Forest & Bird has 5 Advocacy staff, 8
Conservation staff and 2 Environment Lawyers
• Of these, 7 staff were heavily involved in the
Denniston campaign
• Drivers – a balance between campaigns that
need funding and campaigns that are likely to
get funding
• Regular and open communication plus
understanding of roles
Título original
Forest and Bird: Multi-channel Fundraising And Advocacy 2012
Forest & Bird has 5 Advocacy staff, 8
Conservation staff and 2 Environment Lawyers
• Of these, 7 staff were heavily involved in the
Denniston campaign
• Drivers – a balance between campaigns that
need funding and campaigns that are likely to
get funding
• Regular and open communication plus
understanding of roles
Forest & Bird has 5 Advocacy staff, 8
Conservation staff and 2 Environment Lawyers
• Of these, 7 staff were heavily involved in the
Denniston campaign
• Drivers – a balance between campaigns that
need funding and campaigns that are likely to
get funding
• Regular and open communication plus
understanding of roles
Case Studies: Denniston and Mokihinui Presenter Rebecca Scelly Supporter Relations Manager Forest & Bird R.Scelly@forestandbird.org.nz Forest & Bird History At the forefront of conservation since 1923 Driving force behind the creation of: NZs public conservation land Stopping logging of native forests Establishment of DoC Supporter base of over 80,000 Forest & Bird Mission To be the voice for nature in communities throughout New Zealand Over 4,000 volunteers clearing traps, weeding and planting 50 Branches up and down New Zealand KCC childrens club engaging the conservation leaders of tomorrow Strong advocacy around marine bycatch issues, RMA changes, EEZ Bill issues, primary resource extraction issues Environmental disaster response Fundraising Programme 100% fundraised income No Government funding 4 x fundraising staff + 4 x membership staff Budget = $6,500,000 Massive income increase over the last 6 years, since employing fundraising staff Fundraising Programme Sponsorship 1% Grants 16% Bequests 23% Donations 8% Regular Giving 28% Annual Membership 10% Telemarketing 9% Other 5% Integrated campaigns at Forest & Bird Integrated campaign Communica tions Advocacy Conservation Marketing Multiple website presence Senior Managemen t Team Tele- marketing e- newsletters Newsletter focus Direct mail Appeal News media Advocacy Integration Forest & Bird has 5 Advocacy staff, 8 Conservation staff and 2 Environment Lawyers Of these, 7 staff were heavily involved in the Denniston campaign Drivers a balance between campaigns that need funding and campaigns that are likely to get funding Regular and open communication plus understanding of roles Advocacy Integration Once Go was hit, everyone kept up the pressure Each person was trusted to their role and stepped up Advocacy to Government Public understanding Petition Social media Advocacy to Government Keep the public pressure on Media of the issue Public events E-alerts E-newsletters Social media Magazine Online giving page E-alerts Direct mail Appreciation Acknowledgement of more needed Second tier issue e- alert October January Advocacy Integration Whole campaign is around advocating for a special place (voice for nature) Fundraising stressed the end result rather than the means to get there This worked perfectly with the advocacy campaign Fundraising used the media generation to gain donations Fundraising used the petition names for gaining donations through e-marketing and direct mail How we did it Organisational buy-in Early project team included fundraising, marketing and communications, along with conservation and advocacy This Project Team had an SMT champion Senior Management Supporter Relations Communications Marketing Conservation Advocacy How we did it A strong message An overseas mining company want to open-pit mine an important part of NZs conservation estate, without public consultation The Government publically back-tracked on a pre- election promise to provide public consultation The biodiversity on Denniston Plateau is unique NZers have shown to be very concerned about what happens on our conservation estates Single-minded How we did it Direct Mail Wrote in-house Stressed urgency Signed by a non-staff member Included a Christmas catalogue Included a regional section Stressed the loss of biodiversity rather than the legal fees Appeal letter page 1 Appeal letter page 2 Appeal letter page 3 Appeal letter page 4 Appeal outer envelope Appeal letter page 5 Appeal letter page 6 How we did it Facebook Posts on the issue several times per week Experts took part in the online discussion Harnessing the passion into action How we did it Twitter Regular tweets on the issue, including during live discussions with key players Many active followers were following our website news feed An additional touch-point for supporters How we did it Online giving page Visually matched the direct mail piece and the magazine Stressed the christmas catalogue concept 8% uptake (usually 1%) Of 1,252 unique visitors to the page, 1,232 donated Most donations online were as a result of the direct mail piece Link How we did it E-alert Sent one every 2 weeks (usually 1 per 6 weeks) Single minded and reiterated the key messages Visually appealing How we did it E-newsletter With every standard e-newsletter we included an article on the Denniston issue Whenever we asked for donations towards the campaign we received a spike in page hits Careful to not always ask for money, but to build a supporter group How we did it Website home page Same images and key messages Prominent Pushed the campaign page towards making a donation (unusual) How we did it YouTube Multiple clips Not all made by Forest & Bird Links included on website, e-alerts and e- newsletters How we did it Magazine Exactly the same imagery and messages as the direct mail piece and online donations page High readership Not all who receive the magazine also receive the direct mail Front cover Magazine spread 1 Magazine spread 2 Magazine spread 3 How we did it Media During the key campaign phase there were up to 6 media articles in newspapers and on TV per day Most was generated by Forest & Bird Some was generated by the mining company High level of letters to the editor written by our supporters How we did it Timing Extremely important All staff were on the same page and stepped up for this campaign Very good coordination The issue is still alive Results how it worked for Forest & Bird Average of last five appeals Christmas (Denniston) appeal % change Gross income $68,530 $131,633 +92% Expenses (excluding staff time for all appeals) $20,791 $17,308 -17% Net income $47,739 $114,325 +139% Average gift $58.04 $89.73 +55% Cost % 33% 13% -54% ROI 3.4 7.6 +123% % giving via online 1% 8% +700% Response rate 5.91% 9.50% +61% Mokihinui One of New Zealands last remaining large wild rivers was threatened with extinction through a hydro dam This would drown 330 hectares of primeval forest and river bed, leaving several threatened species homeless Purchase a Share Certificate using the online interactive system: http://www.savethemokihinui.org.nz/ Mokihinui The Share Certificate Mokihinui Results All Share Certificates sold - $15,255 (Feb 2011 October 2011) Additional money raised - $33,703 Mokihinui saved through pressure exerted by the Advocacy and Conservation teams which happened because of funding through our supporters Denniston & Mokihinui Challenges and learnings Integration works extremely well Perfect case studies to convince reluctant staff Must communicate well and trust people to do their job very well Planning helps The perfect issue helps but integration can happen at many different levels Transparency with donations is imperative Integrated campaigns - Future We now have champions for integration Our website is being updated to include fundraising at every level Our next two campaigns will have limited integration as a build up to another large camapign