-6

SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1650 Mission St.
Sue 400
DATE August 25 2014
San Francisco,
ugus
CA 94103-2479
TO: Angelina Pan Lee Reception:
415.558.6378
FROM: Julian Baales, Planning Department
Fax :
RE: PPA Case No. 2014.0969U for 1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
415.558.6409
Planning
Information:
415.558.6377
Please find the attached Preliminary Project Assessment (PPA) for the address listed
above. You may contact the staff contact, Doug Vu, at (415) 575-9120 or
Doug.Vu@sfgov.org , to answer any questions you may have, or to schedule a follow-
up meeting.
aleior Planner ,~Xan
SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment
1650 Mission St.
Suite 400
San Francisco,
Date: August 25, 2014
CA 94103-2479
Case No.: 2014.0969U
Reception:
Project Address: 1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
415.558.6378
Block/Lot: 4913/011 Fax :
Zoning: RM-1 (Residential-Mix ed, Low Density)
415.558.6409
3rd Street Alcohol Restricted Use District
Planning
40-X
Information:
Area Plan: Bayview Hunters Point Area Plan
415.558.6377
Project Sponsor: Angelina Pan Lee
(415) 385-2303
Staff Contact: Doug Vu -(415) 575-9120
Doug.Vu@sfgov.org
D I S C L AI M E R S :
Please be advised that this determination does not constitute an application for development with the
Planning Department. It also does not represent a complete review of the proposed project, a project
approval of any kind, or in any way supersede any required Planning Department approvals listed
below. The Planning Department may provide additional comments regarding the proposed project once
the required applications listed below are submitted. While some approvals are granted by the Planning
Department, some are at the discretion of other bodies, such as the Planning Commission or Historic
Preservation Commission. Additionally, it is likely that the project will require approvals from other City
agencies such as the Department of Building Inspection, Department of Public Works, Department of
Public Health, and others. The information included herein is based on plans and information provided
for this assessment and the Planning Code, General Plan, Planning Department policies, and
local/state/federal regulations as of the date of this document, all of which are subject to change.
PR O J E C T D E S C R I PT I O N :
The project site is located at the northeast corner of Jennings Street and Fitzgerald Avenue in the Citys
Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood. The approx imately 7,500 square foot (sf) lot currently contains an
approx imately 1,500 sf two-story, single-family residential building (built circa 1909), a one-story, two-car
garage, and open space. The proposed project would demolish the ex isting structures on the property
and construct a four-story, nine-unit building that would encompass approx imately 19,000 sf of floor
area. The new units would range from 1,000 sf to 2,700 sf in size, and the project also proposes nine
accessory parking spaces located in three ground-level garages. Two garages would be accessed via
separate entrances along Jennings Street, while one garage would be accessed via an entrance along
Fitzgerald Avenue.
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In order to begin formal environmental review, please submit an Environmental Evaluation
Application.
This review may be done in conjunction with the required approvals listed below, but must be completed
before any project approval may be granted. See page 2 of the current Fee Schedule for calculation of
environmental application fees. Note that until an approval application is submitted to the Current
Planning Division, only the proposed Project Description will be reviewed by the assigned
environmental planner. Below is a list of topic areas that would require additional study based on our
preliminary review of the project as it is proposed in the Preliminary Project Assessment (PPA) submittal
dated June 23, 2014.
1. Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE). The proposed project consists of demolition of a potential
historic resource (a building constructed 50 or more years ago). Therefore, the project is subject to the
Departments Historic Preservation review, which may include preparation of an Historic Resource
Evaluation (HRE) by a qualified professional who meets the Secretary of the Interiors Professional
Qualification Standards. The department will provide the project sponsor with a list of three
consultants from the Historic Resource Consultant Pool. Once the Environmental Evaluation
Application is submitted, please contact Tina Tam, Senior Preservation Planner, via email
(tina.tam@sfgov.org) for the list of three consultants. Upon selection of the historic resource
consultant, the scope of the Historic Resource Evaluation shall be prepared in consultation with
Department Preservation staff.
The Department recognizes that an Historical Resources Evaluation has already been completed for
the subject property by William Kostura, who is a pre-qualified historical resources consultant in the
Citys Historical Resources consultant pool. However, this does not preclude the possibility that
additional historical resources analysis may be required, given that this study was not prepared in
consultation with a Department preservation planner. Based on this, the project sponsor is
encouraged to contact Tina Tam at the email above to ensure that all requirements concerning
historical resources analysis are met.
2. Archeological Resources. Project implementation would entail soil-disturbing activities associated
with building construction, including excavation to support the to-be-determined foundation type.
Based on this, the project would require a Preliminary Archeological Review (PAR), which would be
conducted in-house by the Planning Department Archeologist. The PAR would determine what type
of soils disturbance/modification would result from the project, such as excavation, installation of
foundations, soils improvement, etc. Any available geotechnical report or Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment prepared for the project site would be reviewed as part of the archeological review for
this project. In addition, it would also be determined if the project site is in an area that is
archeologically sensitive. The result of this review would be provided in a memorandum to the
environmental planner assigned to the project. If it is found that the project has the potential to affect
an archeological resource, the PAR memorandum would identify any additional measures to be
1 William Kostura, Historical Evaluation of 1298 Fitzgerald Avenue, San Francisco, September 2013
SAN FRANCISCO
2
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
implemented. Such actions may include application of appropriate archeological mitigation measures
and/or requiring additional archeological studies as part of the environmental evaluation. If an
additional archeological study is required, it must be prepared by a qualified archeological
consultant. The qualified consultant must be selected from a list of three archeological consultants
from the Planning Departments archeological resources consultant file provided by the Planning
Department during the environmental review process. The Planning Department Archeologist will
be informed by the geotechnical study of the project sites subsurface geological conditions (see Item
11, Geology, below).
3. Transportation Study. Based on the PPA submittal, a transportation study is not anticipated.
However, an official determination will be made subsequent to submittal of the environmental
evaluation application. Planning Department staff does recommend that the project sponsor
consolidate garage access to one door and driveway, rather than three as currently proposed. The
recommended location for the driveway entrance is on Jennings Street in order to avoid potential
conflicts with a bus route on Fitzgerald Avenue. Staff also requests that plans submitted with the
EEA include street labels, indicate existing and proposed curb cuts and dimension, streetscape
improvements and locations of trash rooms and Class 1 bicycle parking spaces.
4. Hazardous Materials. The proposed project would involve demolition of existing structures on the
property (a two-story residence and a one-story garage) and construction of a four-story residential
building containing nine dwelling units. Although the extent of excavation is unknown at this time, it
is likely to exceed 50 cubic yards since the new building would span the majority of the
approximately 7,500-sf parcel. Moreover, the parcel adjacent to the project site at 1373 Egbert Avenue
was formerly zoned for industrial uses and may contain subsurface contamination. Based on these
factors, the project may be subject to Article 22A of the Health Code, also known as the Maher
Ordinance. The Maher Ordinance, which is administered and overseen by the Department of Public
Health (DPH), requires the project sponsor to retain the services of a qualified professional to prepare
a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) that meets the requirements of Health Code Section
22.A.6. The Phase I would determine the potential for site contamination and level of exposure risk
associated with the project. Based on that information, soil and/or groundwater sampling and
analysis, as well as remediation of any site contamination, may be required. These steps are required
to be completed prior to the issuance of any building permit.
DPH requires that projects subject to the Maher Ordinance complete a Maher Application, available
at: http://www.sfdph.org/dph/EH/HazWaste/hazWasteSiteMitigation.asp . Fees for DPH review and
oversight of projects subject to the ordinance would apply. Please refer to DPHs fee schedule,
available at: http://www.sfdph.org/dph/EH/Fees.asp#haz . Please provide additional information
regarding the proposed excavation as well as a copy of the Phase I ESA with the Environmental
Evaluation Application.
2 San Francisco Planning Department. Consultant Resources, Archeological Review Consultant Pool. Available online at:
http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=1886
SAN FRANCISCO
3
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
5. Air Quality (AQ) Analysis. The proposed projects nine dwelling units is below the Bay Area Air
Quality Management Districts (BAAQMD) construction and operation screening levels for criteria
air pollutants. 3 However, detailed information related to cubic yards of excavation should be
provided as part of the EEA.
In addition, project-related demolition, excavation, grading and other construction activities may
cause wind-blown dust that could contribute particulate matter into the local atmosphere. To reduce
construction dust impacts, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved the Construction Dust
Control Ordinance (Ordinance 176-08, effective July 30, 2008) with the intent of reducing the quantity
of dust generated during site preparation, demolition, and construction work in order to protect the
health of the general public and of onsite workers, minimize public nuisance complaints, and to
avoid orders to stop work by the Department of Building Inspection (DBI). Pursuant to the
Construction Dust Ordinance, the proposed project would be required to comply with applicable
dust control requirements outlined in the ordinance.
In addition, San Francisco has partnered with the BAAQMD to inventory and assess air pollution and
exposures from mobile, stationary, and area sources within San Francisco. Areas with poor air
quality, termed the "Air Pollutant Exposure Zone," were identified. Land use projects within the Air
Pollutant Exposure Zone require special consideration to determine whether the projects activities
would expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations. Although the proposed
project is not within an Air Pollutant Exposure Zone, improvement measures may be recommended
for consideration by City decision makers, such as equipment exhaust measures during construction
and enhanced ventilation measures as part of building design. Enhanced ventilation measures
would be the same as those required for projects subject to Article 38 of the Health Code. 4
If the project would generate new sources of toxic air contaminants including, but not limited to
diesel generators or boilers, or any other stationary sources, the project would result in toxic air
contaminants that may affect both on-site and off-site sensitive receptors. Detailed information
related to any proposed stationary sources shall be provided with the EEA.
6. Greenhouse Gases. The 2010 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines provide CEQA thresholds of significance
for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. On August 12, 2010, the San Francisco Planning Department
submitted to the BAAQMD a draft of the City and County of San Franciscos Strategies to Address
Greenhouse Gas Emissions. This document presents a comprehensive assessment of policies,
programs and ordinances that collectively represent San Franciscos Qualified Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Strategy. The BAAQMD reviewed San Franciscos GHG reduction strategy and concluded
that the strategy meets the criteria for a Qualified GHG Reduction Strategy as outlined in BAAQMDs
CEQA Guidelines (2010). 5 Therefore, projects that are consistent with San Franciscos GHG reduction
strategy would result in less-than-significant GHG emissions. In order to facilitate a determination of
compliance with San Franciscos GHG reduction strategy, the Planning Department has prepared a
3 BAAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, May 2011, Chapter 3.
4 Refer to http://www.sfdph.orgldph/eh/Air/defaulLasp for more information.
5 San Franciscos Strategies to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions and BAAQMDs letter are available online at:
http://www.sfplanning.org/index.aspx?page=1570.
SAN FRANCISCO
4
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
Greenhouse Gas Analysis Compliance Checklist. The project sponsor will be required to submit a
completed checklist, which can be found at this link http:I/www.sf -
121anning.org/index.aspx?12age=1886, as part ofthe environmental review process.
7. Naturally Occurring Asbestos. Based upon mapping conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) the project site may be underlain by serpentine rock. 6 Project construction activities could
release serpentinite into the atmosphere. Serpentinite commonly contains naturally occurring
chrysotile asbestos (NOA) or tremolite-actinolite,a fibrous mineral that can be hazardous to human
health ifairborne emissions are inhaled. In the absence ofproper controls, NOA could become
airborne during excavation and handling ofexcavated materials. On-site workers and the public
could be exposed to airborne asbestos unless appropriate control measures are implemented. To
address health concerns from exposure to NOA, the California Air Resources Board enacted an
Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and
Surface Mining Operations in July 2001. The requirements established by the Asbestos ATCM are
contained in California Code ofRegulations (CCR) Title 17,Section 93105,7 and are enforced by the
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The proposed project would be required to
comply with the requirements ofthe Asbestos ATCM, which include measures to control fugitive
dust from construction activities.
8. Wind Study. The proposed project would involve construction ofa building approximately 38-feet 2-
inches in height. The height ofthe proposed building is not expected to cause adverse ground-level
wind speeds resulting from the project. Therefore a wind analysis study would not be required.
9. Stormwater. The proposed project would result in a ground surface disturbance ofover 5,000 sfin
area and is therefore subject to San Franciscos stormwater management requirements as outlined in
the Stormwater Management Ordinance and the corresponding SFPUC Stormwater Design
Guidelines (Guidelines). Projects that trigger the stormwater management requirements must
prepare ofa Stormwater Control Plan demonstrating project adherence to the performance measures
outlined in the Guidelines including: (a) reduction in total volume and peak flow rate ofstormwater for
areas in combined sewer systems OR (b) stormwater treatment for areas in separate sewer systems.
Responsibility for review and approval ofthe Stormwater Control Plan is with the SFPUC,
Wastewater Enterprise, Urban Watershed Management Program. Without SFPUC approval ofa
Stormwater Control Plan, no site or building permits can be issued. The Guidelines also require a
signed maintenance agreement to ensure proper care ofthe necessary stormwater controls. The
projects environmental evaluation should generally assess how and where the implementation of
necessary stormwater controls would reduce the potential negative impacts ofstormwater runoff. To
view the Stormwater Management Ordinance, the Stormwater Design Guidelines, or download
instructions for the Stormwater Control Plan,go to http://sfwater.org/sdg.
6 Planning Department,GIS Layer,"Areas Affected by Serpentine Rocks." Created February 25,2010 from United States
Geological Survey and San Francisco Department ofPublic Health data.
7 California Air Resources Board,Regulatory Advisory, Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction, Grading,
Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, July 29,2002.
SAN FRANCISCO
5
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
10. Tree Removal. The Department of Public Works Code Section 8.02-8.11 requires disclosure and
protection of landmark, significant, and street trees located on private and public property. Any tree
identified in this Disclosure Statement must be shown on the site plans with size of the trunk
diameter, tree height, and accurate canopy drip line. Please submit the Tree Planting and Protection
Checklist with the EEA and ensure trees are appropriately shown on site plans. 8
11. Geology. The project sponsor is required to prepare a geotechnical investigation to identify the
primary geotechnical concerns associated with the proposed project and the site. The geotechnical
investigation would identify hazards and recommend minimization measures for potential issues
regarding, but not limited to, soil preparation and foundation design. The geotechnical investigation
should be submitted with the EEA, and will also assist in the archaeological review of the project (see
Archaeological Resources section above).
12. Notification of a Project Receiving Environmental Review. Depending on the level of
environmental review, a notice may be required to be sent to occupants of the project site and
properties adjacent to the project site, as well as owners of properties within 300 feet of the project
site at the initiation of the environmental review process. Please be prepared to provide these
mailing labels upon request during the environmental review process.
If the additional analysis outlined above indicates that the project would not have a significant effect on
the environment, the project may qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption, in which case the
Planning Department would issue a Certificate of Determination of Exemption from Environmental
Review.
If the additional analysis performed after submittal of the Environmental Evaluation Application
indicates that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, Planning Department staff
would prepare an Initial Study to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is needed. If
the Department determines that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment, the
Department would issue a Preliminary Negative Declaration. If the Department finds that the project
would have significant impacts that can be reduced to a less-than-significant level by mitigation measures
agreed to by the project sponsor, then the Department would issue a Preliminary Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
If the Initial Study process indicates that the project would result in a significant impact that cannot be
mitigated to a less than significant level, an EIR will be required to be prepared by an environmental
consultant from the Planning Departments environmental consultant pool. The Planning Department
would provide more detail to the project sponsor regarding the EIR process should this level of
environmental review be required. Environmental Evaluation Applications are available in the Planning
Department lobby at 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, at the Planning Information Center at 1660 Mission
Street, and online at www.sfplanning.org .
8 Available online at http://www.sf-planning.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=8321.
SAN FRANCISCO
6
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment Case No. 2014.0969U
1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVALS:
The project requires the following Planning Department approvals. These approvals may be reviewed in
conjunction with the required environmental review, but may not be granted until after the required
environmental review is completed.
1. A Discretionary Review Application is required for the proposed demolition of the existing single-
family dwelling, which must be approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Planning Code
Section 317.
2. A Building Permit Application is required for the demolition of the existing buildings on the subject
property.
3. A Building Permit Application is required for the proposed new construction on the subject
property.
Building Permit applications are available at the Department of Building Inspections at 1660 Mission
Street.
NEIGHBORHOOD NOTIFICATIONS AND PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Project Sponsors are encouraged to conduct public outreach with the surrounding community and
neighborhood groups early in the development process. Additionally, many approvals require a public
hearing with an associated neighborhood notification. Differing levels of neighborhood notification are
mandatory for some or all of the reviews and approvals listed above.
This project is required to conduct a Pre-application meeting with surrounding neighbors and registered
neighborhood groups before a development application may be filed with the Planning Department. The
Pre-application packet, which includes instructions and template forms, is available at
www.sfplanning.org under the "Permits & Zoning" tab. All registered neighborhood group mailing lists
are available online at www.sfplanning.org under the "Resource Center" tab.
Although the Department will notify the Bayview Hunters Point Citizens Advisory Committee (BVHP
CAC) of the project upon filing of a building permit application, the project sponsor should inform the
BVHP CAC of the required Pre-application meeting. The BVHP CAC contact is Bill Barnes, Office of the
City Administrator, and can be contacted at Bill.Barnes@sfgov.org or ( 4 1 5 ) 5 5 4 - 4 1 4 8 .
PRELIMINARY PROJECT COMMENTS:
The following comments address specific Planning Code and other general issues that may significantly
impact the proposed project.
1. Rear Yard. Section 1 3 4 requires that the last ten feet of building depth be limited to a height of 3 0 feet
when the rear yard requirement is reduced from the standard 4 5 % lot depth. Your project includes a
reduced 25 % rear yard so please ensure your project meets this provision by including a dimension in
your formal application, i.e. building permit plans. Alternatively, please consider the re-orientation
SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
of the project to Fitzgerald Avenue and the preliminary design comments made below regarding the
site design, open space and massing.
2. Open Space - Residential. Section 135 requires 100 sf of private open space, or 133 sf of commonly
accessible open space for each dwelling unit. Additionally, any such open spaces, including balconies
must meet the dimensional requirements of Subsections (f) and (g). Please include dimensions and
area totals by dwelling unit in your building permit application to confirm this requirement is
satisfied.
3. Permitted Obstructions. Section 136(c)(2)(D) states the maximum width of a balcony at the line
parallel to and at a distance of three feet from the property line shall be nine feet. Please revise your
plans to ensure the proposed balconies at the third floor meet this requirement.
4. Street Trees. Planning Code Section 138.1 requires one street tree for every 20 feet of frontage for new
construction. Please include the required five trees along Jennings Street and four trees along
Fitzgerald Avenue on your building permit plans.
5. Standards for Bird Safe Buildings. Planning Code Section 139 outlines bird-safe standards for new
construction to reduce bird mortality from circumstances that are known to pose a high risk to birds
and are considered to be bird hazards. Feature-related hazards may create increased risk to birds
and need to be mitigated. Any feature-related hazards, such as free-standing glass walls, wind
barriers, or balconies must have broken glazed segments 24 square feet or smaller in size. Please
review the standards and indicate the method of treatment(s) to comply with the requirements where
applicable in your building permit plans.
6. Moderation of Building Fronts. Section 144.1 requires the stepping of the building along the front lot
line, or along the front of the building where it is set back from such lot line, by at least one of the
following methods:
a. Variation of the upper limit of the front elevation of the building, at intervals of not more
than 35 feet, by a minimum of two feet in height. Not less than 30 percent of the width of
such elevation shall be varied in this way from the height of the remainder of such
elevation. For purposes of this provision, the term "front elevation" shall mean the front
wall and other portions of the building to a significant depth on the lot.
b. Variations of the depth of the front building wall from the front lot line, at intervals of
not more than 35 feet, by a minimum of two feet in depth. Not less than 30 percent of the
width of such front building wall shall be varied in this way from the depth of the
remainder of such wall. For purposes of this provision, the term "front building wall"
shall mean such wall exclusive of all projections and other obstructions permitted by
Section 136 of the Code for required front setback areas.
Please revise your plans to meet this requirement. Alternatively, please consider the re-orientation of
the project to Fitzgerald Avenue and the preliminary design comments made below regarding the
site design, open space and massing.
SAN FRANCISCO
8
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
7. Curb Cuts. Planning Code Section 155(1) states that driveways crossing sidewalks shall be no wider
than necessary for ingress and egress, and shall be arranged so as to minimize the width and
frequency of curb cuts, to maximize the number and size of on-street parking spaces available to the
public, and to minimize conflicts with pedestrian and transit movements. Please revise your plans
and reduce the number of curb cuts and driveways to comply with this requirement. Alternatively,
please consider the re-orientation of the project to Fitzgerald Avenue and the preliminary design
comments made below regarding the site design, open space and massing.
8. Bicycle Parking. Planning Code Section 155.5 requires one Class 1 bicycle parking space per dwelling
unit, and the standards for Class 1 spaces are described under Planning Code Section 155.1(b). Please
identify the location of the nine required spaces in your building permit plans.
9. Stormwater. Projects that disturb 5,000 square feet or more of the ground surface must comply with
the Stormwater Design Guidelines and submit a Stormwater Control Plan to the SFPUC for review.
To view the Guidelines and download instructions for preparing a Stormwater Control Plan, go to
http://stormwater.sfwater.org/. Applicants may contact stormwaterreview@sfwater.org for
assistance.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN COMMENTS:
This project is located in the Bayview Hunters Point neighborhood and is therefore guided by the
Bayview Hunters Point (BVHP) Area Plan. Jennings Street leads to a more one story industrial area
while Fitzgerald Avenue, towards and beyond Ingalls Street is predominantly two-story residential. The
following comments address preliminary design issues that may significantly impact the proposed
project:
1. Site Design, Open Space, and Massing. Policy 5.1 of the BVHP Area Plan states: "Preserve and
enhance the existing character of residential neighborhoods." Thus, new construction should relate to
existing bulk, orientation, modulation, etc. of the surrounding residential buildings. Therefore, the
Planning Department recommends that the project sponsors significantly reconsider its massing on
the site by suggesting that the project orient its primary face along Fitzgerald Avenue that is a
residential street, offer a rear yard, put the parking below grade or at the rear interior corner of the
property, offer residential units that are accessible from the public realm at the street, and reduce the
parking access to a single maximum 10 wide entry point along Jennings Street. The Planning
Department supports the proposed 4 1 h level setback as shown.
2. Street Frontage. The residential units at the ground floor should either be elevated or include a
significant landscape or porch buffer pursuant to the Residential Ground Floor Guidelines. This puts
the project more in line with the existing character and pattern of the neighborhood.
3. Parking. The Planning Department encourages providing the required bicycle parking at the ground
floor.
SAN FRANCISCO
9
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
Preliminary Project Assessment

Case No. 2014.0969U

1298 Fitzgerald Avenue
4. Architecture. The Planning Department recommends that the project significantly improve the
quality and character of the proposed architecture. The ground floor should be attractive to and
engaged with the public realm and the upper level facades should have more depth, material quality,
texture and relief. The project should also consider features that would celebrate the corner.
PRELIMINARY PROJECT ASSESSMENT EXPIRATION:
This Preliminary Project Assessment is valid for a period of 18 months. An Environmental Evaluation,
Conditional Use Authorization, or Building Permit Application, as listed above, must be submitted no
later than February 2 5 , 2 0 1 6 . Otherwise, this determination is considered expired and a new Preliminary
Project Assessment is required. Such applications and plans must be generally consistent with those
found in this Preliminary Project Assessment.
Enclosure: Neighborhood Group Mailing List
cc: Doug Vu, Current Planning
Tania Sheyner, Environmental Planning
Mat Snyder, Citywide Planning and Analysis
Maia Small, Design Review
Jonas lonin, Planning Commission Secretary
Jerry Robbins, MTA
Jerry Sanguinetti, DPW
SAN FRANCISCO
10
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
FIRST LAST TITLE ORGANIZATION
Brent Plater 0 Wild Equity Institute
Bruce Murphy President Eureka Valley Trails/Art Network
David Gilliam President Porlola Place Homeowners Association
Jason Castleberry Chair Exeter Street Bayxiew Triangle
Lena Miller CEO Hunters Point Family
Linda Burton 0 Anna Waden Library
Malia Cohen Supervisor, District 10 Board of Supervisors
Marsha Pendergrass President Bayoiew Hill Neighborhood Association
Mary Ratclrif Editor SF Bay View Newspaper
Maverick Madison President Shatter Avenue Community Club
Michael Herrman Chair India Basin Neighborhood Association
Patsy Tito Executive Director Samoan Development Centre
Paul Gawlowski Father St. Paul of the Shipwreck Church
Tiffany Bohee Executive Director Office of Community Investment and
Infrastructure, City and County of San
Francisco
Timothy Ho Community Organizer Bayvlew Hunters Point Citizens Advisory
Committee
Willie Kennedy BVHP Project Area Southeast Community Facility
Committee
Jonathan G Protect MILK Pool/Equality SF
ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE EMAIL NEIGHBORHOOD OF INTEREST
474 Valencia Street Suite 295 San Francisco CA 94103 0 bpIaIeriwildequity.org Bayxiew, Bernal Heights, Glen Parts, Golden Gate
Parts, Lakeshore, Mission, Dater Sunset, Presidio,
Seaclift, Twin Peaks
170 Yukon Street San Francisco CA 94114-2306 415-863-0207 Iuckylaowai sfomail.com Bayxiew, Castro/Upper Market
P.O. Boo 24181 San Francisco CA 94124-0181 415-467-8567 0 Bayview
55 Exeter Street San Francisco CA 94124 415-728-1509 1castIeberryCMymcasf.orq Bayxiew, Visitacion Valley
1800 Oakdale Avenue San Francisco CA 94124 415-822-9995 lenahunterspointfamily.org Bar-yiew
5075 3rd Street San Francisco CA 94124 415-715-4100 0 Bayview
1 Dr. Carlton B Goodlett Place, San Francisco CA 94102-4699 415-554-7670 Malia.Cvhensfgov.org ; Bayyiew, Potrero Hill, Visilacivn Valley
Room #244 Yoyo.Chanistgoo.org:
Andrea Bruss'sfgov org;
cohenstaff,stqov urn
803 Meade Avenue San Francisco CA 94124 415-468-9168 MurshaPenqmarl.com Bayview
4917 Third Street San Francisco CA 94124 415-671-0789 editorsfbuyview.com Bayoiew, Potrero Hill, Visitacion Valley
1629 Shatter Avenue San Francisco CA 94124 415-822-1069 misterfinqers04ryyahoo.com Bayview
702 Earl Street San Francisco CA 94124 415-643-1376 mhamman'igc.org , Bayoiew
infoindiabasin oro
2055 Sunnydale Avenue #100 San Francisco CA 94134-2611 0 0 Bayview, South of Market
1122 Jamestown Aveue San Francisco CA 94124 415-467-0660 spswofflcru,ryaol.com Bayolew
1 South Van Ness Avenue, 51h San Francisco CA 94103 0 tiffany.bohee'srgov.org ; Bayolew, Downtown /Civic Center, South of Market,
Floor mike.grtsso'sfgov.org ; Visitacion Valley
courtney pash(8/sfqov.orq
1 Dr. Curfton B 000cttett Place. San Francisco CA 94102 415-554-4928 tim hosfgov.org Bayoiew
Room #362
1800 Oakdale Avenue Ste. B,San Francisco CA 94124 415-821-1534 0 Bayview
Room 8
P.O. Boo 24297 San Francisco CA 94124 0 0 Bayxiew