Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Robert Barsotti, Arkema Inc., 900 1st Avenue, King of Prussia, PA, 19406, USA
K1C (MPA*m1/2)
outstanding toughening (K1C=1.82 MPA* m1/2 with 10% 1.5
loading). These worm-like micelles are very asymmetric,
1
10-50 nm in width but several hundred nm in length. An
experimental grade with even better compatibility to the 0.5
epoxy matrix gives spherical micelles and a good but not
outstanding toughening (K1C=1.54 MPA* m1/2 with 10% 0
180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250
loading). (Figure 2) DGEBA EEW
Im pact Testing
3
500 nm 500 nm
Energy Absorbed (J)
2.5
2
Figure 2. AFM Tapping modes images of 10% loading of 1.5
M52N (left) and an experimental grade (right) in a DICY
cured DGEBA epoxy. 1
0.5
A study at Lehigh University has recently shown that the
0
toughening of epoxies with MAM block copolymers
Neat M52N- 10% CTBN-10%
increases as the epoxy equivalent weight (EEW) of the
DGEBA backbone of the epoxy increases. This study
showed that M52N in a dicy system exhibited superior
fracture toughness to different micron sized reactive Figure 4. High speed impact energy of toughened epoxies.
rubber toughening agents (CTBN X13 or X8 with 82%
butadiene) for both low and high EEW resins. (Figure 3) The differences in toughening between competitive
technologies are even more significant in a lower Tg
High speed impact testing (CEAST Fractovis Dart Drop)
polyetheramine cured epoxy. In this system with a more
was also carried out to see the ability of a modified epoxy
PMMA friendly crosslinking agent, the greatest
to absorb impact energy. CTBN was compared to block
improvements in toughening are seen with either an SBM
copolymer grade M52N in the same DICY system as
(E21) or a traditional MAM (M53).
tested above (10% loading of the modifier). Again, block
copolymers show superior ability in impact testing as
Table 2. Comparison of toughening with Nanostrength
compared to the neat resin and micron sized rubber
modifiers, absorbing more than twice the energy at failure block copolymers and CTBN in a polyetheramine cured
as shown in figure 4. DGEBA epoxy (K1c in MPA* m1/2; G1C in J/m2; Tg in °C )
0.4
Tg Fluidity at 120°C
0.2
0.0
Neat
M51
The enhanced fracture toughness and impact performance Table 3: Toughening of high Tg epoxy systems (with
with minimal sacrifice of thermal properties using block block copolymers. (K1c in MPA* m1/2; G1C in J/m2; Tg in
copolymers modified epoxies makes them potentially °C )
valuable in several types of end use applications.
Application specific testing has been carried out to M-DEA M53
confirm the value of MAM block copolymers in
Loading Level K1C G1C Tg
advanced epoxy composites and epoxy adhesives.
0% 0.74 258 170
The use of block copolymers in RTM6, an epoxy resin/ 10.00% 1.01 530 168
hardener system used for resin transfer molding in the E41
aerospace industry, was studied in collaboration with Dr. 10.00% 1.08 418 177
Fabris at Bayreuth University. (Figure 6)
Phenolic Novolac E41
Loading Level K1C G1C Tg
0% 0.63 152 175
10.00% 0.86 282 180
DDS M52N
Loading Level K1C G1C Tg
0% 0.9 283 229
10.00% 1.08 428 227
Nanostrength-10%
25 43 1950 (2005) 1950.
CTBN-10%
6. R. Baghere, R. A. Pearson, J. Materials Sci., 31
20
3945 (1996).
15
0
DICY Jeffamine D230 DETA
Conclusion
Acrylic block copolymers have been used to successfully
toughen epoxies. Due to its block copolymer structure and
unique nanostructured morphologies, Nanostrength block
copolymers provide exceptional toughening to epoxies