Diesel engines are considered a major source of air pollution in cities and urban areas. Emulsions of diesel and water are often promoted as being able to overcome the difficulty of simultaneously reducing emissions of both oxidises of nitrogen (NO x) and particulate matter from diesel engines. While producing similar or greater thermal efficiency and improved NO x emission outcomes use of the emulsified fuel also results in an increase in brake specific fuel consumption
Diesel engines are considered a major source of air pollution in cities and urban areas. Emulsions of diesel and water are often promoted as being able to overcome the difficulty of simultaneously reducing emissions of both oxidises of nitrogen (NO x) and particulate matter from diesel engines. While producing similar or greater thermal efficiency and improved NO x emission outcomes use of the emulsified fuel also results in an increase in brake specific fuel consumption
Diesel engines are considered a major source of air pollution in cities and urban areas. Emulsions of diesel and water are often promoted as being able to overcome the difficulty of simultaneously reducing emissions of both oxidises of nitrogen (NO x) and particulate matter from diesel engines. While producing similar or greater thermal efficiency and improved NO x emission outcomes use of the emulsified fuel also results in an increase in brake specific fuel consumption
* Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jordan University, Amman 11942, Jordan a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Available online 21 January 2010 Keywords: Emulsied fuel Diesel engine performance Pollutant emissions a b s t r a c t Emulsions of diesel and water are often promoted as being able to overcome the difculty of simulta- neously reducing emissions of both oxidises of nitrogen (NO x ) and particulate matter from diesel engines. In this work, the performance of an engine together with its effect on environment were tested when engine was powered by both pure diesel and emulsied fuel with various quantities of water content in the diesel fuel. The amount of water quantities added ranged between 5% and 30% by volume. The engine speed during the experimental work was within the range from 1000 to 3000 rpm. While produc- ing similar or greater thermal efciency and improved NO x emission outcomes use of the emulsion also results in an increase in brake specic fuel consumption. It was also found that, at high amount of water addition, the nitrogen oxide decreases. Also, in general, the diesel emulsion fuel emitted an amount of CO 2 higher than that of pure diesel. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction At present, diesel engines are still the most fuel efcient com- bustion engines, and diesel fuel is the dominant fuel used by the commercial transportation, industrial and agricultural sectors. This is because it offers fuel economy, efcient power, durability and heavy-duty application. The development of internal combustion engines followed a dual strategy over years: improvement of en- gine performance and reduction of pollutant emissions. However, diesel engines are considered a major source of air pollution in cit- ies and urban areas because of their black smoke, nitrogen oxides (NO x ), particulate matters (PM), sulfur oxides (SO x ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions. The composition of diesel exhausts varies considerably depending on engine type, operating condition, fuel, lubricating oil, and whether an emission control system is installed or not. Researchers and scientists con- centrated their effort on reducing emissions because they found that prolonged exposure to diesel engines pollutants above a spe- cic level should be harmful to human health. Of all the methods proposed to introduce water into the combustion chamber, diesel oil emulsions appear to be the most appropriate because they re- quire no engine retrotting. The water in the emulsion is sus- pended in the fuel by a surfactant, thus the water does not come into direct contact with engine surfaces. This type of delivery may also provide advantages due to enhanced in-cylinder droplet evaporation caused by droplet micro-explosion from rapid gasi- cation of the suspended water in the atomized droplets [1]. It has been found that the presence of water vapor in reactants inuences the physics and chemical kinetics of combustion. And it has a benecial effect on the rate of heat release and reduces the pollutants emissions. During combustion, vaporized water reduces the ame temperature, changes the chemical composition of the reactants resulting in higher OH radical concentration controlling the NO formation rate and soot oxidation and dilutes the reach zones in the combustion chamber [2]. While there is decrease in emissions of nitrogen oxides and par- ticulate matter, there is an increase in the emissions of hydrocar- bons and carbon monoxide with increasing water content in the emulsion [3]. Several emulsied fuels are commercially available and are marketed under trade names such as PuriNOx (Lubrizol), Proformix (Chevron), Aquadiesel (Shell), Aquazole (TotalFinaElf), Aspira (BP) and GECAM (Cam Technologie). The water content in these fuels range between 10% and 20% for the summer blend with some methanol for the winter blend. Large amounts of data are available on the effect of water diesel emulsions on the performance and emissions of stationary engines and on- and off-highway light and heavy vehicles [47]. Abu-Zaid [8] conducted a study to investigate the effect of water emulsication on the performance and gas temperature of a single cylinder water cooled diesel engine. Emulsied diesel fuels of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 water/diesel ratios by volume were used, operating was in the range from 1200 to 3300 rpm. Results indi- cated that the addition of water in the form of emulsion improves combustion efciency. The engine torque, power, and brake ther- mal efciency increase with the increase of water percentage in the emulsion. 0196-8904/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.044 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +962 6 5355000; fax: +962 6 5355589. E-mail address: mhamdan@ju.edu.jo (M.A. Hamdan). Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 17081713 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Conversion and Management j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ enconman In this paper we present measurements of the performance of a diesel engine operating on a typical diesel oil emulsion were pre- sented and examined. Measurements and a discussion on the gas- eous emissions of the engine are also presented with particular emphasis. Further, the apparatus is constructed to facilitate the analysis of exhaust efuents to measure the concentration of most common exhaust species namely; NO, NO x , and CO 2 . 2. Experimental 2.1. Water diesel emulsion An emulsion is a mixture of two immiscible (i.e., not able to be blended) substances. In an emulsion, one substance the dispersed phase is uniformly distributed throughout the second substance the continuous phase. For example, a fuel oil emulsion features water globules the dispersed phase uniformly distributed throughout the fuel oil the continuous phase. An emulsion takes on the characteristics of the continuous phase. Hence, fuel oil emulsions exhibit characteristics of fuel oil NOT water. The term surfactant is a blend of Surface active agent. Surfac- tants reduce the surface tension of water by adsorbing at the li- quidgas interface. They also reduce the interfacial tension between oil and water by adsorbing at the liquidliquid interface. Many surfactants can also assemble in the bulk solution into aggre- gates that are known as micelles. Polysorbate 20 (commercially also known as Tween 20) is a polysorbate surfactant whose stabil- ity and relative non-toxicity allow it to be used as a detergent and emulsier in a number of domestic, scientic, and pharmacological applications. It is a polyoxyethylene derivative of sorbitan monola- urate, and is distinguished from the other members in the Tween range by the length of the polyoxyethylene chain. The commercial product contains a range of chemical species. To stabilize the emulsions, 2% by volume of a Tween 20 surfac- tant was used. Six diesel emulsion blends were prepared, namely; 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% water by volume. The density, vis- cosity and caloric value were determined for the prepared emul- sion fuels. Pure diesel was rst used to set the base line for comparison. A four-stroke, four-cylinder, water cooled and di- rect-injection engine was used in this work. The engine specica- tions are listed in Table 1. 2.2. Theoretical studies using DIESEL-RK software Thermodynamic software DIESEL-RK was used for calculation and optimization of the performance for compression ignition en- gine. The main reason of using software is to do a comparison be- tween experiment studies and theoretical by using DIESEL-RK software. Also, it is used to get a more calculation and a brief description of the operating of diesel engine such as determine the temperature, pressure and heat released or transferred at each stroke or crank angle. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Engine torque The experimentally obtained values of the engine torque are compared with the theoretical values in Figs. 1 and 2. As shown in these gures, the torque increases with the engine speed to a maximum value and then starts to decrease due to friction losses (negative torque), which increase with the engine speed and also due to the fact that the engine is unable to ingest full charge of air at high speed. The effect of water addition in the form of emulsions on the en- gine torque under variable conditions for various speeds is shown in Fig. 3. As indicated in this gure the torque produced is maxi- mum when the engine is powered by the 5% water-emulsied fuel and operating at practical speed. And as increases the percentage of water in emulsion the produced torque decreases. This is attrib- uted to the additional force on top of the piston provided by the pressure exerted by the steam. When the charge is red in the cyl- inder, the water would turn to high pressure. 3.2. Engine power The experimentally obtained values of the engine brake power are compared with the theoretical values in Figs. 4 and 5. The power produced by the engine using emulsied fuels and pure die- sel under variable conditions for various speeds is presented in Fig. 6. As indicated in this gure the power produced is maximum when the engine is powered by 5% water-emulsied fuel and oper- ating at practical speed. And as increases the percentage of water in emulsion the produced power decreases. The emulsion fuels re- quire less compression (negative) work than the diesel fuel due to the longer ignition delay in the compression stroke. This helps to reach a higher peak pressure after TDC to produce more power out- put during the expansion stroke. In addition, when the ignition de- lay increases, more diesels would be physically prepared (evaporation, mixing) for chemical reaction, which increases the fraction of diesel burned and the rate of heat release in the pre- mixed burning. This results in enhancement of combustion and improvement of combustion efciency. Table 1 Diesel engine specications. Type Automotive 30 test bed Bore 72.25 mm Stroke 88.18 mm Number of cylinder Four cylinder Type of injection Direct injection Type of cooling Water cooled Swept volume 1450 cc Compression ratio 21.5 Intake valve diameter 34.51 mm Exhaust valve diameter 28.49 mm Connected rod length 155.8 mm 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B r a k e
T o r q u e
( N . m ) Predicted for Pure Diesel Experimental for Pure Diesel Predicted for 5% water Addition Experimental for 5%Water Addition Predicted for 10% water Addition Experimental for 10%Water Addition Predicted for 15% water Addition Experimental for 15%Water Addition Fig. 1. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake torque for pure diesel, 5%, 10% and 15% water addition. A. Alahmer et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 17081713 1709 3.3. Engine brake specic fuel consumption (BSFC) The experimentally obtained values of the engine brake specic fuel consumption are compared with the theoretical values in Figs. 6 and 7. As shown in these gures, the BSFC decreases with the en- gine speed until it reaches a minimum value, beyond which it in- creases with engine speed; due to at low speeds, the heat loss to 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B r a k e
T o r q u e
( N . m ) Predicted for 20% water Addition Experimental for 20%Water Addition Predicted for 25% water Addition Experimental for 25%Water Addition Predicted for 30% water Addition Experimental for 30%Water Addition Fig. 2. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake torque for 20%, 25% and 30% water addition. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 T o r q u e
( N . m ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) Pure Diesel Diesel+2%surfactant+5%water Diesel+2%surfactant+10%water Diesel+2%surfactant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 3. Engine output versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions. 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B r a k e
P o w e r
( k W ) Predicted for Pure Diesel Experimental for Pure Diesel Predicted for 5% water Addition Experimental for 5%Water Addition Predicted for 10% water Addition Experimental for 10%Water Addition Predicted for 15% water Addition Experimental for 15%Water Addition Fig. 4. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake power for pure diesel, 5%, 10% and 15% water addition. 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B r a k e
P o w e r
( k W ) Predicted for 20% water Addition Experimental for 20%Water Addition Predicted for 25% water Addition Experimental for 25%Water Addition Predicted for 30% water Addition Experimental for 30%Water Addition Fig. 5. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake power for 20%, 25% and 30% water addition. 0.22 0.27 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.47 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B S F C ( k g / k W . h ) Predicted for Pure Diesel Experimental for Pure Diesel Predicted for 5% water Addition Experimental for 5%Water Addition Predicted for 10% water Addition Experimental for 10%Water Addition Predicted for 15% water Addition Experimental for 15%Water Addition Fig. 6. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake specic fuel consumption for pure diesel, 5%, 10% and 15% water addition. 0.29 0.34 0.39 0.44 0.49 0.54 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B S F C ( k g / k W . h ) Predicted for 20% water Addition Experimental for 20%Water Addition Predicted for 25% water Addition Experimental for 25%Water Addition Predicted for 30% water Addition Experimental for 30%Water Addition Fig. 7. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake specic fuel consumption for 20%, 25% and 30% water addition. 1710 A. Alahmer et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 17081713 the combustion chamber walls is proportionately greater and com- bustion efciency is poorer, resulting in higher fuel consumption for the power produced. At high speeds, the friction power is in- creased at a rapid rate, resulting in a slower increase in the power than in fuel consumption with a consequent increase in BSFC. Brake specic fuel consumption of the engine using emulsied fuels and pure diesel under variable conditions for various speeds is illustrated in Fig. 8. In general, Fig. 8 shows that and at higher speed the percentage of water in the emulsion increases, the BSFC increases. However at lower speed here is no signicant change in BSFC with the amount of added water. The reason of increasing BSFC is as the percentage of water in the emulsion increases a large amount of diesel is dis- placed by an equal amount of water. This means that less diesel fuel is actually contained in each volume of the emulsion. 3.4. Engine brake thermal efciency The experimentally obtained values of the engine brake thermal efciency are compared with the theoretical values in Figs. 9 and 10. As shown in these gures, the thermal efciency increases when the engine speed increases until it reaches a maximum va- lue. Beyond this, the thermal efciency decreases with engine speed. Due to at low speed, along time is available for heat to be transferred to the cylinder walls, and hence signicant amount for a greater proportion of heat loss occurs. As speed increases the brake power increase, which implies a higher thermal ef- ciency is obtained. Higher speeds, however, are accompanied by rapidly increasing friction power and by greater inertia in the mov- ing parts, this leads to a drop in thermal efciency. Brake thermal efciency of the engine powered by emulsied fuels and pure diesel fuel under variable conditions for various speeds is presented in Fig. 11. As shown in this gure and in Table 2, the maximum average increase in brake thermal efciency oc- curs when 5% water in the emulsion used due to increase of brake power. 3.5. Emission of diesel engine Below are the main emissions of emulsion diesel fuel that are measured, but the values of NO, NO x and CO 2 must be normalized before comparison according to this equation. E B
21 O B 21 O M E M 1 E M is the measured emission, E B is the emission related to 3% oxygen concentration, O M is the measured oxygen concentration (%), O B is the reference oxygen concentration (%). 3.5.1. Exhaust gases temperature The variation of the gases exhaust temperature with engine speed for different emulsion is shown in Fig. 12. As shown in this 17.5 19.5 21.5 23.5 25.5 27.5 29.5 31.5 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B r a k e
T h e r m a l
E f f i c i e n c y
( % ) Predicted for 20% water Addition Experimental for 20%Water Addition Predicted for 25% water Addition Experimental for 25%Water Addition Predicted for 30% water Addition Experimental for 30%Water Addition Fig. 10. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake thermal efciency for 20%, 25% and 30% water addition. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 B r a k e
T h e r m a l E f f i c i e n c y
( % ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) Pure Diesel Diesel+2%surfactant+5%water Diesel+2%surfactant+10%water Diesel+2%surfactant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 11. Brake thermal efciency versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 B r a k e
S p e c i f i c
F u e l
C o n s u m p t i o n
( K g / K W . h ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) Pure Diesel Diesel+2%surfactant+5%water Diesel+2%surfactant+10%water Diesel +2%suractant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 8. Brake specic fuel consumption versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions. 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) B r a k e
T h e r m a l
E f f i c i e n c y
( % ) Predicted for Pure Diesel Experimental for Pure Diesel Predicted for 5% water Addition Experimental for 5%Water Addition Predicted for 10% water Addition Experimental for 10%Water Addition Predicted for 15% water Addition Experimental for 15%Water Addition Fig. 9. Comparison between experimental and theoretical values (DIESEL-RK software) of brake thermal efciency for pure diesel, 5%, 10% and 15% water addition. A. Alahmer et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 17081713 1711 gure, as the percentage of water in the emulsion increases, the ex- haust temperature decreases. Abu-Zaid [8] attributed the decrease in the exhaust gases to heat absorbed by the additional water. Also the latent heat of water will cool the chamber due to evaporation of water, and the cylinder average temperature following injection and before ignition becomes lower as the water percentage increases. Dryer shows that the decrease in exhaust gases temperature is due to the nely dispersed water droplets of the emulsion causing a phenomenon known as heat sink. When heat sink occurs it re- sults in the water contents of the inner phase partially absorbing the caloric heat value of the emulsions, there by decreasing the burning gas temperature. 3.5.2. Nitrogen monoxide (NO) and Nitrogen oxides (NO x ) emissions The variation of the NO and NO x with engine speed for different emulsion are shown in Figs. 13 and 14. As shown in gures, at low amount of water addition, the amount of emitted NO and NO x in- creases. Beyond this, as the percentage of water in the emulsion in- crease the amount of emitted NO and NO x decreases. The reduction of NO and NO x with increases water content refers to the vaporiza- tion and sensible water heat reduces the local adiabatic ame temperature. The lower combustion temperature as increase water content in emulsion directly inuence on NO formation during the reduction in chemical reaction rates. This can be shown from Zeldorich mechanism reactions: O N 2 ! K1 NO N K1 1:8 10 12 exp319 kJ mol 1 =RT N O 2 ! K2 NO O K2 6:4 10 9 exp26 kJ mol 1 =RT N OH! K3 NO H K3 3:0 10 13 3.5.3. Carbon dioxide emission The variation of CO 2 emission with engine speed for the differ- ent emulsions is shown in Fig. 15. As shown in this gure, and as general the water emulsion emitted amount of CO 2 higher than pure diesel. The main reason for increasing amount of CO 2 emitted compared with pure diesel is increasing amount of oxygen atoms in mixture. In other words, the mixture becomes a lean. References [1] Kadota T, Yamasaki H. Recent advances in the combustion of water fuel emulsion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2002;28:385404. [2] Samec N, Kegl B, Dibble R. Numerical and experimental study of water/oil emulsied fuel combustion in a diesel engine. Fuel 2002;81:203544. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
G a s e s
E x h a u s t
T e m p e r a t u r e
( o C ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) Pure Diesel Diesel+2%surfactant+5%water Diesel+2%surfactant+10%water Diesel+2%surfactant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 12. Gases exhaust temperatures versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions. 0 200 400 600 800 N O
( P P M ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed Pure Diesel Diesel+2%surfctant+5%water Diesel+2%surfctant+10%water Diesel+2%surfctant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 13. The amount of normalized nitrogen monoxide emitted versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions as fuel. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 N O x
( P P M ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) Pure Diesel Diesel+2%surfactant+5%water Diesel+2%surfactant+10%water Diesel+2%surfactant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 14. The amount of normalized nitrogen oxides versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions as fuel. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 C O 2
( % ) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (rpm) Pure diesel Diesel+2%surfactant+5%water Diesel+2%surfactant+10%water Diesel+2%surfactant+15%water Diesel+2%surfactant+20%water Diesel+2%surfactant+25%water Diesel+2%surfactant+30%water Fig. 15. The amount of normalized carbon dioxide versus engine speed using water diesel emulsions as fuel. Table 2 Variation brake thermal efciency compared to pure diesel fuel with different water content. Water content (%) Variation (%) 5 8.31 10 6.58 15 3.74 20 3.96 25 0.88 30 6.26 1712 A. Alahmer et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 17081713 [3] Lif A, Holmberg K. Water-in-diesel emulsions and related systems. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2006;123126:2319. [4] Evaluation of a water emulsion fuel in air force aircraft ground support equipment diesel generator set. Final report FR-99-107, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; January 2000. [5] Impact of Lubrizols PuriNox water/diesel emulsion on exhaust emissions from heavy-duty engines. EPA draft technical report EPA420-P-02-007; December 2002. [6] Sadler L. The air quality impact of waterdiesel emulsion fuel (WDW) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies, Kings College ERG for the Mayor of the City of London; July 2003. [7] Lin Cherng-Yuan, Wang Kuo-Hua. Diesel engine performance and emission characteristics using three-phase emulsions as fuel. Fuel 2004;83:53745. [8] Abu-Zaid M. Performance of single cylinder-direct injection diesel engine using water fuel emulsions. Energy Convers Manage 2003;45:697705. A. Alahmer et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 17081713 1713
Effect of Electrical Load on the Emulsification Methods of Inline Mixing System RTES Produced by the Static Mixer and Ultrasonic on Fuel Consumption and Emission CharacteristicsJournal of Advanced Research in Fluid
Influence of Chosen Parameters of Water Fuel Microemulsion On Combustion Processes, Emission Level of Nitrogen Oxides and Fuel Consumption of Ci Engine
Influence of Chosen Parameters of Water Fuel Microemulsion On Combustion Processes, Emission Level of Nitrogen Oxides and Fuel Consumption of Ci Engine