Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
w
c
l
o
p
v
v
p p
O (Lt
5
_c
ra
fe
2
p 1-
C O P r^ .-I
5 a, o ^ _
[/I
0
"0
"re
b
O
0
5
CL
0
.c
U
i
n
s
i
d
75
I- i
^ re
^ - - I-
I 3
.2 lU
"oi
r
l
i
c
a
t
Q
a.
o
- ^
o - o
30
31
32 D. Mortelmans
Figure 4 Bulk sales shop (Antwerp, Abdijstraat).
when this group is large enough to be called a real chain. Since this discussion is a
rather restricted one, it is not quite to the point here. What we call a chain store in
our typology does not necessarily correspond to the technical definition of chain
stores. Chain stores in this typology are defined as shops giving an impression of
mass production, based on a rather uniform pattem of window design.
The impression of working on a large scale is totally different from bulk sales
shops. The impression of cheapness and abundance is suppressed. Large chain
shops do not overcrowd their shop windows. On the other hand, they also avoid
the use of too much emptiness (see further). The impression of middle-class pri-
cing is created in the shop design itself. The brand name is predominantly present
in front of the shop. Contrary to bulk sales shops where sometimes shops don't
even have a name [Figure 4], the brand name is prominent here. Further, these
shops are big. The biggest chain stores have two or three floors connected with
escalators. On the outside, large windows enhance the department store-like
feeling of the shop (Figure 6).
Figure 5 Boxer (A)itwcrp, Abdijstraat).
:5
u
=1,
33
34 D. Mortelmans
All shop windows of chain stores are very alike, not only within chains but also
between different chains. At a certain moment in our data collection, we saw the
dressing of a shop window of a particular chain store (Etam in Antwerp). The
store personnel had emptied the window and were working on a new design,
based on a predesigned scheme. One of the employees had a briefing on paper,
and she was instructing her colleagues on how the window needed to be dressed.
By accident, we came across the same company in Brussels a few days later and
the shop window was designed almost identically.
The main reason, however, we have included the chain store as a separate
category of window dressing styles is that our data showed a large subgroup of
stores with a similar design. The emphasis on the brand name and the large
windows were only two characteristics of these shops. When we look at the shop
window itself, it is striking that several aspects recur. One of the recurring ele-
ments is the use of large posters. As we have said, large chain stores do not
overload their shop windows. Tliere are several dummies (three or more for each
window) in the window, showing the newest collection. Often, additional shelves
are used to present clothes. All this looks well-balanced but it does not give the
impression of emptiness. The main reason for that is the use of large photographs
of models in the stores. The photographs give the impression that they are cut out
of a fashion catalog [Figure 7], The shop window of the chain store is designed as
an enlarged, real-life advertisement for itself. Therefore, store chains as a group
give a similar, mass media-like message through their shop windows.
Next to the large posters, the use of seasonal themes in the shop window
enhances the commercial picture we have sketched. Since our data were collected
in June, the main recurring theme was summer and vacation. The metaphors used
most frequently to express the idea of summer and vacation were palms or sail-
boards. To underline the themes, the posters often featured beach scenes with
models walking along the beach. Also, separate catchwords referred to the
upcoming holiday season. Although all shops were selling their summer collec-
tions, only chain stores regularly referred to this. As was stated before, bulk
purchase shops merely concentrate on prices and large sales. But smaller bou-
tiques or exclusive luxury boutiques also did not predominantly use the seasonal
theme (see further).
Boutiques
As soon as the size of the shop decreases, a clothing shop can be described as a
boutique. Boutiques are ground-floor shops with a limited collection of clothes
usually restricted to one sex. Large chain stores sell clothes for both men and
women (often also for children); boutiques are smaller and more specialized.
Almost half of our sample (58 of 125 shops, 46%) can be described as a boutique.
As a consec]uence, there is a much larger diversity in this group.
A first group we will not further discuss in detail, consists of boutiques with a
pattern equivalent to those of chain stores. They belong to a smaller chain or a
more specialized chain within the fashion market. These shops are indeed smaller
and have a few characteristics of the boutiques we will discuss further. Their
dominant image however is one of a brand-oriented and highly popularized shop.
Visualizing Emptiness 35
Figure 7 Springfield (Antwerp, Meir).
This results in the use of large posters or sailboards, only on a smaller surface.
Although these shops are both technically and economically boutiques, we classify
them in the chain store category. Besides this group, we can discern three groups
of boutiques: first, boutiques using modern and artful design m their shop win-
dow; second, boutiques where the interior of the shop itself becomes part of the
shop window, and third, boutiques in which emptiness prevails.
Firsl Type: Art and Modern Design. Some boutiques try to distinguish themselves
with art and design. Although such decor might exist elsewhere, we did not find
any modern painting or sculptures in our sample. The most prominent type of
design used includes abstract objects and forms. Hardly any figurative objects
are used in this type. The impression of the shop window is one of soberness
and distinction. The amor vacui enters the shop window but it does not prevail
as we will see in the last type. Dummies and other window elements still have
an important place. Sometimes the dummies as such are the subject of design.
36 D. Mortelmans
Figure 8 Olivier Strelli (Antwerp, Keyserlci).
In Figure 8 the dummies form a composition in themselves. Here, the shop
designer went further than merely dressing some dummies. He created an isolated
composition with an artistically-minded undertone. In this shop window, we also
see one of the rare exceptions in the use of person-like dummies. The women in
the composition have a head and a face. In boutiques, dummies are usually
decapitated. Only torso and legs are used, without a head. The personalized
dummy is used more frequently in bulk purchase shops.
One of the particular elements of the boutique as such is the entrance-way.
Chain stores all have large glass entrance doors. Boutiques are more likely to have
a regular door with a doorhandle and a doorpost. In addition, about half of the
boutiques do not leave their doors open: there is a deliberately created border
between the shop and the outside world. An interested consumer can't just walk
in and out; entering a boutique requires an explicit action of the consumer.
Moreover, it is not just the act of grabbing the doorhandle and pushing the door.
The door closes again behind the consunier, giving the impression that he is more
than a flaneur (Bauman) who passes by.
Second Type: Blurring the Threshold between Public and Private Spheres. The sec-
ond type of boutique is the first one where emptiness is used as a technique on its
own. It is characterized by the transparency of the shop window. The window
itself is rather empty; the number of clothing items is limited, as is the number
of dummies. The main characteristic of the second type is transparency. It is a type
that has been described earlier by the French semiotician Ana Claudia Alves de
Oliveira [19961. The shop window does not have a background. There are some
objects in the shop window but the shop itself is visible in the background. The
shop window ceases to exist: it becomes integrated with the shop itself. The shop
window is a bridge between the public sphere outside and the private sphere of
the shop vanishes. Both spheres make direct contact. The outsider can look and
judge the activities inside the shop.
Most shops without a clearly distinct shop window do not reduce only the shop
window to a minimum. The interior design of the shop itself also is an utterance of
Visualizing Emptiness 37
what we called amor vacui: large rooms with only a few racks. The shop window of
Natan [Figure 9] is reduced to a small platform with two dummies. Further, the
window gives a vision of the interior design. Inside the shop there are only a few
racks on the right side of the shop and a cash desk in the middle of the room.
Further, the shop is nearly empty. There is no decoration on the walls and the
height of the shop combined with a large unused surface inside the shop gives an
impression of emptiness.
The sign of amor vacui in this type is not created in the shop window itself.
Because of the transparency of the shop window, the empty space inside the shop
is brought to the fore. In the last type of boutique, the emptiness is created in the
shop window itself.
Third Type: .^lnor vacui as a Sign of Distinction. The last type of boutique has a lot
in common with both types described earlier. This type does not use glass doors or
humanized dummies. It does not have large windows but rather tall and straight
ones. The crucial difference however is the use of emptiness in the shop window
itself. The interior world of the shop and the exterior world are separated by the
shop window. There is no or hardly any direct connection between both sides.
Unlike the previous type, the shop window is used as a separation. The interior
of the shop is not visible from the street.
As with the interior design of the Natan shop, backgrounds in this type are
monotonally colored. The most dominant color is white, but some shops use other
light-colored shades. The prototype of the last type of shop window can be found
in Figure 10. The shop window of Gianni Versace suppresses all superfluous
material. Each window contains only one dummy and a white background. The
impression of emptiness is enhanced by the tall windows. The background behind
the dummies is limited to the height of the dummies. In this way, the profundity of
the shop is added to the upper side of the window, as becomes visible at the right
side of the photograph. All redundant elements are left out and what remains is a
well-balanced equilibrium between showing a collection and leaving the shop
window completely empty.
Figure 9 Natan (Antwerp, Schuttershofstraat).
fc
I
CQ
b
Visualizing Emptiness 39
Shop Window Design and Prestige. In this last section, we want to combine the
quantitative and the quaUtative analysis. The qualitative typology we constructed
by analyzing our visual data does not tell us anything about the prestige of a cer-
tain shop. It is quite possible that shop design has little or nothhig to do with the
prestige of a shop. Therefore we need to link the quantitative typology to the pres-
tige scale we constructed earlier with consumer prices. In an intuitive way, we can
expect a correlation between the use of emptiness and the prestige of a shop. The
Pearson's correlation of the prestige scale and the total number of objects in the
shop window is .25 (Probability /-teat = 0.009). Although the number of objects
tells nothing about the design of a shop, there is a negative correlation with prestige.
A more accurate way of looking at the design of a shop and its place on the
prestige scale is given in Figure 11. Here we have transposed the qualitative
typology in scores where bulk sales stores have the lowest score and the third type
of boutique has the highest score.'^ Important to notice is that we added all shops to
the graph this time. As was explained before, a necessary condition for the con-
struction of the prestige scale was the presence of price tags. In Figure 11, we added
the shops that did not show any price tags at the right side of the graph. They were
added to the graph in no particular order. It is important to include these shops,
since it was hypothesized that the omission of prices was in itself a sign of luxury.
If we look at Figure 11, there are several conclusions to make. First, bulk sales
shops are located in the lower parts of the scale. Their trademark is low prices, and
therefore they score very low on the prestige scale. Since we did not include any
second-hand shops in the sample, it is difficult to judge whether or not these shops
are the absolute lower limit of clothes shops. Next to the bulk sales shops we see a
large group of chain stores clustering together. This is the part where the z-scores
Figure 11 Prestige scale and shop window design.
40 D. Mortelmans
are rising very slowly, indicating that the prices of large chain stores are very
similar. They operate in the same market segment, and therefore they use similar
pricing categories. This category is not only coherent in its prices, it is equally
coherent in its window dressing. Most shops here showed the previously descri-
bed design of large posters and seasonal themes. Even if each brand uses its own
accents, the main structure is very much the same.
This uniformity no longer applies once we enter the world of the boutique. Since
the use of emptiness as a sign of luxury was the starting, point in our research, we
expected to see a reflection of the use of emptiness on the prestige scale. If we take
the last three categories from our typology, there is indeed a correlation with the
prestige scale. Window dressing techniques we identified as Boutique 1, 2 or 5 are
occurring at the higher end of the prestige scale. Also shops that are not using price
tags are all using these types of window dressing. However, we cannot clearly
distinguish any of the three types of window dressing along the prestige scale. Only
the third type with an absolute stress on emptiness seems to occur more regularly at
the higher end of the scale. A possible explanation for this result is the existence of
different signifiers of prestige in window dressing. Here art, design, transparent
windows and emptiness can be used to construct prestigious shop windows.
In conclusion, we want to draw attention to two outliers from Figure 11. Since
shops are free to dress their window as they like, they can easily adopt styles from
others. At the left side of the prestige scale there is one shop using the transparency
technique in its shop window. The shop window (from Mexx) is shown in Figure
12. It was a surprise that it appeared so low in the prestige scale. When studying the
quantitative data more closely, it appeared that they did not use price tags on their
models. The reason they appeared so low was that three t-shirts had prices on
them. Therefore, they appeared in the prestige scale at a rather low level. A second
Figure 12 Mexx (Antwerp, Meir}.
Visualizing Emptiness 41
Figure 13 Boss (Antwerp, Meir).
outlier is situated at the right side of the scale where a shop without price tags uses
chain store techniques in its shop window. The shop was identified as a Boss store,
which was an even bigger surprise. If we look at Figure 13, we can see that Boss is
indeed using chain store techniques in its shop window. They do not present price
tags, but they do use large posters and several dummies and shelves in their store
window. Possibly, Boss tried to adapt its store to the general view of the shopping
street (Meir in Antwerp). Nevertheless, it is one of the most striking examples of a
shop in the higher range of the prestige scale using a deviant design.
CONCLUSION
Shop windows are part of the packaging of a consumer gooci. They need to
convey the image a brand wants to create for itself. But there is more to shop
windows than a mere commercial function. If we look at the shop windows we
have researched and their connection to the urban network they come from, there
is a connection. Shops group together in neighborhoods or in certain streets
because they belong to the same category. This results in a highly similar
appearance of shops along the shopping street. Waterloo Avenue in Brussels, with
all its boutiques, has a more or less coherent look, which contrasts highly with the
Abdijstraat in Antwerp. In this sense, we could also say that the shop window is
the package of a neighborhood. The type of shop and the layout of shop windows
give much information to visual sociologists about the condition of the
neighborhood.
In our research, we concentrated on horror vacui as one of the discriminating
factors to classify shop windows. The typology we constructed shows that shops
and shop windows can be classified in more or less homogeneous groups. Some
groups are clearly related to the use of or the fight against the principle of horror
vacui. The self-constraint of one's inherent fear of the void seems to create
standing. However, we need to place the use of emptiness in shop windows in a
42 D. Mortelmans
broader perspective. As Stuart Hall argued, the meaning of visual culture in
general or images in particular is never fixed [Hall 19971. Images and artifacts are
not only polysemous, their meaning is often ephemeral [Attfield 2000]. Bour-
dieu's theory clearly showed that this polysemy is class-bound. Moreover, dif-
ferent classes not only have different tastes but also different histories of
perception. Classes have specific ways of perceiving their surroundings [Lowe
1982]. This observation points to one of the weaknesses in the above presented
analysis. The visual analysis showed some evidence of the role of horror vacui in
distinction processes. However, the analysis that was performed used an etic
perspective [Silverman 1994]. The styles of window dressing were constructed
with a visual analysis from the researchers' perspective. No confrontation of
these data has been made with the actual viewers of these shop windows, nor
with the shop window designers themselves. Such an approach departs from an
emic approach. In this way, the visual material of the shop windows can be used
to check whether the fear of the void indeed leads to perceptions of distinc-
tiveness as Elias' theory indicated. It can also reveal more detailed information
about the rationale behind the process. Is horror vacui indeed an acceptable
explanation of the connection between emptiness and exclusivity, or might there
be other processes at work?
The present results should therefore be seen as sensitizing concepts [B[umer 1969].
The use of emptiness, art and modern design or transparency in the creation of
distinction can serve future research in exploring the relation between visual
material (like advertisements) or graphic design (as in shop windows) and stra-
tification processes.
NOTES
1. Besides the philosophical debates on the principle of horror I'aciii, several physicists (e.g.,
Pascal) tried to prove experimentally the existence of a void.
2. Elias treats the state formation in the transition from medieval feudalism to the nation
states in the Renaissance.
3. In his Distinction, Bourdieu 11994] gives several examples of differences in aesthetic taste
as well as how differences in uses and habits differ on several courts. He illustrates the
working of the amor vacui principle in several domains.
4. The data collection was done in June 1999 by the author and a colleague on the Faculty
of Social and Political Sciences at Antwerp University. The author wants to thank Sofie
Damen for her help in the data collection of the research. Both the coding and the
analysis were done by the author himself.
5. If a limiting decision needed to be made, the encoder always took the left side of the
entrance door. This additional rule was imposed to prevent a content-based decision
(e.g., taking only empty windows). The left-criterion followed the reasoning that large
stores have their entrance in fhe middle of the shop, hi this fashion, the shop design
itself usually suggested which part of the shop window needed to be inventoried.
6. One Euro equals 40.3399 Belgian Francs (1.32 U.S. in 2004).
7. In order to reduce bias, it is recommended [Suchar 19971 to use phrases from text as codes
{ill I'ivo coding). Since we worked with visual material it was not pctssible to code this way.
8. Atlas-ti provides a separate tool for organizing the open coding: the Network Editor.
This too! allows the researcher to link and unlink different codes in a graphic network.
Visualizing Emptiness 43
9. All clothes in the shop window were inventoried, independently of the presence of a
price-tag. If three trousers were piled with only one price-tag, for example, the encoders
were instructed to write down tliree separate trousers with this price. If no price-tags
were shown, they were instructed to inventory the clothes in the shop window.
K). In this case, power refers strongly to monetary power, to the capacity to buy.
11. Of course, the reliability of this connection lies in the fact that we suppose that shops
from Boss or Chanel are exclusive ones.
12. Only at the very beginning of the curve is there a little leap. The first two shops (called
Jeffry and Boxer) at the very beginning of the curve have extremely low clotliing prices.
Both shops are located in the shopping street Abdijstraat, which is in a poorer district of
Antwerp.
13. The main purpose of giving scores was to create an easily readable graph. Therefore, the
scores for bulk sales shops and large chain stores were low (1 and 1.5) while the scores
for the three types of boutiques were high (4, 4.5, and 5). Tlie dotted line in the middle
of the graph was also added manually for readabihty.
REFERENCES
Alves de Oliveira, Ana Claudia
1996 La vitrine: de la vision au sens. Noiwcaux Actes Semiotiques, 43: 1-36.
Anonymous
1991 Horror vacui. De eeiiw van de luchtpomp 1650-1750. Leiden: Museum
Boerhave.
Attfield, Judy
2000 Wild Things. Tlie Material Culture of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
Berryman, Sylvia
1997 Horror vacui in the Third Century BC: When Is a Theory Not a Theory?
In Aristotle ami After. R. Sorabji, ed. Pp. 147-157. London: Institute of
Classical Studies, Unversity of London.
Blumer, Herbert
1969 Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1994 Distinctioii. A Social Critique of the fudgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
Brown, Stephen, and Darach Turley
1997 Consumer Research. Postcards fivm the Edge. London: Routledge.
Charrueau, A.
1991 Les strategies internationales de distribution des metiers du luxe. Revue
FranqaisedH Marketing. 132-133(2-3): 137-141.
Corsani, A., and C. Giuseppe
1992 L'Industrie mondiale du luxe: I'imperatifde la creation face a la banalisation des
marches. Paris: Eurostaf.
Domecq, Jean-Philippe
1995 Le pari esthetique de I'art minimal. Espril-Paris, 6: 58-71.
Dumas-Hermes, J.L.
1991 Est-ce la fin de l'age d'or pour les metiers du luxe? Revue Franqaise du
Marketing, 132-133(2-3): 5 ^ .
44 D. Mortelmans
Elias, Norbert
1978 The Ciznlizing Process. The History of Manners. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1982 Tlie Civilizing Process. State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Basil
Blackwell.
Featherstone, Mike
1991 Consumer Culture & Postmodernism. London: Sage.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss
1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitntive Research.
Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Gombrich, Ernst H.
1970 The Sense of Order. A Sludy in the Psychology of Decorative Art. Oxford:
Phaidon.
Gottdiener, Mark
1995 Postmodem Semiotics. Material Culture and the Forms of Postmodern Life.
Oxford: Blackwell.
Hall, Stuart
1997 Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. London:
Sage.
Hauschildt, Sara
1994 Mark Rothko: A Study in Mythmaking. Available at <http://
rothko.athO.com/obsessions/art/rothpaper.html>.
Hetherington, Kevin
1992 Stonehenge and Its Festivals. Spaces of Consumption. In Lifestyle
Shopping. The Subject of Consumption. R. Shields, ed. Pp. 83-98. London:
Routledge.
Hughes, Robert
1997 American Visions. The Epic Story of Art in America. New York: Alfred
A. Knopf.
Kandinsky, Wassily
1955 Die kalile Wand. In Essays iiher Kunst und Kunstler. W. Kandinsky, ed.
Pp. 119-122. Teufen: Veriag Arthur Niggli und Willy Verkauf.
1982 Complete Writings on Art, Vohnne Two (1922-1943). Boston: G.K. Hall &
Co.
Kuspit, Donald
1998 Sacred Spaces. Laying Claim to Mark Rothko. Available at <http://www.
forward.com/issues/1998/98.05.01/arts.html>.
Lebas, Michel, Frangois Israel-Russo, and Gilles De Gouyon
1990 Strategies de luxe. Paris: Chambre de Commerce et d'lndustrie de Paris.
Lowe, Donald
1982 History of Bourgeois Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miles, Steven
1998 Consumerism as a Way of Life. London: Sage.
Miller, Daniel, Peter Jackson, Negal Thrift, Beverly Holbrook, and Michael
1998 Shopping, Place and Identity. London: Routledge.
Visualizing Emptiness 45
Mortelmans, Dimitri
1997 Zien en gezien worden. Naar een definite van luxeproducten. Tijdschrift
voor Sociologie, 18(3): 381^04.
1998a Chanel No 5 goes MTV. On the Popularization of the Luxury Perfume
Market. PSW-Papers, 2(12): 1-33.
1998b Socio-semiotic Analysis of Print Advertisements for Luxury Products.
Semiotica, 120(1-2): 181-206.
Muhr, Thomas
1991 ATLAS/ti A Prototype for the Support of Text Interpretation. Qualitative
Sociologx/, 14(4): 349-371.
Prinzhorn, Hans
1995 Artistry of the Mentally III. A Contrilmtion to the Psychology and Psycho-
palhologi/ of Configuration. Wenen and New York: Springer Verlag.
Read, Herbert
1964 Art and Industry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Silverman, David
1994 Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text aud
Interaction. London: Sage.
Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet Corbin
1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Newbury Park, California: Sage.
1994 Grounded Theory Methodology. In Handbook of QnaUlative Research.
Norman K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. Pp. 273-285. London: Sage.
1998 Basics of Qnalitntive Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Newbury Park, California: Sage. (2nd edn.)
Suchar, Charles S.
1997 Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts. Qualitative
Sociology, 20(1): 33-55.