimate Complaints, with Solutions. Regardless of the licensing issue, you dont have a valid point to
make in your anti-lawyer tirade, even though you could make some very valid points. Please allow me to make
some of them for you:
1.
Bar
Integration Destroys Republic.
a.
The integration of the bar with the Supreme court makes every bar member a member of the
Judicial Branch of government. The Florida Constitution requires in Article II Section 3 that
The powers of the state government shall be divided into legislative, executive and judicial
branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any powers
appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided
herein. It does not permit bar members outside the judiciary except as Attorney General and
State Attorneys and their assistant attorneys. All legislator attorneys and staff attorneys in the
Legislative and Executive branches operate in violation of the Constitution and to that extent
create a judicial oligarchy because the Supreme Court can and does exercise dominion over all of
them. That violates CUSA Article IV Section 4 which provides in pertinent part The United
States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.

b.
Solution: de-integrate the bar and turn the regulation of the practice of law over to the Executive
branch.
2.
Attorneys dont regulate judges, but tolerate judicial immunity.

a.
Attorneys form the pool from which judges rise to office, and so attorneys comprise the group best suited to
lead in judicial reform for eliminating judicial corruption. They have the requisite skills and the proximity to
judges, so they know better than any public other than victims of corruption which jurists have become corrupt
or downright evil. They have let the people down because they dont use their bar to police the judiciary. In case
you havent noticed, the bar governors and grievance committees ignore grievances against jurists. But they can
and should work to revoke the bar licenses of corrupt judges, for that would disqualify the judges from office
(the state constitutions typically make bar membership a qualification for becoming a jurist). Many attorneys
fail to hold the courts accountable or engage in guerilla activism against crooked judges. By guerilla I mean a
form of activism like hiring a Private Investigator to dig up the dirt on a judge, and then hiring a Public
Relations agency to expose that dirt to the press and the public through blogs, etc, without the attorney coming
under fire for bring disrepute to the profession.

b.
Solution:
litigate and lobby against judicial immunity and for empowerment and independence of grand juries to
investigate government employee crimes.
3.
Unfair
Business Practices.
a.
Some law firms overcharge for services rendered and overbill clients by charging for services not
rendered. Some attorneys suffer from incompetence or laziness and dont give clients their best
effort at advocacy. As a consequence, many people who need advocacy simply cannot afford the
service, and of those who manage to afford it, many dont get adequate advocacy, and lose the
case as a result. Pro bono work does not balance this out. The bar seems to turn a blind eye to
much of this, and the public has no clue whether the attorney for hire will do a good job or not.
b.
Solution:
Lobby for laws to require attorneys to give clients satisfaction questionnaires and make the
results public.
4.
Legal
Services Monopoly.
a.
Attorneys seem loathe to campaign against the unfair Unlicensed Practice of Law statutes with
which the bar and state attorneys attack private citizens who help one another with legal matters.
They have helped create a legal services monopoly that has led to their overcharging for legal
services. Attorneys really should become leaders in the communities of their residence, guiding
people in ways to keep our governments constitutional. Many dont seem to participate nearly to
the extent they should or could.
b.
Solution:
Lobby for change in UPL to apply only to specifically defined activities that actually require
knowledge gained in law school or other special certification.
The law should allow anybody to practice an area of law upon a demonstration of competent
knowledge in that area.
You
have probably noticed that I offered solutions to each problem. Lawyers cannot implement three of the solutions
by themselves. They need public support. You could help educate the public about their need to provide that
support. You could encourage attorneys to do the lobbying.
Many Attorneys Deserve Our Appreciation. Bottom
line, instead of flaying the flesh off the stooped backs of overworked Patriot Attorneys, you ought to bless them
for their general goodness and generosity, and encourage more to join their ranks and help them excise and
bring to justice crooked judges and over-zealous prosecutors.
What law professionals do you know who have created web sites and led movements to educate patriots in the
law and constitutional principles, and to mobilize people to effective political activism? Can you name any? I
can name three:
1.
Larry Becraft
http://hiwaay.net/~becraft - for at least 20 years, Larry has at some expense hosted a web site that does not sell
his legal services, but educates people in the law and guides patriots away from harmful myths that will land
them in prison, and guides students toward sound principles of economics.
Larry spent hundreds of hours scanning and converting to searchable text the Statutes at Large for the income
tax laws and the related Code of Federal Regulations, put them on DVDs, and makes them available via the web
and on disk to serious students. He operates a radio show at his own expense weekly to educate people about
tax issues and patriot myths, encouraging people to learn and use the law, and participate in honest government.
2.
Tom Cryer
http://truthattack.org
for the past 2+ years, Tommy has led patriots in attacking the errors of the IRS, making a public, political issue
of those errors (such as the Stop Thief rallies at post offices at tax time) and educating people about income tax
laws and issues. He has posted all of Larrys searchable laws and codes on his web site, making them freely
available to everyone. He co-hosts the radio show with Larry, as a public service, free.
3.
Jon Roland
http://constitution.org
Jon does not practice as an attorney, but as an educator and law philosopher he devotes his life to helping our
governments adhere to the Constitution and our people become better Citizens. He interacts with many
attorneys and leaders in the Patriot movement to encourage people to become activists in reforming our
government and courts. His web site constitutes a treasure trove of related educational information, including
Larrys searchable laws.
I love these men. I invoke Gods most precious blessings upon them. I honor them for their devotion to truth
and their selfless contributions to our nations underlying greatness. I dont examine them under a microscope
for their peccadilloes, vices, and sins. I dont expect perfection of them. But, I do encourage them toward
whatever perfection they can achieve in their short lives on this whirling rock.
I encourage you to do the same.
Bob Hurt

2460 Persian Drive
#70
Clearwater, FL
33763
+1 (727)
669-5511
Scholar
Fund Jurisdictionary Law
Newsletter Archives Downloads GetZooks!
You received this because you have membership in the "Lawmen" Google Group.
Comment to group owner - reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options - visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join
/ Subscribe - send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign /
Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawmen+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

********************************************

*** Note****

I looked into it further to find that Richard Fine was not only dismissed from the Bar, but put behind bars and
has been in solitary confinement for over 18 months without charges laid against him presumably holding him
there until the Bilderberg New World Order is in place having been meeting since 1954 began their initiative in
2007 with the world financial collapse that we ain't seen nothing yet.



10 Years if you think Government corrupt USA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSYLdoRwkrs




Richard a Fine example goes to jail






11/15/10

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine/
Please join the Facebook Cause: FREE THE LA-FIPs (Los Angeles
Falsely Imprisoned Persons)

http://www.causes.com/causes/222335/about

INTRODUCTION - MULTI-IDIOMAS

English Intro:

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not
permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed
"retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009
Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los
Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Richard Fine attempted to have his habeas corpus reviewed by the United States courts, from the US District
Court, through the US Court of Appeals, to the Supreme Court of the United States; however, all United States
courts involved in the matter denied Richard

DOCUMENTS

The two records below, produced by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and by the Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Department as the legal foundation for the holding of Richard Fine are alleged as
fraud, each on its own. Moreover, the production of contradictory records by the two justice system agencies of
Los Angeles County is alleged as additional fraud to top it off.

1) View the FALSE AND DELIBERATELY MISLEADING records provided by Sheriff Lee Baca in letter to
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Michael Antonovich, in response to request for access to the California public
records that were the non-existing warrant and booking records of Richard Fine. For over a year, Sheriff Lee
Baca insists on providing false records - claiming that Richard Fine was arrested on location and by authority of
the "San Pedro Municipal Court". No such court has existed for almost a decade:

http://inproperinla.com/10-01-08-antonovich-ltr-repeat-mailing-w-attch-env-s.pdf

2) View the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment and Order of Contempt. Such judgment record is
missing any authentication at all. It was stamped on its face "FILED" with the date of March 4, 2009, but signed
on its last page by Judge Yaffe and dated March 24, 2009. Such judgment was never entered as required by
California Code to make it "effectual for any purpose":

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-marina-v-county-09-03-04-false-fine-judment-record-copy-from-us-
dist-ct-habeas-corpus-doc-16-response-by-la-sup-ct-filed-may-1-2009.pdf

MISSING DOCUMENTS

The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false records in online public access systems,
and denial of access to or missing true judicial records:

1) The Los Angeles Superior Court in Marina v LA County (BS109420) published a false online "Case
Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case management
system of the court.

2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County in re: Richard I Fine, (Inmate #1824367) published false online arrest
and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los Angeles County
Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.

3) The US District Court, Los Angeles in Fine v Baca (2:09-cv-01914) published a false online "PACER
docket", which the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify, but denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic
Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and to the paper record, which was Richard Fine's commencing
record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated at the US District Court.

4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) and Fine v Sheriff (09-56073) published
false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs
(Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by respondents in the
appeal.

5) The US Supreme Court in Fine v Baca (09-A827)
published a false online "docket" noting denials on both March 12, 2010 and April 23/26, 2010, which were not
supported by the Court records in the case. Any evidence of valid judicial review of the Application was
missing from the Court file.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/

COMPLAINTS

Below are links to two complaints filed with the office of US Attorney, Central District of California - for
public corruption and deprivation of rights in the case of Richard Fine:
1) View complaint filed with US Attorney Office, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights by the
California Judicial Council and California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George, relative to their conduct
in the habeas corpus at the US District Court:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/

2) View the Complaint filed July 8, 2010 against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public
Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in re: Imprisonment of Richard Fine:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/

3) View the Complaint filed July 1, 2010, against Counsel Danny Bickell, of the US Supreme Court, alleging
public corruption and deprivation of rights relative to his conduct in the Application Fine v Baca (09-A827).

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/

PETITION

WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND PROPERLY ADDRESS THE
LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD
FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367). WE PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST AND BOOKING
RECORDS, AND IF FOUND NOT CONFORMING WITH THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE LAW -
INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTORNEY RICHARD FINE.
WITH IT, THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL...

Executive Summary:

Instant petition is filed with Los Angeles County Sheriff LEE BACA, to use his due authority and properly
address the legal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE (#1824367).
Reconstructed Chronology:
- Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding, a request was forwarded by the court of Judge David Yaffe to the
Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding that the
proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Attorney Richard Fine for contempt.

- On March 4, 2009 Judge David Yaffe indeed pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced in the
Court Reporter's transcript. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe misled the Sheriff's Warrant Detail to
arrest Attorney Richard Fine at 11:05 am - albeit - with no written, valid, and effectual warrant at all.
- On March 4, 2009, at 11:05 am, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail arrested Richard Fine in open court, at the
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, albeit - with no warrant at all.
- On March 4, 2009 Judge Yaffe then left the courtroom, and likewise - left the Warrant Detail with no record
as an adequate legal foundation for the arrest. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a second, contradictory
record in the court file. The court file to this date does not reflect any sentencing or jailing at all. In fact, the
March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely omitted from the record!
- On March 4, 2009, at 12:32 pm, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail, having no record as foundation for the arrest and
jailing, recorded the arrest and booking of Richard Fine as if they had taken place on location, and pursuant to
the authority of the non-existent "San Pedro Municipal Court." Such records were a false and deliberately
misleading records, and out of compliance with the law. They had no valid court order or judgment as its
foundation. No such court had existed for almost a decade! The false and deliberately misleading booking
record is the main subject of instant petition.

- On March 4, 2009, at 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff's Department through an anonymous fax
transmission, unauthenticated, and with no cover sheet, from "Judicial Services". Such papers reflected yet a
third, again false and deliberately misleading set of retroactive records for the arrest and booking of Richard
Fine. Such records included invalid records: (a) The March 4, 2009 Remand Order and (b) the March 4, 2009
Judgment for contempt.

On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Lee Baca refused to respond to Attorney Richard Fine's
habeas corpus petition, and likewise - why Sheriff Lee Baca has refused to allow access to the California public
records, which are the arrest and booking record of Richard Fine.

Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest and booking records, and if such records are found failing
to conform with the fundamentals of the law - take corrective actions and immediately release Attorney Richard
Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles County justice system, with dignity of
the legal, civil, and human rights of
all.

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Jz12345@earthlink.net

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f"
stroked="f">

style='width:201pt;height:103.5pt'>

o:href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/S7GNMg5PW6I/AAAAAAAABRQ/sdbzbE4EqpM/S1600-
R/HRA%20Logo.jpg"/>

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights
violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County,
California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems
in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.


Frank, You signed on May 25, 2010.

Your signature has been
delivered to:

Sheriff Lee Baca, Los Angeles County, California

About


What have the
experts said over the past decade?

* "Innocent people remain in prison"

* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the
justice system that the Blue Panel Report

recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have
not produced any response that we know of...

LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)

* judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they
did not commit."

Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police
states and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are
convicted.

Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000)

Please see additional information and sign the petition:

FREE RICHARD FINE

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free...

Positions

1.
Richard Fine is held under false records - he must be immediately released
2.
Official reports show that thousands were falsely imprisoned as part of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) - they
must be immediately released.
3.
Review of the computerized records of the Sheriff's Department documented routine ongoing false
imprisonments - they must be stopped.
4.
US and/or international investigation must be instituted of the widespread public corruption in Los Angeles
County, California.

How large is the cause?

The innocent must be freed and the guilty made to recompense the victims
NOT THE TAXPAYER


The following was published on the web
www.4urjustice.com

Legal Associates | Everyone Deserves Equal Justice

We give Everyone Equal Access

Etched above the doors of the US Supreme Court are the words "Equal Justice Under Law."
It's one of the basic principles of democracy. Unfortunately, in reality we
receive about as much justice as we can afford.

The wealthiest ten percent can afford to have a lawyer on retainer, and are
accustomed to consulting with one before making decisions. On the other hand,
the bottom ten percent has access to public aid. But what about the rest of
us?
?

For most people, the idea of calling a lawyer before taking legal action or
making an important decision just isn't an option -- either because we think we
don't need one or because it would simply cost too much.

But there is a solution.

Legal Associates is
currently serving the legal needs of well over one million families for less than a dollar a day!

Content copyright 2009. Legal Associates. All rights reserved.

So I sent them an e-mail

From: Frank Gallagher
[mailto:frankly1@rogers.com]
Sent: October-22-09 2:31 PM

To: 'Jesse Magee'
Subject: RE: Legal Associates | Feldman, Kramer & Monico

Obviously any lawyer is in the business to cash in on the illegal administration and enforcement of purported to
be democratic governments that demands equality and they publicly proclaim it, but do not enforce it, whereas
private sector lawyers are set up to debate the non-debatable permitted by the obvious criminal frauds as you
people admit on your site as I am well aware that a person can buy or rent all the rights they can afford, with the
legal profession profiting from the woes of society that the legal system responsible to deal with it refuse to do
so.

The root of societys woes is the illegitimate legal system as CanLaw www.canlaw.com a Canadian national
Lawyer referral service states on their front page that the Law Society cannot be trusted as they protect their
members not the consumer.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829583/Can-Law-August-182008
I went on to read more published on their site that gave me the crazy idea that they would help me in exposing
the illegitimate legal system and they confirmed that I was a wild and crazy guy

It is time to change to a legitimate government legal system that protects every individuals equality democratic
rights internally as financed by the taxpayer to do so.

I am Frank Gallagher Director/Operations Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. www.cdfji.ca federally
incorporated to Solicit Victims of Crime for Class Action Suits against Government Personnel whereas the
majorities are victims 80 percent as you publish.

We are operating under company name 1 LIFE www.1life.cC and have the site being professionally developed
to sell membership and C-Note certificates for the express purpose to organize the majority providing them the
democratic voice they are entitled to with equality, an entity every individual of the majority desires but not a
probability unless equally supported to ensure the governments consistently enforce it.

The Law Society is going down and abrupt change is eminent, not having a leg to stand on in an informed
populace.

I am considering attempting to bring a Law Firm on side with us though seemingly a venture into futility but
nothing ventured, nothing gained.

I provide you the opportunity to scrutinize my sites for consideration and eagerly await your response, though
well aware of the depth of thought required to do an about face and the length of time it will take to study the
evidence to be coherent to the validity and firmness of the rationale that can only conclude with the collapse of
the present government legal systems once the public become informed.

Please acknowledge receipt and your intention whether or not to consider

Thank you

Frank


I published on my Scribd site and not long after
poof

their web site was gone

Not much longer
"Double Poof"


the document along with 250 others on my Scribd site were gone

www.Frank13.com
Fiduciary Responsibly Accountable Nefarious Kink
Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis

http://docket13.frank13.com
Illegal Aid Illegal

Law Society Act administered by the Attorney General Guardian of the Public Interest asserts we are all
entitled to competent legal representation consistent with the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General, however history, reality and all evidence irrefutably shows the Public Interest will be supported only if
consistent with the Law Society personnel personal interests and that of the Queen

http://www.scribd.com/doc/140515945/Attorney-General-the-Crown-Independent-Judiciary-the-Rest-Just-de-
Facto-Words

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only the
community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court
to present all the credible evidence available.


http://www.scribd.com/doc/71070946/Economic-Democracy-the-Satanic-Way
Inherent precedence must keep the slaves working for SS Sustainable Satanic growth a most onerous and
formidable challenge for our purported to be representative PRICE puppets


http://www.scribd.com/doc/148685029/When-the-Queen-is-Tried-and-Found-to-Be-Criminal-What-Are-Her-
Representatives

www.JUSTICE.of13.com

www.Watch.Frank13.com