Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
C. The
phase constitution and morphology of the CuO-doped SnO
2
lms were characterized by X-ray diffraction
andscanning electron microscopy. In all cases, a polycrystalline porous lm of SnO
2
was the product, with
the CuO deposited on the individual SnO
2
particles. Two types of CuO-doped SnO
2
lms with different
microstructures were obtained via control of oxidation time: nanosized CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
and ultra-uniform, porous, and thin CuO lm coated SnO
2
. The sensor response of the CuO doped SnO
2
lms to H
2
S gas at 50300 ppm was investigated within the temperature range of 25125
C. Both of
the CuO-doped SnO
2
lms show fast response and recovery properties. The response time of the ultra-
uniform, porous, and thin CuO coated SnO
2
to H
2
S gas at 50ppm was 34 s at 100
C and 600
C and the copper and tin on the ITO glass were oxidized dur-
ing the ring. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the oxidized lms were collected
using a Philips PW3040/60 diffractometer at a scanning rate of 0.03
min
1
for
2
C for 8h.
was tested. When the response remained constant at a xed operating tempera-
ture, air was let in immediately. The temperature of the furnace was controlled at
25, 50, 75, 100 and 120
C and 600
C, the
nanosized CuO particles were transformed into an ultra-uniform,
porous, and thin CuO lm coating on the top of the porous SnO
2
particles (Fig. 2(c)).
Sensors wereassembledbytheCuOdopedSnO
2
lms connected
separately with two platinum wires. The resistances of the sen-
sors in air were rst recorded in a few minutes and the H
2
S gas at
50300ppm was ejected gradually after the resistances are con-
stants and the sensing properties of the CuO doped SnO
2
lms
to the H
2
S gas were measured within the temperature range of
Fig. 2. SEM images of the as electrodeposited lm and the oxidized lms: (a) as-
electrodeposited lm with rectangular-shaped crystals, (b) nanosized CuO dotted
island doped SnO
2
red at 600
C for 10h.
25125
C. With
increasing operating temperature, the response times of both the
S. Wang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 130 (2011) 13251328 1327
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
300 ppm
200 ppm
100 ppm
50 ppm
25
o
C
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
50
o
C
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
75
o
C
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
Time(s)
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
100
o
C
Time(s)
500 400 300 200 100 0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
R
,
t, s
225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 -25
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
Time(s)
25
o
C
50
o
C
75
o
C
100
o
C
125
o
C
a
b
c
Fig. 3. Baseline and sensitivity versus response time curve of CuOdoped SnO
2
lms
to H
2
S gas: (a) the baseline of nanosized CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
to 100ppm
H
2
S at 25
C; (b) the sensitivity of the nanosized CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
to 100ppm H
2
S at operating temperatures of 25125
C.
CuO doped SnO
2
lms decreased. At 125
C, the
response time of the CuO lmcoated SnO
2
to 50ppmH
2
S gas was
34s, and this increased to 50s for 300ppm H
2
S (Fig. 3(b)). This
indicates that we were successful in fabricating CuO doped SnO
2
lmwith a short response time of 34s to H
2
S gas at 50ppmat the
low operating temperature of 100
C by an electrodeposition and
oxidation method.
Another important feature of the CuO doped SnO
2
lms is their
fast recovery property. This can also be seen fromFig. 3. The recov-
ery time of the nanosized CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
from
100ppm H
2
S gas within the temperature range of 25100
C is
4030s, andthis range decreasedto1510s for the CuOlmcoated
SnO
2
. The recovery times for both the CuO doped SnO
2
lms were
about 1/3 of their corresponding response times, which is much
shorter than the reported results in the literature [24,9,17,18].
The ultra-uniform, porous, and thin CuO coated SnO
2
had a larger
sensing area and higher sensitivity to H
2
S gas than the nanosized
CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
. The fast recovery property of CuO
lm coated SnO
2
is mainly attributed to the more uniform distri-
bution of CuO on the surface of the SnO
2
than in the case of the
nanosized CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
and to the transitional
layer at the CuOSnO
2
interface due to interdiffusion processes [3],
as well as the n-SnO
2
/p-CuO heterojunctions formed in the CuO
doped SnO
2
lms [4]. The ultra uniform, porous, and thin CuO lm
coated SnO
2
has advantages over the nano-sized CuOdotted island
doped SnO
2
in the speeds of both response and recovery, and in the
sensitivity. It is a promising material for fast sensing of H
2
S at low
temperature.
4. Conclusions
We prepared fast response detection of H
2
S by CuO-doped SnO
2
lms prepared by an electrodeposition and oxidization method.
We designed a sensor assemble and tested the sensor response
of the CuO-doped SnO
2
lms. By controlling the oxidization time
of the electrodeposited lms, two types of CuO doped SnO
2
lms
were prepared: ultra-uniform, porous, and thin CuO lm coated
SnO
2
and nano-sized CuO dotted island doped SnO
2
. Both the CuO
doped SnO
2
lms response to the H
2
S gas at 50300ppm from
room temperature and show the maximum sensitivity. The ultra-
uniform, porous, and thin CuO lmcoated SnO
2
is better in terms
of response and recovery properties than the nano-sized CuO dot-
ted island doped SnO
2
lm. The response time of the ultra-uniform,
porous, and thin CuO lm coated SnO
2
to H
2
S gas at 50ppm was
34s at 100