Determination of optimum operating conditions of an acidication
reactor treating a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater
Yalcin Askin Oktem a , Orhan Ince b , Tom Donnelly c , Paul Sallis c , Bahar Kasapgil Ince d, * a Istanbul University, Department of Environmental Engineering, 34320 Avcilar, Istanbul, Turkey b Istanbul Technical University, Department of Environmental Engineering, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey c University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, School of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, NE1 7RU, UK d Bogazici University, Institute of Environmental Science, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey Received 29 November 2005; received in revised form 28 April 2006; accepted 10 May 2006 Abstract In this study, the optimum operating conditions of a lab-scale completely stirred acidogenic reactor treating a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater were determined. Individual effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT), organic loading rate (OLR) and pH on the degree of acidication were investigated at a mesophilic temperature (35 1 8C), for HRTin the range 824 h, OLRup to 14 kg COD/m 3 d and pH in the range of 5.06.3. A maximum acidication level of 44% and COD removal efciency of 13%, were obtained at an OLR of 13 kg COD/m 3 d at pH of 5.5 0.1 with an HRTof 12 h. Under these conditions, acetic, propionic and n-butyric acids were found to be predominant volatile fatty acids in the acidogenic reactor. # 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Degree of acidication; Chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater; Optimum operating conditions; HRT; OLR 1. Introduction Anaerobic processes have become a viable option for the treatment of medium-high strength industrial wastewaters. The pharmaceutical industry is a major source of industrial waste- waters andthese comprise substrates whichare difcult totreat in biological treatment systems. Wastewaters from pharmaceutical plants are characterized by a high COD and variable concentra- tions of salts [1,2]. Based on the production processes, the pharmaceutical industry can be divided into ve categories, namely fermentation, natural product extraction, chemical synthesis, formulation and research and development. Among these processes, the most important one is chemical synthesis, in which solvent-intensive processes are involved. The processes generate wastewaters containing a variety of organic and inorganic constituents including priority pollutants such as methylene chloride, toluene, isopropyl alcohol, chloroform, chlorobenzene, chloromethane, cyanide, phenol andbenzene [3]. A substantial part of the COD may be made up of relatively biodegradable solvents, but may also contain specic com- pounds that are difcult to biodegrade and/or inhibit biological treatment systems [4]. Physical and/or chemical processes without a biological treatment are not generally considered to be suitable for treating pharmaceutical wastewaters because of their lowefciency for dissolved CODremoval and high consumption of chemicals [5]. The high COD content of pharmaceutical wastewaters makes them particularly amenable to treatment processes based on anaerobic technology. However, relatively few studies on the anaerobic treatment of chemical synthesis- based pharmaceutical efuents have been reported in literature. Although, the specic operational conditions for acetogenic/ methanogenic phases have been extensively studied, generally relevant literature on the acidogenic phase is still scarce [6]. The acid-phase digestion products, such as volatile fatty acids (VFA), CO 2 and H 2 can be greatly inuenced by operational and design parameters such as hydraulic retention time (HRT), solid retention time (SRT), environmental factors such as pH, temperature, oxidationreduction potential (ORP), as well as reactor conguration, wastewater characteristics and avail- ability of trace minerals [7]. To increase the efciency of two- phase digestion it is particularly important to optimize the conditions within the acid-phase digester since hydrolysis and liquefaction is often considered to be the rate limiting fermentation step [8]. www.elsevier.com/locate/procbio Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 22582263 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 212 359 70 16; fax: +90 212 257 50 33. E-mail address: bahar.ince@boun.edu.tr (B.K. Ince). 1359-5113/$ see front matter # 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2006.05.016 Studies have been conducted into the effect of temperature on acidication of a synthetic substrate, mainly glucose, over the range 2060 8C, with an HRTof 810 h and a pH5.8 [9] and showed that the optimum temperature for maximum acidica- tion was at 37 8C for mesophilic and 52 8C for thermophilic processes. Although a slightly higher degree of acidication occurred in the thermophilic ranges, it was pointed out that mesophilic ranges are more robust due to the advantages of having greater stability. Acetic, propionic and n-butyric acids were found to be the main VFA. Similar studies investigated the effects of temperature and pH on the acidication of dairy wastewater at a constant HRT (12 h) [8]. It was reported that the optimum operating conditions were found within the tempera- ture range of 3436 8C and pH in a range of 5.75.8. It was also stated that acetic acid was the predominant VFA. In a study investigating effect of HRTon mesophilic acid-phase digestion of a dairy wastewater [10], it was observed that the degree of acidication increased from 28 to 54% with increases in HRT from 4 to 12 h; however, further increases in HRT from 16 to 24 h only increased acidication slightly from 56 to 59%. In contrast, other studies showed the degree of acidication increased from 6 to 56% as the HRT was decreased from 24 to 12 h [11]. Effect of pH on acidication of various wastewaters has been investigated [12,13] and the optimum pH range for acidication of gelatin-rich wastewater was found to be 72% at pH 6.5 [14]. However, despite these studies on the acidication of industrial wastewaters, there is still lack of specic information on acidication of chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewaters. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the optimum design and operating conditions of a laboratory- scale completely mixed acidogenic reactor treating a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Acidogenic reactor The acidogenic reactor was constructed from acrylic with an active volume of 5 l (Fig. 1). The reactor included a sampling port, a gas collection unit, an inuent and efuent line and was operated continuously over a period of approximately 280 days. Mixing was provided by a magnetic stirrer. The reactor was placed in a water bath where the temperature was maintained between 35 1 8C using temperature controller. The pH value was controlled by automatic addition of 1 N NaOH and/or 1 N HCL. 2.2. Wastewater characteristics The wastewater was taken from a local chemical synthesis-based pharma- ceutical manufacturing plant. The main production at the site was bacampicil- Y.A. Oktem et al. / Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 22582263 2259 Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental system. line and sultampicilline toshylate. The major chemical contaminants arising from production activities were n-butyl acetate, dimethyl formamide, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl acetate and methylene chloride. Although the site had a solvent recovery system in place, the nal combined efuent from the manufacturing process still contained a signicant quantity of solvents due to the malfunction of the solvent extraction unit. The general characteristics of the wastewater are given in Table 1. 2.3. Seed sludge The acidogenic reactor was inoculated with sludge taken from a full-scale up-ow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating an alcohol industry efuent. Due to the granular characteristics of the sludge, ltration could not be accomplished, therefore, total solids (TS) and total volatile solids (TVS) parameters were used; TS concentration of the seed sludge was approximately 105 g/l of which 96% of TVS and after inoculation the reactor had a sludge concentration of 10 g/l TS. 2.4. Analytical methods During the operation of the acidogenic reactor, routine analyses such as COD, TS and TVS, pH, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH 3 -N), orthophosphate phosphorus (PO 4 -P) and alkalinity were carried out in accordance with standard methods [15]. VFAwere measured using a HP Model 5890 Series II Gas Chromatograph (GC) (HP FFAP Column, 10 m 530 mm 1 mm) with nitrogen as a carrier gas. 2.5. Reactor operation After inoculation the reactor was ushed with nitrogen gas for a period of 15 min in order to maintain anaerobic conditions inside the acidogenic reactor. Temperature inside the acidogenic reactor was increased gradually over 24 h from room temperature to the operational temperature of 35 1 8C which was maintained throughout the study. The acidogenic reactor was initially fed with glucose solution of 1000 mg COD/l. During the initial study employing glucose feeding, a HRT of 24 h was applied and the OLR was gradually increased to 6 kg COD/m 3 d. Then, the glucose containing feed was replaced with increasing proportion of the pharmaceutical wastewater from 10 (w/v), 30 (w/v), 70 (w/v), to 100% (w/v) at above conditions. Overall feeding regime is given in Table 2. This stepped feeding strategy was used in order to allow microorganisms to acclimatize gradually to the pharmaceutical wastewater from the glucose feed which was totally biodegradable substrate under anaerobic conditions [16,17]. OLR was then increased to 13 kg COD/m 3 d as 100% pharmaceutical waste- water to determine performance at high organic loading to the acidogenic reactor. In addition, the optimum operating conditions for HRT and pH were also determined in Stage 3 (Table 2). 2.6. Calculation for degree of acidication As VFA concentration is the most widely used parameter to assess acid- ication [18], the combined CODequivalent of each individual VFAwas used to express the total COD of VFA in the efuent (COD of VFA eff ) and this was compared to the soluble COD of the inuent (Soluble COD inf ) and the degree of acidication calculated by Eq. (1). The COD equivalents and percentage of organic carbon for individual VFA are given in Table 3. Degree of acidification% CODof VFAmg=l eff soluble CODmg=l inf 100 (1) 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Acclimation to pharmaceutical wastewater During the initial study (Stage 1), the acidogenic reactor was gradually loaded with increasing levels of glucose in the feed, OLR of 16 kg COD/m 3 d, at a HRTof 24 h and pH in a range of 5.5 0.1. The degree of acidication achieved was approximately 47% at OLR of 6 kg COD/m 3 d (Stage 1). It has been recommended that pre-acidication should be partial (2040%) in achieving higher organic loading rates [19]. Similarly, other researchers have stated that degree of acidication should be in a range of 4050% to maintain stability of process [20]. Following the initial study (day 41), the glucose containing feed was replaced with increasing proportion of the pharmaceutical wastewater, until at the end of Y.A. Oktem et al. / Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 22582263 2260 Table 1 Characteristics of the chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater Parameter Concentration (mg/l) COD 4000060000 TKN 800900 PO 4 -P 36 Volatile suspended solids/suspended solids (VSS/SS) 0.60.7 Alkalinity (as CaCO 3 ) 9001000 pH a 78 a Unitless. Table 3 Conversion factors for each VFA VFA Carbon (%) COD equivalent Acetic 40.00 1.066 Propionic 48.64 1.512 Butyric 54.53 1.816 Valeric 58.80 2.036 Caproic 62.04 2.204 Table 2 Summary of the operating schedule with feeding strategy applied to the acidogenic reactor Stage Operation Time (d) Feeding strategy OLR (kg COD/m 3 d) HRT(h) Period 1 Initial studies 141 Glucose 16 2412 Acidication with glucose 2 Steady-state 4153 10% wastewater 6 12 Acclimation to the wastewater 90% glucose Steady-state 5379 30% wastewater 6 12 70% glucose Steady-state 7993 100% wastewater 6 12 3 Steady-state 98285 100% wastewater 614 812 Determination of maximum organic loading and operating conditions Y.A. Oktem et al. / Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 22582263 2261 Fig. 2. Effect of organic loading rate (OLR) on the degree of acidication (*) and COD removal efciency (*) during different stages of the investigation. Fig. 3. Composition and concentration of VFA produced within the acidogenic reactor during initial study with glucose (Stage 1), acclimation to the pharmaceutical wastewater (Stage 2) and determination of maximum organic loading rate (Stage 3). Total volatile fatty acids ( ), acetate (*), butyrate (^), propionate (). the acclimation period (day 93) the reactor received 100% pharmaceutical wastewater and achieved a 37% degree of acidication in Stage 2 (Fig. 2). 3.2. Determination of maximum organic loading rate and optimum operating conditions In order to determine the maximum organic loading applicable to the acidogenic reactor, OLR was gradually increased during Stage 3 from 7 to 14 kg COD/m 3 d and a 39% degree of acidication and a 17%CODremoval efciency were achieved at an OLR of 7 kg COD/m 3 d. Changes in COD removal and degree of acidication throughout this part of the study were observed (Fig. 2). VFA in the acidogenic reactor mainly comprised acetic (41%), propionic (20%) and n-butyric (29%) acids. Every step increase in OLR was followed by an increase in VFA production until OLR of 13 kg COD/m 3 d at which point 43% acidication degree was obtained and VFA composition did not change (48%) acetic, (18%) n-butyric and (13%) propionic. Further increase in OLR to 14 kg COD/m 3 d (day 136) resulted in a dramatic decrease in the degree of acidication to 19%. Moreover, total VFA concentration decreased from 3410 to 1370 mg/l as acetate, which can be explained by the stress imposed on the acidogenic bacteria. Therefore, OLR was reduced to 13 kg COD/m 3 d and the acidogenic reactor recovered within 15 days. Fig. 3 shows the composition and concentration of VFA produced within the acidogenic reactor to determine maximum OLR. After the determination of the most applicable OLR, the effects of HRT and pH on the acid-phase reactions were investigated by varying these parameters (Fig. 2). Optimum HRT was investigated by gradually decreasing from 24 to 18, 12, then 10 and nally 8 h. The degree of acidication was determined to be approximately 40, 43, 44, 35 and 30% at HRT of 24, 18, 12, 10 and 8 h, respectively. Therefore, an HRT of 12 h was considered to be optimum for acidication of the pharmaceutical wastewater under pre-determined conditions of OLR of 13 kg COD/m 3 d, pH of 5.5 0.1 and temperature of 35 1 8C and acetic, propionic and butyric acids were still the main VFA products under these conditions. Previously published studies do not agree on the role of HRT in determining the degree of acidication, one group concluding that product distribution (i.e. VFA composition) is not inuenced to any substantial degree by HRT [21,22], whereas, the other group maintains that VFAcomposition in acidication of biological sludge, primary sludge and dairy wastewater was strongly affected by HRT [7,23,24]. A summary of related studies is presented in Table 4. Results fromthis study indicated that the pharmaceutical wastewater was acidied at HRTas low as 8 h and the VFA composition was not inuenced to any substantial degree by HRT (Fig. 4). During the nal part of the Stage 3 investigation, the effect of pHon the degree of acidication was determined by varying pH under the above pre-determined conditions (OLR 13 kg COD/ m 3 d and HRT 13 h). The degree of acidication increased from 30% at pH 5.0 to 44% at pH 5.5, but reduced to 35% at pH 6.3, therefore, a pH of 5.5 0.1 was considered to be optimum for acidication of the pharmaceutical wastewater. The predomi- nant VFA products were acetic acid, butyric acids and propionic acids at pH 5.05.5, whereas acetic and propionic acids became the main products at pH 6.3. The VFA distribution was therefore sensitive to pH changes during the acidication of the pharmaceutical wastewater, a result that agrees with the results of other researchers who also found that the VFA composition was dependent on pH [21,25,26]. In another study, carried out to determine the inuence of dairy wastewater strength (230 g COD/l) on acidication at pH 5.5 and temperature of 37 8C [7], it was reported that the degree of acidication decreased from 57 to 33% with increases in wastewater CODfrom2 to 20 g/l andfurther increases in CODto 30 g/l decreased degree of acidication to 29%. Acetic, butyric and propionic acids were main VFA products. It was also stated that COD had a considerable effect on the distribution of VFA. However, some researchers have claimed that acidication Y.A. Oktem et al. / Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 22582263 2262 Table 4 Summary of related studies Wastewater Reactor type pH range HRT (h) Acidication degree (%) Loading (kg COD/m 3 d) Temperature (8C) Reference Dairy Lab-scale CSTR No control 0.5 56 3.1 35 1 [11] Dairy Lab-scale UAR 5.5 0.51 5459 4 37 [10] Gelatinaceous Lab-scale UAR 5.5 0.161 8490 230 37 [30] Gelatinaceous -rich Lab-scale UAR 47 0.5 3267 4 37 [14] Synthetic Lab-scale UAR 5.5 5927 424 3755 [31] This study Lab-scale CSTR 5.5 0.5 44 13 35 1 [32] UAR: upow anaerobic reactor; CSTR: continuously mixed stirred tank reactor. Fig. 4. Effect of HRTon the degree of acidication. (OLR of 13 kg COD/m 3 d, pH of 5.5 0.1 and temperature of 35 1 8C). products were dependent on pH [26,27] and whereas other researchers stated have that HRTwas more effective than pH in determining the acidication products [25,28,29]. However, it is difcult to make direct comparisons between these different investigations since they all used different wastewaters, reactor congurations and operating conditions. 4. Conclusions Based on above results, an HRTof 12 h, pH of 5.5 0.1 and OLR of 13 kg COD/m 3 d were found to be the best combination of conditions, withinthe ranges studied, for efcient acidication of a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater. Under these conditions, a maximum acidogenic conversion of 44% of the inuent soluble COD was achieved. Throughout the investigation, COD removal was in a range of 1025% and the main VFAwere found to be acetic, propionic and n-butyric acids. Acetic acid was produced in higher concentrations than other VFA in the acidogenic reactor at all HRT and pH ranges investigated. HRT had only a minor effect on the composition of VFA produced, however, VFA distribution was found to be highly sensitive to the operating pH within the reactor. Acknowledgements O. Ince would like to acknowledge the project coded 1536 of the Institute of Science and Technology of Istanbul Technical University. Author Y. Oktem also acknowledges Institute of Environmental Sciences, Bogazici University and Engineering Faculty of Istanbul University. References [1] Benitez J, Rodriguez A, Malaver R. Stabilization and dewatering of wastewater using hollow-ber membranes. Water Res 1995;29 (10):22816. [2] Kilroy AC, Gray NF. The toxicity of four organic solvents commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry to activated sludge. Water Res 1992;26: 88792. [3] EPA, Ofce of compliance sector notebook project: prole of pharma- ceutical manufacturing industry, 310-R-97-005, 1997. [4] He Y, Bishop PL. Effect of acid orange 7 on nitrication process. J Environ Eng 1994;120:10821. [5] Mayabhate SP, Gupta SK, Joshi SG. Biological treatment of pharmaceu- tical wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 1988;38:18997. [6] Yu HQ, Fang HHP. Acidication of mid-and high-strength dairy waste- waters. Water Res 2001;35:3697705. [7] Elefsiniotis P, Oldham WK. Anaerobic acidogenesis of primary sludge: the role of solids retention time. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994;44:713. [8] Ince Kasapgil B, Ince O, Anderson GK. Determination of operation conditions in an anaerobic acid-phase reactor treating dairy wastewater. In: Proceedings of the 50th Industrial Waste Conference; 1995. [9] Zoetemeyer RJ, Arnoldy P, Cohen A, Boelhouwer C. Inuence of temperature on the anaerobic acidication of glucose in a mixed culture forming part of two-stage digestion process. Water Res 1982;16:31321. [10] Fang HHP, Yu HQ. Effect of HRT on mesophilic acidogenesis of dairy wastewater. J Environ Eng 2000;126(12):11458. [11] Demirel B, Yenigun O. Anaerobic acidogenesis of dairy wastewater: the effects of variations in hydraulic retention time with no pH control. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2004;79:75560. [12] Yang ST, Zhu H, Li Y, Hong G. Continuous propionate production from whey permeate using a novel brous bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994;43:112430. [13] Zoetemeyer RJ, van den Heuvel JC, Cohen A. pH inuence on acidogenic dissimilation of glucose in an anaerobic digestor. Water Res 1982;16:303 11. [14] Yu HQ, Fang HHP. Acidogenesis of gelatin-rich wastewater in an upow anaerobic reactor: inuence of pH and temperature. Water Res 2003;37: 5566. [15] APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed., Washington, DC: American Public Health Associa- tion; 1995. [16] Noike T, Endo G, Chang JE, Yaguchi JI, Matsumoto JI. Characteristics of carbohydrate degradation end the rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng 1985;27:14829. [17] Stronach SM, Rudd T, Lester JN. Anaerobic digestion process in industrial wastewater treatment Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1986. [18] Hajipakkos C. An investigation into volatile fatty acid production in thermophilic anaerobic digester. England: University of Newcastle Upon Tyne; PhD Thesis; 1987. [19] Lettinga G, Hulshoff Pol LW. UASB process design for various types of wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 1991;24:87107. [20] Alexiou IE, Anderson GK. Pre-acidication: concept, guidelines and parameters for application. In: Proceedings of 8 International Symposiums on Anaerobic Digestion (AD-8), IAWQ, 1997; 2529; 1997. p. 66876. [21] Zoetemeyer RJ, van den Heuvel JC, Cohen A. pH inuence on acidogenic dissimilation of glucose in an anaerobic digester. Water Res 1982;16:303 11. [22] Breure AM, van Andel JG. Hydrolysis and acidogenic fermentation of a protein, gelatin, in an anaerobic continuous culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1984;20:405. [23] Henry MP, Sajjad A, Ghosh S. The effects of environmental factors on acid-phase digestion of sewage sludge. In: Proceedings 42nd Purdue Industrial Waste Congress; 1987. p. 72737. [24] Yu HQ, Fang HHP. Thermophilic acidication of dairy wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2000;54:43944. [25] Maharaj I, Elefsiniotis P. The role of HRT and low temperature on acid- phase anaerobic digestion of municipal and industrial wastewaters. Bior- esour Technol 2001;76:1917. [26] Veeken A, Kalyuzhnyi S, Scharff H, Hamelers B. Effect of pHand VFAon hydrolysis of organic solid waste. J Environ Eng 2000;126:107681. [27] Fang HPH, Yu HQ. Acidication of lactose in wastewater. J Environ Eng 2001;127:82531. [28] Borja R, Sanchez E, Rincon B, Raposo F, Mart n MA, Mart n A. Study and optimization of the anaerobic acidogenic fermentation of two-phase olive pomace. Process Biochem 2005;40:28191. [29] Yang K, Yu Y, Hwang S. Selective optimization in thermophilic acid- ogenesis of cheese-whey wastewater to acetic acid and butyric acids: partial acidication and methanation. Water Res 2003;37:246777. [30] Fang HHP, Yu H. Mesophilic acidication of gelatinaceous wastewater. J Biotech 2002;93:99108. [31] Yu HQ, Fang HHP, Gu GW. Comparative performance of mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenic upow reactors. Process Biochem 2002;38:447 54. [32] Oktem Y.A. Comparison of system performances regarding single and two-phase anaerobic digestion of pharmaceutical wastewater. Turkey: Istanbul Technical University; PhD Thesis; 2004. Y.A. Oktem et al. / Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 22582263 2263