Page 1 of 4

2 - 7 - Naked Planet Climate Model (8_13) 4/24/14, 7:19 PM

Now you have the pieces you need to
construct
our very first climate model
of a naked planet.
We have sunlight that's coming from the
sun
and coming all in one direction
toward the Earth.
And then we have Earth that is shining
it's own light, based on it's own
temperature, with light that's going in
all
different directions around the surface of
the Earth.
And what we're doing, to
solve for the temperature of the Earth,
is we're solving for the condition where
the energy
coming into the planet balances the energy
that's leaving.
That's the eventual steady state.
An analogy to that would be if we had
a kitchen sink, and you turn on the faucet
and the
water starts to build up in the sink and
it gets
deeper and deeper. And as it gets deeper in
the sink,
there's more pressure
of water pushing it down the drain, and so
the rate at which the water
leaves the sink is a function of how deep
the water is in the sink.
And so, the water level in the sink, if it
starts out all the way down, will rise,
until it comes close to the level which
the water budget balances and stays there.
Or if you start out with too much water,
it'll sink
until it goes to that steady state value
and stay there.
If this is the rate of water
flow in from the faucet, and you started
out with
no water, there would be no more
coming in
than out initially, and so the water would
build up.
And it would tend to relax to that
condition of balance.
Or, if you walk up to it with a big bucket
and dump a big bucket all at
once in there, you'd start with too much
water,
and it would relax downward, toward that
steady state value.
So, what we were doing in this
calculation,
is going right for that steady state
value.
So, we're looking for the condition
where
the energy in is equal to the energy out.
We'll look at this in pieces.
The energy going out is
given by the Stefan-Boltzmann formula,
epsilon, sigma, temperature to the fourth.
Where the temperature is the temperature
Page 2 of 4
2 - 7 - Naked Planet Climate Model (8_13) 4/24/14, 7:19 PM
of the Earth, and we're assuming for now
that it's all the same temperature because
this is a very, very simple model.
Epsilon for the Earth is pretty close to
one.
Most solids and liquids, most condensed
matter
has a pretty good black body properties.
And so it has epsilon pretty close to one.
The exception to that we'll get to is
greenhouse gases.
A very important exception.
But for now we can kind of just call that one and
not worry about it
and this is the Boltzmann
constant which
you can just look up in a book.
This tells us the energy flux in watts
per square meter, but if we want to
do the planet overall, we have to multiply
by the area of the surface of that sphere.
So this area, to get rid of the watts per
square meter, in the area of the sphere,
is 4 pi R squared.
Now on the other side of the equation, we
have the energy coming in from the sun,
and this is given by a solar constant.
Which is a number in watts per square
meter which is determined by how
bright the sun is, but also how far away
we are from the sun.
It's how bright the sunshine is if you
look at it straight on.
at the distance
from the sun to the earth it's about 1350
watts per square meter of area.
If you had a solar cell.
One square meter in size,
You could about run a normal sort of hair
dryer
on that, that's kind of the energy flux
coming through that.
But not all of that energy actually is
absorbed as heat by the planet.
Some of it gets reflected back out to
space and never gets absorbed.
And that fraction is reflected in the
albedo, which is given the Greek letter
alpha.
So, 1 minus albedo is the fraction that
gets absorbed.
The value of the albedo for the
Earth is about 30%, because of the clouds,
mostly.
Reflecting light back out into space.
This is in watts per square meter
but it's in per square meter of
this energy, that's coming from the sun,
looking straight on, and we
have to multiply it
by an area, to get the total
energy coming in.
But this is a bit tricker now, because the
area of the earth isn't all
facing directly at the sun, perpendicular
to the way the sun is coming.
So we could do a complicated integral,
where we add up all this,
Page 3 of 4
2 - 7 - Naked Planet Climate Model (8_13) 4/24/14, 7:19 PM
the square meters of the earth and figure
out which ones
are sort of oblique and so they're not
getting as intense sunlight.
But there's a tricky, easier way to do it,
and that is to realize that the amount of
light that is intercepted by this
planet is given by the size of the shadow
of the earth.
That shadow is all directly
straight onto
the sun, and so it's oriented in the right
way.
This area is not the area
of the sphere that we had before.
but it's the area of a circle which is
only pi R squared.
So, if we equate those two sides we have
the solar constant, times a fraction
that's absorbed,
times the area of the shadow, and here's
the infrared emission, the black-body
radiation, and the area of the sphere, but
we can now divide by pi R squared.
In fact, we can even divide by 4 pi r
squared.
To get this
equation, which is in the most convenient
form, it's now in units of watts per
square meter of the surface of the sphere,
so per square meter of the Earth's
surface.
So what we have now is an equation that
only has one unknown,
and that's the temperature of the planet.
We can rearrange that, and
calculate what the
temperature should be, for any given
combination of the solar constant,
and the albedo.
This is a table of how that
calculation goes
for the Earth and our sister planets,
Venus and Mars.
The solar constant is much higher for
Venus because Venus is closer
to the Earth than the Earth is and it's
lower for Mars.
That's because the intensity goes down as
you get further from the source.
The reflectivity of Venus is very, very
high.
That's because Venus
is covered with clouds all the time.
Venus is the second brightest thing in the
night sky.
Not because Venus is so hot that it's
shining its own
light, it's not a star.
It's just reflecting the light that's
coming
in from the sun because of these clouds.
And then Mars doesn't really have clouds
or much of any ice, it's mostly
darkish rock and so it has a fairly low
albedo.
Here is where we calculate the
temperature of
Page 4 of 4
2 - 7 - Naked Planet Climate Model (8_13) 4/24/14, 7:19 PM
these planets given their solar constant
and albedo values.
And it's interesting, Venus, because it's
so
reflective, would be even colder than the
earth.
Even though it's closer to the Sun.
It's just wasting all that energy
by reflecting it out to space.
And then the Earth is warmer than
Venus and then
Mars is cool again because it's so
far from the Sun.
But the real interesting thing comes when
we compare
it with the real temperatures that the
planets actually have.
Venus is much much hotter than we just
predicted
Earth is hotter than we predicted, and so
is Mars.
They are all the same, the climate model as
we've done
it so far is always too cold.