Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
=s
w
d p=dx and P
m=qu
3
s
d p=dx. Very mild
streamwise pressure gradients exist in the computational domain
for the boundary layer of the constrained wake design. The value
of C
pw
in the present ow varies between 0 and 0.025, compared
to the much larger range of variation of 3:6 6 C
pw
6 1 on the
suction side of the T106 turbine blade, which was imposed by Stie-
ger (2002) on his transitional at-plate boundary layer experiment
with passing wakes. Weak favorable pressure gradient exists from
the inlet to Re
h
150 due to the introduced free-stream passing
wakes, and also exists near the exit due to the imposed outlet
boundary condition. Over a signicant portion of the computa-
tional domain from Re
h
150 to 900 the streamwise pressure gra-
dient for the boundary layer with constrained passing wakes is
even much weaker and can therefore be considered as nominally
zero. The pressure gradient near the inlet of the boundary layer
with un-constrained passing wakes is slightly larger than that
shown in Fig. 2 due to the impingement of the passing wakes di-
rectly onto the at-plate at Re
h
80, see Fig. 32 in Wu et al. (1999).
Skin-friction coefcient C
f
is shown in Fig. 3. The region in
which C
f
strictly follows the Blasius prole is signicant, and the
location at which C
f
attains a minimum is relevant. By the word
strictly we mean the deviation is no more than one or two per-
cent. We consider the streamwise range in which C
f
strictly follows
the Blasius solution as one in which disturbance level inside the
boundary layer may be regarded as innitesimal, which in turn
permits the application of linear stability analysis. We also con-
sider the minimum C
f
station as the statistical averaged location
of breakdown events, which in turn divides the transitional region
into the early and late stages. It is evident that perturbations inside
the boundary layer produced by the constrained inlet wakes up-
stream of Re
h
180 can be considered as innitesimal, but the
same can not be said about those in the un-constrained wake de-
sign. C
f
in the boundary layer with the un-constrained inlet wakes
deviates from Blasius right from the inlet, and disturbance level in-
side that boundary layer should be considered as nite. The aver-
aged breakdown locations as indicated by the x-coordinate
where C
f
attains a minimum value are found at Re
h
250 and
260 for the un-constrained and constrained boundary layers,
respectively. In both boundary layers at Re
h
800, skin friction
coefcient has achieved its fully turbulent level as indicated by
good comparison with the experimental data of Murlis et al.
(1982) and Adrian et al. (2000).
Boundary layer integral parameters are presented in Fig. 4. The
onset of the fully turbulent region Re
h
800 is found at x 3:05
0 200 400 600 800 1000
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
Fig. 2. Mean streamwise pressure gradient as a function of Reh in the boundary
layer with constrained passing wakes. Solid line: wall static pressure coefcient
Cpw; dotted line: b
y0:1
; dashed line: 20P
y0:1
.
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
Fig. 3. Mean skin friction coefcient C
f
as a function of Reh. Solid line: boundary
layer with constrained passing wakes; dotted line: boundary layer with un-
constrained passing wakes; dashed line: Blasius solution; solid circle: Murlis et al.
(1982); open circle: Purtell et al. (1981); diamond: Adrian et al. (2000).
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Fig. 4. Mean boundary layer integral parameters as a function of Reh. Solid line:
boundary layer with un-constrained passing wakes; dashed line: boundary layer
with constrained passing wakes; symbols: corresponding Blasius solutions. open
circle: boundary layer thickness d multiplied by 100; solid circle: displacement
thickness d
as a function of y
=h shown in Fig. 5 is an
excellent indicator of boundary layer transitional state. It is seen
that H in the boundary layer with un-constrained inlet wakes de-
parts very soon after the inlet from the Blasius solution at around
Re
h
170, where as the constrained setup follows the solution
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Fig. 11. Reynolds shear stresses as a function of y=d at Reh 900. Solid line:
boundary layer with constrained passing wakes; dotted line: boundary layer with
un-constrained passing wakes; dashed line: ZPGFPBL of Wu and Moin (2008);
circle: Honkan and Andreopoulos (1997) at Reh 2790; diamond: DeGraaff and
Eaton (2000) at Reh 1430; plus: Spalart (1988) at Reh 670.
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Fig. 12. Reynolds shear stresses as a function of y