Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
V IR
s
R
p
(1)
where I
ph
is the photo current (A); I
0
is the diode saturation current
(A); R
s
is the series resistance (U); R
p
is the shunt/parallel resistance
(U); V
t
nKT/qis thediode thermal voltage(V); nis thediodeideality
factor; T is the cell temperature (K); K is Boltzmanns constant
(1.381 10
23
J/K); q is the electron charge (1.602 10
19
C);
Based on the modules specication, the ve key parameters
I
ph
, I
0
, V
t
, R
s
and R
p
under standard test conditions (STC) can be
computed using analytical or numerical solution. After that the
parameters under general operating conditions can easily be
obtained by considering the effects of solar radiation and solar
cell temperature. Therefore, the power output from a PV array is
[46]:
P
A
I
A
V
A
N
p
I
ph
V
A
N
p
I
0
V
A
_
e
1
V
t
_
V
A
Ns
I
A
Np
Rs
_
1
_
N
p
R
p
V
A
_
V
A
N
s
I
A
N
p
R
s
_
2
where N
S
is the number of PV cells in series for the studied array
and N
p
is the number of PV module in parallel. This equation can be
expanded to any number of solar cells in series (N
S
), and thus it is
not restricted to one module. If there are N
M
modules connected in
series, and there are N
C
solar cells in series in each module, then
N
S
N
M
N
C
.
The maximumpower point tracking function is usually included
in the inverter. Therefore, based on the above equation, the
completed PeV curve and the maximum power value can be
obtained.
3.2. Wind turbine
The wind turbine Proven 11 fromKingspan Renewables Ltd. was
employed in this study. Table 2 presents the main specications of
the wind turbine.
Different types of WTs may output different power although
they have the same rated power and they are installed at the same
site due to their difference in the power curve characteristics.
Therefore, the model used to describe the performance should be
different. Through a comprehensive literature review, it was found
that the following equation was mostly used to describe the power
output of a WT if its power curve is not available:
P
WT
v
_
_
P
R
v
k
v
k
c
v
k
R
v
k
c
v
c
v v
R
P
R
v
R
v v
F
0 v < v
c
and v > v
R
(3)
where P
R
is the rated electrical power; v
c
is the cut-in wind speed;
v
R
is the rated wind speed; v
F
is the cut-off wind speed; k is the
Weibull shape parameter, which depends on the distribution of
wind speed.
To estimate wind energy yield, some losses should be consid-
ered as well such as downtime losses, array losses, soiling losses
factor and other losses [47]. Therefore, a new factor about wind
turbine power output probability is introduced using the following
equation.
p
WT
1p
downtime
_
1p
array
__
1p
soiling
_
1p
other
(4)
Table 1
Key specications of the Suntech STP200-18/Ub-1 PV panel.
Characteristics Value
Open circuit voltage (V
oc
) 33.4 V
Optimum operating voltage (V
mp
) 26.2 V
Short circuit current (I
sc
) 8.12 A
Optimum operating current (I
mp
) 7.63 A
Maximum power at STC (P
max
) 200 Wp
Table 2
Key specications of the wind turbine.
Rated power 5.2 kW (1 min average at 11 m/s)
Peak power 6.1 kW
Reference annual energy 8949 kWh (5 m/s at 10 m hub height)
Output voltage available 48 V or 300 V DC
Cut in speed 3.5 m/s
Cut off speed 13.5 m/s
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 9
3.3. Pumped hydro storage subsystem
The pumped hydro storage is the major energy storage systemin
this study. The PHS subsystem consists of a separated pump/motor
unit and a turbine/generator unit. The water pumping coefcient
(m
3
/kWh) and turbine generating coefcient (kWh/m
3
) are two key
parameters of the PHS subsystem. The model for the PHS has been
examined in Refs. [42,48,49].
3.3.1. Pump/motor unit
The water ow rate sucked from the lower reservoir by the
pumps is expressed in Eq. (6). The power source is directly supplied
by the hybrid renewable energy generator. This ow rate can be
compared to the charging rate of battery.
q
p
t
h
p
,P
h/p
t
rgh
c
p
,P
h/p
t (5)
where P
h/p
t is the charging power from the hybrid generator to
the pump (W); h is the elevating head (m); g is the acceleration due
to gravity (9.8 m/s
2
); r is the density of water (1000 kg/m
3
); h
p
is
the overall pumping efciency; and c
p
is the water pumping coef-
cient of the pump/motor unit (m
3
/kWh);
3.3.2. Turbine/generator unit
In the case of energy decits, water is drawn from the upper
reservoir in order to operate the hydro turbines. The released po-
wer from the turbine/generator unit is:
P
t
t h
t
rgh,q
t
t c
t
,q
t
t (6)
where h
t
is the overall efciency of the turbine/generator unit; q
t
(t)
is the water volumetric ow rate input into the turbine (m
3
/s); c
t
is
the turbine generating coefcient (kWh/m
3
).
3.3.3. Upper reservoir (UR)
The water quantity stored in the UR should be adequate to meet
the islands power demand in case of no power supply for several
consecutive days [50]. The water level in the UR can be considered
as the state of charge (SOC) of the storage tank. The gravitational
potential energy stored in the UR should be:
E
c
n
day
,E
load
h
t
,r,V,g,h
3:6 10
6
(7)
where E
c
is the energy storage capacity of a water reservoir (kWh);
n
day
is the number of days of autonomy; E
load
is the daily load en-
ergy consumed; V is the volume or storage capacity of the water
reservoir (m
3
). Therefore, the required volume of the UR can be
obtained.
The total quantity of water stored in the UR at any time t is
determined by:
Q
UR
t Q
UR
t 11 a q
p
t q
t
t (8)
where a is the evaporation and leakage loss. For simplication, this
study has ignored these losses in the above equations. In addition,
the water quantity of the upper reservoir is subject to the following
constraints:
Q
UR
min
Q
UR
Q
URmax
V (9)
The minimum storage of the UR Q
URmin
is usually set at zero. In
Ref. [51], a lower limit of water quantity was kept to maintain pump
press, to preserve efciency, and to support emergency reserve.
Accordingtopractical engineeringexperience [44], the efciency
of the water pump (6.6 kW) and turbine (5.0 kW) at their best
operating point is 72% and 64%, respectively. Besides, in the litera-
ture [52], the rated efciency of the micro-water pump (10 kW) and
turbine (7.5 kW) was calculated at 68% and 39%, respectively. In the
present study, the hydro turbine and pump used in a real engi-
neering project inLaos [41] were employed. The pumpefciency is a
littlelowat 50%, andtheefciencyof theturbineis 65%. Theavailable
water head was assumed at 60 min this study. Therefore, the overall
energy storage system efciency is 32.6%, and thus the corre-
sponding water pumping coefcient and the turbine generating
coefcient is 3.06 m
3
/kWh and 0.106 kWh/m
3
, respectively. The
pump and turbine are of variable speed, which allows the exploi-
tation of small amounts of excess energy produced by the PV arrays
andwindturbines, andalsoallows coveringsmall net loadbya small
quantity of water, to improve the overall energy system efciency.
Therefore, based on the above models, the required minimum
UR size can be obtained after 8760 simulations, if the capacities of
PV and wind turbine are inputted.
3.4. Energy balance model for power generation system and load
consumption
The energy balance model of the hybrid solar-wind power
generation system at time t is expressed as:
P
PV
t,f
PV
P
WT
t,p
WT
,h
inv
P
h/l
t P
h/p
t P
h/d
t
(10)
where h
inv
is the inverter efciency, which is the ratio of the in-
verters AC output power and DC input power; f
PV
is the PV derating
factor, accounting for the factors as aging, soiling, wiring losses,
shading, and so on; p
WT
is the power output probability of a WT;
P
h/l
t is the hybrid system power output directly delivered to the
load; P
h/p
t is the power transferredtothe pumps for charging UR;
and P
h/d
t is the excess/wasted energy delivered to a dump load.
The load demand is mainly covered by two sources, so the en-
ergy balance mode of load consumption is:
P
l
t P
h/l
t P
t
t (11)
where P
h/l
t is the power directly delivered from the hybrid RE
generator; P
t
(t)is the power produced by the turbineegenerator
unit. When the net load is negative or zero, no supplementary
energy is required and thus P
t
(t) is zero; when the net load is
positive, the pumpeturbine set will be started and P
t
(t) will be
positive.
3.5. Load demand prole
Currently, this island is powered by a diesel generator and a
small PV plant (19.8 kWp). However, the actual load information on
this island is not measured. Besides, the power demand will rise
due to the increasing number of residents in the near future.
Therefore, in this study, the daily base load on this island was
estimated at 200 kWh/day, and was then synthesized in HOMER
software by adding randomness for different days and months, to
create a quite reasonable prole for this island. The daily and yearly
load proles are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3.
3.6. Solar energy and wind energy resource
The meteorological data on this island was collected by the
Hong Kong Observatory, including solar radiation, wind speed and
ambient temperature. The solar radiation and wind speed
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 10
distribution are presented in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. Their hourly
weather data was synchronized throughout 2009.
4. A case study
The mathematical model proposed above was used for
designing such a hybrid system for a research project on a remote
island in Hong Kong for supplying power to the some 100 local
people. Dozens of cases were simulated with the wind capacity
ranging from 0 to 20.8 kW in steps of 5.2 kW (the rated power of
one WT) and PV size from 70 to 150 kWp in steps of 5 kWp. No
energy decit was allowed for all the cases, and the initial water in
the UR was assumed to be the maximum capacity. Finally, one
representative case, which is technically feasible in terms of power
supply reliability, was selected to examine its operation perfor-
mance with respect to power production, efciency, energy utili-
zation, and CO
2
emission reduction. The main components of the
system in this case are PV arrays (110 kWp), WT (2 units, 10.4 kW),
energy storage system (UR: 5106 m
3
) and a converter. The selected
case may be not the optimal scenario among all these cases froman
economic perspective or from a techno-operational perspective
[54], but certainly it can meet power supply reliability. The system
optimization will be carried out in our future work based multiple
objectives.
4.1. Monthly average energy production from PV arrays and WTs
The daily average WT and PV power generation for each month
of the year are presented in Fig. 6. It can be noted that solar power
0 6 12 18 24
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
L
o
a
d
(
k
W
)
Hour
Fig. 2. Typical daily load demand prole.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
H
o
u
r
l
y
l
o
a
d
(
k
W
)
Month
Fig. 3. Yearly load prole.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Month
D
a
i
l
y
s
o
l
a
r
r
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
k
W
h
/
m
2
d
a
y
)
Fig. 4. The monthly solar radiation distribution [53].
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
(
%
)
Wind speed (m/s)
Actual data
Fit curve: Weibull distribution
Fig. 5. Wind speed frequency distribution at the involved island [53].
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 11
production dominates the power supply, contributing almost 83%
of the total production during the simulated year. In addition, the
PV output is extremely high in the summer months. This is a
favorable characteristic since electricity demand is also high in
summer because of high cooling load. Therefore, the PV size has a
somewhat higher share than that of the wind turbines in this
hybrid system. Similar ndings were seen in the previous studies
[8,55], but it may depend on the share of RE. In contrast, the wind
energy contribution was found to be signicant from Jan to March
and from Oct to Dec. Moreover, the solar and wind output distri-
bution in Fig. 6 shows good monthly complementary characteristic
between each other.
4.2. Energy ow and water ow
Fig. 7 summarizes the daily average electricity ow and water
ow of the case study. The red (in web version) lines and blue (in
web version) lines represent the electrical energy ow and water
ow, respectively. It can be found that 83% of the renewable energy
output is contributed by the PV and 17% by the WTs. Among the
total useful electricity (456.6 kWh/day), about 31.4% is directly
consumed by the end-users, and 38% is transferred to the pump/
motor unit for lifting water to UR for storage. However, almost 30%
(139.4 kWh/day) of the total output is an excess to requirements
which has to be transferred to a dump load as spilled energy.
4.3. Hourly energy balance
An example of the hourly simulation result during one typical
week is illustrated in Fig. 8 to analyze the energy balance of the
proposed system. It is obvious that the available PV and WT output
is rst used to cover the local power demand, and accordingly
support the pumping units to increase water storage in the UR
when RE output exceeds the load. When energy decit exists, the
hydro/turbine units are launched, releasing water from the upper
reservoir to produce electricity and thus meet the net load.
4.4. UR charging and discharging power
The duration curve of the UR charging and discharging power is
presented in Fig. 9, which illustrates that the maximum surplus
power from the hybrid renewable energy generator available for
charging is 83.7 kW. Therefore a single variable speed pump or a
combination of several pumps rated at 85 kW, at least, should be
used for the proposed system. On the other hand, the maximum
power decit is 18.4 kW, and hence a single variable speed turbine
or a combination of several turbines rated at 20 kW should be
employed to cover the net load. The combination of several pumps
or turbines can improve their efciencies and utilization ratios.
On the other hand, the integration of the charging power curve
over time (i.e. the area under the duration curve) is the total input
energy to the pump/motor unit, which is calculated as 63,426 kWh
at the simulated year. Similarly, the integration of the discharging
power curve over time is the total output energy from the hydro
turbine/generator unit, which is calculated as 20,654 kWh. There-
fore, the overall efciency of the PHS system, i.e. the ratio of the
area under discharging curve to the area under charging curve, is
calculated as 32.6%. This value is well consistent with the mathe-
matical model presented in Section 3.3.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
5
10
15
20
25
P
o
w
e
r
(
k
W
)
Month
PV
Wind
Load
Fig. 6. Daily mean renewable energy power production and load demand.
AC bus DC bus
Pump
Turbine
UR LR
Inverter
PV array
Dump
Load
Load
Electricity
Water
537.2 kWh 456.6 kWh
1
4
3
.
4
k
W
h
173.8kWh
56.6kWh
139.4kWh
200kWh
532 m
3
533 m
3
110 kWp
5106 m
3
85 kW
20 kW
200 kWh
Wind turbine
10.4 kW
91.7kWh
445.5kWh
Fig. 7. Summary of daily average electricity ow and water ow.
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 12
4.5. State of charge of the UR
The results in Fig. 10 illustrate the hourly energy stored in the
UR during the simulated year. This water level of UR can be
considered as the state of charge (SOC) of the energy storage
system, similar to the SOC of a battery bank. It can be seen from
the rainbow prole that the SOC was relatively high. For the yearly
distribution, the values between 90% and 100% (red in web version
color) accounts for 76% of the time, indicating the UR is full or
nearly full charged for a quite long time. Meanwhile, a consider-
able part of energy is wasted because of limited storage capacity.
For the daily distribution, the storage system is usually charged in
the afternoon and discharges power in the late night and earlier
morning.
High depth of discharge occurs in May and July, which results
from the high cooling load in these months. The minimum water
stored in the UR (0.921 m
3
) appeared at 7:00am on 26th May.
Therefore, to ensure a sustainable and continuous power supply,
there must be a sufcient power generator and UR capacity in those
two months.
4.6. Pollutant emission
A purely solar and wind energy supply systemdoes not emit any
pollutants during its lifecycle. However, if this island was to be
powered by diesel generators, substantial emissions will be
26/6 27/6 28/6 29/6 30/6 1/7 2/7
0
20
40
60
80
Load PV WT
Charging Discharging UR level
Date
P
o
w
e
r
(
k
W
)
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
U
R
l
e
v
e
l
(
m
3
)
Fig. 8. Hourly energy balance of the proposed system.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
H
o
u
r
s
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
(
h
)
Power (kW)
Charging power
Discharging power
Fig. 9. Duration curve of UR charging and discharging power.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
6
12
18
24
D
a
y
o
f
Y
e
a
r
Month
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%
Fig. 10. Rainbow prole of URs state of charge during the simulated year.
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 13
released into the environment, which are summarized in Table 3. It
can be seen that the 100% renewable energy system can avoid
about 85 tons emissions per year, including 82 tons CO
2
, which will
improve the health of the local inhabitants and reduce their med-
ical bills. It is clear that investment in RE is imperative to mitigate
both energy shortages and environmental pollution.
4.7. Loss of power supply probability analysis
If a very small energy decit is acceptable, a much smaller UR
can be achieved. As illustrated in Fig. 11, the loss of power supply
probability (LPSP) is 0.4% when the UR size decreases to 4000 m
3
,
leaving only 0.2% (157 kWh) of total load not met during the year. If
the UR size could be further reduced to 2000 m
3
, the annual LPSP
and unmet load are only 2.56% and 1077 kWh, respectively. This
situation only allows some peak power not to be met under the
conditions of extreme bad weather. Therefore, if a secondary en-
ergy storage system is employed, the pumped storage capacity
could be greatly reduced and power supply reliability can be
improved simultaneously. Fromthe point of our view, introducing a
small battery bank (or supercapacitor) is of vital importance in the
micro-pumped storage based renewable power supply system. The
battery is only used to cover the peak load in May and July and
greatly reduces the UR size in the combined energy storage system.
To better balance the energy ow between supply and demand, a
small battery bank, has already been studied in Refs. [39,44,45],
which will be considered for this case study project.
5. Conclusions
This study proposed a pumped hydro storage serving for off-grid
hybrid RE systems. The mathematical model and simulation
program were developed. The complementary characteristics be-
tween solar and wind energy output were presented in this study,
which can reduce the storage capacity. The results reveal that the
PV has a relatively higher share of energy production than that of
the wind turbines since the solar energy resource matches better
with the load pattern. The duration curve of charging and dis-
charging power was discussed, which can be used to calculate the
overall energy efciency of the energy storage subsystem. The case
study shows that if a lower LPSP is acceptable, the UR capacity can
be greatly reduced. The study also indicates that utilizing a small
battery bank to cover the peak load could greatly reduce the UR
capacity and improve power supply reliability. This paper demon-
strates that technically the PHS based renewable energy system is
an ideal solution for 100% energy autonomy in remote commu-
nities. Employing the three technologies in a complementary
manner, the hybrid system could generate and store electricity at
low cost and with minimal complexity.
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper is nancially supported by
China Light & Power (CLP) Holding Limited (Hong Kong) and The
Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
References
[1] WHO. The energy access situation in developing countries: a review focusing
on the least developed countries and Sub-Saharan Africa. New York and
Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP); 2009.
[2] IEA. World energy outlook. 2nd ed. International Energy Agency Publications;
2006.
[3] Tong W. Wind power generation and wind turbine design. Southampton,
Boston: WIT Press; 2010.
[4] Ma T, Yang H, Lu L. Performance evaluation of a stand-alone photovoltaic
system on an isolated island in Hong Kong. Appl Energy 2013;112:663e72.
[5] IEA. Renewable energies for remote areas and islands; April, 2012.
[6] Elhadidy MA, Shaahid SM. Parametric study of hybrid (wind solar diesel)
power generating systems. Renew Energy 2000;21:129e39.
[7] Kanase-Patil AB, Saini RP, Sharma MP. Sizing of integrated renewable energy
system based on load proles and reliability index for the state of Uttarakhand
in India. Renew Energy 2011;36:2809e21.
[8] Zhou W, Lou C, Li Z, Lu L, Yang H. Current status of research on optimum sizing
of stand-alone hybrid solarewind power generation systems. Appl Energy
2010;87:380e9.
[9] Bagul AD, Salameh ZM, Borowy B. Sizing of a stand-alone hybrid wind-
photovoltaic system using a three-event probability density approximation.
Sol Energy 1996;56:323e35.
[10] Bernal-Agustn JL, Dufo-Lpez R. Simulation and optimization of stand-alone
hybrid renewable energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009;13:
2111e8.
[11] Himri Y, BoudgheneStambouli A, Draoui B, Himri S. Techno-economical studyof
hybrid power systemfor a remote village in Algeria. Energy 2008;33:1128e36.
[12] Kaldellis JK, Kondili E, Filios A. Sizing a hybrid wind-diesel stand-alone system
on the basis of minimum long-term electricity production cost. Appl Energy
2006;83:1384e403.
[13] Sopian K, Zaharim A, Ali Y, Nopiah ZM, Razak JA, Muhammad NS. Optimal
operational strategy for hybrid renewable energy system using genetic al-
gorithms. WSEAS Trans Math 2008;7:130e40.
[14] Borowy BS, Salameh ZM. Optimum photovoltaic array size for a hybrid wind/
PV system. Energy Convers IEEE Trans 1994;9:482e8.
[15] Deshmukh MK, Deshmukh SS. Modeling of hybrid renewable energy systems.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008;12:235e49.
[16] Ould Bilal B, Sambou V, Ndiaye PA, Kb CMF, Ndongo M. Optimal design of a
hybrid solarewind-battery system using the minimization of the annualized
cost system and the minimization of the loss of power supply probability
(LPSP). Renew Energy 2010;35:2388e90.
[17] Diaf S, Diaf D, Belhamel M, Haddadi M, Louche A. A methodology for optimal
sizing of autonomous hybridPV/windsystem. Energy Policy 2007;35:5708e18.
[18] Dihrab SS, Sopian K. Electricity generation of hybrid PV/wind systems in Iraq.
Renew Energy 2010;35:1303e7.
[19] Ghoddami H, Delghavi MB, Yazdani A. An integrated wind-photovoltaic-
battery system with reduced power-electronic interface and fast control for
grid-tied and off-grid applications. Renew Energy 2012;45:128e37.
[20] Sreeraj ES, Chatterjee K, Bandyopadhyay S. Design of isolated renewable
hybrid power systems. Sol Energy 2010;84:1124e36.
Table 3
Pollutants emissions avoided from the proposed RE system.
Pollutant Emissions (kg/year)
Carbon dioxide (CO
2
) 82,652
Carbon monoxide (CO) 204
Unburned hydrocarbons (CH
x
) 23
Particulate matter (PM) 15
Sulfur dioxide (SO
2
) 166
Nitrogen oxides (NO
x
) 1821
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0
1
2
3
4
5
LPSP
unmet load percentage
UR capacity (m
3
)
L
P
S
P
(
%
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
u
n
m
e
t
l
o
a
d
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
(
%
)
Fig. 11. LPSP & unmet load fraction vs. UR capacity.
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 14
[21] Chen H, Cong TN, Yang W, Tan C, Li Y, Ding Y. Progress in electrical energy
storage system: a critical review. Prog Nat Sci 2009;19:291e312.
[22] Daim TU, Li X, Kim J, Simms S. Evaluation of energy storage technologies for
integration with renewable electricity: quantifying expert opinions. Environ
Innov Soc Trans June 2012;3:29e49.
[23] European Commission. The future role and challenges of energy storage. In:
DG ENER Work Pap; 2013.
[24] Kumari JS, Babu CS. Mathematical modeling and simulation of photovoltaic cell
using Matlab-Simulink environment. Int J Electr Comput Eng 2012;2:26e34.
[25] Lindley D. The energy storage problem. Nature 2010;463:18e20.
[26] Saini RP. Large-scale energy storage systems. Indian Institute of Technology
Roorkee; 2011.
[27] Aihara R, Yokoyama A, Nomiyama F, Kosugi N. Impact of operational sched-
uling of pumped storage power plant considering excess energy and reduc-
tion of fuel cost on power supply reliability in a power system with a large
penetration of photovoltaic generations. In: power System Technology
(POWERCON), 2010 International Conference on; 2010. pp. 1e6.
[28] Aihara R, Yokoyama A, Nomiyama F, Kosugi N. Optimal operation scheduling
of pumped storage hydro power plant in power system with a large pene-
tration of photovoltaic generation using genetic algorithm. In: PowerTech,
2011 IEEE Trondheim; 2011. pp. 1e8.
[29] Ruisheng L, Bingxin W, Xianwei L, Fengquan Z, Yanbin L. Design of wind-solar
and pumped-storage hybrid power supply system. In: Computer Science and
Information Technology (ICCSIT), 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference on;
2010. pp. 402e5.
[30] Ren Y, Li Y. Simulation and optimization of hybrid wind-solar-pumped-
storage power system. In: Electric Information and Control Engineering
(ICEICE), 2011 International Conference on; 2011. pp. 729e33.
[31] Yan R, Zheng Yuan, Li Yan Pin, Huang Jian Jun, Zhang D. Modelling and
optimization of hybrid wind/PV pumped-storage power system. Appl Mech
Mater 2011;48e49.
[32] Ma T, Yang H, Lu L. Feasibility study and economic analysis of pumped hydro
storage and battery storage for a renewable energy powered island. Energy
Convers Manage 2014;79:387e97.
[33] Padrn S, Medina JF, Rodrguez A. Analysis of a pumped storage system to
increase the penetration level of renewable energy in isolated power systems.
Gran Canaria: a case study. Energy 2011;36:6753e62.
[34] Katsaprakakis DA, Christakis DG, Pavlopoylos K, Stamataki S, Dimitrelou I,
Stefanakis I, et al. Introduction of a wind powered pumped storage system in
the isolated insular power system of KarpathoseKasos. Appl Energy
September 2012;97:38e48.
[35] Tuohy A, OMalley M. Pumped storage in systems with very high wind
penetration. Energy Policy 2011;39:1965e74.
[36] Caralis G, Papantonis D, Zervos A. The role of pumped storage systems to-
wards the large scale wind integration in the Greek power supply system.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16:2558e65.
[37] Varkani AK, Daraeepour A, Monsef H. A new self-scheduling strategy for in-
tegrated operation of wind and pumped-storage power plants in power
markets. Appl Energy 2011;88:5002e12.
[38] Crettanand N. Small storage and pumped storage plants in Switzerland. Int
Water Power Dam Constr 2012;64:22e4.
[39] Manolakos D, Papadakis G, Papantonis D, Kyritsis S. A stand-alone photovol-
taic power system for remote villages using pumped water energy storage.
Energy 2004;29:57e69.
[40] Manolakos D, Papadakis G, Papantonis D, Kyritsis S. A simulation-optimisation
programme for designing hybrid energy systems for supplying electricity and
fresh water through desalination to remote areas: case study: the Merssini
village, Donoussa island, Aegean Sea, Greece. Energy 2001;26:679e704.
[41] Compilation and analysis of information on existing rural electrication and
renewable energy programmes in the Province of Oudomxay, Lao PDR (nal
report). Lao PDR: SUNLABOB RURAL ENERGY SYSTEMS LTD; October 2007.
[42] Li Y, Yang M, Zhao L, Wang F. The research of wind-light complementary
based on pumped storage power system. Adv Mater Res 2012;354e355:
1132e6.
[43] Connolly D, Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Pican E, Leahy M. The technical and eco-
nomic implications of integrating uctuating renewable energy using energy
storage. Renew Energy 2012;43:47e60.
[44] Papadakis G, Manolakos D, Papantonis D, Kyritsis S. A hybrid renewable en-
ergy system for supplying electricity and fresh water trough desalination to
remote places. In: Mediterranean Conference on Renewable Energy Sources
for Water Production, Santorini, Greece, 10-12 June 1996. p. 265e70.
[45] Kaldellis JK, Kapsali M, Kondili E, Zarakis D. Design of an integrated PV-based
pumped hydro and battery storage system including desalination aspects for
the Island of Tilos. In: International Conference on CLEAN ELECTRICAL PO-
WER, Alghero, Sardinia, Italy; 2013.
[46] Ma T, Yang H, Lu L. Development of a model to simulate the performance
characteristics of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules/strings/arrays. Sol
Energy 2014;100:31e41.
[47] Bagiorgas H, Mihalakakou G, Rehman S, Al-Hadhrami L. Offshore wind speed
and wind power characteristics for ten locations in Aegean and Ionian Seas.
J Earth Syst Sci 2012;121:975e87.
[48] Schoppe C. Wind and pumped-hydro power storage-determining optimal
commitment policies with knowledge gradient non-parametric estimation.
Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton
University; 2010. p. 128.
[49] Tao M, Chengzhi L, Lin L, Hongxing Y. Study on stand-alone hybrid solar
pumped storage systems. In: 11th International Conference on Sustainable
Energy Technologies (Set-2012), Vancouver, Canada, September 2-5, 2012.
[50] Standalone photovoltaic systems: a handbook of recommended design
practices. Sandia National Laboratories; 1995.
[51] Mougharbel I, Shehab Z, Georges S. Simulation of a hybrid renewable energy
system in rural regions. In: IECON 2012-38th Annual Conference on IEEE In-
dustrial Electronics Society; 2012. pp. 1150e5.
[52] Junhui Z, Graves K, Caisheng W, Gene L, Chih-Ping Y. A hybrid electric/hydro
storage solution for standalone photovoltaic applications in remote areas. In:
Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2012 IEEE; 2012. pp. 1e6.
[53] APEC. APEC energy overview 2012; 2013. p. 259.
[54] stergaard PA. Reviewing optimisation criteria for energy systems analyses of
renewable energy integration. Energy 2009;34:1236e45.
[55] Lund H. Large-scale integration of optimal combinations of PV, wind and wave
power into the electricity supply. Renew Energy 2006;31:503e15.
T. Ma et al. / Renewable Energy 69 (2014) 7e15 15