Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
JimMurtagh
Introduction
BridgewaterMIddleschoolisapublicschoolforstudentsingrades5and6.TheschoolislocatedinaWaterloo
countyinamixedsuburban/ruralsetting.Thetownhasstrongagriculturalroots,butoverthepasttwodecades,
therehasbeenalargeinfluxofnewresidents.Theschoolisconsideredahighperformingschoolwithinthe
State.
StudentsatBridgewatergenerallycomefromwelleducated,financiallystable,whitefamilies.Theschooliswell
staffed,exceptforanoticeableabsenceofatechnologyspecialist.Classsizesaverage23students.
Technologyexpendituresarepartoftheannualtownbudget,andwhileitvariesfromyeartoyear,
approximately$500,000isallottedfortheentiredistrict.Allclassroomsintheschoolhaveinteractive
whiteboards,desktopscomputers,andaccesstoacartoflaptops.Documentcameras,iPads,student
responsedevicesandothertechnologyarepresentinvaryingamounts.Allfacultyareprovidedwithlaptops.
BroadbandInternetandwirelessaccessisavailablethroughoutthebuilding.
Thefollowingtablesprovideaprofileofthetownandtheschool.
TownProfile
Population(2011) 22,383
LandArea 47squaremiles
MedianAge(2011) 37years
MedianHouseholdIncome(2011) $99,233
EducationalAttainment(2011) 54%withBachelorsormore
Race/Ethnicity(2011) 91.2%White
MedianHousePrice(2009) $400,000
PovertyRate(2010) 2.8%
SchoolProfile
NumberofSchoolsinDistrict 7(includingonehighschool)
BridgewaterMIddleSchoolGradeLevels Grades5and6
BridgewaterMIddleSchoolStudents(2009) 544
NumberofSchoolDaysPerYear 180
BridgewatersTechnologyBudget $65,000(annual,butvarieswithbudgetapprovalvia
townreferendum,estimatefor2009)
1
SchoolStaff*
FullTimeEquivalentCountofSchoolStaff(200910) Employees
GeneralEducation:TeachersandInstructors 41.05
SpecialEducation:TeachersandInstructors 5.4
SpecialEducation:ParaprofessionalInstructionalAssistants 16.0
Library/MediaSpecialistsand/orAssistants 2.0
Administrators,Coordinators,andDepartmentChairs 2.5
InstructionalSpecialistsWhoSupportTeachers(e.g.,subjectarea
specialists)
0.0
Counselors,SocialWorkers,andSchoolPsychologists 3.5
SchoolNurses 1.0
OtherStaffProvidingNonInstructionalServicesandSupport 15.2
StudentRace/Ethnicity*
Race/Ethnicity Number Percent
AmericanIndian 0 0
AsianAmerican 24 4.4
Black 4 0.7
Hispanic 32 5.9
White 484 89
TotalMinority 60 11.0
IndicatorsofEducationalNeed*
NeedIndicator NumberinSchool PercentinSchool
StudentsEligibleforFree/ReducedPrice
Meals
38 7.0
K12StudentsWhoAreNotFluentinEnglish 4 0.7
StudentswithDisabilities 68 12
StudentsIdentifiedasGiftedand/orTalented 4 .07
KindergartenStudentswhoAttended NA NA
2
Preschool,NurserySchoolorHeadstart
*ThisprofilewasproducedbytheStateDepartmentofEducationinaccordancewithGeneralStatutes10220(c)usingdataand
narrativesprovidedbytheschooldistrictortestingservicesforthe20092010academicyear.
MaturityBenchmarks
ThefollowingmaterialisanextractfromPeterSibleysandChipKimballsworkTheTechnologyUsePlan
Primer.Inthisdocument,SibleyandKimballdescribethestagesforadoptionanduseoftechnologybydividing
theprocessintofourdiscretebenchmarkstages.
1. EmergentStage
2. IslandsStage
3. IntegratedStage
4. IntelligentStage
Twofactors,resourceavailabilityandbehavioralchanges,arerequirementsforadvancementwithineach
stage.Thebenchmarkisatoolthatschooldistrictscanusetoperformaselfassessmentonhoweffectively
theyareintegratingtechnology,andthentodeterminewhereadditionalsupportofresourcesarenecessary.
Note:thefollowingdescriptionsofthefourstagesaredirectyfromSibley&Kimball
TheEmergentSystemsStageischaracterizedby:
Lackofformalsupportwhenusingcomputingtechnologyforinstruction
Noformalplans,policiesorproceduresexisttoensuretheefficientandappropriateacquisitionor
useoftechnologythroughouttheInstitution
ComputersareusedsporadicallythroughouttheInstitution
Institutionwidecoordinationtoensuregradelevelandprogramlevelaccessisabsent
Formalsupportforteachertrainingisminimal
TheIslandsofTechnologyStageischaracterizedby:
Regularuseofcomputersatoneormoregradelevelsandprogramlevelsateachschoolwithinthe
Institutiononaregularlyscheduledbasis
Formalplans,policiesandproceduresexisttofacilitatetheoptimaluseoftechnologyinboth
instructionalandadministrativeareasthroughouttheInstitution
Institutionsponsoredandschoolsponsoredtrainingisavailable
TechnologyhasbudgetaryvisibilityattheInstitutionallevelandschool/programlevel
Theinstructionaldeliverysystemissomewhatdependentontechnology
TheIntegratedSystemsStageischaracterizedby:
3
Regularplannedaccessforstudentstotechnologyasameansofinstructionandafocusof
instruction
Teachers'systemsalsosupportadministrativefunctions,suchasgrading,attendanceand
electronicmail
TechnologyhasahighbudgetaryvisibilityattheInstitutionalandschool/programlevel
Comprehensiveplans,policiesandproceduresforinstructionalandadministrativeuseoftechnology
arereviewedandrevisedregularly
TheInstitutionisanadvocateoftechnologytrainingforallpersonnel
Theinstructionaldeliverysystemisverydependentontechnology
TheIntelligentSystemsStageischaracterizedby:
Studentaccesstotechnologyasanindispensablecomponentofinstruction
Everycurriculumisaugmentedbyintelligentlearningsystems
Administrativefunctionsareautomated,integratedandpaperless
Student,teachersandstakeholdershaveaccesstoappropriatesystemsfromhome
TechnologyisoneofthethreehighestexpendituresofInstitutionfunds
TechnologyplanningisanintegralpartofInstitutionplanning
Thesystematicadoptionofnewtechnologiesisongoing
Technologyadvocatesateachorganizationalunitassistintheintroductionofthenewtechnologies
Instructionalandadministrativepersonnelareknowledgeableintheuseoftechnology
MaturityModel
TheMaturityModelBenchmarkImpactTablepresentsatabularsnapshotofyourdistrictstechnology
integrationstage.Therearefivecategorieswhichallowuserstofocusonparticularobjectives,suchas
curriculumorconnectivity.Byexaminingasinglecategory,theycanhelpyoufilteryourorganizations
technologyneeds.
Thefivefiltersare:
AdministrativeFilter
Policy,Planning,BudgetandAdministrativeInformationcriteria
ImpactsAdministratorsandStaffthemost
CurricularFilter
CurriculumIntegration,Assessment,TeacherUseandStudentUsecriteria
ImpactsTeachersandStudentsthemost
SupportFilter
StakeholderInvolvement,AdministrativeSupport,Training,andTechnicalInfrastructureSupportcriteria
ImpactsTeachersandSupportStaffthemost.
4
ConnectivityFilter
LocalAreaNetworking,DistrictAreaNetworking,InternetAccessandCommunicationSystemscriteria
Impactsallsegmentsoftheinstitution
InnovationFilter
NewTechnologiesandComprehensiveTechnologiescriteria
ImpactsTeachersandStudentsthemost
BridgewaterAnalysis
ThefollowingtablesrepresentthematuritybenchmarksforBridgewaterMiddleSchool.Eachorganizational
filterisexaminedseparately.Thefirstchartineachsectionemploysdifferentcolorsforthebenchmarkstages
togivethereaderaclearindicationofwheretheschoolliesonthatfilter,fromaquickglance.Asthe
benchmarksadvancefromlefttoright,thetechnologicalmaturitylevelincreases.Thesecondtableprovides
therationalandincludesdetailsofwhytheschoolwasidentifiedasbeingataspecificbenchmark.
AdministrativeFilter
Summary
Bridgewaterisontheupperendoftheadministrativefilter.Thedistrictconsistentlyinvestsintechnologybut
needstoinvolvemorestakeholdersinthedecisionmakingprocess.
6
CurricularFilter
Summary
Bridgewaterisontheupperendofthecurricularfilterbutlagsinassessmentandstudentuseofcloud
technologies.Thedistrictstechnologyplandoesidentifycloudcomputingasatargetfornextyear.
8
SupportFilter
Summary
Bridgewaterstrugglesthemostwiththesupportfilter.Thedistrictseemstodelivertechnologytousersand
thenletsthemfigureitoutontheirown.Trainingisanotherareawherethedistrictprovidestoofew
opportunitiesforteachersandstaff.
10
ConnectivityFilter
Summary
Bridgewaterhasbeeninvestingintheirinfrastructureforfiveyearsandtheirbenchmarksreflectthisprogress.
Theyneedtousetheirresourcesinmoreimaginativeways,andtheyneedtoaddressanagingwireless
infrastructure.
12
InnovationFilter
Summary
Bridgewaterhasatremendousamountoftechnologicalresources,andstaffandteacherswillingtouseit.Lack
oftimetoexperimentandexplorethetechnologyisfrequentlycitedastheprimaryreasonwhythetechnologyis
notusedtoitsfullpotential.Additionalsupportfromaintegrationspecialistwouldbenefitthedistrict.
CategoryAnalysis
Thefollowinggraphsshowthatthebehavioralversusresource/infrastructurekeysofthematurityindexare
workinginconcertwitheachother.Thebehavioralmeasureisslightlyfurtheralongintheintelligentgrouping,
butbothareshowingpositiveresults.Bridgewaterisclearlysuccessfulintheirtechnologyintegration,though
thereisroomforimprovement.
13
Conclusion
BridgewaterMiddleSchoolisahighperformingschoolwithawellequippedinfrastructureandadiverseand
abundantamountoftechnology.Theschoolisonthemidsideandapproachingtheupperlimitsofthe
benchmarkscaleinmanyareas.Teachers,staffandstudentsallusetechnologydailytoperformtheirtasks.
Whilethereisnoformalwrittentechnologyguidelinesintheschool,theschoolhaslearnedtoadoptand
managetheirresourceseffectively.Bridgewaterneedstoadvancestudentusebeyondbasicwordprocessing
andInternetsearches.Teacherswouldbenefitgreatlyfromanintegrationspecialistwhocouldeducateand
supportthemonmorechallengingusesoftechnology.Theschoolwouldbenefitfrommoreinvolvementfrom
staffonthedirectionoffuturetechnologyinitiatives,andthecurriculumshouldbeexaminedtoseewhere
instructioncouldbeimprovedbyincorporatingappropriatetechnology.
Resources:
1. CERCTownProfile2012.Downloadedfrom:www.cerc.com
2. CTStateDept.ofEducation,StrategicSchoolProfile200910.Downloadedfrom:www.sdeportal.ct.gov
3. Sibley,P.&Kimball,C.,TechnologyUsePlanPrimer.Teacherprovidedreference
14