1AC

History = epochal
Management is bad
The politics of standing reserve destroys
Modern technological thought is bad
Dominant social imaginary institutionalizes
PLAN
Be open to things
New relations with ocean is prereq to ethics
Now is key time to reimagine relations with
Ontology first
Intrinsic value to nature
contemporary relations are fundamentally
1NC
No reason to relate to ocean
squo solves relations
No capital B "Being"
Technology can be good
Aff doesn't solve
Warming is inevitable- tech solutions are key
Model of questioning = detruction
Ethical obligation to save lives
Ontology first allows violence to occur
Impossible to determine ontology
Either ocean is object or don't solve
Utopian thought bad
2AC
Humanistic view of resource and nature asks the question of what is nature
who least imposes onto other- not a neutral thing
Questions aren't neutral
AFF kritiks ideas of technological thought
Sartre says only certain beings can access being
doesnt exclude tech, it's question of how we relate to tech
No static idea of what is being- reason why their Levinas stuff is bad
Not a utopian idea
2NC/1NR
Must prove they change current action
tech exists- only thing that solves for emissions-
warming is inevitable- only tech solves
policy/tech action k2 solving for issues like the
Impossible to solve for being with a big b
Ontology first is essentalist
They're a utopia, you don't solve
1AR 2NC
We don't reject technology
Tech thought is bad
tech thought in squo is being used in bad way
Tech may be used for good or community
2AR
1NC
1AC's presents itself as community about
Artificial connections destroy community and
Alt = deconstruction of Dasein- truly ethical
2AC
Their reading of f/w links them to Community K
Alteration of policy key
Their idea of community is unjustified- only the
Be open to all ideas of what the other is
Permutation
2NC/1NR
Communities are based on conditioanl hospitality
Framework is a prior question
Derrida discusses static meaning
Static communities are bad
Kritik is a solvency deficit to the 1AC- the 1AC upholds
Their ev talks about conditional hospitality based on meaning
Turns instrumentalization
Every risk of a link is a DA to the permutation
Dasein is exclusive-turns case
Utopian thought = scapegoating
No perm to deconstruction
Question of sequencing, some groups are only viewed as good
Their community is exclusive
Alt deconstructs Dasein community
Only deconstruction asks the ontological question
No evidential contradriction- no double turn- not a voting issue-
1AR
No link- they have to prove that the aff's use of Dasein is bad
Deconstruction changes instrumentalization
Derrida contradicts framework
deconstruction allows alt voices to be heard
they try to create a perfect community but it's not
f/w/ contradicts the Derrida flow
releasement allows truth to be heard
Evidential contradiction is offense
Perm solves 100% because it deconstructs the 1AC
2NC 2AR
1NC
Exploration = physical exploration
USFG is national government
Resolved
Aff's ontological inquiry isn't exploration
Must prove better than squo
language indeterminate err neg
Everything is effectuallly topical
Limits
Dialogue key to education
Stasis point key
Impact is development of critical thinking
2AC 2NC/1NR
Plan focus is key for effective
Their idea of USFG is arbitrary Vital access to education
C/I: Defend critical interp of resolution
Interp is pessimistic
C/I aff must defend topical version of the topic Competing interps are good
It's a question of whether language engages Limits key to stasis point
Instrumentalization destroys ideas of being and how Policy good
Perm do both-produces a new meaning of topic T version of aff
be prepared to answer Heidegger Limits explosion
Aff key to innovation policy k2 education
Derrida impact turns their decision making Debate is good
T is precondition to the aff
T version of the debate shows
includes discussions of
1AR 2NC
They double turn themselves
Deconstruction is DA to the flow
Policy denies justice
squo good guaranees limits
challenge preconditions
f/w destroys meaning of debate
Shaw provides orientation
Limits are bad for justice
Aff is the topical version of the
They force a static ontology-
2AR
1NC 2AC
2NC/1NR 1AR
2NC 2AR